The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-7079AJill M. Doherty, President James F. King, Vice-President Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. John Bredemeyer Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD # 061 lC CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Date: November 18, 2010 THIS CERTIFIES that the demolition of existing and construction of new single- family dwelling with screened porch, front and rear porch and terrace, new garage, driveway, paths and swimming pool, surrounding patio and reconstructed sanitary system At 4545 Hallock Lane, Mattituck, New York Suffolk County Tax Map # 112-1-2 Conforms to the applications for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated 3/26/09 pursuant to which Trustees Administrative Permit #7079A Dated 4/22/09 was issued and conforms to ali of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The project for which this certificate is being issued is for the demolition of existing and construction of new single-family dwellin.~ with screened porch, front and rear porch and terrace, new garage, driveway, paths and swimmin~ pool, surrounding patio and reconstructed sanitary system The certificate is issued to BRIAN FRAWLEY owner of the aforesaid property. r~zed Signature/ James F. King, President Jill M. Doheny, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bcrge~ Bob Ghosib, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, Ny 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION: ,/Zz,'~-- 3 / 0 ~ ~'"'Ch. 275 Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE v// Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt Curtain st day of construction constructed v//' Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTEDBY: ~ COMMENTS: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold~ New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 1st day of construction ~ constructed J Project complete, compliance inspection. James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Permit No.: 7079A Date of Receipt of Application: March 26, 2009 Applicant: Brian Frawley SCTM#: 112-1-2 Project Location: 4545 Hallock Lane Date of Resolution/Issuance: April 22, 2009 Date of Expiration: April 22, 2011 Reviewed by: Board of Trustees Project Description: To conduct construction activity within 100' from the top of the bluff for the demolition of a single-family dwelling, construction of a new single-family dwelling with screened porch, front and rear porch and terrace, new detached garage, driveway, paths and swimming pool, surrounding patio, and reuse or reconstruct sanitary system. Findings: The project meets all the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The issuance of an Administrative Permit allows for the operations as indicated on the site plan prepared by Frederick R. Weber last dated December 11,2008. Inspections: Final If the proposed activities do not meet the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, a Wetland Permit will be required. This is not a determination from any other agency. Jam s F~. King, prOne'esi '~t' Board of Trustees James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickers~)n Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095Route25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: O r~ 0L~ Please be advised that your application dated ~ ]o3.(.o / 0 ~1 been reViewed by this Board at the regular meeting of ~//,~/O !~ and your application has been approved pending the coml~letion of the following items checked off below. has __ ReVised Plans for proposed project __ Pre-ConstructiOn Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) __ Ist Day of Construction ($50.00) Constructed ($50.00) ~"Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) __ Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-Preside~t Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631 ) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: BRIAN FRAWLEY requests an Administrative Permit to conduct construction activity within 100' from the top of the bluff for the demolition of a single-family dwelling, construction of a new single-family dwelling with screened porch, front and rear porch and terrace, new detached garage, driveway, paths and swimming pool, surrounding patio, and reuse or reconstruct sanitary system. Located: 4545 Hallock Lane, Mattituck. SCTM#112-1-2 Type of area to be impacted: __Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: __Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland __Coastal Erosion __Amendment __Administrative__Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: __&King __J.Doherty __P.Dickerson __ D. Dzenkowski Mark Terry__other Form filled out in the field by D. Bergen__ B.Ghosio, Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Environmental Technician Review- OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Gerard Goehringer, Chair Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner ,;'J'"~ LWRP Coordinator Date: March 18, 2009 Re: ZBA file Ref. No. 6261 (FRAWLEY) Location: 4545 Hallock Lane (a private road), Mattituck SCTM 1000-112-01-02 This proposal is for a request for variances pursuant to the Building Inspector's November 3, 2008 Notice of Disapproval and Zoning Code Interpretation # 5039 ONalz Application), citing Code Sections 280-112 and 280-124 for the minimum required side yard setbacks on nonconforming lots (51,955 square feet in this R-80 Zone). The applicant is proposing a new dwelling at less than 20 feet on a single side yard and less than 40 feet for total side yards. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Jenifer Andaloro, Assistant Town Attorney New York State Department o~vironmental Conservation 50 Circle Road - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Telephone (516) 444-0365 Facsimile (516) 444-0360 Ale×nnder B+ Grnnnis Commissioner LETTER OF NON JURISDICTION -TIDAL WETLANDS Brian Frawley 130 East 12 Street, Apt. 2A New York, New York 10003~ Date: December 23, 2008 RE: 1-4738-00231/00003 Frawley Property 4545 ltailock Lan% Mattituck SCTM #1000-112-1-2 Dear Mr. Frawley: Based on the information you have submitted, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that the property landward of the topographic crest of the bluff, as shown on the survey prepared by John Minto on 9/26/08, is beyond Article 25 jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with the current Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) no permit is required under.the Tidal Wetlands Act. Please be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the tidal wetlands jurisdictional boundary, as indicated above, without a permit. It is your responsibility to ens.ure that all ndcessary precautions are taken to prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation within Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction which may result from your project. Such precautions may include maintairdng adequate work area between the tidal wetland jurisdictional boundary and your project (i.e. a 15' to 20' wide construction area) or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hay bale berm. Please be further advised that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies. Very truly yours, George W. Hammarth Permit Administrator cc: Mr. Frederick Weber, 41 East Maple Road, Greenlawn, NY 11740 Marine Habitat Protection, NYSDEC File DMG COUNTy OF SUFFOLK PAGE 02/11 311,11 , ,,la Paul A. TeNyenhu/s (6~1)727-2315 x~ M~rc~h i9, 2009 Cha/rman C-er~ C-ochrirl~ Board'ofAppcals, Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 S outhold, New York 11971-0959 RE: ZBA File REF. No 6261 (Frawley) Dear Chairman Gonbfinger: As requested, a site review was conducted at 4545 Hallock Lane in Mattituck on March 18, 2009. The site was evaluated for pot~ntiai natttral resource concerns ~garding the demolition of an ex/sting home and deck and thc subsequent construction of a new dwelling, porch, terrace, detached garage, and a pool. The property is located on an eroding bluff on Long Island Sound. The rear ysrd is in dense grass cover. There is a gentle slope from the house towards .the bluff edge and also towards thc neighboring property to the west. There was no access to thc bottom of the blu~ However, it was observed from the top of the bluff that storm tides reach the toe of thc bluff and there is some ~tivc erosion on the bluff face. Extreme care must be taken during demolition and construction to protect ~he bluff. Construction equipment must keep as far away from the bluff as possible. Debris of any type must n~ver be d/Sposed of on the bluff face. Runoff should not be allowed to flow over the bluff edge and down thc bluff face. It is advised to install temporary structures such as straw bales and s/It £ances to reduce runoff velocity and trap sediment.. These practices should be installed north and west of the construction area. Sec the attached New York Standards and Specifications/'or Sediment and Erosion Control for thc proper insl~llation of these practices. Additionally, see the attached document "Stabilization of Eroding Bluffs" for further recoiziniandations on restoring thc bluff, Lastly, the new residence should be fitted w/th gutters ~0d downspouts that outlet into d~ wells. This will decrease the volume ofnmoffon the pwperty. Provisions must also be made for draini~ the pool; thc drain water must never be allowed to flow towards the bluff. The site must be re-seeded ~t/ter and posdbly du~ng construction to maintain grass cover on the lawn. Annual rye grass is recommended for quick temporary cover during construction while a rye and rescue blend is rec ,oF~manded after construction. If you require further assistance in th/s matter plea,sc don'1 hesitate to let me know. 423 GRIFFING A%;~N~3~ SUITE 110 RI%~EP-R~AD, ~ %1901 03/i9/2009 11:33 6317273 USDA NRCS PAGE 83/11 STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRAW BALE DIKE Definition A temporary barrier ofslraw, ~' ~nilar material, used tO iatCw.~pt sediment lad~ nmoff from small drailaage a~cas of d;~t~bed soil. Ptlrt~0se The purl~e ora bale dike is tO reduc~ nmoffvelocity anti effect depositio~ of the transpoaed sedim~t load.. Straw hale dikes have an estimated design life 0f thrce (3) months. Conditions ..Wh.e,r.e,.Pracflce Aoolies T~e straw bale dike is tm~l whore: I. No other practlc~ is fcasiblc. Whm'e slope grad/ent changes through the drp/nagn ares, steCPneas refers to th~ steepest slope section conm~outiug to thc s~aw bale The pracde~ may also be used for a s/nDe £~ * m'~, lot fi*he slope/s less ~ 15 percent. Thc contn'but/ng areas in this instance shall be less than c~e scrc and the l~g*h of slopa abo,~e the dik.¢ sl~ll be less than 200 f~t. DeSiun Criteria The above table is adequate, hx genre'al, ~or a one-inch r~infali ~vent. Larger stories could cause fl~ilum Of thi~ practice. U~ of this practice in sensitive ~ forlongcr *~- enc monlt~ should be specifically designed to store expected runoff. All bales sh~ be placed o~ *he contour with cut edge oft~de adhering to tha ground. See Figu~ 7A.7 on page 7A. 18 or details. March 2003 Page 7A. 17 New York Sta~dsrds and Specif~afious For Ems/on and Sed/ment Control 83/19/2889 11:33 ~3172731 USDA HRCS PAGE 84/11 Figure 7A.7 Straw Bale Dike · . ~ SYMBDL 4' VERTICAL. FACE: NaT Tn SCALE DRAINAGE AREA NO HaRE THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FEET tlF STRAW BALE DIKE 'FDA SLDPES LESS THAN ~5~, ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARI)S ~ ~ REV!mSLY LAz ~ DR 8°X8' STAKES PLACED ~f ! [/~' TG 8~ tN GR~ ' ~~ ~XVE STAKES ~ VETH ~ TOP ~ ~LE. ~T TD SCALE I CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. BALES SHALL BE ~ACE9 AT T~ TOE ~ A SLD~ OR ON T~ CONTRA AND IN A RgV VITH ENDS TZ~LY A~TT[~ THE A~JAC~T BALES, ~, EACH ~ALE SHALL ~ EN~EDOE~ IN THE ~L A MININ~ DF (4) ~HES, PLA~9 SD T~ BXNDI~S ARE ~IZ~T~. ' 3, ~ES 'SHA~L ~ SECURELY ANC~D IN ~ACE' ~Y E~T~R TVD ST~ES DR RE-~ARS ~IVEN THR~GH T~ BA~. T~ FIRST ~TAKE IN EACH ~ALE ~ALL BE ORtVEN TDVAR~ THE P~VIDUSLY LAIO BA~ AT ~ ANGLE 7D FORCE THE BALES TD~THER. ST~S SHALL ~E 9RIVEN ~USH VITH THE 4, I~PECTI~ SHA~ ,~ FREQUENT ANO REPAIR R~CE~NT S~LL PRDNTLY AS ~, ~ALEg SH~L ~E RE~OVE~ ~HEN THEY HAVE SERVE~ THOR u~FULLNESS AS NOT TO ~ OR 1ED[ STDRH FLDV DR DRAINAGE. ~s. DEPARTMENT ~ AGRIC~E NATU~C RESD~CES ~NSERVATi~ S~VI~ STRA~ BALE ~ Y~K STATE S~IL & VATER C~SERVATIDN CDMMIT~E DIKE mmm mmm New York Standards and ,~peoifications Page 7A. 18 March 2008 For Erosion and Sedimern Control 03/~S/200S 11:33 ~317273~I US~A ~ PAGE 85/11 STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FENCE Definition 2. MiL~_'m.m denMnoe ares for overland/Iow to_ s silt c.,~-.~- shsll~ot exceed ~A acr~ ue~ ] 00 feet of flmoc: Erosion would occur i~ the fo~m of sheet erosion; and 4. The;~ is no. concontration ofwate~ flowi~ to the barrio'. Design Criteria Design computations are not required. Ail silt fimces shall be placed as close to the ar~as as po.~ible, but at least 10 feet fi'om ~ toe cfa slope to show for maiotenanoe and roll down. The area beyond the fence nmsi betmdisturbed or stab~31zed. A dzteil of the Silt lance shall be shown on the plan a~l coata/~ the following minimum rcquirmz~-nts: ~u,,rpose Th~ Purlx~ cfa silt fmcs is to reduce ~noffvelocity and cffect deposition cf trans!0ort~l s~:limcnt load. Limits impo~m:l by ul~revlolet etablliW of tbs fabric will d/crate the maximum period the silt lance may b~ used (st~proximately Conditions Where Practice Auvlies A silt fence rosy be treed subject to the following condi¢ions: 1. Maximum allowable slop~ lengths contributing nmoffto a ;ih fence placed on a slope ~: Slol~ Maximum ~eelm~SS L~th 2:1 25 3:1 50 4:1 75 $:1 or flatt~ 100 I. The type, SiZe, and spacing of fence poa~s. 2. The size of w~ven wire anppon fosses. 3. The tyi~ of filter closhused. 4. Thc mktbed of ~mcbofi~ the ~ter cloth.. 5. The metbed of fastening the filtes clo~ to the fencing suppan. SansMw are~ to be prote~t~l by silt f~ce may need to be reinforced by,,q;-g heavy ~ fencing for added suppo~ to prevent onllapse. Where ends of ~ltzr sloth come together, they ahab be overlapped, folded and stapled to ~ sediment byp~s. ~ Figure ?A.$ on pagn 7A.21 for derails. Criteria for Stir Fence Materials 1, Silt Fanes Fabric: The fabric shall meet thc following specifications (table on followi~ page) ~nless otberwiso epprov~xi by the appropriate erosion and sediment co~lrol plan ~proval authority. Such approval shall not e~mMm.'.~ stalewide acceptanon. Statewide acceptability shall dspe~d o- in-field and/or laboretor~ obsorvslions a~d ewluation~. March 2003 pa~e 7A. 19 New York Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control , 03/1B/2009 11:33 6317273 PAGE 06/11 Acceptable Fabric Pror~ies Value On0o Temil¢ St~gth Ohs) 90 Elongation at Failure (~A) 50 Mull~u B~rt streng~ O's~) l~o Punctu~ Strength O~s) 40 $1uny Plow Rate (ad/mia/sO 0.~ I~ulval~t Opening Size 40,,80 S~biUty (~) 90 Te~t Method ASTMDi682 ASTM D 1682 ASTM D3786 ASTM I)751 US Std Sieve C~..022i5 ASTM 0-26 2. Fence Pogs (for fabricatedunies): Th¢le~gth shall be ~ ma;mum of 36 inches long. Woodposts will be of sotmd quali~y hardwood w/th a minimum ~ros~ sectional arm of 3.0 ~quate bac~s. Steel lX~ts will-be standard T and U section weighing not less than 1.00 pomld p~r llne~ foot. 3, Wir~ Feac~ (for fabrioat~d u~its): ',,Vire feocing shall be ,, minimum 14-1/2 gage with a maxlmmla 6 in. New York Standards and Specl/]c~tlo~ Page 7A.20 March 2003 For Erosion and Sedimeat Conlxol 03/19/2009 11:33 USD~ ~S PAGE 87/11 Figure 7A.8 Silt Fence raven ~/IP, E: FENCE ~YMBOL cHIN. r, AUGE 36' MIN. FENCE PDST~ VOVEN V[RE F~E (NI~ 14 ', · SPACING) VITH FILTER CLOTH CDNP~TE~ SOIL : EMBED FILTER ~OTH ~ A MIN. OF 6' IN CDNSTRUCT.!DN SPECIFICATIONS 1. ~OVEN VIRE FENCE TO ~E FA~TENE~ SECURELY TO FENCE PD~T~ VI~H ~IRE TIES OR S~APLES. POSTS SH~E~ ~E STEEL EITHER 'T' E, FILTER CLQ+H TO BE TO ~ FASTE~9 SEC~Y ~ WOVEN VIRE FENCE ~TH TIES SPACED EVERY 24' AT TOP ~D HID SECTI~. FENCE SHALL BE V~EN V~RE, 1~ t/a GAU~, 6' HRXIHUH HESH ~ENING. 3. ~HEN TVQ SECTIONS DF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN ~CH OT~R THEY SHALL LAPPED ~Y SIX INCHES AND F~DED, FILTER CLOTH SH~LL BE EITHER FILTER X, HIRAFI IOOX, STA;ILINKA Tt40N, DR A~RDV~ EOUIVAL~. 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL 9E GEDFA~, ENVIRDFENCE, DR APPROVED EQuiVALENT. 5. NAINTENANCE SHALL ~E PERF~RN~ ~ NEEDE~ AN~ HATER[AL R~HDVE9 VHEN '~GE;' DEVEL~ IN THE SILT FENCE. , NA~EAL RESDURCE$ CDN$gRVATmN $ERVI~ ~[LT ~N~ ~v Y~RK STATE ~p~T~NT ~ ENVIRD~NT~L ~V YGRK STATE ~OIL & VATEfl CDNSERVATTDN CO~[TTEE March 2003 Page 7A.21 New York SomOards and Sp~cificati~ms For Erosion and Sedimmat Coatrol 03/19/2009 11:33 us~ ~cs PAGE 88/11 NRCS United States Depar~t,ent of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Suffolk County Soil & Water Conservation District STABILIZATION OF ERODI~, ,G BLUFFS L The coast1 shoreline is afl'~ct~ by m~y ~ffer~t fo~ md is ex~ m m~y ~h ~fi~. A ~t of ~ese ~ ~d ~ndi~om is ~. BI~ ~on is an~. pi'~e~ ~ c~ be slow~ ~t not sWpp~. ~e o~y ~cfion ~ bl~ ~ ~H ~ &e ~in8 ad de~ of ~e ~ ~ot ~ ~g ~e ~e ~y ~ ~1~ ~ of ~si~ due to f~ ~ch ~ ~ ~s ~ ~a,,~e ~ fi~. ~ ~ ~, ho~ ~d ~c~ b~lt on ~e ~ of~c bl~ ~ ~ of ~ s~dy bl~ ~g co~flines h~ c~l~ed ~e~o~s~ sin~ w~ ~t ob~ ~i~ of ~ bluffs ~ ~ose ~ong &e ~ sho~ of L~g ~d. ~e ~il ~ ~ ~dy ~d ~sive, ~ily mov~ by ~nd or wa~. Bluffh~t v~ ~m a f~ f~ m well ov~ 1~ f~. ~e sl~e ~ ~ly about 1:1, or at wh~ · e ~ is ~le, ~e ~offi~ offing ~ ~b~e bl~ ~ ~t~ ~low. Tvvicai chara~.e, ristics of erodMe bluffs May 2007 1 0@/1~/200~ 11:33 6317273] USDA I-IRCS PAGE Tvo/ea/or_o.~,~/--es tlu~ kape ~d a desira.ltl, e,effe~°~ slowi~ bluff e~osion 05/11 high fids m= Numerous attempts have been made by la,dowries to stabilize bluff slopes; only a few have succeeded. Althou~ no procedur~ can guarantee a p~ent solution or stop this eros/on, the £olldwing measures 'have been found to be the most effective in obtaining the best possible stabilization of the bluff fac~. Stabilization of the We and top o£ the bluff (ideally simult~eously) must.occur. Implementing pract/ces .(such es revegetation, terracing, geo-t~x61es) without achieving this stability will not be successful.. Res~ting in a loss of time, r',~,ources, and financial investment as these areas ~re compromised by erosior~ Oncc both of these areas are stabilized, efforts should be focused on rean~tiafing the bluff face. Although stabilization of the toe and top is recommended first, the environment should be evaluated holistically. Thereby, retaliation of the bluff face should occur in eo~junction with and/or as soon as possible altar the remediation of the top and toe. May 2007 Top Stabilization: - ~ Remove the overhanging lip at thc top of the slope creating a natural angle of repose. This is generally a l:I slope or45 degree angle. b. Any trees along the top edge of the bluff should be cut at the base leaving the roots in place. Tall trees swaying in the wind will loosen the bluff soils. c. Do not allow surface wa~r (i.e. pool water, runoff; irri~tion water) to flow over the top of the slope. Installation of a diversion with a catch bas/n drain. and a vegetated natural buffer both serve this purpose; d. No ground disturbing activities should occur with/. 10 feet of the edge of the bluff. This includes installation of landscaping plants, irrigation systems, decks, and fences. e. Pools should be install~ with an in ground drain to facilitate drainage (unless clay lenses exist within thc biuffprofilc). 2 03/19/~009 11:33 USD~ HR(IS PAGE 18/11 ~ay 2007 f. Hons~ should be fitted with gutters arid down spouts which discharge into dry wells in order to reduce runoff/lowing over the b!uff edge. g. Sprinklers should 10et dischargc wat~ onto or near the bluff face. h. Irrigation scheduling should not exceed the peak consumptive requiremants of the turf grasses (approximately 1" per week). Toe Stabili~flon: a. The use of vegetation is the prcfcrrcd method to maintah a stab/lo toe. However, vci~mtion alone is not always successful, i good indicator of whether or not vegetation will stabilize the toe is the location of the mean high tide (IrE-IT) mark. If MHT reaches the toe of the bluff, it is nnllkely that vegetation alone will stabilize this site. ff this is the situation, a consultation with NRCS orthe SC SWCD can provide you with other alternatives. b. If a hardenilig structure, such as a bulkhead or reck rewiiii~-'nt ~xists, it is critical that proper msintenance occurs to the~ structures. Such regular maintenance prolongs' the life. The additional bene~ts are the protection the toe of the bluff and reductio~ in r~air/r~lacement costs.' The following are the maintc-nsnce activities that should occur oil the bulkhead. ~, Decaying and.or damaged boards should be replaced. ~, Holes behind the bulkhead should be filled with sand. ~ G-eotexlile must be malnlained betwean the bulkhead or revering'at in order to retain sand behhld the s~roctur~. The lack of geotextile in combJl~atioll with wave action will pull sedimant through the structure eventually cause collapse a~d failure. ~, Vegetation (beach grass, Spartina patens, Coastal Panic grass) should be maintained on top of the bulkhead. ]Bluff Face: ~- Any tr~s along the top e/ige and on the bluff face should be cut at the base leaving the roots in place. b. Trash, grass clippings, leaves and branches should not be disposed of on the bluff face. This creates instability as the debris adds vdeight to the bluff face and d:~_-.!ly smothers veg~afiorc Thus, such debris should tm removed from the bluff face and disposed of properly. c. A natural angle of repose should occur on the bluff face. Depending on the height and location of the vertical faces, such an angle may not be practical. Grading is a satisfactory practice to create such a natural slope at locations where such an angle can be achieved. Care should- be taken to not di,sturb stabile areas of' the bluff in an attempt to stabilize the eroding locati°ns. Such precautions will prevent additional erosion problems on the bluff. d. Re/Vegetate the slope. ~ 'Cape~ American beach grass and Spartina patens plugs should be used for this pu~osc and transplanted while dormant in the late winter or 3 03Zl~Z200~ 11:33 63172731 USDA HRCS PAGE 11/11 curly spring. ?lan~ug should occur from the top of the bluff face down. Both Spartina and Bcachgrass should bc planted 12" apart. Rows should be scpami~ by 12" and the plants should be si~gered with plants in adjacent rows.' Each full row should consist of entirely Bcachgrass or Spar~na and the rows should alternate between these the two species. For Beachgrass, one 3~mm film canister of Osroocote slow wlcase fertilizer should be placed into cach planting hole and than plant three steo~s or eulmz per hole. To add diversity to the bluff planting, redn¢~ the ~roat of disease, and compensate for natural beach grass die out, it is recommended to broadcast the following warm season grass mixture immediately prior to planting the 'Cape' American beach grass. mixture should consist of 'Blackwell' Switch grass (Pa#icum 'A0snllc' C0~tal panic grass (Pa~n 'Niagara' Big bluestem (A~,oP°~oa gerardii)* Coastal Little bluestcm (Sea~a~ ~copariumv. littoriale)* Sbeep.fescue (Festuca orca) for quick, tc~nporary cover 'Monarch' Seaside Goldea~rod (~llda~ semper~rens v.'Mot~arch) 'Golden lubilee' Black-eyed Susan (Rud/,~iia hirta) Partridge Pea (Ciamaecrista fasci~lata) ColIlm011 ]~¥~llillg Prhllrose Oenotiera bieanis) The warm seasoxl fi~rass 4 PLS lb/Ac 5 PLS lb/Ac $ PLS lb/Ac 3 PLS lb/Ac · 10 lb/Ac l'lb/Ac I lb/Ac 1 lb/Ac 1 lb/Ac (*Rates are in Pure Live Seed. Pounds Per Acr~.) Spreading this seed mix j~st prior to planting the Beachgrass and Spartina, allows fora incorporation of the seed by foot traffic and. sand disturbance as the beach grass is planted. This action is critic~ to a good soed establishlnant. Adapted shrubs and vines can be added when the slope is well stabilized with the above listed grass~ Species include Bayberry, Beach' pea, Shore rose, and Beach plum. Apply 20 lb/ac of nitrogen in lun¢ ffbeach grass vigu~~ is declining. Maintenance of the vegetated slope will be required on a continuous basis. Remove debris from-plarited areas; keep all water divcrtcd from the slope; do oot over-irrigate the lawn shovc; avoid excessive foot traffic and repair any damaged or eroding areas. May 2007 4 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 S~ate Route 25 Main Rd. & Youngs Ave. Southold, NY 11971 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: From: Date: Re: Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Scott A. Hilary, LWRP Coordinator April 8, 2009 Chapter 268, WATERFRONT CONSISTENCY REVIEW Administrative Permit for BRIAN FRAWLEY SCTM#112-1-2 Frederick Weber, Amhitect on behalf of BRIAN FRAWLEY requests an Administrative Permit to conduct construction activity within 100' from the top of the bluff for the demolition of a single-family dwelling, construction of a new single-family dwelling with screened porch, front and rear porch and terrace, new detached garage, driveway, paths and swimming pool, surrounding patio, and reuse or reconstruct sanitary system. Located: 4545 Hallock Lane, Mattituck. SCTM#112-1-2 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation the proposed action is the proposed action is EXEMPT pursuant to § 268-3. § 268-3. Definitions. MINOR ACTIONS -- Include the following actions, which are not subject to review under this chapter: Minor temporary uses of land having negligible or no permanent impact on coastal resources or the environment; Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only __Coastal Erosion Permit Application __Wetland Permit Application __ Administrative Permit t~R __Amendmcnt/Transf£r/Extension eceived Application: ~ ~_~Q~ ,/Received Fee:$ 55~) ~ ~ ' ~Completed Application Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Coordinafion:(date sent) ~q~WRP Consistency Assessment Form OgTkC Referral Sent: ~ ~ate of Inspection: __Receipt of CAC Report: __Lead Agency Detemfination: ___Technical Review: ~Yublic Hearing Held: ,6/./ Resolution: Name of Applicant ]~\t~q~ ~/<kJ~ I~..~ Address [~ ~-'*' [r/~. ,~'~ ~ M~ ~ ehoneNumber:( ~5 ~-q*~% Suffolk County T~ Map Number: 1000 - [ [~ ~ [ -~ Prope.yLocation: q~ ~~L~ ~rovide LILCO Pole ~, distance to cross streets, ~d location) AGENT: (If applicable) Address: of Trustees Appli Land Area (in square feet): Area Zoning: ~x ~ ~2~ GENERAL DATA Previous use of property: Intended use of property: Covenants and Restrictions: Yes X No If "Yes", please provide copy. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date __ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): of Trustees Applicatio~ WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: ~n~t~,4 ~:: I~f~C~ ~ ) Area of wetlands on lot: ~ Percent coverage of lot: ~ Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~ feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: -~ feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes ~.~,JO,I~V~,~ ~a ~X6d'ed, tx~'bo*.-I If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: ~ t' G,~ Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: ~xo~ O~ ~,'~4~, ~;~Ui.~--.~P_,! ~.~r2,,u~ Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? X No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No ,~ Yes ~'~"4[:~iZ> If Yes, how much material will be excavatea. How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) PROJECT ID NUMBER PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION I 617.20 APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only ( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) SEQR 1. APPLICANT I SPONSOR ~/'~.l~J~.*~l2-PROJECT NAME 3.PROJECT LOCATION: ~.~ 4. PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersec§ons, Prominent landmarks etc -or erovide mai) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: .~ New [] Expansion [] Modification I alteration DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres L WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTtNG ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? []Yes [] No If no, descfibebfiefly: 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) ~Residential [~lndust~al []Commercial '~gdculture [~ParklForestlOpenSpace []Other(describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR F~G. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) ~4~.~. ~[~ --~ ~c.. ~,~-. ~'Yes [] No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: '~ ~, ~o~'~t~ _ ~¢~t3tlJ~ ~ j 11. OOES ^NV ASPECT OF THE ACT,O. HAVE A CURRENTLY V^L,D PERM,T OR APPROVAL? '~Yes r~]No If yes, list agency name and permit/ approval: 12. AS A E~_~LT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [~Yes ~N.o I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Signature If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead A~lenc¥) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.47 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL FAF. ['-]Yes r-]No WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. [~] Yes [~No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, sudace or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal, petentiai for erosion, drainage or ficoding problems? Explain briefly: I C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other naturai or cultural resources; or cemm~nity or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, tish, shelltish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain bdefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officiall~ ad0pied, or a change in use or intensity of ase o[ land or other natural resources? Exptain bdefl~ C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related acflvities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly: C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects n(~t identified in c1-C5~ Explain briefly:. C7. Other impacts (including chan~ es in use (~f eit~ei~ ~uantit~ or t~pe of energy? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA_ tCEA~? Ill y_ es, expl__ai~n br~efl~: I--lYes [--INo [ E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes ex~laj~: [~] Yes j---1 No PART III - Dr:: t t=RMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probabllfly of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibilily; (e) geographic scope; and (t~ magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference suppo~og materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially tsrge or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed actio~ WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachmenta as necessary, the reasons supporting thi determination. Name of Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Pdnt or Type Name of Responsibts Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York ?-I BEr O DU Y SWO DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature-~'-~. --~ SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS / q DAY OF ~a.a.,ad~ ,20 ~) ¢ Notary Pugl~c ~ LTNDA J COOPER NOTARY PUBLtC, State of New Yor!' NO. 01 CO4822563, Suffo!k County Term Expires December 31,20~) of Trustees Applicatio~ AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) (print owner of property) residing at ~gP ~.[O3a~. , ~q-. Q~k ( mailing address) M.~., M.~. IO~Zg~ do hereby authorize ( Agent ) ~)~[~6~ W~.~tS~O apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. 8 APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics omhibits conflicts of interest on thc Dart of town officers and emnlovees. The nuranse of this form is to nrovide information which can alert the town of vnssible conflicts of interest and allow it ~ take whatever action is ne to avoid same. ¥OURN E: the.ameof (Lust name, f'u'st name,~niddle initial, unless you are applying in someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee ~ Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other Of"Other", name the activity.) Do you personally (or through your company, sponse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Buslnes~ interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a coq~oration in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO ~ If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name ofporsoo employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (ti~ applicant/agcot/represe nt ative) and the town officer or employee. Either cheek the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): __A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applic~ant (when the applicant is a corporation); __B) the legal or beneficial own~:r of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partoei', or employee of the applicant; or __D} the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Form TS I Submitted this /~ day of ~,g~/'" 200 ~ Signature ~L~ ~ Print Name ~ I~%~--I,.I · ~ Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard ,~rea. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evalnated as to its beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail~ listing both suooorting and non ~. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold ' s website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION scurvy# laao- [Iq. ol The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoara ~] P'a,ingBoara[] BaaingDep~7~ BoaraofTr~ste~-l__~k 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ~-] Co) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Site acreage: [o Ic) ~ Present land use: ~; 0,16,Lr~, ~tv~.!t ~ Present zoning classification: ~" ~ If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Nameofapplicant: ~Z)Rti/o,I ~~ Co) Mailing address: [~,o ~,~ Iq-'rw,_%'~. }/t~?. 0.~; },.12-~. ~ ],,l,~'[. (c) Telephone number: Area Code (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ~ No [] If yes, which state or federal agency? ~]~L.- ~ ~ C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that wffi further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. BYes ~ No ~-~ Not Applicable amen aamuonal sneers ir necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ?3 yes Appli. ble Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes [~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section m - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~ yes N No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LTM Section HI - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes [] No ~'NotApplicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife ]Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section m - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. · ~'Yes ' No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No ~, Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Y,s ?3 mo [] mot Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes~ No~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary · WO'RKINO COAST POLICIESO Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section HI- Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~] No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necr~sm y Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ~Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~Yes ~ No ~'~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section HI- Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ~.~es ~] No ~ Not Applicable PREPARED BY WEBER 52 NOYACK PATH, ~'0 BOX B74), WATI~ MI_L, ~ YOI;K 11976 TEL 631. 754-5555 41 EAST MAPLE ROAD, ~AWN, ~ YORK, 11740 FAX 631-261-1084 March 25, 2009 Southold Town Trustees Town of Southold Annex PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: BRIAN FRA WLEY 4545 Haiiock Lane, MA TT1TUCK, TOtVN of SOUTHOLD, NY SCTM# 1000-122-01-02 Southold Town Trustees: Attached please f'md the following documents submitted in an application for an Administrative Permit. The scope of work involves the demolition and removal of an existing house and the construction of a new single family residence with porches, terrace, detached garage, driveway and future swimming pool. 1- Three (3) copies of the Application 2- Three (3) copies of Owner Authorization for site inspection 3- Three (3) copies of Agem Authorization 4- Three (3) copies of Disclosure form 5- Three (3) copies of Short Environmental Assessmem form 6- Three (3) copies of survey showing proposed house w/porches, terrace, detached garage, driveway and future swiinming pool. (John Minto, Surveyor, March 6, 2007, Last updated February 22, 2009, 1" = 50') 7- Three (3) copies of Architect's site plan showing roof drainage and line of staked hay bales/silt fencing (Last revision December 11, 2008) and house plans and elevations. 8- Three (3) copies of pictures of existing house and site 9- Three (3) copies of LWRP and memorandum on "Consistent" action 10-Three (3) copies of NYS DEC Letter of Non-Jurisdiction l 1-Three (3) copies of Soil and Water Conservation Report (Nicole Spinelli) Please contact me if you need any additional information for this application and send all correspondence to my Greenlawn address. Thank you very much. WEBER 52 NOYACK PATH, ~0 BOX ~74), WATIBt Mi_L, ~ YO~K 11976 41 I=AST MAPLE ROAD, C-:~A~q, hEW YORK, 11740 ~ ~1o 754-5555 FAX ~1- 2~P10~4 January 25, 2009 Southold Town Trustees Town of Southold Annex PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 BRL4N FRA WLEY 4545 Haiiock Lane, MA TTITUCK, TOWN of SOUTHOLD, NY SCTM# 1000-122-01-02 Southold Town Trustees: Attached please find two (2) copies of a survey (Updated with Coastal Erosion Hazard Line) showing proposed house w/porches, terrace, detached garage, driveway and future swimming pool. (John Minto, Surveyor, March 6, 2007, Last updated January 22, 2009, 1": 503 I have also included a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction from the NYS DEC for your records. Please continue your review of this project and contact me if you need any additional information for this application. Send all correspondence to my Greenlawn address. Thank you very much. New York State Department of E'l~ronmental Conservation 50 Circle Road -SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Telephone (516) 444-0365 Facsimile (516) 444-0360 Alexander B. Grannis Commissioner LETTER OF NON JURISDICTION -TIDAL WETLANDS Date: December 23, 2008 Brian Frawley 130 East 12 Street, Apt. 2A New York, New York 10003 1-4738-00231/00003 Frawley Property 4545 Hallock Lane, Mattituck SCTM 111000-112-1-2 Dear Mr. Frawley: Based on the information you have submitted, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that the property landward of the topographic crest of the bluff, as shown on the survey prepared by John Minto on 9/26/08, is beyond Article 25 jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with the current Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) no permit is required under the Tidal Wetlands Act. Please be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the tidal wetlands jurisdictional boundary, as indicated above, without a permit. It is your responsibility to ensure that all n4cessary precautions are taken to prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation within Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction which may result from your project. Such precautions may include maintaining adequate work area between the tidal wetland jurisdictional boundary and your project (i.e. a 15' to 20' wide construction area) or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hay bale berm. Please be further advised that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies. Very truly yours, George W. Hammarth Permit Administrator cc: Mr. Frederick Weber, 41 East Maple Road, Greenlawn, NY 11740 Marine Habitat Protection, NYSDEC File WEBER 52 NOYACK PATH, ~0 BOX 1374). WATI~ k/J_L, ~ YORK 11976 41 EAST MAPLE ROAD, ~.REENLAWN. NEW YORK, 11740 TEL 631 · 754-5555 FAX 631 o 261-1084 December 11, 2008 Southold Town Trustees Town of Southold Annex PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 BRIAN FRAWLEY ~-C ~ 2 4545 Haliock Lane, MA TTITUCK, TOWN of SOUTHOLD, NY13 ~ SCTM# 1000-14~-01-02 Southold Town Trustees: Attached please find the following documents submitted in an application for a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction based on all work occurring over 100' from the top of bluff. The scope of work involves the demolition and removal of an existing house and the construction of a new single family residence with porches, terrace, detached garage, driveway and future swimming pool. 1- Fee $50 (Check #622, FRW) 2- Two (2) copies of Owner Authorization for site inspection 3- Two (2) copies of Owner Authorization of agent 4- Two (2) copies of survey showing proposed house w/ porches, terrace, detached garage, driveway and future swimming pool. (John Minto, Surveyor, March 6, 2007, Last updated December 5, 2008, 1" = 50') 5- Two copies of Architect's site plan showing roof drainage and line of staked hay bales/silt fencing (Last revision December 11, 2008) 6- Two (2) copies of pictures of existing house and site 7- Two (2) location maps Please contact me if you need any additional information for this application and send all correspondence to my Greenlawn address. Thank you very much. Ve,<y tr~y yours, FI~EDE~ R. WEBER, R.A. AbT~ORI ZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) (p ' t owner of property) (mailing address)' [\~%~. %'; ~.~ .; %U~)~ do hereby authorize ( Agent ) ~O~{~10~ ~D~/ /~[~~to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. ( Owner ' s ~nature ) Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York ~LZ~-'~ ~w~Wl_.l~t~ BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES, THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), 1~ GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF ¢~-7..t.g~ ,20 $ Notar~ Public LoNG CLAN9 soUN9 96 50 SURVEY OF PROPERTY ?yoV°se6 96 situote at THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHTS OF WAY UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE CORY GUARANTEES INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPAN~', GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING ~NSTI- TUTION. GUARANTEES ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE ADD AR['A G4LC$ AND L:L~ATION$12/5/0g ADD ¢OAgAI ~'ROMON flAIARD UflE 2/22/09 MATTITUCg Town of Southold Suffolk County, N.Y. S.C.T.M. # 1000-11 2-01 -02 Scale 1'= 50' March 6, 2007 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 COASTAL EROSION flAZARD LIN[. LAND SURVEYING JOHN MINTO, L.$. 93 SM1THTOWN BOULEVARD PHONE: (651) 724 4832 FAX: (651) 724 5455 SMITHTOWN, N.Y. 117~7 96 ', 9s \ 2oo ( IN FEET ) 1 inch : 50 ft. TOTAL LAND 96 AREA= 51,977 S.F. to Lonq Island ~ound Tie Line OR t. t9 ACRES BUILDABLE LAND AREA 38, 792 SO. Ff. 0.$9 ACRES ¢0 96 9g ~oo Prepared for FREDERICK WEBER DRAINAGE: AREA VOLIJ~E [Required) DRAINAGE STRUCTURE5 ¢OLUNE (Prowded) Am, A2 D~ELLING 2330 ¢ x .l&~" = 38l ~m Doae Top (Traffic Bearmng) 4~0 c¢ Il) 8'+ x 4'-0" NrC ~/ SQUARE SQUARE FOOTAGE (HOUSE)~ FOOTAGE (GARAGE): mST FLOOR: HBO SF GARAQE~ E'I~ 5F FRONT PORCH; 220 SF COVERED 51TTING: 1fl2 SF REAR PORCH: IlO 5F SCREEN PORCH: 20"1 5F TOTAL: '~&8 SF TERRACE! 513 SF TOTAL: 2~O SF SQUARE FOOTAGE (POOL); POOL; 800 SF N.¥.5. DEC NOTE: ALL CONSTRUCTION TO OCCUR ABOVE THE ~0' CONTOUR OR CREST OF BLUFF f"NON-JURtEE)JCTION") PROPERTY OWNER: BRIAN FRAWLE¥ SITUATE: MATTITUCK 4B4S HALLOCK LANE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK SCTid:~ IOOO-II2-OI-O2 LOT AREA; ~1,911 E.F, fi. Mi ACRES) BUILDABLE LAND (LANDt. UARD OF TOP OF BLUFF): ~8.3ff2 5F BUILDING AREA: 5898 SF (INCLUDING DWELLING, PORCHES, TERRACE, GARAGE, EUJli'INING POOL t COVERED SITTING) PROPOEED LOT COVERAGE ON BUILDABLE LAND = ~O.O~ ZONING¢ R-80 NOTE: SEE SECTION 2EO-124 "NON-CONFORilING LOTS" t~ITH AREAS FROM 40.000 E.F. TO ~fl,999 E.F. FOR SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: YARDS: (PRINCIPAL) FRONT ~O' SIDE (ONE): 51DB (BOTH)~ 40' ~EAR: ~O' MAXIMUM HEIGHT (PRfNCIPAL): ~', (2 I/2 STORIES) MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 20~ MAXIMUM HEIGHT (ACCE55ORY)¢ 22' SURVEY INFORMATION: JOHN MINTO, LAND SURVEYOR 95 5MITHTOWN BLVD,, 5HITHTOWN, NY 5URVEYED; MARCH ~, 2003 ADDED PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: SEPTEMBER ~J, ADDED CONTOURS~AREA CALCULATIONS: DECEMBER $, 2008 $1TF PiL,A,N I" = 30'~0" NORTH FREDERICK ROBERT BEBER ARCHITECT III J DRAWING TITLl=: 51TE PLAN JOB= NEU.I RESIDENCE BRIAN FRAUJLEY 4B4B HALLOCK LANl= MATTITLICK, NT TO(tIN OF I=OUTHOLD ~CTM# IOOO-I1~-OI-O2 ARCHITl=CT: FREDERICk; R. ~l=BER 41 EA-~T NAPLl= ROAD GREENLAI[IN. NY 11140 B2 NOYAC PATH tlJATI=R MILL, NY II'Il& TEL &SI FAX &~,l El=AL; DATI=; AUG ~,O. 5CALl=: I" = JOB NO.- ~u200101 DRAUJING NO. Al OF A8 23'-0" 4'-¢ I , --~ ~- ,, ~, ,-- '~ qoIII I ' -W = ~ ; ' ~ II I H , , . E ' ~ 16'-~" and Proposed 5~-tback) 20'-0' SQUARE FOOTAGE: 1ST FLOOR: 1480 5F FRONT PORCH; 2:20 5F REAR PORCH: IIO 5F SCREEN PORCH: ';O1 5F TERRACE: ~1~ 5F FIRST FLOOR PLAN NORTH I1'-0" i / SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2ND FLOOR: 1(.O8 SF SECOND FLOOR 1/4" = I'-O" PLAN