The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-59.-10-1 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair Town of Southold Planning Board From: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator ~ Principal Planner Date: September 6, 2007 Proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zoning District AC This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area on a 12.088-acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold. SCTM#1000-59-10-1. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the Planning Board consider the following policy standards in site design: Policy Standards 3.1 Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. Minimize introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. C. Screen components of development which detract from visual quality. Use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality: 1. Preserve existing vegetation which contributes to the scenic quality of the landscape. 2. Allow for selective clearing of vegetation to provide public views without impairing values associated with the affected vegetation. 3. Restore historic or important designed landscapes to preserve intended or designed aesthetic values. 4. Restore or add indigenous vegetative cover that presents a natural appearance It is further recommended that the following best management practice be applied to further Policy 5, "Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold" and protect and improve the water quality and supply in the area: 1. The parking areas are constructed of pervious materials. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Planning Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer File S A M U E L S & S T E E L M A N June 11,2007 Mr. Bruno Semen Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Sparkling Point Vineya~s 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 hesitate to call. Dear Mr. Semen, - d~ Enclosed, please find a completed LWRP Application, a check amoun~ for the balance of the Site Plan Approval fee, and the Full Environmental A'~-~rffe-fft Form. If we can answer any questions or provide any additiop~al~'fn~fOrmati~, please do np~ Sincerely, S/~e & Stee~n Architects ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEWYORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 FAX/631) 734 6407 Town of Southold Edited by Foxit PDF Editor Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only. LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). B. DESCIIWTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCr]~I~ 1000 59 _ 10 - 1 The Applieafion has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ~ Planning Dept. [] If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, ff necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the max/mum extent practicable with the L~___..~clicy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent~%mNRP pohcy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following PlOw, s: online at the TOwn of Southold's ~ website (southoldtown.northfork.ne0, the Board of Tms~LOffice, ~Planning'Department, all local l~raries and the Town Clerk's office. "~ ~' Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) (b) (c) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital [] construction, planmng activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [] Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) Permit, approval, license, certification: [-~ Nature and extent of action: New winery Edited by Foxit PDF Editor Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only. Location of action: 39750 CR 48, SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 Site acreage:_ 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC Present land use: FARM / STORAGE Present zomng classification: A-C If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: SAMUELS AND STEELMAN ARCHITECTS (b) Mailing address: 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) (631) 734 6405 (d) Applieation number, if any:. Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No [~ If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See L~VRP Section HI-Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [~¥es [~ No [] Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG AN AGRICULTURAL CORIDOR (NORTH ROAD) AND THE iNTENDED USE OF THE PROPERTY IS A WINERY WHICH IS AGRICULTURAL IN NATURE AND PRESERVES THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY AS OPEN SPACE IN THE FORM OF A VINEYARD THERE ARE OTHER WINERIES ALONG THE SAME ROAD TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section HI - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes [] No ~-~ Not Applicable THERE ARE NO HISTORICAL OR ARCHEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY Attach additional sh~ts if n~cessary Edited by Foxit PDF Editor Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only. Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IU[ - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable THE NEW WINERY IS A ONE STORY ABOVE GRADE STRUCTURE WITH A BASEMENT THAT CONCENTRATES THE BUILDING VOLUME IN A CENTRAL LOCATION, THUS PRESERVING OPEN SPACE. ALL UTILITARIAN AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED WITH PRIVACY FENCING AND EVERGREEN SCREENING. THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE BUILDING MATCHES OTHER ARCHITECTURAL STYLES IN THE AREA. Attach additional sheets if nccessaq' NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section HI - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable ALL RAINWATER RUNOFF ON DEVELOPED PORTIONS OF THE SITE, WILL BE RETAINED ON SITE WITH THE USE OF UNDERGROUND DRYVVELLS. Attach additional sheets if necessmy Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section HI -Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable ALL RAINWATER RUNOFF ON DEVELOPED PORTIONS OF THE SITE, WILL BE RETAINED ON SITE WITH THE USE Of UNDERGROUND DRYWELLS. A SANITARY SYSTEM FOR THE WINERY WILL MEET CURRENT SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH SEVICES STANDARDS FOR SANITARY WASTE WATER. THE PROPERTY IS SERVED WITH PUBLIC WATER FROM SUFFOLK COUNTY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and W'fldlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE NO DEVELOPMENT WILL TAKE PLACE IN THE "PROTECTED" OR NATURAL tNDIGINOUS ENVIRONMENT Edited by Foxit PDF Editor Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only. Attach additional sheets if neeessaw Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH- Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [-~ Yes ~-~ No [] Not Applicable THE WINERY WILL NOT ADD POLLUTANTS INTO THE AIR. ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MEET THE FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR AIR POLUTION DISCHARGE. THE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS OF THE WINERY WILL MEET THE FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR AIR POLLUTION DISCHARGE Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. MinJml-e environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No ~-~ Not Applicable THE CONSTRUCTION AND THE USE OF THE WINERY WILL MAKE USE OF THE TOWNS DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING CENTER. ALL WASTEWATER "SANITARY" WILL BE DISCHARGED INTO AN APPROVED SCDHS SANITARY SYSTEM PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Santhold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. [] Yeti No [~ Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE Attach additional sheets if neeessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section I]] - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [~ Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE Edited by Foxit PDF Editor Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only. Attach additional sheets if neeessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section HI- Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes [] No [] Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE Attach additional sheets if neeessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes [] No [] Not Applicable THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG AN AGRICULTURAL CORIDOR (NORTH ROAD) AND THE INTENDED USE OF THE PROPERTY iS A WINERY WHICH IS AGRICULTURAL IN NATURE THE WINERY PRESERVES THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY AS OPEN SPACE IN THE FORM OF A VINEYARD THERE ARE OTHER WINERIES ALONG THE SAME ROAD TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY Attach additional sheets if neeessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use nad development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section HI- Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable THE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE USING EQUIPMENT APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR ENERGY USAGE. THE WINERY WILL MEET FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR CONSERVING ENERGY "ENERGY STAR PROGRAM "AND WILL USE "NEW YORK STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION AND CONSTRUCTION CODE" FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE WINERY TITLE ,~ i~+ DATE Created on 5/25/05 11:20 AM PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B· WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN II. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPII L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: May 22, 2007 To: Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Co0~n~t0~- From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer ~ ~o~, ....... Re: Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Status: Old revised Site Plan Application This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. fi. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of Cotmty Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan, EAF, Notice of Disapprovals and be advised no LWRP form was submitted with the application. The applicant has been notified the LWRP form is required. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for LWRP consistency· Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 8i~d~y~Samucls & S~**im,m d,~d ~'*~7-,~eria! and site plan application, ND, EAF and site plan application. Applicaticm ~a~e: 05 16 ,' 2007 Site Plan Na~,: Sparkling Pointe Winery TOWN OF' SOt TIIOLD PLANNING BOARD SiTE PLAN APPIACATION S~ffolk Caul~ty Tax Map #i000~, ~59~, ~ ~0 - ~ ,~ Oilier SCTM Street AcMress: 39750 County Rd. 48 Harnlel; Dis~ncc to hearst inter~ecfion: Type of Site Plan: MAY 1 8 2007 Southold ~. ~, New ........ Amcm~ed Re~ideafial lfAmelld/,al, lasl apl}ro,~ al date: ~ CFiON B, Owners/Ageat ( ontac! hfformaqo_.u' PmpertyOwner Thomas and Cynthia Rosicki Stre¢~ 51 E. Bethpage Rd. Cky Plainview s ate NY Zip 11803 Applicant Same as Above Applicant's Agent or Rcpresca~adve: Comaet Persoms~* Nancy Steelman Strc~'[ Samuels and Steelman Architects ('i~ Cutchogue , )--- - ~ NY Z 11935 10/05/85 ~,E(TI ION C: Sile I)a~a Pro~aed eoaatrt~etlon type: Property tota! acreage or silmu'e foolage: Site Plmi tmild~out acreage or s{luare footage: _'L~ .... ac. sq~ fl. .\glicultural Property Zouing District(s); AC Building Depam~lem Notice o£Di~pproval Date: ts an application to ~e Southold Town Zen'rog Boatd o£ Appe [1~ rc~{ui~ c~: Yes 1[ yes, have 5~m ~ubmitted ~ appliCaOon to Ihe ZBA? Y~ .... No Ifj~, attach a e~y of the ~plicati0n p~ket. ..... S~.A~ached ZBA Decision Dated: June 3, 2004 Show MI ~ propos~ and exisffng h~d~cat~ whicl~ buildiag w~ll have whkh plol~sed per building, indicate square fbotage of floor area per use. L~st all existingpmpt~y uses: Agricultural Building and Vineyard List all propos~ properly uses: Off~cr acctts~*ry us~: none Existing tm coverage: _. :5 % Pr~>posed lot addition .......... fl, Owss flora mea o~ )rope ~4 ~: 5053 Parkfllg Spume Dala: 5/16/07 Si[mature of Preparer: Da~c; P',,~ 2 of 2 10/05105 ,8,(-'~ FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUrHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Thoma R s osick~(Sparkling l~oint LLC) 1 Old Country R'o~d Carle Place, NY 11514 DATE: March 17, 2004 Please take notice that your application dated March 11, 2004 For permit to convert mi existing nurser,/building & office to a winery at Location of property 39750 County Road 48, Southold County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 59 Block 1~0 Lot 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 11.5 acre lot in the AC District, is not permitted pursuant to Article III 100-33, A. 4., which states; "(c) The winery structures shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from a major road." The existing structure is located 67 feet from County Road 48. In addition to a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, the project requires approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. CC: file, ZBA, Pla~ming Board ~ ,~/'/'~'~-~) '~ tl Damon Rallis Pemxit Examiner Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above ~:eferenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. 1 7 2OO4 $outhold Tow~ _ Plannin~ 80a~ PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Prpvide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Il - ' / Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Business Telephone ~'/(,, 'q~'l Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO Business Telephone State Zip Code Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 'Piease Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Forest /~griculture []Other D Residential (suburban) ~1 Rural {non-farm) Total acreage of project area: J~.,~)~S acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, crop,and, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) / What is predominant soil type(sD on project site? a. Soil drainage: [~Well drained (0 0% of site ]Poorly drained % of site PRESENTLY ~,)A acres ~ ~ acres h.l.o ¢ soras ~,~ acres P seres ] Moderately well drained __ AFTER COMPLETION N ~ acres I~J ~ acres /~..0 ~ acres N/r aoras acres acres acres % of site. b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? I~-O_~_~ acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? r~ Yes ~ No a. What is depth to bedrock ~J ~ (in feet) §. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes; ~0-10% ~% []10- 1§% % 6. Is project substantiall~ontiguoust,l~.~¢or ontain a Historic Places7 U Yes ,~No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? · [] 15% or greater__% building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~...~) I {in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes I0. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [] Yes Page 3 of 21 ]Yes · 1 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: [, Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site;' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? E] es Describe: I 1:3. Is the proieet eito p[esentl¥~aed by the community or neighborhood DYes If yes, explain: 4, 14. Does tho present site include scenic views known to be important to th? :omr'.~J~ity? Yes / or eonfiguoua to proiect area: ~t ~ [5. Streams within a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: as an open space or recreation area7 DYes b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? s a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes "~o 18. Is the site located in.an ag~ultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304, ~es NINe 19. Is the site located in or substantially co,~iguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617;' E]Yes ~"No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes;' B, Project Description E]Yes ,~ Physical dimensions and scale of project {fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: I,~.O~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ~J ~' C)acres initially; 0 ~JA acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: k) ~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: .tJ ~:~ (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indi%te percent of expansion proposed. /~ % f. Number of off-street park,rig spa~es exlst,ng / ~'- ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: {upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: ~*'~A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes DNo ~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? ft. tons/cubic yards. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation {trees, shrubs, ground covers) wi[l be removed from site? ~ acres. Page 5 of 21 · 5: Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation ~)e removed by this project? 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ~J~ months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: ~J ~, a. Total number of phases anticipated ~ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month __ year, (including demolition} c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month year. d, Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases;' [] Yes [] No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ~ Yes [] No fl Dr" 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~'J I~ ; after project is complet? 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ ~-. require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes [~ 1 1. Will project If yes, explain: Is surface liquid waste disposal involved;' [~ Yes a, If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b, Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes ,~No Type 1 3. Is subsurface 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? r~ Yes If yes, explain: 16. Will the project generate solid waste;' [] Yes ,LL-XI,No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? __tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill7 EYes ENo Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal;' __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated sit_e life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides7 ~Yes [] No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes/'~, o 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes~"~o If yes, indicate type{s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~) gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~ ~ ¥[.~ '-~"~1o,~'¥1 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? LJ Yes ~-No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 · 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board I-l.o Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board "~Yes City, Town Zoning Board ~ No City, County Health Department DYes [~ No Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies DYes [] No []¥a, r-l.o :/ State Agencies .F~--yes [] No Federal Agencies [~ Yes [] No C, Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~es [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment *~oning variance [] New/revision of master plan D Site plan D Special use permit D Resource management plan D Subdivision ]Other Page 8 of 21 What is the zoning classification(s) of the site7 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning;' 4, What is the proposed zoning of the site;' 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ¥ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Wes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) anti zoning classifications W~th~n a ~A mile radius of proposed action? I I 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed;' a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes o 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~ [] No proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels;' [] Yes ~ 1 2, Will the a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. DYes [] No ' ' I D. Informational Details /' Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project, if there are or may be any adverse impacts /~ssociated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verificatlon I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/SponaorName ~' ~.0~-~'~.~). ~t.k.~ Signature ~ Title If the a=tion Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 'APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (63~) 765-9064 June 8,2004 Mr. Thomas Rosicki Sparkling Pointe, LLC One Old Country Road Carle Place, NY 11514 Re: Appeal No. 5520 - Setback Variance Dear Mr. Rosicki: Supplementing yesterday's fax transmission, please find enclosed a copy of the variance determination rendered by the Board of Appeals at its June 3, 2004 Meeting. Please be sure to contact the Planning Board (765-1938) and Building Department (765- 1802) regarding further steps in the building and zoning application review process. You may want to furnish an extra copy of the enclosed determination when submitting any other documents that may be requested by both departments in their final reviews. Thank you. Very truly yours, alski Enclosure Copy of Decision 6/8/04 to: Building Department Planning Board zEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road I~O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2004 ZBA #5520 - SPARKLING POINTE, LLC by THOMAS ROSICKI Property Location: 39750 C.R. 48, Southold; CTM 59-10-1 Zone District: Agricultural-Conservation A/C SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 12-acre lot has 564.88 feet along the south side of County Road 48, a/k/a North Road, in Southold. The property is improved with agricultural buildings as shown on the December 19, 2002 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 17, 2004, Notice of Disapproval, citing Code Section 100-31A.4 in its denial of a building permit application regarding applicant's plan to convert the existing building use from agricultural-nursery to agricultural-winery for the reason that the existing building is less than 100 feet from the front lot line along County Road 48. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 20, 2004, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests the continued agricultural use of an existing building located 67 feet and 80.8 feet at its closest points to the front line along C.R. 48. The building was built in 1999 and has been used as a nursery office and storage areas related to the agricultural (nursery) use of the land. The applicant is proposing a winery within the building which is a permitted agricultural use in this A/C Zone. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the relief requested will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant is not proposing to increase the structure in any way. The appearance of the current plantings that parallel County Road 48 create a visual effect of a much larger setback than the 67 feet that exists. These plantings and the Page 2 - June 3, 2004 Appl. No. 5520 - Sparking Pointe LLC/Rosicki CTM 59-10-11 at Southold existing building will remain, in place. The plantings will be continuously maintained as a landscape buffer. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot I~e achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant is using the existing structure on this agricultural site, and the structure has been used as an office and storage for the nursery's activities. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial, however, the building will remain in place. The reduction of the current code requirement is 33 feet, for a 67 ft. setback instead of a 100 ft. setback from the front property line. 4. The difficulty was self-created when the applicant acquired the building in a nonconforming location. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this community of single-family residences will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of this relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a different agricultural use (winery), while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carded, to GRANT the variance as applied for, as shown on the December 19, 2002 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr., L.S., with the CONDITION that the existing trees and shrubs, be · 4~ maintained at a minimum average height of as a landscape buffer, as exists, between the building and CR 48. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject pr0per~y that may violate the Zoning Code, other than s~Jch uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, Goehringer, Tortora, and Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 618104 Approved for Filing PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM Date: August 10, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer~ Re: Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Stares: Pending approval at the Planning Board September Meeting, please review and respond ASAP. This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. fi. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, fi. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan and a copy of the LWRP form. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for LWRP consistency. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan set prepared by Samuels & Steelman dated August 7, 2007. -"/ --~ ENTRY ANP EXIT N ~[121= TYIO UPLI~HT~ PER DI~N~ NEI, N ~I~N AT ~DP-,IVEYIA¥ EN] ~IE~ LETTEf~5 ON A LIGHT CONTI~A~TIN~ NO -.TH OIL ANI~ BLUI~TON~ ON AE~HALT ON C, OUNT'T' fa. Oh DU~JEGT TO APPP..OVAL ENTP-.Y ONLY c~ON¢"I"~UC, TION Ot~ C, Uf~B IO 5PACEG 5TONE CUP~IN~ TY~IG,~.. ~'T HIgH PENCE e hATE WITH PRIV~¥ AR~UN~ f~ETAININ~, J6IALL IVI~TAL R, AILIN~ NO1 E: 51EE SHEET #5 FOR-., OVtD~ALL 5lib PLAN SCTM # t000-59-10-1 PROPERTY: 39750 CR 48 ADDRESS SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 OWNER: THOMAS P. ROSICKI CYNTHIA ROSICKI (SPARKLING POliTE, LLC) PARTIAL SITE PLAN LOCATION MAP SITE: 526,560 SQ. FT. - 12.088 AC ZONING: A-C SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIL AREA 637 SF/200 SFISPACE 4.1 SPACES OFFICE AREA 813 SFIt00 SF/SPACE 8.1 SPACES TASTING ROOM 4170 SFI260 SF/SPACE 20.8 SPACES STORAGE AREA 3306 SFII000SF/SPACE 3.3 SPACES PRODUCTION AREA 2415 SFIS00 SFISPACE 4.8 SPACES TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 41.t OR 41 SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 41 SPACES W/2 H.C SURVEYOR: BUILDING: AREA STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR PO BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 LICENSE# 49273 DATED 18 AUGUST 2006 TOTAL: 17,189 SQ. FT. WINERY (foot print): CRUSH PAD: OUTDOOR TERRACES: 3.3% ACTUAL / 20% MA~ ALLOWABLE 7,662 SQ. FT. 2,885 SQ. FT. 6,642 SQ. FT. LOT: COVERAGE PARKING: 22,558 SQ FT / 4.3 % LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING: 486,813 SQ FT / 92.5 % LOT COVERAGE TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION WI OI J~Z. DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NO: 1 HIGH · 28.o7 AN~ t~XIT [ DW ,32,09 ~ex ~L ~e EXISTING CATCH BASIN, ALL D~.AINA~E STR~CTURE~ TO ~ GLEA~ AT T~ GO~LETiOH OF ~O~TION OF THE NORTH COUNTY 48 EL 34.62 ENTP.,'rq 35.09 PROVI~ FULL ~ 0 HY~NT ,~"H~'r TO (~) VALVE PAP`KI N~ EL 37'73 e~37.14 HIGH LINE POLE HIGH LINE .. R~-I~ "~o NE~ UNDEP.~3UND U~IDTIN~ [ BLUESToNEOIL A~ BLUE~TONE E~J~ACIN~ I~" HIN I~..LO~ LINE .. NOTE: SEE 5HF:ET ~5 FOP. OVr=f;J~LL 51TE PLAN ex EL 33.3 PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'~" TEST HOLE NO SCALE TEST HOLE DATA (5/29/07) 1FT. DARK BROWN SILTY LOAM OL 3 FT. BROWN SILTY SAND SM PALE BROWN FINE SP TO MEDIUM SAND 21 FT. BY MARK McDONALD GEOSCIENCE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE UTILITIES PLAN SHEET NO: DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: SANITARY CALCULATIONS ROOF AREA OF NEW WINERY I. ALLOWABLE DENSITY ~X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL ACERAGE: 2.010 ACRES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) (DW) A 7,877 SF. X (21.1,,2 FT.) X t.0 = 1,313 CU. FT. HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 5 HIGH POOLS , (6) ,8' DIAMETER x 4' HIGH POOLS WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER (1) 8, X 1,0 STORM DRAIN RING = 422.5 CU. FT. ALLOWABLE: 2,0t0 Acres x 600 GPD. = 1,206 GPD. (6) 8 X 4 STORM DRAIN RING = 1~0t3.4 CU. FT. TOTAL SITE SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW~ t,206 GPD. t,435.9 CU. FT. PROVIDED ~ II. SANITARY DESIGN 1,435,9 CU. FT. > 1,313 CU. PT. SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: PARKING AREAS ~REA X RAINFALl. X RUNOFF FACTOR WINERY: (DW) B 5,852 SF. X (2/t2,F,T.) X 0.9 = 878 CU. FT. 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD + 2.5 GPDIOccupant) USE: ,(2) ,1,0 DIAMETER x 7 HIGH POOL 7.5 GPD X 72 Occupants = 540 GPD (2} 10 X 7 STORM DRAIN RING = 958 CU. FT. 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) PROVIDED REQUIRED 0.03 GPD X 804 SF = 24.2 GPD ZONING zo.i.G AC ~-- SEE ENLARGED SITE ~ LB ~ PLAN SHEET #1 ZONING FA~I AC REEIDENCE ~ _~ ~ ~ REEIDENCE ~' 958 CU. FT. > 878 CU. FT. 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF) / DRYWELL AREA' X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR 0.04GPD X5,203 SF = 208.1 GPD (DW) "C" 4,152 SF. X (2112 FT.) X 0.9 = 623 CU. FT. 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) Z~NING ' ~-~ USE: (1) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD ' COUN~ USE~ (2),8' DIAMETER x 8' HIGH POOL SEWAGE FLOW = 801.7 GPD ( ) SEWAG W = 801.7 G (2) 8' X 8' STORM D~IN RING = 676 CU. FT. ~ ~SmNC~ . ~ REQUIRED ~PTIC SYSTEM - 801 7 GPD ................................ I SEPTIC TANK (ST)' 80~ .7 GPD x 2 DAY FLOW = 1,603 4 GAL (DW)"D 5,7~SF X '~2FT.' X 0.9 862CU. FT. USE MINIMUM. 2,000GALSEPTICTANK(~0FTDIAxS~HT) ,' [ ,; = 2.L~CHING POOLS ( LP ): 801.71 1.5 S.F./GPD = 534.5 S.F. USE:(2) 10 DIAMETERx7 HIGHPOOL H~;MlUlMHM(O .;T nlA Y4~;T ~ ~ ~ ~H ;T PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): t - 8 FT DIA x 12 FT HT DRY ~L'"~-' X ~INFA~' ~-' '~NOFF FACTOR IlL WASTE WATER PROCESSING (DW) E 5,320 S~. X (~12 F~.) X 0.9 = 798 CU. ~. NEW PRODUCTION AREA (1) X 12 STORM O IN RING = 82J CU. FT. TOTAL WAST WATER P.OC SS. O 82~ CU. FT. > 798 CU. FT. t094 CU. FT. > 1068 CU. FT, EFFECTIVE DEPTH ( 2 10 FT. DIA. X 9,67 FT. HT.) = 303.6 ~ SYSTEM ~1, NO SCALE SYSTEM ~, NO SCALE I / I ~ ~ ~ ~ ·. ~ / ~ II , -- . ~ ~.. . · . ~ / DETAILS / ~ ~ ~ - . II II ~1~1 I III ' ~ ~ "~ / ~ ' ~ ' ~ -I~ / SHEETNO: ~va,~A. ~CA~U,~ onn~ n~ SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON GREASE TI~P TYPICAL L~CHING POOL DETAIL SEPTIC TANK - 1200 GALLON / ,.t.s. SEPTIC SYSTEM ..... SEPTIC SYSTEM '" ~'"~ ~'~ TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION I I [] I~a I¥ ~1 j~ !~' MIN. LAP, IN 5BOR, E~;~,A '"M(~, I0,000 D~IV~PIA¥ LI~HT.~, ~,~,oo ~ · A * LAPIN · A · " C I~l~d_L MOUN] ~-D P. AMP LIGHTS, · A · "C * ~HALL MOON I t=~ ~ i t~P LI~HT~, GEILIN~ MOUNTED DO,WN LIGHT~, 5or, i, Et~,A 1:2.24/~,o, q.~::7 l!JlVlEN5 ~=~A T~I~ 2~' R~UII~ LAI~N L.a~IN LII~d. IT~, ~O~ ON A~ I~l,lll~l~ LAI,~N PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION Zl CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30"0" SHEET TITLE: SITE .ANDSCAPIN¢ & LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NO: 4 HALtCI~IAY e'roNe ~ TO F'At~.t~IN~, eT~m,e ~ ~-TAIL ~T~= 0 0 0 RAILIN~ TA~TIN~ ~OOM MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" COI'~-ER. EN~E BALGON~ RAILIN~ OPEN TO PRODUC, TION BELOH ~'~I,.I~-IIN~ii//OAID I N~ AREA l~t~mo~l TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2001 SHEET TITLE: MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: 5 P~IN~ LIB~A~ RI~LIN~ X LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: t/8" = 1'-0" TOIL'I' TAN~ Gt~J~--JHIN~/L.OA~IN~ AREA TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION DATE: AUGUST 7, 2007 SCALE: 118"='1'-0" SHEET TITLE: LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEETNO: 6 NEW ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'4)" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'4)" MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A - WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION LU CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST 7, 2007 SCALE: 118"=1'4)" SHEET TITLE: NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SHEETNO: 7 EXISTING BIUILDING WITH NL=W ENTRY RAILING-- NEW ADDITION WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" -- t'~)" CRUSHING PAD BELOW ~P BELOW EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 118"=1'-0" MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWSlDOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM AT CRUSHING PAD PAINTED WOOD RAIUNG AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE SA -WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION DRAWN DY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST 7,20D? SCALE: 1/8"=~'-0" SHEET TITLE: WEST & EAST ELEVATION~ SHEET HO: 8