HomeMy WebLinkAboutTB-02/24/2009 ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
TOWN CLERK PO Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Fax (631) 765-6145
MARRIAGE OFFICER Telephone: (631) 765 - 1800
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER southoldtown.northfork.net
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
February 24, 2009
7:30 PM
A Regular Meeting of the Southold Town Board was held Tuesday, February 24, 2009 at the
Meeting Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, NY. Supervisor Russell opened the meeting at 7:30
PM with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
Call to Order
7:30 PM Meeting called to order on February 24, 2009 at Meeting Hall, 53095 Route 25,
Southold, NY.
Attendee Name Organization Title Status Arrived
William Ruland Town of Southold Councilman Present
Vincent Orlando Town of Southold Councilman Present
Albert Krupski Jr. Town of Southold Councilman Present
Thomas H. Wickham Town of Southold Councilman Present
Louisa P. Evans Town of Southold Justice Present
Scott Russell Town of Southold Supervisor Present
Elizabeth A. Neville Town of Southold Town Clerk Present
Patricia A. Finnegan Town of Southold Town Attorney Absent
I. Reports
1. ZBA Annual & Monthly Report
2008 Annual Report
January 2009 Report
2. Island Group - Claim Lag Report
2/1/08 - 1/31/09 Claims
3. Town Clerk Monthly Report
January 2009
February 24, 2009 Page 2
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
4. Disabled Recreation Program
January 2009
5. Trustees Monthly Report
January 2009
6. Judge Bruer Monthly Report
January 2009
7. Judge Price
January 2009
8. Judge Evans
January 2009
II. Public Notices
1. Notice of Applying for On-Site Liquor License
North Fork Asian Corp., 110 Front St., Greenport
2. Liquor License Renewal with NYS Liquor Authority
East End Vineyards, LLC d/b/a Clovis Point, 35 Cox Neck Rd., Mattituck for Special Farm
Winery License
Hay Harbor Club, Inc., 1 Fox Ave., Fishers Island
Pellegrini Vineyards, 23005 Main Rd., Cutchogue, Farm Winery License
Willowmere Inn Ltd., 730 Main Bayview Rd., Southold
III. Communications
IV. Discussion
1. 9:00 A.M. - John Cushman
- Update on Budget
- Elected and Appointed officials’ health insurance buy-out and coverage
2. 9:30 A.M. - Heather Lanza
Wireless Communications
3. 9:45 A.M. - Heather Lanza
Inter-municipal Agreement, S. C. Planning Commission Referral Process per Supervisor Russell
February 24, 2009 Page 3
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
4. 10:00 A.M. - Lloyd Reisenberg
SC Multi-Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
5. 10:15 A.M. - Lloyd Reisenberg
Cell Phones per Councilman Orlando
6. 10:20 A.M. - Lloyd Reisenberg
InVision Wireless Auditing Services
7. 10:45 A. M. - Jeff Standish
2009 Southold Town Deer Management Survey Results
8. 11:00 A.M. - Thomas Neely
East End Rail-Bus Study
9. 11:30 A. M. - Melissa Spiro
- CPF Management & Stewardship Plan
- Land Preservation Year End Report
10. 12:00 Noon - John Sepenoski
Stewardship Plans & Procedures
11. Appointments
- Planning Board
- Zoning Board of Appeals
12. Docks on the Bay
13. LWRP Chair
14. Extension of SCWA Main
15. Cox Lane & Route 48 Intersection
Recommendation from Transportation Commission
Pledge to the Flag
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Please rise and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
Thank you. What I am going to do is anyone that wants to address the Town Board on any of the
issues that appear on the agenda. I know there is a lot of people that are here for the first time.
Generally what we do is we take comment on the items that are on the agenda, then when we are
done with the business of the agenda, we will open up the floor and you can comment on any
issue. Benja?
February 24, 2009 Page 4
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Opening Statements
Benja Schwartz, Cutchogue
BENJA SCHWARTZ: Good evening, Scott. Town Board. I am Benja Schwartz for Cutchogue.
From Cutchogue, excuse me. Tonight on the agenda we have three important, excuse me, let me
start again. Tonight there are three important appointments on the agenda. At the Town Board
work session this morning, the public discussion ended by a vote to go into executive session to
continue to discuss who to appoint tonight. before the meeting was closed to the public, a
revealing statement was made by Supervisor Russell. He stated that he was not looking for
activist Board members. Supervisor Russell stated Board members should follow the law and
not try and make law. The problem with that is, Supervisor Russell, that for quasi judicial boards
like the ZBA, the Zoning Board of Appeals and especially the Planning Board, following the law
also is supposed to include making law. There are two kinds of law in our legal system, the civil
law and the common law. In cases where there is more than one literal way to interpret the civil
law, the laws on the books, I want the Board members to interpret the law in the common public
interest. I believe that the majority of Southold citizens want board members that are chosen for
their readiness, their willingness and their ability to apply the law by taking hard looks at
applications and using the authority vested in them to protect the public interest. Not just the
individual interest of applicants. The rights of property ownership are subject to rights of other
property owners, citizens, and I believe the natural environment has a right to protection. In
appropriate cases, I want Board members, I want Board members to deny applications.
Condition applications and request modification of applications before approval. Apparently the
other three Board members agreed with Supervisor Russell. They didn’t discuss their reasons
this morning but all agreed to vote for the candidate that Supervisor Russell nominated. I believe
Supervisor Russell nominated candidates for their willingness to neglect their responsibilities to
lead as well as follow the law. I am also sure that intelligent Southolders will realize there is a
difference between fast talking promises to work together and walking that talk with non-
partisan leadership. I hope I am proved wrong but I expect the only way Southold Town
government will represent all the people is if we the voters elect a third Democrat this
November. Thank you.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Benja, let me respond and I know this Board is going to hem and
haw because they don’t like me to respond but you are factually incorrect in just about
everything you said as usual. The fact is that that discussion on activism was centered on the
Zoning Board of Appeals appointment. The Planning Board appointment had already been
appointed. And if you remember, I was the one two weeks ago that proposed expanding that
Board to include….
MR. SCHWARTZ: Are you going to….
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Don’t interrupt me. To include the Planning Board. The members
that are currently there and to add new members to represent the more complex community that
we have. We have a very difficult community to plan for because of the different needs in
Mattituck versus the different needs in Orient. I had proposed expanding the Board, the
Planning Board leaving the existing member in place and adding two new members. That was
February 24, 2009 Page 5
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
two weeks ago. Every single member of this Board rejected that idea. But remember, the
activist decision was with regard to the Zoning Board of Appeals candidate and to be frank, the
candidate I put on the table didn’t get appointed to the Zoning Board of Appeals. They didn’t
follow my lead, they put a new name on the table and that is where the consensus led us tonight
for the Zoning Board of Appeals. It was with that narrow discussion. Not with the other Boards.
And we didn’t do that Planning Board or the chairmanship in executive session, that was done in
public session. Executive session was called by a member of the Town Board to discuss the
Zoning Board of Appeals appointments.
MR. SCHWARTZ: I would just like to add, I hope I am proved wrong. And Supervisor Russell,
I am sorry this was directed at you but you happen to be the one making the statement and in
reality, the government of the Town of Southold has been inactive for at least the last 40 years. I
have been here for a little longer than that and government has a tendency to do as little as
possible. I think the times today for more than that. I think we need a proactive stance and I
look forward to maybe seeing some of that type of action and a little less me. A little more us.
Thank you.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: I support and endorse your idea of a little less you as well. Would
anybody else like address the Town Board on the agenda?
MR. SCHWARTZ: Wait a second. Wait a second.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: I am sorry, Benja. That was an unfair shot.
MR. SCHWARTZ: I know you are trying to be funny.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: I know, Benja. It was an unfair shot.
MR. SCHWARTZ: And you know, I can let it, I got a hard head believe me. But Mr. Russell, I
am not the only one in this town who should be up here at the mic. And you should be doing
everything you can to encourage people to come up here. Not making jokes about them. But it
was pretty funny.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Thanks. Would anybody else like to address the Town Board on the
agenda items?
Tom Skabry, President CSEA
TOM SKABRY: Tom Skabry, CSEA President. Unfortunately I lost track of what particular
resolution because I was working off a pre-agenda from this afternoon. But evidently there is a
resolution on the table for tonight dealing with contracting out with work that is currently being
done by CSEA, down at the landfill. Can someone please cite me what resolution that is now?
COUNCILMAN WICKHAM: I am looking.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: I can explain what the resolution is for, which is to go out for
proposal to determine whether we can save money having the shipping or the trucking of the
February 24, 2009 Page 6
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Town’s C & D done by a private company. We are in a very critical economic climate and we
need to save money wherever we can. They are in the trucking business for a living, we are not.
It would be nice if we could get out of the trucking business and save money by doing that. And
that is resolution number 165.
MR. SKABRY: Thank you. Just for the record, CSEA’s stance on this is that we do not approve
of this, however, we were not, input from CSEA was not requested on this particular venue and I
think as a matter of fairness it would be appreciated if the Town Board as a whole would take
into consideration of at least tabling this until the next Town Board meeting and perhaps we can
meet next week, discuss any particular concerns or other cost saving ideas which would not be a
detriment to CSEA or its workers.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Okay. I would just ask that, this is just a resolution to go out to bid
to get some numbers on the table. There is no decision to be made yet, so, I would ask the Board
to consider just going out to bid and then get some numbers back and take the discussion from
there. this might be a non-starter. There might not be savings. We need to get the facts before
we can make decisions.
COUNCILMAN WICKHAM: I think that is a good solution but I do think if Tom has
information to give to us, we would be happy to take it into consideration, together with the bids.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Absolutely. Yeah. Let’s get the numbers to see. Like I said, it
might be a no go.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: Inaudible.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: And then we will sit down with you, Tom, right away and have a
labor management meeting to discuss it.
MR. SKABRY: Alright.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Okay?
MR. SKABRY: Okay. Thank you.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Would anybody else like to address the Town Board on the
resolutions? (No response) Okay.
Resolutions
2009-160
CATEGORY:
Audit
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
Approve Audit 2/24/09
February 24, 2009 Page 7
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
RESOLVED approves the audit dated
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
February 24, 2009.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-160
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-161
CATEGORY:
Set Meeting
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
Set Next Meeting 3/10/09 4:30 Pm
RESOLVED
that the next Regular Town Board Meeting of the Southold Town Board be held,
Tuesday, March 10, 2009 at the Southold Town Hall, Southold, New York at 4:30 P. M..
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-161
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-40
Tabled 1/6/2009 11:00 AM
CATEGORY:
Organizational
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
Planning Board Appointment
RESOLVED appoints William Cremers
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
as a member to the Planning Board, effective February 24, 2009 thru December 31, 2013.
February 24, 2009 Page 8
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-40
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-41
Tabled 1/6/2009 11:00 AM
CATEGORY:
Organizational
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
Planning Board Chairperson
RESOLVED Martin Sidor is hereby
that pursuant to Section 272 of the Town Law,
designated Chairperson of the Southold Town Planning Board
for the term of February 24,
2009 through December 31, 2009; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED
that the Chairperson of the Planning Board shall be responsible for
furnishing to the Town Board a detailed monthly report of activities within his department; and
be it
FURTHER RESOLVED
that the Chairperson of the Planning Board shall be paid a salary of
$2,000.00 per annum, in addition to his regular salary, effective February 24, 2009 through
December 31, 2009 and the same shall be paid in regular bi-weekly payments.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-41
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Seconder
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-42
Tabled 1/6/2009 11:00 AM
CATEGORY:
Organizational
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
February 24, 2009 Page 9
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Zoning Board of Appeals Member
RESOLVED appoints Kenneth
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Schneider as a member to the Zoning Board of Appeals, effective February 24, 2009
through December 31, 2013.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-42
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
21. Statement
JUSTICE EVANS: I was just looking, do we have a resolution appointing the chair of the ZBA?
TOWN CLERK NEVILLE: That was done in January.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: But we are going to have to, in the near future, because he was
appointed as a holdover not knowing who our choices would be.
COUNCILMAN WICKHAM: Should we do it next time?
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Yeah, we will do it in two weeks.
2009-162
CATEGORY:
Attend Seminar
DEPARTMENT:
Police Dept
Request Permission to Send Detective Steven Harned to Annual Training for the US Marshal’s Fugitive
Task Force
RESOLVED grants permission to
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Detective Steven Harned to attend the annual training seminar for the US Marshal's
Fugitive Task Force in Atlantic City, New Jersey, commencing Monday, May 18 through
Friday, May 22, 2009.
All expenses for travel, meals and tolls to be a legal charge to the 2009
Police Training budget line - A.3120.4.600.200.
February 24, 2009 Page 10
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-162
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-156
Tabled 2/3/2009 4:30 PM
CATEGORY:
Enact Local Law
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
Enact LL 4 of 2009 Wireless
WHEREAS
there has been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk
th
“A Local Law in
County, New York, on the 20 day of January, 2009 a Local Law entitled
Relation to Wireless Communications Facilities”
and
WHEREAS
the Town Board of the Town of Southold held a public hearing on the aforesaid
Local Law at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, now
therefor be it
RESOLVED
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby ENACTS the proposed
“A Local Law in Relation to Wireless Communications Facilities“
Local Law entitled, to
read as follows:
LOCAL LAW NO. 4 OF 2009
“A Local Law in Relation to Wireless Communications Facilities”
A Local Law entitled, .
BE IT ENACTED
by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows:
Article XVII entitled “Wireless Communications Facilities” is hereby repealed in its entirety and
replaced as follows:
§280-67. Purpose
A. It is the express purpose of this article to minimize the visual and environmental impacts of
wireless communication facilities while protecting the health, safety and welfare of
Southold’scitizens and allowing wireless service providers to meet their technological and
service objectives. This article allows wireless communication facilities, to be reviewed and
February 24, 2009 Page 11
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
approved in keeping with the Town's existing zoning and historic development patterns,
including the size and spacing of structures. The goals of the following sections are to
accomplish the following:
a. Site wireless facilities in these preferred locations:
i. Within or on existing buildings and structures where the antennas are invisible
(or nearly so) from public and residential vantage points;
ii. Industrial areas;
b. Take into account the aesthetic aspects of the Town, including open vistas, scenic
byways and historic districts, when designing and siting wireless communication
facilities.
§280-68. Scope.
The regulations of this article shall govern and control the erection, enlargement, expansion,
alteration, operation, maintenance, relocation and removal of all wireless communication
facilities. The regulations of this article relate to the location and design of these facilities and
shall be in addition to the provisions of the Southold Building and Zoning Codes and any other
federal, state or local laws or Federal Communication Commission (FCC), Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) or other regulations pertaining to such facilities. Nothing herein shall be
construed to, apply to, prohibit, regulate or otherwise affect the erection, maintenance or
utilization of antennas or support structures by those licensed by the Federal Communications
Commission pursuant to Chapter Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97, to operate
amateur radio stations.
§280-69. Definitions
As used in this article, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
ANTENNA
Any transmitting or receiving device, including whip (omnidirectional omni
directional antenna), panel (directional antenna), disc (parabolic antenna) or similar device,
mounted in or on a tower, monopole, building or structure and used in communications that
radiate or capture electromagnetic waves, digital signals, analog signal, radio frequencies
(excluding radar signals), wireless telecommunications signals or other communications signals.
ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE
Any structure that is designed and constructed primarily
for the purpose of supporting one or more antennas for wireless telephone, television, radio and
similar communication purposes, including self-supporting lattice towers, guyed towers and
monopoles. The term includes radio and television transmission towers, microwave towers,
common-carrier towers, cellular telephone towers, camouflaged tower structures, and the like.
The term includes the structure and any support thereto. The term does not include wireless
facilities located in or on existing buildings or structures that previously existed or are being
constructed for a primary purpose other than a wireless facility e.g. water tower, electric utility
pole, or church steeple.
February 24, 2009 Page 12
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
BASE STATION EQUIPMENT
Ground-mounted Equipment integral to the operation of an
antenna system. Base station equipment typically includes, but is not limited to, communications
equipment cabinet/shelter, backup power supplies, generators, electric and telecommunications
backboards, wiring, grounding loops, equipment enclosures, security fencing and lighting.
CO-LOCATION
The use of a single mount on the ground by more than one provider (vertical
co-location) and/or several mounts on an existing tower, building or structure by more than one
carrier for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for
communications purposes.
EQUIPMENT SHELTER
An enclosed structure at the base of associated with the mount
within which is housed the base station equipment for a wireless communications facility.
FALL ZONE
The area on the ground within a prescribed radius from the base of a wireless
communications facility. The fall zone is the area within which there might be a potential hazard
from falling debris or collapsing material, including the antenna support structure.
GUYED ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE
An antenna support structure that is
supported, in whole or in part, by guy wires and ground anchors.
HEIGHT
When referring to a tower or other antenna support structure, the height is the distance
from the top of the structure at its highest point, including antennas, lightening protection devices
or any other apparatus attached to the top of the antenna support structure, to the base of the
structure, measured in feet above ground level (AGL). Absolute height is the distance from the
top of the structure, including all attachments, to the height of Mean Sea Level (MSL).
measured from the average preexisting grade level within a radius of 300’ to the highest point on
the tower or structure, including antennas, lightening protection devices or any other apparatus
attached to the top of the tower or antenna support structure.
LATTICE ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE
An antenna support structure that has open-
framed supports on three or four sides and is constructed without guy wires and ground anchors.
MODIFICATION
The addition, removal, or change of any of the physical and visually
discernable components or aspects of a wireless facility, such as antennas, cabling, radios,
equipment shelters, landscaping, fencing, utility feeds, changing the color or materials of any
visually discernable components, vehicular access, parking and/or an upgrade or replacement of
the equipment.for better or more modern equipment Adding a new wireless carrier or service
provider (co-location) to a wireless communications tower or site is a modification. A
modification shall not include ordinary maintenance, as defined herein. Modifications shall be
classified as major or minor.
A. MAJOR MODIFICATION
- Improvements Changes to existing wireless
telecommunications facility or antenna support structure that result in a substantial
change to the facility or structure. Major modifications include, but are not limited to,
February 24, 2009 Page 13
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
(1) Extending the height of the antenna support structure by more than 5 feet
above its current height;
(2) Replacement of the structure;
(3) Expansion of the base station equipment or compound area; beyond ten
percent of the current floor area.
(4) Addition of antennas to an existing carrier’s antenna array;
(5) Co-location;
(6) Re-orientation or relocation of existing antennas;
(7) Changes affecting the operating frequencies, effective radiated power or
number of operating channels.
B. MINOR MODIFICATION -
Improvements Changes to existing wireless
telecommunications facility or structure, that result in a material change to the facility
or structure but of a level, quality or intensity that is less than a substantial change.
Such minor modifications include, but are not limited to, replacement of antennas,
components and accessory equipment on a like-for-like basis within an existing
wireless telecommunications facility. and relocating the antennas of approved wireless
telecommunications facilities to different height levels on an existing antenna support
structure upon which they are currently located.
MONOPOLE
A freestanding antenna support structure consisting of a single pole, without guy
wires or ground anchors.
MOUNT
The structure or surface upon which antennas are mounted and/or the location of the
antenna, e.g.:
A. ROOF-MOUNTED - Mounted on the roof of a building.
B. SIDE-MOUNTED - Mounted on the side of a building.
C. STRUCTURE-MOUNTED - Mounted on a structure other than a building.
D. FLUSH-MOUNTED - Mounted very close on a building or structure so that the profile of
the antenna(s) is not readily apparent.
E. INTERIOR-MOUNTED - Mounted within a building or other structure so that the
antennas are not visible from the outside.
F. GROUND-MOUNTED - Mounted on the ground.
February 24, 2009 Page 14
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
ORDINARY MAINTENANCE -
Work done to an existing wireless telecommunications
facility and antenna support structure for the purpose of maintaining them in good operating
condition. Ordinary maintenance includes inspections and testing to maintain functionality,
aesthetic and structural integrity, and involves the normal repair of a wireless facility without
adding, removing, or changing anything and therefore does not include minor and major
modifications.
RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) PROFESSIONAL
A person who specializes in the study of radio
frequency engineering and has expertise in radio communication facilities.
RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) EMISSIONS or RADIATION
The electromagnetic field of
radiation emitted by wireless antennas.
RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) SIGNAL
The actual beam or radio waves sent and received by a
wireless facility. A signal is the deliberate product of a wireless antenna. The RF radiation is the
by-product.
WIRELESS CARRIER -
A company that provides wireless telecommunications services.
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY -
Antenna or antenna support structure and
base equipment, either individually or together, including permanent or temporary moveable
facilities (i.e. wireless facilities mounted on vehicles, boats or other mobile structures) used for
the provision of any wireless service.
WIRELESS SERVICES -
Commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, and
common carrier wireless exchange services, including, but not limited to, voice, data, images or
other information, cellular telephone service, personal communications service (PCS), and
paging service.
280-70. Applicability, permitted uses
§
A. No wireless communication facility shall be used, erected or altered in the Town of Southold
except in accordance with the provisions of this article and any other applicable sections of
the Town Code.
B. All wireless communication facilities, and modifications to such facilities (as defined in
§280-69) shall require a building permit, except in cases of ordinary maintenance, as defined
in §280-69.
C. Building Permit Required:
A wireless communication facility is a permitted use requiring only a building permit,
without the requirement of site plan approval if it conforms to the following:
(1) Minor modifications (defined in 280-69); or
February 24, 2009 Page 15
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
(2) New wireless facility that is interior-mounted in an existing building or existing
structure in the LI, LIO, B, HB, MI, or MII zoning districts which conforms to the
requirements for permitted use in §280-72; or
(3) Major modification, including co-location, on an existing antenna support structure or
other wireless facility holding all valid permits and causing essentially no visible
change to the exterior, and which conforms to the requirements for permitted use in
§280-72.
D. Site Plan Approval Required:
A wireless communication facility is a permitted use requiring a building permit and site plan
approval if it conforms to the following:
(1) New wireless facility that is roof or side-mounted to an existing building or existing
structure in the LI, LIO, B, HB, MI, or MII zoning districts which conforms to the
requirements for permitted use in §280-72; or
(2) Major modification, including co-location, to an existing wireless facility holding all
valid permits in the LI, LIO, B, HB, MI, or MII zoning districts and causing a visible
change to the exterior, and which conforms to the requirements for permitted use in
§280-72.
E. All other wireless communication facilities, major modifications, and co-locations require a
building permit, site plan approval, and a special exception approval by the Planning Board.
280-71. General requirements for all wireless communication facilities
§
A. No new antenna support structures may be constructed without a carrier licensed by the
FCC as co-applicant. An FCC-licensed provider of wireless communications services
must be the applicant or the co-applicant for any proposed new wireless communication
facility, co-location or modification.
B. Guyed or lattice antenna support structures are prohibited
C. Antenna support structures shall not be located in the following areas:
(1) Wetlands, tidal and freshwater;
(2) Land above high groundwater (within ten feet of the surface).
(3) Within 500’ of residences;
(4) Lands purchased with Community Preservation Funds;
(5) Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas;
February 24, 2009 Page 16
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
(6) Designated parkland.
D. The fall zone of an antenna support structure must not include areas where people
congregate, and must be clear of all structures except the base station equipment. shelter.
E. Federal Aviation Regulations. All towers shall comply with applicable airport hazard
and/or obstruction regulations. Any facility that would be classified as an obstruction or
hazard under current federal aviation regulations or would otherwise interfere with the
operation of radio navigation aids, communications and/or airport operations is
prohibited.
F. Antenna support structures are allowed in the following zoning districts: LI, LIO, MI,
MII, B, and HB, with are subject to the following restrictions:
(1) Minimum lot size
i. LI, LIO, B & HB - in accordance with the bulk schedule for each zone
ii. MI & MII - 200,000 sq. ft.
(2) Maximum Height: 80 feet
G. Antenna support structures are not allowed permitted in AC, R-40, R-80, R-120, R-200,
R-400, LB, RO, RR, HD, or AHD zoning districts, except under are subject to the
following conditions (these are in addition to any other applicable conditions):
(1) Minimum area surrounding the proposed location: five contiguous acres
200,000 sq. ft. of contiguous vacant land restricted from future residential
development by deed for the duration of the property’s use for the wireless
facility; and
(2) Maximum height: 45’; and
(3) The structure is a monopole with interior-mounted antennas, or a suitable
unobtrusive camouflage structure; and
(4) Structure is screened from view from surrounding properties by dense
vegetation and trees, either planted or existing, and meeting the site design
appearance criteria for residential zones in Section 280-77 76; and
(5) Noise from base equipment, including any backup generator, measures less
than 45dB at an outside location 10 feet from the equipment shelter; and
(6) Minimum distance of all wireless equipment to adjacent residential property
lines or street shall be no less than 500 feet.
February 24, 2009 Page 17
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
H. Radio emissions must fall within the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits
established by the FCC.
(1) A power density analysis of the radio emissions for the proposed wireless
communication facility must be provided by the applicant. The power density
analysis shall be prepared and signed by a qualified professional specializing
in radio communication facilities.
(2) The results from the analysis must clearly show that the power density levels
of the electromagnetic energy generated from the proposed facility at the
nearest point(s) of public access and the point(s) of greatest power density (if
other than the nearest point of public access) are within the Maximum
Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits established by the FCC which are in effect
at the time of the application.
(3) The power density analysis must be based on the most recent edition of FCC
Office Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65, must cite the specific
formulas and assumptions used and must show all calculations and must
include simple sketches showing the spatial relationships between the facility
and the points of interest. If the wireless communication facility would be co-
located with an existing facility, or is designed for future expansion or co-
location, the cumulative effects of all emitters now on, or likely to be on, the
facility in the future must also be analyzed.
(4) The power density analysis shall be based on the assumption that all antennas
mounted on the proposed facility are simultaneously transmitting radio energy
on all channels at a power level equal to the maximum transmitter power
rating specified by the manufacturer.
(5) The conclusions of the power density analysis must be corroborated by an
independent radio frequency engineer retained by the Town to provide such
determinations.
I. At the request of the Building Inspector, which shall be no more frequently than every five
years, the provider shall provide a structural inspection report prepared by a structural
engineer.
280-72. Design standards for permitted usesRequirements for Permitted Use
§ (without
Special Exception) (these are in addition to the General Requirements listed above)
If the following requirements are met, the applicant may proceed without special exception
approval:
February 24, 2009 Page 18
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
a. Fall-zones. An antenna support structure must include an area surrounding it that
is free of other structures and uses, except the base equipment, with a radius equal
to a distance of two times the height of the structure. A smaller fall-zone may be
allowed if supported by a report submitted by a qualified structural engineer, and
corroborated by an independent consultant hired by the Town, that demonstrates
that a smaller fall zone is safe.
b. Major modifications causing essentially no visible change in the appearance of
the exterior means that the antennas are interior-mounted in the existing structure
and are not visible from the outside after installation. The base equipment area is
expanded by no more than 10% of its existing floor area, and is entirely screened
from view from any public or residential vantage points, including all roads,
yards, and commercial buildings the public enters. Exceptionally well-designed
flush-mounted antennas may also fall into this category if they present no visible
profile protruding from the surface to which they are mounted, and are
camouflaged to blend in with the background surface to which they are mounted.
c. Interior-mounted facilities in existing buildings shall be constructed so that the
outward appearance of the building or structure before and after the installation is
complete is identical or nearly identical. The addition of a significant architectural
feature on to an existing building that is visible from outside for the purpose of
accommodating interior-mounted antennas shall require a special exception site
plan approval.
d. Roof-mounted facilities shall conform to the following requirements:
i. Visual impact minimized to the greatest extent possible;
ii. Height limited to no more than 10 feet above the highest point of the
building
e. Side-mounted facilities shall be flush-mounted and painted or otherwise
camouflaged to blend with the façade or background materials of the structure.
f. Co-locations shall not extend the height of the structure more than ten feet over
the original approved structure. To prevent the incremental extension of height
over time, any subsequent application with a proposed extension beyond the first
ten feet shall require special exception review and approval.
g. Base station equipment
i. Located within an existing shelter or building, not to be expanded beyond
an additional ten percent of floor area; or
February 24, 2009 Page 19
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
ii. Located in an underground vault, with any above-ground components
screened from view with evergreen planting; or
iii. Entirely concealed from view with dense evergreen planting so that all
equipment, shelters, fences, gates and other associated structures are not
visible from any vantage point. Plantings shall be of sufficient size to
achieve this screening effect immediately upon planting.
iv. Noise from base equipment, including any backup generator, measures
less than 45dB at the nearest property lines of all adjacent residences.
§280-73. Special exception approval.
A. Authority. For the purposes of this section, notwithstanding Article XXV of the Southold
Town Code, the Planning Board shall be empowered to issue a special exception
approval for wireless communication facilities, subject to the provisions of this chapter.
This supersedes Article XXV in that the Planning Board is the reviewing board in place
of the Zoning Board of Appeals for wireless communication facilities that require Special
Exception approval. The remainder of Article XXV remains in effect and shall apply to
the Planning Board’s consideration of a special exception approval for wireless
communication facilities, together with the additional standards and requirements in this
section.
B. Standards. In addition to the standards in Article XXV of this Code, no special exception
approval shall be granted unless the Planning Board specifically finds and determines the
following:
(1) Construction of the proposed facility or modification of the existing facility is a
public necessity, in that it is required to meet current or expected demands of the
telecommunications provider and to render adequate service to the public.
(2) The applicant has made substantial effort to co-locate with existing wireless facilities,
or, failing that, has made substantial effort to locate on municipally-owned land or
structures, or within or on existing buildings or structures.
(3) There are compelling reasons which make it more feasible to construct the proposed
facilities rather than alternatives.
C. Matters to be considered. In addition to the matters to be considered in Article XXV of
this Code Chapter, the Planning Board shall give consideration to the following in issuing
a special exception approval for wireless communication facilities:
(1) The proposed antenna support structure must be demonstrated to be the lowest
height above the ground feasible to achieve the service needs of the carrier(s). The
February 24, 2009 Page 20
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
rationale behind the explanation by the applicant must be corroborated by an
independent consultant hired by the Town.
(2) The wireless communication facility has been situated to minimize its proximity
and visibility to residential structures, residential district boundaries and
landmarks designated by Town, federal or state agencies.
(3) The wireless communication facility is designed and situated to be compatible
with the nature of uses on adjacent and nearby property.
(4) The wireless communication facility has been designed to use the surrounding
topography to minimize its visual impacts.
(5) The wireless communication facility has been designed to use the surrounding
tree, building or foliage coverage to minimize its visual impacts.
(6) The wireless communication facility maximizes design characteristics to reduce
or eliminate visual impacts and obtrusiveness.
(7) Other adequate conditions have been placed on the wireless communication
facility which will minimize any adverse impacts of the facility on adjoining
properties.
D. Conditions. The Planning Board shall consider the following in establishing conditions
on the issuance of the special exception approval:
(1) In reviewing special exception approval applications required by this section the
Planning Board shall consider the Town's policy as stated in this article.
(2) In approving a special exception the Planning Board may waive or reduce the
criteria in this article, to the extent specified below, if the Planning Board
concludes that the goals and stated purposes of this law are better served, and that
doing so will have no detrimental effect on adjacent properties or on the public
health, safety and welfare, and thereby:
(a) Minimize proximity of the tower to residential structures or historic
landmarks listed by federal, state or Town agencies.
(b) Modify the planting of surrounding tree coverage and foliage to account
for existing vegetation and land contours, but only to the extent that the
existing vegetation achieves the purpose of concealing the structure.
(c) Modify the design of the tower, with particular reference to design
characteristics that reduce or eliminate visual obtrusiveness.
February 24, 2009 Page 21
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
(3) Any special exception approval granted under this article shall have a term of five
years, commencing from the grant of the special exception, which may be
extended for an additional five-year term upon application to the Planning Board.
On a renewal application, the applicant shall demonstrate that the wireless
communication facility is in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and
regulations and with all of the conditions of the special exception approval and
site plan, that the facility is necessary to provide adequate service, and that there
is no reasonable alternative available to the owner which will provide adequate
service without the continuing use of the facility. Subsequent special exception
renewals shall be subject to review by the Planning Board and subject to such
standards that shall be included in the Town Code at that point in time.
§280-74. Application requirements
A. Fees. The following fees are in place of those required in other sections of the code.
a. Building Permit Application Fees
i. Minor modification $250
ii. Major modification $500
iii. New facility $750
b. Site Plan Application Fees
i. Major modification. $1000
ii. New facility $2000
c. Special Exception Application Fee $1000
d. Review by independent consultants. In all cases where the Town determines that a
review of an application by a qualified expert is warranted, the applicant shall
bear the reasonable cost associated with such review, which cost will be assessed
as an additional application fee. This payment shall be made to the Town prior to
the review commencing and the decision being rendered on the application. The
consultants will work under the direction of the Town Planning Director. Copies
of the consultants’ qualifications, findings and reports will be provided to the
applicant and an opportunity given to the applicant to respond to the content of
the consultants’ report prior to any decisions being made.
B. Building Permit Application
(1) The following application requirements are in addition to those required in §144-8 C.
February 24, 2009 Page 22
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
a. Written analysis demonstrating the project complies with the Maximum
Permissible Exposure regulations in accordance with § 280-71 J. (1)-(5)
H.
b. Written documentation as to the facility’s structural compliance with local,
State and Federal Codes.
c. Copies of all applicable FCC licenses, notices of proposed construction or
alteration, federal environmental impact statements and other documents
verifying compliance with federal, state and local regulations.
(2) Report from Planning Department Once the application is received in the Building
Department, it will be forwarded to the Planning Director for report and
recommendations on compliance with §280-71 General Requirements, §280-72
Requirements for Permitted Use, and any technical consultant reports that may
have been required. No building permit for a wireless facility may be granted
prior to this report being submitted to the Building Inspector.
C. Site Plan Application
The following application requirements are in addition to those required in §280-133.
a. Seven copies of items a-c listed above at §280-74B(1) for the Building Permit
Application
b. Aeronautical study or appropriate consultant’s report demonstrating that the
proposed facility will not constitute an obstruction or hazard to air navigation.
c. Visual Impact Analysis - renderings or computer graphics illustrating the
appearance of the completed facility from all residential and public vantage points
residential and public vantage points to be determined by the Planning Board.
d. Adjacent land uses, structures and zoning within 500 feet.
e. The location in latitude and longitude, type and height of the wireless
communication facility.
f. A list of other carriers already located on the facility with the number, and type,
of antennas for each, and the capacity of each carrier at that location height,
orientation, effective radiated power, number of channels and operating
frequencies of each antenna, including the proposed.
g. Digital information about the facility (AutoCAD, Shapefile) that can be imported
into a geographic information system depicting the search ring of each carrier
already located on the facility, including the proposed facility.
February 24, 2009 Page 23
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
h. A photo of the facility, if already existing.
i. Location of landmarks listed by federal, state or Town agencies within 300 feet.
j. Distances between the proposed facility and the following:
i. the nearest residential structure,
ii. the nearest property line with a residential use,
iii. all other structures.
iv. Roads, rights of way, driveways
k. Fall-zone radius and distance
l. Proposed means of access
m. Elevation drawings with dimensions clearly indicated, including diameter or
width of the structure at its widest and narrowest, and the tallest point including
antennas or lightening protection.
n. Other information deemed by the Planning Board to be necessary to assess
compliance with this law.
D. Special Exception Application
To make the determination on an application for special exception, the Planning Board
shall require the following in addition to the requirements of Article XXV:
(1) Each application shall include
a. One copyies of the building permit application
b. Once copy of the site plan application
c. Each application shall include a written site location alternative analysis
describing the location of other sites considered, the availability of those sites, the
extent to which other sites do or do not meet the provider's service or engineering
needs and the reason why the subject site was chosen.
d. Other information deemed by the Planning Board to be necessary to assess
compliance with this law.
(2) The applicant shall document to the satisfaction of the Planning Board that a
good-faith effort has been made to locate or co-locate on existing towers or other
available and appropriate buildings and structures, that it is not feasible to co-
February 24, 2009 Page 24
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
locate on an existing facility and that the proposed location is necessary to
provide adequate service to the public. The documentation shall include a
notarized statement by the applicant as to whether construction of the wireless
communication facility will accommodate co-location of additional antennas for
future users
(3) Each application shall include a plan which shall reference all existing wireless
communication facility locations in the Town of Southold, any such facilities in
the abutting towns which provide service to areas within the Town of Southold,
any changes proposed within the following twelve-month period, including the
applicant's plans for new locations and the discontinuance or relocation of
existing wireless facilities. Alternatively, at the beginning of the year the
applicant may submit an annual wireless communication facility plan containing
the aforementioned information for the calendar year.
(4) The Planning Board and Planning Department may retain technical consultants as
they deem necessary to provide assistance in the review of the needs and site
location alternatives analyses and other matters that the Board deems necessary.
The applicant shall bear the reasonable cost associated with such consultation,
which cost shall be assessed as an additional application fee. The consultants will
work under the direction of the Town Planning Director. Copies of the
consultants’ qualifications, findings and reports shall be made available to the
applicant upon acceptance of the final draft of the report by the Planning Board.
(5) A copy of the deed or lease agreement establishing applicant's right to use the
parcel on which the wireless communication facility is to be located.
(6) A power density analysis of the radio emissions for the proposed wireless
communication facility. The power density analysis shall be prepared and signed
by a qualified professional specializing in radio communication facilities. The
results from the analysis must clearly show that the power density levels of the
electromagnetic energy generated from the proposed facility at the nearest
point(s) of public access and the point(s) of greatest power density (if other than
the nearest point of public access) are within the Maximum Permissible Exposure
(MPE) limits established by the FCC which are in effect at the time of the
application. The power density analysis must be based on the most recent edition
of FCC Office Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65, must cite the
specific formulas and assumptions used and must show all calculations and must
include simple sketches showing the spatial relationships between the facility and
the points of interest. If the wireless communication facility would be co-located
with an existing facility, or is designed for future expansion or co-location, the
February 24, 2009 Page 25
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
cumulative effects of all emitters now on, or likely to be on, the facility in the
future must also be analyzed. The power density analysis shall be based on the
assumption that all antennas mounted on the proposed facility are simultaneously
transmitting radio energy at a power level equal to the maximum transmitter
power rating specified by the manufacturer.
(7)(6) Propagation maps shall be submitted for existing coverage from existing
surrounding and/or approved sites, coverage from all alternative sites considered
and coverage from the proposed site. Propagation maps shall include a minimum
of three signal strength depictions (-75dBm, -85dBm and -95dBm) and any other
signal strength levels deemed appropriate by the Applicant based on the
Applicant’s documented coverage and reliability needs.
(8)(7) A “gap map” prepared and signed by a qualified radio frequency engineer and
overlaid on an “existing coverage” background propagation map demonstrating
the area(s) within which the applicant’s existing service is not adequate. In
addition, a search ring shall depicted indicating where the wireless
communication facility needs to be located in order to provide adequate signal
strength and/or capacity to the target gap area. The applicant must explain and
document its standards and criteria for adequate signal strength, capacity and
reliability and must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Board why
these standards and criteria are applicable to the Town of Southold.
(9)(8) The applicant must also explain to the Planning Board why it selected the
proposed site, discuss the availability or lack thereof of a suitable structure within
the search ring for collocation, and the extent to which the applicant has explored
locating the proposed tower facility in a more intensive use district.
Correspondence with other telecommunication providers concerning collocation
is part of this requirement. The applicant shall also provide evidence supporting
the existence of inadequate service. This may include the propagation maps cited
above, drive test maps, traffic studies, customer complaint logs and similar data.
The applicant must also demonstrate to the Board that the proposed facility
satisfies the demonstrated service deficiency to an equal or greater degree than
any of the reasonably available alternatives.
§280-75. Historic buildings and districts.
No wireless communication facility is allowed on any designated landmark property or district
listed by federal, state or Town agencies, except as specified below, and subject to §170
Landmark Preservation:
A. Any wireless communication facility located on or within an historic structure listed by
federal, state or Town agencies shall not alter the character-defining features, distinctive
construction methods or original materials of the building.
February 24, 2009 Page 26
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
B. Any alteration made to an historic structure to accommodate a wireless communication
facility shall be fully reversible.
C. Wireless communication facilities within an historic district listed by federal, state or
Town agencies shall be concealed within or behind existing architectural features, so that
they are not visible.
§280-76. Site design standards.
All wireless facilities, including co-locations, shall be the least visually obtrusive design possible
that also permits the applicant to achieve its service needs. To that end, the following design
standards shall apply to all wireless communication facilities installed or constructed pursuant to
the terms of this chapter:
A. Camouflage on buildings. Wireless antennas, if mounted on a building façade, shall be
flush mounted and painted or otherwise treated to blend with the façade. When a
wireless communication facility extends above the roof height of a building on which it is
mounted, every effort shall be made to conceal the facility within or behind existing
architectural features to limit its visibility from public and residential vantage points, yet
permit the facility to perform its designated function. Facilities mounted on a roof shall
be stepped back from the front facade in order to limit their impact on the building's
silhouette. If antennas are part of the stepped back facility, the applicant shall submit an
access control plan that precludes inadvertent access to the front faces of the antennas by
building workers and the general public. The wireless communication facilities shall
blend in with the existing building's architecture and shall be painted or shielded with
material which is consistent with the design features and materials of the building.
B. Setbacks. Towers and equipment facilities shall adhere to the setbacks for principal uses
in the Bulk Schedule applicable to the zone in which the structure(s) are located, unless
otherwise indicated elsewhere in this chapter.
C. Signs. Signs shall not be permitted on facilities except for signs displaying contact
information and safety instructions, which are required. Safety signs shall be in
accordance with American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards for radio
frequency radiation warning signs. Contact signs shall identify all service providers
located on the facility and shall include normal and emergency contact information for
each. Such signs shall not exceed five square feet in surface area.
D. Base equipment shelter. Equipment accessory to the wireless communication facility may
be located within an existing building or in an underground vault. For newly constructed
wireless facilities, a base equipment shelter is limited to 500 square feet in floor area. If
the newly constructed wireless facility is designed for co-location, the facility may be up
to 1,000 square feet. The base equipment shelter shall be constructed with a finish similar
to that of adjacent structures on the property and integrated into the architectural style.
February 24, 2009 Page 27
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
The shelter and associated fencing must be entirely screened from view by evergreen
plantings. The new plantings must be of sufficient size to accomplish the screening
within six months. Any newly constructed base equipment shelter shall be located in
accordance with the minimum height and yard requirements of the zoning district
applicable to the site, and up to two adjacent off-street parking spaces may be provided
for service vehicles.
E. Site lighting. The lighting permitted shall be the minimum required to protect the public
welfare. Facilities sited on existing developed sites shall be incorporated into the lighting
plans of those sites. Outside lighting shall use fully-shielded fixtures so that the light
source is not visible from beyond the property line, and no light is reflected or shone
towards the sky, except in the case of structures required to follow FAA guidelines for
safety lighting.
F. Access. Access to wireless facilities shall be from already established site access points
whenever possible.
G. Dish antennas. Dish antennas shall be colored, camouflaged or screened to the extent that
they are as unobtrusive as possible, and in no case shall the diameter of a dish antenna
exceed six feet.
H. Electric line setback. Except for wireless facilities specifically designed for mounting on
electric transmission towers, or within the footprint of such towers, no wireless
communication facility shall be located nearer to any overhead electric transmission line
carrying more than 220 volts than a distance equal to the facility's height above the roof
or other permanent structure to which it is attached.
I. Co-location. Wireless communication facilities shall be designed to provide for co-
location by multiple providers or designed so that they can be retrofitted to accommodate
multiple providers, wherever possible.
§280-77. Appearance and visual impacts on character of community
A.J. Scenic landscapes and vistas. All antenna support structures which are not concealed
inside of buildings or screened by existing trees or buildings, must be surrounded by a
planted buffer of dense tree growth. An antenna support structure that is located within a
scenic vista or scenic landscape or within 300’ of a scenic road, as designated by the
Town, shall not be taller than ten feet above the height of trees within a 300’ radius of the
proposed location, or 35’ maximum in the absence of trees.
B.K. Base landscaping. A screen of evergreen trees shall be planted outside the fence of the
telecommunication tower base area to provide a visual screen or buffer for adjoining
private properties and the public right-of-way or other vantage points accessible to the
February 24, 2009 Page 28
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
public. The screen shall consist of a double row of evergreen shrubs and trees that are of
sufficient density and height to immediately screen the base equipment from view.
Required front yard setback areas shall be landscaped and include shrubs and trees.
Survivability of the landscaping shall be guaranteed and maintained by the applicant for
the life of the installation.
C.L. Color. Antenna support structures in the form of monopoles or other towers shall either
be blue/gray in color, or be colored appropriate to the context of the structure’s location
so that the tower is as unobtrusive as possible, unless otherwise required by the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA). If a wireless communication facility is installed on a
structure other than a tower, the antenna and supporting electrical and mechanical
equipment must be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the
colors of the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and related equipment as
visually unobtrusive as possible.
D.M. Wireless facilities sited within new structures meant to mimic some other structure or
natural feature must be designed at a scale compatible with the community, be
unobtrusive, and characteristic of the area.
E.N. Camouflage by vegetation for residential screening. Antenna support structures in or
adjacent to residential zones. Where the site proposed for an freestanding tower antenna
support structure is located within a residential zone or has one or more property lines
abutting or on the opposite side of a street from a residential zone or use permitted in a
residential zone, no antenna support structures may be constructed unless adequately
screened from view of those residential zones by existing buildings or large trees,
including evergreens. The structure may protrude no more than 10’ above screening
buildings and/or trees.
In the absence of an adequate arrangement of existing large trees or buildings to provide
camouflage effective screening, the height of the proposed structure may be no more than
35’, and the base equipment must be buried in an underground vault. Two rows of
evergreen trees must be planted encircling the structure, one row at a distance from the
structure of 50% of the height of the structure, and the other at 90% of the height of the
structure. Transplanted trees shall have a minimum caliper of three inches, spaced thirty-
feet on center. The trees must have an expected height at maturity of at least 10’ less than
the height of the structure to be screened. Smaller evergreen shrubs must be used to fill in
the gaps in between for screening during the time the trees are filling in and maturing.
The Planning Board may vary the arrangement of the trees and shrubs to accommodate
specific site conditions, and accomplish the goal of screening the facility from view of
residential properties. A written guarantee from the wireless facility’s owner shall be
required to ensure that the plantings survive and are maintained throughout the existence
of the installation.
February 24, 2009 Page 29
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
G.O. Commercial and industrial siting. Towers to be sited on developed commercial or
industrial properties shall be located to the rear of other principal buildings and shall not
encroach on planting buffers, parking areas or otherwise impair the operation of
previously approved systems such as stormwater drainage basins. Existing buildings and
structures should be used in the siting of freestanding towers to contribute to the visual
screening of the tower.
§280-78 77. Removal.
A. Any wireless communication facility that is not operated for a continuous period of 12
months shall be deemed abandoned. At that time the owner of the wireless
communication facility shall remove same within 90 days of such deemed abandonment.
In the case of a wireless communication facility on preexisting structures, this provision
shall apply to the wireless communication facility only. If the wireless communication
facility is not removed within the said 90 days, the Building Inspectors may, with the
approval of the Town Board, give the owner notice that unless the removal is
accomplished in 30 days, the Town will cause the removal at the owner's expense. The
grant of a site plan approval under this article shall include requiring the applicant to post
a decommissioning bond and irrevocable permission to the Town to accomplish removal
of the wireless communication facility under this article.
§280-7978. Nonconforming uses.
Preexisting telecommunication towers shall be allowed to continue their usage as they presently
exist. New construction, other than maintenance on a preexisting facility, shall comply with the
requirements of this article.
§280-8079. [Reserved].
§280-81 80. Severability.
The various parts, sections and clauses of this article are hereby declared to be severable. If any
clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this Local Law shall be adjudged by any court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the judgment shall not affect the validity of this law as a
whole or any part thereof other than the part so decided to be unconstitutional or invalid.
§280-82 81. Effective Date.
This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-156
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Initiator
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Seconder
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
February 24, 2009 Page 30
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
2009-163
CATEGORY:
Employment - FIFD
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Salary Increase FIFD Raymond Lefevre, Purser
WHEREAS
the Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Ferry District adopted a
resolution at their February 3, 2009 to increase the salary of Raymond Lefevre , Purser, to $15.00
per hour effective February 1, 2009, and
WHEREAS
the Town Board of the Town of Southold is required to approve appointments and
salary adjustments of employees of the Fishers Island Ferry District, now therefore be it
RESOLVEDincreases the salary of
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Raymond Leferve, Purser, Fishers Island Ferry District to the rate of $15.00 per hour. This
will be effective February 1, 2009.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-163
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-164
CATEGORY:
Budget Modification
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Budget Modification - 2009 Risk Retention
RESOLVEDmodifies the 2009 Risk
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Retention Fund budget as follows:
From:
CS.1910.4.300.600 Umbrella $ 25,000
February 24, 2009 Page 31
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
To:
CS.1910.4.300.100 Commercial Package $ 25,000
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-164
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Seconder
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-165
CATEGORY:
Authorize to Bid
DEPARTMENT:
Solid Waste Management District
Trucking Bids
RESOLVEDauthorizes and directs the
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Town Clerk to advertise for bids for the trucking of construction and demolition debris
(C&D) and recyclables from the Cutchogue Transfer Station
according to specifications to
be provided by the Solid Waste Coordinator.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-165
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Seconder
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-166
CATEGORY:
Budget Modification
DEPARTMENT:
Solid Waste Management District
SWMD 2008 Budget Mod
RESOLVEDmodifies the 2008
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Solid Waste Management District budget as follows:
From:
February 24, 2009 Page 32
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
SR 8160.4.100.650 (Town Garbage Bags) $ 2,600.00
To:
SR 8160.4.200.200 (Light and Power) $ 2,600.00
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-166
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-167
CATEGORY:
Fmla
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Grant FMLA Leave to Administrative Employee
RESOLVEDgrants a 12 week leave of
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
absence under the FMLA (the Family and Medical Leave Act) to an Administrative
employee # 7670, effective January 23, 2009.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-167
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Initiator
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Seconder
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-168
CATEGORY:
Employment - Town
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Approval Transfer of PSD Tanya Newman
RESOLVEDgrants approval to transfer
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Tanya Newman, Public Safety Dispatcher I, from the Town of Riverhead’s employ to the
Town of Southold’s employ, at a salary of $47,713.36 (step 1), effective March 1, 2009.
February 24, 2009 Page 33
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-168
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-169
CATEGORY:
Surplus Equipment
DEPARTMENT:
Solid Waste Management District
Solid Waste District Surplus Equipment
RESOLVEDdeclares the following
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
equipment from the Solid Waste Management District to be surplus equipment:
One (1) Bobcat Lawnmower, c. 1984; one (1) Oliver farm tractor; one (1) 1996 Ford F-150
Pick-up Truck; one (1) 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis automobile; one (1) Mobil Road Sweeper,
c. 1980; one (1) 1985 STECO 100 cubic yard push-out type trailer, steel bodied; one (1) 1984
Dorsey Cargo Trailer, 45 ft. length; one (1) 1979 Fruehoff Cargo Trailer, 45 ft. length; one (1)
1978 Copco Cargo Trailer, 45 ft. length; one (1) 1975 Gindy Cargo Trailer, 45 ft. length; one (1)
1985 Gehl agricultural mixer wagon; one (1) Oliver farm tractor; one (1) Ag-Bag encapsulator,
1996; two (2) Accurate Industries vertical down-stroke balers; one (1) Hewlett Packard 610
digital color copier.
RESOLVED
Be it further that the Town Board authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to
advertise for the sale of same.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-169
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Seconder
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-170
February 24, 2009 Page 34
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
CATEGORY:
Attend Seminar
DEPARTMENT:
Planning Board
Attend Seminar - Lanza
RESOLVEDgrants permission to
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Planning Director, Heather Lanza, to attend the following two seminars
, all registration fees
to be a legal charge to the 2009 Planning Board budget:
Seminar #1: Complete Management Course for Planning Directors
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
March 16-17, 2009
Cost: $495.00
Seminar #2: SEQRA
Plainview, New York
April 21, 2009
Cost: $474.00
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-170
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-171
CATEGORY:
Contracts, Lease & Agreements
DEPARTMENT:
Town Attorney
Authorizes and Directs Supervisor Scott A. Russell to Execute an Agreement Between the Town of
Southold and the Suffolk County Board of Elections for Use of the Southold Town Recreation Center as a
Polling Place for 2009 and 2010
RESOLVEDauthorizes and directs
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Supervisor Scott A. Russell to execute an Agreement between the Town of Southold and
the Suffolk County Board of Elections for use of the Southold Town Recreation Center as a
Polling Place for 2009 and 2010
, provided they file with the Town Clerk a Certificate of
Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00, all in accordance with the approval of the Town
February 24, 2009 Page 35
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Attorney.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-171
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-172
CATEGORY:
Bid Acceptance
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
Peconic School
RESOLVED accepts the proposal of L.
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
K. McLean Associates, P.C., to provide Professional Architectural and Engineering
services for design documents and bid specification for a geothermal system, including the
design drawings, bid and construction documents, for the Peconic School Renovation
Project,
in the amount of $ 6,500, all in accordance with the Town Attorney.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-172
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Initiator
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Seconder
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-173
CATEGORY:
Bid Acceptance
DEPARTMENT:
Solid Waste Management District
Accept the Bid of Burt’s Reliable, at a Fixed Transportation Charge of $0.20 Per Gallon Above the
Northville Industries Consumer Rack Wholesale Price of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel, for Supplying the Town
of Southold with B20 Bio-Diesel Fuel Blend for the Calendar Year 2009
RESOLVED accepts the bid of Burt’s
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Reliable, at a price of $0.20 per gallon above the Northville Industries consumer rack
February 24, 2009 Page 36
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
wholesale price of ultra low sulfur diesel, for supplying the Town of Southold with B20 Bio-
Diesel Fuel blend for the calendar year 2009
, all in accordance with the approval of the Town
Attorney.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-173
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-174
CATEGORY:
Appeals
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
Waive 30 Day Period on Liquor License
RESOLVEDwaives the 30 day
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
notification period for the renewal of a liquor license to Janina Bienias d/b/a Willowmere
Inn Ltd,, 730 Main Bayview Road, Southold, New York.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-174
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-175
CATEGORY:
Contracts, Lease & Agreements
DEPARTMENT:
Recreation
Hire Spring Recreation Program Instructors
RESOLVEDauthorizes and directs
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Supervisor Scott A. Russell to execute an agreement with the following individuals and
businesses for the Spring 2009 Recreation programs, all in accordance with the approval of
the Town Attorney
. Funding for the instructors listed below has been budgeted for in the
February 24, 2009 Page 37
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
recreation department's 2009 instructor line A7020.4.500.420.
Lisa Baglivi (watercolor).............................................................. $30/hour
Antoinette Beck-Witt (drawing class)........................................... $30/hour
Dan Borg (model building)............................................................ $30/hour
Sara Bloom (memoir writing)....................................................... $30/hour
Thomas Boucher (guitar)............................................................. $30/hour
Bernard Cannac (intro to French)................................................ $30/hour
Eugenia Cherouski (folk dancing)............................................... $30/hour
Doris Coniglio (knitting classes)................................................. $30/hour
John Crosser (Youth Basketball Program)……………………. $15/hour
Paula Croteau (baking classes)…………………………….……… $30/hour
Mary Dempsey (English as a second language).......................... $30/hour
Kirk Dombrowski (non-contact karate)…………………….……… $30/hour
Lenora Dome (belly dancing).................................................... $30/hour
Martha Eagle (Aerobics).............................................................. $30/hour
Linda Eckert (sewing)………....................................................... $30/hour
East End Insurance Services (Defensive Driving)..................... $30/person
Mike Furst (beginner computer)................................................. $30/hour
Bill Gatz (Youth Basketball Program)…………………………… $30/hour
Dan Gebbia (dog obedience)..................................................… $55/dog
Gail Horton (rug hooking)………………..………………….…… $30/hour
Rosemary Martilotta (yoga classes)……………………………..... $55/class
Judy McCleery (Digital Photography)…………………………… $30/hour
Tom McGunnigle (basic golf)………………………………………$50/person
Sue Mulholland (bridge lessons)................................................ $30/hour
Riverside Gymnastics (youth gymnastics)................................. $50/person
Ivan Santiago (non-contact boxing)………………………………. $30/hour
Linda Scheer (parenting program)…………………….…………... $30/hour
Thomas Shalvey (TIPS program)................................................ $30/hour
Laurie Short (aerobics classes)................................................... $30/hour
Steve Smith (Weight Training)..................................................... $30/hour
Gail Starkie (acrylic painting)....................................................... $30/hour
Jocelyn Suglia (Youth Basketball Program)………………….. $30/hour
Angela Tondo (Mommy & Me)................................................... $30/hour
Barbara Terranova (tennis lessons)............................................. $30/hour
Touch Dancing Studios (ballroom dancing)……………………… $65/person
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-175
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
February 24, 2009 Page 38
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
2009-176
CATEGORY:
Attend Seminar
DEPARTMENT:
Police Dept
Grant Permission to Police Office Thomas Hudock to Attend the State of New York Juvenile Officers
Association Quarterly Meeting
RESOLVED grants permission to Police
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Officer Thomas Hudock to attend the State of New York Juvenile Officers Association
Quarterly meeting commencing on Thursday, March 5 through Friday, March 6, 2009 in
Syracuse, New York.
All expenses for travel and miscellaneous expenses to be a legal charge
to the 2009 Juvenile Aid Budget line - A.3157.4.600.200. Travel to be by Department vehicle.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-176
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-177
CATEGORY:
Refund
DEPARTMENT:
Solid Waste Management District
Solid Waste Resident Refund
RESOLVEDauthorizes a refund to
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby by
McCarthy Management from the Solid Waste Management District in the amount of
$559.20
, due to a duplicate payment made by McCarthy Management on their Solid Waste Tip
Fee account.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-177
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Initiator
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
February 24, 2009 Page 39
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
2009-178
CATEGORY:
Bid Acceptance
DEPARTMENT:
Police Dept
Accept Bid - Police
RESOLVED accepts the bid of Edward
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Stanley in the amount of $658.00, for a 1997 Ford Crown Victoria
, color Tan, VIN
2FALP71WVX150545, in "as is" condition, all in accordance with the Town Attorney.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-178
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-179
CATEGORY:
Retirement/Resignation
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Resignation of FIFD Personnel
WHEREAS
the Board of Commissioners of the Fishers Island Ferry District adopted a resolution at
their February 17, 2009 to accept the resignations of the following personnel, and
WHEREAS
the Town Board of the Town of Southold is required to approve appointments and
resignations of employees of the Fishers Island Ferry District, now therefore be it
RESOLVEDaccepts the resignations
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
effective February 10, 2009 of the following:
Charles Burgess – PT Ferry Captain
Eric Easter – PT Deckhand
Brett Eagan – PT Deckhand
William Felker – PT Deckhand
February 24, 2009 Page 40
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Michael Gelman – PT Deckhand
Jan-Michael Walker – PT Deckhand
James Wright – PT Deckhand
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-179
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Seconder
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-180
CATEGORY:
Contracts, Lease & Agreements
DEPARTMENT:
Town Attorney
Authorizes and Directs Supervisor Scott A. Russell to Execute the Letter of Intent, Clean Vessel
Assistance Program Operation & Maintenance Annual Application, Request for Reimbursement Form,
and Any Other Accompanying Documents Between the Town of Southold and the New York State
Environmental Facilities Corporation in Connection with the Filing of a Clean Vessel Assistance
Program Operation & Maintenance Grant Program Annual Application for 2009
RESOLVEDauthorizes and directs
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Supervisor Scott A. Russell to execute the Letter of Intent, Clean Vessel Assistance
Program Operation & Maintenance Annual Application, request for reimbursement form,
and any other accompanying documents between the Town of Southold and the New York
State Environmental Facilities Corporation in connection with the filing of a Clean Vessel
Assistance Program Operation & Maintenance Grant Program Annual Application for
2009
for grant funds up to the maximum amount of $5,000 per boat regarding the two pump-out
boats owned and operated by the Town of Southold, utilized for the Town and Fishers Island,
subject to the approval of the Town Attorney.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-180
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
February 24, 2009 Page 41
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
2009-181
CATEGORY:
Contracts, Lease & Agreements
DEPARTMENT:
Town Attorney
Approves the Memorandum of Agreement Between the Town of Southold and the CSEA Dated February
4, 2009
RESOLVEDapproves the
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Memorandum of Agreement between the Town of Southold and the CSEA dated February
4, 2009
, concerning the settlement of an employee grievance.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-181
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-182
CATEGORY:
Budget Modification
DEPARTMENT:
Solid Waste Management District
SWMD Budget Mods Re: Funded Deficit & Truck Repair
Fiscal Impact:
Needed to cover 2008 deficit and repairs to pickup truck.
RESOLVEDmodifies the 2009
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Solid Waste Management District budget as follows:
From:
SR 8160.4.100.640 (Maint/Supply Trailer Fleet) $ 1,500
SR 8160.4.100.200 (Diesel Fuel) $ 2,600
TOTAL $4,100.
To:
SR 8160.4.100.625 (Maint/Supply Chevy P/U) $ 1,500
February 24, 2009 Page 42
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
SR 1989.4.600.100 (Funded Deficit) $ 2,600
TOTAL $4,100.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-182
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Initiator
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Seconder
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-183
CATEGORY:
Budget Modification
DEPARTMENT:
Police Dept
Budget Modification - Police
Fiscal Impact:
Payment of Fishers Island Bay Constables as per Town Board resolution
RESOLVEDmodifies the 2008 whole
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Town budget as follows:
From:
A.3130.4.100.200 Gasoline and Oil $1,550.00
To:
A.3130.4.500.400 FI Bay Constables $1,550.00
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-183
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-184
CATEGORY:
Bond
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
Refunding Bonds 2009
February 24, 2009 Page 43
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
REFUNDING BOND RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK, ADOPTED FEBRUARY 24, 2009,
AUTHORIZING THE REFUNDING OF CERTAIN
OUTSTANDING SERIAL BONDS OF SAID TOWN,
STATING THE PLAN OF REFUNDING, APPROPRIATING
AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,000,000 FOR SUCH
PURPOSE, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO
EXCEED $3,000,000 REFUNDING BONDS TO FINANCE
SAID APPROPRIATION, AND MAKING CERTAIN OTHER
DETERMINATIONS RELATIVE THERETO.
Recitals
WHEREAS, the Town of Southold, in the County of Suffolk, New York (herein
called the “Town”), has heretofore issued on May 19, 1998 its $2,000,000 Agricultural Land
Preservation Serial Bonds-1998 (the “1998 Bonds”), which are currently outstanding in the
principal amount of $1,120,000 (the “Outstanding 1998 Bonds”), which shall mature on May 1
in each of the years and in the principal amounts and bear interest payable semiannually on May
1 and November 1 in each year to maturity, as follows:
Year of Principal Interest Rate
Maturity Amount
2009 $100,000 4.85%
2010 100,000 4.85
2011 110,000 4.85
2012 110,000 4.85
2013 110,000 4.85
2014 110,000 4-7/8
2015 120,000 4-7/8
2016 120,000 4-7/8
2017 $120,000 4-7/8%
2018 120,000 4-7/8
WHEREAS, the 1998 Bonds maturing on or after May 1, 2009 are subject to
redemption prior to maturity, at the option of the Town, on May 1, 2008 and thereafter on any
date, in whole or in part, in inverse order or maturity or in equal proportionate amounts (selected
by lot within a maturity), at the following redemption prices, plus accrued interest to the date of
February 24, 2009 Page 44
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
redemption:
Redemption Dates (all dates inclusive) Redemption Prices (Percentages of
Principal Amount)
May 1, 2008 to April 30, 2009 102%
May 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010 101
May 1, 2010 and thereafter 100
WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999 the Town issued its $1,900,000 Open Space
Preservation Serial Bonds-1999 (the “1999 Bonds”), which are currently outstanding in the
principal amount of $1,160,000 (the “Outstanding 1999 Bonds” and together with the 1998
Outstanding Bonds, the “Outstanding Bonds”), which shall mature on May 1 in each of the years
and in the principal amounts and bear interest payable semiannually on May 1 and November 1
in each year to maturity, as follows:
Year of Principal Interest Rate
Maturity Amount
2009 $ 90,000 4.70%
2010 90,000 4.70
2011 100,000 4.70
2012 100,000 4.70
2013 100,000 4.70
2014 110,000 4.70
2015 110,000 4.70
2016 110,000 4.70
2017 110,000 4.70
2018 120,000 4.70
2019 120,000 4.70
WHEREAS, the 1999 Bonds maturing on or after May 1, 2010 are subject to
redemption prior to maturity, at the option of the Town, on May 1, 2009 and thereafter on any
date, in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturity or in equal proportionate
amounts (selected by lot within a maturity), at the following redemption prices, plus accrued
interest to the date of redemption, as follows:
Redemption Dates (Both Dates Inclusive) Redemption Prices (Percentages of
Principal Amount)
May 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010 102%
May 1, 2011 to April 30, 2011 101
May 1, 2012 and thereafter 100
WHEREAS, Section 90.10 of the Local Finance Law, constituting Chapter 33-a
February 24, 2009 Page 45
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
of the Consolidated Laws of the State of New York (herein called the “Law”), permits the Town
to refund all or a portion of the outstanding unredeemed maturities of the 1998 Bonds and the
1999 Bonds by the issuance of new bonds, the issuance of which will result in present value debt
service savings for the Town, and the Town Board has determined that it may be advantageous
to refund all or a portion of the Outstanding Bonds;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it
RESOLVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW
YORK (by the favorable vote of at least two-thirds of all the members of said Town Board), AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. In this resolution, the following definitions apply, unless a different
meaning clearly appears from the context:
(a) “Bond To Be Refunded” or “Bonds To Be Refunded” means all or a portion of
the aggregate Outstanding Bonds, as shall be determined in accordance with
Section 8 hereof.
(b) “Escrow Contract” means the contract to be entered into by and between the
Town and the Escrow Holder pursuant to Section 10 hereof.
(c) “Escrow Holder” means the bank or trust company designated as such
pursuant to Section 10 hereof.
(d) “Present Value Savings” means the dollar savings which result from the
issuance of the Refunding Bonds computed by discounting the principal and
interest payments on both the Refunding Bonds and the Bonds To Be
Refunded from the respective maturities thereof to the date of issue of the
Refunding Bonds at a rate equal to the effective interest cost of the Refunding
Bonds. The effective interest cost of the Refunding Bonds shall be that rate
which is arrived at by doubling the semi-annual interest rate (compounded
semi-annually) necessary to discount the debt service payments on the
Refunding Bonds from the maturity dates thereof to the date of issue of the
Refunding Bonds and to the agreed upon price including estimated accrued
interest.
February 24, 2009 Page 46
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
(e) “Redemption Date” means May 1, 2008, or any date thereafter, with respect to
the 1998 Bonds and May 1, 2009 with respect to the 1999 Bonds.
(f) “Refunding Bond” or “Refunding Bonds” means all or a portion of the
$3,000,000 Refunding Serial Bonds-2009 of the Town of Southold, authorized
to be issued pursuant to Section 2 hereof.
(g) “Refunding Bond Amount Limitation” means an amount of Refunding Bonds
which does not exceed the principal amount of Bonds To Be Refunded plus
the aggregate amount of unmatured interest payable on such Bonds To Be
Refunded, to and including the applicable Redemption Date, plus redemption
premiums payable on such Bonds To Be Refunded as of such Redemption
Date, as hereinabove referred to in the Recitals hereof, plus costs and
expenses incidental to the issuance of the Refunding Bonds including the
development of the refunding financial plan, and of executing and performing
the terms and conditions of the Escrow Contract and all fees and charges of
the Escrow Holder as referred to in Section 10 hereof.
Section 2. The Town Board of the Town (herein called the “Town Board”),
hereby authorizes the refunding of the Bonds To Be Refunded, and appropriates an amount not
to exceed $3,000,000 to accomplish such refunding. The plan of financing said appropriation
includes the issuance of not to exceed $3,000,000 Refunding Bonds and the levy and collection
of a tax upon all the taxable real property within the Town to pay the principal of and interest on
said Refunding Bonds as the same shall become due and payable. Bonds of the Town in the
maximum principal amount of $3,000,000 and substantially designated as “REFUNDING
SERIAL BONDS-2009”, are hereby authorized to be issued pursuant to the provisions of the
Exhibit A
Law. The proposed financial plan for the refunding in the form attached hereto as
(the “refunding financial plan”) prepared for the Town by Roosevelt & Cross, Incorporated, New
York, New York, and hereby accepted and approved, includes the deposit of all the proceeds of
said Refunding Bonds with an Escrow Holder pursuant to an Escrow Contract as authorized in
Section 10 hereof, the payment of all costs incurred by the Town in connection with said
refunding from such proceeds and the investment of a portion of such proceeds by the Escrow
February 24, 2009 Page 47
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Holder in certain obligations. The principal of and interest on such investments, together with
the balance of such proceeds to be held uninvested, if any, shall be sufficient to pay (i) the
principal of and interest on the Bonds To Be Refunded becoming due and payable on and prior
to each applicable Redemption Date and (ii) the principal of and premium on the Bonds To Be
Refunded which are to be called for redemption prior to maturity on any such Redemption Date.
Section 3. The Bonds To Be Refunded referred to in Section 1 hereof are all or a
portion of the Outstanding Bonds issued pursuant to the bond resolutions duly adopted on their
respective dates, authorizing the issuance of bonds of the Town for open space and agricultural
land preservation. In accordance with the refunding financial plan, the Refunding Bonds
authorized in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $3,000,000 shall mature in
amounts and at dates to be determined. The Supervisor, the chief fiscal officer of the Town, is
hereby authorized to approve all details of the refunding financial plan not contained herein.
Section 4. The issuance of the Refunding Bonds will not exceed the Refunding
Bond Amount Limitation. The Refunding Bonds shall mature not later than the maximum
period of probable usefulness (“PPU”) permitted by law at the time of original issuance of the
Bonds to be Refunded. The maximum period of probable usefulness (“PPU”) of the Bonds to be
thirty (30)
Refunded is years.
Section 5. The aggregate amount of estimated Present Value Savings is set forth
Exhibit A
in the proposed refunding financial plan attached hereto as , computed in accordance
with subdivision two of paragraph b of Section 90.10 of the Law. Said refunding financial plan
has been prepared based upon the assumption that the Refunding Bonds will be issued in the
aggregate principal amount, and will mature, be of such terms and bear such interest as set forth
therein. The Town Board recognizes that the principal amount of the Refunding Bonds, the
maturities, terms and interest rates, the provisions, if any, for the redemption thereof prior to
maturity, and whether or not any or all of the Refunding Bonds will be insured, and the resulting
present value savings, may vary from such assumptions and that the refunding financial plan
Exhibit A
may vary from that attached hereto as .
Section 6. The Refunding Bonds may be sold at public or private sale and the
Supervisor, the chief fiscal officer of the Town, is hereby authorized to execute a purchase
contract on behalf of the Town for the sale of said Refunding Bonds, provided that the terms and
February 24, 2009 Page 48
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
conditions of such sale shall be approved by the State Comptroller, and further providing that
prior to the issuance of the Refunding Bonds the Supervisor shall have filed with the Town
Board a certificate approved by the State Comptroller setting forth the Present Value Savings to
the Town resulting from the issuance of the Refunding Bonds. In connection with such sale, the
Town authorizes the preparation of an Official Statement and approves its use in connection with
such sale, and further consents to the distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement prior to the
date said Official Statement is distributed. In the event that the Refunding Bonds are sold at
public sale pursuant to Section 57.00 of the Law, the President of the Board of Education is
hereby authorized and direct to prepare or have prepared a Notice of Sale, a summary of which
shall be published at least once in (a) “THE BOND BUYER”, published in the City of New York
and (b) the official newspaper(s) of the Town having general circulation within said Town, not
less than five (5) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of said sale. A copy of such
notice shall be sent not less than eight (8) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of said
sale to (1) the State Comptroller, Albany, New York 12236; (2) at least two banks or trust
companies having a place of business in the county in which the Town is located, or, if only one
bank is located in such County, then to such bank and to at least two banks or trust companies
having a place of business in an adjoining county; (3) “THE BOND BUYER”, 1 State Street
Plaza, New York, New York 10004; and (4) at least 10 bond dealers. The Supervisor is hereby
further authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to accomplish said
refunding, and to execute any contracts and agreements for the purchase of and payment for
services rendered or to be rendered to the Town in connection with said refunding, including the
preparation of the refunding financial plan referred to in Section 2 hereof.
Section 7. Each of the Refunding Bonds authorized by this resolution shall
contain the recital of validity prescribed by Section 52.00 of the Law and said Refunding Bonds
shall be general obligations of the Town, payable as to both principal and interest by a general
tax upon all the taxable real property within the Town without limitation as to rate or amount.
The faith and credit of the Town are hereby irrevocably pledged to the punctual payment of the
principal of and interest on said Refunding Bonds and provision shall be made annually in the
budget of the Town for (a) the amortization and redemption of the Refunding Bonds to mature in
such year and (b) the payment of interest to be due and payable in such year.
February 24, 2009 Page 49
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Section 8. Subject to the provisions of this resolution and of the Law, and
pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.00 of the Law with respect to the issuance of bonds
having substantially level or declining annual debt service, and Sections 50.00, 56.00 to 60.00,
90.10 and 168.00 of the Law, the powers and duties of the Town Board relative to determining
the amount of Bonds To Be Refunded, prescribing the terms, form and contents and as to the sale
and issuance of the Refunding Bonds, and executing any arbitrage certification relative thereto,
and as to executing the Escrow Contract described in Section 10, the Official Statement referred
to in Section 6 and any contracts for credit enhancements in connection with the issuance of the
Refunding Bonds and any other certificates and agreements, and as to making elections to call in
and redeem all or a portion of the Bonds to be Refunded, are hereby delegated to the Supervisor,
the chief fiscal officer of the Town.
Section 9. The validity of the Refunding Bonds authorized by this resolution may
be contested only if:
(a) such obligations are authorized for an object or purpose for which the
Town is not authorized to expend money, or
(b) the provisions of law which should be complied with at the date of the
publication of such resolution, or a summary thereof, are not substantially
complied with,
and an action, suit or proceeding contesting such validity is commenced within twenty days after
the date of such publication, or
(c) such obligations are authorized in violation of the provisions of the
constitution.
Section 10. Prior to the issuance of the Refunding Bonds, the Town shall contract
with a bank or trust company located and authorized to do business in New York State, for the
purpose of having such bank or trust company act as the Escrow Holder of the proceeds,
inclusive of any premium from the sale of the Refunding Bonds, together with all income
derived from the investment of such proceeds. Such Escrow Contract shall contain such terms
and conditions as shall be necessary in order to accomplish the refunding financial plan,
including provisions authorizing the Escrow Holder, without further authorization or direction
February 24, 2009 Page 50
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
from the Town, except as otherwise provided therein, (a) to make all required payments of
principal, interest and redemption premiums to the appropriate paying agent with respect to the
Bonds To Be Refunded, (b) to pay costs and expenses incidental to the issuance of the Refunding
Bonds, including the development of the refunding financial plan, and costs and expenses
relating to the execution and performance of the terms and conditions of the Escrow Contract
and all of its fees and charges as the Escrow Holder, (c) at the appropriate time or times to cause
to be given on behalf of the Town the notice of redemption authorized to be given pursuant to
Section 13 hereof, and (d) to invest the monies held by it consistent with the provisions of the
refunding financial plan. The Escrow Contract shall be irrevocable and shall constitute a
covenant with the holders of the Refunding Bonds.
Section 11. The proceeds, inclusive of any premium, from the sale of the
Refunding Bonds, immediately upon receipt shall be placed in escrow by the Town with the
Escrow Holder in accordance with the Escrow Contract. All moneys held by the Escrow Holder
shall be invested only in direct obligations of the United States of America or in obligations the
principal of and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed by the United States of
America, which obligations shall mature or be subject to redemption at the option of the holder
thereof not later than the respective dates when such moneys will be required to make payments
in accordance with the refunding financial plan. Any such moneys remaining in the custody of
the Escrow Holder after the full execution of the Escrow Contract shall be returned to the Town
and shall be applied by the Town only to the payment of the principal of or interest on the
Refunding Bonds then outstanding.
Section 12. That portion of such proceeds from the sale of the Refunding Bonds,
together with interest earned thereon, which shall be required for the payment of the principal of
and interest on the Bonds To Be Refunded, including any redemption premiums, in accordance
with the refunding financial plan, shall be irrevocably committed and pledged to such purpose
and the holders of the Bonds To Be Refunded shall have a lien upon such moneys and the
investments thereof held by the Escrow Holder. All interest earned from the investment of such
moneys which is not required for such payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds To Be
Refunded shall be irrevocably committed and pledged to the payment of the principal of and
interest on the Refunding Bonds, or such portion or series thereof as shall be required by the
February 24, 2009 Page 51
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
refunding financial plan, and the holders of such Refunding Bonds shall have a lien upon such
moneys held by the Escrow Holder. The pledges and liens provided for herein shall become
valid and binding upon the issuance of the Refunding Bonds and the moneys and investments
held by the Escrow Holder shall immediately be subject thereto without any further act. Such
pledges and liens shall be valid and binding against all parties having claims of any kind in tort,
contract or otherwise against the Town irrespective of whether such parties have notice thereof.
Neither this resolution, the Escrow Contract, nor any other instrument relating to such pledges
and liens, need be filed or recorded.
Section 13. In accordance with the provisions of Section 53.00 and of paragraph
h of Section 90.10 of the Law, the Town Board hereby elects to call in and redeem all or a
portion of the Bonds To Be Refunded which are subject to prior redemption according to their
terms on the Redemption Date, as shall be determined by the Supervisor in accordance with
Section 8 hereof. The sum to be paid therefor on the applicable Redemption Date shall be the
par value thereof, the accrued interest to such Redemption Date and the redemption premiums, if
any. The Escrow Holder is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of such call for
redemption to be given in the name of the Town by mailing such notice at least thirty days prior
to such Redemption Date, and in accordance with the terms appearing in the Bonds to be
Refunded, to the registered holders of the Bonds To Be Refunded which are to be called in and
redeemed. Upon the issuance of the Refunding Bonds, the election to call in and redeem the
Bonds To Be Refunded which are to be called in and redeemed in accordance herewith and the
direction to the Escrow Holder to cause notice thereof to be given as provided in this Section
shall become irrevocable and the provisions of this Section shall constitute a covenant with the
holders, from time to time, of the Refunding Bonds, provided that this Section may be amended
from time to time as may be necessary to comply with the publication requirements of paragraph
a of Section 53.00 of the Law, as the same may be amended from time to time.
Section 14. This bond resolution shall take effect immediately, and the Town
Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish the foregoing resolution, in summary, together
with a Notice attached in substantially the form prescribed by Section 81.00 of the Law in the
“The Suffolk Times” two newspapers having general circulation in the Town and hereby
designated the official newspapers of said Town for such publication.
February 24, 2009 Page 52
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-184
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Seconder
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-185
CATEGORY:
Budget Modification
DEPARTMENT:
Highway Department
2008 Budget Modification - Highway
Fiscal Impact:
The reason(s) for this additional transfer is that the Highway Department recently received a $3,150.00
invoice in connection with 2008 travel to and from Fishers Island for a project there as well as additional
regular ferry charges.
RESOLVEDmodifies the 2008 Highway
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Fund Part Town budget as follows
:
To:
DB.5140.4.600.300 Brush & Weeds/Miscellaneous
Contractual Expense
Miscellaneous
Travel $ 4,000.00
TOTAL: $ 4,000.00
From
:
DB.5130.4.100.500 Machinery
Contractual Expense
Supplies & Materials
Parts & Supplies $ 4,000.00
TOTAL: $ 4,000.00
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-185
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-186
February 24, 2009 Page 53
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
CATEGORY:
Budget
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Budget Modification - 2009 GFWT Insurances
RESOLVEDmodifies the 2009 General
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Fund Whole Town budget as follows:
Reduce
Appropriations:
A.9901.9.000.000 Transfers to Other Funds
Transfers to Health Plan $542,000
A.9901.9.000.300 Transfers to Other Funds
Transfers to Risk Retention Fund 120,000
Reduce
Revenues:
A.5990.00 Appropriated Fund Balance $662,000
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-186
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-187
CATEGORY:
Budget Modification
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Budget Modification -- 2009 Risk Retention Fund
RESOLVEDmodifies the 2009 Risk
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Retention Fund budget as follows:
Reduce
Appropriations:
CS.1910.4.300.200 Insurance, Public Officials $20,000
CS.1910.4.300.600 Insurance, Umbrella 100,000
February 24, 2009 Page 54
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Reduce
Revenues:
CS.5031.00 Interfund Transfers $120,000
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-187
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Initiator
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-188
CATEGORY:
Budget Modification
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Budget Modification -- 2009 Employee Health Plan
RESOLVEDmodifies the 2009
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Employee Health Plan budget as follows:
Reduce:
Revenues:
MS.5031.00 Interfund Transfers $542,000
Reduce:
Appropriations:
MS.9060.8.000.000 Medical Benefits $542,000
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-188
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-189
CATEGORY:
Close/Use Town Roads
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
Southold Little League Parade
February 24, 2009 Page 55
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
RESOLVEDgrants permission to the
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
North Fork/Southold Little League Baseball & Softball to use the following roads for its
Opening Day Parade on Saturday, April 18, 2009,
beginning at 11:30 AM: Recreation Center
parking lot, Peconic Lane and Carroll Avenue, Peconic provided they file with the Town Clerk a
One Million Dollar Certificate of Insurance naming the Town of Southold as an additional
insured and notify Capt. Flatley upon receipt of this resolution to coordinate traffic control.
Support is for this year only, as the Southold Town Board continues to evaluate the use of town
roads.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-189
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Seconder
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-190
CATEGORY:
Attend Seminar
DEPARTMENT:
Police Dept
Grant Permission to Detective Sergeant John Sinning to Attend MAGLOCLEN 2009 Annual Conference
in Indianapolis, IN
RESOLVED grants permission to
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Detective Sergeant John Sinning to attend the Middle Atlantic Great Lakes Organized
Crime Law Enforcement Network (MAGLOCLEN) 2009 Annual Conference in
Indianapolis, Indiana commencing on Monday, April 6 through Thursday, April 9, 2009.
All expenses for registration and meals to be a legal charge to the 2009 Police Training Budget
line - A.3120.4.600.200.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-190
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
February 24, 2009 Page 56
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
2009-191
CATEGORY:
Local Law Public Hearing
DEPARTMENT:
Land Preservation
LL TOS CPF Management & Stewardship Plan 2009
WHEREAS,
there has been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk
th
“A Local Law in
County, New York, on the 24 day of February, 2009, a Local Law entitled
relation to the Town of Southold Community Preservation Fund Management and
Stewardship Plan 2009”
now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing on the
aforesaid Local Law at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, on the
th
day of March, 2009 at 4:32 p.m.
10 at which time all interested persons will be given an
opportunity to be heard.
“A Local Law in relation to the Town of Southold
The proposed Local Law entitled,
Community Preservation Fund Management and Stewardship Plan 2009”
reads as follows:
LOCAL LAW NO. 2009
“A Local Law in relation to the Town of Southold Community
A Local Law entitled,
Preservation Fund Management and Stewardship Plan 2009”.
BE IT ENACTED
by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows:
I. PURPOSE
In compliance with the Peconic Bay Community Preservation Fund, the Land
Preservation Department has prepared a Community Preservation Fund
Management and Stewardship Plan for real property interests acquired through
the fund. This plan must be adopted by local law and all expenditures from the
fund for management and stewardship functions must be in compliance with the
terms of the plan.
February 24, 2009 Page 57
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
II. Chapter 17 of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as
follows:
§ 17-13A. Community Preservation Fund Management and Stewardship Plan
adopted.
A. The Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves and adopts the
Town of Southold
Community Preservation Management and Stewardship
2009
Plan for real property interests acquired by use of moneys from the
Town of Southold Community Preservation Fund, prepared by the Land
Coordinator,
Preservation Department and Land Preservation Committee
Director of the Department of Public Works, and the Stewardship
Coordinator, ,
for the periodJuly 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008
presented to the Town Board during the Work Session of August 12, 2008
February 24, 2009,
and intended to be the management and stewardship plan
(6)
required by amendments to § 64-e of the New York State Town Law.
III. SEVERABILITY
If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or part of this Local Law shall be
adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the judgment shall
not affect the validity of this law as a whole or any part thereof other than the part
so decided to be unconstitutional or invalid.
IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of
State as provided by law.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-191
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-192
CATEGORY:
Contracts, Lease & Agreements
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
CPF 2008 Audit
February 24, 2009 Page 58
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
WHEREAS
the Town Board of the Town of Southold is required by New York State Law §64.e
to engage an independent auditor to prepare an annual audit of the Community Preservation
Funds for purposes of determining whether the fund has been administered consistent with State
and local laws, and
WHEREAS
the Town Board of the Town of Southold is required to appropriate funds for
completion of said audit of the Community Preservation Fund, now therefore be it
RESOLVED modifies the 2009
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Community Preservation Fund
as follows:
To:
H3 .1320.4.500.300 Independent Auditing and Accounting $7,000
From:
H3 .8660.2.600.100 Land Acquisitions $7,000
and be it further
RESOLVEDauthorizes and directs
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Supervisor Scott Russell to execute an engagement letter with George R. Rehn, CPA
in connection with the Audit of the Town of Southold’s Community Preservation Fund for the
year ended December 31, 2008 in a total amount not to exceed $7,000 which shall be a legal
charge to the 2009 Community Preservation Fund’s Independent Auditing and Accounting
budget (H3.1320.4.500.300), all in accordance with the approval of the Town Attorney.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-192
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Initiator
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Seconder
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
February 24, 2009 Page 59
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
2009-193
CATEGORY:
Policies
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Fund Balance Policy
RESOLVEDadopts the following policy
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
entitled:
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
FUND BALANCE POLICY
Year-end surpluses and fund balances are moneys that can provide a cushion or buffer
that may be needed from time to time to operate without interruption or reduction in services.
They provide a degree of stability and the resources to weather fluctuations in revenues and
expenditures without severely impacting real property tax rates. Fund balances and adequate
reserves should be managed and reviewed on a regular basis.
In its evaluations of credit ratings, a formal fund balance policy is cited by all major
rating agencies (Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch) as a best management practice
commonly used by better rated communities. Municipalities that adhere to a fund balance policy
are viewed as being more pro-active and this reflects well on management, which in turn results
in higher credit ratings and lower borrowing costs. A formal policy is an effective operating tool
because it minimizes political concerns and keeps the Town more focused on achieving
structural balance.
Auditors and financial advisors often note that fund balances are not replaceable through
the budget process because of the legal requirement to develop balanced budgets for the general
fund and the special revenue funds. The Town does face significant pressure on the revenue and
expenditure sides of its budget, and therefore on its reserves. If surplus is depleted at the end of
a fiscal year, it cannot be replaced unless during the ensuing fiscal year expenditures are less
than amounts budgeted or non-tax revenues are higher than projected (or both).
In recognition of sound fiscal policy and in order to stabilize and possibly enhance the
current credit rating of the Town, the Town Board desires to maintain an unreserved and
unappropriated fund balance in its General Fund at the end of each fiscal year equal to at least
10% of its total operating budget, not withstanding the Town’s past practice to appropriate 50%
of the estimated fund balance in the ensuing year’s budget. Such unreserved/unappropriated
fund balance will be exclusive of any reserve funds maintained by the Town. The Town believes
that at least 10% of its total operating budget is a reasonable amount of
unreserved/unappropriated fund balance to achieve at the end of each fiscal year as unanticipated
events during the course of a year can have negative effects on non-tax revenues or expenditures.
February 24, 2009 Page 60
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
If an emergency or a need were to occur that necessitated the appropriation of funds that
would result in reducing the unreserved/unappropriated fund balance in the General Fund below
10% of operating expenditures, a resolution of the Town Board is required to approve such
appropriation consistent with current practices. In addition, subsequent to such appropriation,
the Town would begin the process of reducing expenditures or raising revenues during the
current or ensuing fiscal year in order to restore the unreserved/unappropriated fund balance in
the General Fund to at least 10% of operating expenditures.
Unreserved/unappropriated fund balance in the General Fund above 10% may be
appropriated by the Town Board for the following purposes:
To reduce the ensuing year’s property taxes.
For one-time capital expenditures.
For emergencies caused by unforeseen occurrences.
This policy will remain in effect until the Town of Southold, by resolution, amends
or revises it.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-193
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-194
CATEGORY:
Contracts, Lease & Agreements
DEPARTMENT:
Town Attorney
Authorizes and Directs Supervisor Scott A. Russell to Execute the Siren Pole Easement and All Other
Necessary Documents to Effectuate Same
RESOLVEDauthorizes and directs
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Supervisor Scott A. Russell to execute the Siren Pole Easement and all other necessary
documents to effectuate same
, in connection with the installation of a siren pole located within
the Town of Southold right-of-way for Equestrian Avenue on Fishers Island, subject to the
approval of the Town Attorney.
February 24, 2009 Page 61
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-194
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Seconder
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-195
CATEGORY:
Policies
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Debt Management Policy
Resolvedadopts the following policy
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
entitled:
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY
Introduction
The following policy is enacted in an effort to standardize and rationalize the issuance and
management of debt by the Town of Southold, New York (the Town). The primary objective is
to establish conditions for the use of debt and to create procedures and policies that minimize the
Town’s debt service and issuance costs, retain the highest practical credit rating, and maintain
full and complete financial disclosure and reporting. The policies apply to all general obligation
debt issued by the Town, debt guaranteed by the Town, and any other forms of obligation of
indebtedness.
Regular, updated debt policies can be an important tool to insure the use of the Town’s resources
to meet its commitments to provide needed services to the citizens of the Town and to maintain
sound financial management practices. These policies are therefore guidelines for general use,
and allow for exceptions in extraordinary conditions.
The Town Board has adopted these policies by resolution. As one function of these policies is to
stimulate discussion and broader appreciation of debt issues, these policies will serve as a
guideline. Under the recommendation of the Town’s Financial Advisor, the Town will evaluate
its experience under these policies, and will make changes if needed. The Debt Management
Policies of the Town can be adjusted at any time by resolution of the Town Board.
Creditworthiness Objectives
February 24, 2009 Page 62
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Policy 1. Credit Rating:
The Town seeks to maintain the highest possible credit ratings for all
categories of short-and long-term General Obligation debt that can be achieved without
compromising delivery of basic Town services and achievement of adopted Town policy
objectives.
The Town recognizes that external economic, natural, or other events may from time to time
affect the creditworthiness of its debt. The Town Board remains committed to ensuring the
actions within their control are prudent and beneficial to its citizens.
Policy 2. Financial Disclosure:
The Town is committed to full and complete financial
disclosure, and to cooperating fully with rating agencies, institutional and individual investors,
Town departments and agencies, other levels of government, and the general public to share
clear, comprehensible and accurate financial information. The Town is committed to meeting
secondary disclosure requirements on a timely and comprehensive basis.
Policy 3. Capital Planning:
To enhance creditworthiness and prudent financial management,
the Town is committed to systematic capital planning, intergovernmental cooperation and
coordination, and long-term financial planning. Evidence of this commitment to systematic
capital planning is demonstrated through adoption of a three-year Comprehensive Capital
Budget.
Purposes and Uses of Debt
Policy 4. Debt Limits:
The Town will keep outstanding debt within the limits prescribed by
State statute and at levels consistent with its creditworthiness objectives.
Policy 5. Capital Financing:
The Town normally will rely on internally generated funds and/or
grants and contributions from other governments to finance its capital needs. Debt will be issued
for a capital project only when other funding is not available or sufficient.
Policy 6. Asset Life:
Town debt will not be issued for periods exceeding the useful life or
average useful lives of the project or projects to be financed, as recommended by its Bond
Counsel and Financial Advisor.
Debt Standards and Structure
Policy 7. Length of Debt:
Debt will be structured for the shortest period consistent with a fair
allocation of costs to current and future beneficiaries of users.
Policy 8. Debt Structure:
Debt will be structured to achieve the lowest possible net cost to the
Town given market conditions, the urgency of the capital project, and the nature and type of
security provided. Moreover, to the extent possible, the Town will design the repayment of its
overall debt so as to recapture rapidly its credit for future use.
Policy 9. BANs:
Use of short-term borrowing, such as bond anticipation notes (BANs) will be
undertaken only if the transaction costs plus interest of the debt are less than the cost of internal
February 24, 2009 Page 63
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
financing, or available cash is insufficient to meet working capital requirements.
Debt Administration and Process
The following policies apply to all Town debt issuance, including all General Obligation debt as
specifically noted.
Policy 10. Investment of Bond Proceeds:
All general obligation bonds proceeds shall be
invested as part of the Town’s Capital Fund, as noted by the Town’s investment policies.
Policy 11. Competitive Sale:
In general, Town debt will be issued through a competitive
bidding process. The Town shall retain the services of a Financial Advisor to administer the
competitive bidding process for serial bonds.
Policy 12. Property Tax Supported Debt Service Thresholds:
In order to maintain
appropriate budgetary controls and to prevent imposing excessive burden on taxpayers of the
Town, it is the intention of the Town Board to limit debt service expenditures supported by local
real property taxes to no more than 12% of aggregate budgetary appropriations in the Town’s
General Fund in any given year.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-195
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-196
CATEGORY:
Close/Use Town Roads
DEPARTMENT:
Police Dept
St Patrick Parade, Cutchogue
RESOLVEDgrants permission to the
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Cutchogue-New Suffolk Chamber of Commerce to use the following roads for its 4th
Annual St. Patrick’s Day Parade in Cutchogue on Saturday, March 14, 20092
beginning at
PM
: Cox’s Lane, west on Main Road, to Cases Lane, provided they file with the Town Clerk a
One Million Dollar Certificate of Insurance naming the Town of Southold as an additional
insured and notify Capt. Flatley within ten (10) days of the approval of this resolution to
coordinate traffic control. Support is for this year only, as the Southold Town Board continues to
evaluate the use of town roads.
February 24, 2009 Page 64
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-196
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-197
CATEGORY:
Close/Use Town Roads
DEPARTMENT:
Police Dept
Grant Permission to the Oysterponds U.F.S.D. to Use Certain Roads for Its 5K Run/Walk Race in Orient,
on Saturday, May 16, 2009
RESOLVEDgrants permission to the
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Oysterponds U.F.S.D. to use the following roads for its 5K Run/Walk race in Orient, on
Saturday, May 16, 2009
beginning at 10:00 AM: Main Road, Platt Road, Halyoke Road,
Orchard Street, Narrow River Road, Harbor Street, Douglass Street, King Street, Village Lane,
and Tabor Road, provided they file with the Town Clerk a One Million Dollar Certificate of
Insurance naming the Town of Southold as an additional insured and notify Capt. Flatley after
notification of the approval of this resolution to coordinate traffic control. Support is for this
year only, as the Southold Town Board continues to evaluate the use of town roads.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-197
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Initiator
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-198
CATEGORY:
Strawberry Fields
DEPARTMENT:
Police Dept
Approve Request for Annual Strawberry Festival
RESOLVEDgrants permission to the
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
February 24, 2009 Page 65
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Mattituck Lions Club to use Strawberry Fields in Mattituck from June 19 - 21 for the
annual Strawberry Festival
. Applicant must file with the Town Clerk a One Million Dollar
Certificate of Insurance naming the Town of Southold and Suffolk County as additional insured
and notify Capt. Flatley after notification of the approval of this resolution to coordinate traffic
control.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-198
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-199
CATEGORY:
Employment - Town
DEPARTMENT:
Accounting
Create and Set Salary Zoning Inspector Position
RESOLVED
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby creates the position of
the position of Zoning Inspector as
Zoning Inspector and establishes the annual rate of pay for
follows:
Effective Date Entry Level Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
January 1, 2009 47,634.09 50,813.30 52,084.74 53,801.19 55,072.54 58,251.25
January 1, 2010 49,420.99 52,718.80 54,037.02 55,818.74 57,137.86 60,435.67
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-199
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Initiator
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Seconder
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-200
CATEGORY:
Contracts, Lease & Agreements
DEPARTMENT:
Town Attorney
February 24, 2009 Page 66
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Retain InVision for Wireless Bill Review
RESOLVEDauthorizes and directs
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Supervisor Russell to retain InVision Wireless, LLC to review the Town's wireless bills
, at a
cost not to exceed 33% of the annual savings and credits identified, all in accordance with Town
Attorney approval.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-200
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Seconder
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Initiator
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Voter
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-201
CATEGORY:
Contracts, Lease & Agreements
DEPARTMENT:
Town Attorney
Intermunicipal Agreement with SCPC
WHEREAS
, General Municipal Law (GML) § 239 requires the referral of certain proposed
planning and zoning actions to the Suffolk County Planning Commission by local Towns and
Villages within the County, and
WHEREAS
, GML also allows for the County to enter into an agreement with a referring body
or duly authorized body of a Town or Village to provide that certain proposed actions be deemed
matters of local rather than inter-community or county-wide concern and therefore, not subject to
referral, and
WHEREAS
, the Town of Southold has proposed a litany of actions which are consistent with
the intent of GML and represent matters of local not county-wide concern, and
WHEREAS
, an inter-municipal agreement would streamline the referral review process without
any compromise to county-wide or inter-community planning considerations, now therefore be it
February 24, 2009 Page 67
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
RESOLVED
, that pursuant to the above the Suffolk County Planning Commission considers the
following list of actions to constitute matters of local determination which are NOT subject to
the referral process:
??All area variances associated with single-family residences.
??Change of one permitted use to another with no changes in parking requirements
??(i.e. retail to office).
??Minor additions less than 1,000 square feet with no change to use or occupancy.
??Site plan applications proposing less than 5,000 square feet of new or renovated
??floor area or less than 10,000 square feet of land disturbance.
Exception - actions that have been given a Positive Declaration pursuant to SEQR or actions
involving property abutting state or county parkland, the Atlantic Ocean, Long Island Sound,
and bay in Suffolk County or estuary of any of the foregoing bodies of water shall be subject to
the full review process.
RESOLVEDauthorizes and directs
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Supervisor Russell to execute and Intermunicipal agreement consistent with this resolution
,
and be it further
RESOLVEDTown Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the
, that the
Suffolk County Planning Commission and to the Planning Board and Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Town of Southold.
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-201
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Voter
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Initiator
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
2009-202
CATEGORY:
Committee Appointment
DEPARTMENT:
Town Clerk
LWRP Coordinating Council
February 24, 2009 Page 68
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
RESOLVEDappoints the LWRP
that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
Coordinating Council, pursuant to Section 268-4B of the Southold Town Code as follows:
John Sepenoski, Chairman
Scott Russell, Supervisor
Thomas Wickham, Town Board
Albert Krupski, Town Board
Martin Sidor, Planning Board Chairperson
Ruth Oliva, Zoning Board of Appeals
James King, President of the Board of Trustees
Peg Dickerson, Trustee
Mark Terry, Principal Planner
James Richter, Engineering Inspector
James McMahon, Director of Public Works
Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways
Captain Martin Flatley, Police Department
Jack McGreevy, Conservation Advisory Council
? Vote Record - Resolution RES-2009-202
?
Adopted
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
??
Adopted as Amended
? ? ? ?
William Ruland Initiator
??
Defeated
????????
Vincent Orlando Voter
??
Tabled
????????
Albert Krupski Jr. Voter
??
Withdrawn
????????
Thomas H. Wickham Seconder
??
Supervisor's Appt
????????
Louisa P. Evans Voter
??
Tax Receiver's Appt
????????
Scott Russell Voter
??
Rescinded
Closing Statements
Supervisor Russell
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Okay, this concludes the agenda. I would like to invite anyone that
would like to address the Town Board to please come up?
Larry Halliger, Mattituck
LEROY HEYLIGER: Good evening. I am Leroy Heyliger from Mattituck. I am here with a
petition from our church and the residents of Mattituck cottages. The petition to stop the 7-11
from coming to Mattituck. The zoning board has turned them down on their variance that they
requested and I understand that this is going to come before the Board on the future and I wanted
to present the reasons why we, the congregants and the residents of the Union Baptist Church
and the Mattituck cottages are against this, the need for the 7-11 convenience store being located
at the junction of Factory and Route 25 where the Citgo gas facility presently resides. We do so
for the following reasons as stated on our petition. Number one, we will see an increase in the
16 wheel and box truck traffic and personal vehicular traffic, with said vehicles exceeding the
presently high posted speed limit through our street, Factory Avenue. As you know, we have
had an ongoing problem there with these box trucks and these tractor trailers, they come down
Aldrich Lane up through Old Sound Avenue, back down Factory Avenue, make all their
February 24, 2009 Page 69
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
deliveries to the Waldbaum’s and to the restaurants and with the addition now with this 7-11,
proposed 7-11, it is going to put another burden on Factory Avenue which is in deteriorating
shape as it is right now. The next thing I have is the litter that would be generated by the facility.
We already have from the McDonalds and in the summer time we get litter all over our roadway
there. People going down Factory Avenue heading back out to 247 to go out to Orient and they
just throw the stuff all over the place during the summer time and also we have problem with the
Dempsey dumpsters. Where are they going to place another Dempsey dumpster? We already
have one problem, as the Supervisor had noted, the one with Waldbaums. Garbage all over up
and down the street. What was used to, at one time, referred to as a side street is no longer a side
street. It has become a commercial thoroughfare. Number 3 is our quality of life in this area is
slowly being deteriorated. We have quality of life issues that will be generated with this
convenience store that is going to operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It is going to
become a late night hang out for the young crowd, during the summer time. Once t he movie
theater closes down, the Waldbaums, the restaurants in the mall, once that closes down, the
young people have no place else to congregate but to congregate right there at that 7-11 store.
And then another problem, a quality of life problem, would be the beer and the tobacco sales that
is going to be generated and that is going to cause another problem, we are going to have to have
the police or some kind of watchdog group watch our young people with the beer and tobacco
sales. Another thing is it is going to become a, we all know 7-11’s up the island and around here
become a pickup area for our laborers, day laborers. You get vans, you have pickup trucks, you
got, they come in there and they pick the guys up and they take them on jobs and they bring them
back and they drop them off and then you get them hanging around. We don’t want to become
another problem like they have up in Farmingville and Patchogue. We don’t need it at that
intersection. Another thing is the volunteer fire department and the EMS know that there has
been several serious accidents right there at that corner. As a matter of fact, there was one
fatality, I believe, in 2007. And it was an elderly person. And that is a very dangerous
intersection with people trying to go into the shopping center, going to the movies and coming
out. So if they do some kind of a traffic study or police study, they should take that in
consideration about the accidents that have happened at that intersection. The owner of the 7-11,
he stated at the variance or it was stated at the variance that the curbing would have to be
removed, it would have to be taken out and he wasn’t going to pay for that and he wasn’t going
to pay for the renovation to the roadway. We can’t even get sidewalks on Factory Avenue. Who
is going to pay for that? The Town tells us they can’t afford it in the budget right now to give us
sidewalks so that the pedestrians who come out of our facility and also to come out of the
Mattituck cottages to walk to the theater, to go to Waldbaums with their shopping carts and their
baby carriages, they have to walk in the roadway. I sincerely hope that the Board will look into
this matter when it comes before them and would go over these petitions that are being presented
here tonight. And let us all remember, we are all Factory Avenue in Southold Town. Thank
you.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Thank you.
Art Tillman, Mattituck
ART TILLMAN: Art Tillman, Mattituck. I am here along with Leroy Heyliger. Leroy didn’t
mention he is deacon in the Unity Baptist Church and he has been authorized to speak on behalf
of his minister, who I believe lives in Southampton, so it is not too convenient to get over here. I
February 24, 2009 Page 70
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
would just like to read to you what the petition says. ‘We feel a 7-11, 24 hour, 7 day a week
store on Main Road and Factory Avenue would be detrimental to the community as it would
increase traffic on both Main Road and Factory Avenue, would not be a benefit to our
community in anyway. We the undersigned are concerned citizens who urge our leaders to act
now to reject and disapprove any application to convert the existing Citgo gas station on Main
Road into a 7-11 store’ There are six reasons why the Zoning Board of Appeals negated the
application. I want to mention two of them and I will try to be as brief as possible. It said that 7-
11 will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood
and while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood, the health and safety and
the welfare of the community, in effect is in jeopardy. With Mr. Heyliger’s petitions, we have a
total of 1,233 names on these petitions. And I have to tell you, it was some easy getting these
petitions signed. Nobody wants this thing. With the exception of a few kids who want some
Slurpees. It makes interesting reading because, we don’t expect you to take it home, but we left
room for comments and some of the comments are really precious. One we had to white out, it
was so profane. They go along with, these people are very passionate. No way, we don’t need
it, no way, not necessary, we don’t need it, no way, no, no, no, no way. No, no, no, no. Enough
graffiti, too much traffic, etc. etc. etc. The people of Mattituck are passionately against this 7-11.
Now, I know it probably isn’t the proper time to bring this before you because it has been
rejected by the Zoning Board of Appeals, but we are going to submit these petitions to you now
because it is my belief that the applicant, whose name is Gamma Deer Park Incorporated will be
back. I don’t think these guys are going away. So I have been carting these things around in my
pickup truck, they are getting a little beat up and I want to present them to the Board.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Art, I happen to think it is an excellent time to bring it before the
Town Board’s attention.
MR. TILLMAN: Do you? Good.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: I had talked to the Planning director about this, I talked to the
Planning director, just so you know, I did talk to the Planning director about options there. I am
going to meet with some people in the next few days that would be a bona fide buyer for the site
and use the site for a more appropriate use. I think if you are from Mattituck and I was raised in
the west end of this town, you have to say, you know, Mattituck has had enough. It is not just
that location being just as bad a spot as you can find for a 7-11 but also you have the franchises
already. And the mom and pops are disappearing overnight and you can ask Riverhead, they will
not come back if you lose them. And when these franchises come out there and having to
compete with these, the purchasing power of these franchises, is very difficult, so I think in the
near future we will have to engage the Town Board and figure out better uses for that site. Oh,
let me just hide my coffee cup. This is the Southold 7-11.
Victoria Belegrinos, Event Power
VICTORIA BELLEGRINOS: Hi, my name is Victoria Bellegrinos, I am the race director for
the Mighty North Fork Triathlon. Thank you for letting us address the Board and Supervisor
Russell, I sent you some information about the race supporting material and I have additional
supporting material for you.
February 24, 2009 Page 71
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Sure.
Steve Tarpinian, Event Power
STEVE TARPINIAN: And I am Steve Tarpinian from the triathlon as well and I would just like
to thank the Board for giving us this opportunity to speak and appreciate the opportunity and
hopefully the Board can reconsider their vote to deny the permit for the triathlon. I would like to
just take a couple of minutes to hit three points. The income from the event, the impact on the
Town and the event, the triathlon, an event such as this what it can mean to a town, how it can be
a very positive event for the Town. I will just go through them backwards. The impact of a
triathlon on the Town, this is in the packet that Vicky just gave you. This is from the Town of
Islip, of course every town is very different but the Town of Islip as just announced in this media
release last week, that they are putting on a triathlon and some of the positive aspects for the
Town and community. I don’t know how much the Board knows about a triathlon, it is a
sporting event. Swimming, biking, running. There are very few on Long Island, there are none
on the north fork, this is the only one. People who participate in this very healthy activity and
they are pretty passionate about it. I believe there are some people here today in support of the
event, I don’t know if any of them are going to want to speak or say anything but that is one
point. We would be more than happy, I don’t want to take up anyone’s time but if you want to
hear more about some of those positive aspect of the event itself. As far as the impact on the
Town, it is a little bit difficult to tell exactly what the problem was, especially since the, this
th
would be this year, if we could have it, would be the 11 annual. In the first 10 years, the permit
was vote 6-0 in favor and this year 6 against and none in favor, so it is kind of hard to address
really haven’t heard, we heard some things from the meeting and a little bit of the video clip, so
obviously it would be difficult to address exactly what it is but in terms of impact on the Town,
that seems to be one of the key points. So just to clarify a few things, in the packet Vicky
prepared, hopefully that clarifies things further. There are no town parks used or open space, it is
town roads and it is a pretty short, condensed amount of time between 7:00 AM and 8:30 AM on
a Sunday morning, the roads are not closed, they are managed by the police which brings up
another point, I don’t know how much in some of the things we have heard, there might be some
issues with police costs which could be a possibility the event could raise funds for that, to be
able to offset that, I don’t know how much that is or is not an issue. But in terms of impact on
the community, the actual race itself takes place at Cedar beach, which is a Suffolk County park.
The event company itself really prides itself in trying to leave an area nicer than what we took it,
we collect garbage not only from the event and participants but also surrounding areas.
Wherever there is an issue, we have tried to address it, of course we don’t hear of everything so
that is one thing. So that is impact on the Town. And finally in terms of income from the event,
there is, a triathlon is not like a running race where you have a bunch of runners and they get a
running number and they run around on a course and they finish and timing is just in terms of
what the finish time is, again, there is lots of things involved in triathlon, I don’t want to take up
a lot of time, if you would like more information we can give it to you but just as a real brief
thing, there are many costs associated with producing a safe and successful triathlon and the
money from the entry fees goes directly to produce the event. Whatever profit is there after
expenses is donated. We are always interested to increase any sponsorship or save money on
expenses and salaries, since this allows the event to give more things to participants such as their
jerseys and things they get in what is known as a goodie bag and also to give more to the
beneficiaries. Again, in terms of income and expenses, we can, the event can certainly go into
February 24, 2009 Page 72
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
more detail if that is requested and interested, something of interest from the Board. So I think
there might be some misunderstanding, like I said, some people might say oh, this triathlon is
like a running race and there are lots of additional expenses for a triathlon, that is why there are
not so many of them. And you know, it might be easy for someone to take a look and say, this
out of town company just comes in, uses town resources and roads and what do they do for us
and they leave a mess and go away with a pile of money and I want to say I wish that was true
but I really don’t wish that was true. The company that puts on the event, the event business part
of the company is a small part of the company. The company is mostly a training company. I
am the president of the company and we put on the events mostly as a service to the community.
The athletes are very passionate about it and hopefully the Board can reconsider the permit
request or at least discuss with us their concerns and maybe we can come up with a solution.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Thank you. I will just say that we did get the packet last week, I
distributed it to the Town Board and because of the timing and the agenda already being set
today, I told you that we would come back in two weeks at a work session, that informal
environment so we can talk a little more in depth about these issues and it will be on the agenda.
Ruthanne Woodhull, who is my assistant, will contact you to see what time will work for you. It
will be two weeks from today. And so we can get a little more in depth with this. But I would
certainly welcome anyone that wants to comment further on this particular issue. I just need to
tell you that this Board wasn’t really focused on your company, we are just, we have re-
evaluated the policies of the Town use because we are in a very tight fiscal climate and we
needed to look at what was costing us money and what wasn’t. And you saw for the agenda
tonight we have already had three or four requests for road closings from local organizations
such as teachers organizations, fire departments and it is very costly for the Town to keep
participating in this. So we tried to narrow, because of the overwhelming requests we are
getting, we are trying to narrow or limit the use of the public assets. The police department,
everybody else, it costs us a lot of money. We are just in this climate where we are looking to
save money wherever we can.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: Can I ask a quick question?
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Yes.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: But you asked the question what has changed, well, obviously
you have been watching the news well, the globe has been changing financially and of course it
affects us, the police chief did tell us that the marine patrol boat is out there and he has some
traffic control people out there that does cost the town some money, so we are all tightening our
belts. So that does affect us and we are all trying to save the taxpayers money. That was the, no
one here is against staying in shape. Look at us, we are all in great shape here. So no one is
opposed to bicycling, riding or swimming or anything like that, it was strictly a fiscal response
on that one. We are trying to do the best we can like everyone else. But I got the stuff from
Vicky and I wanted to ask a few questions if you don’t mind.
MR. TARPINIAN: Absolutely.
February 24, 2009 Page 73
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: You do paint arrows on the roads and to me that is a form almost,
of graffiti. You might run for that day, walk for that day and then leave and it stays there for
weeks and weeks and weeks. Is it possible to use maybe chalk or tape or something that can
come right up that day? Because the arrows do stay for weeks and I live down there, it stays for
a long time and you go but it stays.
MS. BELLEGRINOS: For some of our races we use chalk paint, they request that. So we have
used chalk paint and then it washes away in a couple of rains.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: The other thing, you talked about the garbage. You come and
you pick up the garbage and you walk around and I guess you get the water bottles, whatever
falls out, which is really appreciated. Do you take the garbage with you?
MS. BELLEGRINOS: We have Mickey’s carting, through the dumpster.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: So you have a dumpster there that you pay for and you pull it
away afterwards. Okay.
MS. BELLEGRINOS: Correct.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: And the other question was you say you make donations to town
organizations out here, I was wondering if you could get a list of who you donated to and what
amounts in ’08 when you come back to talk to us.
MS. BELLEGRINOS: Yes. Definitely.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: Thank you.
Alan Connell, Southold
ALAN CONNELL: My name is Alan Connell, I am a resident of Southold Town and I really
look forward to the triathlon. It is an event that motivates me, keeps me in shape, it is an event
that is complicated, as Steve said. And it requires an event coordinator like this company to even
pull off an event like that. And even if it was a not for profit organization that was sponsoring
this event, they would still have to hire a company like this to make it happen and so, I guess
what I am saying is that I think it is important that we have this in the Town. It provides a great
community activity, there is an awful lot of people in Southold Town that participate in it but it
also brings a lot of people from out of town which benefits our businesses. They are staying
overnight in bed and breakfasts, they are staying overnight in motels. They are eating in our
restaurants. It is all positive for the Town and I would really urge you to reconsider this and give
th
it another chance. It will be the 10 annual, which is, you know, it says something for us.
Eleventh.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: You must have missed one.
MR. CONNELL: I missed a race. So I think it is a fantastic event, there is no alcohol involved,
it is something that is really a positive thing for the Town. And I would urge you to reconsider.
February 24, 2009 Page 74
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Thank you.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Peggy and then you, Mr. Wills.
Peggy Murphy, Southold
PEGGY MURPHY: I am Peggy Murphy and I am a resident of Southold Town. And I also am
involved in the Board of Directors of CAST and Vinnie, I think you asked about the
organizations that receive….
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: I did receive your letter, a copy of your letter that you sent.
MS. MURPHY: Okay. So I made my case in terms of…
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: Well, I wondered who else they contributed to besides CAST.
MS. MURPHY: I wanted to be sure well, CAST is a pretty important agency and you know,
going down there for the first time last year I volunteered and the enthusiasm, I am not a runner,
I am not even much of a walker but the enthusiasm that was evident down there and the
organization was really something to see and the benefit to CAST, I don’t need to tell you, we
look for every dollar. And it is a different way of having some income come to CAST other than
our supermarket sitting for food or selling chances. So, I hope you will give it some thought and
allow them to continue this event.
COUNCILMAN WICKHAM: We look forward to reviewing it in two weeks time.
Steve Tarpinian
MR. TARPINIAN: I am sorry, I just wanted to mention one thing to Councilman Orlando, what
you say about the economic environment is absolutely 100 percent true and one of the things that
we pride ourselves in as an event company and doing events like this in various communities is
we want to be an asset to the community. So wherever there are costs like that, whether they be
police costs or what has happened in other towns where police costs were covered and they came
to us before accepting or denying the permit and said, hey you know we have this increased cost,
would you be able to contribute towards it. And that has happened, you know, we welcome the
opportunity whether we could or we couldn’t, I am not 100 percent sure but we certainly would
do our best effort. And again, you know, we want to be a part of the community, we are all Long
Islanders, I am not from the Town of Southold but my parents live in Shelter Island and this is an
important part of the community and if we are not a good part of the community, we wouldn’t
want to have the event. This is a fairly small event for us and really we could walk away from it,
it is not a big deal. But it is a big deal to the people that participate in it and I think it is a
positive thing for the Town. Hopefully it is, in your view and in reality. And as far as the other
beneficiaries, they are listed in the actual letter with the, when you did the vote. The letter that
came for the vote and Vicky has the other ones right off the top….
MS. BELLEGRINOS: Southold fire department (inaudible) and this year if the event is to take
place, we were also going to donate to the American Heart Association, which is based in
Southold.
February 24, 2009 Page 75
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Would anybody else like to address the Town Board on this or
anything else? Oh, I am sorry, go ahead.
Barbara Poliwoda, Heart Assoc
UNIDENTIFIED: I just wanted to say as a representative of the American Heart Association and
as a resident of this Town, I was really looking forward to participating in this event for the first
time this year after looking at those little green marks every year and saying to myself, I really
would like to do that because people I know, people I talk to, they train for it, they work really
hard and it emanates to other people to be part of that as well. And as we all know, heart disease
is the number one killer of not only Americans but Southolders. And Long Islanders and New
Yorkers. So anything we can do to avoid heart disease and one of that would be exercising, I
would love to see as much heart healthy activities going on in this town as possible. So I really
hope we can work this out and have this race.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Thank you.
Frank Wills, Mattituck
FRANK WILLS: Frank Wills, I live in Mattituck. I am not a runner, so I am not part of the
triathlon. At the Board meeting two weeks ago, the subject of the division of natural resources
came up, there were some discussions and because there were some objections to the last
paragraph, it was tabled. This morning, a copy of the program that I got included number 151
and I thought it would show up on tonight’s then but it has disappeared. I was wondering why?
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: I had, two weeks ago, the objection was to the wording of the
resolution, empowering the natural resources division. I had met with the attorney and Mark
Terry, we reworded it, redrafted it, distributed it to the Board. When we talked about it this
afternoon, it was apparent that there aren’t three votes to move forward with the creation…
JUSTICE EVANS: Four. There are not four votes.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: I am sorry, there aren’t four votes needed to move forward with the
creation of the division of natural resources.
COUNCILMAN KRUPSKI: We are split along party lines, the east versus the west here I think.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: We actually, there were three people that were in support of it, three
people that were in opposition to it. We can’t move forward on it with that type of vote. It is, as
a doctor would say, dead on the table.
MR. WILLS: Well, let me digress for a minute, when I look at my calendar and my diary, it
seems to indicate that this is 2009. 2009. And I would presume that we have come quite a ways,
not in 2009 years but let’s say in the last 100 years when we realize and sometimes reluctantly
admit, that science and facts should rule and govern our lives in what we do because it will help
us live and live better, including what we do to the environment. So the Town’s indecision,
apparently, in not establishing a group of people who would be helpful to all the other
February 24, 2009 Page 76
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
departments and divisions by supplying scientific and technical facts. Now I admit, I am
prejudiced, my training is as an engineer, as a chemical engineer, as a metallurgist and so forth
but over and above that, I feel we have learned a lot through science and technology, we now
know that road runoff is a bad idea, where as years ago when we paved the roads, oh, let the
water go down in the inlet and let it pollute, we didn’t even know it was polluting. We now
know it does. So I would urge you to reconsider abandoning this idea and establishing a division
or a department or a unit, what ever you want to call it. But don’t kill it because it will hurt all of
us. Thank you.
COUNCILMAN KRUPSKI: Actually, Frank, some of us felt the people who are involved here
are already employed in the Town. The decision was made to hire those people that are credible
and that are helpful to any town department on environmental issues and right now, it doesn’t
seem like the time to create new departments and new divisions that could possibly have a
financial impact in the Town. We are looking at every way to consolidate town government and
not expand it and that is the feeling on some of us. Myself, anyway.
COUNCILMAN WICKHAM: There are points of view but it is just hopeless tonight. I don’t
think there is any point in trying to rebut all of that. The Town Board needs to deal with it again
in another couple of weeks and maybe we can find a way to move forward with it at that time.
Denis McDermott, Frisky Oyster
DENNIS MCDERMOTT: My name is Dennis McDermott, I own the Frisky Oyster in
Greenport. Temple yoga center in Greenport, and soon to open (inaudible) in Greenport. I have
done the triathlon for the last four years and I found it to be a very encouraging thing for my staff
to do the triathlon as well and it became very infectious to the Greenport community because of
what was going in the restaurant. We inspired other people in the community to do the triathlon.
And they inspired other people to do the triathlon. And it has sort of grown to be a nice
community event where people who you would never be thinking to be swimming and biking
and running are now looking forward to doing the triathlon. The Mighty North Fork Triathlon. I
also do the mighty Hamptons triathlon and two triathlons in Montauk. And it is sort of nice that
we have one here on the north fork. It is smaller, it is more intimate, it is more community based
because so many people from Southold and Greenport and Mattituck and Cutchogue do the
Might North Fork and it sort of has to be sort of the jewel of that little string of triathlons and it
would be a shame if we didn’t have our little triathlon here. I know it is not as big as the one in
the other areas, Sag Harbor, Montauk but there is a lot charm to the little Mighty North Fork
Triathlon. And speaking as a business person and speaking as an athlete, it would be a shame to
see it not held this year.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Thank you.
MR. MCDERMOTT: If any of my input helps change your decision, I would be happy about
that.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Thank you very much.
Kate Williamson, Mattituck
February 24, 2009 Page 77
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
KATE WILLIAMSON: Hi, my name is Kate Williamson and I live in Mattituck and I am one
of those people that you wouldn’t look at and think, oh, she does triathlons but I do. And the
reason I can do it is because the Mighty North Fork is right here and it is billed as a beginners
triathlon and it welcomes people who might not be in such wonderful shape but it gives people a
goal to work for and like other speakers have said, it is really infectious. I went back after I did
my first one in 2006 to my Weight Watchers meeting and I said, I just did the most incredible
thing and if I can do it, you can do it and the next year, maybe 10 more people from that group; it
just is a really great thing to have here on this north fork and it would be a shame to lose it and I
hope you reconsider that decision. Thank you.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Thank you. Would anybody else like to come up and address the
Town Board?
Anne Murray
ANNE MURRAY: Anne Murray from East Marion. Just two quick things, I agree with Frank
on the natural resources division, I am kind of disappointed that you all can’t come to an
agreement on it. And it was my understanding from what Mark Terry put together and I have
been at a lot of meetings where this has been discussed but it was a budget neutral division, using
existing staff. This is something that the public is requesting and it would establish a clear path
of communication and accountability to the public on environmental issues and it would also
streamline the process of application for residents. So I really wish you could come to an
agreement on this, I think it is extremely important. And the other issue is, this morning you
were discussing this how the town could get money from the federal stimulus plan, which is
great. And I had a question on your, you were talking about stormwater projects. Do you think
you will be able to get enough money from the federal government to cover most of the
stormwater projects that you want to take care of?
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: You know, to be frank, there is no way of knowing and the federal
government has just created a package. How it is going to be disseminated and how much to
each region, there is still big question marks. Certainly I hope to get money to make an impact
on that ongoing challenge. The stormwater mitigation challenge is probably an ongoing,
expensive proposition for the next several years. If we can maybe leap frog ahead a little bit
with some stimulus money, it would be a great thing. To suggest that we are going to end the
problem with stimulus money is probably unrealistic.
MS. MURRAY: Well, if it is big environmental issues…
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: It is a huge environmental issue and it is going to be a very costly
fix over the next several years.
MS. MURRAY: I was just curious how many, do you have a number that you can put into your
request of stormwater project for the Town?
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Yes. We actually have, we already organized all of our inventory
for stormwater mitigation. We have about 120 critical areas identified by, with cooperation from
Cornell. We have the inventory. What we need is engineering on some of those solutions.
February 24, 2009 Page 78
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
Some are very quick, easy fixes that we are doing in house, through Pete Harris. Some are very
costly procedures that we will need land, land acquisition, things like that, to find a place to deal
with the volume of water we have in certain locations.
MS. MURRAY: Right. I just meant for the stimulus, if you had a number of projects you
wanted to target.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Well, we intend on submitting 120 locations.
MS. MURRAY: Great. Good luck. I hope we get it. Thank you.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: So do we.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Would anybody else like to address the Town Board?
Benja Schwartz
BENJA SCHWARTZ: (inaudible) Benja Schwartz. You remember me. Hey, if they put a little
rowing, sailing and swimming, I will do that. You can add an event. I would just like to speak
about the proposed division of natural resources. And I would like to ask who the three, I know
Al votes against everything, and voted against this but who are the other two?
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: I would be one those.
COUNCILMAN RULAND: I would be the other.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: Like Al said, to the left, to the right.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Well, then you three are the ones that I would like to ask you reconsider
your decision based on the number one, the proposal was budget neutral and there was no
request or no, it was examined, the comptroller, I was here when the comptroller came in and
said it wasn’t going to cost any money to form.
COUNCILMAN RULAND: I think it should be said, sir, that if you are going to quote him, the
comptroller said that day, he said, today…
MR. SCHWARTZ: Today. Correct. To form. To form. Not that it wouldn’t cost money down
the road.
COUNCILMAN RULAND: The day he was speaking, today, that day, it was budget neutral.
MR. SCHWARTZ: It was budget neutral to create the division.
COUNCILMAN RULAND: That is correct.
MR. SCHWARTZ: It was also government, the size of government neutral. It was not adding
new…I am sorry, I didn’t mean to interrupt.
February 24, 2009 Page 79
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
COUNCILMAN RULAND: I will let you understand my position and then I won’t have to say
anything more.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Can I finish what I had to say? And then I would love it if you would
respond. I did but I wanted to explain.
COUNCILMAN RULAND: No, please.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Somebody go forward and let’s get going.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Number one, we are not looking for more money, we are not looking for
more government right now. What they are trying to do, the people that work for the Town want
to add efficiency and effectiveness to their government. The addition of efficiency would result
in less cost, possibly, down the road. The addition of effectiveness would result in more
environmental protection. And I don’t want to see adding on layers and layers of government all
over but to define the layers that we already have, I thought it sounded like a good idea. Did you
want to respond?
COUNCILMAN RULAND: Only if you are finished.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes.
COUNCILMAN RULAND: Each one of us may see it in a different way. I see it based on the
experiences I have had in other positions I have held. Mr. Cushman was absolutely right in what
he said that day. In my opinion, there are underlying civil service issues that are in my mind,
unresolved. Moving forward in that direction without iron clad answers to those questions, I am
not willing to go there at this time. I do believe, I will say that I agree with you in the fact that I
am not saying it is not a good thing for the Town. I will agree with Councilman Krupski in that
our Planning Board and our Planning staff should be doing everything that they can to make this
process as easy and user friendly and comprehensive as it should be. If it is not, we need to sit
down with them and see if there are better ways to do what we do. That is all I have to say.
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: Ironically, Benja, the three of us are meeting at Town Hall for
another meeting on Friday at 3:00. Maybe we could all meet before that and we can sit down
and talk to you about that. We can spend some time on it.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Sure. Thank you.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: I would like to say for the record that on February 24, 2009 at 8:59
PM that I agreed with Benja Schwartz. The issue for me was exactly what you crystallized. You
crystallized it for me. And that is, we are not creating new government here, we are defining, we
are honing the roles of people that are already working for town government and I think that is
the essence of it. That is exactly what we are doing.
February 24, 2009 Page 80
Minutes
Southold Town Board Meeting
MR. SCHWARTZ: I don’t want to push my luck, Scott, but…
COUNCILMAN ORLANDO: You two should shake hands or something like that.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: You, in the most succinct way, said how my position is.
MR. SCHWARTZ: Fortunately, I lucked out.
SUPERVISOR RUSSELL: Would anyone else like to address the Town Board? (No response)
Hearing none, motion to adjourn?
Motion To:
Adjourn Town Board Meeting
COMMENTS - Current Meeting:
RESOLVED
that this meeting of the Southold Town Board be and hereby is declared adjourned at 9:02
P.M.
* * * * *
Elizabeth A. Neville
Southold Town Clerk
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER:
Thomas H. Wickham, Councilman
SECONDER:
Albert Krupski Jr., Councilman
AYES:
Ruland, Orlando, Krupski Jr., Wickham, Evans, Russell