Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-35.-3-12.7 ,/ KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAIUNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 SouthoId, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair OFFICE WCATlON: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town of South old Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner L WRP Coordinator Date: July 19, 2006 Re: Wetland Permit for Gregorson's Keep SCTM# 35-3-12.6 and 12.7 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of South old Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (L WRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the L WRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is generally CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the L WRP provided that: 1. If feasible, the installation of a silt boomltnrbiditv screen durin!! construction activities is required to minimize turbidity in the water column. Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. '. ,.. ....."',.~........,..~~.-..-. ~- '''''.L..._ -.;;::- Town of Southold L WRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM OrlE (f[ , i ! \111\1 ~I"\""'~ ..' ~ ",~^';-'",,:,~,~~: A. INSTRUCTIONS I. All applicants forpelmits* including Town of South old agencies, sh,all c CAEfor..._----.J proposed actions that are subject to the Town of South old Waterfront Consiste'ilCY Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a ~~~ertGy.'I<"_ in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated 0 its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all ofS thold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this [onn is answered "yesl1, then the reposed action may affect the achievement of the L WRP policy standards and conditions co ined in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if cessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent acticable with the L WRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified s consistent with the L WRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: line at the Town of South old's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Offi e, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. ~ So I "f" l, B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE ND PROP SED ACTION Gre!!ersen's Keep LLC Gull Pond Road, Greenport NY ,'J MAY - SCTM# 1000-35-3-12.6/12.7 (lot 1) AGENT: Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road. Southold NY 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board D Planning Dept D Building Dept D Board of Trustees X Zoning Board of Appeals D_ . /1 ~ ( ~\\.",f' \/ ,,/ Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): ~_ (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, plannin activity, agency regulation, laud transaction) D \ ~'\ : (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) D ~ 0 \"0 (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Tvpe: \~. 0 Wetland Permit for dock \ Town of South old LWRP Consistency Assessment Foml ; ,. Nature and extent of action: fixed Timber Dock (4' x 34') with seasonal (4' x IS') hin!!ed ramo and (6' x 20')t1oat Location of action: Gull Pond Site acreage: @.1 acre waterfront lot with sin!!le familv dwellin!! Present land use: residential Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name ofapplicant:Gre!!erson's KeeJ,J LLC (b) Mailing address: c/o 51020 Main Road. Southold NY 11971 (c) Telephone number: (631 )765-4330 (d) Application number, ifany: _ Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes 0 No X If yes, which state or federal agency:_ Town of Southo]d L WRP Consistency Assessment Fom1 2 " DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No 0 Not Applicable 0 Discussion (if appropriate): Waterfront residenciallot wishes to olace residential dock for orivate use. Dock orooosed which will enable a small oleasure boat to be used bv a familv. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of South old. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes X No 0 Not Applicable 0 Discussion (if appropriate): Parcel is not on Archeolo!!ical inventorv map. The dock will enhance the historic maritime culture. Recreational boaters suooort the coastal culture and oromote oreservation of historic Ii!!hthouses. The dock oromotes the economic revenue of the maritime economv. Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section 111 - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes X No 0 Not Applicable 0 Discussion (ifappropnate): Location of dock is sensitive to the {lreservation of tidal wetlands. The dock is elevated to oreserve and Protect the natural resources. The dock is limited in size to protect scenic resources. The size and location is in keeoine with adiacent docks and Trustee's oolicies and re!!ulations. Town of Southold L WRP Consistency Assessment Fonn 3 ... NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes X No D Not Applicable D Discussion (if appropriate):The dock is the minimum necessary to meet the policies of both the Trustees and DEe. Water depth is adequate and does not exceed 1/3 of permissible len\:th into Creek. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of South old. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes X No D Not Applicable D Discussion (if appropriate): No direct or indirect discharl!e is oermitted or anticioated bv orooosed boat. Size of ooles and heil!ht of dock above the wetlands prevent disturbance to creek bed or bank Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See L WRP Section III _ Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No D Not Applicable D Discussion (if appropriate): No imoact on ecolol!icalQualitv of Peconic Bav and Creek. Owner maintains a boat and merelv wishes to provide for oersonal dock at his home for his familv. James's Creek is not listed as a Sil!nificant Fish and Wildlife Habitat. While the owner recol!nizes the imoortance of the ecolo!!V of James's Creek the dock is similar to neil!hborinl! docks on adiacent orooerties and the existinl! Marina on the west side of his orooertv. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section 111- Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes D No D Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): no imoact on air Qualitv would be anticioated. Boat usal!e bv the familv remains the same. No oollutants will be discharl!ed Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See L WRP Section III -Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Town of South old LWRP Consistency Assessment Fonn 4 .r Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): Use of small pleasure boats should not discharl!e petroleum products or other hazardous substances. Town of Southold L WRP Consistency Assessment Foml 5 " PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No 0 Not Applicable 0 Discussion (if appropriate): Proposed dock will provide access to navil!:ation and recreational use of water ways. The size of the dock is the minimum necessary to provide for access to riparian owner. The size of the proposed dock is consistent with neil!:hborinl!: docks. The proposed dock is smaller then many of the neil!:hborinl!: docks on Gull Pond Inlet. The dock materials are from an approved list and is elevated to permit Iil!:ht and air to pass to the underlvinl!: vel!:etation. Dock will not interfere with public access. Town of South old LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 6 ... WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes X No 0 Not Applicable 0 Discussion (if appropriate): Jame's Creek is a recreational creek with si!!nificant water dependent development. Both the location and size of the proposed dock will not adverse im{lact navh:ation. Private docks promote economic development of marine industrv. Demand for marine products and services !!enerated bv private recreational use of the water. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62for evaluation criteria. Yes X No 0 Not Applicable 0 Discussion (if appropriate): Activitv at Marina and surroundin!! docks have not si!!nificantlv adverselv impacted marine resources. The proposed ramp and float are seasonal use and not interfere with marine !!rowth. The dock provides a recreational experience and economic benefit that is inte!!ral to the coastal identitv of Southold. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of South old. See LWRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): The economic tax base of Southold impacts the availabilitv of funds for a!!ricultural preservation. Amenities such as docks to waterfront properties provides for an economic return which indirectlv benefits a!!riculture. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): No significant demand on energy is caused by a dock *copy of Town form created on 2/11106 Town of South old LWRP Consistency Assessment Foml 7 \ " \ ' , SITE PLAN DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 10' CATWALK (Including Stairs): 4' wide x 34'Iong ... ~.o , ~~. HINGED RAMP: 3' wide x 15' long ,,,"1;,. FLOA TING DOCK: 6' wide x 20' long '~Jt. ,.~ ,~ , r :'" I I r I , , ( (1) (1) ELEVATED CA1WALK o o ;.. ::r: :e 34' . .,. I - - - .~. ~ .. " . '".. .": _:":; , .... 0.' .-. ~ .,... . . .... .: . .... .....:".....'"., - ". .. "'::,",.. .,. ".,'" I &.ioli.1,~e' _'. J I )~ 15' I o I I / / I HINGED RAMP o ~ :e I 6' I r~ ~ , , I : t-.- ," I I I I I I I I I I ..: _.J. , -.... ,..- i' " , ~"IJ 54" , "'-oJ' '_/ o ." 5 ;.. .., :z o o o () '" ,.- -.......,...- / 22"' I 36" " 56" \ ~ }, }, I _./ .... ~ .....- (1) - -- _AHW ALW 86' -,-......p. " " ", :~'." ~ -.: ~ ~ (0 .~ SOUTHERN ELEV A TI SCALE: 1" = 10' " .. ", Jtl . - 'Z ()O -< QlJII'lf I(pCt1-!1 f & 5f~ ) JUOI "... ptJI3W' YI Po ~ flfl"l 1..L.1tl6 (i) c:. rr ')>r 'Z.\) rnO~" 'Z. ~ o *1J'V"' . rflIel.A & pI' 1'l10lf pfi. ~s.. . ~ ~... . .- ."-1 , . ~.. \ 'Z. VI \t\)q 00 \ \ \'Y~ . \ , , -/. .. . ~. o \ . \ tt\ \. , \ \ 'II \ \ 't 1>-"'_ '\; ." (. , .4> " , \ I ) I 1 r I \ "" ~ Pr~ Dock . . 1fli4.0' 10q ~bIy {SEE DETAIL] /U.DG ENV/iU,P$ \ ~\: ~ . " v " fJdl ~. '. . ,. 390TJ~'.S:. ,. ZONE'~ ,15'~ . ':-,' ;.. A- ll': .... '.. '. _ ./ Il\ \ \ 1'~:. f!} ~~ ~.~ /\ eo'($I;W. \ .~.J / I ",,"I/IAL~~. I.. --...... .J--v- -- - ~ ...... ....." . lION.".. ...~....... ..... ~ ,.A/flL I~ Q,~ """'----)' -___ /6'11 . W ,"'" 32' -. , S 74"49'50 vu. N e .;:--........ " r:---r...... "1,. '>tJo "~-..::' I f'A r~""', tf/O/I'";~ h-. " - ( O~~ F. <f rffDMA~~ 1."/... -'-'-QVS'J"tn"PUa. .E: k'H..4U$ ~A::' --II' A 7"tJ? i ~. ~,. ~. '@ R ,..., 15' (SIdcJ *" "D. C ~ .~ r..;;;: ~ SITE PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1" = 50' Net a survey. Adapred from NY5DEC aPfXD'/f!d SllJW!y last dated Hay 17"',2005. PROPOSED DOCK ASSE1vffiLY PLAN for the GREGERSEN'S KEEP UCProperty 2(. CZJ) Prepared by SuffoJl. Environmental Cotuulting, Inc. Date: 4/W2006 PROrnCI' SPECIFICATIONS Applicant propooes to construct a private docking assembly upon subject parcel. Specifically, the applicant propooes to construct !~ 1) Fixed Elevated Catwalk (w / steps): 4' wide x 34' long [secured with eight pilings/6" diameter] c5 2) Hinged Ramp: 3' wide x IS' long 3) Floating Dock; 6' wide x 20' long [secured by four pilings/6" diameter] Catwalk to maintain a minimum elevation of !our (4] ~ above the existing grade. AIl malI!ria1s to be non treated malerial(s) (ie.Fir, Oak, Cedar~J!ll:..,).All1wdware will be hot-dipped galv~ All ~ nerfnt'll>>d hv ~lffnllr 'Pnvipt\ftnwit'l....,...,.."..,.lw-_ r_... __A t10 J#IUVV ...;'..;..2 ":"1. _ 'I'. ; ". _ .