Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2831~m~umm~, FRAi~-~ A. -- I200 Maple Lane, Greenport D-construct add. to dwelling w/insmff. sideyard area. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ACTION OF THE ZONING BOAI~D OF APPEALS Appcal No. 2831 by application Dated May 7, 1981 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To Frank J. Abbadessa 14 Walden Place Great Neck, NY 11020 filed May 11, 1981 Appellant at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a specia! exception under the Zohing Ordinance ( ~ Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance Art. III, ( ) June 18t 1981 Sec. 100-31 the appeal granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspecto~ (') be reversed ( ) be confirmed because Public Hearing: 6/11/81: 8:15 P.M. Application of Frank J. Abbadessa, 14 Walden Place, Great Neck, NY 11020 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for per- mission to construct addition to dwelling with insufficient side- yard area at 1200 Maple Lane & 55 Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, NY~ Cleaves Point Sec. II Subd. Filed Map #3521 Lot 40; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-35-6-1. (SEE REVERSE SIDE) 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (al Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce hardship because practical difficulties or unnecessary (SEE REVERSE SIDE) (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) (e) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) change the character of lhe district because (SEE REVERSE SIDE) (would not) and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. CG: lk ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FORM ZB4 After investigation and personal inspection, the Board finds and determines as follows: By this appeal, appellant seeks permission to construct a 24' by 13'6" garage addition, to be attached at the southerly side of the existing dwelling with a 4'6" by 9' breezeway in the sideyard area. The setback proposed from the southerly property line is seven feet. The premises in question is improved with a~one-family framed dwelling with a 12' by approximately 6' accessory building in the rearyard area and contains approximately 10,000 square feet in area. The premises is located at the junction of two intersecting streets. It is the opinion of this Board that sufficient hardship or practical difficulties has not been shown inasmuch as a facility as proposed by appellant may be constructed in the rearyard area under the provisions in the Code specified for "accessory buildings." The Board does not agree with the reasoning of appellant. The Board finds that the relief requested is substantial in relation to the Code requirements; that the relief requested is not within the spirit of the zoning ordinance; that if the variance were granted the character of the neighborhood would be adversely affected; that the hardship or practical difficulty is not sufficient to warrant the granting of this relief; that the circumstances are not unique; that the relief may be obtained by a method other than a variance; and that the interests of justice will be served by denying the relief requested by this appeal. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that Frank J. Abbadessa be denied a variance to the zoning ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 as applied for, Appeal No. 2831. Location of Property: 1200 Maple Lane (a/k/a 55 Snug Harbor ~oad); Greenport, NY; County Tax Map Parcel Item No. 1000-35-6-1. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Douglass, Goeh- ringer and Sawicki. (Member Doyen was absent). APPROVED Chairman B~ard ~A~p&ls/ RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTtiOLD TOWN CLERK LEGAL NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Provisions of the Amended Code of the Town of Southold, a Regular Meeting and the following public hearings will be held by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY on Thursday, June 11, 1981 commencing at 7:15 p.m. and as follows: 7:15 p.m. Application of Edward P. Berte~o. 1240 Inlet Drive, Mattituck_ NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for ar~Pr$va-l.~Of insufficient area of two proposed parcels known as Capt. Kidd Estates Subd. Lots 97 and 98, Filed Map #1672; also known as 1240 Inlet Drive, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-99-2-6. 7:30 p.m. Application of ~nna L. Bertero~ 955 Inlet Drive, P.O. Box 977, Mattituck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning iOrdinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for approval of insufficient area of three proposed parcels known as Capt. Kidd Estates Subd. Lots 74,75 and 76, Filed Map #1672; also known as 955 Inlet Drive, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-99-2-8 and 14. 7:40 p.m. Application of Herbert Hoffman by Mrs. Jules Adriaenssens, Box 76F, R.R.#2, Mattituck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permission to construct dwelling with insufficient front and rear yard setbacks at Smith Drive, Southold, NY; 106, 107,113 and part of 114, No. 1000-76-2- 34.1.' also Ymown as Goose Neck Subd. Lots Filed Map #1663; Co~ty Tax Map Item 7:55 p.m. Application of Susan C. Trentalange, 124 Cherry Valley Avenue, Garden City, NY 11530 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permission to construct deck with insufficient front yard setback at 90 Haywaters Road. Cutchogue, NY; also known as Nassau Point Subd. Filed Map #156 Lot 272; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-111-2-4. Page 2 - Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of June 11, 1981 legal adv. 8:05 p.m. Application of Keith and Arden Scott McCam¥, 76375 Main Road~ Greenport, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-32 for permission to build garage in sideyard area at 76375 Main Road, Greenport, NY; bouuded north by Levine, · Mazzaferro and Corwin; west by Union Free School Dist. No. 10 and · Mazzaferro; south by Main Road; east by Levine; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-48-1-2. ~ 8:15 p.m. Application of Frank J. Abb~dessa, 14 Walden Place, Great Neck, NY 11020 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permission to construct addition to dwelling with insufficient sideyard area at 1200 Maple Lane & 55 Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, NY; Cleaves Point Sec. II Subd. Filed Map #3521, Lot 40; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-35-6-1. t8:30 p.m. Application of Mobil Oil Corp.~ 464 Doughty Boule- vard, Inwood, NY 11696 for a Special Exception to the Zoning 0rd- inance Art. VII 100-70B & Art. XI 100-118E for permission to replace existing nonconforming tanks at the S/W oorner of Main Road & Youngs Avenue, Southold; Frohnhoefer; south by Sullivan; Map Item No. 1000-61-4-23. bounded north by S.R. 25; west by east by Youngs Avenue;County Tax 8:45 p.m. Application of Nicholas W. I~polito, 36 Gehrig Street, Commack, NY 11725 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permission to construct addition to dwelling with insufficient front, side and rear yard setbacks at 230 Carol Road, Southold, NY; bounded north hy Stachtiaris; west by Carole Road; south by Hass; east by Arshamomaque Pond; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-52-2-7. 8:55 p.m. Application of Peconic Corp., c/o Norris Grain Co., Box 1058, Ocala, FL 32670 for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance Art. III, Sec. 100-30 for permission to convert barn with existing one-f~nily use to a two-family dwelling use at the South side of New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck; bounded north by New Suffolk Avenue, Cichanowicz, Dove, Reeve and Brooks; west by Page 3 - Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of June 1 1981 legal adv. Camp Mineola Road, Reeve, Murphy, Peters, Kirchgessner, Haberman, Smith, Norris and ors.; south by the bay; east by Wickham, Bagshaw and Park Avenue; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-115-9-4, (by A. A. Wickham, Esq. as attorney). ~9:15 p.m. Application of Charles Bocklet, 1295 Robinson Lane, Peconic, NY, (by Peter R. Stoutenburgh as agent) for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-32 for per- mission to construct swimming pool with fence in front (and/or sideyard) area at 1295 Robinson Lane, Peconic, NY; bounded north by Suskevich; west by Robinson Lane and McQueen; south by the bay; east by Wood; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-98-5-2, 3, 4. Dated: May 22, 1981. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOkRD OF APPEALS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN Instructions to newspapers: Please publish once, to wit, Thursday, May 28, 1981 and forward 10 affidavits of publication to: Mrs. L. Kowalski, Secretary, Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Southold, NY 11971, as soon as possible. FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No ................................ IV ~ALb~ ensasa T~a,OT~Ca ta~t you, ~ppn~tioa a~t~a ............. A~...E~.., ~s~. ?.. fo, p¢~it to ~oa~t~¢t... q ~ ~ .... 9.~% Lg... ~..~ ~.'.q~??.ff.... ~. ?.k k ~.Lqt Location of Property I &oO- ~;&; ~oZ ....................... ~;i ............... I ....... ~;~iei cou,~y Tax mp ~o. ~000 S~tio~ ........ ? :~.. ~o~k ...... ~ ...... ~t . .I ............ SQbdlvlslon ~-~.~...~ .... ~FQed Map No .... ?. ~. ~ ...... Lot No .................. is returned herewith and disapproved on the follow~g ~ounds . .. [ ./~/.. ~'. (~ ~. C. ~ ~ ~ ...... Building Inspector RV1/80 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEA' NO. 4 DATE May...~.,...ZgB.1 .... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. x (We)...~..~.,.....A.~..4p~.s..s..6...~...u..!F.~..of ..!.4....~..A.~.D...Z.R..~4.C..~ ...................................... Name of Appellant Street and Number .................. .~.~.A.,~....S)', .~..C.~ ................................................... ~.~..~.....¥..0.~ .......... HEREBY 'APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ..................................... DATED .,~.~];~..~-.~.,...~.9.~.1. ................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) ( ) (x) FRANK J. ABBADESSA & WIFE Name of Applicant for permit of ...! .4.....U...A.~p.~.. Z ~...C..~., ............... .G..~...A..%. ~..C..Z. ............ ~.U....!0...~._ .................. Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY to bu±ld 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY 1200 MAPLE LANE & 55 SNUG HARBOR ROAD Street U~e District on Zoning Map 3521 40 Map No. Lot No. 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) ART. III 100-31 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (x) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (J:~s-~--¢=~'~) been mode with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 x) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinamce ) ~s requested for the reason that it [~ desired to bu±ld a garage add±t±on to the south side of the existing dwellin~ with a request to build within 7'-0" of the side yard property line. Form ZB1 (Continue on other side) REASON FOP, APPEAL Continued ~. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practicaldifficulties or unneces* sary HARDSHIP because the dwelling is located on a coz-nar plot bound on the north side by Snug Harbor Road and on the east side by Maple Lane. The contractor had evidentally located the building to the limits of ordinance requirements. There was no consideration given in the design of the dwelling for the possibility of adding a garage. In order to attach a garage to the dwelling without a breezeway, it will be necessary to block up the Master Bed Room window which faces south and also block off quick egress from the side door to the side yard. It would then be required to exit from the side door into the garage and then out from the garage into the side yard. In the event of an emergency such method of egress could be hazardous to life safety. Access to the crawl space under the house (no basement) will also be blocked off. 2. The hardship creotedis UNIQUEandisnotshared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity ofthisproperty and in this use district because the dwellings in the area were all designed and built with attached garages and with two means of proper egress. The motif of the dwelling design is Japanese in character. Additions to such dwellings are done by separate buildings with minor connections such as a breezeway. 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because the garage as designed with the breeze- way would maintain the original design of the dwelling and in fact enhance the character of the area. The south property line is planted with trees which will screen the south side of the garage. Entry will be directly off Maple Lane. The proposed addition will aesthetically add to the design of the dwelling which will result in upgrading the in~nediate area. Locating the garage at any other location would in fact downgrade the design value resulting in negative value to the character of the district. STATE OF NEW YORK ) ~' / Sworn tr~ this ............... . .~....~.~... ................ day of ...... "~ .................................. 19~¢'/ / SANDRA CONNER NotarY Public, State of Now York No, 24-47131'71 (~ua~ified in K nos County Commission Expires March 30, ~g82 =0 ~ F Southold Town Bo rd of Appeals MAIN RFIAO- STATE ROAD ~5 SOUTHIqLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOERRINGER JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI September 18, 1981 Mr. Frank J. Abbadessa 14 Walden Place Great Neck, NY 11020 Re: Appeal No. 2831 Dear Mr. Abbadessa: Reference is made in your most recent letter received by the Board on September 8, 1981 concerning the construction of a home at premises located on Maple Lane. All construction within the township must be given approval by the Building Department before it is commenced, and at any time during regular office hours someone would be happy to make the files available to you for inspection. If variances were granted, the files would contain the written findings and determination of the Board. Among the findings in this Board's determination regarding this appeal made June 18, 1981 is the opinion of the board that sufficient hardship has not been shown and the fact that a facility such as you propose may be constructed under the provisions of the zoning code, Article III, without requiring a variance. It is also the consensus of the board mer~ers that the reasons indicated for a rehearing are not sufficient to warrant a motion among the board members to call for a rehearing. Accordingly, the request for a rehearing is denied. CG:lk Yours very tr,uly, CHARLES GRIG~NIS, JR. CHAIRMAN August 12, 1981 14 Walden Place Great Neck, New York 11020 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. William R. Pell, III, Supervisor Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Ii Dear Mr. Pell: Reference is made to the enclosed copy of letter dated July 27, 1981 to the Board of Appeals requesting a rehearing regarding an application made to the Board on June 11, 1981 for a variance to build a garage adjacent to my dwelling with "insufficient side yard." My application was denied without prejudice. I learned of the above mentioned denial through the Suffolk Times. I have not, as of this date, received formal notification. During a conversation in early July with Mr. Charles Gregonis, Chairman of the Board of Appeals, he suggested I re-apply for a variance or write a letter requesting a rehearing. Naturally, I chose to request a rehearing since submitting another application would require considerable time and effort which, in my opinion, would be an unnecessary expenditure of time and money on my part and also of the tax payers money. My application and letter re- questing a rehearing were very explicit in explaining the hardships caused to me by not being allowed to build the garage where I have planned it. The Board in its double denial to my request has completely ignored the extreme hardships caused to me and is denying me the right to protect and take full advantage of my capital investment. The ordinance of which I am requesting a variance requires a distance of ten feet from a major dwelling to the side yard property line. I have requested a variance of three feet which would result in seven feet from the property line in lieu of the specified ten feet. Any major dwelling built on the adjacent property will be ten feet from the mutual property line resulting in seventeen feet between dwellings. August 12, 1981 Page 2 There is presently being built on Maple Lane, the road from which I plan to lay a driveway to the proposed garage, a fairly large house with an extension well beyond the thirty five foot distance required by ordinance from a major dwelling to the property line parallel to the road. I would like to know under what circumstances the owner of the property has been allowed such a variance. I called the Board of Appeals on August 12, 1981 to inquire on the status of my request for a rehearing. I was informed that the Board members discussed the matter and that since no one made a motion a vote was not taken and therefore my request was denied. I consider this a blatant, inexcused and prejudiced move on the part of the Board members. As a very irritated tax payer I am asking your office to look into this matter as soon as possible and to inform me why (1) the building on Maple Lane is allowed to be erected well beyond the thirty five foot requirement, and (2) on what explicit grounds my requests have been denied. If I do not receive satisfactory replies, I will be left with no alternative but to take action against the Board members, individually if necessary, to have them show cause regarding this matter. I apologize for the necessity of having to write such a letter to your office. However, I am incensed by the seemingly calloused concern of the Board members - or member - regarding the hardships they are creating by their denial to grant me a variance to build a dwelling seven feet from the property lime instead of ten feet. I will appreciate a response from your office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, CC: Zoning Board of Appeals Mr. Charles Gregonis, Jr. Chairman 14 Walden Place Great Neck, New York RE: Maple Lane & Snug Harbor Road Greenport, New York Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Charles GreEonis, Jr. Gentlemen: I have noted in the Suffolk Times that my appeal for a variance to build an attached breezeway and garage on the south side of my dwelling at Maple Lane and Snug Harbor Road, Greenport has been denied without prejudice. T~e denial of my appeal to build the structure as I have requested will create an.extreme hardship for me for the following reasons: 1. There is presently no storage facilities in the dwelling other than four clothes closets and a p~ntry. The attic, foundation crawl spaces are o~ no storage value. A small storage shed is my only means of storing all outside furniture, garden tools and equipment, and the many miscellaneous items required in the maintenance of the dwelling and its surrounding property. I have no area which can be used as a workshop, an absolute necessity in the upkeep of a dwellinE and property. I take great pride in the appearance of my grounds and keeping them in excellent condition requires that I use a hand mower. A sit-down type would facilitate care and cause less pressure on my back which, because of a boating accident, causes me discomfort aftem certain strenuous activities such as walking to mow over 10,000 square feet of lawn. Since I have no place to store a sit-down mower to protect it from the elements and vandalism, I cannot take advantage of having one. July 27, 1981 Page 2 I am forced to leave me car out in the elements which in any area is detrimental. In Greenport, where the salt air has a more deteriorating effect, depreciation is accelerated. The vehicle represents a sizeable investment which I can not replace now or in the near future without financial hardship. To erect the needed addition in any area other than where proposed, will create further damaging hard- ships. The property value will be down-graded and it will be a blight on the community. I w~ll be denied my right to appreciate my capital investment. In one instance it would ~ require the destruction of a beautiful old weeping willow tree and pines to create an awkward driveway off Snug Harbor Road. In the other instance it would be necessa in approximately the o~ to erect the addition center the now open and pleasant property. In both instances it would be necessary to remove the storage shed which is required in addition to the ara e. t dwellin~ .~_, _h~ a~iti~n cannot be attached to the ~ wztnouc further ~estruction and unnecessary added costs; the v~ew from the deck would be reduced to the point of negative value. I hereby request a rehearing at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your consideration. truly yours, CERTIFIED MAIL August 12, 1981 14 Walden Place Great Neck, New York 11020 Town of Soufhoid Mr. William R. Pell, III, Supervisor Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Pell: Reference is made to the enclosed copy of letter dated July 27, 1981 to the Board of Appeals requesting a rehearing regarding an application made to the Board on June 11, 1981 for a variance to build a garage adjacent to my dwelling with "insufficient side yard." My applicatzon was denied without prejudice. I learned of the above mentioned denial through the Suffolk Times. I have not, as of this date, received formal notification. During a conversation in early July with Mr. Charles Gregonis, Chairman of the Board of Appeals, he suggested I re-apply for a variance or write a letter requesting a rehearing. Naturally, I chose to request a rehearing since submitting another application would require considerable time and effort which, in my opinion, would be an unnecessary expenditure of time and money on my part - and also of the tax payers money. My application and letter re- questing a rehearing were very explicit in explaining the hardships caused to me by not being allowed to build the garage where I have planned it. The Board in its double denial to my request has completely ignored the extreme hardships caused to me and is denying me the right to protect and take full advantage of my capital investment. The ordinance of which I am requesting a variance requires a distance of ten feet from a major dwelling to the side yard property line. I have requested a variance of three feet which would result in seven feet from the property line in lieu of the specified ten feet. Any major dwelling built on the adjacent property will be ten feet from the mutual property line resulting in seventeen feet between dwellings. August 12, 1981 Page 2 There is presently being built on Maple Lane, the road from which I plan to lay a driveway to the proposed garage, a fairly large house with an extension well beyond the thirty five foot distance required by ordinance from a major dwelling to the property line parallel to the road. I would like to know under what circumstances the owner of the property has been allowed such a variance. I called the Board of Appeals on August 12, 1981 to inquire on the status of my request for a rehearing. I was informed that the Board members discussed the matter and that since no one made a motion a vote was not taken and therefore my request was denied. I consider this a blatant, inexcused and prejudiced move on the part of the Board members. As a very irritated tax payer I am asking your office to look into this matter as soon as possible and to inform me why (1) the building on Maple Lane is allowed to be erected well beyond the thirty five foot requirement, and (2) on what explicit grounds my requests have been denied. If I do not receive satisfactory replies, I will be left with no alternative but to take action against the Board members, individually if necessary, to have them show cause regarding this matter. I apologize for the necessity of having to write such a letter to your office. However, I am incensed by the seemingly calloused concern of the Board members - or member - regarding the hardships they are creating by their denial to grant me a variance to build a dwelling seven feet from the property line instead of ten feet. I will appreciate a response from your office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Prank Jo ~bbadessa CC: Zoning Board of Appeals Mr. Charles Gregonis, Jr. Chairman APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, .JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, Jr. ROBERT 3. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of APPeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 2S SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11cj71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 August 13, 1981 Mr. Frank J. Abbadessa 14 Walden Place Great Neck, NY 1102~ Re: Appeal No. 2831 - Application of Frank J. Abbadessa Your Correspondence Dated July 27, 1981 Dear Mr. Abbadessa: Please be advised that the Board of Appeals reviewed your corres- pondence to the Board dated July 27, 1981 requesting that the Board reconsider its decision on Appeal No. 2831, and it is the consensus of the Board not to re-hear this matter to change, modify or reverse its decision of June 18, 1981. It is suggested that you contact the Building Department in order to find out what alternatives you have for constructing a storage facility. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, CG:ec CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. CHAIRMAN Board of Appeals Town of Southold July 27, 1981 14 Walden Place Great Neck, New York RE: Maple Lane & Snug Harbor Road Gr. eenport, New York Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Charles Gregonis, Jr. Gentlemen: I have noted in the Suffolk Times that my appeal for a variance to build an attached breezeway and garage on the south side of my dwelling at Maple Lane and Snug Harbor Road, Greenport has been denied without prejudice. The denial of my appeal to build the structure as I have requested will create an extreme hardship for me for the following reasons: There is presently no storage facilities in the dwelling other than four clothes closets and a pantry. The attic~foundation crawl spaces are of no storage value. A small storage shed is my only means of storing all outside furniture, garden tools and equipment, and the many miscellaneous items required in the maintenance of the dwelling and its surrounding property. I have no area which can be used as a workshop, an absolute necessity in the upkeep of a dwelling and property. I take great pride in the appearance of my grounds and keeping them in excellent condition requires that I use a hand mower. A sit-down type would facilitate care and cause less pressure on my back which, because of a boating accident, causes me discomfort aftem certain strenuous activities such as walking to mow over 10,000 square feet of lawn. Since I have no place to store a sit-down mower to protect it from the elements and vandalism, I cannot take advantage of having one. July 27, 1981 Page 2 Be I am forced to leave me car out in the elements which in any area is detrimental. In Greenport, where the salt air has a more deteriorating effect, depreciation is accelerated. The vehicle represents a sizeable investment which I can not replace now or in the near future without financial hardship. To erect the needed addition in any area other than where proposed, will create further damaging hard- ships. The property value will be down-graded and it will be a blight on the community. I will be denied my right to appreciate my capital investment. In one instance it would require the destruction of a beautiful old weeping willow tree and pines to create an awkward driveway off Snug Harbor Road. In the other instance it would be necessary to erect the addition in approximately the center of the now open and pleasant property. In both instances it would be necessary to remove the storage shed which is required in addition to the garage; the addition cannot be attached to the dwelling without further destruction and unnecessary added costs; the view from the deck would be reduced to the point of negative value. I hereby request a rehearing at you= earliest Thank you for your consideration. A,blY, yours, convenience. Today' s Date: ~, Members Absent, if an~: (/ .~d'o.40~ Appeal No. 2831 Agenda Item/Matter of: Type of Variance or Appeal: Resolution made by: Seconded by: AttDADESSA ~ FRANK g. addLtion to dwellin, g with. ins__uf_ificient sideyard area at 1200 Maple Lane & 55 Snug Harbor Rd., GCharles Robert ~ G~rard r,goms Dougl-&ss ~oenrmger ( ) ( (¢) ( ) (¢) ( ( ) ( ) Greenport ~oseph. aWICKI ( ) ( ) Action: ( ) Approve as applied for ( ) Deny as applied for (~/) Deny (~/) Deny without prejudice ( ) ~dithdrawn without Prejudice ( ) ( ) Approve with the following conditions: ( ubject to County Planning referral ( ) Subject to Planning Board approval ( ) Subject to D.E.C. requlations ( ) Other: Findings of the Board are as follows: Other: ( (, Not Within the Character of the Neighborhood Variance is Substantial in Relation to Code If so, Hardship not sufficient Hardship or Difficulty Not Unique Will set a precedent in the neighborhood Area is already very congested Interests of justice served by denyin9 Granting the Relief Requested is within spirit of the zoning code Relief is not substantial Burden of hardship or difficulty shown and is unique Variance will not change character of the neighborhood Interests of Justice served by granting Vote of the Board: Notes: Ayes: (/) CG Nay: ( ) Abstain: ( ) Absent: ( ) ) SD ) ) . (¢) (~/~ RD (4 GG (vfJS ) () () ) () () ) () () permission to construct deck with insufficient front yard setback at 90 Haywaters Road, Cutchogue, NY; also known as Nassau Point Subd. Filed Map #156 Lot 272; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-111-2-4. 8:05 p.m. Application of Keith and Arden Scott Mco Camy, 76375 Main Road, Greenport, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-32 for permission 'to build garage in sideyard area at 76375 Main Road, Greenport, NY; bounded north by Levine, Mazzaferro and Corwin; west by Union Free School Dist. No. 10 and Mazza- ferro; south by Main Road; east by Levine; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-48-1~2. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, STATE OF NEW YORK, ~ ss: ........ ?.~.o.y...~.~.s.~..~@o~ ............ being duly Sworn, says that .. ~e is Printer and Publisher of the SUFFOLK WEEKLY TIMES, a newspaper published at Greenport, in said county~ and that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the said Suffolk Weekly Times once in eoch week, for ...o.rl.e. ...................... weeks successively commencing on ~he ....2.8..~.h. ................. achy of ....... .Fi.~_~. _ 19.~--. t~ .., Sworn to before me this .... 2~..! day of ..... ~t~. ........ 19.. 8~ ........... ...... LEGAL NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Provisions of the Amended Code of the Town of Southold, a Regular Meeting and the following public hearings will be held by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at the South- old Town Hall, Main Road,. Southold, NY on Thursday, June 11, 1981 c°mmencing at 7:15 p.m. and as follows: 7:15 p.m. Application of Edward P. Bertero, 1240 Inlet Drive, Mattituck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for. approval of insufficient area of two proposed parcels known as Capt. Kidd Estates Subd. Lots 97 and 98, Filed Map #1672; also known as 1240 Inlet Drive, Mattituck, NY; COUnty Tax Map Item No. 1000-99-2-6. 7:30 p.m. Application of Anna L. Bertero, 955 Inlet Drive, P.O. Box 977, Matti- tuck, NY for ~a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for approval of insufficient area of three pro- posed parcels known as Capt. Kidd Estates Subd. Lots. 74, 75 and 76, Filed Map #1672; also known as '955 Inlet Drive, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-99-2-8 and 14. 7:40 p,m. Application of Herbert Hoffman by Mrs. Jules Adriaenssens, Box 76F, R.R.#2, Mattituck, NY for a 'Variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permission to construct dwel- ling with insufficient front and rear yard setbacks at Smith Drive, Southold, . NY; also known as Goose Neck Subd. Lots 106, 107, 113 and part of 114, Filed Map.//1663; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-76-2- 34.1. 7:55 p.m. Application of Susan c. Trentalange, 124 Cherry Valley Avenue, Gar- den City, NY 11530 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for p.m. Application of Mobil Oil Corp., 464 Doughty Boulevard, Inwood, NY 11696 for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance Art. VIL~'~ .... · ~nue, Southold; or~P~f'd~] north by S.R. 25; west by Frohnhoefer; south by Sullivan; east by Youngs Ave- nue; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-61-4-23. 6:45 p.m. Application of Nicholas W. Ippolito, 36 Gehrig Street, Commack, NY 11725 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permission to construct addition to dwelling with in- sufficient front, side and rear yard setbacks at 230 Carol Road, Southold, NY; bounded north by Stachtiaris; west by Carole Road; south by Hass; east by Arsharnomaque Pond; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-52-2-7. 8:55 p.m. Application of Peconic Corp., c/o Norris Grain Co., Box 1058, Ocala, FL 32670 for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance Art. III/Sec. 100-30 for permission to convert barn with existing one-family use to a two-family dwelling use at the south side of New Suffolk Avenue, Matti- tuck; bounded north by New Suffolk Avenue, Cichanowicz, Dove, Reeve and Brooks; west by Camp Mineola Road, Reeve, Murphy, Peters, Kirch- gessner, Haberman, Smith, Norris and ors.; south by the bay; east by Wickham, Bag- shaw and Park Avenue; Coun- ty Tax Map Item No., 1000- 115-9-4, (by A. A. Wickham, Esq. as attorney). 9:15 p.m. Application of Charles Bocklet, 1295 Robin- son Lane, Peconic, NY, (by Peter R. Stoutenburgh as agent) for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-32 for permission to construct swimming pool with fence in front (and/or side- yard) area at 1295 Robinson Lane, Peconic, NY; bounded north by Suskevich; west by Robinson Lane and McQueen; south by the bay; east by Wood; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-98-5-2, 3, 4. Dated: May 22, 1961. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN 1TM28-3699 HELEN K. DE VOE NOTARY PUBLIC. State of New York No. 4707878, Suffolk Gount~ Term Expires March 30, 19~'.~ Tax Map Item No. 1000-76- 2~34.1. 7:55 p.m~' Application of Susan C. Trentalange,'. 124 Cherry Valley Avenue, Garden .City, NY 11530 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for permission to construct deck with Ln- sufficient front yard setback at 90 Haywaters Road, Cutch- ogue, NY; also known as Nassau Point Subd. Filed Map . #156 Lot 272; County Tax Map Provisions of the Amended Code of the Town of Southold, a Regular Meeting and the following public hearings will be held by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southol'd, NY on Thurs- day, June 11, 1981 com- mencing at 7:15 p.m. and as follows: 7:15 p.m. ~,pplication of Edward P. Bertero, 1240 Inlet Drive, Mattituck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance, Art. III, Sec. 100-31 for approval of insufficient area of two proposed parcels known as Capt. Kidd Estates Subd. Lots 97 and 98, Filed Map #1672; also known as 1240 Inlet Drive, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-99-2-6. 7:30 p.m. Application of Anna L. Bertero, 955 Inlet Drive, P.O. Box 977, Matti- tuck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art.. HI, Sec. 100-31 for approval of insufficient area of three proposed parcels known as Capt. Kidd Estates Subd. Lots 74, 75 and 76, Filed Map '#1672; also known as 955 Inlet Drive, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-99-2-8 and 14. 7:40 p.m. Application of Herbert Hoffman by Mrs. Jules Adriaenssens, Box 76F, R.R.#2, Mattituck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordin- ance, Art. III, Sec; 100-31 for permission to construct dwell- Lng with insufficient front and rear yard setbacks at Smith Drive, Southold, NY; also known as Goose Neck Subd. Lots 106, 107, 113 and part of 114, Filed Map #1663; County Item No. 1000-111-2-4. 8:05 'p.m. Application of Keith and Arden Scott Mc- Carny, 76375 Main Road, Greenport, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-32 for per- mission to build garage in sideyard area at 76375 Main Road, Greenport, NY; bound- ed north by Levine, Mazza- ferro and Corwin; west by Union Free School Dist. No. 10 and Mazzaferro; south by Main Road; east by Levine; · County Tax Map Item No. 1000-48-1-2. 8:15 p.m. Application oi Frank J, Abbadessa~ 14 ~aiden Place. Great Neck. N~ ~11020 for a V~,4~"''e to the ~ OrOinance, Art. III_, -~e~.~00-31 for nermission to ~t addi~jc~n to dwelliu~ 'with' insufficient sideward arena ~ple Lane & 55 Snu[~' -Harbor Ro~; '~'d"'~[~21, Lo~ 40: .County 'l'~X Man Item No, ---'~-:-:~0 p.m. Application of Mobil Oil Corp., 464 Doughty Boulevard, Inwood, NY 11696 for a Special Exception tO the Zoning Ordinance Art. VII man, Smith, Norris and ors.; south by the bay; east by Wickham, Bagshaw and Park Avenue; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-115-9-4, (by A.A. Wickham, Esq. as attorney). 9:15 p.m. Application of Charles Bocklet, 1295 Robin- son Lane, Peconic, NY (by Peter R. Stoutenburgh as agent) for a Variance to 'the Zoning Ordinance, Art. III, Sec. 100-32 for permission to construct swimming pool with fence in front (and/or side- yard) area at 1295 Robinson Lane, Peconic, NY; bounded north by Suskevich; west by Robinson Lane and McQueen; south by the bay; east by Wood; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-98-5-2, 3, 4. Dated: May 22, 1981. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., Chairman 1T, 5/28/81 (7) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NE%V YORK ss: P~',ricia Woad, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and thru the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watch- man once each week for ................. ~ ..................... weeks successively, commencing on the ..... .~.....<~. ........................ Sworn to before me this '~ day of .................. , Notar~ Public Addendum to Legal Notice 6/11/81 Board of Appeals Regular Meeting On Tuesday, May 26, 1981, copies to: Mr. Edward P. Bertero Anna L. Bertero Mr. Herbert Hoffman Mrs. Jules Adriaenssens (as Mrs. Susan C. Trentalange Mr. Arden Scott McCamy Mr. & Mrs. Frank J. Abbadessa Mr. Nicholas W. Ippolito Mr. Charles Bocklet Mr. Peter R. Stoutenburgh (for Mr. Charles Bocklet) Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. for Peconic Corporation Peconic Corporation c/o Norris Grain Co. Mobil 0il Corporation Harold J. Van Brunt (Project Manager, Fenley & Nicol Co., Grigg's Service Station Z.B.A. members T.B. members Supervisor Town Attorney Town Clerk Bulletin Board (posted May 26, 1981) Appeal Files agent for Mr. Herbert Hoffman) Inc.) !clT° Southo wn Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD ~TATE ROAD 25 S0UTHOLD, L.I., N.Y, 11g'71 TELEPHONE (516) APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. T ~-,"L~ '! TUT:::LL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER N.Y.S. Joseph H. Saw~cki NOTICE OF DECLARATION PURSUANT TO ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Appeal No. 2851 Application of: Frank J. Abbadessa Location of Property in Question: 1200 Maple Lane & 55 Snug Harbor Road, Greenport, NY County Tax Map Item No. 1000- 35-6-1 ~ Project Proposed by Appeal Application: to construct addition to dwelling with insufficient sideyard area. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southold Town Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as proposed herein is hereby classified as a Type II Action not having a significant adverse effect upon the environment for the following reason(s): An Environmental Assessment in the Short Form has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as planned. The property in question is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be involved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal appli- cation. Dated: June 30, 1981 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Copies to: Town Clerk Bulletin Board Applicant ZBA file APPEALS BOAF~D MEMBERS CltARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER JOSEPH H. SAWICKI MAIN ROAD- S,'T,~TE RDAD 2S July 15, 1981 flOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 Mr. Frank J. Abbadessa 14 Walden Place Great Neck, NY 11020 Dear Mr. Abbadessa: This is a Notice of De:!aration pursuant to the New York State Environmental Qu5!ity Review Act (New York SEQRA). It does not indicate the de:ision of the Board of Appeals. The official, final cc;':' of the decision of the Zoning. Board of Appeals is not yem ready for mailing. You will receive a copy of the dec!=_~n as soon as possible. Thank you for your cc:~eration. Sincerely, Eileen M. Carey, Temporary Secretary Zoning Board of Appeals Enclosure K JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, L. 1., N. Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 To: From: May 11, 1981 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 2831 application of Frank J. Abbadessa for a variance. Also included are notification of adjoining property owners, Notice of Disapproval fromthe Building Inspector, Short Environmental Assessment Form, and Wetland Questionnaire. JTT/bn Enclosures Judith T. Terry Town Clerk September 2, 1981 14 Walden Place Great Neck, New York RE: Appeal No. 2831 11020 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: Thank you for your letter of August 17, 1981 which refers to my letter of August 12, 1981 addressed to Mr. William R. Pell, III, Supervisor. I will discuss your suggestion with the Town of Southold Building Department. The above mentioned letter of August 17, 1981 neglected to respond to my questions. I would be most appreciative for the courtesy of a reply. I would like to again make a request for a rehearing. Thank you for your time and consideration. Very truly yours, ~rank J./Abbadessa ( ) ¢ ) ( ) f~gonda Itenz for / Z~A Chairman/Mombers eopt~ ] u~ldin[~ D~Dt. Plannin~ Eoard ;q~pli~n:~t Or his ;~gent Cc, p? to Origizal for Z~A file Co~en~s or Reply Requeste~ . Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- ~TATE ROAD 2.5 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765~1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER JOSEPH H. SAWICKI August 17, 1981 Mr. Frank J. Abbadessa 14 Walden Place Great Neck. NY ll02G Re: Appeal No. 2831 Dear Mr. Abbadessa: Your letter dated August 12, 1981 addressed to Mr. Wil- liam R. Pell, III, Supervisor, has been referred to our office for reply. On August 13, 1981 our office forwarded correspondence to you, which you may or may not have received by today, and which perhaps have crossed in the mails. It is our understanding that a facility for purposes of storage is permitted in the Code without a variance in the A-Agricultural & Residential District subject to certain require- ments, a copy o~Article III, Section 100-32 is enclosed for yOU. .If you have any questions or if we may be of assistance, please do not hesitate to call. CG:lk Enclosure Very truly yours, CHARLES , CHAIRMAN iNSTRUCTIONS: StlORT EFIVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ~ order to answer the questions in this short EAF it is assumed that the preparer ~'till use. currently avoiioble information concerning the project and the likeiy impacts of the action. It is not.expected that. additional studies, research or other investigations ~,liII be undertaken. (b) IF any question has'been answered Yes the project may be significant and a completed Environmentoi Assessment Form is necessary. (c) IF aiI questions have been answered No it is likeiy that this project is not significant. .. (d) Environmental Assessment ' . 1. W±I1 project resul't'"in a large physicai change to the project site or physically alter more land? Yes ~No than l0 acres of ........................ 2. ¥1iII there be a major change to any unique or · unusuai land form found on the site? .......... Yes, ~NO 3. ¥1iIi project aiter or have a iarge effect on y existing body of wot~r? ....................... , 4. ¥til~ project have a potentially large impact on ground~,later quality? ....................... Yes,~No._ 5. ¥1£11 project significantly effect d~o~nage fl adj nt ire ? . Yes ~ No 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? ............ Yes ~ No 7. ¥;ill project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? .............. - ................. Yes. . 8. ¥1ill projec~ have o major effect on visual character of the community or scenic views or vistas known to:be important to the community?. Yes. ~. ¥1ill project adversely impact any site or .. . structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontologicol..importance or any site designated as a critical environmental oreo by o local agency? ................ Yes ~No lO. %~ill project have a major effect on existing or Future recreational opportunities?. ......... . Yes ~No 'll. %?ill project result in.major traffic problems o~ cause o major effect to existing transportation systems? ........................ Yes. ~ No 12. Will project :regularly cause objectionable · odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturbance ts a result of the project's operation? ......... : ............................ ~' Yes. ~..N° 13. %?ill project have any impact on public health or.safety? .................................... Yes 14. %?ill project affect the existing community by ' directly causing o gro~.i~h in permanent population of more than 5 percegt over a one year period or hove a major negative effect 15. on the chara'cter of the community or neighborhood? .................................. Yes ~No. Is there public controversy concerning the '~N project? ...................................... Yes. ... o DATE (Today's Date) To: Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appeal Application of Location of Property: [1o0 Dear Sirs: In reference to the New York State Tidal Wetlands Land-Use Regulations, 6 NYCRR, Part 661, and Article 25 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law, please be advised that the subject property in the within appeal application: (please check one box) [ ] May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; however, constructed along the water-lying edge of this property is a bulkhead in very good condition and at least 100 feet in length.* [ ] May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; however, constructed along the water-lying edge of this property is a bulkhead in need of (minor) (major) repairs, and approximately__ feet in length. [ ] May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; however, constructed along the water-lying edge of this property is a bulkhead less than 100 feet' in length. [ ] May be located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands; and there is no bulkhead or concrete wall existing on the premises. Is not located within 300 feet of tidal wetlands to the best of my knowledge.* [Starred items (*) indicate your property does not appear to fall within the jurisdiction of the N.Y.S.D.E.C.] Sincerely yours, 'lSigh~t~e please) May 7, 1981 14 Walden Place Great Neck, New York Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find application for an appeal from decision of the Building Inspector regarding a request for permit to construct a garage addition to existing dwelling at 1200 Maple Lane & Snug Harbor Road in Greenport. The sketches included indicate the south side of the garage at 7'-0" from the southerly property line. The distance shown on the permit application was 4'-0". The proposed addition was moved northerly as much as possible and still maintain the integrity of the design. Thank you for your consideration. decision. I look forward to a favorable Very truly yours, Frank J. Abbadessa Enclosure BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold TO: NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance) ~c.**: 1. 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: l~OO.:t~ ~ ~44~o~ I~M.l:~a~- ~.o.:l~,T~ I~ LA~_.; ~GoT~ ~ A~)AI~AO'~. 3. Th. at the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: .1~r~ u~,-r~N OF 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are: . .~'T. ~ Ioo- ~ ~ 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. '7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in tl~e Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: ~ ~' ~(' Post Office Address II o~c) NAME PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICF ADDRESS P35 G983084 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROV~DED-- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) SENTTO P .. STATE AND ZIP COD POSTAGE $ CERTIFIED FEE ¢ ~ SPECIAL DELIVERY ~ ~STRiCTED DELIVERY ¢ SHOW T0 WHOM AND  ~ ~ OATEDELIVERE0 ~ ~ SHOW~OWHOM DAlE ~ ~ DELIVERY ~ ~ ~HOWTO~HOMAN~fE ADDRtSS OF DELWERY WITH ¢ STA P35 6983083 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) ~O., S~ATE AND ZiP CODE ~ AND ADDRESS Of ¢ ~ ' SHOW TO WHOM ~b b~E ~ ~ DELIvERYDeuvERe"WITH~EsTRICTEE ¢  SHOWTOWHOM D~TEAN~ ADDRESS OF DELIVERY WITH ~ , residing at /~ ~dO,.CID~/i~, ¥,'~//q'/~¢/~ )v'.y. , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~ day , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the re- verse side hereof, directed to each of the above-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Of- fi ce at G'~A/~. ~/"~o: /~'Lr~ ~'0~/~ ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (:'cg!s:c;';d} mail. Sworn to before me this day~~ Notary Public SEE SEC. NO. 036 515 GULL POND INLE 7' (UNDERWATER t. AND) ? ? 3,27,000 ,J L ' SCALE /8 RESIDENCE or MR.¢ PIRS. F'. SNUG HARESOR ~.D., 5REE. NPORT, L.I. ,N.Y.