The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-108.-3-5.5PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND April 8, 2009 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-108-3-5.5 Shipman Site Plan Application Fee Dear Ms. Moore: Enclosed is a check in the amount of $500 payable to Shamrock Tree Expert Co. which we are returning because no site plan application was necessary. Sincerely, Tamara Sadoo Planner Enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 January 6,2009 Ms. Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Application for Joe and Catherine Shipman This property is located 25.5 feet west of Elijah's Lane on Main Road (SoR. 25), Mattituck. SCTM#1000-108-3-5.5 Zoning District: AC Dear Ms. Moore, This letter is to inform you of the Southold Town Planning Board's decision regarding your site plan application for Joe and Catherine Shipman, SCTM#1000-108-3-5.5. The Planning Board has reviewed the above referenced application at their January 5, 2009 Work Session. Based upon this review, the Planning board has determined that Site Plan approval for this project is not required for the following reasons: a. Pursuant to §280-127 of the Southold Town Code, Site plan is not required because the proposed agricultural storage barn will not create any changes in use or intensity of the property which will affect the characteristics of the site in terms of parking, loading, access, drainage, open space or utilities; and b. Pursuant to §280-133(c) of the Southold Town Code, the Planning Board has the discretion to waive any or all of the requirements of §280-133, where the application involves uses strictly related to agriculture and where the requirements of §280-133 are not necessary to protect and maintain the public health, safety or welfare. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thankyou. Tamam S. Sadoo Planner Town of Southold Southold Town Annex 54375 State Route 25 PO Box 1179 Southold, NY' 11971-0959 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Cc: Joe Shipman Mike Vedty, Chief Building Inspector WORK SESSION AGENDA THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOAI~) Monday, January 5, 2009 4:00 p.m. Site Plans: Project name: Location: Description: Breeze Hill Farms I SCTM#: I 1000-74-1-36 31215 CR 48, Peconic, 609' west of Henry's Lane, Peconic Additions and alterations to house and buildings: this proposed action is to build additions and make alterations to a two-story farm-house, convert a 1-story frame house to a farm stand, build a new farm crop storage building/barn, build an addition to a masonry building for a farm office, and build a home barn. Status: Action: Attachments: Open Accept Site Plan application, refer out and begin SEQR Staff Report Project name: Shipman, Shamrock Tree Experts! SCTM#: I 1000-108-3-5.5 Location: 25.5 feet west of Elijah's Lane, on Main Road (SR. 25), Mattituck Description: This site plan is proposing to construct an agricultural storage building on the northern portion of SCTM~1000-108-3-5.5. The total lot size is 40,854 sq. ft. or 0.94 acres. Status: _ Open Action: Determine if site p_lan is required. Attachments: _Staff Report Project name: Location: Description: Status: Action: Attachments: Macari Vineyards 1 SCTM#: t 1000-121-1-1.6 Bergen Ave, Mattituck This site plan is proposing to construct a 72' x 138' agricultural storage building on the southeast portion of survey. The total lot size is 219,088 sq_. ff. or 5.030 acres. Open Determine if site plan is required. Memo to Mike Verity I Project name: North Fork Self Storag_e- I SCTM#: I 1000-96-1-1.2 Location: The west side of Commerce Drive, approximately 475 feet south from ~C__o_rp___orate Road in ~_u_t_c_ho~ue, a.k.a. 115 Commerce Drive. i Description: ! This site plan is for the construction of a 23,490 sq. ft. self-storage I building on a 47,166 sq. ft. p_arcel in the Light Industrial Zoning District. I Status: New site plan applicatior{ -- Recommendations: for the Planning Board to accept the application, refer Sta~f-~ecomr~nds out, and berlin SEQR. Attac~.h_m_~_n_ts_: ..... -,LS-t aff-~R-e P-?~'- '--~--..-...~--i--i~.--~ii~ii ~'-' __--_--~__ ""~'~_ _~ _~__._~-'"~-"-'--____~_ _~_. i~' SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, REGIONAL DIRECTOR December 29, 2008 STATE OF NEW YOrK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK ] 1788 www.nysdot.gov ASTRID C. GLYNN COMMISSIONER Ms. Heather Lanza Plarm~ing Director Town of Southoid PO Box [17~9~ .... Southold~ ~ [ 1.97t- Applicant's Recent Submission Greenbriar Acres Route 25, Mattituck SCTM 1000-10800-0300-005005 Our Case No. 08-497P Dear Ms: Lanza: · This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review· We have completed our review of this submission. As long as all work takes place outside the NY 25 highway right-of-way (ROW) and the NY 25 highway ROW is not used to perform any work or to stage equipment or vehicles, we will not require a Highway Work Permit from our Agency. However, please note that as mentioned in our previous letter of 12-1-08, any utility work in State ROW will require a utility Highway Work Permit. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for the opportunity to review this development and for your cooperation conceming this matter. Very truly yours, Original Si~ned By Shaik A. Saad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: ~r. Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold ~t~Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Mr. Joseph Shipman, 985 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, NY 11952 SAS:MDW:ajf PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOV~rNSEND December 12, 2008 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Ms. Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Application for Joe and Catherine Shipman This property is located 25.5 feet west of Elijah's Lane on Main Road (S.R. 25), Mattituck. SCTM#1000-108-3-5.5 Zoning District: AC Dear Ms. Moore, This letter is to confirm that the Southold Town Planning Board is in receipt of your site plan application for Joe and Catherine Shipman, SCTM#1000-108-3-5.5. The Planning Board is currently reviewing your application and the proposed action consisting of constructing a new agricultural storage building on the property. Once the initial review has taken place, we will contact you to schedule a meeting with the Planning Department to review your proposed action. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thank you. Tamara S. Sadoo Planner Town of Southold Southold Town Annex 54375 State Route 25 PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 December 1, 2008 Southold Town Planning Board Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Main Road, Mattituck SCTM#1000-108-3-5.5 Owner: Joe & Cathleen Shipman Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Enclosed please find an application for site plan approval for an agricultural storage building. Also enclosed are following: 3. 4. 5. Surveys with site plan of proposed structure with existing 20' juniper and proposed parking. Long EAF LWRP ZBA decision granting setbacks of proposed structure My client's check in the amount of $500 for site plan application fee The applicant requests that your board waive further requirements on the site plan. The structure will be used for the adjacent tree farm. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Ruth D. Oliva Jarn~s Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman Mailing Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor. North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTItOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS, AND DETERMINATION - MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2008 ~ ZBA # 6173 - JOSEPH and CATHLEEN SHIPMAN ~ PROPERTY LOCATION: 20685 Route 25 (Main Road), Mattituck CTM 108-3-5.5 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated June 24, 2008 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a 40,854 square foot parcel measuring 264.09 feet along Main Road (Route 25) to the south, 200.00 feet along the western boundary, 144.44 feet along the northern boundary, and 233.05 feet along the eastern boundary. The lot is improved with a tree farm, as shown on the survey by John C. Ehlers, Land Surveyor, dated March 3, 2005. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance as amended under Section 280-124, based on the Building Inspector's August 18, 2008 amended Notice of Disapproval which states that the proposed agricultural storage building on an existing tree farm property is not permitted for the reason that barns, storage buildings, greenhouses (including plastic covered) and other related structures, shall conform to the yard requirements for principal buildings, and the required minimum rear yard setback is 60 feet. RELIEF REQUESTED The applicant requests a variance to construct an agricultural storage building with a setback of 10 feet from the rear property hne. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted, and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Town Law ~267-b(3)(b)(3)(1). Grant of setback variance will not have a significant adverse environmental effect on the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed building will be close to the adjoining part of a farm owned by the applicant and will not impact on neighbors' property. Page 2 - October 16, 2008 ZBA # 6173 - J. and C. Shipman, Applicants CTM 108-3-5.5 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit of an agricultural storage building cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The Board finds that location of the building for the storage of agricultural equipment close to the adjoining lot is important to the operation of the farm. 3. Town Law §267~b(3)(b)(3). The variance is substantial. It is partially mitigated by the fact that the adjoining property is part of the same tree farm owned by the applicant. 4. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The need for a variance was self-created. It is a consequence of the layout of the farm, which is divided by a boundary near the middle of farm occupying more than one lot. 5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that grant of this relief will have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Town Law §267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of new construction, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Simon, seconded by Member Weisman, and duly carried, to DENY the variance as applied for, and in the ALTERNATIVE, to GRANT a variance to allow a 15-foot setback from the rear lot line. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Vice Chairwoman), Dinizio, Simon, and Weisman. (Chairman Goehringer w~a~ absent.) This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Vice Chairwoman 10/~i08 Approved for Filing PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Gerard P. Goehringer, ZBA Chairman Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Members of the Planning Board Date: June 16, 2008 Re: Shamrock Tree Expert. SCTM#108-3-5.5 ZBA# 6173 The Planning Board received your request for comments regarding the above application to construct an agricultural storage building. The Planning Board has not received an application for this site. Based on a preliminary review of the plans submitted with this request, it appears the site is well-screened with vegetation from the Scenic Byway (SR 25) and other properties, and there is enough land area to be able to provide an adequate drainage system for storm-water runoff associated with the building. The property line nearest to the proposed building (10') appears to be under the same ownership and part of the same farm operation. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the Planning Department. Ai~PEALS BOARD MEMBER~I~ Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Ruth D. Oliva James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman Mailing Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · PO. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTItOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Gerard P. Goehringer, ZBA Chairman DATE: May 14, 2008 SUBJECT: Request for Comments (Site Plan Coordinatior*~,-~N~;~hamrock Tree Expert, Inc.) As confirmed with your office, the ZBA is reviewing the following application, and enclose copies of the ZBA Legal Notice, Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, ZB application, and latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the site plan review steps under Chapter 280 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience for reference if needed. NAME TAX # / ZBA BD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE NOD DATE DATE STAMPED SHIPMAN, 108-3- 6173 2126108 280-124 5/12/08 John C. Joseph/Shamrock 5.5 Ehlers, Tree Expert Inc. Land Surveyor Your comments are appreciated by June 12, 2008. Thank you. Encls. ~,~,, MAP OF ®t:;~JEENBRIAR AC,~ PILED OCTOBER -/, Iq-/-/, PILE No. 660~ SITUATE~ HATTITUC, K. TOI,',IN.- ~AI'4PTON c--J. FFOLK (.,¢JNTY, NY 5UP, V'ffT'ED O~5-2~-2OO5 6ORI',IER5 MARKED 05-04-2005 PP-,OP. A6. BUILD~IN~ OI-OE~-2OO6 SUFFOLK C, OUNTI" TAX ~ IOO-IO~-~-5.,.5 PiONUI, IENT FOUND AREA = 40.~F.54 .SF or' O.q4 Acre¢ ®RAPHIC, 5GALE I"= 40' S85"25'50,,E 144.44' . .- , ', PROPOSED A®RICULTURAL Lot I (Nfo[[l[uck _ ~eer~or~ N E ~ Vacant, ~ $.R. 25 JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 50202 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF.-\\Compaqserver~pros\05~05-142.pro FOPd'd NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Shamrock Tree Expert, Inc. 985 Elijah's Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated January 22, 2008 DATE: February 26, 2008 For permit to construct an agricultural storage building on an existing tree farm property at Location of property: 20685 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 108 Block3 Lot 5.~5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed agricultural storage building is not permitted pursuant to Article III, Section 280-13 (A) (2) (c), which states, "Barns, storage buildings, greenhouses (including plastic covered) and other related structures, provided that such buildings shall conform to the yard requirements for principal buildings." · ~ III Secu Pursuant to ArficI~_XX ,___ 'on 208-~124_._t.h~quired minimum front yard setback is 50 feet and the minimum single side yard setback is 20 feet. Following the proposed construction, the agricultural storage building will be 48 feet from the front yard (dirt road) and 10 feet from the side yard. In additi~nosedmse~quires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Au-'fl~m izod Si ture Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board, ZBA APPLICAnt/TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOAI~OF APPEALS For Office Use Only ~ Fee: $. Filed By: Date Assigned/Assignment No. Office Notes: House No. Street Hamlet SCTMl000Section/~Block~Lot(s) ..~.~-' LotSize 7!'(~.~ Zone I (WE) APP_EA~TIi~ WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED ~ _ BASED ON MAP DATED pplicant(s)/Owner(s). ~'vS~ ~/ P Telepboue: ~-~-/4 ~ ~ ~ Fax #: Email: NOTE: In addition to the pbove, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: ~'1~ for (~Owner, or ( ) Other: Agent's Address: ~ ~ Telephone C~ ~x_~_ Fax #: Email: Please check box to specify who you wish correspondence to be moiled to, from the above names: [] Applicant/Owner(s),or [3Authorized Representative, or [] Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED MAP DATED AN APPLICATI~O~ DATED .~ I~,]0.~ FOR: I~Building Permit [3 Certificate of Occupancy [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy [] Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Construction EOther: and DENIED Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) Article Section 280- Subsection Type offAl, peal. An Appeal is m. ade for: O'A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. [] A.Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. [] Interpretatio~ of the Town Code, Article ~Section~~._ t3 Rev~7 C~her~ A pr_iql'~lPeal~.,,as~,~ has not been made at any time with respect to this property~ UNDER Appeal No.~T~ea[_~ (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for Name of Owner: ~BA File # REASONS FOR APPEAL (additional sheets tna¥ be used with preparer's signature}: AREA VARIANCE REASONS: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: (3) The amount of relief requested is not subst.nti~l bec.use: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impac~ on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the alleged difficul~ been self-created? ( )Yes, or (~o. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this laud: ~o. E Yes (Mease furnish copyJ. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box ( ) IF A USE VARIANCE lS BEING REQUESTED, AND PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED USE VARIANCE SHEET: (Please be sure to consult your attorney.) Sworn to before me this ~..~nd day o~ 20..O_~._. Notary Public Notary Public, State of Now York No. OZED4891383. Suffolk County COmmission Expires May 4, APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: ~ o~ ,OB 1~. ,¢[x~ ~A~ Date Prepared: U I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: II. New Construction Areas ('N~l~..pwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor ~ars~J~ O~fg~.L ~0 Dimensions of new second floor: ~ 0 1,1~o Dimensions of floor above second level: ;,.1 ~ ~,,~ Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): .~ (> @ Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?-If yesu, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach exa'a sheet if necessary) - Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: I IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: Proposed increase of building coverage: Square footage of your lot: bio :~ ~'~ Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: V. Purpose of New Construction: VI. Please describe the land contours (fiat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 NOTICE ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 108 E:,URVE'T' OF LOT I FlAP OF ~f;~FNBRIAR Ell ~ OC. TC)~I~Ia.. '1, Iq-/'/, I=II_E No. ~ SITUATE= I'4ATTITUC, K TOI~N; 5OUTHOLI~ 5UFT:OLK C, OUN'I~, NY SURVEYED CX:~NL=R5 FtAI~.~J~ 05-04-2005 REVISED 11--O5-2OO~, 11-1~-2OO~5 ~K C, OUNT~ TAX # IOO-IO~5-~-5..5 C~l~'l'llq ~.u ] TO: I:;~AIl'bauSE C, ALC, ULATIONS, BUILDII',I~ ROOt= AREA 2.5~O 5.t=. ~ X O.1"/ X I.O = 4~5.~ 251 / 42.2.4 = IO.4 V.L.F. REGDIRED I E)'-O' DIA. X 5'--O" PEEP DRAII',I/~:~ POOL I ~5'-O" PlA. X b'--O" I~EEP I:::~RAINA~ POOL ~ VJ_.F. HONU~-RT ~ ~%L'~j~.'~<j,C.[~CC'; EXISTIN~ 20' JUNIPER VIRGINIA LOT COVEt;~,,(:~E AREA = 40,~-~t 5t= or o.q4 Acre~ ~P-,APHIC 5GALE I"= 4~' ph E"h~pmon S85°25'50"E 144.44' (HotUt~c.k _ eceerC, oct Rood) N JOHN C. EHLERS L~NTD SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 50202 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF.-\\Compaqserver~pros~0b-305-142.pro TOWN OI~OUTHOLD PLANNING SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: Site Plan Name: Suff°lk C°unty Tax Map #1000-?L)o Other SCTM #s: B~ARD Street Address: Distance to nearest intersection: l'ype of Site Plan: Hamlet: _ ~ New Amended If Amended, last approval date: / / __ Residential CECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Informatioo Please list name, mailing~address, and p_hone humble below: Property Owner Street 2 City_ ~F_~p/9 )Zz~c2_ Home Telephone State ~ _Zip_ Other Applicant Street City Home Telephone State _Zip_ Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)*. Street City <~d)b0t~ 6 ~ State Office Telephone Other *Unless otherwisd requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. os/os Page 1 of 2 (Date) Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: ~,.T~t% ~ Coc~¢j-t ~ ~D~t~,~mo2}fi , hereby authorize you to make any and all applications to the Suffolk County health Department, Town of Southold Zoning Board, Town of Southold, Southold Town Trustees, DEC and any other necessary agencies on our behalf regarding our property located at Very truly yours, APPUCAN]'S AFFIDAVR' :SI-ATE OF NEW YORK COUNIY OF SUFFOLK ;,._"~<:~.. ~_f3~10.*'~ being duly sworn, deposes and says thai: he resides at: in ~e S~ ~ New Y~k, and ~at he Is ~e owner ~ ~e above properW, or ~at he is the ~ ~ ~0 ~e ~ltle) (Sp~ ~r ~hlp or Corp.) which Is hereby maldng application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown onthe Site Plan; that the Utie to the entire parcel, Including all rightS-Of-way, has been dearly established and Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and ~s to roads;'that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by Uqe Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans subrnlt-~ed, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvement~ will be Installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. /" .Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and TIUe) -: · ,-oposed construction type: ~!~__~New Modification of Existing"'gtntcture Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: ~/~ oc'~¥ ac./sq, ft. ~/~ Agricultural Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ac./sq, ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes If yes, explain: No '/,7, Property Zoning District(s): Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes ~ No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes ~( No Ifyes, attach a copy ofthe application packet. ~ 7cT~.c.e~to..~ ~~ Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: l..ist all proposed property uses: Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: V'a..e_.a~ % Proposed lot coverage: /~ % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): ff~ sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: # of proposed spaces: /7/ Loading Berth: Yes No Landscaping Details: ~'~'/~'0 ,~..0'-2J-~.~-~ ~-~,~ Existing landscape coverage: % Proposed landscape coverage: Waterfront Data: /4///]. Is this property within 500" ora wetland area7 Yes No )(" If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify tha2t a~l'lh~-~iij, j~e information is tree. Signature of Preparer ~___~ .~-'/~-~ Date: Page 2 of 2 10/05/05 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: February 26, 2008 TO: Shamrock Tree Expert, Inc. 985 Elijah's Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated January 22, 2008 For permit to construct an agricultural storage building on an existi~ng tree farm property at Location of property: 20685 Route 25, Mattituck, NY . ~ County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 108 Block3 Lot 5._~5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed agricultural storage building is not permitted pursuant to Ahie[e~ffI; Section 280-13 (A) (2) (c), which states, "Barns, storage buildings, greenhouses (including plastic covered) and other related structures, provided that such buildings shall conform to the yard requirements for principal buildings." Pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 208-124, the required minimum front yard setback is 50 feet and the minimum single side yard setback is 20 feet. Following the proposed construction, the agricultural storage building will be 48 feet from the front yard (dirt road) and 10 feet from the side yard. In addition, the proposgxtA~q~luires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. // x-,peath~ze~Si~ Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board, ZBA F~q~ ~ 2008 In !ti atDi}ter~i n a '~.'- Date: I / Project Name: t%k,?~,, Project Address: c~,O _&'~_ _~ FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY PLAN USE DETERMINATION .A. Date Sent: /51 Suffolk County Tax Map Ne.:1000- I6~ ?) _ ~-. 3'- Zoning District: (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: ~,o.~_ Initial Determinati(d)n as to whether site plan is required: Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: ~. / / / ~_~.~ Date of Comment: .~ /?, / ~ Final Determination Date: / / Decision: Signature of Building Inspector ~ ~- SHAMROCK TREE EXPERT CO. 6536 PH. 631-298-4619 ~ 985 ELk~,H'S LANE ORDER OF DOLLARS North Fork Bank www.northforkbank.com FOR _ Building Inspector Expiration ~PPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT ' I/3 i Date / I~- 0 ,20 INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and subznitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Depamnent for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicabIe laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. ~Sign{ ature~name, if a corporation) 'OHailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Nameofownerofpremises ~ oo¢{~ · OO7-rl~eW ,_~; ~ rn,,¢~ (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: House Number Street County Tax Map No. 1000 Section /~-10~°~fi'0 Block Subdivision ~ eco,o /~tP IA,O ./40,~ 3 FiledMapNo. (Name) Hamlet Lot Lot State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy }( rr~d,5 /-R, eet~ ~ b. Intendeduseandoccupancy /t~[at eu'l~roP-~ ,sT~,e,4~c ~o/~ ~t~ % 3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Repair Removal Demolition Addition Alteration Other Work 4. Estimated Cost .4/~7~. ~ Fee 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units If garage, number of cars (Description) (To be paid on filing this application) Number of dwelling units on each floor Depth_ ~ Rear 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front ~ Rear_ ~'~ Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Depth Height. Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front ~ c9 t Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front ~t/~ Rear /t/5/~ 10. Date of Purchase 0 Name of Former Owner Rear [~ I Depth _Depth 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated ~ y 0 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES.__ NO ~ 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES__ NO ~//Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO _ 14. Names of Owner ofpremises~e-~~t ~,u Address ct/$(~/Q~,OI4's L~ Name of Architect Address Name of Contractor Address 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES__NO / * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES_ NO__ * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. l ?. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. l 8. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES __ NO ~ * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. Phone No.~-¢ff- qb Iq Phone No Phone No. STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY O~;: /(Na~e of ir~divid]ial signing contract) above named, (S)He is the ~O7~. ~ (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his h~owledge and belief; and that the work will be ,~,~Jc, AN O. NAGY performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Nota~ Public State of New Y~rk No. 4896755 Sworn to before me "7~ 4J tO day o~ -~ N~ary l~blic 20 ,o8~ Qualified in Suffolk County . Commission Expires May 2U../_/ Signature o~ )Applicant FILED OOTOBEt~. -/, Iq-/-/, FILE No. 51TUATE.. HATTI'R,IOK TOIdN .- 5Ot. tT'HAI"4PTON 5UFFOLK CC~N'I'Y', N'r' SURVEYED 09-2;~-2005 OORNERS HARK. ED 05-04-2005 Pt~.OP. A®. BUILO~IN~ 01-08-2008 SUFFOLk. C. OUNT'¢ TAX # 100-108-9-5.5 lo~ph N E · ivlONUI'4ENT FOUNO AI~.EA = 40854 SE or O.q4 Acres ®t~APHIC SCALE I"= 40' 1~ Ro~d S oRo 25 (l'dot~'/~:uck ~ ~eenpor[ tP. Oad) JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 50202 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF.-\\Compaqserver~m'os\05\05-142.pro Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. lfany question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP ~s avadable ~n the following places, onhne at the. T~)f-SQ,-,~ ~!hgtlds webs~te. . ' (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planmng,l)epartment, all local hbranes and the Town Clerk's office. ,- ~.~_---~ .... DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000-108-3-5.5 AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq., 51020 Main Road, Soutold NY 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board [] Planning Dept. X Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees [] Zoning Board of Appeals X (approved)_ 1 Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [] (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy)[2 (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: [] Type: Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 1 Nature and extent of action: existin~ orooertv screened with 20' iunioer virginia hed~,e, a orooosed aericulatural building to be constructed Location of action: 20685 Rt.25, Mattituck Site acreage: 40,854 sq.ft. Present land use: vacant parcel Present zoning classification: AC 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Joe & Catherine Shipman (b) Mailing address: Main Road, Mattituck NY 11952 (c) Telephone namber: (631 ) 241-1373 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No X If yes, which state or federal agency: __ DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southo/d that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use ora coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2for evaluation criteria. Yes X No [] Not Applicable Discussion (if appropriate): Existing vacant proper~ is fully screened with 20' iunioer virginia and earicultural building proposed within screened area. Proposed site plan review and approval for agricultural storage buildint, Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6for evaluation criteria Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): __ Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III- Policies Pages 6 through 7for evaluation criteria Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 2 Yes X No [] Not Applicable [] Discussion (if appropriate): development will not be visible due to 20' Juniper NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16for evaluation criteria Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): __ Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold See L WRP Section II1 - Policies Pages 16 through 21for evaluation criteria Yes X No [] Not Applicable [] Discussion (if appropriate) agricultural use without adverse affect on water supply Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of SouthoM ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See L WRP Section III- Policies; Pages 22 through 32for evaluation criteria. Yes X No [] Not Applicable [] Discussion (if appropriate) not applicable- property used for adjacent agricultural business Policy7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section lll- Policies Pages 32 through 34for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38for evaluation criteria. Yes X No [] Not Applicable [] Discussion (if appropriate): not applicable Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section II1 -Policies; Pages 34 through 38for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): not applicable Town of Southold LWR~ Consistency Assessmenl Form 3 PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 38 through 46for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): not applicable- agricultural use WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 47 through 56for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See L WRP Section 11I - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): Policy l2. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southol& See LWRP Section lll- Policies; Pages 62 through 65for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No [] Not Applicable X Discussion (if appropriate): Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68for evaluation criteria. Yes X No [] Not Applicable [] Discussion (if appropriate): Agricultural use has no impact on energy or mineral resources. Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 4 *copy of Town form created on 2/11/06 Town of Southold LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 5 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS"---" Ge,.~rd P. Goehringer, ChaJrmm~ Ruth D. Oliva Jam~s Dieizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman Mailing Addr.ess: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · Re. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 ~Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fo~k Bank 54375 Main Road (at Yoangs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 bttp://southoldtown.north fork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTItOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) '/65-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBEtLKTIONS, AND DETERMINATION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2008 ZBA # 6173 - JOSEPH and CATHLEEN SHIPMAN PROPERTY LOCATION: 20685 Route 25 (Main Road), Mattituck CTM 108-3-5.5 SEQRA D.~TEtLMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review fails under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQP~A. S.U. FFOLK COUCqTY ADMINJ~TRATP~E CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planniug issued its reply dated June 24, 2008 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. P~ROPERTfi/FAC.TS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a 40,854 square foot parcel measuring 264.09 feet along Main Road (Pmute 25) to the south, 200.00 feet along the western boundary, 144.44 feet along the northern boundary, and 233.05 feet along the eastern boundary. The lot is improved with a tree farm, as shown on the survey by John C. Ehlers, Land Surveyor, dated. March 3, 2005. B_ASIS OF APPLICATIO~N: Request for a Variance as amended under Section 28o-124, based on the Building Inspector's August 18, 2008 amended Notice of Disapproval which states that the proposed agricultural storage building on an existing tree farm property is not permitted for the reason that barns, storage buildings, greenhouses (including plastic covered) and other related structures, shall conform to the yard requirements for principal buildings, and the required minimum rear yard setback is 60 feet. RELIEF I~.EQUE..~TED: The applicant requests a variance to construct an agricu].tural storage buj.iding with a setback of 10 feet from the rear property line. REASONS FOR BOAI.~D ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented., materials submitted, and personal, inspection~ the Board makes the following findings: l. Tow.n. Law ~26%.b(3)(b)(3)(1). Grant of setback variance will not have a significant adverse environmental effect on the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby propertiee. The proposed building will be close to the adjoining part of a farm owned by the applicant and will not impact on neighbors' property. Page 2 - October 16~ 200S ZBA# 6173 - J. a~cl C. Shipman, Applicants CTM 108-3-~.5 2. Town Law ~267-b(_3)(b)(2). The benefit of an agricultural s~orage builclLng cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The Board finds that location of the building for the storage of agricultural equipment close to the adjoining lot is important to the operation of the farm. 3. Town Law §267-b(.3)(b)(3~. The variance i~ substantial.. It Jz partially mitigated by the fact that the adjoining property is part of the same tree farm owned by the applicant. 4. Town Law ]267-b(3)(b)(5). The need for a variance was self-created. It is a consequence of the~layout of the farm, which is clivided by a boundary near the middle of farm occupying more than one lot. ~ ..Town Law .~26%b(3)(b)(4): No evidence has been submitted to suggest that grant of this relief wi]~ have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Town Law ~267-h, Grant of the requested relief is the minimum a~ion necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of new construction, while preearving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community, RESOLUTIQIq OF T,H~E ,BOARD: In considering all ef the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offerecl by Member Simon, seconded, by Member Weisman, and duly carried, to DENY the variance as applied for, and in the ALTERNATIVE, to GIKANT a variance to allow a 15-~oot setback from the rear lot line. Any deviafS.on ~om the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the appllcant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any cuxrent or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis ~n nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members eltra (Vice Chairwoman), Dinizio, Simon, and Weisman. (Chairman Goebringer wa~Tabsent.) This Eesolutionwas duly adopted (4-0). Ruth D. Olios, Vice Chairwoman 10/~e~08 Approved for Filing 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions ,de.tify the Portions of EAF completed for thls project: E~Part I ~"~Part2 ~Part ~ Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. r~c. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Act on because the mitigation measures described in PAR~ 3 have beeq Yequ~red .~r~.¥efore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared ':, The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ',', '~ , Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as parL of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) State .~/(.,/~ Zip Code Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO Business Telephone State Zip Code Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban ~ Industrial [] Commercial []Forest }~Agriculture r~ Other ~'Residential (suburban) [] Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: ~ ~' acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) /~,/~¢"~- /'.~M'x/j What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained /~)0 % of site r~Poorly drained __ % of site b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? F~ Yes [] No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres r~ Moderately well drained __ % of site. If any agricultural land is inv~ed, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? z L~ acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). []0-10% 10¢0 % [=~10-15%__% []15% or greater__% is project substantialC.y~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes ~[~ No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~ Yes r~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? C~ /'(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~=~No []Yes ~No Page 3 of 21 11. ,Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: E~Yes .~No Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? []Yes [~No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area7 E~] Yes '~No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? []Yes []No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size {in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes b. If YE[S, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? liNc []Yes ONe 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? r~Yes r~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description r~Yes ~No Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: /~' Project acreage to be developed: · ~' acres initially; ~ 5 acres ultimately. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ~:~/~ acres. Length of project, in miles: /V/l//4 (if appropriate) If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~/'~ ; proposed Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: ¢ (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ~'~ height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Willdisturbedareasberec,aimed ~Yes []No [~N/A width; tL/~ ft. tons/cubic yards. length. a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No Page 5 of 21 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: _. 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number/ b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction7 [] Yes ~ No 5. ,Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? []Yes r~No ~ months, (including demolition) year, (including demolition) year. F~ Yes El No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ; after project is complete ~ O. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~(A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? If I Yes IP~INo a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes [] No Type ~ - ~~ 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [] Yes ~ No(~ If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? r~Yes r~No 16. Willtheprojectgeneratesolidwaste? r~Yes ~]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? ~' tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [~Yes ~No Page 6 of 21 e. · If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r~Yes [] No ~No tons/month. 19. Will project routinely produce odors {more than one hour per day}? F'~ Yes []No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [] Yes [] No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use7 ~'~ Yes F~ No If yes, indicate type{a} 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~//~gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~0 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25,. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board F~Yes ~ No City, Town, Village Planning Board 'F~ Yes E]No City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies []Yes I~ No Other Regional Agencies ~Yes FI No State Agencies ~Yes [] No Federal Agencies r'~ Yes r~ No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I~Yes r~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~ Zoning amendment [] Zoning varianc [] New/revision of master plan ~Site plan [] Special use permit [] Resource management plan E~] Subdivision E~ Other Page 8 of 21 2. · What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4., What is the proposed zoning of the site? What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~ Yes r~No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¥4 mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ~/. mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? l~Yes [] No Page 9 of 21 10: Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water distdcts? ~ Yes [] No I 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes [] No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes [] No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. F. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/SponsorName /~'//~ , ~ /~,~-),/,¢,~_ Date Signature ' / Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · ~n completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question dues not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? £xamples that would apply to column 2 o Any construction on slopes of 15 Ye or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] r~Yes []No [] [] E ¥es [,o [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes E~No [] [] r~Yes []No Page 11 of 21 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. [] [] r"~Yes [] No Construcfion in a designated floodway. [] []Yes []No Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No I 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) Specific land forms: r~ [] []Yes [] No Impact on Water Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Adicles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) F"] NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. [] Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of [] a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water [] body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] Other impacts: [] [] FlY,s [] BYes [] FlYes [] E3¥~s [] D~es 4 Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: [] E]¥es []No [] E;]¥es rq,o [] Elves E]No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? Examplas that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvidus visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Other impacts: [] fqYes IZ]No [] []~es []No [] []Yes []No [] Fi~es []No r~Yes []No F1 IZ]~es ~.o ~Yes ~.o ~Yes ~No [] Fq~es Fi.o [] I'q ~es I--].o [] []Yes []No [] I--Fes []No Page 13 ¢21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: []~es IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: [] []Yes E]NO [] Elves [] E~]Yes E]No [] E]Yes E]No []~es [] Fq~es IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Removal of any podion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: [] [] []yeS r~No Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? []YES Examplee that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: [] [] E~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] ~ []Yes []No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? [] NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cress or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. [] [] F"~ Yes []No [] [] []Yes E~]No [] [] E]Yes E~No Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes Fq.o Other impacts: [] [] OYes ON• IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualdies of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be impor[ant to the area. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project siLe, Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. [] [] OYes [] [] OYes [] [] OYes Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by impact Impact Project Change [] [] E~Yes [~No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? [] No F1YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space impod, ant to the community. Other impacts: [] [] []Yes F~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] F~Yes E]No IMPACT ON CRmCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? []NO r-lYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: [] E]Yes F'lNo [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] E]Yes r'"] No Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [] No [] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Other impacts: Small to Moderate Impact [] [] 2 Potential Large impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change [] []Yes []No [] OYes ON• [] OYes [].o IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5 '/o increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: [] [] [] OYes •.e [] OYes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a resutt of the Proposed Action? •No OYeS Examples that would apply to column 2 B[asting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] OYes EON• [] OYes 0~o [] OYes •No [] •*es []No [] OYes []No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? []YES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or reJease of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] O~es [] •~es IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing communily? F'I"° I-1vEs Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of tand use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additionar community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] O~es [] Elves [] C~Yes [] OYes ON• [] O~ea Page 19 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: 20. Is there, or is there Iikelyto bel public controversy related to potential 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change r~Yes E~No ]Yes [] No adverse environment impacts? []No If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · ]ts irreversibili[y, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 ~: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Ma~n Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: November 21, 2008 Re: Payments Please deposit the attached check into a deferred account. Fee is for a site plan application not yet accepted by the Planning Board. I Shipman Applicant/P~oject Name & Type Tox Map # 108-3-5.5 Amount $5OO Check bate/No. Authorization Code 11/25/08 - 7381 PAY TO THE ORDER OF SHAMROCK TREE EXPERT CO. PH. 631-298-461g 985 ELIJAH'S LANE MATTITUCK, NY 11952 7381 50-791/214 FOR DOLLARS LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Project Type: Site Plans Status: No Site Plan Required SCTM #: 1000- 108.-3-5.5 Proiect Name: Shipman (Shamrock Tree Expert Co.) Address: 20685 NYS Route 25, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: Joseph & Cathleen Shipman Owner Name: Joseph Shipman Zone 1: R-80 Approval Date: End SP Date: OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: This property is located 25.5 feet west of Eliiah's Lane on Main Road (S.R. 25), Mattituck. SC Filin.q Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M A.qreement: SCAN Date: SCANNED MAR ' 9 2009 Records Management