HomeMy WebLinkAboutSKUNK LANEdesignation of Skunk Lane.
./
We the undersigned,residents of Bay Avenue,Outchogue,New York
hereby petition the, To.w~:~ Board of Southold Town to cha~ge the
name of Bay,, Avenue to i~s f6rmer designation of Sku~k Lane.
I(
/I
New York, hereby p~tition t~a Town Eoard of oout,old
Tow~ ~o chants ~1~ n-~m~ of B~y aw~i~u~; to its for~r
d~sigaation of Skunk Lane.
112
Hr, Supervisors wet as res~dentss taxpayerss and voters of
$outhold Towns have coma to demand that the Town Board take
~mm~d£ete action to reverse one of ~ts decLsionss a dec~sion
which is re~arded as d~sa~r~eables ridicul°uss end arrosantly
inconsiderate by a vast majority of us, ~ts decision was to
chanse the name of the streets formerly known as Bay Avenues to
Skunk Lane, We fend Et incredible and outraseous that the Town
Board shoulds by Ets action, seek to force the residents of
street to refer to Et as ,*Skunk Lane"--a nama which is ludLcrouss
unpleasants and defamatory to anyone livir~ or ownin~ property on
the street, We fend Et incredible and outraseous that the Town
Board should have aeted on this matter w~thout personally
every resident of the streets and every owner of property on the
street, We find Et incredible and outrageous that the Town Board
has hOC acted in asreemant with a petitions havin~ 99
which requested the restoration of the name Bay Avenue. ~nese
99 signatures were those of residents and property owners on
Bay Avenue, ~hey were no~ the signatures of people randomly
scattered about the town, They were no~ the sisnatures of people
anxious to become known as antiquarians and clever
such as have insisted on the present use of the name 'Skunk Lane#,
Let us examine the arguments of those who w~sh the street to
be called Skunk Lane. Firsts we be$in with the so-called
arsument0 We hear Et saids #The street was called Skunk Lanain the
pas~l therefores ~ts name should be the same nowo~ But by analosys
thens woman should not be allowed to vote because they wer~ no~
allowed to do so a hundred years a$o, Thuss we see tha~
historical arsument needs to be made much more precise in order~o
avoid bein~ based on heinous nonsense. Even if we accept the nol:ton
chac the name of a street should be one ~Ch historical slsnificance~
we are hOC oblised Co asree~ in this case~ ~haC the s~ree~ In question
should be called Sku~ ~ne. ~e na~ ~Bay Arena*~ has b~n in use
for aC leas~ 78 years. ~entC ~hose 78 years as ~ch a ~rC of
hiSEo~ as anyChi~ chaE ca~ ~fo~? Perhaps a toC has happed
d~ chose 78 years Cha~ dese~s ~e a~Cen~ion of local
sxie~les. IC was d~i~ ~hose years ~ha~ Ehe lace ~1~ W.
boule ~he HorCon EsCa~e~ a~ so o~d more fron~ase on ~he s~ree~
~han anyone is ever likely ~o o~ in the fu~e. He didnS~ call ~he
scree~ "Sku~ ~"~ he called i~ ~Bay A~nue"l and ~he ~ny ~ople
~o bou~ his land ca~ ~o ~ow t~ as Bay A~n~. ~us ye see Cha~
the na~ "~y Avenue" has S~eaC historical significances as
ve~ ~ch associa~ed wi~h ~he ~i~ ~en ~ny nemours ca~ ~o
e~ich ~he life of SouChold T~s and contribute ~o l~s prog~ss.
~e ocher ars~en~ tn favor of usi~ ~he na~ "S~ ~ne"
emp~sizes its ~cognizabiliCy a~ uniqueness, l~ ~s pointed ou~
ChaC there are ~hree Bay A~nues--one in G~enpo~s one in Cu~osue~
and one in ~cCi~uck--and a Bay Road in CuCchogue. BuC as
uniqueness o~ sCree~ na~s Is considered Co be so im~r~an~s ~y
no ac~en~ion been gi~n Co ocher i~e~ularl~ies in ~he ~mi~ of
screens? ~ere a~e ~wo Firs~ S~ree~s; one ts tn ~w Suffolk; ~he
o~her, on Flee~s ~ck. ~ere are ~wo Brid~e ~sI o~ in~ersec~s
Rou~e 25; the o~her is in ~ssau Point. ~e~ are ~wo Broad~a~er
o~ is ~n ~he Broadwa~ers Cove areal ~he o~her~ o~ ~ssau
~ere a~e ~wo ~k SCreens; one is ~ ~w Suffolkl ~he o~he~s aC ~e
e~ of Harbor ~ne; a~ an ~k Dri~ in ~he Broa~acers 6o~ area.
Confusion is also possible between New Suffolk ~ a~ New Suf~otk
Avenue. Bu~ even if we a~ree ~ha~ alt ~h~s confUSion shoutd be e~eds
-3-
why musc ve have the name #Skunk Lane#, tn particular? Nhy not choose
& name ~hLch would be Maccepcable co the ma~orLCy of residents?
We quesCLon Che sincerLCy of Chose who have fussed over Che number
of Bay Avenues while remaLnLn$ lilenC about ocher, possibly more
The arsumenCs In favor of Che name t~Skunk Lane~ all have one
chir~ in common: chey compleCely tsnore Che quesCion of how offensive
and ridiculous Che name ii, &nd how a~roganC LC Ii for the Town Board
To force anyone co use ic. We possess Che wriCCen opinions of Two
lawyers, one of Chem a real esCaCe IpeciallsT~ sCaCin~ ChaC the charge
of screeC a~l~e~ If hoc undone, will be a sreaC nuisance co Che residenCs
and properCy owners on Che screeC, because of char~es~ ~hLch LC would
be hishl¥ advisable Co makeB tn lesal documents. We have 81yen copies
of chess opinions To Che Town Board. Unless Che name of Bay Avenue is
restored, iC will be a great nuisance for us Co nocify all our
correspondents of Che new sCree~ name. Since Che Post Offices are hOC
legally obliged co deliver mail ChaC is incozTecCly addressed, we
could run Che risk of never recei~n~ some of Che leCCers ~hich may be
sene Co us ~n che future. "Skunk Lane" ia so ridiculous and ouCland£sh
an address ChaC iC is possible Chac people livLr~ tn ocher areas of
The counTry wou~d doubt Che seriousness o~ someone who lisCed "Skunk
Lane# as an address. The very mencion of Che name evokes derision.
This poinC is amply ~roved in The newspaper accounCs which invariably
make some reference Co bad smells, l~any people have laid Chat Chey
signed the original peCiCion for Skunk Lane only because They ChoughC
ic was a Joke. The name could also impair Che marketability of real
esCaCe~ because outsiders mLg~hC be reluctant Co ~isC "Skunk Lane" as
an address. This possibLliCy it hOC far-fetched;. Chars are businessel
and private persons who deltberacely mainCaLn a poaC office box tn
Princetons
dignified.
Jerseys because l:he address is considered very
In conclusions ~e feel ~ha~ since a vas~ majority of proper~y
owners and residen~s demand ~he res~ora~ion of ~he name Bay Avenues
The Town Board should ac~ in~nedia~ely. By almos~ anybodyms no, ion
of Justice, e majority should no~ be ~rea~ed arrogantly and
inconsidera~ely.
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
0ctc~er 2, 1972.
Hon. Albert Nartocchia,
To~n of $outhold,
16 South Street,
Oreenport, N.Y.
Supervisor
A newspaper announcement appeared in the Long Island Traveler
and Mattituck Watchman on September 21, 1972 stating that the Town
Board approved a change of name "Bay ~venue" Cutchogue to one ~hich
in older times was called "Skunk Lane".
As President of the Nassau Farms Association, Cutchogue, I have
received many telephone and house calls by property owners and resi-
dents of "Skunk Lane" (Bay Avenue) as well as others in the adjoin-
lng area expressing their diesatifaction with this change. I have
been informed that a second petition is being circulated requesting
the the name of the road should remain "Bay Avenue" as it was since
1894.
It is our feeling that this c~ange is not beneficial or desired
by the majority of the property owners and should be reviewed by you.
7ery truly yours,
Henry Schmeckpeper
President.
~blishcfl in ~ue Fwbreary 6,1975
ir~ 2'~ply to t~!e
iszu of the
Sk~'~nk Lane
Cutcho~E,~, i?ow fork 11935
February 12, 1973
De~r ~,'~r. Klein,
The pul-pose of this lo~Ser is %o inform you of our satisf~ctioI~
,.'~itn the Town Boar~ of oouthold. !;e feel that ~h8 Town Hoard naa
acted in = jus5 and proper maimer.
La~:z su~,~ner t~e youn6 ledy w,~o circulated the petition was
rolled as a fres'm,~an in Southold Nif~a School. She circul~ted tbs
oetition in a sincere and serious manner,with th~ mpproval of
parents and somo neighbors. She was carefal to have only
c~ners ~,nd residents of ~he L~e sign net pstitien.
The yo~g lady's reasons for wantinc Sk~k L~e restored were:
Ail her life ~e has heard %ne road r~ferred ~o as Skunk L~ne by
her fa~ly,neigi~bo~s and many residents of the town. She looked
into the history of the name ~d fo~d she shared She same desire
as many residents to have the name restored.
Sk~k L~ne is not a nickname or a Joke.The name appears on
offical m~ps and d~eds. Our To~n Clerk checked back in the Town
records and fo~d no record of the name having been legally
ch~uged to Bay Avenue. ?~e feel that Sk~k L~e is an honest and
indi~enous n~me. The proponents~are not mischi~f-~kers,~m~ers
city people,' history-fixated f~natics or a ~roup of cr~uKs.
Some years back Miss ~inifred Billard, a tax payer and resident
of %ne L~e, %~ote a history of Sk~k L~e ~d its residents,
The Historical Society Izad her freeent n~r history at oar lecal
schooI. Th~ auditori~ was filled with interested spectators~
~iss Billard has retired f~on teaching and is now ssrvlnc a
year enlistment with the Peace Corps in Ealaysia.
The pro B~ay ~v~nue ~ople f~il zo mention tk~.t they go%
people to c2mnge th~ir sxde by t~l!inb %non th~t it woa!d cos~
5non ~ac~ ~J0D.D0 5o nave tho n~me o~ C~unk Lane restored. The
2own Scar~ k~d thoir ~ttorney c~ec~: i~r5o chis ~nd it w:~z f~u_~d
f~voring Si~:lnk L~le.
Th~ TC~L Bc .!,f id no ~e~d in ~n~ irregular manner. The
affici~l Town Paper publisi~d the fact ~nav ~ petition karl
~resentod to ~,~ ~vor3 0n~ l.~.t~ of '~h[lnk Lane to the then Bay ~v~aue.
After ~aiting 5wo eont~s and hearing no objec~iea ~hey officially
changed the name. Tk~ circulation of the pet$~ion ~d the offici~-~l
nam~ cn~ge ~,,;ere bo~h done in a sincere ~d honest ~ma~er.
The United Fire Company ~o.1 of C,~tchogue sent a letter 5o
the Town Board favoring o~e name of Skm~k Lane for efficiency
reasons. Tho Town of Southold h~s ~m%~y B~y avenues, Bay Roads
The Officers of the Cutchogue Historical 3ociety also
the Board a letter favorin~ the name of Sk~k I_ane for historical
red, sons. Th~ Southold Town Historiun is a residents of S.~2
and favors tho
L~ .vour letser fro~.~ t~e ~ro Bay Avenue people?you wer~ ~o!d
that no l~t%~rs ~;ere read from their side ~at the January ~3
m~ting. They failed uo mention that no letters w~r~s~re,~d
t~ other sid~ either.
i.~r. L[artocchia conducted, o~e .~ectln~ ii~ vary dignifiwd
.... ' Thc reason I~e calle,1 ~or ~ h~it to' the '' ~-'
0 f- l~and.
This letter has be~n compiled and approved by a number
SKunk L~e z-esidents.
Sincerely,
Co~ies of tnis letter
i.~. John Klein
The N~sRovicw
The Souti~old Town Board
./ 4' **
Southold Town Board
Southold,New York
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The names which appear on the attached petition~
are residents or vacant property owners who pay
taxes on their property on Bay Avenue,Cutchogue.
TO : TOWN BOARD, Town of Southold
We, the undersigned, hereby request to have our signatures
removed from a document that concerns the changing of the
name of BAY AVenUE to SKUNK LANE. Upon fUrther and careful
consideration we realize that since no benefit will be
derived from the change, it does not warrant the cost and
inconvenience it will cause.
PROTEST
TO : TOWN BOARD, Town of Southold
We, the undersigned, hereby protest the changing of the
long established name of BAY AVenUE to SKUNK LANE.
Buch change has no merits nor will be beneficial in any way.
We forsee that the Official Ohan6e of Identification of
BAY AVENUE will cause much inconvenience to property
owners and residents who will be obliged to have all
their legal documents, business stationery, applicable
vehicles, etc. altered to reflect the above change.
We hereby ~th. restoration of the name BAY AV~2~UE.
TO ~ TO~ BOARD, To~n of 8outhol~
the undermLsnedt hereby protest the ohan6~~ of the
lon~ established n~e 9f B~Y &V~UE to ~E
~oh ~e ~ ~ me~t~ no~ w~ll be beneficial ~ ~
forage ~t ~e Offiolal ~e of Id~fioatio~ ef
AV~E vXll c~e ~oh Xn~nTe~oe ~ p~rty
o~eri ~ resX~entl vho rill be obl~se~ ~ ~Ye ~l
~e~r le~ doo~entB~ ~l~nese I~t~one~,
We hereby ~the reatoration of the name BA~ AW~E~
T
To. Town BOard, Town of Southold.
We the undersigned, hereby PROTEST the chan~ing of the long
established name of BAY AVENUE to ~k'UNK LANE.
Such change has no merits nor will be of beneficial in any way .
#e f0rsee that official change of identification of BA~ AVENUE
will cause much inconvenience to property owners and residents
who will be obliged to have all their legal documents ,stationery
applicable vehicles etc. altered to reflect the above change.
We hereby request the restoration of the name BAY AV-~UJE.
iii t
January 29, 197~
C. Whitney Booth, Editor
'The Lon~ Island TraMeler
Southol~,/"N~',Y.~; ·
er~ !for your editorial
~ Skunk 'Lane vs. Bay Avenue.
of Jauu~
And speaking of lack of local character,
who namedthe~following thoroughfares
~ sudden and severe rush of shit
~gue:
Vanatou. Road, Griffin Street, Moore's Lane,
~l~ah, s 'Lane, Eugene's Road, Cox' s Lane.
~'.New Suffolk:
"~.. Fred Road, George Road, Grathwohl R0ad,
:' 'Tuthitl Road, Wicks Road, Kouros.Road, Jack-
,, sou Street.
Southold:
Boise eau Avenue, Young ' s' Avenue,
Gr~eenport:
Albertson Road
Mattituck:
LIPCO~ Road
'~'~'~ 0la ~Juie Lane .(Jesus, this one has got to be
the worst name for any road in
~ n e
whole oomntry).
It would seem to m ...... those who are in the
position ,to name new roads would have a little
more imagiustion than to use the names of a bunch
of old farts who have probably contributed uo more
to the community than merely adding to the wealth
of their children, ..grandchildren and great grand-
children.
y, I would really like the dual high-
from Msttituck ~o Southold renamed "THE
TOWN 'B.~'J~. R. ETERNAL HEH-
ORIAL HIGHWAY. (hah, hah)
~r Albert Hsrtocch~a
of. Highways Ra~Deau
r't FF~DER K
SOUTHOLD, L. I., IN. ¥. 119'71
Thomas C. Hunter, Jr.
Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer
Department of the Army
New York District,
26 Federal Plaza
Dear Mr. Hunter:
April 9, 1976
Corps of Engineers
Re:
Application No. 75-556
Public Notice No. 8407
Craig Lehmann
J'At a meeting of the Southold Town Board held
on April 6, 1976, the Board adopted a resolution to
oppose the application o,f/Craig Lehmann, Skunk Lane,
Cutchogue, New York for permit~on his completed pier,
ramp and float arrangement on the grounds Mr. Lehmann
failed to secure the necessary permits prior to
commencing the work.
Christopher 'P~der sen 212
Re: Public Notice No. 8407
Area Engineer
DELAY, REFERRAL, OR FOLLO~.UP NOTICE
!
OFFICE OF TI- COUNTY LEGISL
JANET CAMPBELL
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
BETTY G. OETRANDER
DEPUTY CLERK
March 19, 1976
Mr. Albert M. Martocchia, Supervisor
Town of Southold
16 South Street
Greenport, New York 11944
D~.ar Mr. Martocchia:
Enclosed herewith please find a copy of Public Notice
No. 8407 from the DeFartment of 'The Army w~th regard to a
Completed Pier, Ramp and Float Arrangement, Broadwaters Cove,
Great Peconic Bay, Village of Cutchogue, Town of Southold.
Very truly yours,
Betty G. Ostrander
Deputy Clerk
Di.:p~I~'TMENT OIF THE ARMY
APPLICATTON N0' 75-556
--- PUBLIC NOT'ICE NO. 8407
To WHOM 1TMAY CONCERN:
This District has received an application for a Department of the Army per-
mit pursuant to Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.
403); Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (86 ~tat.~16,
P.L. 92-500); Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries.
Act of 1972 (86 Stat. 1052; P.L. 92-532)' as appropriate, as described below:
'APPLICANT: Craig Lehmann
Skunk Lane
Cutchogue, NY 11935
WORK: Completed Pier, Ramp and Float Arrangement
WATERWAY:~ Broadwaters Cove, Great Peconic Bay
LOCATION: village of gutch0gye, Town of Southold, Suffolk
County, NY
A detailed description and plans of the completed work are inclosed to assist
in your review of the proposal.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the
probable impact of the completed activity on the public interest. That
decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization
of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to
accrue from the completion must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable
detriments. Ail factors which may be relevant to the completed work will be
considered; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, historic values, fish and wildlife values, flood
damage prevention, land use classification, navigation, recreation, water
supply, water quality, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people.
No permit will be granted unless its issuance is found to be in the public
interest.
. --~ o~ waterways
NANOP-E
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 8407
A preliminary review of the application indicates tha
Impact Statement will not b
ye ·
rSXon of the Nati -al ~ ~_~repared. A revi t an Environmental
o ...... glster of His~-~- ~w of the latest
or absence of registered -~u ~laces and ~ ~
published Version of the ·
properties or properties · ~ the presence
· ' Register as ~ ........ 1Xsted in th ~.~
pren~storica~ ...... resentlv unk ....
be accom6]{.~ ~ slStor~cal data ~ "~ arcneologicaL scientific,
--=--oueu Unde~ ~- may be lost ~- ~- ~ '
' ~ reguested permit. ~ u~Scroyed by Work to
The fOllowin- -
· 9 government authorization has been obtained or will be
obtaiQed prior to the issuance'of a Department of the Army permit:
'1. Permit from New York state Department of Environmental Conservation.
2. Water Quality Certification from State of New York Department of
Environmental Conservation.
Any criticisms or protests regarding the proposed Work should be PREPARED
IN WRITING AND MAILED TO REACH THIS OFFICE prior to 11 April 1976
otherwise it will be presumed that there are no objections. ,
It is requsted that you COmmunicate the foregoing information COncerning
the pr'oposed Work to any persons known by you to be interested and who
did not receive a Copy of this notice.
If you have any questions COncerning this application, you may COntact
~.~r. Christopher Pedersen of this office, Tel: (212) 264-0182.
THOMAS C. HUNTER, JR.
Colonel, Corps of Engineers
2 Incls District Engineer
1. Description of Work
2. Plans
NADNy FL_129.2
June 74
NANOP-E
APPLICATION NO. 75-556
PUBLIC NOTICE 1~0. 8407
DESCRIPTION OF WORK~'
The ~aPPlicant requests Department of the Army authorization to
maintain an existing open timber pile supported pier, ramp and
float arrang~n~'extending approximately 26 feet into an exist-
i~g boat basin. The float (16' x 6') is held in place by two (2)
anchor p~l~es;
The purpose was to provide dry access to the applicant's pleasure
craft.
it should be noted that the above was completed without prior
Department of the Army authorization. The New York District
Corps of Engineers, having reviewed the matter, has declined
at this time, to initiate legal proceedin~ for the undertaking
'of the unauthorized work . The applicant has been directed
to submit an application for approval of plans for the existing
structure. The decision whether o.r not to grant approval will
be based on an evaluation of the probable impact on the public
interest of either allowing the work to remain as constructed,
or requirimg its modification or removal, public comments in
response to this notice should be directed toward these
alternatives
DATUI4
ADdACENT PROPERTY OWNERS:
~ROF~LE VIE~J
c~ 8
gCALE 1~4 ~'EET
I&
At'.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. 11971
May 26, 1976
Mr. Christopher Pedersen
Area Engineer
Construction Permits Section
Department of the Army
New York District, Corps of Engineers
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10007
re:
Application No. 75-556
Public Notice No. 8407
Craig Lehmann
Dear Mr. Pedersen:
The Town of Southold wishes to withdraw their
objections to the granting of a permit by the Corps
Engineers to Craig Lehmann. In view of the fact Mr.
Lehmann has the proper permit from the Board of
Southold Town Trustees, we no longer object. Our
original disapproval stemmed mainly from his failure
to secure all of the necessary permits, which included
the Corps of Engineers.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
NANOP-E
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
NEW YORK DIBTRICT. CORP~ OF ENGINIE"rR~
· e FEDERAL pLAZA
NEW YORK. N. Y. 1OOO?
30 April 1976
Ms. Judith T. Boken
Town Clerk
Office of the Town Clerk
Town of Southold
Southold, New York 11971
Dear Ms. Boken:
~ Inclosure is furnishecl for your
information.
J~] Coal $ ~a~rment BhOUlCl be mstte
inclosure
~s
~o this office 'Dy check or money o~cler d_~n l~e~able 'Go ~
"~-e~surer of the United. S~tes."
forvarde8 sha~ly.
Inclosed is a Board of Southold To~m Trustees Permit.
Kindly submit your comnencs on the inclosures, so
that we might proceed with the timely processing of
this application.
Incl 2
1. Cpy permit did 7 Apr 1975
rrm B.S.T.T.
2. Cpy ltr did 9 Apr 1976
frm Office of the Town clerk
Sincerely yours,
C~t~ISTOPHER PEDERSEN
Area Engineer
Const~ction Permits Section
17 Jan 69
FIF~DERK
SOUTHI"ILD, L. I.. N. Y. 11971
Thomas C. Hunter, Jr.
Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer
Department of the~ Army
New York District, Corps of
26 Federal Plaza
Re:
Dear Mr. Hunter:
April 9, 1976
Engineers
Application No. 75-556
Public Notice No. 8407
Craig Lehmann
At a meeting of the Southold Town Board held
on April 6, 1976, the Board adopted a resolution to
oppose the application of Craig Lehmann, Skunk Lane,
Cutchogue, New York for permit~on his completed pier,
ramp and float arrangement on the grounds Mr. Lehmann
failed to secure the necessary permits prior to
commencing the work.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Boken
Town Clerk
SOUTHOLO, NEW :0~( ..,
Pr,.~h ,~0. ~060 ......
iSSUED TO ............ G~a~
~itted '~ULAT1N~ AND TH~ PLAC'~ O~ O~STRUCTIO~S
IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and
~E~OVAL O~ SAN~, ~RAVEL O~ O~HE~ ~ATE~iALS
LANDS UNDE~ ~OWN WAbaSh" ~d ~n ~e~ord~nc~ w~h
~sotu~on o~ Th~ ~o~rd ~dop~d ~ · me~ing held o~~:~ 7
.1~~ ..... ~d i~ ~o~s~d~r~on o~ ~h~ ~m o~ ~ ~.00.
p~
........................................ 9~ig...~.bD~ ...............................................
T~rms ~.d Conditions I~ded o~ the reverse
ct Sou~oJd Town TrusSes aufhorzzes a~d'permifs fha
o~ ~o~e~[~ o~ ~=oa~a~ ~ove, o=[ b~u~ ~a~e,
Cu~c~o~e, ~e~ ~o~.
ell in acc~dance with fha de~ai~d speclflcaflons ~s pre~n~ed
fha orlglnaflng appllca~ion.
IN WITNESS WH~O~, The said Board of Trustees here*
by causes ifs Cor~rafe Seal fo be a~ed, and these presents
be subscribed by a maj0ri~ of f~ said Board as of
:.