The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-85.-2-5APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva Gerard P. Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Chairman Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman M__ailiag~ddress: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold. NY 11971-0959 Town Annex/First Hoor, No~d~ Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 ® Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JANUARY 25, 2007 RECEIVED JA l 3 1,' g ZB File No. 5970 - HENRY OMAN and CHRISTINA J. OMAN Property Location: 1380 Bddge Lane, Cutchogue CTM 1000-85-2-5 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 1.637 acre parcel has 230 feet along the east side of Bridge Lane and is improved with a single-family dwelling as shown on survey prepared by John T. Metzger, Land Surveyor dated July 14, 2005. The applicants' property is situated 1306 feet north of the Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) and is located in the A-C Agricultural Conservation Zone District. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Zoning Code Section 280-14 (100-32), based on the Building Inspector's July 25, 2006 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed Lots 1 and 2 with less than the code required 80,000 square feet, less than the minimum 175 feet of width (frontage) along Bddge Lane, and with a proposed side yard setback at less than the code-required 20 feet from the division line. The applicants' parcel as exists is nonconforming with a land area of 1.637 acres and conforms to the side yard setbacks. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application has been referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning for review and determination under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23. In a reply dated December 13, 2006, the Suffolk County Department of Planning confirmed that while General Municipal Law and the Suffolk County Administrative Code mandate referrals within 500 feet from the boundary of a farm operation located in an agricultural district (property to the east), these laws do not apply to applications for area variances, the subject of this application. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on November 30, 2006, at which time wdtten and orat evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: Pag~ 2 - January 25, 2007 ZB File No. 5970 - Henry Oman CTM No. 85-2-5 AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicants wish to divide their 1.6-acre nonconforming parcel into two smaller lots, as follows: Proposed Lot 1 with 40,002 square feet, and lot width of 140 feet; proposed Lot 2 with 31,314 square feet and width of 90 feet. Each of the two proposed lots will not meet the code-required minimum of 80,000 square feet and minimum width of 175 feet. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Allowing the variances will increase the density of immediate neighborhood by creating two nonconforming lot where one currently exists. There are three lots to the south consisting of 1.6 acre with a single-family house; a 1.4 acre lot with a house; and a 5.5- acre lot. There is preserved agricultural acreage with a winery building to the east of the applicants' property. The lot to the west is agriculturally preserved land. There are 14 lots to the north containing approximately one acre each in size, and one lot further north near the railroad containing 9.5 acres. 2. The effect of granting the requested variances will be (and is) substantial, One of the proposed lots will require nearly a 50% reduction of code-required lot size, The second proposed lot will require an additional 61% reduction of the required lot size. Both lots will be narrower than the 100- foot required width: 95 and 90 feet, respectively. One lot will have a 16-foot side setback, where 20 feet are required. 3. The difficulty is entirely self-created, It is a result of an attempt to subdivide an existing non- conforming lot into two non-conforming lots. 4. The benefit sought by the applicants, providing a residence for their daughter, can be achieved without the need for an area variance, by constructing an addition to the existing house. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Simon, seconded by Member Weisman, and duly carried, to DENY the variance as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva, Simon and~.e~sman. Nays: Members Goehringer and Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopte, d~-2). Ja~s Dinizie, Jr., C-hain:n~3~' ,~/¢proved for Filing PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D~ SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NrY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: October 26, 2006 To~ Ruth Oliva, Chairperson Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Members of the Planning Board Re; Oman Variance Application SCTM# 85-2-5 Appeal # 5970 We are in receipt of your request for comments regarding the above-referenced application currently before the ZBA. The Planning Board reviewed the application at their work session on October 23, 2006, and offers the following comments and recommendations at this time: This proposal will result in the creation of two (2) non-conforming lots in the R- 80 Zoning District. Lot 1 is 40,002 square feet and is improved with a single- family residence. Lot 2 is 31,314 square feet and is vacant. As proposed, Lot 1 requires a lot area variance of 39,998 square feet and a lot width variance of 80 feet. Lot 2 requires a lot area variance of 48,686 square feet and a lot width variance of 85 feet. 2. The Planning Board supports the proposed layout, which is consistent with the nature and character of the surrounding neighborhood. Pursuant to the Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Department dated July 25, 2006, in addition to the lot area and lot width variances sought by the property owner, this proposal also requires setback relief for the existing residence on Lot 1, which has a proposed side yard setback of 16 feet, where 20 feet is the minimum required by the Zoning Code. The Planning Board typically does not support the creation of non-conforming lots that allows a property owner to increase density when the parcel does not have the yield pursuant to the Town's subdivision regulations. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact this office. Memo to File Date: 1/31/07 Re: Proposed Standard Subdivision Application for Henry & Christina Oman SCTM# 1000-85-2-5 As of this date, the above-referenced file is hereby considered closed due to the Zoning Board of Appeals' denial of the variance request. ~,, pL~n~O Bosom ME~B~'q~' Char KENNETH L, EDWARDS MAR~N H.~DOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: October 26, 2006 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCAqHON: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 RECEIVED OCT 2 7 2OO6 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS To: Ruth Oliva, Chairperson Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Members of the Planning Board Re: Oman Variance Application SCTM# 85-2-5 Appeal # 5970 We are in receipt of your request for comments regarding the above-referenced application currently before the ZBA. The Planning Board reviewed the application at their work session on October 23, 2006, and offers the following comments and recommendations at this time: This proposal will result in the creation of two (2) non-conforming lots in the R- 80 Zoning District. Lot 1 is 40,002 square feet and is improved with a single- family residence. Lot 2 is 31,314 square feet and is vacant. As proposed, Lot 1 requires a lot area variance of 39,998 square feet and a lot width variance of 80 feet. Lot 2 requires a lot area variance of 48,686 square feet and a lot width variance of 85 feet. 2. The Planning Board supports the proposed layout, which is consistent with the nature and character of the surrounding neighborhood. Pursuant to the Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Department dated July 25, 2006, in addition to the lot area and lot width variances sought by the property owner, this proposal also requires setback relief for the existing residence on Lot 1, which has a proposed side yard setback of 16 feet, where 20 feet is the minimum required by the Zoning Code. The Planning Board typically does not support the creation of non-conforming lots that allows a property owner to increase density when the parcel does not have the yield pursuant to the Town's subdivision regulations. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact this office. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard IZ Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman TOWN MEMO http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTtIOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Board Ruth D. Oliva, ZBA Chairwoman October 3, 2006 Request for Comments Mailin~ Address' ~ '-~ Southoki Town Hill 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179T Sou~old, NY 11971-~59 Office Location: Town Annex/F~t ~oor, Noah Fork B~ 54375 M~n Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 Our Department has received and is reviewing the following application, and we enclose copies of the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, and application with the applicant's latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the subdivision review steps. Copies of the assessor's cards for this non-conforming lot as existing and the adjacent lot 6 are attached to show the history of the splits. Your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience. NAME TAX#/ ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATE DATE STAMPED OMAN, Henry 85-2-5 5970 7/25/06 Bulk Schedule, 7/14/06 John T. and Christina -kC. ~.o~ 100-32 SURVEY Metzger LS Subdivision; Your comments are appreciated by October 30, 2006 Thank you. ~ ~ For Office Use Only Fee: $ /~?~-~ Filed Bye, /~ Date Assigned/assignment Office Notes: Parcel Location: House No. 1380 Street Bridge Lane Hamlet Cutchogue SCTM 1000 Section 85 Block2 Lot(s). 5 Lot Size 1.637 Zone District A-C I-(WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: July 25, 2006 for a permit for a subdivision Applicant/Owner(s): Henry Oman and Christina J. Oman Mailing Address: 1380 Bridge Lane, Cutchogue, New York 11935 Telephone: (631) 734-5432 Fax: NOTE: If applicant is nol the owner, state below if applicant is owner's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. Authorized Representative: Richard F. Lark, Esq. o£ Lark & Folts, Esqs. Address: P.O. Box 973, Cutchogue~ New York 11935 Telephone: (631) 734-6807 Fax: (631) 734-5651 Please specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from tile above listed names: [] Applicant/Owner(s) I3 Authorized Representative [] Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED July 18, 2006 FOR: I~ Building Permit [] Certificate of Occupancy [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy [] Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article l~_l Section 100- 32 Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: 1~ A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. [] A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. [] Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section [] Reversal or Other A prior appeal [] has ~has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No.N/A Year Iq/A (for current and all prior owners ). Name of Owners: HENRY OMAN and CHRISTINA J. OMAN Appeal No.__ When we built our home in the 1972/1973 time frame, this area along Bridge Lane was zoned one acre and did not contain many homes. Shortly thereafter, the Planning Board approved a one-acre subdivision known as "Ismar Acres" along the easterly side of Bridge Lane immediately north of your applicants' property. We purposely placed our home on the northerly side of the property so in the future we could setoff a building lot for one of our children. Later on this area became up-zoned to an Agricultural-Conservation District (A-C). In effect all of the lots including your applicants have become non-conforming as there is now a requirement of 80,000 sq. ft. for a building lot with a width of 175 ft. What your applicants are proposing is to setoff and gift a building lot to their daughter, Carroll Oman, who resides with them, so she will be able to afford to build a small home for herself on proposed Lot 2. Our daughter is single and lives with us and although working full time, due to the high land prices in Southold Town, she is unable to purchase a lot and build a home for herself. Attached to this application are the following Exhibits: Map of Property prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated July 14, 2006 showing proposed Lots 1 and 2. Copy of Subdivision Map of Ismar Acres filed on March 13, 1973 as Map No. 5872, which property is in the same neighborhood. C. Diagram of proposed house to be built on proposed Lot 2 by our daughter. D. County of Suffolk Real Property Tax Service Agency Aerial Map of this neighborhood. REASONS FOR APPEAL: AREA VARIANCE REASONS: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: the majority of the existing residential lots in this neighborhood on Bridge Lane, south of the railroad tracks, are non-conforming with the average building lot being rectangular in shape with an area of approximately 41,000 to 42,000 sq. ft. in size with a lot width of approximately 130 to 135 ft. The granting of area variances will'not in anyway change the pre-existing, non-conformity of these developed parcels and will not result in a significant increase in the density of the neighborhood causing any problems to surrounding properties. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance: Because of the current zoning requirements, area variances will have to be obtained so that proposed Lots 1 and 2 will qualify for a minor subdivision. Therefore, the following area variances are necessary: Proposed Lot 1: requires an area variance for a lot of 40,002 sq. ft. with a lot width of 140 ft. Proposed Lot 2: requires an area variance for a lot of 31,314 sq. ft. with a lot width of 90 ft. Ail of the other requirements of the Bulk Schedule for this residential district are complied with the proposal. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: in applying the required balancing test weighing the benefit to your applicants against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood. Viewed in a vacuum the area variances as requested, as measured against the current Bulk Schedule, are substantial. However, considering the surrounding neighborhood the proposed variances will allow one additional house to be built in this developed neighborhood. In utilizing the balancing test and viewing the neighborhood as a whole, it is seen that approximately 100± acres to the east of your applicants' property the development rights have been sold or the property is being used as a vineyard. To the west across Bridge Lane, the development rights have also been sold and the property is being used by the Pugliese family for the development of a vineyard and winery. The point being is there will be no future subdivision development in this neighborhood. The proposed lots although slightly smaller than the existing non-conforming building lots in this neighborhood will not cause an adverse effect. Proposed Lot 1 will be almost identical with the size and width of the existing building lots on the easterly side of Bridge Lane. Proposed Lot 2 although smaller in size containing 31,314 sq. ft., due to the size and shape of the house proposed to be built on it by our daughter, will also be in conformity with the shape of the lots and character of this neighborhood. Therefore, utilizing the balancing test, it is submitted the granting of the variances to allow an additional house will not cause any detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: it is submitted that both proposed Lots 1 and 2 will be in general conformance with the size and shape of the improved existing non-conforming building lots on Bridge Lane. Your applicants' existing home on proposed Lot 1, and the proposed future home for our daughter on proposed Lot 2, will comply with the front, side and rear yard components of the Bulk Schedule. Further, due to the topography, setbacks and landscaping, it is submitted there will be no adverse effect on the neighborhood by allowing the construction of this house. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? (X) Yes. Does this variance involve as-built construction or activity (X) No. The self-created hardship was caused by your applicants waiting too long to setoff a lot for our daughter. The granting of the variances will not establish a negative precedent. It will be in the nature of providing affordable housing for your applicants' family. Your applicants' request is the minimum variance practical, given the benefits to your applicants. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the~rh~ and the health, safety, and welfare of the co~mnun~---//~ S~tur/~of--~ppsl lant Henry Ofnan Sworn to before me this 28th day of July, 2006 Notary Public AREA = 1.637 Acres %?% / MAP OF PROPER TY FOR THE OMA N FA MIL Y A T CUTCHOGUE TO WN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY ,N Y. 1000-85-02-05 SCALE .. 1"- 50' July 14, 2006 49618 - 1797 "7 Su'$Ol-v'/ $/c~l /'dAP /,~/~mf~ .,~C~$ F~ MA~I 3 1973 'r'or'm/.. ,Z~,3K9 ~7235 i TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET {~ ~'0 VILLAGE ~ "-' DIST,' SUB. LOT Till~bl~ FRONTAGE ON WATER /Vll. Bldg~ Extension Extension Polch 'L Foundation B~Sement Ext, WaiLs :Fire PIoz:e Recreation Room Bath Floors Jnterior Finish Heat Rooms ist FJoor Rooms 2nd Floor FIN, B 'J. LARK & FOLTS Attorneys at Law 28785 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK ! 1935 Tele. No. (631) 734-6807 Fax No. (631) 734-5651 RICHARD F. LARK MARY LOU FOLTS Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Annex, 54375 State Route P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 25 RE: Application for Sketch Approval of Oman Subdivision {SCTM #1000-085.00-02.00-005.000 Gentlemen: In connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing the following: 1. Application for Sketch Approval. Authorization of Henry Oman and Christina J. Oman. Copy of Deed dated October 3, 1972 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on October 5, 1972 in Liber 7257 Page 132. 4 Full Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form. 6. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form. Five prints of Map of Property for the Oman Family prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated July 14, 2006. If all is in order, would you kindly place this matter on the next available Planning Board agenda for their consideration and notify me of the date and time. If you have any questions, db not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, RiChard F. La~k~ RFL/bd Enclosures Town o~ Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfxont Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the eXempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfxont Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# i000 - 85 2 - 5 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): TownBoard [] Planning Board ~ Building Dept. ~ BoardofTrustees Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) Co) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Subdivide property into two lots, one With existing house (40,002' sq. f{;) and the other lot to ~onstruct a proposed house (31,314 sq. ft.). Location of action: Site acreage:_ Present land use:. 1380 Bridge Lane, Cutchogue, New York 1.637 acres residential Present zoning classification: Agricultural-Conservation (A-C) If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Nameofapplicant: Henry Oman and Christina J. 0man Co) Mailing address: 1380 Bridge Lane, Cutchogue, New York 11935 (c) Telephone number: AreaCode ) (631) 734-5432 (d) Application nu~mber, if any: N/A Will the action be directly undertaken, Yes [] No [~ If yes, which state or federal agency? require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? H/A C. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use 6f a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. []Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Building already in place on existing lot. Attach additional sheets if necessary -- ?oiicy 2. Protect and~reser~-ffistoric and archaeological resources ol the Iown of Southold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~] Yes ~-] No [-~ Not Appli~:able ^'~ach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town Of Southdd. See LWRP Section !II - Policies Pages 6 through ? for evaluation criteria Yes ~'~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion, See LWRP' Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [-~ Yes ~ No ~-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes [] No [~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 .. through 32 for evaluation criteria. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 throagh 34 for evaluation criteria. . Yes ~ No [-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Y. es ~ No [-~ Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lauds, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for ~valuation criteria. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable nsc of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 5'/through .62 for evaluation criteria. F~ Yes ~ [No F~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessai'y Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town' of Southold. See L%VRP Section III - Policies; pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ BIo [-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~ No ~-~ Not Applic. able Created on 5/25/05 11:20 AM ' Sworn to belore me this 2.8_ch day of July, 2006 ~otary Public -~' ~ ~ MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~ P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J. CREMERS 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L. EDWARDS (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone: 63,1 .,7.~r,l~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Application for Sketch Approval APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Town of South~ld oltrd for SKETCH APPROVAL for the subdivision described herein. 1. Name of Subdivision 0man Subdivision 2. Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-085.00-02.00-005. 000 3. Type of Subdivision Standard iX ] Conservation [ ] 4. Hamlet Cutchogue 5. Street Address/ Project Location 1380 Bridge Lane, Cutchogue, New York 11935 6. Acreage of Site 1.637 acres two lots 7. Proposed Yield 8. Number of Lots Proposed two lots 9. Zoning District Agricultural-Conservation (A-C) July 28, 2006 10. Date of Submission I1. Please provide the names, addresses and phone numbers for the following people: Applicant: Henry Oman and Christina J. Oman 1380 Bridge Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 (631) 734-5432 Agent: Property Owner(s): Surveyor: Engineer: Richard F. Lark, Esq. of Lark & Folts, Esqs. 28785 Main Road - P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935 (631) 734-6807 Henry Oman and Christina J. Oman 1380 Bridge Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 (631) 734-5432 John T. Metzger of Peconic Surveyors, P.C. 1230 Traveler Street - P.O. Box 909 Southold, New York 11971 (631) 765-5020 N/A Attorney: Richard F. Lark, Esq. of Lark & Folts, Esqs. 28785 Main Road - P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935 (631) 734-6807 12. Has an application for subdivision ever been filed for this property? If so, please indicate when and whether or not approval was granted by the Planning Board. No 13. Has a pre-submission conference been held with the Planning Board? If so, provide date. Yes 14. Has the owner/applicant met with Land Preservation? If so, provide date. No 15. Is any part of the property in agricultural use? No 16. Is there an existing or proposed sale of development rights on the property? No 17. Does the owner own any adjacent properties? If so, please indicate the properties by SCTM#. No 18. Are there any building permits currently pending on this property? If yes, please provide permit number(s). No 19.The site will be serviced by the following special districts or utility companies: Fire District Post Office School District Water Cutchogue Cutchogue Mattituck-Cutchogue UFSD N/A (well water) 20. Has LIPA or Keyspan been notified of the proposed subdivision? If so, please provide proof that service will be provided. No, presently residence on property is serviced by LIPA; LIPA will provide service to proposed lot. 2l. Please indicate the type of open space proposed and how it will be managed? N/A 22. Are there any existing structures on the property? If so, please indicate the type of structure and its use(s). Will these structures remain, be removed or altered? Yes, one-family residence occupied by applicants. This house will remain "as is". 23. Based on the parcel yield and the affordable housing requirement of the Town Code, how many Moderate Income Family Dwelling Units are proposed? If the number that will be built is less than 25% of the yield, please indicate how you intend on satisfying the requirement. None 24. Application completed by ~//~ [ ] agent [ ] other Signature of Preparer~ Date 7/28/06 Henryv Om~ff Z j.,C~is~iha 3. Omar5[-~ .... AUTHORIZATION We, HENRY OMAN and CHRISTINA J. OMAN, owners of the property at 1380 Bridge Lane, Cutchogue, New York (SCTM #1000-085.00- 02.00-005.000), hereby authorize Richard F. Lark, Esq. of Lark & Folts, Esqs., 28785 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York to act as our agent and handle all necessary work involved in the variance and subdivision process with the Southold Town Board of Appeals and the Southold Town Planning Board. ./ -C~istina ~Oma~/ ~ v-- Sworn to before me this 28th day of July, 2006 Notary Public T-3849 ATIC #' 07=63671 - Standard N,Y.B.T. orm 8002 * S-71-70M--Bargain and Sale Deed, with Covenant against Grantot's Acrs--Individual or C~rporation (sinsle sheet) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER~DRE~, SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTi~ENT ' HOULDL BE U~E~) BY LAWYERS.ONLY. TI~]~INI~rI. IRE~ made the 3 ~ day o' ~ ,nineteen h.ndred .d seventy-~0_. 9E~ C~IS T. DiGREGORIO, residing at (no n~ber) Bridge Lane Cu~Ghpgue,' N~ York and HE~Y O~N, residing at 198 Lake Avenue, Ngsconset~ New York 11767, party of the first part, and HENRy OMAN and CHRISTINA J. OMAN, his wife, - as tenants by the entire~y, both residing at 198 Lake Avenue, Nesconset, New York 11767, party of the second part, WITNE..~'T~, that the party of the first pan, in consider,atio,n of Ten D?llars and o.t .h? valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant ano release unto tne par~y ot me second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument on the easterly side of Bridge Lane at the point where the southerly line of land of Krupaki-intersects said easterly side of Bridge Lane; RUNNING THENCE along the southerly line of said land of Krupski North 48 degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds East 322.05 feet to land of Davids: THENCE along Said land of Davids, South 43 degrees 10 minutes 20.seconds East, 215.04 feet; THENCE Southf~6 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West 319.20 feet to the easterly s'i~'~of Bridge Lane; THENCE along the easterly side of Bridge Lane, North 43 degrees 50 minutes O0 seconds West 230 feet to the point or place of beginning. This deed is given for the purpose of correcting the description' contained in deed recorded in Liber 7083 cp 49 TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streots and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER wkh the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of Che party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the pa~ty o£ the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party o~ ,the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust {und to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the sa.me for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense o~ this indenture so requires. IN WITNF_~ WttE. REOF, above the party of ,the first part has duly ~teouted this deed the day and year first Li~s '~ ~./~ (L.S.) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK personally came CHRT. S T. DiGREGOR~O to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he execute~l.4he same. Nbtary Pub lib RENSSELAER G. TERRY, JR. Naiad/Public, State of New Residing in Suffolk Coum¥ No. 52-3954850 /~y Commi~ion Expires March 30, 1973 STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF ss: On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ~ . that he is the of , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by. order of the b~ard of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK october m personally ~e HE~Y O~N to me known to ~ the individu~ descried in and who ex~ut~, the foregoing instr~ent, and a~wledg~ t~t he executed t~.~. Notary Publ~. ¢' RENSSE~ER G. TERRY, JR. NoIow Public, Slate of New York R~iding in Suffolk Covnty iTATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF sst O.n.~,e.. · d~y of~ ~ 19 before me that he, ~d subscnbm¢ w~mess, w~ pr~ent a~ ~w ex.ute the same; ~d that he, ~id w:tness, at the s~e ~me subscribed h ~me as ~tness thereto. T~3849 wrm COVENANT AGAINST GRAN1OR'S ACIS ~Tltt£No, ATIC ~ 07-63671 CHRIS T. DiGREGORIO and HENRY 'OMAN HENRY OMAN ~nd CHRISTINA J. OMAN, his wife SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNTY OR TOWN Recorded At Request of The Title Guarantee Company RETURN BY MAIL' TO: THE TITLE GUARA3/'TEE CO~IP~I~I~' RENSSELAER G. TERRY, Jr. ATrORNEY - AT - LAW BOUTHOLD, N. ~ .o. Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same Your Name: Oman, Henry and Christina J. last name, first name, middle initial unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person 's or company's name. Nature of Application: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Special Exception Coastal Erosion Change of zone Mooring Subdivision Plat Planning Site Plan Other (Please name other activity) .-- X Subdivision of property into two lots Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship includes by blood, marriage or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a parmership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. Yes No X If you answered "Yes" complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of the person employed by the Town of Southold N/A Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her souse, sibling, parent or child is (check all that apply): A. the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B. the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C. an officer, director, parmer or employee of the applicant; or D. the actual applicant Description of Relationship: N/A Submitted this28t~ July, Signature Print Name .~i~nry Oma~h 2006 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action ma'/ be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough tO allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given proiect and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Pert 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of FAF completed for this project: I IPartl I IPart2 b !Part3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any ether supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: DA. The project wil~ not result in any large end important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [~B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures de,s(~'ibed tn PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared,* ........................... I ! C. The pro act may result m one or more large and important impac, t~,tJ~3t m=;, h~_,,~.a, ct enwronment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ; ~ "' r ~ *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ' " AUG - 1 2006 Name of Action Name of Lead Agency ;~~,--,,~ ......................., Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Tiffs of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Pads A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of t h e application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you be II eve will be needed to complete Pads 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Oman Subdivision Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 1380 Bridge Lane, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York NameofApp cant/Sponsor Henry Oman and Christina J. Oman Address 1380 Bridge Lane City/PO Cutchogue State ~ Zip Code 11935 Business Telephone (631) 734-5432.. Name of Owner (if different) ~ame Address City / PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: Applicants propose to subdivide their property of 1.637 acres into two parcels, one containing 40,002 sq. ft. with an existing'dwelling of approximately 2,015 sq. ft. and the other one containing 31,314 sq. ft. to be gifted to their daughter on which will be built a home of approximately 1,000 sq. ft. AUG - 2006 Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N,A. if not applicable A, SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. I. Present Land Use: ~ Urban F'~ Industrial [] Commercial N Forest ~ Agr,culturo •Other ['~"~ Residential (suburban) D Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: 1,637 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) .028 PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 0 acres acres 0 0 acres 0 acres acres .04 acres 0 acres 0 acres 4., What is predominant soil type(s) on project site7 a, Soil drainage: E]Well drained ].00 % of site D Moderately well drained % of site. []Poorly drained __% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 0 acres (see I NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes [] No a, What is depth to bedrockN/~- (in feet) Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~0'10% 1% [~10'1B%__% [] 15% or greater % 6. )s project substantial~L~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places7 [] Yes r~ No 7. is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks7 ~ Yes D~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? ]-6 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole sourqe aquifer? ~Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Page 3 of 21 1 f .'Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: Identify each species: 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site}' {i.e., cliffs, dunes, ether geological formations? DYes Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by ti~e community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area;' [~Yes []No if yes, explain: 14. Does the present site i?iude scenic views known to be important to the community? E~]Yes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: 16. e. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acrss): Paso 4 of 2~ 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DNo r~Yes 18. is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL and 6 NYCRR 617? U--]Yes r~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description DYes [~No 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions es appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor; ]. o637 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: [ · 000 ~ initially; 3 · 0]_.5 sq. ft. sq. ft c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0 acres. ultimately. (with existing house) d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) ~ / e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed, o01 % / f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2 ; proposed 3 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: ]. lupo~/completior~ of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housin§ units: " Initially Ultimately One Family Two Family one residence two residences Multiple Family Condominium i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 17 ~ height; 30 t width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 230 ft. 50 ' length· 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site;' 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Wi,, disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes DNo DN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? After excavating for a foundation· dirt will be spread around new residence for grading and landscaping. Wil~ topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No b. c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No How many ,~cres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 'Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes [] No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 12 If multi-phased: 1 a. Total number of phases anticipated __ {number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 c. Approximate completion date of final phase; __ month 1 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~ Yes L~ No 8. Wilt blasting occur during construction? []Yes r~ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 5 ; after project is completp 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~ Yes [] No If yes, explain: 1 2. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved?~ Yes ~No 13. 14. -- months, (including demolition) after approvals have been obtained. -- months year, (including demolition) a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes ~ No Type residential cesspool Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ]___! Yes ~ No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~ Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No E~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? []Yes Page 6 o121 e. If yes, explain: Normal one-family residence septic tank and cesspool. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? J~JYes ~"]No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated sit~ life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? J~Yes J~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (mere than one hour per day)? [] Yes ~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? J~Yes 21 ;Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~ Yes ~ No / If yes, indicate type(s) ?roposed increase of a one-family residence. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 20 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 100 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [~ Yes ~ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25., Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board L--~Yes [] No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes · ' val City, Town Zoning Board ~Yes [] No Area variances Article 6 City, County Health Department [] Yes E]No Other Local Agencies E~Yes ~ No Other Regional Agencies [] Yes ~ No State Agencies []Yes [] No Federal Agencies Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a panning orzoning decision? '~Yes If Yes, indicate decision required: ~ Zoning amendment ~Site plan , ~No C~ Zoning variance E"~ Spedial use permit E~ New/revision of master plan E] Resource management plan []Subdivision [~ Other Page 8 of 2t '2, What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by tho present zoning? k ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: I 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permittad by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended usas in adopted local land uae plans? ~'~Yo$ I~lo What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications Within a Y4 mile radius~o~proposed action~' One-family residences and vineyards. Agricultural Conservation (A-C) 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ~A mile? [] Yes [] No 9, if the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? two a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 31,314 sq. ft. Page 9 of 21 ~ ' 10.'Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? DYes k~No a. if yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present ~evel$? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. DYes [] No I : I Informational Details / Attach any ad[Jitional information as may be/~eeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss ~ch impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/SponsorSignature Name~Hen~d Date 7/28j06 Christina J. Oman Title Applicants/Owners If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 ~ / / AREA -- 1.632' Acres C. ./ %\x MAP OF PROPER TY FOR THE OMA N FA MIL Y A T CUTCHOGUF TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY ,N Y. 1000-85-02-05 SCALE : 1"-- 50' July I'q, 2006 AUG- I"~ -~ )5 lC. NO. 49618 (6311 2~,~t,~'-/(631) 765- 1797 P. O. BO:t%g~"u..~. 1250 TRA V~ STREET SOUTHpLD~ ~ N.Y. 119~1 · 06-1,~.q OLASER FICHE FORM SUBDIVISIONS Proiect Type: StancJard Status: SCTM #: 1000 - 85.-2-5 Proiect Name: Oman, Henry & Christina Location: e/s/o Bridge Lane, Cutcho.que Hamlet: Cutcho,que Applicant Name: Henry & Christina Oman Owner Name: Henry Oman Zone 1: A-C Approval Date: /'~f~_. PLAT Si.qned Date: OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 3: Zone 2: C and R's: Homeowners Association: R and M A.qreement: Address: 1380 Bridge Lane, Cutcho,que County Filin.q Date: SCAN ~ Date: