HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrlando Property A Stage 1 Archaeological SurveyI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY
for the
ORLANDO PROPERTY
in
BAYVIEW, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGISTS:
David J. Bernstein, Ph.D.
Allison J. Manfra
The Institute for Long Island Archaeology
Department of Anthropology
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Stony Brook, New York 11794-4364
November 2005
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SHPO Project Review Number
Involved State and Federal Agencies
Phase of Survey
Location
Survey Area
NYS DOT 7.5 minute Quadrangle Map
Archaeological Survey Overview
Results of Archaeological Survey
Report Authors
Date of Report
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
N/A
N/A
Stage 1; reconnaissance survey.
Location: Town of Southold
Minor Civil Division: 10310
County: Suffolk
Number of Acres Surveyed: 4.62 acres (1.848 hectares)
Southold, New York (1991 )
Number and Interval of Shovel Test Pits: 82 shovel test pits dug at 15 meter
(49 foot) intervals
Number and Size of Units: N/A
Width of Plowed Strips: N/A
Surface Survey Transect Interval: N/A
Number and Names of Prehistoric Sites Identified: none
Number and Names of Historic Sites Identified: none
Number and Names of Sites Recommended for Phase II/Avoidance: N/A
David J. Bernstein, PhD
Allison J. Manfi'a
Institute for Long Island Archaeology
State University of New York at Stony Brook
November 2005
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................. ii
LIST OF FIGURES, PHOTOGRAPH, AND TABLES .............................................. iv
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................
ARCHAEOLOGICAL LITERATURE SEARCH AND SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT .................... 1
Project Description ................................................................... 1
Background Research ................................................................. 1
Environmental Conditions ....................................................... 1
Site File Search ............................................................... 7
Historic Maps ................................................................ 8
Sensitivity Assessment ................................................................ 14
Prehistoric Context ........................................................... 14
Historic Context .............................................................. 14
Disturbance ........................................................................ 14
Testing Recommendations ............................................................. 14
ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD INVESTIGATIONS ................................................ 15
Field Methodology ................................................................... 15
Surface Survey ...................................................................... 15
Subsurface Testing ................................................................... 15
Results ..................................................................... 15
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................. 16
REFERENCES ............................................................................. 17
APPENDIX: Shovel Test Pit Excavation Inventory ................................................ 19
iii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Photograph 1.
Table 1.
Table 2.
LIST OF FIGURES, PHOTOGRAPH, AND TABLES
Map of Long Island showing the location of the project area ............................ 2
1991 NYS DOT topographic map, Southold, New York 7.5 minute series showing the
location of the project area ...................................................... 3
Archaeological testing of the Orlando property ....................................... 4
1975 USDA Soil Map showing the location of the project area .......................... 5
1797 Moore Survey of the Town of Southold ........................................ 9
1858 Chace Map of Suffolk County ............................................... 10
1873 Beers Atlas of Long Island ................................................. 11
1904 USGS topographic map, Southold, New York .................................. 12
1929 Dolph and Stewart Atlas of Suffolk County ..................................... 13
Field crew members excavating shovel test pit in eastern portion of the property.
View is west .................................................................. 6
Project area soils .............................................................. 6
Known archaeological sites within 1.6 kilometers (1 mile) of the project area ............... 7
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a Stage I archaeological survey undertaken for the Orlando property in
Bayview, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York (Figures I and 2). The survey was conducted by the
Institute for Long Island Archaeology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook in November of 2005. All
field data and photographs generated by this survey are curated at the Institute for Long Island Archaeology.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed subdivision wilt impact archaeological remains of
prehistoric and/or historic age. This required amhival research and an archaeological survey with subsurface testing.
The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Standards for Cultural Resource
Investigations and the Curation of Archaeological Collections issued by the New York Archaeological Council
(1995) and the Phase lArchaeological Report Format Requirements issued by the New York State Office of Parks,
Recreation, and Historic Preservation (2005).
ARCHAEOLOGICAL LITERATURE SEARCH AND SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT
Project Description
This survey was conducted to determine if proposed subdivision will hnpact archaeological remains of
prehistoric and/or historic age. The project area, located southeast of North Bayview Road and west of Paradise
Point Road, consists of five lots designated Lots 1-5 totaling 4.62 acres (1.848 hectares) (Figures 2 and 3). Areas
west of Lots 1-3 and east of Lots 4 and 5 are designated to remain "open space" and were therefore not surveyed for
the presence of archaeological materials (Figure 3).
Background Research
Environmental Setting. The project area is located in Bayview on the south shore of the North Fork of
Long Island, on a peninsula (Great Hog Neck)jutting into Little Peconic Bay (Figures I and 2). It is situated on the
outwash plain of the North Fork, just south of the rolling hills of the recessional moraine, a geological feature created
over 15,000 years ago by meltwater runoff from the Wisconsin ice sheet (Sirkin 1995). Topography is gently
sloping, with an average elevation of 3 meters (10 feet) above mean sea level. Fresh water wetlands are present in
the central portion of the Orlando property (Figure 3).
The project area is open deciduous woods with small amounts of low bush blueberry and briar.
Disturbances appear to be limited to the eastern edge of the property along Paradise Point Road (Figure 3).
Disturbed areas have a low potential for the presence of intact archaeological deposits.
Soils in the Orlando property consist of Riverhead sandy loam (3-8% slopes), Carver and Plymouth sands
(3-15% slopes), Muck, and a small amount of Plymouth loamy sand (3-8%slopes) (Figure 4). The Riverhead soil
series consist of deep, well-drained, medium to moderately coarse textured soils with low natural fertility (Warner et
al. 1975:71). The Carver and Plymouth soil series is comprised of Carver and/or Plymouth mapping units. Both
Carver and Plymouth soil series consist of deep, excessively drained, coarse-textured soils with low natural fertility
(Warner et al. 1975:66-67, 77-78; Table 1).
I
I
I
Figure 1. Map of Long Island showing the location of the project area.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 2. 1991 NYS DOT topographic map, Southold, New York, 7.5 minute series (scale 1:24,000) showing the
location of the project area.
3
· mapping datum
0 sterile shoveltest pit (STP)
photograph angle
I
I
I
Figure 3. Archaeological testing of the Orlando property.
4
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 4. 1975 USDA Soil Map showing the location of the project area.
Photograph I. Field crew members excavating shovel test pit in eastern portion of the property. View is west.
Table 1. Project area soils
Nome Soil Horizon Depth Color Texture Slope % Drainrtge
Carver and A0/AI: 0-7.6 cm (0-3 in) dk gr sd 3-15 excessive
Plymouth sands A2:7.6-20 cm (3-8 in) (It) gr sd
BI: 20-35 cm (8-14 in) bn sd
B2:35-56 cm (14-22 in) ob sd
Pl3maoath loamy A0/AI: 0-I0 cm (0-4 in) vy dk gb lm sd 3-8 excessive
sand BI: 10-25 cm (4-10 in) yb lm sd
B2:25-43 cm (10-17 in) yb hn sd
B3:43-68 cm (17-27 in) bn Im sd
Riverhead Ap: 0-30 c~n (0-12 in) dk bu sd hn 3-8 well
sandy loam B2:30-68 cm (12-27 in) ob sd lm
B3:68-80 cm (27-32 in) yb lm sd
I
I
I
I
Site File Search. The files of the New York State Museum (NYSM), the Office of Parks, Recreation, and
Historic Preservation (OPRHP), Suffolk Cotmty Archaeological Association (SCAA), and the Institute for Long
Island Archaeology (ILIA) document nine known archaeological sites within 1.6 kilometers (one mile) of the project
area. There are no State or National Register of Historic Places listed or previously determined eligible properties
within or adjacent to the parcel (Table 2).
Table 2. Known archaeological sites within 1.6 kilometers (1 mile) of the project area.
Site identifier Site name Age/Cultural Affiliation Comments
NYSM 4909 ACP SUFK 40 prehistoric i "Village site and shell heap on Hog Neck or
Hogonock, a little northwest of Sag Harbor.
Bone implements and pottery have been
found here" (Parker 1920:699). Site may
be on the South Fork, but not as mapped in
site files.
NYSM 8546 prehistoric "Traces of occupation" (Parker 1920).
Al0310.001285 Pellicano prehistoric Woodland period site with pottery,
debitage, one biface, one scraper, and two
hanunerstones (Cammissa 1996).
Al0310.000297 Cedar Beach prehistoric Quartz flakes, tools, and fire cracked rock.
County Park
Al0310.000286 Angel Shores prehistoric and historic Prehistoric artifacts include pottery, quartz
flakes, and a quartz tool; also 2 unidentified
19th century map documented sites; historic
artifacts include slipware, creamware,
pearlware, and ironstone (Billadello and
Johannemann 1988).
Al0310.000284 B. Wells historic 19th century site with mdware, pearlwam,
and bottle glass.
Al0310.000285 Mills outparcel historic Late 19th century outbuilding site; 2 nails
outbuildings and 2 bottle glass found.
Al0310.000287 Beebe-Brown historic Late 19th century site with brick, nail,
House window glass, redware, pearlware,
stoneware, whiteware, ironstone, bottle
glass and pipe fragment.
Al0310.000288 Brown-Tinsdale historic Early 20th century site with brick, nails,
Homestead wood, window glass, pearlware, ironstone,
whiteware, porcelain, and bottle glass.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Historic Maps. A survey of late eighteenth through early twentieth century maps reveals minimal
documented activity in and around the Orlando property. The 1797 Moore Map of the Town of SouthoM (Figure 5)
depicts the approximate route of Main Road (New York State Route 25) through the Town of Southold, and early
settlement is indicated along its path. Great Hog Neck is shown jutting into Little Peconic Bay. Hog Neck Road is
illustrated, but no structures are shown on the peninsula.
An increase in settlement is shown on Great Hog Neck in Southold on the 1858 Chace Map of Suffolk
County (Figure 6). A linear settlement pattern is shown along Bayview Road on Great Hog Neck. However, no
structures are shown within or immediately adjacent to the project area. A similar settlement pattern is shown on the
1873 Beers Atlas of Long Island (Figure 7). Homesteads line Main Bayview Road southwest of the Orlando
property, however, the project area remains devoid of structures.
While the 1904 USGS topographic map (Figure 8) does not indicate land ownership, it does provide
information about natural features and general use of the land. This map depicts the project area as relatively
unchanged since the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The wetlands are shown in the center of the Orlando
property and a dirt path is shown in the eastern portion of the parcel. No structures are shown within or adjacent to
the property. The 1929 Dolph and Stewart Atlas of Suffolk County (Figure 9) shows the wetland area in the center of
the Orlando parcel, but no development in or around it. The project area remains devoid of structures.
The survey of historic maps indicates that the project area wimessed minimal development during the
historic period.
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
project area
Figure 5. 1797 Moore Map of the Town of Southold showing Hog Neck Road on Great Hog Neck.
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 6. 1858 Chace Map of Suffolk CounO~ showing increased settlement in Southold north of the project area
and throughout Great Hog Neck.
10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 7. 1873 Beers Atlas of Long Island. No structures are shown within or adjacent to the project area.
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 8. 1904 USGS topographic map of Shelter Island, New York showing the wetlands in the central portion of
the Orlando parcel.
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 9. The 1929 Dolph and Stewart Atlas of Suffolk County showing the project area south of North (Bayview)
Road.
13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sensitivity Assessment
Prehistoric Context. 'fhe closest know prehistoric site was encountered during an archaeological survey of
the Pellicano property (A 10310.001285; Table 2). The Pellicano site, located west of the Orlando property, is
described as "a small seasonal, Woodland period base camp" (Cammissa 1996:22), and it contained a relatively low
density of artifacts, including quartz flakes, fire-cracked rock, a quartz tool, and prehistoric pottery sherds. A similar
density and diversity of artifacts was encountered at the Cedar Beach County Park and Angel Shores sites (Table 2).
Additional sites located within 1.6 kilometers (one mile) were described in Parker's 1920 inventory (NYSM 4909
and NYSM 8546; Table 2).
In 2001, an archaeological survey performed by the Institute for Long Island Archaeology north of the
Orlando property yielded one prehistoric artifact, q3ais artifact, a quartz tool fragment, represented an isolated
incident of loss or discard (Bernstein et al. 2001).
Although little modern archaeological research has taken place on the North Fork of Long Island, the region
is known to have been well-populated by Native Americans prior to the European arrival in the seventeenth century
(Ritchie 1959; Smith 1950). The Great Hog Neck region would have been aRractive to prehistoric peoples, as
marine resources such as fish, water fowl, and shellfish were available nearby, and upland areas contained game and
edible plants. Similarly, areas adjacent to freshwater wetlands would have provided abundant natural resources, and
thus acted as focal points for human activity.
The project area has a high sensitivity for the presence of prehistoric remains based on the proximity of
known sites and favorable environmental conditions.
Historic Context. The English permanently settled the northeastern end of Long Island in the mid-
seventeenth century. At the time of contact the North Fork was occupied by the Corchaug Indians, speakers of the
Mohegan-Pequot-Montauk Algonquian language (Salwen 1978).
Four historic period archaeological sites and one site with prehistoric and historic period artifacts are
documented within 1.6 kilometers (one mile) of the Orlando parcel. These sites are located south of the project area
along Main Bayview Road.
Based on the results of the site file search and the historic map overview, the project area has a low
sensitivity for the presence of historic period Euro-American sites.
Disturbance
As mentioned above, disturbances appear to be limited to the eastern portion of the Orlando parcel along
Paradise Point Road (Figure 3).
Testing Recommendations
It is recommended that Lots 1-5 of the Orlando property be subject to a surface survey and subsurface
testing. Subsurface testing should consist of the excavation of shovel test pits (STPs) at 15 meter (49 foot) intervals
to verify suspected disturbance and to ascertain if archaeological remains are present beneath the ground surface.
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD INVESTIGATIONS
Field Methodology
A two phase survey design was employed to search for archaeological remains in the project area. Similar
survey designs, used in other areas of Long Island, have proven successful in detecting prehistoric and historic sites
(Bernstein et al. 1999; Lightfont 1986). The initial phase of the survey involved a surface reconnaissance and
inspection intended to iocate large and easily visible remains. The second phase entailed subsurface testing.
Surface Survey
The entire project area was walked over in November 2005, with special attention given to examining
exposed soil for artifacts or other surface manifestations of past activity. Vegetation patterns and topographic
features which might provide insight into early land use were also noted (please see above).
Ground surface visibility is fair to poor throughout the project area due to leaf litter and low vegetation
(Photograph 1). No cultural material other than recent debris (i.e., less than ten years old) was encountered during
the surface survey.
Subsurface Testing
The second phase of the field survey consisted of the excavation of shovel test pits (STPs) designed to
detect the presence of archaeological remains buried beneath the ground surface. Mapping data were established at a
utility pole north of Lot I and at a monument north of Lot 5 (Figure 3). All of the test units are designated using
metric grid coordinates relative to each mapping datum (Figure 3; Appendix). In general, the project area was tested
at 15 meter (49 foot) intervals. Subsurface testing was performed throughont both areas of potential impact (APE).
A total of 82 shovel test pits was excavated in Lots 1-5. Shovel test pits have a diameter of approximately
40 centimeters (16 inches). All of the shovel test pits were dug well into the B2 subsoil, typically to 60 centimeters
(24 inches) below the present ground surface. The soil fi.om each test unit was screened through six millimeter (1/4
inch) wire mesh to aid in the identification and recovery of artifacts. All photographs and field notes produced
during this survey are curated at the Institute for Long Island Archaeology at the State University of New York at
Stony Brook.
Results. The specific data recorded in the field for each shovel test pit, including information on soil
stratigraphy and cultural material, are presented in the Appendix.
The general characteristics of the soils found in the project area are discussed above in the Environmental
Setting section. The topsoil layer (referred to in the Appendix as the A0/AI horizon) consists of partially
decomposed organic matter and dark brown or dark gray brown loam, and extends to an average of 6 centimeters
(2.4 inches) below the ground surface. Thirty nine shovel test pits exposed an A2 leaching zone of gray or gray
brown sand between the topsoil and the upper subsoil. The upper (B1) subsoil consists of medium brown sandy
loam or loamy sand to an average depth of 19 centimeters (7.5 inches) below the ground surface. It is underlain by
the lower subsoil (B2), an orange brown or yellow brown sand or loamy sand. The B3 substratum (orange brown or
dark orange brown [occasionally] loamy sand) was reached in 19 shovel test pits.
No prehistoric artifacts, and no prehistoric or historic period features, were encountered during subsurface
testing. One historic period artifact, an aqua bottle glass fragment, was found in STP S90/E15. This artifact is an
isolated incident of loss or discard, and as such, has virtually no potential for contributing to our understanding of
past activities in Southold.
15
1
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Archival research and archaeological investigation for the Orlando subdivision in Southold, Town of
Southold, Suffolk County, New York indicate that the project area wimessed minimal discernable human activity in
the past. A total of 82 shovel test pits was excavated in Lots 1-5 of the property. No prehistoric artifacts, and no
prehistoric or historic period features were encountered during subsurface testing. One historic period artifacts, an
aqua bottle glass fi'agment, was encountered during subsurface testing in Lot 5. This artifact is an isolated incident
of loss or discard, and as such, has virtually no potential for contributing to our understanding of past activities in
Southold. Therefore, no fi~rther archaeological investigations are recommended.
16
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REFERENCES
Bernstein, David J., Michael J. Lenardi, and Daria Merwin
1999 Stage IB Archaeological Survey of the Kycia Property, Head of the Harbor, Town of Smithtown, Suffolk
County, New York. Institute for Long Island Archaeology, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
2001 Stage I Archival Search and Archaeological Survey of the Bayview Overlook Property, Bayview, Town of
Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Institute for Long Island Archaeology, State University of New York
at Stony Brook.
Billadello, Laurie S. and Edward J. Joharmemann
1988 Stage I Survey of a Cultural Resources Inventory of the Angel Shores Subdivision, Bayview, Suffolk
County. Long Island Archaeological Project, Setauket, New York.
Cammissa, Alfred G.
1996 Phase IB Archaeological Survey and Phase II Intensive Testing of the Pellicano Site for the Proposed
Bayview Development, Bayview, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. Tracker Archaeological
Services, North Babylon, New York.
Lightfoot, Kent
1986 Regional Surveys in the Eastern United States: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Implementing Subsurface
Testing Programs. American Antiquity 51:484-504.
Ritchie, William A.
1959 The Stony Brook Site and its Relation to Archaic Transitional Cultures on Long Island. New York State
Museum and Science Service, Bulletin 372. The University of the State of New York, Albany.
Salwen, Bert
1978 Indians of Southern New England and Long Island: Early Period. In Handbook of North American
Indians, Volume 15, edited by Bruce Trigger, pp. 160-176. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.
Sirkin, Les
1995 Eastern Long Island Geology with Field Trips. The Book and Tackle Shop, Watch Hill, Rhode Island.
Smith, Carlyle S.
1950 The Archaeology of Coastal New York. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural
History 43:95-202
Warner, J. W. Jr., W. E. Hanna, R. J. Landry, J. P. Wulforst, J. A. Neely, R. L. Holmes and C. E. Rice
1975 SoilSurvey of Suffolk County, New York. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service,
Washington, D.C.
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
List of Maps
Moore, T.
1797 Map of the Town of Southold. Copy on file, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Beers, F. W.
1873 Atlas of Long Island, New York. F. W. Beers, Comstock and Cline, New York.
Chace, J.
1858 Map of Suffolk County, Long lsland, New York. J. Duglass, Philadelphia.
Dolph and Stewart
1929 Atlas of Suffolk County. Dolph and Stewart, New York.
New York State Department of Transportation
1991 Southold, New York. 7.5 minute series. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, New York.
United States Geological Survey
1904 Shelter Island, New York. 15 minute series. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX:
EXCAVATION AND ARTIFACT INVENTORY
Basic descriptive data fi.om the project ama are presented in the following appendix. Excavation,
stratigraphic, and artifactual information are included. Excavation information includes shovel test pit (STP)
coordinates relative to mapping datum, level number, stratigraphic designation (stratum), and starting (SD) and
ending (ED) depths (in centimeters) for each excavated level.
The following abbreviations are used in the appendix:
Stratum
A0/A 1 -topsoil
A2-1eaching zone
B 1 -upper subsoil
B2-1ower subsoil
B3-substramm
Soils
dk-dark
bn-brown
cb-cobbles
gb-gray brown
gr-gray
gv-gravel
lm-loam(y)
md-medium
ob-orange brown
pb-pebbles
sd-sand(y)
yb-yellow brown
19
1
I
I
I
APPENDIX: LOTS 1 AND 2
SHOVEL TEST PIT EXCAVATION AND ARTIFACT INVENTORY
1
STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material
S15/W90 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5 8 A2 gb sd
8 15 B 1 md bn lm sd
15 60 B2 yb sd
S15/W75 0 8 A0/AI dk bn lm
8 17 B 1 md bn sd lm
17 62 B2 yb sd
S15/W60 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
5 l0 A2 gb sd
10 13 B 1 md bn lm sd
13 60 B2 yb sd
S15/W45 0 5 A0/AI dk bn lm
5 12 A2 gb sd
12 23 B1 mdbn sd lm
23 60 B2 yb sd
S15/W30 0 4 A0/AI dk bn lm
4 8 A2 gb sd
8 12 B 1 md bn ira sd
12 60 B2 yb sd lm
S30/W90 0 4 A0/AI dk bn lm
4 15 B 1 md bn sd lm
15 41 B2 yb sd
S30/W75 0 8 A0/AI dk bn lm
8 12 A2 gb sd
12 22 BI md bn lm sd
22 60 B2 yb sd
S30/W60 0 22 A0/A 1 dk bn lm
22 27 A2 dk gb sd lm
27 35 BI md bn sd
35 73 B2 yb sd
S30/W45 0 5 A0/A! dk bn lm
5 10 A2 gb sd
10 23 B1 md bn sdlm
23 60 B2 yb sd
S30/W30 0 6 A0/A1 dk gb lm
6 19 B1 mdbn sd lm
19 31 B2 ybsd
31 67 B3 ob sd
20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material
S45/W105 0 6 A0/A1 dk gb lm
6 14 B1 md bn sd lm
14 30 B2 yb sd
30 45 B3 ob sd
S45/W90 0 6 A0/AI dk bn lm
6 17 B1 md bn lm sd
17 60 132 yb sd
S45/W75 0 8 A0/A! dk bn lm
8 12 A2 gb sd
12 31 B 1 md bn sd lm
31 62 B2 yb sd
S45/W60 0 7 A0/A1 dk bn lm
7 13 B 1 md bn sd lm
13 41 B2 yb sd
41 60 B3 ob sd
S45/W45 0 9 A0/A 1 dk bn lm
9 17 A2 gb sd
17 26 B1 md bn sd lm
26 60 B2 yb sd
S60/W120 0 6 A0/A1 dk gb lm
6 15 B 1 md bn sd lm
15 42 B2 yb sd
42 60 B3 ob sd
S60/W105 0 10 A0/AI dk bn lm
10 33 B1 md bn sdlm
33 61 B2 yb sd
S60/W90 0 5 A0/AI dk bn lm
5 8 A2 gr sd
8 16 B 1 md bn lm sd
16 60 B2 yb sd
S60/W75 0 9 A0/AI dk bn lm
9 17 A2 gbsd
17 31 B 1 md bn sd lm
31 62 B2 yb sd
S60/W60 0 9 A0/A1 dk bn lm
9 18 B 1 md bn sd Im
18 34 B2 yb sd
34 62 B3 ob sd
S60/W45 0 6 A0/A1 dk bn lm
6 11 A2 gb sd
11 19 Bi mdbn lm sd
19 60 B2 yb sd
S75/W120 0 6 A0/AI dk bn lm
6 27 BI md bn sd lm
27 60 B2 yb sd
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material
S75/W105 0 6 A0/A1 dk bn lm
6 17 B l md bn lm sd
17 60 B2 yb sd
S75/W90 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
5 8 A2 gr sd
8 15 B 1 md bn lm sd
15 60 B2 yb sd
S75/W75 0 11 A0/A 1 dk bn im
11 17 A2 grsd
17 21 B 1 md bn sd lm
21 39 B2 yb sd
39 60 B3 ob sd
S75/W60 0 8 A0/A1 dk bn lm
8 15 A2 gb sd
15 25 B1 md bn sd lm
25 60 B2 yb sd
S90/W135 0 7 A0/AI dk bn lm
7 16 A2 gb sd
16 35 BI mdbn sd lm
35 62 B2 yb sd
S90/W120 0 5 A0/AI dk bn lm
5 24 B 1 gb sd
24 60 B2 yb sd
S90/W105 0 4 A0/AI dk bn lm
4 8 A2 gb sd
8 22 B 1 md bn lm sd
22 60 B2 yb sd
S90/W90 0 4 A0/A 1 dk bn lm
4 8 A2 gr sd
8 19 BI md bn lm sd
19 60 B2 yb sd
S90/W75 0 7 A0/A1 dk bn lm
7 18 B 1 md bn sd lm
18 42 B2 yb sd
42 60 B3 ob sd
S105/W135 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
5 8 A2 gb sd lm
8 27 B 1 md bn sd lm
27 60 B2 yb sd
S105/W120 0 4 A0/A1 dk bn lm
4 19 BI md bn sd lm
19 58 B2 yb sd
S105/W105 0 3 A0/A1 dk bn lm
3 15 B 1 md bn lm sd
15 60 B2 yb sd
22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material
S105/W90 0 8 A0/A1 dk bn lm
8 22 B1 md bn sd lm
22 50 B2 yb sd
50 60 B3 ob sd
S105/W75 0 6 A0/AI dk bn lm
6 17 B1 mdbn sd lm
17 43 B2 yb sd w/pb&cb
43 70 B3 or sd w/pb&cb
S120/W150 0 5 A0/A1 dk gb lm
5 16 B 1 md bn sd lm
16 29 B2 yb sd
29 60 B3 ob sd
S120/W135 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
5 10 A2 gb sd
10 20 BI md bn sd lm
20 60 B2 yb sd
S120/W120 0 5 A0/AI dk bn lm
5 8 A2 gb sd
8 27 B1 md bn sd lm
27 60 B2 yb sd
S120/W105 0 4 A0/AI dk bn lm
4 13 BI mdbn lm sd
13 40 B2 yb sd
S120/W90 0 6 A0/AI dk gb sd lm
6 24 B 1 md bn sd Im
24 37 B2 yb sd w/pb
37 60 B3 ob sd w/pb&cb
S135/W165 0 4 A0/A1 dk bn lm
4 9 A2 gr sd
9 17 B1 md bn hn sd
17 60 B2 yb sd
S135/W150 0 3 A0/AI dk bn lm
3 7 A2 gb sd
7 19 B1 md bn im sd
19 60 B2 yb sd
S135/W135 0 5 A0/AI dk bn lm
5 9 A2 gr sd
9 16 B1 md bn Im sd
16 60 B2 yb sd
S135/W120 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
5 10 BI md bn lm sd
10 60 B2 yb sd
23
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material
S135/W105 0 8 A0/AI dk gb sd lm
8 28 B 1 md bn sd lm
28 54 B2 yb sd
54 63 B3 or sd
S150/W165 0 4 A0/AI dk gb lm
4 9 B1 mdbn sd Im
9 24 B2 yb sd
24 57 B3 ob sd
S150/W150 0 8 A0/AI dk gb lm
8 14 BI mdbn sd lm
14 39 B2 yb sd
39 62 B3 ob sd
S150/W135 0 5 A0/AI dk gb sd lm
5 12 B 1 md bn sd lm
12 40 B2 yb sd
SI50/WI20 0 6 A0/A1 dk gb sd lm
6 15 BI md bn sd hn
15 41 B2 yb sd
41 60 B3 ob sd
S150/W105 0 14 A0/AI dk gb lm
14 17 BI mdbn sd lm
17 44 B2 yb sd
44 59 B3 ob sd
24
I
I
I
APPENDIX: LOTS 4 AND 5
SHOVEL TEST PIT EXCAVATION AND ARTIFACT INVENTORY
I
STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material
S15/W3 0 3 A0/AI dk bn lm
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3 19 B 1 md bn sd lm
19 60 B2 ob lm sd
S30/W3 0 4 A0/A 1 dk gb sd lm
4 22 B 1 md bn lm sd
22 60 B2 ob lm sd w/pb&gv
S45/W3 0 4 A0/A 1 dk bn lm
4 25 B 1 md bn sd lm
25 60 B2 ob lm sd
S60/E0 0 3 A0/AI dk gb sd lm
3 26 B 1 md bn lm sd
26 60 B2 ob lm sd
S60/E15 0 6 A0/AI dk bn lm
6 11 BI md bn sd lm
11 50 B2 ob lm sd
50 60 B3 dk ob lm sd
S60/E30 0 6 A0/AI dk bn lm
6 8 A2 gb sd
8 11 B1 mdbn sd lm
11 60 B2 ob sd lm
S60/E45 0 7 A0/A1 dk bn lm
7 8 A2 gr sd
8 13 B 1 md bn Ina sd
13 36 B2 ob lm sd
36 60 B3 dk ob sd
S75/E0 0 5 A0/A 1 dk bn lm
5 20 B 1 md bn sd lm
20 60 B2 ob lm sd
S75/E15 0 6 A0/A1 dk bn lm
6 21 BI md bn sd lm
21 60 B2 ob lm sd
S75/E30 0 6 A0/A 1 dk bn kn
6 10 A2 gb sd
10 27 B1 md bn sd lm
27 62 B2 ob sd lm
S75/E45 0 5 A0/A 1 dk bn lm
5 7 A2 gr sd
7 12 B 1 md bn lm sd
12 60 B2 ob lm sd
25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material
S90/E0 0 5 A0/A1 dk gb sd lm
5 33 B1 md bn lm sd
33 49 B2 ob lm sd
sg0/E 15 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
5 17 B 1 md bn sd lm I aqua bottle glass
17 49 B2 ob lm sd
49 66 B3 dk ob lm sd
S90/E30 0 4 A0/A1 dk bn lm
4 9 A2 gb sd
9 19 B1 mdbn sd lm
19 62 B2 ob sd lm
S90/E45 0 4 A0/A t dk bn lm
4 6 A2 gr sd
6 10 BI md bn lm sd
10 60 B2 ob lm sd
S105/E0 0 8 A0/AI dkbn lm
8 22 BI mdbn sd hn
22 60 B2 ob lm sd
S105/E15 0 6 A0/A1 dk bn lm
6 23 B1 mdbn sd lm
23 60 B2 ob lm sd
S 105/E30 0 5 A0/AI dk bn lm
5 9 A2 gb sd
9 19 B 1 md bn sd lm
19 60 B2 ob sd lm
S 105/E45 0 5 A0/AI dk bn lm
5 9 A2 gr sd
9 14 B1 mdbn lm sd
14 60 B2 ob lm sd
S120/E15 0 8 A0/AI dk bn lm
8 21 BI mdbn sd lm
21 60 B2 ob lm sd
S120/E30 0 6 A0/A1 dk bn lm
6 8 A2 gb sd
8 60 B2 ob sd lm
S120/E45 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
5 10 A2 gr sd
10 15 B1 md bn lm sd
15 60 B2 ob lm sd
S135/E15 0 6 A0/AI dk bn lm
6 21 B 1 md bn sd lm
21 60 B2 ob lm sd
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STP SD ED Stratum Soils Cultural Material
S135/E30 0 10 A0/A1 dk bn lm
10 13 A2 gb sd
13 26 B 1 md bn sd lm
26 60 B2 ob sd lm
S135/E45 0 5 A0/A1 dk bn lm
5 9 A2 gr sd
9 13 B 1 md bn lm sd
13 60 B2 ob lm sd
S 150/E15 0 6 A0/A1 dk bn lm
6 20 B1 md bn sd lm
20 62 B2 ob lm sd
S150/E30 0 5 A0/AI dkbn lm
5 10 A2 gb sd
10 28 BI md bn sd lm
28 60 B2 ob sd lm
S150/E45 0 6 A0/A1 dkbn lm
6 8 A2 gr sd
8 11 B1 mdbn lm sd
11 60 B2 dk ob lm sd
S165~E15 0 6 A0/A1 dk bn lm
6 17 BI mdbn sd lm
17 60 B2 ob lm sd
S 165/E30 0 8 A0/AI dk bn lm
8 20 B1 mdbn sd lm
20 60 B2 ob Im sd
S165/E45 0 6 A0/AI dk bn lm
6 10 A2 gr sd
10 14 BI md bn lm sd
14 60 B2 dk ob Im sd
27