Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-142.-1-27
Louis DeRonde PETROLEUM ASSOCIATES 29 Mowbray Avenue Bay Shore, NY 1170~ (516)665-3062 July 21, 1997 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: CITGO Service Station N/E/C Main Rd. & Factory Ave., Mattituck, NY Section 142, Block 1 Lot 27, Zone: Gen. Business Dear Mr. Orlowski: The referenced colonial design service station was completed in the early 1970's for Sun Oil & Refining Co. as a conventional service station providing gasoline sales and service repair bays. Three years ago the Town gave its' approval following the necessary format and submission of plans to erect the pump island canopy that presently exists at the site. Due to competitive market conditions the present owner of the site (Warex Terminals Corp.) a branded Citgo retailer through my office is requesting permission to convert the existing service station building to a convenience store keeping the colonial design. The conversion from auto repairs to convenience store will be encapsulated in the confines of the existing building structure with only the required interior and exterior modifications (due to repair bay elimination) to accept the changeover. In any case the colonial motif will be maintained. The station is in a general business zone which permits convenience store use. Present site improvements include concrete sidewalks and curbs, landscaping, paving and internal yard drainage, etc., The site is well maintained and in good condition. Required parking will be provided for the store as well as handicapped accessibility. Signage will be included within Town code. Gasoline availability will remain unchanged. The enclosed site plan with the proposed building elevation is provided for your use and information. May we have your Boards approval for this proposal? We understand separate submission to the Bldg. Dept. is necessary for required modification permits. ~ ,Lt 221997 Louis DeRonde SOIJTHO'~'~T?'~;~- i cc: Warex Terminals Corp. Mr. E. Cuccurullo APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Richard C. Wilton BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DECISION RENDERED: January 4~ 1995 APPL. #4290. APPLICANT: Warex Terminal Corp. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 9945 Main Road~ Mattituck~ NY. TAX MAP DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 142~ BLOCK l, LOT 27. Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 BASIS OF APPEAL: Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector 11/2/94. "Accessory structure(s) shall be located in the required rear yard." PROVISIONS APPEALED FROM: Article X, Section 100-101C(1). RELIEF REQUESTED: Canopy structure over existing gasoline pumps which are located in the front yard area and more particuiarly shown on Drawing 9427-LD dated 9/22/94 prepared by W. Wade, P.E. and Louis DeRonde of Petroleum Associates. MOTION MADE BY: Robert A. Villa SECONDED BY: James Diuizio, Jr. ACTION/RESOLUTION ADOPTED: Approved location of accessory canopy structure as shown on 9/22/94 drawing, provided: (1) peak of greatest lighting be limited to periods during regular, business hours when open to the public; (2) setback no less than 11'5" to the property line as applied; (3) subject to other applicable fire and safety requirements as determined by the Building Inspector. Canopy structure shall be surface-mounted as deemed appropriate by the Building Inspector. REASONS/FINDINGS: Gasoline pumps and islands are existing. Canopy is an open, roof-type structure rather than a fully enclosed structure; the canopy does not cause obstructions for egress or ingress within the parcel. Placement of a canopy structure is not an expansion of use and does not create additional parking under code regulations. Property received Special Exception approval on December 12, 1968 by the Board of Appeals under Appl. No. 1225. (The sale of vehicles is prohibited and is not a request under this application.) The property contains two front yards and virtually has no rear yard under the definitions and setbacks of the Southold Town Zoning Code. VOTE OF THE BOARD: Ayes: Serge J. Doyen, Member James Dinizio, Jr., Member Robert A. Villa, Member Richard A. Wilton, Member Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman-Member. This resolution was duly adopted. . ...... . ///: .4.-~/ .// GERA~D P. GOE~RINGER, CHAIR~N PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765ol938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOT]I' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York Il971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Certified Mail: August 26, 1992 John Wagner ~. ~, ~ ~ ~ NcNulty, DiPi~9~ro & Spiess 633 East~ Street P.O. BoxY757 ~ Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sun Refining & Marketing N/E/c ST25 & Factory Ave.. Mattituck, New York SCTM # 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner: On August 10, 1992, we sent you a letter in which we asked for the revised site plans that we need in order to proceed with the SUNOCO site plan, if your client intended to proceed with the application. Ten business days have elapsed since your receipt of that letter on August 11, 1992, and we have not received the revised site plans. Accordingly, as of today's date, the file has been closed. ~ , -- If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the office. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Tclephlme 1516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York II971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Certified Mail: August 10, John Wagner . / ~ ~%/~L~, ~ NcNulty, Di~i~tro & Spiess 633 East~in Street P.O. Bo4k 757 Riverhead, New York 11901 1992 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sun Refining & Marketing N/E/c ST25 & Factory Ave.. Mattituck, New York SCTM # 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner: On February 5, 1991, a letter was sent to you which detailed the information that was needed in order to proceed with the SUNOCO site plan application. A copy of that letter is enclosed for your convenience. Since we did not receive a response, a call was placed to you on June 17, 1991, during which you stated that your client had placed this project on hold. Accordingly, review of the application was held in abeyance. More than a year has transpired since the letter and the subsequent telephone call. We are writing to ask if your client intends to proceed with this application. If your client does wish to proceed, please send us six copies of a site plan that has been revised in accordance with the enclosed letter of February 5, 1991 letter. If we do not receive the revised plans within ten business days of receipt of this letter, we will assume that your does not wish to continue with the application at this time and we will close the file. Our closing of the file will not preclude your client from making a new application again in the future. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encls. MEMO TO FILE June 17, 1991 RE: SUN OIL A telephone call was placed to John Wagner on this date to discuss the status of Sun Oil. Mr. Wagner said his client has placed the project on hold, instructed me to stop all review of this application until further notice. Robert G. Kassner ~ Site Plan Reviewer and PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTY L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 IVlain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 February 5, 1991 John Wagner Esseks, Heftner and Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Proposed Site Plan Sun Oil Refining and Marketing Co., Mattituck SCTM~ 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner: This letter will confirm your telephone conversation with staff member Robert Kassner on this date regarding the above referenced site plan. As discussed with Mr. Kassner the following changes must be made to the site plan before the Planning Board can proceed. 1. Curb cuts must be 40' in width. Red Maples must be replaced with Pin Oaks or other suitable street trees. 3. Drainage calculations must be shown on the map. Handicapped parking space must be moved to the North, as previously indicated on the map. Finally, please submit proof of review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Bob Kassner of this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. // ' '"' Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector MEMO TO FILE June 17, 1991 RE: SUN OIL A telephone call was placed to John Wagner on this date to discuss the status of Sun Oil. Mr. Wagner said his client has placed the project on hold, and instructed me to stop all review of this application until further notice. Robert G. Kassner ~ Site Plan Reviewer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 IVlain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516} 765-1823 February 5, 1991 John Wagner Esseks, Heftner and Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Proposed Site Plan Sun Oil Refining and Marketing Co., Mattituck SCTM~ 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner: This letter will confirm your telephone conversation with staff member Robert Kassner on this date regarding the above referenced site plan. As discussed with Mr. Kassner the following changes must be made to the site plan before the Planning Board can proceed. 1. Curb cuts must be 40' in width. Red Maples must be replaced with Pin Oaks or other suitable street trees. 3. Drainage calculations must be shown on the map. Handicapped parking space must be moved to the North, as previously indicated on the map. Finally, please submit proof of review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Bob Kassner of this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~/ f ~ Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER STEPHEN I~. ANgel JANE ANN R. KRATZ JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONE¥ THOMAS F. WHELAN EsseK$, HeftER ~ ANGel COUNSELORS AT LAW (5 16) 369-1700 February 1, 1991 WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAU K HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATEF~ MIL~-, N.Y. 11976 (516) 726 6633 Planning Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Bob Kassner Re: Application of Sun Refining and Marketing Co. for Site Plan Approval for Property at Factory Avenue and Main Road, Mattituck Dear Bob: With regard to the above-referenced application, please be advised that the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals has now approved the accessory convenience store and proposed canopy incorporated in the site plan under review by your Board. A copy of the Zoning Board's decision is enclosed. Please review the file in this matter and proceed to schedule the site plan application for public hearing on the earliest available date. If you require any further information from the applicant, please advise me. Very truly yours, John M. Wagner JMW:pi Enc. Serge Doyen. Ir. ~ames Dmizio. Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHO~ Town Hall, 53095 lVlain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 January 28, 1991 John M. Wagner, Esq. Esseks, Heftar & Angel P.O. Box 279 108 East Main Street R±verhead, NY 11901 Re: Appl. No. 3788 Sun Refinin~ & Marketing Dear Mr. Wagner: Transmitted for your records is a copy of the deterra±nation rendered by the Board of Appeals at our Janua~-y 11, 1991 Re~lar Meeting concerning the above application. Please be sure to return to the Build_%ng Department and Plarkning Board, and any other agency which may have jurisdiction, for appropriate approvals Crior to commencing sit~ alterations, etc. k copy of this decision has simultaneously been transmitted to the Building Inspector and Planning Board Offices for their files and updatel Yours ver~ truly, GEi~ P. GOEI{RINGER By Linde Kowalski Copy of Decision to: Planning Board Building Deparrnnent Su£folk County Planning Commission APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goetueinger, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James l)imzio. Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTI1OLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhokl, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Upon application of SUN REFINING & MARKETING CO. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-102: (1) for permission to establish convenience store use in conjunction with and accessory to the existing gasoline station use on this substandard parcel which contains less than 30,000 sq. ft. in lot area for each use, and (2) for interpretation as to the height limitation of accessory (canopy) structure, and (3) for approval of canopy structure in the front yard location. Location of Property: Corner of the Easterly Side of Factory Avenue and Northerly Side of the Main Road, Mattituck, NY; District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 27. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 1, 1990 and continued on November 29, 1990, in the Matter of the Application of SUN REFINING & MARKETING CO. under Appeal No. 3788; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a corner lot with 150.0 feet along the east side of Factory Avenue and with 198.0 feet along the north side of the Main Road, in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold, and more particularly identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 27. 2. The subject premises contains a total area of 24,139 sq. ft., is located in the "B" General Business Zone District, and is improved with a 30' x 66' principal building and two gasoline service (concrete) islands, all as shown on Drawing No. Page 2 - Appl. No. 3788-- Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 13-1318 (Rev. 11) as updated October 29, 1990, prepared by Sun Refining & Marketing Company. 3. By this application, the appellant requests Variances: (a) to convert the existing principal building from gasoline sales and vehicle/engine repairs to gasoline sales and accessory convenience store for the on-premises sales of packaged food and nonfood items, without on-premises food services, incidental to and in conjunction with the existing gasoline service station use, and (b) for approval of the location of a new 30 ft. by 103 ft. canopy over new gasoline pumps/islands with its closest set-backs at 29 feet from the westerly property line along Factory Avenue and at 29 feet from the southerly property line along the Main Road, as shown on Drawing 13-1318-M (Rev. 2) dated September 14, 1988 (also revised May 7, 1990), at a height at not more than 18 feet above ground. 4. For the record, it is noted that under previous Action of this Board under Appl. No. 1225 rendered January 2, 1969, a Special Exception was granted for a gasoline service and indoor repair station. 5. In considering this application, it is the understanding of the Board Members that the items to be sold would include small variety store items, such as packaged and canned foods, magazines, refrigerated items, microwaved items, and the like. 6. The following information is also noted for the record: (a) the premises has continuously for the past 22 years been used as an office for sales of gasoline and other incidental merchandise, with small engine/vehicle repairs within the enclosed three bay areas of the principal building, and gasoline sales at the pumps; (b) the use as a convenience store is to be used accessory and incidental to the gasoline-service station and not as a separate principal use or business establishment; (c) the existing vehicle lifts and (three) bay areas will be eliminated and replaced with the accessory convenience store use; (d) the principal building will not be enlarged without prior approval of the Board of Appeals by subsequent application; Page 3 Appl. No. 3788v Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 (e) also noted is the interpretation of the board, as requested by the applicant, in that the subject canopy structure is an accessory structure, limited to the 18-ft. maximum height requirement {and not the height limitation for a principal building at 35 feet), and subject, of course, to the rules as apply to accessory structures. 7. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the subject parcel is surrounded by other properties to the north, west, east, and south of the Main Road which are also located and used as regulated by the General Business "B" Zone District; (b) the variance, as conditionally noted below, is the minimum necessary to afford relief; (c) the accessory use as authorized will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (d) the difficulties are unique, are not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood, and are not personal in nature; (e) there is no other feasible method for appellants to pursue other than a variance; (f) the relief as conditionally granted will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of this district or of adjacent use districts; (g) the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed business use and its location; (h) in light of all of the above, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variances requested and as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested for permission to convert the existing principal building for sales of gasoline and related items, together with an accessory convenience store, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P~ge 4 - Appl. No. 3788 Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 1. No cooking, except by portable microwave; 2. No food preparation (must be pre-packaged - including cold cuts and sandwiches); 3. No table service or seating for public use; 4. No signs advertising the convenience store use, except by approval of the Board of Appeals; 5. Ail engine/vehicle repairs and/or car washing services must cease; 6. No drive-thru or drive in services; 7. Convenience store sales shall be limited to self-service (including vending machines, refrigeratorsl; 8. Convenience store is permitted only as an accessory use incidental to the principal use as a gasoline service station (as proposed herein) and within the principal building only, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance for the canopy structure of a size 30 ft. by 103 ft., 29 feet from the westerly property line (along Factory Avenue) and 29 feet from the southerly property line (along the State Highway), provided that the canopy structure not exceed 18 feet in height in the front yard area, as applied. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis due to illness.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, ~AIRMAN PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 February 5, 1991 John Wagner Esseks, Heftner and Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Proposed Site Plan Sun Oil Refining and Marketing Co., Mattituck SCTM9 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner: This letter will confirm your telephone conversation with staff member Robert Kassner on this date regarding the above referenced site plan. As discussed with Mr. Kassner the following changes must be made to the site plan before the Planning Board can proceed. 1. Curb cuts must be 40' in width. Red Maples must be replaced with Pin Oaks or other suitable street trees. 3. Drainage calculations must be shown on the map. Handicapped parking space must be moved to the North, as previously indicated on the map. Finally, please submit proof of review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Bob Kassner of this office. Very truly yours, ~ennett Or±owsKi, Jr. // /~' ~- Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector JANE ANN R. KRATZ ESSEKS, HeFTER & ANgel COUNSELORS AT Law I08 EAST MA~n STREET P. O. BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 (51~) 369 I7OO February 1, 1991 WATER MILL OFFICE M ONTAU K HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y, 11976 Planning Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Bob Kassner Re: Application of Sun Refining and Marketing Co. for Site Plan Approval for Property at Factory Avenue and Main Road, Mattituck Dear Bob: With regard to the above-referenced application, please be advised that the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals has now approved the accessory convenience store and proposed canopy incorporated in the site plan under review by your Board. A copy of the Zoning Board's decision is enclosed. Please review the file in this matter and proceed to schedule the .site plan application for public hearing on the earliest available / date. If you require any further information from the applicant, please advise me. Very truly yours, John M. Wagner JMW:pi Enc. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Jamt's I)ini~i~,. Jr. Telephone (516) 765-18(19 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTIIOI.D SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Upon application of SUN REFINING & MARKETING CO. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-102: (1) for permission to establish convenience store use in conjunction with and accessory to the existing gasoline station use on this substandard parcel which contains less than 30,000 sq. ft. in lot area for each use, and (2) for interpretation as to the height limitation of accessory (canopy) structure, and (3) for approval of canopy structure in the front yard location. Location of Property: Corner of the Easterly Side of Factory Avenue and Northerly Side of the Main Road, Mattituck, NY; District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 27. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 1, 1990 and continued on November 29, 1990, in the Matter of the Application of SUN REFINING & MARKETING CO. under Appeal No. 3788; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a corner lot with 150.0 feet along the east side of Factory Avenue and with 198.0 feet along the north side of'the Main Road, in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold, and more particularly identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 27. 2. The subject premises contains a total area of 24,139 sq. ft., is located in the "B" General Business Zone District, and is improved with a 30' x 66' principal building and two gasoline service (concrete) islands, all as shown on Drawing No. Page 2 Appl.~9o. 3788 Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January ll, 1991 13-1318 (Rev. 11) as updated October 29, 1990, prepared by Sun Refining & Marketing Company. 3. By this application, the appel]ant requests Variances: (a) to convert the existing principal building from gasoline sales and vehicle/engine repairs to ~asoline sales and accessory convenience store for the on-premises sales of packaged food and nonfood items, without on-premises food services, incidental to and in conjunction with the existing gasoline service station use, and (b) for approval of the location of a new 30 it. by 103 ft. canopy over new gasoline pumps/islands with its closest set-backs at 29 feet from the westerly property line along Factory Avenue and at 29 feet from the southerly property line along the Main Road, as shown on Drawing 13-1318-M (Rev. 2) dated September 14, 1988 (also revised May 7, 1990), at a height at not more than 18 feet above ground. 4. For the record, it is noted that under previous Action of this Board under Appl. No. 1225 rendered January 2, 1969, a Special Exception was granted for a gasoline service and indoor repair station. 5. In considering this application, it is the understanding of the Board Men~ers that the items to be sold would include small variety store items, such as packaged and canned foods, magazines, refrigerated items, microwaved items, and the like. 6. The following information is also noted for the record: (a) the premises has continuously for the past 22 years been used as an office for sales of g~soline and other incidental merchandise, with small engine/vehicle repairs within the enclosed three bay areas of the principal building, and gasoline sales at the pumps; (b) the use as a convenience store is to be used accessory and incidental to the gasoline-service station and not as a separate principal use or business establishment; (c) the existing vehicle lifts and (three) bay areas will be eliminated and replaced with the accessory convenience store use; (d) the principal building will not be enlarged without prior approval of the Board of Appeals by subsequent application; 4)age 3 - Appl. No. 378 Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 (e) also noted is the interpretation of the board, as requested by the applicant, in that the subject canopy structure is an accessory structure, limited to the 18-ft. maximum height requirement {and not the height limitation for a principal building at 35 feet}, and subject, of course, to the rules as apply to accessory structures. 7. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the subject parcel is surrounded by other properties to the north, west, east, and south of the Main Road which are also located and used as regulated by the General Business "B" Zone District; (b) the variance, as conditionally noted below, is the minimum necessary to afford relief; (c) the accessory use as authorized will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (d) the difficulties are unique, are not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood, and are not personal in nature; (e) there is no other feasible method for appellants to pursue other than a variance; (f) the relief as conditionally granted will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of this district or of adjacent use districts; (g) the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed business use and its location; (h) in light of all of the above, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variances requested and as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested for permission to convert the existing principal building for sales of gasoline and related items, together with an accessory convenience store, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Page 4 Appl. 3°788 Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 1. No cooking, except by portable microwave; 2. No food preparation (must be pre-packaged - including cold cuts and sandwiches); 3. No table service or seating for public use; 4. No signs advertising the convenience store use, except by approval of the Board of Appeals; 5. Ail engine/vehicle repairs and/or car washing services must cease; 6. No drive-thru or drive in services; 7. Convenience store sales shall be limited to self-service (including vending machines, refrigerators); 8. Convenience store is permitted only as an accessory use incidental to the principal use as a gasoline service station (as proposed herein) and within the principal building only, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance for the canopy structure of a size 30 ft. by 103 ft., 29 feet from the westerly property line (along Factory Avenue) and 29 feet from the southerly property line (along the State Highway), provided that the canopy structure not exceed 18 feet in height in the front yard area, as applied. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis due to illness.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, !~AIRMAN APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. ~ooehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio. Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,--.&, SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 January 28, 1991 John M. Wagner, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel P.O. Box 279 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Appl. No. 3788 Sun Refinin~ & Marketing Dear Mr. Wagner: Transmitted for your records is a copy of the determination rendered by the Board of Appeals at our January 11, 1991 Regular Meeting concerning the above application. Please be sure to return to the Building Department and Planning Board, and any other agency which may have jurisdiction, for appropriate approvals ~rior to commencing sit~ alterations, etc. A copy of this decision has simultaneously been transmitted to the Building Inspector and Planning Board Offices for their files and update; Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Copy of Decision to:/ Planning Board~/ Building Department Suffolk County Planning Commission 2 91991 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765 - 1800 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Upon application of SUN REFINING & MARKETING CO. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-102: (1) for permission to establish convenience store use in conjunction with and accessory to the existing gasoline station use on this substandard parcel which contains less than 30,000 sq. ft. in lot area for each use, and (2) for interpretation as to the height limitation of accessory (canopy) structure, and (3) for approval of canopy structure in the front yard location. Location of Property: Corner of the Easterly Side of Factory Avenue and Northerly Side of the Main Road, Mattituck, NY; District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 27. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 1, 1990 and continued on November 29, 1990, in the Matter of the Application of SUN REFINING & MARKETING CO. under Appeal No. 3788; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a corner lot with 150.0 feet along the east side of Factory Avenue and with 198.0 feet along the north side of the Main Road, in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold, and more particularly identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 27. 2. The subject premises contains a total area of 24,139 sq. ft., is located in the "B" General Business Zone District, and is improved with a 30' x 66' principal building and two gasoline service (concrete) islands, all as shown on Drawing No. Page 2 Appl. No. 3788 Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 13-1318 (Rev. 11) as updated October 29, 1990, prepared by Sun Refining & Marketing Company. 3. By this application, the appellant requests Variances: (a) to convert the existing principal building from gasoline sales and vehicle/engine repairs to ~asoline sales and accessory convenience store for the on-premises sales of packaged food and nonfood items, without on-premises food services, incidental to and in conjunction with the existing ~asoline service station use, and (b) for approval of the location of a new 30 ft. by 103 ft. canopy over new gasoline pumps/islands with its closest set-backs at 29 feet from the westerly property line along Factory Avenue and at 29 feet from the southerly property line along the Main Road, as shown on Drawing 13-1318-M (Rev. 2) dated September 14, 1988 (also revised May 7, 1990), at a height at not more than 18 feet above ground. 4. For the record, it is noted that under previous Action of this Board under Appl. No. 1225 rendered January 2, 1969, a Special Exception was granted for a gasoline service and indoor repair station. 5. In considering this application, it is the understanding of the Board Members that the items to be sold would include small variety store items, such as packaged and canned foods, magazines, refrigerated items, microwaved items, and the like. 6. The following information is also noted for the record: (a) the premises has continuously for the past 22 years been used as an office for sales of gasoline and other incidental merchandise, with small engine/vehicle repairs within the enclosed three bay areas of the principal building, and gasoline sales at the pumps; (b) the use as a convenience store is to be used accessory and incidental to the gasoline-service station and not as a separate principal use or business establishment; (c) the existing vehicle lifts and (three) bay areas will be eliminated and replaced with the accessory convenience store use; (d~ the principal building will not be enlarged without prior approval of the Board of Appeals by subsequent application; Page 3 - Appl. No. 3788 Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 (e) also noted is the interpretation of the board, as requested by the applicant, in that the subject canopy structure is an accessory structure, limited to the 18-ft. maximum height requirement {and not the height limitation for a principal building at 35 feet~, and subject, of course, to the rules as apply to accessory structures. 7. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the subject parcel is surrounded by other properties to the north, west, east, and south of the Main Road which are also located and used as regulated by the General Business "B" Zone District; (b) the variance, as conditionally noted below, is the minimum necessary to afford relief; (c) the accessory use as authorized will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (d) the difficulties are unique, are not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood, and are not personal in nature; (e) there is no other feasible method for appellants to pursue other than a variance; (f) the relief as conditionally granted will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of this district or of adjacent use districts; (g) the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the Town will not be adversely affected by the proposed business use and its location; (h) in light of all of the above, the interests of justice will be served by granting the'variances requested and as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested for permission to convert the existing principal building for sales of gasoline and related items, together with an accessory convenience store, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Page 4 - Appl. No. 3788 Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 1. No cooking, except by portable microwave; 2. No food preparation (must be pre-packaged - including cold cuts and sandwiches); 3. No table service or seating for public use; ~ ~/ 4. No signs advertising the convenience store use, by approval of the Board of Appeals; except 5. Ail engine/vehicle repairs and/or car washing services must cease; 6. No drive-thru or drive in services; 7. Convenience store sales shall be limited to self-service (including vending machines, refrigerators); ~ f 8. Convenience store is permitted only as an accessory use incidental to the principal use as a gasoline service station (as proposed herein) and within the principal building only, and BE IT FURTHER ~-~/<' ~ RESOLVED.,r to GRANT a V for he canopy structure of a size 30 ft./~ 103 ft., 29 feet from the westerly property line (along Factory Avenue) and 29 feet from the southerly property.s,. · line (along the State Highway), provided that the canopy structure not exceed 18 feet in height in the front yard area, as applied. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis due to illness.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, :~HAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTr L. HARRIS Supentisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman~'AJ Appeal for Sun Oil, Route 25, Mattituck SCTM$1000-142-1-27 DATE: September 24, 1990 The Planning Board is not favor of granting this variance for the following reasons. The addition of an accessory retail use bears no clear relationship to the gas station use. Should a Special Exception use such as a gas station be allowed to have non-automotive retail accessory uses? Should the Town encourage the mixing of these two disparate uses on one site? One of the reasons why most zoning codes have placed specific restrictions on gasoline stations is the potentially hazardous nature of the use. It doesn't make sense to encourage people to congregate at a hazardous site. If the proposed accessory use is allowed, where does one draw the line with regard to the nature of permitted retail uses? For instance, would a florist shop be an acceptable retail use? Or perhaps a video rental store? Will allowing the proposed retail use open the door to expanding that retail use beyond that specific use requested? If the newspaper, pre-prepared fast-food and cigarette business doesn't do well, but the video rental business does, how does one control the change from this type of retail to the other? Finally, it is useful to reverse the question. If a retail shopping .center, whether large or small, asked for permission to open a gas station as an accessory use, would you consider the request for the second use as a strictly accessory use? Page 2 Sun Oil Although the Zoning Board has granted three other requests like this and two of them are in existence, this Board sees no reason to continue granting these requests - they are contrar~ to the public safety and are out of step with the spirit of our zoning code. ,JAMES A. KUZLOSKI REGIONAL DIRECTOR Town of Southold Planning Department Town Hall/Main Road Southold,N.Y. 11971 STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORial HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FRANKLIN E. WHITE COMMISSIONER September 6,1990 Gentlemen: Re: Sunoco Service Station Rt. 25 ~ Factory Ave., Mattituck Our Case No. 89-361 The necessary site plans have been submitted and reviewed by this office, and have been deemed acceptable. Inasmuch as the above noted project is on a state highway and the applicant has been satisfactorily bonded to the State of New York, a Highway Work Permit will be issued shortly. We,therefor,have n, objection to the issuance by the Town of a Building Permit for this siSe. We thank you for your continued cooperation. Very truly yours, For: T.C. Hoffm~u Regional Traffic Engineer V.F. Lena Regional Permit Engineer AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACT/ON EMPLOYER PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 20, 1990 SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York I 1971 Fax (516) 765~1823 John Wagner Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Site Plan Sun Oil Refining and Marketing Co., Mattituck SCTM~1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner: The Planning Board reviewed your July 19th submission. The site plan was deemed to be acceptable. The Board has notified the Zoning Board of Appeals of its review. A copy of that memorandum was sent to you. If your client receives the variances that they seek, the Planning Board will proceed with the application. However, drainage calculations, as requested in the Planning Board's letter of June 7, 1988 and curb cut approval will be needed in order to complete the review. Finally, please submit proof of review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. You should apply to the Health Department soon in order to avoid any delays. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact Bob Kassner of this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowskf, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Flail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals FROM: RE: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ~-'~/~:~/~ Proposed Site Plan for Sun Oil Refining and Marketing Mattituck SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 DATE: August 6, 1990 The Planning Board has reviewed the proposed site plan for the Sunoco Gas Station and Convenience Store at the northeast corner of State Route 25 and Factory Avenue. The Board is not in favor of the proposal to add a convenience store as an accessory use to the gas station. However, if your Board should see fit to grant permission for this use, the enclosed site plan meets with our requirements. Also, pursuant to the State Code, the following equipment and procedures must be in installed and implemented: Suppression systems must be installed in the canopy over the pumps. Automatic shut off valves must be installed at base of gas pumps. An attendant must be in attendance at all times and have access to a shut off valve that controls all pumps. - Ail nozzles must have "hold down" straps removed. Signs must be placed in prominent places indicating, "No Smoking," No Unauthorized Gas Cans." The attendant must have a clear field of vision from his/her position to the pumps. - There must be a fire extinguisher at each island. cc: John M. Wagner, Esseks, Hefter & Angel Encl. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: PLANNING BOARD - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS~ AUGUST 1, 1990 SUN REFINING & MARKETING - Appl. No. 3788 & 3789 Property ID # 1000-142-1-27 Regarding the above captioned appeal, the applicant has requested that we reactivate the application. Please inform this department of any new submissions under the SEQRA and site-plan reviews so that we may proceed with the application before this Board. Please keep us advised as to any new information submitted to your department regarding this application. Thank you. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Senior Planner RE: Proposed Site Plan for Sun Refining & Marketing Co. N/E/c State Route 25 and Factory Avenue, Mattituck. DATE: July 26, 1990 The Planning Board has reviewed the enclosed site plan and finds it to be acceptable insofar as it is concerned. However, it cannot proceed with site plan approval because the applicant needs a Special Exception and maybe a variance from the Zoning Boardof Appeals. Before the Planning Board sends its recommendations down to the Zoning Board, I want to make sure that the site plan is in conformance with the Building and Fire Codes as well as the Zoning Code. This is not a formal request for certification, but rather a request for an informal review. I E$SeK$, HeFTeR & ANGel COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN ~TREET P. O, BOX 279 ~lVErheaD, N.Y. 11901 (516) 36917o0 P. O, Box 570 WATER Mill, N.Y. rl976 (516) 726 6633 July 18, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Bob Casner Re: Site Plan for Sun Refining & Marketing Company Main Road and Factory Avenue, Mattituck, New York Dear Mr. Casner: Enclosed please find eight copies of each of the following: 1. Plot Plan, last revised July 9, 1990; and 2. Miscellaneous Details & Elevations plan, last revised July 10, 1990. Please review the enclosed, with regard to the comments set forth in Bennett Orlowski's letter to me dated June 18, 1990, and schedule the site plan for discussion at the earliest available Planning Board work session. Also, please advise me when the Planning Board can approve the site plan. If you have any questions or comments about the enclosed, please call. ,JUL I 9 1990 JMW: pi ~ ~- Encs. ~ Very truly yours, John M. Wagner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 18, 1990 SCO'UFL. HARRIS Su~isor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southokl, New York 11971 Fax 11516) 765-1823 John Wagner Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Amendment to Site Sun Oil Refining and Marketing Co., Mattituck SCTM91000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner: The Planning Board has reviewed the June 8, 1990 submission. The Board requests the following changes (refer to enclosed map for illustration): A total of four (4) street trees on Main Road, two (2) on Factory Avenue and three (3) on the east side of the property must be provided. Street trees must be forty (40) feet on center on Main Road and the east side of the property. Trees on Factory Avenue must be placed as indicated on the enclosed map. The landscaped area north of the new curb cut on Factory Avenue must be expanded as shown on the enclosed map. Parking at the northwest side of the site must be relocated to the east side near the fuel storage tanks. The dumpster and the handicapped parking space are located in the same area· The handicapped space must be relocated to the east side of the food market. A reverse image of the store with the door on the east side would facilitate handicapped entrance to the building. ,~r ~ ~',-~ ~. ii/ ,, Page 2 Sun Oil Refining The landscaped area at the corner of Route 25 and Factory Avenue must be extended to the south side of the curb cut on Factory Avenue. The public phone booth near the street should be relocated so that it is adjacent to the building. Outdoor lighting details must be shown, including height of pole and sketch of lighting fixture. 8. Existing shrubs must be identified as to type. Ail of the above requested changes are indicated in red on the enclosed map. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector WILLIAI~ W. EsseKs MArciaZ. Hefter `STEPI"IEN R. ANGEL JANE ANN R. KRATZ JOHN M, WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MAIONEY ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT Law P. 0. Box 279 ~;~IVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 June 7, 1990 MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. O. Box .570 WATER MILL, N.Y, i 1976 (516) 726-6633 O~" COUNSEL Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Bob Casner Re: Site Plan for Sun Refining & Marketing Company Main Road and Factory Avenue Mattituck~ New York Dear Mr. Casner: Enclosed please find seven copies of each of the following: 1. Plot plan last revised 6/90; 2. Miscellaneous Details & Elevations last revised 5/7/90; 3. Isolux Plan (showing proposed on-site illumination) dated 5/7/90. Please review the enclosed and schedule the site plan for discussion at the earliest available Planning Board work session. Also, please advise me when the site plan can be scheduled for public hearing. In the interim, if you have any questions or comments about the enclosed, please call. Very truly yours, John 5{. Wagner JMW:pi Encs. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765- ! 800 March 19, 1990 John Wagner Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 East Main Street P.O.Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Proposed Amendment to Site: Sun Oil Refining & Marketing Co., Mattituck SCTM #1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner, At our meeting of March 6, 1990, you and Mr. I~er, a Sunoco representative, indicated two design options that you felt would address the Planning Board's concerns as well as meet the needs of the gas station. Both those options were reviewed. The Board decided to select the option that calls for the elimination of the westernmost curb cut on State Route 25. The easternmost entrance can be widened to 30 feet in width. And the north-south orientation of the pumps can remain as shown on the proposed site plan. It is understood that the entrance on Factory Avenue will be relocated further north. As mentioned at the March 6th meeting, the revised site plan should be in conformance with the new zoning regulations and site plan ordinance. Please include a lighting plan showing a down light source type of lighting that will preclude overflow of light off the site. It would ~e appreciated if you could also present the Board with a copy of the elevation drawings for ~he canopy that shows the proposed signage and lettering for the canopy. It is recommended that the facade of the canopy be used for signage purposes instead of erecting a separate signpost. The Board looks forward to receipt of revised site. plans incorporating the information noted above. If there are any technical questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very Truly Yours, ' Town ~lanner for Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Jr. cc: Radcliffe L. Dwyer, Field Engineer, Sunoco Marketing Date; ~eptember 29, 1990 To: Sun Refinery and Marketing 3624 Hampton Road Oce.an~$~e~ New York 11572 Re: SUNOCO Set,vice StaTion Route 25, Mattlcuck Case No. 89-391 Gentlemen: The site plan for the above noted project has been reviewed by this office. Please be advised that before a Highway WorF~ Permit can be issued the items indicated betm~ must be forwarded to 'this office. Please return a copy of this correspondence with the items indicated below. Failure to do so will result in the return of,your submittal. Phone inquires as to the status of pe~it applications will not be accepted by this office, .- - 1. Check or money order to the State of New York $ '!~2.50 cuts pcrmendicular ~-o Bond ~ampie enclosed) for $ On file ' Four copies of revised prints detailing' I. Rebuild ¢wn exis[£::~ curb R,~,,te 25 L~--~"=' ~'~,~- 2. C~ean ca~ch basin 3. Locate ah~ 'replac,e "NO ~ANDTWG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York ] 1971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD March 19, 1990 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (5163 765 - 1800 John Wagner Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 East Main Street P.O.Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Proposed Amendment to Site: Sun Oil Refining & , Marketing Co., Mattituck SCTM ~1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wagner, At our meeting of March 6, 1990, you and Mr. E~er, a Sunoco representative, indicated two design options that you felt would address the Planning Board's concerns as well as meet the needs of the gas station. Both those options were reviewed. The Board decided to select the option that calls for the elimination of the westernmost curb cut on State Route 25. The easternmost entrance can be widened to 30 feet in width. And the north-south orientation of the puraps can remain as shown on the proposed site plan. It is understood that the entrance on Factory Avenue will be relocated further north. As mentioned at the March 6th meeting, the revised site plan should be in conformance with the new zoning regulations and site plan ordinance. Please include a lighting plan showing a down light source t!~pe of lighting that will preclude overflow of light off the site. It would be appreciated if you could also present the Board with a copy of the elevation drawings for .the canopy that shows the proposed signage and lettering for the canopy. It is reco~unended that the ~acade of the canopy be used for signage purposes instead of erecting a separate signpost. The Board looks forward to receip~ of revised.site, plans incorporating the information noted above. If there are any technical questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very Truly Yours, Town Planner for B~ennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Radcliffe L. Dwyer, Field Engineer, Sunoco Marketing Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANNI1NG BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 31, 1989 Arthur DiPietro McNulty,DiPietro & Spiess Attorneys & Counselors at Law 633 East Main Street P.O. Box 757 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Sun Refining and Marketing Site Plan,Mattituck, SCTM9 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. DiPietro: The Planning Board has reviewed the above mentioned site plan. The following changes must be made before the Planning Board can proceed: 1. Parking calculations must be shown on the map. Sign drawings are required. Sign sizes shown on the map are excessive. One smaller sign is recommended. Orientation of gas pumps should be East West instead of North South in order to facilitate the flow of traffic from Main Road and Factory Avenue. Lighting plan, including canopy, is required. Ail lighting is to be directed downward. A thirty five (35) foot front yard setback between the street and the top portion of the canopy is required. Street trees 40' apart are required around the perimeter except in the area of Factory Avenue and Main Street where a clear zone is recommended. Shrubs not to exceed three feet in height must be used in this area. 7. One access along Main Road twenty five feet wide and located to the east side of the property is required. Access on Factory Avenue should be twenty five feet wide with greatest separation as possible between intersection'and curb cut. e A clear zone at the intersection of Factory Avenue and Main Road should be maintained. A minimum of fifty feet along Factory Avenue and seventy five feet along Main Road is required. 10. Ail underground steel tanks must be removed in accordance with Health Department requirements. Upon receipt of the revised maps showing the requested changes, the Planning Board will proceed with its review. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN rgk CC: Gerard Goehinger, Zoning Board of Appeals Victor Lessard, Building Department Toxvn Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD kugust 18, 1989 Arthur DePietro 32 Mill Road Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 RE: Sunoi! Refining $CTM ~1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. DePietro: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 14, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board make a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act of a conditional Negative Declaration. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contac this office. BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. ? CHAIR~JtN Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE: August 14, 1989 Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Enviornmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency for this unlisted action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. NAME OF ACTION: Site Plan of Sunoi! and Refining located on the corner of Factory Avenue and Main Road at Mattituck. SCTM 01000-142-1-27. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to convert a pre-existing "standard" service/repair facility into "gas and go"/convenience store facility. CONDITION This conditional negative declaration is declared by the Planning Board for this unlisted action with the provision that the following recommendations made as a result OF THE Planning Board's review of the Dunne Traffic Impact Study are addressed satisfactorily by the applicant. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: The project has been determ..ined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An Environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The Planning Board has requested the following site plan revisions: One access along Main Road twenty five feet wide and located to the east side of the property. Access on Factory Avenue should be twenty five feet wide with greatest seperation as possible between intersection and curb cut. A clear zone at the intersection of Factory Avenue and Main Road should be maintained. A minimum of fifty feet along Facto~j Avenue and seventy five feet along Main Road is desirable. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted tim. e, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correpondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. 765-1938. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Co~mission Robert Green, DEC Commissioner Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Applicant Planning Board CRAMER, CONSULTANTS June 30, 1989 Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Review of Traffic Impact Study Sunoco Service Station n/s Main Rd (NYS Rt. Mattituck Town of Southold JUl - 3 1989 25) e/s Factory Ave, Dear Valerie: At your request, we have conducted an investigation of the above noted location regarding the existing Sunoco Service station. In addition we have reviewed a traffic study dated March 1989 prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates assessing the traffic impacts of the proposed re- development of the site. The site re-development proposes to convert the existing service station garage bays into a convenience mart and provide self service gasoline filling pumps. Proposed access includes two (2) access drives along Factory Avenue and Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) respectively. The following comments are the results of my field investigation and traffic study review: ExistinK Conditions: The existing site maintains several full service gasoline pumps, as well as~ garage bays for automotive repairs. Access to the site is by one (1) 30 foot driveway off Factory Avenue and two (2) 24 Feet driveways off Main Road. Concrete curbing exists along the site's entire frontage. Parking prohibitions exist along both sides of Main Road adjacent to the site. The site's access drives along Main Road are located within 25 feet of the intersection of Factory Avenue and approximately 48 feet west of the main access drive to the adjacent shopping center, respectively. Page 1 of 3 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Sunoco Service Station Traffic Impact Review Opposite the service station is the Mattituck Bowling Alley and several offices. Since no curbing exists along the south side of Main Road, access to these sites are generally unrestricted. Access to the site from Factory Avenue is located approximately 40 feet north of Main Road. Opposite this driveway is an ice cream shop (Carrel type) with unrestricted access along Factory Avenue. Factory Avenue and Sigsbee Road form an offset four-way intersection at Main Road. These existing conditions will promulgate traffic safety problems as vehicle volumes increase in this area. This potential is evidenced by an average of 16 total accidents per year in a 3 year period adjacent to this site. This total includes reportable, as well as, non reportable type accidents (those under $600 damage). Both types indicate that conditions exist which are problematic and should not be overlooked. Vehicle volumes along Main Road, referred to on page 13, of the Dunn report, claim to be derived from several sources. However, the actual source documents are not included in the reports appendix. It is not clear how the estimated 1989 average daily trips (ADT) was derived or if seasonal variations were considered. The report refers to existing site entering and exiting driveway peak hour volumes but actual volume count data is not included in the report's appendix. Volume count data referred to in the report should be documented in the appendix. Trip Generation: The report's analysis of trip generation and discussion of pass by trips vs. new trips is reasonable. As indicated in the study the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Report~ estimates approximately 58 percent pass by trips during the evening peak hour. This percent was arrived at by studying full service type service station where more primary trips are likely due to on site repair capabilities. We concur that the proposed site will generate relatively few new trips along the adjacent streets. However, as indicated, driveway volumes may increase by approximately 11 percent~ These driveway volumes increase the potential for conflicts. The report provides reasonable trip distribution but identifies some deficiencies pursuant to acceptable critical gap analyses. Conclusions: CRAMER, S ENVIRONMENTAL AI~ CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 3 Sunoco Service Station Traffic Impact Review It is apparent that few new trips will be added to the adjacent street network. Sight distances at the adjacent intersections and the site's access drives are adequate. The report indicates that driveway volumes may increase by 11 percent and that increased delays can be expected with or without the re-development of the site. Existing field conditions are problematic and may play a significant role in the accident history that has averaged 15 accidents per year, The proposed site re-development will generally have minimal traffic impacts upon the adjacent roadway network. Yet, increases in vehicle volumes and driveway activities at this site, with the interaction of adjacent sites, the gas station will increase accident potential. Reasonable site planning now, will help mitigate the anticipated problems indicated in the study. Recommendations: Existing curb cuts to the proposed site should be relocated. A clear zone at the intersection of Factory Avenue and Main Road should be maintained. A minimum of 50 feet along Factory Avenue and 75 feet along Main Road is desirable, One access along Main Road is desirable; 30 feet wide and located midway along the site's frontage. This will maximize distance from adjacent shopping center access. Gasoline pump islands may need to be located with a north- south orientation for better on-site circulation. Accesses to Factory Avenue should be 24 feet wide with greatest separation as possible between the intersection and curb cut. hope this information is useful and if we p.~'9~ide I any additional information please feel free to~. ~ ~~yours, ~SL~ CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES Page 3 of ENV RONMENT~ AND !P~N~NG CONSULTANTS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE · (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Arthur DiPietro 32 Mill Road Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 June 20, 1989 RE: Snnoil Refining SCTM #1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. DiPietro: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 19, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this unlisted action. The Board assumes lead agency status and in that capacity has made an initial determination of non-significance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI ,JR. CHAIRMAN eno. jt Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($!6) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 20, 1989 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental. Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Sunoil Refininq SCTM #1000-142-1-27 Requested Action: Applicant proposes to convert a pre-existinq "standard" service/repair facility into "qan and qo"/convenience store facility. ~EQRA Classification: [ ] Type I ~XX] Unlisted Contact Person: Jill M. Thorp 516-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ ] Other. (See comments below) Comments: The applicant is before the Zoninq Board of Appeals for permission to to add a convenient store to the existinq qasoline service station. Please feel free to contact this office 'for further information. Sincerely, cc: _~oard of Appeals _~Building Department ffolk County Dept. of Health Services SDEC- Stony Brook _ . ..... ~ Ccrp cf ~ v c ~ ~- Transpcrtaticn. * Maps are enclosed for your review _ Coordinating agencies ARIHUR DiPIF_.TRO ATTORNEY AT LAW 32 MiLL ROAD WEs-fHAMP1-ON BEACH,~_~NEW YoRK 11978 516-288-82OO FAX: 516-288-8262 JUN PLAFii,!i ~!G June 5, 1989 southold Town planning Department southold Town Hall Main Road southold, New york 11971 Att: MeliSSa spiro - planner Refining and Marketing Re: sun Application site plan Factory AvenUe and Main Road, Mattituck Dear Miss spiro: - -~ication has · hove referen~ed~a~ Admittedly, that the a 'nce AugUSt o~ ~=vv. -- and ¥ records indicate not completed ~en pending before your Board si a Traffic impact study which yoU requested was filed by Dunn Engineering, the aPPlicant's traffic consultantS, until March 31, 1989. last Given the foregoing circumstances I can not help but conclude .... clusionS rega~- that your Department had more than sufficient time between AuguSt and March to revieW, analyze and reaCh u~. impact StUay. ing all aspeCts of the application save the Traf[lc e since March 31st it would seem to me yoU also had Furthe~mor~fficient time and opportunity to analyze the contents more than = ImpaCt study. of the Traffic e artment on a weekly ed our D P be sched- _~,~ have ca~l _~,~sting that we these Either I or mY secr?u~_ ~ ADrll ~---- Despite ' t~e beglnnln9 ~ t~e p~anning Board- yoU with basis since session absolutely nothing back from · . he only advice I ever u~d ~or a work -~ ~ have heard repeated requests we ~ $~4= aDDllcatlon' ~*~=sant and help~ul ~ ~eatus o~ ~,'~- ~%~ a very P~=~ eh~t she nas re~arding b~e.~em der is wora ~ ...ho advises me ~e&m to be_,a n your Departmen~ ~- you are very busy. woman namea u~ - messages but that given yoU all of our · understandln~7:30 p.M. A~'~u~. with the day It is ~Aav' June %9~, ~2^~, week at 7.Ju~rL~ the work sesRio~_ be on muA~=~/~k sessiOns =~=~n~ the wee~ u~==~_ so that 1 can Board has=~[~ decided upon u~=~2E~s communica~y~ ~lication- the week.~O u=n~osse respond =o ~A~ status of ~ cuestlon- ~ ~, client o~ ARTHUR DiPIETRO ATTORNEY AT LAW June 5, 1989 Sun Refining & Marketing Page Two It is our sincere belief that the work envisioned by this ap- plication will substantially upgrade the facility in question and at the same time have no adverse effect whatsoever on the health, safety and welfare of the p~opla of Mattituck and the Town of Southold. We do not seek preferential treatment; rather, all we seek is the common courtesy of a response and a fair opportunity to substantiate, with solid factual data, the wo~liness of our application. Your anticipated courtesies are appreciated. / \ /~ ~ Very ~.i.~u~ ART~I~E~R~ ADP/dmw cc: Radcliff Dwyer APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICKI JAMES DINIZIO, JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11g'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board of Appeals October 26, 1988 Site-Plan Project of Sun Refining & Marketing Property ID #1000-142-1-27 Zone District: B-1 General Business Upon reviewing the above applications which were recently filed with our office, please be advised that the Board of Appeals has taken the following position under the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA): 1. Application must be filed with the Southold Town Planning Board; 2. Recommend that the Planning Board take Lead Agency status for the following reasons: a. the site plan elements and physical construction of or site alterations will be changes directly to the site; b. ~he "occupancy" under consideration in this Department's application is not directly related to physical changes of the site. Suggest that determinations be made by the Planning Board as to the sufficiency of parking spaces for the multiple uses existing at the site, after allowing for egress, ingress, loading, ramps, trailer lift parking, landscaping, etc., if possible, in either a preliminary review or during the certification process. Southold Town Planning Board October 26, 1988 Site-Plan Project of Sun Refining Page 2 & Marketing The applicant has been advised to proceed with the filing of a complete application through your office and to keep us informed of submissions under the SEQRA and site-plan reviews. Please keep us advised of developments under the SEQRA process for coordinated reviews. Thank you. ' Southold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS ROARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CRAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH N. SAWlCKI JAMES DINIZIO, JR. October 26, 1988 Michael G. Walsh, Esq. McNulty, DiPietro & Spiess 633 East Main Street, Box Riverhead, NY 11901 757 Re: Appl. No. 3788V & 3789SE - Sun Refining & Marketing Property Location: Factory Ave. and N/s Main Road, Mattituck Dear Mr. Walsh: This letter will acknowledge receipt of your recent appli- cations before the Board of Appeals. The Board Members will be conducting field inspections and environmental reviews as may be required by State and local laws prior to scheduling these applications for public hearings. In the interim, we recommend that you complete your file with the Planning Board, whom we have recommended to be lead agency under the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act, and furnish our office with future submissions for departmental coordination. cc: Planning Board Office Yours very truly, GERARD p. GOEHRINGER .CHAIRMAN dOHN R, MCNULTY ARTHUR DiPIETRO dAMES SPIESS MICHAEIG. WALSH McNULTY, DiPIETRO ~ SPIESS ^TTORNSYS ~ COUNS=LOeS ^T L^W 633 E^ST MA~N P. O. BOX 757 RIVERHEAD~ NEW YORK ]1601 516 - 727-8200 October 17, 1988 EDWARD D. BURKE Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Melissa Spirro Re: Application of Sun Refining and Marketing Factory Ave. and Main Road, Mattituck Dear Ms. Spirro: OCT 20I '~:~ ~l~ SOUTHOLO In connection with the above referenced application please find enclosed Revision #3 of the site plan that was filed with your office. I would appreciate your placing this matter on your calendar for a hearing at the Planning Board's earliest convenience. If you are in need of any further copies of the site plan and or any other documents please don't hesitate to phone. Thank you again for your courtesies. Very truly yours~~ MGW/lat Enclosures MAIN RD- -RTF--''''~-r~ ~ FACTORY AV--"- SEP I 3 I~iJJ dOHN R. MCNULTY ARTHUR DiPIETRO dAMES SPiESS MICHAEL G WALSH McNULTY, D~PIETRO ~ SPIESS August 2, 1988 FAX 516-727-82~2 EDWARD D. BURKE OF COUNSEL Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Melissa Spirro Re: Application of Sun Refining and Marketing Factory Avenue and Main Road, Southold Dear Ms. Spirro: This will confirm our conversation of July 29, 1988 whereby you advised that the above application will be on the agenda for an informal discussion with the Town planner and members of the Zoning Board of Appeals on Monday, August 15, 1988 at 7:30 p.m.. If you are in need of any further copies of the site plan and or any other documents please don't hesitate to phone. Thank you again for your courtesies. Very truly~ yours, MI~kEL G. WALSH MGW/lat cc: John Emra-Marketing and Sales Lawrence Jenkins-District Operations Manager Linda Panzner gOHN R MCNULTY ARTHUR DIPIETRO gAMES SPIESS MICHAEL GWALSH McNULTY, D~PIETRO ~ SPIESS A3~-ORNEYS ~, COUNSELOF{S AT LAW ,~33 EAST HAIN STREET P O, BOX 757 RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK July 20, 1988 MS. Valerie Scopaz Planning Board-Town of Southampton Southold Town Hall $outhold, New York 11971 Re: Application/Mattituck Sunoco Dear Ms. Scopaz: In connection with the above captioned matter, enclosed please find three (3) copies of a revised site plan for the Mattituck Sunoco station. Upon receipt of this letter and the enclosed site plan, kindly have a member of your staff contact t~dersigned for the pu.rpose o.f scheduling a presubmission/conf~ence with regard to th~s app~l~ation. /~ Your anticipated courtesies are appreciated. / ~ ~// MGW. lat %-/ Enclosures Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 7, 1988 Arthur DiPietro McNulty, DiPietro & Spiess Attorneys & Counselors at Law 633 East Main Street P.O. Box 757 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Sun refining and Marketing Site Plan SCTM9 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. DiPietro: The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned site plan at their last work session. Please refer to both the enclosed marked map and the comments listed below. More landscaping is needed. Street trees should be planted around the entire perimeter of the property. The parking spaces are poorly laid out, there is insufficient room for backing up. The electrical plan shows a kerosene dispenser, the site plan does not. Further, the electrical plan does not conform to the site plan. Indicate whether the colonial design of the exterior will be retained. Show new elevations if it is to be changed. Show floor area of retail sales area. Drainage should incorporate roof runoff for the canopy. Drainage calculations for existing drainage should be shown. The southerly curb cut should be eliminated as it is only 50' from tbe~intersection of Factory Avenue and Main Road. The refuse bin should be located in an area where a garbage t~uck can obtain access to it. The difference in grade between the property and the parking area to the east of the property should be shown. Upon submission of revised maps including both the above mentioned comments and those on the map, the Board will proceed with their review of this site plan. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN MAY 1988 516-727-8262 PAT FRANK NESCI EDWARD D. BURKE OFCOUNSE~ May 4, 1988 Ms. Melissa Spirro Planning Board - Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application of Sun Refining and Marketing Factory Avenue and Main Road, Southold Dear Ms. Spirro: In connection with the above captioned matter, enclosed please find the following: 1. Application for Site Plan Review duly signed and sworn to by our client, Lawrence W. Jenkins, District Operations Manager of Sun Refining and Marketing, Inc.; 2. Environmental Assessment Form Part I; 3. Our fi_~m check in the amount of $150.00 made payable to the Town of Southold, which sum represents your filing fees; 4. six (6) copies of the site plan map. Upon receipt of this letter and the enclosed items, kindly have a member of your staff contact the undersigned for the purpose of scheduling a presubmission conference with regard to this application. Your anticipated courtesies are apprecia~di~/~ Very /truly/ ~ MW: lep Enclosures 14-16-t (9,84) PART I MAY 1988 · PROJECT NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION · DIVISION OF RECULATORY AFFAIRS State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS~IENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) Wr;;;gg s oco S~m P~fining, and Marketing Mu.ici~.lit¥ Tc~n of Southold Coun~ Suffolk Conversi~ of pre-exist~g "standard" service/repair facility ~to "gas and go"/convenience store facility. New York State Route 25 at the intersection of Factory Avenue and Main Road. Initially . OU ac,es UItimatel¥ acres [] Yes -[~] No If No, descr,be briefly [] Residential [] Industrial [~C ...... iai [] Agricuiture [] Parkland/open space [] O:het --'. 3[~ Yes [] No If yes, list agent,s) and permiUapprovaJs Town of Southold - Planning Board LT~ Yes .-~. No I~ yes. list agency name and permit]approval type I CERTIFY TII^F TIlE iNFORMATION FROVIDED ^JJOV£ 15 [RU~ TO THE BEST OF MY KNO~YL~DCE ^~;"..,¢,pon,o, ~ S~ Rmfining and Marketing If tho action is in tho Coastal Area. and you are a state agency, complete tho Coastal Assessment Form before procooaing with this assessment OVER < (a) ~ order ~o ~ro~arar will u~ currently avallabl~ ~nfonn~tion conc()rtlJ?;: t.),o praise; and tho ~ arbor lnvos~i~otion~ w~l bo tmdortal~on. (b) If any quaetion baa boon an~wor~,d cc~.plot~d Envtro~ental Aauoosmunt Fol~ l:i m:cc~sar7, (~) ~ ~ q~aot~on~ havo Pg~ a~snl~icanc. [d) ~nvirnnm, ntnl A~nnnn~ent ~, ~1 project roo~ ~n a largo physical clmngo to the proJoct sito or physiC:ally altur more than lO acres of land7 · , . . . 2, Will thoro bo a ~Jo? chango to o,v uniqu~ or uhuaual ~d fo~ found on tho ~itu7 an oxid%inB body of ;~utor? · . . . . grou~clwatcr quality7 , , ..... Will proJcc~ oi~lflcnntly.~ffect draln,~gu 11o,~ %?ill proJac~ a££oct any thrL, aC,m,,,I ')r endl,ng,~ro,i -plant or anL.~%l opccieu'? , . , . . . 7. Will proJac% remLlt in , ;raJ(~r I,lv,i:m .ffcct ~.ll air qualltT? o . . .... WI-Il project havo'a coJor of£oct cn vim)ill cha~. UFO Of hi~orlce p¥o.-hls~orl¢, or l)aluoncoloalc~k l~portaBco or ahy Site doaiKnttted a:; t~ critical onviroam~n%al area by a local agunc¥? . . , 10. Will project have a major uffoct on axl,tln4 or £~%uro rocr~atto.nal OppOrtmlitiu~7 . . . ll. Will proJoct.rooult' in ra~Jor tr:A£flc l)rc'hlem, o:- 12. ------ '{. ') X No [ ,~ X y ~, !~ X HO ---. ¥,::~ X NO X Will proJoct have any impact on publtc hca]th or a let7. //~. · .......... ---_ f,.:; x~ . Will proJac~ ~,ffec~ tho ~xl:)tln~i ((r,~m,ull',.y by SITE PLAN Presub mission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received Iwithin 4 months of presub, conference) Application reviewed at work session (within 10 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessarv revision-s' (within 30 days of review)' Revised submission received Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination REFERRED TO: Zoning Board of Appeals (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees ...~,~..Building Department (certification) , Suffolk County Department of Planning Department of Transportation -State _~-)' Department of Transportation - County -~ Suffolk County Dept. of Health :, Fire Commissioners RECEIVED: ~ Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan Lighting plan Curb Cut approval Health approval Drainage plan Reviewed by Engineer Approval of site plan -with conditions Sent: Received: Endorsement of site plan Certificate of Occupancy inspection '~ne vear review Site Plan 1. Sign Short Environmental Assessment Form 2. Sign Short Form Questionnaire 3. Attach 6 surveys 4. Filing fee of $150.00 TOWN CLERK TOIVN OF SOUTHOLD County, New York 516. 765-1801 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF SUNOCO SERVICE STATION MAIN ROAD AT FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NEW YORK PREPARED FOR: 8UN REFINING AND MARKETING CO. PREPARED BY: DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE8 MARCH 1989 I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page INTRODUCT ION ..... Purpose of Report Location . . Area Map . . . · Location Map . . Site Map . . STUDY APPROACH .................. EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK ...... · · Roadway Descriptions ..... Major Intersections ........ Grades and Sight Distances . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW CONDITIONS ..... Traffic Volumes .......... Traffic Growth Rate ........ Accident Records .......... EXISTING EMERGENCY SERVICES . · SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS · . INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS . . ACCESS EXAMINATION ...... ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS · · Summer Traffic Volumes .......... Traffic Interaction with Adjacent Shopping Center . CONCLUSIONS .................... APPENDIX ........ Capacity Analysis Traffic Volume Counts Accident Records 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 i0 11 12 13 13 14 16 18 28 31 42 44 ~5 45 46 49 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -1- INTRODUCTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Purpose of Report This Traffic Impact Study contains the results of a traffic engineering ex- aminatiou of the proposed redevelopment of an existing Sunoco gas station into a self-service gasoline filling station with a convenience, store. This report has been prepared to assess the traffic impact of the proposed development with particular emphasis on its impact on the adjacent street and highway network. ~oeation The proposed service station will be located on 0.55 acres at the northeast corner of Main Road (N.Y. Route 25) and Factory Avenue, Mattituck, within the Town of Southold, in Suffolk County, New York. Figure 1, Area Map, indicates the location of the Town of Southold in the New York Metropolitan area. The project site is shown in Figure 2, Location Map, while Figure 3, Site Map, presents the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. At present, the site contains an existing Sunoco service station. -2- N.J. RICHMOND / WESTCHESTER BRONX QUEENS KINGS CONN. NASSAU LONG ISLAND SOUND SUFFOLK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCALE: i° FIGURE 1 AREA MAP ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES DATE: IPAGE: = 7,4m, MAR. 1989f 3 I ! 'Lake . 'CK 6 Lake ' Boat ,y., Launching Site pEcoNIC- BAy FIGURE 2 '.. LOCATION MAP d' % ~. © .o DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES - ~ Laurel ~ ©' Camp SC~'L'~.' DATE: PAGE; < [ n~. ~,~ ~3,] ~.t~ 1'=1000' MARCH I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I FIGURE 3 SITE MAP SCALE: 1"=200' 5 I I STUDY APPROACH -6- As part of the preparation of were undertaken: this Traffic Impact Study, the following tasks Several personal, field observations were made to observe the traffic movements under various conditions at the site. 10. A physical inventory was made of the adjacent street network. An analysis was made of the traffic volume data obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. Supplementary manual traffic counts were collected as necessary to up- date the available volume counts. An examination was made of the traffic flow on Main Road and on Factory Avenue. Also, the capacity of the adjacent intersection was determined. An evaluation was made of safety factors by reviewing sight distances and available safe gaps in the traffic flow. The availability of police and fire protection services was examined. A trip §eh, ration analysis was performed to determine the additional traffic attributable to the proposed service station and convenience store. That analysis included data obtained at a comparable service station/convenience store on Long Island. A directional distribution analysis was made to distribute the site- generated traffic onto the adjacent street network. A trip assignment analysis was performed to examine the composite traf- fic volumes that would result from the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes, in order to determine the traf- -7- 11. 12. fic impacts on the adjacent roadways. A review of the access arrangements was made. As a result of the data and facts gathered were made re~arding the traffic impact redevelopment. -8- in this study, conclusions of the proposed Suuoco I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK -9- Roadway Descriptions As shown in Figure 3, Site Map, t'he proposed service station and convenience store is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of, Main Road (N.Y. Route 24) and Factory Avenue. The site has access directly onto Main Road and onto Factory Avenue. Main Road is a east/west State highway facility. In the vicinity of the site, Main Road is a two lane roadway (one lane in each direction). Factory Avenue is a north/south Town road. roadway (one lane in each direction). Factory Avenue is a two lane The above described roadways serve as the principal routes to and from the site. Major Intersection? There are no traffic signals in the vicinity of the site. The key intersection in the vicinity of the site is the intersection of Main Road and Factory Avenue. The lane configurations at this intersection consist of the following: i. Eastbound Approach on Main Road: 2. Westbound Approach on Main Road: 3. Southbound Approach on Factory Avenue: 4. ~orthbound Approach on Sigsbee Road: One lane. One lane. One lane. ! ! Grades and Sisht Distances The grades on Main Road in the vicinity of the site are essentially flat and there are no appreciable horizontal curves. The grade on Factory Avenue slopes away from Main Road at a modest rats and there are no appreciable horizontal curves on Factory Avenue. As a result, no sight distance restrictions exist at the site driveways. -11- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Available traffic flow information was obtained from the New York State De- partment of Transportation and the files of Dtmn Engineering Associates. The estimated average annual daily traffic (AU~DT) volume on Main Road (Route 25) in 1989 is 11,600 vehicles. ~ Additional traffic turning count information was collected to supplement the information provided by the ~tate and to obtain specific turning movement information for existing traffic during peak hours. Manual intersection turning counts were collected on a weekday during morning and afternoon peak periods. Also, traffic turning movement counts were collected on a Saturday. An examination of the traffic volume information reveals that the peak weekday traffic volumes occur between the hours of 8:00-9:00 A.M. and 5:00-6:00 P.M. The peak highway hour on Saturday occurs from 12:00-1:00 P.M. The traffic volume information is contained in the section of the Appendix entitled 'Traffic Volume Counts". Traffic Growth Rate In order to estimate future traffic volumes, the growth rate of traffic was determined using information from the New York State Department of Transportation and the Suffolk County Department of Public Works. Discussions with the State revealed that the current eastern Suffolk County is 2.5 percent per year. traffic growth rate in Discussions with Suffolk County revealed that they project a 70 percent increase in traffic along Sound Avenue (County Road 48) over the next 20 years. Sound Avenue (C.R. 48) runs parallel to Main Road (Route 25) north of the site. A 70 percent increase in 20 years translates into an annual growth I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I rate of 2.7 percent. In other words, 2.7 percent per year, compounded annually for 20 years is approximately equal to 70 percent. The growth rate information from the State and County was discussed with the Town of South old planning staff. As a result, a conservative growth rate of 3.0 percent per year was selected. Accident Records Information was obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation of all accidents that have occurred in the immediate vicinity of the site over three years from January I985 to December ~87. A summary of the accident statistics is presented tn Table 1, Accident Summary. Details on the accident data are contained in the Appendix under "Accident Records". Based on the past accident histories, it is expected that the redevelopment of the service station and convenience store will not lead to an increase in accident rates or create a traffic hazard. -14- ACCIDENTS PER YEAR 1985 1986 1987 LOCATION Re~rtable Non-Re~rtable Re~rtable Non-Re~table Re~rtable Non-Reportable N.Y.S. Route 25 at /- 6 4 5 4 6 5 Facto~ Avenue N.Y.S. Route 25 3 1 4 2 3 1 bet~en Factory Avenue and Marlene Lane N.Y.S. Route 25 at 1 0 2 0 2 1 Marlene Lane Facto~ Avenue between 1 2 1 1 2 1 N.Y.S. Route 25 and Oak Place * Non-reportable accidents are those accidents that are not required to be reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles. TABLE 1 ACCIDENT SUMMARY EXISTING EMERGENCY SERVICES -16- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The availability of police protection and fire vicinity of the proposed site is excellent. Department patrols the area of the site. protection services in the The Southold Town Police The closest firehouse of the Mattituck Fire Department which is located at the intersection of Pike Street approximately .25 miles east of the site. is the Headquarters and Wickham Avenue, Due to the excellent patrol coverage of close proximity of the firehouse, it emergency services are available to redevelopment. the police department as well as the should be recognized that excellent service the site of the proposed -17- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -18- SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Information on trip generation rates for a service station is contained in the 1987 edition of "Trip Generation" a manual that is published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The ITE manual uses two different methods to estimte vehicle trips to and from a service station. The first method bases the trip estimate on the number of pumps at a site. The secoud method uses the service station as an whole entity to estimate the number of trips. The results of the two methods are shown in Table 2, "Site-Generated Traffic, Based on ITE Manual", which presents the number of vehicles expected to enter and exit the proposed S~oco facility during the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak 'hours, as well as the Saturday peak hour. However, not all of the site-generated traffic is new traffic added to the adjacent street system. Buildings such as service stations, retail establish- ments, certain restaurants, banks and convenience markets attract traffic from the passing stream of traffic. The ITE notes that where this phenomenon occurs, trips can be broken down into the following three categories: - Primary Trips - Diverted Linked Trips - Pass-by Trips A primary trip destined to a service station is one in which the purpose of the trip is go to and from the service station. The trip pattern is generally home-to-service station-to-home. A diverted linked trip or a pass-by trip is one in which the gas station destination is a secondary part of the primary trip, such as work-to-gas station-th-home. The diverted linked trip involves a route diversion from one roadway to another, for example, to reach a service station. -19- I I TRIPS PER TRIPS PER TRIPS PER METHOD A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR SATURDAY PEAK HOOP. Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit 1. Bused on 8 8 6 15 14 - - fuel dispensing pumps 2. Per Service 11 11 13 13 27 27 Station I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Notes: 1. 2. ITE data not available for estimating Saturday peak hour trips, using Method 1. The ITE Manual may include data from sites that do not have convenience Stores. TABLE 2 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC BASED ON ITE MANUAL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The pass-by trip comes directly from the traffic stream passing the facility on the adjacent street system and does not require a diversion from another roadway. It is essential that this phenomenon be recognized when examining the traffic impact of a development on the street system. To determine the percentages of primry trips, diverted linked trips and pass-by trips, as well as other data, patrons at an Exxon facility in Westbury were interviewed. That facility is a self-service filling station with a convenience store, and no service bays. The patron interviews were conducted on a weekday and a Saturday. Over 200 persons were interviewed, regarding (a) the purpose of their trip, (b) the route they selected, and (c) the types of purchases they made. The Table 3, "Survey Results, Westbury, New York, 1988". discussed below. results of the interview study are summarized in Self-Service Filling Station and Convenience Store, Significant findings from the interview study are Regarding trip purpose, only one percent of those interviewed on a weekday said that their trip to the Westbury site was their primary trip. For Saturday, no patrons said the trip was a primary one. Almost all of those interviewed sa id their primary trip was to work, shopping or soma other purpose. Regarding the route selected, 87 percent of those interviewed on a weekday said that they usually drove by the Westbury site. Only 13 percent said that they made a route change (detour) to arrive at the site. For Saturday, the corresponding percentages were 81 and 19, respectively. The ITE "Trip Generation" manual states that 54 percent of the A.M. peak hour volume and 58 percent of the P.M. peak hour volume, generated by a service station, involve vehicles passing by on their way to another destination. The "pass-by" percentages at the Westbury site were significantly higher, probably due in part to the fact that the Westbury facility has no service bays, whereas a typical service station does. A trip to a typical service station for auto -21- I I QDESTIONS RESPONSES (IN PF. RCI~T) WEEKDAY SATURDAY 1. What is the purpose of your trip: a) Work 79% 19% b) Shopping 5% 39% c) Recreation/Social 4% 28% d) School 2% 0% e) Service Station Only 1% 0% f) Other 9% 14% Totals 100% 100% 2. How did you get to this service station? a) Usually drive by 87% 81% b) Made a route change (detour) to get 13% 19% here Totals 100% 100% 3. Did you/will you buy: a) Gas 0nly 56% 70% b) Convenience Store item(s) only 15% 15% c) Both 29% 15% Totals 100% 100% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 3 SURVEY RESULTS SELF-SERVING FILLING STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE WESTBURY, NEW YORK 1988 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I repair or other service that would require the use of a service bay is not a routine trip. Thus, such a trip would most likely be a primary trip, not a pass-by trip. However, such trips were not generated at the Westbury site and will not be created by the proposed S~oco facility in Mattttuck, because the existing service bays will be eliminated. Therefore, for the proposed Sunoco facility in Mattttuck, we have conservatively estimated that 75 percent of the vehicle trips will be pass-by vehicles and only 25 percent of the vehicle trips will be new traffic. R~garding the type of purchase made, 56 percent of the patrons purchased motor vehicle fuel only, 15 percent used the convenience store only and 29 percent made fuel and convenience store purchases. For saturday the percentages are 70, 15 and 15, respectively. This purchase data is relatively consistent with a similar interview study done in 1986 at two Exxon facilities in New Jersey. Thus, future traffic volumes in and out of the S~oco facility in Mattituck are expected to be affected by two factors (a) the addition of the convenience store (which would cause an increase in driveway volumes) and (b) the elimination of the existing service bays (which will reduce driveway volumes). As indicated above, the convenience store accounts for 15 percent of the generated trips, on both weekdays and Saturday. Therefore, we have assumed that the convenience store will increase driveway volumes by 15 percent. Observations during peak hours at an existing Amoco Station in Roosevelt indicate that service bays account for about four percent of the driveway volumes. This percentage was calculated by determining the difference between entering and exiting volume and dividing that net difference by the total of the entering and exiting vehicles. In summary, the convenience store will increase driveway volumes by 15 percent and the elimination of the existing service bays will reduce traffic by four percent; so the net change in driveway volumes is estimated to be approximately 11 percent. Also, since pass-by traffic represents about 75 percent of the driveway volumes, the net increase in traffic on adjacent streets will be 25 percent of 11 percent, or about three percent. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 4, "1990 Site-Generated Traffic, Sunoco, Mattituck", presents the number of vehicles expected to enter and exit the proposed Sunoco facility during the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hours, and during the Saturday peak hour. Since only 25 percent of the increase in driveway volumes will be new traffic on the adjacent streets, the projected increases in traffic on the adjacent streets are also shown. The Town of South old requested that the Traffic Impact Study include analyses for five years after the build year and 15 years after the build year. Thus, Table 5~ "1995 Site-Generated Traffic, Sunoco, Mattituck% and Table 6~ "2005 Site-Generated Traffic, Sunoco~ Mattituck," were prepared to present volume tnforwation similar to that shown in Table 3. For Tables 5 and 6, it was assumed that site volumes will grow the same annual rate as highway trafflc~ 3.0 percent per year. -24- I I I I SUNOCO FACILITY A.M. PEAK HOUK P.M. PEAK HOUR SATURDAY PEAK HOUK 8-9 AM 5-6 PM 12-1 PM Enter Exit Enter Exi t Enter Exi t Existing Site 26 36 24 22 53 55 Volume s Projected Future 29 40 27 24 59 61 Site Volumes Increase in 3 4 3 2 6 6 Driveway Volume Driveway Volume 2 3 2 1 4 4 Increase That will Be Pass-By Vehicles Net New Traffic on 1 1 1 1 2 - Adjacent Streets I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 4 1990 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC SIR;OCO MATTITUCK -25- I I I I SUNOCO F&CIL I T¥ A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR SATURDAY PEAK HOUR 8-9 AH 5--6 PM 12-1 PM Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Existing Site 26 36 24 22 53 55 Volumes Projected Future 36 49 33 30 73 75 Site Volumes Increase in 10 13 11 8 20 20 Driveway Volume Driveway Volume 7 10 8 6 15 15 Increase That Will Be Pass-By Vehicles Net New Traffic on 3 3 3 2 5 5 Adjacent Streets I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 5 1995 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC S~NOCO MATTITUCK -26- I I I I SUNOCO FACILITY A.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR SATURDAY PEAK HOUR 8-9 AM 5-6 PM 12-1 PM Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Existing Site 26 36 24 22 53 55 Volumes Projected Future 43 59 40 36 87 91 Site Volumes Increase in 17 23 16 14 34 36 Driveway Volume Driveway Volume 13 17 12 i0 26 27 Increase That Will Be Pass-By Vehicles Net New Traffic on 4 6 4 4 8 9 Adjacent Streets I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 6 2005 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC SUNO(X) MATTITUCK -27- I I I I --~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I -28- -DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The directional distribution was based on the existin§ distribution pattern of turning movements in and out of the Sunoco service station. Figure 4, Directional Distribution of Site-Generated Traffic, indicates the percentage of the vehicles that will arrive at and exit from the proposed S~oco facility via the existing roadways. -29- I I ! ~ SITE ~ NYS] ROUTE 25 MAIN RD. I I FIGURE 4 I DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC I 30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS The site-generated traffic and the directional distribution were utilized to assign traffic volumes at the access points and on the surrounding roadway network. Figure 5, "1990 Assignment of Site-Generated Traffic, Weekday Peak Hours", shows the site-generated traffic during the weekday morning and afternoon hours of 8:00 to 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 to 6:00 P.M. Figure 6, "1990 Assignment of Site-Generated Traffic, Saturday Peak Hour", reflects the assignment for the Saturday peak hour. Figures 7 and 8 show similar information for 1995. Also, Figures 9 and 10 show similar traffic assignment information for the year 2005. For all figures, the ~olumes shown represent the total composite site driveway volumes resulting from the proposed redevelopment of the site. NYS ROUTE 25 MAIN RD. KEY: XX ,~ AM (XX)=PM FIGURE 5 ASSIGNMENT OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC 1990 WEEKDAY PEAK HOURS 33 SITE I I I I I I FIGURE 6 ASSIGNMENT OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC 1990 SATURDAY PEAK HOURS 34 I I I k ,o,,, SITE ~ ~ 8(3) ~ 5(5) . ~ -- 4(4) ~- 4(4) o(o)~NYS ROUTE 25 MAIN RD. i KEY: (XX)=PM FIGURE 7 ~SSIGNMENT OF SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC I 1995 WEEKDAY PEAK HOURS 35 ! I SITE / I FIGURE 8 I ASSIGNMENT OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC I 1995 SATURDAY PEAK HOURS 36 I I I ! I SITE 15(141 ~_ 5(4) NYS ROUTE 25 MAIN RD. KEY: (XX) =,PM FIGURE 9 ASSIGNMENT OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC i 2005 WEEKDAY PEAK HOURS 37 I ! ~ ~8 SITE I~3 ~ ~ 121 6 29 I I I I I ~~'"~NYS ROUTE 25 MAIN RD. I FIGURE I 10 ASSIGNMENT OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC 2005 SATURDAY PEAK HOURS 38 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES -39- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I In order to examine the impact of the new site-generated traffic, critical gap analyses were performed to examine the ability of vehicles to safely enter and exit each of the key locations noted below: - Main Road at Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road - Main Road at the site driveways The site driveway on Factory Avenue was not considered to be a critical location because of the relatively low volumes at the driveway and on Factory First, the critical gap analyses were performed for the 1990 No-Build condition. Then, gap analyses were performed for the 1990 Build condition with site traffic generated by the redevelopment of the Sunoco station (1990 Composite Traffic with the Site). In addition, at the request of the Planning Department of the Town of Southold we were also asked to design for five years after the build year and 15 years after the build year of 1990. Thus, the analyses were also done for 1995 (1995 Composite Traffic with the Site) and for the year 2005 (2005 Composite Traffic with the Site). The critical gap analyses were performed in accordance with the methodology set forth fn the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. Summaries of the critical gap analyses are contained in Tables A and B, in the Appendix under "Critical Gap Analyses ". At the intersection of Main Road and Factory Avenue, the gap analyses for 1990 No-Build and 1990 Build show that the unstgnallzed levels of service during the weekday A.M., weekday P.M. and Saturday peak hours will be C, E and F respectively for 1990. The gap analyses for the 1995 Composite Traffic condition show that the unsignaltzed levels of service during the weekday A.M., weekday P.M. and -40- Saturday peak hours will be D, F and F respectively for 1995. Finally, the gnp analyses were done for the 2005 Composite Traffic condition. Those analyses show that the unstgnalized levels of service .during the weekday A.M., weekday P.M. and Saturday peak hours will be E, F and F, respectively. All of these analyses indicate that left turns from southbound Factory Avenue will experience delays during the Saturday peak hour in 1990, and during the weekday P.M. peak hour and the Saturday peak hour in 1995 and 2005. It should be noted that these delays will occur whether or not the Sunoco station is redeveloped. It should also be recognized that for the redevelopment of the Sunoco station, site-generated traffic at this intersection will consist mostly of pass-by traffic already on the adjacent roadways. Only one percent of the vehicles exiting the site will seek to make a left turn from southbound Factory Avenue. Thus, our initial review indicates that the need for a traffic signal should be reviewed by the New York State Department of Transportation in the future to determine if traffic volumes on Factory Avenue meet the warrants for signalization. However, a signal is not recommended based on the proposed additional traffic generated by the site. Re~arding the site driveways on Main Road, the easterly driveway was selected first for the critical gnp analyses. This was done because, compared to the westerly driveway, a) it is expected to handle ~ore volume and b) it will carry more left turns out to the Sunoco station. The gap analyses show that there will be adequate gaps in traffic to accommodate all movements in and out of the easterly driveway, even during peak hours, in 1990, 1995 and 2005. By inspection, the same conclusion applies to the westerly driveway. I I I I I I I I I I I I I '1 I I I I I ACCESS EXAMINATION -42- I I I I I I I ! ! ! I I I I I I I I I Siuce the proposed Sunoco facility will have ~wo access driveways on Main Road and two on Factory Avenue, the access plan was examined in order to assure that the driveways will cause minimal interference to the flow of traffic on Main Road and on Factory Avenue. Each of the access driveways on Main Read and Factory Avenue are desigaed to accommodate left turns in and out, and right turns in and out. On the basis of the observed traffic movements and the expected future directional distribution of traffic to and from the site, the driveways will not cause interference to the flow of traffic on either Main Road or Factory -43- I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS I I I I I I I I ! I I I i I I I I I I Summer Traffic Volumes It ts nomal practice in the preparation of a Traffic Impact Study to adjust data collected during different times of the year in order to represent an average day. However, for this project it is recognized that in Southold traffic volumes during the summer months and particularly on summer weekends, are higher than during the rest of the year. Thus, a "worst case" traffic examination is presented in this Traffic Impact Study that reflects the heavier traffic volumes during the summer. Traffic Interaction with Adjacent Shoppin~ Center At the request of the Planning Department of the Town of Southold, we investigated the interaction of traffic between the existing Sunoco station and the shopping center that abuts the Smaoco station on the north and east. The results of that analysis indicates that although some vehicles travel between the S~moco station and the shopping center, the number of vehicles is very small (generally less than i0 per hour). Further, the driveways for the two sites are well separated, allowing motorists sufficient distance to leave one site and enter the other. Although a direct, internal connection between the two sites might be desireable, this is not feasible due to the substantial difference in grades between the Sunoco station and the shopping center. -45- I I I I I I I I I I I i I I ! I I I I -46- CONCLUSIONS I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I ! ! I Our study and analysis have concluded that the redevelopment of the Sunoco site into a proposed self service gasoline station with a convenience store will have no adverse traffic impact on Main Road (N.Y. Route 25) and Factory Although the redevelopment of the S~moco site will add traffic to the adjacent roadway network, the traffic impact will be minimal and the existing highway network will be able to accommodate this additional traffic. The following points should be recognized: Based on a study of a comparable filling station and convenience store on Long Island, it is expected that redevelopmant of the S,moco site will increase driveway volumes by approximately 11 percent and, of that percentage, approximately three percent will be '%ew" traffic added to the adjacent roadways. Almost all traffic entering and leaving the site will be on the road uetwork anyway, destined for work, shopping or some other purpose. ® The vehicular entrances/exits to the site are clearly visible and sight distance in the vicinity of the site driveways is adequate. 5 The location and desigm of the access driveways on Maim Road and on Factory Avenue will easily accommodate the anticipated traffic, with minimal disruption to traffic. The design volumes presented in this Traffic Impact Study reflect the "worst case" coudition due to heavier traffic volumes during the summer. The interaction of Sunoco station traffic with the adjacent shopping center involves very low traffic volumes and has a minimal effect on traffic. At the intersection of Main Road, Factory Avenue and Stgsbee Road, the gap analyses indicate that most movements will not experience significant -47- I I ! I I I I I I I I i I I i I I I I delay. Left turns from southbound Factory Avenue will experience delays during certain hours, but these left turns will not be significantly affected by the small incremental increase in traffic volumes generated by the proposed redevelopment of the site. It is recommended that the New York State Department of Transportation determine whether future traffic volumes on Factory Avenue .met the warrants for signalization. As a result of our examination, based upon traffic engineering considerations, it is recommended that the proposed redevelopment of the Sunoco service station and convenience store be approved. -48- I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I -49- APPENDIX I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Critical Gap Analysis I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7.40 ~ ~ 33 ~1 ~ 47 6.~ 7 4 8 ~4 ~ 6.~ 14 ~ ~ ~ 5~ 327 -- 47 ~ ~ ~7 ~ 7.~ ~ 47 ~ ~ 97 49 6.~ 6 4 7 ~ ~ 69 6.10 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5.30 ~ ~ ~ ~ 5~ 5.~ ~ ~ ~ ~6 575 * = Vol~ ~ in p~_~_ruer ~mr m I I I I I I i I I ! I I I I I I I I I ~ Ttrn Fr(m Fa:to~y 7.40 31 33 37 140 58 43 A~p_ru~ Fa~q; ~ 6.90 8 6 10 204 94 66 Right Tan Fran Pac~Dry 6.10 17 25 25 661 453 253 CuJo/ne] N0~tYocu~d ~rce~h -- 56 64 7/ 195 94 65 Left T~rn Fr(m FaC~DZy 7.40 43 55 53 170 65 45 Scutltxu-~ ~u on Fastu~' 6.90 7 6 8 212 95 66 Right %lrn Fr(m Faut~ry 6.10 65 61 76 5~ 436 402 A~u~ Omi/ned S~i-Poocrd ~ -- 115 ]~? 137 290 117 93 Left ~ Fr~ Bafce 25 5.30 5~ 48 53 633 489 446 Isft Ttrn Fr~n l~ute 25 5.30 30 24 25 72) 513 312 * = %blares are in .r~3er car e~uivalaats. ~. A 1995 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Asenu~ F-~ct_ _oog ~ 6.90 11 8 13 117 6~ 55 ~ NoL~r_14~u~d Api~,~ -- 75 86 98 100 61 43 ~ Ttrn From Facbozy 7.4~ 58 75 70 88 44 33 SoJti4oor~ ~ on Fa~toq; 6.90 9 8 ll 122 62 55 Ase. num Bight T~n Fr(m Fauto~_; 6.10 88 8]. 101 473 313 275 Cu£ub~d SoX. tb0uld .~ce~h -- 155 164 18~ 169 78 67 I. eft ~Lrn From ikute 25 5.30 70 67 70 515 357 318 ~ TLrn Froll I%:Lte 25 5.30 40 33 36 632 381 188 * = VOAm~ are in ~3er car e~/wl~:s. ! ! (Seconds) (V~'~.'-lesA-lo~)* (V-h~,.les/Hour)* 1990 BUIlD Southbotnd to Eastbomd Left Turn Fr~m Site 7.40 18 10 26 242 110 60 S~uthbcund to Westb~ad Right T~-n From Site 6.10 6 3 8 589 466 433 Combined Southbotnd Approach -- 24 13 34 281 136 74 Eastbo~d to N~rtFoomd Left Turn From Route 25 5.30 3 3 7 664 537 495 1995 BUILD Southbouad to Eastbound Left Turn Frcm Site 7.40 21 13 32 193 77 59 SoutFoomad to Westbcund Right T~n Fr~m Site 6.10 7 4 10 53~ 4(~ 370 Com~ed Southbo~d Approach -- 28 17 42 228 97 74 Eastbomd to 5brtFootnd Left Turn Frcm Route 25 5.30 4 4 9 612 471 423 ! m m Note: * = Volumes are in p~ssanger car eq,~lents. TA~R B I I 2005 BUILD Southbound to ~o~d ~t ~ ~ Site 7.40 S~t~d to Wes~ R~t T~ ~ Site 6.10 8 4 12 4~ ~ 249 ~ S~o~ ~ -- 33 21 52 ~3 71 71 ~omd to ~o~d ~ft ~ F~ ~te 25 5.30 6 4 11 ~9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Note: * = Vehicles ace in pessen~_r c~r equi~al~nts. T~.~ B I I I I I ! I ! I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Volume Counts I, VEHICLEVOLUME COUNT I~TERS~E .~. 'CTIONTURNING MOVEMENTS ~OCA TION +':',~ro~y J,"~',-.',-'~ e... ~,,,,,..., ~o,,,,:, (',,,J,/~ .~o,,~ .~ DATE 6-Z(~-~'I~' TIME I. ' [~ Cou,:,i'E~ ,:, ',' mm ~ METH'OD OF COUNT ~ .. ~4a~oac. · .. TRAFFIC CONTROL m m m m m m m DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT TERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS DATE m M'ET Hmo D OF COUNT TRAFFIC CONTROL DUNN ENGINEERIi",IG, P C. VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT IiNTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS M'ETH'OD OF COUNT ~ TRA lC CONTROL I I I I I I I DUNN ENGINEERIHG, P.C I, VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT 'I°^'~'°~' ..+~-ro,~y A,,~,~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~y~ ~o~ ~) DATE_~-~5.~ ~ ' COMPILED BY' { DUNN ENGINEEIRING P.C. VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT .-o _ ~~ ~'ETH'OD OF GOUNT I DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. I, VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT '~ITERs~'CTION TURNING .MOVEMENTS DA TE I~-Z7'-I~D TIME .. IV~R~"SOP'("'- · ... TRAFFIO OONTROL DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. _, VEHICLE VOLUME COUNT iI'TERSE'CTION' TURNING. MOVEMENTS · W, % ~oo o~ couNT I I I I I I I OUNN ENGINEERING, P.C LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Project Type: Site Plans Status: Expired SCTM #: 1000 - 142.-1-27 Project Name: Sun Refinin,q & Marketin,q 1988 Address: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: Sun Refinin,q & Marketin,q Owner Name: Zone 1: Approval Date: End SP Date: OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: n/e/c/o NYS Rt. 25 & Factory Avenue, Mattituck SC Filin,q Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M A,qreement: SCAN Date: SCANNED FEB 1 0 200~ Records Management + 0.1 + + + + + + ' + + + + + + + + + 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.10 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.14 + + + + + +' + + + + + + 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.'11 0.12 0,21 + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.04+ 0.04+ 0,04+ 0.05+ 0.0 ~810,%0+~ '+ · 0.15+ 0.14+ 0.1~+ 0.17 0,~ 0.04 0.04 0.05 0,05 0.0 0.15 0.20 0.21 + + + + + + + + + 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0,06 t0 0.15 0.25 0,54 0.55 + + + + + + ' + + + + 0.10 0.16 0.51 0,54 0.~ + 0~05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0,07 0.08 + + + + + + + + · + + 0.05 0.06 0,07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.15 0.52 0.65 + + + + ~- + + + + + 0.05 0.05 0,07 0.08 0,09 O,lO 0.11 0.14 0.52 1.01 % + + + + + + + + + 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.44 + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.6 5.4 + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 0,5 1.2 6. + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.9 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.5 + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 2. .5.8 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.2 0.5 I 5.5 + 0.2 + 0.1 0.2 0 + + + 0.5 0.5 0.7 L .5 + + + + 0.2 0.4 O. 0.9 + + + 0.2 0.5 1. + + + 0.2 0.3 0.5 + + 0.12 0.16 + + 0.11 0.17 J ¥o ).2 14,8 + + 6.4 + 4.7 + $.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04' 0.04 0.04 0.05 + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.16 0.1`5 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 + + + + + + + + + + + 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.08 .0.07 0.05 0.04 + + + + + + + · + + + 0.56 0..55 0.28 0.21 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.05 + + + + + + + + + 59.1.88 1~i84 1.28'10.85 0.58 0.59 0.28 0.15 0.08 J + +' + + + + + + + 39 5.00 5.124 2.18'1.51 0.85 0.55 0.05 0.02 0.05 O.d5 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0,04 0.04 0.04 0,04 0.05 0.08 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.0'4 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.09 0,15 0.24 0.50 + + ,.3.87 4.41 5.1 1.8 10.5 + + + 0,12 0.] 0.24 + + 7 0.49 0.62 0.76, + + + + + + + + ,.09 + + 0.07 0.09 + + + 0.06 0.07 0.07 + + 0.05 0.06 + + + F + + + .2 16.5 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 + + + + + + + + + + + 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.12 + + + + + + + + + + 0.10 0.07 0.06 O.Q6 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.17 0.21 + + + + + + , + + +- + 0.25 0.17 0.10 0.12 0.18 0.12 0.1~o 0.25 0.56 0.59 + '+ + + + + + + + + + + t,]dRa gT'+~A"F+ L4~.'~A' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~+ + 1.14 1.05 0.81 0.56 0.58 0.28 0.18 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.10..~.12 0.16 0.20 0.22 0.25 0.41 0.77 1.20 1.72 1.78 1.42 1.64 1.58 2,09 1.81 1.54 0.92 C~,62 0.49 + + ~ ~ ~ + + * + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~ + 0.07 0.05 0{02~.02~0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 ] i0 2.19 5.50 4.95 4.10 4.15 5.10 4.76 5.62 2.29 1.45 /~.27 1.02 +, + + + + + + + + + + + + QQ+ + __ + + + + + + + + + :+ + 7.51 8. 60 7.6] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.C 0.0 19.6 56, 43,.5 52. 18.0 111 5.9 ~'.9 2.1 I 10.,8 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.¢ 0,0 18.0 50,5 21.5 ]15 8.5 4~.6 2.5 1.5 + + + + + + + + + + + + + , + ~. .+ + 10.7 O' 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.C 0.0 15.8 22.1 21.5 ]18 10.2 2 5 I 1.6 9.5 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.( 0.0 12.6 18.4 2/.8 ~1 12.3 7~.4 3.8 1,9 + 4~ ;5,9 20.2 L2.0 + + + ;0.5 18.0 ].1,1 !1.4 14.9 0.5 7 2 5 4 4.5 + + + + + 14.0 15.6 10.5 5.9 4.7 0 + 4.0 + + + 0,21 0.: 0.50 0., 4 + + + + + + 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.14 + + + + + + + 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.12 + + + + + + ~.~ga7A~~ 07 o.o8 o.o~ 0.09 $ + + +: 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 + 0.04 0.04 0.05 + + + + + + + + -~".04 ~04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0 08 08 + + + + + + 0.21 0.18 0.14 + + + 0.50 0.25 0.17 + 0.25 + 0.57 + 0.65 + 0.77 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~F + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,( 0.0 9,3 10.8 12.1 16.7 ~55.5 __~8.9 1(~.2 5.1 1.4 I + + + + + + ~ + + + + + + + + + .+ + + 8 2.2 2,0 2. 2,1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.01 2.2 2.7 7.6 9.5 11,4 15.1 22,5 ~5.6 ',,8 52.0 if~,l 5.5 1.4 + i4+4- i5+5- + +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + '+ 11.6 8.4 '6.1 5.0 4.2 5.8 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.2' 5.2 5.1 5.0 3.( 3.i 4.2 ''~'~ i0.0 i1.8 14.4 19.4 19.8 i~.4 + + 5.8 1.5 14.1 ' + + + o+ 6b +o+ 5.6 12,1~.1 + + + + + + + + 15.0 17.5 26.0 + + + + + i + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ~+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ¢ + + + + + ~ 27T2 28.+8 29+-9 + + i8;9 16+-8 · 5i.o 5i.9 $0T4 50.+4 51+-0 $i.+2 50+-5 50+-7 51+-6 5i+-0 50+-5 50.+5 $0.,+ 7.8 11.015.518.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1.16 1.55 1.55 1.57 1.75 1.84 1.92 2.12 2.07 2.11 2.21 2,11 2.15 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2j 2.5 2,8 5.8 5.0 7.1 + + + + 0.45 0.47 0.59 + + + + 12.5 15.2 15.1 X4.1 1 + + + + 10.0 15.7 iS.-; XT.D + + + + 8~9 12.5 19.2 ~9,t + + + 0.52 0,54 O, + + + + 4+ 0.26 0,28 0.51 0,.56 0 + + + + + + + + + 9- + + + + + + + 0.1.5,0'V15 0.~ 0~17 0.17 0.17 0.18 O.kS'O 180 19 '0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.25 0.29 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .+ + + 0..12--0.15 O.l~ 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.].7 0.17 0.20 + :+ +. + + ;+ + + + + + + J+ · + 19.4 1(~.5 5.8 1.5 + ,+ + i8."~ ~.~7~:~+ + ~lo ~ + + 11.3 ]~ 3.6 1.fl + .+ + + 7.9 ~- 1 5.1 1.7 7.~ 1.7 2,9 1.7 9.4 ~.~ ~,~ 1,7 + [+ + + 14.7 0~.0 8 23.6 1(~.5 5.1 1.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + 8.5 11.6 18.0 27.4 52.~81%~1,~7 10.1 2.9 1.1 + + + +Q + + + 9.1 11.8 12.8 16.5 7.6 5,5 1.5 + + + + + + + 8.5 10.6 10.9 8.9 8.0 6~9 4.5 2.6 1.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +i + + + + + S48° 57' 30"W [98. .+69 0 7 .+80 0.85 0.90 0.96 O. 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 4.2 6.4 + + + + + + + + + + +f + ' + + ),.49 0.5 ~.57 0,58 0.6`5 0,67 0.67 0.7 O,7 O.7 0,7 0,9 1. 1.6 2 .5.5 6,6 + + + + + + + + + + + 0.56 0.40 0.41 0.42 0,46 0.45 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0,9 1.1 1,5 2.2 4.7 + + + + + + + , + + + + + + + + + ).28 0.50 0.59 0.41 0.42 0.45 0.5~ 0.79 1.11 1.62 2.79 5.47 8.51 9.12 7.05 4.99 5,8~ ~.50 1.62 0,91 i NOT.EJ ~L V~IJES SHO~N RB~ESENT FOOT6NO. ES ~T PAVEHENT LEVEL LEGE~I LERN~ON HOOEL 3948q-~2GI 4~ WATT SUPt~R I,J~TAL ~L[OE FJXTLJ~E$ WITH REaR SHIELOIN6 E~j WHIT£WAYI RI¥[ERA H00EL '3~59-4~ 4~ WATT SUPER FIXT[JRES E~j M'~TEW~Y) SUN REFINING & M~xRKETI'NG COMPA2qY ISOLUX PLAN MA~N RD.& ~FACTORY AVE. NATT~ TUCK, N,Y. D. COOK J.L. 5/7/90 SC~L£ i' = I0'-0' 0 2 I"CONDUITR [N COL. BY PREFAB, TIE IN BY G.C, .C~ ~J 4' 8" SO. FOR. TYP. 18 REQ'B) 27' 0' ~ TO ~ , Ck TO ~ ~ TO ~ ~OOT[NG LAYOUT LEOENO AIR mi TYP. LIGHT FIXTURE I4' 183' 8"CANOPY LIGHTING LAYOUT SCALE 18' WIDE FRONT VIEW ANCHOR BOLTS I'X 48%6, FORM SID[S OF FDUNDAfI(N G'ABOVE GRAD[ BACKGROUND YELLOW DIAMONQ RED ARROW BLUE LETTENS 2B,9 SO, FI. (EACH SIOEI BLUE LETTERS RED & WHITE STRIPES ALTERNATE · X 4'HANDHOLE WITH COVER (GNDUND WINE SHALL BE TO A SCREW ON THE COVEN PLATE) ('CONDUIT TO BANDNOLE MUST BE iN CONCRETE FOUNBATION) 19.75 S§.FT. lEACH SIDE) -, ~EAE, sm ~', ~j XXX'$-L ,ED DADRDRBOHD ~' xxx II ~W,IT~ ,DROERS ~ WHITE LETTERS ANCHOR BOLT~ I'X 48'LG. 4 HANDHDLE W[IH COVER I~'LEVELING NUTB~ WITH WASHERS\ G'ABOVE GRADE1 78 10'X I'DR STEEL BOG. PL TO BE FILLED WITH DRDUT IGN AS BEEN SET ~G'ABOVE GRADE ~4'CLEAR TO HANDHOLE D' X D' X~' H.R. TUBE STEEL TD BE FILLED WITH DRBOT [EN GRADE. REMOVE AND BACKFILL AFTER CDNDRETE HAS SET. SY GENERAL (~'HOLE FOR DRNOUIT IN BASE PLATE TOTAC SI~ A~EA l = ~,4 S(~ FT. - SFM SION ASSEMBLY INA. REBAR EQUALLY SPACED. I'HOLE FOR CONDUIT , iN BASE PLATE ;~ 4'CLEAR- 4'CLEAR (TYPJ STANDARD CONCRETE FOUNDATION DRILL I~'DIA. HDLES FOR 1' ANCHOR BOLTS IA REiIUIREO) ALTERNATE TOE VIEW STANDARD CONCRETE FOUNDATION TOP VIEW - AUGER DRILL 1~$' O]A. HOLES FON 1' ANCHOR BOLTS (4 REQUIRED) FOUNOATION I,: POST' (TYP. R PLAECES) POST & FOOTING tTYP. 2 PLACES) P.S,L CONCRETE SLAB WITH 4' CRUSHED STONE BASE CONCRETE FOOTING ~J (TYP. q PLACESI TRiASH ENCLOSURE SCALE 1/4":V-8" ~IOE VIEW CHAIN LINK W/VINYL SLATS STREET SIDE ENO ELEVATION 1 COLUMN SIGN FRONT ELEVATION - 38' X tE~3' CANOPY SCALE 1/8'=I'-0' ILLUMINATED PANELS 18'HIGH LETTERS CANOPY INFORMATION: FoodMarket] I_ ~ lOOO~ YELLOW DIAMOND REO ARROW BLUE LETTERS' BLUE BACKROUND WHITE STRIPE I I 13' ILLUM. CANOPY COLUMN SION SCALE 1/2'=I'-8' 8Imooo FooO lilrlcet i ' - I I FRONT ELEVATION 14 Hrm I BLUE BACKRO]O-- WHITE LETTERS WHITE STRIPE I I YARD LIGHT ELEVATION SCALE:~':P-O' 30'X 66'SUNOCO FOOD MARKET ) SCALE I/8'= I'-0' i2'X 12"BASE PLATE BY PRE-FAB. CONTR, NOTE:EACH & EVERY GROUT FOR THIS CANOPY TO HAVE SAME ELEV. AT INVERT OF GROUT POCKET, PLAN SEE PLOT PLAN FO8 DETAILS. COL. & BASE PE~TE BY PRE-FAB. CONTR, TOP OF FOOT) FINAL POUR CONCRETE (211' CONDUITS TO (Il COLUMN ISEE PLOT PLAN) (4) #5 HDRIZ. EACH (TOP & BOTTOM OF POCKET) CEMENT GROUT 8l PRE-FAB. CONTR. #4 TIES l) 12' O,C, Ct2) #G VE UNDISTURBED SOIL WITH MIN, BEARING CAPACITY OF 2888 PST 4'-8' SO. SECTION - CANOPY FOUNDATION "GROUT POiCKET" - TY~.TOP AND OOTTOM MAT - 4' CLEAR SIDE VIEW SCALE 3/8' = P - 9' NOTE: I. SOIL PRESSURE Ml~t 2,ffi~ LB~. PER SO,ET. 2. DESIGN WIND LOAD 38 LBS. PER SO. FT. 3. CONCRETE SHALL 8E :~0~ LBO. PEN SO*FL 4. ALL COLUMNS ARE TO BE PAINTED WITH SUN COLOR '72B AFTER INSTALLATION DE ALL SIGN COMR~NTO BY GENERAL DRNlltACT~ 5. ARBOW ON SUNOCO SIGN MUST BE POINTED TOWARD BUILDING. ~ ANCHOR BOLTS SUPPLIED APO INSTALLED BY INTERNAL 4'PUC DRA]N EACH COL. TERMINATES AT INVERT 2' ABOVE GRADE OR lB'BELOW GRADE / TDP OE ISLAND OF FIRST POUR INVERT OF GROUT POCKET FIRM 8EARING SUN REFINING & /MARKETING COMPANY Phfl.~el~hi~ PA MISCELLANEOUS DIETAILS & ELEVATIONS MAIN RD.&, FACTORY AVE. MATTITUCK, NY J/7/88 13-1318-M 7 SCALE AS NOTED 'I ,I REPLACE EX]STING CURB WITH __ REM BE~flEBEED CORE CUR8 GRASS AREA EXISTING STREET SIGN --~ TO BE RELOCATEO RE-INSTALL EXISTING STREET SIGN N ~ LOCATION IISTALL ID NEW RED MAPLE TREE ~ Rubrum'2 t/2'- Y CAL. SIJI~UN~ID IRTN PINE B~RK WULCH INSTALL NEW COLIC. SIOEWALK -- !Junlpm'us Jum'~S SHRtmBs L~DSC~ING TO BE NEll SOD EXISTINO STREET SIGN CONG, CURE fiR) UTIUTY POLE fiR) STEEL GUARD RAIL (Iff) ~(STALL (I)NEN RED MAPLE TREE 'Acer ~br~' 2 {/2' - Y CAL -- & ~ ruTH PIAE B~( IU.O UllLffY POLE ITR) CATCH (IASIN (IR) CONC, CURB (TRI ~ INSTALL NSW __ (]:STEEL GUIBERA]L CON£,C CATCH BASIN STREET SIGN (TR) BITUMINOUS -- DRIVEWAY (TBR) SHRUBS CONC. BASE, LIGHT POLE & FIXTURE (TBR) 14'-6' CURB (TBR) SEPTIC TANK & SEEPAGE PIT (TR) / _ RE REORCED CGNC. PAD AND G' I , ",, HIOU CHAIN LI~ FENCE WITH I / -- , N' GNTE FOR CGNBEHS1NG UNITSJ I ~/ ) I ~ x / %- REFUSE BiN (IBR) \,,__ j/ I J ORYWELL" T-~kR)& ~,~CONC. GIOEV~ALK (TBR) 1MSTALL C~ ~1 REM CORERETE o i2' x ~ Kql)ICAP PACE JCATCH BAS~ GRATE TO BERE ol ~& RESET AT ~CIFI~ ~ I SHRUBS (TBR) PORTION OF EX1SI. GUIDERAIL (TBR) DRYWELL (TR) ~w I~ ~STEM ~ EACH mAIN CONC. BASE, POLE & FIXTURE (TBR) CURB (3 REG'D.) © © © CORC. BABES, POLES & FOOD HAd(ET SIGN ;TING '[ (IR) CONC. APPROACH (TBR) CONC. SIDENALK (TR) iNSTALL EXISI]NG APPROACH (TBR) $TOHAEE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (TBR) LONG, ISLAND, T-UDBT,(~I DISPENSERS & KIOSK (TBR) 2-1' CGNOUITS FGN SPEAKERS. LIGHTING FIRE FOU~)ATION ~ ? ~ ~Y (4 NEll ~ ~ ~ -- 5' X · CONS. ISLAOD (TYP. 4 ~ACES) 11'- B' JEX[ST. BUILDING TO BE CONVERTED TO SGNOCO F000 MAllET IINSTALL NEW CASH ORA'eT_fl J INGT~L REM ~ i ELECmIC~L ~ PS~E SERVI~ TO BIJILDING INSTALL DECAOE 24~ CONSBLE, EHERGENCY STOP BI, fi'TON, pOlm~EREDH~ SWITCRES, PILOT LIGNTS & INTE SYSTE, IN CASRIER AREA INSTALL REW CONCRETE SIBEWm-:<I WITH WI~ELCUAIR RAMP I CONTRACTGN TO TIE NEW VAPOR RECOVERY & PREO~T PIPING FROH REW DISPENSERS INTO EX ST]NO LIRES AT TAI~( MAT 53' CONCRETE MAT (TBR)~ Il" CUNGU1T FOR FIRE ~ ESS] ~TIC AIR INSTALL 32'-~* X 188'-8' X 8' CGNCRETE MAT ~X 183' C~ ] NEW T-LIGHT, & 6 DISPENSERS ITBO) 22'- B' 22'- 8' ' FOP VRPOR INSTALL NEW SAFETY BUIA~ER -- ~YP. I PLASED) 22'- 8' 27'- ~' LNEW WHITE STRIPS FGN ) IF X 2F PARNING EXISTING COH[C, CURB STREET SIGN (lR) ~ TO t K-SEAL ~MDRANE TO BE J APPLIED TO TOP OF NEW ~NOPY mY OTHERS 198.00' 548057, 50"W INSTALL NEW CONCRETE CURB GRASS AREA (IR) CONC, SIDEWALX (TRI RE-INSTALL EXISTING STREET S[~N IN REW LOCATION 76'-~ UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE(~ I ENTIRE YARD TO RECEIVE NEW 8 1~ BITLmMINCUS PAVING AS PER SPECIFICATIONS I EXISTING 'Par s~s Jum~rus' UTILITY POLE CTR) - ll&'-8' 72'-1B' 4% 6' TO BLDG. GRASS AREA (IR) WATER NELL (TRt / [~' X 2ffCDNG. D~PSTED / WITH (2) 4' OIA~ BE~R POSTS ANG 6'HIGN FENCE WITH ~TE G~RD RAIL (lR) FI. STRIP OF BITUM. -- REMAINING FROM TANK INSTALLATION (IR) 20'- D" I OASM ES F O \ V- P I OAGH ES 0 \ V /P / C.O,? 11'- 0' ,I BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (TBR) CONE. SWALE (T~ EX[SlING GRASS AREA (TBR) INST~L REW CGNC.~PROACH INSTALL NEW REET SIGN TO BE RELOCATED EXiST/ND CONE. SIDEWALK ITBR) CONG. GUTTER (TRI RE.ABE ~ISTI~ NEW OEPRESSGD CORC ~RD ~W AP~O~H GUA~R~L 14' B' DRYWELLS INSTALL ~6'1 -- LXRE/ O x, ~ ~ ~ TO MAT \ 42'- 8' \ TD C~OPY \ PAINT WHITE STRIPES FOR [7) m, X 2~' P~I~ REW CORE. BASE, LIGHT POLE & I&~W. SJA.H. FIXTURES WITH LAMPS [(TYPICAL G PLACES) EldST. "Ko%one~t~r Jur~perus' (IR) PAINT WHITE STRIPES FOR (2) 1~' X 2F PARK NG SPACES ~STALL ID NEll RED M~PI;.~ TREE Acer Rubrum' 2 I/2' - 3 C~. ~ B~RK M~JL~ BOUCLE CUT & REPLACE DISTURBED I ~)ITUMINOUS 2' ALONG ALL EDGES OF REW C(]NGRETE MATS t1~1 TEST ~BELL MIT# BEN 4' X 4' CGNCRETE PAO EXIST]NG 1~,000 GAL. TANKS, MAT, MANHOLES, FITTINGS & HARDWARE (IR) EXIST. VENT RISERIB)(TR) AIR TOWER (TBR) -- STEEL GUARD RAIL (TR) ,.I~.TALL Q) NE_W, RED ?P,L,E, TREE 1 -- AC~ Rubrum 2 my2 - 3 CAL. m SURROUND MTH PiNE BARK MULOR] AREA IASTALL 3'X 3' ~ WITH ELECT. CONQJlT FOR m FUTURE TIRE IRELATOR j INSTALL ID NEW RED MAPLE TREE I/~ - ]1 CALl ~ mTR ~ ~RK ~ EXIST. 'Ko~neAster Jumperus" SHRUBS (IR) 9P DIAMOND -POLES& PHONE BOOTH (TBR) BASE, LIGHT POLE, FIXTURE & PRICE SIGN (TBR) 'F~tzer ~ OUT EXISTING ,~ BASIN EXISTING EONC, INSTALL ~EW ', APPROACH (TBR) DRABS " INSTALL REW GRASS AREA (IR) / CGNCRETE CGNC, S~EWALK fIR) NSTALL 12)~w RED MAPLE TREES -- 'Acer Rubrum" 2 I/~ - Y CAL. 25'-(i' EXISTING APPRD)ACH (TBR) CLE~ OUT EXISTING LEACRINS BASIN COLUMN GRADE SCHEDULE A B C O E F MOB LEGEND (IR) TO REMAIN (TBR~ fO BE REMOVED DO.O0 EXISTING G~ADES ~ PROPOSED GRADES S.M.H. SUPER METAL BALIDE MOB MU~TI-GRADE BLENDER DISPERSER F FILL MANRDLE ES ELECTRONIC SENSOR MANHOLE EV EXTRACTOR VALVE MANHOLE OB DRYBREAK MANHOLE S/P SUBMERSIBLE PUMP MANHOLE M/P MULTI-JET PUMP O GAUGE ~ANHOLE CONC. CURB (TR) ::=- CONC, CURB(TBR) mmmm NEW 6'CONC. CURB NEW DEPRESSED LONG. CURB INOICATES NEW WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNDER THiS CONTRACT SANITARY SEWER GAS STORM SE~ER NATER TELEPHONE ELECTBC PARKING REOUIREMENTS: 1 SPACE PER 20B SO. FT. OF BLDG. AREA 1~80/280: q.B SPACES REOUIRED PARKING PROV[OED: II SPACES + I HANOIEA8 : 12 TOTAL ~"", ,.~ ~...;~ REFERENCE % ~ SgP.l~tt¢~' 13-131B-M L.,...,.~J~:~'~ LIGHTING LAYOUT & ISOLUX ~IO iD-131B-I FiRE SUPPRESSION DETAILS 13-1318-F SERVICE STATION BUILDING ~ P.O.S. SYSTEM WITH MOB'S 2-313 EMERGENCY STOP/START & DISPENSER SHUT-DOWN SCHEMATIC 2-R20 ]NTERCONNECTION WID]NG DIAGRAM FOR MCR "3R5 2~24 EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL - SUNOCO FOOD MARKET WITH MGB'S 2-339 FIBERGLASS TANKS & DETAILS DOUBLE WALL TANKS 3-AIR STANDARD FIBERGLASS PIPING - OOUBLE WALL lANKS 3 414 STANDARD FIBERGLASS PIPING & MATERIALS SCHEOULE - D.W. TANKS 3-415 DOUBLE WALL PIPING OETAILS 3-41Q STAGE II VAPOR RECOVERY PIPING & DETAILS (HEALY CENTRAL SYSTEM) 3~422 EXTERIOR CONCRETE OETAILS 4-SOl TRANSACTION DRAWER FOR SUNOCO FOOD MARKET CD-IRB8 BASE CABINET COUNTER TOP LAYOUT SA-lB88 FLOOR PLANS - DETAILS 3 BAY CONVERSION 100 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - 3 BAY CONVERSION 200 INTER[OR ELEVATIONS 3 BAY CONVERSION 3B0 WALL SECOONS - DETAILS 3 BAY CONVERSION 40B INTERIOR EOU[PNENT & SCHEDULE - 3 BAY CON,EftS[ON 5(18 MECHANICAL LAYOUT - 3 BAY CONVERSION 6(18 PLUMBING LAYOUT - 3 BAY CONVERSION 7BO ELECTRICAL & LIGHTING PLANS 3 BAY CONVERSION 888 PANELBOARDS & ENTRANCE DIAGRAMS - 3 BAY C:ONVERSION 90B SUN WOK 12/30/87 REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY PLOT PLAN MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVE. MATTITUCK. NY MANAGERS APPROVAL i3-1318 REV. 7 fiEV. O fiEV. t REV. 2 REV. REV. O REV. I REV. 8 REV. 7 REV. 7 REV, 5 REV. REV. REV. 2 REV. I REV. 2 REV. I REV.) flEV. i REV. REV, I BEV.~ REV. 1 REV. REV. NO. Yl£ ~t Vl~Vl t~°o~ W£~ ~r V/£1,V FRioI~ 7~I. ORTH Vl£ Vl _t Jut._