Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-95.-2-7PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 December 12, 2008 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-95-2-7 Dear Ms. Wickham: Upon review of our files, we found this previous application had not been closed. In light of the approval for this project on a different parcel, SCTM#1000-95-2-5, please be advised that this application is hereby considered closed. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ERIC J. BRESSLER ABIGAIL A. WICKIIAM LYNNE M. GORDON JANET GEASA WICKIIAM~ BRIiSNI.I P,. GORDON & (;I ASA. P.C. />11-298-8353 April '~ _o, 2007 WIllIAM WICKIIAM(06-02) 275 BROAI) HOLLOW ROAD SIJIIIi II1 MIl.VIlli!. NEW YORK 11747 631-249-948(} I}IIFAXNO. 031-249-9484 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Application for Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp. Premises: Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York SCTM# 1000-95-2-7 (Filed Map Lot 8) Ladies and Gentlemen: In light of the proposal to construct this facility on l Jo! 6, wc ask that you hold this application in abeyance pending the proceedings on Lot 6. We do not wish to withdraw the application at this time. Thank you very much for your consideration. AA W/al Re/peconic/shdpbltr Very truly yours, Abigail A. Wickham CONSENT Re: Premises: 560 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York 11935 SCTM#: 1000-95-2-5 COMMERCE EAST ONE, LLC, the owner of thc above referenced property (the "Premises"), does hereby consent to its attorneys, Wickham, Bressler, Gordon & Geasa, P.C.; and their engineers, surveyors, agents, or other contractors retained by any of the above and any of their representatives and/or agents, to make applications to the l'own of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, Planning Board, Town Board, Suffolk County Department of Health Services and Suffolk County Water Authority lbr variance and site plan approval of the Premises, including permits fi'om thc Southold Town Board, and to any other authorities or agencies having jurisdiction over said Premises and for any other matters required to obtain such approvals, including without limitation, soil testing, engineering work, excavations, and utility contracts. This authorization shall include all matters in connection with those applications. Dated: April :7,2007 COMMERCE EAST ONE, LLC By: John M. DiVello, Member 2 ]/consent2OO7var CONSENT Re: Premises: 560 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York 11935 SCTM#: 1000-95-2-5 COMMERCE EAST ONE, LLC, the owner of the above referenced property (thc "Premises"), does hereby consent to its attorneys, Wickham, Bressler, Gordon & Geasa, P.C.; and their engineers, surveyors, agents, or other contractors retained by any of the above and any of their representatives and/or agents, to make applications to the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, Planning Board. Town Board, Suffolk County Department of Health Services and Suffolk County Water Authority for variance and site plan approval of the Premises, including permits from thc Southold Town Board, and to any other authorities or agencies having jurisdiction over said Premises and for any other matters required to obtain such approvals, including without limitation, soil testing, engineering work, excavations, and utility contracts. This authorization shall include all matters in connection with those applications. Dated: April ~/ , 2007 COMMERCE EAST ONE, LLC By:. c,'//'~C- ~ John M. DiVcllo. Member 2I/consent2OO7var FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Peconic Recycling and Transfer 1981 Union Blvd. Bay Shore, NY 11706 Please take notice that yuur application dated March 22 2007 For permit for construction o f a recycling slid transfer center at Location of property: Commerce Drive, Cutchogue_ County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 95 Block2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following groundg: DATE: March 22, 2007 Lot 5 The proposed construction, on this conforming 118,164 square loot properly in thc LIO Zone, is not permitted pursuant to Article XIV,. Section 280-58, which states, "In the LIO District, no build(n.g or premises shal be used and no buildiag or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, inte. ndcd or designed to be used, in whole or in part, I'or any purpose except the following:" The orovosed transfer station is not a pemailted use. la addition, the pro. posed construction is not permitted pursaant to Article XIV, Section 280-59, which states, "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected altered in the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule as~d Parking and Loading Schedules hlcorporated into this chapter by reference, with thc same force and etTect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule reouh'es a minimum rear yard setback of 75 feel. Following the proposed construction, the new buildine will be setback 45 feet from the rear property line. In ¢ddition, the proposed construction is nol pemfitted pursuant to Article XIV, Section 280-60A, w~hich states. "A. Structures shall be set back at least 100...feet from the right-of-way..." at~d "C. A protect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street." · ~l'he new construction notcs~0 feet of linear fi-onlage and front 60 feet. yar~etbacks of+/- 90 feet and ~-/- In addition, site plan approval will bc required from the Southold Tovo~ 'Pla, ming Board. b ean'Blrllat~s, P ermi t Ex ~~----~ Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, ZBA, Plamfing Board ~0S6S9tI£9~ ±dBO ~NIO~Ifl80qOHiQOS ~:~ i00~-6~-£0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave0 Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June12,2007 Mr. Jonathan DiVello Peconic Recycling & Transfer 800 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Peconic Recycling & Transfer Located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road, on the n/e/s/o Commerce Drive, in Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 Dear Mr. DiVello: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 11,2007: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. of office space for recycling center use on a 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on the n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue, SCTM# 1000-95-2-7; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on August 15, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated a coordinated review under an Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency; and Peconic Recycling & Transfer Pa.qe Two June 12,2007 WHEREAS, on April 23, 2007, Abigail A. Wickham, the attorney for the applicant, submitted a letter asking that the Southold Town Planning Board "hold this application in abeyance pending the proceedings on Lot 6" (SCTM#1000-95-2-5) and the Planning Board accepted this request; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board will not issue a determination of significance under SEQRA at this time and will hold the application in abeyance until the applicant withdraws the application or requests that the Planning Board proceed with the review of the application. If you have any questions regarding the above ~lease contact this office. Very truly yours, ~dhouse Chairperson cc: Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. Graham Associaties c/o Glenn Graham Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Office of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TO~NSEND, '1-3CSllTIll e PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: John DeiVello, Jr. Fax: 631-298-2023 From: Bruno Semon, Sen. Site P~ewer Date: 6/7/2007 Re: Peconic Transfer Station/ARC Pages: 4 SCTM 1000-95-2-7 CC: File Urgent [] For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply [] Please Recycle Hi John, Attached is a copyof the ARC minutes of approval dated August 3, 2006 and September 14, 2006 as you requested. Thank You TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES September 14, 2006 4:00 p.m. Town Hall Meeting Hall Present were: Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Joseph "Skip" Lee, Ronald McGreevy, Howard Meinke, Nicholas Planamento, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semen, Senior Planner Amy Ford, ARC Secretary Linda Randolph, and project representatives. The minutes of the August 3, 2006 meeting were accepted. Held Open Applications: · LaPanache Hair Design SCTM: 1000-18-5-13.8 Accept sign as submitted. Sign & post will not be higher than 4-1/2'. Motion: Nick; Second: Sandy (all in favor) · Warex Project 2006 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Applicant not present. Discussion tabled. · Slfinn Winery (potato barn/storage) SCTM: 1000-100-4-3.1 Assuming Site Plan is approved by Land Preservation, approve Site Plan pending submission of letter describing landscaping on w/s/o potato barn. Motion: Howard; Second: Sandy (vote: 3 in favor, 1 opposed, 1 abstention because "ARC members should not be commenting on the development (parking area) of preserved land." Revisited Applications: · Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM: 1000-95-2-7 Approve resubmission. Motion: Ron; Second: Howard (all in favor) Southold Floor Covering SCTM: 1000-55-2-18.1 Sign and lighting approved as submitted. Motion: Sandy; Second: Howard (all in favor) New Applications: Cutchogue Ne~v Suffolk Free Library SCTM: 1000-109-6-2.2 Approve as submitted. Motion: Howard; Second: Nick (all in favor). The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES August 3, 2006 4:00 p.m. Town Hall Meeting Hall Present were: Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Joseph "Skip" Lee, Ronald McGreevy, Howard Meinke, Nicholas Planamento, Ural Talgat, Elizabeth- Thompson, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semen, Senior Planner Amy Ford, ARC Secr-etary Linda Randolph, and project representatives, The minutes of the July 13, 2006 meeting were accepted. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. Copies of the meeting agenda were circulated. Revisited Applications: Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM: 1000-95-2-7 Recommendations: Resubmit. Applicant to go back to architect to further break down visual scale of building elevations; suggest using horizontal bands, colors, striping and panel doors. In addition, landscaping (combination of native evergreen and deciduous) without berm. Colors: sage brush & tan and evergreen roof OK. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. Warex Project 2006 SCTM: 1000-142~1-27 Applicant not present at meeting. Recommendation: Redesign canopy and color based on Hess plan from 2-3 years ago. Suggest applicant look at Hess Station in Southampton and/or Easthampton for design. Motion: Sandy; Second: Elizabeth. New Applications: Shinn Vineyards (Pre-submission: SCTM: 1000-100-4-3.1 existing potato barn) In favor of project. Note that it is advertised as a winery. Recommendations: Continue to pick up colors & detailing from existing buildings and add to potato barn. Suggest using cross-gabling, dormers, cupolas, false doors/windows. Add landscaping, identify trees and sizes. Bring photos of all four sides, signage, lighting cuts. It should also be noted that construction work has started on the potato barn. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. Cingular Wireless/MGll Enterprises SCTM: 1000-15-9-8 Flagpole approved with following conditions: Color - white. Illuminate from ground 365 days/year from sunset to sunrise. Gold globe and red beacon light atop pole. Motion: Ural; Second: Howard. ARC Meeting Minutes Page Two July 13, 2006 New Applications: Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM: 1000-95-2-7 Committee recommends resubmission with additions to break down scale and give natural light (e.g. windows, ornamentation) and add deciduous trees. Warex Project 2006 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Design tabled. Committee requests resubmission using softer colors (gray, beige). Submit materials and light fixture cuts. East End Development (Preliminary) SCTM: 1000-63-3-15 Exterior layout and design of units well-received. Comments: minimize hard surface, add gardening area, consider one car garage instead of two, check driveway turnaround area on east and west sides of property, submit materials, colors, light cuts, possible handicap adaptability). The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Linda Randolph ARC Secretary STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS 4 STEWART AVENUE WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NY 11978-1103 Division of Plant Industry Phone: (631) 288-1751 Fax: (631) 288-6828 May 30, 2007 Bruno Semon Town of Southold Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Semon, The property located at the tax map designations 95~2-5, 95-2-6 & 95-2-7, located on the east side of Commerce Drive in Cutchogne, NY (approximately 10 acres), is regulated for Golden Nematode RO2 by the New York State Department of Agriculture. The property is designated on the USDA Golden Nematode Control Map of Suffolk County as 37-A-55. <~Mtrict sanitation guidelines must be adhered [o because of the RO2 status of this field. ovement of soil from this property requires a limited permit from NYSDAM to an approved non-agricultural site. Farms, nurseries, greenhouses, vineyards, horse farms and stockpile yards are unacceptable. We recommend a small, gravel-covered area be set aside on the edge of the field to power-wash machinery before it exits the site. All vehicles and construction equipment must be power-washed and free of top soil belbre leaving the property. All unnecessary vehicles should be left offofthe field. The New York State Department of Agriculture will conduct an inspection to ensure that all vehicles and construction equipment are thoroughly cleaned. Vehicles and construction equipment are liable to be quarantined if the soil is not completely removed. If there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact the Westhampton Beach office at (631)-288-1751. Thank You. S~cerely, /~/~ , ///, Schmitt Horticulture Inspector I Golden Nematode Control Program c.c.T. Johnson B. Semon R. Turell ERIC J. BRESSLER ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM LYNNE M. GORDON JANET GEASA I \\\ f)FFI('FS WICKHAM, BRESSLER. GORDON & GEASA. P.C. 13015 MAIN I~,OAI). PO. BOX 1424 MAt [Ill/CK. LONG ISLANI) NIWYORK 11952 631-298-8353 TIIllAXNO. 631-298-8565 April 23, 2007 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 WILt. lAM WICKHAM (06-02) 275 BROAD HOt,I.OW ROAD ,,/,i.--~' SUITE I I I MELVILLE. NEW YORK 11747 631-249-9481}: · I ELEFAX NO. 631-249-9484 Re: Site Plan Application for Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp. Premises: Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York SCTM# 1000-95-2-7 (Filed Map Lot 8) Ladies and Gentlemen: In light of the proposal to construct this facility on Lot 6, we ask that you ho__ld this application in. abeyance pending the proceedings on Lot 6. We do not wish to withdraw the application at this time. Thank you very much for your consideration. AA W/al Re/peconicCshdpbltr Very trnly yours, Abigail A. Wickham ERIC J. BRESSLER ABIGAIl. A. W1CKHAM LYNNE M. GORDON JANET GEASA LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER, GORDON & GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 631-298-8353 TEI,EFAX NO. 631-298-8565 wwblaw(a!aoLcom April 23, 2007 WILLIAM WICKHAM (06-02) 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD SUITE I 1 I MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 631-249-9480 TELEFAX NO. 631-24%9484 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Application for Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp. Premises: 560 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York SCTM# 1000-95-2-5 Ladies and Gentlemen: Enclosed are the tbllowing in connection with the above site plan application: 1. Site Plan Application Form; 2. Applicant's Affidavit; 3. Consent from Peconic Recyling & Transfer Corp.; 4. Consent from Commerce East One, LLC; 5. Full Environmental Assessment Form; 6. Six (6) copies of Site Plan; 7. Notice of Disapproval from Building Department; 8. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form. W/al Re'peconic 3hdphltr Vel'}' t ru/by~,'o ur s, '/Abigail A. Wickham Semon, Bruno To: Cc: Subject: Chic Voorhis PB Members, mt; Finnegan, Patricia RE: Peconic Transfer Station Hi Chick, I will notify the Planning Board and recormmend we ask the applicant for a copy of the 360 submittal. Thanks for the help. Thanks Bruno ..... Original Message ..... From: Chic Voorhis [mailto:cvoorhis@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:56 PM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Terry, Mark Subject: RE: Peconic Transfer Station We should ask the applicant for a copy of the NYSDEC submission. You can ask the DEC too, but I think the applicant should pay for the copies instead of the taxpayers. You could make the Part 360 submission a request for additional information to assist the Planning Board in their review since there is overlapping information related to environmental mitigation (i.e. dust control, noise, odors, safety, groundwater protection, etc.). These are things that we considered and most are mitigated by the indoor tipping, sorting nature of the operation, but I think it would be good to have. Thanks and call if questions. Chic Voorhis ..... Original Message ..... From: Semon, Bruno [mailto:Bruno. Semon@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:44 PM To: Chic Voorhis (E-mail) Cc: Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark; Ford, ~ny; Edwards Ken (E-mail); George Solomon (E-mail); Jori Woodhouse (E-mail); Joseph Townsend (E-mail); Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail) Subject: Peconic Transfer Station Hi Chic, Sorry about the last minute response, I was only made aware of this on April 11, 2007 the file was on Marks desk. Pat Finnegan and Kieran was out of the office and Pat was able to meet at 3:30pm yesterday. Be advised of the project status is as follows: August 15, 2006, The Planning Board started a coordinated Unlisted review under SEQR Part 617 article 6 I was instructed to start this before the Town Board reviewed the Salvage Center Permit. October 13, 2006 NPV issued an Environmental review report to Planning Board. October 17, 2006 The Planning Board assumed lead agency for the project build out as shown on the site plan. November 14, 2006, The Planning Board accepted the NPV report and requires the applicant to address the items in the report and submit supplemental information. November 21, 2006 LWRP Coordinator by letter indicated the project is 1 consistent with the LWRP standards. December 6, 2006 The Planning Board received a response at a work session from Gail Wickham on some of the items in the November 16, 2006 resolution. I was instructed to place this on hold by Pat Finnegan and Mark Terry and not send this to you until the Town Board has worked out the Salvage Center Permit/Use details. This project has basically not moved on the site plan end since that correspondence. Various agencies have replied to the coordination request. The file does not contain a specific reply to the November 14, 2006 resolution requesting supplemental information. I faxed you the copy of the NYS DEC Lead Agency Coordination request received by the Town. Can you please tell us if we should request to include this under the Towns State Environmental Review of the site build out and request lead agency on the NYS DEC permit action? The question is whether you are comfortable reviewing this under the Towns review or should it be a separate review by the NYSDEC for the permit action? It looks like we will need to respond by 4/16/07 to meet the thirty-day period. Thanks PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Marilyn Peterson Fax: 631-444-03611~ From: Bruno Semon, Sen. Site Plan Revf~r' Date: 4/17/2007 Re: Lead Agency Request, Peconic Pages: 2 Transfer Station SCTM 1000-95-2-7 CC: File [] Urgent [] For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply [] Please Recycle Hi Madlyn, .~s you requested attached is a f-axed copy of the letter which will be mailed out today. Thank You PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 3ER1LYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAILING tM)DRESS: ILO. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 16, 2007 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, region One 50 Circle Road- SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-3407 Attn: Marilyn Peterson, Environmental Analyst Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request dated March 16, 2007 Under DEC Application # 1-4738-03697/00001 for Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp. 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-95-2-7 Dear Ms. Peterson, We are in receipt of the Lead Agency Coordination Request dated March 16, 2007. Be advised that the Southold Town Planning Board established Lead Agency on October 17,2006, enclosed is a copy of the resolution for your file. Included you will find information pertaining to the following: · August 15, 2006, The Planning Board started a coordinated Unlisted review · under SEQR Part 617 Article 6. · October 17, 2006 The Planning Board assumed lead agency for the project · build out as shown on the site plan. · November 14, 2006, The Planning Board accepted the NPV report and requires · the applicant to submit supplemental information. The Planning Board is awaiting the applicant's submission of an official response from the November 14, 2006 request. If there are any questions, please contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file, Patricia Finnegan, Mark Terry, Planning Board Eric.: Various resolutions and NPV report KENNETH L EDWARDS MARTIN H SIDOR GEORGE D SOLOMON ,IOSEi'H L, TOWNSEND M.\IIJNI, l'(> L x L17,9 Southold. Nh' 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) SI)ut h{lld, Nry Telephone: 631 765-1938 F~,x: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 14, 2006 Mr. Jonathan DiVello Peconic Recycling 800 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000~95-2-7 Dear Mr. DiVello: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 13, 2006: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue, SCTM#1000-95-2-7; and WHEREAS, Under Town Code Section 211, the applicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center permit by the Southold Town Board prior to the Planning Board granting approval of the site plan; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act is performing a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and established itself as lead agency; and WHEREAS, on October 30, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the report dated October 13, 2006 from Nelson, Pope, Voorhis, LLC. and accepted the report, the Planning Board will require that the applicant address Peconic Recycling & Transfer Paqe Two November 14, 2006 the items in the report by submitting supplemental information before a determination of significance can be issued; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act will require supplemental information before a determination of' significance can be issued. Enclosed are a copy of the NPV report and the EAF Part II. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson encs. CC: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC- Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Office of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw Abigail Wickham, Esq. ENVIRONMENTAl. REVIEW REPORT including Part III EAF, Significance of Impacts) M~ECONIC RECYCLING & TIL4NSFER Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Soutbold, New York 11971 555 Madison Avenue, 12th Floor, Prepared by: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP October 13, 2006 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION: SCTM: ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAYS: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Site Plan Application 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-095-2:) Lie-Light Industrial Office Park NA 3.14 SITE DESCRIPTION ANDRE. SOURCES"' The overall prqiect site is located at 860 Commerce Drive, approximately 1,083 feet north of thc intersection of Commerce Drive and Corporate Road, (?utchogu¢, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 3.14-acre vacant parcel has approximately 90 feet of frontage at thc terminus of Commerce Drive. The site is generally fiat and is entirely covered with low shrubs. Several trails cross the property in various directions. Thc site is zoned LIe Light lndustrial/Pla~med Office Park, and the area surrounding the site is similarly zoned LIe. A Town composting fi~cility is located east of thc site, beyond which arc Town solid waste management lhcilities. The nearest residence is west of the site fronting Depot Lane and this site is also zoned LIe. There is a small residential community well to thc south t'ronting CR 48 and this area is zoned R- 40. Setbacks and potcntial impacts to surrounding uses are considered in more detail herein. Pec( , cling & rlTallsfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within 5,000 feet of the property. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies three (3) soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following: Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8% slopes (RdB), Haven Loam, 0- 2% slopes (HaA) and Haven Loam, 2-6% slopes (HaB). The topography and soils on the site do not appear to present scvere development constraints. Therefore, no significant impact on soils and topography is m~ticipated. A review of the Snfiblk Couuty Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2005 indicates that no water mains arc located in the area of the subject property. Using typical SCDHS flow rates for ao mdustriaI building of the size proposed, it is estimated that the proposed development will usc approximately 1,573 gallons of water per day based. It is anticipated that this ammmt will be significantly less as the proposed operation is not a water intensive use. The applicant will need to demonstrate to the SCDHS under Article 4 of the Sanitary Code, that potable water can be supplied to the site. It is expected that water supply will be provided by usc ora private well. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site approximately 5 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 50 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therclbre, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 45 feet. The subject property is located just north of the north fork groundwater divide. The majority of the groondwatcr recharges vertically into the groundwater but, there is a slight horizontal component of flow x~hich is generally toward the north and west. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the west towards the Long Island Sound. REQUESTED ACTION Thc proposed action involves the development of the 3.14-acre site with a 38,214 SF building that will house a recycling and transfer facility and associated office space. The application filed with the Town indicates that "Sorting & collection to be performed indoors & held on site for short periods of' time for distribution to other recycling centers". This is critical to the safe, compatible operation of thc facility. The application also indicates solid waste generation in the amount of 1,060 cubic yards (cy) per month. Part of the information contained in the Part I EAF indicates that topsoil will bc reutilized for landscape berms, a feature which will assist with visual and land use compatibility. Two (2) large scales that will be utilized by entering trucks will be located along the western property boundary. Twenty (20) truck parking stalls and 12 car parking stalls are plmmcd. One (I) curb cut in the eastern property bonndary will connect to the adjacent, vacant property. The site will be accessible via a gated entrance point located at the northern terminus of Commerce Drive. A series of stormwater leaching pools will collect runoff generated by the property. The dcvelopment will use well water aud a septic system will be provided both of which will need approval fi'om the SCDHS. Thc perimeter of the property will be landscaped with cvergreens and shrubs. Page 2 , cling & '11'ansler. ('utchogue Enxironn]entat Review NP&V No. 06279 SITE PLAN APPLICATION The Applicant has provided the following forms which comply with the Town's Site Plan Application submission requirements: · Site Plan application lbrm · Fee · Long environmenlal assessment form · Site plan · Certified survey A Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) Consistency Assessment Form was also provided. ENVIRONMETAL ASSESSMENT FORM The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further information or analysis: · The proposed coverages provided do not cmTespond to site acreage. · Soil types identified on the subject property are not provided. · No parking space infomaation is provided. · Building dimensions are not provided. · Linear lkontage along a public roadway is not indicated. · Number of jobs generated during construction seems too high and no amonnt is provided for after completion. · Applicant should identify how solid waste generation amount was calculated. Additionally, the solid waste that will be generated by the facility and xvhere the material will be disposed should be provided. ,, The anticipated water usage appears to be incorrect. The applicant should usc Suffolk County Department of Health Services Flow rates to calculate water usage. · The type(s) of permit that are to be requested fi.om the DEC should be noted, and in particular if a DEC Part 360 Solid Waste Facility permit will be required. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The lblloxving analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide fmther or update information or analysis: · Gross square lbotage provided on the application is not consistent with plan. Percentage of lot coverage is, therefore, not correct. · The site plan should indicate water usage and sanitary calculations. Page 3 Pc¢on]c'l~ clin~ & l'ranslcr, En'~ironmental Review NP&V No. 0627~ POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part I1 Environmental Assessment form (EAF) has been completed for tile proposed action. Potential large imapcts are noted as follows: · Potential traffic impacts · Potential odor impacts · Potential noise impacts · Potential visual impacts Other small to moderate impacts are identified in the Part il EAF analysis of thc significance of impacts are noted as follows: · Potential groundwater impacts · Potentialland use impacts PART III EAF - SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION This section provides a Part llI uarrative to consider the significance/magnitude of mitigation and how modifications in the project or mitigation can be used to ensure that an impact does not occur or that it is not significant. TRAFFIC Proposed project will result in an increase of large trucks on Middle Road (CR 48), Depot Lane, Corporate Road and Commerce Drive. The trucks will cnter the site loaded with solid waste, unload waste in the building and leave the site. Additionally, sorted matcrial will be stored on- site and removed periodically to the adjaceut town solid waste facility resulting in additional truck traffic. The majority of the traffic entering and exiting thc site xvill utilize the light- controlled intersection at Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The Town Engineer reviewed the proposed project and in a memo dated August 7, 2006 asked that the large vehicle scales be moved from adjacent to the right of way to avoid congestion on Commerce Drive. The plans were revised and the scales moved to an iuterior location. Traffic impacts t?om tile proposed project can be lessened by: · Truck parking stalls provided on tile site that w/Il reduce congestiou on (.~Olllllqel'ce Drive. · Thc location of thc scales to an interior location will reduce stacking ou Commerce drive. This impact is not considered significant for thc lbllowiug reasons: addressed. The existing road system appears adequate lo handle traffic l~om land uses in the area. The site is part of an approved subdivision in an IAO zone; additional industrial related traffic has been anticipated m connection with this site and the overall subdivision. The site and area are zoned tk)r industrial usc; thc proposed project and other I.IO uses which could occupy thc site woukl all inxolve some degree uf truck and induslrial use t~affic. NP&V No. 06279 ODOR AND NOISE It is anticipated that odors will emanate from the solid waste being transported to the site and fi'om the trucks themselves through exhaust. Additionally, the trucks will produce noise. Odor and noise impacts can be lessened by: · Material being transported to and from the site should be covered xxith plastic or other appropriate material. · Unloading and sorting will be conducted m the building limiting odors to surrounding uses. · Trucks being unloaded and those waiting to be processed will bc expected to turn their engines off thereby reducing the impacts of exhaust odors and noise. · Perimeter landscaping will reduce noise impacts to the surrounding uses. · The facility will operate during normal working hours which will reduce noise and odor impacts to surrounding residences when individuals are at home. The applicant's EAF Part I indicates "Noise from payloaders & commercial traffic similar to Town facility located adjacent to subject property". This is a fair statement and is considered in the context of this analysis. Small solid waste sorting facilities arc becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly mintage this type of opcration. Recycling lkqcilities such as this assist in reducing waste needcd to be disposed of and conform with good solid waste management initiatives. Significant odors are not expected since small loads of waste will be sorted and boxed and held on site temporarily before shipping to disposal or other markets. Sorting occurs indoors and therefore impacts will be localized. There are no nearby residential uses, the nearest residence is over 275 Feet to thc west of thc west property line and is in an LIO zone. No other reccptors are nearby, and it is expected that the area will become occupied by othcr industrial uses in accordance with zoning. The sitc is next to a Toxvn compost facility to the east, beyond which is the Towns MSW facility. Solid waste facilities exist in the area at present, and the proposed use is not out of character with these uses in terms of noise generating potential, particularly since operations will be conducted indoors. Noise and odor impacts are not cxpectcd to be significant based on the following considerations: · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW l~tcilities are in the area. · The Town has noise and nuisance ordinances that can be entbrccd should it be necessary, though this is not expected. · There are no residential receptors within 275 Fcct of the west propelty liuc. x~hcre there is ooe home on an industrially zoned site. · Activities will be conducted indoors and contaiucFized sorted mater/als :mil x~'~stc win be' on s~te on a temporary basis beti)re being shipped to disposal nr market. Page P¢conic~l~ cling & 'l ransfer, Cu~¢hogue Environmental NP&V No. 06279 VISUAL The proposed structure will be noticeable fi'om surrounding areas and roadways including, Commerce Drive, Corporate Road, Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The lighting plan has been designed to ensure that lighting is cast doxvnward and only illunfinates the subject site. The Architectural Revise Committee (ARC) has reviewed the project m~d in a document dated August 3, 2006 recommended specific architectural features and color. Visnal impacts can be lessened by: · The use of landscaping around the perimeter of the property. The site plan includes a laudscaping schedule. · Specific color, exterior finishing and landscaping as recommended by the ARC to reduce the visual impact of the structure. The proposed use is fbr an industrial site in an industrial area. While the site may be visible from CR 48, it will not be unlike other solid waste manage~nent facilities currently operating in the area. No significant impact to visual resources is expected to occur based on the following reasons: The ARC rcview for color, texture and architecture will ensure that visual/aesthetic issues are addressed. · Landscape materials and berming will help "soften" the structural improvements on the site. · The site is setback over 2,500 t'cet from CR 48 and over 500 feet from Depot Lane. · The proposed usc is not unlikc other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned For industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. GROUNDWATER Solid xvaste sorting on site could potentially release groundwater contaminants; however, the operation and regulations should be understood to assess the significance of this impact. First, the usc must conform to Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for sanitary flow density. This is determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) who will review and approve the site plan. Potential impacts with respect to groundwater can be lessened by thc following methods: · Thc 'tipping" floor should bca sealed concrete floor with no cracks or floor drains. " Thc concrete slab should pitch reward, not toward the door. · All tipping and sorting operalions should be conducted indoors. · Solid waste containers should be respected before being"tipped". · Spill control tools should be available such as speedi-dry, absorbant pads and other control materials. · Site personnel should bt: trained m spill response, and the NYSDEC spill hotlinc number should be posted and part of the training. · The facility should institute an on-call contract with a licensed scavenger. · Nc) liquid materials should be stored outdoors; should any be encountered, they should be separated, retained m doors and removed by a licensed scavenger afier testing and identification. Page 6 NP&V No. 06279 in tcrlns of potential for impacts, significant gl'ouudwater impacts are not expected for the following reasons: · The measures noted above should be implemented, as these are standard methods of the industry. · The fioor will be of sealed concrete with no floor drains and pitched toward the interior of the building. · All operations will be conducted indoors. · SCDHS prohibits discharge under Article 12 of the SCSC and County inspectors maintain records and inspections of industrial facilities. LAND USE Thc proposed project is located in a Light industrial/Planned Office Park (LIe) zoning district. Adjoining property to thc north and south are similarly zoned. Light Industrial zoning districts are located south and north of the subject property. Famfland, a compost facility, Town landfill and solid waste facility and commercial uses are located in the area of the subject property. One non-confbrming resideutial structure is located approximately 275 feet to the west along Depot Lane. The next closest residential area, zoned R-40, is located approximately 1,400 feet to the east. Land use impacts are not expected based on the following reasons: · All operations will be conducted indoors. · The area is industrially zoned. · Thc site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · The proposed use is not un}ike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned lbr induslrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recobmized as appropriate for the area. RECOMMENDATIONS The applicant shoold address discrepancies and requested information identified herein which the Planning Board fecls is important. The Part I EAF was reviewed and a Part 1I EAF has been completed and attached. A Fart 111 assessment of the significance of impacts has been completed. The applicant should provide any additional matcrials which the Board feels are necessary to determine the significance of the action, and once satisfied the sofficient information is available, the Planning Board should issue a Determination of Significance. From a philosophical standpoint as well as for envirom-neutal management and waste reduction goals, recycling facilities such as this assist iu redncing waste needed to be disposed of and conlbnn with the good solid waste mauagemcnt initiatives. Small solid wastc soaiug facilities arc becoming morc t~fical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal ~(~li~t W,~to (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor ;~ a way to ....... 1,~ ........... , ,~ ~,~,: manage this type of opcratiou. If thc PIalnfing Board is m agrecment, the action does not appear to rise to the level of requiring a Draft Environmental hnpact Statement, and it is expected that a Negative Declaration could be jnstified lbr consideration by the Board based on thc analysis aud weighing of issues conducted as part of this report in addition to review and deliberation of the action by the Planning Board mclubers, staff and advisors. Page 7 PLANNING BOARD 1;IESIBEIISO ,}ER/LYN Il. WOODIIOUSE Chair ~NNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TO.SEND M \11 Ix, ti \I)I)RI, SS: lh~x 1179 hold, NY 11971 OFlq( E LOCATION: Town [Jail Annex 54375 State Route 25 Main Rd. & Youngs Ave,) S.ut hokl, ~ elepnone: 631 765-19a8 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 17, 2006 Mr. Jonathan DiVello Peconic Recycling 800 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000-95-2~7 Dear Mr. DiVello: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 16, 2006: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on nlelslo Commerce Drive in Cutchogue, SCTM# 1000-95.-2-7; and WHEREAS, Under Town Code Section 211, the ~plicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center permit by the Southold Town Board prior to the Planning Board granting approval of the site plan; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHERE/~S, on October 13, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board has not accepteCthe Environmental Review Report received from Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act is performing a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency. Peconic RecyclinFI & Transfer Paqe Two October 17, 2006 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, dhouse Chairperson Enc. cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of_Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Office of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw Iq.ANNING BOAItl) 51ESIBI~I~ I .IEI~ILYN B. WOODIIDU~E Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN 1:t. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L TOWNSEND August15,2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 51.\ 11.15;I i .\Dl Southnht, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town }][all Annex 54375 State Route 25 icor Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Sonthold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Jonathan DiVello Peconic Recycling 800 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 Dear Mr. DiVello: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 14, 2006: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on nlelslo Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. SCTM#(s) 1000-95.-2-7 WHEREAS, Under Town Code section 211, the applicant will require a Salvage Center permit granted by the Southold Town Board to approve the proposed building use prior to the Planning Board granting approval of the site plan; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action. Semon, Bruno To: Cc: Subject: ? Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark; Ford, Amy; 'Edwards Ken (E-mail)'; 'George Solomon (E- mail)'; 'Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail)'; 'Joseph Townsend (E-mail)'; 'Martin Sidor Jr, (E-mail)' RE: Peconic Transfer Station To All, I will recommend to the Planning Board we send a letter indicating we are lead agency on this project and copy all information. Please be advised that I spoke to Gall Wickham on Friday and the following was discussed: I was informed a site plan application would be submitted for the other parcel on the corner. Currently an application is in the ZBA and pending an appeal and relief for the zoning variance. At such time when the new site plan application is submitted the agent will request that this project review be placed on hold. Additionally upon submission, the request may be made to apply for a refund or transfer the site plan fees from this project to the new project. Thanks Bruno ..... Original Message ..... From: Chic Voorhis [mailto:cvoorhis@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Honday, April 16, 2007 8:17 AM To: Semen, Bruno Cc: Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Hark; Ford, Amy; 'Edwards Ken {E-mail)'; 'George Solomon (E-mail)'; 'Jori Weodhouse (E-mail)'; 'Joseph Townsend {E-mail)'; 'Martin Sider Jr. (E-mail)' Subject: RE: Pecenic Transfer Station The information you faxed over is a routine SEQRA coordination letter. The letter indicates that NYSDEC has received an application under Article 27 for a Solid Waste Management Facility. The coordination indicates that the State has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for review of the project. As I recall, the application was previously the subject of a coordinated review, and I believe the Town Planning Board assumed lead agency. I reco~end that you write to the NYSDEC and apprise them of this. NYSDEC reserves the right to provide comments on the action. At this time, I understand the Town has received additional information which is under review. The next step is to issue a determination of significance which would be either a positive declaration (require applicant to prepare DEIS), or a negative declaration (no significant adverse environmental impact expected). Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this input, and please feel free to call should you have any questions. Thanks, Chic Voorhis ..... Original Message ..... From: Semon, Bruno [mailto:Bruno. Semon@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:44 PM To: Chic Voorhis (E-mail) Cc: Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark; Ford, Amy; Edwards Ken ! (E-mail); George Sol,~mon {E-mail); Jori {E-mail); Joseph Townsend (E- Sidor Jr. (E-mail) Subject: Peconic Transfer Station ; Martin Hi Chic, Sorry about the last minute response, I was only made aware of this on April 11, 2007 the file was on Marks desk. Pat Finnegan and Kieran was out of the office and Pat was able to meet at 3:30pm yesterday. Be advised of the project status is as follows: August 15, 2006, The Planning Board started a coordinated Unlisted review under SEQR Part 617 article 6 I was instructed to start this before the Town Board reviewed the Salvage Center Permit. October 13, 2006 NPV issued an Environmental review report to Planning Board. October 17, 2006 The Planning Board assumed lead agency for the project build out as shown on the site plan. November 14, 2006, The Planning Board accepted the NPV report and requires the applicant to address the items in the report and submit supplemental information. November 21, 2006 LWRP Coordinator by letter indicated the project is consistent with the LWRP policy standards. December 6, 2006 The Planning Board received a response at a work session from Gall Wickham on some of the items in the November 16, 2006 resolution. I was instructed to place this on hold by Pat Finnegan and Mark Terry and not send this to you until the Town Board has worked out the Salvage Center Permit/Use details. This project has basically not moved on the site plan end since that correspondence. Various agencies have replied to the coordination request. The file does not contain a specific reply to the November 14, 2006 resolution requesting supplemental information. I faxed you the copy of the NYS DEC Lead Agency Coordination request received by The Town. Can you please tell us if we should request to include this under the Towns State Environmental Review of the site build out and request lead agency on the NYS DEC permit action? The question is whether you are comfortable reviewing this under the Towns review or should it be a separate review by the NYSDEC for the permit action? It looks like we will need to respond by 4/16/07 to meet the thirty-day period. Thanks .e_ facsm ile To: Chick Voorhis Fax: 631-427-5620 From: Bruno Semen, Sen. Site Plan Reviewer Date: 4/13/2007 Re: Peconic Transfer Station Pages: 15 SCTM 1000-95-2-7 CC: File [] Urgent [] For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply [] Please Recycle HiChick, n copy of the NYS DEC Lead Agency Coord~natJon request received by the Town. Ca you should r~u~t to ~nc~ude th~s un~er the s,e bu,d out StaR and r.q~t ~,~ a~e.cy NYS DEC pe g thi rmit action? The question is whether you am comfortable mviewin s under our ~r should it be a separate review by the NYSDEC. It 10oks like we will need to respond by 4/16/07 to meet the thirbj-day period. Please review the information and telephone us. Thank You To: From: Re: Date: To~n Attorney Patricia Finneg~ To~n Clerk Elizabeth Neville~,~C~// Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp. 3/20/07 The enclosed correspondence with regard to lead agency coordination on the above application was received from the NYS DEC by my office yesterday. I am forwarding it toyou foraction. Tbankyou.~ ,q)(~{,~gf ~~ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One 50 Circle Road - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-3407 Phone: ((331) 444-03(35 FAX: (631) 444-0360 March 16, 2007 RECEIVZD 2007 Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST Dear Sirs/Madams: The purpose of this request is to determine under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; Enclosed is a copy of our permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in responding. Project Name: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp Location: 860 Commerce Drive, Southold DEC Application #: 1-4738-03697/00001 Permit Type: Article 27 Solid Waste Management SEQRA Classification: [ ] Type I [x ] Unlisted DEC Position: [D~EC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. Page 2 Please respond to my attention within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assuming the role o flead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. Please feel free to contact this office at (63 l) 444-0366 for further information or discussion. Yours truly, Environmental Analyst cc: see distribution list above) Page 2. NEW YORK STATE OEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DEC APPLICATION NUMBER 01VISION OF SOUD WASTE ~,PPLICATION FOR A sOLID ~STE MANAGEMENT FACILIT FACILITY CODE · , PERMIT Please read all instructions be;ore completing this application Please TYPE or PRINT cleerP/ 1. TYPE OF APPLICATION (Check fiji Applicable Boxes): X~ Permit Jo Operate Subsequent Siege (New) Modlflcalion 3. PACILL~ OWNER'S ~E Peconzc Recyc±zng and D~ere~er-Corp · 800 Wickham Avenue Ma~ituck Ne~'~Pr~del 195 2 1 1 7 3 1 4. FACILrrY OPERATOR'S NAME Peconic Recycling and 800 Wickham Avenue City . Matt~tuck StatelZlp Coda New York 11952 EACILITY NAME AND LOCATION (Aitach USGE Tepo Map showing enact Iocat!en) Norad Peconic Recycling and T~ansfer Corp. sueet Solid Waste Recycling ~-~--i-l~-~y 860 Commerce Drive Oily, Stale, Zip Cede Cutchogue, New York 11935 Southold Suffolk Coordinates NYTM--E NYTM--N 8. TYPE OF FACILITY (Check ~11 al)Ducat)la poxes] [] Landfill (Speclly category} ~ Rese~rch,'Deve,l~prnen~ and Demonstration [] Land ,~l!c~lion [] Solid Waste incineration [] Refuse D~rlved FU., Processing [] Compostlng X~ Rccyclables Handling and Recovery ~..~ elbe,' (Describe) ~ Transfer Slatiou [] Medical Waste [] Waste Tire Storage [] tandllll Gas Recover/ [] Waste OII C & D D~hriq Proges_~i~g F=_C 2. APPLICANT IS THE: Xi~J Eacllih/ Operator 5. ENGINEER'S NAME AND P.E LCEN E NO Eugene (2. Kempey 68~64' Kempey Engineering Address 4 Brunswick Drive CltylStatelZIp Code East Northport, NY Telephone Number I 631) ~68-3324 7. SITE OWNER'S NAME Address 800 Wickham Avenue Matti tuck Stat elZlo Code New York 11952 (631) 298-8888 I g. IS'APPLICATION BEING FILED BY OR 10. FEE AMOUNT ON BEHALF OF A MUNICIPALITY? ENCLOSED 11. NAMEiS) OF ALL MUNICIPALITIES SERVED Southold and Riverhead Townships 12. SOUO WASTE HANDLED asphalt Pavement/l~ 13. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WHERE APPLICABLE a. List wastes to be accepted ~ca~~rbte, Facllgy area proposed in the apolicatlan 3 . 1 4 acres brick and other masonry products, ~ C & D D~~~~i~ Facility, area ulBmately planned 3. 1 4 acres rock soil _ ~Qoc] _~_ __ J c Ultimate facility height above existing grouna eve 35 leer b. Quantity (S,pecdy Units) J Exisdno ' appeared design capacity" -- __ J d. Total site area 3 . 1 ~ acres 480 TPD MSW P oposed "app eyed design capacdY'800 'l'.b'U L;&'iDe. Existing landfill area on this site and adjacent properties N/A acres 14. IS A VARIANCE REQUESTED FROM ANY PROVISION OF 6 NYCRR PART 360? [] '(es X~ NO If yes, cile the speciHc provision(s) 15. CERI'IFIQAT[OH: I heleby atlirm under penalty al pe jut/ ha in ormation provided on Ihis form and altached s~atements and exhibits was prepared by me or COlislllfnnis lu I~liYirOllllieliflll Bnuineeri,,g 4 Brunswick Drive, East Northport, NewYork 11731 (631) 368-3324 Facsimile (631) 368-1524 February 23, 2007 Mr. John Pavacic Regional Permit Administrator Division of Environmental Permits New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Region 1 Building 40 SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11790 Re: Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp. 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York 11935 Solid Waste Transfer, Recyclables Handling and Recovery, and Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility Permit Application Submittal Dear Mr. Pavacic: Transmitted herewith, for your review and approval, are three (3) copies of Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp.'s Application for a Permit to Construct and Operate a Solid Waste Transfer, Recyclables Handling and Recovery, and Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility for their proposed 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York 11935 facility. The application packages consists of the following documents: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Solid Waste Management Facility Application Form. 2. Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF). 3. Structural and Archeological Assessment Form (SEAF). 4. Closure Plan. 5. Contingency Plan. 6. Engineering Report. 7. Operations and Maintenance Manual. 8. Facility Training Plan. Mr. John Pavacic 2 9. Waste Control Plan. Please review our submittal at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or require additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, President February 23, 2007 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approva~ and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full fAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Peconic Recycling and Transfer - Solid Waste Recycling Facility Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York 11935 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp. Address 800 Wickham Avenue City / PO Mattituck State New York Zip Code 11952 Business Telephone (631) 298-8888 Name of Owner (if different) Commerce One, LLC Address 800 Wickham Avenue City / PO Mattituck Business Telephone (631)298-8888 State New York Zip Code 11952 Description of Action: Application for a Permit to Construct and Operate a Solid WastManagement Facility for a solid waste transfer, recyclables handling and recovery, and a construction and demolition debris processing facility processing four hundred eighty (480) tos per day of recyclables and municipal solid waste and eight hundred (800) tons per day of constrcution and demolition debris within the thirty-four thousand two hundred ten (34,210) square foot pre-engincered building to be constructed on the three point fourteen (3.14) acre site. The construction will include all necessary site improvements. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: r~ urban r~ Industrial [] commercial [] Forest r~ Agriculture []Other ]Residential (suburban) F~ Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: 3.t4 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 3.14 acres 0.39 acres acres __acres acres __ acres acres __ acres acres acres acres acres acres 2.75 acres acres __ acres HaA Haven Loam 0% to 2% slope, HaB Haven Loam 2% to 6% slope, and RdA r"m Riverhead sandYolOam 0% to 3% a. Soil drainage: r~Well drained 100 % of site LJ Moderately well drained ~ of site. slope r~Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres (see I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes [] No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5, Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r~0-10% 100% F-110.15%__% ~-'] 15% or greater % 6. Is project substantial~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? [] Yes ~ No 7, Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes E~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 50 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ['~Yes 10. DO hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? r~No r~l Yes I~No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? E]Yes [] No According to: [~;;;;~n Associates: Visual inspection of the property previously cleared with Iow scrub brash Identify each species: 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? E]Yes r~No Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r~Yes []No )lain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? r'~Yes [~]No 1 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 1 7. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [] Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? D No []Yes r~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? E~Yes F~INo 19. Is the site located in or substantiall~,ontiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? []Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: b. Project acreage to be developed: 3.14 acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0.00 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. __ f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially N/A N/A Ultimately N/A N/A i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? __ 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes r~No r-~ N/A a, If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? ]Yes [] No 3.14 acres, 3.14 acres ultimately. N/A % 0; proposed 20 30 (upon completion of project)? Multiple Family Condominium N/A N/A N/A N/A 160' width; 230' length. N/A ft. 0 tons/cubic yards. tLandscape Berms b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r~lYes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 2.0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? r~Yes r~No 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 6 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month __ year, (including demolition) Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes r~ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes r~ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 50; after project is complete 5) 5 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? r~ Yes ~ No If yes, explain: r-'l 12. is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I I Yes ["lNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? r~ Yes [] No Type Sanitary wastewater and stormwater 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? []Yes r~l No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [] Yes ~ No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? r~ Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 4 tons 75 b, If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? r~ Yes [] No c. If yes. give name Subject Application ; location Catchogue d. will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? []Yes lb/week per employee 25 employees x 4 weks ]No Page 6 of 21 e, If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~ lYes I"lNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r~Yes [~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? )mI Yes ~ ~ No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ~ Yes F'l No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) Odors will be controled with a odor control misting system, Nosie from the payloaders will be controled by the proposed building and commercial traffic nosie is similar to the noise produced by the Town Facility located adjacent to the subject property. Diesel Fuel for the payloaders and electric power 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute, 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 200 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? FI Yes I~ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board F~Yes F1 No Type Waste & Recyclin~ Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes r~ No Site Plan Approval City, Town Zoning Board r'-'] Yes r~l No City, County Health Department [] Yes F'l No SCDHS Sanitary System Approval Other Local Agencies E~, Yes r~ No Other Regional Agencies r'~ Yes r~ No State Agencies [] Yes [] No NYSDEC Solid Waste Management Facility Permit Federal Agencies ~ Yes [] No Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~lYes [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance r~ New/revision of master plan [] Site plan [~1 Special use permit [] Resource management plan N']Subdivision [~ Other Page 8 of 21 What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? las proposed 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No change What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [] Yes [] No What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~,'~ mile radius of proposed action? Mixed use: Project is located in a recent subdivision planned for light industrial use. To the west is farmland with one residential unit. East of the subject property is the Town of Southhold Recycling Facility. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a 1/~ mile? ['~Yes [] No If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a, What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? []Yes r~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes Fire proptection, mail and general services [~No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes [] No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Peconic Recycling and Transfer Signature John Divello Title Vice President Date ///:/0 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 JONN DIV[LLO & $0N8 MATTITUCK SANITATION BOO WICKHAM AV~NU~ D~AWER 1402 MA'~["I'gOK, N.Y, 1~952 p~ONE 831 .~gB-BBBB FAX B~'I 4[98.2023 ~ax Transml,ttal Sheet Date:~ Time: ..... Number Pages Including Cever Sheet: To: C~_ompa.~v: , -~ Fax Namber= ~ Regarding: _ CO~I~ENTS NOTIPIOATDN O~ OTN~ PERMI~ )~LI~TION~ ~lm A: P~rml~mm Aoo.~ k~l Rmm~mlbill~ m~d ~mel t~ I~dm ~ui~, m~la~, an~ de.gem, ~ t~e exit a~v~le to t~a ~l~e'a a~te ~ emissions In oo~ wl~ t~ p~mlRee m [~m B: Pm~l~'m Cont~m ~ Co~ with P~ll the perml~ la raeponel~a for Ink.lng it& Indepen~t conV~re, empl~., ~tl and e~g~e of ~elr I~m C~ Pi~l~ Rel~nl~ll for Obffi~lng ~her Riqutrod [~e requ)~ lo ca~ out ~le aotlvltlee t~t ere euthod~d by Item D: No Right W Tr.pmem or Inteffe~ with RWi~I~ RIIhtl Thi~ per.it doal not ~nvey to the p~ml~ee any right lo ~aapaam upon 'he lands ~r In.dare with the riparian r]~hts OEN~L CONDIT~Ng Gallaral Coi~dlUol~ I: Fm~illf~ hm~[;Ol~ by fl,u DeFiant mu~oriz~ ~aenteuve ~ the Depe~men~ of Envlm~e~l C~se~ail~ ~ (tho O0~e~ment) to dethrone whether the ~!ttee ~ ~mpl~ng wi[h [h~a permit and the EOL, Such rep~On~etivo m ay order :he wor~ su~pe~0efl pumuant to ~CL 71-0~1 ~ ~PA 401(~. A cosy OF this parmlL including el~ r~fere~ed maps, ~rawinga a~ special c~d~tlona, mu~ ~ syllable for Inspectior~ O~erll Oondltlon 3: ~litlonihlp of this Permit to Other Ompid~ ~t O~e~ and Oite~laaflons U~ae e~proseiy p~vld~ ~r ~ Ihs ~pa~t, laeuence of t~tl pem,~t ~s not m~el~, supereede =r re~cind any orde~ e~ ~ell~m~m~;o~ pr~atoullY lasU~ by ~ha Oepa~ent ~ any ~ the h~rma, c01~dltl~ ~r requirements contoln~ In ~ch order or aeterml~aU~. p~ L ~h applioe~n m~i Incfude I~y f~l ~ lU~p~men~l In~rm attoe t~ De~e~ma~t req~lreg, A~Y mod~atlo~ ~ ~ne~r grant~ ~y ~ Depl~lflt must be IA writing, ~e ~e~i~e must aubm~ e fenwal appllcaUon at ~aat; a) 160 days b~ore ~plro~on ~ permits f~ S~o Po!lutant D~sch~r~ ~limina~n System (SPDES), Feelllflea (EWMF); ~d ~) 30 ~aya be?ore expiration of ~1~ olh~' permit ~u~mls~lO~ Of eD~l~atl~ ~r perml~ ~ne~l o~ m~lfl~ion are to be ~ a~mltte0 ~o: NYSDEC Regional Pmmlt Administrate, Region 1, 8U~ Bl~g ~0 $~y Brook NY t 17~-Z358 b) re)lure ~ the ~mrm~o ~ ~ply wt~ any te~s or ~Cl~nm cf tho P~rmit; o] exoeedlng tho a~pe of the pmJeot aa da~rlbed In ~l ~mil mP~t~a~on; ~ r~d~ dl~nvar~ miter~l I~rmntinn nra martial rhinOl In in d~Amentll ~nHitJonl, teleran[ t~11~°loO~ or ~ppil~bla law ~ ~gula(Io~ .lam the leauan~e of the ex!s~ng i,~mlt; Environmental Conae~atl~, ~w or regulations 01 the ~oa~, m~ related ~ the ~l~e~ ~o ~R~;~ WUM~ PA~E, 2OI4 1~720-~a27710000~ I ~ RPFCIAL CONDI'I'IOI'4~ ~pp~ved E.~h~ hi~ ~vu~[ V,.F~d by Ecmpoy Engine Jrln~ d~[~d July 2~5m The N~ York Al; least seven (?) days before ~mme~aement Of operalion Df tile facility, tile Perm it!so shall illhrlll! i liner from Innnl firm mnrnhn'l demolition (CAD) debrio poe day at ~e tellS. All a~l ~;l[~ ;,M.d;.~ but ~u~ limited m through Saturday, l']~uts alii day~ of npermi(~ shall not con 'lict with local r~stri~tio.s and ,. d;.n.ur., hi addill~aL u[T siie nolle levels gen,,~lcd atll'lnll c~ernt{tsn of th~ li:~iilt¥ durinB n~rfllaI hours ihllll not o~eed limtllt ~et by Ioelll zotling cedi lancet, vialble to an~ vehlole approach 'nS the f~:d'~y ~atranaa. The Pemllttee ehl~ll effecllvel>' :onlrol all dust. noise, odors md veclo~ ;o thai they do not yf~htr, le~ entering lhn feelll~y, ~l~ctlea any eoottJaln§ unautl,od"ed Ir, aleei~{I, I~PE¢IAL CONDiTIONal ~ct[~ immedia~Jy ~n dl~cow~, The ownertope~etor intend~ resolutlo~ sMll be surmised m thc Depa~enl following: Ioge and nil re~d~ L~d to ~uppo~ ~ke d~ly log ~v~ilable t~ tl~e D~p~ment hnm~d~ately upon day o~Ja~ua~' foUow];~E ~ch year' otopcration on t~rm~ presctlbc~ by or acceptable to the JJ~pa~elzt, ~omrol amAll el)ilia, P^~ ~ OF ~ CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT Board of Fire Conlmissloners 260 New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Telephone (631) 734-6907 o Fax (631) 734-7079 E-marl: cutfd~t~optonline, ne t February 3, 2007 Mr. Bruno Semon Planning Board Office PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Ref: Peconic Recycling and Transfer Dear Mr. Semon, ', With reference to the above property, the Board of Fif~ '~oin~nissioners of the Cutchogue Fire District does not feel that a fire well or fire hydrant is needed due our previous requirements for this sub division requiring Fire Hydrants on each end of the Cul-de-sacs. Thank you for your request and please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Board of Fire Commissioners Matthew J. Martin District Secretary PLANNING BOARD MEMB JERiLYN B WO()DIIOt!SE Chair WILLIAM J. CI{EMER$ KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDER flEORGE 1) ,%OI,OMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTItOLD MAILIN(; AI)I)RESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE IX)CATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 Stale Route 25 (cot. Main Rd & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 SITE PLAN APPLICATION Submission Requirements The following items arc rcquired for a complete site plan application submission: · Site Plan Application Form (2 pages) · Applicant's Affidavit (1 page) · Agent Authorization (if applicable) · Environmeutal Assessment Form (EAF- Part One) · Payment to Town of Southold (see 100-256B for lee schedule) · Nine Copies of Site Devclopmeut Plan (see appendix for requirements) · Grading and Dntinage Plan with Calculations (if not inclnded in site plan) ·Existing aud Proposed Landscape Plan (if not included in site plan) Survey Prepared by Licensed Surveyor or Civil Engineer · Architectural Review Materials to Inchldc: 2 sets of constructiou plans with elevation details & lighting dctails, samples of material, colors, type of roofing and siding. Sec the Architectural Reviexv Committee Check List. · Scaled Sketch of Sign Showing Color, Material Type, and Sign l.ighting Details · Notice of Disapproval limn Building Department (Sec Town Code Section 100-253) NOTE: See the Site Plan Application Guide for fulXhcr iufimnation. Revised 03/18/05 Page 1 of 3 TOWN ~ SOUTHOLD PLANNIN~I~BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SEC 1 ION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: B /23 / ©¢_~ Site Pla,, Name: ~'~C~'h.-II r,~. '~-C.-~('~-LI N~ Suffolk Co,,nty Tax Mal, ¢1000-~% ~ -~$ 7 OtherSCISI~s:" ~/A Street Address: ~O ~E~C~ _~ Distance to nearest intersection: [~ ~ * (OU~O~' Type of Site Plan: ~ Ne~v Amended If Amended, last approval {late: Handet: (, Residential / / SECTION 13: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone mm~ber for the people below: City_ ~C}7('_ L.kZ) ('~ ,qk.) ~,State Home Telephone rO~ Applicant Street Home Telephone (~i ~'?f~-'~'~¢'~ Other z p_i 5 z Applicant's Agent or Representative: Street i<'h.~-'~I k,)b0i',~x3 ~i.-~_.~ . City ~::l~,.x?/ ,~,~r~{::; State ~-~/ *Unless otherwise requestedTcorr'espondence will be sent only to thc contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 SE(fl'iON C: Site Data Proposed construction type:X. New Property total acreage or square footage: Modi ficalion of Existing Structure ~qlange of usc Site Plan Imild-out ~creage { r square footagci..~. :.~ ac.'stl, fl. __ Agricultund Is there an existing or proposed Sale ofi)cvclopmcnt Rights on the property? Yes No ~ If yes, explain: t-.TO _Cm q:' Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: Is an application to the Southold Toxvn Zoning Board of Appeals rcqu red. Yes '~ If yes, have you submitted an application to thc ZBA? Yes ~ _ No . if yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No Show all uses proposed amd existing. Indicate which buikling will have which use. If more then one usc is proposcd per building, indicate square lbolage of floor area pcr use. existing property rises: ~t~' ~ D List 15st all proposed property uses: ~Z~~_~'~ 1'~ Existing lot coverage' ~[~ % ~o:xtl~ot coverage: Z~-V % Gross floor area of existing structure(s)'~__~ sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed stmcture(s~ ._ Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces:['o/,,~_ ~ el ) oposeu spaces Loading Berth: No I'roposcd landscape coverage: Water fl'ont Data: lis t~ s property within 500"cfa wetland area? Yes No '~ If yes explain: I, thc undersigned, certif~ ab~n is tn. lc. Patze 3 of 3 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST MINIMUM SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Notice of Disapproval from Building Department required under 100-253 of the Town Code. Lot, block section from Suffolk County Tax Map. Name and address of landowner on record. Names and addresses of adjoining landowners. Names and address of applicant (if not same as landowner). Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature. Date of Plan. North Point. Location of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines. Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. Existing zone district, adjoining property zone districts and zoning district lines if the property includes a split zone. Buildings and build out with percent lot coverage ( see bulk schedule of zone). Landscaping and percent landscaped ( see bulk schedule of zone). Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet. Existing building structures / utilities and proposed structures/utilities. Show all uses of the site in a town defined type, detail square feet and parking calculations broken down by the use, refer to Town Code section 100-190. Include handicap parking spaces as required in New York State Code. Drainage plan detailing paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas with calculations. Show outdoor lighting with detail of wattage and type of fixture refer to 100-239.5. Show location of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants. Show location of dumpster. Existing trees of 6 inches in diameter at a point 3 feet above the truck base property boundaries. Landscape plan detailing location of landscaping, type of material plants, buffering, street trees -see attached Town Code information 100-212 & 100-213. Data for architectural review (see information below) & refer to 100-257 & 100-258 Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area ADDITIONAL'REQUIREMENTS (If Applicable) Off street loading areas as required, refer to Town Code 100-192 for Loading Berth Requirements. Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less Show wetlands Outdoor signs - sketch to scale and colors refer to 100-z00/209 Proposed grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line Spot elevations for buildings PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGED. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 july 11, 2006 Matthew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SC-TM~ (s) 1000-96.-1-1.8 Zone: LIO (Light Industrial Office) DearMr. Manin: Enclosed please find one (1) commercial site plan/survey for the above referenced site. This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the l,lO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/c/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Senior Site Plan Revie~ver enc. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID G. GRAHAM, M.D., M.P.H. ACTING COMMISSIONER December 11, 2006 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM # Peconic Recycling & Transfer - Site Plan 1000-95-2-7 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS your letters dated November 14, 2006 concerning theabove-referenced ~'proj "Department") has received Based on a review of the subject coordination, the Department offers the following comments. However, the Department wishes to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. These comments should not be construed as an implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project. All applications are reviewed thoroughly with respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code concerns by appropriate departmental personnel when SCDHS applications are completed. 1. SANITARY CODE A. Article VI Application Status: Our agency has not received an application for the above referenced project as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. The project sponsor should submit an application to our agency's Office of Wastewater, as well as a complete package for the project, at the earliest possible date so that a complete technical assessment of this proposal can be undertaken. B. SCDHS Jurisdiction: The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF ECOLOGY 360 Yaphank Avenue, Suite 2B, Yaphank, NY 11980 (631) 852-5750 Fax (631) 852-5812 In general, the Department encourages the following land use measures be considered (where appropriate) to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA. 1. Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%. 2. Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes. 3. Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping. 4. Employment of stormwater runoffcontrol measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site. Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-5750. Sincerely, Philip de Blasi Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology PD/amf pc: Kimberly Shaw Walter Hilbert, P.E. Southold 'l'o~n (?ode Section 48 precludes salx age centers from collcctiug and disposing of "municipal recyclables". That term is nol ctel~ncd or used in thc ('t/de or in thc industr5. Jim l?,unchuck dlinks "municipal rcc,,,clables" refers to "mandated recyclables" which is defined in £'hapter 48. as Y~I and ~2 plastics, cans. glass, corrugated cardboard, and nc~xspapcr. These are thc items which residents arc required under thc l'own Code to rec3clc. Some residents lake them lo the l.andfill and put them in thc bins. ,Sonic residents have private carlcrs pick them up in separated containers. This facilil3' will not handle )cllo~ bag garbage, or cnntaincrs nf mandated rec~clables picked up from residents and cummercial establishments, l'hesc ilcms ~ilJ continue to be picked up bx M~tttiluck Nanitalion Facilit3 ........ l%'conic Recycling and Transl~'r ('orp. (PR I(') l ) ('onstrt~ction and l)cmolition Debris (('&l)) 2) Municipal Solid Wastc(MS~) J~olh Ihcse loads will be t¥om dttmpstcrs: either thc lar~c smallor dtJmpstcrs behind cotntncrcial cslablishmcnls tlaat collects earbagc bags of ~aste. I t~csc loads x~ ill also contain large amounts oJ' non-mandaled rcc)¢c~bles, which will bc pulled fi'om the ~astc stream Ibr ret>cling: cnncrete, asphalt, brick and mason0' products; paper, metal scraps, rock, wnnd and soil. This is the primaO lbcus oJ' Ibc C&J) recycling. ~mcc there is a significant Llmotlnl oJ' these malerials which would od~crx~isc be lost to tl]c ret>cHug Mt'cam and bo disposed in Ibc xxastc stream. This l~tcility will allow thc rec) clin~ iff large amnunts of non-mandated recyclables so thc3 do nol haxc Io bc shipped out ~> xx~lstc producls. 'I hcsc It,ads will contain ~,,m~c incidental amotmts ol mandated rccyclables among ti~e ('&l) debris and thc MS~ lhesc n~andalcd rccxclablcs ~ill be reclaimed I¥om the x~astc stream and recycled bc[~)re Ibc balance of thc load is shipped otll. I 3picall5. l~r instance. ('&[) loads will haxc occi~sional bottles, cans. and plastics which can be rccoxcrcd. Il'this process did not occur, lhosc mandalcd recxclablcs XXOLtld continue to be included in thc non-recyclablc x~aslc stream and lost to thc rcc3cling process. 1l is actuall3 cost cl'lbctix e for PI{I (' to cominuc lo ship Ihcsc mandated rcc3clables to thc 5outhold I'ox~n Facility. and il us I'N l("s understanding thai it is also beneficial to the No indtlstri~ll 'e~aste. ha/ardous xx;istc (it' medical xxaslc xxill be Imndlcd b'¥ I~'R 1'('. Re/pr/mtmicrcc5 Submission Without a Cover Letter SCTM#: 1000- Submission Without a Cover Letter Date: Colnmellts: SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR 'FOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax (631)-765-9015 JAMES A. RICH/ER, - ENGINEER TOW3q OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1197[ Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: Re: November 29; 2006 Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive SCTM #: 1000-95-02-07 As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the amended site plan for the above referenced project. The Site Plans, sheets 1 through 6, have been prepared by Michael k. Dunn, RA. And Graham Associates and have been dated 9/14/06. P~ease consider the fallowing: The proposed Curb Cut has been modified to twenty four (24') feet in width which meets the minimum requirements of the Highway Superintendent. A Plan Detail and Section of this Curb Cut should be included on the plans. It is recommended that a reinforced concrete apron, or other approved apron construction, be installed within the road shoulder area to provide access to the site and protect the integrity of the existing road edge. This apron should be designed with a high point along the property line that would contain all surface-water runoff on site. The large truck scales have been relocated to the interior of the site. This proposed location is considered satisfactory and will allow for the safe staging of vehicles that are using the scales. Currently, the properly owner us utilizing the site for the storage of various sizes of Refuse Containers. Permission has been granted, subject to Final Planning Board Approvals, to install the proposed curb cut to facilitate the storage of these containers on site rather than placing them within the existing subdivision road. Where will these containers be stored when this site plan has been built out? If they are to be stored on the adjacent southerly property, will they require screening or landscaping? Will they need to install a gravel pad? Will drainage be provided for hardened surfaces that may be created on the adjacent property? All access for the storage of containers should be directed through the approved curb cut location. Site access should not be permitted where it requires vehicles to traverse up and over the existing Belgian Block Curbing along the subdivision road. Drainage calculations have been provided and meet the minimum requirements of Town Code. The proposed Roof Drainage System has been located entirely on the southeasterly side of the new facility. How will the runoff from the other side of the building get delivered to these Drainage Systems? How will runoff from the office area roof get delivered to these Drainage Systems? The total amount of drainage that has been proposed for this site is satisfactory. It is recommended that the pool locations be adjusted, as needed, to allow for the leader pipe from all roof runoffto directly enter the drainage systems. Page 1 of 2 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson - Planning Board Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM #: 1000-95-02-07 November 29, 2006 Page 2 of 2 A note on the Drywell Detail found on Drawing Sheet "E", Sheet 6 of 6, indicated that a 10" diameter "RCP" pipe will be used between all interconnected Leaching Pools. The Site Plan notes on Drawing Sheet "A", Sheet 2 of 6, indicates that 6" diameter "SDR" pipe will be used between pools. This item should be coordinated. It is recommended that the 10" diameter pipe be utilized between pools to facilitate system maintenance. Handicap parking stalls have been indicated. These parking spaces and access isles should be constructed with Asphalt Pavement and/or other approved surfaces that would meet the minimum ADA Requirements and provide a continuous accessible route to the proposed facility. The Landscaping, as proposed, appears to meet the minimum requirements of Town Code. This item should be reviewed and approved by the Planning Board. If you have any questions regarding this Site Plan review, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: From: Date: Scott Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair ~ Members of Southold Planning Board Ruth Oliva Members of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator November 21,2006 NOV 2 2 2006 Proposed Site Plan for Peconic Transfer Station SCTM#1000-95-2-7 Zone: LIO This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. SCTM#(s) 1000-95.-2-7. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action is generally CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided the following best management practices and conditions are required to further the policies of the LWRPo POLICY STANDARDS Policy 1 Foster a pattern of development itt the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use ora coastal location, attd minimizes adverse effects of development. The proposed use is permitted by a special use permit issued by the Town Board under Chapter 211 Salvage Centers. A salvage center is defined as: § 211-1. Definitions. SALVAGE CENTER -- An'( location where a private collection of items, exclusive of municipal rec¥clables, is gathered, reused, recycled, reclaimed and processed for eventual disposal off site. Policy 3 3.1 It is unclear what the term municipal recyclables refers too, it is not defined in the Town of Southold Town Code. A definition should be developed. The ability of the use to enhance community character is subject to the site plan and conditions placed on operations of the Salvage Center if approved. The proposed location will "make efficient use of infrastructure"; the parcel is located close to CR 48 a main highway of the Town. The proposal will not preserve open space. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regulates waste transfer facilities under Part 360 Regulations. The proposed facility will be subject to compliance with the State Department of Environmental Conservation's Part 360 Regulations which mandate controls through its permit provisions. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. Enhance visual quality and protect sceaic resources throughout tile Town of Southold. Minimize introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. The property is zoned LIO and the use requires a large building to internally house operations. The proposed building is not discordant with other types and size of buildings within the area used for similar operations and agricultural uses. Utility lines serving the site are proposed to be buried. The proposed fencing includes privacy slats which would provide additional screening of operations from public view. Therefore the proposal furthers this sub-policy to the extent practical for the proposed use. Screen components of development which detract fi'om visual quality. The property located to the north is occupied by the Southold Town Landfill, to the west vacant agricultural lands, to the southeast pending commercial uses and to the east agricultural lands with one single family residence. The applicant proposes to screen adiacent properties from the proposed physical improvements and operations using a landscaped vegetative buffer of varying ~vidths. The landscape buffer is proposed along the north, south, east and west properW boundaries. Therefore the proposal furthers this sub-policy. Use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials' to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. The proposed use is located greater than 1000' from County Road 48 (CR 48) a designated New York Scenic Byway. The parcel is the most northern parcel in the subdivision. There is no ability to increase the distance from the proposed action to the CR 48 within the subdivision. The proposed building scale and materials are consistent with other buildings currently under conslruction on site and those located to the east and located on the Southold Town Landfill property. Exterior materials and colors of the proposed building are proposed to coordinate with the surrounding buildings within the Industrial Park. Protect visual quality associated with public lands, including public transportation routes', public parks and public trust lands and waters'. As indicated above, the proposed action is located within the view-shed of CR 48, a designated New York State Scenic Byway. During the creation of the subdivision which created the subiect lot, the Planning Board required a 100' vegetative buffer to screen the uses from CR 48. It is recommended that the distance form the roadway, the 100' buff'er and proposed on site landscaped buffer will sufficiently screen the propose use from CR 48 to the greatest extent possible and therefore the action meets this sub-policy. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply itt the Town of Southold. 5.5 Protect and conserve the quality and quantity of potable water The proposed action includes a pervious gravel parking area, subsurface drainage system and drywells to control roof and surface runoff. To further the policy it is recommended that: 1. Require a wash down/cleaning area for trucks and equipment be incorporated within the site plan to prevent contaminants from inadequate treatment and disposal. Disposal of leachate and drainage from any cleaning areas and/or holding tanks must be in compliance with all applicable County, State and Federal regulations. 2. All processing, tipping, sorting, storage, and compaction areas must be located within an enclosed building or covered area 3. Require that a spill response protocol be submitted to the Town. 4. Storage areas and type of cquipment to be stored be clearly outlined with areas designed to control and dispose of runoff appropriately. Clearly indicate if dumpsters will be stored on site. 5. All floors and concrete pads on site should be designed to direct runoff to an improved drainage and disposal system approved by the SCDOH. Policy 8 Minimize environmental degradation in Town of SouthoM from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. 8.1 Manage solid waste to protect public health and control pollution. Manage solid waste by: 1. reducing the amount of solM waste generated, 2. reusing or recycling material, 3. using approved methods endorsed by the NYSDEC to dispose of solid waste that is not otherwise being reused or recycled. Prevent the discharge of solid wastes into the environment by using proper handling, ~nanagement, and transportation practices. D. Operate solid waste management facilities to prevent or reduce water, air, and noise pollution and other conditions harmful to the public health. The following is recommended to further the above sub-policies: 1. Only construction and demolition debris shall be accepted at the facility. No industrial waste, treated or untreated regulated medical waste or treated and destroyed medical waste shall be accepted unless specifically approved by the Town Board. &6 2. The acceptance, storage, processing or transferring of hazardous waste is prohibited without Town Board approval. 3. The facility shall operate only between the hours of sunrise and sunset. 4. The owner/operator of the facility is responsible for the control of litter, insects, odors and vectors. Blowing litter must be confined to solid waste holding and operating areas by fencing or other suitable means. Solid waste must be confined to an area that can be effectively maintained, operated and controlled. Solid waste must not be accepted at a solid waste management facility unless the waste is adequately covered or confined in the vehicle transporting the waste to prevent dust, and blowing litter. 5. The facility must be maintained so as to prevent or control on-site populations of vectors using techniques appropriate for protection of human health and the environment and prevent the facility from being a vector breeding area. 6. Odors must be effectively controlled so that they do not constitute nuisances or hazards to health, safety or property. 7. Noise levels resulting from equipment or operations at the facility must be controlled to prevent transmission of sound levels beyond the property line at locations zoned or otherwise authorized for residential purposes. 8. The application indicates that the facility would permit public use. However, the site plan does not show a public passenger vehicle access or processing area. To further this policy it is recommended that the site be evaluated and designed to avoid commercial and private passenger vehicle conflicts: Site solid and hazardous waste facilities to avoid potential degradation of coastal resources. SolM and hazardous waste facilities should not be located within the coastal area unless there is a demonstrated need for waterborne transport of waste materials' and substances. The proposed action is not located adjacent to a water body and waterborne transport of waste materials is not included within the proposal. Correspondingly the facility is not located within a flood zone. If the need for a coastal location is demonstrated, preclude impairment of coastal resources' from solid and hazardous waste facilities by siting these facilities so that they are not located in or wouM not adversely qffect: agricultural lands, The proposed action will result in the net loss of agricultural land/soil within the Town. However, the parcel is zoned LIO and the loss of agricultural lands is attributed to the zoning district and allowable uses. Any improvements would result in the net loss of agricultural land/soils. The proposed use is permitted by a Town Board special permit within the LIO zoning district. naturalprotectivefeature areas, There are no protective natural protective features on-site. surface waters, primary water supply, or principal (sole-source) aquiJkrs The subject parcel is not located over a Special Ground~vater Protection Area, however all best management practices to protect groundwater should be imposed. designated Sign(ficant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats, There are no Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats on site. habitats critical to vulnerable fish and wildlife .species', vulnerable plant species, and rare ecological communities, There are no habitats critical to vulnerable fish and wildlife species, vulnerable plant species, and rare ecological communities on site. wetlands. There are no wetlands on site. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. Cc: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer PLANNING BOARD MEMB! JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE C, hair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH I,. TOWNSEND November 14, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Jonathan DiVello Peconic Recycling 800 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 Dear Mr. DiVello: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 13, 2006: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue, SCTM#1000-95-2-7; and WHEREAS, Under Town Code Section 211, the applicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center permit by the Southold Town Board prior to the Planning Board granting approval of the site plan; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act is performing a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action and established itself as lead agency; and WHEREAS, on October 30, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the report dated October 13, 2006 from Nelson, Pope, Voorhis, LLC. and accepted the report, the Planning Board will require that the applicant address Peconic Recyclin.q & Transfer Pa.qe Two November 14, 2006 the items in the report by submitting supplemental information before a determination of significance can be issued; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act will require supplemental information before a determination of significance can be issued. Enclosed are a copy of the NPV report and the EAF Part II. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~. Woodhouse Chairperson encs. cc: Southold Town Southold Town Southold Town Southold Town Southold Town Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Building Department Board Board of Trustees Engineer Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transpodation New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Office of Ecology, Kimbedy Shaw Abigail Wickham, Esq. Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: (.~,/ //.J/¢/C~.~,~.t SCTM#: 1000- ~'~"~'2'-2 PECONIC RECYCLING AND TRANSFER CORP. FACILITY OPERATION DESCRIPTION In order to reclaim reusable and recyclable materials from the waste stream, Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp. has designed a facility to handle both Construction and Demolition Debris and Municipal Solid Waste. This facility will pull recyclable and marketable materials from the waste stream, thereby reducing the amount of materials sent for disposal. CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS and RECYCLABLE RECLAMATION PROCESS Peconic Recycling and TranstEr Corp. intends to accept construction and demolition (C & D) debris and commingled recyclables (uncontaminated cardboard and waste paper normally contained in the construction and demolition debris waste stream) from local contractors. All activities will be performed in accordance with NYS Department of Environmental Conservations permits and Suffolk Count~ Department of Health approvals. The commingled recyclables and C & D debris will generally arrive at the facility in five (5) to tbrty (40) cubic yard containers transported by roll-offtmcks. The trucks will back into the south side of the building and be entirely inside the building prior to unloading. The activities, conducted entirely inside the building, will include (1) the unloading of the C & D debris and commingled recyclables waste stream onto the C & D tipping and sorting area; (2) the picking and sorting of the C & D debris and commingled recyclables waste stream for recyclables (uncontaminated asphalt pavement, brick and other masonry' products, cardboard, concrete, ferrous and nonferrous metals, paper, rock, soil. and wood) in the C & D sorting area; an excavator will place the material onto a conveyor belt for sorting, or deliver the separated materials directly to their designated bins; (3) the daily storage of recovered recyclables in containers in recyclables storage areas One and Two; (4) the daily storage of the C & D debris residual waste in the C & D debris residual waste storage area; (5) the compacting of the C & D debris by a tracked front-end loader to reduce its size for transportation; (6) the loading of the containers containing recovered recyclables onto roll-off'trucks in recyclables storage areas One or Two for transportation to recyclers of that material for recycling and/or reuse; and (7) the loading of C & D debris residual waste into transfer trailers trucks in the loading area for transportation to a permitted disposal facility. The recovered recyclables will be transported to material handlers ~br recycling. The C& D debris residual waste that cannot be recycled will be transported in one hundred (100) cubic yard trailers to a permitted disposal facility for disposal The activities, including the unloading, sorting, compacting, storage, and loading, will be conducted indoors on a reinforced concrete slab within the recycling building located on the site. SOLID WASTE TRANSFER AND RECYCLING PROCESS Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp. intends to accept municipal solid waste (MSW) from commercial collection activities performed by Mattituck Sanitation and other local waste collection companies. This material will include commingled recyclables (uncontaminated cardboard, ferrous and nonferrous metals, paper and plastic). All activities will be perlbrmed in accordance with NYS Department of Environmental Conservations permits and Suffolk County Department of Health approvals, and will 2 occur within the building. The commingled recyclables and MSW will generally arrive at the facility in twenty (20) and thirty (30) cubic yard compactor trucks and various size compactor units transported by roll-off trucks, which will back entirely inside the building on the south side. The activities will include the (1) unloading of the commingled recyclables waste stream and MSW onto the MSW tipping and sorting area; (2) the sorting of the MSW and commingled recyclablc waste stream for recyclables (uncontaminated cardboard, ferrous and nonferrous metals, paper and plastic) in the MSW tipping and sorting area; (3) the storage of recovered recyclables into containers in recyclables storage area One; (4) the loading of the containers containing recovered recyclables onto roll-off trucks in recyclables storage area One for transportation to recyclers of that specific recyclable for recycling or reuse: (5) the temporary holding of MSW in the MSW storage area (all materials are shipped oul the same day) and (6) the loading of MSW into 100 cubic yard transfer trailers trucks in the loading area for transportation to a permitted disposal facility. The activities, including the unloading, sorting, storage, and loading will be conducted indoors on a reinforced concrete slab within the recycling building located on the site. All material will be removed daily. NOISE CONTROL The noise levels will be controlled by conducting the operations described above entirely within the recycling building located on the site. In addition, it should be noted that the only major noise sources within thc facility will be the delivery trucks, the excavator, the front-end loaders, the roll-offtrucks, and the transfer trailer trucks. These vehicles will be equipped with mufflers in accordance with motor vehicle regulations. Therefore. the noise generated by this equipment will be similar to the noise levels generated by the truck traffic on the surrounding roadways and considerably less than the noise levels generated by the nearby outdoor composting, land fill and excavator sites. The building and site layout will prevent the noise level generated at the facility from adversely impacting the residential properties located a considerable distance to the West. This is accomplished by placing the truck entry and exit door to the facility on the south side of the building. This will direct any noise generated by the facility towards the industrial properties to the south and away from the residential properties to the West. The single door on the east side will limit noise generated easterly. In addition, due to the properties of sound waves that generally require that the receptor be within line of sight of the noise source, the building itself will act as noise barrier for the facility. Also, the buffer plantings that will surround the facility will also act as a noise barrier. Those buffers include a berm and vegetative buffer on the west and south sides of the lot and will ultimately include the vegetative buffer on the north side of Lot 7 (immediately adjacent to the South) when that lot enters site plan review. Further, due to the properties of sound waves, the noise levels generated by the facility will be significantly reduced at the residential receptors due the distance between the facility and the residential receptors (1400 feet to the West, 1500-1600 feet to the Southeast). Therefore, the thcility should not have an adverse noise impacts on the surrounding area ODORCONTROL Offensive odors will be controlled by conducting the waste processing operations within the recycling building located on the site. In addition, the offensive odors will also be controlled by the AiReactor Inc. Fogmaster Mirco-Jet Dram Service Units, the standard New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) approved odor control methodology, installed at each overhead truck door at the facility. The AiReactor, Inc. Fogmaster Mirco-Jet Drum Service Unit sprays a mixture of water and AiReactor, Inc. OWD Organic Waste and Decomposition Odor Counteractant. This fine mist then mixes with and reacts with the odor causing molecules and destroys the odors. The data provided by AiReactor, lnc for the OWD Organic Waste and Decomposition Odor Counteractant chemicals indicates that the product is non-toxic, non-flammable, completely bio-degradable, and environmental sate. The tloor of the facility will be cleared on a regular basis during daily operations in order to remove odor-causing material. No floor drains will be installed per DEC regulations, to avoid groundwater contamination. Therefbre, the facility will not have an adverse odor impacts on the surrounding area. OTHER ITEMS: Water will be provided by SCWA. Materials transported to and from the site will be in enclosed trucks or covered with heavy tarps in accordance with DOT requirements. Nov. 13, 2006 6 November 13, 2006 To: Jim Bunchuck From: Jonathan DiVello Subject: Response for Southold Town Solid Waste Management District I am pleased to respond on behalf of Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp. (Peconic Recycling) in regard to the concerns addressed by you as the Southold Town Waste Coordinator. In a Memorandum dated October 27, 2006 it is stated there are concerns 1) regarding the impacts Peconic Recycling may have on the Town's framework for managing solid waste and 2) compliance with DEC regulations. 1) Peconic Recycling will be happy to provide Jim Bunchuck and the Southold Town MSW facility with any and all information obtained by Mattituck Sanitation and Peconic Recycling. The Department of Environmental Conservation requires all Transfer and Recycling Facilities operating in New York State to keep detailed and accurate records of tonnages, types of waste, and disposal sites. We will be happy to supply Southold Town with copies of these reports, and feel they should be more than adequate in helping the Town develop a (SWMP) Solid Waste Management Plan. 2) Peconic Recycling is required to receive all mandated State operating Permits before operations can begin according to NYSDEC part 360. We look forward to the opportunity of working with you and the Southold Solid Waste District. Please let me know if you have any questions. ~n, n/~han DiVel~,,4 ,~ tor of R3perations ic Recycling & Transfer Corp. T0:63~ ?65 Law Offices WICKHAM, BRE$SLI:R, GORDON & GEASA, P.C. 13015 Main Road, P.O. Box 1424 Matti.Vack, New York 11952 631-298-8353 Telefax no, 631-295-8565 P.001,'~18 ~ ~r~:~ge :r~r rh~ m~m of the doc~lm~ts I:o u~ al ~o co~t t~ you. [f~u do not ~ive al] ~f thc ]m~ Comments: l'hil_~ is page one of._~_ ?,ECON1C I~.ECYCLIN(; ,AND TRANSF.ER CORP. FACILITY OPER~TION DESCRIPTION In order lx0 reclaim reu.~.%]¢ and re¢.x ¢lalMe materials :fl:el~ fl~ wa,slc sttca2~, P~conic ~cy:ling and Transfer Corp. Has d~signed a ~cility ~, handle ~111 Co~l~l~l:iol~ and Demolqlion Debris m~d Municil~tl Solid Wasle. This Facility will };u]l recydable and m~rket,~Ne mat:rials f~m ting lhe~ waste stratus, tlqereby reducing Ibc amo~I of real,rials seni for dis~asaI. CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS trod RECYCLABLE RECLAMATION PROCESN Peconic Recycling a~d 'F? ansfer Corp. intep, ds to accept: con~l,'rL c!:ion a.nd demolition (C & D) debris and co:'nmi~g ed rtcy¢labks (uncontaminated ca:rdboa.rd and waste paper non'rally cont;dncd io thc construclicn and e'en ~olPiou debris waste ,re'earn) fi'om Iota contractors. Ail activities will be performed in accordm~ce with N~rS Depa~:rnc~qt of E~irom~qemu Conse~wafions penn,ts amd SulSkdk County [)epm~mm~l of approvals. T~e commdngI:d rccyclablcs and C & D debrb ,.~ill generally re'rive m the facili~' in riva (5) '.o Ibny (40) cubi: yard conlMners tn'a.ns[o~ed by mll-offtmcks. Tlqe tracks wi ~ I b~ck in~:c t'~e so ,.n:b si de o I' the bui I din g ~d be ¢ nti rely } n si de the buil di ng prl or ~ o m~]oading, Tl~e activities, conducted entirely ii, side lhe building, x~'ill include :'15 ti~e un'carling ofrl~e C & D debris a~d commingled ~cyclables was:e sttca.m onto fl~e C & O tipping and soiaing atom; [2) the pick ;ng and sorlb~g of'the C & D debris *.nzl commingled recyc!ables wasle stream A~r recyclaNes (u.nconmmlnated fllgha]l pavemem, brick and other ~1flsolqD products, c~rdboard, concrete. ~k~ous and nonferrous metals, pap~. rock. *oil. and wood) in lhe C & D sorting ama7 an exca~tor will place tho material onto a. c. onxeT..'r bell ¢.,r sorting, r~]' de~iver ~the separated materials directly t~ their Jesignal:ed Ng, s: (3) 'the daily ~torage areas One 8nd 'Vwo; {4} lhe ~dy ~?orsge otd~e C & D debris resldua~ w~te ir thc C & D deNA r:sidu~l ,,voste sl:ora~gc aret: {5) the compacti~ng o17¢~e C & D debris by a tracked fi'om-end loader m r:duce h~ size for ?,anspedatwn; (5) ~hc loading of the containers containing ~ecovored recyc,abica otll;o 'oll-off truck> in i'gc),clablcs storag~ re'cas One or Two for trens~o~agioo 2o rc:yclers oFths: t~'o:eria: [k ]' T'ecyding saqd/ot reuse: and (7) the loadir,3 ofC & D debris rcs[dr a; x~ste ipto transl:r t~ailers tracks in the lom:.ing ~a Cot The recovered t¢c>claNes wi;l be tr~mspc~rtcd 1.o materi,I hardlers ~3r ~ecyc]i~g. hundred (.i 001 cubic > ard t-al:ers to a i~ermittcd dspo,a; !~ciht), .Ibc disposal Tl~e SO.LID WA.e, TE TP. AN $1,'E R Ah D RECYCLING PROCESS Pcconic Recycling a:M ! r¢¢s¢c,' (2'oq~, h~,¢nds rc zccepl municioal ~)lid waste (MSW) l}om commercial collection a:!ivities perF,m~cd by Madituck Sanilalion ard other l~al w~te collectiol~ companies. This mater al will i~ ch~ te ct,,nmi~g'ed rccyc~ables tuncot~tamina,tcd cm'dboar:l. ~rrous ~d nonf~rto,~s ~ ~tals, paper and phast~c} All azti':i:ies will be perfbrmtd ir %co, dance with Nh S Deomm~ent of Environment2l Conservathm ,):~'mits end Std'~bi;: (ounb' Depar~mt,~t oi Hcalih approvals, and will i':~c ccmm!ngled ,-cc~cl.~tl_,lcs and MS'e, ~ill gcl~eral]y arrive ~1 the facility ~n lv enty ~Zt~) a.t~ lhi~:,' (30'1 cobic y,n'd compac:ov Jr[~ck~ and various size compactor un,ts U'a~spotCe.t by roll-o:Ttmcks, whic~n w/Il back e~rh :l? h ~ide the building en the south <renm and MS~ onto tl~e MSW tipph~g and 5,,t%',g stc~; i2) the so~ng el'the MSW and and nov ~er~'ous mctats, pa~,r arid :>l~sl:ic) in '~bc ¥1S W ~ epi~,g ~nd son:ing ~J'ea: (2) the stc,~ag~ of rocor. ~red ~'ecycleNcs ~nto ccntr:tn~s iD ,.ecycmNes storage area One; (41 th~ '.oad '~g of the containers co~n~sining reccvcrcd ~rc: clablcs omo roi: ol~?trreks in reryclables ~tor,,gc areaOne for tmnspor~ado~ m ecyclc s of that specific mc)clablc for :ecyckng ct reuse; (5) d~e tem,>ora'%' hold:n~ of'h'*gW ha :!;e MSW storage area (all r:ateria]s are sl~ipped om the same day) and (6) ¢~e Ioudiug of MSW into I O0 cubic y~d transfer lra~l*rs ~rucks in llqc Ioadi:,g a"ea ibr t~a.sporl :tt'on to ;~ permilled disposal f~ciiil:y~ T!~e activities. :.ncl~ding iht unlo~.dh,g sortiqh, sro:r* ge. an[5 loeding will be conducted indoors on a r=in(orced co~qcrele ~lab witln.~ l:he rt.cycli~ng buildi~g located on Tine sil:. All n, at.~ria! will bc removed dali?,. NOISE CON I'ROL 'rheno~'~-.. < levels will be convolle3 1D' conducti m. fhe operat, o ~s described above ¢!lt.t'c'y ,,~ itlnin lhe lecycli~'g buildiug Io¢c~ted on th,c si~.', tn addition, iT sl'ould be i~oted 0~a: the onl? m~jor noise qc.u:'¢es Wi '~in the facil:: v ,x'~l* bc the 0e:iveo: truck.. by ll'~c Imck t?aO~c on t~e surroundh~g ~ot ]~a):; and co~sicterab~ le~s d~an :~tc ira?acting thc reside:'.~iai properties located ~ ~ onsider~blc distance m th.~ ¥, est. accemp!~shed by piaClng lhe track en:D~ a~c' cxk Joor ~:o thc [acilib o~, rl~e sout;x bu~IdMg. This will d?-ect an3 hoist gei :rated by t ~¢ fac~llty toy rods lhe [,:vperJes t,o tire so~,t]~ a~d away fr~ ,m th* ~ esidcm:ia} pro?et~ies to lhe West door mn t]:~ cast side will limit no~sc geaecaled t~s'mrly. ]n addition, duc I:¢ thc i:~c~ude [ be,n and vegctal:h e buffer ora the x~cst and so]JlJ sides of thc Io1: and dtimatai5 i~]ck~de the ~cg~tati~c buffer c.'~ fine forth s:dc o"Lol 7 (immediat: > ~e. ves. the ¢oise revels gener*.~ted i>y :he 15cillry ,viL bc s~g qficam.iy reduced m (1.,~0 ~eet to xh¢ West. 1500.1600 lkct t~. the Southeast } Tl~ereiq>r¢. d~e ]~il~ty shouid ODOR CONrROL O?en$i~¢ odors v, il! bc comrolled by conducting the ~ .;i.st¢ proccs_~ing c,pcraHons be controlled b3 !he AiR.~cto? Inc. F,~gm~ter MJrco-.let D~%m Se'Ace {..fn{t;, 11~ slmldm'd com¥o! ?aefi,odology. mstaled at end, overhead truck door e~t l.l:e f~c.lit;,. The AiReactor. inc. Fogmaster Mimo~Jet D~'tm~ Service Unit sprays a mixTtll:e o1' water an,.! AiRez. e:or, lac. OWD Orgmfic Waste and Decomposition Odor Count=raci.mt ]"hig line mist ~en m~xe~ wi0a mqd r~cls wi{h t?e odor ceusing mo]ccules ~.nd aes~t~ys thu odors. The c~la rrovided by A. iRcoclor~ l~c for t~c OWD Organic Waste e.n6 Dctom~osition Odin. Counleractant chemicals i:~dicates d~at t]~: product is non-I:ox{c. ,non-flmn~:~able, cmnplete!}, bic..degmdablc, end er,~ironmemal sar:. The J:loor of the fa¢il!t,, will be dcm:ed on a regular basfs Juri~,g Jail>' Ol>;ermions in order !:o remov,_~ odor-oausm~ mater/al, No Iloo? drains wi7} be mstailcd per [.)F:C r~ ! at 0 ~S. *.0 ~lvr0id grou'ld'a n~c]' comam:nf~don. the Ca¢ili~) ,,viii not have an adverse odor impac;s on the 5urroundiug OTIqlSR V¢~.ler will l~e 'p 'er deci b~, SCWA. heavy ~arps i~ ~ccordanc'c ~ith DOT f~quil'emcl~l.5. 6 Fro_, , 532 ~98 8565 TO:6~: '765 ~1~6 P,0~38~8 t a~'~ ple;4$e:~ to r~'spond o~ belial f or Peconic Recycling a:ad T:'a~asfer Coqs, (Peconic l(ec~cl n~) i,q ;e~al'd to lh¢ con,et:m; addressed by you as the Southold Town Wasle Cooedin¢.~o?. ~n a Memorandum dated October 27. 2006 it is stated d~ere are concerns '.) ?egarding the impacts Peeo~ic Recycli~:g may have on thc lown's framework for t11eJ~:tg~llg solid waste mad 2) crmnplim~cc with DEC regulations. Pcconic R.ccyclin~ will be ha~'py 'to provide Jim Bunchuck and die Southold Town MSW racili;!, with ma5 and all i.~formatio~, oblai ~¢d by Ma~:tituck Sanitation and Peconic Recycling. The Deparlnment of En~iron~renta! Conservation requires al! Transfer m~d Recycling Facilhies operating in New York St¢:e to kee~ detailed a:~d accurate recorc's ofto~mag~, t~s of waste, a~d disi>o~a', ~ites, We ~fi¢l be happy :o su¢ply Souihold ~own wkh capics oflhcsc reports, and f~el they sl~ould be mom than adequate h~ helping thc 'I own~ develop ~ [SWMP) Solid Waste Manugement Plan. Peconi.:' Recycling ~s requi~d m receive all mandated Smie operaiug Permits bc¢)m op:mtions can begin accordh~g ~:o N¥SDEC pm' 300. '.X.;e Iooi( Sore ard to dnc Ol)?Otlunll.~ tff worbnk2 '~th 7~..u ['~d tl?e Southold Solid Wa.sic District. Please let me k~o;~, ii' .~ou ha~¢ an? que~ti¢',n,~. J,onalhan DiVe lc. Director of~ O?crations Pecor:ic Recyclit,~: & Trarls£cr Corp. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FAX COVER LETFER MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: John DiVello Fax Number: 631.298.2023 From: AmyFor(~ No. of Pages: 3 (total) Date: 3 November 2006 SC-TM #: 1000-95-2-7 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer As discussed, please find attached a copy of the memo from Jim Bunchuck regarding the above referenced application. Please contact this office should you have any questions. Thank you. October 27, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer FROM: Jim Bunchuck, Solid Waste Coordinator SUBJECT: Site Plan Application of Peconic Recycling and Transfer, SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 I am pleased to respond on behalf of the Southold Town Solid Waste Management District on the above named application, as requested. The concerns discussed below relate to 1) impacts the proposed facility may have on the Town's framework for managing solid waste and 2) compliance with DEC regulations. 1) New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) designates the Town of Southold as the Solid Waste Management Unit (SMU) for the Town of Southold. A key provision of this status is the requirement for the Town to develop a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) that explains in detail how the Town will ensure that ALL of the waste generated within the Town will be handled both in an environmentally sound manner AND in compliance with the solid waste management heirarchy as outlined in the ECL, whether or not the waste is acutally handled or managed through a Town-owned facility. In this manner, the State seeks to identify all of the waste for which the Town is potentially responsible (should private arrangements change or break down). (It is also in the Town's interest, as it is clearly relevant to Town decisions on the development of it Solid Waste program and facilities). The Town first developed its SWMP Plan in 1990 and, as per regulations, it has been updated several times (most recently in 2005) since to reflect changes in the waste stream, dcvelopments in management processes and technology, and developments/improvements in the Town's infrastructure and waste handling abilities. It is estimated that between 20% and 30% of the waste generated within the Town of Southold, primarily commercial waste and construction/demolition debris, bypasses the Cutchogue Transfer Station and is not in any way tracked by the Town. Whereas the ECL seeks input on this "missing waste" from the Town, the fact that it is destined for various out of Town facilities and does not pass through any single transfer point on its way to those facilities, makes it exceedingly difficult to track with any assurance. In short, it makes it easy to ignore. The State has therefore generally accepted Town reporting on this stream in terms of overall estimates, leaving out details on specific tonnage and destinations. The new Peconic Recycling facility, however, will be capable of providing in-Town access to not only their own customers, but to others involved in generating, hauling, and disposing of waste. As such, to stay in compliance with the ECL, the Town would be required to revise its SWMP to track waste handled at the facility. In addition to the type of waste and tonnage received, this would include sources of the waste, its destination, recycling rates and quantities, permit information from points of ultimate disposal, and other information. The Town may even be required to include information on any out of Town waste handled by Peconic Recycling. At present, the Town has no mechanism for requiring private companies to report on their waste handling and recycling practices. Most municipalities receive such information through a local permitting process, renewable annually. However, Southold does not require permits of waste handling companies that do not use the Cutchgue Transfer Station. The permits that are required are merely vehicle-specific, to allow access to the facility. Should the Town seek information from Peconic Recycling, it makes sense to take the full step and seek the same information from other companies engaged in out of Town disposal. This would avoid singling out one company for regulation and would finally allow the Town to "see" all the waste it is potentially responsible for. In addition, the resulting benefit to the Town's waste management planning efforts are obvious. 2) To the extent possible, the Town should explicitly require Peconic Recycling and Transfer to receive the necessary State operating permits and to adhere to NYSDEC Part 360 regulations for C&D transfer stations. In addition, the Town should require notification from Peconic Transfer of any change from its plans in the type and amount of waste received, and to maintain full compliance with DEC regulations pursuant to any such changes. Thank you for the opportunity to make these comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000 ~ ColYllllelltS: Page 1 of 2 Semon, Bruno From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 10:25 AM To: 'Marisa Dabreo' Cc: Terry, Mark; Corcoran, Kieran; Finnegan, Patricia; Edwards Ken (E-mail); George Solomon (E- mail); Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail); Joseph Townsend (E-mail); Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail) Subject: RE: NPV Revised report Peconic Recycling & Transfer Hi Marissa, The Planning Board held a work session on October 30, 2006 and accepted the report for distribution to the applicants agent with the following revisions: l)Removed from page 1 "Light Industrial" 2)Removed this sentence from page 5 "The Town has noise and nuisance ordinances that can be enforced should it be necessary, though this is not expected." 3)Changed the spelling from "imapcts" to "impacts" on page 4 under Potential Impacts. Attached is the file that I made the above changes to. Thanks Bruno ..... Original Hessage ..... From: Harisa Dabreo [mailto:mdabreo@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:28 PM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: RE: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Sorry Bruno, some more quick changes. I guess I did not save some of my changes. Marissa Da Breo Environmental Analyst Nelson. Pope & Voorhis. LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747 (63 I) 427-5665 ext. 172 11/1/2006 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Johathan DiVello 800 Wickham Avenue Mattimck, New York 11952 Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue NY SCTM# 1000-95-2-7 District: LIO Dear Mr. DiVello, This is to inform you that the Planning Board held a work session on October 30, 2006 to review this site plan application and the NPV report dated October 13, 2006. The Planning Board accepted this report as revised and will require supplemental information before a determination of significance. Please forward this report to your engineer to address all the items. Additionally, we are in receipt of Mattimck Sanitation Division check number 24895 for the amount of $1,200.00, please refer to the estimate attached from NPV dated October 5, 2006 for the SEQRA services. Please submit an additional amount of $50.00 made payable to the Town of $outhold. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 CC:file, Abigail A, Wickham, Esq. Enc.: NPV report, NPV estimate ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REPORT (including Part III EAF, Significance of Impacts) PECONIC RECYCLING & TRANSFER Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Prepared by: Date: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP October 13, 2006, Revised October 27, 2006 & November 1, 2006 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION: SCTM: ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAYS: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Site Plan Application 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-095 -2-7 LlO-Light Industrial Office Park NA 3.14 SITE DESCRIPTION AND RESOURCES The overall project site is located at 860 Commerce Drive, approximately 1,083 feet north of the intersection of Commeme Drive and Corporate Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 3.14-acre vacant parcel has approximately 90 feet of frontage at the terminus of Commerce Drive. The site is generally flat and is entirely covered with low shrubs. Several trails cross the property in various directions. The site is zoned LIO Light Industrial Planned Office Park, and the area surrounding the site is similarly zoned LIO and LI Light Industrial. A Town composting facility is located east of the site, beyond which are Town solid waste management facilities. The nearest residence is west of the site fronting Depot Lane and this site is also zoned LIO. There is a small residential community well to the south fronting CR 48 and this area is zoned R-40. Setbacks and potential impacts to surrounding uses are considered in more detail herein. There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within 5,000 feet of the property. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies three (3) soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following: Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8% slopes (RdB), Haven Loam, 0- 2% slopes (HaA) and Haven Loam, 2-6% slopes (HaB). The topography and soils on the site do Pecoi~/l~Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 not appear to present severe development constraints. Therefore, no significant impact on soils and topography is anticipated. A review of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2005 indicates that no water mains are located in the area of the subject property. Using typical SCDHS flow rates for an industrial building of the size proposed, it is estimated that the proposed development will use approximately 1,573 gallons of water per day based. It is anticipated that this amount will be significantly less as the proposed operation is not a water intensive use. The applicant will need to demonstrate to the SCDHS under Article 4 of the Sanitary Code, that potable water can be supplied to the site. It is expected that water supply will be provided by use of a private well. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is approximately 5 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 50 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 45 feet. The subject property is located just north of the north fork groundwater divide. The majority of the groundwater recharges vertically into the groundwater but, there is a slight horizontal component of flow which is generally toward the north and west. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the west towards the Long Island Sound. REQUESTED ACTION The proposed action involves the development of the 3.14-acre site with a 38,214 SF building that will house a recycling and transfer facility and associated office space. The application filed with the Town indicates that "Sorting & collection to be performed indoors & held on site for short periods of time for distribution to other recycling centers". This is critical to the safe, compatible operation of the facility. The application also indicates solid waste generation in the amount of 1,060 cubic yards (cy) per month. Part of the information contained in the Part I EAF indicates that topsoil will be reutilized for landscape berms, a feature which will assist with visual and land use compatibility. Two (2) large scales that will be utilized by entering trucks will be located along the western property boundary. Twenty (20) track parking stalls and 12 car parking stalls are planned. One (1) curb cut in the eastern property boundary will connect to the adjacent, vacant property. The site will be accessible via a gated entrance point located at the northern terminus of Commerce Drive. A series of stormwater leaching pools will collect runoff generated by the property. The development will be required to use water supplied by the SCWA and a septic system will be provided which will need approval from the SCDHS. The perimeter of the property will be landscaped with evergreens and shrubs. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The Applicant has provided the following forms which comply with the Toxvn's Site Plan Application submission requirements: · Site Plan application form Page 2 Fee · Long environmental assessment form · Site plan · Certified survey · Construction Plans/elevations Peco~l~Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 A Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) Consistency Assessment Form was also provided. ENVIRONMETAL ASSESSMENT FORM The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further information or analysis: · The proposed coverages provided do not correspond to site acreage. · Soil types identified on the subject property are not provided. · No parking space information is provided. · Building dimensions are not provided. · Linear frontage along a public roadway is not indicated. · Number of jobs generated during construction seems too high and no amount is provided for after completion. · Applicant should identify how solid waste generation amount was calculated. Additionally, the solid waste that will be generated by the facility and where the material will be disposed should be provided. · The anticipated water usage appears to be incorrect. The applicant should use Suffolk County Department of Health Services Flow rates to calculate water usage. · The type(s) of permit that are to be requested from the DEC should be noted, and in particular if a DEC Part 360 Solid Waste Facility permit will be required. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further or update information or analysis: · Gross square footage provided on the application is not consistent with plan. Percentage of lot coverage is, therefore, not correct. · The site plan should indicate water usage and sanitary calculations. Page 3 Peco~T~Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part II Environmental Assessment form (EAF) has been completed for the proposed action. Potential large impacts are noted as follows: · Potential traffic impacts · Potential odor impacts · Potential noise impacts · Potential visual impacts Other small to moderate impacts are identified in the Part II EAF analysis of the significance of impacts are noted as follows: · Potential groundwater impacts · Potentialland useimpacts PART III EAF - SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION This section provides a Part III narrative to consider the significance/magnitude of mitigation and how modifications in the project or mitigation can be used to ensure that an impact does not occur or that it is not significant. TRAFFIC Proposed project will result in an increase of large trucks on Middle Road (CR 48), Depot Lane, Corporate Road and Commerce Drive. The trucks will enter the site loaded with solid waste, unload waste in the building and leave the site. Additionally, sorted material will be stored on- site and removed periodically resulting in additional truck traffic. The majority of the traffic entering and exiting the site will utilize the flashing light-controlled intersection at Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The Town Engineer reviewed the proposed project and in a memo dated August 7, 2006 asked that the large vehicle scales be moved from adjacent to the fight of way to avoid congestion on Commerce Drive. The plans were revised and the scales moved to an interior location. Traffic impacts from the proposed project can be lessened by: Tmck parking stalls provided on the site that will reduce congestion on Commerce Drive. The location of the scales to an interior location will reduce stacking on Commerce dave. On August 30, 2006, the SCDPW reviewed this development and indicated a permit is not required. They stated that" find that no additional improvement within the County right of way in the vicinity of this site is required". This impact is not considered significant for the following reasons: · The Town Engineer has reviewed the site plan and provided comments which have been addrcsscd. · The existing road system appears adequate to handle traffic from land uses in the area. · The site is part of an approved subdivision in an L10 zone; additional industrial related traffic has been anticipated in connection with this site and the overall subdivision. Page 4 Pecon~ Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 The site and area are zoned for industrial use; the proposed project and other LIO uses which could occupy the site would all involve some degree of truck and industrial use traffic. ODOR AND NOISE it is anticipated that odors will emanate from the solid waste being transported to the site and from the trucks themselves through exhaust. Additionally, the trucks will produce noise. Odor and noise impacts can be lessened by: · Material being transported to and from the site should be covered with plastic or other appropriate material. · Unloading and sorting will be conducted in the building limiting odors to surrounding uses. · Tracks being unloaded and those waiting to be processed will be expected to turn their engines off thereby reducing the impacts of exhaust odors and noise. · Perimeter landscaping will reduce noise impacts to the surrounding uses. · The facility will operate during normal working hours which will reduce noise and odor impacts to surrounding residences when individuals are at home. The applicant's EAF Part I indicates "Noise from payloaders & commercial traffic similar to Town facility located adjacent to subject property". This is a fair statement and is considered in the context of this analysis. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. Recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with good solid waste management initiatives. Significant odors are not expected since small loads of waste will be sorted and boxed and held on site temporarily before shipping to disposal or other markets. Sorting occurs indoors and therefore impacts will be localized. There are no nearby residential uses, the nearest residence is over 275 feet to the west of the west property line and is in an LIO zone. No other receptors are nearby, and it is expected that the area will become occupied by other industrial uses in accordance with zoning. The site is next to a Town compost facility to the east, beyond which is the Towns MSW facility. Solid waste facilities exist in the area at present, and the proposed use is not out of character with these uses in terms of noise generating potential, particularly since operations will be conducted indoors. Noise and odor impacts are not expected to be significant based on the following considerations: · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · There are no residential receptors within 275 feet of the west property line, where there is one home on an industrially zoned site. · Activities will be conducted indoors and containerized sorted materials and waste will be on site on a temporary basis before being shipped to disposal or market. Page 5 Pecofi'ff Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 VISUAL The proposed structure will be noticeable from surrounding areas and roadways including, Commerce Drive, Corporate Road, Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The lighting plan has been designed to ensure that lighting is cast downward and only illuminates the subject site. The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the project and in a document dated August 3, 2006 recommended specific architectural features and color. Visual impacts can be lessened by: · The use of landscaping around the perimeter of the property. The site plan includes a landscaping schedule. · Specific color, exterior finishing and landscaping as recommended by the ARC to reduce the visual impact of the structure. The proposed use is for an industrial site in an industrial area. While the site may be visible from CR 48, it will not be unlike other solid waste management facilities currently operating in the area. No significant impact to visual resources is expected to occur based on the following reasons: · The ARC review for color, texture and architecture will ensure that visual/aesthetic issues are addressed. · Landscape materials and berming will help "soften" the structural improvements on the site. · The site is setback over 2,500 feet from CR 48 and over 500 feet from Depot Lane. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. GROUNDWATER Solid waste sorting on site could potentially release groundwater contaminants; however, the operation and regulations should be understood to assess the significance of this impact. First, the use must conform to Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for sanitary flow density. This is determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) who will review and approve the site plan. Potential impacts with respect to groundwater can be lessened by the following methods: · The "tipping" floor should be a sealed concrete floor with no cracks or floor drains and repaired / maintained as necessary. · The concrete slab should pitch inward, not toward the door. · All tipping and sorting operations should be conducted indoors. · Solid waste containers should be inspected before being "tipped". · Spill control tools should be available such as speedi-dry, absorbant pads and other control materials. · Site personnel should be trained in spill response, and the NYSDEC spill hotline number should be posted and part of the training. · The facility should institute an on-call contract with a licensed scavenger. · No liquid materials should be stored outdoors; should any be encountered, they should be separated, retained in doors and rcmoved by a licensed scavenger after testing and identification. Page 6 ml~cR 1 Peconlc ecyc ing & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 In terms of potential for impacts, significant groundwater impacts are not expected for the following reasons: · The measures noted above should be implemented, as these are standard methods of the industry. · The floor will be of sealed concrete with no floor drains and pitched toward the interior of the building. · All operations will be conducted indoors. · SCDHS prohibits discharge under Article 12 of the SCSC and County inspectors maintain records and inspections of industrial facilities. LAND USE The proposed project is located in a Light Industrial/Planned Office Park (LIO) zoning district. Adjoining property to the north and south are similarly zoned. Light Industrial zoning districts are located south and north of the subject property. Farmland, a compost facility, Town landfill and solid waste facility and commemial uses are located in the area of the subject property. One non-conforming residential structure is located approximately 275 feet to the west along Depot Lane. The next closest residential area, zoned R-40, is located approximately 1,400 feet to the east. Land use impacts are not expected based on the following reasons: · All operations will be conducted indoors. · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. The Town of Southold Solid Waste Coordinator has reviewed the application and has provided the following input: New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) designates the Town of Southold as the Solid Waste Management Unit (SMU) for the Town of Southold. A key provision of this status is the requirement for the Town to develop a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) that explains in detail how the Town will ensure that ALL of the waste generated within the Town will be handled both in an environmentally sound manner AND in compliance with the solid waste management hierarchy as outlined in the ECL, whether or not the waste is' actually handled or managed through a Town-owned facility. In this manner, the State seeks to identify all of the waste for which the Town is potentially responsible (should private arrangements change or break down). (It is also in the Town's interest, as it is clearly relevant to Town decisions on the development of it Solid Waste program and facilities). The Town first developed its SWMP Plan in 1990 and, as per regulations, it has been updated several times (most recently in 2005) since to reflect changes in the waste stream, developments in management processes and technology, and developments/improvements in the Town's infrastructure and waste handling abilities. It is estimated that between 20% and 30% of the waste generated within the Town of Southold, primarily commercial waste and construction/demolition debris, bypasses the Cutchogue Transfer Station and is not in any way tracked by the Town. Whereas the ECL seeks input on this "missing waste" from the Town, the fact that it is destined for various out of Town facilities and does not pass through any single transfer point on its way to those facilities, makes it exceedingly difficult to track with any assurance. In short, it makes it easy to ignore. The State has therefore Page 7 Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 generally accepted Town reporting on this stream in terms of overall estimates, leaving out details on specific tonnage and destinations. The new Peconic Recycling facility, however, will be capable of providing in-Town access to not only their own customers, but to others involved in generating, hauling, and disposing of waste. As such, to stay in compliance with the ECL, the Town would be required to revise its SWMP to track waste handled at the facility. In addition to the type of waste and tonnage received, this would include sources of the waste, its destination, recycling rates and quantities, permit information from points of ultimate disposal, and other information. The Town may even be required to include information on any out of Town waste handled by Peconic Recycling. At present, the Town has no mechanism for requiring private companies to report on their waste handling and recycling practices. Most municipalities receive such information through a local permitting process, renewable annually. However, Southold does not require permits of waste handling companies that do not use the Cutchgue Transfer Station. The permits that are required are merely vehicle-specific, to allow access to the facility. Should the Town seek information from Peconic Recycling, it makes sense to take the full step and seek the same information from other companies engaged in out of Town disposal. This would avoid singling out one company for regulation and would finally allow the Town to "see" all the waste it is potentially responsible for. In addition, the resulting benefit to the Town's waste management planning efforts are obvious. To the extent possible, the Town should explicitly require Peconic Recycling and Transfer to receive the necessary State operating permits and to adhere to NYSDEC Part 360 regulations for C&D transfer stations. In addition, the Town should require notification from Peconic Transfer of any change from its plans in the type and amount of waste received, and to maintain full compliance with DEC regulations pursuant to any such changes. RECOMMENDATIONS · The applicant should address discrepancies and requested information identified herein which the Planning Board feels is important. · The Part I EAF was reviewed and a Part II EAF has been completed and attached. A Part III assessment of the significance of impacts has been completed. The applicant should provide any additional materials which the Board feels are necessary to determine the significance of the action, and once satisfied the sufficient information is available, the Planning Board should issue a Determination of Significance. · Receive approval from the Southold Town Board Under Town Code Section 211. Where the applicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center Permit for this proposed use. From a philosophical standpoint as well as for environmental management and waste reduction goals, recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with the good solid waste management initiatives. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. If the Planning Board is in agreement, the action does not appear to rise to the level of requiring a Draft Environmental hnpact Statement, and it is expected that a Negative Declaration could be justified for consideration by the Board based on the analysis and weighing of issues conducted as part of this report in addition to review and deliberation of the action by the Planning Board members, staff and advisors. Page 8 Page 2 of 2 Fax: (631 ) 427-5620 From: Semon, Bruno [mailto:Bruno. Semon@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:24 PM To.' Marisa Dabreo Subject: RE: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Thank You ..... Original Message ..... From: Harisa Dabreo [mailto:mdabreo@nelsonpope.corn] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:15 PM To: Semon, Bruno Subject.' Peconic Recycling & Transfer Bruno, the revised review is attached. I incorporated the comments of the solid waste coordinator. Let me know if this is sufficient. Marissa Da Breo }!nvirnmnenlal Anal}st Nelson. Pope & Voorhis, 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY ] 1747 (631 ) 427-5665 ext. 172 }"ax: (631 ) ,127-5620 11/1/2006 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REPORT (including Part III EAF, Significance of Impacts) ~,PECONIC RECYCLING & TRANSFER '~ Preparedjbr: Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 555 Madison Avenue, 12th Floor, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP Date: October 13, 2006 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION: SCTM: ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAYS: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Site Plan Application 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suftblk 1000-095-2-7 LIO-Light Industrial Office Park NA 3.14 SITE DESCRIPTION AND RESOURCES The overall project site is located at 860 Commerce Drive, approximately 1,083 feet north of the intersection of Commerce Drive and Corporate Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 3.14-acre vacant parcel has approximately 90 feet of frontage at the terminus of Commerce Drive. The site is generally flat and is entirely covered with low shrubs. Several trails cross the property in various directions. The site is zoned LIO Light Industrial/Planned Office Park, and the area surrounding the site is similarly zoned LIO. A Town composting facility is located east of the site, beyond which are Town solid waste management facilities. The nearest residence is west of the site fronting Depot Lane and this site is also zoned LIO. There is a small residential community well to the south fronting CR 48 and this area is zoned R- 40. Setbacks and potential impacts to surrounding uses are considered in more detail herein. Peconic l~cycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within 5,000 feet of the property. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies three (3) soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following: Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8% slopes (RdB), Haven Loam, 0- 2% slopes (HaA) and Haven Loam, 2-6% slopes (HaB). The topography and soils on the site do not appear to present severe development constraints. Therefore, no significant impact on soils and topography is anticipated. A review of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2005 indicates that no water mains are located in the area of the subject property. Using typical SCDHS flow rates for an industrial building of the size proposed, it is estimated that the proposed development will use approximately 1,573 gallons of water per day based, it is anticipated that this amount will be significantly less as the proposed operation is not a water intensive use. The applicant will need to demonstrate to the SCDHS under Article 4 of the Sanitary Code, that potable water can be supplied to the site. It is expected that water supply will be provided by use ora private well. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site approximately 5 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 50 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 45 feet. The subject property is located just north of the north fork groundwater divide. The majority of the groundwater recharges vertically into the groundwater but, there is a slight horizontal component of flow which is generally toward the north and west. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the west towards the Long Island Sound. REQUESTED ACTION The proposed action involves the development of the 3.14-acre site with a 38,214 SF building that will house a recycling and transfer facility and associated office space. The application filed with the Town indicates that "Sorting & collection to be performed indoors & held on site for short periods of time for distribution to other recycling centers". This is critical to the safe, compatible operation of the facility. The application also indicates solid waste generation in the amount of 1,060 cubic yards (cy) per month. Part of the information contained in the Part I EAF indicates that topsoil will be reutilized for landscape berms, a feature which will assist with visual and land use compatibility. Two (2) large scales that will be utilized by entering tracks will be located along the western property boundary. Twenty (20) truck parking stalls and 12 car parking stalls are planned. One (1) curb cut in the eastern property boundary will co~mect to the adjacent, vacant property. The site will be accessible via a gated entrance point located at the northern terminus of Commerce Drive. A series of stormwater leaching pools will collect runoff generated by the property. The development will use well water and a septic system will be provided both of which will need approval from the SCDHS. The perimeter of the property will be landscaped with evergreens and shrubs. Page 2 Peconic K'Ecycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 SITE PLAN APPLICATION The Applicant has provided the following forms which comply with the Town's Site Plan Application submission requirements: · Site Plan application form · Fee · Long environmental assessment form · Site plan · Certified survey A Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) Consistency Assessment Form was also provided. ENVIRONMETAL ASSESSMENT FORM The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further information or analysis: · The proposed coverages provided do not correspond to site acreage. · Soil types identified on the subject property are not provided. · No parking space information is provided. · Building dimensions are not provided. · Linear frontage along a public roadway is not indicated. · Number of jobs generated during construction seems too high and no amount is provided for after completion. · Applicant should identify how solid ~vaste generation amount was calculated. Additionally, the solid waste that will be generated by the facility and where the material will be disposed should be provided. · The anticipated water usage appears to be incorrect. The applicant should use Suffolk County Department of Health Services Flow rates to calculate water usage. · The type(s) of permit that are to be requested from the DEC should be noted, and in particular if a DEC Part 360 Solid Waste Facility permit will be required. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further or update information or analysis: · Gross square footage provided on the application is not consistent ~vith plan. Percentage of lot coverage is, therefore, not correct. · The site plan should indicate water usage and sanitary calculations. Page 3 Peconic R~cycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part II Environmental Assessment form (EAF) has been completed for the proposed action. Potential large imapcts are noted as follows: · Potential traffic impacts · Potential odor impacts · Potentialnoise impacts · Potential visual impacts Other small to moderate impacts are identified in the Part II EAF analysis of the significance of impacts are noted as follows: · Potential groundwater impacts · Potential land use impacts PART III EAF - SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION This section provides a Part iii narrative to consider the significance/magnitude of mitigation and how modifications in the project or mitigation can be used to ensure that an impact does not occur or that it is not significant. TRAFFIC Proposed project will result in an increase of large trucks on Middle Road (CR 48), Depot Lane, Corporate Road and Commerce Drive. The trucks will enter the site loaded with solid waste, unload waste in the building and leave the site. Additionally, sorted material will be stored on- site and removed periodically to the adjacent town solid waste facility resulting in additional truck traffic. The majority of the traffic entering and exiting the site will utilize the light- controlled intersection at Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The Town Engineer reviewed the proposed project and in a memo dated August 7, 2006 asked that the large vehicle scales be moved from adjacent to the right of way to avoid congestion on Commerce Drive. The plans were revised and the scales moved to an interior location. Traffic impacts from the proposed project can be lessened by: · Truck parking stalls provided on the site that ~vill reduce congestion on Commerce Drive. · The location of the scales to an interior location will reduce stacking on Commerce drive. This impact is not considered significant for the following reasons: · The Town Engineer has reviewed the site plan and provided comments which have been addressed. · The existing road system appears adequate to handle traffic from land uses in the area. · The site is part of an approved subdivision in an LIO zone; additional industrial related traffic has been anticipated in connection with this site and the overall subdivision. · The site and area are zoned for industrial use; the proposed project and other L10 uses which could occupy the site would all involve some degree of truck and industrial use traffic. Page 4 Peconic R~ycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 ODOR AND NOISE It is anticipated that odors will emanate from the solid waste being transported to the site and from the trucks themselves through exhaust. Additionally, the trucks will produce noise. Odor and noise impacts can be lessened by: · Material being transported to and from the site should be covered with plastic or other appropriate material. · Unloading and sorting will be conducted in the building limiting odors to surrounding uses. · Trucks being unloaded and those waiting to be processed will be expected to turn their engines off thereby reducing the impacts of exhaust odors and noise. · Perimeter landscaping will reduce noise impacts to the surrounding uses. · The facility will operate during normal working hours which will reduce noise and odor impacts to surrounding residences when individuals are at home. The applicant's EAF Part I indicates "Noise from payloaders & commercial traffic similar to Town facility located adjacent to subject property". This is a fair statement and is considered in the context of this analysis. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. Recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with good solid waste management initiatives. Significant odors are not expected since small loads of waste will be sorted and boxed and held on site temporarily before shipping to disposal or other markets. Sorting occurs indoors and therefore impacts will be localized. There are no nearby residential uses, the nearest residence is over 275 feet to the west of the west property line and is in an LIO zone. No other receptors are nearby, and it is expected that the area ~vill become occupied by other industrial uses in accordance with zoning. The site is next to a Town compost facility to the east, beyond which is the Towns MSW facility. Solid ~vaste facilities exist in the area at present, and the proposed use is not out of character with these uses in terms of noise generating potential, particularly since operations will be conducted indoors. Noise and odor impacts are not expected to be significant based on the following considerations: · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · The Town has noise and nuisance ordinances that can be enforced should it be necessary, though this is not expected. · There are no residential receptors within 275 feet of the west property line, where there is one home on an industrially zoned site. · Activities will be conducted indoors and containerized sorted materials and waste will be on site on a temporary basis before being shipped to disposal or market. Page 5 Peconic R~cycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 VISUAL The proposed structure will be noticeable from surrounding areas and roadways including, Commerce Drive, Corporate Road, Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The lighting plan has been designed to ensure that lighting is cast downward and only illuminates the subject site. The Architectural Revise Committee (ARC) has reviewed the project and in a document dated August 3, 2006 recommended specific architectural features and color. Visual impacts can be lessened by: · The use of landscaping around the perimeter of the property. The site plan includes a landscaping schedule. · Specific color, exterior finishing and landscaping as recommended by the ARC to reduce the visual impact of the structure. The proposed use is for an industrial site in an industrial area. While the site may be visible from CR 48, it will not be unlike other solid waste management facilities currently operating in the area. No significant impact to visual resources is expected to occur based on the following reasons: · The ARC review for color, texture and architecture will ensure that visual/aesthetic issues are addressed. · Landscape materials and berming will help "soften" the structural improvements on the site. · The site is setback over 2,500 feet from CR 48 and over 500 feet from Depot Lane. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. GROUNDWATER Solid waste sorting on site could potentially release groundwater contaminants; however, the operation and regulations should be understood to assess the significance of this impact. First, the use must conform to Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for sanitary flow density. This is determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) who will review and approve the site plan. Potential impacts with respect to groundwater can be lessened by the following methods: · The "tipping" floor should be a sealed concrete floor with no cracks or floor drains. · The concrete slab should pitch inward, not toward the door. · All tipping and sorting operations should be conducted indoors. · Solid waste containers should be inspected before being "tipped". · Spill control tools should be available such as speedi-dry, absorbant pads and other control materials. · Site personnel should be trained in spill response, and the NYSDEC spill hotline number should be posted and part of the training. · The facility should institute an on-call contract with a licensed scavenger. · No liquid materials should be stored outdoors; should any be encountered, they should be separated, retained in doors and removed by a licensed scavenger after testing and identification. Page 6 Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 In terms of potential for impacts, significant groundwater impacts are not expected for the following reasons: · The measures noted above should be implemented, as these are standard methods of the industry. · The floor will be of sealed concrete with no floor drains and pitched toward the interior of the building. · All operations will be conducted indoors. · SCDHS prohibits discharge under Article 12 of the SCSC and County inspectors maintain records and inspections of industrial facilities. LAND USE The proposed project is located in a Light Industrial/Planned Office Park (LIO) zoning district. Adjoining property to the north and south are similarly zoned. Light Industrial zoning districts are located south and north of the subject property. Farmland, a compost facility, Town landfill and solid waste facility and commercial uses are located in the area of the subject property. One non-conforming residential structure is located approximately 275 feet to the west along Depot Lane. The next closest residential area, zoned R-40, is located approximately 1,400 feet to the east. Land use impacts are not expected based on the following reasons: · All operations will be conducted indoors. · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. RECOMMENDATIONS The applicant should address discrepancies and requested information identified herein which the Planning Board feels is important. The Part I EAF was reviewed and a Part II EAF has been completed and attached. A Part III assessment of the significance of impacts has been completed. The applicant should provide any additional materials which the Board feels are necessary to determine the significance of the action, and once satisfied the sufficient information is available, the Planning Board should issue a Determination of Significance. From a philosophical standpoint as well as for environmental management and waste reduction goals, recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with the good solid waste management initiatives. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. If the Planning Board is in agreement, the action does not appear to hse to the level of requiring a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and it is expected that a Negative Declaration could be justified for consideration by the Board based on the analysis and weighing of issues conducted as part of this report in addition to review and deliberation of the action by the Planning Board members, staff and advisors. Page 7 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Camfuily) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an exper[ environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generaliy applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are i[lustretive and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question, The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, shod term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2, If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1, d identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further, e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3~ f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? .o [] YES [] Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length}, or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%, Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (ie, rock or soil) per year. [] [] ~Yes ~No [] [] I-I Yes r-l.o [] [] I-i Yea r-l.o [] [] r Yes r No Page 11 of 21 Construction or expansion of a santary landfill, Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: IProject will alter 3.14 acres o1' currently vacant, vegetated land. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) Specific land forms: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change r-"lyes [] No []Yes []No E]Yes []No [] []Yes Impact on Water Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Ar[icles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [~]NO F]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material [rom channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: [] [] F'] Yes F~No [] [] [-']Yes F'~No [] [] [] [] r~Yes []No []Yes []No Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] r-]Yes [] No []Yes []No []Yes []No Page 12 of 21 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] E]Yee I-I.o [] [] E~Yes E]No [] l'il'iYes l'iN° [] [] l.iYes E]No [] [] CYea C.e [] l'i~Yes DNo [] [] OYes 0.o [] [] OYes 0.o [] [] OYes •No [] [] OYes C~No [] [] OYes ON• Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? E]"O I--lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion, Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns, Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: I, [] [] ~Yes r"~ No [] [] r-lyes E3~o [] [] r-lYes [] [] r-'lYes E]No [] [] F-'lYes C]No IMPACT ON AIR Will Proposed Action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour, Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: IOdors [] [] E~Yes E]No [] [] E~] Yes F'~No [] [] r-]Yes ~ [] [~]Yes r-]No [] [] rq¥~ E].o [] [] [~Yes r-lHo will emanate from trucks and the solid waste that they will be transporting IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? []NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. [] [] ~"] Yes [~]No Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: 1 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change r"] Yes C~No r'~ Yes []No []Yes r"~ No Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation~ Other impacts: IMPACT ON AGRiCULTURAl. LAND RESOURCES f 0. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? [] NO ~ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. [] [] OYes •No [] [] OYes NNo [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ]Yes []No ]Yes []No []No [].o Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e,g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Wilt Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in Section 617.20~ Appendix B.) £xamples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or proiect components obviously different from or in sharp oontrest to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: IProject will be visible from surrounding area and adjaceet roadways 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change r-]Yes []No ]Yes [] No ]Yes [] No []Yes []No []Yes r-]No [~Yes [] No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. [] [] [] [] [] [] ]Yes [] No []Yes [].o Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: 1 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Yes []No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? [] NO F1YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: I [] [] OYes ~No [] •Yee I--IN• [] [] [OYes 0.o IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617,14(g)? []NO []YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation cf the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] DYes r~No E]Yes []No D-lYes E]No []Yes r"l N o []Yes []No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [].o [] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. [] []Yes []No Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. []Yes [] No []Yes []No Other impacts: I 17 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [].oI~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day), Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: Page 18 of 21 [] [] [] [] [] Yes [] No [] []Yes []NO [] [] [] [] [] []Yes []No [] BYes I~.o [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. [] [] Other impacts: [] [] Large vehicles will utilize OR 48, Depot Lane and Commerce Drive once project is complete IMPACT ON ENERGY 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 1 8. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? rcl.o Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste, Other impacts: ! [] [] [] [] [] ~Yes ~No [] r'~Yes r~No [] ~Yes r'~No [] C]¥es [].o [] r~Yes E]No IMPACT ON GROW'rH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals, Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use, Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ~¥es r-l.o [] []Yes []No [] ~Yes ~No [] r~Yes [~No [] ~Yes ~No [] r~Yes []No Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employmenL Other impacts: I 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change O [] OYes •No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated, Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Pad 2: Briefly describe the impact, 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s), 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: The probability of the impact occurring The duration of the impact Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value Whether the impact can or will be controlled The regional consequence of the impact Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 ~ NF=LE~ON, I~OF~F= ~, VOOF~HIS, LLC; October 5, 2006 Bruno Semon Town of Southold Town lq'all Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Town of Southold, SEQRA Review Peconic Recycling Proposal for Services Dear Bruno: Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with the SEQRA review of the above referenced project The following services and fees are proposed: 1. Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics. 2. Review Project Plan. 3. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form. 4. Prepare Paxt H Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Prepare detailed environmental planning review of the subject application. Fee: $1,250.00 6. Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application. 7. Prepared recommended dctermination of significance (ff requested by Board). Fee: Time Rates Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call should you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, October 27, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer FROM: Jim Bunchuck, Solid Waste Coordinator SUBJECT: Site Plan Application of Peconic Recycling and Transfer, SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 I am pleased to respond on behalf of the Southold Town Solid Waste Management District on the above named application, as requested. The concerns discussed below relate to 1) impacts the proposed facility may have on the Town's framework for managing solid waste and 2) compliance with DEC regulations. 1) New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) designates the Town of Southold as the Solid Waste Management Unit (SMU) for the Town of Southold. A key provision of this status is the requirement for the Town to develop a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) that explains in detail how the Town will ensure that ALL of the waste generated within the Town will be handled both in an environmentally sound manner AND in compliance with the solid waste management heirarchy as outlined in the ECL, whether or not the waste is acutally handled or managed through a Town-owned facility. In this manner, the State seeks to identify all of the waste for which the Town is potentially responsible (should private arrangements change or break down). (It is also in the Town's interest, as it is clearly relevant to Town decisions on the development of it Solid Waste program and facilities). The Town first developed its SWMP Plan in 1990 and, as per regulations, it has been updated several times (most recently in 2005) since to reflect changes in thc waste stream, developments in management processes and technology, and developments/improvements in the Town's infrastructure and waste handling abilities. It is estimated that between 20% and 30% of the waste generated within the Town of Southold, primarily commercial waste and construction/demolition debris, bypasses the Cutchogue Transfer Station and is not in any way tracked by the Town. Whereas the ECL seeks input on this "missing waste" from the Town, the fact that it is destined for various out of Town facilities and does not pass through any single transfer point on its way to those facilities, makes it exceedingly difficult to track with any assurance, in short, it makes it easy to ignore. The State has therefore generally accepted Town reporting on this stream in terms of overall estimates, leaving out details on specific tonnage and destinations. The new Peconic Recycling facility, however, will be capable of providing in-Town access to not only their own customers, but to others involved in gcncrating, hauling, and disposing of waste. As such, to stay in compliance with the ECL, the Town would be rcquircd to revise its SWMP to track waste handled at the facility. In addition to the type of waste and tonnage received, this would include sources of the waste, its destination, recycling rates and quantities, permit information from points of ultimate disposal, and other information. The Town may even be required to include information on any out of Town waste handled by Peconic Recycling. At present, the Town has no mechanism for requiring private companies to report on their waste handling and recycling practices. Most municipalities receive such information through a local permitting process, renewable annually. However, Southold does not require permits of waste handling companies that do not use the Cutchgue Transfer Station. The permits that are required are merely vehicle-specific, to allow access to the facility. Should the Town seek information from Peconic Recycling, it makes sense to take the full step and seek the same information from other companies engaged in out of Town disposal. This would avoid singling out one company for regulation and would finally allow the Town to "see" all the waste it is potentially responsible for. In addition, the resulting benefit to the Town's waste management planning efforts are obvious. 2) To the extent possible, the Town should explicitly require Peconic Recycling and Transfer to receive the necessary State opcrating permits and to adhere to NYSDEC Part 360 regulations for C&D transfer stations. In addition, the Town should require notification from Peconic Transfer of any change from its plans in the type and amount of waste received, and to maintain full compliance with DEC regulations pursuant to any such changes. Thank you for the opportunity to make these comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Page 1 of 1 Semon, Bruno To: Terry, Mark; Ford, Amy Cc: PB Members Only; Finnegan, Patricia; Corcoran, Kieran; Krauza, Lynne Subject: FW: Peconic Transfer-Memo From Jim Bunchuck Attached is memo which I received from Jim Bunchuck. It will be placed in the site plan file and incorporated in the NPV report for the SEQR review. This is to keep you up to date on the above referenced file. Please advise me if you have any comments or concerns about the attached information. Thanks Bruno ..... Original Message ..... From." Bunchuck, Jim Sent." Friday, October 27, 2006 t1:55 AM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: Peconic Transfer Hi Bruno: Attached are my comments as we discussed. I'm avail. Next week to discuss. Let me know if you need the hard copy. Jim Jim 10/31/2006 Page 1 of l Semon, Bruno To: PB Members Only Subject: FW:FYI Note from Mark Terry to Jim Bunchuck Peconic Transfer and Recycling This FYI on Peconic Transfer Station. Thanks Bruno ..... Original Hessage ..... From: Terry, Hark Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:39 AM To: Bunchuck, Jim Cc: Finnegan, Patricia; Corcoran, Kieran; Semon, Bruno Subject: Peconic Transfer and Recycling Jim, I have recently compiled a list of concerns with the proposal re the Peconic Transfer and Recycling application. One concern is that the definition for Scavenger Waste does not permit the processing of "municipal recyclables" (see definition below). Do you have an idea what the terminology refers too? My concern is that the application specifically states a recycling use. As you are aware the DEC regulates all of the waste differently, and frankly, I am still unclear just what waste materials the applicant expects to process. Also the application states public use. Do you have any insight of the potential issues which may arise regarding allowing commercial truck and public passenger vehicle uses? Do you want to discuss other concerns? § 211-1. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the terms used herein are defined as follows: SALVAGE CENTER -- Any location where a private collection of items, exclusive of municipal recyclables, is gathered, reused, recycled, reclaimed and processed for eventual disposal off site. Please call me with any questions. Mark T. 10/31/2006 ~LANNING BOARD MEMBERS 3ERILYN B. WOODI~iOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSE?H L. TOWNSEND October 17, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING Al)DRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCzX_TI ON: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Jonathan DiVello Peconic Recycling 800 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 Dear Mr. DiVello: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 16, 2006: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue, SCTM# 1000-95.-2-7; and WHEREAS, Under Town Code Section 211, the applicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center permit by the Southold Town Board prior to the Planning Board granting approval of the site plan; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHERE,~S, on October 13, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board has not accepteCthe Environmental Review Report received from Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act is performing a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency. Peconic Recycling & Transfer Paqe Two October 17, 2006 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, dhouse Chairperson Enc. cc; Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Office of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw ERIC J. BP, I!SSI.ER ABIGAIl; A. WI('KI lAM IYNNI M. GORDON JANI I GEASA lAX3, OFFIC['S WICKI lAM. BRESSLER. GORDON & GF, ASA. P.C. 13015 M\IN ReAl). P.() BOX 1424 Mx,I I[[I K'K. lONG ISLAND NJ\~. xr()RK 11952 631-298-8353 I III1.\XNO. 631-298-8565 ~ x~ blaw ~caol.com Wll I lAM WICKIIAM (06-02} 275 BP, OAD I tO[.LO~,~ ROAD %[Jill' Ill M}LVI[[[~, NE~ YORK 11747 631-249-9480 I[ I ['lAX NO 631-249-9484 October 16. 2006 Attn: Bruno %onion Southold Town Plamfing Board Post Olt~ce Box 1179:53095 Main Road Southold. Ncw York 11971 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp. Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, NY Lot 8, North Fork Industrial Park Dear Bruno: Please bc a&ised that I have been retained b? Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp. to represent them in connection with this site plan application. They will also continue with Jonathan DiVello as their agent. Thank you for your time on l:rida} to review the lile. 30 :~hdph l Submission Without a Covet' Letter SCTM#: 1000- 0 5 - ~--/ Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000 Date: [ ~)/ 10)/ Comments: NELE~ON, POPE ~, VOOI~HIS. LLC BmllO S~moi1 Town of Snnthold Tow~ Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Octobef~5, 2006~-~:~7~ Town of Southold, SEQRA Pecoulc Recycling Proposal for Services Dear Brano: Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with the SEQRA review of the above referenced project. The following services and fees are proposed: 1. Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics. 2. Review Project Plan. 3. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form. 4. Prepare Part 11 Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Prepare detailed environmental planning review of the subject application. Fee: $1,250.00 6. Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application. 7. Prepared recommended detarmination of si~tmificance (ff requested by Board). Fee: Time Rates Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel flee to call should you have any questions. Respectfiffiy submitted, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: October 5, 2006 From: Re: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jarn/e Richter, Town Engineer Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator Bnmo Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer(,~ Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM# (s) 1000-96.-1-1.8 Zone: LIO (Light Industrial Office) Status: In SEQRA and would like to issue a determination at the October 16, 2006 public heating. Required Return Date: The Planning Department requires comments on or before 10/16/06. This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,08Y n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Conunerce Drive in Cutchogue. In reference to the above, attached you will find revised site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site plan enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan revised 9/14/06. Timothy J Hopkins General Counsel SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 (631) 563-0236 Fax (631) 563-0370 September 28, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NV 11971 Re; Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM# 1000-95-2-7 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: I would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the EAF agplication-for the above referenced project. Asstaning the facility is connected to public water service, both the domestic and fire line service will require the installation ofbackflow prevention devices prior to tap. They will also be required to have all of the paperwork filed by a l;censed engineer to ~2,CWA as well as the Suflblk County Department of Health Services. If the applicant has any questions with regard to this process, they may contact Donna Stein, RPZ Supervisor at 631-563-0244. Very truly yours, Kimberly Kennedy Assistant to General Counsel PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H~ SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDPdESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 FAX COVER LETYER To: John DiVello Fax Number: 631.298.2023 From: Amy Ford ~ No. of Pages: 2 (total) Date: 21 September 2006 SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer As discussed, please find attached a copy of the adopted Town Board resolution regarding the bond amount for the Tide Group subdivision. Please contact this office should you have any questions. Thank you. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 23 OF 2005 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON JANUARY 18, 2005: RESOLVED that thc Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves the letter of credit number 3330001013 in the amount of $99~000.00 of the North Fork Bank on the account of Tide Group~ Inc. for the completion of highways and other improvements in the North Fork Industrial Park subdivision SCTM# 1000-96-01-01 located at the northeast comer of County Road 48 and Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York, as recommended by the Southold Town Planning Board and the Town Engineer, subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN 13. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPHL. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 FAX COVER LETTER To: Jotm DiVello From: Amy Ford Date: ~ Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Fax Number: 631.298.2023 No. of Pages: 2 (total) SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 As discussed, please find attached a copy of the draft minutes of the Architectural Review Committee from their meeting on September 14, 2006. The Planning Board will review the draft minutes at the work session on Monday, September 25, 2006. Please contact this office should you have any questions. Thank you. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES September 14, 2006 4:00 p.m. Town Hall Meeting Hall Present were: Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Joseph "Skip" Lee, Ronald McGreevy, Howard Me[nke, Nicholas Planamento, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semen, Senior Planner Amy Ford, ARC Secretary Linda Randolph, and project representatives. The minutes of the August 3, 2006 meeting were accepted. Held Open Applications: · LaPanache Hair Design SCTM: 1000-18-5-13.8 Accept sign as submitted. Sign & post will not be higher than 4-1/2'. Motion: Nick; Second: Sandy (all in favor) · Warex Project 2006 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Applicant not present. Discussion tabled. · Shinn Winery (potato barn/storage) SCTM: 1000-100-4-3.1 Assuming Site Plan is approved by Land Preservation, approve Site Plan pending submission of letter describing landscaping on w/s/o potato barn. Motion: Howard; Second: Sandy (vote: 3 in favor, 1 opposed, 1 abstention because "ARC members should not be commenting on the development (parking area) of preserved land." Revisited Applications: · Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM: 1000-95-2-7 Approve resubmission. Motion: Ron; Second: Howard (all in favor) · Southold Floor Covering SCTM: 1000-55-2-18.1 Sign and lighting approved as submitted. Motion: Sandy; Second: Howard (all in favor) New Applications: · Cutchogue New Suffolk Free Library SCTM: 1000-109-6-2.2 Approve as submitted. Motion: Howard; Second: Nick (all in favor). The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Linda Randolph, Secretary GILBERT ANDERSON, P.E. CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOUIS CALDERONE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER August 30, 2006 Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971-0957 Attn: Jerilyn Woodhouse Re: CR 48, Middle Rd. Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM#1000-95-2-7 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: .... ~ ~ A permit from this Department will not be required. We have reviewed this development and find that no additional improvements within the County right-of-way in the vicinity of this site will be required. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. WH:MPC:ln Very truly yours, William Hillman, P.E. Chief Engineer EM~"r~tUelr Co~H~nw~mlanning & e ermit s SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ! AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER · YAPHANK, N.Y. 11980 · (631) 852-4010 335 YAPHANK AVENUE FAX (631) 852-4150 8u~ 23 2006 lO:36HM PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND August15,2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave. Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Jonathan DiVello Peconic Recycling 800 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 Dear Mr. DiVello: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 14, 2006: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. SCTM#(s) 1000-95.-2-7 WHEREAS, Under Town Code section 211, the applicant will require a Salvage Center permit granted by the Southold Town Board to approve the proposed building use prior to the Planning Board granting approval of the site plan; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action. Peconic Recyclin~l & Transfer Paqe Two AuRust1512006 Enclosed is the Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, B. Woodhouse Chairperson Eric. cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works PLNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND August15,2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review ActoSEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Southold, N.Y. SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7, Zone: Mil Marine II District Requested Action: The proposed action involves a site plan for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. SCTM#(s) 1000- 95.-2-7 Under Town Code section 211, the applicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center permit by the Southold Town Board prior to the Planning Board granting approval of the site plan. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938, X 229 August 15, 2006 Lead Agency Coordination Request Peconic Recycling Page 2 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: x This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other (see comments below) Comments: Enclosed is the Full Environmental Assessment Form part 1. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, ~;n ~oodhouse Chairperson CC; Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works PLANNING BOARD MEMBERe JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE (-',hair KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPHL. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFHCE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: August 14, 2006 To: Supervisor Russell Town Board From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair, Planning Board ____~'~/ Re: Peconic Recycling and Transfer SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 The Planning Board held a Work Session on July 31, 2006 to review the site plan dated February 14, 2005 and last revised July 11, 2006 prepared by Graham Associates and certified by Michael K. Dunn, R.A. for compliance with Town Code Section 100-211 "Salvaging Centers" and offers the following comments: This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. of office space for recycling center use on a154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. 1. The Planning Board received a complete site plan application on June 6, 2006. 2. On July 21, 2006 the Suffolk County Department of Planning responded by letter to the site plan referral with the comments below (see attached letter): · They determined this matter is for "local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s)" and the Planning Board accepts this pursuant to 239L & M General Municipal Law. · They indicated that the "subject property is not in a designated special Groundwater Protection Area". · They indicated care should be taken to have all storm water runoff kept on site, treated and returned to the groundwater table". All discharge to groundwater table should be pursuant to the NYS DEC and SCHDS prior to final Planning Board Approval. 3. The Planning Board started SEQRA as an Unlisted Coordinated Action at the August 14, 2006 public meeting. 4. The Planning Board will require that the Town Engineer re-review the site plan for storm water runoff, require the applicant to apply for a SPEDES permit and to the SCDHS for review / approval. Peconic Rec_~ling & Transfer Page Two August 14, 2006 This application will require the following reviews and or approvals before the Planning Board can grant final approval: Southold Town Building Inspector certification, Southold Town Engineers/Highway, Cutchogue Fire District, Suffolk County Water Authority, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, LWRP and Architectural Review Committee. On August 7, 2006, the Planning Board reviewed the letter from the Town Engineer dated July 31, 2006 and Planning Board accepted the comments (see attached letter). Planning Staff will send a copy of the letter to the applicant for revisions to the site plan. The Planning Board is concerned about the mass of the proposed building on the view shed from Depot Lane and Oregon Road. We will be reviewing the affects of view shed and will require the landscaping to be upgraded to provide a natural buffer. The Planning Board is in favor of the Town Board issuing the Salvage Center Permit based on the proposed site plan which provides adequate on site parking, includes an enclosed facility and is proposed to be located in an appropriate area of our Town. Please be advised that the Planning Board can not issue site plan approval until the Salvage Center permit is issued. We hope these comments will be useful to the Town Board in its review of this permit application. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Planning Board Ms. Linda Cooper, Deputy Town Clerk Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq., Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax, (631)-765-9015 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JAMES A. RICHTERv;R:3 } ' TOWN OF SOUTIIOI,D, NEW YOPd<2 1197i Tel (631 ) - 765 - 1560 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: Re: AUgust 7, 2006 Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive As pera request from your office, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. The Site Plans, sheets 1 through 5, have been prepared by Michael k. Dunn, RA. And Graham Associates and have been dated 2/14/05. Please consider the following: 4. 5. 6. Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC)under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. The Developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-01) prior to the initiation of construction activities. A 55' Curb Cut has been proposed that includes two large vehicular scales located 6' from the Right of Way of Commerce Drive. This would back up all vehicles waiting to enter the site out into the roadway. This will create traffic problems and maintenance issues that have been discussed with and reviewed by the Highway Superintendent. The proposed scales should be moved to a location within the site and the Curb Cut should be narrowed to twenty four (24') feet in width. Cross over access cuts have been shown on the Site Plan indicating access to the southerly property. Is this adjacent parcel part of this site plan review? Potential use of the second lot may dictate changes that would not be considered without the knowledge of how this second lot may be used. Drainage calculations have not been provided. This item should include calculations for containment of a two (2") inch rainfall event. A note on Drawing "D", Sheet 5 of 5, adjacent to the manhole detail indicates that when drainage overflows or ponds more than 6 inches that it will overflow into the street. This will not be acceptable. Drainage designs shall provide for storm water run-off generated On-Site tol be Contained On-Site. All necessary improvements to the Commerce Drive Right of Way that are required by the installation of the proposed curb cut shall be the responsibility of the Developer. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) ///James A. Rlchte"r, R.A. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING [ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE July 21, 2006 THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan which have been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan SCTM No. Peconic Recycling Transfer Conunent: Subject property is not in a designated special Groundwater Protection Area (SGPA). Howcver, care should be taken to have all storm water runoff kept on site, treated and returned to the groundwater table. All discharge to the groundwater table should be pursuant to NYS DEC and Suffolk County Department of Health Services agreements. Proof of correspondence between these agencies and the project sponsors should be presented to the Planning Board prior to final approval of the site plan. NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, APF:cc Thomas Isles, AICP Direcior of Plan0i~J~ .........~ LOCATION H, LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY MAILING ADDRESS P. O, BOX 6100 HAURPAUGE, NY 11788 0099 · ,~. (631) 853-5190 ,~,~' IELECOPIER (631) 853 4044 SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)-765-9015 JAMES A. RICHTER ,R;A-k ENGIf~ER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)-765- 1560 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: Re: August 7, 2006 Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive SCTM #: 1.0 -~0~96-9-1~'~- ~'~'~ As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. The Site Plans, sheets 1 through 5, have been prepared by Michael k. Dunn, RA. And Graham Associates and have been dated 2/14/05. Please consider the following: 4. 5. 6. Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC) under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. The Developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-01) prior to the initiation of construction activities. A 55' Curb Cut has been proposed that includes two large vehicular scales located 6' from the Right of Way of Commerce Drive. This would back up all vehicles waiting to enter the site out into the roadway. This will create traffic problems and maintenance issues that have been discussed with and reviewed by the Highway Superintendent. The proposed scales should be moved to a location within the site and the Curb Cut should be narrowed to twenty four (24') feet in width. Cross over access cuts have been shown on the Site Plan indicating access to the southerly property. Is this adjacent parcel part of this site plan review? Potential use of the second lot may dictate changes that would not be considered without the knowledge of how this second lot may be used. Drainage calculations have not been provided. This item should include calculations for containment of a two (2") inch rainfall event. A note on Drawing "D", Sheet 5 of 5, adjacent to the manhole detail indicates that when drainage overflows or ponds more than 6 inches that it will overflow into the street. This will not be acceptable. Drainage designs shall provide for storm water run-off generated On-Site tol be Contained On-Site. AIl necessary improvements to the Commerce Drive Right of Way that are required by the installation of the proposed curb cut shall be the responsibility of the Developer. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING INTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE July 21, 2006 THOMAS iSLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road- P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan which have been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan SCTM No. Peconic Recycling Transfer ). 1000-96-1-1.8 Comment: Subject property is not in a designated special Groundwater Protection Area (SGPA). However, care should be taken to have all storm water runoff kept on site, treated and returned to the groundwater table. All discharge to the groundwater table should be pursuant to NYS DEC and Suffolk County Department of Health Services agreements. Proof of correspondence between these agencies and the project sponsors should be presented to the Planning Board prior to final approval of the site plan. NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, APF:cc LOCATION H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY MAILING ADDRESS P. O. BOX 6100 HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 Thomas Isles, AICP Direc~r of Plannine Chiefelanne;~ ~ ,,j~ ~.,.~:'Z, (6311 853-5190 '~ TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 Semon, Bruno To: Richter, Jamie Cc: Kalin, Carol Subject: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Hi Jamie, FYI, our office noticed that the SCTM # was incorrect on your comments dated 8/7/06. The SCTM we have for the project Peconic Recycling is 1000-95-2-7 and the report noted 1000-96-1-1.8. I noted the report with the correct number in our file. It is not necessary to send a revised copy. Thank You Bruno TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES August 3, 2006 4:00 p.m. Town Hall Meeting Hall Present were: Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Joseph "Skip" Lee, Ronald McGreevy, Howard Meinke, Nicholas Planamento, Ural Talgat, Elizabeth- Thompson, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semen, Senior Planner Amy Ford, ARC Secr-etary Linda Randolph, and project representatives. The minutes of the July 13, 2006 meeting were accepted. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. Copies of the meeting agenda were circulated. Revisited Applications: Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM: 1000-95-2-7 Recommendations: Resubmit. Applicant to go back to architect to further break down visual scale of building elevations; suggest using horizontal bands, colors, striping and panel doors. In addition, landscaping (combination of native evergreen and deciduous) without berm. Colors: sage brush & tan and evergreen roof OK. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. Ware× Project 2006 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Applicant not present at meeting. Recommendation: Redesign canopy and color based on Hess plan from 2-3 years ago. Suggest applicant look at Hess Station in Southampton and/or Easthampton for design. Motion: Sandy; Second: Elizabeth. New Applications: Shinn Vineyards (Pre-submission: SCTM: 1000-100-4-3.1 existing potato barn) In favor of project. Note that it is advertised as a winery. Recommendations: Continue to pick up colors & detailing from existing buildings and add to potato barn. Suggest using cross-gabling, dormers, cupolas, false doors/windows. Add landscaping, identify trees and sizes. Bring photos of all four sides, signage, lighting cuts. It should also be noted that construction work has started on the potato barn. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises SCTM: 1000-15-9-8 Flagpole approved with following conditions: Color - white. Illuminate from ground 365 days/year from sunset to sunrise. Gold globe and red beacon light atop pole. Motion: Ural; Second: Howard. ARC Meeting Minutes Page Two August3,2006 Sandy Hanauer suggested ARC members should meet at the 4:30 p.m. August 24 Work Session of the Planning Board to discuss the ARC's role in dealing with "as built" structures. Ural Talgat commended the work of Planning Dept. staff members Bruno, Amy and Linda in cooperation with the ARC (getting electronic information to the Committee Members). Elizabeth Thompson suggested having a copy of "Barns of the North Fork" available to applicants as a reference. The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. ARC Secretary Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000- Date: ~/~/~ .~ Comments: JOHN DIVELLO & SONS MATTITUCK SANITATION 800 WICKHAM AVEI~UE DRAWER 1402 MA~-1-1TLJCK, N.Yi 11952 ~'HONE 631-298-8888 FAX 631-298-2023 Dear Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, 1 have provided the specs for the Peconic Transfer & Recycling Facility located at 800 Commerce Drive in Cutchogue NY. The building will be a sagebrush tan with an evergreen roof. I would like to make a note that the stone face on the front of the office will not be brick veneer it will be cultured stone. The garage doors will be solid gray metallic. The lights will be high pressure sodium 200 watt commercial grade fixtures lights and will be set on timers. Jonathan DiVello ~g & Transfer ARC Meeting Minutes Page Two July 13, 2006 New Applications: Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM: 1000-95-2-7 Committee recommends resubmission with additions to break down scale and give natural light (e.g. windows, ornamentation) and add deciduous trees. Warex Project 2006 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Design tabled. Committee requests resubmission using softer colors (gray, beige). Submit materials and light fixture cuts. East End Development (Preliminary) SCTM: 1000-63-3-15 Exterior layout and design of units well-received. Comments: minimize hard surface, add gardening area, consider one car garage instead of two, check driveway turnaround area on east and west sides of property, submit materials, colors, light cuts, possible handicap adaptability). The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Linda Randolph ARC Secretary TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES July 13, 2006 4:00 p.m. Town Hall Meeting Hall Present were: Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Herbert Ernest, Howard Meinke, Ural Talgat, Joseph "Skip" Lee, Elizabeth Thompson, Planning Board Chair Jerilyn Woodhouse, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semon, Senior Planner Amy Ford, ARC Secretary Linda Randolph, and project representatives. The minutes of the June 1, 2006 meeting were accepted. Elizabeth Thompson requested a copy of the "Retail Building Design Req's" which were distributed at the June meeting. Linda will get a copy from Mark Terry. Revisited Applications: · Mullen Motors SCTM: 1000~62-3-11, 22.5 & 24.1 Application approved as submitted with two provisions: (1) Submission of catalog cuts for fixtures (assume white aluminum window frames); (2) If additional lighting/signage is required by another agency, ARC will revisit. · RomanelliBrothers SCTM: 1000-60-2-7.1 Accept with screening of a/c condensors from nodh side and Main Road with evergreens. LaPanache Hair Design SCTM: 1000-18-5-13.8 N/A: Applicant did not submit or represent at meeting. Montauk Bus Service SCTM: 1000-96-1-1.2 Conditionally approved, based on architect's sketch at meeting: eliminated small dormer over porch, added 2 large reverse dormers in front and rear increasing fascia to 8"; changed windows to quads. Drawing to be resubmitted for the file. M & R Developing SCTM: 1000-96-1-1.8 Same comments as Montauk Bus Service above. Signage to be submitted at a later date. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND Date: July 11, 2006 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 From: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC- Stony Brook Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works Architectural Review Committee Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Agency Referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns, comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a New Active Site Plan. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM~ (s) 1000-96.-1-1.8 Zone: LIO (Light Industrial Office) This sire plan is for new constmction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling cemer use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximatcly 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. Attached is a copy of the site plan application for your review. Thank you in advance. cc: File, attachment, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM Date: Jtdy 11, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator From: Bnmo Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer ~ Rel Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM# (s) 1000-96.-1-1.8 Zone: LIO (Light Industrial Office) Status: New Application Required Return Date: August MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, N-Y Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approxLmately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan, elevation plan and LWRP form. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for LWRP consistency Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: attachments PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND July 11, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County Planning Commission Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, AICP, Chief Planner PO Box 6100 t-LLee Dennison bldg., 4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM# (s) 1000-96.-1-1.8 Zone: LIO (Light Industrial Office) MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Dear Mr. Freeleng, Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan is being referred to you for comments. Enclosed you will find a site plan, application, LWRP Consistency Form, EAF and Southold Town Notice of Disapproval. This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file Enc, site plan, misc PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 11, 2006 Matthew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTiV~ (s) 1000-96.-1-1.8 Zone: LIO (Light Industrial Office) Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find one (1) commercial site plan/survey for the above referenced site. This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,60! sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specifywhether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Date: July 11, 2006 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer ~ Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTiVff (s) 1000-96.-1-1.8 Zone: LIO (Light Industrial Office) Status: New Application Required Return Date: None This site plan is for new construction of a building that includes 32,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 2,210 sq. ft. office space for recycling center use on 154,601 sq. ft. parcel in the LIO Zone located approximately 1,083' n/o Corporate Road on n/e/s/o Comznerce Drive in Cutchogue. In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site plan enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan, Architectural plans and the site phn application. Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000- 9% ' '~ - "-I Date: & I.~ 06 Colnments: Co,-4 '¢ £ PLANNING BOARD MEMBEe JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 19, 2006 Johathan DiVello Peconic Recycling 800 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 Peconic Recycling & Transfer 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SCTM#: 1000-95-2-7 Dear Mr. DiVello: Please be aware that, as of today, this Department has not yet received your application for site plan review. Once a site plan application is received and accepted bythe Planning Board, the Board will review the application trader Chapter 74, Salvage Centers for the Town Board and provide comments regarding ~74-5, Permit Provisions. Please be aware the Town Board issued Salvage Center permit cannot be commented upon bythe Planning Board until a site plan application is submitted to this Department. Please do not hesitate to contact this office shotfld you have any questions or need further assistance. Sincerely, Senior Planner Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq., Town Attorney Linda Cooper, Deputy Town Clerk File PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N-Y 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Ms. Linda Cooper, Deputy Town Clerk Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq., Assistant Town Attorney From: Amy Ford --'~ Senior Planner Date: 19 May2006 Peconic Recycling and Transfer SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 As per the memo from Pat Finnegan on April 26, 2006 this is to inform you that as of today, May 19, 2006, the Planning Board has not received an application for site plan for the above reference project, however an application is expected within the near future. Once an application is received and the Planning Board has accepted the application, comments regarding the application will be forthcoming. Please contact this office should you have any questions or need further assistance. Thank you. Planning Board Mark Terry, Acting Department Head File NNF, GANe PATltlCIA A. FI TOWN ATTORNEY patricia.finnegan~)town.southold.ny.us KIERAN M. CORCOHAN ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY kieran.corcoran(a)town.southold.ny.us LORI HULSE MONTEFUSCO ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY lorl.monte fusco(h)town .southold.ny.us To: SCOTT A. RUSSELL Supervisor Town Hall Annex, 54;375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Ms. Linda Cooper, Deputy Town Clerk l~elephone (631) 765-1939 Facsimile (631) 765-6639 From: Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq. Assistant Town Attorney Date: April 27, 2006 Subject: Peconic Recycling & Transfer I have reviewed the application for a recycling and transfer station submitted by the above-referenced applicant. I am recommending that the application be sent to the..Elarmin~ Department for review arKI recommendatiorl ~. The application will be reviewed for its effect on the environment, character of the area and operations in the Town, per Chapter 74 of the Town Code. The project will also be subject to site plan review before the Planning Board. I have spoken to Mark Terry about this matter, and advised him that the Planning Department should advise the Town Board and/or myself when the application is ready for action by the Town Board. Please let me know if you have any questions. PAF/Ik cc: Members of the Town Board Mr. Mark Terry, Acting Department Head, Planning Department South0id 10wn APPLICATION ~REGULATING SECONDHAND, J~ AND AUTO PA~S ACTIVITIES AND BUSINESSE~~ IN TIrE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ame of Applicant, IndiviUual, CorpoPation or Partnership Adgr~ss of Business Or Activity -- ~ ' Exacg Type of Business to'be conducted I am under 21 years of age Yes No~ I am a citizen of the United States Yes ~ NO Convicted of Felony or Misdemeanor Yes No '~ Number of employees to be engaged / ~ Name and Address of owner of lands and nature of the right of occupancy of the applicant to the use of such Applicant must file map or plan of real property upon which business is to be conducted with the following information: 1. Location o£ fence required. 2. Location of buildings. 3. Location of streets and highways. 4. Location of water and gas mains. I hereby certify that all the above information is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I will conduct the business pursuant to the regulations set forth in the Ordinance Licensing and Regulating Secondhand, Junk and Auto Parts Activities and Businesses. Sworn to before me this //~lgna~ure OI q~rppllcan~ RECEIVED So~tl~old Tow. Cler~ FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: May 16, 2005 RENEWED/AMENDED: March 23, 2006 AMENDED: March 28, 2006 AMENDED: April 14, 2006 TO: Graham Associates A/C Peconic Recycling and Transfer 1981 Union Blvd. Bay Shore, NY 11706 Please take notice that your amended application dated April 14, 2006 For permit for construction of a recycling and transfer center at Location of property: 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 95 Block2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed use requires a salvage center permit from the Southold Town Board and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. This Notice of Disapproval was amended on March 23, 2006~ to address changes made to the site plan and on April 14~ 2006 to eliminate the need for variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals,.hased on an amended site plan received by the Building Department on April 14~ 2006. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAl, DATE: May 16, 2005 RENEWED/AMENDED: March 23, 2006 TO: Graham Associates A/C Pcconic Recycling and Transfer 1981 Union Blvd. Bay Shore, NY 11706 Please take notice that your application dated May 6, 2005 MAFI 2 4 2006 For pemfit for construction of a recycling and transfer center at Location of property: 860 Co~nmerce Drive, Cutchogue County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 96 Block~l Lot 8 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XII1, Section 100-132, which states, "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulatious were set forth herein in full." According to Bulk Schedule, a rear yard setback of 75 feet is required. Following the proposed construction, the main building will have a rear yard setback of+/- 36 feet. In addition, the proposed scale house/scale is not permitted pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100- 133A., which state, "Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way." The proposed scale house is 36 feet from the right of way and the scale is noted as being 6 feet from the right of way. in addition, the proposed use requires a salvage center permit from the Southold Town Board and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. This Notice of Disapproval was amended on March 23~ 2006~ to address changes made to the site plan. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE Telephone: ~'.~ i Mailing Address: SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: Query: (Please be specific about the information you need. Provide supporting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) / / o~ ~c~-J~ c gccycLl~. For Office Use Only: FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: May 16, 2005 TO: Graham Associates A/C Peconic Recycling and Transfer 1981 Union Blvd. Bay Shore, NY 11706 Please take notice that your application dated May 6, 2005 For permit for construction of a recycling and transfer center at Location of property: 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 9~6 Blockl Lot _1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-132, which states, "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." According to Bulk ~e'hcdule, a rear yard setback of 75 feet is required. Following the proposed construction, the mall b)tilding will have a rear yard setback of+/- 36 feet. In addition, the proposed scale house is not permitted pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133A., which state~ "Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way." The proposed scale house is 0 feet from the right of way. In addition, the proposed use requires a salvage center permit from the Southold Town Board. "~Cff~gffzed ~gmature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: ': / .,, / '~- Date Sent: Project Name: -T,oIe (?o,~:,o '~/c ~_'con,c ¢<'(ur Project Address: ~m~cce Suffolk CountyTax Map No.:1000- ('1~, - / - I Zoning District: Request: ~-c~c~tf~A~ c~:~, --~r~,~ L~r~-~f~ o ~ (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: ~{~,t~,l z~q/~ Signature of uilding Inspec Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: ~ / ') lc -'; Date of Comment: -~' / /.Z Final Determination Date: / / Decision: Signature of Building Inspector Peconic Recycle & Transfer 6-06 Site Plan SCTM 95-2-7 Peconic Recycle & Transfer 6-06 Site Plan SCTM 95-2-7 SITE PLAN TYPE: NEW LOCATION: ~'-Vre--,.~ %,.5 -~ HAMLET: SCTM#]ooo-~q - a_ _ ']. ~'~.) co ,,,.~.~ t, ,,... ~~~ ~PLICANT NAME: ~~ [~ ~ ~e [{O~ TELV~)__-__ [AGENT NAME: ~~ AgSOC- ~ YEL~(--~~ J?,XIST~GUSE: g~ {~ PROPOSED USE: /'UILD~G DEPART~N' NOTICE: S~ REQU~:>R N ZBA APPEAL REQUIRED Y OO ?~-SUBMISSION CONFE~NCE (WITH~ 30 DAYS OF WRI~EN REQUEST) INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: APPLICATION RECEIVED DATEr__/ / , APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: PAYMENT RECEIVED: AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ q.(Z~q [. NEW SP: $500JACRE &.I0/SF, AMENDED SP: $250. + .10/SF, AGRIC SP: FLAT $500 FEE AMOUNT: ($ .00 X =$ )+($. 10 X/..3 ~ ~ SF=$ ) =$ NEW APPLICATION WORK SESSION (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT), PB ACCEPTED Y OR N APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEEETING 100-254B3 (WITHIN 30 DAYS) NOTES: REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED: NOTES: REFE~TD AG~ENCIES: (WITH MAPS=)V/P) - "2/// /~ 5TZBA__,STBD ~ ,STC/TB~,:~L, STBT ~/,STEA~,SCDHS~,NYSDECX/~,USACORPS__,NYSDOT__, SCWA~, SCPD V~, SCDPW~./', LWP,?~ a-ESPONSES NOTES ~EQRA DETERMINATION :NEG DEC Y OR N APPROVALS REQUIRED: REFERRED DATE NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES ARCR,TEOTU~LREV, EWCO~.,TTEE: >__,,_L,~ ~,X_,~ ~X/""'" /..d.......... LWR~'OOORD,NATOR: BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: > //ff / ~ /~/.~ / / F,RE OOMM,SS,O.ER~: ~_, ,./,,~7 x,~,_~qno Poe i / Oeec/ed_ TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: . DE~.OFT~,SPORTAT,O,:DOT__¢~,~. TOS_~'' ~-,,,', SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH: PERMIT #: / / OPTIONAL APPROVALS: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEAL#: / / / / BOARD OF TRU$ ~ m~'~: / / / / NYS DEC WETLANOS/TIDA / / / / PLANNING BOARD DECISIONS: ICONDITIONAL FINAL: / / DENIED: , APPROVED: FINAL: / ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: / / NOTES DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT / / TOWN ENG / / I New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One 50 Circle Road - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-3407 Phone: (631) 444-0365 FAX: (631) 444-0360 Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 March 16, 2007 RECEIVED MAfa 1 9 2007 Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST $outh~i~l Tc;';n Clerl~ Dear Sirs/Madams: The purpose of this request is to determine under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Enviromnental Conselwation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your agency's interest in acting as lead ageucy; Enclosed is a copy o four pemfit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Foml (EAF) to assist you in responding. proiect Name: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp Location: 860 Connnerce Drive, Southold --DEC Application #: 1-4738-03697/00001 Permit Type: Article 27 Solid Waste Management Type I Ix ] Unlisted DEC Position: [ D~EC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. Page 2 Please respond to my attention within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 d, ys, we w~ll assume that you have no object o ~ to DEC or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. Please feel free to contact this office at (631) 444-0366 for further intbrmation or discussion. Yours truly, Environmental Analyst cc: see distribution list above) Page 2. Semon, Bruno To: Cc: Subject: Chic Voorhis Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark; Ford, Amy; 'Edwards Ken (E-mail)'; 'George Solomon (E- mail)'; 'Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail)'; 'Joseph Townsend (E-mail)'; 'Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail)' RE: Peconic Transfer Station To All, I will recommend to the Planning Board we send a letter indicating we are lead agency on this project and copy all information. Please be advised that I spoke to Gail Wickham on Friday and the following was discussed: I was informed a site plan applicati_?n would be ~for the other parcel on the corner. is in th~B~ and pending an appeal and relief for the zoning Currently applicat'ion am variance. rot much time when the new site mlan application is submitted the agent will request that ject review be placed on hol~ ~ Additi-onaiiy upu~ ~ubmiss£on, The z~½~est may be made to apply for a refund or transfer the site plan fees from this project to the new project. Thanks Bruno ..... Original Message ..... From: Chic Voorhis [mailto:cvoorhis@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 8:17 AM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark; Ford, Amy; 'Edwards Ken (E-mail)'; 'George Solomon {E-mail)'; 'Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail)'; 'Joseph Townsend (E-mail)'; 'Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail)' Subject: RE: Peconic Transfer Station .The information you faxed over is a routine SEQRA coordination letter. The letter indicates that NYSDEC has received ah appllcatlon under Article 27 for a Solid Waste Management Facility~ The coordination indicates that the State has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for review of ~he projeJt. As I recall, the application was previously the subject of a coordinated review, and I believe the Town Planning Board assumed lead agency. I- recormmend that you write to the NYSDEC and apprise them of this. I understand the Town has received additional information which is under review. The next ~tep is to issue a determination of significance which would~r a~siti~d~claration (require applicant to prepare DEIS), or ~egativs~eclaratlon (no significant adverse environmental impact expected). Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this input, and please feel free to call should you have any questions. Thanks, Chic Voorhis ..... Original Message ..... From: Semon, Bruno [mailto:Bruno. Semon@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:44 PM To: Chic Voorhls (E-mail) Cc: Finnegan, Patricia; Terry, Mark; Ford, Amy; Edwards Ken (E-mail); George 1 Solomon (E-mail); Jori (E-mail); Joseph Townsend {E-mail); !,iartin Sidor Jr. (E-mail) Subject: Peconic Transfer Station Hi Chic, Sorry about the last minute response, I was only made aware of this on April 11, 2007 the file was on Marks desk. Pat Finnegan and Kieran was out of the office and Pat was able to meet at 3:30pm yesterday. Be advised of the project status is as follows: · - ~August 15, 2006, The Planning Board started a coordinated Unlisted review '--~nder SEQR Part 617 article 6 I was instructed to start ~his before the Town Board reviewed the Salvage Center Permit. '~October 13~ 2006 NPV issued an Environmental review report to Planning ~oard. -- ,-~_October 17, 2006 The Planning Board assumed lead agency for the project '-6~ild out as shown on the site plan. - - ' __~,l~November 14~ 2006, The Planning Board accepted the NPV report and requires applicant to address the items in'the report and~oml~ sup~~ information. ~ __~November 21_= 2006 LWRP Coordinator by letter indicated the project is o~6-~s~-~t WF{lY~the LWR~i~olicy stand~ Decembe~ 6,~UU6 1'ne Planning Board ~_q_qived a ~at a work session ~rom Gail Wickham on some of the items in the November 16, 2006 resolution. I was instructed to place this on hold by Pat Finnegan and Mark Terry and not send this to you until the Town Board has worked out the Salvage Center Permit/Use details. This project has basically not moved on the site plan end since that correspondence. Various agencies have replied to the coordination request. ~ The file does not contain a specific reply to the Novemb_~eF ]4~ 20~06 ~,~ resolution requesting supplemental information. I faxed you the copy of the NYS DEC Lead Agency Coordination request received by the Town. Can you please tell us if we should request to include this under the Towns State Environmental Review of the site build out and request lead agency on the NYS DEC permit action? The question is whether you are comfortable reviewing this under the Towns review or should it be a separate review by the NYSDEC for the permit action? It looks like we will need to respond by 4/16/07 to meet the thirty-day period. Thanks ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REPORT (including Part III EAF, Significance of Impacts) PECONIC RECYCLING & TRANSFER Prepared for: Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Prepared by: Date: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP October 13, 2006, Revised October 27, 2006 & November 1, 2006 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION: SCTM: ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAYS: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Site Plan Application 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-095-2-7 LIO-Light Industrial Office Park NA 3.14 SITE DESCRIPTION AND RESOURCES The overall project site is located at 860 Commerce Drive, approximately 1,083 feet north of the intersection of Commerce Drive and Corporate Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 3.14-acre vacant parcel has approximately 90 feet of frontage at the terminus of Commerce Drive. The site is generally flat and is entirely covered with low shrubs. Several trails cross the property in various directions. The site is zoned LIO Light Industrial Planned Office Park, and the area surrounding the site is similarly zoned LIO and LI Light Industrial. A Town composting facility is located east of the site, beyond which are Town solid waste management facilities. The nearest residence is west of the site fronting Depot Lane and this site is also zoned LIO. There is a small residential community well to the south fronting CR 48 and this area is zoned R-40. Setbacks and potential impacts to surrounding uses are considered in more detail herein. There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within 5,000 feet of the property. The Suffolk County soil survey C~Varner, 1975) identifies three (3) soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following: Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8% slopes (RdB), Haven Loam, 0- 2% slopes (HaA) and Haven Loam, 2-6% slopes (HaB). The topography and soils on the site do Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 not appear to present severe development constraints. Therefore, no significant impact on soils and topography is anticipated. A review of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2005 indicates that no water mains are located in the area of the subject property. Using typical SCDHS flow rates for an industrial building of the size proposed, it is estimated that the proposed development will use approximately 1,573 gallons of water per day based. It is anticipated that this amount will be significantly less as the proposed operation is not a water intensive use. The applicant will need to demonstrate to the SCDHS under Article 4 of the Sanitary Code, that potable water can be supplied to the site. It is expected that water supply will be provided by use of a~private well. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is approximately 5 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 50 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 45 feet. The subject property is located just north of the north fork groundwater divide. The majority of the groundwater recharges vertically into the groundwater but, there is a slight horizontal component of flow which is generally toward the north and west. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the west towards the Long Island Sound. REQUESTED ACTION The proposed action involves the development of the 3.14-acre site with a 38,214 SF building that will house a recycling and transfer facility and associated office space. The application filed with the Town indicates that "Sorting & collection to be performed indoors & held on site for short periods of time for distribution to other recycling centers". This is critical to the safe, compatible operation of the facility. The application also indicates solid waste generation in the amount of 1,060 cubic yards (cy) per month. Part of the information contained in the Part I EAF indicates that topsoil will be reutilized for landscape berms, a feature which will assist with visual and land use compatibility. Two (2) large scales that will be utilized by entering trucks will be located along the western property boundary. Twenty (20) truck parking stalls and 12 car parking stalls are planned. One (1) curb cut in the eastern property boundary will connect to the adjacent, vacant property. The site will be accessible via a gated entrance point located at the northern terminus of Commerce Drive. A series of stormwater leaching pools will collect runoff generated by the property. The development will be required to use water supplied by the SCWA and a septic system will be provided which will need approval from the SCDHS. The perimeter of the property will be landscaped with evergreens and shrubs. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The Applicant has provided the following forms which comply with the Town's Site Plan Application submission requirements: · Site Plan application form Page 2 · Fee · Long environmental assessment form · Site plan · Certified survey · Construction Plans/elevations Pecoi~WRecycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 A Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) Consistency Assessment Form was also provided. ENVIRONMETAL ASSESSMENT FORM The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further information or analysis: ( //~ The proposed coverages provided do not correspond to site acreage. Soil types identified on the subject property are not provided. i No parking space information is provided. Building dimensions are not provided. Linear frontage along a public roadway is not indicated. Number of jobs generated during construction seems too high and no amount is provided for after completion. · Applicant should identify how solid waste generation amount was calculated. Additionally, the solid waste that will be generated by the facility and where the material will be disposed should be provided. · The anticipated water usage appears to be incorrect. The applicant should use Suffolk County Department of Health Services Flow rates to calculate water usage. · The type(s) of permit that are to be requested from the DEC should be noted, and in particular if a ~DEC Part 360 Solid Waste Facility permit will be required. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further or update information or analysis: ~/· Gross square footage provided on the application is not consistent with plan. Percentage of lot coverage is, therefore, not correct. The site plan should indicate water usage and sanitary calculations. Page3 PeconnRr Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part II Environmental Assessment form (EAF) has been completed for the proposed action. Potential large impacts are noted as follows: · Potential traffic impacts · Potential odor impacts · Potential noise impacts · Potential visual impacts Other small to moderate impacts are identified in the Part II EAF analysis of the significance of impacts are noted as follows: · Potential groundwater impacts · Potential land use impacts PART III EAF - SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION This section provides a Part III narrative to consider the significance/magnitude of mitigation and how modifications in the project or mitigation can be used to ensure that an impact does not occur or that it is not significant. TRAFFIC Proposed project will result in an increase of large trucks on Middle Road (CR 48), Depot Lane, Corporate Road and Commerce Drive. The trucks will enter the site loaded with solid waste, unload waste in the building and leave the site. Additionally, sorted material will be stored on- site and removed periodically resulting in additional truck traffic. The majority of the traffic entering and exiting the site will utilize the flashing light-controlled intersection at Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The Town Engineer reviewed the proposed project and in a memo dated August 7, 2006 asked that the large vehicle scales be moved from adjacent to the right of way to avoid congestion on Commerce Drive. The plans were revised and the scales moved to an interior location. Traffic impacts from the proposed project can be lessened by: Track parking stalls provided on the site that will reduce congestion on Commerce Drive. The location of the scales to an interior location will reduce stacking on Commerce drive. On August 30, 2006, the SCDPW reviewed this development and indicated a permit is not required. They stated that" find that no additional improvement within the County right of way in the vicinity of this site is required". This impact is not considered significant for the following reasons: · The Town Engineer has reviewed the site plan and provided comments which have been addressed. · The existing road system appears adequate to handle traffic from land uses in the area. · The site is part of an approved subdivision in an LIO zone; additional industrial related traffic has been anticipated in connection with this site and the overall subdivision. Page 4 Pecol~lPilecycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 The site and area are zoned for industrial use; the proposed project and other LIO uses which could occupy the site would all involve some degree of truck and industrial use traffic. ODOR AND NOISE It is anticipated that odors will emanate from the solid waste being transported to the site and from the trucks themselves through exhaust. Additionally, the trucks will produce noise. Odor and noise impacts can be lessened by: · Material being transported to and from the site should be covered with plastic or other appropriate mater/al. · Unloading and sorting will be conducted in the building limiting odors to surrounding uses. · Trucks being unloaded and those waiting to be processed will be expected to mm their engines off thereby reducing the impacts of exhaust odors and noise. · Perimeter landscaping will reduce noise impacts to the surrounding uses. · The facility will operate during normal working hours which will reduce noise and odor impacts to surrounding residences when individuals are at home. The applicant's EAF Part I indicates "Noise from payloaders & commercial traffic similar to Town facility located adjacent to subject property". This is a fair statement and is considered in the context of this analysis. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. Recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with good solid waste management initiatives. Significant odors are not expected since small loads of waste will be sorted and boxed and held on site temporarily before shipping to disposal or other markets. Sorting occurs indoors and therefore impacts will be localized. There are no nearby residential uses, the nearest residence is over 275 feet to the west of the west property line and is in an LIO zone. No other receptors are nearby, and it is expected that the area will become occupied by other industrial uses in accordance with zoning. The site is next to a Town compost facility to the east, beyond which is the Towns MSW facility. Solid waste facilities exist in the area at present, and the proposed use is not out of character with these uses in terms of noise generating potential, particularly since operations will be conducted indoors. Noise and odor impacts are not expected to be significant based on the following considerations: · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · There are no residential receptors within 275 feet of the west property line, where there is one home on an industrially zoned site. · Activities will be conducted indoors and containerized sorted materials and waste will be on site on a temporary basis before being shipped to disposal or market. Page 5 VISUAL Peco~l~ Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 The proposed structure will be noticeable from surrounding areas and roadways including, Commerce Drive, Corporate Road, Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The lighting plan has been designed to ensure that lighting is cast downward and only illuminates the subject site. The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the project and in a document dated August 3, 2006 recommended specific architectural features and color. Visual impacts can be lessened by: · The use of landscaping around the perimeter of the property. The site plan includes a landscaping schedule. · Specific color, exterior finishing and landscaping as recommended by the ARC to reduce the visual impact of the structure. The proposed use is for an industrial site in an industrial area. While the site may be visible from CR 48, it will not be unlike other solid waste management facilities currently operating in the area. No significant impact to visual resources is expected to occur based on the following reasons: · The ARC review for color, texture and architecture will ensure that visual/aesthetic issues are addressed. · Landscape materials and berming will help "soften" the structural improvements on the site. · The site is setback over 2,500 feet from CR 48 and over 500 feet from Depot Lane. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. GROUNDWATER Solid waste sorting on site could potentially release groundwater contaminants; however, the operation and regulations should be understood to assess the significance of this impact. First, the use must conform to Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for sanitary flow density. This is determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) who will review and approve the site plan. Potential impacts with respect to groundwater can be lessened by the following methods: · The ,'tipping" floor should be a sealed concrete floor with no cracks or floor drains and repaired / maintained as necessary. · The concrete slab should pitch inward, not toward the door. · All tipping and sorting operations should be conducted indoors. · Solid waste containers should be inspected before being "tipped". · Spill control tools should be available such as speedi-dry, absorbant pads and other control materials. · Site personnel should be trained in spill response, and the NYSDEC spill hotline number should be posted and part of the training. · The facility should institute an on-call contract with a licensed scavenger. · No liquid materials should be stored outdoors; should any be encountered, they should be separated, retained in doors and removed by a licensed scavenger after testing and identification. Page 6 PecolIKrRecycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 In terms of potential for impacts, significant groundwater impacts are not expected for the following reasons: · The measures noted above should be implemented, as these are standard methods of the industry. · The floor will be of sealed concrete with no floor drains and pitched toward the interior of the building. · All operations will be conducted indoors. · SCDHS prohibits discharge under Article 12 of the SCSC and County inspectors maintain records and inspections of industrial facilities. LAND USE The proposed project is located in a Light Industrial/Planned Office Park (LIO) zoning district. Adjoining property to the north and south are similarly zoned. Light Industrial zoning districts are located south and north of the subject property. Farmland, a compost facility, Town landfill and solid waste facility and commercial uses are located in the area of the subject property. One non-conforming residential structure is located approximately 275 feet to the west along Depot Lane. The next closest residential area, zoned R-40, is located approximately 1,400 feet to the east. Land use impacts are not expected based on the following reasons: · All operations will be conducted indoors. · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. The Town of Southold Solid Waste Coordinator has reviewed the application and has provided the following input: New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) designates the Town of Southold as the Solid Waste Management Unit (SMU) for the Town of Southold. A key provision of this status is the requirement for the Town to develop a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) that explains in detail how the Town will ensure that ALL of the waste generated within the Town will be handled both in an environmentally sound manner AND in compliance with the solid waste management hierarchy as outlined in the ECL, whether or not the waste is actually handled or managed through a Town-owned facility. In this manner, the State seeks to identify all of the waste for which the Town is potentially responsible (should private arrangements change or break down). (It is also in the Town's interest, as it is clearly relevant to Town decisions on the development of it Solid Waste program and facilities). The Town first developed its SWMP Plan in 1990 and, as per regulations, it has been updated several times (most recently in 2005) since to reflect changes in the waste stream, developments in management processes and technology, and developments/improvements in the Town's infrastructure and waste handling abilities. It is estimated that between 20% and 30% of the waste generated within the Town of Southold, primarily commercial waste and construction/demolition debris, bypasses the Cutchogue Transfer Station and is not in any way tracked by the Town. Whereas the ECL seeks input on this "missing waste" from the Town, the fact that it is destined for various out of Town facilities and does not pass through any single transfer point on its way to those facilities, makes it exceedingly difficult to track with any assurance. In short, it makes it easy to ignore. The State has therefore Page 7 Pecoilf~ Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 generally accepted Town reporting on this stream in terms of overall estimates, leaving out details on specific tonnage and destinations. The new Pcconic Recycling facility, however, will be capable of providing in-Town access to not only their own customers, but to others involved in generating, hauling, and disposing of waste. As such, to stay in compliance with the ECL, the Town would be required to revise its SWMP to track waste handled at the facility. In addition to the type of waste and tonnage received, this would include sources of the waste, its destination, recycling rates and quantities, permit information from points of ultimate disposal, and other information. Thc Town may even be required to include information on any out of Town waste handled by Pcconic Recycling. At present, the Town has no mechanism for requiring private companies to report on their waste handling and recycling practices. Most municipalities receive such information through a local permitting process, renewable annually. However, Southold does not require permits of waste handling companies that do not use the Cutchgue Transfer Station. The permits that are required are merely vehicle-specific, to allow access to the facility. Should the Town seek information from Peconic Recycling, it makes sense to take the full step and seek the same information from other companies engaged in out of Town disposal. This would avoid singling out one company for regulation and would finally allow the Town to "see" all the waste it is potentially responsible for. In addition, the resulting benefit to the Town's waste management planning efforts are obvious. To the extent possible, the Town should explicitly require Peconic Recycling and Transfer to receive the necessary State operating permits and to adhere to NYSDEC Part 360 regulations for C&D transfer stations. In addition, the Town should require notification from Peconic Transfer of any change from its plans in the type and amount of waste received, and to maintain full compliance with DEC regulations pursuant to any such changes. RECOMMENDATIONS · The applicant should address discrepancies and requested information identified herein which the Planning Board feels is important. · The Part I EAF was reviewed and a Part II EAF has been completed and attached. A Part III assessment of the significance of impacts has been completed. The applicant should provide any additional materials which the Board feels are necessary to determine the significance of the action, and once satisfied the sufficient information is available, the Planning Board should issue a Determination of Significance. · Receive approval from the Southold Town Board Under Town Code Section 211. Where the applicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center Permit for this proposed use. From a philosophical standpoint as well as for environmental management and waste reduction goals, recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with the good solid waste management initiatives. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. If the Planning Board is in agreement, the action does not appear to rise to the level of requiring a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and it is expected that a Negative Declaration could be justified for consideration by the Board based on the analysis and weighing of issues conducted as part of this report in addition to review and deliberation of the action by the Planning Board members, staff and advisors. Page 8 - 2 2007 To: From: Re: Date: Town Attorney Patricia Finneg~/~ Town Clerk Elizabeth Neville Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp. 3/20/07 The enclosed correspondence with regard to lead agency coordination on the above application was received from the NYS DEC by my office yesterday. I am for~varding it to you for action. Thank you. O.)( ,,~0 i,~ ~91~ ~'~ . ~ ,~/,~ .~ ~ ,,~ ~ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One 50 Circle Road- SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-3407 Phone: (631) 444-0365 FAX: (631) 444-0360 March 16, 2007 RECEIVED Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ~AR I 9 2007 Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST Dear Sirs/Madams: The purpose of this request is to determine under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; Enclosed is a copy of our permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in responding. Proiect Name: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Corp Location: 860 Commerce Drive, Southold DEC Application #: 1-4738-03697/00001 Pem~it Type: Article 27 Solid Waste Management SEQRA Classification: [ ] Type I [x ] Unlisted / DEC Position: [/']DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. Page 2 Please respond to my attention within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. Please feel free to contact this office at (631) 444-0366 for further information or discussion. Yours truly, Environmental Analyst cc: (see distribution list above) Page 2. APPLICATION FOR A SOLIBi~I'ASTE MANAGEMENT FACILI' PTRMIT Please read all instructions before completing this application Please TYPB or PRINT clearly 1. TYpE OF APPLICATION (Check All Applicable Boxes): FACILITY CODE 2. APPLICANT IS THE: Permit iD Operate LJ Subsequent Siege (New} ~] Mudlflcatlon E. ENGINEER'S NAME AND P.E. LICENSE NO.- Eugene G. Kempey 68364 3, FACILI~ OWNER'SN ME Peconlc Recycling and 800 Wickham Avenue Ma~ituck ¢. FACILrrYOPERATOR'SNAME Peconic Recycling and 800 ~ickham Avenue I clt~ York 1~1952 ~attituck (6~?)298 ~og~g ~ 6tl ) Pcno,-R888 S FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION (AUa~h USGS Top(} Map showing exact IocaRon) Name Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp. s,oot so±io Waste Rec-y~i'~g ?~-i-lity 860 Commerce Drive Kempey Engineering Address 4 Brunswick Drive CltylSlalelZIp Code East Northport, NY 11731 Telephone Number { 631) 368-3324 7. SITE OWNER'S NAME Oily, State. Zip Code Cutchogue, New York 11935 Town County StatelZl~ Code Southold Suffolk New York 11952 Coordinates [] LandRII (SpecUy:¢alegory] [] Research, DevelOpment and Demonstration [] SoRd Waste Incineration [] RefuGe D~rlved Fuel Processing [] Compostlng X~] Rscyclables Handling and RecoveL X~[] Other tOescribe] )~ Transfer Station [] Medical Waste E~ Waste Tire Storage [] Landllg Gas RecoveP/ []'Waste Oil C & D D~hr~ P~Pess±ng Fac Address 800 W]akham Avenue City Matt~tuck Telephone t631) 298-8888 I 9. IS APPLICATION BEING FILED BY OR ON BENALF OF A MUNICIPALITY? I0, FEE AMOUNT ENCLOSED $ 11. NAMEISt OF ALL MUNICIPALITIES SERVED Southold and Riverhead Townships 12. SOLID WASTE HANDLED asphalt pavementl, ~3. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WHERE APPLICABLE a. List wasies to be accepted ~q.3~]~. concrete- Facility area proposed in the application 3 1 4 acme brick and other masSnry products,I C & b DebI~lq3~-~ ~T~ISl~i~ b. Facility area ultimately planned 3. I 4 acres rock soil 2Rood -- Ie. Ultimate facility height above existing ground level 3~ leer b. OuanRty (Specify UnI,.~I ~ I .480 TPD MSW 3_14 ~r.~ 14. IS A VARIANCE REQUESTED PROM ANY PROVISION OF 6 NYCRR PART 360? E} '(es XJ~ No If '),es, cile the specific provision(s) 15. CERTIFICATION: I he{eby affirm under penalty ol pefjuPy Ihal hqormaRon provided on this Iorm and attached statements and exhibits .~as prepared by me ct ' {ERe) of pe~e~ic/_4R~i~m:l Tr_n_¢ ..... mn i y - ~ [h.~ ~pphc,ho~ ~,~.~rd {o ~ N~CR~ F~h ~0., ~m nware dla~f¢se~t~t~fa3e herein Is pg,lShablo as a Class A misbranD, IdEtfPEY EII ItlE££1 I GlllslilfnlltS iff Elldrolini~lliltl I~ll91[if~rliig 4 Brunswick Drive, East Northport, NewYork IJ731 (631) 368-3324 Facsimile (631) :168-1524 February 23, 2007 Mr. John Pavacic Regional Permit Administrator Division of Environmental Permits New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Region 1 Building 40 SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11790 Re: Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp. 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York 11935 Solid Waste Transfer, Recyclables Handling and Recovery, and Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility Permit Application Submittal Dear Mr. Pavacic: Transmitted herewith, for your review and approval, are three (3) copies of Peconic Recycling and Transfer Corp.'s Application for a Permit to Construct and Operate a Solid Waste Transfer, Recyclables Handling and Recovery, and Construction and Demolition Debris Processing Facility for their proposed 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York 11935 facility. The application packages consists of the following documents: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 0xlySDEc) Solid Waste Management Facility Application Form. 2. Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF). 3. Structural and Archeological Assessment Form (SEAF). 4. Closure Plan. 5. Contingency Plan. 6. Engineering Report. 7. Operations and Maintenance Manual. 8. Facility Training Plan. Mr. John Pavacic 2 9. Waste Control Plan. Please review our submittal at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or require additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, i ..._.Eugene G. Kempey, e. E' ]~ President February 23, 2007 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Pads A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as pad of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review, Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Pads 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Peconic Recycling and Transfer - Solid Waste Recycling Facility Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, New York 11935 Name of ApplicantdSponsor Pecqnic Recycling and Transfer Corp. Address 800 Wickham Avenue City/PO Mattituck State New York Zip Code 11952 Business Telephone (631) 298-8888 Name of Owner (if different) Commerce One, LLC Address 800 Wickham Avenue City / PO Mattituck Business Telephone (631)298-8888 State New York Zip Code 11952 Description of Action: Application for a Permit to Construct and Operate a Solid WastManagemcnt Facility for a solid waste transfer, recyclables handling and recovery, and a construction and demolition debris processing facility processing four hundred eighty (480) tos per day of recyclables and municipal solid waste and eight hundred (800) tons per day of constrcution and demolition debris within the thirty-four thousand two hundred ten (34,210) square foot pre-engineered building to be constructed on the three point fourteen (3.14) acre site. The construction will include all necessary site improvements. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N,A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1~ Present Land Use: r--"lurban ~ Industrial [] Commercial []Forest r'-I Agriculture r~ Other E~ Residential (suburban) [] Rural (non-farm) Total acreage of project area: 3.14 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 3.14 acres 0.39 acres acres acres acres __acres acres acres acres 2.?5 acres HaA Haven Loam 0% to 2% slope, EaB it~:.; Haven Loam 2% to 6% slope, and RdA Riverhead sandyoloam 0% to 3% r~Moderately weildrained ~ ofsite, slope a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained 100 % of site ~Poorly drained __% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres (see I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [~ Yes ~ No a, What is depth to bedrock (in feet) Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: F~ O-10% 100% ~10- 15% % r~ 15% or greater % Is project substantiall~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? U Yes [] No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes []No ]Yes [] No r""] Yes ~No What is the depth of the water table? 50 (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 7, 8. 9. 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Parle 3 of 21 1 1, Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes []No Accordin9 to: Graham Associates: Visual inspection of the property previously cleared with low scrub brush 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? []Yes []No Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? []Yes J~No 1 4. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? dYes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a, Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 1 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No b, Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES. does surf cent capacity exist to allow connection? [~ Yes b If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? E]No 18, Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, 304? E]Yes []No 1 9. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical and 6 NYCRR 617? []Yes []No ]No Article 25-AA, Section 303 and Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. 1, Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). f. g. h, DYes []No Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: Project acreage to be developed: 3.14 acres initially; Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0.00 acres. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. __ 3.14 acres, 3.14 acres ultimately. N/A % Number of off-street parking spaces existing Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Initially N/A Ultimately N/A 0; proposed 20 30 (upon completion of project)? Two Family Multiple Family Condominium N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 160' width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes UNo [] N/A a, If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? jLaodscape Berms N/A 230'length. N/A L. 0 tons/cubic yards. b, Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 2.0 acres, PageSof21 Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ~Yes ~No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 6 months, (including demolition) If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month __ year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? r~ Yes r~ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes ~ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 50; after project is complete 25 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~ Yes ~ No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? r~ Yes ~ No Type Sanitary wastewater and stormwater 1 4. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~ Yes ~ No if yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? r'-lYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes ~ No ]No a. Ifyes, what is the amount per month? 4tons 75 lb/week per b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes r~ No × 4 weks c, If yes, give name Subject Application ; location Catcbogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? []Yes employee 25 employees Page 6 of 21 e, Ifyes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? L_lYes mlL~lNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month, b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18, Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r~Yes ['~']No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~ Yes [] No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [] Yes [] No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) Odors will be controled with a odor control mistieg system. Nosie from the payloaders will be controled by the proposed building and commercial traffic nosie is similar to the noise produced by the Town Facility located adjacent to the subject property. Diesel Fuel for the payloaders and electric power 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 200 gallons/day. project involve Local, State or Federal funding? F-~ Yes ~ No 24. Does If yes, explain: Pagn 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~Yes n No Type Waste & Recycling Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes ~ No Site Plan Approval City, Town Zoning Board []Yes ~ No City, County Health Department ~ Yes SCDHS Sanitary System Approval Other Local Agencies E~, Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies ~Yes ~ No State Agencies [] Yes [] No NYSDEC Solid Waste Management Faciliw Permit Federal Agencies [] Yes [] No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a plannin9 or zoning decision? ~Yes [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan [] Site plan [] Special use permit [] Resource management plan ]Subdivision E] Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [] Yes [] No ?. What are the predominant land use(a) and zoning dassifications within a V4 mile radius of proposod action? Mixed use: Project is located in a recent subdivision planned for light industrial use. To the west is farmland with one residential unit. East of the subject property is the Town of Southhold Recycling Facility, 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ¼ mile? [] Yes [] No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? []Yes []No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Fire proptection, mail and general services []Yes [] No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes D. informational Details ~Yes [] No E]No Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them, £. Verification Signature John Divello Title Vice President I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Peconic Recycling and Transfer Date If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this Page 10of21 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for V~indows § 280-58. Use regulations. In the LIO District, no building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose except the following: A. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses permitted under Subsection A(1) hereof, are subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989; 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 26-1994; 4-28-1997 by L.L. No. 6-1997] (1) The agricultural operations and accessory uses, including irrigation, the raising of field and garden crops, vineyard and omhard farming, the maintenance of nurseries and the seasonal sale of products grown on the premises, the keeping, breeding, raising and training of horses, domestic animals and fowl, barns, storage buildings, greenhouses and other related structures to the same extent and subject to the same conditions allowed in the AC Zone. (2) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, school districts, park districts and fire districts. (3) Wholesale businesses, private warehousing and public warehousing, and building material storage and sale, but excluding storage of coal, coke, fuel oil or junk. [Amended 11-19-2002 by L.L. No. 7-2002] (4) Building, electrical and plumbing contractors' businesses or yards. (5) La~'a~g,~, baking and other food processing and packaging plants that are not offensive, obnoxious or detrimental to neighboring uses by mason of dust, smoke, vibration, noise, odor or effluent. (6) Office buildings for businesses, governmental and professional uses, including administrative training, data processing, publication, financial and sales offices. (7) Telephone exchanges. (8) Wineries as regulated by § 280-48A(11). (9) Tourist camp. (~q~) Recreational facilities which meet the following conditions: (a) Minimum parcel size shall be three acres. Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows (b) There shall be three acres for each use. (11) Standard regulation golf course. (12) Food catering facility. (13) Machine and equipment workshop. (14) Boat building, boat servicing and boat storage facilities, excluding retail sales of boats and accessories. (15)~~, subject to the following conditions: (a) No such process or operation shall involve the handling, storage or discharge of explosives or permit upon the premises any virus or other type of infectious organisms identified with diseases of animals or humans. (b) No offensive noises, gases, fumes, smoke, odors, dust, effluent or vibrations shall emanate from such use and no waste products shall be discharged therefrom of a character to create a nuisance or to be injurious to health or to negatively impact groundwater. (c) Such processes shall involve the use of only oil, gas or electricity for fuel. (16) Printing and publishing plants. B. Uses permitted by special exception of the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided, subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: [Amended 5-23-1989 by L.L. No. 7-1989; 4-28-1997 by L.L. No. 6-1997] (1) Research, design or development laboratories, provided that any manufacturing shall be limited to prototype and products for testing. (2) Lanndry or dry-cleaning plants, subject to the following conditions: (a) All processes and storage shall be carried on within an enclosed building. (b) All fluids used in processing shall be recycled, and the overall facility shall be designed, located and operated to protect surface waters and the groundwater reservoir from pollution. (3) Conference facilities, subject to the following conditions: (a) Where rooms are provided for conference attendees, said rooms are permitted as set 2 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows forth and regulated by § 280-35B(4) of the Resort Residential (RR) District. (4) Public utility structures and uses, except that wireless communication facilities must obtain approval pursuant to Article XVII. [Amended 11-12-1997 by L.L. No. 26-1997] (5) _ ' (garages, parking facilities, loading docks, etc.). (6) ,~a~hlm~sffig~p~tcltag~gpi~, not including fish processing plants. (7) Repair of boats and mar/ne items. (8) Basic Utility Stage II airport, subject to the following conditions: (a) Minimum parcel size shall be 100 acres. C. Accessory uses. The following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by Article XIX, are subject to site plan review: [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] (1) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily incidental to any permitted or special exception use and not involving a separate business. EN(1) (2) Fully enclosed storage facilities incidental to the principal use. (3) Open storage as set forth in and regulated by § 280-48C(2) of the General Business District. (4) Indoor and outdoor recreation facilities for the exclusive use of executives and employees of the principal use and their families. (5) In-service training schools for employees of the principal use. (6) Private garages for the storage and service of motor vehicles owned by the owner of the principal use or the executives or employees thereof, or visitors thereto, including the sale of them, but not to the public generally of gasoline, oil and minor accessories. (7) Central heating and power plants accessory to the principal use and the service of all structures on the premises. (8) Maintenance and utility shops incidental to the principal use. (9) Off-street parking and loading. Said areas shall not be nearer than 50 feet to any lot line or street and, if generally adjacent to any street or any residence district, shall be suitably screened by a landscaped strip of at least 10 feet in width. Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Y~indows § 280-59. Bulk, area and parking regulations. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same fome and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full. EN(2) § 280-60. Front yard setbacks. [Added 8-22-1995 by L.L. No. 18-1995] A. Structures shall be set back at least 100 feet from the right-of-way. B. There shall be an exception to Subsection A if the adjacent parcels are developed, in which case the minimum front yard setback shall be the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels. C. A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildings are at least 75 feet from the right-of-way. 4 Town of Southold PC/Codebookfor Windows 1 (Popup - Popup) Endnotes Editor's Note: Former Subsection C(2) and (3), regarding signs, which previously followed this subsection, were repealed 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 25-1994. For current provisions regarding signs, see Art. XIX, Signs. 2 (Popup - Popup) Editor's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter, and the Parking and Loading Schedules are in §§ 280-78 and 280-79. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REPORT (including Part III EAF, Significance of Impacts) PECONIC RECYCLING & TRANSFER Prepared for: Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Prepared by: Date: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP October 13, 2006, Revised October 27, 2006 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION: SCTM: ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAYS: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Site Plan Application 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-095-2-7 LIO-Light Industrial Office Park NA 3.14 SITE DESCRIPTION AND RESOURCES The overall project site is located at 860 Commerce Drive, approximately 1,083 feet north of the intersection of Commeme Drive and Corporate Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 3.14-acre vacant parcel has approximately 90 feet of frontage at the terminus of Commeme Drive. The site is generally flat and is entirely covered with low shrubs. Several trails cross the property in various directions. The site is zoned LIO Light Industrial/Light ~lanned Office Park, and the area surrounding the site is similarly zoned LIO and LI Light Industrial. A Town composting facility is located east of the site, beyond which are Town solid waste management facilities. The nearest residence is west of the site fronting Depot Lane and this site is also zoned LIO. There is a small residential community well to the south fronting CR 48 and this area is zoned R-40. Setbacks and potential impacts to surrounding uses are considered in more detail herein. There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within 5,000 feet of the property. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies three (3) soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following: Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8% slopes (RdB), Haven Loam, 0- 2% slopes (HaA) and Haven Loam, 2-6% slopes (HaB). The topography and soils on the site do Pecol~Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 not appear to present severe development constraints. Therefore, no significant impact on soils and topography is anticipated. A review of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2005 indicates that no water mains are located in the area of the subject property. Using typical SCDHS flow rates for an industrial building of the size proposed, it is estimated that the proposed development will use approximately 1,573 gallons of water per day based. It is anticipated that this amount will be significantly less as the proposed operation is not a water intensive use. The applicant will need to demonstrate to the SCDHS under Article 4 of the Sanitary Code, that potable water can be supplied to the site. It is expected that water supply will be provided by use of a private well. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is approximately 5 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 50 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 45 feet. The subject property is located just north of the north fork groundwater divide. The majority of the groundwater recharges vertically into the groundwater but, there is a slight horizontal component of flow which is generally toward the north and west. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the west towards the Long Island Sound. REQUESTED ACTION The proposed action involves the development of the 3.14-acre site with a 38,214 SF building that will house a recycling and transfer facility and associated office space. The application filed with the Town indicates that "Sorting & collection to be performed indoors & held on site for short periods of time for distribution to other recycling centers". This is critical to the safe, compatible operation of the facility. The application also indicates solid waste generation in the amount of 1,060 cubic yards (cy) per month. Part of the information contained in the Part I EAF indicates that topsoil will be reutilized for landscape berms, a feature which will assist with visual and land use compatibility. Two (2) large scales that will be utilized by entering trucks will be located along the western property boundary. Twenty (20) truck parking stalls and 12 car parking stalls are planned. One (1) curb cut in the eastern property boundary will connect to the adjacent, vacant property. The site will be accessible via a gated entrance point located at the northern terminus of Commeme Drive. A series of stormwater leaching pools will collect runoff generated by the property. The development will be required to use water supplied by the SCWA and a septic system will be provided which will need approval from the SCDHS. The perimeter of the property will be landscaped with evergreens and shrubs. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The Applicant has provided the following forms which comply with the Town's Site Plan Application submission requirements: · Site Plan application form Page 2 · Pecdffl~ Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 · Fee · Long environmental assessment form · Site plan · Certified survey Construction Plans/elevations A Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) Consistency Assessment Form was also provided. ENVIRONMETAL ASSESSMENT FORM The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further information or analysis: · The proposed coverages provided do not correspond to site acreage. · Soil types identified on the subject property are not provided. · No parking space information is provided. · Building dimensions are not provided. · Linear frontage along a public roadway is not indicated. · Number of jobs generated during construction seems too high and no amount is provided for after completion. · Applicant should identify how solid waste generation amount was calculated. Additionally, the solid waste that will be generated by the facility and where the material will be disposed should be provided. · The anticipated water usage appears to be incorrect. The applicant should use Suffolk County Department of Health Services Flow rates to calculate water usage. · The type(s) of permit that are to be requested from the DEC should be noted, and in particular if a DEC Part 360 Solid Waste Facility permit will be required. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further or update information or analysis: · Gross square footage provided on the application is not consistent with plan. Percentage of lot coverage is, therefore, not correct. · The site plan should indicate water usage and sanitary calculahons. Page 3 Peco~lT~ Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part II Environmental Assessment form (EAF) has been completed for the proposed action. Potential large imapcts are noted as follows: · Potential traffic impacts · Potential odor impacts · Potential noise impacts · Potential visual impacts Other small to moderate impacts are identified in the Part II EAF analysis of the significance of impacts are noted as follows: · Potential groundwater impacts ,, Potential land use impacts PART III EAF - SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION This section provides a Part III narrative to consider the significance/magnitude of mitigation and how modifications in the project or mitigation can be used to ensure that an impact does not occur or that it is not significant. TRAFFIC Proposed project will result in an increase of large tracks on Middle Road (CR 48), Depot Lane, Corporate Road and Commerce Drive. The trucks will enter the site loaded with solid waste, unload waste in the building and leave the site. Additionally, sorted material will be stored on- site and removed periodically resulting in additional truck traffic. The majority of the traffic entering and exiting the site will utilize the flashing light-controlled intersection at Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The Town Engineer reviewed the proposed project and in a memo dated August 7, 2006 asked that the large vehicle scales be moved from adjacent to the right of way to avoid congestion on Commerce Drive. The plans were revised and the scales moved to an interior location. Traffic impacts from the proposed project can be lessened by: Truck parking stalls provided on the site that will reduce congestion on Commerce Drive. The location of the scales to an interior location will reduce stacking on Commerce drive. On August 30, 2006, the SCDPW reviewed this development and indicated a permit is not required. They stated that" find that no additional improvement within the County right of way in the vicinity of this site is required". This impact is not considered significant for the following reasons: · The Town Engineer has reviewed the site plan and provided comments which have been addressed. · The existing road system appears adequate to handle traffic from land uses in the area. · The site is part of an approved subdivision in an LIO zone; additional industrial related traffic has been anticipated in connection with this site and the overall subdivision. Page 4 · P--R I mT ~ ~ ecome ecyc ing ee rans~er,~utchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 The site and area are zoned for industrial use; the proposed project and other LIO uses which could occupy the site would all involve some degree of truck and industrial use traffic. ODOR AND NOISE It is anticipated that odors will emanate from the solid waste being transported to the site and from the trucks themselves through exhaust. Additionally, the trucks will produce noise. Odor and noise impacts can be lessened by: · Material being transported to and from the site should be covered with plastic or other appropriate material. · Unloading and sorting will be conducted in the building limiting odors to surrounding uses. · Tracks being unloaded and those waiting to be processed will be expected to turn their engines off thereby reducing the impacts of exhaust odors and noise. · Perimeter landscaping will reduce noise impacts to the surrounding uses. · The facility will operate during normal working hours which will reduce noise and odor impacts to surrounding residences when individuals are at home. The applicant's EAF Part I indicates "Noise from payloaders & commercial traffic similar to Town facility located adjacent to subject property". This is a fair statement and is considered in the context of this analysis. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. Recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with good solid waste management initiatives. Significant odors are not expected since small loads of waste will be sorted and boxed and held on site temporarily before shipping to disposal or other markets. Sorting occurs indoors and therefore impacts will be localized. There are no nearby residential uses, the nearest residence is over 275 feet to the west of the west property line and is in an LIO zone. No other receptors are nearby, and it is expected that the area will become occupied by other industrial uses in accordance with zoning. The site is next to a Town compost facility to the east, beyond which is the Towns MSW facility. Solid waste facilities exist in the area at present, and the proposed use is not out of character with these uses in terms of noise generating potential, particularly since operations will be conducted indoors. Noise and odor impacts are not expected to be significant based on the following considerations: · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in ~[h¢ area. "'~"he Town has noise and nuisance ordinances tha~can be enfbrced should it be ~'ec-~sssary, though~ ~t :xpc~tcd. / · There are no residential receptors within 275 feet of the west property line, where there is one home on an industrially zoned site. · Activities will be conducted indoors and containerized sorted materials and waste will be on site on a temporary basis before being shipped to disposal or market. Page 5 Pec{ fi~c Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 VISUAL The proposed structure will be noticeable from surrounding areas and roadways including, Commerce Drive, Corporate Road, Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The lighting plan has been designed to ensure that lighting is cast downward and only illuminates the subject site. The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) has reviewed the project and in a document dated August 3, 2006 recommended specific architectural features and color. Visual impacts can be lessened by: · The use of landscaping around the perimeter of the property. The site plan includes a landscaping schedule. · Specific color, exterior finishing and landscaping as recommended by the ARC to reduce the visual impact of the structure. The proposed use is for an industrial site in an industrial area. While the site may be visible from CR 48, it will not be unlike other solid waste management facilities currently operating in the area. No significant impact to visual resources is expected to occur based on the following reasons: · The ARC review for color, texture and architecture will ensure that visual/aesthetic issues are addressed. · Landscape materials and berming will help "soften" the structural improvements on the site. · The site is setback over 2,500 feet from CR 48 and over 500 feet from Depot Lane. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. GROUNDWATER Solid waste sorting on site could potentially release groundwater contaminants; however, the operation and regulations should be understood to assess the significance of this impact. First, the use must conform to Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for sanitary flow density. This is determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) who will review and approve the site plan. Potential impacts with respect to groundwater can be lessened by the following methods: · The "tipping" floor should be a sealed concrete floor with no crocks or floor drains and repaired / maintained as necessary. · The concrete slab should pitch inward, not toward the door. · All tipping and sorting operations should be conducted indoors. · Solid waste containers should be inspected before being "tipped". · Spill control tools should be available such as speedi-dry, absorbant pads and other control materials. · Site personnel should be trained in spill response, and the NYSDEC spill hotline number should be posted and part of the training. · The facility should institute an on-call contract with a licensed scavenger. · No liquid materials should be stored outdoors; should any be encountered, they should be separated, retained in doors and removed by a licensed scavenger after testing and identification. Page 6 ecomc ecycllng &Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 In terms of potential for impacts, significant groundwater impacts are not expected for the following reasons: · The measures noted above should be implemented, as these are standard methods of the industry. · The floor will be of sealed concrete with no floor drains and pitched toward the interior of the building. · All operations will be conducted indoors. · SCDHS prohibits discharge under Article 12 of the SCSC and County inspectors maintain records and inspections of industrial facilities. LAND USE The proposed project is located in a Light Industrial/Planned Office Park (LIO) zoning district. Adjoining property to the north and south are similarly zoned. Light Industrial zoning districts are located south and north of the subject property. Farmland, a compost facility, Town landfill and solid waste facility and commercial uses are located in the area of the subject property. One non-conforming residential structure is located approximately 275 feet to the west along Depot Lane. The next closest residential area, zoned R-40, is located approximately 1,400 feet to the east. Land use impacts are not expected based on the following reasons: · All operations will be conducted indoors. · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. The Town of Southold Solid Waste Coordinator has reviewed the application and has provided the following input: New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) designates the Town of Southold as the Solid Waste Management Unit (SMU) for the Town of Southold. A key provision of this status is the requirement for the Town to develop a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) that explains in detail how the Town will ensure that ALL of the waste generated within the Town will be handled both in an environmentally sound manner AND in compliance with the solid waste management hierarchy as outlined in the ECL, whether or not the waste is actually handled or managed through a Town-owned facility. In this manner, the State seeks to identify all of the waste for which the Town is potentially responsible (should private arrangements change or break down). (It is also in the Town's interest, as it is clearly relevant to Town decisions on the development of it Solid Waste program and facilities). The Town first developed its SWMP Plan in 1990 and, as per regulations, it has been updated several times (most recently in 2005) since to reflect changes in the waste stream, developments in management processes and technology, and developments/improvements in the Town's infrastructure and waste handling abilities. It is estimated that between 20% and 30% of the waste generated within the Town of Southold, primarily commercial waste and construction/demolition debris, bypasses the Cutchogue Transfer Station and is not in any way tracked by the Town. Whereas the ECL seeks input on this "missing waste" from the Town, the fact that it is destined for various out of Town facilities and does not pass through any single transfer point on its way to those facilities, makes it exceedingly difficult to track with any assurance. In short, it makes it easy to ignore. The State has therefore Page 7 econic ecycling &Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 generally accepted Town reporting on this stream in terms of overall estimates, leaving out details on specific tonnage and destinations. Thc new Peconic Recycling facility, however, will be capable of providing in-Town access to not only their own customers, but to others involved in generating, hauling, and disposing of waste. As such, to stay in compliance with the ECL, thc Town would be required to revise its SWMP to track waste handled at the facility. In addition to the type of waste and tonnage received, this would include sources of the waste, its destination, recycling rates and quantities, permit information from points of ultimate disposal, and other information. Thc Town may even be required to include information on any out of Town waste handled by Peconic Recycling. At present, the Town has no mechanism for requiring private companies to report on their waste handling and recycling practices. Most municipalities receive such information through a local permitting process, renewable annually. However, Southold does not require permits of waste handling companies that do not use the Cutchgue Transfer Station. The permits that are required are merely vehicle-specific, to allow access to the facility. Should the Town seek information from Peconic Recycling, it makes sense to take the full step and seek the same information from other companies engaged in out of Town disposal. This would avoid singling out one company for regulation and would finally allow the Town to "see" all the waste it is potentially responsible for. In addition, the resulting benefit to the Town's waste management planning efforts are obvious. To the extent possible, the Town should explicitly require Peconic Recycling and Transfer to receive the necessary State operating permits and to adhere to NYSDEC Part 360 regulations for C&D transfer stations. In addition, the Town should require notification from Peconic Transfer of any change from its plans in the type and amount of waste received, and to maintain full compliance with DEC regulations pursuant to any such changes. RECOMMENDATIONS · The applicant should address discrepancies and requested information identified herein which the Planning Board feels is important. · The Part I EAF was reviewed and a Part II EAF has been completed and attached. A Part III assessment of the significance of impacts has been completed. The applicant should provide any additional materials which the Board feels are necessary to determine the significance of the action, and once satisfied the sufficient information is available, the Planning Board should issue a Determination of Significance. · Receive approval from the Southold Town Board Under Town Code Section 211. Where the applicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center Permit for this proposed use. From a philosophical standpoint as well as for environmental management and waste reduction goals, recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with the good solid waste management initiatives. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. If the Planning Board is in agreement, the action does not appear to rise to the level of requiring a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and it is expected that a Negative Declaration could be justified for consideration by the Board based on the analysis and weighing of issues conducted as part of this report in addition to review and deliberation of the action by the Planning Board members, staff and advisors. Page 8 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REPORT (including Part III EAF, Significance of Impacts) PECONIC RECYCLING & TRANSFER Prepared for: Prepared by: Date: Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 [555 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorI Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP October 13, 2006, Revised October 27, 2006 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION: SCTM: ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAYS: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Site Plan Application 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-095-2-7 LIO-Light Industrial Office Park NA 3.14 SITE DESCRIPTION AND RESOURCES The overall project site is located at 860 Commerce Drive, approximately 1,083 feet north of the intersection of Commerce Drive and Corporate Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 3.14-acre vacant parcel has approximately 90 feet of frontage at the terminus of Commeme Drive. The site is generally flat and is entirely covered with low shrubs. Several trails cross the prope~ ,~.~various directions. The site is zoned LIO Light Industrial:/~-i~ .~lugd'r~l Planneff,[Officg~Park, and the area surrounding the site is similarly zoned LIO and LI Light Industrial. A Town composting facility is located east of the site, beyond which are Town solid waste management facilities. The nearest residence is west of the site fronting Depot Lane and this site is also zoned LIO. There is a small residential community well to the south fronting CR 48 and this area is zoned R-40. Setbacks and potential impacts to surrounding uses are considered in more detail herein. There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within 5,000 feet of the property. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies three (3) soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following: Riverhead sandy loam, 3 to 8% slopes (RdB), Haven Loam, 0- 2% slopes (HaA) and Haven Loam, 2-6% slopes (HaB). The topography and soils on the site do not appear to present severe development constraints. and topography is anticipated. Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 Therefore, no significant impact on soils A review of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2005 indicates that no water mains are located in the area of the subject property. Using typical SCDHS flow rates for an industrial building of the size proposed, it is estimated that the proposed development will use approximately 1,573 gallons of water per day based. It is anticipated that this amount will be significantly less as the proposed operation is not a water intensive use. The applicant will need to demonstrate to the SCDHS under Article 4 of the Sanitary Code, that potable water can be supplied to the site. It is expected that water supply will be provided by use of a private well. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site i$ approximately 5 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 50 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 45 feet. The subject property is located just north of the north fork groundwater divide. The majority of the groundwater recharges vertically into the groundwater but, there is a slight horizontal component of flow which is generally toward the north and west. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the west towards the Long Island Sound. REQUESTED ACTION The proposed action involves the development of the 3.14-acre site with a 38,214 SF building that will house a recycling and transfer facility and associated office space. The application filed with the Town indicates that "Sorting & collection to be performed indoors & held on site for short periods of time for distribution to other recycling centers". This is critical to the safe, compatible operation of the facility. The application also indicates solid waste generation in the amount of 1,060 cubic yards (cy) per month. Part of the information contained in the Part I EAF indicates that topsoil will be reutilized for landscape berms, a feature which will assist with visual and land use compatibility. Two (2) large scales that will be utilized by entering trucks will be located along the western property boundary. Twenty (20) truck parking stalls and 12 car parking stalls are planned. One (I) curb cut in the eastern property boundary will connect to the adjacent, vacant property. The site will be accessible via a gated entrance point located at the northern terminus of Commerce Drive. A series of stormwater leaching pools will collect runoff generated by the property. The development will be required to It$~ wat®r sUl~l~li®d blt fha $¢1~/g, ~se well wate4 and a septic system will be provided ~ which will ~]approval from the SCDHS. The perimeter of the property will be landscaped with evergreens and shrubs. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The Applicant has provided the following forms which comply with the Town's Site Plan Application submission requirements: Page 2 Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 · Site Plan application form · Fee · Long environmental assessment form · Site plan · Certified survey · Construction Plans/elevations A Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) Consistency Assessment Form was also provided. ENVIRONMETAL ASSESSMENT FORM The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further information or analysis: /' · The proposed coverages provided do not correspond to site acreage. · Soil types identified on the subject property are not provided. · No parking space information is provided. ~x · Building dimensions are not provided. ~ · Linear frontage along a public roadway is not indicated. ) · Number of jobs generated during construction seems too high and no amount is provided for after -~ completion. · Applicant should identify how solid waste generation amount was calculated. Additionally, the "~ solid waste that will be generated by the facility and where the material will be disposed should be provided. / · The anticipated water usage appears to be incorrect. The applicant should use Suffolk County Department of Health Services Flow rates to calculate water usage. ~ · The type(s) of permit that are to be requested from the DEC should be noted, and in particular if a ~,.,~DEC Part 360 Solid Waste Facility permit will be required. SITE PLAN APPLICATION The following analysis identifies areas where the Applicant must provide further or update information or analysis: Gross square footage provided on the application is not consistent with plan. Percentage of lot coverage is, therefore, not correct. The site plan should indicate water usage and sanitary calculations. Page 3 Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue ,, Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part II Environmental Assessment form (EAF) has been completed for the proposed action. Potential targe '~e?~ _~ ~z--/~,/~,' ~ ]'Tn°ted as follows'. Potential traffic impacts Potential odor impacts Potential noise impacts Potential visual impacts Other small to moderate impacts are identified in the Part II EAF analysis of the significance of impacts are noted as follows: Potential groundwater impacts Potential land use impacts PART III EAF - SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION This section provides a Part III narrative to consider the significance/magnitude of mitigation and how modifications in the project or mitigation can be used to ensure that an impact does not occur or that it is not significant. Proposed project will result in an increase of large trucks on Middle Road (CR 48), Depot Lane, Corporate Road and Commerce Drive. The trucks will enter the site loaded with solid waste, unload waste in the building and leave the site. Additionally, sorted material will be stored on- site and removed periodically ]to the adjacent town solid waste facility ~resulting in additional truck traffic. The majority of the traffic entering and exiting the site will utilize the flashing at the ~ight-controlled] intersection at Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The Town Engineer reviewed the proposed project and in a memo dated August 7, 2006 asked that the large vehicle scales be moved from adjacent to the right of way to avoid congestion on Commerce Drive. The plans were revised and the scales moved to an interior location. Traffic impacts from the proposed project can be lessened by: Track parking stalls provided on the site that will reduce congestion on Commerce Drive. The location of the scales to an interior location will reduce stacking on Commerce drive. On August 30, 2006, the SCDPW reviewed this development and indicated a permit is not required. They stated to # find that no additional improvement within the County right of way in the vicinity of this site is required". This impact is not considered significant for the following reasons: · The Town Engineer has reviewed the site plan and provided comments which have been addressed. · The existing road system appears adequate to handle traffic fi.om land uses in the area. Page 4 Peconie Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 Thc site is part of an approved subdivision in an LIO zone; additional industrial related traffic has been anticipated in connection with this site and the overall subdivision. Thc site and area are zoned for industrial use; the proposed project and other LIO uses which could occupy the site would all involve some degree of truck and industrial usc traffic. ODOR AND NOISE It is anticipated that odors will emanate from the solid waste being transported to the site and from the trucks themselves through exhaust. Additionally, the trucks will produce noise. Odor and noise impacts can be lessened by: · Material being transported to and from the site should be covered with plastic or other appropriate material. · Unloading and sorting ~vill be conducted in the building limiting odors to surrounding uses. · Tracks being unloaded and those waiting to be processed will be expected to turn their engines off thereby reducing the impacts of exhaust odors and noise. · Perimeter landscaping will reduce noise impacts to the surrounding uses. · The facility will operate during normal working hours which will reduce noise and odor impacts to surrounding residences when individuals are at home. The applicant's EAF Part I indicates "Noise from payloaders & commercial traffic similar to Town facility located adjacent to subject property". This is a fair statement and is considered in the context of this analysis. Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to properly manage this type of operation. Recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and conform with good solid waste management initiatives. Significant odors are not expected since small loads of waste will be sorted and boxed and held on site temporarily before shipping to disposal or other markets. Sorting occurs indoors and therefore impacts will be localized. There are no nearby residential uses, the nearest residence is over 275 feet to the west of the west property line and is in an LIO zone. No other receptors are nearby, and it is expected that the area will become occupied by other industrial uses in accordance with zoning. The site is next to a Town compost facility to the east, beyond which is the Towns MSW facility. Solid waste facilities exist in the area at present, and the proposed use is not out of character with these uses in terms of noise generating potential, particularly since operations will be conducted indoors. Noise and odor impacts are not expected to be significant based on the following considerations: · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · The Town has noise and nuisance ordinances that can be enforced should it be necessary, though this is not expected. · There are no residential receptors within 275 feet of the west property line, where there is one home on an industrially zoned site. · Activities will be conducted indoors and containerized sorted materials and waste will be on site on a temporary basis before being shipped to disposal or market. Page 5 Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 VISUAL The proposed structure will be noticeable from surrounding areas and roadways including, Commerce Drive, Corporate Road, Depot Lane and Middle Road (CR 48). The lighting plan has been designed to ensure that lighting is cast downward and only illuminates the subject site. The Architectural Re¥[ew ~e~Committee (ARC) has reviewed the project and in a document dated August 3, 2006 recommended specific architectural features and color. Visual impacts can be lessened by: · The use of landscaping around the perimeter of the property. The site plan includes a landscaping schedule. · Specific color, exterior finishing and landscaping as recommended by the ARC to reduce the visual impact of the structure. The proposed use is for an industrial site in an industrial area. While the site may be visible from CR 48, it will not be unlike other solid waste management facilities currently operating in the area. No significant impact to visual resources is expected to occur based on the following reasons: · The ARC review for color, texture and architecture will ensure that visual/aesthetic issues are addressed. · Landscape materials and berming will help "soften" the structural improvements on the site. · The site is setback over 2,500 feet from CR 48 and over 500 feet from Depot Lane. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. GROUNDWATER Solid waste sorting on site could potentially release groundwater contaminants; however, the operation and regulations should be understood to assess the significance of this impact. First, the use must conform to Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code for sanitary flow density. This is determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) who will review and approve the site plan. Potential impacts with respect to groundwater can be lessened by the following methods: · The "tipping" floor should be a sealed concrete floor with no cracks or floor drains and repaired / maintained as necessary. · The concrete slab should pitch inward, not toward the door. · All tipping and sorting operations should be conducted indoors. · Solid waste containers should be inspected before being "tipped". Spill control tools should be available such as speedi-dry, absorbant pads and other control materials. · Site personnel should be trained in spill response, and the NYSDEC spill hotline number should be posted and part of the training. · The facility should institute an on-call contract with a licensed scavenger. · No liquid materials should be stored outdoors; should any be encountered, they should be separated, retained in doors and removed by a licensed scavenger after testing and identification. Page 6 ecomc ecyc ing & Transfer, Cutcho, Environmental Re~ NP&V No. 0 In terms of potential for impacts, significant groundwater impacts are not expected for .. following reasons: · The measures noted above should be implemented, as these are standard methods of the industry. · The floor will be of sealed concrete with no floor drains and pitched toward the interior of the building. · All operations will be conducted indoors. · SCDHS prohibits discharge under Article 12 of the SCSC and County inspectors maintain records and inspections of industrial facilities. LAND USE The proposed project is located in a Light Industrial/Planned Office Park (LIO) zoning district. Adjoining property to the north and south are similarly zoned. Light Industrial zoning districts are located south and north of the subject property. Farmland, a compost facility, Town landfill and solid waste facility and commercial uses are located in the area of the subject property. One non-conforming residential structure is located approximately 275 feet to the west along Depot Lane. The next closest residential area, zoned R-40, is located approximately 1,400 feet to the east. Land use impacts are not expected based on the following reasons: · All operations will be conducted indoors. · The area is industrially zoned. · The site is adjacent to a Town solid waste facility and other Town MSW facilities are in the area. · The proposed use is not unlike other existing or expected industrial use buildings. · The site is zoned for industrial use and is part of the Town comprehensive plan by developing in accordance with zoning recognized as appropriate for the area. RECOMMENDATIONS · The applicant should address discrepancies and requested information identified herein which the Planning Board feels is important. · P~F was reviewed and a Part II EAF has been completed and attached. A Part III assessment of the ~ of impacts has been completed. The applicant should provide any additional materials which the Board feels are necessary to determine the significance of the action, and once satisfied the sufficient information is available, the Planning Board should issue a Determination of Significance. · Receive approval from the Southold Town Board Under Town Code Section 21t. Where the applicant is required to obtain a Salvage Center Permit for this proposed use. From a philosophical standpoint as weI1 as for environmental management and waste reduction goals, recycling facilities such as this assist in reducing waste needed to be disposed of and c..~onform_with the_gpod solid waste management initiatiyCs~ Small solid waste sorting facilities are becoming more typical as solid waste disposal costs increase and recycling initiatives are encouraged. The hand sorting of Construction and Demolition (C&D) debris and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) on an indoor tipping floor is a way to~p~operly manage this type of operation. If the Planning Board' ' the actio~ppear to rise to the level of reqmrtng a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and it is expected that~a Negative Declaration could be justified for consideration by the Board based on the analysis and weighing of~ssues Page 7 Peconic Recycling & Transfer, Cutchogue Environmental Review NP&V No. 06279 conducted as part of this report in addition to review and deliberation of thc action by thc Planning Board members, staff and advisors. Page 8 October 27, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer FROM: Jim Bunchuck, Solid Waste Coordinator SUBJECT: Site Plan Application of Peconic Recycling and Transfer, SCTM #: 1000-95-2-7 I am pleased to respond on behalf of the Southold Town Solid Waste Management District on the above named application, as requested. The concerns discussed below relate to 1) impacts the proposed facility may have on the Town's framework for managing solid waste and 2) compliance with DEC regulations. l) New York State Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) designates the Town of Southold as the Solid Waste Management Unit (SMU) for the Town of Southold. A key provision of this status is the requirement for the Town to develop a Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) that explains in detail how the Town will ensure that ALL of the waste generated within the Town will be handled both in an environmentally sound manner AND in compliance with the solid waste management heirarchy as outlined in the ECL, whether or not the waste is acutally handled or managed through a Town-owned facility. In this manner, the State seeks to identify all of the waste for which the Town is potentially responsible (should private arrangements change or break down). (It is also in the Town's interest, as it is clearly relevant to Town decisions on the development of it Solid Waste program and facilities). The Town first developed its SWMP Plan in 1990 and, as per regulations, it has been updated several times (most recently in 2005) since to reflect changes in the waste stream, developments in management processes and technology, and developments/improvements in the Town's infrastructure and waste handling abilities. It is estimated that between 20% and 30% of the waste generated within the Town of Southold, primarily commercial waste and construction/demolition debris, bypasses the Cutchogue Transfer Station and is not in any way tracked by the Town. Whereas the ECL seeks input on this "missing waste" from the Town, the fact that it is destined for various out of Town facilities and does not pass through any single transfer point on its way to those facilities, makes it exceedingly difficult to track with any assurance. In short, it makes it easy to ignore. The State has therefore generally accepted Town reporting on this stream in terms of overall estimates, leaving out details on specific tonnage and destinations. The new Peconic Recycling facility, however, wilI be capable of providing in-Town access to not only their own customers, but to others involved in generating, hauling, and disposing of waste. As such, to stay in compliance with the ECL, the Town would be required to revise its SWMP to track waste handled at the facility. In addition to the type of waste and tonnage received, this would include sources of the waste, its destination, recycling rates and quantities, permit information from points of ultimate disposal, and other information. The Town may even be required to include information on any out of Town waste handled by Peconic Recycling. At present, the Town has no mechanism for requiring private companies to report on their waste handling and recycling practices. Most municipalities receive such information through a local permitting process, renewable annually. However, Southold does not require permits of waste handling companies that do not use the Cutchgue Transfer Station. The permits that are required are merely vehicle-specific, to allow access to the facility. Should the Town seek information from Peconic Recycling, it makes sense to take the full step and seek the same information from other companies engaged in out of Town disposal. This would avoid singling out one company for regulation and would finally allow the Town to "see" all the waste it is potentially responsible for. In addition, the resulting benefit to the Town's waste management planning efforts are obvious. 2) To the extent possible, the Town should explicitly require Peconic Recycling and Transfer to receive the necessary State operating permits and to adhere to NYSDEC Part 360 regulations for C&D transfer stations. In addition, the Town should require notification from Peconic Transfer of any change from its plans in the type and amount of waste received, and to maintain full compliance with DEC regulations pursuant to any such changes. Thank you for the opportunity to make these comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Semon, Bruno From: Sent: To: Subject: Corcoran, Kieran Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12:16 PM Terry, Mark; Semon, Bruno RE: Peconic Transfer ok by me. ..... Original Message ..... From: Terry, Mark Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12:15 PM To: Corcoran, Kieran; Semon, Bruno Subject: RE: Peconic Transfer 10:00 is no good, how about 11:30? From: Corcoran, Kieran Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12::[3 PM To: Semon, Bruno; Terry, Hark Subject: RE: Peconic Transfer is 10 am good? ..... Original Message ..... From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:47 AM To: Corcoran, Kieran Subject= RE: Peconic Transfer This sounds good for me what time works for you? ..... Original Message ..... From: Corcoran, Kieran Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:33 AM To; Terry, Mark; Semon, Bruno Subject: Peconic Transfer can we meet tomorrow a.m. to discuss where this is at and what we should do to coordinate moving forward?? DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ICOUNTY OF SUFFOLK SIEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE July 21, 2006 THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan which have been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be n_n d_onifican~.~t county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan SCTMNo. Peconic Recycling Transfer 1000-96-1-1.8 Comment: Subject property is not in a designated special Groundwater Protection Area (SGPA). However, care should be taken to have all storm water mnoffkept on site, treatect ana returned to the groundwater table. All (~discharg~to t--he groundwat~'~r)able should be pursuant to NYS DEC and Su.~.ff.olk County Department of Health Services am'eeme_nts. Proofof correspondence betwe_e~encies and the project sponsors should b~' presented to th~ Boar~d prior to final approval ~ NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, APF:cc LOCATION H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 411-I FLOOR lO0 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 5-3-1994 by L.L. No. 7-1994. Amendments noted where applicable.] GENERAL REFERENCES Junkyards -- See Ch. 166. Littering -- See Ch. 174. Scavenger wastes - See Ch. 215, Art. I. Garbage, rubbish and refuse -- See Ch. 233, Art. I. § 211-1. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the terms used herein are defined as follows: SALVAGE CENTER -- Any location where a private collection of items, exclusive of municipal recyclables, is gathered, reused, recycled, reclaimed and processed for eventual disposal off site. § 211-2. Permit required. No person shall engage in or conduct a salvage center on real property within the Town of Southold, either for himself or for and on behalf of any other person, directly or indirectly, without first obtaining a permit therefor as hereinafter provided. § 211-3. Application and fee. A. The Town Board may grant a permit for a salvage center. Each applicant for a permit hereunder shall execute under oath an application therefor to be supplied to him by the Town Clerk, which shall contain the following information: ~ (1) Location ofthe operation. ~ -----.7) (2) ,--.-."~ (4) Size and location of access and parking. Location and kind of containers or receptacles. Storage facilities. B. The application shall be accompanied by a fee of $300. Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows § 211-4. Parking and access. Each salvage center shall provide a macadam or crushed rock base for parking and access. § 211-5. Permit provisions. The permit shall be granted for the period of time specified by the Town Board. The permit shall contain such conditions as may be necessary to ensure that the proposed operation will not have an adverse effect on the environment, the character of the area or the operations of the Town. The permit shall provide that the operation shall be conducted pursuant to the terms of the permit or the Town Code, and, upon failure to do so, the permit may be revoked forthwith. Failure to obtain all state, federal or county permits required for this application shall be a basis for immediate revocation of this permit. § 211-6. Penalties for offenses. The permittee who commits or permits the commission of any violation of the permit or of the Town Code shall be deemed to have committed a violation and shall be liable for any such offense or the penalty therefor. Each day such offense shall continue or be permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 5-3-1994 as L.L. No. 7-1994. Amendments noted where applicable.] GENERAL REFERENCES Garbage, rubbish and refuse -- See Ch. 48. Junkyards - See Ch. 54. Littering -- See Ch. 57. Scavenger wastes - See Ch. 75. § 74-1. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the terms used herein are defined as follows: SALVAGE CENTER -- Any location where a private collection of items, exclusive of municipal recyclables, is gathered, reused, recycled, reclaimed and processed for evemual disposal off site. § 74-2. Permit required. No person shall engage in or conduct a salvage center on real property within the Town of Southold, either for himself or for and on behalf of any other person, directly or indirectly, without first obtaining a permit therefor as hereinafter provided. § 74-3. Application and fee. A. The Town Board may grant a permit for a salvage center. Each applicant for a permit hereunder shall execute under oath an application therefor to be supplied to him by the Town Clerk, which shall contain the following information: (1) Location of the operation. (2) Size and location of access and parking. (3) Location and kind of containers or receptacles~ (4) Storage facilities. B. The application shall be accompanied by a fee of three hundred dollars ($300.). § 74-4. Parking and access. Each salvage center shall provide a macadam or crashed rock base for parking and access. § 74-5. Permit provisions. The permit shall be granted for the period of time specified by the Town Board. The permit shall contain such conditions as may be necessary to ensure that the proposed operation will not have an adverse effect on the environment, the character of the area or the operations of the town. The permit shall provide that the operation shall be conducted pursuant to the terms of the permit or the Town Code, and, upon failure to do so, the perrrfit may be revoked forthwith. Failure to obtain all state, federal or county pemaits required for this application shall be a basis for immediate revocation of this permit. § 74-6. Penalties for offenses. The pennittee who commits or permits the commission of any violation of the permit or of the Town Code shall be deemed to have committed a violation and shall be liable for any such offense or the penalty therefor. Each day such offense shall continue or be 2 permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. LIE -ix,T- ® LINE NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (~ Real Property Tax Service Agency SOUTHOLD SECTICN NO --I , ~ATCH Z NOTICE ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (~ K o. ~ SOUTHOLD SECTION NO .~.,.c~,,.,~,T~ ~ o~~'~L~'~, Red Property Tax Service Rgency ~' '~~ PROPERTY UAP SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: ~ /23 / Site Plan Name: i~-~}'-II C- ~-~.c_-y(....L.I ~ Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-C~'~x_ - ~ 7 Other SCTM #s: r-~/~. Street Address: <:~tO0 C.~'-~WIt-~2_C~ Distance to nearest intersection: Ic-) ~ ~ ( Type of Site Plan: X New __Amended If Amended, last approval date: Residential / SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number for the people below: Property Owner Street ~t0 'LD City ('t. J-~'~C.I. Xr~ (~,--3L1~__%~ State Iq'N// Home Telephone(o'3l 'L~' -<63~"~ther Zip Applicant Street ~-~CK) City I'-~/'C~ 1-'~,cV,~ State N"'[ ,ome Telephone rag i Other Contact Person(s)* Street i<:~'~6 I Applicant's Agent or Representative: City ~y ~~ State ~4xx/ Zip [/~'~O{(D OfficeTelephon~(~'~ (E~)¢ "'C)(O IC~ Other (C~oi qqgg-oilg *Unless otherwise requeste~, cor{espondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBEI~S JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE PLAN APPLICATION Submission Requirements The following items are required for a complete site plan application submission: · Site Plan Application Form (2 pages) · Applicant's Affidavit (1 page) · Agent Authorization (if applicable) · Environmental Assessment Form (EAF- Part One) · Payment to Town of Southold (see 100-256B for fee schedule) · Nine Copies of Site Development Plan (see appendix for requirements) · Grading and Drainage Plan with Calculations (if not included in site plan) · Existing and Proposed Landscape Plan (if not included in site plan) · Survey Prepared by Licensed Surveyor or Civil Engineer · Architectural Review Materials to Include: 2 sets of construction plans with elevation details & lighting details, samples of material, colors, type of roofing and siding. See the Architectural Review Committee Check List. · Scaled Sketch of Sign Showing Color, Material Type, and Sign Lighting Details · Notice of Disapproval from Building Department (See Town Code Section 100-253) NOTE: See the Site Plan Application Guide for further information. Revised 03/18/05 Page 1 of 3 SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type:X New Property total acreage or square footage: Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage:~ ,. iq Modification of Existing Structure .(~hange of use .~ [~ ac./sq, ft. ac./sq, ft. Aghcultural Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ If yes, explain: No~ Property Zoning District(s): Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes ~ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes _/~ No __ If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: 'qt~,E.2klQ'T' List all proposed property uses:~~ ~t'J Other accessory uses: ~ Existing lot coverage: ~ % ~oposed lot coverage: ~- % Gross floor ~ea ofexist~g stmcture(s)*~'~ sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed stmcture(s)~ Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces:['o/~, # of proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Y~ No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: ~_~% Proposed landscape coverage: 'SO _% Waterfront Data: ~ Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes __ No If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certif~ ab~c vein is true. Signature of Preparer: J q,,ff~X,...~ } f~_.~x,~.~ Date: Paae 3 of 3 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST MINIMUM SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS (} Notice of Disapproval from Building Department required under 100-253 of the Town Code. Lot, block section from Suffolk County Tax Map. Name and address of landowner on record. Names and addresses of adjoining landowners. Names and address of applicant (if not same as landowner). Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature. Date of Plan. North Point. Location of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines. Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. Existing zone district, adjoining property zone districts and zoning district lines if the property includes a split zone. Buildings and build out with percent lot coverage ( see bulk schedule of zone). Landscaping and percent landscaped ( see bulk schedule of zone). Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet. Existing building structures / utilities and proposed structures/utilities. Show all uses of the site in a town defined type, detail square feet and parking calculations broken down by the use, refer to Town Code section 100-190. Include handicap parking spaces as required in New York State Code. Drainage plan detailing paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas with calculations. Show outdoor lighting with detail of wattage and type of fixture refer to 100-239.5. Show location of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants. Show location of dumpster. Existing trees of 6 inches in diameter at a point 3 feet above the truck base property boundaries. Landscape plan detailing location of landscaping, type of material plants, buffering, street trees -see attached Town Code information 100-212 & 100-213. Data for architectural review (see information below) & refer to 100-257 & 100-258 Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area ADDITIONALREQUIREMENTS (If Applicable) Off street loading areas as required, refer to Town Code 100-192 for Loading Berth Requirements. Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less Show wetlands Outdoor signs - sketch to scale and colors refer to 100-200/209 Proposed grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line Spot elevations for buildings Town of Southold INSTRUCTIONS 1. , All applicants for pemfits* including Town of $outhold agenciis, sl~all complete tkis CCAF proposed actions ~at ~e subject to the Town of Southold waterff~tC~sistency Revi~ Law: ~sessment is intended to supplment other info~ation used by a Town of Southold sKqncv m~ng a dete~natlon of consistency. *Except minor exempt ~o~ ~'~ B~7[ding Permits and other ministerial pe~its not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then thc proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a detem:fmation that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board [~ Planning Dept. ~7[/ Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) (b) (c) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Location of action: Site acreage: '~ Present land use: Present zoning classification: If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: '-~ot/o~Jf~ o./I ~)t P/C ![ _f) (b) Mailing address: ~t.~ [.~)tC }'~ c_~_p~, f~_]'~ (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) ~ ct ~ '- ,~ ~ ~ ~C~ (d) Application number, if anYL Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ~ No~-~ Ifyes, which state or federal agency? b~ C DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No ~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria V'~ Yes [] No ~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~ No ~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes ~ No ~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes V~No ~-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. . / ~ Yes ~ No ~/~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No ~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ~YeYes [~ No ~ ]Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes~] No [~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. ~See L~WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes [] NoI--J-1/[_~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ~-] Yes ['~ No [~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [--'] Yes ~'~ No ~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [~/Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable APPUCAN]~ AFFIDAVIf 5q'ATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~ I--~ ~) i%~. L.L_~ being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the State of New York, and that he Is me owner of the above properb/, or that he is the (Title) {Specify whether P~rtnershlp or Corp.! which is hereby making applicaUon; Lhat there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown onthe Site Plan; that the tiUe to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-Way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and bs to roads;'that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical ImprovementS will be installed in strict accordance With tine plans subml~ed. /" /r~ner or C~rate Officer and Title) MB.~E V. ~OWN Nal~/pd~,, 81~e e/New YoA ') NOTE: YOU ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS: OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS (If Applicable) Review required by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Review by New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit ( For,Route 25) Review by Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) for curb cut permit ( For County Road 48) Review by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Storm water runoff permit (SPDES) for ground disturbance of 1 acre or greater. Review by Southold Town Trustees for dredging, bulkhead, wetlands, coastal hazard area Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Review required by Southold Town Board U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Bulkhead, dredging. Greenport Village Utility: Water if within village franchise area. Other 2 ~EC--05-2006 12:05 A~ PES KE~PEY EN~ 817.20 Appendix A sta~ En¥1ranrn~ntal ~ue#ty lfgv~w r'tdW, bNVIt~[ZNMENTAL ASs;ESRM£NT FORM Purpose; The full FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine In an orderly manner, w~ether a project or action may be significant. The question ofwhetber an Set On may be significant Is not always easy [o answer, Frequ_~D~tly, t. here are aspects cf a pro, act that are sub~ective or unmeasurable, It is also understood that those who detarmJ~e significance may have lirde or no formal knowJedge Of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, man.who have knowle~je ~ in one particular area may not be aware of the brOade~ concerns affecting the question of ~gnifi~ance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agenCies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in natur0, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full £AF Compmlenta: The full FAF is cornprlsed of three parts: P~IL '1, P, uvides objecove data anti information about a given Foject and its site, By identifying basic ~oJect data, it assists ~ reviewer in the analysis that takes place In P§r~ ~ al~J ~, part 2: Focuses on identifying U~e range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, It provides g~iCalqCa as to whether an trnpeet is likely I~o be c0~idered srnaJl to moc~ate or whether it is a potantiaJly~arq~ imgaGL The, fnn'n also Idont~o£ whether on impact .~ L~ ,,,IUlauu~ or reauc~, Part :~: If any Impact In Part 2 is ide~Ufled as potentially.large, then Part 3 is .sed to evaluate whether or not the Impact is actually important, THIS AREA FOR ~ USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 If appropriate), and any other supperUng information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by t~e lead agency that: The project will not result In any large a~ important Impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a sicjnlficant impact on the envlro~mwl[, ~:r~:f~m. a he. tire dedirat~ wfl be pralull~i. [i ii] R. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, ti~era will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED tt~t~ive r'~c. The project m~y r{~aR in 13r1: ix mar~, I~ru..nd Important imp3ctc that may hove a ~.;~l.ifi~.,L hnpac[ on cee ~vlrnnrne~t. therefore a poelflue decl3tatlm~ 'A Condltlonoa No.~ntiva D~elaeati~rl iS 6111y V~Jld r~r I Inllsted actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of ResPOnsible 'Officer Signature of Responsible ofncar in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If diffe~nt from r~spon$il~e officer) Date laego 1 m'Q~ PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document Is dselglled to assist in determining whether the action propeaed may have · significant effect on the environment, Please complete the entire form, Parle A through E, Answers to these queatlon$ will be considered ea part of the application for approves and may be subject to further verification end public ~vlew, Provide any additional information You believe wilt be needed to complete Per'~e 2 and 3. It ts expected that cOmpletion of the fulr EAI= will be dependent on Infom~aflon currently aYallabla and will nnt involve new ctudios, POSeS,eh er I~,ve~l;Wdtlur ~, Ir Inform~lgn r}gulrlng fiil~ih ~lrlditlnnil wnr~ is LIn'~uflil~lo, Se i~dle&t~'., ,d =~,~,li'y uu~ tnetance. Name of Action Peeonic Recycling nd Transfer - Solid Wast~ Recycling Fgility Location of Action (Include Street Address, Mufliclpelity and County) 860 Commeme Drive, Cutchoguc, New York 11935 Name of Owner (if different) Comm~m.~ Address 800 Wic~am Avenue State New York Zip Code 11952 City/PO Ma~r~¢k State NewYork ZIpCode 11952 Description of Action: Applmat~[n ~r a Permit to Construct and Operate a Solid WastManagem~nt Fitcility for a solid waste ~f~mc~labl~s h~dl~s ~d rccov~l ~nd a e0~ti~ and demolition de~s pm~ess~ ~cili~ ~cssing ~r ~n~d eighW (480) tos per day of ~clablcs and muntc{pal solid ~s~ and ei~t hunted (8~) tons per ~y ofoons~cufion and d~olition ~bfis wi~in ~¢ ~i~-four ~ou~nd ~o hun~d ~ (34,210) ~um ~ot p~enginec~d building to be ~s~ct~ ~ ~e ~e point ~¢n (3,]4) ~ $i~, ~ construction will incl~e all necea~ silo ~ovcmcnts. *Recyclables handling and recovery will be incidental to the transfer of solid waste. Pegs 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A, if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical se[tinfl of ov~r~ll D~t. I~th ~l~valol~e~l and undnvHnpad areas. 1, Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial D ForeSt D Agd¢-It.ra D Othe¢ r~ Residential (suburban) [~] Rural (non.farm) 2. Tatar acreage of project area: 3.14.acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Bruahland (Non-agrfculturel) Forested A~'lcultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) wetland (Freshwator or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of' ECL) Water Surface Arse Unvegeteted (Rock, e~h or fill) Roads, buildings and ether paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 3.14.acres 0.39 acres acres 2,75 acres BaA Raven Loam 0% to 2% slope, [-IaB ~J. Whatl~pr~domlnant~ilbjpe(~)onp~j~ct$1te? ~l~ven Loam 2~ to 61 niope, an8 ~ Eiverhead sandy lqam 0% to 3% a, Roil dral~0e', ~Well drain~ ,,I~ % of s~e ~ M~er~ly well drain~ % or ~, ~ ~orly drained % of ~itc Classification SyStem? N/A acres (see 1 NYCRR 4, Are thee bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes [] No What is depth to bedrock ........... (In feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~O,lO% 1oo% ~1o- 15% % ~ lS% ~' gr~mer G. Is pmJa~ eubstantJa[l~/..~3ntigucyJS to. or contain Historic Places? U Y~s [] No 7, Is project ~ul~s~l~flal[y contigu~u~ t~ a site listed ~n t~e Reglst~' ur NarCo.al Natural Landmarks? a building, site, o,' disb'icL li~ted un ~ ~tate or National Registers of 8, What is the dsl~h of the water table? 50 (in fe~t) g. Is site located ov~r a primal, principal, or sole source aquifer?. []yes ~ No 10. Do hunting, fishing Or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the proJec[ area? [] Yes ~No Page 3 of 21 11, Does project site COntain ~y species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ^ccordlng to: Graham A~socia~ca: Vi~l inspection of the propcrty'~rc~ously cleared with l'ow samb brush Icier. if7 ~mr.h' ~iem: ............................................. 12, ~u'e tl'~ ~ sty unique or unusual tan{] torres on the project s~te7 i~,~., cliffs, dunes, o[her geological formations? []Yes ~No 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood ~$ an open ~pace Or recreation area? [] Yes ~]No r yes, explain; 14. Does the present site include scenic views I(nown to be Important to the community? E~Yes a, Name of Sb'eam end ' ' ' name of Rwer to which ~t Is tributary Lakes, ponds, we~Jand are~s within or contiguous W pro, leer a,me: No Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] NO a, If YES, tines sufficient cepecit~ exist to allow con~ctlo~? [] Yes [] NO b. If YES, will Improvements ~3e necessary to alJow con~=th3n? []Yes 18. IS the site located in an agricultural district ca~fied pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, ArtJde 25.AA, Section 303 and 304? r~Yes 1 g. is the sim located In or substantJaflv contiguous to e Critical EnvlronmentaJ At~a designated p[xsuant to Article 8 of the ECL, end e ,YC,, 6~77 F]Y~ 20, Has the site ever been used for the disposal of s~lld or hazardous wastes? 1. NTM r~N0 Physical dimensions and scale of project (fiji in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by pro~ect sponsor: b. Project acreage to be developed; 3.]4 acres inlUally; c. ProJect aa'sage to remain undeveloped: 0.00 ac~es, d. Length OF project, In miles: H/A (if appreciate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. f. Number of off-si)est perking spaces existing ~ g, Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: h. 3.14 acres. 3,14 acres ultimately. NtA % 0; proposed 20 30 (upon completion of project)? If residential: Number arid type of housing units; One Family Two Family Initially N,/A N/A Ultimately N/A N/A i. Dimensions (In feet) of largest proposed structure: ,~' height; Multiple Family N/A N/^ 160' width; j. Linear feet et frontage along a puMic thoroughfare project will occupy is? ....... How much natural material (La. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will dist.-bed areas be reclaimed [Ycs DNo []N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose Is the site being reclaimed? gaedscapc Beans Condominium N/^ b. Will topsoil be stockpiled far reclamation? [] Yes [] No c, Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No How many acres of vegetat[0n (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 230' length, N//~ ft. 0 tons/cubic yards. 2.0 acreS. Page 5 of 21 Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally, important vegetation be removed by this project? If single phase IxoJect: Anticipated period of construction: ~ months, (including demolition) If multi-phased: e. b, g, 10, Num0er of jobs eliminated by this project O. require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes project If' yes, explain: Total number of phases anticipated N/A (numt)er) Anticipated date or' Commencement phase 1: ,, momh ------- year, (Including demolition) Approximate comp~atlen dare of final phase: ~ month ~ year, Is phase 1 functlo~mlly dependent on subsequent phases? [] Y~s [] No Will blasting occur during Construction? [] YeS I~ No Num0er of Jobs generated: during construction ~0 ~ after project is complete 2,5 r'~No 12, Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes []No a. If yes, Indicate type of waste (Sewage, industrial, stc) and amount b, Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13, Is subsurfaCe liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes [] No 14, Will suri'ace area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [] Yes [] No II~ yes, explain: 15. la project or any porUon of project Iocateclln a 100year floocl plain? []Yes IT]No 16, Will the project generate so, id waste? ~ Yes [] No Type Sanitarv wastcwater and stormw~,~r e. Ifyes, what ls the amount per month? 4runs 75 lb/week per employee 25 b. ~f yes, will a~ e~i~tin§ solid wa$:.e faclll[y be used*,/[] Yes [] No x 4 wok~ C. If yes. give name Subject Application ; location Ca:cho/,~, c d, Will any wastes not go Into a sewage disposal system er Into a sanita~ landfill7 []Yes [] No employees Page 8 of 21 e, If yes, explain: 17. Will the pro. lect involw the disposal of' solid waste? E]¥es a, if yes, whet Is the anticipated rate of disposal?, runs/month, b, If yeS, what Is the anticipataJ site lire? years, 38, Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes [] No 19, Will proJect routinely 13'oduce odors (more than one h~r p~ day)? []Yes E]No 20, Will proJect produce oporatlng noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [] Y~s [] No 21, Will project result In an inerssse in energy use? [] Yes [] No If )'es, indicate type(s) Odors will bc Controled with a odor control misting ~ystem. Nosie f~'om the payloedcm will be contmlod by thc proposed building and commercial traffic ~osi¢ ts similar to the noise produced by thc Town Fa¢ilib' loc~.{=d adjacan~ to thc subje¢: p~'opcmj, Diesel Puel z~r the payloaders at~d electric pow¢£ 22. If' water supply Is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~ gallons/minum. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 200 gallons/day. ~4. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yea [] NO If yes, explain: Page ? of 21 25. Approvals R~lulred: City, TOWn, VIIla~ Board ~Ye5 [] NO City, Town, Village, Planning Board [] Yes D NO Type Submittal Date City, Town Zoning Beard r~Ye~ [] No City, County Health Dapa~tment []Yes [] NO Other LOCal ~:Jellclea L~ Yes [] No A~v~ Other Regional Agencies ~'l Ye~ [] Ne State Agencies [] Yes [] Nd NYSDEC Solid WR~te Manaaement Facility ~etmit Federal A~.w~cles ~ YeS []No C. Zoning and ;~annl~g InformWon 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? []Yes [] No rf Yes, indicate decision required: n Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of [] Site plan [] Special use permit [] Resource management plan D Subdivision Page 8 of 21, 2, Wh~t is the zoning classlflcetion(s) of the site? Lil ,i ~t Industrial 3. What is ~e maximum, potenrJal development of t~ site if de~lo~ as ~mltted b~ t~e present zonin~ 4. Whet Is the pro~s~ ~ning ~ ~e site? I No oh~8~' ' 5. What i~ ~ maximum ~te~al d~lo~ of ~e s~e If ~velo~ as ~mi~ by me pro~ ~nlng? 6. Is the pm~ a~lon consi~en~ wgh the r~omm~ u~s In adopted I~*t land use plans? ~ y~ what are the predominant land use(s) and zon~n§ classifications within a A mile radius of prOposed acUon? Mixed use: Projcct is Iocamd in a recent subdivision planned for light industrial use. To the west is farmland with onc residential unit. East of the subject propcliy is the Town of gouthhold Recycling Facility. Is the pzopo~d action compatible with adjoining/surrounding lei'Id uses with a ~A mile? If' the prOposed action is the subdivision of land, how many Io~s are proposed? N/A e. What is the minimum lot size p~oposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed actJon require any authorization(s) ~or the formation of sewer er water dis~lcts? [] Yes [] No 11. Will the Foposed action create a demand for any community provid~a~ services (recreation. education, police, fire protection? r~Yes yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle proJecte~ demand? ptoptect[on~ mail ~nd {~eneral services []Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. if' yes. is the existing road hat, york adequate to handle the additional tralllc. []Yes D. Informational Details nNo Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarlf~ your proJecl;. If ~em am ~ may be any adverse Impac~ associated wl~h your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose tO mitigate or avoid them. I certify that t~e i~form3tion provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Peconic Re~yclin$ sad Trak.fa.r. Date ~;Ignature Title Vice Pmsi~l~nt If th~ action is In the Ceast~ Area. and you are a stele agen~, conl~ete the Coastal Assessmem Farm befol'e I~ng with this Page 10 of 24 ~EC--05-2006 12 ~ 11 AM PES KEMPEY ENG 6515681524 P, 12 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE ReaponMbll~ Of L,e~l AgenG. y gsneral Informction (Read Carefully) · In completing ihs form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmeatat enat~t, s The Examples provided are to eeelat the reviewer by sh~wing types of impacts and wherever possible the thr~ill{Nd of magnitude [ha[ womo trigger a response In ~olun~n 2, The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, fo; any specific project or site ether examples end/er lower thresholds may be ePpropriat~ far s PRtllrltiel i sron Impnnt rooponoa, tkue ~S~lul~is! sualuS~&L,. :.. P..I ti. · The impels of each project, on each site, In each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance, They do not constitute an exhaustive fist of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not Indicate the importance of each question, · In identifying Impacts, ~nelder long term, shod term and cumulative effects. Instru~ionc (Rood oer~fully) Answer each Of the 20 questions In PART 2, Answer yes if there will be any Impact. Maybe answers should be considered es Yea answers. ff answering Yea to a question then cheek the appropdata box(column 1 or 2)to Indicate the potential s[z.e Of the Impact. If impact threshold efluatsor exceeds any example provlded, checkcolumn 2, Ifimpect willoccur but threshold is lower then example, check column 1, Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column ~') does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any la~e impact must be evalualed In PART 3 to determine signlficat~c.e, IdentifYing an impact in column 2 simply asks that It bu luuk=d at I'u~h~r. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider tho impoct co potentially la,la end pre,~s,sd t~, PART 9, II'u put. ri(tally litr~19 ir~gi~ {;he~;l~d Ill ~lumn Z ~a, I~e ~lltlontr,,d hy nnRn0R(aJ In tl~ hrnj,.,rt to a small to mudsrxlu imperl, also check the Yes box in column 3. A I~o reeponce indicates thel auah s {'aduetJen Is e-'.t p,sss;bl,~, Tl,l,~ ,~u~l bu explathed In Part ~. Smatl to Potential Can Impact Be Moderns Largo Mtilgated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Lend 1, Will the Proposed Action result In a physical change to the pr~ect site? Examplea that would a ppty to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (1 $ foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes In the project area exca~l 10%. Construction on lend where the depth 1o the water table is less then 3 feet. n ConstruCtion of paved perking eras for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] [] ID " 12]"o n Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feat of exiating ground surfak. Construction that will continus for more than 1 year involve more then one phase or stage, Excavation for mining pure. es that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural materiel ii.e., rock or coil) per year, [] [] DYes •No Page 11 of 21 (~ C~anstflJCtlon or expl~nalofl cf ~ santary lancifill, r~ Construction In a designated floodway. Other Impacts: 2. Will thnm hA Rn effagt tg ltrlY ulllg~a or unusual land farms f°und °n the site? (I,e,, cliffs, dun~. geol~l~l fo~atlo~., ~,) ~ Specific land form*: Im~ct on Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated aa protected? (Under Articles 15, 24.25 of the Envimnmestal Consent*rich Law, I~CL) r.-~ NO ~-'~ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 [ Do~elnpshla e~aa nf ~ttP nnntain.'t a grgtg~9~l water body, Dredging more than 10g cubic yards of material from channel of a protected at*am. E^te,',elen ~ ufilily dlstFIbuflon f3cilitias thm~oh n pmt~.Ind w/ilar I:~x~y. Construction In a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [J Other impacts: Will Proposed A~ion affect any non-protected exl~ng or new body of water? Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% Increase or dec,'ease In the au~ace area of a~y body of wat~' or more theft * 10 aero Inet*aaa or dec*ese. D Conatruc'~ion of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of sun'ace ama. (~ther impala', t 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impa~t Impact Pmja~ Change [] [] r'~Yes r~No [] [] ~y., 1'1.o [] [] r"lv. [] [] nY- E].o [] [] nY. n,o [] [] 1-1~., 0.o [] [] EIb.. I-l,o [] [] r'"l,. ~,o Page l~,gf 21 O .0 Will Proposed Action effect aurface or groundwater quality or quar~ty? ID"o E]~.~ lxamplea that woulq apply to column 2 Pmpesad Action will require a discharge permit, Proposed A~tlon requires usa of s source of water that does not have approval to serve pmpesad (project) action. D Prepesad A~len requires water aupply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system, Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater, Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exlat or have Inadequate capacity. PropOSed Action would use water In excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be mn obvious visual contrast to natural ~ondltlons, Proposed ACtion will require Ihs sloral~e of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water sndlor sewer se~ioes, Proposed Action Ioc~l~ c. ommerclal and/or Industrial ut, we whl(~h may require new nr Rxp~n~inn nf ~xixtino was~ t~atment and/or ~tormgo bolllfleo. Other Impa~s: 1 Small to Moderate Impa~ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes CNo OYes DNo OYes ONe DYes L~No DY. ~No OYes ONe OY-- ONe E]Yee CNo OYn~ 01~o Page 13 of 21 Will PrOposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water EXamples that would apply to column 2 O Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action r~ay ~auaa substantial erosion, D Proposed Action la Inc~mpatible with existing dralnog$ patterns. Proposed Action w~ll allow development in a destgneted floodway. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AJR Will Proposed Action affect air quality? r'l.o F-J-m npluc* Lhul wuuld apply to ~;lumn 2 given hour. Proposed Action will result In the Incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rote of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more then '10 million BTU's oer hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amou~lt of land committed to industrial use, Proposed Action will allow an increase In lhe density of industrial development within existing Industrial arses, Other Impacts: l IMPACT ON PLANTe AND ANIMAL8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I-'l "O []YES Examples treat would a~my to ~lumn 2 ~eduction of one or mom species listed on l~e New York or Federal fist, using the atto. over or near the site, or found on the site. I 2 3 Small to Poten~al Can Impact las Moderate Large Mitigated by ~mpect impact Project Change [] [] [] [] [] [] [] n [] [] r-)Yes []No I-IY. ID.o r~Iye~ []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] DY" l"1"O [] [] [DY. [].o DYes J'~J No Page 14 of 21 Removal cf any portion of a critical or algn~cant wildlife habitat, Application of Pesticide or herbicide more than twins s year, other than for agricultural purposes. ~] Other Impacts: Will Prc, p,;,~ed Action eubetanfially affect non-threatened or non- endanl~ered species? ~ta~ ~hnl would ~pply ~o ~lum~ ~ ~ Pro~$ed Action would ~u~ntlally Inte~em with any resident ~r mlgrato~ fish, shellfish or ~ldllfe species. Pmp~ed A~lon requires the removal of mom than 10 a~ren metu~ ~mst (~er 1 O0 ~am ~ age) or other I~ally immdant veg~afion. Other Impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impa~ .% Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] r-iv. [.o [] [] []yes r-'l.o [] [] r~Yea [~No [] [] ['"'J Yes •No [] [] IMPACT ON AGRiC, ULTURAL. LAND R~8OiJ~C~.~ 10, Will Proposed Action affect agricultural la nd reeourosa? I,I.o Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, oroBa or limit access to agricultural land (includes sropiend, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Constructlan a~lvlty would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural lend, The Proposed Action would Irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, If located In an Agricultural District, mere than 2.5 acres Of'agricultural land, r'~ Ye~ []No ID .. I-t,c Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, atdp cropping); or create a need ~ such ~aaa~Jres (e,g. Cause e farm field to drain peody due to ~ncreaeed runoff), n 1 2 Smell to Pctentlal Moderate Large Imrmt~ Impo~t [] [] Other ~,mpects: [] [] IMPACT ON AESTHETIC Fu~,~ RC ES t 1. WIll Proposed Action affect aesthetic rasouroeo? (if necessary, use lbo ~ual EAF ~dendul'~l Ir~ 8~utlu~ U 1 ~,20, Appendix Examples that would apply to c~lumn ~> Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in shard Contrast to current surrounding land use patteroa, whether man-mede or natural, Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aeothetlc reaoumea which w~ll eliminate or significantly rsdue, e their enjoyment of the esathetlc qualities of that resource, Project osmponents that will result in the elimination or significant scraenlng of $canlc views known to be important to the area. [] [] [] [] [] [] Other Impaot$; IMPACT ON HI,~"roRIC AND AR~HAEO*..OGIC.~L RE~IOURC~S 12, Will Proposed Action Impact any alta or atructurs of historic, prehistoric or paleontological Importance? E]"o IDY~ E~xarnplaa that would apply to ~oluron 2 Proposed Action occun'log wholly or partially wilhin or substantially ~flguoua to any facility or site listed on the State or National Re~lster of hletodc pieces, Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed Ice, atari within Ihs project site, Propo~ed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY$ Site Inventory. [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Elves E]~o DYes DNa DYes r"J yes DNa DYes ~No []Yes []No DYes []No D~es I,l.o Page ~6 of 21 Other impacts: IMPACT Of] OldEN ~I=ACE AND R~CEF. ATION t 3. Will prep•sad Action affect the quantity or quall~ Of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Exempllm '~lt would ~ lo ~lumn 2 g The pS.anent ~r~lolu~ cfa ~ture mcr~lonal op~nRy. ~ A major r~u~lon of an ~en apa~ Impo~nt to ~e Other impacts: IIA~ACT ON CI~11CAL ENVlRONMENI'AL A~ 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of e critic, el environmental sma (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 8NYCRR $17,14(g)? r"].o i--:l s List the environmental characteristics that caused ~a designation of the CEA, 1 Smell to Mode fate Impact 2 Potential La~le Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated t3y Project Change r~Y. []No ' [] [].o [] rlY. Examples that would apply to column 2 P?oposed Action to Io~te within the CEA? [] [] Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the [] [] ms•ufos? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the [] [] Proposed Action will impact the usa, function ar enjoyment of the [] [] Page 17of 21 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? FYampli~ that t~JId apply to eelum~ 3 ,~temtion of p~ psXsms ~ movement of people anWor goods. Proposed Action wig result in major ~'sfflc problems. Other impacts: I&tPACT ON ENEEGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? F~NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action w{ll require the erection or extension of an sne~y transmission er ~91~,ly ~W~{~ffi tg ~,erw mgre than ,'iD single or two family residences er to serve a major commercial nr Industrial use. Other Impacts: 1 :~ 3 Small to Potential Can Impsm Be Moderate LS~a Mitigated by Impact imbecl P~Ject Change [] [] [] [] [] [] r~yes ~"] No r~ves ID.o Dyes [].o [] []Yss []No [] DY- r']No NO~E/M~ID ODOR IMPACT 17. wig there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration ss a result of the Proposed Action? r'lNo DYES that WOLIIH npply tn r~lumn 2 Blastln,~ within -1 ,~g~ f~et Of ~1 hgagital, ~l~;hggl or Qth~r ,~',nRilive Lq edom will occur routinely (more than one hour per ciay). n Ilrepoood A~len will predu~& ~,pe~fing n,~166 ex~,==,J;,,~ II local ambient noise levels t~ noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural battlers that would act es a noise screen. Othe~ impsots: I I ~lle$11 i ~tt i Paa~ IR nf ~4 [] [] [] [] [] [] DY. l'"J No [] D~es E].o IMPACT ON PUBLIC HF-N,,'TH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Prol;,9~vd ^uLlun m.y cause a rISK or .xploi[ior~ or talollse of hazardous aubatanoas (i.e. oil, peetloldes, ohemlCala, radiatten, otc,) in the event of accident or ugset ~ndltions, or there may be e chronic Iow level dlsd~arge or emission, 0 Propoasd Aotlon may result in the budal of*hazardous wactea" In any form (La, tOxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, Infectious, etc.) 0 Storage faoilittes for one mtlllon or more gallons of liquefied natural gas Or other flammable liquids. Proposed A~"tion may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste, r- Other imp;ets: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND ~.HARAC~R 0¢ COMMUNITY C~ NE~HBORI'IOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect lhe character of t he existing community? ~amp, tee that w,.',ul~J ,~ppl~ [u ~lUlllf~ $ The p~rmanent population of the city, town or village in whloh the project is located Is likely to grow by more Ihen 5%. [~ The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increaee by more than 5% per year as a re'=ult of this pmJe~, Proposed Actioll will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use, Prop9~l ^gtigll ~lr rN'llnnn nr nliminata a¥1stlnO facilities. structures or areas of historic tmportenca to the community, Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g, schools, police and lire, eta,) I 2 3 Small tO Potonlial Can Impeot Be Mod&ate Large Mitrgated by Impact Impact ProJe~ Change [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] DYes r~No DY-- DNa DYes DNo ~Yea r-'~ No ElY. Page lg of 21 1 Smell to Moderate Proposed Action will set en important precedent for futura [] Propcaed Action will create or eliminate employment, [] Other impacts: ~ 20. I~ tham, or i8 them Ilkal~'i~ b-i pulpilY: a:]~t~]~a~y reJm~cl to I:)otenfl~l ....... adverse envlronmer~ impacts? ID"o 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be La~le Mitigated by Impact ProJe~ Change [] []Yea r~No [] If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified aea Potential Large Impa~t or If you Cannot Determine tho Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part $ Page 20 of 2t Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Reeponelblllty of Lead Agenoy Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be pctentieliy large, even if the Impeot(s) may be mitigated. ~ (If you need more space, attash additional shest~) Discuss tl~e folloWing for seoh impact Identifls~i in Column 2 of Part 2: 1, B~leifY deeoflbe the Impact. 2. Describe (If applicable) how the impact aould ba mitigated or reduced to e smell to moderate impact by project change(e), 3. Based on the inforrnatlo~ available, decide if It ts reasonable to ~onolude that this Impact Is Impertant, To answer the question of Importance, ~onsidsr: · The probability of the Impact occurring · The duration of the Impact · its irreverslbiiity, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the Impact can or will be controlled a The regions consequence of t~le Impact · its potential divergence from local needs end goals · Whether known objections to the p~oject relate to this Irnpsct, Page 21 of 2~ 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an ordedy manner, whether e project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1; Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Pert 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LI~AD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of FAF completed for this project: I I Part1 I I Part2 I I Part3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: DA. DC. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared? The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Dete Page 1 of 21 BENNETT ORLOWSK~, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDs GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 S/a~e Rou/o 25 P,O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Sample authorization letters: 1. I ~ owner of the property at SCTM# 1000-100-10-10 inMattituck, NY, hereby authorize Southold Consultants Inc~ to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved in/he subdivision process with the Southold Planning Board. Signature: ~~ Sworn before me this 30th day of February 200_0, ~ ~ [ Michael Hill's Notary stamp ] 2. We John and Jane Smith, owners of the property at SCTM# 1000-88-8-8 in Southold,. NY, hereby authorize Home Builders Inc. to apply for a subdivision on our property and hire any agents necessary to complete the work involved in the subdivision process with the Southold Planning Board. Signatures: 0~~ Sworn before me this 30~h day of February 2000, · [ Michael Hill's Notary stamp ] 3. I Jim Davis, President of Home Builders Inc., hereby authorize John Jones, Esq. to act as my agent on the property of SCTM# 1000-88-8-8 in Southold, NY, and handle all necessary work involved in the subdivision process with the Southold Planning Board. ~ignature: o~ .~. __ Sworn before me this 30~ day of February_2000, '~ .~ ' [ Michael Hill's Notary stamp ] PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATI~ ':,'." ~ ' ' ": :': '~ Prepared by Project Sponsor ~ ," ,",~q NQTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed r~ay~.a~ a Significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form Parts A through E. Answers to these quest~(~r~ill be considered as part of the ~ application for approval and may be sub'ect to fudher verification and public review. Provide af~yladditior~e.l,i,qform~tk:~h'~u bell eve will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. ! ~U~ - ,- L~u it is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on ini~ormation currently available arid will not involve new studies, researdh or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and speei~ each instance. Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipaliiy and County) NameofOwner<ifdifferen,, ~.~lo ~OV~N'~ ~ ~~ C i~/PO C~~ ~ State ~7 I ' Zip Code Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 ~ Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A, SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. I. Present Land Use: N Urban L~ Industrial [] Commercial r~ Forest ~ Agriculture []Other D Residential (suburban) Rural (norYfarm) ib APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Sud~ace Area Unvegeteted (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other {Indicate type) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION ~ - i~'~ acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: []Well drained IOO % of site [] Moderately well drained__% of site. ~Poorly drained __% of site b. If any agricultural land is invglved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? ~ /i.~ acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes ~ No a. What is depth to bedrock ~/-~ ~in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~]0-10% i~.~O % r~lo-15%__o/o . ~ 1§% or greater % 6. ]s project substantialS( contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? [] Yes ~ No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~ Yes ~No OYes 8, What is the depth of the water table? ~'~) (in feet) 9, Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole sourqe aquifer? OYes / 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area ? Page 3 of 21 1 I. Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes ~]No According to: Identify each species: ~ ~ 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on tho pro~ect site7 {i.e. cliff~, dunes, other ~oolo~ical formations? ~Yes ~No Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by ti~e community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? O es lg"o If yes, explain: t 4. Does the present sita i~'fil'ude scenic views known to be important to the community? 1 5~ Streama within or comiguous to project area: a, Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 1 6. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: h Jo b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [~ Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DNo L--~_Yes 18. ts the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, 304? r~¥es r~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 L--~Yes [~]No DNo Article 2§-AA, Section 303 end 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor; ~ ' DYes ~No Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: acres. b. Project acreage tO be developed: ":~' I'~ acres initially; ~ tq acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ~/~, acres. d. Length of project, in miles: e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: ~ ~--(uP~°mpleti°n°fpr°ject)7 h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially ~ ~ ~ltimatolv ~ ~ hoi~htl width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. W,,, disturbed areas be reclaimed '~Yes []No DN/A Condominium length. ft. tons/cubic yards. a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Wil~ topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? RYes [] No ' ' c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [~Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~ acres. Page 5 of 21 ~ 5. Will any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? r~Yes ~,No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ~ months, lincluding demolition) 7. If multi-phased: ~ a. Total number of phases anticipated __ Inumber) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month year, {including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [] No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? r~Yes ,~_ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction SC) ; after project is complet9 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 1 $. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~ Yes ~ No If yes, explain: ! 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No Type 14. Will surfaca area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? r'~ Yes ~ No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain7 DYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste?'~ Yes E]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? i(~ns C_~.) \j/~J~.~ b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No UNo d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? []Yes ~ No Page 6 of 21 ~ e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [~Yes L----JNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal;' I~'~ tons/month. b, If yes, what is the anticipated site~ life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? .~, Yes []No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [~Yes ~No 21. ~Nill project result in an increase in energy use? '~Yes [] No / If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~"~f~'~gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~ Yes . No tf yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~, Yes ~ No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes ~ No City, Town Zoning Board _~Yes ~ No City, County Health Department [] No Other Local Agencies DYes [] No Other Regional A~enc~es State Agencies [~Yes [] No Federal Agencies [] Yes ~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~21Yes ~ No ~ Zoning variance ~ SpeCial use permit E] New/revision of master plan Resource management plan E~ Subdivision r"=~ Other Page 8 of 21 2, What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by tho present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? What is tho maximum potential development of the site if developed as perm}tted by tho proposed zoning? 6. IS the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land uso plans? /]~ Yes [] No 7. What are tho predominant land usela} and zoning classifioatiooa Within a V* mile radius o~/proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a % mile? ~Yes [] No 9, If the proposed action is the subdivision of ~and, how many lots are proposed? / a, What is tha minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Wi(I proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes ~ No 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services {recreation, education, police, fire protection? ~] Yes []No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? L~ Yes U No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. OYes [] No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may he,heeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss ~uch impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. S*gnature ~/, ~ ~ ,t ~ ~ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 ' FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Graham Associates A/C Peconic Recycling and Transfer 1981 Union Blvd. Bay Shore, NY 11706 Please take notice that your application dated May 6, 2005 For permit for construction of a recycling and transfer center at Location of property: 860 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 96 Blockl Lot 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: DATE: May 16, 2005 The proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-132, which states, "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park District unless the same conform:; to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." According to Bulk Schedule, a rear yard setback of 75 feet is required. Following the proposed construction, the mail building will have a rear yard setback of+/- 36 feet _In addition, the proposed scale house is not permitted pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133A., which state, "Structures shall be set back at least one hun,a, red (100) feet fi.om the ri~ht-of-wa¥." The proposed scale house is 0 feet from the right of way. In add!tiola,_tke proposed use requires a salvage center permit from the Southold Town Board. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Sonthold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: 11/14/06 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt~: 19600 Transaction(s): 1 1 Seqra Review Reference Subtotal 95-2-7 $50.00 Check~: 19600 Total Paid: $50.00 Name: Peconic, Recycling/Transfer Cutchogue, NY 11935 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 95-2-7 PLANNING BOARD MEMB JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town I-Iall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To.' Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: November 14, 2006 Re: Checks RECEI¥~D So~tf,~l~ ~o~':~. Clerk Enclosed herewith is the check listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Nome & Type Peconic Transfer SP Tax Map ¢~ Amount bate of Check 95-2-7 I $50 add'l SEC~R I 10/30/06 LR enc, Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: 11/02/06 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt#: 24895 Transaction(s): 1 1 Seqra Review Reference 95-2-7 Check#:24895 Total Paid: Subtotal $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Name: Peconic, Recycling/Transfer Cutchogue, NY 11935 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 95-2-7 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southoid, NY Telephone: 63'1 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 RECEIV~:D To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: November 1,2006 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith is the check listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Nome & Type P~conic Recyling SP Tax Map # Amount I $ ,zoo Dote of Check I Io/I2/o6 LR enc. Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: 06/14/06 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt~: 68687049 Transaction(s): 1 1 Application Fees Reference Subtotal 95-2-7 $4,991.00 Check~:68687049 Total Paid: $4,991.00 Name: Peconic, Recycling/Transfer Cutchogue Ny 11935 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 95-2-7 p~G BOARD ~rBERS Chair ~ KENNETH L. EDWAR]~ MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM RECEIVED JUN 1 4 2006 To: From: Date: Re: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Planning D_epartment Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name & Type Tax Map Amount Date of # Check Peconic Recycling/Transfer 95-2-7 $4,99! 6/5/06 Application fee LR enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBE9 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H, SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Planning Depadment March7,2006 ~,~[-~.. Checks Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Nome & Type Tax Mop Amount Dote of ¢~ Check Peconic I~¢c¥cling/Transfer 95-2-7 $4,991 6/5/06 Application fee LR enc. NI=LSON' pOpF= ~, VOOFRHIS, LLC Bruno Semon Town of Southold Town Hall 54375 Stat~ Rout~ 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 October~5,: Town f Solghold~S~t~Remew .-, Pecomo R~oy~g Proposal for Services Dear Bruno: Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with the SEQRA review of the above referenced project. The following services and fees are proposed: 1. Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics. 2. Roview Project Plan. 3. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form. 4. Prepare Part H Environmental Assessment Form. 5. Prepare detailed environmental planning review of the subject application. Fee: $1,250.00 6. Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application. 7. Prepared recomm ended determination of sJ~onificance (ff requested by Board). Fee: Timc Ratcs Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel flee to call should you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, Purchase Order # Date .~--~, -15340 Ta× Exempt # A163554 .3~, ~o~(..,,, Aecouot # ~ ,~o '-+5-0:::~ ,3oo IDeliver and send billing to: Department Add ess VENDOR **Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment** ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 250,"- THIS PURCHA(~ ~ URES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR SUFFICIENT FUNDS, /,~ IN THE APPROPRIATI 8upo~i,or VENDOR COPY PAY TO: - - ~,:/&, ,'~ .... Invoice Number Invoice Date Purchase Order Number P.O Date ~ Item Number Description of Materials / Services Town of Southold, New York. Standard Voucher ?ay¢¢ Tax Identification Nurabcr Payee Reference " Vendor Contact Cash Discount '%~Days Quantity Unit Price Amount Total Payee Ce Net The undersigned (Clmma~"~(Actin~4-~ bel~ ofa~t*~,,ve n~me~ , ~ificatiol Department Certification performed and ~,!3~ quanmies thereof have be~ffvenfied with th~ exceptmns or discr pancies noted Check # Town of $outhold BILL OF Vendor No .... I.%. ~'~' ( .... Invoice No ...... 9~~ A~oun~ C~i~d * tsar.' Purchase Order No. ~ ~ ~ For Services and Disbursements as Fund ~d Accoua~ Entered by ~ ~0 Allowed, $ ............... Audited ......... -. , 19 .... Town Clerk LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Withdmw,q Proiect Type: Site Plans Status: Withdrawn SCTM #: 1000 - 95.-2-7 Proiect Name: Peconic Recycling & Transfer Address: 860 Commerce Drive, Cutcho,que Hamlet: Cutcho,que Applicant Name: Jonathan DiVello, Peconic Recycling & Transfer Owner Name: Peconic Recycling Zone 1: LIO Approval Date: ?~'T End SP Date: OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: approximately 1,083 n/o Corporate Road on n/so/Commerce Drive in Cutcho.que SC Filing Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCAN Date: SCANNED DEC 1 9 2008 Records Management CO 86O YQ LiN G COMMERCE CUTCHOGUE, NY TRANSFER DRIVE 11935 S CTM: , TE P 100 LAN 0 96--1-8 PACKAGE 'TAX M,&~ INIt~O~M,~TIONI MICHAEL K. DUNN -'.2 REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1961 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING =EOONIC t~EC'fCLING AND TF~AN$FEF~ 8~0 COMMERCE DRIVE CUTCIqO~UE, N% 11~35 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SHEET DESCRIPTION: ;OVE~ 5NEET Unauthorized alteration or oddlNon to this plan ~s o v~olobon of secNon 7209 of FAX MAP# ~CALE. A5 NOTED )WO #: ,A~OOlAT O~O2®1 BY' I CHKD BY: 3ATE: SHEET 2114105 DWG,#: IOF~, Z -JI IL Jl II Ir--71 II II II II IL__J L__J L--J L-- z DI C 1F--l[ ]F--q 7F · I I I I I I I I I I I ~e ZONINS INFOP. F"ATION OHAI~T I L -- Jl Ii I L -- J I I L -- J I I L _ · I I L _ · I I I IF--al IF--71 IF--71 IF--ql IF--~I II IF~ql II L I 0 ZONe I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J L _ J L ~ J L ~ J L _ J L ~ J L _ J L -- J L ~ J L ~ J L -- J L _ J L ~ J L -- J L ~ - LoT~NS~E~GYGLIN~A~A ~A~ILI~ I " " / (4.'-o" x ~a' o') STORAGE AREA ~ 1 I~0'~" [ i (SB'-O' X 20'-~') II MSW TIPPING AND II II II SORTING AREA REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE MICHAEL K. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNINO *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~,,.NE¢ I~UILDING SHEET DESCRIPTION: SlTE PL,ANID~A INA~.E Unauthorized alterabon or addition o hs pon s o violotion of section 7209 of DATE: tsHi 2/14/0D DWG.#: 20F~ ~ BUIII?IN® 160'-0" L ANI:? SC., A P I N®PLAN -! ¢][v ~' T°W'~'~ MICHAEL K. 6HRUtD PLANTrN® PETAIL (631) 665-9619 *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING D UNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY FAX 969-0115 ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS BAYSHORE, NY 11706 FAX 969-0115 *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING GO MMtE f:2-,.C.,E PECONIC 11706 RECYCLING AND TF~AN$FEF~ &&® COMMEt~CE DRIVE OUTGNOGUE, NY 11~3D PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEUJ BLJILDING SHEET DESCRIPTION: LANDGGAPIN~ Unouthonzed olterotion or oddltlon o this pkln is o voutlOn of section 7209 of the New York store Educotion Low, Co~les of this p on not TAX MAP# SCALE. ,AG NOTED DWO.#: AGGOCIAT ®5®2®1 )RAWN BY: [ CHKD BY: ~FN ~ C~LUC, 3ATE: SH~ 2/14/®~ )wo.#. / BUILDIN® LIGHT ISOLUX CHART SITE LIO t~X ~ IN~O~f~,TIONI REVISION DESCRIPtiON DATE MICHAEL F. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (6~) ~6~ F~ ~-9~0~1~ - PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 19gl UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11700 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~,,.NEU) BUlLDIN~ SHEET DESCRIPTION: LI~NTIN~ Unauthorized alteration or odd~Uon to thru plan s o ¥iolotion o section 7209 of the New York St~ite Education Low Copies of this plan not TAX MAP# SCALE: A~ NOTE~ DWO #: A$5OCI~T O502Ol DRAWN BY. I CHND BY' ~FP! I C~U~ DATE: SHE~ 2/14/®~ IDW°% OF NOT TO SC, AL~ ,TONE MICHAEL K. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PECONIC RECYCLING AND TF ANSFEF 8~® COMMERCE DF~IVE CUTCHO~UE, NY 11535 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~NEW BUILDING SHEET DESCRIPTION: ELEVATION5 Unauthorized alteration or additTon to this pton ls o vitiation of section 7209 of the New York State Education Low. CaRles of this plan not bearing the professona engineers Inked sea shall no be o va d true copy TAX MAP# SCALE. ,A~ NOTE~ DWC.#. DRAWN BY: J CHKD BY GFN J 21141¢5 DWg,#. DOF6 O~BO0 O~OOO 000 D ¥PJE:L/ N1ANHO/1E DETAIl GONC .ETE CU .B DETAIL O&5-OE-O`5.1 10'150 OREGON ROAD RFD BOX 15q, OREGON ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY' I Iq55 JOHN P. ~. 5UZANN M. ' / / / / / / / /: O~E-04-10 .1155 DEPOT LANE KRUPCKI, ANN MARIE P,O. DOX 40~D LIVINGETON MANOR, N~ O8,B-O5-O`5.1 10.190 OREGON ROAD McBRIDE, FRANK, J, RFP BOX IE~, OREGON ROAD CUTOHOGUE, Nh' II~IBE N N \ \ \ \ ~-0~-04 I 8`510 DEPOT LANE / GOOD!,qlN, dAME5 D. / `5`510 DEPOT LANE / P.O. BOX 14~ / / / ~6-01-002 20.15 COUN'1'~T' ROAD McE~RIDE, ~I~kNK d. ROAD Of~EGON ROAD CUTCHO~UE, NY IIqE5 '~-01-001 20945 ~AIN ROAD TIDE GROUP, INC. C/O H. RAY'NOR P.O. BOX 145q MATTITWCK., NY Iiq52 DEPOT LANE q5-4-11 `5005 DEPOT LANE KRUPEKI, JOHN P. ~ 5UZANN M. 14 COMPA~ COURT HUNTINGTON, NY 11"/45 '1'200 DEPOT LANE RAE IUS hJAP 20510 COUNTY ROAD McCALL, ~55EL C. ATLANTA, ~A 9050,5 DEPOT LANE ~,HLIDZINDKI~ GENEVIEVE DEPOT LANE ~UTCHOGUE, N'f Iiq55 1 REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE ICHAE£ K. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1961 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVI) BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEU) BUILDING SHEET DESCRIPTION' DETAIL5 Unauthorized alteration or ~ eddton o he p~n s o violation o section 7209 o the New York State Educo on Low Co,les of tbs pen net bearing the pro essonel TAX MAP# ~CALE: ,~ NOTE~ A550CIAT 050201 )ATE: SH~j 2114/05 )W6.#: 86 OUT S RECYGL N 0 COMME CHOGUE, CTM ,IO0 TE PLAN G 0 AND TRANSFER RC E DRIVE N Y 11935 96-1-8 PACKA GE ,TONE REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE MICHAEL K. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PROJECT DESCRIR AON: %,,NE UJ BWILDING~ SHEET DESCRIPTION: COVE~ SNEET oddllon~ to this plan is o violation of section 7209 of the New York Sta~e Education Law, CaRies of this plan not engineers Inked seal shall not be o valid true copy FAX MAP# gCALE: AS NOTED )WO.#: ,&550C. I AT ®5®2®1 DATE: SHEET DWO,#: I 51, Z 50'-0" 51¢ X ZONIN~ INF"O~J'-fATION ~HAI~.T ZONE 52.5 I I III I I / ~'r'~lC4,/ LOCATIC~N: ZONE REVlSION DESCRIPTION DATE MICHAEL I(. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PECONIC RECYCLING AND TF~AN$FEt~ 860 COMMEI~CE DRIVE CLITCNOGUE, N~ IIGDD PROJECT DESCRIPllON: NEUJ E%IILDING SHEET DESCRIPTION: SITE PLANE; Unouthorlzed olterotlon or violation of section 7209 of the New York 5ta · Education Law. Copies of this p an no bearing the pro ess anal engineers Inked sea sholl not be ovolid true copy, FAX MAP# I®00- c3& - I- ~CALE: 4,5 NOTED )Wa,# )RAWN BY: J CHKD BY' OFN I )ATE: 2/14/¢~ )WD,#. 2 Z OT OT DT OT fLT DUILDIN® E~k/E~®RF=EN PLANTfN® ~F=TAIL SHI~.UB F~LANTIN® %$ DETAIL ' ' ' I · "I · · I · · I · · I · · ............ I · · I ' ' Ii i~l~ ~i4111111i ]~ 3~ ~E~ 10I ~11 ~4~ 43~ il' I' ' I I ....... I . III PLAN REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE MICHAEL _K. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 19~1 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-96]_9 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1961 UNION BLVD BAYStt0RE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~,NE LU E~WILDIN~ L SHEET DESCRIPTION: L4~NDGCAPING Unauthorized alteration or odd~bon to this plon ls o violotion of section 7209 of the New York Store Educabon Law, Copies of [h]s plan not bearing the professono engineers inked seal shall nor be o vohd [rue copy, FAX MAP# ~CALE: ,A~ NOTED )WG,#: A~OCIAT ®D®2~I )RAWN BY: I CHKD BY: 3ATE: SHEET 2114/®5 B )wo.~ OF & BUILOlN® 400 WATT E~UILOIN® LIGHT ISOLUX CHART DEPOT LANE REVISION DESCRIPTION I DATE MICHAEL K. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 1170~ (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION DLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNINO *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PECONIC PROJECT DESCRIPqON: NEU. J E~UlLE)INO SHEET DESCRIPTION' LIGNTrN~ Unauthorized alteration or oddiDon to this pon s o violotion o 8e¢ on 7209 of he New York Store Edu¢otion Low CaRles of Ibis plan not bearing the professona e~gmeers inked seal shell not be e valid [rue copy, TAX MAP# I®®®-~-I-~ SCALE: ~ NOTED )WO #: ~OCl~T g)50201 )RAWN BY: I CHKD BY I )ATE: SHE~ 2/14/0~ )WG.#: W r ANTHONY ~ o~ ~UA~ REGISTERED ARCHITECT ~ 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 ~ (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AN~ EXPEDITERS ~ ~ ~ T ~ L ~ ~ ~ T I 0 N 1981 UNION BLVD rAYSHORE, NY 11700 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 CUTCMO~UE, NY 1I~3D ~NE~ BUILDIN~ ELEVATION5 I¢¢¢- ~m t , , ..... · :== ..... mm mm mill , NOTED )we $OWTH ~L~TIO~ 2/14/¢5 g ~0000 DDD~ CONO~ETtE OU~B DETAIL gR'dP4ELL ~/ N1ANHOLtE I~ETAIL KRUPSKI, JOHN P. ,~ 5UZANN M. ~ / // // // / //: HUNTINeTON, NY 11%45 ~/ // / > / / ? / / / / /, ~////////////k 0q5-04-10 '/155 DEPOT LANE <~gP~<l, ANN "4ARIE SKYLINE D~IVE P.O, DOX 40qD LI¥1NG~TON h4ANO~., N'¢ 12%36 N N \ \ \ \ \ ~6-01-04 I 6810 D~POT LANE / GOOD,lIN, JANfE5 D. / &810 DBPOT LANE / P.O. BOX 145~ / GUTGHO~UB, N~ IIq~D / / / / / q6-Ol-O01 20343 NfAIN ~.OAD TIDE G~OU~, lNG. G/O H, ~.AYNOR PLO, BOX ~ATTI~O~, N~ 11~2 ~EPOT LANE 6003 I;2EPOT LANE KRUPDKI, JOHN P. ~ 5UZANN I% 14 GONfPA58 HUNTINGTON, NY 11%4~ %200 DEPOT LANE GOOD,lIN, JANfE5 D. ~ NfARYLIN %200 DEPOT LANE C.t.)TOHOGUE, NY t .A I U S IvfAp 205J0 OOUNTY ~.OAD 48 h4cGALL, P*USSEL 233 8P~.IN¢ STREET ATLANTA, GA D050D q8-02-01 Iq8%0 GOUN"F'¢ ROAI2 4 330 OENTE~. O~IVE ~6-04-5 5'133 DEPOT LANE C. HUDZINSKI, GENEVIEVE OUTGHOGUE, NY IIqDB Lie t~-× fdA~ IN~O~t'f~-TIOIN REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE MICHAEL K. D UNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEUJ BUILDING SHEET DESCRIPTION: DETAILS Unautharrzed alteration or ~ addition o hs pan s a violation o sec on 7209 a the New York State Educa on Law. CaRles of this plan not bearing the professlono engineers inked seal sha no TAX MAP# IOO0-~& -I-8 SCALE: AG NOTED DWO.#: DRAWN BY: I CHKD BY I DA~E: SHEET 2/14/¢B )WG.#: ~ OF~ - Xy5 S ''-- REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATE ~"'~ ~*'""~'~"~'~ ~'~- MICHAEL K. D UNN ~, ~m m~mo , ~.~VO~L~mo~L~IM~I~O~mON~ 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 *~m~ o~ ~ ~v ~(631) 665-9619 F~ 969-0115 ~ ~ L~AL ~m~ ~Nm~mP~mTm~, P~R~IT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS B. LIEN~SA~5~NAFPIDAVI~, ~N~OTOR~A~I~TO~ O~[~IN~O~AYSAF~R 1981 UNION BL~ BAYSHORE, NY 11706 A~ ~u~u~, (631) 665-9619 F~ 969-0115 I0. THE INST~LATION OF ~L 51~ A~ HI~Y IH~T5 I~LUDI~ E~AVATION, ~AG~ILL OF ~E ~HE5 FO~ 5ANITA~ ~E~ AND ~lLlTl~ ~g ~NIN~5 ON EXIDTIN~ D~ETS. 5AID ~RK ON ~IDTINe " /' I~-~-I-~ ~R~ LI~ A~/O~ ~ILPIN~. c~ 5HALL ~ PL~EP IN ~ PA~ ~ To ~f PED~IAN ~FFIC. " -.,~, A~5OOIAT 050201 O~1~ OF ~E TO~N OF ~5~ BAY. ZONE REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE MICHAEL K. DUNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1961 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE IMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PEI~OLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NELU t~UILDtN~ SHEET DESCRIPTION: 61TE TAX MAP# SCALE: ,~ NOTED DWG.#: DRAWN BY: t CHKD BY: OF~ J QUJ~ )ATE: SHEET 2/14/O5 J A PROPOSED LANDS6APIN¢ III I ~II IIllIlIII I III II I ~IiIIIII II II I i % % O Mk F__ROP_ DRIVE MICHAEL K. DUNN 10gl UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11700 REV1StON DESCRIPTION DATE (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING r · PECONIC ~EC¥CLIN~ AND Tf~N$FEf~ ~,~ COMMEf~C:E Df~IVE CUTCNO~UE, MT 11~35 PROJECT DESORIP1]ON: ~NELU E%IILDING SHEET DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPING Unauthorized alteration or addilition to this plan Is o violation of secton 7209 o the New York State Education Law. Co@les of this lan not TAX MAP# SCALE: ,~,5 NOTEID DWO.#. DRAWN BY: I CHKD BY: I 2/14/¢~, )W6.#: 30F~ Z M~W ~UlLDIN~ 40' 20' 01 t~H't'51OAL ZONE REVISION DESCRIPTION DATE MICHAEL K. DUNN REGISTI~RED ARCHITECT 1961 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (6:]1) 665-9619 FAX 969-011,5 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PECONIC IREC.¥CLING ,AND ,~&~ CO]"II"IEF~CE D~IVE CUTCNOGLIE, N'r' IIC~3D PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NELL) BIJILD IN~ SHEET DESCRIPTION: LIGNTING addlll~ion to ths pan is a · ~o ot on o section 7209 of he New York SLate Education Law. Copies of this plan not MAP# AS NOTED DWO.~: AGSOCIAT ~D5~2®1 )RAWN BY: ~ CHKD BY: GFH ~ ~ )ATE: SHE~ 2/14/C~5 )W6,#: ON 51TE ~ONO~ETE 4 ~&VI~G IDET&IL O85-O~-O6.1 IO'~EO O~,E~ON ~OAD ~.l~D ~OX IE~, O~.E~ON ROAD GUTCHO~UE, NY IIqDD Oq~-O~-OOOM \ \ \ \ "/lED IDJ~POT LANE KP-.UF~KI, JOHN P. * SUZANN i'4. 14 COi'/iPAS~ OOURT j HUNTINGTON, NY 1194DI \ \ \ \ X 0q5-04-10 '1155 OF:POT LANE KF~UF'DKI, ANN HARIE DKYLINE Z~RIVE LIV'IN~TON ~ANOR, N'Y' r2"/58 DRIVE I q&-or-o4 6810 DEPOT LANE GOO]DF, lIN, JAr"lES P. 6810 DEPOT LANE P.O. tDOX 145q OUTOHO~UE, N~ IIq~5 -- qD-O2-5 %200 DEPOT LANE GOODFIIN, JANES iD. 4; NfARY'LIN '1200 DEPOT LANE OWTOHO~UE, NY' IIq'DD q~,-OI-OOI 20545 I~AIN ~OAD TIDE GROUp, lNG. O/O H. RAYNOR P.O. ~ox 14~q DEPOT LANI~ q5-4-11 &OOD DEPOT LANE K~J. JPSKI, JOHN P. 1.4 GOHPA~8 GOUF~T HUNTINGTON, NY 11~45 20510 OOUNTY' ROAD' 48 McOALL, P-LJDSEL G. ATLANTA, ~A DODO5 IqS"/O GOUNT~ ROAD 550 ~'.ENTEt~ [DRIVE RIVE~,HEAID, NY' IIqOI q&-04-D 5155 OEPOT LANE GUTGHODUE, NY' IIqDD I MICHAEL K. DUNN REGISTERED lOgl UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11700 (631) 665-9619 F~ 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BL~ BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 F~ 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *PE~OLEUM SPECIALISTS *COMMERCIAL S~TE PLANNING *PERMIT EXPEDI~NO PECONIG ~EC~GLIN~ ~ND T~N~FE~ CUTCHO~UE, NT II~DD ~NED ~UILDING DETAIL5 lOOo- ~G NOTED AGGOCIAT O502Oi 2A4/OD D OF~ r PECONIC REC¥C..LIN~ AND ~NDFEP. ~00 kIICK,HAM AV~RLIE TAX f"14,~ IN~OI~f'IA?IONI MICHAEL K. D UNN REGISTERED ARCHITECT 1981 UNION BOULEVARD BAY SHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 PERMIT ACQUISITION AND EXPEDITERS 1981 UNION BLVD BAYSHORE, NY 11706 (631) 665-9619 FAX 969-0115 *ENVIRONMNETAL COMPLIANCE *COMMERCIAL SITE PLANNING *PETROLEUM SPECIALISTS *PERMIT EXPEDITING PECONICRECYCLING ,AND TRANSFEf~ GLITCNIO~UE, NY IIC33D PROJECT DESCRIPTION: t~,%NE LU t~UILDING SHEET DESCRIPTION: ELEV,ATION5 Unouthorlzed olterotion or ~ TAX MAP# SCALE: AG NOTED DWO #. A550CIAT 050201 DRAWN BY: BY' ~F:N I CHKD IDATE:2/I4/os SHE~ · IDW% oF ~