The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-52.-5-58.33120 Albertson Lane Greenport, NY 11944 January 25, 2008 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Warren Corazzini site plan 67575 NYS 25, Greenport, NY SCTM #1000-52-5-58.3 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: With regard to the above-captioned matter, please withdraw the incomplete site plan application dated August 16, 2000. Sincerely, Warren Corazzini WC:afw JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON September 2, 2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 William C. Goggins, P.C. 13105 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Warren Corazzini site plan 67575 NYS 25 Greenport, NY SCTM# 1000-52-5-58.3 Dear Mr. Goggins, in reviewing the site plan application materials submitted to this office, the Planning Board will require additional information. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed any further: 1. Submit a letter to withdraw the incomplete site plan application dated August 16, 2000. 2. Submit the appropriate site plan fee calculated based on the build out shown on the plan submitted August 25, 2005 orS 1,020.65. 3. Submit a draft crossover agreement and draft covenant and restriction for the required site plan access. 4. Submit a landscape plan. 5. Enclosed you will find the Architectural Review Committee checklist for your review. We will need the materials submitted to the Planning Department before the referral can be done. In addition we will need three copies of the site plan for circulation and referrals. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. ~iewer CC:file, eric PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 September 2, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. William Goggins, P.C. PO Box 65 13105 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed revised site plan for Warren Corazzini 67575 Main Road, Greenport SCTM#1000-52-5-58.3 Zone: LI Dear Mr. Goggins, In reviewing the site plan application materials submitted to the office on August 30, 2004, the Planning Board staff found additional information will be required. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed: 1. The site plan will need to be updated, please refer to the checklist attached for requirements. Please add the lot coverage percent, landscape percent, detail the specific storage use, building property setbacks and show lighting information if any. 2. Please illustrate and detail the type of landscaping to be installed within proposed build out. 3. Please submit information for presentation to the Architectural Review Committee. See the checklist. 4. Please supply information that supports the driveway crossover easement agreement. 5. The site plan will require the following approvals before PB Final Approval: Fire Department, A.R.C. and Southold Town Building Department. 6. Attached is a copy o f the site plan application, please update the application with the new agent information and the environmental assessment form for the new size building. 7. Please submit the approvals from NYSDOT and SCDHS when you receive them. Page Two, September 2, 2004 8. Research shows a variance was granted 5/16/02 appeal number 5095 and the building was smaller. To avoid town Zoning issues, please prepare and submit a building permit application for review by the Building Department. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, F~E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL Highway hauPPauge, New YOrK 11788 www. dot.state.ny, us THOMAS J. MADISON, JR. COMMISSIONER September 6, 2006 Mr. William C. Goggins, Esq. Goggins & Palumbo Attorneys and Counselors at Law 13105 Main Road P.O. Box 65 Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. Goggins: Proposed Subdivision - Warren Corazzini Route 25, Greenport SCTM 1000-52-05-58.2 & 58.3 Our Case No. 01-326P We are writing in regards to the subject location following our letter of June 30, 2005 which is attached herewith. The property owner recently placed a soil berm across the unauthorized site access to Route 25, which effectively removes any access to Route 25. As we stated previously the area shall be m- vegetated. This should occur as soon as possible to minimize erosion impacts and all work should take place within the property owners property limits so that the property owner will not need to secure a Highway Work Permit from us. If the Town concurs, landscaping may be kept to a minimum as this area will likely be disturbed by our proposed project, PIN 0042.28, to reconstruct the Route 25 bridge over the LIRR to the west of the site. This project is presently scheduled for a 6/7/07 letting date. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. Saad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachment CC: Mr. Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold r. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:SME PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON September 2, 2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 William C. Goggins, P.C. 13105 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Warren Corazzini site plan 67575 NYS 25 Greenport, NY SCTM# 1000-52-5-58.3 Dear Mr. Goggins, In reviewing the site plan application materials submitted to this office, the Planning Board will require additional information. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed any further: 1. Submit a letter to withdraw the incomplete site plan application dated August 16, 2000. 2. Submit the appropriate site plan fee calculated based on the build out shown on the plan submitted August 25, 2005 of $1,020.65. 3. Submit a draft crossover agreement and draft covenant and restriction for the required site plan access. 4. Submit a landscape plan. 5. Enclosed you will find the Architectural Review Committee checklist for your review. We will need the materials submitted to the Planning Department before the referral can be done. In addition we will need three copies of the site plan for circulation and referrals. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. · Se~o~ Site Plan Reviewer CC:file, enc ~NILLIAM C ~. GOGGINS, ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW 13105 Main Road P.O. Box 65 Mattituck, New York 11952 Phone: (631) 298-4200 Fax: (631) 298-4214 August 22, 2005 Planning Board of the Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer WILLIAM C. GOGGINS DONNA M. PALMER Paralegal Re: Warren Coraz~ Dear Mr. Semon: Enclosed please find three copies of the site plan application documents together with three additional site plan surveys. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. Thank you. AUG 2 5 2005 GOGGINS & PALUMBO 13105 Main Road P.O. Box 65 Mattituck, New York 11952 Phone: (631) 298-4200 Fax: (631) 298-4214 Jtme 20, 2005 Planlfing Board of the Town of Soufliold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Re: Warren Corazzini WILLIAM C. GOGGINS ANTI IONY H. PALUMBO DONNA M. PALMER Paralegal Dear Mr. Semon: Enclosed please find additional documentation for the site plan application. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. Thank you. yyours, WILL~INS AFFIDAVIT Re: Warren Corazzini 1000-052.00-05.00-058.003 67575 Main Road, Greenport, New York STATE OF NEW YORK ) )SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) WARREN CORAZZINI, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am the owner of the above referenced property, and I hereby authorize William C. Goggins, Esq. to act as our agent and to handle all necessary work involved in the application process with tl~e Southold Town Building Department, Planning Board, Board of Trustees, and Zoning Board of Appeals. ~AkREN~C~O.~R~INI Sworn to before lne this ~-] ~ ~hday of April, 2005 NOTARY PUBLIC ELAINE T. VILLANO Notary Public, State of New Yo~ No. 01VI602§22§, ~uffolk Oount~ Commission Exl~lr,.~ A ri ri. ,;)--*~3 ~-~ PLANNING BOARD MEM~RS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS 1GENNETIt L, EDWARDS MARTIN Il. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTItOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 Stal;e Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 __ _Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee APPLICAflON FOR CONSIDERAI'ION OF A SITE PLAN ~__~_New ~Change of Use __Re-use , ~Extenslon ~Revlslon or Approved Site Plan Name off BUsiness or Site: SCTM #: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Warren Corazzini t000'~52.00-05.00-058.003 67575 Main Road Greenport, New York Warren Corazzini Address of Appllcanl: Telephone: ~1750 McCaan Laney 631-765-2012 Greenport, New York 11944 Owner of Land: Same as above Agent or Person responsible for application: Address:' Telephone: Site plans prepared by Llcer~se No. William C. Goggins, PC 13105 Main Road P.O. Box 65, Mattituck,'N~:'51952 631-298-4200 Peconic Surveyors 49618 Address: Telephone: 1230 Travelors Street, Southold, New York 11971 631-765-5020 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: Tiffs document Is designed to asslsl in determining whether the action proposed may Imve a slgnltlcanl effect on the environment. Please complete the entire [orm, Pads A lhrough E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verg[catlon and public review. Provide any additional in[ormation you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expecled that completioa o[ the tull EAF will be dependent on io[ormatior, currently available and will not iavolve new studies, research or investigation. I! in!ormation requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name o! Action Warren Corazzini LocalioaofAction(includeSIreetAddress, MulflcipalilyandCounty) 67575 Main Road, Greenport, New York 11944 Name o[ Appllcanl/Sponsor Address 13105 Main Road~ P.O. Box 65 City / PO Mat tituck Warren Corazzini by William C. Goggins Business Telephone 631-298-4200 Stale NY Zip Code 11952 Name of Owner (if dit!erent) Warren Corazzini Address 1750 McCann Lane Cily / PO Greenoort ,/ State Business Telephone 631-765-2012 ( Zip Code 11944 Description of Action: Construction of Storage Boilding Page 2 of 21 ~ Page 2 Plannln~J Board Site Plan Appflcatloo APPUCANI~ AFFIDAVIT SLATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF suFr~IK William C. Goggtns being duly sworn, deposes and says that he 13105 Main Road , Mattituck,_N__e~ Y__ork attorney/agent in the State of New York, and that he Is the owner of the above properS, or that l~e is the of the (TIMe) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on(he SEe Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance With the plans submit(pal, /~¢,,(,7 ~ / ,/ Signed (Owner) Signed (Partner or Corporate officer and Title) Sworn to me this 2005 2 (%Jr_day of June ELAINE T. VILLANO . Notary Public, State of Ne)i~l,~r~~ No, 01VI6029229, ~uff01'k County / P'aoe 3 Planning Board Site Plan Application 1.04 Tptal Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning District Existing Use of Site ¥ornn~ ' Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate wl~lch building will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Storage Building 0 Oross Floor Area of ExlsUng Structure(s) ~000 sc! ft Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) 7% Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by NO Board of Appeals - Case # & date NO Board of: Trustees - Case # & date NO NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date NO Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date N/A Case Number N/A Name of Applicant N/A Date of Decision N/A Expiration Date N/A Other None Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, lmve proper permits been Obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION 0/~ CONST~°UCTION) MAY BE UNOE£TAf'E~/ UNTIL APP£OVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOA£D. V/OLATO,~S A£E SUBJECT 1'0 PP, OSECUT/ON. Site Plan Applieations Public Hearings Under the current site Plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options 1. To follow the established procedure, or To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional Site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departr~ent approval subject to the following conditions: The ~pPlicant hereby agrees and understands that If the site plan wliich receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change Is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. The applicant agrees notto object to a new public, hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans, The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. Re; Warren Corazzini SCT~/~_.:1000- o~-o5.oo-o58.oo3 Applicant June 21. 2005 Date Please Complete Each Question--IRdicate N.A. if Rot applicable A, SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial r'~ Commercial [] Forest [] Agriculture [] Other Residential (suburban) Vacant Land ]Rural (non-farm) Light Industrial 2. Total acreage of project area: 1.04 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brusldand (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, i)asture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Olher (indicate type) Building 11%; Landscape and Buffer 72% What is predominant soil Iypels) on project site? a, Soil drainage; DWell drained _,[O~L% of site ]Poorly drained % of site PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 1.04 .25 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres O acres 0 acres O acres 0 acres 0 acres .079 acres acres __acres / ]Moderately well drained % of site. 7. 8. 9. Classi[ication System? Are there bedrock outcroppings oil f)rojecl site? ~ Yes a, What is depth to bedrock (in feet) Approximate percentage o[ proposed project site with slopes: DO-lO% X % E]10-15%__% is project substantiall~ontiguous to__or contain Historic Places? ~ Yes IX~ No If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of tbe NYS Land acres {see 1 NYCRR 370). None · [] 15% or greater__ % a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Is project substantially contiguous to a.site listed oil the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes ~No ~Yes ~ No []Yes ['~No What is the depth of the water table? [ !' (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole sourqe aquifer? 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in tile project area? Page 3 of 21 1 1. Does project site contain soy species of plant or animal life that is identilied ss threatened or endangered? E]Yos [] No According to: I Identify each species: 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? DYes E]No Describe: 13. Is tim pr?ject site presently used by the community or neighbodlood as an open space or recreation area? E]~es E]'o If yes, explain: '14. Does the / 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name el~ Stream and name of River to which it is tributary present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? r~Yes 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: None b. Size (in acres): 1.04 acres Page 4 of 21 17. Is tile site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? OYes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DNo r~Yes DNo 18. is the site located in au agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 3047 E~Yes []No 19. Is the site located in or substautially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of tile ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 r~Yes DNo 20. Has tile site ever been used for tbe disposal of solid or hazardous wastes7 B. Project Description !. Physical dimensious mid scale of project )fill in dimensions as appropriate). Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor; . acres. r~Yes ~]No Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. Project acreage to remaiu undeveloped: _acres, ] 1% or . 1144 acres Building 72% or .7488 acres Landscape & Buffer Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) 17% or . 1768 acres undeveloped If tbe project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; IViaximum vel)icular trips generate,~ per hour: .5 If resldentu, l: Number and type f housing units: N/A Initially Ultimately proposed ,.5 )upon completion of project)? One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium width; ft. ~Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No How many acres o~' vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 100 length. tons/cubic yards. i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; 50 j. Linear feet of frontage along a public II/orougbfare project will occupy is? q~?/. '~7 2. Now I11UCJl natural Inaterial (i.e. rock, earth, otc.) will be removed from the site? 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed E~Yes []No ~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? I b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? , Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project;' r~Yes ~ No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 8 If multi-phased: Iq/A b. d. Will blasting occur during construction? [~ Yes [] No Number of iobs generated: during construction __ months, (including demolition) Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month __ year, (including demolition) Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month year. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [] No 9. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Wil~ project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~ Yes If yes, explain: after project is complet~ 0 r~ No 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, otc) and/'amount ,/ / b. Name of water body into which effluent will be dischart:ed /- 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes ~ No Type 14. Will surface al ea of air existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [] Yes ~ No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [] Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes ~ No a. If yes, what is tile amount per montb?__tons b. If yes, will all existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give nanre ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~Yes [] No Page 6 of 21 o. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project iuvolve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes []No a. If yes, what is lhe anticipated rate of disposal? __ b. If yes, what is the al~ticipated site lifo? -- 1 8. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes tons/l~onth. E]uo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? r~Yes E]No 20. Wiil project produce operating noise exceeding tire local ambient noise levels? E]Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~ Yes [] No If yes, indicate typeIsl New Construction: Utilities for Storage Building 22. if water supply is from wells, il~dicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: ,/ Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board DYes ['~ No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes [] No Site Plan City, Town Zoning Board ~Yes ~ No Variance for Set Back City, County Health Department r~ Yes r~ No Other Local Agencies C~Yes r~ No Other Regional Agencies OYes [] No State Agencies ~Yes [] No N¥S DOT Federal Agencies ~ Yes ~ No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? []Yes [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~ Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan r~ Site plan ,: [] Spedial use permit [] Resource management plan [] Subdivision D Other Page 8 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation or sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 11. Will the proposed action create a dema~3d Ior any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection7 []Yes a. If yes, is existing capacity suflicient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. D. Informational Details DYes [] No DYes ONo Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification Signature' ~5(~ ~ ~ Title I! the action Is In the Coastal Area, a~d you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form betore proceedlr~g with this assessment, Page 10 o[21 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Goggins & Polumbo A/C Warren Corazzini PO Box 65 Mattituck, NY 11952 DATE: December 17, 2001 AMENDED & RENEWED: July I, 2005 Please take notice that your application dated December 17, 2001 For permit to construct a new building at Location of property 67575 Main Road, Greenport, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 52 Block5 Lot 58.3 Is retumed herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed 5,000 square foot building, on a conforming lot measuring 45,359 square feet in the Light Industrial (LI) District,tis not permitted pursuant to Article XIV, Section 100-142, which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LI Light Industrial District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule requires a front yard setback of 100 feet and a rear yard setback of 70 feet. Plans note a front yard setback of+/- 75 feet and a rear year setback of+/- 41 feet. Site plan approval is required before a building permit can be issued. This Notice of Disapproval was amended and renewed on July 1, 2005, following the submission of a new aonligation which showed a change in the size of the oronosed building. CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. Subimal Chakraborfi, P.E. Regional Director State of New York Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788-5518 http://www.dot.state.ny.us Thomas Madison, Jr. Acting Commissioner June 30, 2005 Mr. William C. Goggins, Esq. Goggins & Palumbo Attorneys and Counselors at Law 13105 Main Road P.O. Box 65 Mattituck, NY 11952 Your June 20, 2005 Submission Proposed Subdivision - Warren Corazzini Route 25, Greenport SCTM 1000-52-05-58.2 & 58.3 Our Case No. 01-326P Dear Mr. Goggins: This is in regard to the referenced project which was previously submitted to us for review. We recently wrote to the consulting engineer for this project in a letter dated May 27, 2005 (copy attached). We are in agreement with cross access through the adjoihing property with no access to Route 25 for this parcel. The adjoining property has access to Albertson Lane which has access to Route 25. The property owner shall remove any access to Route 25, grade and re-vegetate the Route 25 site frontage so that all on site water is contained on site. All proposed trees shall be planted entirely within the applicant's property. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation conceming this matter. Very truly yours, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY SHAIK A. SAAD SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Mr. William C. Goggins June 30, 2005 Page 3 Attachment cc: ~. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold s/Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW FORINTERNALUSE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: ~' /,,~¢ /~' Project Name: Project Address: Date Sent: Suffolk County Tax Map No.:lO00- ~ Request: ~7-z~,4¥7~,~ ~.~ Zoning District: (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: ~- Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: ~ / .~ / ¢_~ Date of Comment: ~/~ /05 Final Determination Date: / / Decision: Signature of Building Inspector GOGGINS & PALUMBO ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 13105 Main Road P.O. Box 65 Mattituck, New York 11952 Phone: (631) 298-4200 Fax: (631) 298-4214 June 20, 2005 Planning Board of the Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Re: Warren Corazzini WILLIAM C. GOGGINS ANTHONY H. PALUMBO DONNA M. PALMER Paralegal Dear Mr. Semon: Enclosed please find additional documentation for the site plan application. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. Thank you. ?~ ~.~y y~ ,,urs, AFFIDAVIT Re: Warren Corazzim 1000-052.00-05.00-058.003 67575 Main Road, Greenport, New York STATE OF NEW YORK ) )SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) WARREN CORAZZINI, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am the owner of the above referenced property, and I hereby authorize William C. Goggins, Esq. to act as our agent and to handle all necessary work involved in the apphcation process with the Southold Town Building Depa~hnent, Planning Board, Board of Trustees, and Zoning Board of Appeals. ~//ff/~/7~~4-~ ~wom to before me this ' ~'~'-day of April, 2005 NOTARY PUBLIC ELAINE T. VILLANO Notary Public, State of New York No. 01VI60~§2l~§,,guffolk Oounty Commission Ex[~lree AIJ~ ~. ~ SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI~ P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR May 27, 2005 Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. 1725 Hobart Road P.O. Box 616 Southold, New York 11971 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 . Your December 14, 2001 and February 6, 2002 Submission Corizzini Property Route 25, Greenport SCTM 1000-52-05-58.2 & 58.3 Our Case No. 01-326P Dear Mr. Fischetti: This is in regard to the referenced project which was previously submitted to us for review. We previously wrote to you in a letter dated May 3, 2002 regarding this parcel. Our letter stated that the dirt driveway must be removed and re-vegetated so that there was no access to this parcel from Route 25. This parcel has cross access to the adjoining parcel to the east which has access to Albertson Lane. To date the dirt driveway has not been removed and is being utilized as an access to Route 25. Additionally we have spoken to Town of Southold personnel who have informed us that the Town has not given any approvals for this site. Please be advised that by copy of this letter we are requesting the engineer-in-charge of our capital project D259518 to not re-install any access at this location. The dirt road access is shown on our construction plans at approximate center line station 16+525.00 slightly offset to the west of Kerwin Blvd on the north side of Route 25. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. May 27, 2005 Page 2 CC: [iPeter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW May 27, 2005 Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. 1725 Hobart Road P.O. Box 616 Southold, New York 11971 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 Your Decembe~.l~, 2001 and February 6, Corizzini Property Route 25, Greenport SCTM 1000-52-05-58.2 & 58.3 Our Case No. 01-326P 2002 Submission Dear Mr. Fischetti: This is in regard to the referenced project which was previously submitted to us for review. We previously wrote to you in a letter dated May 3, 2002 regarding this parcel. Our letter stated that the dirt driveway must be removed and re-vegetated so that there was no access to this parcel from Route 25. This parcel has cross access to the adjoining parcel to the east which has access to Albertson Lane. To date the dirt driveway has not been removed and is being utilized as an access to Route 25. Additionally we have spoken to Town of Southold personnel who have informed us that the Town has not given any approvals for this site. Please be advised that by copy of this letter we are requesting the engineer-in-charge of our capital project D259518 to not re-install any access at this location. The dirt road access is shown on our construction plans at approximate center line station 16+525.00 slightly offset to the west o£Kerwin Blvd on the north side of Route 25. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, C SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. May 27, 2005 Page 2 CC: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold i' Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold · Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 September 2, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. William Goggins, P.C. PO Box 65 13105 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Proposed revised site plan for Warren Corazzini 67575 Main Road, Greenport SCTM#1000-52-5-58.3 Zone: LI Dear Mr. Goggins, In reviewing the site plan application materials submitted to thc office on August 30, 2004, the Planning Board staff found additional information will be required. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed: 1. The site plan will need to be updated, please refer to the checklist attached for requirements. Please add the lot coverage percent, landscape percent, detail the specific storage use, building property setbacks and show lighting information if any. 2. Please illustrate and detail the type of landscaping to be installed within proposed build out. 3. Please submit information for presentation to the Architectural Review Committee. See the checklist. 4. Please supply information that supports the driveway crossover easement agreement. 5. The site plan will require the following approvals before PB Final Approval: Fire Department, A.R.C. and Southold Town Building Department. 6. Attached is a copy of the site plan application, please update the application with the new agent information and the environmental assessment form for the new size building. 7. Please submit the approvals from NYSDOT and SCDHS when you receive them. Page Two, September 2, 2004 8. Research shows a variance was granted 5/16/02 appeal number 5095 and the building was smaller. To avoid town Zoning issues, please prepare and submit a building permit application for review by the Building Department. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file YOU ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS: Please check off all that are applicable! (x) * Town of Southold Building Department notice of Disapproval required under Town Code Section 100-253. (x) · Suffolk County Department of Health Services: Water supply, wastewater disposal permit. Proof of Health Department Review or Exceptions: Staff will indicate what type of approval is required. Curb ~t permit for New York State and Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works. ( ) · Southold Town Trustees: Dredging, bulkhead, wetlands, coastal hazard area. (v)~· New York State Departme~-I~d,ronmental Conservation: Storm water runoff permit~ulkhead, dredging and or tidal wetlands. (?) · Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals: Variance, interpretation, special exceptions. ( ) · U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers: Bulkhead, dredging. ( ) · Greenport Village Utility: Water if within village franchise area. ( ) · NYNEX, Long Island Lighting Company Poles moved, other utili~ cons deration. / The Plannin,q Board will also: ( x ) · Send a referral to all town, county and state agencies for comment on the proposed site plan. ( x ) · Schedule a referral meeting with the Architectural Review Committee for a written recommendation on the site plan. ( x ) · Process the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). ( x ) · Send a copy of the site plan to the Building Department for certification. ( x ) · Send a letter to the Fire District for a recommendation on the need for a fire well or hydrant. ( x ) · Send to Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. (x) · ( )· Send to the Town Engineering inspector for review of drainage and road profiles. Send to the Town's Consultant's price quote to review the proposed project as required. (x) · After site plan approval we will forward an endorsed version to the Building Department, Town Engineer care of the Highway Department and when applicable to the Town Trustee's and Town Zoning Board of Appeals. SITE'P'bAN* CHECK MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Notice of Disapproval from Building Department required under 100-253 of the Town Code. Lot, block section from Suffolk (~ounty Tax Map. Name and address of landowner on record. Names and addresses of adjoining landowners. Names and address of applicant (if not same as landowner). Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature. Date of Plan. North Point. Location of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines. Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. Existing zone district, adjoining property zone districts and zoning district lines if the property includes a split zone. Buildings and build out with percent lot coverage. Landscaping and percent landscaped. Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet. Existing building structures / utilities and proposed structures/utilities. Show all uses of the site in a town defined type, detail square feet and parking calculations broken down by the use, refer to Town Code section 100-190. Include handicap parking spaces as required in New York State Code. Drainage plan .letailing paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas with calculations. Show outdoor lighting with detail of wattage and type of fixture. Show Ioc~ion of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants. Show location of dumpster. ~- Existing trees of 6 inches in diameter at a point 3 feet above the/truck base property boundaries. Landscape plan detailing location of landscaping, type of mat~.;ial plants, buffering, street trees -see attached Town Code information 100-212 & 100-213. Data for architectural review (see information below) Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS-IF APPLICABLE (} {} {} (} {} (} Off street loading areas as required, refer to Town Code 100-192 for Loading Berth Requirements. Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less Show wetlands Outdoor signs - sketch to scale and colors Proposed grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line Spot elevations for buildings Review required by Suffolk County Depadment of Health Services Review by New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit Review by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Review by Southold Town Trustees (freshwater wetlands). Flag and show wetlands on plan Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Review required by Southold Town Board Other The following information is to be subxf~itt~4 to the Architectural Review Committee after the Planning Board notifies you in,writihg that the application is acceptable. The Planning Board office will attach a copy of g site plan to the following material: Notations as to the type of building construction, proposed occupancy or use and the location of fire separation walls (If it projects beyond the building envelope). Floor plans drawn to scale (1/4" = 1' preferred) Elevation drawings to scale of all sides of each building (1/4" = 1' preferred). The follow information shall be shown on the drawings: o Type and color of roofing - include sample o Type and color of siding - include sample o Type ofwindows and doors to be used, material and color of all windows and door frames - include sample o Type and color of trim material - include sample Rendering of building if possible Notation of the type of heating/cooling equipment to be used. Show or indicate exterior locations of all equipment i.e., heat pumps, air conditioning compressors, etc. on plans and/or elevations. Type and locations of all roof-mounted mechanical equipment Type and locations of all mechanical equipment, plumbing and/or attic venting through roof or building sidewall. Type, color and style of proposed masonry material for chimneys or accent walls- include samples or photos. Details, color, type and style of any proposed ornamentation, awnings, canopies or tents Photos of existing buildings and/or neighboring properties from four directions of project site, if possible. Type, color and design of all exterior signage, both building-mounted and free standing. Please use this list as a checklist. Regretfully, we cannot accept incomplete submissions. Place all materials in a large manila envelope with your application name printed on the outside. Large samples should be labeled. If you want samples returned, please note same on the label. THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WOULD BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH YOU AT .4 PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE PRIOR TO YOUR ACTURAL SUBMISSION BOARD MElVlBER5 Geraxd P. Goekringer. Chainnau Lydia A~ Tonora O~o~e Homing Ruth D. Oliva V'meent Orlando Southold Tows Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fa~ (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown,northfork.net BOARD OF APPEA~ TOy~rN OF SoLrrHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OFMAY 16, 2002 Appl. No. 509,5- WARREN CORAZZINI Lqcafioh of P~b~.e'r~: ~75T§'Main Road, Greenport Parcel 52.-5-58.3 Date of P/Iblic'He~;Ihl~!".May 16, 2002 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESGRIPTION: The subject property is a 1.0413-acre lot with 3~4.37 ff. along the north (northwest) side the:Main Road (S,R. 25), 260 feet west of Albertsons Lane Greenoort The lot is vacant and is located in the LI Light Industrial Zone District. BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval: date¢ December 17, 2001 denying ,an ap[~l!catton dated December 17, 2001 for s permit to build a commercial building, for the fOllowing masons: (1)'AdJcle XIV, Section 100-142 requires (a) a 70 ft, minimum rear yard setback, and (b) a lO0:ff: front yard setback i RELIEF.REQUESTED: APPlicant requests a vapenca to I~tca~;'~p;~,~ ~l~,!P.~ Wl'~ ~'rear ' ' yard setback ati41 teet: il~S~ead 0!:70 feet, and a front yard ~etl~t~7~ as more particuledy detailed on Peconic Surveyors Apd110~2000 sit~'pla~,,map, revised Febru- ary 5, 2002. ~ ~ ;' ~ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION. DESCRIBED BELOW: On th~'ba~i~ (~ materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the:following findings 1 Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties becaug6;"when consiclerthg the nature of applicant's business and the size of the tracks and equipment that the applicant intends to store and work on within the proposed building, a 60 x 50 ft. building is the minimum size to allow adequate room. The building is proposed near the center of the lot and will be screened from the road. The immediate neighboring properties are other industrial zoned uses 2. The benefit sought cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue other than an areavanance If applicant were to build alonger, more narrow building were placed, other variances m~ become necessary when considering screening along the mad and the light industrial uses permitted in the area, The applicant wishes to construct this building to house vehicles and equipment from outside elements and related uses. 3. The area variance is not the minimum necessary, ~ut is acceptable for the size and dimensions of the lot FORI~ NO. 3 TOWN OF 8OUTHOLD BUILD1NG DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD. N.Y. TO: NOTICE O1' DISAPPROVAL ,Of Joseph Fischetti, Jr. A/C Core.hi PO Box 616 Southdi~ NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated December 17. 2001 For permit for construction of a new building at DATE: December 17. 2001 Location of property: 67575 Main Road. C_u~envort. NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 52 Block 5 Lot 58.3 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The nronosed 3.000 foot bulldine, on a conforming lot measuring 45,359 square feet in the Light Industrial District. is not eermitted rairsuant to Article XIV Section 100-142 which states; '~No buildine or oremises shall be used and no building or part theranf shall be erected or aita~e.d in the LI Linlit Industrial Dislxiet unless the same con*om to the Bulk Schedule and Parldng and Loadin~ Schedules incomorated into ti'ds cham~r by reference, with the same force and effect a.s if such romflations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule requires a front yard setback of 100 feet and a rear yard setback of 70 feet. Planes note a front yard setback of +/- 75 feet and a mar yard +/- 41 fe, t. Total lot coverage, following eroposed construefio~ is seven Authorized Si~mmre Cc: File, ZBA ApPEAL.FROM DECISION'OF BUILDING INSPEC'~'(~ APPEAL. NO. TO THE ZONING BOARDL~,~,_I~ LS, TO~ OF ~H~, ~ ~ .~ ~.' - APPLI~ ON ~ ...................... ............. ~-~. ....... ~j, .. ......................... WHEEZY THE ,~[~I~G JN~E~O~ DENIED ~O .......................... ~ ~ ~~llcant~permit. ~, ;, o, . · T . .... st,- ~g~.~g~;;,..:~.~-? .-. F,7..-A.~,i~i~,; ................. ~; ....................... ( ) M~p No. ' ~t No. Pti o~ 0wne~. s~fl~ and Pamg~ of the Z~ 0~1~ by nu~r. ~ ~t quo~ the O~a~.) 3. · ~PE ~ ~pp~I-Is ~'he~wlth for (please check app~pri~ ( ~' X VARIANCE t~ ~' ~ing O~l~e or Zoning ~ ' ( ) A VARIANCE d~jte I~k of ~.(Stamof N~ Yo~T~ ~ ~t. 16 Sec. 280A ~bs~tlon'3 () 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A j~revla~s~appeal (h~) (b~as not)!bee[n ~e with r~ ~ ~1~ ~1~ of the BuJld{~ I~.~r-~t~ ~.~.~isp~. ~ap~l~w~( )~ ~ra s~permlt ' ' ' ' ' ~ ; ' ( )-~ ~ a ~ri~e a~ was m~e In ~pea,~ ~o ................................. ~t~ ............................. ~ .................................... ~N FORAPP~L - ( ): A Va~a~e to S~tl~ 280~. (~ A Variance to t~ ~Jng ( ) is r~st~ for the r~ t~ (Continue on other side) r wn of S tt ta § 100-141. Use regulations. In the LI District, no building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose except the following: A. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989; 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 26-1994; 4-28-1997 by L.L. No. 6-1997] Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses permitted under Subsection A(1) and Subsection A(2) hereof, are subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) The agricultural operations and accessory uses, including irrigation, the raising of field and garden crops, vineyard and orchard farming, the maintenance of nurseries and the seasonal sale of products grown on the premises, the keeping, breeding, raising and training of horses, domestic animals and fowl, barns, storage buildings, greenhouses and other related structures to the same extent and subject to the same conditions allowed in the AC Zone. (2) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, school districts, park districts and fire districts. (3) Wholesale businesses, private warehousing and public warehousing, and building material storage and sale, but excluding storage of coal, coke, fuel oil or junk. [Amended 11-19-2002 by L.L. No. 7-2002] (4) Building, electrical and plumbing contractor's businesses or yards. (5) Cold storage plants, baking and other food processing and packaging plants that are not offensive, obnoxious or detrimental to neighboring uses by reason of dust, smoke, vibration, noise, odor or effluent. (6) Office buildings for businesses, governmental and professional uses, including adrniuistrative training, data processing, publication, financial and sales offices. (7) Telephone exchanges. (8) Wineries as regulated by § 100-10IA(11). (9) Auto repair shop. (10) Repair shop (not including auto and marine). (11) Custom workshop. (12) Machine and equipment workshop. (13) Light industrial uses. (14) Publishing and printing plants. (15) Boat building, servicing and storage, excluding wholesale and retail sales of boats and accessories. [Amended 4-28-1997 by L.L. No. 6-1997] Uses permitted by special exception of the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided and subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) Research, design or development laboratories, provided that any manufacturing shall be limited to prototypes and products for testing. (2) Laundry or dry-cleaning plants, subject to the following conditions: (a) All processes and storage shall be carried on within an enclosed building. (b) All fluids used in processing shall be recycled, and the overall facility shall be designed, located and operated to protect surface waters and the groundwater from pollution. (3) Light industrial uses, subject to the following conditions: (a) No such process or operation shall involve the handling, storage or discharge of explosives or permit upon the premises any virus or other type of infectious organisms identified with diseases of animals or humans. (b) No offensive noises, gases, fumes, smoke, odors, dust, effluent or vibrations shall emanate from such use and no waste products shall be discharged therefrom of a character to create a nuisance or to be injurious to health or to negatively impact groundwater. (c) Such processes shall involve the use of only oil, gas or electricity for fuel. (4) Conference facilities, subject to the following conditions: (a) Where rooms are provided for conference attendees, said rooms are permitted as set forth and regulated by § 100-61B(4) of the Resort Residential (1~) District. (5) Public utility structures and uses. (6) Truck or bus terminals (garages, parking facilities, loading docks, etc.) (7) Food processing and packaging plants, not including fish processing plants. (8) Repair of boats and marine items. 2 C. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by Article XX, are subject to site plan review: (1) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily incidental to any permitted or special exception use and not involving a separate business. (2)EN( 1)Accessory uses as set forth in and as regulated by § 100-131 C(5) through (8) of the Light Industrial Park/Plauned Office Park District. § 100-142. Bulk, area and parking regulations. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LI Light Industrial District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full. EN(2) § 100-143. Front yard setbacks. [Added 8-22-1995 by L.L. No. 18-1995] A. Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way. B. There shall be an exception to Subsection A if the adjacent parcels are developed, in which case the minimum front yard setback shall be the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels. C. A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five (75) feet from the right-of-way. 3 Endnotes 1 (Popup) Editor's Note: Former Subsection C(2) and (3), which regulated signs, were repealed 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 25-1994, which local law also renumbered former Subsection C(4) as C(2). For currem sign provisions, see Art. XX, Signs. 2 (Popup) Editor's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter, and the Parking and Loading Schedules are in §§ 100-191 and 100-192. 4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIA_NO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State l~oute 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: September 2, 2004 To: From: Re: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Review~ Site Plan Approval for Warren Corazzini Main Road Greenport, NY SCTM# 1000-52.-5-58.3 Zoned LI Status: Active Site Plan. This is to document for the file that we delivered a site plan for review at the joint Building Department and Planning Board meeting today. In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of the site. Please review for comments, concerns and approval. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by John Metzger dated 4/10/00, last revised 4~2~04 and received by the Planning Board 08/30/04. Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: scm#: ~ooo- 0,5-3.00 --- OW, c:O-- 2,5"}'. 00'~ Date: Comments: <_.~ ~0~ (~ /~(A,/ f/--'~ WILLIAM C. GOGGINS, P.C. ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW P.O. Box 65 13105 Main Road Mattituck, New York 11952 Phone (631) 298-4200 Fax (631) 298-4214 WILLIAM C. GOGGINS July 14, 2004 DONNA M, PALMER Paralegal Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application No.: 5095-Warren Corazzini Premises: 67575 Main Road, Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Sir/Madam: In connection with the above referenced application, we respectfully request a work session be scheduled at your earliest convenience. If you have an).' questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you in advance for your anticipated time and courtesies. Very truly yours, WILLIAM C. WCG/dmp enclosure PLANNING BOARD MEMB BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 30, 2002 Mr. Joseph Fische~i 1725 Hobart Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Storage Building for Warren Corazzini SCTM#1000-52-5-58.3 Dear Mr. Fischetti: At its Work Session, on May 28th, 2002, the Planning Board reviewed your site plan application for a new storage building and has the following comments: In view of the New York State Department of Transportation's latest correspondence, dated May 3, 2002, the proposed curb cut onto Route 25 must be eliminated and revegetated as part of the proposed buffer area. As a consequence of this change, permission for cross access from the adjacent parcel must be obtained and shown on the revised site plan. Greater landscaping detail within the buffer zone along Route 25 must be provided, including a planting plan and schedule for all varieties selected. Evergreens are preferred. Please note that a 50' buffer zone was proposed for the adjacent parcel (P.J. Corazzini). Explain why only a 25' buffer is proposed on this site. Final building elevations must be shown on the plan. Any lighting fixtures or signs must be located on the plan, including security lighting. > Indicate the loading bays and concrete aprons on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies of the revised site plan at your earliest convenience at which time the Planning Board will continue its review. If you have any additional questions, you may contact me at 765-1938. Very truly yours, 'Victor L'Ep'[atte~er Senior Planner PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 1725 HOBARTROAD/PO Box61§, SOUTHOLD, NEW¥ORK11971 TEL 631-765-2954 - FAX631-614-3516 · e-mail: joseph~fischetti.com Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Date: Reference: October 17, 2001 Warren Corizzini / Site Plan Dear Sirs, Please find enclosed 7 copies of the site plan for a commercial building. An application and fee check has been sent to your office prior. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call. ~E Cc: Corizzini 0CT i u 211111 Southold Town Piannin§ Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 26, 2001 Joseph Fischetti 1725 Hobart Road Southold, NY 11971 Proposed Storage Building for Paul Corazfini SCTM# 1000-5-58.2 Warren Corazzini SCTM# 1000-5-58.3 Route 25 & Albertson's Lane, Greenport Dear Mr. Fischetti, There seems to be some confusion on the above site plans. The plan submitted for Warren Corazzini says Paul on the plan with Paul's tax number. The plan in Warren's file is also Paul's plan and tax number! Please respond as to which application is active. If Warren, we need new plans and tax number. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 7, 1988 Bob Melrose 39 Robinson Road Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Bob Melrose SCTM #1000-52-5-58 Dear Mr. Melrose: The following action was taken by the $outhold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 6, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on this minor subdivision for 3 lots on 3.5~7+ acres located at Greenport. / RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Boa~'d authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated as amended March 1, 1988. If you have any'questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ~y yours, ~ /,; /~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN cc: Assessor's Building Department jt TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD VILLAGE OWNER LAND IMP. ST?EET ' DIST. SUB. LOT __'~ REMARKS ACR. TYPE OF BLD. PROP. CLASS TOTAL DATE FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD DEPTH BULKHEAD TILLABLE WOODLAND MEADOWLAND HOUSE/LOT TOTAL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD ~)WNER ~I[AND IMP. STREET ~"7 ~:~"7_..~ VILLAGE R~RKS AC.. 1,04~ ' TYPE OF BLD. DIST. SUB. LOT ~ TOTAL PRO~, ' c~J'~SS ~"~ DATE I ',/~.,-~ !'z/~[~ L '~ ',,~'~. ""' FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGEONROAD DEPTH BULKHEAD o TILLABLE WOODLAND MEADOWLAND HOUSE/LOT TOTAL STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VE'rERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y, 11788 JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER May 3, 2002 Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. 1725 Hobart Road P.O. Box 616 Southold, New York 11971 Southold Town Planning Board Your December 14, 2001 and February 6, 2002 Submission Corizzhfi Property Route 25, G-reenport SCTM 1000-52-05-58.2 & 58.3 Our Case No. 01-326P Dear Mr. Fischetti: This is in regard site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. The site plans for the proposed work show the installation of a driveway apron fi.om Route 25 for a proposed commercial building and cross access from the adjacent parcel to the east. Your December 14, 2001 letter, however, indicates that this site will only be accessed from the adjacent parcel mad that the proposed driveway apron is only for possib!e future access to the site, Based upon your letter, we have no objection to the site maintaining the cross access from thc adjacent parcel so long as no work is proposed along the property's Route 25 frontage. A field investigation of the site revealed a dirt driveway to the site. This access must be removed and the area revegetated. If, at some time in the future, the owner requires new access to the site, a NYSDOT Highway Work permit must be secured. Questions conceming this matter should be directed to Mr. Gene Smith at (631) 952-6020. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. May 3, 2002 Page 2 Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original S~gned By ~ ~.'~: [~i~[~, P.E~.~/ Civil Engineer ~ ~ Traffic Engineering ~d Safety cc: Ms. Valefie Scope, To~ of Sou~old~ Mr. Peter H~s, Town of Southold AWB:ES:JS CRAIG SIRACUSA, F~E. REGIONAL DIRECTOr STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETEraNs Memorial HighwaY Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788 JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN CoMmISSIONER December 31, 2001 Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. 1725 Hobart Road P.O. Box 616 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Fischetti: Your December 14, 2001 Submission Corizzini Property Route 25, Greenport SCTM 1000-52-05-58.2 & 58.3 Our Case No. 01-326P This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must also include the County tax map number. The subject material is being reviewed by Mr. Gene Smith. He can be contacted at (631) 952- 6020 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By A.W. BACHNER A. W. BACHNER, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold ~ Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Town of Southold JAN 0 4 2~U2 Southold Town Planning Board AWB:ES:JS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fox (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 19, 2001 Mr. Joseph Fischetti 1725 Hobart Road PO Box 616 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Warren Cora77ini SCTM#1000-52-05-58.3 Located on the North corner of Route 25 opposite Kerwin Boulevard Greenport Dear Mr.~tti, The Planning Board reviewed the enclosed proposed site plan at its October 29th Work Session. There are a number of concerns they have about the site plan. They have requested that you set up a meeting with me to discuss these items which include the following: 1. The access to the site from State Route 25. 2. The landscaping. At the time of our meeting it would be advantageous if you could bring with you information relevant to the Architectural Review Committee for their review, We will need some matedal describing the proposed building. In the meantime, a copy of the drainage plans will be sent to Jamie Richter for his review. Please call the office at your earliest convenience. Thank you. truly yours; Town Planner VS/bd PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMEHS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Memorandum To: Jamie Richter, Town Engineer From: Valerie Scopaz, AICP, Town Planner//~,/'-~'" Date: November 19, 2001 Subject: Proposed site plan for Warren Corazzini SCTM# 1000-52-05-58.3 Located on the North corner of SR 25 Opposite Kerwin Boulevard Greenport Enclosed is a site plan for Warren Corazzini. Please review the enclosed plan dated October 15, 2001, for drainage. VS/bd ~ll~k,.~kN STATUS REPORTill~ ~ I PROJECTNAME: biJtxrr,..9 ~' ' ~O t"~ ~/~] ZONEi: ~ ZONE2: ZONE3: SCTM# 1000 - .5'2 ~.~ - _~R . ,SL 0WNERNAME: b'-~r,-.a ("or,,,.~...;,~,' TEL#( ) 'APPLICANT NAME: 0-o~-4j~ /5,-~-,~, ~ · TEL# ( ) - ITHE ~ ZONE LOCA~D AT' Im 000- :NCY: D: UNCOORDINATED: ER~IINATION: ' RECEIVED/REVIEW: DRAINAGE PLAN: LANDSCAPE PLAN: LIGHTING PLAN; PRE-SUBMISSION WRITTEN REQUEST: DATE PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE__(WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRH~ ~N RE ~._Q~.~T2._ --"--/~/ ~ST FOR REVISIONS: / / ___J PRE-WORK SESSION: -- ~ (TYPEI: TYPE2: UNLISTED:_._~ /'~ RECEIVED DATE ___._/~ / REFERRED FOR APPROVALS: -~ONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEAL#:._~_I~__~ BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTiFiCATION: TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: [)EPX3F TRANSPORTATION: DO ~'1~, D~ SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING FIRE COMMISSIONERS: ~ BOARD APPROVALS PREPARED: ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: FINAL SITE PLAN INSPECTION: DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: E_.__UILDING DEPT___./_.___/~ TOWN ENG ~/~/__.__ ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Ch~rman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee x New _Change qf Use Re-use --,' Extension __l~evislon of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN Warren Corazzini SCTM #: Location: Address: / Name of Applicant: 1000-052.00-05.00-058.003 67575 Main Road New York 1~44 Greenport, Warren Corazzini Address of APplicant: Telephone: 1750 McCann Lane, Greenport, New York 11944 631-765-2012 Same as above Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: ' Telephone: William C. Goggins, PC 13105 Main Road P.O. Box 65, Mattituck,'NY"l1952 631-298-4200 Peconic Surveyors 49618 Site plans prepared by: ticer~se No, Address: 1230 Travelors Street, Southold, New York 11971 Telephone: 631-765-5020 / PART 1~-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Pads A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as pad of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Pads 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation, tf information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Warren Corazzini LocationofAction(includeStreetAddress, Municlpeli~andCounty) 67575 Main Road, Greenport, New York 11944 NameofApplicant/Spensor Warren Corazzini by William C. Go~ins Address 13105 Main Road~ P.O. Box 63 City/PO Mattituck State NY Business Telephone 631-298-4200 Zip Code 11952 NameofOwner(ifdlfferent) Warren Corazzini Address 1750 McCann Lane City/PO Greenport Business Telephone 631-765-2012 ,/ State ~Y Zip Code 11944 Description of Action: Construction of Storage Building Page 2 of 21 ~ Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPLICANI~ AFFIDAVIT :STATE OF NEW YORK COUNt' OF SUFFOLK William C. Goggins being duly sworn, deposes and says that he 13105 Main Road , Mattituck, New York attorney/agent in the S~teofNew York, and that heisthe owner oftheabove properW, or ~atheisthe of ~he (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the tiUe to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly es~ablished and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and ~s to roads;'that he has examined all rules ancl regulaUons adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Slta Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, wiil not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed in strict accordance With the Signed (Owner) Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title} Sworn to me this 2005 )/~A~ day of June ~ (Notary Public) ELAINE T. VILLANo Notmy Public, State of Ne~l~' N~. 01Vi6029229, ~ffoik ~.ounty 'Page 3 Planning Board SEe Plan Application 1.04 T,T Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning Dlstdct Existing Use of Site · Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing, Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Storage Building o Oross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) ~,000 sq f t Gross Floor Area of P¢oposed Structure(s) 7% Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Pad<lng (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by N0 Board of Appeats- Case # & date NO Board of Trustees -Case # & date N0 NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date NO Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date N/A Case Number N/A Name of Applicant Date of Decision N/A Expiration Date Other None Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSrRUOTION) MAY BE UNDE£TAKEN UNTIL APP,~OVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. Site Plan Applioations Public Hearings Under the current site Plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the. Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Bepartment approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: To follow the established procedure, or To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the' Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional Site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departr~ent approval subject to the following conditions: The ~pplicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public, hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans. The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval .and .certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. Re: Warren Corazzini SCTIV~:~//~_1000- ~:oo-o5s.oo3 Applicant June 21. 2005 Date Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial []Forest D Agriculture D Other D Residential (suburban) Yacant Lan(] D Rural (non-farm) Light Industrial 2. Total acreage of project area: 1.04 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc,} Wetland {Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or filll Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) Building 11%; Landscape and Buffer 72% What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: []Well drained 100 % of site ]Poorly drained % of site PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 1.04 .25 acres acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres acres acres 0 .acres 0 acres 0 acres .0 7 9 acres D Moderately well drained % of site. b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYe Land Classification System? acres {see 1 NYCRR 370). None 4, Are there bedrock outcroppinga on project site7 [~] Yes [] No e. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) §. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopea: D0-10% X % D10-15%__% . D15% or greater ,% 6. Is project substantialt~ontiguous t~..~ contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LU Yes L~ No Is project aubstantially contiguoua to a.site liated on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes •No What is the depth of the water table? 11 ' (in feet) Is site located over a primary principal or sole source aquifer? DYes [] No DYes •No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area;' Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: Identify each species: DYes ~"] No 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? {i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? [~Yes DNo Describe: 13. Is the pr?ject site presently used by the community or neighborhood es an open space or recreation area? E~] Yes DNo If yes, explain: /~'[4. Does the present site include 1 §. Streams within or contiguous to project area: scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes ~]No None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: None b. Size (in acresl: I 1.04 acres Page 4 of 21 1 7, Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? DYes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? NNo DYes DNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 3047 r-]Yes ~]No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 r~Yes ~'~ No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes7 B. 1. Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). f. g. h. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: ['~ Yes ~]No Project acreage to be developed: acres. acres initially; acres ultimately, Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. 11% or . 1144 acres Building 72% or .7488 acres Landscape & Buffer Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) 17% or . 1768 acres undeveloped If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A Number of off-street parking spaces existing Maximum vehicular trips generate~ per hour: . If res~denb~h Number end type f housing units: N/A proposed ~ (upon completion of project)? One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? '~?A How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes DNo []N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? width; 100 ft. tons/cubic yards. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation {trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres, length. , Page 5 of 21 Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [~Yes [] No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 8 7. If multi-phased: b. d. 8. Will blasting occur during construction7 r~ Yes [] No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction __ months, (including demolition) Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases7 [] Yes [] No year, (including demolition) after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes ~ No If yes, explain: I 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved7 ~ Yes []No a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc) and/amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be dischar(.ed 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [-~Yes ~No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood p~ain? E]Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month?__tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes ]Ne Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Wil( the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes DNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated sit~ life?__ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides, DYes ~]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes r~No 20, Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? r~Yes r~No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use7 [] Yes ~ No If yes, indicate type(s) New Construction: Utilities for Storage Building ,/ 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity__ gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~] Yes [] No 24. Does If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board DYes [] No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes r~J No Site Plan City, Town Zoning Board ]Yes N No Variance for Set Back City, County Health Department [] Yes [] No Other Local Agencies DYes ~ No Other Regional Agencies DYes [] No State Agencies []Yes [] No NYS DOT Federal Agencies DYes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? r~Yes [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan [] Site plan , [] Spedial use permit [] Resource management plan D Subdivision D Other Page 8 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? DYes ~]No a, If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No r'-I 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? I I Yes I~1 No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. DYes [] No I I D. Informational Details Attach any adciitlonal information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may De any adverse Jrnpacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification /, 'certify that the information pr(/(/~e,~f~bov~ is truet/~/tho ~est of my knowledge, Applicant/Sponsor Name ~'/(//~/' ~'~ ~7~ Signature /. ~. ~ Title If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this Page 10 of 2t I--~-- 51TE PLAN Presubmission conference (Within 30 days of written request) Complele application received (within 4 months a[ presub, conference) ApPlication reviewed at work session (within 10 clays of receipt} Applicant advised of necessary revisions (within ~0 days o[ review)' Lead .3.ge-~C'iT"C]iord,nation /)' SEQRA determination to. __ g .oning Board of Appeals - (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees ~ding Department (certification) Suffolk County Department of Planning _ Department of Transportation -State Department of Transportation - County _ ~rffOlk County Dept. of llealth e ~mmissioners 5tM/ Dr~[t Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covemmts and Restrictions andscape plan ~- ~/~ T ~hting plan ' Curb Cut approval ~';liuage pla~! v/~cviewed q.5/?, j by Engineer. Approval of site plan -with conditions Endorsemenl of site plan Certi£icale of Occupancy inspection Sent:_ Received:_____ C~ne year review BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS I~gNNETH L. EDWARDS ~ GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roac~j P.O. Box i179 ~ Southold, New York 11971 ~//~ Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee APPLICATION FOE CONSIDEP. ATION OF A SITE PlAN X New Change of Use Re-use Extension Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: SCTM#: 1000- Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: Telephone: Site plans prepared by: License No. Address; Telephone: HAY ~ 0 Z~,. ~ Southold Town Board Paoe 5 Planning Board Site Plan Application L! Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning District / Existing Use of Site [2~¢_,~,~ ~' ' Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees - Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision .Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONST£UCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNI1L APP£OVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATO£S ARE SUBJECT TO P£OSECUTION. Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: 1. To follow the established procedure, or To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departr~, ent approval subject to the following conditions: The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. The applicant agrees notto object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans. The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. SCTM#: 1000- ~'~--~)F -- 5~ o~ Date Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK "~,~1~' ~ ~ ~/~ t'1,'1 ] being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the of the (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. igne /A.Z~m~f.~ ; Signed (Partner or corporate officer and Title) Sworn to me this ~.~ day of '-~ ~l~'~- (Notary Public)(~- MARY MANTILLA ~ Public, StYe ~ New Yo~ No. 01MA~656~ ~ed In S~olk Cou~ ~mission ~1~ O~ober 29, ~ STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VEYERAN$ MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. ! '1788 May 3, 2002 Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. 1725 Hobart Road P.O. Box 616 Southold, New York 11971 Southold Town Plarming Board Your December 14, 2001 and February 6, 2002 Submission Corizzini Propertyr,~ t// Route 25, Greenpurt ,fi" _ SCTM 1000-52:05,58.2 & 58.3/' Our Case No. 01-326P Dear Mr. Fischetti: This is in regard site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. The site plans for the proPosed work show the installation of a driveway apron from Route 25 for a proposed commercial building and cross access from the adjacent parcel to the east. Your December 14, 2001 letter, however, indicates that this site will only be accessed from the adjacent parcel and that the proposed driveway aPron is Only for possib!c future access to the site, Based upon your letter, we have no objection to. the site maintaining the cross access fi'om the adjacent parcel so long as no work is proposed along the property's Route 25 fi:ontage. A field investigation of the site revealed a dirt driveway to the site. This access must be removed and the area revegetated. If, at some time in the future, the owner requires new access to the site, a NYSDOT Highway Work permit must be secured. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Gene Smith at (631) 952-6020. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the ab°ve address. Kindly refer to the subject case nUmber and County tax map nUmber in all correspondence. Mr. Joseph Fischetti, P.E. May 3, 2002 Page 2 Thank you for your cooperation conceming this matter. Very truly yours, Civil Engineer llI Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold ~ Mr. Peter Harris, Town of Southold AWB:ES:JS TO: FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDiNG DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Joseph Fischetti, Jr. A/C Corazzini PO Box 616 Southold, NY ,1,1971 DATE: December 17, 2001 Please take notice that your application dated December 17, 2001 For permit for construction of a new building at Location of property: 67575 Main Road, Greenport, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 5~2 Block5 Lot 58.3 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed 3,000 foot building, on a conforming lot measuring 45,359 square feet in the Light Industrial District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X1V Section 100-142 which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LI Light Industrial District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule requires a front yard setback of 100 feet and a rear yard setback of 70 feet. Planes note a front yard setback of+/- 75 feet and a rear yard +/- 41 feet. Total lot coverage, following proposed construction, is seven (7) percent. Authorized Signature Cc: File, ZBA PLANNING BOARD M[EMBE~ BENNET~ ORLowsKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM g. CREMER8 KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Complete0 Filing Fee ~New Change of Use Re-use Extension Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: SCTM#: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: ~000- 5'z ¢ ~ ~f¢. ~_¢ AUS 16 2000 Southold Town Planning Board Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: Telephone: Site plans prepared by: License No. Address: Telephone: Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPUCANI~ AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW' YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK /~ ~('t~~ ~)~Z_~.I'H; being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the S~te of New York, an0 that he is the owner ~ the above prope~, or that he is the of the (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or change~ in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) Sworn to me thisfl _ ( Nota'ry Public) DENISE REDDEN NOTARY PUSUC, STATE OF NEWYORK NO. 01RE6~62 SUFFOLK COUNTY (~V~MI~ION EXPIRES JUNE 22, 2~ ~__~ Page 3 Planning Board Site Plan Application Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning District Existing Use of Site VA ~-I ~ Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) 'ZT~g~,~j~ercent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees - Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision .Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVA[ION 0£ CONST£UCTION) It, lAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. V/OLATO£S A£E SUBJECT TO P£OSECUTION. PROJECT i.D. NUMBER 617'.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQR APPLICANT SPONSO 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Munlcipa,ity 5-F 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street adaress and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide 5, IS PROP SED ACTION: ~New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAN AFFE TED: ,nitlal,'~ ~/' ~ ~'~ 1 ~C acres Ultimately 5/~'~ ~ acres 8. WILL E POSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~ [] NO If No, describe briefly WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF ROJECT? [] Residential [] Industriar ~Commercial Describe: [] Agriculture []Par~PoresUOpen space []Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? / [] Yes [~No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 11. DOES ANY ASP CT OF TH~ ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes ~No If ye~, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF ROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: / v~/~' ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ Date: Signature: ~ If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER · I PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASS~MENT (To be completed by Agency) A. ODES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I I~I~sMOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.t27 ~t yes. cOOrdinate tile review process and use the FULL EA~=. [] Yes [] NO 8. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR. PART 617.67 II No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE ~:i-i-~,[S ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may Pe handwritten, if legible) C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic,.or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain brtefty: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish. shellfish or wildlife species, s~gnificant hal~ttats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or ether natural resources? Explain brlefl C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified Jn Cl*C~? Explain bdefiy. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. O. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [~] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly PART IIImDETERMINATION.OF S!GNIF_!CANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e~ch adverse effect identified above, determine'whether it is substantial large,.Impo~ant or othenvise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (La. urhan or ~ral); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) Irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessa~, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. T-hen proceed directly to the FULL FAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. '~1 Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any. significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'reasons supporting this determination: 2 Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Prepoee~ (If different from responsible offlceH Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: To follow the established procedure, or To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departm, ent approval subject to the following conditions: The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans. The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. Re: ^pp i t / APPENDIX -Applicant Information -Pre-Submission Conference Check List -Technical Data -Parking Requirements -Parking Lot Specs -Architectural Review -Notice of Public Hearing -Long Environmental Assessment Form 14-'16-2 (9/95)-- 7c 617,20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full E^F is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may nc~t be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been ordeHy, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part :2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 i-IPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: I-1 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. I-I B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* I-'l C. The project may result In one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 S Approximate percentage of pro project site with slopes: O0-10% % [-I10-1S% _ % [~15% or greater 6 Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? E]Yes [3No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? EYes 8 What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E]Yes ~]No 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [3Yes [3No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ~lYes ~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [~Yes [:]No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I-lYes I-]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes DNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: * a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16, Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ["lYes ~lNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow ~onnection? D-lYes I-INo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? E]Yes i'-INo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? I-lYes I-INo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article g of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 D-lyes I-INo ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I-lYes I-1No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour - (upon' completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prolect will occupy Is~ ft. acres, acres ultimately. Condominium length. 25. Approvals Required: Type Submlttal Date City, Town, Village Board ~]Yes E3No City. Town, Village Planning goard EYes [3No City, Town Zoning Board [:]Yes [:]No City, County Health Department EYes [3No Other Local Agencies [:]Yes [:]No Other Regional Agencies [Yes [No State Agencies [Yes []No Federal Agencies [~Yes ENo C. Zoning and Planning Information I Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision~ I~Yes ~]No If Yes, indicate decision required: E]zoning amendment I~zoning variance Cispecial use permit Esubdivision [:]site plan [:]new/revision of master plan [:]resource management plan [3other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zonin§? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? I-lYes ENo 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action.;' 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/~ mile? I-lyes {:]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land~ how many lots are proposed[' a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lYes nNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? I-lYes [:]No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I-lYes {:]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation .of traffic significantly above present levels? I-lYes CINo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lYes I-INo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this a~e~sment. 5 IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [:]NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [:]NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: $. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? I-1NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wile require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have Inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water mnoffi' I-INO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential :Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [~Yes [~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I--lYes []No [] [] []Yes ~]No [] [] C~Yes [-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ DYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures {e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources[' ONO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual £AF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLO(~ICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importanceS' P'INO ByES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities~ Examples that would apply to column 2 E]NO OYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space Important to the community. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated impact Impact Project Chan~ [] [] OYes [] [] OYes [~N [] [] [~Yes [] ~ ~ves ~ ~ ~Yes 0 0 []Yes 0 0 OYes 0 0 OYes 0 0 OYes 0 0 OYes 0 0 OYes O~ 0 0 Oyes 0 0 OYes 0 0 OYes 0 0 OVe~ NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? I~NO C]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors wil[ occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? I~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid o( hazardous waste. · Other impact: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARA(~TER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community~ QNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project Is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budset for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or 8oals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existin8 facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.8. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for futura'projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: '"'1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes ~]No [] [] ~]Yes [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~Yes E3~o [] [] []Yes K-]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~N0 ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~es ~No ~ O OYes DNo ~ ~ OYes DNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts~ [::]NO 0'lYES If an]/action la Part 2 I$ Identified aa a potential large Impact or If you cannot determine the magnitude o! Impact, pmcaad to Part 3 11 ,. ,4.,, (9~9~)-9< SEQR 617.20 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and availab]e to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or rnan-rnade scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the Rational or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · Hadonal Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · Hatlonal Hatural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · Hational Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or .Arntrak? · A governmentally established or designated Interstate or Inter-county foot trail, or one l~orrnally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic'~ · f~unlcipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-~A V4 -I/2 V2-3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) I-lYes [-]Ho 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? r-I?es nNo PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.20 Appendix C State Envlronrnental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR J 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Munlclpal[ty County 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: f-'l New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACT[ON COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes [] No I! No, descrlb~ briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LANO USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] PeridForest/Open space [] Other SEQR 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAU? I'--I Yes [] No If ~es, Iisi agency,s) lad permlUapp[ovals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF 'I~E ACflON HAVE A ~JRRENTLY VAUO PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No If yes, list &gee~/name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION W[LL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIOED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE 8EST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: . If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 .1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southald, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: March 27, 2008 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith are the checks listed. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Applicant/Project Tax Map ~ Amount Check Name & Type Bate/No. Blue Heron Farm/Preserve 75-6-6.1 3,250.00 8/17/07 - 143 Girards/Flora Nurseries 107-10-10.1 2,500.00 10/16/07 - 146 Sterlin9 Harbor, Inc. 88-2-15 500.00 12/17/07 - 1068 Conklin Point Estates 53-4-44.1 1,000.00 1/14/08 - Corazzini, Warren 52-5-58.3 1,020.69 1/30/08 - 1008 LR Enc(s). Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 05/31/02 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt~: 0 Subtotal $600.00 Total Paid: $600.00 Name: Corazzini, Warren R. 1375 Mccann Lane Greenport, NY 11944 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID: 55978 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 09/27/00 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt#: 3447 Subtotal $380.00 Check#: 003447 Total Paid: $380.00 $£P ~ ? 2000 Southold Town Plaoni~l Beard Name: ClerklD: Corazzini, Paul Jr & Sons 3120 Albertson Lane Greenport, NY 11944 JOYCEW Internal ID: 18363 473889 SOUTHOLD 52.-5-58.3 67575 MAIN RD = OWNER & MAILING INFO .... MISC CORAZZINI WARREN R~-SS 110 MCCANN LA GREENPORT NY 11944 BANK NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY RSCHOOL GREEN-PORT SCHOOL CLS 330 VACANT COMM DATE : 09/02/2004 ROLL SEC TAXABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 17 .............. ASSESSMENT DATA ........... **CURRENT** RES PERCENT LAND 3,900 **TAXABLE** TOTAL 3,900 COUNTY 3,900 **PRIOR** TOWN 3,900 TL~TAL 3,900 SCHOOL 3,900 3,900 ==DIMENSIONS .......... SALES INFORMATION .................................. ACRES 1.04 BOOK 12015 SALE DATE 01/07/00 SALE PRICE 95,000 PAGE 050 PR OWNER MELROSE JAMES ....... TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 ............. I== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 3 ..... CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE FD031 ~020 8W011 FI=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF F10=GO TO MENU LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Project Type: Site Plans Status: Withdrawn SCTM #: 1000- 52.-5-58.3 Proiect Name: Corazzini, Warren Address: 67575 Main Road Hamlet: Greenport Applicant Name: Corazzini, Warren Owner Name: Corazzini, Warren Zone 1: LI Approval Date: OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION End SP Date: Zone 2: Location: SC Filin.q Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M A,qreement: A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 3: SCANNED DEC t 9 2008 Records Management SCAN Date: ERS ~ DBWNSPDUTS r-- OUTTEn ', ~q qT 7'7 n~ S;]~E\/ALL ELE\/ATiiiN F LEFT END~/ALL ELEVATIBN Not to StoLe Planninl] Board OC"[ 'lis 2~! Southold Town PJanning Board SITE PLAN FOR WARREN' C ORAZZINI AT GREENPORT TOWN OF SO UTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY , N. Y 1000-52-05-58.3 SCALE.'1" =20' APRIL I0, 2000 JUNE 5, ZOO0 ( topo. I. fo. ) FEB. 14, 2001 Aug. 2g~ 2001 [revisions) KEY MAP' SCALEd "=600' eL 8,O ALBffRT$ON'$ LAN~ff NO TS' SUBSURFACE SEIEAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN BY' dOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. HOBART ROAD ' SOUTHOLDr N,Y, I1~?1 (ESI) ?~§ - E954 r ' ~:~-.-UTILITY AREA PDL E i.o ts , , . EXCEPT HEREDN ~creS Y ? / ZONING DISTRICT.. LI SCHOOL DISTRICT: FIRE DISTRIC T: PARKING 1 / 1000 sq. ft 50 x ~0 STORAGE BUILDING 3000 / 1000 = $ = 3 spa~es Provided 4 ~ DRAINAGE: ROOF .7000 s.f. I ~ 0.17 :': 3000 = 510 cu. ft. BLUESTONE PARKING & DRIVEWAY 6~00 s.L 0.5 ~ 0.17 x 6900 587cu. Il. 1097 cu. lt. /097 / 4Z.~ = 26 V.F. PROVIDE 9 I.P..s. 8' ~ 4' Deep LIGHTING ~M' = SHIELDED FLOODS HP5 SANITARY. DE$1G~ / SITE DA TA SITE AREA 1.0413 ACRES~ TOTAL BUILDING AREA, EX/STING, 0 PROPOSED' 3000 ALLOWABLE SANITARY FLOW (DENSITY) ----~-= PROPOSED GROUND WA TER MANAGMENT ZONE, 1V FLOW FOR SITE' $00 gpd ( no public wa/er ) 300 9pd I S.L ~ 1.0413 acres = 28820 9pd .SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN CAL CULA, TIONS GPD USE, ST?ORAGE BUILDING ( INDUSTRIAL ) SANITARY DESIGN gpd $000 J. f. $000 ~ .04 gpd I SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN .SEPTIC TANK PROPOSED' I~O gpfl ~ ~ 256 PROVIDE' MINIMUM SYSTEkt 900 GPD gallon to~k use I000 gal. tm~h t. EACHIN6,POOLS' REOUIRED; I~0 '+ I.$ =: 80 ~.f. leochi,?g oreo PROVIDE, MINIMUM '300 s,f. leaching area LOT COVERAGE BUILDING - 7% LA NDSCAPING 8 BUFFER BO % ~CDNIC PHDNE,'<531) 765- P, D, BDX 909 1£30 IRA VELE~ '$DUTH~LD, = 120gpd ' 496I'8 f~X,'(631) " '7~5- i 79 SITE PLAN FOR WARREN CORAZZINI AT TO WN GREENPOR 2' OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY , N. Y 1000-52-05-58.3 SCALE.' I"--20' APRIL 10, 2000 JUNE 5, BO00 ( lopo, Info. ) FEB. 14, 2001 Aug. 2~ 2001 (revI$iolt$) Feb. 5~ 200~ (revisions) KEY MAP SCAL£d "=605 Southold Town Planning Board ALBERTSON'S LAN~ / fo NOTE, SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. HOBART ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (GBI) 765 - 2954 ILO Y eL. 9.$ ZONING DISTRICT.. LI SCHOOL DIS TRIC 7:. FIRE DIS TRIC T.. ? / 1000 sq. ft. 50 x 60 STORAGE BUILDING 3000/1000 = $ = $ spaces Provided 4 DRAINAGE: ROOF JO00 s,f. ' I ,, 0.17 x .5000 = 510 cu. 11. ,. BLUESTONE PARKING & DRIVEWAY 6900 s.k 0.5 x 0./7 x 6900 = 587CU. fi. 1097 cu. fi. /097 / 42.2 = 26 V.F. PROVIDE ,9 L.P.s. 8' ¢ 'ri' Deep LIGHTING ~" = SHIELDED FLOODS HP5 SANITARY DESIGNr / SITE DA TA SITE AREA 1,0413 ACRES TOTAL BUILDING AREA; EXIS TING, 0 PROPOSED, $000 s.f. PROPOSED ALLOWABLE SANITARY FLOW {DENSITY) GROUND WA TER MANAGMENT ZONE, IV .E FLOW FOR SITE~ 600 gpd 600gpd / s.k ~, 1.0413 acre~ = 625 gpd .SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN CALCULATIONS USE, STORAGE BUILDING I INDUSTRIAL 3000 s. f. SANITARY DESIGN gpd GPD 3000 .04 gpd / s.f. = 120~pd SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN SEPTIC TANK PROPOSED' 120 gpd x ~ = 256 GPD PROVIDE, MINIMUM SYSTEM. 900 gallon tenk use I000 gel. tenk LEACHING POOLS~ REQUIRED, I~0 + I.~ = 80 s.L leochfng orea PROVIDE, MINIMUM '300 ~.f. leeching oreo FEST HOLE 511101 LOT COVERAGE BUILDING - LA NDSCAPING 8 BUFFER 8O% AREA 1.0413 ANY ALTERATION DR AflDITIDN TD THIS SURVEY ZS A VIOLAT]DN OF SECTION 7209 DF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW, EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7809 SUBDIVISION B, ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS NAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SAID HAP DR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL DF THE SURVEYOR ~H~SE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON,, Y,S, LIC, ND, 49618 P,C, ~0£0 FAX,'(83i) 755-~7~7 i830 T~AVELE~ STREET N,Y, 11971 9-273 ,f \ FOR AT TO WN SUFFOLK COUNTY 1000-52-05-58.3 SCALE: I" =20' APRIL 10, 2000 JUNE 5, 2000 ( lopo. Info, ) FEB. 14, 2001 Aug. 22, 2001 frevldonsl Feb. 5~ 2002 frevlslonsl SITE PLAN WARREN CORAZZINI GREENPORT OF SOUTHOLD ALBERTSON'S LANB Y KEY NAP SCALE,1 -60~ / ZONING DISTRIC~ LI / SCHOOL DISTRICT: FIRE DIE~.TRIC T.. I / 1000 sq. ft .5o', too' sro~RA2e~ 8U~LOINS 5000/I000 = 5 5 spaces PRO VIDEDH5C speces Includes I space FF. EL. NO TE, SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN JOSEPH FISCNETTI, P.E. HOBART ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (651) 765 - 2954 ? SANITARY DESIGN / SITE DA TA SITE AREA /.0415 ACRES_ TOTAL BUILDING AREA' EX/STING, 0 PROPOSED~ 5000 AL'LOWABLE SANITARY FLOW (DENSITY) DRAINAGE: ROOF 5000 s.f." l ~ 0.17 '~ ~OO0 = 850 ~q. fl. BLUESTONE PARKING 8 DRIVEWAY 9150=~s.f. 0.5 ~ 0.17 ~ 9150 = 778 cu. ft. 1628 cu. fl, 16281 42.2 = 39 V.F. PROVID~ I0 L.P.s. 8' ¢~ 4' Deep LIGHTING ~ = SHIELDED FLOODS HP5 fmax. helgh114') '--~'-= PROPOSED CONTOUR GROUND WA TER MANAGMENT ZONE~ IV -Z FLOW FOR SITE~ 600 gpd 6009pd / s.f. ~ 1,0413 acres = 625 gpd ,SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 'DESIGN CALCULA T/ONS -~-=UTILITY PEL_E AREA ,, y~v~r EASTERN TOWi~ TOPOe~AP~C ~Z4p ANY ALTERATIDN DB ADDIT/EN TD THIS USE, STORAGE BUILDING ( INDUSTRIAL ) SANITARY DESIGN gpd 5000 s, f. 5000 x .04 gpd / s.f. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGN ~SEPTIC TANK PROPOSED, ~OO gpd x 2 = . 400GPD PROVIDE' MINIMUM SYSTEM. SO0 gallon la~Tk use I000 gal. fork LEACHING POOLS~ REOUIRED' BO0 ~ 1.5 -- 133 $.f. leaching oreo PROVIDE~ MINIMUM '300 ~.f, leeching oreo GPD = RO0 gp8 LOT COVERAGE BUILDING - II % LANDSCAPING 8 BUFFER 72% SU,EVEY IS A VIDLATIEN SAID 'NAP' OR CDPfE. S BEAR THE WHESE 'S?GNATUR~ APPEARS. HEREEN, DF SECTIDN THE NEV '"P~CDNIC ~L.~t~'Y,/£YDfeS, P,C. ~ ~ 7209 DF YDRK STATE EDOCATIDN LAW, " ' EXCEPT AS PER SECTIDN 7209-SUBDIVIS!DN 2, ALL CERTZFICATIDNS PHDNE,'(d3]) 7~5. - 50B0 FAX~ *INPRESSED SEAL DF THE SURVEYDR D, BDX 909 ~ ~B30 TRAVELER STreET SEUTHDLD, N.Y. II'97i . 765-i79; 9-273