The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-15.-9-10.1, 11.1 & 15.1 Approved 2001 (1)MAIN ROAD (S. R. 25) DarE rseW cmE z.r 7 W ti 2 L5,— — — —fDWfRAYNIIEO AL IERI TIW W AWITIW ro A SWVEY NIP . A LILENSED LAM MNVEYW'S SEAL Is A VId.ATIW W SECTIW r SL60IVISIW 2 W TIE AEN YORK SIAM ADAC•ArIW LAN. My L,P= F TIE WIBINAL W THIS SURVEY NIAWEO "I AH WISINAL W nw LAM S WYWs ENSD45ED SEAL W INKED SEAL S W LO nseD TO BE VALID TME C MS. PREPARED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 FROM FIELD WORK COMPLETED SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 MAP REVISED: JANUARY 1B, 2013 (EASTERLY PARCEL 1 © 2013 THE RAYHOR DROOP, P.E. S L.S. PLLC wrmwrrzm xrnamvrrw+s usA.rv.. eu ruwrs,esonrs N/F COUNTY OF SiIFFOLK M ` _ J S 2 N/F WILLIAM 0, MYSOCKI & P. hFIINSKX r OOLPHIm MJ MOW HEREON N / / 1N.�gs �D MAP SHOWING EXISTING CONDITIONS PREPARED FOR CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC, SITUATE D ORIENT FEB 162013 Southold Tawn Plannhi9 BOartl TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK TAX MAP NO.: 1000-015.00-09.00-010.001, 011.001, 015.001 6 003.005 SCALE.- P - 20' 20 0 PO 40 60 I 1 i i - - - - - - - - - - - MAIN ROAD (S. R. 25) DarE rseW cmE z.r 7 W ti 2 L5,— — — —fDWfRAYNIIEO AL IERI TIW W AWITIW ro A SWVEY NIP . A LILENSED LAM MNVEYW'S SEAL Is A VId.ATIW W SECTIW r SL60IVISIW 2 W TIE AEN YORK SIAM ADAC•ArIW LAN. My L,P= F TIE WIBINAL W THIS SURVEY NIAWEO "I AH WISINAL W nw LAM S WYWs ENSD45ED SEAL W INKED SEAL S W LO nseD TO BE VALID TME C MS. PREPARED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 FROM FIELD WORK COMPLETED SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 MAP REVISED: JANUARY 1B, 2013 (EASTERLY PARCEL 1 © 2013 THE RAYHOR DROOP, P.E. S L.S. PLLC wrmwrrzm xrnamvrrw+s usA.rv.. eu ruwrs,esonrs N/F COUNTY OF SiIFFOLK M ` _ J S 2 N/F WILLIAM 0, MYSOCKI & P. hFIINSKX r OOLPHIm MJ MOW HEREON N / / 1N.�gs �D MAP SHOWING EXISTING CONDITIONS PREPARED FOR CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC, SITUATE D ORIENT FEB 162013 Southold Tawn Plannhi9 BOartl TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK TAX MAP NO.: 1000-015.00-09.00-010.001, 011.001, 015.001 6 003.005 SCALE.- P - 20' 20 0 PO 40 60 T , N ROAD -T EXISTING NATURAL - R 2 R - BO MAI (S. 5' ___ ^-4,t _ µx LANDSCAPE BUFFER zoNE _ I T P, j(SReN F • AS PER _�E } m ZONE " M. -I I RESIDENTIA L, R.O.W.- .. - N 63'23'25"E so,N 19 •'.. E .- ,r �° Po In 1.62' - ! f ._ _, -- z „- w,-r.ti - _ - . - II� j'. i • ' 1 r' 6Y 06'55 `E 73.18' ` , N i IT MATCHEXISTING GRADES y 4�,,..,,.i," ,� m I � �y � GRADING NOTE. 113 . CURB - — - - - - -__ _ BECAUSE THE SLOPE OF THE PROPOSED PARKING (824)1' - ) `.t STOPS (9 J88)3l, r '�. AREA IS SUBTLE, PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN ARE j / ❑ DRAIN IN INTERVALS OF TWO-TENTHS (02)OFAFOOT. J ' 7.l r 7 )' 7 `ti IJV � J JI13', 0 c SS O RM v- - • 7 1 l( j(9.6) I' o '.RR.� (8.6) , 7 ' - - • II(I (8.4) \ (9.4) 5 I FRENCH ]n] 1, i JII JV i M p I ( 8.2 ) I r ) I -� L 1 1 C I m �' C1 W _t M Ac _ o EL evAT oN n < 7 E TI 1 'E I <o I 3 MR TIMBER GUIDE RAIL DETAIL GPA VEL SURFACE PARKING AF7EZ A r 1 PM I, 3 (NO SCALE) (REGRADE PARKING AREA AS NEEDED TO m II JV t {V ❑ x ELIMINATE DEPRESSIONS AND APPLY I� K aHEXiTCE • Z AC STONE/GRAVEL TO THE SURFACE) w ` o PM M P C (L ( FOUR (4J EXISTING PARKING t II 9 SPACES IN THIS AREA TO BE I F �— DESIGNATED AS o (8.2) \ \ tl HANDICAPPED PARKING p5M' I I - \,\ (8.8) {� j A7 AD a I � Z - � ERGENCY \ H ',dVr EM 1 (8.4) •��-, 1 , 3 ACCESS AREA 1 AC �l PM ' j , I PERMANENT _ _ PROVIDE \ H W MP FRENCH TO STONERSTONEND WE RING COURSE 25 X 40' POS ESS 6 NO PA KING \ I TNG ESS R A J —A C A 2 THICKNESS 3 EACH DRAINS EGO � t STONE BLEND WEARING COURSE x zo PARKING AREA ACTED TO ! iSIGNSJ ONE (1) PAVED W I W t HANDICAPPED , 3oii�zm PARKING SPACE Z Z41 J iiiii:.iii{:iiiiiii•iiv{if f;•{jf•{•f•{• FINE GRADE 'I N w� EXTEND EXISTING i \ Q Q R R Q 6" COMPACTED BALE COURSE K SPACES SHONN ON WESTERLY ��y - U1¢z� m 1 SIDEWALK p05E0 EXISTING BANK RUN OR OTHER PARCEL WERE TAKEN FROM A OcwD" 1 " N-�I IJ 3 : , SITE PLAN PREPARED BY PECONIC w ¢'a o w O 1 III SUITABLE MATERIAL '$UgVEYORS, PC, LAST DATED p 0 iiw� 8 PROVIDE RAMP TO' I 3' ~ h1 P z Y 16 1996 0_ '1' n gEVISED MA , mxx I Z¢ to -SNACK BAR OOR 1 AC u QE%ISTING EXISTING SOIUNSUITABLE SOILS (EXPANSIVE I ¢LIGHTSI v SOILS SOILS CONTAINING ORGANIC MATTERO xae,¢= BUILDING Im S SHALL B BE REMOVED WHEN ENCOUNTERED '^ D -o na BELOW THE BASE COURSE. AS DIRECTED BY THE W uma¢o , T Q PM TOWN ENGINEER. ❑oo uz 1 LL EXISTING PARKING SPACES TERM�NA d _ GRAVEL PARKING AREA r^ y (APPROVAL FOR 69 SPACESnJ BUILDING EXISTING (_ _ I PROPOSED 39 9 [j) SNACK BAR 1 �I t` • WOODEN GUIDE RR : j Mp' TYPICAL DETAIL RAIL ALONG I �' NO SCALE PROPERTY LINE a Y, AZ g D 9... c '3 i C/L CROWNED m I 41- PARKING AREA w W PROPERTY m ROP R tlm v x O PROPERTY AM n ` . 'N N a In 1 1�J • '25 LINE LINE �n 4 ' m �p 5 , 9 M I AS- � I 0 � Z to Y VARIABLE WIDTH T 4.00 0.+ �. 3 m z a S MP HEIGHT VARIES- SEE DESIGN GRADES mNo ON SITE PLAN O /JMEET - EXIST. PN T EXISTING PROPERTY NE LIGHT ON AC pUPe e BUILDING In 33T I EXISTING GRADE PM PROVIDE1 SMOOTH - 37 \J AT ALL OF POINTS SECTION THROUGH O AT ALL POINTS !rI r m TON PROPOSED LIGHT 9 : RR li l y m ACE FIXTURES ON 0 CROWNED PORTION OF PROPERTY LINE Z 5 ° m m PM GRAVEL PARKING AREA , I 0 NO SCALE 6 9 r 0 m m (B) 1 MP m 2. fi I V] I MIX 6TONi BLE NC D FILTER FA BAIL O COURSE fit WEMM CULTEC n I O =N I I.NO. 1101 A9MANUFACTURED BY WI STONE BLFNO II " $ Uro I RR AC ORDANCEWITH AND vicm rEOTDAY I Z 1 ZMANUFACTURER'SFRE N H THICKNESS ACCORDANCE WITH O m W x I SPECIFICATIONS. FRENCH DRNN6 x Iz - ---A Tu Ull ,G T I.A. e- FlNEGMDE _ I I � - p fJ 4N4NN THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN n �, ; i I I j O� QQ4�U OF SOUTHOLD GRANTED SITE PLAN' , •c ` 1 6 11- COMPACTED VO�JOI� BABECWRBK 9 0 2 1 P E%5Ie10 BAN PARCEL" N M RTHECH 30ERMINAL / Q PARCEL" ON MARCH 30, 1964'. C o x o m / (�VQ - / � RUN 0110TIEI1 1 CURABLE LIGHT DETAIL F' „ m m a o Q� MATEwL N (NO SCALE � - 1 m a t0 m N v TO BE MOUNTED < m HEAVY DUTY OUTSIDE LIGHT FIXTURES to m A . UTILITY m � u ' I'1 � I O POS2' GH STANCHIONS IG TOP OF THE GUIDE RAIL T a N HI o ti , WITH SPORAN FACINGOVERALLADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL85, ¢ POLE r m O - �'_ EXISTING SOIL SOILS URMLE IOtlb WITH SHIELDS FACING ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL BE v O O F FILL FIST SUE (E%PANSNE SOILS OR BOILS PROVIDED I4IIDENTICAL"TUBES WILL BE MOUNTED = N c N ''g WITH FIST SHED CONTNNINGORGAN6M11T1C111111GMLL- ON 4" X 4" WOODEN POSTS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF " ,ten m x m I K COBBLES BE NEMOVED WHEN ENCOIINfEREC THE PARKING LOT, AT THE GAME 0' HEIGHT. IN W BELOW THE BASE COURSE, AS �- "TERMINAL PARCEL" DIRECTED BY THE TOWN ENGINEER. PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE EMPLOYED STACKING ,LANES FOR FROM DUSK UNTIL ONE HOUR AFTER LAST FERRY - CAR ,FERRIES AND U i ARRIVES AND/OR DEPARTS. DURATIONSHORTTION (DROP-OFF) PARKING HISTORIC �nzrn N' (7. I�a _ SECTION THROUGH THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED APPROXIMATE EDGE oGRASS MILE ,MARKER FRENCH DRAIN LIGHT FIXTURES ARE SHOWN THUS: A m { i 2 (NO SCALE) S GI IV 1 t `NO PARKING ' (8.2) I - - SIGN I 1", Drainage Computations , 1 1, T1 Drainage Area "A" (Northerly portion of site) 'STOP" 1 I d a EXISTING SIGN • Total Tributary Area = 21,700 s I. STAGING AREA �, III - 51.1. osXo.ls 7 feel = 2 17 I e Area: 21 000 s.l. z , PROVIDE LIGHT Stene Blend EXIGT _ i I ' 2 STORY FIXTURES ON BOTH I (fisFRAME SIDES IN INGRESS 6 HOUSE EGRESS .5) l Ih II I Provide French Drain: 11 'x 120z 3.5 x50/ = 2310 C.t. EMERGENCY(8 ACCESS AREA 'I - O PERMANENT 1 I ' Drainage Area "B" (Southwesterly portion of site p i 50' X 40' { •- """ Including building and patio) INGRES�G EGRESS STO NO PARKING 1 - Total butary 4.7 ❑ { I ' PARKING AREA 11 StoneTBllend Area: a 0400 S. 1� 6 x 0.167 feet feet =1,042 C.f. i W POST SIGNS) II In 1.1E I II Building & Patio: ,32 - ti; C J *THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN H LS J Total: 1,765cf. a OF SOUTHOLD GRANTED SITE PLAN — IL G II EXISTING APPROVAL FOR THE "WESTERLY _ — ' J Provide French Drain: 9'x 120'X 3.5'x so �' =1,690 C.I. --�, zi PARCEL" ON MAY 16, 1995 w - sxcn I H m O W LIMIT I Drainage Area "C" (Southeasterly portion o1 site) HAZARD Total Tributary Area = 15,550 s 1. I 15,550 al. X 0 6 X 0.167 feet =1,559 L.t. 0.33 - W Y W Slone Blend Area. 0 S IO EP s FENCE T DETERIORATING .) U I I TERIOflATIN (B Q Q i COA ..•�'"` _ 1 Provide French Dram. 11 x 65 z 50 %'WINCE TO BE REPLACED =1636 ci. STAL - WITH NEW SPLIT RAIL FENCE W ii ' x 3.5' --- ¢ ii EDGE OF PAVEMENT OsSD SA BU OSP W THEE G Q _ 110 PPOP 1iOSA R CE v RR POW OP SNOW FEt1 EXIST. ST AKEO BLDG. I. 0 N - - M A1THIN .25 AV 'I ^• - .. - -.- . -� _ - ••'�- 5 BY 1!5 RMAL ETNNING NOR RANT SHAPE _ 4� G I .a 5 Ag' 16 • W - 116.51 ... " c - E BARK M,LLH BOn•n PJ-), MIN, CREATE SAUCER WITH TOPSAIL ISCI 16') MIN 3 2 — I IF ROPES AT TOP OF BALL SHALL Be LUT. REMOVE TOP ITS OF BURLAP ION-1310055RADABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED 1 O• GENTLY COMPACTED TOPSAIL MIXTURE TAMPED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL 3 S 34'30'55'E 21.00' 2X BALL DIA, MIN - w \ � RUBBER HOSE AT DARK - - \ GUY MIR I5 (3) WHITE FLAG ON EACH TO INCREASE OT TO SCALE VISIBILITY AVOID TIGHT GUY WIRES AS THEY - PREVENT NATURAL 50LAr ., .,.-.,,..•- AB•H 5 . B SHRUB PLANTING - BALL AND BURLAP 1g L N I TURNBUCKLE (3), GALVANIZED OR DTP -PAINTED PLANTING OFEGPGATONS \\ i B q3• SET TREE AT ORIGINAL GRADE -'-- MULCH PINE BARK OR WOOD CHIPS 715mm SMI MIN I DESCRIPTION OF WORK ' SOIL SAILER USE PREPARED TOPSOIL l ') MIN S (6 - { • PURNISH ALL LABOR PLANT MATERIALS AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE \ / - WOOD STAKES (B) PROPER INSTALLATION AND ESTABLISHMENT IT PLANTING$ IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS \ ` \ '/ .. �1�Mr�.. iO�� i ANO AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT \ 1 / 1, ty96 -/ '"�'�� ROPES O TOP OF BALL SHALL R OUT REMOVE MAP TOP / TOP Ijd OF BURLAP EMOVODE6RADABLE MATERIAL _� WALITY INSURANCE Of SHALL Be TOTALLY REMOVEDit • HEALTHY SPECIMENS CAPABLE OF VIGOROUSbOWTH \ IpTER A5 R� - t;T is t , PREPARED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL OR NATIVE SOIL • CONFORMANCE IN 512E AND SHAPE WITH "AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ` i • PLANT MATERIALS SHALL I \ M NN1GH -I TAMPED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL FOR SIZE TERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT ANY TIME FOR INSPECTION BY LANDSCMPE \ 1` \ / EA NO 1'E: _ ARCHITECTTHE 3 DELIVERY, STORAGE. AND HANDLING NO STORMWATER RUNOFF GENERATED FROM ACKNOWLEDGES UNDERSIGNED, AT THE CONDITIONS SONS OF NDOOPROVAL SET100-21 FORTH THE PROPOSED GRAVEL PARKING AREA WILL ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE CONDR ONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL SEF FORTH IN 2X BALL DIA. MIN �\ THE RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL DATED DECEMBER 10, 2001 ARE ACCEPTED. SEE _ • PROTECT ALL PLANTS FROM DESSILATION DJRING TRANSPORTATION AND 57051 ON '{ 1 \ \\\ \,' FLOW DIRECTLY INTO GARDINERS BAY CON MONSON REVERSE SIDE. DELIDUOJ5 TREE PLANTING 51TE WITH TALI SUITABLE LOVER AND WATER • REMOVE ALL PLANTS WITH ROOT BALLS OAMAbED BY DROPPING OR ROLLING, AND 11 \ \ \ 0\ L -I NOT TO SCALE PLANTS WITH DAMAGED BARK ' I � 4 PLANTING PROCEDURE \ Y • INSTALL PLANT MATERIALS ONLY WHEN WEATHER CONDITIONS ARE FAVORABLE OR WEEN i CpO(��5J55,01D1IN{O�FERRV SERVICES, INC. •* � MATERIAL5 HAVE BEEN HARDENED OFF EXIST. B / �[ \ W PRI U •,�M - • PLANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANTING DETAIL SHOVMI ON PLAN \\ FAMP. II Ob�n • PLACE AND PLUMB IN PIT WITHOUT DAMAGING ROOT BALL �\ \ \\ APPROVED BY • REMOVE ALL INORGANIC, ROOT BALL COVERING AND TWINE LEAVE INTACT ALL SITE PLAN 1 NON. TREATED BURLAP LOAbINGG \ PLANldYl�r deOA'iLD RAMP CROWN OF ROOT BALL SHALL BEAR SAME RELATION 5 PLANTING MIXTURE I (OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE) TO FINISHED GRADE AS IT - • ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLANTED INA MIXTURE WHICH WILL CONSIST OF ON PROPERTIES OF TOWN t-+_�_-+II� I H��f G-1"} BORE TO PREVIOUS GRADE PINE BARK MULCH T' 159 MIN. TOP501L M 50% COMPOST THIS PLANTING MIXTURE SHALL BE UNIFORMLY MIXED ON SITE AND BACKFILLED IN THE PLANT PITS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANTING DETAILS DATE CREATE 501E SAUCER WITH TOPSOIL ISOmm C69 MIN • COMPOST SHALL NAATI-I CAPABLE OF CONTSSUSTAAIN INGNTHE EXI OF VEGETATION, WIIC HATTER OR MATIERIAL OF A GTHHNO FORE16N ERALLY rfiiiiw r/f MATTER n E GLASS, PLA5TIC,ETO) OR MATERIAL TOXIC TO PLANT GROWTH FOLD DOWN OR OUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/d OF BURLAP • COMP05T SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REOJIREMENTS OR PROPERTIES CROSS SOUND IF NON -BIODEGRADABLE NRAP 15 USED REMOVE TOTALLT PH 55-65 PREPARED SOIL BACKFILL MOISTURE CONTENT 35% - 55% PARTICLE SIZE • 2' PREPARED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL OR NATIVE SOIL O N RATIO 15-30 I 6 MAINTENANCE I GUARANTEE \ FERRY SERVICES, IN • UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING THE AT THE END A A RANTING 2X BALL DIA MIN SEASON NC INSPECTION SHALL )A CONDUCTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UPON A SUM CONLE OF PLANTING A GUARANTEE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR SHALL COMMENCE 2 LONIPEROUS TREE RLANTIN6 A SUM EQUAL A NT E THE TOTAL LOST OF THE PLANTING SHALL BE RETAINED L -I HOT TO SCALE DURING THE GUARANTEE PERIOD - 11' �1 O SITUATE • MAINTAIN ALL MATERIAL TO SUSTAIN GOOD VIGOROU5IMMEDIATELY GROWTH O • REMOVE AL'_ DEAD PLANT MATERIAL FROM SITE IMMEDIATELY • REPLACE ANY PLANT MATERIAL AS SOON AS WEATHER CONDITIONS PERMIT 0 R I E N T { • GUARANTEE SHALL ALSO LOVER REPAIR OF ANY PART OF THE PREMISES Ap r' PREPARED: DECEMBER B, 2000 -v5 A REse* OF THE PLANTING PROLEDcar I' REVISED: JAUARY 4, 2001 REVISED: JANUARY 22, 2001 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REVISED: APRIL 12, 2001 REVISED: AUGUST 28, 2001 D REVISED: OCTOBER 9, z6o1 OF NE SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK _ REVISED: NOVEMBER 15, 0 2001 z OWNER/APPLICANT: q _ Q200 JOHN J. RAYNOR�IHX, P E. S L s.. P C. ° �All9 (LANDSCAPE NOTE' TAX MAP Ni 1000-01 a 015. 00-030.001, JAN Z 5 1UUL CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC 013.001 C 015.001 * THE LANDSCAPING INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS 2 FERRY STREET JOHN J, RAYNOR,�P.E. 6 L.S.. P.C. TAKEN FROM A PLANTING PLAN PREPARED BY ARAIYAS P.O. BOX 33 SCALE 1" - 20• aS0100100ii 1, • DESIGN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, DATED JANUARY 17, 2001. L ' CIVIL ENGINEERS �F. NEW LONDON, CT, 06320 2D a PC 40 60 Plannfn8Balill L SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS e�0 •633 DE,ERFIELD GREEN P.O. BOX 720 A^EJBBBNP.N ` DR �1 • NATER NTLL. N.Y. 1197fi (831 1 726-7600 PROFESSI ER NO. 53385 s., - �KPLOT�F REV. OVERALL SITE PLAN l2/00) - Sfi [0. 14]PF: SBRfi01 584 08-OeC-00 10:16 AM / SB 1 -...., .. ., _ _. ---- - -- - - 4111_ PLANT LIST KEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE G REMARK& AC AmelmWa cFr,GGensI ehamlon 6-1' 12 BIB. FVII N U,mpe."e vVglmaw Ec•bm Retl LeOa- 6-1 22 BIB, Full MP M,/rlce pen•W.IIVP,ka B[•/iC,�y 2-5 61 w0� PM Prw• maWtlma Beach plan 5-4' a5 BIB RR Rosa ngona W pw roes 1 Gal ,35D t;T is t , PREPARED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL OR NATIVE SOIL • CONFORMANCE IN 512E AND SHAPE WITH "AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ` i • PLANT MATERIALS SHALL I \ M NN1GH -I TAMPED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL FOR SIZE TERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT ANY TIME FOR INSPECTION BY LANDSCMPE \ 1` \ / EA NO 1'E: _ ARCHITECTTHE 3 DELIVERY, STORAGE. AND HANDLING NO STORMWATER RUNOFF GENERATED FROM ACKNOWLEDGES UNDERSIGNED, AT THE CONDITIONS SONS OF NDOOPROVAL SET100-21 FORTH THE PROPOSED GRAVEL PARKING AREA WILL ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE CONDR ONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL SEF FORTH IN 2X BALL DIA. MIN �\ THE RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL DATED DECEMBER 10, 2001 ARE ACCEPTED. SEE _ • PROTECT ALL PLANTS FROM DESSILATION DJRING TRANSPORTATION AND 57051 ON '{ 1 \ \\\ \,' FLOW DIRECTLY INTO GARDINERS BAY CON MONSON REVERSE SIDE. DELIDUOJ5 TREE PLANTING 51TE WITH TALI SUITABLE LOVER AND WATER • REMOVE ALL PLANTS WITH ROOT BALLS OAMAbED BY DROPPING OR ROLLING, AND 11 \ \ \ 0\ L -I NOT TO SCALE PLANTS WITH DAMAGED BARK ' I � 4 PLANTING PROCEDURE \ Y • INSTALL PLANT MATERIALS ONLY WHEN WEATHER CONDITIONS ARE FAVORABLE OR WEEN i CpO(��5J55,01D1IN{O�FERRV SERVICES, INC. •* � MATERIAL5 HAVE BEEN HARDENED OFF EXIST. B / �[ \ W PRI U •,�M - • PLANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANTING DETAIL SHOVMI ON PLAN \\ FAMP. II Ob�n • PLACE AND PLUMB IN PIT WITHOUT DAMAGING ROOT BALL �\ \ \\ APPROVED BY • REMOVE ALL INORGANIC, ROOT BALL COVERING AND TWINE LEAVE INTACT ALL SITE PLAN 1 NON. TREATED BURLAP LOAbINGG \ PLANldYl�r deOA'iLD RAMP CROWN OF ROOT BALL SHALL BEAR SAME RELATION 5 PLANTING MIXTURE I (OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE) TO FINISHED GRADE AS IT - • ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLANTED INA MIXTURE WHICH WILL CONSIST OF ON PROPERTIES OF TOWN t-+_�_-+II� I H��f G-1"} BORE TO PREVIOUS GRADE PINE BARK MULCH T' 159 MIN. TOP501L M 50% COMPOST THIS PLANTING MIXTURE SHALL BE UNIFORMLY MIXED ON SITE AND BACKFILLED IN THE PLANT PITS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANTING DETAILS DATE CREATE 501E SAUCER WITH TOPSOIL ISOmm C69 MIN • COMPOST SHALL NAATI-I CAPABLE OF CONTSSUSTAAIN INGNTHE EXI OF VEGETATION, WIIC HATTER OR MATIERIAL OF A GTHHNO FORE16N ERALLY rfiiiiw r/f MATTER n E GLASS, PLA5TIC,ETO) OR MATERIAL TOXIC TO PLANT GROWTH FOLD DOWN OR OUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/d OF BURLAP • COMP05T SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REOJIREMENTS OR PROPERTIES CROSS SOUND IF NON -BIODEGRADABLE NRAP 15 USED REMOVE TOTALLT PH 55-65 PREPARED SOIL BACKFILL MOISTURE CONTENT 35% - 55% PARTICLE SIZE • 2' PREPARED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL OR NATIVE SOIL O N RATIO 15-30 I 6 MAINTENANCE I GUARANTEE \ FERRY SERVICES, IN • UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING THE AT THE END A A RANTING 2X BALL DIA MIN SEASON NC INSPECTION SHALL )A CONDUCTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UPON A SUM CONLE OF PLANTING A GUARANTEE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR SHALL COMMENCE 2 LONIPEROUS TREE RLANTIN6 A SUM EQUAL A NT E THE TOTAL LOST OF THE PLANTING SHALL BE RETAINED L -I HOT TO SCALE DURING THE GUARANTEE PERIOD - 11' �1 O SITUATE • MAINTAIN ALL MATERIAL TO SUSTAIN GOOD VIGOROU5IMMEDIATELY GROWTH O • REMOVE AL'_ DEAD PLANT MATERIAL FROM SITE IMMEDIATELY • REPLACE ANY PLANT MATERIAL AS SOON AS WEATHER CONDITIONS PERMIT 0 R I E N T { • GUARANTEE SHALL ALSO LOVER REPAIR OF ANY PART OF THE PREMISES Ap r' PREPARED: DECEMBER B, 2000 -v5 A REse* OF THE PLANTING PROLEDcar I' REVISED: JAUARY 4, 2001 REVISED: JANUARY 22, 2001 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REVISED: APRIL 12, 2001 REVISED: AUGUST 28, 2001 D REVISED: OCTOBER 9, z6o1 OF NE SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK _ REVISED: NOVEMBER 15, 0 2001 z OWNER/APPLICANT: q _ Q200 JOHN J. RAYNOR�IHX, P E. S L s.. P C. ° �All9 (LANDSCAPE NOTE' TAX MAP Ni 1000-01 a 015. 00-030.001, JAN Z 5 1UUL CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC 013.001 C 015.001 * THE LANDSCAPING INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS 2 FERRY STREET JOHN J, RAYNOR,�P.E. 6 L.S.. P.C. TAKEN FROM A PLANTING PLAN PREPARED BY ARAIYAS P.O. BOX 33 SCALE 1" - 20• aS0100100ii 1, • DESIGN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, DATED JANUARY 17, 2001. L ' CIVIL ENGINEERS �F. NEW LONDON, CT, 06320 2D a PC 40 60 Plannfn8Balill L SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS e�0 •633 DE,ERFIELD GREEN P.O. BOX 720 A^EJBBBNP.N ` DR �1 • NATER NTLL. N.Y. 1197fi (831 1 726-7600 PROFESSI ER NO. 53385 s., - �KPLOT�F REV. OVERALL SITE PLAN l2/00) - Sfi [0. 14]PF: SBRfi01 584 08-OeC-00 10:16 AM / SB 1 -...., .. ., _ _. ---- - -- - - 4111_ PLANNING BOARD AENERS I3FNNPM.ORLQwSKI, JR.. Chaicman W11JAAM J. CREDIERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATH- M, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO December 11, 2001 1 A PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Richard E. Warren, President Inter -Science Research Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1201 36 Nugent Street Southampton, NY 11969-1201 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry SCTM No. 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1 & 15.1 Dear Mr. Warren: P.O. Box 1179 --- Tow°n Hall, 53095_State ILo_ufe__25 Southold, New York L1971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 10, 2001: The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board received a revised site plan application from Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. on September 8, 2000; and WHEREAS, this proposed site plan amendment concerns 4.06 acres of land owned by the applicant at the terminus of SR 25 at Orient Point; and WHEREAS, John & Adam Wronowski are the owners of the property designated as SCTM No, 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1 & 15. 1, consisting of three parcels, all zoned Marine II (MII) Zoning and in current active use as a ferry terminal for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. located at Orient Point, coincident with the termination of NYS Route 25; and WHEREAS, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. requests site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for the entire site; and — Cross Sound Ferry — PaueTwo _ 12/11/01 WHEREAS, the proposed application was determined to be an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR Part 617.2 (a -k) and 617.4, and, the Town of Southold Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on August 13, 2001 after review of relevant materials, public hearings, inspection of the property, and independent deliberation; the Negative Declaration finds that the proposed site plan for Cross Sound Ferry would not have a significant adverse impact on the environment as recorded in the resolution and determination adopted by the Planning Board on August 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said site plan amendment at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on December 10, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2000, the Director of Code Enforcement ruled in a memorandum of that date that the parking on the parcel known as "the Snack Bar Parcel" is a pre-existing use; and WHEREAS, the site plans for the other parcels included in this site plan application received g certifications at the time of their approval; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposed to undertake a specified list of actions designed to improve operations, safety, aesthetics, wetlands and coastal resource protection and traffic efficiency at the site as reflected in the pending revised site plan; and WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated a willingness to seek additional operational improvements to accommodate passengers. These measures are noted as follows: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. will consider establishing a system for the reservation of parking for travelers using the high speed service, to allow for advance notice for the need for parking and to allow for daily planning of on-site parking. Investigate other areas for additional parking outside of the Orient area. Investigate bus/rail links and potential to establish parking outside of Orient in association with mass transportation modes. Investigate out -of -the -area ferry landing sites to augment ferry services to Long Island. Pursue with the NYS Department of Transportation the re -arrangement of the terminus of NYS Route 25 as an integrated plan with ferry terminal properties, and coordinate such improvements with the Town of Southold. Until this is achieved, Cross Sound Ferry will be responsive to community concerns regarding traffic flow } and pedestrian safety. As with any ongoing operation, it is important to continue to improve the management and timing of off-loading cars due to their impact on the traffic flow on NYS Route 25. - Cross Sound Ferry - Page Three - 12/11 /01 It is recognized that these measures are not part of the site plan application, but are useful in further improving operations at the site as long-term mutual goals of the Town and Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby acknowledges and supports the efforts of the applicant to pursue the additional operational improvements noted above; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has reviewed the site plan and the modifications made thereto with respect to Sections 100-251 and 100-252 of the Town Code and makes the following specific findings as they relate to these sections of the Code: 1. Given the site conditions and character/use of the adjoining properties, the improvements proposed in this site plan address the need to protect the established character and value of adjoining properties. The property is located within the M -II Marine Zoning District and lies adjacent to the terminus of SR 25, and the Cross Sound Ferry terminal building and vehicular parking and staging areas. While the property to the east is within the R-80 Residential Zone, this vacant property is currently owned/controlled by the applicant. The building on the subject property that is now the snack bar was constructed before 1955. Given the existing site conditions, the modifications that are proposed are considered to be improvement to the protection of the character of the immediate area. �t The implementation of the landscape buffers as illustrated on the site plan will, to a degree, increase the visual screening of the parking on-site. The installation of the perimeter controls (curb stops and guardrail fencing) will help contain the parking within the area that have been designated for such use. 2. The plan proposes no increase in the square footage of the pre-existing building found on-site. With the implementation of the proposed plan, the physical surface areas currently used for parking will be reduced through the installation of guardrail fences and curb stops. 3. The proposed improvements will not cause any detrimental impact toward issues related to safety from fire, flood and other dangers, and as designed will provide adequate light, air and convenience of access for those using this facility. 4. The applicant has worked with the Planning Department to arrive at an appropriate design for traffic access to the site, for both vehicles and pedestrians. 5. The determination of parking on this site has clearly been a difficult issue for the Planning Board to resolve. After much deliberation, the Board finds that it is appropriate to grant site plan approval to permit the improvement of the parking conditions found on the subject site for use by the general public who, as patrons of Cross Sound Ferry Services, hie., use the property. In making its determination, the Planning Board found that the use of the site operator (vehicle and passenger ferry/carrier service) does not fall within any of the specific categories listed in § 100-191A of the Town Code, leaving the Planning Board to determine what constitutes "reasonable and appropriate off-street parking" on a site -by -site, project -by -project basis. Cross SoundPer y— PaeeFour— 12/1 l/01 6. The Planning Board finds that the improvements proposed on the site plan prepared by John I Raynor, P.E., 1-..S., P.C., last dated November 15, 2001, fulfills the objective of § 100-252(B) by making improvements to the existing parking conditions on the site. In general, the improvements include: i. the re -grading and application of stone/gravel to the unpaved lot, so as to reduce potholes and provide on-site drainage control; ii. the installation of curb stops and a guard rail fence wound the perimeter of the parking area so as to delineate the parking and protect the proposed plantings from vehicular encroachment; iii. the addition of a cross walk to aid pedestrians; iv. the assurance that the applicant will maintain at least one parking attendant during peak parking periods (summer and holiday weekends), to facilitate interior circulation and parking. 7. Under the unique circumstances of this particular site and application, the Board finds that the unpaved stone/gravel lot is preferable to a paved lot with marked stalls. The unpaved "Snack Bar Parcel" provides flexibility to use parking assistants in order to maximize the capacity of that lot during the peak seasonal needs of the applicant's services, thus reducing potential impact to the adjacent streets. Accordingly, the Board finds that the maintenance of the parking on the "Snack Bar Parcel" as an unpaved, unmarked parking area, in conjunction with the existing lots to the west represents the most "reasonable and appropriate off-street parking requirements" for this unique facility. 8. The proposed plan, to the maximum extent possible, provides adequate landscape buffers to the adjacent streets and properties. As illustrated on the site plan, last dated November 15, 2001, the applicant has proposed vegetative buffers around the parking areas of the snack bar parcel. 9. The proposed plan has been designed to protect/conserve natural features of the property and adjacent areas. To address concerns raised by the Trustees, the applicant will relocate the proposed parking area approximately 20 feet further away from the beach than originally proposed, and will install a low berm landscaped with native coastal species to provide protection and separation between the beach and the parking area. The plan also proposes to improve the drainage conditions found on the site, by regrading, and redirecting drainage to french drains proposed to capture and recharge runoff to the groundwater below. The use of french drains will prevent runoff from entering the adjacent tidal estuary. 10. The proposed plan avoids unnecessary pavement of the parking area by using a pervious stone/gravel material for resurfacing the snack bar parking lot. 11. The proposed plan minimizes the lighting effects on adjacent properties by employing low intensity safety lighting, which will be operated by a timer that allows the lights to automatically shut off one-half hour after the arrival of the last ferry for each business day. 12. No public address intercom or sound system is proposed within this site plan application. Cross Sound 1'errv- Page Five— 12, 11/01 13. The proposed plan fulfills the objective "that all site developments shall respect existing grades on site and on adjoining sites to avoid unnecessary excavation or filling and that all stormwater runoff generated on site will be retained on site in an environmentally acceptable manner." While the original design of the project included leveling of the parking surface, adding a stone surface and filling potholes, the current design includes regrading as sought by the Town Engineering Inspector to redirect and contain stormwater runoff on-site. 14. The proposed plan raises no issues related to public utilities in the area. 15. The proposed plan is determined to be at a scale consistent with existing development and with the Comprehensive Development Plan of the Town of Southold The proposal does not change the scale of the use of the property and proposes no new additional parking areas not historically used in the pre-existing parking areas. The use is consistent with the Marine Zoning District and the Town's Comprehensive Plan. 16. As the project proposes no new buildings, the proposed plan does not raise architectural issues. 17. The addition of a hard -surfaced handicapped space adjacent to the snack bar building is considered an improvement over the existing conditions found on the site. The Planning Board also ®l acknowledges the creation of additional handicapped -accessible parking on the Terminal Parcel, nearest to the main building as part of this facility, for use by patrons needing such accommodations. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grants final approval with conditions to the revised site plan prepared by John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S., P.C. (last revised on November 15, 2001 and received in this office on November 20, 2001) and authorizes the Chairman to endorse said plans with the following conditions affixed thereto: 1. Curb stops shall be used to define the northern and western parking area within the "Snack Bar" Parcel boundaries, including south of the Snack Bar. 2. A wooden barrier or guardrail shall protect landscaping and define the eastern border of the parking area within the "Snack Bar" Parcel. 3. A snow fence and berm planted with a double row of Rosa Rugosa (as per Board of Trustee Permit # 5408, dated November 8, 2001, and revised on December 5, 2001) shall define the southern border of the parking area within the "Snack Bar" Parcel boundaries. 4. Low Intensity Safety Lighting shall be installed within the "Snack Bar" parking area. Said lighting is to be shielded to the ground and operated by timer so as to automatically shut-off approximately one-half hour after the arrival of the last ferry run of each business day. Said lighting is to be installed on the wooden barriers/guardrails and curb stops within the boundaries of the "Snack Bar" parking area. 0 Cross Sound Feny— Page sir — 12/t1/01 0 5. Existing and/or proposed landscaping around the perimeter of the parking area within the "Snack Bar" Parcel is to be maintained and/orplanted in accordance with the final revised site plan, prepared by John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S., P.C. (last revised on November 15, 2001 and received in this office on November 20, 2001). 6. The regrading and application of stone and gravel within the "Snack Bar" Parcel shall incorporate drainage measures that were specified by the Board of Trustee Permit # 5408, and illustrated on the October 9th revised site plan, prepared by John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S., P.C. (subsequently revised on November 15, 2001 and received in this office on November 20, 2001). These drainage measures were reviewed and approved by James Richter, Town Engineering Inspector, and endorsed by the Trustees. 7. The pedestrian walk across State Route 25 between the "Snack Bar Parcel" and the Ferry Terminal Office is to be painted and maintained in good condition by the applicant and in accordance with standard procedures of the New York State Department of Transportation. 8. No parking shall be permitted within or near the two (north and south) entrances/exits to the parking area within the boundaries of the "Snack Bar" Parcel, denoted on the final revised site plan as "Emergency Access Area". Signage stating that this is a Tow -Away Zone shall be posted at these two locations. 9. The two (2) locations denoted on the final revised site plan as "Emergency Access Area" on the site plan shall be interconnected with a minimum 15 foot aisle within the interior parking areas, in order to provide emergency vehicle access if necessary. 10. The existing wooden fencing at the southwest boundary of the "Snack Bar" Parcel is to be replaced with a split rail fence and maintained in good condition. 11. The applicant shall be required to provide at least one parking attendant to assist during all peak parking times (summer and holiday weekends) to assist travelers where necessary to get their vehicles out of the parking lot. The attendant would remain at the site for at least one-half hour after the arrival of the last ferry for the evening. 12. The applicant shall secure approval from the NYS Department of Transportation for the improvements shown on the site plan. As per Section 100-254 I. of the Site Plan Ordinance of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold, the Chairman's endorsement of the site plan will take place after the applicant signs this resolution placed on the site plan indicating his/her knowledge and acceptance of the conditions of approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. �—� your , Bennett Orl ws r Chairman 4 V N/F COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I I v J I 2 Q / I y l - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4�` _ _ O s MAIN �RI7E LIAE 8•51 � ROAD \ (S.R. 25) N/F WILLIAM G, WYSOCKI VOUXE ` 6 P. HELIA(SKI YELLON LIRE B.7' _ _ NHI1F LIRE - - - - - - - - - EDGE a,PAVE*wr - - - - - - 7.5 EAR7H RDAD N 30.22'15"W / Nn P RKIAG 16.87' NYr 26 An rRESPAssIAGy N 61.23'25"E 80.19- 0 / .9.9.9' N 62.06'55"E 92.78 SIGN NrTHI x----x- 15.50, POLE' 7•B' urrLlrr N7NIA/G 71.16' 7.4 7.1. 7.4• B•9'O B 7.a• 9.01 rH 1 e BUY o' 9.5' VEGETATION RAIL E,'E-x x----__ 7�s 7.a' 7'3• 21.62' B.3' 7.a• 1 Nrr 26 q.5. �E� (IM. S 28.21'25�E_x-"-x--x, a.2' 7.g• CROSS , 9.5' UTILITY PULE x 7.9' - - - 7.5• 7.2lArgy 1 g 2 norSIGN I e.l. 9.si 9.4 clsHrE 1400 9 N 61.54925"E 68.00' \. 1 ENTER, o to.o + 1 g.6•o Lr6Hr 7.B' 7.4 2' 7.9 9.5 B.1' I 10.1' x PREACH RE�LL 1• B.9 AB a' I 0.6' I o9AIN 7.3' 1 SIGN 145 7 7.4I 7 7.1 7.8' GAS I I 7.91 I /sECLRrrY BOXES 1 I B.s• 1 I .5' S �.51 SI6N 7.3. 7.7' B. 1 I !0.! x I 6.9 e• �.0' B.1' I I 9.4• Slav 6.61 9r7.t' SToo 1 0.31 x I hl 6.8• tss DNNTAERRT a.s e B.41 1 Iso.! SIGN I Srcr 9' P'AU 9.5 I 8.4' I- x FREACH a s1 4 jO� \ 8.9, 17.5' a LIGHT DRAIN CHECK 7CIL 1•NICE POINT - ~ 10.2' C 8.4 s.9 7.2' \B.7' _ 1 10.3' I 6.2 CUT 6.3' 7.0' BOOTH I ycZL� S. PAVERS 6.7' k+ 1 10.3' Gtr 5 7.3' 1 m 1 8.4' H I I 6.3' c�L J'NraE B•7' I B. 6. S 78041'15 FRENCH �E k 1 i CL x Jq I 3 �T 11.48' 1 I e.1• % I I Y� 7.0' C/L t•NI 1 9.! I . y C I - - - ccr�cur r 6.5. 6.9 6.3 x.61 1 C/L 1'NI SIGN la A K1 d x fp C/N Ly/T LWAIN .BIT 1 (A 9.2 j I IGF ROE�U 11� O I ; � I 'Con �VEL J PARKING AREA I 6.4 1 SIGN y`g� UTOLIT gIKs 2' ` x SIGN PGCE 9' 6.91 SIGN 1 BEGIN' Q LIGHTI I 6.5' 0 � FAQ 1 • 7.7' I 7.0' 7.2' 7.J' e7.5 SIGN I PARKIAGhWAVICA�110 7.0• \ PAAWTAG•1 1 I 6.7' x 6.0 7.4' 6.9' LS• o_ B.9' 1 Z 9.5I sur 1 1 B.s• HAAOICAPWED 7.6• \� � PARKIAG SI6AP \ 1 1 I B.O. 5 9 1 NILE 1 LIMIT 8.4' HANDICAPPED � I I PARKIAG Sr&fAli B.4' 6.1' 7.4' 7.4' 1 MAA8 1 C ME m i x MA MEL 1 1 \ 8.7 n LI67VT r�Trav B 4SIGN SIGN x '"mob 1 1i 1 B.4`, \ 8.6a' ACCESS ACCESS VjEEP 9.0• � � I `i 1 � 1 aE a.s• e.a• e.e• � 9.41 1 ' i x s.2• � � H 1 pI 9.9 9.B' 1 1j 11 1 9.1 I I 9.B- HAADICAPPED 89, 1 _ 8.3' x ? !0.010.4' 9.6 P�Lir to.4 I i ,~4 slaw 10.2 o.9- PS 6N� $ 8.8' 1 j '� I 'ECMERRGE/ACEY I I cl u = 1 I I ACi,,E9, EPe I I x 8 9' -K AELL OIL 10.1' *4LK 11.4 I 11 1 1 B.5' B.B' AST 1 I TulTAMC I i N 1 PAVE 1 B.4' O I 7N7.5' �' A.C. TAW 11.6'1 1 1 1 1 SLAB 8.7' B. �R Cobs.SLAB UNIT SHED x PARKIAG 6EHERA7o9 �, �1 1 1 16 8= I i NDN A C UNIT 8.5'STOCKADFX� 8.5' I Jo.s Slav 9.01 I PARKIAG'I II I 6.7' �9• I a• s.o• .m O I i1 8.2' B.7' 8.4'` 9.0' i SIL , 8.31 I 9.51 11.3 1 Z I W 1 i 1 =R A B.50 C.X. I COVER I `J UILDING 1 6. i i jjDRV B. 'S ! STORY B '� 1 e.6 gUTLDING B.5' \ '�I c.r. I T11e.4O coVERs \ x 6.7 u zcrrr 10.4• TICI�IE�LES 1 ji 1 \ 9.2 ►��% p.e DTIC I '; B)VE 9' 1 117.8' 1 \\ 7 DELI ;� TAA1r 8.3• I 1 I 7r.3• .. 11.7 esti• I x 9 6' NINODN3 I I SIGN e 1 I e CONCRETE -: Jl.6' B•9' I ••. 1 B.B 8.9I x AREA 11.1• 11.5 Z ¢ v 1 8.61 FFLL ll 1. I TN t0.5' Cf l AAAA[E J0.6' B'3' 11 NYT 2 11 _• SIGN I B X8.6' ow O�ANG ',a.4' PATIO I 'I 10.4 9 �� " I 1 x 10.7 _ � 5.7' 10.5' � 1 ..-•4:0 � I �I STEPS 9. . p 10.5' SIGN 9.3' 1 496 C 0 n "W 5.6•rN c.r. An S70PPIAG B.5 I B.3' S 4•6 •G5 n 1• y& I 3x to.9' J0.9' l0.6' lO.I' 8.6' B.0' N I = Q HAADICAPPED � PAVERS �0r.� WALK I PARKING SIGN B.4' I C.I. Q 10.4' 9.9 9.81 B.4 8.0' B. 1 2 Mtn �'J 8.41 p I �x to COVER 10.2' 10.1' PAVERS SIGN 1 7% SIGN ING LAM• K1 PDsr � t I • I 9.70 COVER 7.5' 1 8.0,--, / LIONVT u 8• 8.5 I HAAorEA x M Q COVER 9.9' C.I. O 1j SISNe•�1' B.6' .6 B.5 11 PARKIA(G�e�t O II Z( 9.5' Q COVER 9.4' Q . i 'NO e 1 Q c.rV. 9.6' Q 1D PARKING' 1 5 e 10.2 10.0• 10.0• 9 B � I 1 1 I x 9.9' 10.0' 9.7 COVER W j 1 1 PWTAG�e71B• tD I I 9.t• s.5• W I 11 1 I Q • j W A B.B' COVER 9.6' 1 1 I In 9.91 Q 1j 1 1 II 2IGHT A•5' 8.4 I I C.I. ar COVER Q • 1 I x COVER 1 PSIG NG I I TRV N Q 11 I I I SIGN I � I I 10.4 U rLITY COVER N i I 1 I I GRAVEL M I x 5.7' E s.!• �1 I 1 1 x I N I 7N7.4 1 I cr ul 1 1 x 4.B' • i 1 1 m 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 x U3 1 I I LIGHT 7 I 1 1 'I 1 9.6' BRA VELI 1 FERRY TAGING L MES �i 1 1I P AIOLR J.B x 1 �rs,�/'G \ I LIGHT d 5 ti I 6.71 POLETYI7.9' 7.6• I PARKING x I �i 04. 1 1 I to l0 X 7.3 1 \ \ IN x II A&hAAY♦ 1 \I 2 rrou9 I 4.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -5.5' I 30 N 1 1 PARKING a I= •0 SL1 FOLK PARKIAG \ SIGN x I ; ClN • 1 1 I 1� 4.6' LIGHT IO x I �� AO I7.6 I I 1u N 1 1 PARKlAfGj 1 \ 1 I NCOWC.TH�® R0� I I 6.�9' 7.B'I x OIL TAM1 O.H. ' 4.9 I I I \ \ R Al I 4.3 I 1 sr� I 1 \ SIGN x 4.0' 4.1' 1 srsN I I 7s• HA ICAPPED eJ' I �\1• e7.6- 1 7.9' PAWih! rISN v /i.rcHr o y-� 1 SIGN e7.7 AREA x 4.2 i 2 STORY 11 AREA PAWIM9 HOUSE s.7' B.t• 1 17.6' 8.4' I �' •-"- SMALE I SILL I - 7.4I B 4.6' 4.7 I 6.0 I GRAVEL. I \ 1 SIGN \ 7VHI F_ L NES 77. 1 'Aro x \ I STOPPING - - - Bono 7• LIGHT �•- -X \ PARKIAAi _ - 17.9' \ • 7. LANK \ - _ 9.8' 5.3• \ 7.9� % \ x, \ AREA ~ COAC.SLAB #77H FLEL FENCE 1. OIL TAw 16.6' OS% p�°M F�X \ B.5' B. NYT 4 x g� \ yELLO LINE 8.5'1 B.9\ NIT of NE%/ NiX� 5.B' \ 9.3 8.5. B.5' MALL A 6RIDE '8.9. NORTNE�Y 5.9. 7.B' 9.6\ COVCfd` B.9' 9.0' v x 9.2' CONE RETAINING MALL �•s' B.9' AVERAGE H 8.6' .A :4150% STORY 2•A9.0' H4NOICAPPED PAR IMG STNS 9.6• I S A6. 18 B.9 jjLING a? x VEGETATION \' , V p: SE ET 141.25 y SIC ALES :9.9 x 5" SILL i1 I S 48' 16 l0.2 \ 8.3' 9.9' .• ' PpNERS 9.3 11 B.B e.0 8. � ' I \ _••_.._.._. .... -.._.._.._.......-BOTTOM OF SLOPE \B ti 8.9• (�1 -+ \ 0 3.0 \ Z 1[1 x TOW � O 8L O a. x9.9• - -�'-� \\ N / I - ?2.3- _ r "� MEAN HIGH NATER AS OF,AN.Y 2005 \ 7.5 2.8' / 1. 9� qBN� Jp • 2p0g 1 of LY X C, A /AN 0160 E l 7' 7.7 7.6' • 1 i NOTE, \ \ ELEVATIONS SHOW HEREON ARE %7.7'\ \ / BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC / VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 @ \ , 3.6• / ("•G•V•°• 1929'• 3 MAP SHOWING EXISTING CONDITIONS \ \ PREPARED FOR MAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY MAP BEARING A LICENSED LAW siNvEYO7's SEAL IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUBDIVISION$ OF THE NEN YORK STATE \ \ / %✓, 1 EDUCATION LAM. OAC Y COPIES FRON THE ORIGINAL OF THIS S[A4VEY MARKED \ 7.1' NITH AN ORIGINAL OF THE LAND SURVEYOR'S EMBOSSED SEAL OR x % CROSS SOUND LAKED SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID TRUE COPIES. Gp� � CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SIGNIFY THAT THIS SURVEY \ \ MAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE NITH TAS EKrSTIA'G COQ OF ` 6.5' RAMP % PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS ADOPTED BY THE NEN YORK 11 1 STATE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAAD SURVEYORS. SAID CERTIFICATIONS SHALL RNN To THE PERSON Faq Om THE \ �\ SURVEY IS PREPARED, AAO ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY, % CERTIFICATIONS AGENCY AAO LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED NEREOV. FERRY SERVICES, INC , CERTIFICATIONS ARE MDT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONS �A OR SUBSEOUENT ONNERS. CERTIFICATIONS RNV ONLY TO THE LAST FIELD SLRVEY DATE. NO CERTIFICATION IS MADE AS TO TTA:EXISTENCE OR \ \ NON EXISTENCE OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-or MAY AFFECTING THIS PROPERTY. "E LOCATIONS OF EASEMENrs OR RrGHTS�MAY •Q OF RECORD ARE sHow HEREON on r IF COPIES OF TAE rNsTRMENTS ARE PROVIDED To THE suRVEYoR. L SITUATE rcw 6B4 R ORIENT GN PREPARED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 D FROM FIELD WORK COMPLETED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 MAP REVISED: JANUARY 18, 2043 (EASTERLY PARCEL ) SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FEB 15 2013 OTAX MAP NO.: 1000-015.00-09.00-010.00 i, Southold Town s • Planning Board �'ti� ^• /� 011.001, 015.001 & 003.005 ®2013 THE RAYNOR GROUP, P.E. & L•S. PLLC f G�' DNAuiwgIZED REPwotc ov IS IMAWU. ALL Rmfs RESERVED. '; is THE RAYNOR GROUP, P.E. & L.S. PLLC DOLPHINS NOT SHONN HEREON 4 CIVIL ENGINEERS 1\ssty y c l/ SCALE,' f N = 20 ' SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS20 0 20 40 60 ��' ® U DEERFIELD GREEN P.O. BOX 720 RA OR WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 ( 631 ) 726-7600 LAND S RVEY OR N0. 49778 *P* existing conditions map - 2[0. 14lPF: 188601 511 18-Jan-13 01: 17 PM / i886-1 r +, t - J' ->�.- .��, �i,`t�', jrs,/ ,r'/ �r f� ,,I ,rr !!j/Jr .�' r,' _/ F�,J •t r.!' � '/ '-'-t' ~�<:t. ''f;' .Af„ _ /' �'J. ' - t 'f/ J/' p/, •;r •'f,It`J/f ter 'r: j' r ,r .!',rt �/�-�, r .+,. �- _ „` .tS to _ _ _- _ _ , + - _ .'.. J� ,% rT :l `/ .,"r I"` 'r� •rr r i' _ t. �Y` �r.J' 'J �' -,�`r :�'+a ••J,, -�'�t-•• w:' - J^ " '-h `1 `�- i r,- :`//'iJ Jr r, � ,!, lrr./ � <: - - - - - i.' .d. •��-.'`~�-':�, ;RtL -'.� -1 tf' �J - ',7 - r, f' rF d Jp /.' '`"J-'`. .r,y-f� ,t '+r� a-.p •-r' _ ,1', - %7 ! �''r• !� '.� ' I%.'r tt.. '/+ f J/ - '�'-Jy ,/ / 7f •i. .. i+� A. , 7J J' +M . ��i, - � `•.�� rr r' ,;r O •"!i s�' ., i! /� JF�! f. _ _ .(, , .rf /l�f/,, /! '! ,�• - !I. J�.4 _ .'�. - __ _ _ '4'r,. �.E, �., 'r i Y 3,�•^, �j� -_ Jjlr! f .f I /�/ p� 1'f s'Z` •C.- ;- -�'u"- i'{}" , !' '. /A/'<, J ♦ - ,IJ'I l V sY J., - ,-- ,. ! + i` r •% `r w`- - '� ;,}' ')r '-tN,• L� -�R. � 'y.' �Jr�c,` s -ti, - •- .-_ t f "f`''h ,r - ✓. 'J'' }, ',l•'):'',`f`,r,�1 // -:r _>,'` '�,,;,' - �.' ,O- `r:. .{ir -_ ',.�:y�� { .•Jr' rt - •r;' - ,,l' 'rff r - .;rt, '�,' ~ �aS ;'3`' ♦ .aE '.'•.'��;<M y, '�' '_ � hrr ,l`��J, , .°"v� - ,. / - F f, !'f•' !+ ! ,lA �. "f,J�'�`f,� ,J . .' --}` p _'I; 1t� ,L' '1rr. I` .t } ' l "VT ., /1• `rfl - rJ, .{« �Y - ` _n - -`Y[. 3..` '�/lsr ••!! ,'J ' li _ r -+ ' ,' {'• -r /: 1 '4 -, -Ir♦,J", .f '�'> , l4- _ y'�`,�+., r' a "•_.lt it n• - "/'•!' SY4r <'.` _ _ } ,� - } t - ., loll 'J . j' 9 I / ryi• ,�' r _ - • 15;,.=�` ii •1 R` 'I¢ _ , - - ��'- ,le',�(' r ..i-J _.,3- '«:"• - 'L-:{t-fi"y.:. 'h - ., ,1 , rrf '-" f ' �iY„ ' -'r�t,5er< / .y j� .. _y/•'.}r 1=,+,;r` _ �, ^'a4.< _ �^.S} - •�h. �:�T „'�\.-. "f� h r•�' ,j _'fi' _ - , ri 'F. �+ r r1" �4' ,S[^' >, •1 p'' ,i� f ,�'�'Ir 1� �� - _ •J1 +u� � +�� .y:�`'"'°S:``.w 'c� �i � ?•,, Js,.t - ,'�' .r 'l,'- _ -.i, J/';!• - rr ,y •l, '!:r' - i i. 'i. - _ -•+. - .-ees - S, sfsr �. - C''Y ? 'ijh,a i ��.14- - - ,� +� .I,• .r - ! ,X"�� /`f-f ti; ` /'- - .r - <,.- ;r .. _ - .. sky" _ . ��:}:".�:c:;'ar'f `rs. r,l�,('�t<�,a` a„a�r.' .7;.`:f r ,1' ?,,r 1 '\� t• `'�, t 'j l j -. - _ - `-� � - `i '^�sr +P_�. "i+ .,t•t; 9,c,r� 1,�s �F`3J �f.-- /,y o„•/ ,f„ , ,�, - -•/ ,�J)b, ,`-•*.: .,� �s� 'I/ .: - +f .y, -- • ` ` - r , - � �, ''=�'.F-•:" r .-7'` .,C:J{,• «'r. ,. �,J. �°;��r.':sF �F`f 4'!4+ -ra , % ,/ - '`v, /_ f - ,r S � a,,ri moi. .•.��,:Vin',' Wa :.k .0v ' �'`'V a, 'j ' s / h- ;� f. ,, 'rr„_ _� -, � = _ - '�" ,-:j - - req Ss' -- - - i ti. - - _ - W ' a' 'i- Y`+,? >-:. +�: '1. ,. - • I' / � 1},r� j _ <ti` Af'• 1 _ .. - . � , 'Y' „w �'�f+ rrf �.��i,fr r. FF _ fl, ri'. ,� /� A•� '--t -'rJ• ��I!- fy~•' -!c /',. �.* - r,Lw ti L - - .7 't-_� M1-`•d, ti �„r I �;t1. � ��` - r [ if"o •j _ 1 1J '+i !' - '� i,l' .J - f/r �� ')'Y 4r�,t} '' - '�' i.'y- , �`'wr � - - ':' /r`. %r ;r� i.;y "a 4+��.; �� - ,. • , ;'J _ - -- / r,'il Jl,c r.�•*t ,�! r' rt'.,r { ,; r•f" - _•�. - .t _ ,fir,..` x '-�• :s r� - r �' - ,�� ,ti. ,'Fr,":b �.r; -{ -„ "{-,Fi l �,+ 'r I', 1 ;,,r ! ,! :, - - - _ �h�k,. _ r •�,. , k',,, ', .'T' " , �`. ,tl�. cr- J_ +� 1• �f/ ,,t• -/' /f+�!->/ �r 'J / `� -`�.<y ��` l'< �r, - � - ,F' '�;, t''r �', ..r,• 1 ��Y �I r < '�%/�'�'� f� 'r'-'•t �f' r� if �r 1l` /;1, ll dr�'��,`f µ. /. .. 1F3` r -rt _ - - 'c a -�'y t •.ror 'J','- , ,>; + y; i r ';f',l•1, 'rl' - :t' r'�... "* - rr �_ %. _� :t,.. / } � _ _ - ♦ }, r` / :f4 ,•h' _�. r''s: r�'1 t'�, e•'F,,�,;1�„�,,`/y r ! yar - , :,� 'f-iltft,� � �' -� a'r ��11 � _-, �_- "1•�� •Y�a�. -i, � 1 :;'� yi'r'[ � %s - - _ - , "x;51 s.` .d.+ Y<, '4<-,,Jr `-�” sf<`!._C•, d �.,G;•- ��,�;t fs • t _ + 11; f�./' l •i' ! .:1 '>f'� ,F ..,a••�I '},• 1 ,i*,r _ - �'± �''�., -f�,l.,, .,£,g,,, '4' 'v. 7-•'a - «•� - ^'�, 'r� ,�i,','� '::1+ r f'. • �' .f ,�'1� f fi•" 1 ,J, `r,,R n` U•��. - ,Ir' `�•; _ +fy�',l'I}'��"�_ c.,f "�. -, �� , _-:�' i� -,1.,T�=,>��t` -��r':r;, r,1 ` 'i r rL '' 'rl �l •,[t:� .Ii 4`•7- r' '1',r Nr --, a4'a• :`"^ a;,' +`>,,s,�, `y, IS A ,Z.,,r `"•- - - ', ,J '�,cs, ' ' ! r fT r � S+.h s r/y;"r ,lf t - f s, +1• 4` - _ i� �`�'c�' off ':ie . - _ - _ .l - - _ l;a- 'j`' �Jf�- - ,f�s - - F t, a, r J y •/`",j'- r r s a �{ ,:-t'tft::c _•a�`'.a;`�:_"a.'�,y� 'w,,.. ^">t - . ' _ ',t+y - - "f�f - - 'li',` 'l';h: r{ i` •4',q ,a" r 'r ,,1�['- t. -'9�`v a. �*/ ?�- `r�':�'' � t ,.- � ::�.: � f ,. 'rl I >� '1:':i�a,. t` '"rc .- '1' I a'��•a`=, • u :+r�- - �. _ '�� •�'r-+'', r", 'Ef): �' �r<`� ` `y'.''i� -. 1'r/ 3r ). x' ,,, .r t✓ .'1 - �:.•' µ��5'l: l�'•q*�,�'*�'` - - ",• ,`�h, 1_ _ - .s:t1 li 'r� i f + , - .1+ '7, rl ( e l ll, t :r.,} J� .f• t ;.• ^i. _ -- f ,�`y't -fir 1 'V''' fJ ',� _ ., - - _ _ .� ,t f.. f ! '( � 1 r � :ri~ `et ',):.p : - 1f - -�#, - „•• `�t(. a p'SS'..o _ '+�=/ �'a. .- j i" uG _ :ter,, 1. �' a - I /'� - I J/' ,a+ A' •1.,'• �I••r"-J` � . 1,i�1[. � � � ri.A ' 9Y {�` , i� ?�'� - �, '' ,f `t'� - • «•SL*.'aR.�•k iJ. ,• F' '.I - �.i-• r f'•' ! 1 I ") �,st3'� 4..L..-'�,, T - }- ),ft i.t�"l e..-, ` '�' 7 ,f �'•. 1 _ n - -„�i ,`c`�._ - ,+'� - - . 't _ , , - . �(•. 'l i �,•1 - F - I.r, r .f 'y ^'•i. '11 f � , w !c y �. �y�-�y-r J!'r” .,1 -•i• �/'' 'V. - f' 7'�-:�' f"i:i'i J,r- - _ r, , - „/„t t "r /' .x `�� '!;L- .a4F ��,� .-. ,- � � � ']'''� , r "'r• '!- ',/�. "%'.,h F¢'� .�" -rl •r,' j Mty� d/:•- 1. •4 f ;r' f - - J' // i r :c s ,i. = ..•i , - N -Q+ .� .r.. {r ,a+ .r: _ __ '1 F .r' , ' l,l. - , :� /I Ir f - - 1;. .•/ , =1 :Ji J,,,._.a. ,`' +.-• ,..7�-' •I - ,',�=•xr, - - .��' �r?� - J," _ a .•�' I - t� l.r / rc / _ , + 'Jt '1 :�t � w�`xr•: �' - -. tc5�; �'{� _ ^.._, - .-",Y" J Y ,�`I,_ - ,. /} Jrd� i+ 3 , - '+�" .� [ 1. ,k i.. "� rf � , , - +r?,,,, r,F'• �� ,,�. � . 'S r.. � n,�Fl .'y ryrF r. 1 ,r ,•,�S' '`l((II;ty.��'- - Y ,,:�,r.,t. _ � rr._ �,Ij,/„/,r .jft��+.•,e.�-J.�, f/ ,i - s'�e:.�T/� > sr;;�'� - 4 �'�`” �»:.ci^• � _ -- f' - _ " { `�=_�u�+-'�- - _ 1',r- .- `�' .[ b,� 1'1'� r J�rC9i�f" - -J.✓.if k, J` .Ila _`-6`r R.r .�-� + -aN"'!;(.,JJI, rl. ;.W:r�..,.•rr,1M:p l ,. ��p°�C`.. �'"^�:�'U,.,r.�' � _mss •� h. +�, -...'a. x; _ �} d{i.�g >: ,h T' aC,f 'AIl 4•J �+. .'� .,i�1 cv k 'I ',� `�F'r •':5 �',7aar;p„- _S`>yw�, f � ,�t ..,,a� - _ '�• ,��F c , F'+'� - - J•1 } F I i , J. }, 5 i- '�!-, � .� .�-'- �.w t' �;''`�•- � �• ,a. - ,19,l.' .•s,r «ui. "* ' 3L x U+r"J f'1 t. r, + r �, g t�p� �,,i%}t;+,'�•.�.-'�..%°- s - '';� �'c� '�;'.YL^'g`�' '�'� ,f/ l :'+r •t` - _, �'t `_d� "r'-�r . '.5: r • , r�' I i I t !'t 1 '� -S �'_�.,,,'i"}Y" -:?`y a S�7.s. y, -- a •:�`°:° '�:. _,�a"�'f� '�'�'«. _y`�'""pyl�,�t } 'a?b r,. .�� v n - -- -_ !:% F' �j,.n�" 'r`- "$f;.� I •� 1� ! :lir a=;`'''�,'>' �" - t �`• "�".' ,� - - - J h ,F. �` �"" • ., x, � -� • �, ,�,'}"�,�y - , it �';'• v?s - - H�',1:'jr i1r r r�1, .�,' `rl ,�,]�j`tT '.'d j�r;��f'�„Ct'ifT� _�` � _� _ _• f r °�> �. .!':Y'a'S�a'•,,,`:,•t ie�'� 7- ""`-r�".f. �' }" •rna� � --,} ',;��._ �f J/ 1 ,•1/,'$:r" �� '}}'rA�,- �$, � �r' ` � - �Jy, r �•i ,s'` ,+Yt• �, y r� •_ t�4� - .r,�r •+-x_,� '�" . ` - , •f„1�,f:�•fr / .,' r.4'f.>fJ�:+d�'t=g �'"'>M" "r � '.�.? _..I ,7, s - �t•'� /, -'!' `=� {i � Y: _ .<i;}dr, ��e9: '� ��/ - ,;;+ �. `, �� ,.w ji. f%,rl ri' !I• / ;i !a>a;�aa`x, ,� c,r �.t�` ��rJ r�=r .� 7 a ;, -, - / ,;, i � � �.'�.` `- �1� ,��3 _�.. •t.,. t. _�7=•�� , '; ��' � � , _'�_,l't' J JI � !1','h. -t,• - d, •:�,� t'�y- �' _ -- .- _f �J ,ii -•,.,�� 1�,”-' 3,', .r ,= ,�0�'e - tF _ <; - - i °` - '- 1 lj "'�f)7�k`l,y ,} +jf/'�:/,:q't�. ,!.� "I .�• j�IS •;,RY•Y j.i ��F' �� C _ - _il' - 1 na' fr1 :/•,.'; ;' -_J``r,['�C..� �� a� sY'..f,�._�,�. 1� _ - %'�' L . 'R r� 1 f}'�`i,Ti h' R*"iv-�`� I J+t l: �f 'j ,yl '"' � - -,i- `• - '�i^�-r yp,� f3 y�yy a',N"� l.y , = ��;�� i,-,A, •r - 'C J'r'`r''ir - , - f, 1, _,,�rtr,� ��,� :r:tL` ,�, ,� j.� ;� �,�� '.' +��'"z•> r ,. �.t: ;.�. i, J r,` ,.j�•' _ 'i•,�''�:.,�y � ^r' '- ',l - / "• '4=.? r ' 't;, ,'an` 7!A' .,�'+' mss '• - :' ! • , / , ti,.•y �_; ' .,�(,1' f, YI. _,f•`r:fl,6, �!;'�'�:y`ri• '�}��,ru�Ai;-9r c; tw_''r I _ _ .. .'/ .� � �;`s .,y-,. --sem` _ - + -. ._ ,r. - ".'_ r �'}_' r-_'!r r ' < ff ,1�. /'r'�.+�$.", .a, J 7 +� `:,�j��'"v�� ,r �� 1' - �t�' z { .r ,, �e -.tet '> 1�, - $ 1 '' ,.J� r�•'. � -'i iI -�l{ .tc4,' c�" J ,yp �•F�[� ^,..Y'w�'Ri •'lt''' Y8,•. 1 � _ r <1 r/ ,f.0 Y~�-'' � 1 _ _ f .,i" `.,^� _ - _ - '�. r,ju4_ 4 •- '/ „ h"'� .,*.z > / _ ,C��• 6 T" E �!'.T--�;7 s;r-=n?•?. �' _J ,t t''+ 't � �s""'S> I t 21, t .d l '�s�'�. $i '�:��4,,t� „'� ��,,2'�,r _ _ _ ./ J�r ��' ,r'/r� x f - �'n'A �r�f r,,. .i,, r ` ,! _ , 'r, i •, r� ' $' 'eyi!1 � Y ' // #!! L*ir� i;�•� _ . _ 'r�. ,,,x/ �, 'r ,R�sa?!� ,;F, � ;,. _ k� y , •r�,�w: � ,,�., �a - •, •,.,%, - , _ •.: < t. - ' ,- r +" - , „�+S, 37! - i ..'� `S' ,'e• 1; -yr - `.4`-� - p rw• �q._ �t '� � :,y "�i;l` c')'T .�', �T r:`. ) 1J+>< 1 y'+.:,� �fi�gg/?•GAJ 'a.i =3' ��,a-h'�l' � "` r �r' 'r„r,�"•s� / R"''Z,'+ � .c '.� h�- � �,� - f+ f• r• ir' y=+" /, J �''✓,[y,` ' ;./;,.� �rr•` S� � ,1,xT's .1 47 »• iRyy��`��s�, 6, - �Xk�i;,.��1i.';,�✓ •� �' - - --, _ 1 r• « i 'F;, y�"+• - M ,- ;..�-1^ -ii.�'-4 ,r �+,� F �� i' j 7/; ,.•� __ f ' �, J -' �}'•a�' ::, ,f,.. -: -_ .. .l',,1,; s s;Fhl` ,� l�� - - _•• < {'r_�f �p` :S f=:y' �K -.4`•�i'' - ��1 +' 1 -t!: r +..ni J'� r {` r'-��"` _-r,- - - L• -.�i.. ci:•. _ - t, Y�3,}' .T-r ,.r' � q �r:'7.,' -^_.:.-' 1 �.-. ( _ - - - tl'r =! A, Ft��apr� s. r tf `T - -_x.�,;` y . .- - ,,..'i:9.' ,tet .den ',L, F - J,.,•l ..R�(j�'y - 1 _ '� Ci orf^- rr� -4 r - _ ,:f•w- _-.#' ��'"� - fr cK `1 _�•'/ ,'C p� / •'; els 'Jc �' „'r,Yrrz-'[•�f' } f J4� �. a .� J'rl-,r,t•,y,•�`./. +t, �.,i �' "+ /;",,r', `.,,- �l - _ _ _ r�3- _, ,•••� _ ,j;r _ci` _�}`� 'fy .:j',_•rl. �r'',r �•i,`-.- LYr_.•�a� - �' � - - ., 'y .,4 � f:,r;.r •{. - rSa;-`6�;,- , , � +'•'{� 1"J•,�' ,,`/ - c. Y'•. � �� _ -`�a„I,,"'��-.t,�s-•�,f.,� {' r,` �'1'-< �;a y4l r:74�,17E } `•xa.Mu x#.E�'��0'-t=i,'�;.-`-%. ��4^S"'',�;e' - �2�-"rrz{�� J S �,( L,' -! f � .Te �' ,„}rlY L�• t 4't, X' i+a�'''�� ! R �- �1`� "''^`b .. Y " R;��' -• -F,+Kf��y' , f , -r • r iu }''f�4��s•'�t' �' _� r1' j�_^ rs'--•.r' `� �� ,�� , � ` _,,..5._.•+/.'�•r•._-^- __. _ - - �.F..ll.-�'- s .�,��e1.-'7 -rs,� �•�-=4 ,r, r ;11r�J,le%'. � r�,r'"iy;�`z� ,:d, 4 ��--,.- _ - „�.".'•>�-r ,>w _ _ " ,fie 'E f,1,tlk Mcy..f' ...."_.�f itJC✓a>:� I• .R�y��``'"" �.�i.` �,+•a... �"�r.._, - �.. _ }�` _ � - • Y • � '�`�/ it, -K�l.� `,��j` r 6+� �a'S�C •'� _' _ � "-. ,a �," S� =i. 4 u�' �F� � � r �>��r�,- '�,rrS' '� _.% 1``, .•ham �=,`�_ - ''' � � e x p/r C+`-, -.may-;,:,♦ circ i1Qf'. ` _ +� .fa �" -, - T µ /t;•.fir~, - ' ems �.tk4s,` 1-r•4',� ,./�•P, r ��,�-�'_r v`°.J' ,r-:, 1955 � rr .,r,w. �: � •_ -'` ,�. - :r'�,e.-. ".tr:j'. 4�' ,L', ++ ��' _ _ ,Y •.,.;n za i`•i _ s+;tv ro r _ �' ''y�"` y. ' t• :, + .17`= t '�"'� -.�'�t' 'k!etYF ��"� .tr- `��f'` �, A� ,'� � •72M ei?. ! xxj'S:• '.4'tp" - f •a -3 J.'R :Ci -.3' ��4 a ��,. �r • .E �' 'i=- �« � �. �};'K�..�.m��„ .,a-r ftA. .fir,. !r t' a r 3 1 't cyic - c•L 3. rsd � ,,_ •rte, _r.. i' i n/'fit :,y S `F ,r� •i •..:y 4 ) a,,.a.� yy1,' •..Nll .....{. ,- , b- .� r � `ry +� f? .- ,. ,. �f' ,F �•r , , - •�g} +4�r.n. f�:. ��.,y ,.. y _ ..�?''�C } -!.. 't' 'illi, ..,' r1D•t !�.: 5l' :r '.tk. .. _' w .. .- ..�5'. �• Y ,- v, �- .' .]+SP, '!w ;_.. ::3 .,•,: ¢t, L: .. ..r r 1- ..w 'Cit _ .. . +crr.. .. .,,.... a .t 1-�".•s.,{� .. ..a � '� � ..TMt��..5*•.. T^�::'•,' ,ctl-v:r :�'•R r. ...-�.( �t r.G-- •. •. - .., .f f f... -.. ,a 'ice . • . ^4t-',.. � .�' +.-r.. ,. �"a. 'f,•- .J., „[" Y. :" e -��L 4•�: •?^Y -1:• ' _y. a.,., ,�,t--_... {. � , � � ...LL,,,,. r'• ,._ , .. ., �i1 •. I,. rat.... �- " .c.+. ,*W.•Yi. is ''�" .r�r•�'+r<,- .,:Y- R -L �,.• i -�'. 4f .#' �- r., 'ti.::'iY�, _ �. �Y't.. ,a - t li , k�- K .,�': .54' T saw• ,_.ayq�.. .t, ::J•+r ..fir �'.`'• '^'` f r rr } • : rt..t� d:._ ...••L.. -� `'ti .iv`. ,.'i {{,�,, ,c":� 7. .t '"ti' t� =):ka: 44 +y.• .1,-. ��LL``'' K- s as UC •�-: >._ ,a. ... , .. '�' :. # r u., y.� r .t?Y !�� te..y t. .Y: Sal -J... � ±ti •!`. �. R ti �y,, t R' S K 4 _l ,ce• rY 4• ilj• �w , WWI -•�` .^ '... ,b. "rir- Y'. �.X• 'r,F _. .3' ... ,y�-._ ,,,.J$p{['' '9 ,. 3� - .'\I�..�•D= .i .: r. y •...' ':'.•yy' +� :1 r t'F3 .•S. „�s_ 4. ,4 � ',Et"' � a' }y Y' + y 2 x .'1 • t' r -. '"i .L , Y .., , -„� ._ ._-n .fit.- «.L r•s .'i + �_.. r _ .. S'r e .'++. 'fit ;.` .�4.��1 'q• -••4 i )_ �.� ,r.. SR -S. :) Wiz. ,1 �3 }.�-' �.t•y -'"Tr y � f. .R" '.. , ,,, ,. , • ., �. , illy • ,,.. S - ,:' - , we .. ,.. .. ..<•. .r, i'= -r(, s.. :, . :•L�Jt• � , �.. .1 ',Sr -y •'i. Q �. k • -r T+y SF .. .3, :. .. •. 1, .. t ;. y�y ... : .0 _ .. :_A. .:. ... ..,. i.. .fie R :A .t. .,�" l p�. _a Y-L ♦ rr-'�i' ftt'a fr_ a rr"r'., Fs �' r....: 1 .... • . j. : `hCt 1 ' r. •�,, < h� •!.'�. 1. i� r:'' �• f .� .J Y.F.. r♦, r� h Aw �� ''/'<-k. " ' •. +�' ,to ..� Y^"E ) �Sa:k J ••+J+ t r'!'' }}.,_ s. : .ca-a..i,, •a.., ♦ .,.. � :, r. ..G'.. , :.. _:�:. �,ri. c`.T.'1'- �i ::'lr•• •`V`i :.�.F:": .... •. e ..> .,.. -:�•�, ,. _.:1 x•<r : f� �+ 4 FIN ,. .. :'(s't' �} � '•:• ,. L a , t. ,. .ti,.. rt.. �R. [,.,._ •'J. � � '.. ,.:_- :.. _'p r .. ,. .. r ,. ...:. ,..._ - t a�• y�pis+:, �:' k •w�� w~ .Rkr• .� s• ,� t f. *Ri.. ''r• '3 t �d L ra :# - 3.,�:•.r''� f -+...4, , >, ,. ; ,.. al;t.� �\ • -. . ., �.... ♦ '<'+ a��,,f r .!:" , a , c. .Y'a Y{!.r. a..z..-.�. ... .. � .. -:`'�'`..-;.. . .� .. r .St- t��, S: J', sem+- '•hX .l r ..--,�, .. : .f `.'.:.•i ...5::.� .: .i.' .. �[�]_ .-r.M£ a r+ , � �•. :.. 4.. �. i�.� 'ntc' , r .. +. r- .6 z`. '� �• a .-E `,"4'•, :}.. ,+.,-..f r. Y rr I L. ':4Y rx A f_ ,�tS•�a K. -� ,z L -r. 1 -r �. ... _.. ,..Y-� fit(•� --�' !:,L. .. - ..: r - x -:,� A z �•_, <, YY . . F 1' t. ,•.� f,.. ' I I t t i; F laa ,4* t, 1•w & ..„}. r . , ... '• �"/{•,.. }:.�:' - :' "''ti .:tiff �. _.c i• t- • -:: r L '.-b. •. � > <.r. r....r .. ,t.♦: ...: .. .� ,r '.: i ,. a 7 -. i' ,_ •�,- .: s�C I'i 'Lp x .,. r. ,.: , �--.. .. �. .: .) .. ', .. r_... ._.,,:. k..., ,y�.f -; - �t � ms'µ- •a•. .. c+'es .*.SSr-� �L.,.iG..,t. , rc' o'i fa.,.. i'.: :tp,t :r:. --.�.'�'•.,.. .r' � I: .. , .,.. '..3}� :5_ }. :r?. •� .a'f ,fr:,x f.. A,A- r � p p.. `'•�'. ''`i a s r v :•C ._,). I� .L!�y .e. .. y n .....:'.' .2 f`._ „ 4;L � � .. 'In 1:. .,iJL" .4: 5l , ) f1'T.1 ,r.. � .... :.�. .....•> ..,.. .� � :., tilt � .,, el.- �.:. ! •)ny -an{' �-.5 f " ,t�• +,a .s�* h: ,LI� 'tit• :`$ •, N; ,�' G ,, k.,! r�.� C/- ::!i �w � r •rJ' ,:yw.�K � :^'J.' 1 i. �• ( v �.�(� .� 't�..}.', �. .,.yy.. -., .,e, ..4<'y.. •, h. .. ra ...-'! N Itt '.. .. - ,�A�� " ., ,:` LL r'i',^'r :-"„�{,. •4'lr .M' .- ,•,.,f.{..�' .,,,..T �,. l• � ..�.-.'... ,Jfi. .. •t' 1!- ` LrtY' ?F� ,r r�. •L+. C,. y'�(' .{'l !y,.� C' `yet- '. v�:rY'- - : ,t,<• .• .y-.. . „_. q,,..�" .. : ., � : �t t' _ ..,'�w- _ �,-:. .i.. r�`. .-."•.. `T .ii.' r - .r .•.. sl ,.. ,..- Y. ,. st .a ..' - ..- ,. ,t �'•.... 4♦iSsF, - a... ,'* ?J _ :E`�t�._l .-.• ._ ..;.� r,''� :. _.. `tea .r.. ,: - 3 _ •an �� -s. ,« r .. Yr-.- ..y. ,.. -X...:.... .+s .. ... ... .. ,.:.. a,•t,• �. _:. �6,,. 4 � r.: � ,,r _ -x. .V 1r: i . . .> .._ t..1.: . .-f. ...-};... _,. ." � rr cl a r a:aw. r•, t .. ,,,. $' ,}'�•'+ 'a�,. - L (, t(rrA: .c:•.. -......•.- t - .,a.. ..« .. t. .. ..., u.L 3 ....�' � R :'3'.. ".'S �.��',' _I� ,Y. ,4� �� l • , .' .. ... ..-. .. .:r.. L. � _. _ a:. , �... •. ,:�.{t 5r rata. ,. ..` !`. .��'".. :r A4 t fi ' s : r li.. :: ,. ",� ).•....,i, .. .. .- '.. d f - _.- ... :. ', 4"�i -'+"` ski rF' f,�••`` - ay', j. } 1 .: 'r'`�..�...r E, ,., � , r �:.� { '-. .r .r � ,i�. ..: -. ' •,_3.. �„ F�,...�i.,M.. y>• :.-tf . , .. .,lam- w , , .•J ,•.,..;-. .. :..._i J.. ...•. „ ,.. ]!' �.+, ! l'L �i_ �,Y.�+:`i.:. � ` �..: f ,X"t...,, T _ , , �- '•1•. -._ -' rs.^ i:'3 C•.3!' tf '.rr.: •m' h ' w. nr,.r., :).., r .. .� -.. ,. .. t s :. ';a , .r til. •F E t f?' �, 1 ,�� .. _ .•�+t .. #` +f ,. � _ -, .,_, �„ . ,�+t" ate.ot,. '�, � ! .{ ,-.y. f :.:F :-(crra.:•Yn h...u.. _: .;. .. _, .. ,, .4 ... .Fat. >i, : _ r.�''Z. - a}Y° ",P'; ."?7. 'r. +,. - _, .� r •+ .1.....'^G.,...: .A..-. :. ,. .�. .. .' , !:'r .. . !I � r'11. M�.�t' �: S �. ,' ,• .'`tel •• >. 'S r .S� 1 Y y f: - -� r, L 'ar Ya w• 1 �A.� t 4a �ty •�' 7 i... :x a n3. e , M r , r - 1. 1010 E'r t.. - _ - , ..i., '••; .�• qs rr ♦S``''•�. Y ,r - �-- '+r-n - v -�f', t�. /.,t��r .i �_ 'r4. {} r:�. Sty" i'u _ s\•• �! T7 r rtT_ •'� f t 'moi` , �' •al P , , .r.v �,. : J! . t.. . .. -. ) JJ .. i' e•"yi , .. { �� :, 1. ,. .: � �. - .Lt'.,, '�,r� - ♦. :. d !�v. „-R ... ... r H ,j. .- ,. ✓ ... .. '-It1 ,.. _ , ;' >a-. ! w,• -�f��! ..el[ •riv '31� ._ '59' • •fit' .. .:.. .1: •� ,�: •+ .. �'�� Y4..f_ . - ,. ,. _ �•��,�'..i''!�'r" _ tl �y' �f'r�4.,•'.. 'aVF r},.., ',Y _ 1...L I...t l e.•a,f.. � J ��t1Ar .i2 •aF G•t. Ay, � S.. 'f' r: r •, �r` '�.•Y• r':ti: .. r,r.....:'' r. � `. i"",j ". S � ,,{ w,1+�. :af' r• :,Sf,'✓'. f��.� F't�J •¢f• � ./ '. y, <' a.> A / p .. "r': - 15• �}r Y �{,i•s- ,t i ti. "L F'4..- ,r /1 �. �f ri.. .:e.a� .7 ..- 3 f�a. ..:q .. {Q.. .. y � ,. r. '; '-1 • .• .,5.' -t:+ 2 �f,V�n, 'MJ' T .• .a .,ate,ay.� .� .' .}.� 4:K :, � , i. • '.i. .. /' .�Yr ti L.Y �!• j•J V•,' .' 4.."r{,'YL -.l.r- � J .. � , '. .. � ✓f., .t .{. l � h -. _ . , :- •7".r "S tT �^fir-:• • +1• :. :,,,. :.. v � M•'M1;'�• ,Y k 4 -,-• Ir � 1. _a. a. ... -• ., Y4T .:. .. t'11tt.•.�� li is i `,; At' ) "r'r:, ,i '� ,. ,.h _..y-.. i ..R. x 'G-....�',`, , Yrt �'' � a 1 \ „ .,a � S •+..r,yt _. r .,,., �-. (( .Iws _ «,Lr, y. i4• q.�r� 5:.: i.,. � :. ,Y. -i+,r��y5?�a��}� .. ..M.ry... S. _.. - �, :- _ -v- :. .. _ -a.: r-� -.. .� n �� 4.� �'•�Qr ''�i'.� e�, wS: �;t 7:.-r.' .. j .- .. - e s -<+ '�s`rs'• ' .s ^''- .. .. .�� } IF:s-. �",r•.. _�,i- :c't`�>.. �' 'c�1•f '�. r}� rvt'. .II _ :massa' •',!-!r �! - . �+rt, ,. r .1,. « �� >3k..+y' ¢ y. trs - ,.rs: x 3 } `�=• _�..aha.•= / tr� yu+ t L' �'r`,' �� ,(� . %=:sa,. ems• •s- :r. �!. ;l,r ::t <.y. , ti.:�4 r, '•` ...r '�Sfi-. �;� - Vii. ..t.. Sr'tFi.' ,•'`'J,l. �i�. I 1 i F li .. Yam - ,.: - t'3-" ,r:: i .� :_..:�. �a.�' : ,: - ,.., .. -- 'C., �i, 3.-. _ �•" ,t 4 ' L•.. ...!!'.`. .Y}'�•a , ; *17 -. �, ,. f. i.,. � : -�. ��.. P• x�v t- �7.,,, r `ti_r� tr�. '�'�., .�' +� -'� rY""'. •�.r c �. .+- , ... - •' �. :'^' '` ,r� •:i� , �•a aKL ice, x:�+t,��- U > f ray • .. : r � a 4a:�• �.' k ray .. .. .... .' .•.•�.�r > rti3' .� :k`"•r�{a. %i� �, lsj,.v.r,`�`M��,'ai'?E "lc.-''�}, _ • ��•r•'•..�;,� rte' '� �+1'J r a t�t3C �-2 .r'� - ;tr"•F,.v-t.. • 'CJ,-2'-. •�•�. c :t!. a`'''�' 'tr _.SY•s x.«,S'�: {!' 'tc'-.. - •' -.S .. Y� ��s•, �., ]' L :1:0 Y -Y•1�• 4 s ..,. •,,.;,: .�.:<-:.r,"r. -•� _. -A ;•,. 4:• SIS' ,«`R', b♦ 'r`� ? �; �±'t afi�>•,� � � s � � _ :tics: s h i C r - a y 1 L 4 '• � ��t' � .:irk .`��, .ra f - ' ' . . � - ... � i ?5;T�4�,, tr.• rl'`'2�f'��-. � � � .. �� `�i rte. ' � .. '- i � ' ..Y •M1` _f. •Y .. 111 . it y t f� �h�i* ";�'.�'�''` +'+5.�. ��i 'a„ycf'� x�'�, •:rr_j. - - is � � r!:-�- i�_ , •.:i' ��`. n t::-�-_.'C..c. -}�`c r'.i'fi{"'±.x-. �"� ;_ y y_y f1 ..Jf k j R}ryt _.�... it rr , vi' �Lt' <r :.�JF'..M4• .Y,.- .''�r„n;_., _ ti+ n: r,Yy' - :., t. • ,,. : ....•.J, 4. ..,_ ., „ � -1 ...'n.{.: .:'4.i f.e:.,,. ti -- .' .. �,, D , �., .ftp .iy., '�,. -�.�..4�.f•'W D. 'S. `•`q•' - :C .k :4„ �s�C a «.x rs _�- •t �' >•'�+{spa. 5 t 7S� f - / F �y� f y r• ! l+ R 33 r , • r , _,.-ti .r+..- •_ , >s. .... t. x,• .- ,y..r � ., __ ., 3' :� r.r,,- ,}- '):4r � 7 : t,; ,t} ah .,r .+ '.'4Y"F ..r.r i'!�.y �, ,:�f.- ,Yr-•, Rn M , a:. .h "i t�.. r�.,.. - ��'4*'-a. -_r•, J: � :4:5` ..xt`,•'.!..' ,j. ��. ttY ;� :"[' � •,w 'Y 'r• .�« i^ Y:,� ,f ..�'. 1 �:•. '�Y'pL �.. y 1Kw i� v' r, , ng a. r • .t r SC w r- j ,�. .:�-rY-. .i 2��[��QJr,. -� 'C � - 'l� ,' ✓, ,�+:Z.+x•+s �,Ah•• ,.f.' t';,� I �.... �$f,� t;7�� •�r`,'.+r ,'."!.;A_r +;'. T YS •.} % "•NJ -t Y a!�� "`i'. rJi"1�. .e V. fI' .Y ._ ,I-. r. -,r, ,..., .. s :rf . r. .. .. 2 :"1 I.' g� ,u�S I x� a��(,tt 4..•Yrp �,.••..��.. �' _ :. a ._s y.K ... .::� •"tr.. .a :,..r-: i'- :•,�• , - .r .. ,,: .,..., _ - •i:-''-.i' ':.1- MM �x- _ ti`•" '�:.sL':t�*e' � i•,.- ..r-' '�.•,�. .,.. .Mar .. : x!e .. •:..: ,f` .:.?': r':�t - ... x ", • 'S �'-�, '7 .:"4...,., v',� ::.;�• {:�, r - - C' ..,,. n ,.a,.r.6: _.•i:- -.,�r ,,,,fa .... ,, -.F`•.:.. .. Y. - ... �%��r• f ..� J �.1.. rr„ �y. i�'•'w�' .:�J• t :/_y.� ,tT_ -afar? - z ,.rv' M�+rtd- � .� ', •�y,:� '•r:;; •,.':c;z+ :s,. `3� tc '. �.. '•�Ft ,aar t �. k .,-. ''i. }, t,,,. -r �,`''t ."1h`;°�:2 Wf .iv"s. �'.1-- TD:., ''i--_7, 1 :F: !':i• 'Zz t a t •f'+'" 'at .'C'' Jf 's r. 1:Y,. r v,T, .ti.�•. 4 � 4t � •lt Y k 4 a .Maw .t , b 1f. f 71'k S •! :M 'ItT G• it t • 4. J:1' ,.Ttr '�. �r•' Y .: }4.. 1)i: t J> .,a?. :-3. J. •"�� .7r .lj '^a�• '�4 -S'.'�:'j.�'1R _ , , „r ,.,, - ,.fi ,;. '^ ,' +cD-^:. •" � rte:. 1'• i,� K orf, .+ �4., - c �,�,,,,ysf, f, r:G^+�' _,. .... .. ....:..'.r r , ..', r:., M1'.D.- ..a -. ,. t r - -;t CY: 1•- 'y-< ..:...c. ;Nj+'".�°a+• f� .,j.. 'R. ty. 4 � I Z' - •:rr �1Y:ta'.. ^•'�., ,t,t � :^ ...ti �,f ~ter•-Z'C; .t' Y•in � it': .,; �,-c, -•'�°I a' ,ry.,,'f.4,,,.t.• ,+rA .. _- .. u � , ., 4",�` s � � s�... y wLi sat ,'i' '�: ,s«� :,s:3�' �1"�:`�" r.'. -. :. ..- + - .' t wg'�-,°':.. er. .{S�Yr «1^Ji ,. �-. Ce ,. .. � t_.-.�•.` '�•�.r�,�C• .:� ^i�:' +:'t :4;: a ,� a., � �'s, dl , _. ... � a�:--•t-,- ,' "fit - � �R. :-K: - - y �- y�r - <"..• - .' ,.., y*;:: y.. -.., � �., -e':r�� .. >, ..., - -:rl .-*.,.,:<.. .r a <Crt'y� .r - `''. - •rr. r a :+y..�r}�•,..- .. J.Lir'+',�. •Ns 'fir. ,T*.-..� ^. ,'.S` Y !'. j�' i r.-°k yl.. EdM. _q ''j•ts�. i�. •t :,tom � :�+ L?•T'�':,. .:�f "� `�� I _ ,?„> .��-.<�,�.��•sirs,,: »�-��- ' `;,=, .• .� '�. - : n , 7 ICA r. - ' rC ., , t r .9>i:... f 4>Tr .•- .,. , ,. ,:nc :- ..- ... � t -� .. �: ,�,: r • , �• �I r y f• , Y.. ,r4, , .- ... �'y�`. ,• R .� r. „�i. ,,,.f ,�� • .., e+• yk' :..... - :.�k .}. ":.J` � Yl•.'•ry,: t,.. _. .. �- ...r-:f�, .»r " �. _,.t, t- ti•.. � ,.. d. r� 4- .y y.,,eY.f_•Y.; '#: _ .,�#3 � . . � .. -.�,.. r 'ti ,.Jf3•• J_ V . 4 ,iD < S 3?�"''2 :.-%r �!`: .� c 1. .n, '�C'. Y t -+t`Y ,. , �`:. +. t-. .�1,y r '�iti}°' '.yr!c�+".•:tra:• �� '.��. .} � .,.. �' 3 ,� ,.. - :;.,� .� - - „y„"- _ -.-G{"., 71'��.1. '�` ''��„8YE<'xalr•tY ••it!�Y �r,:• •':F,� r �r, , , .• -. _ - •s /t' SS .. ..,. ��.. r . :. .. .. r :a_._. ., S , �• '.. - .. Yr ,4a,,� ia' .,.' ..+n ' NN .+fes: " ..� ,- a ,. �: ; .... - ...... .... ,. -... ., r.Sh/ :, .. .rf, •�' „A,.. :'a,.::9 ! �.q w' .e. S< e- Yr �f •S� i. , : SS R. . >.- .: ,),- � k. .. lt. H.. t. �. :., w ,•,�;:}r Y .�;•.t -5•Y:,. 4...�; x�. •ef"' . ;-r'.. `* �.y $'- � ,. .'�., ,. ..: . a .; .r: !+. . - �-i.. .;.><. ,r •�:: A.is A;' ~J•a �'.`l.' Jt� a :: `+ ao- i- .".r . [7�,•�Sit' F „- ';,£•:�:= ,: �� `k;,: � x. Kl "�:^� �bt,:_' Y' - : f C: , �. tr , : i .... .., .: �A �, , ..Y„ ^,Y{` .v.. -. �. �4 ...Y� ,,y.' T•„�� i'(.i�fi' d a+� L �� •'��. 4' - J 'P. f=J `T-_ .w�' �,r�'-.,it. r. , _ : -: ., u. , .> J ) _t t f ,,y i :5„",. 'ABY,•}yJ7;i�C�}yet' fpi't� ., - -J_ •ti t,. '. , _. ..,.- 7 .'•r,' •. _-_',+n r' r ,.. -�f ^r� ... ... :.: i -� `-`_,t'r .•i,"�.�w ,:Y sk =.#y�rC ,��. _ r „n ,. .;, <�... -0.. : ..-i. L,.A'. 4�.- .. ,«. •.. •„. _ . . •� .. .:,.X>r t. s :t a p t' 'Si'• k� 4 .. :7. � , 'r. : ,v ,.. , )'�..-_-.�w.4 .•'4 ,..k .x.�': ,� 7. ] • r. . ., �' .. A Z �'F' .Ya,'; 1 F .<kl f. ,+,M.. . '� ��- x i L y .. , ,. . , .,k..- .':.. _.. ... ur'. , .. v. r• A ._, '-t r �Jy`. *,'� i .r-*r i=�' `• .,;: s'rs"•r::,..,}. u Y� .r ... i .. .:F : ..,. ,1'. '�[ x. ,' ._:,, I` r<I X:Ar� .T ch,,, ti .•:..:Y ;p ,Y?:t ,.nY,? �r Yrf t. ? h.: .. X r. ,.{., �..,n .. ♦... _ _.. „:.,t,- 'D: :. �. .,. •� # r..'jt'�,.Y-7 .- �+ .. J •' Y , •i �:7 a ,.L.n .'�2� 4h_. , , ., ?.r .!S..• w,:.: , ... ^; Y,♦ �Yi' . _ .,.. t � ,i ,. ,. ., .� .,� °rf'Fe -'al'�h'. Y Y tY.'.. k. .'•J. :'��.,a•`,.'r!:. •� i. .s:- ��.. i.. t _+••' ,�,.; ,:�,:'�' _ r:, a.syr~•,' �-ar •J s• ,r Y# t'• ar: '�S 4�er•'. P K Y"17 •arrt -, ,K( �r It a '�rf , ., .�-,.. .r ,::. S. r'...'.]'.,- , .. .. , r -' Y ,,•�{'+.r,. 'Z' yY'�.. f,.., i rd - . t7.a•Tr ., , !� - ., , ,.-+r,,✓. .r , ,.. 1r ,., n a r'�t, .,, � ... 'Y .' t �.,.... i.... '.� • r 4q > : __��. ...._ -x. .ra` t, ,. ,._ -, <,,...-,. ,;_ :,t. �`•,+x ,. �' ► "r +6.. � � sem" r ';c t, x ,.{t=' x r"L -.... , _ .. . .y,. k.. ,_:'1•k• , :r. „J;. +- `` ! ,. .3tL. -. �'r. _„ � :.yi 't '�• sK, •.K ,i f.r'`':. :*. ,Yi.-. f 1 • -- � . . - . .:. �., ,... .F:;• :" r�}fi. �;a �. r � •i .. - [. i ar_ �!! 1...:x .k�c• ? _ �'4+,� - -:"1' �i` Y..f .n. .... ..: ..kl.t .,_.,.. ., ., 7 s •: -" w:wY. •+�fj'� '4' � �:-+tom �r�r 4� f�-rrr<.ar• p vim,, KA#?;: :r, :. a..}} w, j",+ d''a+- jK -a•, -}+�'...a'1. o-r _ K- i'aw. :a • \,......� :,. rK. .. .+ a.f..• ..S ..: i, .: _. r' _.,: , . ., ry9a•t•:-::,•..•.' • - ,,,I:'..h -T iS� 'i- •�. t` w �.`'c i:.'+F... - ... r. s -.Ya.M ... ,.1 .. ,f -.. ..fr,�.,J �, � ,. ,. _ <. a -._ ., y �.� w. f„ .-- T ,. ,.-. • 'y'.;a�i'. '3.;T fig- :'"y. ;r', j. 3 -'^ a -•..'Y t '..i ,-: . .,.. ,.: -t ',..,,.,... .<s nrw '%y. R _#*.' .`t J.ir. "+. �..Y:7 r4 of r"-^ _ - �.� _ ••.,. _i +•l) Ir ) s•. t f S..•: +y r 'ti fw, x , t ...,.,.. ,fig, ,,•t�. .:. r...t,: _ - :�... , -Ja- F....gY•fd•.Yt,�t. .. ,.. •i'i•-• l`.,e.. �: > �Y>_- ♦ / , y. i! .:r �i�{.. • - .:, v- ,.J .i _... .. n , � .r ..r, ✓. ..r♦ w- l v. er-f•; 5 ..., }} I' � •�} -! ,. -._4,.. ♦ .. r �. $ . . �• J• }',•, .,J .:.-.t ..1 •na- -.,J r .r:. M.• - 1�. �-�: .�. y, ..-.�,,' 1 •lire' . ,�s V 1a�n.'• 4 .. .t-.., u. ..,. ,,- _n,..: T. r.,. .. 1� � -. ,' Jr Z(.'• > Tr .5,,.�:.q. t - .. :.. _. F«��. , .: .< r-r•, ,:• �.r�„ a �. :;tom fir,. a�i re, . Y�,3!'ear .,-.r"'�". v f .,`.: -•.. .. ..' :.� A .>` ....•.-., � - -. .. .,.. -: •i. -r3.3 '.i. �.Y� -,.•. ' • ,. .. ,...,[" "Imp _•,_•� V. '.-.! � - : .•.r.: .... .. .� .. '. .' 1> � -k 'l+ ... ' ..: >:S�f^� •i'?�ax t, 4. �•2*' r�• . S ..,# r -r -. r .:. ,.. ,:..,>.•„?t' � .h,.. .,- r, , +�„ .AY .s" •t ,` .:r:.3,` '� �$' `'•'1= r: �-"?{�, i .,1� .. .-..' __.r .3.d, .. .. � :,: �•� .:.r. Y ,. n•. ..- .... ...: $ ,v , - ^+:. Y i,�! Ss, rte. _ it. '3 i,' / S ,`II tt • Y ,fit i l - 1 a� Z ,r. `„i mss{ t'� t a Y ,a''' may. sr, 1 • r - --rr� _. r, .r^t' �+ ,,•.• ,.. e. ':. '"��`� a•.• .:�•}' i L'' 't`C. 'yam ... .. ..- _ �.. ..:. f _ :.,..>{'.,� - ;dE'. �3• '�'i:" ,.•,r=Nr' .'int.. t ..r:..;. yp4.:.. i .:' ;.. : � 7.':..Ly ,.►.. .•< . - 4. :� iT� :.;... ,`,.-. .:r,' .r I �_..r ::1... 'jy' .Z' .A �•' "�M� L - '•�` .T,R' 1 '.'Zqf` -,., ...f. .t. - - �YfK� -H 4 „d S-�',••t>...', L ,.. r 1 < i. ,•yf y � .r�:. '� A4. ,�,., l� �T y }*.. .r `r' , ., A u.. -_.:-=a .,f,..r...i. ,.r,. �1.- -, 1•' ,s:,• � _ .#,,. :(.. 5:.c,.�� , rt GA-` � r , ��jj �Y - • : .i.�,. �:. S- Da f ... ..M .Y•.�<,. .: '_tt 1.. r .-. , Yw. -, t. -. L x:.< i L ,�". , :{. .. �.- r. -. ,r' •:- ,.} ..'...�,,.:,. .•.-.•...,. i..•, -. .,. ., ... • .'; ," -• k ,- .i. sir '{. t/ .i rD q Y .,. y2'. .. ._r ..,,, ,r- � k.- r. .rfu'�: L " •1'' �•••1� .) r1' 4 F� • 'fi1� .-t .. -a .. .p • `r. a .., , ;,. � h r ,rr:' r �=t. `a" �<' { : _� ..,_ ,r.t. ,: :.N-,' S, .. �- r ._ .:a-Y:,J. � �, r �f - {i - .►," k 'a- �- Jr' �l as 4. "ri , y • i b",Ce• t',�it .\,'i ._ t ,: "$ Y. ,; b ... .r. � .72--. ... .rJ ', , .. •,, ��i�,, _ *�fc:t:.r �fi r.�-;r•'s: S� r S ,J/ , :. •, a:,:in3'. D L .::. .R...<.�� .,:;.. , :1•'si C :� 1 :f-�J�e� 1. "t.,, xs '.�Y'.> T.: ,`,.,t.,. ^!.. �t'-. -'�f •:.rYx. `F S i 'x`�"'« 'a r:Y1i�''.. Via. 'H�'�=•=-w ,k +,z .f:'•... � {- d,. y tF - �t 9 •,,,.. T .sit .t r-. Y' ;wi •:La L x. .3 7� s';�7t'• :'i � it f, v ��.' �.,. �'•- �qy. ,.\' r� �'t Y� ,:Y,, r �. r , z•..�Tr. t- .l ,: r �rY '. - „•aF,..�. •M'��9.r'"''lf.�•..�..'�..r,:. 7:t...�w.,..-w.fx ♦. � J F•r, 'r�rY.'.c,, �r,.'' .�>,4:- - .�,. n ♦ -.., _ ::. " a .: n: ;I y ! Y=:,cx;Yr�k,.,�, 'W:t�'�F'�-.:+`;-:Mfrs.r��' ��.'." ,, „�.y"4,�S' •%+-s{'i.. - •rh .-s��'- T-�r S�!•tV•`it4:r' ..Y'[i�i@'Lt 4 r'.F.::'*�'1c.; :t,�-,+:Yi•.r•".`L.y+.;:.-'r"•l+ n. _,s u � ,ft t n },• rr ,arm' r�• . •�, ,� �. ��,,,:-'Sr`� ` - �i•' :. ' 4` �- rc+"'"�"'1 ,r.:�'F.a +" t Ff �•�_•;,. ,�: .:"�L�,��t ft..�'.�..;�,'.. y�� -�X _ e'i,f, y: -<: tr'3°r.:r '',,,a"'...�yN '� x•' _ a ,. r "'�A •r r� .r-�• - - - 1t �,. �:. y.• r)Sr-Z, ,4'l .h�` r `i _ ,.3.1., Ar, _ ,;}+Y'T,+ Ti aa 11 •a.N'� -" ..;fes �'t Thi fir Yr .. - l ^ �ta , Y 11 t S .''t _ S. �. �..�,r n•:.,. .. �, , �..�,:* �,' � rCs•;'.f`f- --1. - <',3 Y, �'f`tm" is •✓. �;. 'Ln?w-' ':ice"'. +� ,,a � ..,.1 ,.� ., '.,>, y., '..� t,•_ .,.rix .C'�, :c rw J.. � f. i! i,t .. V .t t � s:: ,�• ,�•JS ,.dal .i �. .�'t � ,:k 11 , t ' r - - ,. ,� :.,. W s 4a _ ., ; '-. r_.: ..,; I..�t' _ dF' �,1. j 7' ✓c Ad':.v -:.k ..>, {la".. ��.K €' 11 t� � �• ,r .. .,r .. �. x- �, �.. �.:,:. ,.t �` '.r. - f s,i, '.Y ,�,- „-k ;:*,t. :"�' ;w dF r.d. - d - ��` ' .. tA4a- j` '1'#_. '4 ti. -:.i Y' ��t��L �_�ry•_i-4•,.}�l .nE 3".' +C� ti ✓' ::.E� '"a .tea.•--,.t ------•-._—_ . . �, *.� ;�,. r• - .tit._ 'i -� i w, r Ni. A rX�v-..3 AT F r a 1 } �J r l 'A i' S aY:• _ r: 7 4 j , r, � .: .,. ... - -• Y9'arl�:Y..ti, ...'._, y.J1... .. :.� ,': .r. .t:.J. q �j... 3 • a}';. �� , �' a .. 'w,. w•F,L ': •. :..... ,:.a. �y;.,� �- .... �.R ._Y �. ..j.s >�. aJ..,. J:. , r� � ( 1: ':^1�__ .'._ .. .ti' 'Std i, 'mss: .. ,,• -1 ._ _ �, ^yf -. v � �.e. l j.•:'- ! 4 i" '�+(f y 7{ c ,- r. - a 'vt ., , . ". er7 .;• f �„{: )q:1vc r ., �„. .: ` .t•..: -. �' - .a"r : a'J!!. .:.. ..., P''. , L y ., , -. �i 4,,.- K_. .... a ,..., , .''. ,+•" °'�,� '-:die _S �� ,�{' .. ' .. X ,. ,, �:.:. rt..=at+�.y,}�... : ..: :-a' .:..,,r;, :q- _.'..,"r. .-. �, � _�[e�"-,T A.-^ . K•ti.,.�-� x r:.. JF:: ..,.. � ,. y ,... �.. f.v� - � ,� �5 aY, `fin :4�t,•�� ra .a - ,:. t•,L ._ r. .F.A. fir.:<.. }'y,�a :1y/r' .... .: :.. ..^�:.,. .a.._ .�: ,y'� �_. _ �.fir.,J _..;�,j;;l.,y":� : ._� . ��.- .. .- .r r .-.. YR". ,.� „( - ..r,"' .r r ::-}.,. � ��•r1T�''p4':� ';1rv. r�1' T�."S.. �n Y� ' � - t_•l+ri:-r - ,=�ar'r�'_.. .rS .+i �: �Y'. !, r., •j, _ •�z .�"•.i.Y, X :.2J �A�� .-e; ':�. lr•.,,..,� ,3 'f `+t'�- :.,.,� c��'._J•, rr� a,:33�� -S Y q tf-..�'..� �-.. � r s -:`? .: .... - .,..;, ir'., t ., .•r .:@ .,r,;;;' r .is"fa!° Ar ;;+T• `7, �,,•'�'�"': s;,, .- ._ .fir.. ,. ,-, _'k_.,.-.;_ :.... , .. ,.. _ <,• ::�, •_ :� �i,`+��'*° 'i .. � .,. ;tai '1 .^ -!: al ..,� 1 y, .,. •RAN '�.,., '� •.'.�: 13_. :�Y^ .. r .el. w.: ! -.,k ,.3• .„•>t ..'.,!'.:r. ,Y � t �%r -�' ,' •s.,�,'•a- ♦ �.'6[ �C,+^h:::� :w a . .. .. , i.. -.,�' .,: :>F•- .- :S. ::..F- ,...yTv: - ,,. _ ..'.. /"�' -5_,- 1 .,.y^' '{?f _ •t1`. �,.G,.y ,+. .> r • .� .x' � r i ,t.� �,:1 1. ,>? ,/. .r :... ,, . . ..... .. � : ,... .:ri. :..�'� :�k.• ..N X 'i ��'tom`':, d �i .. ..-.... �....,. ._.,��:,... 7...,. .. .. .: air.,,r >r:- .' - :. .,e'r... y"A.+-, 4ry�•3 Jk _. V ... :,,• •`fi ..,4.�..• .Y' (. -.. �y- ; .,,• � .•. !. �,�i, .� .•' ,,e i is y, �>. y. a. � , ,. • �. '. .. �._-.r1.._.. �' ` �'{y(��.� � J • ..i..': ,� - - }t.. •�.�,• F �� `�,.! t.fa�Ri''a{-' , y� it, ., ." , .:. y�. ..._ ,.. ...,, 4 r _ 'y..” .k•SJ, -r.fi-: •3!' "'".� �.r: ,rS,'„(-. ,w t. 2 _ .; 'r-Sar ;,. .. .x•.J .., r-.a r -., ,... ,- „ :. _•.: _>;..iu ar•. ,: arF-:(w �.. b .,�. .:•- .,ac 'fi ,,,�" S, .. Ft. ...: ., a3. �. •'t ,.. ,9 .. �._.. .._..::c � -,. ,._,�..e .. tire'... � t'` 1i '�•� ;h`., .. ... ,^v. . _ .. �... .. . ,.'.,_ ._ :•�.... �' _ ., -, ., .-. Star ea ... "� .v ,. .. Y,� .:.- ys r .. .. r>�8-. -,: - -,:.: ,. :� .:,.. . •:.Q^:"�'. .r.a. � Ge ti!' ,,rF' - x - P3 ,�•' ^� ( h _y ., - 3 .,. ,.,:.+•.a-'11t. a .. _, i 's .. 3..,•. .-.':-.:: ',. _ .k - � ,,...' Kt'°-. .,r q ::e�'"�"-. ,.t� •rT!.� p ? ?cJ'.'-:., VIX ..�.' j► .ia J- Y a'- ✓ '•'t I l .'i.. � ..f hM. r'�' .�,a"�w '�f �%l''r Y e,,1,, _. ._y� r, a'n .. :. :�1,. a .. :. : •.. -' •.`,.. ., ....s-,� ,• ,y -.. _ ...�- r A�'' �`4Y� r� - atal` ��G' ^1"•+eG ,.. ,QI. <, ' s , a �f :-.. .'. _ i_,.... � .,:a. . � :_ - � ,5,•' .,,, .. R ...3 R},�,�isj yy •�>y.. �t,v 4'�. ..: � -'al' .[. .- ..., ,:- r • 1. -. � • .. ✓ S - >t:'. •_Yi :Sr.: a�> _. ,, "'➢R {-. 'a .r.,� - .. C' ►" f�a _... .. r+. � r�3'w'y, �,-'� •�1�' -z ,�y .s 4 I A a #,. v. '� -., • ., .. --. .. =.,. .... Y�"Eo ''IS �. .z 7..., _ ,.:_ --,. yy • , ".a .. ',.....:t r s ,_.•.. ,:.:. '.. .. , :. .. :. ,f,.'-1 b. $: 'Y. 4,:. -. ... -. ..:.r� e�rr. crX.,.-:.w-: - r.. M� a .• a... Y'"e % .. i. t� "!" f-` _ ,�;;... h�, '�wT•A•t� y9 +,,I, . +I'_ .., ,....>,c �, ta�F�'•k'..: ,,,h r, : 'la Com:a „Rt - '',F '� - �i� 7y "F� �F�, r A'� . �. 1"..,t .: . ,. ;z~'s-,;,tats_. .., a K ?:' -��.� -•� ,e�' ,:.... d•% I"�r ♦ - .t J, , - >•.,:.. � - e ..��. �.... ,art f ] �" {! y'. tij.'�'4=' y-r-. yr 4. ., b d 15' ! :r .'-rpt - ... .... ... a. ,6. ...5- ... {, n��4'k`.y,�� -':'•T-_,J. ,k ;+''. .> i� .. - JIF �-:.;. C r. ,�,.... .. + A.. -v �- � a, *�•` �_�. -'' i- a..r'�� 'ap Pi ��+^(,�u a•, :� , � .. ,:. :., ..... s,�. ....` .. -'yf. r,, Y ;.K:aJ::� � f >,i _ � {�� tt�'0 ��{ �{i� •�,:�::t'f,-.:'.. j, IT .i .. !II a .. J A �..} nY '.:- .. �., {.i'1 a s `.-. "- : 1. • C f. ��• 1`•l: i/ �, ( }l % *.Y •t•as''� . s� ,L.': `•� :� r,r.' '� F-J- alb.•• - S.. i- J Y• 9 r�{{ t .y s 'T f F i f r` d hr a+: 7 L re , t . ,-.. J i .. .. .. ,,,•. ::,. _-. .:�,: .. .."r�x .a.;::.,o '.. .5 y,k S r'• 9.: Sri¢.. !A - a ' , r 3' F,t ! ••. +. r;s : .: rr •.: f '^':y�r: �4,. � �. t 'rl - [12, ;: �s-' >�:Y .ti�,G. $,•'.11,.>�ur.:. a' - ,i�~: IF WWIit .:`�. �a ',ni:, iA4 :r^'-T' �-' - ,"er''> �'� 3 ! `r•` '�': l-' •+! r VS �-`.,an �•� :-h •`at �,:.�k::- , t , e - F �+, '. xF y :� �ar:�•;eY r C. r .�� ,� Rta, '.c'r'� -�y ,J fes" ,1, -. ♦ ,j t� ,1I i i'yi -C .a y. •• .:' •''iJ X. -,. „n r J- a S .. ,•.51s I' �r.:a•J .` {''''> � _ .. r,- �•�. ._.•c. } y� � � :Z �„ti,�r.�,;,S s• F4 i be x• •YFa1�, � '.�'- - - •.y, .t rx;. ..�-�:, �L -5 ..f 't i. •::/_ ..1` r�.�. :11 is . Y F • :...' .. :Lt� .l._ W .. • okr, _3 � . ..,e C: e1 .. .. _ ,.. , iry� r . . ... 'liMe tc A'.� -'"•1t.• y.- a-. -. V,T �-- - - :gin . . wl��-,r . .. .. -. ._ 'S, +y - - y - d rt.. •,, • - „• yr•, - :.+- ,. '�'.^a ., ...x.Yr �. _. _s . .• " ,[`fie[.a f 'i'� 4, :' `� - .. ..'T .e+a ,.. .. .. ..t�•, .. G ,i ex�i„ ,_.- _. � . -. .y+: a' ,ilt �''F t Y.-: -..'fe.' _ I. -: �. fF. • -7,, ♦ .'- .,, A -. ZiJ :{. :� �ri... r�r•` .. � .F``,, � .,,� i - - T �- r : FY. . S.y.. _ - X11}- •�:'. 'r' l _ � 3 r i y� >3 r } , y�. tri, ^. �,•.Y� ':'� ;.f �•.'r.,x'�7^. •:�n �� l,: _ . Jf�. �.:.,-!!.. . .-.03i .':: }, `� �..yf::?.,: 'rt.• ..-..4-a: ..,. ... Y :}..r•rr.. •'� *:..• j�, :`�S..0,�: _ .. ..,,,y��r� ,..:.. l .5 S • �- ,..,. k., ..-•N�r.+E. .:: •�(-• _ .F -,E -4- �r.', �:-I 'x{' _t .,�'�.. h., _fv..T .. -., -_,. l•x ..�- ... -: ,.. 4 .r ..y. r�.:' L L'. - ). ..�.,... -ti Wi.�. $. r.{:.i r'. ,. ._ .t 'a, :,: a r .�1. .�i� .. ✓... F f o-'-- ,. 3r- lJ�+IlG��1. _ .. ..„yr_.-. :,j "_�1' ,rr•�� - � .: ?!c , .<,,. _ J of . _ . „ a.. n. ,. _ � 4F. `�' '':r '''� .�. •� ,\. ''' �;.�,�h:' � .�- rR� ;.. „• R� . - a- y :. ,,.. •' .f,.. r. 1. Z - is l wt f 4 ..,TS ter%' i p y - .+ "F'-: gyp «} • l *Itl'. �^x- .•'Cit 4. : 1 ' `a'< .: $,_, ,'.. . . �' '� ; .- :. r.... ,. ." �. .. ;. ) ..... .-.'. � :., '#E. .s:,., .1 .,,• Imo. f�. fir. ;+.� : , � .. "- .. r..•n -. .igl}'_._. . v.+'��.• erC- .. `•'!�J" '•i✓.+•5, Y� "7•+e. ..`�, i A'w:.:_C,;. •. 1,^i '^: r n• _ .. .,. qt. , � l: w It =�� .-�,_" , ,., ..T' ,, ,.E i '}. ! .ri L y , y�¢� : �.'" , 2' fiyr�,... .. ',. a _, .\ a 1X ..ca . :. v '. a ',. -•,�Y _, .. _� �,£' ,.. „ra ..,. ..,.a ..-. _, . .. Via; ..: '," .!�>. _�; •k., X�`a,� �i�`; :i3�'.a�y,�„�:' , .. +,1 , S,+w� 'S 4r._:k. .'� �. _ S� _ ,:'i�_ : /i. -.#' .--�'t-:- F•3 -i'•v tsYi. r .b• �� .s �- ,.� ._ : .. .; ,... ... 4 t ,> i. d!.: �. - ::.�i,.,:�•�. '�:� .,s �=,rif - •, r', 4}.•::�f}. Vit•,,.. rS _ .. ... F - �" ^,.:-• -.s: If. . r4 a N�•,.J._- 'r,.: .- : Z-, YF. ,,.:. : �.. ..-... , .,..,. . 1r i �,. +{'.v..'•.a � ...,4':. : ., 75. tl 1 ': 4: ..,.� -iy�(_:P- .. ,.,' rr"�1:r'if � ,. A:'-,+�,.• J F,�e' = r 'A , r :.,, ,'i• •v ..tom:_. 'R': , _.",z . . _. __,.31�,. ._ >-• ,_ �q� , - +i@' ,� l3' ,.�.flip., 1 .,_. _.,� .� r e� ',_.� -�•:. ..,- ... a _... a:-. .. :41 ti ,. ,,.� w:_ �...., x _]+,a- '�i; .rxaz •'lir; =`;�.�:-, .,. - .1 !�! ... n � :, .. '_ ...,. .. .. ..-: '.'-ate # •+�• zT i < _r" ..!iF' .,. . ..+,r--. n, l�; :.s¢r'f-"F' t' :. ..•.. . rc-•.; .�«t'•-, " .r..s •i�,:' ,:cx- 'IY:a."?fvtia:,. .•r to i J 7 L h a f '.,. ":.l '...t .. ... �:r., - .. � , - �. � ',�'.-�. .::. gy[� +ate n' ,,',L]�i,,'.., :I •�• t.. "~4�-..: Zw , " r t , � ..:� F,' .,r.Sid`. i `� .+,fir,•.•, ,f t�-•T �^ w. ,a Y4 J ) i, _ rr r 4. i^ , - ,�,eg .{! n .<.. Y♦_... .�.3•. ,' v,' n�j.,�.4i. . A. -:. t :. C .- ±P �.1f,_ v'.. -'"}y ,,- .. , .......,�. :: •.., i" fJF' iii. ,. 1.- ".. . -' ? I .1 i{'� 4�,. .4r '�t � - d � _v.f•- • � -. Ir<). '; MW,r ,y'. .- .. �� `�._:. ',"„'N• �+.�,c 5.. .. r ♦. : ... 5... ,, ,:.+n _ .: ' _. <R.1 ..... '.'.: •_ , ..• 4 �K-r;f 5' a M. ,1 s ...F �Y.: :h.'-. .. .. -,. - ,: ,, M t!,..: .t a. : M :,r .- .. ...: ... .:. .c :' $' rC. �✓Y .a � i �. ^''�, j�.x M_ .• .. ,� .. -,, e, ..:: - � . x. ,.,.,:. � T%•. �rr om. w ., ... .. ... . i�, `-. y. _ ... 'rL► ,. ... ..:�m t•, * .as',r ? � .X.-,t..r ;5- :,r r '.,=.�.a~. -'�rJ. ,,. . - �r .lets., .?r .� _'�. o... «r.r .. .._ •-.. -r'�). h. :. .. ,r: �: c�� . ., ;r -C .. ""' �t�,�rr'..�� •t 7' 'ki .�-^ - , ... X•r _._ ..- �rG;,, "r, i Y,fi 'xr'i! ..A -.r's ��{ ; ',s, K� .. •, > .. ..' '- -. -. -. .t.,,.. "!.., ..... .,.,>,:. ,:' � aYAv -:r .. ,,,. .� ,. r �,.. .. .'. :.. .._._'.b - {,� .1 /,�I•) ':.i+ ,'t _.y t:.-V �4' '_? .f _i� ♦ : � .. .. '.r �♦ 'S v �.(.k ,�wl ?•: .�, .�, Y{''7 r�1 '.S{�,<, •9 � ,.-'S',. ..l .-. ,J-,�. . .r. �r".^� v- u: T..: ... M1 ... I� +„i 'T. �F� �' ,ry. ,G '•S,� •.•�•" - _ _:J: v r 4 , ,u. .+F' Y : . ., i .v_ :' .. -e_ „ .. •-F: ,..f..e f:J. ,.�,- - ... „ 1. .F `S:: .f r T, .. � :, ,.::rx" ^... ,.ts..: .... :. .r,.- .. � •. ;. 4 •C �• �''� - �"t�,..:-' � TMS. _ ...,. ,}r.- ,,. s, .. ,. ,.,,.l.a ...,..:. ._.:, ., .. ,�., ,' � �' i .. C .�•�� ,�•I .ani!• �d `•�, _ ..'7 -.dr:'_ ' -•.r -A 1' s - R ,i. �. .. : , .,: .r., ': ,. '>, _,.� _ .. .. - .:may► r:y. ?t..+s" � ,- .. , � :.. _. '' .,,N r.' y • t•.. .it .. t ... .r .u . . .. _ _ :Rd r� ,,r'� .w. :7r� 1 v -3"�4a ., , . � i'{, �`* l' .r: l,, -t�•r r-71.+,1...:t�: �f� i.: 'd r Z ti,.r.• ... .�s ,`'� rpt'+ ,...�., L` ;{, M ,. :.� rti�.< w 'r�r , - r' -¢. �.��^ .,if• -:vr 1 -k f" �,n"_.(`.'�'�,r i�' e,ij 71�'.� t T... �.. .:' •,. ... � .. '. At. ',t-., _ � ,r ..: iz'�rt: ,-,.: ;:- -:w,..a .. .. :•' Str t rt'i„i _ _A. + ,• -`• ,. fir( aF, -. - .r ti 'rEE.... :.::... v. i- t.. .. ,'�, .-� ^•�'.., t":4h ,! '.,a,a ♦ham.. �iT, ; - Y 1 t��+• �;y i r e .':� t fi' ...-. .-, u 'i • n, -�_Jf... - �, r5 `r a :t` ,,r� zT Sr , v ti ay � t1 ,_.. $ -} .Y. d / /?:'�'•� is ..:� - JIM mr ml ., _ A . .. - �.:.. - ',., .: .u'Y .,.�„y. .,j,. Yti R^i��!•. .. Y.: �' � . .'�' .'=�'J,*' s `r wY ; , -y(f ` i, i •- S, •1 . i 'L ' •I r ti � tr ) f i, . , s , >.R �.,ip : .•�c it r�;. M^ .;� t ,.,1 .w�-.+t'� �' , •��$-•. - c�thtr�'"' �},, � '�4r .%:,.. '�• ''". � '�' 1 • ,, ��SI'i1� r� ,}+'..i i. �'a� E� �' ;`y'r• •k - � d` ,��,- •r may.. .�'.. -. •�,7 1,:��' it �' � i" •�' �„ : �" r amu.r �,�� , «: Q.- .,. '-... �,a. -..+ 4t. , •-�••, � ..'}..-. :' .. ,. ,.,5 � r6 � t ?(" ..'~t't." _ _ "lrr� ;` .j.. �.. �' 7..'Wit... .� . '' .K .i.r •ty,, �, :Y � L :�„ .. � � -.. ..,,. .' j. ,�� a ...af f. :,. ,..' .. ... ,. � /� � �•,t,;�' � j(�t ♦ .t� yrs. t -, + t.t , .. •`l _ "'� �•` '1 n•J ' .. - , � '�� -• � � � nK Y fl ar , 'A :J'- s .VT '1 .:,T �` T - y �. y •� LKS♦ • � � � 5� ,syr .:-p :, -� -• ,. .. ��. �a' „`iq _;tr,. `.1...`• 4r'- 1 ,ti f !: x•> � i ..�.� s ��,`•" _ h:. . • ,... .• i . ;��d'�� '� ,J :I �_,w �..."�b •� T.:: � A�... iy �TL., hli ,.L ,�`v� ••li` . :y,�..J:-'t'� - iI !••,lw..:. 7� �r {•� ..:� e j. � � C r- < � L .., .;� u.; ti �� _ _ �'� .y _ t xr r-•;.' � '/t ''k. ^,4fG�'��V"� � x\ .d« �' •'r� ,k �t� Yrs �7+� � L. y^ � Y. -3 ^rn`•a.- ar }�...'Sf'v"S �}��K�f. E'� ,.•�.�.. .'t -S.,l �'i.:.l ice.,-. . ••1 7 :....^i': ^.3 4... Nk., : �^F,p.', �. , . • ?" ''-fid .�� `' -------- J1"4 _ 6J1"a n - ..�y,.,.* :.rf.• `� � yr_• •",•`•.• :51 s . -f_. ..• ,: � '•rim � .., -�.,,,rr�gg � } }}. ty- , .: �' ,y, -, .. a. e.. , ,. � �-�y s 'i_. �'{ k� :• F ��,+�(:. , "fir' 4 •M" , - 'An +. .. „" ..a r >.,.� [ �'• .'� ?. .. .:� :.« ..�,:. :eF ?J`r4♦ ,�.. :r a , W 'iS r , .1. "-� 4fY •2` .. .-.;: rr •�-:-'♦' ;,_ ..n>' 3:., .. , '.. ,• ". J.. '.. '.1••' Y".� r',��`'�1- •l.. r x',,1 r .c- - 'S.. . : ,. .�. .,:• s : 5. ".� ,.>, :. _•Y;,:. ,.r `�..,. _w •^,' iC.J -.•7 iF 1 1 --. a .1-i ..', . ,<:. " � /- a :::. ..: .-..., ' .. - ,-. -fi.y",.a..., � .. ""tw,?a- .,t�', 'o.e`"' h?.• n.:. A :�.. [ N.,. GY i -..'l .'�F.'�"i.-I ' •. - > �'i` .. ::e� r.:.. .... .. ::: _ _ -S: -.=J.y �- ,,��,,��tt� •Y r.''. M'�R� .�� "i.. ,k} ... +..._, r y.'i .. �:, .. �.:�. -.c .. ,,,.. ,#i!• .,: .... - _ .r - +.0-�-.,f-. Jam. �-� - ! .. S. .l�� a, .'k.� '� v' �-F•..: ..� ::. x �. -.. •4. -.. � :i�-vtr•f.�. f ..W .:� yy' .�. -.:�- fj -, ry� •ry , ..::.u.� +7j7� sa' -Y.}. a y�.:-. n• ,a .:, +t e : - ,Vi. :{�. - �i, ."{i1 :4'y� �� ,y '-•,V,fF, '� '.�. r- .•�_ s.5:. •.lir l +' .. x`'•i sr G, -•� %�.I[^r� a .. .... S i`..., , �.., .,..>} ;..:, ..->j•7.��.1'ZFJd ...� : ..:• � ,., x.,rE:,,c ss �f,,�.k :�7� •f. �� p�':�.,'. . . � !. • . .. A4., .: '.. '� k : _ ••� �>.. -,. ,..,.,.� ,.. .. .':'F+. - :. :x ,.a; n t:,,[' :.•.'� i2:.. ."�°'..". a. .a: 4. �"'�F��.- .i 1:r7._ � 1c. -:2� �•`2�`.»�•'' 1 Yi r :t .b<••z trt y r .k .rt t T .. -Fr. -'...�rl :. '�. _ "1. `T1.� �. -_ .-f. 'A.•,c. .. A^:. _ �" ? .t' ! !',.. i., .. -: 1 ..,r w -, o >- r-,... _!' 'S'. . ti :. ;. .. , - :�-- -.7,,.C>[_, .... :. A,, ',�.� _ r r+% 1. f•i'- Vr�t �-S^ vT s'" '.. _ � .,. �•••sem. .�-�r, -.�a .,. z� F.,,. G _'y'. ':- .s -' l` - t•+ .,�.' „�';.. •� �':�. .y. SS r... ., �; .. e , ... � ,r .,.-..'........�� -.-,.'� .� "*M5. .r" sfr•. ,. , ,. .. :,.. .,,- � - .-'r'• :,;,'�•^ d 'r. �'r .,�:^ r . : ,, - � •. • .. .^7 .I- 1 .: :1.,. .. .. .,. - •: �.,. ::- �): ..iM� ." ,•.7,., .�i 1. Y4,�,r:,�':rV ;,{ � n1,i"i 4 �•-,!"fie �r ;T?K sy 'F '. :, - ..✓.. y. .. - :.h.. tip. .e. F. � -. .... _ �- ... -_ �Y. ,:f'y> � ., �..�''. •7' f ...- - �,v<. � .� !•':.. .....,, � ., ... _ ..,h',,, .,rte ..' .�, .. M .._.. - �i., -<:.;'t �_ - � .: !r . .,_ .. -�.,,. .. ....� t. )i3 +> ..-, _. t •o f•.",. .i" �� r' � �'`" e� `jY5}..Y.n �'.�� :.t .. .. •..,y •� -,:. :.. -_'.. y ,..._„_.e ...,. .. r. ..Ti �...- _ : .: ..J pit•.. �� .• .�t}.;•r. •'/ . 5, :,�'Ii. .r ;. _ rj` f_, r �? ,4' a' ;� a •h. �k�-4M ,ti'>,, Jl :. 5li ,-i<..... .� S ,. •. .. r:, �., �, _ .}i. -iTi,- _:YY> Lxi+ .+Si'tf' ,S Fi':. t N` 'f -7v 1� ��"- '• - -- '-, _ �. .:: ._.. Y►. � _y' .:. ":r ,. ,+6 jt 3 ... K... F - � .wtt• C�` , �' . ....✓`••. ,. . ... I ,-s •... .►r it ... .- .... ., S.',5•._..r + s t...,. ..1�.,+�'. -. :: .n'�,v �.Mi•" ,�d. "3'. .+.1\�. ...�: :� �i Y� . �' a � '..'. 'r!� r. - vr. ♦ ai ....: tq o -.SCS• • .. ...,1 ,�W�. Cf <. 2 .-. .. •s..... 't i1 5;.' - ..•� .. .: _ •. Y .� ♦y.. ,.. r-..�•.* �y3 �.J•• _ •::�' ��r �ya�1., • +li ��_�}t'IL � _ r: 5 a. �.. ..." -..!: ; :.,/'. -.y,�. :f,. 3•>.y •7.Y.., :'1#,•.. �"^...-_. e.. .,. --.•e a.^^,, _. '� � �: .� '; '.: - �y,. l F 4t. -,+` ,..4 l � f�� in � .:_+t c. .. .S+r: _ ,.r .�p ,',:. � �. �{' k , / t • •h:>. i �. .. ,r. `. .'�-...y .. } J,i•t :..K '.._�r9r- .u.: 'ia�,'ir,� �1' �' r ,•-1. ' <. TI},.,� a .. .-, yr .s -d y 'i.. ,i". ryr f. �.ti � _ �1 h.•' p,i :� �• -.�- ^�-.''f.±• � f kb ;� e a" l .. JXa. ne • •,. ,j ,. _ ,.'- '±%Y'.. .e': ..7y ".,>.. •♦; `�' k a., �c� :i hr.. l: '-.. .., -p"E'f • ... Sr.;E Y _. , ., . ... -_: t .� :. ..g."♦ �F'r rr. `�� 't• if'. - h"" -. •r`s •� lid E t. � .�.r 'h ��?. .r'�v i<. :%..} -,� 3 .:� ".•',i". � �r'1�•� ?r#!` a" 4` _ 5: �r: t�r<' ,1 .y i.•y.'s k,:l 7�' '' •.i• + - >•� « -, F ..: � �... ,. ..+� � :y� - .t :" ;: � -- : � ' -- •�,�7`t�`: -[ a 3�i 1 'i -r: :��` ",r !;`':'4:��+."�' _-'"i '.,tiav--, '.,,,.. :.. r' t ::�[` a+• h :i. �-- - a a 'Y ��•y '1., t: ,:r�-T,.r-•j�> ,t Y ..� ie :t~•. •y 5. 1;,. ,.fir,- ,j1' 4 ;.•y-. S 3, :; ,� ... t l ..�. y - . _.::. •...,. .a i - J .r +l •{J r. :.r.. 1�. S:-, ... ,,, � - _ ,- ,' �--•- .._, X-1711,r{� p ..��•, moi, �• x-�' . .f.. �7 ' . . �. - ..: : .. "..ID .rw �:. -'}" y , 4 ...t. -'♦. :1 '.'; .✓h f of "J.ry. ,.1�ti� ..ry,. �.7y,♦. �: :�_;.. r - ,• 'i'*!'1 �,ry`5 � 4f p �, .. . . -.. . ,�, ." R f Y:. ..•�'�[ = t. ,�. ;. .. „' .,r .._ .._--•.'� r ,., vr• _r .,. .✓'<. .. :., ♦ � � ..-. ��. ^:rx- i'•' Jar•' .� .... l�-,� - -. 't -..-.,' ii". ,. .y _ s,> ,r. :u *�, -.•R t.(('{e - ,, J a.-' >!•'. :r, „ • r .. ..^,. -• "•r. i ...�r!�r fy'«.�� sf w'' �3r� ',L_ q•, Iy .k' ti a .....,; _�. ,�•., .z,,A' � �.. .<._. :> - r � � _ .: .i.� ♦ r .-#c:`t:, '�-�iM' .� t�y fir:?' s r -'�� I J .l s. .s. Ss � .� .�•.. _ r � �- :. .._i S. �`,. '7{'y.r)}., +.i+ 'i Sr d ?5Py"•. .at-. .�-'. ,.r �`�}¢ r,• .:� _ i .S.'." t`i'> S --#- •e.,' . y , , 5[ f .Jo- r .. >7: _ ..)„ t.- ..►F_ •' :.. 'is73•.' - '.'�yY f.. ` ':r�,�y �`�'. '� r.� 3:� .� i', ,". ,.�`rk�ref-> .t `� ,-�' , - .. , ! .- 7. .kr' :'r �� .. ! ' � --�utC",.. L :'r:.. � `• - }., A+l• 4 •�2� •-(b �?•� 'k,1� ,�f.•,± ..S , .'- ,:. �' ._ �� 7, ♦ .. _ '__""rte :�,., .a' `-.,r, •►; F*•.�t � f>•* 1' � t� ?t y 3. � { Jam' w , �.- r..^c �tr.xy ..+. �.�., , v ,�,v!• ,�,+ o F r .� ', r r :: Y �.. ,. NG:a •, ^. :.:t'::' sa.. '•'d, f• _K. _ Y .ta - -1.1 8S' .4�., !' •i� `-✓!r 17 740 , r y ', i>an .. ;�>.. ,•�'� ' .• ' .! ...` '. `a flf 1i��'.� Tr• _ ,.T �.it.: - rJi� '�-�� Tir{Ki' ^ Y� 1 t `r � ri�..;� '. .,) .,5.'.<E.:,r r ,,r �t� •�_,�_ -y' �.,.+ t.,e� •*sr-., -C :fir Zvi 41 ,sr.,'7.' V r , G .s'/. i _ y��Y 1-. J?�rrr .'. ): 1� 7� t n r�' � f�� .'2,} 'ate♦ [ t ` i`` / -' � ,r v+.t }:y A .,,�'1 f{:; .. z :.: ><• t a �." �''"� ''�'.-S �` IV. i 1 r• .,:.,�� _ .....�� s y.'�S-+ •T•; ,r%',f�� A 'd � �' t a�''ana,� ,�.�, y.;{i `:�•. ;'• `.�y.,�;`r �{• .,��.. � s:f. V. , '.. ., .,5.!' .r�/' �....� ..>, ., .:. �.:. �- ._ .. ;, .. I„F�">,+..f,• S'r FY�• ,�+ �'i s.�.5 � fqn� �,'``.r�� i�l'1. �}i•y,�i�.y f ,- � f,� ..� �,;:�`_ %'ia x•, �'�-• - .,L ''' •SEf'�ak-'_. r ”" tw` tis a '�' A a•i fc -.-51 ��••^"^�•• - � �„d .. Br' `t. .�..* t(a• t- i,H__..X'Y^1"�'� ��'�� .♦�xt 4;;.J'-r�^�4~�ty�� >•`w i t �.,�- - .G ,. Y' -c. d?r�.c"{C • - �� t�4"�S;a �}fir`,,.t' ' S }{,�3 .ii,;�r tt� f: � 5- -p. �. -. "r7rf�,sy�.IP}FSrT.:`�. �• '�x ..�•.,-�`'.'E:7�La.- �! • NIIYDepartment IDPII1,;; . CUOMO TATIE OF: � Transportation A,,,,�, ,. CcGovernorVIII°cIII,,,,,,W J. DFUSC01 III,,, Coirynissioner P 1 RL 1' , .. " - ,. JOSIEPI,,,i T. BROWN,TIRE August 16, 2016Y 2 % 2QI' rvw�sou F6'6ijTR�� _ Rianniag Board Mr. John J. Condon, P.E. ° -° Condon Engineering, P.0 1755 Sigsbee Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Your June 14 & July 21, 2016 Submissions Cross Sound Ferry-Terminal Water Service NY 25, Orient Point SCTM 1000-01500-0900-011001 Our Case No. 55932 Dear Mr. Condon: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. In order to work within the right of way of NY 25, a NYSDOT Highway Work Permit will be required. At this time, we have the following general comments in regards to the submission for the subject site: 1. It appears that the owner of the facility, Cross Sound Ferry, is a private entity. A NYSDOT Use & Occupancy Permit from us will also be required. Please contact Mr. Bruce Branigan from our Office of Right of Way at (631) 952-6806 for further direction in the matter. Highway Work Permit issuance is subject to satisfactory disposition of this issue. 2. The plans shall include cross-section showing that the line is a minimum of five (5) feet below grade. Site plan approval for Highway Work Permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter, no further revisions are made to the plans once we approve them and the municipality has issued site plan approval. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. .,, 2m �p4www a�W�� "�We tlg,�A,, Hauppauge, u d�^��u� 7��'!i�I �»,ra��ii.o:Np �o.o �� k��ow��;!��Bo�n��¢�Grp,u9�bw�,, Mr. John J. Condon, P.E. August 16, 2016 Page 2 of 2 Kindly submit three (3) sets of revised plans. All other required submission items are listed below: • Completed, signed Highway Work Permit application, Perm 32 (Available on our website www.dot.ny.gov/permits). • Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): Base fee of $32.00 + $0.32/linear foot of line in NY 25 ROW (All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number). • Surety Bond, Guarantee Deposit or Letter of Credit Amount: $5,000.00 (Perm 44 Sample Surety Bond form available online. • Insurance Requirements: Acord 25 (minimum limits $5,000,000.00) with NYSDOT as an additional insured. The Certificate Holder's box on the Acord form should read NYSDOT Traffic Engineering & Safety, 250 Veterans Memorial Highway, Rm. 6A-7, Hauppauge, NY 11788. • Acord 855. • Provide proof of Workers Compensation Insurance (Form C-105.2, U-26,3 or SI- 12) or proof of exemption (Form, CE-200). • Provide proof of Disability Benefits Coverage (Form DB-120.1 or DB-155) or proof of exemption Form CE 200). All forms should be secured by the same entity. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952- 7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Permit Section Manager Traffic Safety and Mobility Group cc: Mr. Vincent M. Orlando, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Mr. Donald Wilcenski, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:rq NEWYORK Department of ANDRIEW M. C M STATE OF Governor EI, OPPORTUNITY. Transportation MATTHIEW J. IDIRISCII,,,L Commissioner JOSEPH T.IRIROWIN,P.E. Regional Director May 5, 2016 i Ct .. - Mr. John J. Condon, P.E. Sou qWWr%� Condon Engineering, P.0 Planning Bad 1755 Sigsbee Road mM Mattituck, NY 11952 Your April 4, 2016 Submission Cross Sound Ferry Terminal Water Service NY 25, Orient Point SCTM 1000-01500-0900-011001 Case No 16-55932 Dear Mr. Condon: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. In order to work within the right of way of Route 25, a NYSDOT Highway Work Permit will be required. At this time, we have the following general comments in regards to the submission for the subject site: 1. Please identify the owner of the water line being installed. If the owner is a private entity, a Use & Occupancy Permit from us will also be required. Please contact Mr. Bruce Branigan from our Office of Right of Way at (631) 952-6092 for further direction in the matter. 2. The plans shall show all NY 25 Right of Way (ROW) lines and the longitudinal length of the entire water line within the NY 25 ROW. Attached is a copy of our Record Plan for this location to assist you. 3. Please provide all construction details referenced to our standards and specifications. The excavations will be five (5) feet or greater. Provide sheeting details signed by a NYS Licensed Professional Engineer. 4. The plans shall show that the new line will be installed a minimum of five (5) feet below grade of the NY 25 pavement as per the requirements outlined in publication titled "Requirements For the Design and Construction of Underground Utility Installations within the State Highway Right-of Way", also know as the "blue book." This publication can be referenced on our website at wwW................. ... ..i:.y.m.q. 7 �; iMriMr: ..IC: . 250 Vrdfears N6erncn1@1 [IPyhway „-,D�eite 6A-7, f i,aimay�pl vete, P,,JY 11 M:3� vvwva clr5t ny gov Mr. John J. Condon, P.E. May 5, 2016 Page 2 of 3 5. Erosion control details shall be provided depicting how excavated soil from trenches will be contained and stabilized. 6. A Landscape Plan was not located in the plan set. All disturbed areas of the ROW that were vegetated should be stabilized with permanent plant material. Coastal grasses (i.e., beach grass) may be satisfactory. 7. Provide Work Zone Traffic Control (WZTC) Plans for appropriate shoulder, travel lane and sidewalk closures schemes as necessary for all required mitigation items. All WZTC plans must be in accordance with the current National Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and NYSDOT Supplement. The plan must include the note: "All Lanes Must Be Open To Traffic Before 10am And After 3pm. No Lane Closings Are Permitted On Weekends Or Holidays. Nighttime Lane Closings Will Not Be Permitted Without Prior Approval From The State Permit Inspector." 8. The plan shall include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." 9. We recommend that permanent survey markers be installed at the property limits along NY 25 and that ROW markers be installed at any intermediary turning points along the State highway frontage in accordance with NYSDOT Standard Sheet 625. Please include the appropriate detail. 10.A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the site frontage at the completion of construction. Please submit one (1) paper copy of the plans and one (1) paper copy of a response letter and one (1) electronic copy of each of the noted items in "pdf' format. The response letter shall state how the above comments are addressed, item by item. The electronic plan set shall be provided as a complete file, not individual sheets. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-6152 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachment: Record Plan Mr. John J. Condon, P.E. May 5, 2016 Page 3 of 3 cc: Mr. Vincent M. Orlando, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Mr. Donald Wilcenski, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:rq CUOMO STATE OF ®Governor OPPORTUNITY. Transportation MATTHEW J.DRISCOLL Commissioner JOSEPH T.BROWN,P.E. Regional Director April 8 2016 � � Mr. John J. Condon, P.E. 1, 151 1�,�iiW Condon Engineering, P.0 1755 Sigsbee Road Na'a ing Board Mattituck, NY 11952 Your April 4 2016 Submission Cross Sound Fer Terminal Water Service NY 25 Orient Point SCTM 1000-01500-0900-011001 Case No 16-55932 Dear Mr. Condon: This is to acknowledge receipt of the subject submission for the above project application. In order to work within the NY 25 Right of Way, a NYSDOT Highway Work Permit will be required. We are in the process of reviewing this submission. When our review is complete, we will notify you by letter to provide you with further direction in the Highway Work Permit process. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952- 7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Please always refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map Number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety ?,r(1\/4,tr:i ,u i„ I�r,';^rrir,rirxf I°IIT fnnMr ,...`.rut , ' r 1 ral ,,Frix�z,a,Ped ° 1 fP?,fir Wv'm'.rrJot ny r,oV Mr. John J. Condon, P.E. April 8, 2016 _PWe 2 of 2 cc: Mr. Vincent M. Orlando, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Mr. Donald Wilcenski, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:rq _77 .7, CHARLES R. CUDDY F5 Attorney at Law AUG I 445 Griffing Avenue Riverhead,NY 11901 Mailing Address: Tel:(631)369-8200 PO Box 1547 Fax:(631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 e-mail: charles.cuddy Oiverizon.net August 14, 2013 Donald J. Wilcenski,,Chairm an Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Cross Sound Ferry-Site Plan Dear Mr. Wilcenski: As you know, I represent Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. For a number of months we have been discussing with the planning staff and also the Planning Board updating the site plan and then proceeding to have additional parking approved. I was surprised and disappointed to learn that while I was before the Board and meeting with the planning staff that no one mentioned the proposed changes for the Marine II District involving the new regulations affecting the ferry. Whether intended- or not, the impact of these proposed regulations was enormous. I'm hopeful that if there is a future proposal concerning new ferry regulations that I would be apprised and be able to contribute to the discussion. I believe this would have a beneficial result. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy. CRC:ik Enclosures, WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, June 3, 2013 4:00 p.m. Southold Town Meeting Hall 2:30 p.m. Special Executive Session re: Legal Advice —Annex Board Room 4:00 p.m. Applications —Town Meeting Hall 5:30 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda Applications: Project name: ( Cross Sound Ferry SCTM#: 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1, I _ _I 15.1, 3.5 Location: NYS Route 25, Orient Descriptions — — Submitted existing conditions survey of the entire site Status:_ _ Pre-submission Action: Applicant's agent to discuss what is to be included in the amended site plan application required by the Planning Board. Attachments: I None 1000-120-3-11.11 Project name: Peter Harbes Open Development t SCTM#: i Area — Lot Creation --_ Location: _ _—j—Aldrich_Lane, Laurel_ Description: This proposed conservation subdivision is to subdivide a 22.1659-acre € parcel into 4 lots, one of which the Town of Southold purchased the _ — Development Rights over 18 acres for farmland preservation. Status: — New Application _ Action: _ -- Review for Final Plat completeness_ - ----- -_ Attachments: LStaff Report Project name: Carbone & Horse Head Corp. SCTM#: 1000-1-2-5 Location: _ _ 5671 & 6227 Castle Road Fishers Island Description: This proposed Lot Line Change will transfer 0.4 acres from SCTM#1000- 1-2-6 to SCTM#1000-1-2-5. Lot 5 is located in the R-120 Zoning District &will increase from 3.2 acres to 3.6 acres and Lot 6 is located in the R- --- acres. I 120 Zoning District &will decrease from 3.4 acres to 3 acres ------------ ---- Status: New Application — Action:_ _ _ Review for completeness_ _ Attachments: j Staff Report Discussion: ❖ Draft Proposal for Planning Board Required Annual Training .i L MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD AEE1%MERS O� OF so�ro� P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKIy Southold,NY 11971 Chair h OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS .Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY G Q 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR COU ' Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 23, 2013 Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Cross Sound Ferry SCTM#1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1, 15.1 & 3.5 Dear Mr. Cuddy: After a substantive review of the file, the Planning Board has had an initial discussion regarding the Existing Conditions Plan you submitted on behalf of the Cross Sound Ferry on February 15, 2013. Due to the fact that the'2002 site plan has been expired for eight years, and that the site has apparently changed configuration from the time of the original 1984 site plan approval and the subsequent 1995 site plan approval (both were incorporated by reference in the 2002 approval), the Board is requiring that an amended site plan application be filed. Further, the Board strongly recommends that any new proposal-for parking in the field to the east of the existing site be included as part of this amended site plan process and be submitted concurrently with the Zoning Board of Appeals. This would provide for the most efficient processing of this application. We also suggest a pre-submission meeting to discuss what is expected to be included on the amended site plan. Please call with any questions. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman CHARLES R. CUDDY Attorney at Law 445 Griffing Avenue Riverhead,NY 11901 Mailing Address: Tel:(631)369-8200 PO Box 1547 Fax:(631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 e-mail: charles.cuddy(a)verizon.net April 24, 2013 Heather Lanza, Planning Director FOR r�� ESouthold Town Planning Department PO Box 1179 2 62013 Southold,NY 11971 i Re: Cross Sound Ferry-Site Plan Fl2flili(IJ auard Dear Ms. Lanza: The Cross Sound management has advised that there has been no increase in the volume of vehicles and passengers in the period of 2005 to present. Please let me know once the site inspection has been completed and what further is required to obtain site plan approval Very truly yours, C�" - 4 Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ik Enclosures I� PC CHARLES R. CUDDY Attorney at Law 445 Griffing Avenue Riverhead,NY 11901 Mailing Address: Tel:(631)369-8200 PO Box 1547 Fax:(631)369-9080 Riverhead,NY 11901 e-mail: charles.cuddylcverizon.net February 13, 2013 Heather Lanza, Planning Director D C U Southold Town Planning Department FEB 5 2013 PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Southold Town Planning Board Re: Cross Sound Ferry-Site Plan Dear Ms. Lanza: Pursuant to earlier discussions with you and Mr.Isler,I am enclosing nine(9)prints of the site plan for the Cross Sound Ferry site showing current conditions. Please review this plan with the Planning Board so Cross Sound Ferry may obtain site plan approval for its existing site. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy CRC:ik Enclosures cc: Frank Isler, Special Town Attorney •i , � J; • I — ♦ � �„-` � •'�•►.` s i ��- � _ • moi. s t `.'moi - - - Y Gh. • �.-� `� . c��2o10OO r, magery Date Sep 20,20 0 +b 4Jy09 17 02-N-' 72 1425.39”W elev 5^ `�` Eye alt 790 it '_'� R� C S FORM NO. 3 �Sv NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL L DATE: August 3, 2005 RENEWED/AMENDED: December 28, 2005 TO: Esseks, Hefter & Angel A/C AW L.I. Realty 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901 Please take notice that your application dated August 3, 2005 For a permit for a narking lot at Location of property: 300 Point Road, Orient, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 15 Block 9 Lot 3.5 & 3.6 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed arkin lot of requires Zonis Board of Appeals gpnroval pursuant to Article XIX Section 100-191H. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: file, Z.B.A., Planning DEC 2 9 2jC) NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY DATE 11/20/2003 473889 SOUTHOLD SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS S06 ROLL SEC TAXABLE RCLS 260 SEASONAL RES TOTAL RES SITE 15.-9-10.1 TOTAL COM SITE 41190 MAIN RD ACCT NO O1 OWNER & MAILING INFO===I=MISC 1________ ______ ASSESSMENT DATA CROSS SOUND FERRY IRS-SS I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT SERVICES INC 1 1 ILAND 3,000 **TAXABLE** 2 FERRY STREET I BANK (TOTAL 6,600 COUNTY 6,600 PO BOX 33 **PRIOR** TOWN 6,600 NEW LONDON CT 06320-0033 1 ILAND 3,000 SCHOOL 6;600 1 ITOTAL 6,600 ==DIMENSIONS===1=====_= SALES INFORMATION ---------------------------------- ACRES 1.25 IBOOK 11654 SALE DATE 10/04/93 SALE PRICE 400,000 IPAGE 612 PR OWNER HBB ASSOCIATES ------=TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0_____________1== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 5 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFD025 IPK065 10M060 IWW020 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIR DATE 11/20/2003 473889 SOUTHOLD• SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS S* ROLL SEC TAXABLE PRCLS 260 SEASONAL RES TOTAL RES SITE 15.-9-11.1 TOTAL COM SITE 41270 MAIN RD ACCT NO 01 OWNER & MAILING INFO===1=MISC I-------- ====== ASSESSMENT DATA----------- CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICE IRS-SS I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT INC 1 1 ILAND 12,000 **TAXABLE** 2 WATER ST I BANK ITOTAL 26,600 COUNTY 26,600 PO BOX 33 **PRIOR** TOWN 26,600 NEW LONDON CT 06320 1 ILAND 12,000 SCHOOL 26,600 1 ITOTAL 26,600 ==DIMENSIONS===1=====_= SALES INFORMATION __________________________________ ACRES 1.50 (BOOK SALE DATE 00/00/00 (PAGE 00000 PR OWNER =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0=-------======= TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 5 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFDO25 IPK065 IOMO60 IWWO20 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU 473889 SOUTHOLD 15.-9-12.1 41370 MAIN RD OWNER & MAILING INFO CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES INC 2 FERRY STREET PO BOX 33 NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIR DATE 11/20/2003 • SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS S* ROLL SEC TAXABLE PRCLS 311 RES VAC LAND TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ===1=MISC 1-------- ------ IRS-SS I **CURRENT** I 1 ILAND I BANK ITOTAL **PRIOR** NEW LONDON CT 06320 1 (LAND I ITOTAL ==DIMENSIONS===1=====_= SALES INFORMATION ACRES .08 (BOOK 11271 SALE DATE 00/00/00 IPAGE 99 PR OWNER ACCT NO 01 ASSESSMENT DATA ----------- RES PERCENT 100 **TAXABLE** 100 COUNTY 100 TOWN 100 100 SCHOOL 100 100 =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 _____________1== TOTAL SPECIAL CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT IFDO25 IPK065 10M060 IWWO20 DISTRICTS 5 === TYPE VALUE F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY DATE 11/20/2003 473889 SOUTHOLD• SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS S• ROLL SEC TAXABLE PRCLS 448 PIER / WHARF TOTAL RES SITE 15.-9-15.1 TOTAL COM SITE 42175 MAIN RD ACCT NO O1 OWNER & MAILING INFO===1=MISC 1________ ______ ASSESSMENT DATA CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICE IRS-SS I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT INC 1 1 (LAND 3,000 **TAXABLE** 2 WATER ST I BANK (TOTAL 7,600 COUNTY 7,600 PO BOX 33 **PRIOR** TOWN 7,600 NEW LONDON CT 06320 1 ILAND 3,000 SCHOOL 7,600 1 (TOTAL 7,600 ==DIMENSIONS========_= SALES INFORMATION __________________________________ ACRES 1.46 IBOOK 1 SALE DATE 00/00/00 IPAGE 00015 PR OWNER __=====TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0=-------======= TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 5 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFD025 IPK065 10M060 IWW020 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU 0 q Ej Ln Er ru c OL ru .0 Postage Ln CerfifieciFee M Return Receipt Fee ark I= (Endorsement Required) C3 F e'uncled DeliveryFee Er (Endorsement Required) M M Total Postage & Fees $ Lri M So --- kTot C -oYSO !NuLL -------- r' Street, No.; ",n C 1T or P09ax No. ri cwss U.S. Postal ServiceT. CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT ru. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ln Ir ru fi W _0 ru oc Postage Ln 1:3 Certified Fee M C3 Return Receipt Fee am Here (Endorsement Required) C3 Restricted Delivery Fee D— (Endorsement Required) M M Total Postage & Fees $ BL Lri C3 Sent To bJAA, M lrti ....... ;;7-7 --------- cwss JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR August 12, 2005 n u OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD VIA FACSIMILE and FIRST CLASS MAIL Mr. Adam Wronowski Cross Sound Ferry Service, Inc. 2 Ferry Street, P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320 William W. Esseks, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 Anthony S. Guardino, Esq. Farrell Fritz, P.C. EAB Plaza Uniondale, NY 11556-1320 Dear Messrs. Wronowski, Esseks and Guardino: Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Boa 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax(631)765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1889 The Town of Southold has been informed that the security level pertaining to the Cross Sound Ferry terminal in Orient has been reduced. As a result, the state of emergency will expire tomorrow at 7 o'clock a.m., and will not be renewed. Accordingly, as of midnight tonight, temporary emergency permission to park vehicles on the residentially -zoned parcel adjacent to the ferry terminal site is hereby revoked. In accordance with my letter dated July 28, 2005, the adjacent parcels, SCTM #1000-15-9- 3.5 and 3.6, will be governed by the existing zoning regulations of the Town of Southold. Parking of vehicles on these parcels is not permitted. Messrs. Wronowski, E'I;seks and Guardino August 12, 2005 Page 2 Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Joshua Y. Horton Supervisor JYH/lk cc: Members of the Town Board Members of the Planning Board Zoning Board of Appeals Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq., Town Attorney Mr. Edward Forrester, Code Enforcement Director Building Department �3 Farrell Fritz, P.C. EAB Plaza Uniondale, New York 11556-1320 Telephone 516.227.0700 Fm 516.227.0777 ww w.farrellfritz. com August 8, 2005 ANTHONY S. GUARDING PARTNER DIRECT DIAL: (631) 367-0782 DIRECT FAX: (516) 336-2244 OUR FILE NUMBER aguardino@farrellfritz.com9999.11 1 BY FAX (631.765.3136) AND REGULAR MAIL 6 1 0 2005 Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, 1 P� and Members of the Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc., Orient Point Terminal Dear Chairperson Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board: As you know, Farrell Fritz was recently retained by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ("CSF") with respect to zoning and other issues that affect CSF's ability to use its Orient Point terminal. It is my understanding from an earlier telephone conversation with Bruno Semon that the Planning Board might be inclined to grant CSF's recent request for an extension of its approved site plan for the so-called "Snack Bar" parcel, provided that CSF agrees to complete the majority of the outstanding site plan conditions within a reasonable period of time. As I mentioned to Mr. Semon, I have not yet received the files from the Esseks law firm. Accordingly, it was not possible to provide Mr. Semon with an indication as to how CSF planned to proceed at this time. While CSF is hopeful that the recent dialogue with the Town will result in an amicable solution to the outstanding issues, it respectfully requests that the Planning Board refrain from taking any enforcement actions with respect to the site plan until after I have an opportunity to review the files and advise my client. Since the resolution of this matter cannot be resolved by any one Board of the Town, I also believe that it would be helpful if the Planning Board could arrange a meeting where representatives of the Cross Sound Ferry could meet with representatives of the Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board to discuss how best to deal with the underlying parking issue. On behalf of Cross Sound Ferry, I thank you for your Anthony S. 0 Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, and Member of the Planning Board August 8, 2005 Page 2 of 2 Cc: John Wronowski Adam Wronowski Richard MacMurray FFDOCSI\643782.01 LI -O6-05 17:05 From- i T-600 P.001/002 F-436 • • & Farnell Fritz, P.C. 1315 EAB Plea t7Rlondale, New York 113-1&1370 Tcicphono 516.2270700 P 516227.0777 www.fencn&ka.com August 8, 2005 ANNONY S. CLARDIPO PAR"KIL playa oui.: (631) 367-0762 OUR FILM NOMRRR V,=CT rnx: (816) 336.2244 9999.11 aeuudlno@f4rrellSitR.com ig MAIL gy 1.7 5.3 AND Hon, Iefflyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, and Members of the planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Ina, Orient Point Terminal Dear Chairperson Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board= As you know, Farrell Fritz was recently retained by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. CICSF') with respect to zoning and other issues that affect CSFs ability to use its Orient Point terminal. It is my understanding tYom an earlier telephone conversation with Bruno Semon that the Planning Board might be inclined to grant CSF's recent request for an extension of its approved site plan for the so-called "Snack Bar" parcel, provided that CSF agrees to complete the majority of the outstanding site plan conditions within a reasonable period of time. As I mentioned to Mr. Semon, I have not yet received the files from the Esseks law firm. Accordingly, it was not possible to provide Mr. Semon with an indication as to how CSF planned to proceed at this time, While CSF is hopeful that the recent dialogue with the Town will result in an amicable solution to the outstanding issues, it respectfully requests that the Planning Board refrain from taking any enforcement actions with respect to the site plan until after I have an opportunity to review the files and advise my client. Since the resolution of this matter cannot be resolved by any one Board of the Town, I also believe that it would be helpful if the Planning Board could arrange a meeting where representatives of the Cross Sound Ferry could meet with representatives of the Town Board, Planning Board and Zoning Board to discuss how best to deal with the underlying parking issue. On behalf of Cross Sound Ferry, T thank you for your S. AUG -9 2005 s AuQ-O6-09 17:09 From- t T-600 ?.002/002 F-436 • Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, mid Member of the Plaming Board August S, 2005 Page 2 of 2 Cc; John Wronowski Adam Wronowski Richard MacMurray PPDXSi,6437MOI • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOU] Ul m , o CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTEu7D Q. ru ru August 8, 2005 Cc Postage $ w Mr. Anthony Guardino o �n�kiFee C3 Retum Receipt Fee Farrell Fritz, P.C. (E^dorsement Requ,md) EAB Plaza Restricted Delivery Fe 0' (Eaiorsemect Required Uniondale, N.Y. 11556-1320 o Total Postage 8 Fees ut 0 amQ C3 T RE: Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY � SCTM# 1000-15-9.1. 11.1 & 15.1 `` wliNir 4t. Y,-- r or POBo ,Vo. Dear Mr. Guardino, MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Postmark Hare The Planning Board held a work session on August 1, 2005 and considered your request to extend the site plan approval dated February 1, 2002 for the site plan of Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY to November 1, 2005. The Planning Board agreed to deny your request, and the site plan has now expired under Town Code §100-255 A. A site visit confirmed that site improvements have not been completed in accordance with the conditions of the approved site plan and resolutions. The Planning Board has referred this matter to the Town of Southold Code Enforcement Officer and the Town Attorney's office for consideration of relevant site plan violations In response to the reference in your August 1, 2005 letter concerning the Planning Board "revisit(ing)" its requirement that a fence be installed on the eastern boundary, please refer to item # 4 of the attached letter dated July 27, 2005 sent to the firm of Esseks, Hefter & Angel which indicates that the Planning Board did give relief from the condition of the approved site plan. Any future applications to the Zoning Board of Appeals, and/or actions of the Town Supervisor, do not relieve your client of the obligation to comply with the conditions of the approved site plan. Very truly yours, 9,.e, 4� le, Z04-0-�� Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Planning Board Chairperson cc: Town Attorney, Code Enforcement, Building Department PLANNING BOP 1L- MEMBERS* JERILYN 13. WOOI 'fOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFIED MAIL— RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED July 27, 2005 Anthony C. Pasca, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 Dear Mr. Pasca: RE: Compliance with Approved Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9.1. 11.1 & 15.1, August 1 2005 Deadline This is a follow-up to our May 9, 2005 letter to Mr. Richard MacMurray, Vice President and General Manager, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. (copy attached) and also in reply to your letter of July 25, 2005. As previously noted, your client has failed to demonstrate compliance with the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and all conditions of approval set forth in the final resolution. Pursuant to Town Code Section 100-255, all work proposed on an approved site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of approval, unless the applicant obtains an extension from the Planning Board. The three-year approval period that elapsed on February 1, 2005, and was extended from that date to August 1, 2005, is about to expire. Site inspections on July 18, 2005, and on July 25, 2005 by Southold Town staff revealed that many of the required elements of the approved February 1, 2002 site plan have not been completed (please refer to attached letter). The following discrepancies were observed on this latest site visit: 1. Lighting is inappropriately placed exactly along a state owned railing located on the New York State portion of a New York State R.O.W., located along the west boundary of that parking lot. It is required that the Cross Sound Ferry comply with the Board's original request, per approved 1 LJ MAILING ADDRESS: SOUTOIoP.O. sox 11 Southold, NY 111 971 T .IL T OFFIC -ON: Tov GIS 5437 its Route 25 (cor. Ma d. & Youngs Ave.) rourm ahold, NY Telepf a: 631765-1938 Fan: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFIED MAIL— RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED July 27, 2005 Anthony C. Pasca, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 Dear Mr. Pasca: RE: Compliance with Approved Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9.1. 11.1 & 15.1, August 1 2005 Deadline This is a follow-up to our May 9, 2005 letter to Mr. Richard MacMurray, Vice President and General Manager, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. (copy attached) and also in reply to your letter of July 25, 2005. As previously noted, your client has failed to demonstrate compliance with the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and all conditions of approval set forth in the final resolution. Pursuant to Town Code Section 100-255, all work proposed on an approved site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of approval, unless the applicant obtains an extension from the Planning Board. The three-year approval period that elapsed on February 1, 2005, and was extended from that date to August 1, 2005, is about to expire. Site inspections on July 18, 2005, and on July 25, 2005 by Southold Town staff revealed that many of the required elements of the approved February 1, 2002 site plan have not been completed (please refer to attached letter). The following discrepancies were observed on this latest site visit: 1. Lighting is inappropriately placed exactly along a state owned railing located on the New York State portion of a New York State R.O.W., located along the west boundary of that parking lot. It is required that the Cross Sound Ferry comply with the Board's original request, per approved 1 0 0 site plan dated February 1, 2002, to place the required lighting on the Cross Sound Ferry side of the Cross Sound Ferry property line, located along the west boundary of that parking lot. Additionally, remove the lighting poles off of the New York State-owned railing located on the New York State R.O.W., thus bringing the parking lot lighting on to the Cross Sound Ferry -owned property. 2. Restore and maintain the two previously required turnaround locations in parking lot, located at entry and exit locations (along the western boundary of the southerly and northerly areas of the parking lot). Refer to the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 for any needed clarification of this parking site requirement. Currently, there are cars parked at this southerly turnaround (required to be fifty feet wide per approved site plan dated February 1, 2002) narrowing it to less than twenty feet in width. 3. As per Jamie Richter, Office of the Town Engineer, we are aware of your assurance that appropriate drainage on the site has been constructed. In order to confirm this, the Town of Southold will perform a site inspection after a heavy rainfall in order to confirm the adequate functioning of the site drainage. As requested you must show current existing site grading, on the requested existing conditions site plan, to establish that parking lot runoff is not directly entering the Sound. If it is determined that runoff is not prevented, or that drainage is not functioning adequately, you must perform the re -grading of the site to comply with the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002. 4. Install the appropriate fence posts on your recently installed fence post footings along the eastern property line. Install roping between said fence posts and immediately cease to use the area east of the property line. 5. There is an awareness (cited by the Cross Sound Ferry at the July 18, 2005 site visit) of a need to create a safe means of pedestrian movement across the site in an east/west direction, providing for pedestrians walking across the site, to and from the parking lot. This issue was raised by Cross Sound Ferry, and the Planning Department would like to know if any plan of action has been provided to resolve this safety issue. 6. Show the Cross Sound Ferry site as it actually exists; specifically, include any and all underwater property owned by the Cross Sound Ferry on this site. 7. Asphalt paving of the eastern handicap parking space is required, but does not exist. Handicap parking improvements required by the February 1, 2001 approved site plan have been partially acted upon but not completely satisfied. 11 N C] 0 Please inform the Planning Board by August 1, 2005 of the completion status of all the remaining outstanding site plan elements indicated in this letter, in the attached letter dated 5/9/2005, and in the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002. Thank you for your prompt attention to this requirement. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson enc. , cc: aichard CacMurray, Cross Sound Ferry Services , Inc. Town Attorney Code Enforcement Building Department Engineering Inspector 3 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL VL DATE: August 3, 2005 TO: Esseks, Hefter & Angel A/C A&J L.I. Realty 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901 Please take notice that your application dated August 3, 2005 For a permit for a narking lot at Location of property: 300 Point Road, Orient, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 15 Block 9 Lot 3.5 & 3.6 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed parkin lot of requires Zoning Board of Appeals approval pursuant to Article XIX. Section 100-91H. further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: file, Z.B.A. yL !! Aus —8 tons Snthold Town P!,, 1 :s 3aard may require �3 Farrell Fritz, P.C. EAB Plaza Uniondale, New York 11556-1320 Tclephme 516.227.0700 Fax 516.227.0777 www.farrellfritz.com August 1, 2005 ANTHONY S. GUARDINO PARTNER DIRECT DIAL: (631) 367-0782 DIRECT FAX: (516) 336-2244 aguardino@farrellfritz.com BY FAX (631.765.3136) AND REGULAR MAIL Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, and Members of the Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc., Orient Point Terminal Dear Chairperson Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board: P. r, S 'r. L 'I AUG - 5 2005 OUR FILE NUMBER 9999.11 Farrell Fritz was recently retained by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ("CSF") with respect to zoning and other issues that affect CSF's ability to use its Orient Point terminal. Based on my review of the situation, the New York State Town Law and Southold Town Code provide CSF with several options by which it may pursue approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals to allow for additional parking on the parcels located adjacent to, and east of, the terminal. To that end, CSF is pursuing an application to the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("Zoning Board") which it intends to file shortly after the Town Building Department denies the building permit application that was previously submitted by CSF. Inasmuch as an approval by the Zoning Board of CSF's request to use the adjacent lots for additional parking will require access from CSF's existing parking lot on the so-called "Snack Bar" parcel, CSF may ask the Planning Board to revisit its requirement that a fence be installed along that parcel's eastern boundary. Since the Planning Board's site plan approval for the Snack Bar parcel will lapse if it fails to install the fence by August 1, 2005, CSF is hereby requesting that the Planning Board extend its approval until November 1, 2005. In the meantime, CSF will continue to work with the Town, Police and National Guard to assure that security concerns are addressed at the CSF facility and on Route 25. At this time of heightened security, the parcels located east of the terminal are and will continue to be used for parking at the request of the Supervisor Horton. The use of these parcels for additional parking also precludes CSF from complying with the Planning Board's requirement for a fence along that parcels' eastern boundary and is itself a justification for extending the Planning Board's Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, and Member of the Planning Board August 1, 2005 Page 2 of 2 also precludes CSF from complying with the Planning Board's requirement for a fence along that parcels' eastern boundary and is itself a justification for extending the Planning Board's approval. On behalf of Cross Sound Ferry, I thank you for your consideration of this request and await the Board's response. Very y Anthony S. Guardino Cc: John Wronowski Adam Wronowski Richard MacMurray FFDOCS11642626.01 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON MEMORANDUM Date: August 4, 2005 u PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Cross Sound Ferry Status: Expired Site Plan, in violation Required Return Date: N/A In reference to the above, attached you will find a copy of the requested Cross Sound Ferry File. Thank you in advance. cc: Enc.: Copy of items from file MAILING ADDRESS: S�U% P.O. Box 1179 �DF Southold, NY 11971 T OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G� Q 54375 State Route 25 �yCom (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Comm N� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Cross Sound Ferry Status: Expired Site Plan, in violation Required Return Date: N/A In reference to the above, attached you will find a copy of the requested Cross Sound Ferry File. Thank you in advance. cc: Enc.: Copy of items from file ! . • Pa6V F ,W � Neville, Elizabeth �'` ' From: Lifestories1@cs.com RECEIVED TV Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:09 PM To: Neville, Elizabeth AUG u 1 M Cc: nfec@optonline.net Subject: CS Ferry Parking Permission SoutholA Town Cleat To Southold Town Board: Supervisor Horton's concession to allow parking in the CSF 's east field is effectively an end run that (a) circumvents your ruling not to consider CSR's request for zoning changes and (2) undermines laws the rest of us must abide by. Just how "temporary" will this measure be? Donna Kenny #1 -Ai Cleaves Point Condominiums Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY AUG � 2 2005 8/1/2005 0 0 RECEIVED From: Lifestoriesl@cs.com Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:09 PM AUG 1 2005 To: Neville, Elizabeth Cc: nfec@optonline.net Subject: CS Ferry Parking Permission Southold Towle Cletlt To Southold Town Board: Supervisor Horton's concession to allow parking in the CSF 's east field is effectively an end run that (a) circumvents your ruling not to consider CSR's request for zoning changes and (2) undermines laws the rest of us must abide by. Just how "temporary" will this measure be? Donna Kenny #iAr Cleaves Point Condominiums Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY Farrell Fritz, P.C. EAB Plaza Uniondale, New York 11556-1320 Telephone 516.227.0700 Fax 516227.0777 www.fa llfritz.com August 1, 2005 ANTHONY S. GUARDINO PARTNER DIRECT DIAL: (631) 367-0782 DIRECT FAX: (516) 336-2244 aguardino@farrellfritz.com BY FAX (631.765.3136) AND REGULAR MAIL Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, and Member of the Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 376 Atlantic Avenue East Rockaway, New York 11518-0189 TV VL OUR FILE NUMBER 9999.11 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Ina, Orient Point Terminal Dear Chairperson Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board: Farrell Fritz was recently retained by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ("CSF') with respect to zoning and other issues that affect CSF's ability to use its Orient Point terminal. Based on my review of the situation, the New York State Town Law and Southold Town Code provide CSF with several options by which it may pursue approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals to allow for additional parking on the parcels located adjacent to, and east of, the terminal. To that end, CSF is pursuing an application to the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("Zoning Board") which it intends to file shortly after the Town Building Department denies the building permit application that was previously submitted by CSF. Inasmuch as an approval by the Zoning Board of CSF's request to use the adjacent lots for additional parking will require access from CSF's existing parking lot on the so-called "Snack Bar" parcel, CSF may ask the Planning Board to revisit its requirement that a fence be installed along that parcel's eastern boundary. Since the Planning Board's site plan approval for the Snack Bar parcel will lapse if it fails to install the fence by August 1, 2005, CSF is hereby requesting that the Planning Board extend its approval until November 1, 2005. In the meantime, CSF will continue to work with the Town, Police and National Guard to assure that security concerns are addressed at the CSF facility and on Route 25. At this time of heightened security, the parcels located east of the terminal are and will continue to be used for parking at the request of the Supervisor Horton. The use of these parcels for additional parking Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, and Member of the Planning Board August 1, 2005 Page 2 of 2 also precludes CSF from complying with the Planning Board's requirement for a fence along that parcels' eastern boundary and is itself a justification for extending the Planning Board's approval. On behalf of Cross Sound Ferry, I thank you for your consideration of this request and await the Board's response. Very y Anthony S. Guardino Cc: John Wronowski Adam Wronowski Richard MacMurray FFDOCSIW42626.01 Awa -31-05 14:43 From- . f T-653 P.001/003 F-304 FARRELL FRITz, P.C. EAB PLAZA 13th - West Tower Uniondak, NY 11556 Film- ANTHONYS. GUARDINO DATE: 08/01/05 PHONE: 516-227-0669 CLIENT/MATTER: PLEASE DELIVER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO: RECIPIENT COMPANY FAX N0. PHONE No. Ron, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Town of Southold 631-765-3136 Chairperson, and ;Members of the Planning Board The original of the transmitted document will be sent by: ❑Ordinary Mail IlMessenger Overnight Mail OTHIS WILL BE THE ONLY FORM OF DELIVERY Total number of pages including this page: If you do not receive all the pages, please call (516)227-0669 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: T11a transmission is a privileged and confidential aomtnuuication by an attorney to an intended recipient. Any diaseminatiou of this communication is strictly prolubited. If you bave received tlis document and are not the intended recipient, plasae notify us immediately by telephone, collect if nocesaary, for Instructions to facilitate the return of this communication. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. rrnOC61IJKTLLERWYwL.LIHNa 6:0154,01 April 10, 20M —m:ol PM 6 • Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Site Plans April 26, 2005 From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer To: Planning Board I. Application Information Proiect Title: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Site Plan Prepared BY: John Raynor, P.E. Date of Map: 12/8/00 and last revised 11/15/01 Date of Submission: 01/25/02 Applicant: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Agent: Richard E. Warren, President Inter- Science Research Associates, Inc. PO Box 120, 136 Nugent Street Southampton, NY 11969-1201 Tax Map Numbers: 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1,15.1 Proiect Location: 41190, 41270 & 41370 NYS Road 25 Hamlet: Orient Zoning District: Marine II District Il. Description of Proiect VS This amended site plan is for the entire site to include improvements on a 4.06 acres parcel in the MII Zone located at the s/s/o of NYS Road 25 in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-9.- 10.1, 11.1 & 15.1 Number of Lots Proposed: 3 Lots Type of Access Provided: NYS Road 25 IH. Site Plan Data Present Land Use: Ferry Terminal as described under Town Code 100-121-B- section 2. Existing Structures: • SCTM# 15-9-10.1 =Single family dwelling • SCTM# 15-9-11.1 = Terminal Building 9 SCTM# 15-9-15.1 =Snack bar and unlisted use of an existing building April 26, 2005, Cross Ad Ferry continued, page two IV: Permits and/or Review Required From Other Agencies December 11, 2001 Planning Board granted final site plan approval with 12 conditions. Attached is a copy of the Planning Board Final resolution. Pursuant to Town Code Section 100-255 as shown below it appears the three-year date has elapsed. § 100-255. Duration of plan. "An approved site development plan shall be valid for a period of three (3) years from the date of approval. All work proposed on the plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of approval unless a longer period was approved or the applicant obtains an extension from the Planning Board." January 12, 2002 John Wronowski of the Cross Sound Ferry endorsed the site plan in compliance with the Town Code 100-254 I below. "I. Prior to the Planning Board's endorsement of the site plan, the applicant must sign a statement placed on the site plan indicating his/her knowledge and acceptance of the conditions of approval." February 1, 2002 the Planning Board Chairman endorsed the site plan. As of April 25, 2005 no new building permits have been issued. Research indicates building permit number BP# 16856 dated 03/14/88 & BP# 18984 dated 04/25/90 are the last BP's in the AS400 computer system to be issued. In addition no certificate of occupancy are in the AS400 system for these BP's. As of April 25, 2005 the Planning Department has not received information on approval from the NYS DOT for the highway work improvements. The final resolution condition 412 stated "The applicant shall secure approval from the NYS Department of Transportation for the improvements shown on the site plan". V: Proiect Site Analvsis A site visit took place on April 18, 2005 with Bruno Semon, Edward Forrester, Jamie Richter & John Sepenoski at 12:00pm. The following discrepancies were observed in referenced to the approved site plan: SCTM# 15-9-11.1: • A new ticket booth/shed is located on the entrance to the terminal on the north side of the property. Cross Sound Ferry — Pag�Three -August 21, 2003 0 SCTM# 15-9-12.1: • A new brick walk was installed on 15-9-12.1 for the pedestrian crosswalk connecting 15-9-11.1 parking lot and the NYS Road 25. • The balance of the pedestrian walk has not been installed on the NYS 25. SCTM# 15-9-15.1: • It appears the french drains A, B & C have not been installed in the parking lot. • At this time the 25'x40' emergency access area on the north side of snack bar was blocked with parked cars and the 50'x40' emergency access area on the south side of snack bar was blocked with parked cars. Both emergency access areas were partially blocked. • The 15' emergency access aisle is not delineated. • The ADA handicapped parking space does not match the approval. • The existing sidewalk at snack bar has not been extended as shown. • No ramp has been installed at the snack bar as shown. • No wooden guide rails have been installed along property line on the east side of the parcel as shown. • Still missing light fixtures along the property line as shown. • The stone parking area is in need of re -grading to eliminate depressions. • Apply stone/gravel to the surface as noted. • The natural buffer planting on the east has been partially removed. • The berm on the south side may need to be verified that it conforms to the Town Trustee permit # 5408. • A new shed structure is now in place on the north eastside of the snack bar. See attached digital image. • It appears that the parking lot has encroached onto the property east known as SCTM# 15-9-3.5. See attached digital image. • The wood barrier or guardrail does not define the eastern border of the property. • A dumpster is now present and not shown on the site plan along the east boundary. VI: Staff Recommendations In summary the site plan appears to be in non-compliance with the approved signed site plan and or resolution conditions. The applicant of the Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. was notified by letter on August 21, 2003 in reference to most of the deficient items. See attached letter. File Attachments cc:pb,vs,taxjh,efjr,j s - � a ,• 0 '.SAW ^ 1.2 l LIA 1.aA L1A I 13a u ^ ]s �1 ]61 1 p 6 L] LS JA 1.OA j ,2 ar e0a ^ 1 DId _ cLPiNPM 1.6 a� - x5 re "a• r,e aav a ,u 122 123 w °^a 's i6 2' '2D 25 L.D.„90 11 M.D. 60 I `Ix Ir P.D. 65 Iz ^ al1s �S19n 1.30 un 1.21 1.29^ en a ' e2l nae p ,w to y 01.29 COUNTY Of SUFFOLK ERR aa a e ' Fit ry 1<E rt 1.19 " va• 1.25 A my c 6 na m� c n 1l^ vx e ; ti2 4Rd nnF s 1.26 u O 6,1 ,n 21.6 I0,<gcl 'Ry1 a 1.IB a e ..•u 0 n10: :25 ^ .w, ' ].26 1.10 •^ .' g55,rm e - 1. � ^ u lP" LB 21.1 n 2111 i� B.w uv LSI 21n 1gNW sU ,nu H O�a .na1x" FIly� V� as P 29.16 x 1.11 �9P 1.Od R ax'S"s §RB '" 1.16 8J` 1.0A ,n.. L2A6 raA "e s29 n nv 1.12 s Al i .n 15A _amu w 1�P CY �/ ` au x l6 w B n. • no, R u w 31_ un 2<d9 m W N < n _ 1.23 25PiD " 21.20 j° lAPlcl LtA r.v 115 L.14 +51 y1 x lP• 21.29 1.xP1<1 l \a L1A mr mn 11? u OF1. vu 1.IPIc1 9 NK\ w .10 ' v 50N� A M1O 6 S 12Plcl a {_E \x 0 S1Ptf5 P `i0. a• w � ` B 2.1 � pi Pvc Q. ccsnP' c\ ob s�°G © S.oPld app p A . V' 1.60 \ 13PlCi 32 1.9A1c1 ' '"t, : NOTICE o COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E OWN Of SOUTHOLD 6AWTONUFl0Ll NCO "l'EN°'OAT' 11f 06 Real Property Tax Service Agency r 616EC16 caUNEY uv OAT' is POMmrtfo Colnty Center gryerhead,N Y 11901 nlwf OF REALP e%rrfn AX KRAN A NC 'add 80 4 0, u"tf m K[l; M REAL GNWEfl1Y i°F $EPNCf [LEHCY mf Iw A 2 p xo 1000 o¢racl onf m. lnfe 015 ROPERTY MAP D T .I } -Sl�rj lee S_ ;+ � MK 'ik F ��` 77 114 fp J t tL Q y.� ♦Fy�� `� 'M. w { `K `=' 40 � '""f."� ��:. "d Wil'. ri ` ♦ a u., a�1� 4 :' °v y A .'� i PIk i F� t i a� t 4 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also corn '" A Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: k. Hacp u y V P v 6M CYus4Sow o[�e,, Stx� �� e t� kd--Ad v, CT o 3av Q mom. dKf wd from sem lT LJ yes my address below:. 0 No 3. Service Type O Certified Mall 0 Express Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? Petra Fee) 0 Yes 2. (TranIe rfrom 7005 0390 0005 8229 5041 (Transfer from seMce law PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Recelpt 1025950 M-1540 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: 744AcK,, Cscct Fsq��Q ,e--lj,,�O ,try lig01-oa A Sigre 0 Agent B. by (Pnn Name) C. Date of Delivery i 2`N D. Is delivery address different from iT es N YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. Service Type 0 Certified Mall 0 Express Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Recelpt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number 7005 0390 0005 8229 6109 (monster from service labep PS Forth 3811, February 2004 Domwac Return Receipt tozsssoz+a-1540 rd Farrell Fritz, P.C. EAB Plaza Uniondale, New York 11556-1320 Telephone 516.227.0700 Fax 516.227.0777 www.farrellfritz.com August 1, 2005 ANTHONY S. GUARDING PARTNER DIRECT DIAL: (631) 367-0782 DIRECT FAX: (516) 336-2244 aguardino@farrellfritz.com BY FAX (631.765.3136) AND REGULAR MAIL Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, and Member of the Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 376 Atlantic Avenue East Rockaway, New York 11518-0189 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc., Orient Point Terminal Dear Chairperson Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board: OUR FILE NUMBER 9999.11 Farrell Fritz was recently retained by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ("CSF) with respect to zoning and other issues that affect CSF's ability to use its Orient Point terminal. Based on my review of the situation, the New York State Town Law and Southold Town Code provide CSF with several options by which it may pursue approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals to allow for additional parking on the parcels located adjacent to, and east of, the terminal. To that end, CSF is pursuing an application to the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals ("Zoning Board') which it intends to file shortly after the Town Building Department denies the building permit application that was previously submitted by CSF. Inasmuch as an approval by the Zoning Board of CSF's request to use the adjacent lots for additional parking will require access from CSF's existing parking lot on the so-called "Snack Bar" parcel, CSF may ask the Planning Board to revisit its requirement that a fence be installed along that parcel's eastern boundary. Since the Planning Board's site plan approval for the Snack Bar parcel will lapse if it fails to install the fence by August 1, 2005, CSF is hereby requesting that the Planning Board extend its approval until November 1, 2005. In the meantime, CSF will continue to work with the Town, Police and National Guard to assure that security concerns are addressed at the CSF facility and on Route 25. At this time of heightened security, the parcels located east of the terminal are and will continue to be used for parking at the request of the Supervisor Horton. The use of these parcels for additional parking 4 11 • 0 Hon. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, and Member of the Planning Board August 1, 2005 Page 2 of 2 also precludes CSF from complying with the Planning Board's requirement for a fence along that parcels' eastern boundary and is itself a justification for extending the Planning Board's approval. On behalf of Cross Sound Ferry, I thank you for your consideration of this request and await the Board's response. j _- Very y Anthony S. Guardino Cc: John Wronowski Adam Wronowski Richard MacMurray FFDOCSI\642626.0I IUA Y. HORTON .LJPERVISOR S 1 OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Pb. �S Y.L. Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1889 \ July 28, 2005 05 20 VIA FACSIMILE and FIRST CLASS MAIL PUS Mr. Adam Wronowski Cross Sound Ferry Service, Inc. 2 Ferry Street, P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320 William W. Esseks, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Messrs. Wronowski and Esseks: As we have recently discussed, the Town of Southold has been notified by the Governor of the State of New York that effective immediately, in order to meet the recently established "high alert" national security status for transportation, the National Guard has been deployed to join with the Town of Southold Police Department in conducting searches of all commercial vehicles and random passenger vehicles at the Cross Sound Ferry terminal at Orient Point. We are informed that this is a temporary national security measure, but have not been informed as to the duration of this engagement. In order to comply with these heightened security directives in the safest manner possible, and due to the space constraints within the Cross Sound parking area, it is necessary to conduct the searches of the larger commercial vehicles outside of the Cross Sound Ferry parking and loading area, on the shoulder of State Route 25. As a result, the Town of Southold Police Department will cone off the sides of Route 25 for an appropriate distance in order to perform these mandated searches. The Town Board of the Town of Southold has thus asked for the cooperation of Cross Sound Ferry to permit the overflow ferry parking currently utilizing State Route 25 to be directed, on a temporary and emergency basis only, to the vacant field owned by Cross Sound Ferry to the east of the ferry terminal. You and your employees have ensured us that a safe and orderly system for routing such traffic can be achieved immediately. Messrs. Wronowski an&seks 41 July 28, 2005 Page 2 As we have discussed, the Town's permission to park vehicles on this vacant lot is limited to this temporary emergency activity related to national security directives. This limited permission should not be construed as any grant of zoning, site plan or other regulatory approval of any kind, nor shall it be taken as any waiver of the Town's power to regulate, approve, deny or condition the use of these properties. Any and all required approvals shall continue to be required as provided by law. The Town will notify you immediately once it receives notice either that the heightened security status has been lifted or if it determines for any other reason that parking in the adjacent lot must be discontinued. I wish to thank you for your swift cooperation with these important matters. incerely, r-,��lA��IS'L�. Joshua Y. Horton Supervisor JYH/lk cc: Members of the Town Board Members of the Planning Board Zoning Board of Appeals Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq., Town Attorney Mr. Edward Forrester, Code Enforcement Director Building Department • FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY* 1?15 SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: /Jf/ LS Project Project Address: Date Sent: - I —/ 2 Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- / f - _�-s'`�/3 Zoning District: 12 -SD (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: gelnlTTrb By 26A A'G204LR Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required:3,7ze P/o-,.. Planning Department (P.D.) P.D. Date Received: 7 /,2f / Or Date of Comment: r- // /a,�- Final Determination Date: Decisio Signature of Building Inspector WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER STEPHEN R. ANGEL JANE ANN R. KRATZ WILLIAM POWER MALONEY CARMELA M. DI TAUA ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK NANCY SILVERMAN LISA J. Ross THEODORE D. SKLAR OF COUNSEL By Hand Town of Southold Building Department 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Damon Rallis 0 • ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 (631) 369-1700 TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 July 27, 2005 Re: Application for Notice of Disapproval Dear Mr. Rallis: WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 (631) 726-6633 As we discussed earlier today, we are asking the Building Department to issue a Notice of Disapproval in order to allow us to make an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for an approval to allow parking on the residentially -zoned properties adjacent to the Cross Sound Ferry Services terminal. The Zoning Board is authorized to give such an approval under § 100- 191H of the Code of the Town of Southold. But before we can apply to the Zoning Board, we need a Notice of Disapproval from your office. Per your instructions, I'm enclosing a building permit application (filled out as much as possible under the circumstances), a copy of our survey, a copy of our "Concept Plan," and a check for $35.00. We would greatly appreciate if the Notice of Dissapproval can be expedited, as we have told several Town officials that we would file the ZBA application by August 1, 2005. When the Notice of Disapproval is ready, please give me a call and we will send someone to pick it up by hand to avoid the delay of mailing. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Veryt yours, Anth C. Pa Encls 0 Location and ownership. Required accessory parking spaces, open or enclosed, shall be provided upon the same lot as the use to which they are accessory or elsewhere, provided that all spaces therein are located with two hundred (200) feet walking distance of such lot. In all cases, such parking spaces shall conform to all the regulations of the district in which parking spaces are located, and in no event shall such parking spaces be located in any residence district unless the use to which the spaces are accessory is permitted in such residence district or upon approval by the Board of Appeals. Such spaces shall be in the same ownership as the use to which they are accessory and shall be subject to deed restrictions approved by the Board, binding the owner and his heirs and assigns to maintain the required number of spaces available either throughout the existence of such use to which they are accessory or until such spaces are provided elsewhere (unless municipally owned spaces are utilized in accordance with § 100-191A above). 7 know i\-5 A- P - 0 ter\ -.or, 1,--4 r -A PLANNING ROA 1L MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOO] dOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON O Restricted Delivery F O Restnotetl Delive F _ re CERTIFIED MAIL —RETURN RE (Endo cement Requln (Endorsement Re,ulred) N July 2005 rrl Total Postage B Fe Total P Jul 27 ostages Fees C3 Sent To O Sen'To n\, Anthony C. Pasca, Esq. �` wee{Apt „""'" M1 Snea( ye Na----._aQ or Po Box No. n, or PO Box No. �A L't Yl..-.-- -" . sseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 Dear Mr. Pasca: RE: Compliance with Approved Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9.1 11.1 & 15.1 August 1 2005 Deadline / - a,) -- This is a follow-up to our May 9, 2005 letter to Mr. Richard MacMurray, Vice President and General Manager, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. (copy attached) and also in reply to your letter of July 25, 2005. As previously noted, your client has failed to demonstrate compliance with the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and all conditions of approval set forth in the final resolution. Pursuant to Town Code Section 100-255, all work proposed on an approved site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of approval, unless the applicant obtains an extension from the Planning Board. The three-year approval period that elapsed on February 1, 2005, and was extended from that date to August 1, 2005, is about to expire. Site inspections on July 18, 2005, and on July 25, 2005 by Southold Town staff revealed that many of the required elements of the approved February 1, 2002 site plan have not been completed (please refer to attached letter). The following discrepancies were observed on this latest site visit: I. Lighting is inappropriately placed exactly along a state owned railing located on the New York State portion of a New York State R.O.W., located along the west boundary of that parking lot. It is required that the Cross Sound Ferry comply with the Board's original request, per approved 1 MAILING ADDRESS: II \ 1P.O. ff ffI / outoll, NY 11971 1 • • U.S. Postal U.S. Postal Service,,., CERTIFI CERTIFIED MAIL,, (Domestic Mail (Domestic Mail Only,' RECEIPT delivery No Insurance Coverage Provided) info For delivery information I visit our website at e W.usps.co� • I O Restricted Delivery F O Restnotetl Delive F _ re CERTIFIED MAIL —RETURN RE (Endo cement Requln (Endorsement Re,ulred) N July 2005 rrl Total Postage B Fe Total P Jul 27 ostages Fees C3 Sent To O Sen'To n\, Anthony C. Pasca, Esq. �` wee{Apt „""'" M1 Snea( ye Na----._aQ or Po Box No. n, or PO Box No. �A L't Yl..-.-- -" . sseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 Dear Mr. Pasca: RE: Compliance with Approved Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9.1 11.1 & 15.1 August 1 2005 Deadline / - a,) -- This is a follow-up to our May 9, 2005 letter to Mr. Richard MacMurray, Vice President and General Manager, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. (copy attached) and also in reply to your letter of July 25, 2005. As previously noted, your client has failed to demonstrate compliance with the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and all conditions of approval set forth in the final resolution. Pursuant to Town Code Section 100-255, all work proposed on an approved site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of approval, unless the applicant obtains an extension from the Planning Board. The three-year approval period that elapsed on February 1, 2005, and was extended from that date to August 1, 2005, is about to expire. Site inspections on July 18, 2005, and on July 25, 2005 by Southold Town staff revealed that many of the required elements of the approved February 1, 2002 site plan have not been completed (please refer to attached letter). The following discrepancies were observed on this latest site visit: I. Lighting is inappropriately placed exactly along a state owned railing located on the New York State portion of a New York State R.O.W., located along the west boundary of that parking lot. It is required that the Cross Sound Ferry comply with the Board's original request, per approved 1 site plan dated February 1, 2002, to place the required lighting on the Cross Sound Ferry side of the Cross Sound Ferry property line, located along the west boundary of that parking lot. Additionally, remove the lighting poles off of the New York State-owned railing located on the New York State R.O.W., thus bringing the parking lot lighting on to the Cross Sound Ferry -owned property. 2. Restore and maintain the two previously required turnaround locations in parking lot, located at entry and exit locations (along the western boundary of the southerly and northerly areas of the parking lot). Refer to the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 for any needed clarification of this parking site requirement. Currently, there are cars parked at this southerly turnaround (required to be fifty feet wide per approved site plan dated February 1, 2002) narrowing it to less than twenty feet in width. 3. As per Jamie Richter, Office of the Town Engineer, we are aware of your assurance that appropriate drainage on the site has been constructed. In order to confirm this, the Town of Southold will perform a site inspection after a heavy rainfall in order to confirm the adequate functioning of the site drainage. As requested you must show current existing site grading, on the requested existing conditions site plan, to establish that parking lot runoff is not directly entering the Sound. If it is determined that runoff is not prevented, or that drainage is not functioning adequately, you must perform the re -grading of the site to comply with the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002. 4. Install the appropriate fence posts on your recently installed fence post footings along the eastern property line. Install roping between said fence posts and immediately cease to use the area east of the property line. 5. There is an awareness (cited by the Cross Sound Ferry at the July 18, 2005 site visit) of a need to create a safe means of pedestrian movement across the site in an east/west direction, providing for pedestrians walking across the site, to and from the parking lot. This issue was raised by Cross Sound Ferry, and the Planning Department would like to know if any plan of action has been provided to resolve this safety issue. 6. Show the Cross Sound Ferry site as it actually exists; specifically, include any and all underwater property owned by the Cross Sound Ferry on this site. 7. Asphalt paving of the eastern handicap parking space is required, but does not exist. Handicap parking improvements required by the February 1, 2001 approved site plan have been partially acted upon but not completely satisfied. 2 0 6 Please inform the Planning Board by August 1, 2005 of the completion status of all the remaining outstanding site plan elements indicated in this letter, in the attached letter dated 5/9/2005, and in the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002. Thank you for your prompt attention to this requirement. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson enc. ' cc: aichardCacMurray, Cross Sound Ferry Services Inc. Town Attorney Code Enforcement Building Department Engineering Inspector 3 0 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER STEPHEN R. ANGEL JANE ANN R. KRATZ WILLIAM POWER MALONEY CARMELA M. DI TALIA ANTHONY C. PASCA N ICA B. STRUNK NANCY SILVERMAN LISA J. Ross THEODORE D. SKLAR OF COUNSEL Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn.: Bruno Semon ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 106 EAST MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 (631) 369-1700 TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 t July 25, 2005 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Site Plan Dear Mr. Semon: 0 JUL 2 5 ?' '5 MA WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. 0. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 (631) 7266633 /5_ q - /0,1 Thank you and the Town's engineer, Mr. Richter, for meeting with us at the Orient site last week to discuss site plan issues. As we discussed, Cross Sound is making every effort to bring the site into conformance with the approved site plan. Specifically, Cross Sound is going through the items listed in the May 9, 2005 letter from Chairperson, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse. Most of the items have been addressed already (many had been addressed long before the May 9th letter). For example, as we indicated at our meeting, the three French drains were previously installed when the site plan was initially approved. The required plantings were also done at that time. One of the 'questions we discussed at our meeting was whether it was prudent at this time to put up the wood barrier on the eastern border of the property (item numbered 12 of the 5/9/05 letter). Cross Sound has installed the footings for the wood -barrier guardrail, and the wooden sections are in the process of being assembled and should be ready for installation by August 1, 2005. But, as Mr. Richter noted, erecting the guardrail at this time would displace existing parking spaces and force more cars to park on the shoulder of Route 25. As you may know, the Town Board recently characterized the parking on the shoulder of Route 25 as an "extreme and urgent safety concern." We are trying to ameliorate that condition by making an application to A - 0 0 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW July 25, 2005 Page 2 of 2 the Zoning Board for an approval to park cars on the adjacent properties (with no other structures on the property), and we expect to have that application filed by August 1, 2005. In light of those issues, the Town's engineer, our surveyor, and I discussed with you at our meeting last week whether the completion of the wood -barrier guardrail could and should be held in abeyance pending the application to the ZBA, so as not to exacerbate the condition that the Town Board characterized as an "extreme and urgent safety concern" or to cause further hardship on those traveling on Route 25, including the residents and visitors of the Town who are using Cross Sound's water carrier service. If the ZBA ultimately grants the application for parking on the adjacent property, the public will have an alternative place to park after the wood -barrier guard rail is installed. Moreover, the Planning Board will be reviewing the site plan for the entire property during the application process, thus placing in question whether the guardrail would be needed at all (the Planning Board may determine at that time that the guardrail is not necessary to separate the parking areas). Please discuss this issue with the Planning Board and let us know whether we can hold off on the final installation of the guardrail pending the application to the ZBA. We look forward to working with the Planning Board, you, and the Town's engineer to resolve all of these issues. Feel free to contact me at any time to discuss issues regarding the site plan. Very lwfyours, i Ant y C. Pasca cc.: Jamie Richter John J. Raynor 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBE* JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON June 14, 2005 William W. Esseks, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Extension of the Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry SCTM #1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1 & 15.1 Zone: M-11 Dear Mr. Esseks: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 13, 2005: WHEREAS, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. received site plan approval with conditions from the Southold Town Planning Board for the entire site on February 1, 2002; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the site plan expired on February 1, 2005 and the attorney for the applicant sought to extend such approval; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six-month extension from February 1, 2005 to August 1, 2005 to the final approval with conditions, subject to fulfillment of the following new condition which must be met by the close of the extension: All site improvements shown on the site plan date signed February 1, 2002 be completed and all conditions be met as approved in the resolution dated December 11, 2001. MAILING ADDRESS: pF soujyolo Box 1179 SoP.O. Southold, 11971 h OFFICE LOCATION: y G Town Hall Annex • �O 54375 State Route 25 AApp (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Extension of the Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry SCTM #1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1 & 15.1 Zone: M-11 Dear Mr. Esseks: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 13, 2005: WHEREAS, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. received site plan approval with conditions from the Southold Town Planning Board for the entire site on February 1, 2002; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the site plan expired on February 1, 2005 and the attorney for the applicant sought to extend such approval; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six-month extension from February 1, 2005 to August 1, 2005 to the final approval with conditions, subject to fulfillment of the following new condition which must be met by the close of the extension: All site improvements shown on the site plan date signed February 1, 2002 be completed and all conditions be met as approved in the resolution dated December 11, 2001. 1 • i Cross Sound Ferry — Page Two — 06/14/05 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ?enlyn e � erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Cc: Town Attorney Code Enforcement Building Department ■ complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also Complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: l,.�tA9�o--trw �se,�s 1k08_F_.�1-��.,r, 0 Agent D. is delNery address ditwd fmm ken 17 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. >YPO Certified Mall 0 Express Mall 0 Registered [jM6Wm Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 6 C.O.D. 4. Restdcted Delivell? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. ArticleNumber 7005 0390 0005 8229 5027 (Tre' fer from service Ps Form 3811, February 2004 Domesfic Rehsn Receipt 102595-02 WI540 • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED June 1, 2005 Mr. William W. Esseks Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 RE: Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9.1, 11.1 & 15.1 Dear Mr. Esseks,: This is in response to the your letter dated May 18, 2005, to the Planning Board Office. The Planning Board held a work session on May 23, 2005 and agreed to undertake the following action at its next scheduled public session of June 13, 2005. A resolution will be put on the agenda to issue an extension for six (6) months. The six (6) months extension will start from the February 01, 2005 expiration date and extend to August 01, 2005. This extension will be approved with the condition that all site improvements shown on the site plan dated February 01, 2005 be completed and all conditions as approved in the resolution dated December 11, 2001 be met by the close of the extension period. This letter should not be interpreted as endorsing any changes from the approved (now expired) site plan. If there are any questions you can contact Bruno Semon at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B.®Woodhouse Chairperson aft. cc: Town Attorney, Code Enforcement & Building Department MAILING ADDRESS: pF SOUjyOlo Box 11971 Southold, lI J� OFFICE LOCATION: CA Town Hall Annex �O 54375 State Route 25 lyCOUNV (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) N Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED June 1, 2005 Mr. William W. Esseks Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 RE: Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9.1, 11.1 & 15.1 Dear Mr. Esseks,: This is in response to the your letter dated May 18, 2005, to the Planning Board Office. The Planning Board held a work session on May 23, 2005 and agreed to undertake the following action at its next scheduled public session of June 13, 2005. A resolution will be put on the agenda to issue an extension for six (6) months. The six (6) months extension will start from the February 01, 2005 expiration date and extend to August 01, 2005. This extension will be approved with the condition that all site improvements shown on the site plan dated February 01, 2005 be completed and all conditions as approved in the resolution dated December 11, 2001 be met by the close of the extension period. This letter should not be interpreted as endorsing any changes from the approved (now expired) site plan. If there are any questions you can contact Bruno Semon at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B.®Woodhouse Chairperson aft. cc: Town Attorney, Code Enforcement & Building Department WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. i EFTER STEPHEN R. ANGEL JANE ANN R. KRATZ JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONEY CARMELA M. DI TALIA ANTHONY C. PASCA MICA B. STRUNK WILLIAM M. DUFFY NANCY SILVERMAN THEODORE D. SKLAR OF COUNSEL Town of Southold Planning Board Office Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 P� ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL BS COUNSELORS AT LAW IOB EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 (631) 3631700 WATER MILL OFFICE — MONTAUK HIGHWAY TELECOP1eR NUMBER (631) 369-206S P. 0. Box S70 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 (631) 726-6633 May18, 2005 VIA FAX AND FEDERAL EXPRESS Attention: Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Re: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Dear Ms. Woodhouse: �19� MAY 2 0 2005 Your letter of May 9, 2005, to Richard MacMurray of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. (Cross Sound) has been referred to me for reply. Cross Sound, by this letter, with a reservation of rights, and pursuant to Southold Town Code Section 100.255(a) requests: 1. an extension of the time to complete the subject site plan improvements until November 1, 2005; and 2. to have until August 1, 2005, the opportunity to submit an amendment to the 2/1/02 Planning Board subject site plan for the approval of some, if not all, of the existing conditions at the site not heretofore approved. Cross Sound officers, Adam Wronowski and Richard MacMurray, have asked me to extend to you and your Board their appreciation for the expression of your Board's desire that the site operate legally. Please advise me, on behalf of Cross Sound, if the foregoing dates are satisfactory. Very truly yours, W 0- W, t�Nai William W. Esseks W WE:lac r� u VALERIE SCOPAZ TOWN PLANNER h�o��gUFFO(�-coGy o N at 0 OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Distribution From: Valerie Scopaz i*pj Date: May 18, 2005 Re: Response Deadline for Cross Sound Ferry Compliance with Approved Site Plan Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax(516)765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 The Planning Board's May 5 letter to Richard MacMurray, VP and General Manager, Cross Sound Ferry Services, allowed 10 business days from the certified mail receipt for a reply before enforcement action commences. Attached is a copy of the signed return receipt dated May 13. Therefore, we look to receive their response by May 27th. Distribution: Planning Board Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Bruno Semon File attachment ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Mr. Rickard MacMurray -- VP & Gen'l. Mgr. Cross Sound Ferry Svices, Inc. Two Ferry St. New London, CT 96320 A. Si re u 'gam Addressee . Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery -13 D. Is delivery address tlfiterent from Item 11 13 Yes 11 YES, enter delivery address below: 13 No 3.k:e type Certified Mall 0 Expels Mall ❑ Registered R Return Reoelpt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mall 13 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? Prim Feel 13 Yes 2: Article Number. 7005 2390 0005 8229 5010 ffi�ier from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic. Return Receipt 1025eeS02-M-1s40: PLANNING BOARD MEMBEO JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED May 9, 2005 Mr. Richard MacMurray, Vice President & General Manager Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Two Ferry Street New London, CT 06320 Dear Mr. MacMurray: OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 RE: Compliance with Approved Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry, Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9.1. 11.1 & 15.1 This is a follow up to our letter dated August 21, 2003, copy attached. As previously noted, you have failed to comply with the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and all conditions of approval set forth in the final resolution. Pursuant to Town Code Section 100-255, all work proposed on an approved site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of approval, unless the applicant obtains an extension from the Planning Board. Since the three- year approval period elapsed on February 1, 2005, without the work having been completed, the 2002 site plan has now expired. A site inspection on April 18, 2005 by Southold Town staff revealed that many of the required elements of the approved 2002 site plan have not been completed as noted in the attached letter. Several new structures have been built without the required permits or site plan approval. The following discrepancies were observed in reference to the site: SCTM# 1000-15-9-11.1 A new ticket booth/shed is located on the entrance to the terminal on the north side of the property. Mr. Richard MacMurray May 9, 2005 Page Two SCTM #1000-15-9-12.1 1. A new brick walk has been installed on 15-9-12.1 for the pedestrian crosswalk connecting 15-9-11.1 parking lot and NYS Road 25. 2. The balance of the pedestrian walk has not been installed on NYS 25. SCTM #1000-15-9-15.1 1. There is no indication that the French drains A, B & C have been installed in the parking lot. 2. At the time of the site inspection, the 25'X 40' emergency access area on the north side of the snack bar and the 50'X 40' emergency access area on the south side of the snack bar were blocked with parked cars. 3. The 15' emergency access aisle is not delineated. 4. The ADA handicapped parking space is not situated as per approved plan. 5. The existing sidewalk at the snack bar has not been extended as per approved plan. 6. No ramp has been installed at the snack bar as per approved plan. 7. The stone parking area is in need of regrading and new gravel to eliminate depressions. 8. The natural buffer planting on the east has been partially removed. 9. Verification may be needed that the berm on the south side conforms to Town Trustee Permit #5408. 10. A new shed structure was placed on the northeast side of the snack bar. 11. It appears that the parking lot has encroached onto the adjoining property to the east known as SCTM #1000-15-9-3.5. 0 0 Mr. Richard MacMurray May 5, 2005 Page Three 12. The wood barrier or guardrail does not define the eastern border of the property. 13. A dumpster (not shown on the approved plan) is now present along the east boundary. Despite these numerous violations of Town Code, the Southold Town Planning Board desires to see the site operate legally in accordance with an approved site plan and that this compliance take place voluntarily and swiftly. Therefore, we are extending to Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. an opportunity to respond to this letter before enforcement actions commence. Please reply within 10 business days from the certified mail receipt of this letter as to whether you intend to file a request for extension of site plan approval as well as for an amendment to reflect the changes now evident at the site. Your prompt attention to this matter is important. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Zia cc: Town Attorney Code Enforcement Building Department S:\Planning\Lefters\CrossSoundFerry.doc PLANNING BOARD MEMBE* BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICIiARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS D,L4RTIN It. SIDOR August 21, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Richard MacMurray, VP General Manager Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 2 Ferry Street, PO Box 33 New London, CT 06320 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9-10., 11.1 & 15.1 Dear Mr. MacMurray, P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax(631)765-3136 This letter is to confirm and document our meeting July 30, 2003 at the site described above. First we would like to thank you for taking the time to meet and discuss the site plan requirements. At the meeting we discussed compliance with all items proposed to the Southold Town Planning Board on the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and all items required in the final resolution. At the site visit, the following items were discussed and agreed need to be addressed: 1. Provide one paved handicapped parking space with line notations at existing snack bar as shown on site plan. At the site visit four cars were parked in the spot noted for only one parking space. 2. Extend existing sidewalk at existing snack bar as shown on the site plan. 3. Provide ramp to snack bar door at existing snack bar as shown on the site plan. 4. Install proposed wooden guide rail along property line on the east side of the parcel as shown on the site plan. Have a surveyor verify the emergency access locations and flag. 5. Install all proposed light fixtures on property line as shown on the site plan. 9 0 Cross Sound Ferry — Page Two - August 21, 2003 6. Maintain the emergency access areas with no parking as noted on the site plan. At the time of site visit: the 25'x40' emergency access area on the north side of snack bar was blocked with parked cars and the 50'x40' emergency access area on the south side of snack bar was blocked with parked cars. Have a surveyor verify the emergency access locations and flag. 7. Re -grade parking area as needed to eliminate depressions and apply stone/gravel to the surface as noted on the site plan. 8. Correct location if necessary of the southerly berm with the double row of Rosa Rugosa on the south side of parcel. Have a surveyor verify berm location and flag. 9. Install proposed pedestrian crosswalk as shown on the site plan. 10. Provide written information on the staffing requirements you are providing on site. 11. NYS DOT approval needs to be secured and the work completed in compliance with all DOT requirements. 12. Install proposed natural buffer planting on east as shown on the site plan. 13. The site must comply with all items approved on the site plan and resolution as required. Attached is a copy of the approved resolution. 14. Have a surveyor verify locations of property comer boundary and flag. Please notify the Planning Board Office when all items are complete for a site inspection. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Re c u ours, o Se n Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,pb, vs, bd,Town Attorney, of 9/iti89 15.-9-11.1 NUMB—E RIf ETTE TYPE raj 14426 11/06/85 PERMI 18417 8/21/89 PERMIT 18984 4/25/90 PERMIT 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 ,;Wt1ER: FERRY SERVICES INC, CROSS S(DUN U-)E/DESCRIPTION B P. ff 4426 COC . NEW FERRY T B.P.418417 REBUILD ACCESS BLD B.P.#18984 REPLACES #18417 B. F1=More F7=Permit Detail FB=Co Detail F9=Preco F12=New Swis/Parcel F3=Exi 173889 15.-9-15.1 OWNER: CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICE INC 1dUMBER -- DATETE -- IYPG �� rO� 'E/DESCRIPTION 3799 i X15/6h PERP ]I� B.P. #37992 8844 9/03/76 PERMIT B.P.48844Z BUILD AN ADDITION 16856 3/24/88 PERMIT B.P.#16856 RENOVATE & ALTER R 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 F1=More F7=Permit Detail FB=Co Detail F9=Preco F12=New Swis/Parcel F3=Exi SOy 1S. -y-10.1 OWNER: -TN—IblERf—DATE TYPE CO OSE/DESCRIPTION 226139 10/29/93 PR.E C� 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 F1=More F7=Permit Detail F8=Co Detail F9=Preco F12 -New Swis/Parcel F3=Exi t 0 0 C,sc (Z 4 c) w �' . > �'�- r� �.y,� C �,s ac,C � A,2 �/,8js PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGLANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR August 21, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Richard MacMurray, VP General Manager Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 2 Ferry Street, PO Box 33 New London, CT 06320 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9-10., 11.1 & 15.1 Dear Mr. MacMurray, This letter is to confirm and document our meeting July 30, 2003 at the site described above. First we would like to thank you for taking the time to meet and discuss the site plan requirements. At the meeting we discussed compliance with all items proposed to the Southold Town Planning Board on the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and all items required in the final resolution. At the site visit, the following items were discussed and agreed need to be addressed: 1. Provide one paved handicapped parking space with line notations at existing snack bar as shown on site plan. At the site visit four cars were parked in the spot noted for only one parking space. 2. Extend existing sidewalk at existing snack bar as shown on the site plan. 3. Provide ramp to snack bar door at existing snack bar as shown on the site plan. 4. Install proposed wooden guide rail along property line on the east side of the parcel as shown on the site plan. Have a surveyor verify the emergency access locations and flag. 5. Install all proposed light fixtures on property line as shown on the site plan. OgpFFO(,�c P.O. Box 1179 ti's 'y �'! Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 o Southold, New York 11971-0959 W T Telephone (631) 765-1938 Gy • �pi � Sao �-V Fax(631)765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Richard MacMurray, VP General Manager Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 2 Ferry Street, PO Box 33 New London, CT 06320 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9-10., 11.1 & 15.1 Dear Mr. MacMurray, This letter is to confirm and document our meeting July 30, 2003 at the site described above. First we would like to thank you for taking the time to meet and discuss the site plan requirements. At the meeting we discussed compliance with all items proposed to the Southold Town Planning Board on the approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and all items required in the final resolution. At the site visit, the following items were discussed and agreed need to be addressed: 1. Provide one paved handicapped parking space with line notations at existing snack bar as shown on site plan. At the site visit four cars were parked in the spot noted for only one parking space. 2. Extend existing sidewalk at existing snack bar as shown on the site plan. 3. Provide ramp to snack bar door at existing snack bar as shown on the site plan. 4. Install proposed wooden guide rail along property line on the east side of the parcel as shown on the site plan. Have a surveyor verify the emergency access locations and flag. 5. Install all proposed light fixtures on property line as shown on the site plan. 9 0 Cross Sound Ferry — Page Two - August 21, 2003 6. Maintain the emergency access areas with no parking as noted on the site plan. At the time of site visit: the 25'x40' emergency access area on the north side of snack bar was blocked with parked cars and the 50'x40' emergency access area on the south side of snack bar was blocked with parked cars. Have a surveyor verify the emergency access locations and flag. 7. Re -grade parking area as needed to eliminate depressions and apply stone/gravel to the surface as noted on the site plan. 8. Correct location if necessary of the southerly berm with the double row of Rosa Rugosa on the south side of parcel. Have a surveyor verify berm location and flag. 9. Install proposed pedestrian crosswalk as shown on the site plan. 10. Provide written information on the staffing requirements you are providing on site. 11. NYS DOT approval needs to be secured and the work completed in compliance with all DOT requirements. 12. Install proposed natural buffer planting on east as shown on the site plan. 13. The site must comply with all items approved on the site plan and resolution as required. Attached is a copy of the approved resolution. 14. Have a surveyor verify locations of property corner boundary and flag. Please notify the Planning Board Office when all items are complete for a site inspection. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. jecu ours, n Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,pb, vs, bd,Town Attorney, of PLANNING BOARD MEMBA JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR January 09, 2004 gOFFOUr P.O. Box 1179 cy� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Go = Southold, New York 11971-0959 �y • �� Telephone(631)765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Richard MacMurray, VP General Manager Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 2 Ferry Street, PO Box 33 New London, CT 06320 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Approved Site Plan Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-15-9-10., 11.1 & 15.1 Dear Mr. MacMurray, This letter is to follow up on compliance with the Planning Board approved site plan dated February 1, 2002 and adopted resolution. To date we are still waiting for compliance to the above referenced site plan. Please notify the Planning Board Office when all items are complete for a site inspection. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, B o S on Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,pb, vs, Town Attorney, of PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO December 11, 2001 .r6. v" (/ P.O. Box 1179 Townia11, 530�fe Route -25 w Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Richard E. Warren, President Inter -Science Research Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1201 36 Nugent Street Southampton, NY 11969-1201 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry SCTM No. 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1 & 15.1 Dear Mr. Warren: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 10,2001: The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board received a revised site plan application from Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. on September 8, 2000; and WHEREAS, this proposed site plan amendment concerns 4.06 acres of land owned by the applicant at the terminus of SR 25 at Orient Point; and WHEREAS, John & Adam Wronowski are the owners of the property designated as SCTM No. 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1 & 15.1, consisting of three parcels, all zoned Marine II (Mll) Zoning and in current active use as a ferry terminal for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. located at Orient Point, coincident with the termination of NYS Route 25; and WHEREAS, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. requests site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for the entire site; and Cross Sound Ferry — Page Two —12/11/01 WHEREAS, the proposed application was determined to be an Unlisted Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR Part 617.2 (a -k) and 617.4, and, the Town of Southold Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on August 13, 2001 after review of relevant materials, public hearings, inspection of the property, and independent deliberation; the Negative Declaration finds that the proposed site plan for Cross Sound Ferry would not have a significant adverse impact on the environment as recorded in the resolution and determination adopted by the Planning Board on August 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said site plan amendment at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on December 10, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2000, the Director of Code Enforcement ruled in a memorandum of that date that the parking on the parcel known as "the Snack Bar Parcel' is a pre-existing use; and WHEREAS, the site plans for the other parcels included in this site plan application received certifications at the time of their approval; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposed to undertake a specified list of actions designed to improve operations, safety, aesthetics, wetlands and coastal resource protection and traffic efficiency at the site as reflected in the pending revised site plan; and WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated a willingness to seek additional operational improvements to accommodate passengers. These measures are noted as follows: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. will consider establishing a system for the reservation of parking for travelers using the high speed service, to allow for advance notice for the need for parking and to allow for daily planning of on-site parking. Investigate other areas for additional parking outside of the Orient area. Investigate bus/rail finks and potential to establish parking outside of Orient in association with mass transportation modes. Investigate out -of -the -area ferry landing sites to augment ferry services to Long Island. Pursue with the NYS Department of Transportation the re -arrangement of the terminus of NYS Route 25 as an integrated plan with ferry terminal properties, and coordinate such improvements with the Town of Southold. Until this is achieved, Cross Sound Ferry will be responsive to community concerns regarding traffic flow and pedestrian safety. As with any ongoing operation, it is important to continue to improve the management and timing of off-loading cars due to their impact on the traffic flow on NYS Route 25. Cross Sound Ferry — Page Three — 12/11/01 It is recognized that these measures are not part of the site plan application, but are useful in further improving operations at the site as long-term mutual goals of the Town and Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby acknowledges and supports the efforts of the applicant to pursue the additional operational improvements noted above; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has reviewed the site plan and the modifications made thereto with respect to Sections 100-251 and 100-252 of the Town Code and makes the following specific findings as they relate to these sections of the Code: 1. Given the site conditions and character/use of the adjoining properties, the improvements proposed in this site plan address the need to protect the established character and value of adjoining properties. The property is located within the M -II Marine Zoning District and lies adjacent to the terminus of SR 25, and the Cross Sound Ferry terminal building and vehicular parking and staging areas. While the property to the east is within the R-80 Residential Zone, this vacant property is currently owned/controlled by the applicant. The building on the subject property that is now the snack bar was constructed before 1955. Given the existing site conditions, the modifications that are proposed are considered to be improvement to the protection of the character of the immediate area. ®i The implementation of the landscape buffers as illustrated on the site plan will, to a degree, increase the visual screening of the parking on-site. The installation of the perimeter controls (curb stops and guardrail fencing) will help contain the parking within the area that have been designated for such use. 2. The plan proposes no increase in the square footage of the pre-existing building found on-site. With the implementation of the proposed plan, the physical surface areas currently used for parking will be reduced through the installation of guardrail fences and curb stops. 3. The proposed improvements will not cause any detrimental impact toward issues related to safety from fire, flood and other dangers, and as designed will provide adequate light, air and convenience of access for those using this facility. 4. The applicant has worked with the Planning Department to arrive at an appropriate design for traffic access to the site, for both vehicles and pedestrians. 5. The determination of parking on this site has clearly been a difficult issue for the Planning Board to resolve. After much deliberation, the Board finds that it is appropriate to grant site plan approval to permit the improvement of the parking conditions found on the subject site for use by the general public who, as patrons of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc., use the property. In making its determination, the Planning Board found that the use of the site operator (vehicle and passenger ferry/carrier service) does not fall within any of the specific categories listed in § 100-191A of the Town Code, leaving the Planning Board to determine what constitutes "reasonable and appropriate off-street parking" on a site -by -site, project -by -project basis. Cross Sound Ferry—Page Four— 12/11/01 6. The Planning Board finds that the improvements proposed on the site plan prepared by John J. Raynor, P.E., L.S., P.C., last dated November 15, 2001, fulfills the objective of § 100-252(B) by making improvements to the existing parking conditions on the site. In general, the improvements include: i. the re -grading and application of stone/gravel to the unpaved lot, so as to reduce potholes and provide on-site drainage control; ii. the installation of curb stops and a guard rail fence around the perimeter of the parking area so as to delineate the parking and protect the proposed plantings from vehicular encroachment; iii. the addition of a cross walk to aid pedestrians; iv. the assurance that the applicant will maintain at least one parking attendant during peak parking periods (summer and holiday weekends), to facilitate interior circulation and parking. 7. Under the unique circumstances of this particular site and application, the Board finds that the unpaved stone/gravel lot is preferable to a paved lot with marked stalls. The unpaved "Snack Bar Parcel" provides flexibility to use parking assistants in order to maximize the capacity of that lot during the peak seasonal needs of the applicant's services, thus reducing potential impact to the adjacent streets. Accordingly, the Board finds that the maintenance of the parking on the "Snack Bar Parcel" as an unpaved, unmarked parking area, in conjunction with the existing lots to the west represents the most "reasonable and appropriate off-street parking requirements" for this unique facility. 8. The proposed plan, to the maximum extent possible, provides adequate landscape buffers to the adjacent streets and properties. As illustrated on the site plan, last dated November 15, 2001, the applicant has proposed vegetative buffers around the parking areas of the snack bar parcel. 9. The proposed plan has been designed to protect/conserve natural features of the property and adjacent areas. To address concerns raised by the Trustees, the applicant will relocate the proposed parking area approximately 20 feet further away from the beach than originally proposed, and will install a low berm landscaped with native coastal species to provide protection and separation between the beach and the parking area. The plan also proposes to improve the drainage conditions found on the site, by regrading, and redirecting drainage to french drains proposed to capture and recharge runoff to the groundwater below. The use of french drains will prevent runoff from entering the adjacent tidal estuary. 10. The proposed plan avoids unnecessary pavement of the parking area by using a pervious stone/gravel material for resurfacing the snack bar parking lot. 11. The proposed plan minimizes the lighting effects on adjacent properties by employing low intensity safety lighting, which will be operated by a timer that allows the lights to automatically shut off one-half hour after the arrival of the last ferry for each business day. 12. No public address intercom or sound system is proposed within this site plan application. Cross Sound Ferry–Page Five– 12/11/01 13. The proposed plan fulfills the objective "that all site developments shall respect existing grades on site and on adjoining sites to avoid unnecessary excavation or filling and that all stormwater runoff generated on site will be retained on site in an environmentally acceptable manner." While the original design of the project included leveling of the parking surface, adding a stone surface and filling potholes, the current design includes regrading as sought by the Town Engineering Inspector to redirect and contain stormwater runoff on-site. 14. The proposed plan raises no issues related to public utilities in the area. 15. The proposed plan is determined to be at a scale consistent with existing development and with the Comprehensive Development Plan of the Town of Southold The proposal does not change the scale of the use of the property and proposes no new additional parking areas not historically used in the pre-existing parking areas. The use is consistent with the Marine Zoning District and the Town's Comprehensive Plan. 16. As the project proposes no new buildings, the proposed plan does not raise architectural issues. 17. The addition of a hard -surfaced handicapped space adjacent to the snack bar building is considered an improvement over the existing conditions found on the site. The Planning Board also —; acknowledges the creation of additional handicapped -accessible parking on the Terminal Parcel, nearest to the main building as part of this facility, for use by patrons needing such accommodations. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grants final approval with conditions to the revised site plan prepared by John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S., P.C. (last revised on November 15, 2001 and received in this office on November 20, 2001) and authorizes the Chairman to endorse said plans with the following conditions affixed thereto: 1. Curb stops shall be used to define the northern and wester parking area within the "Snack Bar" Parcel boundaries, including south of the Snack Bar. 2. A wooden barrier or guardrail shall protect landscaping and define the eastern border of the parking area within the "Snack Bar" Parcel. 3. A snow fence and berm planted with a double row of Rosa Rugosa (as per Board of Trustee Permit # 5408, dated November 8, 2001, and revised on December 5, 2001) shall define the southern border of the parking area within the "Snack Bar" Parcel boundaries. 4. Low Intensity Safety Lighting shall be installed within the "Snack Bar" parking area. Said lighting is to be shielded to the ground and operated by timer so as to automatically shut-off approximately one-half hour after the arrival of the last ferry run of each business day. Said lighting is to be installed on the wooden barriers/guardrails and curb stops within the boundaries of the "Snack Bar" parking area. Cross Sound Ferry—Page six -12/11/01 5. Existing and/or proposed landscaping around the perimeter of the parking area within the "Snack Bar" Parcel is to be maintained and/or planted in accordance with the final revised site plan, prepared by John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S., P.C. (last revised on November 15, 2001 and received in this office on November 20, 2001). 6. The regrading and application of stone and gravel within the "Snack Bar" Parcel shall incorporate drainage measures that were specified by the Board of Trustee Permit # 5408, and illustrated on the October 9th revised site plan, prepared by John J. Raynor, P.E. & L.S., P.C. (subsequently revised on November 15, 2001 and received in this office on November 20, 2001). These drainage measures were reviewed and approved by James Richter, Town Engineering Inspector, and endorsed by the Trustees. 7. The pedestrian walk across State Route 25 between the "Snack Bar Parcel' and the Ferry Terminal Office is to be painted and maintained in good condition by the applicant and in accordance with standard procedures of the New York State Department of Transportation. 8. No parking shall be permitted within or near the two (north and south) entrances/exits to the parking area within the boundaries of the "Snack Bar" Parcel, denoted on the final revised site plan as "Emergency Access Area". Signage stating that this is a Tow -Away Zone shall be posted at these two locations. 9. The two (2) locations denoted on the final revised site plan as "Emergency Access Area" on the site plan shall be interconnected with a minimum 15 foot aisle within the interior parking areas, in order to provide emergency vehicle access if necessary. 10. The existing wooden fencing at the southwest boundary of the "Snack Bar" Parcel is to be replaced with a split rail fence and maintained in good condition. 11. The applicant shall be required to provide at least one parking attendant to assist during all peak parking times (summer and holiday weekends) to assist travelers where necessary to get their vehicles out of the parking lot. The attendant would remain at the site for at least one-half hour after the arrival of the last ferry for the evening. 12. The applicant shall secure approval from the NYS Department of Transportation for the improvements shown on the site plan. As per Section 100-254 I. of the Site Plan Ordinance of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold, the Chairman's endorsement of the site plan will take place after the applicant signs this resolution placed on the site plan indicating his/her knowledge and acceptance of the conditions of approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. 1 V y your , Bennett Orl w i, r Chairman C rn-f- ).60� MWIIIIIIIIIII INIMP iAkL� I 065 AV qal., J i d pw--i L....A w p Iy. 1 Az s. 4e 10 0 J4 ys h.0 r ' ' 10 .P or „4 d .ey 0. F F, I I /e /F Y � G f of ,� .r • s .� N. 0 Y I 4471k q� N 44 C 7/i-5-163 �s 1 — r t, _-�- - - PARK AT YOUR OWN -..�. o. RISK _�� _�-y W��yf5�� •� _ .�, .�, �j r =--� �� '�� i _ ' - . _._ ,,. _ I y �.- 1 . rR •..'� 4's. `� 1 /1 . ,. T 7- � _ _ _ � -_ F �, -:;, y. a- t _ f -. � ... et '- �: _, r • �:. ,� _ .��u�� -. �_ ...R. , J � .. _. p '��\ �- ti _ .s �;`.. -- ....ti _. �.. _.. ,� _ i �' _ ` - - e. . a, ., i - _ -�. .---r � _ 4 1 ,it;�+ ;vim .. I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (EAF) PART 3 — EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS (including EAF Parts 1 & 2) Revised Site Plan Application for CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. Orient, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York NP&V Project No. 97106 June, 2001 NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC 1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING • CONBULTING 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAO. MELVILLE. NY 11747-2188-(51B1427-5685 . FAX (5161 427-5620 Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (EAF) PART 3 — EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS (including EAF Parts 1 & 2) Revised Site Plan Application for CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. Prepared By: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Prepared For: Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 (631)765-1938 Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (EAF) Revised Site Plan Application for CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT 3.0 BACKGROUND 4.0 COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL (1996) TO CURRENT (2001) PROPOSED PROJECT 5.0 DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 5.1 Analysis of General Conditions 5.2 Analysis of SEQR Classification 5.3 Comparison With Prior Positive Declaration 5.4 Analysis of Specific Impacts 5.5 Summary of Mitigation Inherent in the Project 6.0 CONCLUSIONS 7.0 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C EAF Parts 1 & 2 Original Positive Declaration Updated Traffic Impact Analysis Page 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 5 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 7 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 12 Part 3 — Evaluation of the Importance of Impacts Revised Site Plan Application for ' CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. ' 1.0 INTRODUCTION ' The site plan application of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc., has been pending before the Town of Southold Planning Board since April of 1996. The issue of parking and traffic involving the Cross Sound Ferry terminal has been a matter involving litigation and concern on the part of the Town of Southold Planning Board and community citizens since the commencement of operations of a high-speed, passenger -only ferry between Orient Point and Connecticut in 1995. ' The Town of Southold Planning Board has maintained a high level of involvement in the application, in order to ensure that the site plan requirements of the Town of Southold are abided ' by, and the duties and responsibility of the Planning Board are fulfilled. The Planning Board has been involved in litigation, court directed negotiations and environmental review, and is intimately familiar with the subject application. This involvement enables the Planning Board to ' take a "hard look" at the matter before the Board, and reach informed decisions with respect to potential environmental impacts. This Part 3 Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) documents some of the history of this application, the evolution of the application before the Planning Board, and the environmental considerations concerning the change in the nature of the proposed project. 2.0 PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT Since the nature of the proposed action before the Planning Board has changed, a Part 3 EAF is believed to be an effective tool for the Board to use as a means of documenting the changes, analyzing the project and presenting the reasoned elaboration that supports a Determination of Significance. ' The EAF Part 1 is used as an information and screening tool, for initial project review and coordination. The EAF Part 1 was submitted by the applicant in connection with a revised site plan submission that severed the Trust Parcel from the site plan application in May of 1999. A ' copy is included in Appendix A of this document. The EAF Part 2, is titled Project Impacts and Their Magnitude. This form provides a means of assessing the magnitude of impacts associated with a project and is also included with Appendix A. The Part 2 EAF indicates the following ' with respect to potential impacts of a project: Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is ' also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. ' Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. This document provides a Part 3 EAF to further assess the potential impacts of the amended site plan application. It is noted that the Part 2 EAT identified certain impacts associated with the application which warrant further discussion, noted as follows: ' • Impact on Transportation; • Impact on a Critical Environmental Area; and • Public Controversy Related to Potential Adverse Environmental Impacts. It is noted that none of these issues were found to be potentially large; however, in order to fully disclose potential impacts and present the discussion and analysis which support a Determination of Significance, this EAF Part 3 has been prepared. In addition, the EAF Part 3 documents ' background with respect to the project, and presents the current and prior application, as related to environmental significance. ' 3.0 BACKGROUND h I 1 In April of 1996, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. submitted a site plan application for the ferry terminal located at Orient Point, pursuant to a request by the Town of Southold Planning Board. The original project involving the Cross Sound Ferry site plan application involved multiple parcels of land identified as follows: rax Map No. Parcel Name Acreage Future Existing Use Zoning Use 1000-15-9-10.1 West Parcel 1.20 ac. Same Overflow Long MII Term Parkin 1000-15-9-11.1 Terminal Parcel 1.40 ac. Same Terminal Bldg; MII Vehicle Staging 1000-15-9-15.1 Snack Bar Parcel 1.46 ac. Same Snack Bar; Long MII Term Parkin 1000-15-9-3.5 Trust Parcel 2.50 ac. Parking Trust Parcel; R-80 Ex ansion Vacant Land The three (3) tax parcels involving the existing Cross Sound Ferry terminal operations comprise 4.06 acres of land. In 1996, Cross Sound Ferry proposed a 62% expansion to add the trust parcel of 2.5 acres to the operation and provide additional parking for the facility. The action at that time was described as follows: To provide additional parking to a previously approved ferry terminal on Route 25 in Orient; in order to accommodate increased demand for parking that has been generated in part by the inclusion of a high speed passenger only ferry service to the existing vehicular ferry service. The Town of Southold Planning Board determined that the project may have a significant impact on the environment and issued a Positive Declaration dated September 16, 1996, thereby requiring the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Page 2 I Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Subsequent to the Positive Declaration, the applicant prepared and submitted a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, which did not receive acceptance by the Planning Board. In addition, on-going litigation involving the Town, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. and a local organization "Southold Citizens for Safe Roads", proceeded during the period up to the present time. tIn May of 1999, Cross Sound Ferry severed the Trust Parcel from the application. This occurred as a result of observations of the traffic and parking patterns over the period from 1995 to 1998, ' which indicated that the Trust Parcel was not needed to provide additional parking for the operation. In addition, there was local opposition to an expansion of the parking area. As a result Cross Sound Ferry severed the Trust Parcel from the site plan application. At the time of the amended application, the applicant submitted additional environmental documents and traffic impact studies. The Planning Board has had the benefit of the following ' supporting environmental and traffic documents: • Traffic Assessment of Existing Cross Sound Ferry Services (updated March 1999, prepared by Dunn Engineering Services) • Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Cross Sound Ferry Parking Lot Expansion (September 1977; prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates) ' • Addendum and Full Environmental Assessment Form for the Revised Site Plan Application for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. (May 1999; prepared by Inter -Science Research Associates, Inc.) In addition, the Board has had updated and supplemental traffic impact analysis prepared by Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, in connection with this EAF Part 3. It is noted that the application before the Town is for review of three (3) ferry related use parcels as an integrated unit. The west parking lot, approved in 1995, already provided for a much ' needed increase in parking spaces. And the terminal parcel used primarily for offices, site entry, and stacking for loading of vessels has experienced modifications to improvements these operations. The purpose of the current site plan is to further improve the facility by improving existing parking facilities, drainage, aesthetics, and safety to accommodate the nature of the current use. 1 4.0 COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL (1996) TO CURRENT (2001) PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project is substantially different from the project which was pending before the Planning Board in 1996 and received a Positive Declaration. The 1996 application involved a 62% expansion of the ferry terminal's land area. The expansion went beyond the operational ' area of the ferry terminal, and utilized a 2.5 acre additional parcel that is zoned R-80 for single family residential use on 2 -acre lots. The expansion parcel would have involved the physical alteration of the additional area for the purpose of parking, in a Critical Environmental Area, ' expanded the use beyond the M II (marine transportation & recreation) zoning area, and encroached within a residential zone. Page3 ' Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ' The subsequent removal of the Trust Parcel from the pending application completely changes the nature of the application. The project as currently proposed, involves a site plan for the existing Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. parcels within the configuration of the existing facility. The project description, as provided in the revised site plan application, is written as follows: t Cross Sound Ferry operates a ferry terminal with car -carrying vessels and walk-on passenger services between Orient Point, New York and New London, Connecticut. The ferry route provides an important inter -state transportation connection and assists in providing an alternative ' transportation connection to and from Long Island. In response to customer needs, and to provide additional walk-on passenger capacity and improved service, Cross Sound Ferry added a high-speed, passenger -only ferry service in the mid -1990's. Cross Sound Ferry currently operates this high speed passenger only ferry from the Orient Point Terminal, providing connection to New London which serves as a link to the ' Foxwoods Casino in Connecticut and other passenger -only destinations. This service involves scheduled daily departures and arrivals and necessitates the short term parking of cars for the walk-on passengers which use this service. Over the past several years, the intensity of use of this service has stabilized, and the operation of this service is considered in the traffic evaluations, parking needs, and site plan/operation improvements plan proposed by Cross Sound Ferry and under consideration by the Planning Board. ' Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. requests site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for the existing and on-going operations currently occurring on the project site. In addition, the proposed action includes facility improvements on the eastern parcel referred to as ' the Snack Bar parcel, as well as operational improvements to the parcel referred to as the Terminal Parcel (west of the terminus of NYS Route 25). ' Those improvements which are design oriented, are incorporated into the site plan as follows: • Continue Existing Parking on the Snack Bar Parcel. The applicant has used the Snack Bar Parcel for terminal parking and will continue to do so; • Proposed Improvement of Vegetative Buffer: Cross Sound Ferry has prepared and submitted a planting plan to enhance and augment the existing vegetative buffer around the perimeter of the Snack Bar Parcel and provide a natural buffer planting area east of the Snack Bar Parcel; ' • Proposed Re -Grading and Application of Stone/Gravel to Snack Bar Parking Area: To eliminate the ponding of water during significant rainfall and reduce the number of existing potholes, the Snack Bar parking surface will be re -graded and surfaced with clean stone/gravel (these improvements will improve customer safety and drainage facilities); • Proposed Installation of Curb Stops and Guard Rail Fence: Cross Sound will install segments of curb stops and guard rail fence around the perimeter of the gravel parking surface. The curb stops and guard rail fence will function to delineate the overall parking ' area, and protect the proposed plantings from encroachment by vehicles; Page 4 Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ' • Proposed Installation of Low Intensity Safety Lighting.For the safety of their travelers, Cross Sound will install low intensity safety lighting on the east boundary of the Snack Bar parking area. All such lighting will be operated by a timer, allowing the lights to automatically shut off after the prescribed period (i.e. one-half hour after the arrival of the last ferry for each business day); and • Proposed Cross Walk: For traveler (pedestrian) safety, a cross walk is proposed to be painted across Route 25, between the Snack Bar parcel and the Terminal Parcel (parcel west of Route 25 terminus). ' The site plan related features are reflected in the formal engineered site plan prepared by a licensed engineer/surveyor and submitted to the Planning Board for site plan approval. The submission includes details of the proposed safety lighting, as well as a landscape plan providing the details of the proposed site landscaping. This EAF Part 3 evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the revised site plan as ' presented above and reflected in the application currently pending before the Planning Board. ' 5.0 DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 5.1 Analysis of General Conditions ' In general, the revision of the project to sever the expanded parking associated with the Trust Parcel from the application, changes the project such that potential significant environmental impacts are avoided. The Trust Parcel represented a 62% expansion of land area and an encroachment of operations into residential areas beyond the M II zoned land, with physical alteration and associated impacts. The Trust Parcel is zoned R-80, and could not be used for ' ferry terminal purposes absent a variance for parking or a change of use. The current site plan involves only the existing Terminal parcels owned and operated by Cross ' Sound Ferry Services, Inc. These parcels are currently zoned M II which specifically authorizes the Ferry terminal use. The site plan modifications are improvements to the current facility which as noted in the project description above (Section 4.0) involve: continued parking on the Snack Bar Parcel; landscape improvements around the Snack Bar Parcel; regrading, stabilization and provision of drainage facilities for the Snack Bar Parcel; installation of curb stops and guard rail fence; installation of low intensity safety lighting, and striping of a proposed cross walk on ' part of the New York State Route 25 property All of these measures involve minimal alteration of the site. All of these measures represent an ' improvement in safety, pedestrian circulation, aesthetics and environmental control. Since there are no major site alterations, no expansion of the structures associated with the current facility, ' and all proposed modifications represent improvements to the site, there is an initial perception that the project will not cause significant adverse environmental impacts based on an analysis of general conditions. Additional, more detailed analysis is provided in the following sections. Page 5 L Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 5.2 Analysis of SEQR Classification ' The original proposed project which involved a 62% expansion of the terminal land area, with additional parking and encroachment into the residential zone, beyond the MII zone, was determined to be a Type I action under the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) Act. A Type I action is an action that is more likely to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) than an Unlisted action. The project received a Positive Declaration, ' thus requiring the preparation of an EIS. The revision of the site plan application, by deleting the Trust Parcel, warrants additional consideration regarding SEQR classification. The current project does not propose an expansion of the facility, does not encroach within residential zoned land beyond the bounds of the MII district, and does not involve significant physical alteration of the project site. ' It is noted that the project has some characteristics of a Type II action, which would not require any review under SEQR. Specifically, Type II actions are defined under SEQR 617.5 (c). One ' Type II action [617.5 (c)(2)] is defined as follows: "replacement, rehabilitation or reconstruction of a structure or facility, in kind, on the same site.... unless such action meets or exceeds any of the thresholds in section 617.4 of this Part". The facility will be rehabilitated in-kind and none of the other thresholds in 617.4 will be met or exceeded. However, the action is controversial and involves a site plan decision for site plan modifications including: parking lot grading and drainage, and the installation of lighting, landscaping and pedestrian circulation. As a result, this analysis finds that a conservative classification of the project as an Unlisted action is appropriate. This enables the Planning Board to take a "hard look" at the project, and come to an informed decision regarding the potential environmental consequences of the site plan application. ' With regard to the Type I action list contained in SEQR 617.4, the proposed project does not meet any of the criteria which would result in classification as a Type I action. Listed actions 1- t 4 involve adoption of community plans, changes of zoning and allowable uses, and acquisition of land by government. Listed action 5 involves residential use. Listed action 6 involves non residential facilities; however, an action must involve physical alteration of more than 10 acres. ' The area proposed to be modified is approximately 1.46 acres, and modifications involve regrading an existing parking lot and adding drainage and landscape improvements. Listed actions 7-9 involve structures of 100 or more feet in height, actions in agricultural areas, or actions within or substantially contiguous to historical buildings, facilities, sites or districts. Listed action 10 involves an action that exceeds 25 percent of any of the thresholds and occurring within or substantially contiguous to publicly owned parkland. There is a County Park ' to the north, that is separated from the site by a State highway (NYS Route 25). In addition, the area proposed to be physically altered involves 1.46 acres of land associated with limited surfacing and drainage improvements on the existing snack bar parcel parking area; 25 percent of 10 acres would require alteration of 2.5 or more acres. The final listed action in the Type I list (11) involves any Unlisted action that exceeds a Type I threshold established by an involved agency pursuant to SEQR 617.14. Review and analysis of the Type I list therefore finds that the action associated with the current (2000) site plan is appropriately classified as an Unlisted action under SEQR. Page 6 ' Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 5.3 Comparison with Prior Positive Declaration ' The Positive Declaration issued by the Planning Board for the original site plan application is dated September 16, 1996, and is included as an Appendix B to this document. The Planning Board provided ten (10) reasons as to why a Positive Declaration was appropriate for the project ' as proposed at that time. ' The current (2000) revised site plan addresses the issues which formed the basis for the original Positive Declaration. The revised site plan not only removes the expansion of parking and use areas associated with the Cross Sound Ferry terminal, but also incorporates site plan features that address drainage, aesthetic, and safety issues that were also of concern to the Planning Board in 1996. ' In order to document the original reasons for the Positive Declaration, and the changes and mitigation represented by the current application, a matrix has been prepared. This matrix, included as Table 1, is titled "Analysis of Reasons for the Original Positive Declaration in ' Consideration of Current Site Plan", and is included on the next page. The matrix lists each of the original reasons for the Positive Declaration, and provides a discussion/reason for a current finding of no significant impact with respect to the current site plan application. The results of ' this analysis finds that the ten (10) original reasons for the Positive Declaration are not valid with respect to the current site plan application, and no significant adverse environmental impact is expected with respect to the original reasons for the Positive Declaration. 5.4 Analysis of Specific Impacts ' The EAF Part 2 identified several potential issues of concern; however, none of the potential impacts were found to be potentially large. These issues are noted as follows: ' • Impact on Transportation; • Impact on a Critical Environmental Area; and ' • Public Controversy Related to Potential Adverse Environmental Impacts. Although EAF Part 2/3 procedures do not require additional analysis of potential impacts that are ' small to moderate based on EAF Part 2 review, the Planning Board has conducted additional analysis of each of these issues. ' Impact on Transportation Transportation impacts have been of concern with respect to the Cross Sound Ferry terminal operation. Several prior traffic impact reports have been completed for the applicant and are available for review and consideration. These include: • Traffic Assessment of Existing Cross Sound Ferry Services (updated March 1999, prepared by Dunn Engineering Services) Pagel Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. TABLE 1 ANALYSIS OF REASONS FOR THE ORIGINAL POSITIVE DECLARATION IN CONSIDERATION OF CURRENT SITE PLAN # '; Uriginal.Reason DiscnssimnlReas¢riTor:rdiagoENOSignificatitImpact Tini 1. 1 The project is a Type I action, which is more likely to The SEQRA Type I list has been reviewed. With regard to the Type I action list contained in SEQR 617.4, the proposed project does not meet any of the criteria which would result in classification require the preparation of a Draft EIS. In addition, the as a Type I action (See EAF Part 3, Section 5.2). The current action which involves site plan approval of the existing use within the bounds of the existing Ferry terminal is not a Type I action. The Actio project is located adjacent to the surface waters of SEQR regulations effective January 1996, do not designate an action in a CEA as an automatic Type I action. The site lies adjacent to Gardiners Bay and the Peconic Estuary; however, no new use a Ty Gardiners Bay, which comprises a portion the Peconic Bay areas will be established, and the boundaries of the current use areas will be better defined and limited. The project will remain within the MII zoned area, and will not encroach on lands associated Estuary, and lies within the Orient Point Critical with Orient Beach State Park or 48+ acres of land owned by S uffolk County. It is also noted that the project has some characteristics of a Type [I action, which would not require any review under No It Environmental Area (CEA). The proposed project may SEQR. Specifically, a Type R action involves: "replacement, rehabilitation or reconstruction of a structure or facili ty, in kind, on the same site.... unless such action meets or exceeds any of the Expe impair the environmental characteristics of this CEA. In thresholds in section 617.4 of this Part". The facility will be rehabilitated in -kind and none of the other thresholds will be met or exceeded. However, the action is con troversial and involves a site addition, the project is in proximity to the Orient Beach plan decision, parking lot grading and drainage, and installation of lighting, landscaping and pedestrian circulation; therefore, this analysis fords that a conservative classification as an Unlisted action State Park and 48+ acres of County Owned land. is appropriate. 2. The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the The proposed action involves improvements to the existing Snack Bar lot portion of the ferry terminal site. The terminal has experienced fluctuations in ridership, as a function of a variety of factors, intensity of land use on the project site, as a function of the one of which includes the popularity of casino gambling facilities in Connecticut. In response to these fluctuations, Cross Sound Ferry provided a high speed passenger boat in 1995. Itis noted that No In expanded parking, demand for parking in connection with the daily passenger carrying capacity of car carrying vessels is 376% of that of the passenger only boat (see Attachment 5). Therefore, the high speed ferry was intended to serve an existing demand Expe ferry operations and on-site traffic circulation for parking in a more convenient fashion. The land use intensity will not increase as a result of expanded parking, since no expanded pa rking is proposed. Cross Sound Ferry reports that ridership has stabilized access. as a function of market factors such as alternative transportation via a high speed passenger ferry to Connecticut from Glen Cove. The Ferry terminal comprises a portion of the Or ient Point traffic, with sightseers, marina, Plum Island and State Park traffic accounting for the balance. On site traffic and parking circulation and needs will be served by the existing terminal with minor modifications and improvements as reflected on the current site plan. 3. The proposed action may change the need and use of The proposed action does not involve any changes in the operation of the Cross Sound Ferry terminal, with the exception of improvements in the pedestrian circulation by installing a cross walk for public and pedestrian transportation services (including patrons and visitors across the State Route (SR) 25 right -of-way in the vicinity of the terminal building and snack bar. Since no change to the operation or major site changes are proposed, no impact No In existing bike trail), and may increase the demand for other is expected on public or pedestrian transportation services. Likewise, the project will not increase the demand for other community services such as fire, police, recreational facilities and utilities. As Expe community services including fire, polic e, recreational previously noted, the proposed action involves improvements to the existing Snack Bar lot portion of the ferry terminal site. facilities and utilities. 4. The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the As noted in the discussion under #2 above, the east end traffic volumes are found to be variable as a result of a variety of factors including growth, and casino gambling in Connecticut. Growth is not number of vehicle trips which utilize off-site infrastructure completely attributable to Cross Sound Ferry. Traffic volumes over the period since the high -speed ferry began operation are found to be variable, but do not reflect a significant increase in the No In facilities primarily including existing transportation number of vehicle trips. Using conservative peak season traffic counts and a growth factor for capacity analysis at road segments west of the terminal f inds that level of service is not reduced (with Expe systems. the exception of an insignificant reduction from B to C at CR 25 w/o Tabor Road), and is actually improved at SR 25 e/o Narrow River Road. Counts conducted by NYSDOT find that Cross Sound Ferry is only a component of traffic volume east of Greenport. Cross Sound Ferry reports that ridership has stabilized as a result of market factors. As a result, noise, air quality and solid waste factors are not attributable to the proposed project and based on traffic volumes, are not expected to be significant. 5. The project may adversely change noise and air quality as Although traffic volumes on Rte. 25 are variable and influenced by a variety of factors, the volumes and ridership attributable to the ferry have not significantly increased as a result of the proposed a function of increased traffic, and/or may substantially project. Accordingly, traffic related impacts such as noise and air quality would not increase. Likewise, solid waste generation as a function of riders would not experience a significant increase and No In increase solid waste generation. Existing and proposed would not be significantly impacted. Site drainage of the existing Snack Bar parcel parking area will be improved as a result of the project. The parking surface will be regraded to eliminate Expe site drainage must be analyzed and controlled. depressions and stone/gravel will be applied to the surface. Drainage rings will be installed in 2 areas at low points on the west side of the parking area to facilitate the recharge of stonnwater. 6. Increased intensity of site use for high speed ferry service As noted previously, traffic is variable as a result of many influences and CSF volume/ridership has not increased significantly, therefore, groundwater or surface water impacts would not increase. will increase the use of on-site facilities, particularly Water supply is provided by private wells or alternative portable sources as necessary. Sanitary effluent is handled by 2 on site systems; 1 for the terminal and I for the Snack Bar. All indications are No In sanitary flow and water use, and may result in an adv erse that the systems are functioning properly and are capable of handling the vo lume of waste generated with minimal impact on groundwater. Since there are no physical changes proposed for the site Expe impact on the environment. (with the exception of drainage control improvements), no significant impact is expected to groundwater or surface water. Drainage contr of on the Snack Bar parcel would be expected to benefit surface waters. 7. The project may impact visual and aesthetic resources, All use will be confined within the M II zoned area, with no expansion of parking or use areas proposed. Low elevation lighting is proposed at the perimeter of the parking lot mounted on guard rails particularly as regards lighting, and use during both and posts. Shields will be provided to screen illumination from adjacent p roperties to the north and east. Site aesthetics will be improved as a result of a landscape restoration plan to be implemented No In daytime and night time hours. along the northwest part of the Snack Bar parcel, and east of the Snack Bar parcel (off-site) a 300 x 15-20' natural buffer pla rating area will be installed. Expe 8. The proposed project may cause growth inducing aspects As noted previously, traffic is variable as a result of many influences and CSF volume/ridership has not increased significantly, therefore, growth inducing aspects of the project are not expected. The associated with the proposed project. In addition, the project does not involve expansion of use or parking areas; the existing facility is proposed to remain and be improved within the limits of the facility and within the limits ofthe MII zoned area. The No In study of mitigation of potential environmental impacts and use has historically operated on the subject site and is an integral part of the character of this parcel, and the transportation connection which it provides to Connecticut, therefore, alternatives do not Expe alternatives would be facilitated by the preparation of a apply. Although the current facility is not proposed to be expanded, mitigation is proposed in the form of drainage improvements, landscape improvements, and pedestrian circulation improvements. Draft EIS. As a result, no significant growth impacts are anticipated, and no additional mitigation measures or alternatives apply. 9. The project involves multiple agency jurisdictions and The project no longer involves multiple agency jurisdictions or permits, as there is no expansion proposed. Th e only entity with permit authority is the Planning Board under site plan review and permits, and the comprehensive review of potential approval procedures. The Town Trustees may require a permit if activity is proposed within 75' of the shoreline, and NYSDOT will be involved with improvements to the SR 2 5 right-of-way as No In impacts would be facilitated through the preparation of a necessary; however, improvements are designed to increase safety and improve circulation. Expe Draft EIS. 10 Impact of passenger only jet boats on marine environment. The high-speed passenger carrying fent' has been in operation since 1995. Water quality in Gardiners Bay is subject to tidal cycles and the area is proximate to Block Island Sound and ocean waters providing excellent water quality as reported in various references. Watercraft have been operating at the terminal since the 1700's, with increasing demand and response to provide service for this No In important transportation link. Given that water quality remains excellent, and large vessels have been transporting vehicles, passengers and cargo from the ferry site for over 50 years, it seems Expe reasonable to conclude that the relationship between the current operation and surface water quality is compatible, and no significant impact on water quality occurs. ling m not me I. ipact cted ipact cted ipact -ted ipact ,ted pact ;ted pact ;ted pact ;ted pact ;ted pact ;ted pact ;ted Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ' • Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Cross Sound Ferry Parking Lot Expansion (September 1997; prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates) In order to update and further evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the project, the Planning Board commissioned Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC to conduct further traffic evaluation. The purpose of the study is as follows: ' "... to compare the latest available traffic volume data with previous studies conducted to determine the prevailing parking and traffic conditions on Route 25 in the vicinity of Cross Sound Ferry". ' The traffic impact evaluation reviews trends in daily traffic volumes, capacity analysis of road segments east of Greenport, trends in ridership on certain vessels operated by Cross Sound Ferry, ' a breakdown of traffic volumes based on uses in the vicinity of Cross Sound Ferry, and provides conclusions regarding potential traffic impacts based on these trends. A copy of the supplemental traffic evaluation is provided in Appendix C of this document. It is noted that traffic growth between Main Street, Greenport and Orient Point, is a function of population growth, and the attraction of other destinations, not simply an increase in ferry related traffic. As noted in review of traffic data, traffic volumes are highly variable with seasonal factors as well as background growth, other destinations and ferry related activity, causing fluctuations in volume. Traffic volumes on the east end of Long Island would experience an ' increase over time, regardless of the introduction of a passenger only ferry, as a result of area growth. The data suggests that traffic volumes on Route 25 are variable and subject to a variety of factors, and that the volume and ridership attributable to Cross Sound Ferry has not increased significantly as a result of the proposed project. This could be a function of the ability of the Cross Sound Ferry services to accommodate a large number of passengers throughout the period of operation of the terminal, coupled with the change in availability of other forms of t transportation such as alternative high speed passenger ferry service from Glen Cove to Connecticut. The data also suggests that Cross Sound Ferry is only one component of traffic volume in the area between Greenport and Orient Point, comprising a portion of the car trips in ' the area of the terminus of NYS Route 25 in Orient, with other trips attributed to Orient Beach State Park, the Plum Island Ferry, Orient by the Sea marina and other services, parkland, sightseers and residents. ' As a result of this evaluation, the following conclusion is provided with respect to impact on transportation: We are of the opinion, based on the most recent traffic data that the conditions described in the Transportation Summary section of the "Traffic Assessment of Existing Cross ' Sound Ferry", Updated March 1999, are valid for the year 2001. Based on the review of prior documents and the update conducted herein, we do not expect significant traffic and/or safety impacts as a result of the improvements to the site. Page 9 1 Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ' Imoact on a Critical Environmental Area The applicant addressed the issue of Critical Environmental Area impacts, as well as impacts related to stormwater, sanitary effluent and erosion, as part of a supplemental environmental report submission in connection with the revised site plan. The document, Addendum and Full Environmental Assessment Form for the Revised Site Plan Application for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. (May 1999; prepared by Inter -Science Research Associates, Inc.) was reviewed ' and found to contain informative discussion regarding LEA's. The following is excerpted from that document to assist the Planning Board in addressing the issue of Impact on a Critical Environmental Area: ' 6 NYCRR Part 617.2 (j) defines a Critical Environmental Area (CEA) as a "specific geographic area designated by a state or local agency, having exceptional or unique environmental characteristics". In 1986, the Suffolk County Legislature designated County -owned land located to the north and east of the Cross Sound facility as a Critical Environmental Area. Furthermore, in 1988, the County designated all land located immediately within 500 ft. of the shoreline as a CEA. Based upon the County's actions in 1986 and 1988, the project site is located in, and is ' surrounded by, land designated as CEA. Relationship to the Current Operation: The nearby County property was designated a ' CEA largely in part due to the Suffolk County Open Space Acquisition Program. The lands within 500 ft. of the shoreline were designated as CEA mainly because of the potential impacts resulting from runoff, sewage effluent and/or erosion on the adjacent ' bay/estuary areas. The existing facility/project site is located over 100 11. from the County -owned CEA land. It is believed that this separation is sufficient in preventing any physical disturbance to the County property generated by the on-going operation of ' the Cross Sound Facility. However, the CEA land that runs along the coastline and includes a large percentage of the project site deserves to be addressed more closely. Given that runoff, sewage effluent and erosion have been identified by the County as the ' principal potential threats to this specific CEA, each of these issues will be discussed separately below: Stormwater Runoff — The existing facility utilizes a drainage system similar to the other ' parking lots in the vicinity. Stormwater is directed towards French drains and drywells. Furthermore, since a large portion of the existing parking area is surfaced with loose blue stone and/or exposed soil, most rainwater simply permeates immediately through the surface. During unique periods of intense or lengthy rainfall, the stormwater control structures (i.e. the French drains and drywells) collect and store the runoff generated on the site for eventual groundwater recharge. It should be noted that the on-site drainage ' plan for the existing West parcel and Terminal Parcels were approved by the Town Engineer and the Snack Bar parcel drainage plan will also require review and approval by the Town Engineer. The addition of drainage on the Snack Bar parcel will be of ' environmental benefit. Sewage Effluent — Cross Sound provides restrooms in the existing Snack Bar and Ferry ' terminal buildings. There are no changes proposed to restroom facilities, and no building expansion that would result in the need to increase system capacity or obtain other agency approvals. L Page 10 I I I Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Erosion — Approximately 95% of the existing operations occurs upland/outside of the designated Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Those operations that occur below the Erosion Hazard Area (such as passenger and vehicle loading/unloading; vessel docking, etc.) have no other alternative with respect to location. Regardless, based upon the site inspection and consultation with coastal engineers, it has been determined that even the actions that take place below the erosion hazard area do not result in negative impacts, or contribute to the erosion of the adjacent beach or dunes. With respect to the discussion noted above, it is understood that the current on-going operation of the Cross Sound Facility does not have any significant effect on the County -owned CEA land located to the east beyond other privately owned lands and to the north beyond NYS Route 25. Furthermore, the on-site CEA land located along the coastline will continue to function as a buffer and remain an important safeguard against any threat to the Bay. As a result of this information, the project is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on a CEA, nor is the project expected to cause a significant adverse impact with respect to stormwater runoff, sewage disposal or erosion. Controversv Related to Potential Adverse Environmental Impacts The degree of public interest is evident in the litigation that has transpired throughout the review process. The Planning Board must rise above the controversy and fulfill their role in implementing the provisions of the Town Zoning Code and conducting appropriate and fair review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. ' The Planning Board has conducted necessary hearings and disseminated information to the pubic as appropriate throughout the review process. The Planning Board has reacted to the submissions of the applicant and completed appropriate reviews in accordance with Town and ' State regulations and guidelines. The Planning Board has conducted itself as appropriate by direction of the Court with regard to the continuing litigation. At this time, the Planning Board is in the process of reviewing all available information in order to render a SEQR Determination of Significance and decision on the site plan once SEQR is completed. 5.5 Summary of Mitigation Inherent in the Project CSI The Applicant has provided mitigation through project design. Project design features intended by the applicant which are shown on the site plan are noted as follows: • Installation of curb stops along the northern, western and southern borders of the Snack Bar Parcel; • Installation of a wooden or metal guard rail along the length of the eastern border of the Snack Bar Parcel; Page 11 ' Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ' • Grade the parking surface to eliminate depressions and apply stone/gravel to the surface (it is noted that any regulated action within 100 feet of Trustees designated wetlands will require approval of the Town Trustees); • Enhancement of existing vegetative buffers adjacent to the parking areas on the Snack Bar Parcel; • Install low intensity safety lighting for pedestrian safety during evening hours of operation; and • Provide striped cross -walk across NYS Route 25, for pedestrian access between the Snack Bar Parcel and the Terminal Parcel (with appropriate NYSDOT authorization). ' These measures minimize potential environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable, and are inherent in the project design. These measures address long-term concerns of the Planning Board with respect to the Cross Sound Ferry terminal operations regarding drainage, ' aesthetics and safety. The measures incorporated into the site plan improve site conditions on a site that is already in operation. As a result, the site plan is viewed as benefiting the health, safety and environmental conditions of the subject site. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS Potential environmental impacts of the revised site plan application for Cross Sound Ferry ' Services, Inc. are evaluated in this EAF Part 3. The evaluation considers the following: • Original and current proposed site plans; ' • Impact analysis of general conditions; • Analysis of SEQR classification of the project; • Comparison with the prior Positive Declaration • Specific analysis of impacts identified in the EAT Part 2 (including transportation, CEA and controversy); and • Appropriate mitigation measures incorporated into the project. ' The Planning Board is extremely familiar with the original and current proposed project, the background and history related to the project site, the project site itself, the on-going litigation, and potential impacts of the project. The Plamiing Board has taken a "hard look" at the potential impacts of the project, and in order to implement the provisions of the Town Zoning Code, as well as the regulations for implementation of SEQR as lead agency in review of the project. ' Based on the evaluation contained herein, and in consideration of available information, it is concluded that there are no significant adverse environmental impacts anticipated as a result of ' the revised site plan application of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Impacts are either not significant, or are adequately mitigated as a result of the design features inherent in the revised site plan. In addition, the Planning Board fully supports Cross Sound Ferry's efforts to improve ' operations through measures identified in Section 7.0 of this report. This document fulfills SEQRA requirements for completing environmental evaluation using a ' Part 1, 2 and 3 Environmental Assessment Form, and allows the lead agency to take a "hard look" at the potential impacts of a project, to reach an informed decision. Page 12 11 11 Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ' 7.0 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Although the proposed modifications to the Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. terminal are not ' expected to have a significant adverse environmental impact, the Ferry company has indicated a willingness to seek additional operations improvements to accommodate passengers. These measures are noted as follows: • Provide Parking Attendant: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. proposes to provide at least one parking attendant during peak parking periods (summer and holiday weekends), to assist travelers ' with vehicular parking and access. The attendant will remain at the site for at least one-half hour after the arrival of the last ferry for the business day. • Consider a Reservation System: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. will consider establishing a system for the reservation of parking for travelers using the high speed service, to allow for advance notice for the need for parking and to allow for daily planning of on-site parking. Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. will also explore further long-term operational modifications to ' further improve service and limit congestion and traffic inconvenience, noted as follows: • Investigate other areas for additional parking outside of the Orient area. ' • Investigate bus/rail links and potential to establish parking outside of Orient in association with mass transportation modes. • Investigate out -of -the -area ferry landing sites to augment ferry services to Long Island. ' • Pursue with the NYS Department of Transportation the re -arrangement of the terminus of NYS Route 25 as an integrated plan with ferry terminal properties, and coordinate such improvements with the Town of Southold. Until this is achieved, Cross Sound Ferry will be responsive to ' community concerns regarding traffic flow and pedestrian safety. As with any ongoing operation, it is important to continue to improve the management and timing of off-loading cars due to their impact on the traffic flow on NYS Route 25. ' Through extensive project review, several items have been identified for incorporation into the site plan to improve design. These items all pertain to the Snack Bar parcel and will be addressed by the ' Planning Board through site plan review. Items include: additional controlled lighting of the parking area, the addition of at least 1 handicap parking stall based on the requirements of the zoning code for the square footage of the building, addition of drainage per the Town Engineer memorandum, additional landscaping, maintaining the open access at the south end of the parking area, and maintaining the existing wood fence between the parking area and the beach. Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. has been a long-term business providing an important service on the east end of Long Island. Cross Sound Ferry provides an inter -state transportation link that serves as a convenient and necessary transportation alternative to destinations in New England, thereby avoiding the need to travel through New York City to exit or enter Long Island. The ferry company has made ' adjustments to serve the needs of the traveling public, and seeks to operate in a safe and efficient manner to serve these needs. In recognition of changes in travel patterns and preferences, Cross Sound Ferry has provided service to accommodate transport of goods, commutation, vehicle ' transport, and recreation and entertainment related travel. Cross Sound Ferry intends to operate at the Orient terminal well into the future, and have indicated the company will seek means to ensure that public needs and desires are met in a manner that maximizes the use of the facility without being a detriment to the locale. The improvements to the terminal and specifically the Snack Bar parcel proposed as part of the pending site plan will improve the operation, and additional considerations outlined above will be explored to further improve the operation. Page 13 L 1 11 APPENDICES 11 I I I I I I I 1 Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Page 14 FI 1 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 I 1 APPENDIX A EAF PARTS I & 2 Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 17 1416-2 (9195)-7c 617.20 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. it is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance.licants and agencies can be assured that the determinati The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby app on process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially - large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially -large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: , ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Cross Sound Ferry – Proposed continuance of current operation and land use. Name of Action Southold Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date I I I PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as partof the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify oarh instance. NAME OF ACTION Cross Sound Ferry — Proposed continuance " of current operation and land use LOCATION OF ACTION (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR ( 860) 443-7394 Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ADDRESS PO Box 33 STATE ZIP CODE CITYIPO CT 06320 New London BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (It different) SAME ( ) ADDRESS STATE ZIP CODE CITYIPO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Refer to E.A.F. Addendum Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial [RCommercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. T I rea a of roiect area: 4.06 acres. (176,854 s.f.) AFTER COMPLETION 17,685 acres QRural (non-farm) 3. ota ac g p APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESENTLY 17,685 acres n acres acres acres acres n acres 0 acres n acres 0 acres 106,113 s. f .acres 106, 113 s afcres 53.056 s.f acres 54 n56 ores n acres 0 acres r 'al What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? FA Fill land nA M a. Soil drainage: UWell drained QS % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site (Poorly drained s % of site b. if any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? []Yes 12No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 I L B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 4.06 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 3.65 acres initially; 3.65 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped G 1 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ;;.A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N _ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing * ; Proposed*Refer to Traffic and Parking sectior of EAF Addendum g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 1,188 ft. 3 5. Approximate percentage of proposed protect site with slopes: Jap-1 0% 100 % ❑10-15% % C115%15% or greater ° �° 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? X3Yes ❑No []Yes ®No contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 7. Is project substantially 8. What is the depth of the water table? 7.8 (in feet) Below surface 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? mes 0N 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes MNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes ❑No According to Refer to E.A.F. Addendum Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes ❑No %ffescribe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community .or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes Flo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Yes ❑No Streams within or contiguous to project area: 15. Stream of River to which it is tributary a. Name of and name 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Gardiner's Bay b. Size (In acres) a. Name 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? MYes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No N.A. a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) if Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes 0N N.A. 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes M&o 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Mes ❑No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ®No I L B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 4.06 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 3.65 acres initially; 3.65 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped G 1 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ;;.A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N _ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing * ; Proposed*Refer to Traffic and Parking sectior of EAF Addendum g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 1,188 ft. 3 o 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No 91/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes IgNo N.A. months, (including demolition). 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7, If multi-phased: N.A. a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No g. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes %RNo N.A. 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N.A. ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N.A. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ONo If yes, explain e 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes WNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Mes ❑No Type Sanitary effluent 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ❑No Explain No change 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? LYes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? OYes '❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1/4 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? };Yes ❑No Cutchogue Town. of Southold c. If yes, give name Southold Landfill/Transfer Sta. location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes 060 e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. M18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes Mo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes XENo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes )MNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes YMNo If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity JZJKNOWN gallons/minute. gallons/day. Design flow = 2,950 gal/day -terminal ar 23. Total anticipated water usage per day g Y• snack bar 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes jalo If Yes, explain 4 Submittal 25. Approvals Required: Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes 9No City, Town, Village Planning Board Cayes ❑No Site Elan _ n/ii/qF City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes CRNo City, County Health Department ❑Yes CRNo other Local Agencies Dyes CRNo other Regional Agencies ❑Yes MNo State Agencies []Yes CRNo Federal Agencies ❑Yes [3No c. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? (Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision site plan ❑new/revision of master plan []resource management plan ❑other 2, What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site?MII (Marine II) 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Building area — 53,056 s.f. (30% coverage) 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N.A. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the. site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N.A. 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? gYes ONO 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? MII, R-80 R-40• Commercial Residential Transportation Open Space 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/+ mile? $%Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? �p 10, Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ONO a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Refer Yto Traffic and Parking section of EAF D. informational Details �J�u$}zi�'be any adverse Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If ther impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. 4/99 Applicant/Sponsor Name Inter—Science Research Associates Inc. Date for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc -Title Signature complete the If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 ICross Sound Ferry Services, Inc./Part II EAF Part II - RESPONSIBILITY OF LEAD AGENCY Project Impacts and Their Magnitude General Information (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. ' Identifying that an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. ' C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If threshold impact equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be mitigated by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude, check the yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. ' IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? _Yes X No I II J 11 1 2 3 IMPACT ON LAND Small to Potential Can Impact Be Examples that would apply to Column 1 Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Enter Yes or No) Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction of land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than one year or involve more than one phase or stage. Construction in a designated floodway. Other Impacts (Please describe): Project involves currently existing ferry terminal use site, and will incorporate facility improvements including operational improvements and landscaping. Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc./Part II EAF 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) Yes X No. List specific land forms: Project will not involve dune areas, additional 1 2 3 landscaping will be provided as part of site plan. Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) _ Yes X No. 4. Will proposed action affect any non -protected existing or new body of water? _ Yes X No A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By Construction or operation causing any contamination of a public water supply system. Impact Impact Project Change Please List Other Impacts: (Enter Yes or No) Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Please List Other Impacts: Project does not involve dredging or development beyond current use areas. 4. Will proposed action affect any non -protected existing or new body of water? _ Yes X No A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Please List Other Impacts: 5. Will proposed action affect surface or groundwater quality? _ Yes X No Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a public water supply system. Please List Other Impacts: 2 I [1 11 1 I C I Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc./Part II EAF 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow, patterns or surface water runoff? _ Yes X No. Proposed Action would impede flood water flows. Proposed Action is likely to cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drain patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Please list other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? _ Yes X No. Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in given hour. 1 2 3 Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of Small to Potential Can Impact Be refuse per hour. Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON WATER (cont.) Impact Impact Project Change (Examples that would apply to column 2) (Enter Yes or No) Proposed Action requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Please list other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow, patterns or surface water runoff? _ Yes X No. Proposed Action would impede flood water flows. Proposed Action is likely to cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drain patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Please list other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? _ Yes X No. Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Proposed Action emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. Per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development in existing industrial areas. Please List Other Impacts: 3 I P I f1 Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc./Part II EAF IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? _ Yes X No. 1 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or endangered species? _ Yes X No [l C I I Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or 1 2 3 I.MPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to Column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Impact Impact Project Change Please list other impacts: (Enter Yes or No) Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide over more than twice a year other than for agricultural purposes. Please list other impacts: 1 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or endangered species? _ Yes X No [l C I I Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or 1 2 3 migratory fish or wildlife species. Small to Potential Can Impact Be Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature Moderate Large Mitigated By forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Impact Impact Project Change Please list other impacts: (Enter Yes or No) IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? _ Yes X No H 1 2 3 IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to Column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Enter Yes or No) The Proposed Action would sever, cross through, or limit access to a field of agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc. Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than one acre of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would disrupt agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); prevent agricultural land management measures from being installed; or create a need for such measures (e.g., cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) Please list other impacts: H I 1 I I I lJ 11 1 Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc./Part II EAF IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES OR COMMUNITY CHARACTER 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources, or the character of the neighborhood or community? _ Yes X No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES OR COMMUNITY 1 Small to 2 Potential 3 Can Impact Be CHARACTER (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By (If Necessary Use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.23) Impacf Impact Project Change g e (Enter Yes or No) Introduction of proposed land uses, projects or project components Impact Impact Project Change obviously different or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use (Enter Yes or No) patterns or existing man-made additions to the landscape. Introduction of proposed land uses, projects or project components as described in the above example that will be visible to users of aesthetic resources. This will eliminate or significantly reduce the public enjoyment or appreciation of the appearance or aesthetic qualities of a resource or community character. Introduction of project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Please list other impacts: The facility is currently existing and has historically occupied the project site. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12, Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontogical importance?—Yes X No 5 1 2 3 IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Enter Yes or No) Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or contiguous to any facility or site listed or eligible for listing on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archeological sites on the NSY Site Inventory. Please list other impacts: 5 I 1 11 11 I 1 �l I I 1_1 Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc./Part II EAF IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? _ Yes X No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? X Yes _ No 1 2 3 IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Enter Yes or No) The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Please list other impacts: X IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? X Yes _ No 1 IMPACT ON ENERGY — 15. Will proposed action affect the communities sources of fuel or energy supply? Yes X No I 1 I I 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Enter Yes or No) Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in severe traffic problems Please list other impacts: The project has been subject to extensive X traffic impact analysis. Surveys find that the ferry related traffic comprises a portion of the volume present at the terminus of NYS Route 25. Traffic volume has been evaluated over a 4 -year period and is found to be variable. Level of service calculations find that uninterrupted flow conditions do not exist for long periods along the segment of Route 25 between Greenport and the terminal. Parking appears adequate for the current level of use, and facility improvements will assist with passenger safety. Long-term plans to coordinate with NYSDOT will further improve conditions at the terminus of the State highway. 1 IMPACT ON ENERGY — 15. Will proposed action affect the communities sources of fuel or energy supply? Yes X No I 1 I I G 1 2 3 IMPACT ON ENERGY Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Enter Yes or No) Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in any form of energy in municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences. Please list other impacts: G F Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc./Part II EAF ' IMPACT FROM NOISE ODORS GLARE VIBRATION, OR ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE I I I 1 I 11 n I I I I 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration or electrical disturbance as a result of the Proposed Action? _ Yes X No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND (HAZARDS) SAFETY 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? _ Yes X No 1 2 3 IMPACT ON NOISE Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Enter Yes or No) Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Please list other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND (HAZARDS) SAFETY 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? _ Yes X No 7 1 2 3 IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND (HAZARDS) SAFETY Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Enter Yes or No) Proposed Action will cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., including wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases). Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other liquids. ease list other impacts: Pedestrian safetywill be improved through F osswalk striping, and improved circulation and futility operations. 7 Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc./Part II EAF ' IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing Community? Yes X No I I 1 I I I I 11 I S I I I IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 19. Will Proposed Action impact exceptional or unique characteristics of critical environmental areas (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14 (g) ? X Yes _ No 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR Small to Potential Can Impact Be NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By (Examples that would apply to column 2) Impact Impact Project Change Project has been subject to litigation. Planning Board has reviewed all (Enter Yes or No) The population of the city, town or village in which the project is likely to X grow by more than 5% of resident human population. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Will involve any permanent facility of a non-agricultural use on more than one acre in an agricultural district or remove more than 10 acres of (prime) X agricultural lands from cultivation. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will in induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more businesses. Please List other impacts: Facility currently exists/ operates at the site. IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 19. Will Proposed Action impact exceptional or unique characteristics of critical environmental areas (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14 (g) ? X Yes _ No 20. Is there public controversy related to Potential Adverse Environmental Impacts? X Yes _ No Either government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed 1 2 3 IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS Small to Potential Can Impact Be (Examples that would apply to column 2) Moderate Large Mitigated By subject to public hearings and thorough Planning Board deliberation. Impact Impact Project Change Project has been subject to litigation. Planning Board has reviewed all (Enter Yes or No) Proposed action to locate within the CEA. X Proposed action will result in a reduction of the resource. Proposed action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource. Proposed action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource. Other impacts: Site use is existing and will not adversely impact a CEA. X 20. Is there public controversy related to Potential Adverse Environmental Impacts? X Yes _ No Either government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the community. Project has been subject to public hearings and thorough Planning Board deliberation. Project has been subject to litigation. Planning Board has reviewed all relevant information and input. E I C I I I I APPENDIX B Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ' ORIGINAL POSITIVE DECLARATION 0 I 1 I I 0 I I PLANNING, BOARD MEMBERS ' September 17, 1996 RICIiA-tD G. WARD gAFra(,Y �;-.� Chairman ' GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. y BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. y 2 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ' 1G N;vETH L. EDWSRDS ' September 17, 1996 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD william Esseks, Esq. ; Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 East Main St. Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed site plan for Cross Sound Ferry SCTM# 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1, 15.1 & 3.5 ' Dear Mr. Esseks: ' The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 16, 1996. ' BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status on this Type I action. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board, as lead agency, finds that ' the action may significantly effect the environment, and makes a determination of a Positive Declaration. ' Enclosed please find a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. Please contact this of cz- within the next week rFor a scoping session date prior to your compiling the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Sincerely, tBennett Orlowski Acting Chairman ' enc. ;d hdlT:£0 IC22 �^� 2w 92:2 S5L 'ON Nrloi C-IOH1r105 WO�� gAFra(,Y �;-.� Town Hall, 63095 Main Road y�ONOGy�i P.O. Boa 1179 y Southold, New Yak 11971 765.3136 y 2 Fa:( (516) O @` ,ya Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD william Esseks, Esq. ; Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 East Main St. Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed site plan for Cross Sound Ferry SCTM# 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1, 15.1 & 3.5 ' Dear Mr. Esseks: ' The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 16, 1996. ' BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status on this Type I action. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board, as lead agency, finds that ' the action may significantly effect the environment, and makes a determination of a Positive Declaration. ' Enclosed please find a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. Please contact this of cz- within the next week rFor a scoping session date prior to your compiling the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Sincerely, tBennett Orlowski Acting Chairman ' enc. ;d hdlT:£0 IC22 �^� 2w 92:2 S5L 'ON Nrloi C-IOH1r105 WO�� I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS � r`S`�F �D(,I- ~�:• Town Hall, .93096 Main Road P.O. Bos 1179 Southold, New York 11971 y Zi Fns (516) 765.3136 p V Telephone (516) 765-19x8 PI -4.N ING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance September 16, 1996 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations ' pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. ' The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Cross Sound Ferry ' SCTM#: 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1, 15.1 & 3.5 ' Location: EIS State Rt. 25 at Orient Point SEAR Status: Type I ( X ) Unlisted ( ) Description of Action: ' To provide additional parking to a previously approved ferry terminal on Rt. 25 in Orient, in order to accommodate increased demand for parking that has been ' generated in part by the inciusicn of a high speed passenger only ferry service to the existine vehicular ferry service. L cc� w�TT:Ze Taez za '1Sw QsTL s 'L : -CN xe_ a�ddoa E�NINNd-d NMC a c4_no= : woa� t e. increased intensity of site use for high speed ferry service will increase the use of on-site facilities, particularly sanitary flow and water use, and may result in an adverse impact upon the environment. i. The project may impact visual and aesthetic resources. particularly as 1 zd Wd2T:�0 :QQZ 20 .�pW 9�ZE SSz LzS 'ON X",= GLHOE DNINNFJ76 NMO_1 =HlnOS WOb2 ' Page 2 SEAR Positive Declaration -Cross Sound Ferry September 16, 1996 Reasons Supporting This Determination: ' The applicant has provided the lead agency with a Long Environmental Assessment Form. The LEAF has been reviewed by the Planning Board, the Planning Board's Environmental Consultant, and other involved agencies. The t Cross Sound project is expected to have a potential significant impact particularly in view of site sensitivity regarding the following issues: ' 1. The project is a Type 1 action, which is mare likely to require the preparation of a Draft EIS. In addition, the project is located adjacent to ' the surface waters of Gardiners Bay, which comprises a portion of the Peconic Bay Estuary, and lies within the Orient Point Critical Environmental Area (CEA). The proposed project may impair the ' environmental characteristics of this CEA. In addition, the project is in proximity to the Orient Beach State Park and 48+ acres of County owned ' land. 2. The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the intensity of land use on the project site, as a function of the expanded parking, ferry operations and on-site traffic ' demand for parking in connection with circulation for parking access. ' 3. The proposed action may change the need and use of public and pedes- trian transportation services (including existing bike trail), and may increase the demand for other community services including fire, police ' recreational facilities and utilities. 4. The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the number of including vehicle trips which utilize off-site infrastructure facilities primarily existing transportation systems. 5. The project may adversely change noise and air quality as a function of increased traffic, and/or may substantially increase solid waste site drainage must be analyzed and ' generation. Existing and proposed controlled. t e. increased intensity of site use for high speed ferry service will increase the use of on-site facilities, particularly sanitary flow and water use, and may result in an adverse impact upon the environment. i. The project may impact visual and aesthetic resources. particularly as 1 zd Wd2T:�0 :QQZ 20 .�pW 9�ZE SSz LzS 'ON X",= GLHOE DNINNFJ76 NMO_1 =HlnOS WOb2 page 3 ' SEQR Positive Declaration - Cross Sound Ferry September 16, 1996 ' regards lighting, and use during both daytime and night time hours. ' 8. The proposed project may cause growth inducing aspects associated with the proposed project. In addition, the study of mitigation of potential ' environmental impacts and altematives would be facilitated by the preparation of a Draft EIS. 9. The project involves multiple agency jurisdictions and permits, and the comprehensive review of potential impacts would be facilitated through the preparation of a Draft EIS. 10. impact of passenger only jet boats on marine environment. The Southold Town Planning Board has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared in order to provide a means to assess the significance of the impacts of the project, to obtain input from involved agencies and the community, and ' to research possible alternatives and mitigation measures. ' For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner ' Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 ' cc: Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Dept. Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Board of Trustees ' Suffoik County Dept of Health Services Suffolk County Dept. of Planning Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works ' Suffolk County Dept. of Parks NYS Dept. of State, Coastal Resources &Waterfront Revitalization Division NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation - Albany & Stony Brook offices ' NYS Dept. of Transportation - Albany & Hauppauge offices NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation U.S. Dept of Agriculture U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Federal Emergency Management Agency ' td wdLT:E6 T02E ZE 9ETE SSL IES : '0N Nrd G'IdOE CNiNNd7d Nf101 Z70HirMc- : W06 -d 11 I. 1 1 LJ 1 1 1 I Environmental Assessment Form Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. APPENDIX C UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 16� Am NELSON & POPE, LLP E N G IN E E R S G E S 1 G N E R S S U R V E Y OR S VICTOR BERT, RE • VINCENT G. DONNELLY, RE. • ROBERT G. NELSON, PE., LS. ARTHUR J. KOERBER, RE. • ROBERT G. NELSON, JR., PE. ' JOSEPH R. EPIFANIA, P.E.-PAUL M. PACS, PL.S. ' June 7, 2001 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ' Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 ' Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cross Sound Ferry Service Inc. Amended and Full Environmental ' Assessment Form Traffic Assessment Review N&P No. 97106 ' Dear Mr. Orlowski: ' This letter is in reference to the Amended and Pull Environmental Assessment Form for the Revised Site Plan for Cross Sound Ferry Services Inc Orient Town of Southold Nelson & Pope has been retained to review prior Traffic 'Impact Analyses and update such materials as ' appropriate in order to apprise the Board of ant traffic impacts based upon all available data. The purpose of this study is to compare the latest available traffic volume data with previous ' studies conducted to determine the prevailing parking and traffic conditions on Route 25 in the vicinity of the Cross Sound Ferry. The State of New York has conducted traffic counts in connection with the "North Fork Recreation of Traffic Needs Assessment' (NFRTNA) program. These counts were conducted during the month of August 1998 and have recently become ' available. The final ;report for the NFRTNA is not available at this time. Several traffic studies were prepared as part of the application. These documents reviewed by Nelson & Pope (N&P) include the following: Traffic Assessment of Existing Cross Sound Ferry Services (updated March 1999, prepared by ' Dunn Engineering Services. Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Cross Sound Fen -y Parking Lot Expansion, (September 1997) ' prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates. 1999 Traffic Volume Report (March 2000) New York State Department of Transportation. — ' Correspondence from W. Ugolik, LITP 2000, North Fork Recreational Needs Assessment (April 13, 2000). 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747-2'160 '16311427-5665 • FAX [631 ] 427-5620 • w .neleonpppe.ccm ' Re: Cross Sound Ferry April 27, 2001 Page 2 Additionally technical reviews and the responses to review comments were also included in the research for this study. The (NFRTNA) data have been used to verify the conclusions of the applicant's Cross Sound Ferry traffic assessment and to recalculate the levels of service within the Route 25 highway segments east of Greenport using the most recent traffic volume data available. The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) reported in the March 1999 Updated Cross Sound Ferry traffic assessments are lower than the volumes reported in the 1999 New York State Traffic Volume Report. Excerpts from the State report are attached (See Attachment 1). The section of Route 25 between Main Street and Narrow River Road is reported by New York State to have an AADT of 5050 vehicles per day in 1999 as compared to the 4200 in 1996 indicated in the applicant's report. The section of Route 25 east of Narrow River Road and west of the ferry ' terminal is reported to have an AADT of 3600 vehicles per day in 1999 as compared to the 2700 previously reported in 1996. It should be noted that the NYSDOT uses these segments as a broad indicator of traffic activity within the specified section of road. During August of 1996, Dunn ' Engineering Associates (DEA) also collected additional traffic volumes on Route 25 east of both Narrow River Road and the entrance to Orient Beach State Park immediately west of the entrance to Cross Sound Ferry. In the March, 1999 Traffic Assessment prepared by DEA, they reported a ' volume of 5620 vehicles per day (ADT). It should be noted that the State generated AADT represented the Average Annual Daily Traffic and thus is proportioned to be an average over the entire year. These values are not directly comparable but are presented to indicate that actual counts during summer months are greater than average annual data. These August counts reflect the highly seasonal characteristics of the travel patterns on eastern Long Island and these data were used by DEA to project 1998 traffic volumes. The historical AADT data is summarized in the attached NYS 1999 Traffic Volume Data Report (Attachment 1). The NFRTNA data collected in July and August of 1998 has been applied to the roadway study segments included in the Cross Sound Ferry traffic assessment prepared by DEA. The study data ' available is for the segment of Route 25 west of the ferry terminal. This is the segment of Route 25 between Narrow River Road and the end of Route 25 at the ferry terminal. Excerpts of Traffic Volume Data for the NFRTNA are included in Attachment 2. The times and other study ' parameters have been retained by N&P for the purposes of this evaluation. Only the traffic volumes have been changed so that results could be properly compared. Additionally, the 3% annual growth rate has been applied to project conditions in the current year (2001). ' The traffic volumes were reported by DEA in the segments east of Main Street between Main Street and Tabor Road, between Tabor Road and Narrow River Road, and between Narrow River ' Road and Orient. These volumes are conservative based upon the other information now available. We have therefore retained their 1998 projected volumes and expanded them by a 3% annual growth for a three year period to project the 2001 traffic conditions to maintain the conservative methodology of the analysis. This will allow the Planning Board to consider the present traffic conditions on Route 25. 1 k 1 I 11 Re: Cross Sound Ferry April 27, 2001 Page 3 The following Table has been prepared as a summary of the traffic volume data compiled from the documents reviewed. The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) statistics have been obtained from NYSDOT reports. These volumes represent a 365 day average traffic volume and therefore do not describe roadway usage during peak seasons. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) statistics have been prepared using week long volume count data, including weekends. All ADT presented in the Table are based on volume counts conducted during the month of August and therefore they are representative of seasonal usage. These ADT volumes have been obtained from counts conducted in connection with the NFRTNA. SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA Studv W/O Ferry Narrow River Road E/O Main Street Year AADT ADT AADT ADT AADT ADT 1991 5300 5300 1992 2450 1993 4700 1994 1995 2650 4150 1996 2700 3950 4200 5920 12490 1997 3570 1 7400 10710 1998 3550 4060 4950 1999 3600 5050 1 7750 The data compiled in the foregoing table represents the best information available at this time. The roadway segments are not consistent throughout the various sources used. The originator of the specific data set defines the segment therefore, there may be overlaps. The count data labeled W/O Ferry was collected between the entrance to Orient Beach State Park and the entrance to the ferry terminal (New York State count location 25 0704 1728). The volume data labeled Narrow River Road was collected near the intersection of a private road and Truman's Path (New York State count location 25 0704 1706). The volume data labeled E/O Main Street was collected east of the NYS Route 25 and CR 48 intersection. This last location does not have an available NYS count location number. The traffic volume data for 1996, 1997 and 1998 under the ADT (average daily traffic) represents 24-hour counts recorded during the month of August. Therefore, these data include the peak summer seasonal traffic volume increases. The variation can be due to many factors including but not limited to: other uses in the area; out-of-state uses such as Casino gambling in Connecticut, the weather pattern during the summer months, the general economic climate as well as the volume of traffic generated by the ferries. The ferry generated traffic is subject to the same types of fluctuations as the other traffic as well as by competition from other transportation facilities. There has been an increase in competition in the transportation sector. A high speed passenger vessel presently operates between Glen Cove, NY and New London, Conn. �ll Re: Cross Sound Ferry April 27, 2001 Page 4 ' The Long Island State Parks and Recreation Commission report that 6760 vehicles entered Orient Beach State Park during the month of August 1998. The two way volume for the month was, therefore, 13,520 trips. Using supplemental daily park trips we have calculated that the park ' generates an ADT of 450 vehicles per day or approximately 11% of the traffic recorded in the segment of Route 25 west of the ferry terminal. I 1 I I The revised Levels of Service have been summarized and compared to the Levels of Service reported in the March 1999 Updated "Traffic Assessment of Existing Cross Sound Ferry". As indicated in the attached summary table (See Attachment 3) most of the Levels of Service projected to 2001 remained the same as those reported in the March 1999 updated report. Notable differences are those Levels of Service reported for the eastern most segment which have improved due to lower hourly volumes for the study intervals. These are the result of altered traffic patterns rather than a significant reduction in the overall daily volume of traffic. These improved Levels of Service are due to lower peak hour traffic volume as reported by NYSDOT as part of the NFRTNA project. The only degradation in Level of Service occurs in the segment east of Main Street during the one hour period between 9 and 10 PM on a Sunday. The Level of Service drops from B to C. This is not a significant change. Level of Service C is considered to be a free flow condition. Copies of the Levels of Service calculations are included in Attachment 4. The previous reports also reported ridership data for the Cross Sound Ferry Orient terminal. While the number of cars arriving and departing by ferry was similar in the September 1997 report and the report updated in March, 1999, there was a slight reduction in the average number of passengers transported on the high speed vessel. The following table is a summary of the peak arrivals and departures of 1997 and 1999 reported by Dunn Engineering Associates. ' The reduced peak ferry hour traffic volumes, evidenced by the 1998 NFRTNA traffic counts indicates there may be further reductions in the use or a different traffic pattern of the Cross Sound Ferry at Orient. ' Other factors such as area development and tourism can be contributing to the modified travel patterns. September 1997 March 1999 Departures 10 AM Weekday 333 329 Sat 10 AM 285 282 Sunday 10 AM 264 218 Arrivals 7-8 PM Weekdays 319 286 7-8 PM Sat. 261 262 5 —6 PM Sun 269 285 ' The reduced peak ferry hour traffic volumes, evidenced by the 1998 NFRTNA traffic counts indicates there may be further reductions in the use or a different traffic pattern of the Cross Sound Ferry at Orient. ' Other factors such as area development and tourism can be contributing to the modified travel patterns. �J Re: Cross Sound Ferry April 27, 2001 Page 5 A copy of the Cross Sound Ferry Excess Passenger Capacities Summary Table is included in the Attachments. This Table lists the vessels in use at the site and the vehicular and passenger capacities of each vessel. The operators at the service report that the car ferries have a two way passenger capacity of 9035 passengers per day beyond the average of 2.5 passengers per car and the passenger only vessel has a two way capacity of 2400 passengers per day. These represent full utilization of all vessels and the peak daily schedules of the vessels. The summary demonstrates that the passenger only vessel does not generate additional passenger trips as the other vessels have sufficient passenger capacity to meet the peak demand passenger volume. We are of the opinion, based upon the most recent traffic data that the conditions described in the Transportation Summary section of the "Traffic Assessment of Existing Cross Sound Ferry", Updated March 1999, are valid for the year 2001. Based on the review of prior documents and the update conducted herein, we do not expect significant traffic and/or safety impacts as a result of the improvements to the site. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. ' Very truly yours, ' NELSON & POPE ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS Attachments is i97 1 07/200 1 ieB4-27 [1 I Peter G. Brown I I I ATTACHMENT 1 1 NYS TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 m0111 MEN ! 110= m m m m m m m110 mmom m m m NEW YORK STATE 1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC VOLUME REPORT END COUNT LDC ROUTE MILE REFERENCE SECTION NUMBER POINT MARKER LENGTH SECTION ENDS AT LATEST COUNT -------PREVIOUS COUNTS------ COUNT EST EST EST EST STATION AADT YR AADT YR AADT YR AADT YR NUMBER 25 0415550 25 07041448 2.90 gNGSUFFOLK CCUTCHOGUE OUNTY FFOLK 25 0415990 25 07041572 4.40 AVE TUCKER LA 11700 sr 11500 98 10600 84 9600 91 25 0416523 25 07041838 5.33 SOUTHOLD RT 114 13700 «+ 13100 87 9300 93 9250 g0 0048 25 0418837 1.14 CR 48 7500 s+ 7450 88 8080 98 6800 93 0049 0,050 25 0417185 25 070417085.58 NARROW RI RI PER RO 7750 s+ 74DD 97 4700 93 5860 80 0052 25 0417462 25 07041729 2.87 ORIENT END 25 5050 .+ 4850 88 4150 85 5300 91 0296 3500 ++ 3650 98 2850 05 2450 82 0295 25A 0.00 REGION 11 COUNTY 5 QUEE/$ ACC 495I 25A 0110029 0.29 QUEENS MID -TOWN TUN JACKSON 26A 0110099 0.62 AVE RT 25 QUEENS BLVDODIS 7250 99 7300 Be 25A 0110307 2.16 ACC RT 27ST BQE 14900 9g 31400 86 10300 93 45800 89 0017 25A 0110543 2.38 ACC GRAND CENTRAL PKWY 36000 r« 35500 88 37000 97 48200 gB 6018 25A 0110128 0.86 ACC VAN WYCK EXPWY 48300 B9 34500 88 40900 85 32700 93 0019 25A 0110904 25A 2.78 ACC FRANCIS LEWIS BLVD 46100 99 0020 0/10895 0.91 ACC CLEARVIEW EXPWY 81100 9B 53500 88 55800 87 62300 98 0086 25A 0111090 0.85 AOC CROSS ISLAND PKWY 35800 s. 34800 97 51800 94 40100 93 0021 25A 0111247 1.S7 NASSAU CO LN 45100 88 3610 0 88 32200 85 30300 93 0022 42100 98 42800 BB 38700 97 41100 g8 0023 25A 0210100 25AO3021006 1.D0 EGION lo COLkTTY 3 NASSAU RLAKEVILLE 25A 0210192 25A03021018 0.8228300 RD EAST SNORE RD / CU17t.1NITY 09 27000 96 27100 94 264GO 93 0225 25A 0210,4&5 2.13 RT 101 ROSLYN ESTATES 30000 99 25800 95 25800 92 24700 89 0228 25A 0210481 25AD3021045 0.58 W SHORE RD VIL FLOWER 00 99 24500 33000"98 32500 32100 96 0227 CC 25A 0210b38 25AO302f062 1.77 HILL GLEN COVE RD `' 89 26400 Be23700 997 99 5 25100 92 0228 25A 0210871 2EAD3021060 2.33 RT 107 38800 99 32000 &2 35200 88 37200 88 0230 25A 0210868 25AD3021091 0.97 WOLVER FOLLOW RD / WHEATLE 99 24100 go 19800 92 27100 90 0231 25A 0211190 25A03021111 2.22 RT 106 19100 99 18700 94 17500 81 IBBOD 88 0232 25A 0211343 2SA03021140 1.53 BERRY HILL OYSTER BAY 20400 98 17600 93 21000 80 19800 87 0233 25A 0211512 25AO3021141 1.69 JCT COLD SPRING HARBOR RD 15300 97 15500 82 17&00 98 0235 25A 0211582 25AO3021154 0.70 SUFFOLK CO LINE 178900 17100 97 18800 Be 17400 95 0059 20300 at 18800 97 23200 eB 21700 85 0238 25A 0310012 25A07011" 1 0.12 RAT1081O COUNTY 7 SUFFOLK 25A 0310244 2SA07031008 2.32 LAWRENCE HILL RD 23400 .+ 22600 97 24206 92 21400 89 0111 25A 0310288 25A07031026 0.44 0 RUNE RT 110 M1NTTt40TON 14700 89 14200 96 13700 95 14200 92 0084 25A 0310360 25A07031035 0.72 PAWL 20700 s+ 20300 88 18300 94 17600 91 0238 25A 03tO407 25A07031038 0.47 GREEN LAWN Ro 28000 +« 27800 98 23800 93 24600 90 0241 25A 0310631 25A 25A07031077 2.24 CR Be CENTERPORT RD /LITTL oo 28400 96 20400 98 20800 92 0087 0310878 25A 25AO7031085 2-47 VERNON VALLEY RD WATERSIDE 2388 ++ 200 98 17000 95 15800 91 0239 0311063 25A 0311295 25A0703f121 1.85 CR 4 BREAD 8 CHEESE MLL12W 18300 rs 18100 ss 18 18200 98 15800 97 20100 97 15700 93 0240 25A 0311400 2SA07031133 2.32 1.05 ACC SUNKEN WADOW PKWY 18700 +« 18800 98 12000 993 15700 95 5 14300 90 0088 25A 0311586 25AO7031158 1.86 INDIAN HEAD ROAD ON RIGHT ST JOFNLANO 10200 «s 10200 88 9200 97 15200 92 10300 93 0092 25A 0311784 25 07031188 1.78 RD START 25 OLAP 18200 18100 98 22100 Be 20800 92 0243 0250 25A 0311819 25AO7031180 0.55 RR OVERPASS 15200 " 14800 95 15100 20500 80 0242 25A 0311899 0.80 RT 991 ENO 25 OLAP 50500 rr 4880il 85 982 43300 B3 3 0229 31100 +r 30000 97 33800 93 32200 92 0058 69 "-" YORK 67ATE muse 25 DIM OF TLARSPORTATIOI9 ¢7ARROW RIOBa RD AV RAGS MEMAY TO ORI64T POINT EI O LY RS POAT AVAIL 1998 AN %A9TBCAAW 6 ST9MMW PILE RAM 12-1 2 2 RT25 07]950498 1-I 1 1 2-1 I 1-0 2 1 4-5 2 1 5-6 16. 7 6-7 109 17 7-6 164 49 DAILY TOTAL 9-9 146 95 3,175 9-10 154 sa IQ-IL 138 79 EST. AADT 11-12 l01 64 3, Soo PH 12-1 155 •• 122 ]-I 115 66 2-1 150 132 7-� 03 111 t-5 116 100 •• 5-E 61 109 6-7 64 105 7-9 44 61 6-9 a7 165 9-10 /] 16 '• DEHOTPS ID-11 14 14 Pp RODR 11-12 A to TOTALS 1,677 11498 m m m m m= m r s= m m m w s m m= m NEM YORE STATE ROUTE 25 DBP1' OF TRANSPORTATION CR 48 MIDDLE RO&U TO AVBRADT WEEKDAY NARRow Rl VBR AOAO BUVRLY RPPORT APRIL 1994 AN EASTBOLND NBSTBOUND FILE) NAME 12-1 R 5 kvs 072960496 1-2 4 ] 2-1 3 1 1-4 4 3 4-5 4 3 5-6 22 14 6-1 119 43 1-6 l68 89 DAILY TOTAL 6-9 105 — 150 4,440 9-10 176 l06 10-11 149 lab 657. AA.bT 11-12 135 121 5,000 FN 12-1 146 111 1-2 143 120 2-1 169 177 3-4 143 152 4-6 V3 244 5-6 117 135 6-7 112 153 7-6 62 83 4-9 60 190 9-10 37 25 Di9NOTB9 18-I1 29 39 Loo" HOUR 11-12 10 12 TOTALS 2,266 2,194 I 1 I I [1 I ATTACHMENT 2 I NFRTNA TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8=-N7 av P02ROIN; ei, t4�nOD; ,. -111, 1 Page: Dunn Fngi.neerIna- Associates /00 66 Main Street 11978 4:16 Westhampton Beach, N.Y. ' Multi -Channel Horizontal *+� *+* Hourly 12:45 Sta*t+Time+*+*Jul*31,*1998+Fri ID : 62 25 W/O FERRY Start Date 10:15 e 1 BB End Time : Aug 13, 1998 Thu 0 2 WE fo End Date or 1.000° Sensor Used Axle+r++**«*+*«++ 3y 2 Yes #1 info EB Aivide Mode Subtraction 2++*Yes*++++*+**+++ Axle Sensor Used #2 In'.o : WE Divide BY Mode Subtraction Lane Lane #2 Av Total 3 Time ate Day---------- #1 ---- --------------------------- 31/98 Fri 13:00 121 90 OS 211 190 360 14:00 189 191 120 116 232 15:00 112 153 161 157 314 16:00 14"0 179 159 319 17:00 126 179 153 307 18:00 158 3160 19:00 134 d3 .82 128 105 211 20:00 21:00 51 139 95 190 81 163 13 122 22:00 13 27 23:00 7 _------- t TOTAL 1129 1541 1335 2670 HOUR 42% 58� PERCENTS Peak Peak Peak Peak Ph; AM Avg Peak Peak AM Tota' Percer-t M Total Percent -------------- ane Total Avg. Total oz - --?M - --------------------14.00 189 16.7% --------------- 1129 102.6 14:00 191 12.4s 1 2 1541 140.1 - - ----- ------ ------ ----- ------ ------ 380 14.2: --- ------ ------ 14:G0 --- - 2670 121.4 1MB. I I I 1-1 SENT bY: FGtlHUMNN; 00, — t4/OO Dunn Engineering Associates 4:16 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11578 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Page: 2 ID 62 25 W/0 FERRY Date of Data Aug 1, 1998 Sat zfo 1 1:8 Adj, Factor 1.00 0 2 WS # Of Lanes 2 tate Day Time Lane Lane #2 Avg. Total -------------------- //ol/98 Sat 00:00 -#1 ------------------------ 3 1 2 4 01:00 1 2 1 3 02:00 0 0 1 03:00 0 0 0 0 04:00 1 0 0 1 05:00 18 12 15 30 06:00 139 14 76 153 07:00 162 So' 109 218 ' 08:00 156 104 130 147 260 295 09:00 192 103 10:00 165 152 156 317 11:00 178 134 156 312 12:00 186 226 206 412 13:00 163 127 145 290 14:00 186 210 198 396 15:00 160 162 161 168 322 337 16:00 150 187 17:00 123 210 166 333 18:OC 94 161 127 255 19:00 100 207 153 307 20:00 68 113 90 181 21:00 57 107 82 164 22:00 21 90 55 8 111 17 23:00 4 13 ------- OUR TOTAL 2328 2391 ----- 2359 4719 PERCENTS 49% 51% PM Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Ati7 AM PM Total Avg.AM Total Percent PM Total Percent Total Avg. ---- ------ - -- --- 1- - 1016 ------------------------..----------------- 84.7 1312 109.3 09:00 1.92 8.2' 12:003 186 o:�a 226 578 48.2 18151.1 1 10:00 152 6.4% 12:00 ----------- _x ----- - _ IB. _594 _ _ 66 4 3125 130.2 10 00 ------ 317 6.7's 12:00 412 8.70 I 1ENT BV: PGBROWPJ; 63+ Za2C80; AHH-z/ -u' /:auHmi; rAbt I t/00 )4:16 Dunn Enqineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Page: 3 I I I Data Aug 2 1998 Sun e ID 62 25 W/O TERRY Date of Adj. Factor 1.00 0 1 EB # Of Lanes 2 0 2 WB Lane Lane to Day Time #1 #2 Avg. Total Sun 00 00 ---------------- 5 2 13 12/98 01:00 11 2 6 02:00 3 1 2 4 03:00 0 0 0 0 ' 04:00 2 2 2 10 4 20 05:00 18 2 06:00 112 12 62 124 07:00 166 56 111 222 08:00 153 53 103 206 09:00 203 80 141 283 10:00 166 177 171 343 i.i:00 258 170 214 224 426 448 12:00 211 237 13:00 178 189 183 367 14:00 230 230 230 460 15:00 235 210 222 16:00 231 284 257 545 17:00 161 239 200 400 18:00 235 127 181 '_-75 362 351 19:00 128 223 20:00 102 122 115 170 21:00 39 140 79 ' 22:00 5 153 IS8 23:00 7 7 7 14 LOUR TOTAL 2859 2724 49% 2791 5583 PERCENTS 51% Peak Peak- AN AIM AM FM FM Total Percen*_ PM Total Percent Total Avg, Total Avg. - -F=a--- _ercent 1097 4 1762 146.6 -Peak 11-00 -Peak 258 0 6'?t- 16:00 235 10_4s 557 46.4 2167 130.6 10:00 177 -284 --91 11:00 -- 428 7.7; =6:00 515 9.2% 1--- t 68 9 3929 163.7 I I I ')ENT BY: PG8POWN; 631 7242btt; Ar;t-41-UI i:auAlm; rAQZ ii 14/00 04:16 Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11976 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Page: 4 I************************************t*-k***********.************************* Date of Data Aug -s, 1998 Mor. .e ID 62 7.5 W/0 FERP.Y p d3 . Factor 1.00 o E. 4 Of manes 2 0 2 W3 Lane Lane #2 Avg. Total ate Day Time #1 ------------ _ _ Mon ------------------- 00:00 1 2 1 3 0 �03/98 01:00 0 0 0 02:00 1 1 1 2 C3:00 0 0 0 C 2 ' 04:00 2 0 1 23 05:00 21 2 11 06:00 136 10 73 146 07:00 159 39 99 198 O9:00 143 65 104 208 09:00 190 84 137 274 10:00 138 136 137 274 ' 11:00 145 127 136 272 329 12:00 166 163 164 13:00 112 95 103 207 14:00 152 181 166 133 15:00 93 102 97 195 16:00 131 154 142 285 17:00 92 189 140 285 18:00 89 147 1'_8 236 211 19:00 62 149 105 20:00 37 116 76 1.53 21:00 31 96 63 127 ' 22:00 7 45 26 52 23:00 1 5 3 6 F3OUR TOTAL 1909 1908 1908 3817 PERCENTS 50% 50% PM Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak AM �e AM PM AM Total Percent PM Total Percent Tota: Ava. Total Avg. _ ----'- ------- ------- -------------- ---190 09.00 10 0'= ,.2:00 lu^ 9�6- 78.0 97- 10:00 136 7.1z i ,- .7'00 9_94 466 38.6 1442 120.2 -- - ---189 -- -- -81-- 100.E - 09:00 - 274 7.2°s 14:00 333 9.74 g, 1402 58.4 2415 I I 3ENI HY: F'UEHUINN, L/00 04:16 I 0111 14440�0, X17 -c'-UI I.a'..rvll Ire' is Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Page: 5 Date*of*Data***Aug **4, 1998*Tue e SD 62 25 W/O FERRY Adj. Factior I -CC 1 o 1 EB Of ;manes 2 0 2 WB I E I Lane Lane to Day Time #1 #2 Avg. Total --------------------------------------------- 4/99 4/99 Tse ---- 0000 ------------------- 2 0 1 2 1 01:00 1 0 0 3 6 02:00 1 = 2 4 03:00 3 1 1 04:00 1 0 4 0 10 21 05:00 17 109 06:00 95 14 54 07:00 152 22 79 1�9 08:00 112 47 174 58 197 09:00 165 32 1"-7 235 10:00 11:00 128 '_30 107 90 110 220 230 100 30 i15 12:00 91 93 186 13:00 14:00 10033 147 ,25 250 15:00 82 101 51 183 16:00 92 117 104 209 226 17;00 68 158 i13 196 18:00 56 140 98 0 220 19:00 98 172 S2 104 20:00 41 63 50 10- 21:00 17 84 66 22:00 5 61 33 7 23:00 2 5 3 ------- 1516 1591 1553 3107 HOUR TOTAL 49% 51% PERCENTS Peak Peak Peak Peak Peak AM A -M Pm pyi Peak 'M Total percent PM Total Percent �e Total Avg. Total of Avg. - ---- ------------------ -'_03 --------------------------------------------- --- --67-3- 709 - 59.1 -------------- 09:00 165 00 10.9'a 14:00 172 6.8`-a 10.8% 807 1269 105 6 10_00 ---- _9-00 ------ ------ ( 322 26.8 ------ 7,E% 14:00 250 8.0° --1129 47 0 197E 82.4 10:00 2:5 p I E I ;ENT BY: ?GBHG49N; OJ1 1444ODD; Arn.cI-UI I.JINaq, r.4uc IJ V/00 Dunn Engineering Associates 6 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 119'YB I *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Page: 6 Date of Data Aug 5, I#++#+++++++++++#+++++++###*#+#*++++#*++#+*+#+*+++#+++++++++++#+++++1998+wed 1D 62 25 W/O FERRY 1 EPAdj. Factor 1.00 2 WE # Of Lanes : 2 I I I to Time Lane #1 Lana #2 Avg. Total Day --------------------------------------------- ",/98 Wed OC:00 3 1 2 4 01;00 1 2 1 3 0 C2:00 G 0 0 03:C0 1 1 1 y 04:00 2 0 1 8 2 17 05:00 13 4 7 39 78 06:00 07:00 71 162 22 92 184 I 08:00 130 64 97 194 277 09:00 203 7 4 1 _6 10:00 139 88 113 227 11:00 134 102 118 236 12:00 118 105 111 223 13:O0 99 73 86 172 14:00 98 159 128 257 I 15:00 77 77 77 154 16:00 93 '125 109 218 7:00 69 155 112 224 18:00 60 145 102 170 205 220 19:00 46 174 20:00 25 104 64 21:00 21 88 55 119 79 22:00 9 50 29 6 13 23:00 4 9 ------- OUR TOTAL 1580 1629 51% 1604 3209 PERCENTS 49% AM PM PM Peak peak Peak Peak PM Peak Total Peak Percent AM Total Avg. Total Avg. P.M Total Percent -------------- ------------------------- 859 71.6 7 21 ----- 60.1 C900 203 1 6_3v 19_ 00 365 30.a 1264 105.3 11:00 1 02 --174 -c-7% -- - 82.7 09:00 -- 277 8.6°s 14:00 257 fi.0% a ;.224 51.0 1985 I I I ;ENT 8Y: POPROM ; 631 7242855; 4N1 -2i -u: l:'j1ARI; raUt 14 /00 Dunn Engineering Associates Page: 7 )4:16 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Ng --- -- 52 5 2511 104.6 10:00 253 6.7% 18:..0 1 I I I Date of Data Aug 6, 1998 Thu ID 62 25 W/0 F'ERRY Adj. Factor 1.00 1 EB # of Lanes 2 2 WB wt#**#xw***rwtw*t****w***t**#**t*********tww**w**x**wt****#*#*#*w*+#*4*+t** Lane Lane to Day Time #1 #2 ----------------0 Avg. Total --------------------------- Thu 00:00 0 0 0 0 �6/98 01:00 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 2 1 1 3' 04:00 3 1 2 c 05:00 12 2 7 123 06:00 115 8 61 200 07:00 18', 19 100 174 08:00 120 54 87 09:00 190 46 118 436 10:CO 148 105 126 253 11:00 151 101 126 252 12:00 153 141 147 294 13:00 101 72 86 173 14:00 144 188 i66 332 206 15:00 106 102 104 16:00 123 146 134 269 17:00 97 67 82 164 19:00 85 274 179 77 359 X55 19:00 77 78 20:00 38 234 136 272 21:00 27 47 37 74 201 22:00 16 185 100 23:00 2 8 5 10 ------- OUR TOTAL 1891 1879 50 ----- 1885 3770 ■ PERCENTS 5`% 0% Peak ° peak a Peak Peak Peak Peak AM RM PM Tom -y percent PM � Total ,- Percent Total Avg. Total -vg Avy. ANI o, ------- ------------------------------------------------------ 09:00 190 10.0a 12:00 153 8.1% 922 76.8 969 60.8 105 5.6°_ 7.74 337 28.1 1542 -128_5 10_00 ----- n 359 -14.6- 9 5% Ng --- -- 52 5 2511 104.6 10:00 253 6.7% 18:..0 1 I I I S--CNT SY: PGBP064N; 14/00 04:16 1 631 /2aZdbD; am-t1-ut I: JIAR11; rNu❑ .o Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westi-.amptcn Bearh, N.Y. 11978 —4 -Channel Horizontal k** Page: 8 I I I _*= Hourly Mu +**AL,g+*7**1998+Fri- 'ate+of*Data ID 62 25 W/0 FERRY Adj. Factor 1.00 0 1 EB Of Lanes p 2 WB Lane Lane #2- Ava-- otal sate Day Time #1 - ------------- 7/98 Fri OO:CC ---- - 3 - 0 1 1 3 2 01:00 1 - 1 2 02:00 1 1 1 2 03:00 04:00 1 3 1 1 2 4 22 3 11 05:00 19 64 126 06:00 115 i3 89 176 ' 07:00 155 23 99 116 232 08:00 133 55 108 216 09:00 161 7,48 759 153 JOG 10:00 11:00 162 7.15 i48 297 295 12:00 143 152 147 253 13 00 'I17 136 126 164 3265 14:00 153 17 130 260 1 15:00 122 136 147 294 16:00 130 164 153:00 306 17 168 126 133 173 150 301 16:00 19:00 111 197 1 308 20100 105 206 31154 195 21:00 57 138 97 144 22:00 13 131 30 6161 23:00 7 54 - -- - ----- HOUR TOTAL 2176 2273 2224 4449 49� 51� PERCENTS peak Peak Peak Peak AM aPt FM FM Peak Peak Total Percent FM Total Percent Total Avg. Total vg. AM ______________ --------------- 7.7% wne ------------------------- ------- "- 11:00 ,A2 _- 6.4� 17:00 8 2�. 9 1% 922 76.8 1_254 1-04.5 150.2 10:00 i59 7.0'5 20:00 __-_-- ------ 1� 12 39.3 1802 ---- -----' -- --- ------ ------ ----- 6.95 14:00 320 __ 1393 56 0 3056 127.3 10:00 30i �MB. I I I SENT BY: P02RONN; 631 72428tt; A'ti-ei-u'. I:jeAna; rHQt 101ea 4/CC Dunn Engineering Associates Page: 9 4:16 66 Main Street Westhamoton Beach, N.Y. 11978 ' +++ Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal +** LD 52 25 W/0 FERRY Date of Data Aug 8, 1996 Sac fo 1 EB Adj. Factor 1.00 0 2 WE # Of Lanes 2 I I Lane Lane to Day Time #2 Avg. Total --------------- 08/58 Sat 00:00 ----#1-- 1 ----------------- 4 2 5 01:00 1 1 1 2 ' 02:00 4 4 4 8 03:00 1 0 0 1 04:00 2 3 2 5 05:00 24 5 14 75 29 151 06:00 139 12 07:00 174 48 111 222 09:00 152 110 131 262 09:00 176 102 139 278 10:00 165 16C 162 325 11:00 189 181 185 370 12:00 i58 154 156 134 312 268 13:00 i42 126 14:00 183 209 196 392 15:00 166 ill 141 283 133 172 152 305 _6:00 :7:00 135 180 157 315 18:00 114 146 130 260 19:00 116 156 136 84 272 168 20:00 8'7 81 21:00 71 95 83 16'0 22:00 15 99 23:00 10 14 --57 12 24 ----14 2 OUR TOTAL -- 2358 - 2179 2268 4537 PERCENTS 52% 48% PM PM Peak Peak Pea;< Peak Peak Peak A� AM Total Avc. AM Total - r percent PM Total Percent Total Avg. ------------- - ---------------------- 85.7 1.330 110 8 11:00 189 8.0v 14:00 183 209 7.80 9.6% _ _028 630 52.5 1549 "_29.1 11:00 181 8.3% 14:00 ------ ------ r, 16Ee -63 '- 2879 120.0 ----- 11:00 ------ 37C 8.2a 14:00 392 8.£% I I ENT BY; FOBAOhIN; t00 4:16 631 72428bb; ArrH-2(-ui /:e�.un�i; Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 119.78 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** r Nut ii lea Page: 10 Ddte*Of*Delta+*+*Au*g*+9**19S&*Sun ID 62 25 4/0 FERRY Adj. Factor 1.00 1 EB u Of Laney 2 2 WB tt I I Lane Lane ..e Day Time #1 #2 Avg. ---------- Total ---------------------- Sun 00:00 9 5 7 14 6 �/96 01:00 5 1 3 7 02:00 2 5 3 5 03:00 2 3 2 3 04:00 2 1 5 1 ,1 22 05:00 17 65 13i 06:00 120 11 99 199 07:00 149 50 -_06 212 ' 08:00 162 50 75 124 09:00 173 151 166 348 33 ' 10:00 i1:00 176 316 125 220 441 439 12:00 297 142 219 13:00 268 111-8 193 386 14:00 258 794 226 452 366496 15:00 233 153 193 6:00 294 202 248 245 49': 1"1:00 18:00 255 239 235 102 170 341 309 212 97 154 19:00 20:00 176 81 128 257 2'_:00 '--20 41 80 161 166 2 110 So' 56 832:00 16 23:00 14 2 8 ------- 'OUR TOTAL 3609 1912 2760 5521 65% 35% PERCENTS Peak Peak Peak AM PM PM Peak -__2M Total Percent AM Avg. AM Total percent Total Avg. Total -F`ak_-Peak-- 8.2% ------------------------ 2476 206 3 11:00 316 6.696 12:00 2.97 12-3% 1424 3.18.7 10:00 10:00 17:00 ------ 488 4 40.7 - -- - -57 -8-2- 8.0% 16:00 4:6 9.05 ----------- 67,5 3900 162.5 11:00 441 1621 I I ;ENT BY: FGBR0VN; 1/00 4:15 1 631 Arra -4/-ul /: dcANif rAUC 1014c Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11y78 ,,-channel Horizontal *** page: 11 *+* Hourly Mu i of Data Aug 10, 198 Mon *+****+*******+***+**+Date*** , *****++*+***++++*++.+.+ ID 62 25 W/0 FERRY Adj. Factor : 1.00 i EB # Of Lanes 2 Lane Lane Total ate Day Time 41 #-----Avg---------- '------------------------- 0/98 Mon 00:00 1 0 0 4 0 8 1 01:00 1 2 02:00 1 1 0 03:00 1 0 0 1 04:00 1 0 10 20 05:00 19 1 6 69 138 06:00 132 , 1 4 228 07;00 206 620 104 208 08:00 148 48 123 246 09:00 198 109 ,3,_ 263 10:00 154 61 120 240 11:00 159 89 --33 267 12:00 178 60 103 219 13:00 -59 137 _23 246 14:00 109 133 213 7 15:00 141 86 222' 16:00 180 146 158 317 17:00 171 128 118 123 246 18:00 120 118 119 238 19:00 8'0 61 73 14-1 20:00 62 54 109 21:00 47 45 6 7 56 112 22:00 2 4 23:00 4 0 --- - ....... HOUR TOTAL -2396 1358 1877 3754 64% 36% PERCENTS Peat peak Peak Peak pN FM FM Peak Peak Total Percent oM Tctal Fercent le iota, pN Avc. Total r E.v9. AM ---- -------------------------- !Bp 7.5a - --028 --BS ----- -1368 114.0 07:00 206 9.61; 6.0% 16:00 17:00 146 10.88° 1028 7 85.8 10:00 109 - - ---- ------ '41 328 27.3 1030 ---- ------ ------ 17:00 317 3.4 56 5 2398 9c 9 !3:00 263 7.03 B. 1356 I I ;ENT BY: PGBPOlNN; 631 72428bb; AN4-21-U1 /:JYAM; r'Aut 1/00 Dunn -Engineering Associates Page: 12 4:16 4:16 66 Mai.,. Screet Westhampton Beach, N.Y. "-1778 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** w++++#++w#+w+Date #ofwData #++Aug 11, +1998+Tue ID 02 25 W/0 FERRY Adj. Factor 1.00 1 : EP # Of Lane9 : 2 2 WB +*++++w++*++w+**ww++++++#+#++ww*#+*ww##+wx**w++#+++++++#++w+++w+++++##ww* 1 I 11 Lane Lane le Day Time #1 #2 Avg. ------------ Total /98 Tie 00:00 2 2 01:00 2 0 1 0 02:00 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 3 04:00 3 0 1 05:00 16 0 6 8 55 .6 110 CG:00 104 22 104 209 07:00 167 97 194 ' 08:00 147 47 41 109 219 09:00 178 161 75 118 236 10:00 11:00 155 68 111 27 19_ 223 255 12:00 194 61 13:00 131 59 4 190 14:00 176 91 133 267 15:00 154 47 100 201 16:00 18C 53 116 233 17:00 169 66 117 235214 18:00 160 54 107 120 241 19:00 162 79 20:OC 173 73 147 21:00 a5 54 109 72 22:00 49 23 33 6 3 23:00 --- OUR TOTAL 2520 864 1692 3384 74$ 26% PERCENTS Peak Peak Peak Peak Pea_erce � AM PM PM PIM Tctai rcent Percent PN Total Percent Total Avg. Total Avg• - -Peak- - -------------- 1565 130.4 67:00 7.4� 12:00 14:00 194 7.71. 10_5% t 79,6 6C5 50.4 10:00 ____91 __-955 259 21,6 - ---175 236 --b-�� 7.Oo 14:00 267 7.90 1214 50.6 2170 90.4 10:00 1 I 11 SENT 8Y: HGSHMNN; bbl Ie44dbb; Art -41-u: i:aaNmi; rAut '�ure6 14/00 04:16 Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Page: 13 P LD 62 25 W/0 FERRY of Data Aua 12, 1998 Wed 0 1 EB Adj. Factor 1.00 0 2 WB # Of Lanes 2 *+***+*#***+*k*#***#t#t*k*+**tt*x+*+*t##t*t*k**+}#+#t*t#+*#t#x*#tt***#****#* 11 I I Lane Lane to Day Time #1 #2 Avg. ---' Total _ Wed _ _ 00:00 -----------"-- 3 i 2 4 6 �2/98 01:00 6 0 3 02:00 0 0 0 0 03:00 1 0 0 1 04:00 1 0 0 5 1 10 05:00 10 0 06:00 82 9 45 91 07:00 194 15 104 209 08:00 131 45 88 176 09:00 215 43 129 258 10:00 174 67 120 241 ' 11:00 163 58 110 126 221 252 12:00 159 93 13:00 116 37 76 1S3 14:00 203 79 141 282 ' 15:00 118 49 83 167 16:00 144 93 118 237 17:00 191 56 12's 247 18:00 157 48 102 lie 205 233 19:00 195 38 20:00 106 26 132 21:00 75 33 5e 108 22:00 24 38 3'_ 62 23:00 6 0 3 6 OUR TOTAL 2474 - 828 25% 1651 3302 PERCENTS 75% pm Peak Peak Peak Peak. AM P.M vg AM Total ?ercer.t PM Total Percent Total Avg, g. of Total Avg. y - -peak- --peak-- -------------------------- 81.7 1494 -- 124.5 -- --- 09:00 215 ., 8.7° 4:00 203 93 8.2% 980 9 590 49.2 10:00 12:00 ------ -•_.2; - _-- 238 19.8 -6--% -- - -- - -- 86.8 -- - 09:00 ---'67 258 14: 7 C0 282 8.5% rta 1218 50.8 2084 11 I I YIVI e'. rU0MUVVI4j UQI ,e`ee u.lJI MI II -eI -uI ,.vw", .-I� Ii I.IV )4:16 Dunn Engineer.ng Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Leach, N.Y 11978 *** Hourly Multi -Channel Horizontal *** Page: 14 ID 62 25 W/0 FERRY Date of Data Aug 13, 1998 Thu EB Ado. Factor # Of Lanes 2 2 WB AM AM PM PM Peak Peak ---Peak- Peak Peak---Peak- Total Avg, Tota' ' Avg. AM Total Percent PM Total Percent ----------- ' 433 43 3 07:00 111 25.6 -236 23.6 09100 102 43.2= ------ ----- ------ -- 6'09 33.5 ---- 09:00 208 31.1% 1 1 1 Lane Lane Avg. Total to Day Time #1 #2 ------------------------ 3/98 Thu 00:00 2 ------------------ 0 1 2 1 ' 0'_:00 1 0 0 2 C2:00 1 1 i 2 0_3:00 1 1 1 ' 04:00 1 0 0 6 1 i7 05:00 15 2 06:00 88 9 48 97 07:00 111 45 78 156 ' 08:00 107 76 91 208 09:00 106 102 104 OUR TOTAL 433 236 --------- 334 669 nco TvrrC 6596 35% AM AM PM PM Peak Peak ---Peak- Peak Peak---Peak- Total Avg, Tota' ' Avg. AM Total Percent PM Total Percent ----------- ' 433 43 3 07:00 111 25.6 -236 23.6 09100 102 43.2= ------ ----- ------ -- 6'09 33.5 ---- 09:00 208 31.1% 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I ATTACHMENT 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY M M M M M M r M M M M M=== M== M 1998 -LOS reported based on 1998 Projected Traffic Volumes 2001 -LOS reported based on 2001 Projected Traffic Volumes The 1998 Data is taken from the "Traffic Assessment of Existing Cross Sound Ferry", updated March 1999 -Dunn Engineering Associates. The 2001 Data has been prepared by Nelson & Pope based upon August 1998 Traffic Volume Counts conducted by NYSDOT for the North Fork Recreational Travel Needs Assessment project. LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON Time Interval Rt 25 E/O Main St. Rt 25 W/O Tabor Rd Rt 25 E/O Narrow River Rd. EVALUATION YEAR 1998 2001 1998 2001 1998 2001 Weekday 11-12 Noon D D C C C C Weekday 5-6 PM D D C C C B Weekday 9-10 PM C C B C B A Sat 11-12 Noon E E D D C C Sat 5-6 PM E E D D C B Sat 9-10 PM C C C C C B Sun 11-12 Noon E E D D D C Sun 5-6 PM E E E E D C Sun 9-10 PM D D C C C B 1998 -LOS reported based on 1998 Projected Traffic Volumes 2001 -LOS reported based on 2001 Projected Traffic Volumes The 1998 Data is taken from the "Traffic Assessment of Existing Cross Sound Ferry", updated March 1999 -Dunn Engineering Associates. The 2001 Data has been prepared by Nelson & Pope based upon August 1998 Traffic Volume Counts conducted by NYSDOT for the North Fork Recreational Travel Needs Assessment project. I I ATTACHMENT 4 CAPACITY ANALYSES WORKSHEETS 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 I I 8= -NT 8Y: PG2R00IN; 631 7242855; APA -27-0' 7:39A4; PAGE 3 1 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of main Sc ANALYST .............. PGB ' TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 11AM-12 Noon DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION ' A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 ' DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... PEAK HOUR FACTOR 50 .89 ............................ DIRECTIONAL D--STRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 55 / 45 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 ' PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.. 57 ' B) CORRECTION FACTORS LEVEL TERRAIN LOS T B R w d -.97 HV ' -A -2 -1.8 -2.2 .84- .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .97 .89 ' C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .97 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .97 .94 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .97 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ' ------------------ INPUT VOLUME(vph): 715 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 80.3 SERVICE ' LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 146 .07 ' B 387 .19 C 693 .34 D 1267 .59 ' E 2225 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D SENT SY: PGBRO!NN; 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:39AM; PAGE 4 1 ' 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS +wxtxww++w+tt+t+t+ttt++x+++w++++w+++w+++++++++w+r+t+x+++++w+w+ww FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Mair. Sr ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 5-6 PM ' DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES........, 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... SO PEAK HOUR FACTOR ......................... .. .75 ' DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN). 51 / 49 LANE WIDTH(FT)..................... I .... ... 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.. ........... 57 B) CORRECTION FACTORS -------------- -- LEVEL TERRAIN ------- --- ---- -------------- - E E E f f f LOS HV ---T- ---B- ---R A 2 1.8 2.2 - ----- ----- .84 .99 --- .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .99 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .99 .89 D 2 1.G 1.6 .84 .99 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .99 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph) 942 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1256 ' SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 149 .07 B 397 .19 ' C 710 .34 D 1299 .59 ' E 2280 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D SENT BY: PGBAONN; 631 7242855; APP -27-01 7:40AM; PAGE 5 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ++wvrr+w+++++++x+rw+wvxvx++ww+v+vxr+++xrr+ry+++++++++++++++++xvr FACILITY LOCATION.... RL 25 East of Main St ANALYSTT.............. !'GFS ' TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 9-10 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ A) 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 1 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL B) 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ C) DTRECTTONAT. DTSTRTBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 63 / 37 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVC. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .8 DTRECTTONAT. DTSTRTBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 63 / 37 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVC. WIDTH :N FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 CORRECTIUN FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f. f LOS T B R w d IAV - - ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 ----- -- .84 .93 - -- .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .64 .93 .89 D 2 1.6 7.6 .84 .93 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .93 .94 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 371 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 464 SERVICE T 0•S FLOW RATE V/C ------------ ----- A 139 .07 B 369 .19 C 661 .34 D 1209 S9 E 2122 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C BENT 8Y: PGBRMAN; 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:40A4; PAGE 6 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS kxxrxrxxr+xxrx++#++#:r#xxxxxxxxx++++++#r#xxxx#++++#+#+rxxxxxx,F+:+ FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Main St ANALYST .............. PGB ' TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SAT 11-12 NOON DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------- ----------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES.. 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .............. .... 50 PEAK HOUR FAC:TOR.. .91 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 54 / 46 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVC. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 ' PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.. 57 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ' ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T P R w d ----- HV ----- --- ---- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 ----- .84 .98 .91 ' B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .98 .89 ' C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .98 .89 D 2 1.5 1.6 .84 .98 .94 ' 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .99 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ' INPUT VOLUME(vph): 1309 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1438 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 147 .07 ' B 390 .19 C 697 .34 D 1275 .59 ' E 2239 1 T nA 7nP CTVRN CY)NT)TTTCINC F SENT BY: POBROOIN; 631 7242855; APA -27-01 7:40AM; PAGE 7 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ##+t+wt+xt++t+++w+ttw++tx*+++wwt*+w+#+++tw++#+++#++++ttwtx+x+xx+ FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Main St ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SAT 5-6 PM ' DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001- 1-17-2001OTHER OTHERINFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ...................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES.......... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .79 DIRECTIONAL DTSTRTRUTION (UP/DOWN)..,. 43 / 57 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 1C USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT').-- 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .............. 57 81 CORRECTION FACTORS LEVEL TERRAIN LOS T 8 R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- --- A 2 1.6 2.2 A .84 .96 .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .96 .94 ' E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .96 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph) 1248 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1580 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C ------------ ----- A 144 .07 3 383 .19 C 685 .34 D 1252 .59 ' E 2197 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS 2 SENT PY: P0PA0l4N; 631 7242855; APA -27-01 7:40At4; PAGE 8 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HTGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Main SC ANALYST .............. PGB ' TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SAT 9-10 PM DAT3; OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVA,UATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ A. 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR...... .............. .88 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... C) 57 / 43 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR...... .............. .88 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 57 / 43 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 CORRECTION FACTORS ------ LEVEL TERRAIN - --------- E E E f _ f LOS T B R w d HV - ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 ----- ----- .64 .96 .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .96 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .96 .94 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INFUT VOLUME(vph) 546 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 620 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- ----- A 144 .07 B 383 .19 C 685 .34 D 1252 .59 E 2197 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C SENT BY: PGRROWN; 1 631 7242855; APR -27-0" 7:40AM; PAGE 9 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... R[ 25 Eas-- of 'Main S: ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 11-12 NOON ' DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION ' A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ....................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) ............. — 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............... .94 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 58 / 42 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.) — 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES............ 57 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w ----- d ----- HV ' --- ----- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 .84 .95 .92. B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .95 .39 ' C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .95 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .95 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .95 -94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph) 1380 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1468 ' SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- ----- A 143 .07 B 380 .19 C 680 .34 D 1244 .59 E 2184 1 LOS FOR GIVEINT CONDITIONS: 2 SENT BY: POSROWN; 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:41AM; PAGE 10 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS rrr+rxrr+r++++++++++++rr+rrx+r+++x+++xx++xxr+x++++++++++++++++r+ ' FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Main St ANALYST .............. PGB ' TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 5-6 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS.. . 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION ' A) 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL B) 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ C) ' (UP/DOWN).......... 38 / 62 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .81 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 38 / 62 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTII IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV . 2.2 A - 2 1-3 .84 .93 .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .93 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .93 .94 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(Vph)� 1396 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1723 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- ----- A 140 .07 B 371 .19 C 665 .34 D 1215 .59 E 2133 1 T,nR FOR (,TVRN CnNT)TTTnNTQ SENT 8Y: PG6A06+1N; i i 631 7242855; AP; .27-01 7:41 AM; PAGE 11 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS +ttr+++rrt+++rrtrt++++trr**tt+tr+t+tx+xt+t*xtx+++t**+*********** ' FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Main St ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 9-10 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION iA) 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... E) PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... i DESIGN SPEED(MPH) .......................... i 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ C) 1 .72 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION i 1 50 / 50 i AD=STMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED(MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .72 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 50 / 50 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WTDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f = LOS T B R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 .84 1 .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .64 1 .59 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 1 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 _ .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 1 .94 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS --------------------- -------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(-,rph) 658 ACTUAL FLOW RA'Z'E : 914 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 150 .07 B 399 .19 C '715 .34 D 1307 .59 E 2294 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D SENT 8Y: RGBROIA; I 631 7242855; AFR-27-0' 7:41ANI; RAGE 12 ' 1985 HCM:TWO LANE HIGHWAYS rtttttttttttrrttttttrttrtrtttratrrrarttrttxxxttrrrtxtxrrrxxxrrar ' FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 west Cf Tabor Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 11-12 NOON DATE OF ANALYSIS.. 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVP.LUATTON A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .76 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBliTION (UP/DOw ).......... 63 / 37 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)..: 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.. 57 B) CORRECTION FACTORS LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f LOS T B R w d HV -- ----- ----- -- A 2 1.8 2.2 - ----- .84 ----- .93 .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .93 .94 E 2 i.6 1.6 .87 .53 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------ ------ INPUT VOLUME(vph): 461 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 607 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C ' ------------ ----- A _39 .07 8 369 .19 C 661 .34 D 1209 S9 E 2122 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C SENT BY: PGBRMUN; 631 7242855; APA -27-0' 7:41A4; PAGE 13 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ' FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 West of Tabor Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 5-6 PM ' DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2UU1 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ---------- --------- -- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ........................ 2 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SYPED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .84 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (JP/DOWN). 56 / 44 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES........... S7 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E _` f f LOS T B R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 .24 .96 ----- .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .96 .94 ' E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .96 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ----- ------------- ---- - - - INPUT VOLUME(vph): 548 ------ - - - -- ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 652 SERVICE ' LOS FLOWRATE V/C - A 14.4 .07 B 28S 19 C 689 .34 D 1260 .59 E 2211 1 r,nc Fn>v rrvFrr rnnrnTrrnn7c � C SENT BY: PGBROWN; 631 72242855; APR -4227-01 7:41AM; PAGE 14 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS tr++#+##+#++++xxr++x+x+x+xxtxx++++++#+++r*#++++++#+#+rrrr+++#++> FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 West of Tabor Rd ANALYST .............. PGB 1 TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 9-10 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-11-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ A) 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 1 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL fi) ' 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 1 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ C) 6'_ DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 57 / 43 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 6'_ DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 57 / 43 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 1.0 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d F,V --- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.9 2.2 ----- .84 ----- .96 .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .96 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .96 .94 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 240 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 393 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- ----- A 144 .07 B 383 .19 C 685 .34 D 1252 .59 E 2197 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIUNS: C SENT SY: PGBROWN; 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:42AM; PAGE 15 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ! FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 Wc3t Of Tabor Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SAT 11-12 NOON DATE OF ANALYSIS.. 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ............. .... PERCENTAGE OF BUSES.. 2 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ....................... .... .79 I DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 ' PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 B) CORRECTION FACTORS LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS B d -HV -R ---w - ---T- ---- A 2 1.6 2.2 .64 .94 - .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .94 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .94 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .94 .94 ' E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .94 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS r ---------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 798 --- ACTUAL FLOW FATE: 1010 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C - A 141 .07 B 375 .19 C 672 .34 D 1228 .59 E 2156 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: n SENT BY: PGBROWN; 1 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:424AM; PAGE 16 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOC'ATION.... RL 2S West of Tabor Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SAT 5-6 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS.. 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCI{S........................ A) 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... i. 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.......... C) .84 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 45 / 55 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCI{S........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.......... .84 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 45 / 55 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 CORREC'.'iON FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E R E f f f LOS T S R w d HV -- --- - ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 ----- 84 97 .91 S 2.2 2 2.5 .34 .97 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .97 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .97 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .97 .94 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph) 720 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 857 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- ----- A 146 .07 B 367 .19 C 693 .34 D 1267 .59 E 2225 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D SENT BY: PGBPONN; 631 7242855; APP -27-01 7:42Ak4; PACE 17 r 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... R-- 25 West of Tabor Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SAT 9-10 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-l'/-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ ------------------ 2 PERCENTAGE OF FUSES.. 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .68 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 68 / 32 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WTDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING= ZONES .................... 57 E) CORRECTION FACTORS LEVEL TERRAIN ' F E E f LOS w B- f f ---T --R A 2 1.8 2.2 .84 -d- .9 ---sv .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .9 .89 C 2.2 2 2.S 84 .9 89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .9 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .9 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ----------------- ------------------------------------------ INPUT VOLUME(vph): 282 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 415 SERVICS ' LOS FLOW RAPE V/C A 135 .07 B 359 .19 C 643 34 D 1176 .59 E 2064 1 I n.cz F(1R QTVF.N r0NMTTT0NR - SENT BY: PG2R0WN; i 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:42AM; FACE 18 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS **************************************************************** FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 West of Tabor Rd ANALYST .............. PGB ' TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 11-12 NOON DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION IA) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 I PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) . 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.. .. .' •87 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (17P/DOWN). 66 / 34 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVC. WIDTH IN FT.). 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.. 57 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E F E f f f ' LOS T S R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 2 i.8 2.2 ----- ----- .84 .91 ----- .9" ' B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .91 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .91 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .91 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .91 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ----- ------------ --- ---- - - - ----------- -- - -- -- -- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 820 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 943 SERVICE LOSFLOW RATE V/C' --- --------- ----- A 137 .07 S 353 .19 C 650 .34 D 1189 .59 E 2087 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D 1 SENT 9Y: PGBRMAlN; I 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:42AM; PAGE 19 1965 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 WeSt Of Tabor Rd ANALYST .............. PGB ' TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 5-6 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS.. 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION 1 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ............ . ... .... 2 1 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES...... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOTIR FACTOR ............................ 7 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIPUTTON (IIP/DOWN)........., 40 i 60 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVC. WIDTH IN FT.)— 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES............ 57 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN LOS BR ----- HV -- A- 2 1.8 2.2 ----- .84 .94 .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .94 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .94 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .94 .94 ' E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .94 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS INPUT VOLUME(VOh): 981 ---------------- ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 1401 SERVICE ' LOS FLOW PATE V/C A 141 .07 D 375 .19 C 672 .34 D 1228 .59 ' E 2156 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: E SENT BY: PGBAONN; i 631 7242855; APA -27-01 7:43AM; PAGE 20 1985 HCM:^WO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 West of Tabor R3 ANALYST .............. PGB TSME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 9-10 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ A) 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 3) PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... i DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ C) .7 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DODN).......... 53 / 47 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .7 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DODN).......... 53 / 47 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES— ................. 57 CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS W HV ---T- ---B- ---R A 2 i.8 2.2 - 84 ----- .98 --- B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .98 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .98 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .98 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .98 .94 LEVE:, OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 420 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 600 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C -- A 148 C7 B 392 .19 C 702 .34 D 1283 . 59 E 2252 _ LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C SENT BY: PGBAOWN; 631 724^4855; APA -27-01 7:43AK4; PAGE 21129 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS t##+wr+tr+wxx*xxt+wwww*xrx++x+*#+++++x+*+#+xt++t#wwxrx+x+#+++txx FACILITY LOCATION.... :T 25 East of Narrow River Rd ANALYST .............. PGP TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 11-12 NOON DATE OF ANALYSIS.. 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION 1 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 1 PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ PERCENTAGE OF BUSES— ............ ... ..... 2 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .71 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 62 / 38 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WTDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 ' PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------- - - -- LEVEL TERRAIN - - - ----- ---- --- -- E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 ----- ----- .84 .93 ----- .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 ' C 2.2 2 2.5 .24 .93 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .93 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .93 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 359 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 506 SERVICE ' LOS FLOW RATE V/C - A 140 .07 E 371 .19 C 665 .34 D 1215 .59 E 2133 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C SENT BY: PGBROMA; I 11 I d I I I I 1 631 7242B55; APR -27-01 7:43A,M; PAGE 22/29 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ++wwwwxxww+ttt+++x+x+wrww++xxxx+++rw+++++++xxx++xwwxwwxw+xxwx+xt FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 2S East of Narrow River Rd ANALYST. ............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 5-6 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ............................ .77 DIRECTIONAL, DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 54 / 46 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 57 CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d IIV - - ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 ----- ----- .84 .98 ----- .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .98 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .98 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .98 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ---------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 257 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 334 SERVICE LOSFLOWRATE V/C - A 147 .07 B 390 .19 C 697 .34 D 127.5 .59 E 2239 1 TOR FOR SIVEN COND T 7 T ONR• R SENT BY: PGBROWN; I D Ij I I I I I I I I I F I r y 631 7242855; APR -27.01 7:43/4; PAGE ^413129 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Narrow River Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 9=10 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-20D1 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT_ FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................ ........... .5 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 59 / 41 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T E R w d HV --- A ----- ----- 2 1.8 `---- 2.2 ----- .84 ----- .95 ----- .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .95 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .95 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .95 .911 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .95 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS --------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): ---------- 57 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 114 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE v/C --- A --------- 183 ----- .09 E 418 .21 C 716 .36 D 1257 .6 E 2170 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: A SENT BY: PGBROWN; 631 7242855; AP9-2/-0' /:44A%I; PAUL 241zy r1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS I I I 11 I I I FACILITY LOCATION.... RL 25 East of Narrow River Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SAT 1_1-12 NOON DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 01-17-2001 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES........ DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ........................ ... .83 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 54 / 46 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES. ........... ....... 50 13) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------ LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV --- A ----- ----- 2 1.8 ----- 2.2 ----- .84 ----- .98 ----- .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .64 .90" .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .98 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .98 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .98 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph) 449 ACTUAT, FLOW RATE: S41 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- A --------- 169 ----- .09 B 431 .21 C 739 .36 D 1297 .6 E 2239 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C SENT BY: PGBR0NN; I I I 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:44AM; PAGE 25/29 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Narrow River Rd ANALYST— ....... .... PGR TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SAT d-5 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS,.... `1/17/01 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .81 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN),......... 44 / 56 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------- LEVEL TERRAIN C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS INPUT E E ACTUAL E f f f LOS LOS B V/C R w d B A -T- 2 1.8 2.2 .36 84 .96 -HV - .91 B 2.2 2 2-S B .64 .96 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .96 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .96 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .96 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS INPUT VOLUME(vph): 278 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 343 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 186 ----- .09 B 426 .21 C 729 .36 D 1281 .6 E 2211 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: B SENT BY: PGBR0NN; 631 7242955; APR -27-01 7:44AM; PAGE 26/29 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS +wwxx+##x#x+#r#ww+#tr#+#-.rxtt+w#+xx#rx+wwwwxtxrtt+#+twtiw#+wxtt++ I I 11 FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 2.5 Fast of Narrow River Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TTME OF ANALYSIS—.. SAT 9-10 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1/17/01 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 0 PERCENTAGE. OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PGAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ .53 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 63 / 37 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------ LEVEL TERRAIN ------------------------------ E E E f f f LOS T B R W d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 ----- ----- .84 .93 ----- 1 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 1 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 1 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .93 1 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .93 1 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS -------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph); 121 --------------- ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 228 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 196 .09 B 457 .21 C 783 .36 D 1305 .6 E 2253 1 LnS PnR CTVEN CONT?TTTONS• R SENT BY: PGBAONIN; I I I 631 7242855; APA -27-01 7:44AM; PAGE 27/29 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Narrow River Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 11-12 NOON DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1/17/01 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................... ....... .81 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 68 / 32 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS --------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E F f f f LOS T- d HV -B ---R- A 2 1.8 2.2 - -w - .84 - .9 .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .9 .85 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .9 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .9 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .9 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 488 --------------- ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 602 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V C- A 174 .09 B 397 .21 C 681 .36 D 1196 .6 E 2064 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C SENT BY: PGBROWN; I I i i M I I I I I 631 7242855; APR -27-01 7:44AM; PAGE 28!29 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Narrow River Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 5-6 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1/17/01 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES.— .................. -- 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 75 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 38 / 62 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 7 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 E) CORRECTION FACTORS ---------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV --- - ----- A 2 1.8 2.2 ----- ----- .84 .93 --- - .91 B 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 .93 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 .93 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 .93 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------ 1NFUT VULUME(vph): 395 --------- ------------- ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 527 SERVICE LOS FLOW V/C -RATE A 180 .09 B 410 .21 C 704 .36 D 1236 .6 E 2133 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: C 8�:NT 8Y: PGSROWN; 631 7242855; AP'H-2/-01 /:4bAM; NAGE 29129 ' 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... Rt 25 East of Narrow River Rd ANALYST .............. PGB TIME OF ANALYSIS..... SUN 9-10 PM DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1/17/01 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2001 EVALUATION A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES.. ....................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 5 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 53 DIRECTIONAL DISTRI2UTION (UP/DOWN). SO j 50 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 10 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES........, WIDTH IN FT.)... , 0 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL TERRAIN E E E f f f. LOS T- R- W- d - - --R- A 2 1.8 2.2 -- .84 1 ---HV .91 9 2.2 2 2.5 1 .81� .89 C 2.2 2 2.5 .84 1 .89 D 2 1.6 1.6 .84 1 .94 E 2 1.6 1.6 .87 1 .94 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS -------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 172 - - ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 325 - SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C - A 193 .09 8 411 .21 C 757 .36 D 1329 .6 E 2294 1 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: 2 I ATTACHMENT 5 I EXCESS PASSENGER CAPACITIES I lJ 11 I I 11 11 l' 1 I M i r= M M M M M M M 11 M� M M M M M Cross Sound Ferry Services Excess Passenger Capacities Vessel Car Capacity Passenger Capacity Passengers from Cars" Excess Passenger Capaclly" Oaity Round Trips"— Daily Excess Capacity""' Cape Hentopen John H. Susan Anne New London Canibbean North Star' 90 120 86 45 22 35 900 1,000 840 300 130 300 225 3D0 200 113 55 86 675 700 640 186 75 215-1 4 4 4 4 3 0 2,700 2,650 2,560 750 225 0 Total Excess Capacity: 2,490 9,035 Sea Jet 400 0 400 6 2.400 Notes The North Star does not operate on regularly scheduled service during peak schedule times l Statistics indicate an average of 2.5 passengers per car. Passenger capacity available assunung a full load of cars with 2.5 pass. per car. Daily round trips rater to peak schedule times. """There has never been an instance when all of the ferries have operated filled to capacity for all of their scheduled trips throughoul the course of a day. Therefore, excess opacities are understated. PROJECT NARRATIVE for the Full Environmental Assessment Form (Part I) as part of the REVISED PROPOSED SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR Cross Sound Ferry Services,Inc. Orient, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Submitted To: Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Prepared For: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc c/o Esseks, Hefter & Angel, P.C. 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901 Prepared By: Inter -Science Research Associates, Inc. Planning & Development Consultants 36 Nugent Street, P.O. Box 1201 Southampton, New York 11969-1201 Date Prepared: September, 2000 I. DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISED PROPOSED ACTION. Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. requests site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for the existing and on-going operations currently occurring at the project site. In addition, the enclosed site plan, prepared by hrter-Science Research Associates, Inc. last dated September 5, 2000, includes the following: A. SNACK BAR PARCEL. • Continued Existing Parking on the Snack Bar Parcel. The continuance of pre-existing nonconforming parking on the Snack Bar Parcel will be maintained; Proposed Improvement of Vegetative Buffer. Cross Sound will evaluate the existing vegetative buffer located around the perimeter of the Snack Bar parcel. Where gaps in the existing vegetation exist, additional native coastal plantings will be installed. Where no gaps exist, the existing vegetation will be evaluated and enhanced as necessary to provide a cohesive/continuous buffer around the perimeter of the parking area. A draft planting plan will be prepared and submitted to the Planning Board for review and approval prior to implementation; • Proposed Re -Grading and Application of Stone/Gravel to Snack Bar Parking Area. To eliminate the ponding of water during significant rainfall and reduce the number of existing potholes, the Snack Bar parking surface will be re -graded and surfaced with clean stone/gravel; • Proposed Installation of Curb Stops and Guard Rail Fence. Cross Sound will install segments of curb stops and guard rail fence around the perimeter of the gravel parking surface as depicted on the site plan. The curb stops and guard rail fence will function to delineate the overall parking area, and protect the proposed plantings from encroachment by vehicles; • Proposed Installation of Low Intensity Safety Lighting. For the safety of their travelers, Cross Sound will install low intensity safety lighting within the Snack Bar parking area. All such lighting will be operated by a timer, allowing the lights to automatically shut off after the prescribed period (ie. one half- hour after the arrival of the last ferry for each business day); and • Proposed Cross Walk. For traveler safety, a cross walk is proposed to be painted across Route 25, between the Snack Bar parcel and the Terminal parcel. r ♦ s In addition to the above mentioned items and practices, Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc., also proposes the following operational improvements to the entire Orient site: • Provide Parking Attendant. Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. would provide at least one parking attendant during peak parking periods (summer and holiday weekends), to assist travelers with vehicular parking and access. The attendant will remain at the site for at least one half hour after the arrival of the last ferry for the business day. -2- Il. NATURALRESOURCES-ANINVENTORYANDANALYSIS OFTHEPROJECTSITE'S PRINCIPAL NATURAL RESOURCES. Based upon site inspections and an analysis of in-house literature/published documents, the following natural resources are considered to be the most relevant with respect to their relationship to the project site, the existing operation and the submitted proposed site plan: A. Surface Soils/Topography; B. Groundwater; C. Surface Water; D. Drainage; E. Vegetation; F. Wildlife; and G. Wetlands. For the convenience of the reviewer, each of the listed resources will be discussed separately. The following text is organized so that each resource is individually inventoried and analyzed with respect to (1) its existing condition and (2) how the resource has been, and may continue to be, impacted by the current operation and the submitted proposed site plan, last dated September 5, 2000, prepared by Inter -Science Research Associates, Inc. A. SURFACE SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY. (1) Surface Soils & Topography: Existing Condition. The predominant surface soil type found on the project site is somewhat typical for disturbed waterfront areas. As shown on the Soils Maps circulated by the U.S. Department ofAgriculture Soil Conservation Service, almost 100 percent of the surface soil occupying the project site is "Fill Land, Dredged Material" (Fd). The other soil associations found on the project site, Beaches (Bc) and Haven Loam (HaA) appear to occupy less than 10% of the subject property. In concert with information provided by the USDA Soil Conservation Service, the characteristics of the 3 surface soils found on the project site are described as follows: FILL LAND, DREDGED MATERIAL (Fd). Fill land/dredged material is made up of areas that have been filled with material from hydraulic or mechanical dredging operations. These operations are used mainly to widen or deepen boat channels in salt water; however, some dredged material has been obtained from new channels cut into tidal marshes. Most of the dredged material is pumped onto tidal marshes. Smaller amounts are placed on beaches and dunes. Fill land/dredged material is not suited for farming. Areas are satisfactory for building sites where the fill is adequate and if the highly compressible organic layers in the tidal marshes are removed prior to filling. (USDA, 1975). BEACHES (BC). Beaches are made up of sandy, gravelly or cobbley areas between water at mean sea level and dunes or escarpments. Slope is nearly level in most areas but it is as much -3- as 15 percent in some places on the Atlantic shore. In most places beaches on the bays are sandy, but varying amounts of gravel are mixed with the sand. Beach areas are not suited to farming. Measures should be taken to control erosion to keep the beach wide enough to protect the nearby dunes or uplands (USDA, 1975). HAVEN LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES (HaA). This soil type consists of deep, well -drained, medium -textured soils that formed in a loamy or silty mantle over stratified coarse sand and gravel. Haven soils have high to moderate available moisture capacity. The hazard of erosion is slight on this Haven soil. Primary management concerns are keeping the soil from crusting after rain, maintaining tilth, and reducing the plowpan. This soil is used extensively for crops, and it is well suited to all crops commonly grown in the county. Potatoes are the main crop, but cauliflower, cabbage, com, onion and sod crops are also grown. Because of the nearly level slope and ease of excavation, most areas of this soil in the western part of the county are being used for housing developments and industrial parks (USDA, 1975). The origin of the surface soil (apparent dredge spoil) as well as the agricultural activity account for the even grade of the project site and surrounding area. Topographic elevations on the project site range from approximately 4.5 feet to 10 feet (above mean sea level; AMSL). A long and narrow bank of steeply sloping land (up to 50% slope) is located along the western property line of the Terminal Parcel. With the exception of the long bank, it is reasonable to describe the project site as being relatively flat with gentle slopes less than 10% in grade (2) Surface Soils & Topography: Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan. Based upon comparing soil maps with current air photos, it appears that approximately 95% of the project sponsor's infrastructure (ie. existing parking areas, staging areas, access roads, buildings, etc.) is located on surface soil classified as Fill Land/Dredged Material (Fd). The remaining 5% is occupied by the auto loading area and the northwestern corner of the snack bar parking lot, which appears to be located over Beach (Bc) and Haven Loam (HaA), respectively. Submitted drawings and air photos indicate that approximately 25% of the project site has been paved for the purposes of vehicle staging and loading. All such paving is located on the project site's Terminal Parcel (occupied by surface soil Fd). Approximately 60% of the existing project site is occupied by unpaved dirt parking areas. 10% of the site appears to be vegetated. Structures (such as the terminal, snack bar and residence) occupy the remaining 5% of the sites surface soils. The proposed site plan will result in the placement of clean loose gravel/rock over the existing dirt parking area on the Snack Bar Parcel. Approximately 51,000 s.f. of exposed soil (mostly Fill Land/Dredge Material) will be covered by such action. The proposed parking of 24 additional vehicles on the West Parcel should not significantly effect the already compacted and graded soil and lawn area located in the proximity of the existing building (house). Given that (1) all three identified on-site surface soils possess structural qualities that make them suitable to support the development that currently exists on the project site and that (2) Fill Land/Dredged Material (Fd) is not considered be a soil type deserving special protection (unlike prime farming soils), it appears that the both the existing operation and the proposed site plan are compatible with the identified surface soils. IMI The project sites history includes a significant amount of agricultural activity. Understanding that agricultural fields are generally level, it is assumed that the project sponsor engaged in minimal grading for the construction of the existing facility, specifically the parking and staging areas. Consequently, it is believed that the topography of the site has changed very little from its agricultural period. No significant changes to the sites topography are anticipated with the approval of the proposed site plan. B. GROUNDWATER. (1) Groundwater: Existing Condition. In an effort to determine the groundwater elevation below, and in the vicinity of, the project site, a test hole was dug by McDonald GeoScience on July 7, 1997. The test hole was located approximately 150' to the east of the existing snack bar structure and provided the following information: TEST HOLE (14' deep) Approximate Surface Elevation: 10.33' Brown Silty Loam 10.33' to 9.33' (1.0' thickness) Pale Brown Loamy Silt 9.33' to 6.83'(2.5' thickness) Brown Fine to Coarse Sand ` _ -6.83' to 2.53' (4.3' thickness) Water in Fine to Coarse Sand 2.53'- to at least - 3.67' As per the test hole data, the groundwater elevation for the project site and the vicinity is approximately 2.53' (or 7.8' below the soil surface at this specific location). In-house investigation concluded that over a ten hour period the tidal cycle had little to no influence over the groundwater elevation. Test results have concluded that the groundwater from the well used by the Snack Bar meets the recommended water quality standards for the parameters tested. In comparison, test results have concluded that the groundwater from the well used by the terminal building meets all of the water quality standards with the exception of Trichloroethane (recorded at 11 ppb, exceeding the 5 ppb standard by 6 ppb). As a result of the presence of this compound, the Terminal building uses an alternative source for its drinking water. (2) Groundwater - Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan. The groundwater below the project site is partially a product of the rainwater, runoff and sanitary waste that percolates throughout the project site's soil horizon. Approximately 85% of the existing project site is used for the parking and staging ofvehicles. Less than one third of the parking/staging areas is paved, therefore most to the rainwater landing on the site percolates naturally and slowly through the soil horizon. Conversely, stormwater collected via on-site existing drainage structures (ie. french drains) tend to expedite percolation through the soil horizon. However, regardless ofhow the parking area water is collected and/or how it percolates through the soil, the National Urban -5- Runoff Study (NURP) has documented that most of the contaminants found in parking area runoff are attenuated via soil filtration and do not significantly impact groundwater quality. Furthermore, and with respect to the excessive presence of Trichloroethane in the Terminal building's well water, it should be noted that the origin of such a compound is typically from the excessive use of pesticides. Therefore, given the agricultural history of the site and surrounding area, without further study, it would not be fair to assume that the current operation is responsible for the excessive presence of Trichloroethane. Other than sanitary waste, the current operation does not generate any by-product that may effect the quality of groundwater. Based upon engineering reports, the sanitary systems used in existing operation are the following: Terminal Parcel Sanitary System Components ... Twelve leaching pools (each 10' dia. x 5' deep); One 5,000 gal. septic tank (10 dia. x 6' liquid depth) Capacity of the Existing Sanitary System .............. 2,500 gal./day Snack Bar Parcel Sanitary System Components ... Five leaching pools (10' dia. x 2' deep); One 900 gal. septic tank Capacity of the Existing Sanitary System .............. 450 gal./day All indications are that the above systems are functioning properly and are capable of handling the volume of waste generated with minimal impact to groundwater. The clean gravel/stone parking surface proposed for the Snack Bar Parcel would continue to allow water to percolate into the soil horizon without significant changes to the existing condition. Therefore, it is believed that the implementation of the proposed site plan should not result in any significant increase in the volume of waste currently generated or result in any significant changes to the quality of groundwater. C. SURFACE WATER (1) Surface Water - Existing Condition. The project site fronts Gardiners Bay, a large body of saltwater open to the waters of the Atlantic, Long Island Sound and Block Island Sound. There are no freshwater surface waters in the immediate vicinity of the project site. The NYSDEC has classified Gardiners Bay in its surrounding water bodies (ie. Plum Gut, Long Island Sound, Hallocks Bay and Orient Harbor) as "SA" - meaning that the best usage of these waters would be shellfishing for market purposes, primary and secondary contact recreation and fishing. All of these waters would be suitable for fish propagation and survival. Consistent with the NYSDEC's targeted usage for these waters, through water samples, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has concluded that Gardiners Bay, Orient Harbor and Plum Gut contain good water quality. -6- h (2) Surface Water - Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan. Watercraft have been transporting passengers, vehicles and/or assorted cargo from the project site to Connecticut since the late 1700's. Vehicular carrier service to New London, CT was introduced in the early 1930's, however, interest did not significantly rise until approximately 1948 - as automobiles became more affordable and popular. As the interest in vehicular carrier service increased, so did the size of the vessels used to transport them. Large vessels, comparable in size to those in use today, have been operating from the project site for approximately 50 years. No part of the current operation involves the discharge of liquid waste, solid waste and/or surface water runoff into Gardiners Bay. Given that tests routinely conclude that Gardiners Bay has high water qualityand the fact that large vessels have been transporting vehicles, passengers and cargo from this site for the past 50 years, it is reasonable to conclude that the relationship between both the current operation and the proposed site plan are compatible with, and pose no significant threat to, the quality of the existing surface water. D. DRAINAGE. (1) Drainage - Existing Condition. In general, the on-site drainage is a product of the relatively level topography of the area and the site's surface material. Given that approximately 70% of the site is basically flat and unsurfaced, stormwater runoff is minimized since a large percentage of rainwater simply percolates naturally through the soil horizon. However, in some areas of the project site, such as the unsurfaced snack bar parking area (where the soil has become hard and compacted), percolation can not keep up with the volume of rainwater generated by severe storm events. Consequently, at this specific on-site location, occasional ponding does occur. Other than the snack bar parking area, the project site employs at least 5 french drainage basins to collect stormwater primarilly generated from the Terminal Parcel's paved surface area and the West Parcel's unsurfaced parking area. (2) Drainage - Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan. Although on-site ponding does occasionally occur during and after severe storm events, it does not appear that drainage is a particularly problematic issue with respect to the current operation and the existing natural resources. Stormwater has not been observed flowing into or near the adjacent water body. None the less, the proposed re -grading and surfacing of the Snack Bar parking area with clean, loose gravel/stone should facilitate stormwater recharge and be considered an improvement to the site's existing drainage patterns. Related discussion on this issue is contained in the preceding sections of this narrative titled "Groundwater - Existing Condition" and "Groundwater - Relationship to the Current Operation and Proposed Site Plan". -7- E. VEGETATION. (1) Vegetation - Existing Condition. Parking and staging of vehicles dominate the project site. Consequently, approximately only 10% of the project site supports vegetation (located mostly along the sites buffer/perimeter). Based upon site inspections, those areas which are vegetated, are dominated bynon-native "weedy" type species. The following list outlines the principal species of vegetation found on the project site: Scientific Name Common Name Acer platanoides .................... Norway Maple* Ambrosia artemisiifolia ............... Ragweed Artemisia vulgaris ................... Mugwort* Celastrus Orbiculate .................. Oriental Bittersweet* Juniperus virginiana .................. Eastern Red Cedar Lonicera sp......................... Honeysuckle* Monis rubra ........................ Red Mulberry Pinus thunbergii .....................Japanese Black Pine* Prunus serotina ...................... Black Cherry Rosa Carolina ....................... Pasture Rose Sedge, Grass, Rush .................. Assorted Grasses Solidago sp. ........................ Goldenrod * Non-native species. (2) Vegetation - Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan Air photographs reveal the proj ect site has an agricultural history and underwent routine planting and harvesting. However, as vehicular parking and staging became more in demand, the agricultural fields became increasingly used to support the infrastructure of the on-going carrier service (ie. parking areas, buildings, etc.). With respect to the agricultural history of the site, it is reasonable to conclude that the current site actually hosts a greater spectrum of plant species, albeit a large percentage of non-native plant species, than when the site was used primarily for farming. Consequently, in comparison to the agricultural conditions of the site, it seems fair to believe that the current operation has resulted in a greater diversity of on-site plant species. Although it appears that on-site plant diversity has increased over the past 50 years, it remains important to clearly indicate that the amount of on-site land currently incapable of supporting vegetation has also increased. Approximately, 90% of the current property can not support vegetation because of parking/staging demands and/or the presence of structures. This figure is not expected to significantly change with the implementation of the proposed site plan. In an effort to improve the vegetative buffer surrounding the Snack Bar Parcel, Cross Sound is proposing to add vegetation where gaps currently exist. Where no gaps exist, the existing vegetation will be evaluated and enhanced as necessary to provide a cohesive/continuous buffer around the perimeter of the parking area. A draft planting plan will be prepared and submitted to the Planning Board for review and approval prior to implementation. So that the planting appears in context with -8- its coastal surroundings as well as the sites existing vegetation, it is suspected that the proposed improvement of the vegetative buffer will consist of the following native species: Native Species Targeted for Planting Along the Borders of the Snack Bar Parcel: Bayberry (Myrica pensylvanica); Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana); Shadbush (Amelanchier canadensis); American Holly (Ilex opaca); Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinum plalidum); Northern Arrowwood (Viburnum recognitum); and Beach Rose (Rosa rugosa) F. WILDLIFE. (1) Wildlife - Existing Condition. Based upon lack of on-site habitat (approximately 90% of the site is used for parking, structures and/or the staging of vehicles), the project site has little prospect of significant habitat value. Most wildlife species observed, or expected to be observed, on site include common "backyard" species. Based upon site inspections, the following represents a listing of the principal species of wildlife observed and/or expected to use the project site as habitat: Avian Species Observed and/or Expected to Use the Site as Habitat: Cardinalis cardinalis ........... Northern Cardinal Carduelis tristis* .............. American Goldfinch* Carpodacus mexicanus .......... House Finch Corvus brachyrhynchos* ........ American Crow* Dumetella carolinensis* ......... Grey Catbird* Geothlypis trichas ............. Common Yellowthroat Hirundo rustics* .............. Bam Swallow* Melospiza melodia* ............ Song Sparrow* Mimus polyglottos ............. Northern Mockingbird Parus atricapillus .............. Black -capped Chickadee Parus bicolor ................. Tufted Titmouse Passer domesticus* ............ House Sparrow* Passerculus sandwichensis ....... Savannah Sparrow Pipilo erythrophthalmus ......... Rufous -sided Towhee Quiscalus quiscula ............. Common Grackle Spizella arborea ............... Tree Sparrow Spizella pusilla ................ Field Sparrow Stumus vulgaris* .............. European Starling* Tachycineta bicolor ............ Tree Swallow Turdus Migratorius ............ American Robin Tyrannus tyrannus ............. Eastern Kingbird Zenaida macroura .............. Mourning Dove Zonotrichia albicollis ........... White -throated Sparrow -9- Mammals Observed and/or Expected to Use the Site as Habitat Felis catus* .................. Cat* Microtus pennsylvanicus ........ Meadow Mole Odocoileus virginianus* ........ White-tailed Deer* Peromyscus leucopus ........... White-footed Mouse Rattus norvegicus .............. Norway Rat Sorex cinereus ................ Masked Shrew Sylvilagus*................... Rabbit* * Observed on site. None of the above listed species are notably rare on Long Island. No designated species (endangered, threatened or special concern) were identified on the site. Designated bird species that occur in the area include Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus; Status Endangered), Least Tern (Sterna antillarum; Status Endangered) and Osprey (Pandion haliaetus; Status Threatened), however, it should be noted that none of these species were observed on or near the immediate project area during site inspection (July 27, 28, 1997). (2) Wildlife - Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan. In general, agricultural fields possess minimal habitat value. Therefore, one could make an argument that even though the current site possesses little vegetation (approximately 10% of the site is vegetated), the vegetation that does exist may provide more habitat than what existed when the site was principally used for farming. From this perspective, the current operation and the proposed site plan are both compatible with the wildlife on the site and adjacent property. Furthermore, although the project site and the adjacent beach does contain some suitable habitat for three designated avian species (Piping Plover, Least Tern and Osprey), it is somewhat doubtful that any of these species would use the site or the beach for nesting purposes. The beach fronting the project site is quite stony. Given that Piping Plovers and Least Terns favor more sandy isolated beaches free of predators, it is suspected that these species would opt to nest along other stretches of coastline. On a similar note, Ospreys prefer nesting areas closer to their hunting sites (often shallow water and low energy wetland areas). Consequently, it is suspected that nearby Orient Point State Park as well as the adjacent County Parkland offer preferred habitat for the Osprey, Piping Plover and the Least Tem. Therefore, due to lack of overall existing on-site habitat, the proposed site plan should not result in an increase in negative impact to inventoried wildlife. E. WETLANDS. (1) Wetlands - Existing Condition. The project site does not contain any tidal or freshwater wetlands. However, since the site lies adjacent to a large tidal water body (Gardiner's Bay), the NYSDEC tidal wetland maps indicate that "Coastal Shoals, Bars & Mudflats" ("SM") and "Littoral Zone" ("LZ") are located offshore. -10- (2) Wetlands - Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan. As evidenced by the DEC Tidal Wetland Maps, the only portion of the current operation to come into direct contact with tidal wetlands are the passenger and vehicular loading ramps along with their adjacent bulkheading and pilings. Periodically, it is necessary to dredge the bottom of the bay in the vicinity of the existing boat slips in order to facilitate the means of ingress and egress of the subject vessels. At these times, dredge spoil is placed upland on nearby property owned by the project sponsor. Often, the spoil is donated to NYS for erosion control purposes at Orient Point State Park. Permits for dredging and the maintenance of the loading ramps have been obtained from the DEC, Town Trustees, Department of State and the ACOE. Subject to storm events, dredging is a relatively infrequent action - needing to occur once or twice over a ten year period. With the exception of the loading ramps and the periodic maintenance for their continued use (dredging, replacement of bulkheading, piles, etc.), the current operation really does not effect existing wetland. 98% of the current operation takes place well above and beyond the high water line. This figure is not expected to change with the implementation of the proposed site plan. With respect to the upland portion of the site, french drains, approved by regulatory agencies, have been installed on-site to specifically minimize the volume of stormwater from flowing into the adjacent tidal wetland. Based upon the primarily upland use of the site and mitigation measures already in place, it is believed that both the current operation and the implementation of the proposed site plan are compatible with the existing wetlands. III. LAND USE AND ZONING. ANINVENTOR YAND ANAL YSIS OF LA ND USE, ZONING AND LAND USE PLANS ON AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT SITE. A. LAND USE. (1) Land Use On & In the Vicinity of the Project Site - Existing Condition. The existing land use on and in the vicinity of the Cross Sound property is represented on the Land Use Map (previously submitted to the Town by Cross Sound as part of an earlier application). This map was prepared in 1997 by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for use in the Peconic Estuary Program. Although this map is considered to be in dra t orm, it is believed that its accuracy and detail is sujFicient for the purposes of this narrative. The land use map reveals the following 7 general land use categories within a half mile radius of the project site: • Low Density Residential; • Medium Density Residential; • Open Space - Recreational; • Vacant Land; • Transportation; • Commercial; and • Utilities. -1l- If the half mile radius was slightly extended (approximately 400% "Agriculture" could be added to this list. As the Land Use Map indicates, the Cross Sound Facility/Project Site is made up of the following land uses: West Parcel ............. Low Density Residential; Terminal Parcel ......... Transportation; Snack Bar Parcel ......... Transportation. The above listed land uses for the Cross Sound Facility are not surprising, except for perhaps the West Parcel. The West Parcel contains a single family residence as well as an approved overflow parking area for walk-on passengers. Given that the residence is considered a more significant structure than the overflow parking area with respect to construction and longevity, the West Parcel was designated "Residential" rather than "Transportation". As indicated on the Land Use Map, the project site (West Parcel, Terminal Parcel and Snack Bar Parcel) lies adjacent to the following land uses: To the East ..... 1 Vacant Residential Lot (controlled by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc.); To the North .... Open Space - Recreational (County Park); 1 Occupied Medium Density Residential Lot; Utilities (LILCO parcel); To the West .... Transportation (Plum Island Ferry Terminal and Parking Area); To the South .... Trustee Owned Beach and Underwater Land. (2) Land Use On and In the Vicinity of the Project Site - Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan. For many years, the project site has been part of a large 5 -parcel block of land used for marine transportation & recreation (commercial, private and federal) - Cross Sound Facility, Plum Island Ferry Facility and Orient by the Sea Marina. All five parcels contain large parking areas. Most residential construction in Orient, including the existing single family residence located to the immediate north of the project site, was built pursuant to the increase in demand for Cross Sound's services. Given that the project site and several of the adjacent properties (Plum Island Ferry Terminal and Orient by the Sea Marina) have been used for parking and marine transportation for many years, neither Cross Sound's current operation or the proposed site plan should be considered inconsistent with local land use. The issuance of site plan approvals in 1985 and 1995, allowing Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. to modify their property in order to meet demand, imply that the existing and proposed use of the facility remains in conformance to current land use patterns. B. ZONING. (1) Zoning On and In the Vicinity of the Project Site - Existing Condition. As indicated on the Towns Zoning Map, the project site is situated within the eastern third of a large block of land currently zoned "M IP' (Marine 1I). Accordingly, the adjacent western parcel, the Plum Island Ferry Terminal and parking area, has the same zoning designation as the project site. Conversely, the adjacent eastern parcel ("Trust Parcel"), controlled by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. is located within an R-80 ("Residential Low Density A") zoning district. With the exception -12- of the project site's eastern boundary, Route 25 serves as the primary zoning boundary between the M lI District and the residential districts (R-80 and R-40) located to the north of the project site. (2) Zoning On and In the Vicinity of the Project Site - Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan. The M ll Zoning Designation for the project site provides for uses that are consistent with on-going and proposed operations of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Furthermore, for the following reasons it is sensible to conclude that the zoning of the project site is consistent with the zoning of the adjacent properties: • The adjacent western parcel is within the same zoning district as the project site and is used by the federal government as the ferry terminal and parking area for Plum Island. • The adjacent vacant eastern parcel, although zoned R-80, is controlled by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. • The adjacent northern properties (primarilly County Parkland), although zoned R-80 and R-40, are separated from the project site by State Route 25. C. LAND USE PLANS. (1) Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and the State Coastal Management Program. In 1982, in response to a federal directive, New York State approved the Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP). The CZMP established a series of 44 coastal policies that every waterfront application must address. Under the U.S. Department of Commerce Regulations (15 CFR 930.57), an applicant proposing to construct within the State's designated coastal area must demonstrate that the subject action is consistent with the 44 individual coastal policies. Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan: As a result of on-site field investigation, in-house analysis and an understanding of the local coastal processes occurring in the vicinity of the project site, it is believed that both the current operation and the proposed site plan will not result in any significant negative impact to the fronting waterbody, coastline, local wetlands and/or existing land use. Hence, in house analysis of the services provided by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. has determined that the on-going and proposed operation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the 44 coastal policies contained as part of the New York State Coastal Zone Management Program. (2) Peconic Bay Estuary Program (PEP). The National Estuary Program (NEP) was established by the Federal Water Quality Act of 1987 as a means to protect and preserve nationally significant estuaries which were/are considered threatened by pollution, development, or overuse. In 1988, Congress added the Peconic Estuary system to the NEP priority list. In 1992, the Peconic Estuary was accepted into the NEP, making the estuary one of only 21 areas in the NEP at that time. The literature provided by the Office of the Peconic Estuary Program indicates the following goals and objectives for the program: -13- "a) To protect and improve the Peconic Estuarysystem water quality to ensure a healthy and diverse marine community. b) To preserve and enhance the integrity ofthe ecosystems and natural resources present in the study area so that: i) Optimal fish and wildlife habitat and diversity ofspecies can be ensured, and ii) Conservation and wise management of the consumable, renewable natural resources of the bay are promoted and enhanced. c) To optimize opportunities far water -dependent recreation. d) Topromote, to the maximum practical extent, the social and economic benefits which have been associated with the Peconic Bay Estuary system. e) To minimize health risks from human consumption ofshellf:sh and ftnfish. f To promote, to the maximum extent possible, public awareness and involvement in estuarine management issues. " Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan: The current operation is water dependent and has been determined as not posing a threat to wetlands, water quality and/or fish/wildlife habitat. Since the implementation of the proposed site plan will not result in any significant changes to the site or operation ofthe facility, the proposed plan should not be considered a threat to wetlands, water quality and/or fish/wildlife habitat as well. Accordingly, based upon (1) on-site field investigation, (2) in-house analysis, and (3) consultation with professional biologists, botanists and coastal engineers, it is believed that neither the current operation nor the proposed site plan is in conflict with any of the above stated goals of the Peconic Estuary Program. (3) Critical Environmental Area Designation. 6 NYCRR Part 617.2 0) defines a Critical Environmental Area (CEA) as a "specific geographic area designated by a state or local agency, having exceptional or unique environmental characteristics". In 1986, the Suffolk County Legislature designated County -owned land located to the north and east of the Cross Sound facility as a Critical Environmental Area. Furthermore, in 1988, the County designated all land located immediately within 500 ft. of the shoreline as a CEA. Based upon the County's actions in 1986 and 1988, the project site is located in, and is surrounded by, land designated as a CEA. Relationship to the Current Operation and the Proposed Site Plan: The nearby County property was designated a CEA largely in part due to the Suffolk County Open Space Acquisition Program. The lands within 500 ft. of the shoreline were designated as a CEA mainly because of the potential impacts resulting from runoff, sewage effluent and/or erosion on the adjacent bay/estuary areas. The existing facility/project site is located over 1001.f. from the County -owned CEA land. Itis believed that this separation is sufficient in preventing any physical disturbance to the County property generated by the on-going and proposed operation of the Cross Sound Facility. However, the CEA land that runs along the coastline and includes a large percentage of the project site deserves to be addressed more closely. Given that runoff, sewage effluent and erosion have be identified by the County as the principal potential threats to this specific CEA area, each of these issues will be discussed separately on the next page: 14 eea, Stormwater Runoff - The existing facility utilizes a drainage system similar to the other parking lots in the vicinity. Stormwater is directed towards french drains and drywells. Furthermore, since a large portion of the existing parking area is surfaced with loose blue stone and/or exposed soil, most rainwater simply permeates immediately through the surface. Since no significant physical modifications to the site are being proposed (with the exception of grading and surfacing the snack bar parking area with clean gravel/stone, which will only improve on-site drainage) no adverse changes to the collection and control of stormwater runoff are anticipated as part of the proposed site plan. During unique periods of intense or lengthy rainfall, the stormwater control structures (ie. the french drains and drywells) collect and store the runoff generated on the site for eventual groundwater re -charge. It should be noted that the existing on-site drainage plan was approved by the Town Engineer. Sewage Effluent - Cross Sound provides restrooms in the existing snack bar building and the ferry terminal. Given that all of the restrooms utilize conventional below grade sanitary systems that were reviewed by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, it is reasonable to conclude that sewage effluent is being properly disposed. Since no modifications to the sanitary systems or restrooms are being proposed, the proposed site plan should have no effect on the collection or discharge of sewage effluent. Erosion - Approximately 95% of the existing on-site operations and actions occur upland/outside of the designated Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Those operations and actions that occur below the Erosion Hazard Area (such as passenger and vehicle loading/unloading; vessel docking, parking, etc.) have occurred on-site for many years and have no other alternative with respect to location. Based upon site inspection and consultation with coastal engineers, it has been determined that the actions that currently take place below the erosion hazard area do not result in negative impacts, or contribute to the erosion of the adjacent beach or dunes. Such operations and actions will not change with the implementation of the proposed site plan. With respect to the discussion noted above, it is understood that the current on-going operation of the Cross Sound Facility does not have any significant effect on the County -owned CEA land located to the east and north of the project site. Since no physical modifications to the site are being proposed which will affect the quality of the off-site CEA land, the implementation of the proposed site plan should not result in adverse changes to the County -owned CEA land. Furthermore, the on- site CEA land located along the coastline will continue to function as a buffer and remain an important safeguard against any threat to the Bay. 15