Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-45.-2-2PLANTIN~ 5C. Ht=DULE HANDIC, AP ~AMP¢ OHt~.UB DETAIL NOTES: ]BALL DIA. 'r'I~EE Df-TAll EXleTIN~ AePHALT PAVEI'4~=NT TO l=E TOP GOAT * el=AL-ER eTl~lmlN~ A5 5HO~IN (12 5TALL¢) F:I~.O~OeEg eHINeLEP ~Al=LEg ROOF EXI~TIN~ ROOF GANOP¥ EXIeTIN~OF GANGer' (JO 5TALL¢) / / / / AC. WNIT ON PAP t=OOTC, AhLDLE ~TATIeTIC,,O HIN. MAX. AV~. / / / ? 12 -HE - / 1 / t / / o - ~-KL AC. LINIT ON PAP o./Ooo..¢s, sou~/nc o~./q.¢ · + 0,33 + + + + + + ~,34 2,~ ~,~E / + + + 7 3,90 + + + + 1,68 3~ i 0,09/ · .%e So~ ~.' ·/°°°'/~s. unq /nc. ~'- T~ HANPlc.APt~.ANP C.ONGm. ETEPATIO N E T~ PA~KIN~ (12 eTALLe) S At~,EA LIGHT %-._ [ / APPROVRDBY cedei,ection 100-255. HANDIGAPPED .GI6N LEGEND NO I ~-0 51TE IMPt~,OVEMENT5 OAN OlI'4EON Br' THE ~OUND, lNG. Du~Folk Goun~W, N¢~ 'fork LANDDC, At~ ~ 00~00000 -: OO~O00000 07000000  "~ 00000000 00000000 ~ 00000000 00000000 -- 00000000 00000000 00000000 CATGH BASIN :2' x 4' FLUSH NT5 W N S Pt~,OPOSEO 5HIN~Lt'=O GABLE~2 ROOF OVER EXISTINd~ ROOF LEA~.HING POOL, LEAC, HING OAT,OH E.~ASlN 0~. DIPt=USION Y'~LL ¢"f"~IPIN¢ A5 5HO/.NN (IO STALLS) PROPOSE~ GONGR~T~ APPROVED FOUNDATION PLAN PLAN ..... ~ '~,, <93 I I .ELEVATION NO'1~ ~ATE ~. HIf',I~:~ I:2ETAIL5 IAIALL SEGTION PLAN5 ~ Df=TAILS - DUMPS'fl=~. ENOLOSU~I-- NT5 EXIDTIN¢ ADPHALT P.,EDURDAGED ~ITH TOP GOAT ~ PROPOSED 5"f'~IPIN~ AG GHO~N (12 5TALL~ GABLED ROOF OVER EXISTLN¢ ROOF GANOP¥ / / / / PROPOSED AC UNIT ON GONG~T~ PAP ('Pt'P,) // OONG~.BTE OUt,B, N'T'~ , / ¸15 NOTE: EINISIflED SURFACE OP RETAINING WALL5 MAY BE CONCRETE FOP'-.M LINER PATTERN OR M A~O NP-.¥ VENEER. TRASH ENOLOSURE 498 -/6Ro' GONC~T~ 51DEAALK HANOlGAP RA~P 573g GONGRETE~ATIO gw ASPHALT PAVEMENT ~SUt~.FAC, ING NT5 BRI~,K Gt~25SY~ALK AT ASPHALT PAVING ('r~mc B~A~IN¢) NT¢ 400 Young & Yowng 11901 i=St HOLE DATA ~-I~ A~ ~H~HN ~N th~ SAN ~IM~N ~TIP~M~NT ~NI~UNIT~ PUMP ~TATI~N PLAN AN~ ~GtION ~AT~ JAN. I~, ~¥ N~NT PC ~ASEI2 ON THE ABOVE F~'/E~NC~D PLANS, TH~ HIgHeST ~XPECT~ (OL) (ML) (e~ D~,AINAGE Z2ESlGN GR.I'T'~,IA * d. ALOULATIONS 'fl~,I~TAR¥ AP4~_A #1 v = A A = A~.EA OF F~IBUTA~¥ (5,FJ LEACHIN~ FIEL~ IA' LEGEND SU~',VE¥OP.'S d. Et~',TI f=IOATION 51TE IMPt~.OVEMENT5 5AN 511'4EON B"¢ THE 50UN~, lNG. AL Gre¢npor[, To~n oF Sou[hold SuFFolk Count~l, Ne~ York Jo. NO. :oo~-o=~ ,,~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN R. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOVCNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 September 23, 2008 Ms. Priscilla DeMasi cio San Simeon by the Sound P.O. Box 2122, 61700 Route 48 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Site Plan Approval for San Simeon by the Sound Located on the south side of CR 48, approximately 700 feet east of Chapel Lane, in Greenport SCTM#1000-45-2-2 Zoning District: HD Zone Dear Ms. DeMasi: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, September 22, 2008 adopted the following resolutions: WHEREAS, the applicant, Priscilla DeMasi, submitted an amended site plan application on May 14, 2008 for alterations to an existing nursing home facility to include change of room lay-out in existing buildings and additions of stairs, a canopy, a generator, a freezer and adding two new parking areas for an out-patient care area; and WHEREAS, on June 30, 2008, the Planning Board accepted this application; and WHEREAS, on July 2, 2008, the Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to agencies for their comments, and the following agencies responded: Town Engineer, Architectural Review Committee, LWRP Coordinator; Suffolk County Planning Commission, Greenport Fire Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the comments from those agencies referenced above were received and accepted by the Planning Board, discussed with the applicant, and incorporated into the site plan to the satisfaction of the Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2008, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed the plan and certified that the proposed use as an adult day care is a permitted use in the Hamlet Density Zoning District; and San Simeon by the Sound Pa.qe Two September 23, 2008 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 B (5), has the discretion to waive some of or all of the parking requirements for those applications where the change proposed will not have an effect on the public health, safety, or general welfare. The Planning Board has found that the parking for this application may be relaxed for the following reasons: the alterations proposed are not changing the size of the building as the proposed is to alter the configuration of the interior, and the proposed project is providing for sufficient additional parking to serve the new use of adult daycare; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131H, has the discretion to waive the public hearing requirement for applications involving modification to existing structures with no substantial change to the existing footprint, and not requiring significant changes to the existing site design features. The Planning Board has found that the public hearing for this application may be waived for the following reasons: this is an existing site that had previously been before the Board for a related site plan application approved on December 23, 1996, the uses on site have not changed; it has been determined that the overall proposal would not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to §280-133 C. of the Southold Town Code, has the discretion to waive any or all of the requirements in §280- 133 for those applications involving modifications to existing structures with no substantial change to the existing footprint. The Planning Board has found that requiring the entire set of site plan application requirements for this site is not necessary to further the objectives set forth in Town Code §280-129 and maintain public health, safety, and welfare for the following reasons: the application is for an amended site plan previously approved by the Board, and the parcel has been used in the same configuration as previously reviewed and approved; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southoid Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) (6 NYCRR, Part 617.5 (c) (3), has determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action, and not subject to review under SEQR; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby waives the public hearing requirement, and site plan application requirements, except for the following items: §280-133 A. (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), B. (1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (j), (k), (3) (a),(b),(c partial), (d), (4) (a),(b), (c), (e-partial),(f), (g-partial), (h), and (i); and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has reviewed the proposed action under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and determined that the action is consistent as outlined in the September 15, 2008 memo prepared by the LWRP Coordinator; and be it further San Simeon by the Sound Pa,qe Three September 22, 2008 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants approval, and authorizes the Chairperson to endorse the site plan entitled "San Simeon by the Sound Inc." prepared by Howard Young, Land Surveyor, dated August 21,2008. Please also note the following required by Town Code: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan, and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. A copy of the approved site plan is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, dhouse Chairperson encl. CC: Southold Town Building Department w/map Southold Town Engineer w/map By signing this letter, the applicant acknowledges that there are Town Code requirements listed above that must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Priscilla Demasi, Applicant Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631 ) 765-1802 Fax (631) 765-9502 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson 8EP 2 2 2008 FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: September 18, 2008 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: San Simeon by the Sound Location: 61700 Route 48, Greenport, N.Y. 11944 SCTM# 1000 - Section 4~5- Block 02 - Lot 2 Date: August 08, 2008 Revised Date: August 21, 2008 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 144 AND 280 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE IS A PERMITTED USE AND IS SO CERTIFIED. Chief Building Inspector OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax~ 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Town of Southold Planning Board From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner ~ LWRP Coordinator Date: September 15, 2008 Re~ Local Revitalization Program Consistency Review of Site Plan Approval for San Simeon by the Sound Location: 61700 CR 48, Greenport SCTM#1000-45-2-2 Zoning District: HD This proposed action is for site plan alterations to existing nursing home facility to include change of room lay-out in existing buildings and additions of stairs, canopy, generator and freezer, adding two new parking areas for outpatient care area. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department and the records available to me, I recommend that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)-765-9015 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (631) - 765 - I560 JAMIE.RICHTER~TOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jedlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Re: Site Improvements for San Simeon by the Sound SCTM #: 1000 - 45 - 02 - 02 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed ti~e amended site plan for the above referenced project. This Site Plan has been prepared by the office of Young & Young and has been dated August 8, 2008. Please consider the following: The proposed alterations to the existing facility indicate an increase in impervious surfaces and asphalt parking areas that will increase the amount of storm water run-off generated at this site. Drainage designs have been indicated on the Grading & Drainage Plan that meets the minimum requirements of Town Code for containment of Storm Water Run-off. At this time, the proposed development, modifications and alterations to the existing site conditions appear to meet the minimum requirements of Town Code. If you have any questions regarding this review, please feel free contact my office. es A. Richter, R.A. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, September 15, 2008 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Site Plans & Subdivisions Site Plans Location: i The intersection of Bergen Avenue and Sound Avenue, on the north side ]; of Sound Avenue, in Mattituck. Description: i This site plan is for additions & alterations to an existing winery on a 5.6 i acre parcel in the A-C Zone ,-~c'~r~r:n~n'da't'~ns 'i"~i'~"e~-at the Special Meeting ~n .... ' i S .eJ~t?~.m.b.e_r i Attachments: i Staff Rel?ort I-iS-r~i~{'~-a'~ .............. San S~meon by the Sound , SCTM#' 1000-45-2-2 L0~:afi~n: 6170--0-~R -~§~"-~ ~'~'~- ............. ~ ~ ay-out in existing buildings and additions of stairs, canopy, generator ] -and. ~[eezer ~ddJ.~g.. ~9 g. ew pa[kiqg.af~s fo.[ .~u~p~ie.9~.q.a[e alea. Status: i Application review & review comments Recommendations: ~ Consider approving the amended site plan at the Special Meeting on ~ September 22, 2008 .-I-_gcati°n: C.R 48 &.¥gungs Ave Soutl~o!d Description: Request for a permit to hold an outdoor event from 10/2 - 10/31 !~.~at!.on: 5~.27.~.NYS Ro.Htff 25 Sou~l~.e.!c~ Description: This site plan is for the proposed conversion of an existing automotive ~ service buildin9 to a bake~ in the Hamlet Business zone. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: :.: Recommendations: i After a site visit and discussion with the Town Engineer, the request for a i final inspection should not be granted at this time. The parking area is :~ not yet finished, their engineer has not submitted certification that the ;: drainage is adequate, nor has the applicant submitted an as-built plan i sh0wing changes made to the..a~p.~gved site p!a~: LA~.tachments; Copy of Request PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southald, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Ma/n Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner ~.j Date: September 8, 2008 RE: San Simeon by the Sound SCTM# 45-2-2 The Planning Board refers this (amended) site plan application to you for your review, comments, and certification. Enclosed please find a copy of the site plan application for your review. Thank you for your cooperation. enc. site plan application site plan Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes ~:00p. m., August 21, 2005 Town Hall Meeting Hall Members Present: Chairman Sanford Hanauer; Herbert Ernest; Joseph Lee; Ron McGreevy; Howard Meinke; Mark Schwartz; Elizabeth Thompson; Heather Lanza, Planning Director; Kristy Winser, Planner; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary. The Architectural Review Committee welcomes Mark Schwartz as a new member to the Committee. The minutes for the July ~, ~2008 meeting were approved. New Applications: MARCARI VINEYARDS SCTM # lOOO-121-1-1.$ Joseph Marcari, owner, Gail Wickham and Howard Young, Surveyor were present to represent this project. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL pending a revised plan to be submitted to the Committee showing the design of deck, details of the patio, stairs, handrails, lighting cuts and finish materials. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. OWEN CONSTRUCTION SCTM# 1000-102-2-1~.5 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL pending final a .p4~lication of.~ site plan submission showing cuts of proposed exterior lighting, parl~ng area screening, proposed signage design, planting plan of property naming the vafio~apecies to b6 used, dumpst~r location and screening. The drawings depicting the elex~ations of th~lhu~ldih]g~are. _ approved as submitted today. ; Motion made and seconded. All in favor. Revisited Applications: SAN SIMEON Priscilla Demassi, applicant and Tom Campiglia, Architect, were present to represent this project. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL pending receipt of cuts of any new proposed lighting, types of screening to be used on the exterior air conditioners along the building, indicate finish to be used for the proposed retaining wall near the front entry. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. A motion was made to close the meeting at 5:oop.m. All in favor. ~' Elizabeth Cantrell, ~ecretary YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Pa'verhead, New York 11901 Telephone 631-727-2303 Facsimile 631-727-0144 adminOyoungengineering, com HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST, Architect DOUGLAS E. ADAMS, Professional Engineer HAND DELIVERED August 21, 2008 ATTN: Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 RE: SAN SZbtEON BY THE SOUND North Road (C.R. 48) at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (08-0273) Dear Hs. Winser: \L- . ....... ~ Enclosed are seven (7) sets of the Site Plan (She~!:s~G~P"~ G~Dp) last ..~ .~ ~ - -_ .., =._ - dated August 21, 2008, for your review. Please note that these drawings have been amended to eliminate the proposed canopy over the front entrance. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, TCW/mal Encl. CC: Mr. Fritz Johnson Mr. Thomas Campiglia, AIA Thomas C. Wolpert + I Set of Prints + ! Set of Prints (Via E-mail) Planning Englnee~ing Land Surveying Architecture Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: c~5c 0c~o~3 SCTM#: 1000- Comments: ' ~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE C~vn Engineer r,~,NNETH L. EVWA~DS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To' From: Date: Re: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Kristy Winser, Senior Planner (~/ August 19, 2008 Site Plan for San Simeon by the Sound, Greenport SCTM# 1000-045.00-02.00-002.000 The Planning Board refers this application to you for your information, comments, review, and certification, if applicable. The file is available at your convenience. Project Description: Alterations to existing nursing home facility to include change of room layout in existing buildings and additions of stairs, canopy, generator and freezer, adding two new parking areas for outpatient care area. Thank you for your cooperation. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILY~N B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: From: Date: Re: MEMORANDUM James Richter, Engineering Inspector Kristy Winser, Senior Planner (~ August 19, 2008 Request for comments on site plan. Application Name: Tax Map Number: Location: San Simeon by the Sound SCTM# 1000-045.00-02.00-002.000 Located in the Hamlet of Greenport Type of Application: Site plan X X __ Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated: 8/8/08 ) Other (AS BUILT) (Dated: 8/8/08 ) Project Description: Alterations to existing nursing home facility to include change of room layout in existing buildings and additions of stairs, canopy, generator and freezer, adding two new parking areas for outpatient care area. Additional Comments: A referral has been sent to the Board of Trustees for their review. Based on the proposed and preliminary comments, it does not appear to have wetland issues. Thank you for your cooperation. YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue ]~'verhead, New York 11901 Telephone 631-727-230~:x3 Facsimile 631-727-01q4~ adminOyoungengineering, com HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST, Architect DOUGLAS E. ADAMS, Professional Engineer HAND DELIVERED August 15, 2008 A~-I'N: Ms. Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 RE: SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND North Road (C.R. 48) at Greenport, T/O Southold, New York (08-0273) Dear Ms. Winser: In accordance with our recent telephone conversation and pursuant to requests contained in your letter to IVlr. Thomas Campiglia, AIA, enclosed are the following items: one (1) original - Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Application, one (1) original - Letter of Authorization from Sterling Management (signed & notarized), and seven (7) sets - Site Plan (Sheets LAP & GDP) dated August 8, 2008. Please contact our office if you have any questions or concerns regarding this application. DA/mai Encl. CC: AUS lB 2008 LZ : .. .... Douglas Adams Mr, I%~tZ Johnson + Encl. + 1 Set of Prints Planning En~neeting Land Surveying Architecture DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLKO STEVE LEW SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE August 11, 2008 THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF pLANNING Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan SCTM No. San Simeon by the Sound 1000-45-02-02 NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, APF:cc Thomas Isles, AICP LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H, LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P, O, BOX 6100 · (631 ) 853.-5191 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788..0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes July 24, 2008 4:00pm Town Hall Meeting Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Sanford Hanauer, Chairman; Herbert Ernest; Joseph Lee; Ronald McGreevy; Howard Meinke; Nicholas Planamento; Heather Lanza, Planning Director; I~-isty Winser, Planner; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary The minutes for the June 19, 2008 meeting were approved. NEW APPLICATIONS: · CELIC CENTER SCTM #1000-143-3-1 PROJECT APPROVED: The Committee is recommending the following: o Updating of the landscaping on the property. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. · SAN SIMEON SCTM #1000-45-2-2 PROJECT NOT APPROVED: The Commattee ~vould like to have the folloxving for review: o Detailed drawing of canopy structure being erected (e.g. is the framing material aluminum or steel, color, etc.) o Swatch of the color and material of the canopy proposed Motion made and seconded. All in favor PECONIC LAND TRUST SCTM #1000-109-1-13.2 PROJECT APPROVED: The Committee endorses the project as it was shown today. Motion made and seconded. All in favor. A motion was made to close the meeting at 4:55pm. All in favor. Elizabeth Cantrell Secretary July 31,2008 P.O. Box 1179 54375 Route 25 - Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 To: Doug Adams From: Kdsty Winser F=c (631) 727-0144 Pages:5 including cover Phone: ~ta: 6/27/08 P.e: San Simeon cc: As Requested, attached is a copy of the letter requesting revisions and a new application form. In addition please submit a letter of authoC~tion with your submission. Should you require additional Information please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you. · Page 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M~II.ING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OI~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, KY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Memorandum To: Sanford Hanauer, Chairman, Southold Architectural Review Committee From: Kristy Winser, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Date: July 21, 2008 RE: Request for review and comments on site plan known as San Simeon SCTM# 1000-45-2-2 The Planning Board refers this site plan application to your agency for your review and comments. The site plan is for alterations to an existing nursing home facility to include change of room layout in existing buildings and additions of stairs, canopy, generator and freezer, and two new parking areas for outpatient care area located on the south side of Route 48, Approximately 700 feet east of Chapel Lane, in Greenport. Thank you. * Site plan application and site plan elevations are enclosed. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 2, 2008 Suffolk County Planning Commission 220 Rabro Drive P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Attention: Andrew Freleng, Principal Planner Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of: San Simeon by the Sound Hamlet/Locality: Greenport S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: Zoning: HD S.C. Tax Map No.: 1000 -45 -2 -2 Major Sub. Minor Sub. Site Plan (amended) X__Cluster Lot Line Change.__ MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat (3 copies).~ Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1).__ Topographical Map (1) Site Plan (1)_X Grading Plan (1).__ Project Description: Applicant request for alterations to existing nursing home facility to include change of room lay- out in existing buildings and additions of stairs, canopy, generator and freezer, adding a new parking area for outpatient care to the rear of the site. Page 2 Southold Town Planning Board Referral Referral Criteria: SEQ RA STATUS: 1. The project is an ( ) Unlisted Action ( ) Type I Action (x) Type II Action 2. A ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Positive Declaration ( ) Determination of Non-significance has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3, E.I.S. statement enclosed. ( Yes ( No 4. The proposed division has received approval of Health. ( )Yes ( )No from the Suffolk County Department Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral ( x ) Yes ( )No Referral received and assigned File No. 2008 by the Suffolk County Planning Commission Sincerely, Sr. Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN II. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAll.lNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Or'~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 2, 2008 Cliff Harris, Chief Greenport Fire Department P.O. Box 58 Greenport, NY 11944 Dear Chief Harris: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan for San Simeon by the Sound located at 61700 CR 48, on the south side of County Route 48, approximately 700 feet east of Chapel Lane, in Greenport. SCTM# 1000-45-2-2 e/// The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Kristy Winser Senior Planner enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 2, 2008 Sterling Management Attn: Thomas Campiglia, AIA 2 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 Sam Simeon by tl~e Sound, Located in tl~e Homlet o£ Gwenport Site Plan Review - SCTM~ 1000-045.00-02.00-002.000 Dear Mr. Campiglia: The above referenced site plan has been formally accepted by the Planning Board for review. Please revise in accordance with the following comments and resubmit directly to the Planning Department. The surveyor should identify the wetlands line on the plan as "Wetlands as delineated by Aram Terchunian on April 2, 2008". Submit a lighting plan and detail of lighting f~xtures indicating the location, direction, power level and me of use for any proposed outdoor lighting or public address systems. Lighting shall be oriented and shielded so as to not illuminate or glare on ad}oining roadways or properties. A copy of guidelines for good exterior lighting plans is submitted for your convenience. The location and listing of landscaping and street tree plans, including type, material, size, quantity and location. The location and design plans of any outdoor signs. Details of aprons, curbs, sidewalks, fencing and grading for proposed parking area. The location and detail of proposed and existing drainage structures and provide drainage calculations. Applica~'on of San Simeon, Greenport Show date, location and elevation of test hole. Show test hole to be 2' foot beloxv deepest drainage structure. Show all utility appurtenances and the method of screening from pubhc view Show location and enclosure detail for refuse. Note on plan Applicant/operator shall maintain refuse enclosure gates in a closed position except at times of loading and unloading of dumpsters. Additional comments will be provided following full review by staff, the Town Planning Board, Town departments and involved/interested agencies. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Senior Planner Priscilla DeMasi, Applicant Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Date: July 1, 2008 To: El/zabeth Cantrell, Arckitectural Review Board Secretary From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner RE: ARC Comments for Site Plan Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: SCTMN#: Street Location: Hamlet: Zoning District: Type of Site Plan: Property Owner: Agent: Property size: Building size: San Simeon 1000-45-2-2 61700 County Route 48 Greenport Hamlet Density Amended San Simeon Thomas Campiglia, AIA 156,000 s.f. (3.5 acres) 41,000 s.f. Description of Site Plan Project This site is located on the south side of Route 48, Greenport. This site has approximately a 41,000 s.f. building on a 3.5-acre parcel with its use as an adult home. The current proposal is to convert existing space on the first floor of the rear section of the building to an adult daycare program having a new parking area to accommodate for the parking needs of visitors and staff. In addition, there are plans for two canopies proposed at each entryway one at the front of the building and the other at the new rear drop-off area of the building for the proposed adult day care. Please review the proposal and provide your comments to the Planning Board for their consideration. Thank you. encl: Site Plan with proposed elevations WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, June 30, 2008 at 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Site Plans & Subdivisions Site Plans: Celic Center SCTM#: 1000-143-3-1 Location: Aldrich Lane in Mattituck Description: basement alterations Action: PB review new site plan application received on 05/01/08. Status: New application pending the PB accepting. Recommendations: PB considers accepting application and waiving site plan elements as indicated in the Staff Report. Request information regarding current status of parking on site. Consider authorizing Staff to start the referral process. San Simeon by the Sound SCTM#: t000-45-02-002 Location: 61700 Route 48 in Greenport Description: Alterations to existing nursing home facility to include change of room lay-out in existing buildings and additions of stairs, canopy, generator and freezer, and adding two new parking areas for outpatient care area. Action: PB review new site plan application received on 5/14/08. Status: New application pending the PB accepting. Recommendations: Referred out to Board of Trustees for verification of wetlands to the rear of the site. PB considers accepting application. Consider authorizing Staff to start the referral process. The Heritage at Cutchogue SCTM#: 1000- 102-1-33.3 Location: end of Griffing Street, approximately 1,079' n/o the Main Road, Cutchogue Description: Residential site plan application for a 55+ Active Adult Community consisting of 139 detached and attached dwellings, and other accessory structures. Action: Review revised DEIS (1st revision) for adequacy for public review. Status: Environmental Impact Statement review process. Recommendations: DEIS is missing important information requested in the Final Scope and should be returned for revisions. For Discussion: Farm Stand Code recommendations to Town Board Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report San Simeon bythe Sound Preparer. Kristy Wmser, Senior Planner Date: June 30, 2008 I. Site Plan Information Site Plan Name: SCTMN#: Street Location: Hamlet: Zoning District: Type of Site Plan: Property Ownen Applicant: Agent: Site Plan Prepared By: Date of Map: Date of Submission to Planning Board: Property size: Parking required: Parking provided: SEQRA: San Simeon 1000-45-2-2 61700 Route 48 Greenport Hamlet Density Amended San Simeon Priscilla DeMasi (San Simeon) Thomas Campiglia, AIA Thomas Campiglia, AIA June 11, 2008 May 14, 2008 156,000 s.f. (3.5 acres) 120 stalls 113 stalls 6% parking relaxation Type 2 action Description of Site Phn Pmject Proposed Construction Type: Amendmem to approved site phn Zoning Determination: The Notice of Disapproval indicates the need for site plan approval under section 280-127 that states an intensity of use requires site plan approval. This site is located on the south side of Rome 48, Greenport. The applicant's proposal is for interior alterations to and for an additional parking area in the Hamlet Density-zoning district under section 280- 127 for an intensification of use on site. This site has approximately a 41,000 sf building on 3.5-acre parcel with its use as an adult home. There was a previous site plan application approved by the Board in 1996 for a parking lot on the south of the property. The current proposal is convert existing space on the first floor of the rear section of the building to an adult daycare program having a new parking area to accommodate for the parking needs of visitors and staff. There arel0 additional spaces proposed as part of the overall plan having a total of 113 parking spaces on site. Based on the Parking requirements, 130 spaces are required based on 1 parking space for each bed. This will need to be clarified by the applicant due to conflicting numbers on the plan but it should be noted that the proposal is more in conformity with the requirements. The new plan is to decrease the number of beds from the current 150 hospital beds. In review of the site, a concern of the Department would be possible wetlands in close proximity to the proposed development seen on department wetland maps however, a wetland line is shown on the plan as having 100 ft from the proposed parking area. To be certain a referral was sent to the Board of Trustees for comment. Permits and/or Review Required From Other Agencies · Board of Trustees -Sent a referral · LWRP review for consistency- Not submitted as part of application · NYS DOT · Mattituck Fire District · Building Inspector Certification · Drainage review from Town Engineer- · ARC Staff Recommendations - The Planning Departmem recommends the Planning Board consider the following: Review of the plan and provide comments Consider waiving any requirements as part of ske phn process. The application is eligible for waiver of site plan elements under § 280.133.C~ and the following elements of are recommended for the waiven § 280.133 A. (3) EAF (Type II action) § 280-133 B. (1)(g) Separate key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500' (site is relatively flat) Request the following information from the applicant: a. Request a drainage plan for new parking area. b. The surveyor should identifythe wetlands line on the plan as "Wetlands as delineated by Aram Terchunian on April 2, 2008". c. Proposed lighting plan for new canopys and for parking area. d. The location and design plans of any outdoor signs. e. Details of aprons, curbs, sidewalks, fencing and grading for proposed parking area 4.consider accepting site plan. Materials to aid in review · Aerial view of property · Copies of prior site plan application and C/O Submission }Yithout a Cover Letter Comments: Thomas C a topi g II a A r c h ~t cc 2 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10016 THOMAS CAMPIGLIA~ ~ T: 212.686.1858 D: 212.201.6128 ¢: 917.952.6680 F: 917.952.6680 E: tc~tcaAxch.com Fdday, Apdr 04, 2008 Thomas CampJglia Sterling Management, Inc. 2 Park Ave New York, NY 10016 RE: San Simeon by the Sound, Greeni~oJ~,.N¥ Dear Tom: On April 2, 2008 1 placed 10 wetland flags delineating the wetland north and east of the San Simeon building. There are flags 1-4 delineating an isolated wetland due east of the rear building. I also placed a small pink flag delineating the point 100 feat from that wetland near the surveyor's mark for the property line. Flags 5-10 were placed in a larger wetland located north and east of the building. The closest point of the 100-foot setback is approximately equal to the line of evergreen east of the rear building. You should have your surveyor locate the flags I placed in the field on the survey and provide a definitive 100-foot setback on the survey. The surveyor should identify the wetlands line as "Wetlands as delineated by Aram Terchunian on Apdl 2, 2008.". I enclose photographs taken on that day, as well as an invoice for services rendered. Sincerely,____..__ Fi~~_~mtion Aram V. Ter~hunian President Enclosure Cc: P. DeMasi G. Vonatski First Coas~si Corporation, Post Office Box 1212 We~hamplon Beach, NY 11978 Phone: 631-288-2271, Fax: 631-288-8949 www.firstcoastal.net Envimnmentsi Consulting and Construction. Permits to ConstnJcflon. Preserving the coast since 1975 FIRS. T PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O[~P'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Memorandum Date: June 16, 2008 To: Southold Board of Trustees From: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Re: San Simeon By the Sound Site Plan. 61700 Route 48, G reenport, NY 11944 SCTM# 1000-045.00-02.00-002.000 Please be advised that the above referenced site plan has been submitted to the Planning Department for site plan review. It is questionable whether the site occurs within your jurisdiction. The applicant submitted two separate plans as part of their application, an overall proposed site plan indicating a wetland area line to the east of the site and a proposed partial site plan. On the partial plan, there appears to be a drainage pipe with a concrete wall at its terminus in close proximity to the wetland area. It should be noted that this drainage was mentioned by the Department as a possible issue during a preliminary meeting with the applicant and is currently not shown on the overall proposed site plan. We would appreciate your verification of the existence of wetlands as shown on the attached survey, and informing the Planning Board of your findings. Thank you. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: Hay / 13 /20 08 Site Plan Name: San Simeon by the Sound Suffolk County Tax Map Number lO00 - 45 - 02 Other SCTM~'s: Street Address: 61700 Route 48 Hamlet: Distance to nearest intersection: 338 feet 2 Type of Site Plan: New x Amended Residential If Amended, last approval date: __/__/__ SECTION B: Owner/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address and phone number for each contact: Street ~/-2oo ~-~L, VF Home Talephon~,_~]/ J ~/7 ? -2//Sther Applicant Priscilla DeMasi San Simeon by the Sound Street E!799 City Greenport State NY Home Telephone (631) 477-2100Other __Zip 11944 Applicant's Agent or Representative Contact Person(s)* Thomas Campiglia, AIA Sterling Management Street 2 Park Avenue City New York State NY Zip 10016 Office Telephone (212) 247-6300Other Unless otherwise requested, correspondence w~ll ~e~'rttq3'ti!y to ffi~s person.: 3/19/2008 1 ~ , r~!AY 14 2008 SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type~ New Property total acreage or square footage~ X Site Plan Mod/fieation of Exis[~g~me~e Change of ~e 3. 5813 ac./sq, ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 41, 813 ac./sq, ft. __Agricultural Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ If yes, explain: No x Proper~ Zoning District(s): Continuing Care Facility (Section 280-22, A, (4)) Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: __/__/__ Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes __ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes __ No __ If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: Continuing Care Facility (Section 280-22, A, (4)) List all proposed property uses: Nursing and Adult Day Care Other accessory uses: Proposed Generator, Refrigerators Existing lot coverage: 26.4 % Proposed lot coverage: 27.0 % Additional Canopy' s at building entries Gross floor area of existing structure(s): 41,813 5q- ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s):. 41,813 S f Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: 104 # of proposed spaces: 113 Loading Berth: Yesx No__ Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: +/- 25 % Proposedlandscapecoverage:+/- 35 % Waterfront Data: ls this property within No NO If yes explain: 100 ' $00~' of a wetland area? Yes I, the undersigned, certify that all the above information is tree. Signature of Preparer: Thomas Campiglia Date: May 12, 2008 3/19/2008 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Accounting From: Planning Department Date: May 14, 2008 Re: Checks Attached is (are) the check(s) listed below, for deposit into deferred account. Applicont/Project Nome & Tax Mop Amount Check Dote/No. Type San Simeon by the Sound S'tct- 45-2-2 $685.80 5/13/08 - 005138 LR Enc(s). ~11® I~ hereby n~g ~l)~llmac;n; ~ ~eha aro no ~Kl~tim'J ~ll(:LLirc~ ~ Improvm~nl:S o1~ ~J~ I~nd Wllldl ~re not ~'lg~l mt the S~ PlarJ: ~t oloa~ ~bJ~hr~d am1 is sl~w*l mi said PI~; 1Ilar no part of t~ Plan I~frlhgJ~ IJ~n ;~l~ du~ filed EU~r'~/L F/LqNAM NO. 01FA6162855 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may he significant. The question of Whether an action may he significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that am subjective or unmeasurable, it is also understood that those Who determien significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not he aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can he assured that the determination process has been ordedy, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides obJective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to he considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The foem also identifies whether an impact can he mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potontiallyqarge, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FORL DA~USEONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and imporb3nt impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not he a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will he prepared.* r~c. in and important impacts that have a significant impact on the The project may result one or more large may environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency webs~e Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Page 1 of 21 Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If~ifferent from responsible o~) 2008 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please completa the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these quesfions will be considered as partofthe application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance, Name of Action San Simeon by the Sound - Adult Day Care Parking Location of Action {include Street Address, Municipality and County) 61700 Route 48 Greenport, New York 11944, Suffolk County Name of Applicant/Sponsor Priscilla DeMasi, Director, San Simeon by the Sound Address 61700 Route 48 City/PO Greanport State New York Zip Code 11944 (~L;lJ ) /-/77-~//~ Business Telephone Name of Owner (if different) Address 7 o Business Telephone State zip Code Description of Action: Increase the paved area on the south portion of the property to: a. Increase parking and 'entry torn-around' to the south portion of the property b. Add a secondary entry to the rear of the building. c. Add a rear egress and small patio to the rear of the north wing. d. Add a concrete pad with generator to service parking area Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N,A. if not applicable A, SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall pr(~ject, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: r~ Urban r--1 Industrial r~l Commemial r'-lForest [~ Residential (suburban) ~1 Agriculture [] Other Nursing Home, Adult Day Carc r--1 Rural (non-farm) Total acreage of project area: 3.5813 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Bmshland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Ama Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 2.1 acres 2.0 acms .3 acres .3 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0. acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres LIS acres [.28 acres acres acres What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Sandy a. Soil drainage: I'~Well drained 100 % of site r~ poorly drained % of site r~ Moderately well drained % of site. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? r'-I Yes a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r~0-10%__% F~lO. 15% % r~ 15% or greater 60 % 6. Is project substantial~[~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Histodc Places? La Yes [] No E~Yes ~"~No If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see I NYCRR 370). [] No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ['"'lYes [] No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? N Yes ]No Page 3 of 21 1 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Accordin~l to: Identif~ each .~-i~,~ 1 ;>. /~'e thoro any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? {i.e., diffs, duoes, other geological formations? ~lYes []No 1 3. Is tho project site presenUy used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes ~]No If yes, explain: I ,, 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? r'~Yes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project ama: r~No Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proJect area: b. Size (in acres): 3.5813 Acres Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~ Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? D No DYes 1 8. Is the site located in an agricultural district cerrJfied pumuant to Agdcultum and Markets Law, I-Iw I'-I No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a and 6 NYCRR 617? r'-lYes r='lNo [~No Article 25-AA, Section 303 and Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. ProJect Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). r-~ Yes N No a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: b, Project acreage to be developed: .3 acres initially; acres. acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: +/-2.3 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: 400' (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. -- f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 104; proposed__ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated par hour: h, If residential: Number and type of housing units; 113 (upon completion of project)? One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: n/a height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes r'"lNo []N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? width; 390 ft. __ tons/cubic yards. length. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? N Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, gmued covers) will be removed from site? .2 Page 5 of 2t 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? F"~ Yes [] No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: __ 7. months, (including demolition) If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipatJ~cl 3 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: (~ month 2008 year, (inoluding demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 6 month 2008 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~1 Yes ~ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ~ Yes F~I No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 150 ; after project is complete -- 10. Number ofjobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [~ Yes r~ No If yes, explain: r=-i 12. is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I I Yes I=lNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? r~ Yes r~ No Type 14, Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? r='"]Yes r~lNo If yes, explain: 15. Isproject or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? r~Yes ~=~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? r"] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month?__ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes r~ No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? r-lYes r']No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 1 7. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I lYes I-INo tons/month. a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? ~ years, 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~]Yes [] No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? r~Yes []No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? r~Yes []No 21, Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [~ No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity__ gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day__ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? []Yes N No If yes, explain: A portion of this project is fund by the Slate 'HEAL' Grant Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~'] Yes r~ No Type Site Plan Approval Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board ~ Yes r~No Site Plan Approval Building Department Department of Health City, Town Zoning Board NYes [] No City, County Health Department r~ Yes [] NO Other Local Agencies r~Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies r~Yes [] No State Agencies r~ Yes r~ No Federal Agencies ~ Yes ~=~ No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? r-]Yes ~'~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~ Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan ~ Site plan [] Special use permit r'-] Resource management plan r--]Subdivision ]Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classirk;ation(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? No Change in Zoning is requested 5. Wllat is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? I 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? JTJ Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning dassificntions within a ~ mile radius of proposed action? Residential [~]No 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ¼ mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a~ What is the minimum lot size proposed? r~,l Yes [] No Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? []Yes []No If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes I~] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic signirmanfly above present levels? [] Yes ~'~ No a. If yes, is the existing rood network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes [] No ! D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to cladf7 your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certif~ that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Na~e__]B~s~lla DeM~asi Date May 13, 2008 Signe(tb~e If the action is in the Coastal Area, and ~,ou are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Iofotmafi~ (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would tdgger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable Ihroughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, shod term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column I or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? .o [] yes [] Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground sudace. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural matedat (i.e., rock or soil) per year. [] [] [] es [] [] []Yes [~]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [3"o [] [] []Yes []No [] [] r-lYes []No Page 11 of 21 Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts; I 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change r'"JYes []No r-]Yes []No []Yes []No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forrns found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) I-I.O FTEs Specific land forms: I []Yes []No Impact on Water Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) F~NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wefiand. Other impacts: I 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [].o r-lYEs Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: r']Yes r']No []Yes []No ]Yes •No r-~ Yes []No [--'~ Yes []No r']Yes []No I-lYes i-IN• r-lYes Page 12 of 21 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply fi'om wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day, Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to nalural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commemial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change ]Yes []No [~] Yes []No I-lYes I-lYes I--lYes I-I.o I-IYes r-l.o I-lyes I-I.o []Yes I-l.o ]Yes ~]No [~Yes []No []Yes r~No [~Yes r"] No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway, Other impacts: [] r~Yes [] [~]Yes ~'~No [] I-lYes r=~ Yes ~""~. 0 I-1 I-1Y~ [-'].o IMPACT ON AIR Will Proposed Action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour, Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: [] r'=lYes [] r'~ yes [] F"'lYes [] [] I--1ye~ I-I.o [] [] F"~Yes ~'"1 N o [] r-1 [r"=l Yes r=~.o IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Wilt Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I--I.o I--lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. [] I-lYes r-l.o Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion cf a cdtical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than [wise a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts; 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Se Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] ~ I--lYes I--I"o [] [] []Yes F~No [] []Yes ~No Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-thraatened or non- endangered species? I-l.o []~Es Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other thcally important vegetation. Other impacts: [] []Yes []No [] []Yes ~]No [] I-Iy. [].o IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10, Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? I'-I.o I-l~Es Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activily would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. [] []Yes F"l NO [] []Yes []No [] []Y. I-I.o Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of aghcu[tura[ land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, stdp cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes [] No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC R~URCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) I'-I.o Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: [] [] ]Yes E]No E]Yes IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? I-I.° I-I Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. [] [] [] r']Yes [] No []Yes r']No []yes Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: I 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change [] []Yes r-'lNo IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: [] I--lYes r-l.o [] r~Yes r"-"] No [] I--]~es [].o IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique charactedstics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? I-I.o r--lYEs List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: [] []Yes r~No r-I []~ r-].o []Yes []No []Yes r'~No [] []~es [].o Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTAllON 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? r~NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use, Other impacts: I NOJSE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting wfthin 1,500 feet ora hospital, school or ether sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action wil~ remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: Page 18 of 21 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Pro)ect Change ]Yes I-1Y.s l-lyes ]Yes [] No r-]Yes []No r-]Yes [] No ]Yes r--]No r~Yes []No E~] Yes []No E~] Yes []No []Yes []No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBUC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of ~hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may resufi in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: [] [] IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEaGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] [] [] []Yes []No [] []Yes r'~No [] r=~Yes r=~No [] r==~ Yes [~]No [] r~Yes ~'lNo [] r'"~Yes []No [] r-l~. [].o [] []Yes []No [] r'="lYes []No [] []Yes []No [] I--1~ r-l.o Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes r=~No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: ! The probability of the impact occurring ! The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility, including permanently Iosl resources of value ! Whether the impact can or will be controlled ! The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from local needs and goals I Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 2I of 21 ~ Submission FFithout a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Project Type: Site Plans Status: Final - Pending Inspection SCTM #: 1000 - 45.-2-2 Proiect Name: San Simeon by the Sound 2008 Address: 61700 CR48, Greenport Hamlet: Greenport Applicant Name: Priscilla DeMasiSan Simeon by the Sound Owner Name: San Simeon by the Sound Zone 1: HD Approval Date: 9/22/2008 SCANNED 8EP 2 5 2008 Records Management OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 9/23/2008 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: Located on the south side of CR 48, approximately 700 feet east of Chapel Lane, in Greenport. SC Filing Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M A.qreement: SCAN Date: ~'~WETLAN~ ~ 25,~ *' 26.7B 35,16~ ~ 28,14 ~ I * 26,55 27,61 I ~~ ~ *~ 'k 5~5 ~ OC 29'06 ~ '28.96 ?/~33.61~~-' ~ ~ yg , O . ./~--k.~.~,..., ~ ~ \ ~ 33,90 .43.~ - ~d ' ~ CONC WALL W/CHA~ ~ 5 mA. X -4--~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ' ~ LINK FENCE ~4,19 ~ TREE _ ~ X ~ ~ ~ / : ~ ~ R 45 74 44 18 /% 48:61 ~ - ~ ~ ~0,65 4E ,37 ~¢¢'~ ' ~ 48.59 ( ) ~ I ~U,bU J~% 50.1~ --F.F. EL= < ~ ,u,,~ ~ 40.99 ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ CONC ff ~-- ~~ 50,58 ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ 40.74 ( ~ 48,61 ~' %~ / UNITS mJ.z % ~ %i 12.8' 40,6¢ ¢5.9' ~ ~ ~ 49,15 ~ ................. I .... 3 30 %% ' ~ ~ o % ' F.F.EL= ) ',, ~ %3,9e x i ~,69 ~ 36.55 ~ ~ 49.3~ u 49.47 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 48,80 . , : . _. , T- ~~ ~2/ I ~0,~ 6%3 RO -~ ~ ~ ~~ 22~{ '"~ ~ so.a~ t/?b ~ ~ /So.~N x. I '~s~ ~ ]9.7 ~ / ~an ~ ~.oa ~ ~ k~ ~ 50,67~TM ~ tG/ N X m / --~ % ~' _~ 47,81 ~ ~/,Jl X . ~ --' ~o.se ~.so % , o.4 ~ ~ 48,13 ~ 50,89 50.72 50,39 50,14 . 9 ~4952 4930 48,14 RI =47.79 4 41 49 68 0 I 49.39 48.60 5149 50 59 50.54 50.a5 50 ~0 49,99 49.7 48,10 47, 5 ' ' I ~ I ~ 47.50 46,59 ~/~ 51.el O/ ' i I ¢~. 48.30 ~ 47,08 5~ ~ % ~t'~ 51.07 ~ ........ ~,~ , / 48.51 %47,90 46.6[ ~ % ~l,~ 51,45 / Z/ b/ALL5 ~/I ~ 48,al / ~ 45,9~ ) 5e.13 ' m ~' ~~f ~ 16~1A ,k~u,/~ m 'k $ '%~ % I; RIM949.07 ! 48,40 ~ ~ ~ 47,9~ '~ 46.08 R CK 5~ 3B BRICK MA~ , 50,31 49 8~ 49 ~ . 52. FLA LE 16 DIA, ; I ~: ~E~ / ~ 5a,53~ 590 O0 51.88 ~ LIL 450 ~l ~24 UZ 3U t ~/ UTILITY P ~ ' / ,. - . ~ ~ ~' ~ ~.~' ~ ~ D*~Z:~,~ .... ~no~ ~ m Jq~l ~g~ a~A / 47.GR 46,99 46,~ 'Z57 ~ ~ //2 51,77 EDGE 50,73 51.63 51,86 52,11 52.02 52,08 · · SMH 45,13 5~62.16 ~ 52.12 51,77 NOR- R D 4,., 45.48 1.64 ~P.4P ., a ~ .... EXISTING LAND SURVEY 1"=20'-0" 39.04 ELECTRIc MEYER t ~338. 43,04 42,29 37,48 39,94 35,03 2008 1 - - ~ REV. No. DATE BY REVISIIONS JOHN W. P.C 0! BAUMQARTEN ARCHITECT, 566 North Broadway Suite 207 Jeriicho, New York 11755 Phone: (516) 939-2555 Fox: (516) 9,59-0055 INTERNET: H~P://WWW.JWBARCH.COM PROJECT: SAN SIMEO~ BY THE SOUND 617001 ROUTE 48 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 SU CLIENT: SAN SIMEONI BY THE SOUND TITLE: JOB No.: 07-136S ] DRAWN BY: I SCALE: I DATE: IISSUE: AS NOTED 04.~ 7.08 SEEDED. 196,1 PLANTING SCHEDULE SYM~0~ BOTANIGAL NAM~ C0~MON ¢^tJgE~ P~AM ~0~£S SPECIES NAME SPACING © (SEEDED) 2 0 0 0 SEEDED. -- tNEW PA~IO 51 15.2' PART LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SC.~T.R,i 1" = lO'q)" -- SAW CUT SEEDED. GEOTDCIILE EROSIOIN CONTROL I~,T ON THIS SLOPE PRIOR TO INSTALLATiON OF PRII~ PLAITING. 12,8 - DAY CARE ENTRY ,4' 'F "¸4 N N N : 1. ALL DEVELOPED PORTIONS OF OPeN SPACES ON THE SITE THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY BUILDINGS, SIDEWALKS ROADS, OR PARKING AREAS ARE TO BE FULLY LANDSCAPED WITH TREES, SHRUBS, GROUND COVER, AND/OR GRASS. 2. REFER TO SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL TEMPORARY SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS. 5. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN AND PLANTS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. 4. GUARANTEE ALL PLANTS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. 5. PLACE 4" OF TOPSOIL ON ALL LAWN AREAS AND ALL AREAS NOT PAVED OR BUILT UPON. 6. PLANT PITS SHALL BE 24" WIDER FOR TREES AND 12" WIDER FOR SHRUBS AND 6" DEEPER THAN THE ROOT BALL. REMOVE ALL EXISTING SOIL FROM PLANT PIT AND BACKFILL WITH A MIXTURE OF ONE PART DEHYDRATED COW MANURE; AND FOUR PARTS TOPSOIL. FERTILIZE ALL PLANTS WITH 2 TO 3 OZ. PER FOOT OF SHRUB HEIGHT AND 2 TO 5 LBS. PER INCH OF TREE TRUNK OF 5-10-5 FERTILIZER. FOR EVERGREEN PLANTING, ADD 1 LB. PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF PLANT BED EACH OF AMMONIUM SULFATE AND SUPERPHOSPHATE. 7. STAKE ALL TREES WITH TWO CEDAR STAKES; COVER TWISTED 10 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE: WJTH RUBBER HOSE AND FASTEN AROUND TREE AT 5 FOOT HEIGHT MINIMUM. WRAP TRUNK WITH KRAFT PAPER TO FIRST BRANCH. REMOVE WIRE AND STAKES AFTER ONE YEAR. 8. MULCH ALL PLANTED AREAS WITH A 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED PINE, OR OAK BARK. 9. FERTILIZE AREAS BEFORE SEEDING OR SODDING WITH 15 LBS. PER AFTER 8 WEEKS. 10. LAWN AREAS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED AT 5 LBS, PER 1000 SQUARE FEET WITH THE FOLLOWING SEED MIX: 40% JAMESTOWN CHEWINGS FESCUE, 40% BARON KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, AND 20% YORKTOWN PERRENNIAL RYE. MULCH NEWLY SEEDED LAWN AT 90 LBS. PER 1000 SQUARE FEET WITH HAY OR STRAW MULCH. SUBSTITUTION GRASS SEED MIXTURES TO BE SUBMI~FED FOR APPROVAL. 11. WHEN SOD IS SPECIFIED BY THE OWNER, SOD SHALL BE WARRENS A-34 BLUEGRASS SOD OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT, 12. SEED IMPREGNATED BIODEGRADABLE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE UTILIZED ON ALL SLOPES 2:1 OR GREATER (SEE DETAIL), FINISHED GRADE UNE -- BURLAP FROM TOP ~ OF BALL WOOD MULCH NOTES: 1. PLACE TOPSOIL MIXTURE IN BOTTOM OF HOLE AND SATURATE. AFTER PLACING PLANT, WORK TOPSOIL MIXTURE CAREFULLY AROUND ROOT BALL AND THEN SATURATE. WHEN HOLe IS ONE HALF FULL OF MIXTURE, SATURATE AGAIN. FILL HOLE COMPLETELY WITH TOPSOIL MIXTURE AND SATURATE AGAIN. FERTIUZE SOIL AS NECESSARY FOR PLANT SURVIVAL. 2. SELECTIVELY PRUNE SHRUBS OF DEAD AND DYING BRANCHES. COMPACTED SUBGRADe 1 PLANTING D TAIL f-lO" LIOHT FIXTURE DETAII.S ~ l"m 1"0" LIGHTING LEGEND AND SPECIRCATIONS ]~PE: C105 DESCRIPTION: INRNI]Y lOOW HPS TYPE 5, CEIUNO MOUNTED. (1) "SMIO" SMRD12HPS-lOO-MEO-V. ~MP (11LU-IO0. TYPE:S1-3 DESCRIPTION: U.S. ~CHITE~RUAL UGHnMG. 150W HPS POPE 3. (1} ~153" VRS-III-15OHPS-~-I-DB. ~MP (11LU-150. NOTES: 1. SEE DRAWING PM-1 FOR FUNCTIONAL LEVELS OF ILLUMINATION. 2. SEE DRAWING PM-2 FOR LIGHT TRE!SPASS EEVELS SHOWING LEED "BARK SKIES" COMPLIANCE. REV. No, DATE BY REVISIONS JOHN W. BAUMOARTEN ARCHITECT, P.C 3~66 North BroDdwoy Suite 207 Jericho, New York 11755 Pho~ne: (5161 959-2533 Folx: (5161 959-0033 INTERNET: HTFP://WWW.JWBARCH.COM PROJECT: SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND 61700 ROUTE 48 GREENPORT, NEW YOrK 11944 ST CLIENT: SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND TITLE: PART LAND.APE & LkiffrLNO PLAN - DAY CARE ]~I-I'KY q 07-136S AS NOTED 04.17.08 ZON/NG ANALYSIS I P ~RICtNG SPACES WHICH AR~ ACCFSSORY TO TI{E SUB ~CT LOT. NO WO~ IS PROPOSED S .O .T.M. No. IOOO-145-O I-[O .~ ~ T~ ~PLIC~NT iS A CERT[F~D NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGA~ZATION. 26.78 ~ * ~8,14 ~ ~ Z01~E. HAk~ET DENSITY REg~ENT[AL DISlmCI' 35,16 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (EFFECTN~DATE-1989~ ~ * 26,55 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ .o~ ~ ~9.9~ ~ ~ AI,)D1TION WAS C'ONS~UCTED IN 1973, THE~FO~ T~m E~S~G SITE ~ROVENiE~S Nee~ f ~ *~s ~ , , ~ a7,5~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ PV~-DATE TIlE ZONING DISTIUCT REG~ATIONS, ~ V~ m , ~-~ ~ . , ~~~ ~ % L I I ~ [ ~ N NOTE. NO LOT SI~DWISION, MERGER OR ~POR~O~'~ IS BErg PROPOSED ,~ , NOTES' R: )u PEk,mN"rS' ~ } JlmD V ~Lrmr ~EXISnN ] V,~UE PROPOSED V.~LE CO~WLIANCE m _ I [ L ~T % IDTH 75 FEET 3 0 FEET 090 FEET YES 7l }N I 1. FOR PAVING, STRIPING, AND SIGNAGE DETAILS, z,z,,'Dnr:'*i IZOFEET ~ ~ I N I SEE DRAWING ST-B FitONTkARD 35FEET 68.2FEET 542FEET "YES(NEW O~-~-Oa PLANNING DEPT. REVI~ ~ 0 0 ~ II ~ I 2. FOR ~NDSCAPING 'LIGHTING AND P~NTING U1 ~ w ~ I I I NOTES AND DETAILS, SEE DRAWING ST-3. SIDEYARD ]SFEET ~86FEET ~86FEET ~mS ' NO. DA~ REASON FOR ISSUE I I 3. SCARI~ SURFACE OF EXISTING PAVING IN B,~TH~DE ~A~S 30FEET /2.FFEET 72.0FLEE ~S PROJECT I PREPARATION FOR NEW ASPHALT SURFACE COAT ~A~A~ 35~E~Z AND SEALER c ~opY I r, ~ENOVATIONS 10: I 4. MAINTAIN PITCH TO ALL EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE LOT COVERAGE 25% SEE C,~C~ATIONS BELOW - I ALL OTHER VALVE AND MANHOLE COVERS TO BE atnLP~2EgmHT 2',~STORIES 3STORtgS oSTORmS NOP~DAI~S [ I FLUSH WITH SURFACE OF NEW PAVING. COD~ ACCESSORY U.~EBO l Z0 s R 61700 ROUTE 48, GREENPORT, NY 11944 ~'~ I ~ KEARDAYC.~CANOPY 606SF ARCHITEC~RE, IN.PlOPS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT F ] q R~ISEDPATIO 396 s.F. THOMAS CAMPIGLIA, ARCHITECT, PLLC [ , W, . ' .,' , ' ,~ -- ( N 054' ~ ~ P L'OSED >CREASE *08° ~ .¢ ~ ~ ~n ~ m ~ ' ~ '~ ~ ~ 3 ~ L .aT1NG IMPERVIOUS SU~ACES 10- %~ s F STERLING MANAGEMENT, INC. ....... ~ ,¢ % ~ 39.04 , , & - o , ,, SC~E: 1 = 20-0 SEAL SHEET NUMBER PLAN'I'IN~ ~GH~ULI= PROPODED 5HIN®L~:D cABLED ROOF OVER ROOF STRIPIN~ AS SHOWN (10 STALLS) HANZ~IGAP ~.AHP5 NT5 ~HPJJB 12~TAIL EXISTIN~ ASPHALT PAVEHENT TO BE 5'FRIPIN~ AS SHOWN (12 STALLS) UNIT ON GONGP4~TD. PAD (T~PJ 1 / / / / / / / / I W~E D~TAIL FOOTCANI2LE 5TATI5TIC5 -I- + + LIGHTIN~ PLAN + -I- 3,90 2-SBL iO-KL 'I2-HE - PROPOSED A~. UNIT ON ~ON~R~T~ PAD (TY'~'.) N - 5VC, S TRASH ENOLODU~'4-- 20-DBLm T~ -I- 0,33 + + + + + -I- q T~ OONG~tETt~PATIO / EL=50.4± E lO)~ p4 b HANOI cT, AI~F'EID 51~N At~EA LIGHT AUG 18 2008 Young & Young 400 Os~rg~der Ave~e, Riverhead, Ne~u Yo~'k 11901 631 - 727-2303 Howard ~, Young, Land S~veyor LEGEND NOTE5 5U~VL='r'OF~'5 CEI~.TIFIGATION 511 J~ INIP~.OVt=NIDNTS 5AN 51HEON BY TH)= 50UNP, lNG. At ~r~nport, To~n o~ 5outhold SuFFolk Gounf, q, N~ York LANIDDGAPE ~ ALI~,N),,Ir:NT PLAN HAP P~J~PA~ LAP 001 00000 ~ o~oooooo 0~000000 00000000 ~ 00000000 ¢ ) 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 CATCH IDASIN 2.' x 4' FLUSH ~I~ N S PROPOSE[2 SHIN~Lt--P ~ABL~=D ROOf= OYER EXIDTIN¢ ROOf= GANOP"F LEAGHIN~ POOL, LEA,':,HIN~ CATCH D, ADIN OR, DIFFUSION ~IELL NT5 ST~IPIN~ AD 5HOMN (IO STALLS) CONORE'TESIOE~ALK PROPOSED BRICK PAVER5 STYLE ~ PA I I I~f~N APPROVt~I2 B'Y OPlNt~R. FOU~ATION PLAN ~ATE ~ HIN~I~ DETAIL,~ / PRINT N NO'F~ J~ALL ~ECTION PLAN5 ~ OETAIL5 - [~U~P5 i ::l'~ ENOLO,5UF~ EXISTIN~ ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO ~E F~IESURFAG~D WITH NE~ TOP COAT ~ SEALER PROPOSI~D S'F~IPIN~ AS SHoI, NN (12 5TA4-LS) PROPOSED 5HINSLEO CABLED EOOF OVER EXISTIN~ ~OOP ~ANOP'¢ / / / / C. ONCP4~..TE PAO (TYP,) ~ // CONCR`.E i t.- CUR`lB 5g 22 CONGRET~ ~4~TAININ® ~LL h' C W 0 D L, P NOTE: T~SH ENDLODURE 57 39 pR~2POSED CONORETEPATIO EL=BO.4~ 2 22 / / / t ~INMO~ED GONCR.EiF- P~TAININ~. HALL iI / / I J / / / / ? .o' [ PROPOSED U' ~IDE~ALK, PROPOSED ASPHALT TURN-AROUND ASPHALT AS'PHALT PAVt--MENT R`,~=SUR,FAClN¢ NT5 BR,ICK C.,R,OS,~Y'IALK. AT ASPHALT PAVIND cr~-~mc E~AR:IN~) NT~ Yo~ar~g & Young 'r~st HOLE DATA LOAN (OL) DR,AINA~E ~ESISN CR,ITER,IA ,~ CALCULATION5 ./ TRIBUTAR,¥ A~k #1 v: A '~ C L~ACHIN® PIEL~ 'Al ~ = f~.AINFALL (FT.) NOTE5 A~A = ~.~1~ AG'F~5 5UR,VEYOR,'5 CERTIFICATION 51'TE IMPP-.OVEMt~NT5 5AN 51MEON BY' THE DOUND, lNG. 5ufPolk Count~, Ne~ York ¢~DIN¢ * Df~NINA~t~ PLAN DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS A~ INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ARE, AND SHALL REMAIN, THE PROPER3Y OF Thames Camp~glia Architect, PLLC. DBA TCA ARCHITECTURE. NO REPRODUCTION, iN WHOLE OR IN PART, SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF Thomas Campiglla Architect, PLLC. DBA TCA ARCHITECTURE, THIS DOCUMENT IS iNTENDED SOLELY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT NAMED HEREIN AND SHALL NOT BE USED BY ANy OTHER PARTIES FOR ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF TCA ARCHITECTURE, Thomas Complgllo, Architect, PLLC, (~.)Copyright 2008 Thomas Camplgllo Architect, PLLC. DBA. TCA ARCHITECTURE 12~-0u PROPOSED sCc~/: ~0,,~ ELEVATION TOP PROPOSED ol SQUARE BOLLAEDS LIGHTS (TYP. OP 1~.} ALUMINUM P~ BLUE CANVAS CANOPY / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 11~-O%" SOT 1 PR~..~O~S.E, D CANOPY ELEVATION I/8" = 1'-0" ~ CANOPY PLAN: DAY CARE ENTRY SCA[E: 1/4" = 1'-0" 8-12-08 ISSUED FOR D.O,S. FILING DATE REASON FOR ISSUE PROJECT RENOVATIONS TO: 61700 ROUTE 48, GREENPORT, NY 11944 ARCHITECT ARCHrlECTURE, IN3ERIORS, PROJECTMANAGEMENT THOMAS CAMPIGEA, ARCHITECT, PLLC 2 PARK AVENUE, b,,.--,'.,~llNE NEWYORK, NY 10016 TEL NO. (212) 688-18~8 FAX NO. (212) 765-8511 PROJECT MANAGERS: STERLING STERUNG MANAGEMENT, INC. 2 PARK AVENUE, M[~"/,N'IIN E· NE'W YORK. NY 1001~ Tel: (212) 245-6300 · F&x: (212} 7~8511 I'~p:/jwww.al~allng nye, Der n CONSULTANT JAMES, LASALA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 11 OVAL DRIVE, BUTTE 129, I~I. AN DIA~ NY 11749 3E!... NO. (8~1) 692-2673 FAX (8~1) 5G2~ CONSULTANT CONSULTANT TRUE NORTH NO. 071038-H PROd. NO, 16209 SCALE AS NOTED DRAWN XX CHECKED TNC DATE 06-11-08 DRAWING ENLARGED CANOPY PLANS & ELEVATIONS CP-1 SEAL SHEET NUMBER · II v Jk F /--% ROOM P/~rrRY DINING I\ STA~O~ =<:2 OFFI~ / PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN "B" SCALE: 1/8" - lU0'' CHARI1NG MATCH LINE q -] L J n m iL' [] [] KEY PLAN SCALE: 1/32"- IL0" LEGEND: m DENOTES END GUARDS. EG m DENOTES CORNER GUARDS AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS. CG HR HAND RAIL, CR CHAIR RAIL. ~ I DENOTES PUSH PLATE (PP) CONTROLLED DOOR ~ DENOTES PARTITION TYPES SEE AW-1 FOR ADDT'L. INFO + DENOTES EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN. = DENOTES NEW CONSTRUCTION. ~ = DENOTES DOOR TAGS. [-~ = DENOTES ROOM TAGS. ~ DENOTES WINDOW OR LOUVER TAGS. ~ = DENOTES BORROWED LiTE TAGS. DENOTES TWO HOUR RATED PARTITION AT NEW AND I I I I EXISTING LOCATIONS. AT EXISTING LOCATIONS CONTRACTOR TO FIRESTOP AND SMOKESTOP ALL VOIDS/PENETRATIONS TO ENSURE TWO HOUR RATED ASSEMBLY. DENOTES ONE HOUR RATED PARTITION AT NEW AND EXISTING LOCATIONS. AT NEW AND EXISTING LOCATIONS / I : CONTRACTOR TO FIRESTOP AND SMOKESTOP ALL VOIDS/PENETRATIONS TO ENSURE ONE HOUR RATED ASSEMBLY DENOTES ONE HOUR RATED SMOKE PARTITION AT NEW AND EXISTING LOCATIONS. AT NEW AND EXISTING .---------- = LOCATIONS CONTRACTOR TO FIRESTOP AND SMOKESTOP ALL VOiDS/PENETRATIONS TO ENSURE SMOKE PARTITION ASSEMBLY · -...,'A' = DENOTES PATCH TO MATCH ALL EXISTING SURFACES SEE · " ' NOTE M-11 ON SHEET AN-1 (TYP.) NOTES: 1. ALL NOTES WITH AN ALPHABETICAL PREFIX WHICH ARE REFERENOED ON THIS DRAWING ARE LOCATED ON DRAWING AN-1. 2. REFER TO AW-1 AND AW-2 FOR INFORMATION ON FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIES. 3 REFER TO "AF" SERIES OF FLOOR PLANS HEREIN FOR EQUIPMENT, FIXTURES, IMPAC PROTECTION AND CASEWORK INFORMATION AND DETAILS. 4. WHERE SHOWN ON IMPACT PROTECTION PLANS, PROVIDE CORNER GUARDS AT ALL C CORNERS. REFERENCE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 5. REFERENCE DIMENSION PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 6. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, THEY ARE DERIVED FROM AS BUILT DRAWINGS ~ SURVEYS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD AND ALERT ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 7. ALL SPACES WITHIN THE CONTRACT AREA TO RECEIVE NEW FINISHES. RE: FINISH SC AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL iNFORMATION. 8. ALL FREESTANDING, MOVABLE FURNITURE AND/OR EQUIPMENT (-,-) N IC. (BY OTHERS). SEE "Ar-SERIES" DRAWINGS. 9. WHERE WINDOWS AND BORROWED LITES WILL REMAIN, GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO CLEAN/REPLACE WHERE BROKEN/REPAIR AND RECAULK ALL EXISTING GLAZING AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE WATERTIGHT ASSEMBLY. 10. SCRAPE, CLEAN, PRIME AND PAINT ALL EXISTING ITEMS TO REMAIN I.E. INCREMENT~ UNITS, BASEBOARDS, ACCESS DOORS, ELECTRICAL PANELS, HOLLOW METAL DOORS FRAMES, ETC, WATERTIGHT ASSEMBLY 11. PATCH TO MATCH ALL EXISTING ITEMS AS RELATED TO DEMOLITION WORK. MINIMUM $6" ON EITHER SIDE OF PARTITION 12 SEE NOTE 2B ON DRAWING D 1 FOR SCOPE OF WORK AT INTERIOR WALLS TO R 13. ALL EXPOSED PIPING TO BE PAINTED AND PATCHED TO MATCH EXISTING/ NEW SURFACES AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL NEW WORK, PARTICULARLY IN AREAS BELOW WORK HEREIN. 14. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 15. WHERE SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING WINDOW WITH NEW REPLACEMENT UNITS. SEE WINDOW DETAILS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 16. WHERE CERAMIC TILE LS THE SPECIFIED WALL FINISH ALL PARTITIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH "DUROC" CEMENT BOARD IN LIEU OF GYPSUM WALLBOARD. 17, ALL PARTITIONS TO BE TYPE <~ U.O.N. REFERENCE PARTITION TYPE SHEET AW-1 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 18. ALL EXISTING DOORSATO REMAIN WITHIN AFFECTED AREA CONTRACTOR TO PRIME AND PAINT AND REPLACE ALL DAMAGED HARDWARE TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION. 19. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 20, WITHIN CONTRACT AREA, CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXTERIOR WALL FURRING, I.E. G' FINISH, BATT INSULATION FURRING STRIPS AND DEVICES TO EXPOSE INTERIOR MAS( WYTHE AND REPLACE W/ NEW IN KIND TO FACILITATE NEW LAYOUT RE: DET 11/AV FOR NEW EXTERIOR WALL FURRING. (TYP) 21, ALL COAT CLOSETS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH (1) SHELF & CONT. COAT ROD (TY ALL OTHER STORAGE CLOSETS WITCH (5) MIN. P. LAM ADJUSTABLE SHELVES. 22. ALL (CRT) COMPUTER TERMINALS TO RECEIVE VOICE AND DATA RECEPTACLES AND QUAD OUTLETS TYP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 23. PROVIDE GFI OUTLETS AT ALL WET AREAS (WHERE WATER IS PRESENT). 24. SKIM COAT ALL EXIST. PLASTER/GWB SURFACES TO REMAIN PRIME & FINISH PER INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS AND SPEC. SEE NOTE 2B ON DRAWING D-1 FOR FUR INFORMATION. SEE MARK [] ON DRAWING D1 REGARDING EXISTING COLUMNS. 25 2 02 22-08 ISSUED FOR BIDDING 1 02-04-08 - ISSUED FOR DOB FILING REV. No. DATE BY REVISIONS JOHN W. BAUMGARTEN ARCHITECT, P.C 366 North Broadway d Suite 207 ~ Jericho, New York 11753 Fax: (516) 939-0033 JV'(0 ,¢,.,¢',;~ INTERNET: HTTP://WWW.JWBARCH.COM SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND PROJECT: 61700 ROUTE 48 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 A CLIENT: SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND TITLE. PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN "B" ' A JOB NO.: I DRAWN BY: I SCALE: I DATE IISSUE: SO00M ,!.'96L 98'68 NIVHO 'ONOO II © Z 0 'ONO0 ZEE' 'O'V EXISTING PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" O. ,17 \ AREA OF SITE DETAIL 'I ' KEY PLAN SCALE: N.T.S. 2 02-22-08 I ISSUED FOR BIDDING 1 02-04-08 ISSUED FOR DOB FILING REV. No. DATE BY REVISIONS JOHN W. BAUMGARTEN ARCHITECT, P.C ¢/1~ 566 North BroodwOYsuite 207 Jericho, New York 1175,3 Fax: (516) 939-0033 INTERNET: HTTP://WWW.JWBARCH.COM SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND :ROJECT: 61700 ROUTE 48 CLIENT' SANI SIMEON BY THE SOUND TITLE: EXISTING PARTIAL SITE PLAN ~ 07 q36 AS NOTED 02.22.08 X LEGEND: " '" '"',' NOT IN CONTRACT AREA - FOR ADDITIONAL REQ'S SEE ........ NOTE D5 ON SHEET AN-I(TYP.) ~ EXIST1NG RESIDE]ff EXISIqNG RESIDENT EXIS'nNG RESID[~IT EXIS'nNG RESIDENT EXISTING RESIDE]4T EXISTING RESIDENT EXIS'ONG RESIDENT EXJST1NG RESIDENT EXISlqNG RESIDENT EXISI1NG RESIDENT EXISTING RESIDE]4T ~ ~ ROOM ROOM ROOM RO014 ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOI~ ROOM ROOM I -- 24.1 S.F. --- ? - EXISTING u, EXISTING E)(Ib~NG _- ~ J.c. .,~, ,- : ~mNG ~1~ ~ EXmSllNO CORRIIX)R r I I o O= HAZARD RECORD ROOM EXISllNG GENERAL , STORAGE EXIST1NG TUB EXISTING ~ EXIS'RNO [] [' EXISTING NURSE ~C'IM~ ~ ~:WC CLOSET STORAGE ~ -- i ' CORRIDOR ~- r EXlST1NG EXIS'nNG CH&°E]. BEAUIY SHOP [3 EXISTING EXISTING STORAGE b STORACE .,/~ CORRIOOR EXISTING STAFF EX. WOMENS EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN "B" - , ." . ?'.'...;, i ' n !!I 2 02-22-08 - ISSUED FOR BIDDING I []. !l~.l~, 4 ~EV. No. DATE ~ REWS,ONS :,~-,1,i 'i ,i 566 North Broedwoy H ~l ~ /~=~ ' ] ri '~ II SuTte 207 II ' '~" N'"'t'x~='~4~'~ ' ~r ,// I Jericho, New York 11755 I }'~l~ II [~ --I I,,. Phone: (516) 939-2333 , ,~ ,~ ,~ ,. 959 0O33 El L, i ........... ~] I1 Ii ~ j~C.~,2q~ INTERNET: HTTP://WWW.JWBARCH.COM I, Im SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND TITLE: EXISTING GROUND FLOOR PLAN "B" KEY PLAN ' ' CANOPYABOVE 1 L· I I i/ h POSSIBLE GRASS PAVER SKIRT PLANT WITH THICK GROUND COVER PLANT WITH THICK GROUND COVER /~ 'PG EG 59.21 -- CUR 36.81 37-4~x [G ', [ 37.33/ PROPOSED PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1''= 10'-0" AREA OF SITE DETNL ', KEY PLAN SCALE: N.T.S. 2 02-22-08 - IISSUED FOR BIDDING 1 02-04-08 IISSUED FOR DOB FILING REV. No. DATE BY REVISIONS  JOHN W. BAUIMGARTEN ARCHITECT, P.C J d~ 366 Nor, h BrocdwOYsuite 207 Jericho, New York 1175,3 [~] D~ Phone: (516)939-2333 Fox: (516) 959-0053 ,.ff'(O ~'J~ INTER'NET: HTTP://WWW.JWBARCH.COM SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND aROJECT: 61700 ROUTE ~8 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 A].3 CLIENT: SAN SIMEON BY THE SOUND TITLE: EXISTING PARTIAL SITE PLAN ~ 07 136 AS NOTED 02 22.08 X // / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ I / / / II zl / / / / I / N S 2008 Young & Young 400 Os~rc~der Ave~t~e, J~iverhead, Net~ York lf901 63 t - 727-2303 NOTE5 AREA = ~.~19 AC, RE-5 5Ut~,',/E¥Ot~.'5 C~Et~TI f=IC~ATION 5AN 51MI=ON B'r' TH~= 50UNO, IN~. A~ Greenpor~, Tomn oF 5ou~hold 5u~olk ~,oun~, Nero York TOPOgRAPHIC, AL 5URVE¥ I N S / XX, ., Young & Young NC., ~ mS ~I. JF~V~-'f'O~.'~ GtE~TIF:IGATION ~AN DII',4EON BY' THt~ ~OUNZ2, lNG. At; ~r~n~or~, To~n of ~ou~:holcl ~uffolk Gounb:j, N,¢~ York RAIDIU5 HAP'