HomeMy WebLinkAboutInclusionary Zoning requirementsPLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE
Chair
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
GEORGE D. SOLOMON
JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND
~o~apF SOpTyo~
T
• ~~0,~
~y~DUNTV ,~~''
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
To: Scott Russell, Town Supervisor, and Town Board Members
cc: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk ((~~
From: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson \1~ ~,\
Date: July 28, 2008 V3
Re: Amendments to [nclusionary Zoning requirements
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-193 S
Fax: 631 765-3136
Thank you for your request for comments from the Planning Board regarding the proposed amendments
to the inclusionary zoning requirements in the Town Code, several of which are a result of
recommendations from the Planning Board. We support the proposal.
:?
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
~o~aOF SOUIyo~
• ,O
~1~00UNiV ,~
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone: 631 765-1935
Fax: 631 765-3136
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
To: Town of Southold Town Board
Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney
Prom: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator '~~
Principal Planner
Date: July 29, 2008
Re: A Local Law in Relation to amendments to hlclusionary Zmling requirements in the
Code of the Town of Southold
The proposed local law titled A Local Law in Relation to amendments to Inclusionary
Zoning requirements in the Code of the Town of Southold has been reviewed to Chapter 268,
Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront
Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the
LWRP Consistency Assessment Fonn submitted to this department as well as the records
available to me, it is my recommendation that that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with
the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the L~'VRP.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Town Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its
written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Ce: Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney
stzzo
Appendix C
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Anolicant or Project Snonsorl
1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME
Town of Southold A Local Law in Relation to amendments to Inclusionary Zoning
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
Municipality Town of Southold County Suffolk
4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map)
Southold Town Hall
PO Box 1179
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York ] 1971
5. PROPOSED ACTION IS:
New ~ Expansion ~ Modification/alteration
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
A Local Law in Relation to amendments to Inclusionary Zoning requirements in the Code of the Town of Southold.
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
1vH
Nf'
Initially
acres Ultimately
` acres
8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS?
Yes ~ No If No, describe briefly
9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT?
Residential ~ Industrial ~ Commercial ~ Agriculture ~ Park/Forest/Open Space ~ Other
Describe:
NA
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY
(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)?
Yes ~ No If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit/approvals:
11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
Yes ~ No It Yes, list agency(s) name and permit/approvals:
NA
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
Yes ~ No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicantlsponsorvame: SWtt A Russell, Supervisor Date: 7/29/08
Signature:
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
OVER
1
F~t~set
PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT ITo he comnlptpd by 1 pad Anpnrvl
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.4? If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF.
Yes ~ No
B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? If No, a negative
declaration may be superseded by another involved agency.
Yes ~ No
C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible)
Ct. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal,
potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly:
None
C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly:
None
C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly:
None
C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially atlopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly:
None
C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly:
None
C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C6? Explain briefly:
None
C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly:
None
D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (CEA)?
Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly:
E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly:
PART III -DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identifed above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each
effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e)
geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain
sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II was checked
yes, the determ ination of signif cance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics ofthe CEA.
Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FUL
EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
Check this box it you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, ihatihe proposed action WlL
NOT result in any signifcant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination
Town of Southold Town Board
7/29/08
Name of Lead Agency
Scott A Russell Supervisor
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency