HomeMy WebLinkAboutFarm StandsPLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE
Chair
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
GEORGE D. SOLOMON
JOSEPH L. TOWNSENU
,~'~OF SOUT~O~
~~~
~ • ~~0,~
~1y00UMfY,~;,r~'
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
To: Scott Russell, Town Supervisor
Members of the Town Board
From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson
Date: September 8, 2008
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
Re: Resolution No. 785 -Proposed Local Law in relation to "Regulations Governing
Farm Stands" in the Town of Southold
The Planning Board has reviewed the proposed local law regarding new Town Code for farm
stands. We support the changes, however we suggest that the farm stand total structure be clearly
defined to make it easy to understand what is included when determining the maximum size of
the building.
.,
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(con Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
~o~~pF SOUIyo~
T
~ ~0
~y00UM'1 ~~
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone: 631 765-19 38
Fax: 631 765-3136
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Town of Southold Town Board
Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney
From: Mark Terry
Date: ~~^°;'2008
Principal Planner't~
LWRP Coordinator
Re: A Local Law in relation to Regulations Governing Farm Stand
The proposed local law has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of
the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)
Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment
Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my
recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and
therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Town Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its
written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney
~ ~ 617.20
Appendix C
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I • PROJECT INFORMATION /To be completed by Annlicant nr Prniacf Snnnsnrl
1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME
Town of Southold A Local Law in relation to Regulations Governing Parm Stands
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
Municipality Town of Southold County Suffolk
4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map)
" Down-wide
5. PROPOSED ACTION IS:
New ~ Expansion ~ Modificationlalteration
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
A Local Law in relation to regulating Farm Stands in zones where the use is permitted.
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
Initially rvq acres Ultimately NA acres
8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS?
Yes ~ No It No, describe briefly
9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT?
Residential ~ Industrial ~ Commercial ~ Agriculture ~ Park/ForesVOpen Space ~ Other
Describe:
NA
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY
(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)?
Yes ~ No If Yes, list agency(s) name and permiVapprovals:
11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
Yes ~ No If Yes, list agency(s) name antl pennit/approvals:
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
Yes ~ No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
ApplicanUSponsor name: Scott Russell, Supervisor Date: 9/R/OS
Signature:
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
OVER
1
JReset
PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT ITo be completed by Lead Aaenrvl
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.4? If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF.
Yes ~ No
B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? If No, a negative
declaration may be superseded by another involved agency.
Yes ~ No
C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers maybe handwritten, if legible)
C7. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing tratfc pattern, solid waste production or disposal,
potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain brieFly:
None
C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain brieFly:
None
C3. Vegetation or fauna, fsh, shellfsh or wildlife species, signifcant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain brieFly:
None
C4. A community's existing plans or goals as offcially atlopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly.
None
C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly:
Nonc
C6. Lang term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identi(ed in Ci-C5? Explain briefly:
None
C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain brieFly:
None
D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL
ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (CEA)?
Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly:
E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS?
Yes ~ No If Yes, explain brieFly:
PART III -DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each
effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or ruraq; (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e)
geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain
sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II was checked
yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA.
Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or signifcant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FUL
EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration.
Checkthis box if you have determined, based on theinformation and analysis above and any supporting documentation, thatthe proposed action WlL
NOT result in any signifcant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supponing this determination
Southold'hown Board
Name of Lead Agency
Scott Russell
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in lead Agency
9/H/OR
Supervisor
Title of Responsible Offcer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
beset '
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE
Chair
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
GEORGE D. SOLOMON
JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND
~o~~pF SOUTyo~
~O
~Ol~ (7U~,~~
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Town of Southold Town Board
Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney
From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner
LWRP Coordinator
Date: June 30, 2008
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
Re: "A Local Law in relation to Regulations Governin¢ Farm Stands"
The proposed local law has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of
the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)
Policy Standazds. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment
Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my
recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and
therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Town Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its
written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney
MAILING ADDRESS:
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
QF S(]V P.O. Box 1179
~
JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE O~ lyOl Southold, NY 11971
Chair ~ Q
~ ~ OFFICE LOCATION:
KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex
MARTIN H. SIDOR G Q
GEORGE D. SOLOMON ~`
~ ~~ 54375 State Route 25
~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
p
JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND
lifCOU'M'~~
I'I 1 , Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
To: Scott Russell, Town Supervisor
Members of the Town Board
1 l
From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson 4~'r~
lll~~~
-
Date: June 25, 2008
Re: Resolution No. 2008-580314 -Proposed Local Law in relat ion to "Regulations
Governing Farm Stands" in the Town of Southold
The Planning Boazd has reviewed the proposed local law regarding new Town Code for farm
stands. We support updating file farm stand code, however we have some comments regarding
the proposed legislation as follows:
Statement of Purpose: consider adding more language about supporting local
agriculture to this section of the law.
2. Maximum size: consider capping the maximum size at 3,000 square feet of enclosed
retail area instead of the proposed 4,000 squaze feet.
Parking requirements: consider simplifying the parking requirements to read as
follows, or something similazly simple: The farm stand parcel provides at least four
off-street pazking spaces and also provides adequate space that may be used to
accommodate seasonal fluctuations in pazking needs so that safe conditions for the
public are maintained at and azound the farm stand at all times.
4. A concern was raised about existing farm stands and what their status would be after
the new code is enacted -how many farm stands would become non-conforming?
5. Processed agricultural products are defined, however are not treated any differently
than other retail products. Consider providing an incentive for farm stands to carry
products made from locally grown produce by providing an incentive to do so. For
example, you might consider a more stringent limit than 40% on non-local processed
foods, souvenirs, clothing and other retail items, but give an incentive for selling
products made with locally-grown produce by allowing a higher percentage of the
gross sales to be processed, if the processed items are from locally grown produce.
6. Develop criteria and a mechanism for evaluating the percentage of local produce
versus other retail, and involve the Agricultural Advisory Committee in this process.
7. Definitions and Consistency: there are a number of definitions throughout the code in
other chapters that are not consistent with the definitions in this new chapter. The
Planning Department has a comprehensive list of those definitions to be provided to
the Town Attorney's office.