The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-6553BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ISSUED NO. 6553 SPYRO AVDOULOS 54985 NORTH ROAD SCTM# 44-1-5 DATE: MARCH 21~ 2007 Pursuant to the Southold and in accordance with the March 21, 2007, and in consideration of a subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated authorizes and permits the following: 275 111 of the Town Code of the Town of adopted at the meeting held on , in the sum of $500.00 paid by Spwo Avdoulos and the Southold Town Board of Trustees Wetland Permit to remove/demolish of house located within CEHA and retain the existing foundation within CEHA and back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/re basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA and landward of prop, ed second floor and construct new second floor; construct new two-story ,n landward o residence; replace existing garage with new garage and; a line of staked ha and silt are installed prior to construction along top of bluff; the installation of gutters, accordance with Chapter 236 of the Ti landward of existing structures. landward of existing structures, and dated December 19, 2007 and installed landward of the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and these presents to be subscribed dr u~l~elling to contain roof runoff and in )de-Storm Water Rui~ff; install new sanitary system install a new driveway,~xalkways, and landscaping depicted on the survey prepare~by Nathan Taft Corwin III, last onJanuaryll, 2008. A 10' n~-turf buffer must be p of the bluff. . ~_ said Board of Trustees hereby causes its~orporate Seal to be affixed, ori~ of the said Board as ~his ~ ~ TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee Spwo Avdoulos, 54985 North Road, Greenport, NY as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisiohs of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low ~vater marks. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation, the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. The Permittee is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Department of Real Properties Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety (90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F. King, President Jill M. Doher~y, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr~ Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Date: 6553C 21,2007 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ent: Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Name of Permittee: S Address of Nodh Road, Greenpod, Nt Property Located: 54985 Greenpod, Nh DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: located within CEHA and retain th, back of house (new walls) existing basement and first floor of hot, demolish existing second floor and con~ landward of existing residence; hay bales and silt fencing are install gutters, leaders and drywells 236 of the Town Code-Storm W~ the top of the bluff; install new a new driveway, walkways, ~stal Erosion to remove/demolish portion of house within CEHA and converted to a patio; ~ns/repairs/modifications to ~dward of CEHA and landward of proposed patio; new second floor; construct new two-story addition garage with new garage and; a line of staked ~g top of bluff; the installation of roof runoff and in accordance with Chapter ; a buffer must be installed landward of system lan of existing structures, if required; install landscaping g structures. The Coastal Erosion Ma~ prepared by Nathan T, 11, 2008. ement Permit III, last dated as indicated on the survey ,2007, and received on January Permit to complete project will expire two the date the permit is signed. SPECIAL COl (apply if marked) __ Bluff re., ~gh a re-vegetation plan is a necessary permit. ldition of this __ A re agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special per __ A maintenance agreement is attached with application and is a necessary special condition of this permit. · King, :lent Board of Trustees ,~ALS BOARD MEMBE~r. ~, Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Ru~h D. Oliva James Dinizio, J~ Michael A. S~mon Leslie ~es Weisman http://southoldtown.north£ork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TeL (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 Mailing Addrea~: Southcfld Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Sou~hold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Am~ox/Flint Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Mahl Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY I 1971 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING HELD APRIL 10, 2008 ZB File # 6145 ' SPYRO AVDOULOS Property Location: 54985 C,R. 48 (a/Ma North Road), Greenport CTM 44-1-5 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE COD~: This application has been referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sect-ions A 14-14 to 23, and the Suflblk County Department of Planning reply states that the application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no signi/icant county-wide or inter' community impact. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 28,149 square ~oot has 63.37 feet along North Road (C.R. 48), 405.83 feet along the easterly side line, and 79.03 feet along the northerly (rear) llns adjacent to tile Long Island Sound. The June 16, 2006 survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno, Land Surveyor shows the premises improved with 1~ story single family dwelling and accessory ~rame garage, BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance under Sec~on 280-116A, based on the Building Inspector's amended March 6, 2008 Notice of Disapproval and applicant's request to amend Building Permit #33677 for reconstruction of a dwelling and replacement of eastern portion ofibundation. A Stop Work Order was issued on February 29, 2008. LWRP: TOWN CODE CHAPTER 268 DETERMINATION: An LWRP Determination was issued by the Board of Appeals under File #6060 concerning Chapter 268, as issued on July 16, 2007 when a recommendation was submitted to the Board of Appeals by the LWRP Coordinator, to maximize the non-turf buffer landward of the top of the bluff to protect the bluff, and to fuxther Policy 5 for protection and improvement of water quality in the Town of Southold. Also considered are all of the expert testimony and information taken under File # 6060 in its LWRP determination, as well zs recent P8/I8 3DVd S~V3ddV3OOEDNINOZ PBBG§BLIEB 8I:9I 800g/9I/PO Page 2-April 10, 2008 ZBA # 6145 - Spyro Avdoulos CTM 44-1-5 infbrmation submitted into tlie record at the 3/27/08 hearing, including but not limited to the applicant's statements that there will be no disturbance to the land between the house and the bulkhead for areas of constrtlction activity under this or the previous variance application. The LWRP Coordinator submitted his recommendation dated March 26, 2008, to the Board of Appeals noting inconsistency, based on the discovery that the east wall of the existing foundation was defective and that no footing was found under the east side of the fbunda~ion wall. The proposed construction was found not to meet the conditions for maintaining existing development within this Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. It was recommended by the LWRP Coordinator that the application be amended to comply, to the greatest extent practicable, with the LWRP policy to have structures adjacent to sounds where a bluff exists a bluff landward of the shore be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of the bluff, DETERMINATION: The Board has considered Policies 4.2, 5 and 6 under the LWRP, and the March 26, 2008 recommendation of the LWRP Coordinator. The applicant and his engineer stated during the March 27, 2008 public hearing that the remaining three walls of ihe foundation will not be reconstructed and therefore will remain (in kind, in place), without reducing or changing the nonconforming setbacks that ex/st (ref. plans prepared by Chorno Associates date'stamped March 7, 2008 with hand notations added, Pages A-1 3-5- 08, A'2 9-25'07, and A-3 3-5-08). In an evaluation issued July 16, 2007 to the Board of Appeals, from the County of Sui'folk, Soil and Water Conservation District, the bulkhead was found to be in stable condition, ]~fforts to maintain the stability of the bulkhead have occt~rred with the installation of new pilings to reinforce the decayed pilings. The applicant agrees to obtain permits and make necessary repairs as recommended in this evaluation. No future sprinkler irrigation system will be /nstalled within close pro~Smlty of the bulkhead, which is a catalyst for erosion and can cause damage to the bulkhead. Within the site plan, silt fencing is documented and care must be taken by the applicant for proper installation of the silt fencing, which involves digging a trench and burying the bottom of the silt blanket. This action is limited to the single wall on the easterly side (with first'stox~ alterations over the es-isting foundation), wh/ch action furthers Policy 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. With the above measures and limitations, this act/on furthers Policies 6, 5, and 4.2. ZONING CHAPTER 280 OF TOWN CODE (fbrmerly Chapter 100): Zoning Code Section 280'116A states that all buildings or structures located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of the bluff, ~0/~0 Bg~ S]~B~V~O~SBNINOZ b98GGg£I~9 8I:9I 808~/9I/~0 Page 3- April 10, 2008 ZBA # 6145 - ,qp!tro Avdoulos CTM 44-1-5 FINDING9 OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 27, 2008, at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE KELIEF REQUESTF-~D: The applicant requests relief in this variance application, setback relief for reconstruction of the first floor and replacement of a single foundation wall at the eastern portion of the structure, with the same setback nonconformity Shat exis ~s, concerning a proposed amendment under Building Permit #33677. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: On August 16, 2007 ZBA #6060 granted relief for alterations and additions to a single-family dwelling, for which a building permit and other agency permits were received. During construction activities, a Stop Work Order was issued by the Building Inspector ~vhen the Town discovered that work pursuant to the building permit (variance and other permJ0 had gone beyond the scope of authorization. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On ~he basis of testimeny presented~ ~materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Town Law ~267-b(3)(b)(3)(1). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The bluff is low and stable and is protected by boulders and vegetation. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2), The benefit sought by the applicant (reconstruction of the first floor of the existing house and reconstruction of the eastern foundation v~all as per plans) cannot be achleved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Adding square fbotage on the landward side of'the house will maintain the square footage lost by removal of the house, and landward ef the top of the bluff (Coastal Erosion Hazard Area). 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). Th'e variance granted herein is not substantial. The house will be more conforming to the house that existed p~ior to reconstruction by ~he reduction of the size of the first floor that is ad]acent to the bluff (Coastal Erosion Hazard Area). The original application and plans that were approved under Appeal No. 6060, and this application, have not changed the bluff setbacks. 4. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has not been self-created, since the existing foundation of the house predates these regulations and the eastern wall has been upon inspectien determined to be substandard. ~0/E0 ~B~8 S~8~O~O~NINOZ ~gOGSgLI~9 6I:~I 800~/9I/~0 P~ge 4-April 10, 2008 ZBA # 6145 - Spyro Avclo ~los CTM 44-1-§ 5. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The three-bedroom house {hat existed will be maintained. No evidence has been presented to show that partial reconstruction of the easterly foundation wall will result in disturbance of the land between the house and the top of the bluff. the ' is 6. Grant of the requested relief the minimum action neoessary and adequate to enable applicant to enjoy the benefit of reconstruction of the easterly wall, in place, while utilizing the remaining (existing) three walls of the foundation, and preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of' ghe above factors and applying ~he balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Simon, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, and duly carried, to GP~_NT the variance as applied for and shown on the survey revised December 2007 by Nathan Taft Corwin II, L.S. and maps, with hand notations added, prepared by Chorno Associates date-stamped by ZBA March 7, 2008, Pages A'I 3'5'08, A-2 9' 25-07, and A-3 $-5-08. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does nog increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members ~airm...~mon an./_d Weieman. / I/4 /o/ 00s / f..~ara P. Ooehringar, Chan'manff '~, f Approved for Filing April 15, 2008 Southold Town Trustees P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Mall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Dear President King and Board: PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Re: 1000-44-01-05 Spyro Avdoulos Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries oarcl of TnJstees ~ The owner has both a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Mazard ~ermit. The applicant applied for the work which was approved in the uilding permit and which was started. We have an amendment request in an effort to resolve the dispute and to permit the work to continue. I wish to submit additional documents and information which appears in the Zoning Board file for your review. County of Suffolk Office of Soil & Water. This report was received by the Zoning Boardjprior to the variance grante~ for the setback of the construction ~rom the top of the bang and bulkhead. The bank is a low bank with only a 25% slope. (Joseph Fischetti testified at the ZBA hearing that a slope less than 36% is considered stable, this is a very stable slope particularly with a hardened toe), the bank is further secured by both a bulkhead and jetty. The property is extremely stable and the owner has maintained the bulkhead to assure stability of the bank. The recommendations made in the report were incorporated into the approval. (July 16, 2007 letter attached) The reconstruction of the house over the existing foundation was intended to make the existing structure more conforming with the Coastal Erosion Hazard Law. The Coastal Erosion Mazard Law allows replacement or repair of same-kind structural elements (defined as '~Normal Maintenance"). Since replacement of same kind structural elements are specifically permitted without a coastal erosion management permit, our project was more consistent with Chapter 111 since we were rebuilding on the same foundation behind the Coastal Erosion Hazard line. 3 o The project, as proposed, is more '~consistent" with the LWRP than the original house before construction because the property contains a bulkhead and jetty which presently provides protection from loss of life, loss of structure, flooding or erosion. The existing residence was constructed in the 60's with no evidence of loss and the slope of the bank is stable and is described as a 25% slope. The re-submission to the Board to allow the east wall to be reconstructed does not change the original plan which was designed to maximize the distance to the Coastal Erosion Hazard line. The house was cut at the nonconforming Coastal Erosion Line and the living reconstructed on the existing foundation seven feet back. s%%~% plan was undertaken primarily to comply with the policies of the LWRP. The owner's efforts to make the existing dwelling "consistent" with the LWRP is evidenced by the following actions taken by the applicant: 1. To further minimize disturbance to the seaward side of the house the exiting foundation of the old house was converted to a patio. By converting the existing living area of the structure to a patio the alterations to the structure were reducing the nonconformity and the house is more "consistent" with the LWRP. 2. The existing sanitary is being replaced with a sanitary which was located more than 100 feet from the t.op of the bank. The owner had received Health Department approval prior to the Trustees hearing, but at the hearing the Trustees conditioned the/permit on placement of the sanitary more than 100 feet from the top of the bank. The owner had to resubmit the application to the Health Department to comply with the Trustee's permit. The construction and relocation of the new sanitary makes this application "consistent" with the LWRP because it addresses policy 5 "protection of the water quality and supply of the Town" and policy 6 "protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold's ecosystem". 3. The alterations to the dwelling required ~ry wells and gutters for all roof runoff, therefore this application is '~consistent" with the LWRP at policy 4 "minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion", policy 5 '~protection of the water quality and supply of the Town" and policy 6 "protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold's ecosystem" 4. This alteration to the dwelling required a non-turf buffer to capture surface water runoff before running down the bank, this condition makes the project "consistent" with the LWRP at policy 4 "minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion", policy 5 "protection of the water quality and supply of the Town" and policy 6 '~protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold's ecosystem" 5. The existing dwelling did not comply with the standards of the New York State Building Code. The construction of a new second floor and addition of the first floor required the remaining building, in particular the existing walls, to bring the entire house into conformity with the New York State Building Code. All existing insulation must be replaced with energy compliance insulation, the studs must be sized for the added insulation, the structural frame and existing foundation requires hurricane strapping, windows must comply with energy efficiency and wind strength. All these requirements mandated by the State of New York make the structure ~'consistent" with the LWRP specifically policy 4 "loss of life" and policy 13 ~'promote appropriate use of energy resources". 6. After the foundation was exposed, one wall on the east side was structurally inadequate. The cement block wall on the east side separate from the full basement foundation requires corrective action, a minimal cost to a $78,000 foundation. A structural element which must be addressed during construction which does not materially change the overall project is consistent with policy 4 "minimizinq loss of human life" It has been further analyzed by the structural ~n~ineer Joseph Flschettl, PE, and the wall can be used without alterations if the Trustees prefer. The overall design of the house remains as was submitted into the record. At the time the Board granted the approval in March 21, 2007 the LWRP was in place, policies were addressed and mitigation implemented to make the proposed dwelling consistent with the LWRP standards. In accordance with your original findings, the project, as proposed, was made "consistent" by virtue of the above mitigation measures taken to conform to the policy's of the LWRP. Finally, the owner has a building permit which was stopped. He has a significant financial investment in this permit with construction drawings, materials purchased from the lumber company, contractors hired, Health Department, DEC, and Zoning Board variances granted. The foundation, which is intended to be used, saves the owner $78,000 in his overall construction costs. The stop work order has had an immediate and detrimental financial impact on the owner: The house plans and construction drawings received a building permit and the house was started. The side yard setbacks are 15 feet and 20 feet. The lot is narrower away from the water. The same house can not fit moving it back. All new design drawings would be re~ T--~lumber, windows and other materials which have been purchased for this house would require review. The Health Department approval would have to be reviewed again if the house location changed because the sanitary location is fixed by the neighbor's well. This was done twice to keep the sanitary 100 feet from the top of the bank. 3. The overall cost of the project would change if the foundation was removed, including the cost of a new foundation and new fireplace. The Trustee's actions impact local jobs. The builder and his subcontractors schedules have been affected. The contractor and the subcontractors are local, their families are equally affected by the delay during a recession. There is no compelling environmental reason to force the owner to abandon all the plans and previous approvals and start over. The house is located on Sound Avenue, a noisy and busy road, the house is located in line with his neighbors, at similar distances from the bank. This is not a bluff, the property is relatively low and protected by bulkhead, a jetty and natural bolder formations. We ask that you rescind your directive to the inspector to issue the stop work order. Ve r._y-~r-~y yours, building 07/30/2007 11:4G G$1?G590G4 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PAGE 02 July 16, 2007 Chairman J~mes Dinizio Jr. Zo-i,~g Board of Appeals Town of Sour_hold P.O, Box 1179 Sourhold, NY 11971-0959 Re: ZBA File Re£. No. 6060 (A~'doulos) Dear Chairman IAnizio: As requested by your office, a sire visit was conducted at 54985 North Road Greenport, Suffolk County Tax Mai? Number 1000-44-1-5 in order to review the proposal for expansion of the house on the' property. The house is sited approximately 20 feet from a wooden bulkhead and Long Island Sound. A grassed lawn exists in this area between the house and bulkhead. No irrigation system appears to be servicing this yard. The house is fitted with gutters and downspouts, The bulkhead is in stabile condition, Efforts to maintain the stability of the bulkhead have occurred with the installation of new pilings to reinforce the decayed pilings, The horizontal boards of the bulkhead are in fair condition; no gaps exist within the wall with the exception of a small section (2' x 3') which has been repaired by placing a board over this section. On top of the bulkhead, full vegetative cover of scrubs and forbs exist. The exception occurs on the eastern section of the bulkhead near t. he groin where landscaping debris is being placed on top of the wail, ~e stairway is in working condition, but the stair rails and steps are broken and rotten and in need of replacement, Due rn the dose proximity of the house to the shorehne, it is imperative co maintain the structural stability oft_he bulkhead, A stabile bulkhead consists of structurally sound horizontal suppcra beams with tighdy fkted face boards. No sediment from behind the bulkhead should be traveling between, through, over or under these boards. The pilings should be tightly bolted into the bulkhead and the horizontal beams should be straight, not bowed out or up. All of the components should be in sou~cl condition (solid, free of decay and pest infestation). 423 GRIFFING AVEN~E SUITE 110 RIVESHEAD, N~ 11901 07/$0/2007 $317659064 ZBA PAGE 03 The top of the bulkhead should be fully vegetated and access to the beach should occur via the stH_rs. Landscaping debris should be composted or disposed of through an alternate means instead of disposing on the top of the lrallthead. Additionally, the sralrs should be repaired/replaced to allow for safe access to the beach. To maintain the best structural stability of the bulkhead, i~specrions should be made regularly and especially after storm events. All necessary repairs should occur as recommended in the enclosed literature as soon as possible in order to rnn~nrnln a stabile bulkhead. The use o£ drywells to collect roof runoff (as documented on the site plan) is fully supported. All the gutters should be fitted with drywells especially those on the Sound side of the house. This reduces the erosion threat that runoff fxom impemeable surfaces poses to the bulkhead. Respectively, it is recommended that the walk on the Sound side of the property be constructed of a permeable or semi- permeable surface flit is slated to be replaced. This will further reduce the amount of runoff from impermeable surfaces near the b~llel~ead. The use or future installation of sprinkler irrigation within close proximity of the bulkhead is not recommended due the erosion potenria! that such a system poses. Additionally, vehicle access (associated with construction activities) on the lawn, between the house and the b~fllehead, should be limited as much as possible in order to prevent compaction of the soft and ratting of the yard. Both are a catalyst for erosion and can cause damage to the b. llehead. Wiri~u the site plan, silt fencing is documented. Care should be taken with the installation of silt fencing at ,hi~ site, due to the erosion potential such installation poses to the bulkhead. Proper silt fencing inst~lT_~don involves digging a trench and burying the bottom of the silt blanket. This prevents sediment and water from travolivg under the fence. As the proper installation of silt fencing causes its own ground disturbing activities, it poses azz immediate erosion threat to the stability of the lawn and top of the bttlkhead. Therefore, the silt fencing should be installed only if ground disturbing activities are to occur with construction. If it is deemed necessary, ~he fence should be installed as fi~r as possible from the bulkhead and close as possible to the construction activities. It should not be installed on the top o£ the bulkhead as noted in the site plan. Once the need for the silt fencing and hay bales has passed, both should be completely removed and the trench and bare areas (from the hay bales) reseeded. P~G~ 04 Enclosed .are directions on the proper installation of silt fence to eusure that it is installed properly. Installin~ the silt £ence without bm-yin~ the bottom is as useful as not i~st~l]ing it, and only regally improved with the use o£hay bales. If you have any questions re§ar~i~§ our site visit and information provided, please do not hesitate to contact ou~ office at (f:~l) 727-2315 x3 betwee~ the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. Monday thro~gh Friday. ,/31/2008 10:48 FA~ 631 76~ 4643 ~00RE LAW OFFICES ~ T~uszees PATRICIA C. MOORE Attom®y at LaW 51020 Mai~ Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:: (631) 765-4643 March 31, 2008 Attn: Michael Verity Building Department Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SPYRO AVDOULOS pp~MXSES: 5~985 North Road, BCTM # 1000-44-1-5 Bouthold "~ Dear Michael: with reference to the above, namely the stop-work order issued by your office, please be advised that Joseph Fischetti, PE, will be at the property on Tuesday, April 1"~ with small excavation equipment to expose the footings for an inspection same. There will be no further work done at the premises. Thank you. ~truly yours, patricia C. Moore PCM/ C: Board of Trustees ES I1 ~AR ] 9 2008 $outhhold Town Beard of Trustees - '4072 Town of Southold Suffolk'County, NY People of the State of New York vs. MI~3{3L~ INI3qAL NUMBER THE pERSON DESCRIBED WOVE IS CHARGED AS 03/0:1 '05 II0N 10:58 FAX 531.7.65 6145 ~/05/~008 10:44 Fg 631 't~ ~k'~ $OTJTItOLD TOWN CLERK( ~ ~ Trustees Town Hall, ~I~0~S Main Road P.O. Box 1199 8OU%I~M~ New yezk 11971 OFFICE oF THE TOWN CLEItlC TOWN OF ~OUTItOLD APPLICATION FOR PUaUC ACCI~SS TO RECORDS iNSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this ~orm and Dive to Town Clerk's Office (~e~'y' I:~ead;m ef Information Officer]. O~e ~p~ wifi be ~urn~ to you in response tO your request, or as an Interim r~pons,. (~partment or Officer, if known, t~at has~ the ;;.~ormation Y~ a~e r~U&sting,) RE~RD YOU ~ISH TO INSPECT: (Deseri~ 't~ r~rd sought. If p~sible, supply data, file title, tax map number, and any ether pertinent Information.) Miili~ Add~s (if diluent fe~ above) :~. ~ APPRO~-D APPROVED WITH DEl-AYe E'~~"l,za~eth A. ~" Freed~le of IflforleatJen. Officer [ ] DENIEDe RECEIVED Oete ~IR 3 ~008 ~001 * If debyed or denied see reverse aide fi~r explmtat~on. C~uthol~, T0wa Cler~ Donald Wilder, Chairman Lauren Standish, Secretary Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631 ) 765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., April 9, 2008, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Peter Young, seconded by Don Wilder, it was RESOLVED to NOT SUPPORT the application of SPYRO AVDOULOS to Amend Permit Wetland Permit #6553 and Coastal Erosion Permit #6553C to demolish the existing second floor and construct new second floor landward of the CEHA, new two-story addition landward of existing residence, and alterations to the east side of the foundation wall. Located: 54985 North Rd., Greenport. SCTM#44-1-5 Inspected by: Don Wilder, Glen McNab, Peter Young The CAC does Not Support the application because the dwelling has been demolished and the application should be amended to included the demolition and complete reconstruction of a new dwelling. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. V~Pr INSPECTION SCHEDULE e-construction, hay bale line~-I~z~)~<~ '0 (~ 1st day of construction ½ constructed ~'. Project complete, compliance inspection. BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 6553 DATE: MARCH 21, 2007 ISSUED TO: SPYRO AVDOULOS PROPERTY ADDRESS: 54985 NORTH ROAD~ GREENPORT SCTM# 44-1-5 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on March 21, 2007, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of $500.00 paid by Spyro Avdoulos and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to remove/demolish portion of house located within CEHA and retain the existing foundation within CEHA and converted to a patio; back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA and landward of proposed patio; demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor; construct new two-story addition landward of existing residence; replace existing garage with new garage and; a line of staked hay bales and silt fencing are installed prior to construction along top of bluff; the installation of gutters, leaders and drywells to dwelling to contain roof runoff and in accordance with Chapter 236 of the Town Code-Storm Water Runoff; install new sanitary system landward of existing structures, if required; install a new driveway, walkways, and landscaping landward of existing structures, and as depicted on the survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin III, last dated December 19, 2007 and received on January 11, 2008. A 10' non-turf buffer must be ihstalled landward of the top of the bluff. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee Spyro Avdoulos, 54985 North Road, Greenport, NY as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisioi~s of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation, the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. The Permittee is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Department of Real Properties Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety (90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 10. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT Permit #: 6553C Date: March 21, 2007 SCTM#: 44-1-5 Name of Applicant/Agent: Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Name of Permittee: Spyro Avdoulos Address of Permittee: 54985 North Road, Greenport, NY 11944 Property Located: 54985 Nodh Road, Greenport, NY 11944 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: Coastal Erosion Permit to remove/demolish portion of house located within CEHA and retain the existing foundation within CEHA and converted to a patio; back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA and landward of proposed patio; demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor; construct new two-story addition landward of existing residence; replace existing garage with new garage and; a line of staked hay bales and silt fencing are installed prior to construction along top of bluff; the installation of gutters, leaders and drywells to dwelling to contain roof runoff and in accordance with Chapter 236 of the Town Code-Storm Water Runoff; a 10' non-turf buffer must be installed landward of the top of the bluff; install new sanitary system landward of existing structures, if required; install a new driveway, walkways, and landscaping landward of existing structures. The Coastal Erosion Management Permit allows for the operations as indicated on the survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, last dated December 19, 2007, and received on January 11, 2008. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (apply if marked) __ Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation plan is a necessary special condition of this permit. __ A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. 2 __ A maintenance agreement is attached with application and is a necessary special condition of this permit. King, Board of Trustees James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 March 21,2007 BOARD OFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 52010 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 RE: SPYRO AVDOULOS 54985 NORTH RD., GREENPORT SCTM#44-1-5 Dear Ms. Moore: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wed., March 21,2007 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of SPYRO AVDOULOS applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated February 1, 2007, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the application be found Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on March 21,2007, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees have found the application to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of SPYRO AVDOULO$ to remove/demolish portion of house located within CEHA and retain the existing foundation within CEHA and converted to a patio; back of house (new walls) constructed outsi~le CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to, existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA and landward of proposed patio; demolish existin~ second floor and construct new second floor; construct new two-story addition landward of existing residence; replace existing garage with new garage and; a line of staked hay bales and silt fencing are installed prior to construction along top of bluff; the installation of gutters, leaders and drywells to dwelling to contain roof runoff and in accordance with Chapter 236 of the Town Code-Storm Water Runoff; a 10' non-turf buffer must be installed landward of the top of the bluff; install new sanitary system landward of existing structures, if required; install a new driveway, walkways, and landscaping landward of existing structures, and as depicted on the survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin III, last dated December 19, 2007 and received on January 11, 2008. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $100.00 Very truly yours, James F. King ~' President, Board of Trustees JFK/eac James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Please be advised that your application dated ~]l/0'7 been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting ~)f ,'~]~1/0 '7 and your application has been approved pending the corn/pletion of the following items checked off below. t~)(q.,~/Y Revised Plans for proposed project ~ Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) has __ 1st Day of Construction ($50.00) ¼ Constructed ($50.00) Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD TO: ~)U. CO Oo~O&(~5 Please be advised that your application dated ,3l I Ir, bp reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of ~1~10~) following action was taken: has been and the ( ,~)'Application Approved (see below) (__)Application Denied (see below) (___) Application Tabled (see below) If your application is approved as noted above, a permit fee is now due. Make check or money order payable to the Southold Town Trustees. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work session Report Date/Time: 3-- / bl - 0 q SPYRO AVDOULOS requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to remove/demolish portion of house located within CEHA and retain the existing foundation within CEHA and converted to a patio. Back of house (new wails) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA and landward of proposed patio. Demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor. Construct new two-story addition landward of existing residence. Construct new garage and renovate existing garage. Install hay bales along top of bluff during construction and drywells, gutters, and leaders added to dwelling. Install new sanitary system landward of existing structures, if required. Install a new driveway, walkways, and landscaping landward of existing structures. Located: 54985 North Rd., Graenport. SCTM#44-1-5 Type of area to be impacted: / __Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland V/Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of above: ~CC of Town Co/de proposed work falls under: hapt.275 b/ Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: /Wetland ~Coastal Erosion __Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Amendment Administrative Modifications: Pres?nt Were: __J.K~ng __J.Doherty ~P.Dmkerson D. Bergen L/B. Ghosio, Jr ~' H· Cusack D. Dzenkowski Mark Terry~other Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Environmental Technician Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town Hail 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., March 14, 2007, the following recommendation was made: Moved by James Eckert, seconded by Joyce Grigonis, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the Wetland Permit application of SPYRO AVDOULOS to remove/demolish portion of house located within CEHA and retain the existing foundation within CEHA and converted to a patio. Back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA and landward of proposed patio. Demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor. Construct new two-story addition landward of existing residence. Construct new garage and renovate existing garage. Install hay bales along top of bluff during construction and drywells, gutters, and leaders added to dwelling. Install new sanitary system landward of existing structures, if required. Install a new driveway, walkways, and landscaping landward of existing structures. Located: 54985 North Rd., Greenport. SCTM#44-1-5 Inspected by: James Eckert, Joyce Grigonis, Peter Young The CAC Supports the application with the Condition drywells and gutters are installed to contain the roof run-off. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried PATRIClA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:: (631) 765-4643 Board of Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SPYRO AVDOULOS PREMISES: 54985 North Road, SCTM # 1000-44-1-5 April 29, Southold 2008 :~d of Trustee:~ Dear Board members: Enclose is a new application for a wetland permit to demolish the remains of the existing dwelling (the existing walls, existing flooring, and existing chimney) and apply to reconstruct the dwelling using the existing foundation but an additional 10 feet back from the original application. The house would be reconstructed a total of approximately 18.0+/- feet from the seaward side of the crawl space (where the existing chimney ends). The addition on the landward side will be larger to accommodate the 10 feet lost on the seaward side of the house. Since the previous amendment was denied, without prejudice, a new wetland permit is enclosed to be heard in May. The Coastal Erosion application was tabled. However in order to simplify the record, we withdraw the previous Coastal Erosion permit amendment filed in April to be continued at the May hearing and resubmit the enclosed new Coastal Erosion Permit application with the Wetland permit application. Therefore, both the full Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit with the revised description are advertised and heard in May. Also enclosed for your file are the following: DEC letter of no jurisdiction, value of existing foundation; Zoning Board Variance granted April 10, 2008 and August 16, 2008. Thank you. yours,~ · Moore April 15, 2008 Southold Town Trustees P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Dear President King and Board: PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Re: 1000-44-01-05 Spyro Avdoulos Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries APR 1 5 Southhold Town Board of Trusteel The owner has both a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Hazard ~ermit. The applicant applied for the work which was approved in the uilding permit and which was started. We have an amendment request in an effort to resolve the dispute and to permit the work to continue. I wish to submit additional documents and information which appears in the Zoning Board file for your review. County of Suffolk Office of Soil & Water. This report was received by the Zoning Boardprior to the variance granted for the setback of the construction from the top of the bank and bulkhead. The bank is a low bank with only a 25% slope. (Joseph Fischetti testified at the ZBA hearing that a slope less than 36% is considered stable, this is a very stable slope particularly with a hardened toe), the bank is further secured by both a bulkhead and jetty. The property is extremely stable and the owner has maintained the bulkhegdto assure stability of the bank. The recommendations made xn the report were incorporated into the approval. (July 16, 2007 letter attached) The reconstruction of the house over the existing foundation was intended to make the existing structure more conforming with the Coastal Erosion Hazard Law. The Coastal Erosion Hazard Law allows replacement or repair of same-kind structural elements (defined as ~'Normal Maintenance"). Since replacement of same kind structural elements are specifically permitted without a coastal erosion management permit, our project was more consistent with Chapter 111 since we were rebuilding on the same foundation behind the Coastal Erosion Hazard line. 3 o The project, as proposed, is more '~consistent" with the LWRP than the original house before construction because the property contains a bulkhead and jetty which presently provides protection from loss of life, loss of structure, flooding or erosion. The existing residence was constructed in the 60's with no evidence of loss and the slope of the bank is stable and is described as a 25% slope. The re-submission to the Board to allow the east wall to be reconstructed does not change the original plan which was designed to maximize the distance to the Coastal Erosion Hazard line. The house was cut at the nonconforming Coastal Erosion Line and the living foundation seven feet back. to comply with the policies spaCesThi reconstructed on the existing plan was undertaken primarily of the LWRP. The owner's efforts to make the existing dwelling with the LWRP is evidenced by the following actions applicant: "consistent" taken by the 1. To further minimize disturbance to the seaward side of the house the exiting foundation of the old house was converted to a patio. By converting the existing living area of >he structure to a patio the alterations to the structure were reducing the nonconformity and the house is more "consistent" with the LWRP. 2. The existing sanitary is being replaced with a sanitary which was located more than 100 feet from the top of the bank. The owner had received Health Department approval prior to the Trustees hearing, but at the hearing the Trustees conditioned thejpermit on placement of the sanitary more than 100 feet from the top of the bank. The owner had to resubmit the application to the Health Department to comply with the Trustee's permit. The construction and relocation of the new sanitary makes this application "consistent" with the LWRP because it addresses policy 5 "protection of the water quality and supply of the Town" and policy 6 "protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold's ecosystem". 3. The alterations to the dwelling required dry wells and gutters for all roof runoff, therefore this application is "consistent" with the LWRP at policy 4 "minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion", policy 5 "protection of the water quality and supply of the Tow~" and policy 6 "protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold's ecosystem" 4. This alteration to the dwelling required a non-turf buffer to capture surface water runoff before running down the bank, this condition makes the project "consistent" with the LWRP at policy 4 "minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion", policy 5 "protection of the water quality and supply of the Town" and policy 6 "protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold's ecosystem" . 5. The existing dwelling did not comply with the standards of the New York State Building Code. The construction of a new second floor and addition of the first floor required the remaining building, in particular the existing walls, to bring the entire house into conformity with the New York State Building Code. All existing insulation must be replaced with energy compliance insulation, the studs must be sized for the added insulation, the structural frame and existing foundation requires hurricane strapping, windows must comply with energy efficiency and wind strength. All these requirements mandated by the State of New York make the structure "consistent" with the LWRP specifically policy 4 ~'loss of life" and policy 13 ~'promote appropriate use of energy resources". 6. After the foundation was exposed, one wall on the east side was structurally inadequate. The cement block wall on the east side separate from the full basement foundation requires corrective action, a minimal cost to a $78,000 foundation· A structural element which must be addressed during construction which goes not materially change the overall project is consistent with policy 4 "minimizing 19ss of human life". It has been further analyzed by the structural engineer, Joseph Fischetti, PE, and the wall can be used without alterations if the Trustees prefer. The overall design of the house remains as was submitted into the record· At the time the Board granted the approval in March 27, 2007 the LWRP was in place, policies were addressed and mitigation implemented to make the proposed dwelling consistent with the LWRP standards. In accordance with your original findings, the project, as proposed, was made "consistent" by virtue of the above mitigation measures taken to conform to the policy's of the LWRP. Finally, the owner has a building permit which was stopped. He has a significant financial investment in this permit with construction drawings, materials purchased from the lumber company, contractors hired, Health Department, DEC, and Zoning Board variances granted. The foundation, which is intended to be used, saves the owner $78,000 in his overall construction costs. The stop work order has had an immediate and detrimental financial impact on the owner: The house plans and construction drawings received a building permit and the house was started. The side yard setbacks are 15 feet and 20 feet. The lot is narrower away from the water. The same house can not fit moving it back. All new design drawings would be required. The lumber, windows and other materials which have been purchased for this house would require review. The Health Department approval would have to be reviewed 9gain if the house location changed because the sanitary location is fixed by the neighbor's well. This was done twice to keep the sanitary 100 feet from the top of the bank. 3. The overall cost of the project would change if the foundation was removed, including the cost of a new foundation and new fireplace. The Trustee's actions impact local jobs. The builder and his subcontractors schedules have been affected. The contractor and the subcontractors are local, their families are equally affected by the delay during a recession. There is no compelling environmental reason to force the owner to abandon all the plans and previous approvals and start over. The house is located on Sound Avenue, a noisy and busy road, the house is located in line with his neighbors, at similar distances from the bank. This is not a bluff, the property is relatively low and protected by bulkhead, a jetty and natural bolder formations. We ask that you rescind your directive to the building inspector to issue the stop work order· Ver~.tr~y yours, ~_~..Pa~ricia C. Moore SOW. ~ ~ ~'.1~;: (63,1) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (631) 727-231S July 16, 2007 Chairman James Dinizio Ir. Zon{~g Board of Appeals Town of Southold P.O, Box 1179 $outhold, NY 11971-0959 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 6060 (2~vdoulos) Dear Chairman Dinizio: As requested by your office, a site visit was conducted at 54985 Noah Road Greenporq Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-44-1-5 in order to review the proposal for expansion of the house on the' property. The house is ~itad approximately 20 feet from a wooden bulkhead and Long Island Sound. A grassed lawn exists in thl.q area between the house and bulkhead. No irrigation system appears to be servicing this yard. The house is £tted with gutters and downspouts. The bulkhead is in stabile condition. RtT:orts to maintain the stability of the bulkhead have occurred with the/ustallation of new t~lings to rein. force the decayed pilings. The horizontal boards of the bulkhead are in fair condition; no gaps exist within the wall with the exception ora small section (2' x 3') which has been repaired by placing a board over this section. On top of the bulkhead, full vegetative cover of scntbs and forbs exist. The exception occurs on the eastern section of the bulkhead near the groin where landscaping debris is being placed on top of the wall, The stairway is in working condition, but the stair rails and steps are broken and rotten and in need of replacement. Due to the dose proxlmiBr of the house to the shoreline, it is imperative to maintain the structural stability of the bulkhead. A stabile bulkhead consists of structurally sound horizontal support beams with fighdy fitted face boards. No sediment from behind the bulkhead should be travellttg between, through, over or trader these boards. The pilings should be tightly bolted into the bulkhead and the horizontal beams should be straight, not bowed out or up. All of the components should be in sound condition (solid, free of decay and pest infestation). 423 ORIFFZNG AV~N~ SUZTE 110 RIVERI~-m~D, NY 11901 The mp of the bulkhead should be fully vegetated and access to the beac_k should occur via the sr,~rs. Landscaping debris should be composted or disposed of throu~ an alternate means instead of disposing on the top of the bulkhead. Additionally, the stairs should be repaired/replaced to allow fur sa~e acces~ to the beach. To waln~ain the best st~uct-~tral stability of the bulkhead, inspections should be made reg~l~rly and especially altar storm events. All necessaxy repairs should occur as recommended in the enclosed hterature as soon as possible in order to m~intaill a stabile bulkhead, The use of dlTwells to collect roof runoff (as documented on the site plan) is fully supported, All the gutters should be fitted with drywells especially those on the Sound side of the house. This reduces the erosion threat that runoff from impermeable surfaces poses to the bulkhead. Respectively, it is recommended that the walk on the Sound side of the property be constructed of a permeable or semi- permeable surface i/k is slated to be replaced. This will further reduce the amount of runoff from impermeable surfaces near the b~lkhead. The use or future installation of sprinkler irrigation with/n close prox/mity of the bulkhead is not recommended due the erosion potent/al chat such a system poses. Add/tionally. vehicle access (associated with constraction activities) on the lawn, between the house and the b-lkhead, should be limited as much as possible in order to prevent compaction of the soft and rotting of the yard. Both are a catalyst for erosion and can cause damage to the b, lkhead. Withiu the site plan, silt fencing is documtmted. Care should be taken with the installation of silt fencing at ~hi~ site, due to the erosion potential sttch installation poses to r. he bulkhead. Proper stir £e.~in§ inst~ll~don involves digging a trench and burying the bosom of the silt blanket, This preveuts sediment and water from traveling under the fence. As the proper installation of silt fencing causes its own ~ound disturbing activities, it poses au immediate erosion thxeat to the stability of the lawn and wp of the bulkhead. Therefore, the silt fencing should be imtalled only if ground disturbing activi, fes are to occar with construction. If it is deemed necessary, the feuce should be inscaned as /ax as possible from the bulkhead and dose as possible to the construction activities. It should not be installed on the top of the bulkhead as noeed in the site plan. Once the need for the silt fencing and hay bales has passed, both should be completely removed and the trench and bare areas (from the hay bales) reseeded. F.~closed .a~e directions on the proper imt.~lation o[ slit fence to ~n~e th~ ir is ~ed p:op~ly. ~st~ ~e s~ ~ce ~out ~ ~e ~om h ~ ~ ~ not ~st.ll~ng it, ~d o~y m~l~y improved ~ ~e ~a o~hay b~es. l/you have any questions regarain§ our site visit and information provided, please do dot hesitate to contact ou~ office at (631) 727-2315 x3 bet~veen the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Monday thro-gh Friday. March 5, 2008 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road $outhold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries Southold Town Trustees P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Re: 1000-44-01-05 Spyro Avdoulos Dear President King and Board: The owner has a wetland permit, this permit was issued. However, during construction the wall of the existing foundation (east side) was found to be missing the footings. All other descriptions of the original project remain the same, the house was cut at the CZM line and foundation will be made into the patio. The photographs of the original house are enclosed to remind you of the condition of the original structure which was built in the 1960's. The balance of the foundation is structurally sound. Prior to construction the builder installed the haybales and requested an inspection of the staking. The builder was then authorized to begin. Since we did not expect to need structural repairs to the existing foundation the building department directed us to you for an amendment to the permit due to the unforseen condition of the foundation wall (east side). The contractor cleaned up the site and ceased further construction. An application for an amendment to the permit is herein enclosed. The architect provided to the building department the amendment to the plans and I have enclosed the original survey, and a detail of the foundation which must be corrected. Since the project required the north wall to be cut off (cut house back to CZM line) and the front wall is where the new addition is proposed, all that remains is the studs of the east and west wall (windows and sheathing removed). Now the east foundation will need remediation so the existing studs are in the way. As was described originally, the first floor must be reconstructed landward of the CEHline. The plans of the proposed house has not changed throughout the permit process. The complication during construction starts with cutting the house back to the CEHline. The property is protected with a bulkhead and a stone jetty. Due to the unforeseen structural problem with the foundation, we need your permit to continue with our project. James F. King, President Jill M. Doherly, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson DaMe Bergen John HolzspfcI Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765~1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only )~ Coastal Erosion Permit Application _~, iancr~r~t Application Administrative Permit k&mendmen~rans fer/F_,xtension ,,-'Keceived Fee:$ .,~-Completed Application __Incomplete __SEQP..A Classification: Type I Type H Unlisted __Coordination:(date sent) c°nsistency Asscssra~nt F°rm .--~AC Referral Sent:~ ~])ate of In~pecfion: ---K¢ceipt of CAC Report:' ' ' Lead Agency Determination: Teclmical Keview: /'"Public Hearing Held: __Rcsointion: Name of Applicant Address Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- t..]~_ C)I - (~' Property Location: ~-c./c~ 8 5-- ~"Jo(-h~ ~rovide LILGO Pole ~, dist~ce to cross streets, ~d location) Ad.ess: ~0~ ~1~ QUO& I [q V t Phone: of Trustees Applicat Land Area (in square feet): Area Zoning: ~..- fro Previous use of property: Intended use of property: GENERAL DATA Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date '?x No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. ~)t'e - ~.~ ~5{~ 5b"tJOxic- Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X~ No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Applicant: Spyro Avdoulos Agent: Patricia C. Moore Esq. AMENDED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Amendment March 5, 2008: As was previously described we will demolished portion of house which is within Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA), however, existing foundation within CEHA is retained and converted to patio. The east side of foundation wall was found inadequate during construction therefore it must be replaced or mitigated with Steele. As was described in the previous application, the back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA. and Landward of proposed patio (See plans prepared by Chomo Associates dated 1-31- 07 and survey by Joseph Ingegno dated 6-16-06, amended 1-24-07. Original plans amended March 5, 2008 with detail of the alteration to the east side of the foundation wall. As was previously described, demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor (landward of CEHA) As was previously described, new two sto~y addition landward of existing residence new garage because Trustees pushed back the sanitary system we will have to demolish the existing garage. Installed haybales along top of bluff during construction and drywells, gutters, and leaders added to dwelling. First inspection completed. New Sanitary landward of existing structures. new driveway, walkways and landscaping landward of existing structures. Board of Trustees Appllca~n WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: ,3 Area ofwetlands on lot:. Mt¢QITI square feet - L-©m~--~::$~o~c[ So~oevC~ Percent coverage of lot: I % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~-~ c/, feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: &~. ~ feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes ~,,~k~4,- If yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? ~>o Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: cubic yards /o cubic yards -Z-P" r~'o feet Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): Board of Trustees Applicat~ COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: Are wetl~ds present wi~in 100 feet of~e proposed acti~? No ~ Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? If Yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? ~O Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: _(cubic yards) (cubic yards)J~ Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) Spyro Avdoulos December 13, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: h . I,S. pyroAvdoulos, as owner ofpremises °~'~ eret>y authorize you to make any and all applications t~ g oard of Appeals,, Town of Southold Planning Board, Town of Southold Board of Trustees, New York State DEC, Suffolk County Health Department and any other necessary agencies on my behalf and on my behalf regarding my above referenced property. · PROJECT ID NUMBER PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION 617.20 APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only ( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 2. PROJECT NAME 4. PRECISE LOCATION: Sb'eet Addess and Road Intersections Prominent landmarks etc-or provide mad SEQR 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion []Modificat,onlalteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially ! ~ acres Ultimately '" ,~ acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLy WIYH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? [~Yes [] No If no, describe briefly: 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) [~Residentia, [~,ndustrial [~Commercial [~Agricullure [] ParklForestlOpen Space ~]Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) []Yes ~----~No If yes, list agency name and permit/ approval: ~. - ,/1/'~ ~To/~LS-(-//,~CJLIdV~j 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ]Yes liNc If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTNG PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIR ~ E MODIFICATION? J CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE iS TRUE TO THE BES--~'~OF MY KN'---~OWLEDGE Applicant / Spo Date' If the action is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead Agency/) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE ~ THRESHOLD iN 6 NYCRR, PART 617 4'~ If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL FAF. [~Yes r--]No ' ' B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. E~] Yes [~]No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain bflefiy: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. ~ti~n or-faUna~~~.y: D ~7· Oi~erim acts includin chan esinueeofeitheruangtyortypeofenaray?-E×oiairl'bheffi~- · HE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAl ENVIRONMENTAL AREA IDEAl? {If ~/es, explain briefi~,: E~Yes E~]No _.-~ E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BEVy RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? I ' : []Yes [--~ No PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be cOmpleted by Agency) effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibitity; (e) geographic scope; and (t) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure lhat explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes, Ihe determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characterislics of the CEA Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or signiticant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULI EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration· Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed actior WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting determination. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (Jr different from responsible officer) 6UT DPt' ~ PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765~1330 Fax:: (631) 765-4643 April 10, 2008 Board of Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SPYRO AVDOULOS PREMISES: 54985 North Road, SCTM # 1000-44-1-5 Southold Soothhold Town Board of Trustees Dear Board members: With reference to the above enclosed please find affidavit of mailing, certified postal receipts, copy of letter to neighbor and green certified mail return receipt card received as of date. Thank you. V~ truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/bp BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK ............................................................... X In the Matter of the Application of SPYRO AVDOULOS Applicant's Land Identified as 1000-44-1-5 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Betsy Perkins, residing at Mattituck, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the I {._.~ay of April, 2008, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Southold, New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to the neighbors on the attached list. Attached hereto is the white receipt post-marked by th..~Southold Post Office on said date. //~;ignaturr~- Sworn to before me this day of April, 2008 ~' (N~ary Public) MARGARET C. RUTKOWSK] Notary Public, State of New York No. 4982528 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires June 3, PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. RECEIPT 7192 64~3 3119 0000 0775 FROM: Palricia C. Moore Esq. TOTAL $ 5.21 POSTMARK OR DATE RECEIPT FROM: SEND TO: FEHI ANIK TOTALv ~ 5.21 POSTMAR~ OR DATE RECEIPT 71~2 6463 311o ooco o8o5 FROM: TOTAL $ 5.21 POSTMARK OR DATE RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 C~]0 0799 FROM: patricia C. Moore Esq. TOTAL $ 5.21 POSTMARK OR DATE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of SPYRO AVDOULOS Regarding Posting of Sign Upon Applicant's Land Identified as 1000-44-1-5 AFFIDAVIT OF SIGN POSTING APR COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) S0uthh01dTo~,n 8card of Trustees I, PATRICIA C. MOORE, residing at 370 Terry Lane, Southold, New York being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 6th day of April, 2008, I personally posted the properly known as 54985 North Road, Southold, New York by placing the board of Trustees official Poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the post has remained in place for eight (8) days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of Hearing to be held on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 on or about 6:00 p.m. PATRICIA C. MOORE Sworn to before me this /S day of April, 2008. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road $outhold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:: (631) 7654643 April i0~ 2008 Board of Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SPYRO AVDOULOS PREMISES: 54985 North Road, SCTM # 1000-44-1-5 Southold Dear Board members: With reference to the above enclosed please find affidavit of mailing, certified postal reciepts, copy of letter to neighbor and green certified mail return receipt card received as of date. Thank you. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore 'PCM/bp PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (63 l) 765-4643 April 4, 2008 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RE: SPYRO A%rDOULOS PROPERTY ADDRESS: 54985 North Road, SCTM: 1000-44-1-5 Southold Dear Neighbor: I represent the above with regard to property located on New York. He has submitted an application to the Southold Town Board of Trustees to amend existing permits to demolish existing second floor; construct new second floor landward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA), new two-story addition landward of existing residence and alterations to east side of foundation wall. The hearing on this matter has been scheduled for WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16, 2007 on or about 6:30 p.m. at Southold Town Hall. If you have any questions, or you wish to support this application, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. encl~. C: Mr. Spyro Avdoulos Mr. Angel Chorno, architect et~truly yours, AVDOULOS NEIGHBOR LIST SCTM: 1000-44-1-5 FEHIM & SEVGI UYANIK 55055 NORTH ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-44-1-4 FEHIM & SEVGI UYANIK 55055 NORTH ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-44-1-6 ZAKARIYA GUNUSEN MARl H. GUNUSEN 325 STONY SHORE DRIVE SOUTHOLD NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-52-3-24 HARUTYUN & NUNIK KUZUKOGLU 480 PARK AVENUE MANHASSET NY 11030 SCTM: 1000-52-3-23 RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 FROM: TOTAL $ 5.21 POSTMARK OR DATE RECEIPT 7192 C:~3 3110 00~0 ~9 FROM: SEND TO: ~ ~ ~O~OLO ~ 1197~:, FEE~~ ,~ ~ ~ TOTAL $ 5.21 POST'AK OR DATE RECEIPT FROM: SEND TO: 0.41 2.65 215 $ 5.21 DATE RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 0000 0~=83 FROM: petticia C. Moore Esq RE: AVDOULOS TRUSTEES Hi SEND TO: HARUTYUN & NUNtK KUZUKO 480 PARK AVENUE ~ DATE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of SPYRO AVDOULOS Applicant's Land Identified as 1000-44-1-5 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Betsy Perkins, residing at Mattituck, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On th'~I day of April, 2008, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Southold, New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to the neighbors on the attached list. /% Attached hereto is the white receipt po~"-"-~arked by the Sou~hojd Post Office on said date. ~etsy Perkin~,---"~/ ./(Signature) ~,.j// Sworn to before me this'/0 day of Ma~-eh, 2008 '~-' -'u,4uta~y Public) MARGARET C. RUTKOWSKI Notary Public, State of New York No. 4982528 CommOUalffied In Suffolk County _ ission Explre~ June 8, ~,O// PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York /~77~/4~c~ ~"' /~/~ O--r~C~ BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE 1N THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. ('--- Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS k~- DAY OF ]~t::~ C/]k~ ,20 0 ~ LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000-01-2-11 OWNER: Spyro Avdoulos 54985 North Road, Greenport NY 11944 AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Dept. Building Dept. Board of Trustees Zoning Board of Appeals~X (t/Vail m/--z--x/~ez,;~ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) __ (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) __ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Variance / Wetland Permit Nature and extent of action: Permits nreviously issued: allowed cut off portion of house which was located in CEHA. New second floor, new first floor because waterfront wall and landward wall demolished due to new wall back away from CEHLine. East wall of existing foundation is defective, no footing found under east side of foundation wall. Proposed construction is within 100 feet of "top of bluff", existing foundation to remain and aooroved convertin~ part of existine foundation as patio. Existing foundation is at 19 feet (at the closest point) from the top of the bluff therefore a variance was obtained. All structures are outside the Coastal Erosion Area. A defective foundation wall must be replaced or modified, which exceeds the scope of the original permit. Location of action: 54985 North Road, Greenport Site acreage: 28,149 sq.ft. Present land use: existing first floor of residence to be reconstructed and east foundation wall modified Present zoning classification: r-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Spyro Avdoulos (b) Mailing address: 54985 North Road, Greenport (c) Telephone number: Area Code (631) 765-4330 (Pat Moore) (d) Application number, if any: amendment to original ZBA appeal pending/trustees application for amendment to permit Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X No If yes, which state or federal agency: DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattem of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable Existing lot is.5 acres and is nonconforming in 1 acre zone. The lot is Iow bluff, protected by wood retaining walls, bolders and a rock ietty adjacent to Long Island Sound. The proposed alterations to the foundation is landward of the CEHA Stabilization of disturbed areas will be achieved with apl~ropriate veuetation, no disturbance is proposed to existina natural vegetation or natural topography north of the line labeled "top of bluff" on survey. Remediation to existing foundation is required. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes No X Not Applicable land is not identified as area of Areheologieal Sensitivity or on the National Register on Map produced by NYS Dept. Of State, Division of Coastal Resources Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resoumes throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria X Yes No Not Applicable Lands adjacent to Long Island Sound protected for both visual, economically productive and recreational resource. The development of the parcel is sensitive to preservation of Bluff. Standard conditions of dry wells, hay bales and Rradine to nrevent water runoff down slope mitigate effect on scenic resource. The previous permit incorporated all mitigation measures. Conditions are consistent with LISCMP (Long Island Sound Coastal Manaeement Proeram/which prevents non-point source pollution, prevents flooding and erosion. This application is to repair a wall of the foundation which was found to be defective during construction. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria X Yes No Not Applicable Owner has implemented erosion control measures, i.e. haybales, silt fence, and buffers. sediment barrier and standard storm water and pollution control measures are implemented on the site prior to and during construction. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria X Yes No Not Applicable Mitigation of impacts on water quality are achieved through stormwater and pollution control methods which have been implemented in this project. Drywells and gutters are proposed to direct all roof runoff into onsite recharge. Groundwater protection implemented throueh oroperlv eneineered sanitary system which requires that the bottom of the leaching pools be located a minimum of 2 feet above seasonal high groundwater. Alon~ Lone Island Sound sanitary systems and construction activities are in excess of 100 feet from the tidal waters. The Trustees requested that the sanitary system be located a minimum of 100 feet ffrom the bluff which resulted in a loss of an existing garage. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable Setback to the bluff is less than 100 feet, however the size of the parcel is nonconforming. The Coastal Area Boundaries of New York State along Long Island Sound will not be affected because of mitigation measures implemented by standard permit conditions. Soils along Long Island Sound (Carver, Plymouth, and Riverhead Soil) are deep, course texture and excessively drained. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable Air quality will not be affected by residential use. Standard building codes compliance prohibit degradation of air quality or emissions. Efficient heating and airconditionin~ systems and filters protect against air quality. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable Solid waste is controlled throngh town-wide recycling, no hazardous substances proposed at site. Use of natural untreated materials (CCA is discouraged by Trustees) A new sanitary meets County requirements, no pesticides are proposed and turf areas are limited. Planting plan will use indigenous and drought tolerant vegetation. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes XNo Not Applicable The parcel is private ownership WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable Residential use of property on establish lot will not adversely impact Long Island Sound coastline. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable Long Island Sound is adjacent to development of parcel, however, construction activity is minimized by retaining foundation along the north side. The replacement of the east foundation wall is necessar~ (in kind in place) to meet structural requirements. Storm water discharge and pollution control measures are critical components of protection of living marine resources. Drywells and gutters are proposed, and filtration and haybales are in place during construction, all measures which prevent leachate or other environmentally deleterious material associated with development from entering the waters of the Long Island Sound. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable Area has not developed for agriculture. North Road is predominantly residential development. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable Single family residential home is deemed by the Town of Southold as an appropriate permitted use with no significant drain on existing energy and mineral resources. Existing electric, gas and other resources are adequate to meet the needs of this lot. *copy of Town form created on 5/25/05 PATRICI~A C. MOORE, ATTORNEY AT LAW 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765--4330 DATE SUBJECT Southhold Town Board ot '[[ustee~ , SIGNED PATRICI~IC. MOORE, ATTORNEY AT LAW 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 TO / o Co ~ /--/ ~-/ - / - 5- L Southhold Town Board of Trustees SIGN[- PATRICI~C. MOORE, ATTO~~'~v 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 ~f i~-~ A~AI OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: James King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: March 13, 2007 Re~ Request for Wetland Permit for SPYRO AVDOULOS SCTM#1000-44-1-5 SPYRO AVDOULOS requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to remove/demolish portion of house located within CEHA and retain the existing foundation within CEHA and converted to a patio. Back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA and landward of proposed patio. Demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor. Construct new two-story addition landward of existing residence. Construct new garage and renovate existing garage. Install hay bales along top of bluff during construction and drywells, gutters, and leaders added to dwelling. Install new sanitary system landward of existing structures, if required. Install a new driveway, walkways, and landscaping landward of existing structures. Located: 54985 North Rd., Greenport. SCTM#1000-44-1-5 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is generally CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the following standard best management practices are implemented. To further Policy 5 "Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold" it is recommended that the Board require the following best management practices: 1. Require the installation of drywells at the terminus of the gutters and leaders. 2. Require that the driveway be constructed of pervious material. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Jolm Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only )~ Coastal Erosion Permit Application X Wetland Permit Application __ Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfer/Extension ~ece~vved Application: ~lllO9 ~.~_Received Fee:$ ~ompleted Application ~ I lO@ ___~complete __SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted __Coordination:(date sent) .~WRP Consistency Assessment Form o~4 I _.~CAC Referral Sent: ,~ ] t ] 09 ___~ate of Inspection: ~ __Receipt of CAC Report:~ __Lead Agency Determination: __Technical Review: ~_Public Hearing Held:_~/J~ __Resolution: ?¥ro Name of Applicant Address 0/o ~o,~cclO~ C ['~O0~"e-.. : .q-hold IIq31 Phone Number:( ) Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - q q - Property Location: ~-c.~ ~ ~- ~,]O(4~ ~.oOd (provide LILEO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: (If applicable) Address: I tq-l t Phone: Dard of Trustees Applicat~ Land Area (in square feet): Area Zoning: Previous use of property: Intended use of property: GENERAL DATA Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date x/,, . No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. ~)ce - e4c ~sfvn~ 7:>t~U c%rc. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Applicant: Spyro Avdoulos Agent: Patricia C. Moore Esq. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Remove/demolish portion of house which is within Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA), however, existing foundation within CEHA is retained and converted to patio. No disturbance to foundation within CEHA.. Back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA. and Landward of proposed patio (See plans prepared by Chomo Associates dated 1-31- 07 and survey by Joseph Ingegno dated 6-16-06, amended l o24-07. Demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor (landward of CEHA) New two story addition landward of existing residence new garage and renovate existing garage Haybales along top of bluff during construction and drywells, gutters, and leaders added to dwelling. (Amended survey to follow) New Sanitary landward of existing structures, if required (existing sanitary may be adequate- to be determined by Engineer inspection prior to construction) new driveway, walkways and landscaping landward of existing structures. )ard of Trustees Applicat~ WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: /~c~c~ 4: ~CL~O~ Area ofwetlands on lot: Percent coverage of lot: I Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~--~. c/. feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: &~. ~ feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes /Sr~-~° ~ - If yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? Z-~>o cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: z/ ' Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: cubic yards feet Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): Bard of Trustees App COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No 5( Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No ~ Yes (~_~ If Yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: __ _(cubic yards) (cubic yards)t~TW Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) d PATRIClA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:: (631) 765-4643 March 21, 2007 Board of Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SPYRO AVDOULOS PREMISES: 54985 North Road, Southold SCTM # 1000-44-1-5 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find green certified mail receipt cards for the above referenced matter together with Affidavit of Posting Thank you. Ve~ruly yours, /By: Bets~rkins, bp Enclosures Seuthttekf Town Board e~ Trustees BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of SPYRO AVDOULOS AFFIDAVIT OF SIGN POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign Upon Applicant's Land Identified as 1000-44-1-5 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, Angel~Chorno, residing at 51020 Main Road, Southold, New York being duly sworn, depose and say that: On thei~d~aay of March, 2007, I personally posted the property known as 54985 North Road, Southold, New York by placing the board of Trustees official Poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the post has remained in place for eight (8) days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of Hearing to be held on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 on or about 6:30 p.m. Swor~to before me this ~2./~-J~day of March, 2007. //Notary P~I::~I_I_I~ ' ~,{AR 2 1 2007 $outhhold Bo~rd of Tms~ee~ County of Suffolk State of New York rd of Trustees Applicati6n swo DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT IqFJSHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN ~ MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPKOVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND AT,T, DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. S~gnature SWORN TO BEFORE ME TI~S / ~'' z DAY OF ~ Notary Spyro Avdoulos December 13, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: I, Spyro Avdoulos, as owner of premises ~'-~/~ 3>3-'/l/3,'3h~ad (1000-44-1-5) ~e_~oo~P hereby authorize you to make any and all applicati~sns ~old Zoning Board of ' Appeals,, Town of Southold Planning Board, Town of Southold Board of Trustees, New York State DEC, Suffolk County Health Department and any other necessary agencies on my behalf and on my behalf regarding my above referenced property. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southoid, NewYork 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:: (631) 765-4643 March 14, 2007 Board of Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: SPYRO AVDOULOS PREMISES: 54985 North Road, SCTM # 1000-44-1-5 Southold Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find Affidavit of mailing, letter to neighbors and certified mail receipts for the above referenced matter. Thank you. bp Enclosures ~AIt 2 1 Ver¥/~ruly yours, ! By: Betsy~F~rkins, LA BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of SPYRO AVDOULOS Applicant's Land Identified as 1000-44-1-5 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I, Betsy Perkins, residing at Mattituck, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 13TM day of March, 2007, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Southold, New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to the neighbors on the attached list. t,~.~ uthold Post Office on Attached hereto is the white receip arked by the~S)o said date. ~~__~ ,,'/Betsy P~,rk'in~ / - -- // (Signat~)// Sworn to before me this ! day of March, 2007 ~ (NI3tary Public) MARGARET C. RIJ'rKOWSF0 Notary Public, State of New York No. 4982528 Qualified in Suffolk Cour~ 0 "~ · io j PLEASE list, onC'~r~e~c~ oF'~t~s ~i~,~v,l. u, ~n a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed· Thank you. SPYRO AVDOULOS SCTM: 1000-44-1-5 NEIGHBOR LIST FEHIM UYANIK SEVGI UYANIK 55055 NORTH ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-44-1-4 FEHIM UYANIK SEVGI UYANIK 55055 NORTH ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-44-1-6 RECEIPT FROM: SEND TO: FEHIM UYANIK SEVGI UY,a,NIK 55055 NORTH ROAD FEES: postage 0.39 RECEIPT FROM: SEND TO: FEES: Pe~tage o~39 T ~~4.64 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 8, 2007 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RE: SPYRO AVDOULOS PROPERTY ADDRESS: 54985 SCTM: 1000-44-1-5 North Road, Southold Dear Neighbor: I represent the above with regard to property located on New York. He has submitted an application to the Southold Town Board of Trustees to remove/demolish a portion of the dwelling within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA), however, the existing foundation within the CE}LA is retained and converted into a patio. There will be no disturbance within the CEHA. The back of the house (new walls) will be constructed outside the CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEliA and landward of proposed patio; demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor; new two-story addition landward of residence; new garage and renovate existing garage; new sanitary system, driveway, walkways and landscaping. A copy of the Hearing Notice is enclosed together with a copy of a portion of the site plan. The hearing on this matter has been scheduled for WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2007 on or about 6:30 p.m. at Southold Town Hall. If you have any questions, or you wish to support this application, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. PCM/bp enclS. C: Mr. Spyro Avdoulos Mr. Angel Chorno, architect Very/~rly' y~urs, ZONE VE ZONE- X .~ ~5~ P~OJECT ID NUMBER 617.20 APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION ( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANT / SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME 3.PROJECT LOCATION: ~-~?/~oC~-- ,/~Of~ ~d ) cou. Municipali~ ~ ~D/~ 4, PRECISE LOCATION: S~eet Addess and Road Intersec~ons, Prominent landmass etc -or orovide ma~ SEQR 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion ~ Modification / alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: renou / r oor / E fl d ioor, 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially / ~ acres Ultimately w~"" acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? [-'-~Yes [] No If no, describe briefly: 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) [~]Residenlial r--~lndustrial ~]Commercial r~Agriculture [~Park/Forest/OpenSpace []Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, State or Local) []Yes r~No If yes, list agency name and permit/ approval: ~)~;;~ . ,~/'~D ~(J~'tJ-(7/tC~LTO'Y3 11. DOES ANY ASPECT Of THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [~']Yes ~-']No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MOD FICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / SpoJ:~d~"~;me~'~ Date: If the action Is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.4? If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. [~Yes [~No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEWAS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain bdefly: C2, Aesthetic, agricultural, amhaeological, historic, or other natural or culturar msoumes; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, she[irish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly: C5. Growth, subsequent development, or mlatad aerivitios likely to be induced by the firopose~ action? Explain bdefiy: DS. Long term, short t~rm, ~mulativo, or other effeo~ not idant~fied in Gl-CS? Explain bflefly: C7. Other impacts (includin~ chan~Jes in use of either quantib/or type of energy? Explain bdefl¥' I D. WiLL THE PROJECT HAVE AN iMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL E. IS THERE, OR iS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL MPACTS? If },es ex lain' PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise sigaificant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (0 magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmenta~ characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potantial~y la rge or significa nt adverse impacts which MAY occur. The n proceed directly to the I: ULI_ EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on aitachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination. Name of Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS (Avdoulos 1000-044-01-05) 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM#1000-44-01-05-Spyro Avdoulos- renovation to existing two story residence and construction of additions landward of existing structures: demolish wails of existing structure within CEHA, convert existing foundation to a patio and all alterations and new construction landward of Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Zoning Board~ Town Board Planning Dept. Building Dept. Board of Trustees ~X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) __ (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) __ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Remove/demolish portion of house which is within Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA), however, existing foundation within CEHA is retained and converted to patio. No disturbance to foundation within CEHA.. Back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA. and Landward of proposed patio (See plans prepared by Chomo Associates dated 1-31-07 and survey by Joseph Ingegno dated 6-16-06, amended 1-24-07. Demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor (landward of CEHA) New two story addition landward of existing residence new garage and renovate existing garage Haybales along top of bluff during construction and drywells, gutters, and leaders added to dwelling. (Amended survey to follow) New Sanitary landward of existing structures, if required (existing sanitary may be adequate- to be determined by Engineer inspection prior to construction) new driveway, walkways and landscaping landward of existing structures. Property improved with a two story residence within CEHA. Location of action: 54985 North Road, Greenport Site acreage:.5 acres Present land use: improved residential Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Spyro Avdoulos (b) Mailing address: 160-12 11th Avenue, Beechhurst NY 11357 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( 212 )344-0600 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes No If yes, which state or federal agency: DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes dverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable Renovation of existing two story residence with additions landward of existing structures. Located of existing house 55.9 feet from Tie Line on Long Island Sound, proposed structure 63.9 feet from Tie Line on Long Island Sound. Existing dwelling very close to top of bluff and Toe of Bluff is protected by bulkhead. Sound Avenue (CR 48) is similarly developed along Long Island Sound. Proposed additions landward of existing foundation, to prevent disturbance to top of bluff existing foundation converted to patio and construction activities are landward of existing structure. See survey and plans in file. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes No Not Applicable Existing developed site- fully developed area. Attach Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes No Not Applicable additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes No Not Applicable The existing house is being renovated to current building code standards. The existing two story residence will be renovated and additions constructed landward of existing structures from the top of bluff. An existing foundation will be converted from dwelling to patio. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes No Not Applicable All construction will meet current stricter standards. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable The renovation of the existing residence will place conditions on eonstrnetion which mitigate impacts. The Trustees require haybales during construction. Drywells and gutters are also required and will be added. All other existing structures (stairs to beach, patios and landscaping will be retained.) The property is protected by bulkhead and stable vegetation. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable Property is presently developed with a two story single family dwelling. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable property is a waterfront parcel with a single family dwelling. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable Construction of renovations to the existing dwelling will be done with current environmental regulations. Proper protection of bluff with haybales and protection of water runoff, Bluff face and toe are protected with bulkhead, stable and vegetated. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No Not Applicable TRUSTEE KING: We'll go off our regular meeting to public hearings. Does anyone want to take a break or anything? It's warm in here. I'll make a motion to go off our regular hearing. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Second. TRUSTEE KING: All in favor.? (ALL AYES.) (After a recess, these proceedings continue as follows.) TRUSTEE KING: We'll go into our public hearings now. We have quite a few. But I don't think there is anything outstanding here. If you have any concerns or comments about these public hearings as they come up, please come up to the microphone and identify yourself. Please try and keep it brief. We would like to keep these meetings moving along so we don't drag things out. I appreciate it. Thank you. TRUSTEE BERGEN: We try to limit the comments to five minutes or less. So we are ready to go. COASTAL EROSION & WETLAND PERMITS: TRUSTEE BERGEN: I'll start with number one under Coastal Erosion and Wetland Permits, Patricia Moore on behalf of SPYRO AVDOULOS requests a Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit to remove/demolish portion of house located within CEHA and retain the existing foundation within CEHA and converting it to a patio. Back of house (new walls) constructed outside CEHA with alterations/repairs/modifications to existing basement and first floor of house landward of CEHA and landward of proposed patio. Demolish existing second floor and construct new second floor. Construct new two-story addition landward of existing residence. Construct new garage and renovate existing garage. Install hay bales along top of bluff during construction and drywells, gutters and leaders added to dwelling. Install new sanitary system landward of existing structures, if required. Install a new driveway, walkways and landscaping landward of existing structures. Located: 54985 North Road, Greenport. Is there anybody here to speak on behalf of this application? MS. MOORE: Good evening. Pat Moore on behalf of Mr. Avdoulos. I think that pretty much covers it all. I'm really here to explain any part of this application that is not clear. The house is there. What we were trying to do is actually, the existing foundation is being maintained. We want to create as little interference with the foundation and its proximity to the coastal erosion line, so all construction is occurring landward of that line. We are keeping -- the survey shows it best. The house right now is, where it goes across the coastal erosion line by that small corner. What they are going to do, based on the roof line. they are going to cut the house where the roof line actually ends and keep the foundation and just, keep the foundation, make that foundation just the decking so as to not disturb anything, and then build the rest of the house behind the existing structure. So it Sounds very complicated but it's actually simplifying everything. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Okay, thank you. Is there anybody else here to speak with regard to this application? (No response.) Okay, a couple of items before we get into some questions. First off, it was found consistent under the LWRP, and CAC supports the application with the condition of drywells and gutters installed, which is already, I saw, on the description. We went out and looked at this and walked around it for a while and we couldn't ~ind anywhere where the septic was staked on the plans. Did we m~iss something, Pat? Because I don't see anything here where -- TRUSTEE DOHERTY: The proposed building was not staked either. MS. MO~)RE: The building itself we are cutting away, so the portion is actualiy on the landward side, probably beyond the 100 foot jurisdiction of the trustees. But we included everything so that there is no argument later on. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: The new building was not staked. We felt it was 100 feet but we could not measure it because it was not staked. MS. MOORE: The existing building is 55.9 feet and the house itself is 33. So that's how we came up with that hundred feet. The sanitary, I don't know that we exactly know where the sanitary is. I think when they start doing - we know the flow pipe goes out to the front. It's in the landward side of the house. But the exact location of it we are not sure. We don't think we actually need to replace the sanitary but in the event that the Health Department says, you know, we recommend that you 'replace it, we want to include it in this application. Agair~, everything is landward of the existing house. The sanitaryis not on the waterfront side of the house. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Well, if there is the need for a new sanitary system, ,Would the applicant be willing to state that it will be landward so it would be outside our jurisdiction? Because if it's going to'be inside our jurisdiction, we'll have to see that. MS. MOORE: Yes, I think it actually will be. It's the corner is 63 plus 33. TRUSTEE BERGEN: But from coastal erosion. MS. MOORE: No, coastal erosion, the line is where it is. That's on March 2 t, the survey. The wetland line is falling from the high tide, from the tide line and that is presently at 63.9 to the comer of what we are cutting off. Plus the 33 that is existing, plus another ten, so I think clearly we can be outside of your 100 foot jurisdiction. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: We are measuring from the top of the bluff not the high water mark. MS. MOORE: Sorry, I'm still going with the previous code. No, I'm sure it's going to be within a hundred feet. I have to believe it's going to be landward of the new garage. Between the garage and the existing house is most likely where it will be. TRUSTEE BERGEN: What we could probably do is if we are going to approve this pending the location -- MS. MOORE: That's fine. I'll get the surveyor to see if he could make a better effort at identifying it. He may have already done it. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: If the septic is faidy close to wetlands, is it possible that you could move it anyway and get it out of our jurisdiction? MS. MOORE: I think the Health Department may -- I think there is -- do we have public water on this? I have a piece of the survey cut out so I don't have the full one. We have, may have to comply with 150 foot separation. Let me double check. If we have public water, I don't think it's a problem. But if it's a private well, we may have a problem. TRUSTEE BERGEN: I'm looking here for either a well or public water. Water supply and septic system is unknown, it says here. MS. MOORE: I have a survey here that shows the sanitary landward between:the house and new garage. There is public water in this area. ~ TRUSTEE BERGEN: We have a well pit on the survey here. MS. MOORE: That's why I'm confused. I'll get that answer to you. I don't want to give you misinformation. So what we can do is you can keep the sanitary out since it's not really going to hold up -- our construction can proceed and I can amend the permit for the sanitary if it's anywhere within the house and the garage, if I have to. Right now it's proposed -- TRUSTEE DOHERTY: If we approve this with the stipulation that the septic is 100 feet, beyond 100 feet and out of our jurisdiction, would you have a problem with that? MS. MOORE: The only problem is I think technically he is putting a sanitary ~ystem, you can~ put a sanitary under a driveway and you have two garages with a driveway. So I don't think technically we can put a sanitary anywhere other than between the garage and the house. TRUSTEI~ KING: Pat, about halfway between the garage and the house is 100 feet. MS. MOORE: That's within that general area, so it might be 98, you 2i Ma,:ch 2 [. 200? know. TRUSTEE KING: Just halfway between the two is right underneath that proposed walk, halfway between the two garages and the house, proposed house. That's a hundred feet there MS. MOORE: So I don't think it's going to be possible without keeping it to the 98 to 100 range. TRUSTEE KING: I would say keep it at 100. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: You are saying you don't know where it is. I just want to make sure it's not seaward. MS. MOORE: No, no. It's definitely not seaward and it is going to be on the landward side of the house. TRUSTEE BERGEN: I think what Jim is saying here, he measured it. Right now. You have the reom between the house and the garage to put the sanitary where it will be at least 100 feet away from the bluff, so it will be outside our jurisdiction. MS. MOORE: You see your survey where is shows the drywell, right? The proposed drywell. I gave you a survey with a proposed drywell there. Do you have that in front of you? TRUSTEE KING: Not the one that shows the drywell, no. MS. MOORE: Okay, I have one that does. TRUSTEE KING: It shows the framed garage and proposed garage. MS. MOORE: Let me bring it up so we make sure we have the same one. TRUSTEE BERGEN: February i, 2007 this is marked. MS. MOORE: I had a newer one. This is the drywell. That's the drywell. I~guess we could relocate the drywell and put it on the side. TRUSTE~ KING: There is your 100 feet here. So the septic here is outside of our jurisdiction. MS. MO.ORE: I might have to move the drywell to the side. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I know the garage is outside of our jurisdiction but what's the purpose of the second garage? MS. MOORE: As esthetic. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Let's get back to the microphone before we get on that one so it picks it up on the record. Just to handle one issue at a time, the septic, there seems to be enough room to put the septic there so it's outside our jurisdiction between the house and what is limed as the current located frame garage and that would require the movement of the drywell to the western side of the property, right? Would that work for the applicant? MS. MOORE: Probably. Yes. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Okay, next question we had was the purpose for another garage because this will now create three structures on one piece of property. MS. MOORE: The client wanted the symmetry. He designed it that }~xu'd o]] rLU~I¢C~ M~rch 2 I, 20(i7 way. That's what he wanted. The existing garage you see is the one that is to the right. So rather than enlarge that, he thought it would look - he preferred that. He just wanted to put, you know, so. TRUSTEE BERGEN: It's outside our jurisdiction, we just had the question. MS. MOORE: That was his choice, so. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Okay, and the other question we had in looking at the house, have you had an engineer look at this house to see if the proposed second story, if the first story can hold a proposed second story?. 111~bther words we don"t want to mn into a situation where the whole house, when you remove the second story, all of a sudden the whole house to has to come down to the ground because the first story couldn't hold the second story. MS. MOORE: An architect has looked at it. An engineer has not. I know it's~been looked at several times for that issue because I'm always e~nphasize that with everyone. And to our knowledge it can, t~ sufficient, the ho_use i_s i_n go~ and t.~heToun~-d-ati6n is a sturdy foundation so I don't believe it needs to be demolished_, If it does, we have to come back and amend the 't f' " ' TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I think one of the reasons it came up is if it gets to that point we would like to see you consider move the house landward a little bit away from that bluff. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Correct. The last issue that we had was we wanted to have a non-turf buffer installed landward of the bluff. Right now there is grass going right up to the bluff and we want to know, we realize it's not a lot of room there so if a ten foot non-turf buffer would be okay for the applicant. That's a pretty minimal non-turf buffer we are asking for. MS. MOORE: I think in the past on tight areas we may have done five feet because I think it's a little easier, as you said, there really is not a lot of room here. TRUSTEE BERGEN: How does the Board feel about that? TRUSTEE KING: There is about 30 feet between the house and the top of the bluff. It's more as you go to the west. This ranges between 30 and 40 feet. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I would like to stick with the ten feet. TRUSTEE DICKERSON: I would, too. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Okay. MS. MOORE: Fine. TRUSTEE BERGEN: We'll stick with the requirement of a ten-foot, non-turf buffer. Were there any other comments from the Board? (No response.) Not hearing any, then I'll make a motion to close the public 23 2007 hearing. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Second. TRUSTEE KING: All in favor? (ALL AYES.) TRUSTEE BERGEN: I'll make a motion to approve number one, Pat Moore on behalf of Spyro Avdoulos as described. TRUSTEE DICKERSON: Second. TRUSTEE KING: All in favor?, (ALL AYES.) TRUSTEE BERGEN: With the inclusion of the non-turf buffer. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: And the septic to be out of our jurisdiction. I just want to make that in the permit. MS. MOORE: Are you going to want an updated, revised survey or are we going to just do it by way of wdtten language in the permit? TRUSTEE DOHERTY: I think we should have a survey showing the septic on it. TRUSTEE BERGEN: We'll need a revised survey to specifically show the new septic and also show the movement of the dry well, the subsequent movement of the drywell, just for clarity for everybody. And the non-turf buffer in there also. MS. MOORE: That's fine. If it was only for that issue I would have said draw it in, TRUSTE,E BERGEN: Yes. Okay, thank you. MS. MOORE: Thank you. WETLAI~D PERMITS: TRUSTEE BERGEN: Number one under wetland permits, DONALD J. PETRIE requests a Wetland Permit to repair the existing stairs to the beach. Located: 16215 Soundview Avenue, Southold. Is there anybody here to comment on this application? MR. PETRIE: if necessary. We would prefer not to have any other people comment. But if necessary, sure. I suggest I start and see where we go. TRUSTEE BERGEN: If you would introduce yourself for the record. MR. PETRIE: If the Board approves, I have a statement; short; one-page. TRUSTEE KING: We just need your name. MR. PETRIE: That's part of my statement. I am Donald J. Petrie. I live at 16215 Soundview Avenue, Southold, and I'm applying for a permit to 'repair our existing stairs to the beach. The stairs were built for our daughter's wedding, August 7, 1982. A While back. They were ruined by a week of virtually steady rain in October, 2005. We built our house in 1973 and worked hard and continuously to stabilize the face of the cliff and to preserve and enhance the natural beauty of our property. We 24¸ File View TooJbar Help 44.-1-5 473883 Sou~old Acti~ R/S: 1 Sch~: 6menpoft School Uyank. Fehm RolYe=: ~ NexlY; 1 F;~ Rm~ldI La~AV 2.~ 55055 CR 48 L~ S~ 0.~5 acle~ To~iAV: 8.~ ~wne~ T~ 2 '' ~ TaxaMe:Value N~me: Fehim UyanA Co~ 8.~0 Bo~: t22~ ~d~ Add ~ 8:~0 Page 813 S~ee 55055 Nolth Rd Sch~ 8.000 ~o~ C~y: Southold. NY Zip: 11971- v Schlafler~ar: 8.000 A~No' 18 5ale T~al: 2 : Site I ~ ~ L~ 0 ot 0 3ook Page 5~ D~e 5~ Pdce 0w~ P~pc~: ! F~il~ Res 12230 813 01/15/03 I U~anik. Fehim Nbhd Cd:0 12201 339 07/2~02 535.~0 N~he Dobbins L~ W~e~:S~r: E~emplion Total: 0 Tem Own ~'pe~al O ~bc~ To~ 3 Va~/ ~ [:~e'~ U~t~ P~ Ty~ ~ove T~ ry~ N~ Diml D~2 SQFT Y~ B~lt ' W . .0 Double click to open a window ~:t F~e Vie~ Toolbar H~p ZONE ZONE X £ S 8~~50,, $7.~ E b6 LO 0 0'1 CHORNO ASSOCIATES architects. SOUTHOLD, ,'.~WiYORK L t £ S 0" 37.: ZONE E LOT 15 W. SURVEY OF & THE WESTERLY 1/2 MAP OF PROPERTY OF H. YOUNG AND R. J. FILE No. 585 FILED SEPTEMBER 11, SITUA TED A T GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-44-0]-05 SCALE 1"=50' JUNE 16, 2006 OF LOT 16 GOODALE 1929 JANUARY 24, 2007 ADDED PROPOSED ADDITIONS FEBRUARY 1, 2007 ADDED PROP, HAY BALES & DRYWELL MARCH 22, 2007 ADDED NON-TURF BUFFER & REVISED PROP. DRYWELL LOCATION MARCH 26, 2007 REVISED AS PER JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E, JUNE 8, 2007 REVISED PROPOSED ADDITION dULY 28, 2007 REVISED AS PER JOSEPH FISCHEFfl, P.E. SEPTEMBER 8, 2007 REVISED PROPOSED GARAGE & SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION DECEMBER 19, 2007 REVISED PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION AREA = 28,149.9.5 sq. fi. (TO TEE LINE) 0.646 SHOWN MAP GENERAL NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:~o EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: .... 5 .... 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 56105C0158 G ZONE VE: COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCI~' HAZARD {WAVE ACTION); BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED ZONE X: AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN APPROVED [;'/-1 BOARD OF TRUST~c~ TOWN OF $OUTHOLD TEST HOLE DATA 28' $outhhold Town PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM NOTES: 1. PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN BY: JOSEPH FISCHETfl. P.E. P.O. BOX 616 SOUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971 2. MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES FOR A 1 TO 4 BEDROOM HOUSE MAXIMUM IS 1,000 GALLONS. 1 TANK; 8' LOND. 4'-3" WIDE, 6'-7" DEEP 3. MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR A 1 TO 4 BEDROOM HOUSE MAXIMUM IS $00 aq ft SIDEWALL AREA. I POOL; 12' DEEP. B' dia. {~ PROPOSED 50~ FUTURE EXPANSION POOL O pROPOSED a' DIA. X 12' DEEP SANITARY L~ACHIND IN30L OBSERVATIONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. 6. THE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM Is TO BE PUMPED CLEAN AND REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.C.D.H.S. STANDARDS. CERTIFIED TO: SPRYO AVDOULOS MARGARITA AVDOULOS N,Y,S, Lic, No, 50467 Nathan Taft Corwmn III Land Surveyor PHONE (651)727-2090 Fox (651)727-1727 S ZONE ZONe. X E' S 87'2~A50'' $7.: E LOT 15 W. SURVEY OF & THE WESTERLY 1/2 MAP OF PROPERTY OF H. YOUNG AND R. J. File No. 585 FILED SEPTEMBER 11, SITUA TED A T GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C, TAX No. 1000-44-01-05 SCALE 1"=50' JUNE 16, 2006 OF LOT 16 GOODALE 1929 JANUARY 24, 2007 ADDED PROPOSED ADDITIONS FEBRUARY 1, 2007 ADDED PROP. HAY BALES & DRYWELL MARCH 22. 2007 ADDED NON-TURF BUFFER & REVISED PROP. DRYWELL LOCATION MARCH 26, 2007 REVISED AS PER JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. dUNE B, 2007 REVISED PROPOSED ADDITION JULY 28, 2007 REVISED AS PER dOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. SEPTEMBER D, 2007 REVISED PROPOSED GARACE & SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION DECEMBER 19, 2007 REVISED PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION AREA = 28,149.95 sq. ff. (TO TIE UNE) 0.646 ac. GENERAL NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:5-2~ EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: - 5 .... 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 5610SC0158 G ZONE VE: COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION); BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED ZONE X: AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM NOTES: 1. PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN BY: JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. P.O. BOX 616 / × \ \ (TEST HOLE DUG BY cD GEOSC ON ~Y 16, 2006) CERTIFIED TO: SPRYO AVDOULOS MARGARITA AVDOULOS N.Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 Nathan Taft Corw,n III Land Surveyor PHONE (651)727-2090 Fax (651)727-1727 SURVEY OF LOT 15 & THE WESTERLY 1/2 OF LOT 16 MAP OF PROPERTY OF W. H. YOUNG AND R. J. GOODALE FILE No, 585 FILED SEPTEMBER 11, 1929 SITUA TED A T GREENPORT .............. SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK lOOO-.-Ol-O SCALE 1"=30' JUNE 16, 2006 JANUARY 24, 2007 ADDED PROPOSED ADDITIONS 2, FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: FLOOD iNSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36103C0158 G ZONE VE' COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCI~ HA~RD (WAVE ACTION); ZONE X. AR~S D~ERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500 Y~R FLOODP~IN ~o.,~, ~, ~,, ,u.~ ~, .0, .~,.~ Land Surveyor 26 189A I , J · iI .=ii.0 '/. ,I WINDOW SOFIJ~DUL~ 2-6 x 4-0 3-0 x 4-0 (2) 2-6 x 5-0 + (2) 2-6 x 1-6 4-0 x 5-0 + 4-0 x 1-6 (2) 3-0 x 5-0 + (3) 3-0 x 1-6 + dr 3-0 x 6-8 3-0 x 5-0 + 3-0 x 1-6 (2) 2-6 x 3-0 + (2) 2-6 x 1-6 2-0 x4-O 4-0 x 5-0 K, (3) 3-0 x 5-0 L 4-0 x 4-0 M 2-0 x 4-0 + 2-0 x 1-6 Q~ /4L// v~T 'q ~Jl]/,/ / " / 13 I~' ' t b 'E 5rOI V4 ! ~47~/~oo~I Mz,/~,/.5Z4 !& *-SCANNING ARTS PAGE 2 ~ 1/31/07 4:30'46 PM 0 - ]1 ,3/- 0 , /~.,r I Z S.C.Tax No 1000-44-01-05 AVDOULOS RESIDENCE PROPOSED ALTERATIONS 54985 NORTH ROAD GREENPORT CHORNO ASSOCIATES architects. SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK DATE: NY 1-31-07 A-1 "- * - SCAN N IN G ARTS PAGE - 1/31/07 4 37:01 PM ,,/ k, \ Ill t'" \ \ \ L1 AVDOULOS R ESIDE'NC 1:: PROPOSED ALTERATIONS 54985 NORTH ROAD GREENPOBT NY CHORNO ASSOCIATES architects. SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK DATE: 1-31--07 --