Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-88.-2-15 THIS JNOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR JS ACRES LOCATED ON SCT,'vIz 1000- IN -t --_7 c�nG At t YiINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) o S o n l Li ►l'—I c rt S Complete application received Q2sIr�? Application reviewed at work session 4.7L OK &7L [OK] Ihro. � Applicant advised of necessary revisions y� ~ W Revised submission received "L01 OK >, Inro. � N � Y �` OK M Ixro. 3 v Sketch plan approval -with conditions U � -It op Lead Agency Coordination SEORA determination 6 162 0 o Sent to Fire Commissioner W �t M o M + Receipt of firewell location ' 0 Notification to applicant to include on final map 0 0 0 Sent to County Planning Commission 5 y Receipt of CountReport uot uro_ OK o M Review of SCPC report 0N0 g Q Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Iero. OK 0 0 0 Y Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewedN.` oK ° 4) . Filed Covenants and Restrictions received F R a Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions T J ;nuGrSCC~eni Of subdivisivu PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS . • BENNETT ORLOW SKL JR Cnal"� �o�gUFFO(,rc Town Hall,53095 State Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS !� Southold,New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS 3 Telephone(631)765-1938 GEORGE ARDRITCcE GiANo ,JR r7j � Fax(631)765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO V PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Subdivision Application Form Name of Subdivision: BCB REALTY HOLDING CORP. Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000- 88-2-15 Type of Subdivision: Major Minor Set-Off Lot-Line Cluster Subdivision: Yes No Hamlet: SOUTHOLD Street Location: N/S MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD, + 600'E/ MIDLAND PKWY. Acreage: 14.174 Number of Lots: 4 Zoning District: AC Date: June 24, 2002 0 0 Please list name, marling address, and phone number for the people below: Applicant: BCB REALTY HOLDING CORP. 110 VINEYARD PLACE PORT JEFFERSON, NY 11777 631-765-1862 Agent handling the application: CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. (Contact Person) 12 MILL POND LANE EAST MORICHES, NY 11940 PHONE/FAX: (631) 878-8951 E-MAIL: cmesiano0optonline.net Property Owner(s): ANELLA AKSCIN 1400 PARADISE POINT ROAD SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 765-0005 JOHN METZGER, L.S. Surveyor: BOX 909 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 765-5020 Engineer: WARREN SAMBACH, P.E. 7675 COX LANE CUTCHOGUE, NY 11934 734-7492 Attorney: ABAGAIL WICKHAM, ESQ. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, NY 11952 298-8353 Other Agent(s): Has this property had a previous application to the Planning Board? Yes No Has this property previously received a SEQRA review? Yes No Have you had any pre-submission conferences with the Planning Board? Yes No Does this application have variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes No Appl. No Date Is this property adjacent to any bodies of water? Yes No Are there any wetlands on the property? Yes No Are there public water mains in an adjacent street? Yes No Is public water proposed for the subdivision? Yes No Is the majority of the property forested? Yes No Is any part of the property in active agricultural use? Yes No Is there an existing or proposed sale of development rights on the property? Yes No Is there a mortgage on the property? Yes No Does the owner own any adjacent properties? Yes No Are there any building permits currently pending on this property? Yes No Signature ofPreparer Z Date: June 24, 2002 A+b m. qg,r, i i'AFTWG & DESIGN + VIEW RD.,P.O. BOX 1675 34 3 HOLD,NY 11971 E75130 OF Qct 1�Rs _1 l slR i4 a� �.!o r as 6 ..m�,. } p BRIDGEHAMPTOU NATIONAL BANK s' 54970 MAIN SD SOUTHOLD;NY 11971 ' 6.0034834■ 'l:02i406667e: 05000059$811` FAM 'C MINI" INC. - .. ....FAK N0. *631-979'n9S1 Iun. 28 2192 09:24AM P1 u�t:irf RE: SCTMrtiiawYork -A rha awrwisi vP d+a above iiAP&Vm pMW.Jd.w.'ew- fw'9 Rorwy 0-0*r.*V", ARtl Inw, rpr*symwm, COON&M Mwiww. ft. w tit o �.?.air:;Ra nr.,�ppl"dt w mr�araeuY for 1!+ ^app aM,hof IV but not IYmied b t o . :3u1!'elkC z tn`j J3p:.r'raeM d H@Wh I*WION and UN Tawn t:i$ouHiai4 ' wb*I6 Baer%AI A'd OAS 43 a nstW41 IPfa, oatxt. Cry` �',1=1:►1 � 1//) _ MR]MCELENTWO-7W PRX 417. ^ao 2002 94:58PM P1 `.. ean•l>Y,M-Iuµ. .J6Y.Ou1.oYL.w Cu�.a,+ylau Guuw in.u-IM�.wu.luCwt^^Iwe � ul. ....�vr.n. ...,nen • M CONaaLT YOue eatww IMM/MMM$iM1I JMesWnov M 1wITAJUI a a,T 0 e1 a3lr aT LAW Tate OMY. � iia1R5028 raae2Gi8 /t 7N19 iNDENTUNa,tnWa the ,p(��M,of July ,daetwa hward wd Jix tp-nne, arrw"N 'iyOFCa R. Le"IH and ILilCio:, J. ,.ibol , resiglrlc at t� pp^ Southold, sullolk County, New York, and 4) ny@ FMWN &SOIN. TI'TUS, residing at 4.3 Dewey Stre*t, Buntingtou, uI. EE Suffolk County, Now York, and .Qi PRAN.T ARRCTTI, reniding at AnntwolA, An44 nik oouotY, , r Mew York, pvty of the Ant pan,Ind _ FRANCIS E. L•1LSOIF awtl AMUL AZSCi1P, his wif0, ae tOnenta by the ontlrety, both F'ee1411116 at SodUho1", 3ut.0011i couhtty, New Yo1dt, yany ct am..I Wu4 Wrl'IIPil67lt dw theµr41 of the&Aµt4 is mlldamlan of Ow (411.00)-_----- --dol hsiallmxyMthe utited tihteland other good and valuable ooNalda ral,loat,pad hf ala paq of the rrm,d part,Ann hnel y annt=A nt e..aMn the pati,of the seroad part.the Dein oT Wcc r sae a9ia93 of the pvy 01 the 380=4 put iGMK1 ALL that earuin plot,pies at peteei of hal,with the hl WMP and iyproTemede thvaoa voted.uhuk, 0'he Aad eWo *AW at Bsyview, near Southold, in the Two of Soutxold, County of Suffolk and state of New York, bounded and dasoribed as follow.: BEGI!WINO at a point on the northerly line of Hain Bayview Road u4 tho 0o.ibhiloobor:7wOr r of land of bho po.:Lioo hereto arkl at the southeasterly corner of land of Adolph R. Trapp and running thence along acid land of Trapp, then &IOM land shown bn ?4ay of 3OawVdd Aurae Sou Llan One" Illed lu ScftUlt. Ouuut'd Clsrk4a Office Juin 26, 19$6 as Nap No. 2575, North 26 desne* ........ .Kf1..mlmtt•. nq e400hvtL 7to.0. a die ten"-of•1.2M.0 feet) thence still clone lots en said filed neo ?forth 26 degrees 06 a.11a1tes 40 arc anus Bast a distance of 137.9 feet; then** alolNt other 1"d of me partisq lie eto, four 00=506, as k ollows t Qew S3 8o0resa ruisYutoe FO osuuado 5.0t, a 113 Lauua u: 1 set; thence 9) South 22 deeree* 07 nin*tes 30 se*ends taest a distance of 438.66 Seth thence (3) 77orth 69 degrees 26 ad.nutes 50 seoondl 47eet a distance of 250.0 fest; thence 11 South, 30 degroes 36 tai-TIVAS 10 seconds west a •1lstenca or L.34 fest to the northerly line Of said Me1M RAYViAw RMAfit khanne al.m1E acid 11n* of Main Bayeiew Poad, North 63 de;;ress 17 minutes 20 second$ hest a diatenoe of 31411.21 feat•. t.^ the point o.4 be;;inuinn. Containing 14.174 aorto. o.Suez ..._, oie ronooe4 yltyryGN 'a ktM1121 P{µ;E 472 ToCkMQt, bb a9 flft tfde and fire¢,if wY,11 46 pa[tY ut the Are Palk ie:aad m my wfto aad; rwda aemthtp lir}bon doomw pxmim*tbi mfr ibtes'thuvof. �t 'COQCI't '#th lb ayyn W=m and all tM estate&Wr*u at dte pwW of the am cart in wA mn MoWuw ;. TO bfM A"m TO MOSSO the prudit buds aaeted sato the nub oe the e A p a.d- t.... «i c op"r O5d 4"W4 of the P"of tha$saw put fere.". c 1 , ,r u., �y. I/f }r! )4 rt S F tai { r Y; AND Iha WW of the Aral pact,in omkQHwn with&dkn 13 of the Lim Law,mmmk thu.IM party of ;� tlu,Jlrk pall w{tleacdra tba eopddasatidn fr mwtaeayaaee mad WIN hold the rt(ht to recd"VA model+, antedn a1•ftipt•tenri M•11e IlynW aM for W Y"•l�•J Y>tye Jw.wl ur Jwto yi mmm aw:10 apppt tA,i° �', dw aaaie Anr iti eye Otitntmr of the wee o!dw:atpcowrwE beloro neioa mY pattof the tow of the w fai e»r.wr wrw Th"Ira°fl4aY"lhaY bt madtned w if it read"parties"wbmerer elle am of t%{adtranrran f 1N:SYtrmwvmtnOS4 the patq d tb Ent put bees dwy=emud thio dad iM dar and Ya AM abotf }*�Y iv.eerwlew er. - } t llr_'sci _^i L.s 'o I�a01 f AU �7tt11 J v on o df1 All A ua ' r rt. ),.. II�Cf`.)Y YIMAf'.... •.IM.1 • rfA1 Y4J . I('14.J':. r - .. _�... JLOryJ��' J!LYMLIV v !rCMULLI rWJL tlJ "rd oti'"wTom two 9S11tt�pLH .., •rAnt a�«aw'roaa,o0tttm is 511A'FOI,Iti- mi 19 /rdty-,Of Jut . . . .f15'QNII73 S:SAHSOIy l 6efote vM one,�I day of July. 1961-, 6a(ere me m� i]tLZ1J tdl$CI'1 -"�1i�;. a �i`L°, S2"Mnd PR MIS N. An co, onw of �fol!gid,1ffiffiaoltalWldaalw dwriMd in ud wM tw no 1+lunu Y be/,(M tadtwt(l,ttk adW!bd In and wlao Yipiodrytim teeut d_Wa tee, lwxl, and aeYroalMgd that mrseuted this faateg laltna lad a.tmowledgad tbsti ., 8. alry ,atsr I uq be�Alry.n WWW N", { 10.'ba rnrla'd' A� Y(Ww nr4a'b4nro Mneh.e^!.1`rg +�Cao '• �. i .,asr• T..Ti° i L�,.g[ATiM M WI't9ag,QOtlMIY OF': r, .NAr Ce MlW"U.coYrfrY OF YrS u ; Y qday.of 19 .MMM a. a WIY WiteA+a ..t )o tqe Jtdown,aho,.y�r�by mo duly swotu,did d"•od fha wbedbing ahntaa to the futrgailag Inapumbnt wrtlt, . uy.that Su r•Jdn atNn whwn 1901 penoLuilY aXI1040 ,+alto. bdOf lrf tri duly awora,did depose mid say that bo raaidu at a. 5 he is the - eWt he Ilaowi tM t»+pnrnrion'desedMd to be the individual do wl wLiok•a euwl loisKo�eg haarumeot i tlut ht k kaOMe tW wl td.slid0.d aha fotegatag mepontiant thu the sal ALW4 dwribol It tud who ctttuInKlutuanrg x f •o'WC ftutnusMnt to ettah eayor.h MI; thu ft that he. eatd subw@tng *Maas wY prescot lard .410,d'th.t.IN aJp� _aaou tbtrAo by hire ardY.I at dw•oma t uuaubscribed h Mimi w witless oeteay a^ Re �rr h r 4 g r �d40 Adv a AtN�ri�aaa�9Rg -� ave` t{ o C � Y t� twt�f Ndb@i S0 100E tT'-'N►J "a laid - 1NOH-" Ji • Avvi.teAN'r • TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohlbl to conflicts of interest on the Dart of .town oCf leers and employees. The Pur ose of this form is to provide Information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of Interest and allow it to take whatever act an is necessary to avoid same. 'p :YOUR NAME: 1 kn; J✓1_AA 3(Z QE,�L�i HN-0'-Wb C-og (Last name, ficat name, middle initial, uolesn you are applyinq In the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, tnd Icite the other person 's of company 's name. ) NATURE OF APPLICATION! (L'hec_1< all khat apply. ) Tax grievance Variance Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or official map _ Other (If "Other," name the activity. ) no you personally (or through your company, spoons, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold7 'Relationship- Includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "nusineas Interest- means a business, including a partnership, III . . which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or emptoymest by) a corporation In which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the — shares. YRS NO A...,_ If you answered "YES," complete the balance of title form and date and sign where indicated. Name of personemployedby the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relatlonsh.Ip between yourself (the applicant) and the town officer or. employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe In the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibllaq, parent, or child is (check allthat apply) , A) the owner of greater than '5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicaul; . to a corporation) ; _ D) the leqal or beneficial owner of any interest is a . noncorporate entity (when theapplicant is not a _ corporation) ; C) an officer, dlrecl:or , partner, Or employee of tl,e applicant; or U) the actual aPplicauh. DESCRIP'IIoN OF RELATIONSIIiP Suhml LLed thin da Signature • 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, In an orderly manner,whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, marry who have knowledge In one particular area may riot be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is Intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly,comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and Its site. By Identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impaCt is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it Is a potentially-large Impact. The forth also Identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any Impact in Part 2 is Identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually Important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this protea: ❑Part 1 ❑Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the Information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 If appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and Importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s)and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant Impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared." ❑C. The project may result in one or more large and Important impacts that may have a significant Impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer signature of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency nature Preparer different from responsible officer) Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Minor Subdivision Application-BCH Realty Holding Corp. Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 13455 Main Bayview Road Southold Suffolk County Name of Applicant/Sponsor BCB Realty Holding Corp. Address 110 Vineyard Place City/PO Port Jefferson State NY Zip Code 11777 Business Telephone 631-765-1862 Name of Owner(if different) Anell Akscin Address 1400 Paradise Point Road City/p0 Southold State NY Zip Code 11971 Business Telephone 765-0005 Description of Action: The applicant proposes to create a 4 lot minor subdivision from the 14.174 acre parcel located at N/S Main Bayview Road,+600'e/ Midland Parkway. The proposed lots will be at least 140,000 square(3.22 A)esch. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑✓ Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 14.174 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres 3 acres Forested 0 acres 0 acres Agricultural(includes orchards,cropland, pasture, etc.) 14 acres 0 acres Wetland(Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0 acres 0 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres Unvegetated (Rack, earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres 4 acres Other(Indicate type) n/a acres n/a acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s)on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑Weli drained 100%of site ❑Moderately well drained 0%of site. ❑Poorly drained 0%of site b. If any agricultural land is Involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes ❑ No a. What is depth to bedrock N/A (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ❑0-10% 100% 010- 15% 0% ❑ 15%or greater 0 % 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? 11 Yes El No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ❑o No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 13'(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer ❑Yes No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist In the project area? ❑Yes ❑� No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain arty spec•plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ❑—! No According to: (dentg each les: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land fors on the project site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes,other geological formations? ❑Yes 19 No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes ❑r. No If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be Important to the community? ❑Yes E]No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NONE a. Name of Stream and name of River to which It is tributary N/A 16. takes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A b. Size(in acres): N/A Page 4 of 21 0 0 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Byes ❑ No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? El Yes ❑No b. If YES, will Improvements be necessary to allow connection? ElYes ❑No 18. Is the site located In an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes E]No 19. Is the site located In or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes Me No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes re No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill In dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 14.174 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 14.174 acres initially; 14.174 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 3 acres. d. Length of project, In miles: <1 (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, Indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 20 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 4 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 0 0 0 0 Ultimately 4 0 0 0 I. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 80' width; 120' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 344 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth,etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. WIII disturbed areas be reclaimed ❑Yes 11 No MN/A a. If yes, for what Intended purpose Is the site being reclaimed! N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? FYes ❑No C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? FYes ❑ No 4. How many acres of vegetation(trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? N/A acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old)or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes 0 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction:_months, (Including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 5 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2003 year, (Including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 3 month 2005 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes MNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ❑No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. WIII project require relocation of any projects or facilities?❑Yes ❑No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal Involved? ❑Yes ❑No a. If yes, Indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial,etc)and amount ROAD AND ROOF RUN-OFF b. Name of water body Into which effluent will be discharged NONE- ON SITE CONTAINMENT PROPOSED 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ❑No Type HOUSEHOLD SANITARY WASTE 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?❑Yes❑No If yes,explain: 15. Is project or arty portion of project located In a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes QNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑� Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name TOWN LANDFILL/FRANS ST ; location CI ITCHOGUE d. WIII any wastes not go Into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑ No Page 6of21 e. If yes,explain: RECYCLING OF GLASS,METALS,PAPER MATERIALS,PLASTICS AND YARD WASTE 17. WIII the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ❑� No a. If yes, what Is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what Is the anticipated site life? years. L kNM%TED ' - 18. WIII project use herbicides or pesticides? no ❑No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? 13 yes MNo 20. Will project produce operating nolse exceeding the local ambient nolse levels? ❑Yes 10No 21. WIII project result in an Increase in energy use? a Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate type(s) ELECTRICITY HOME HEATING FUEL 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1200 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ❑E No If yes,explain: Page 7 of 21 0 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town,Village Board ❑Yes El No SUBDMSION APPR. City, Town, Village Planning Board E]Yes [:3No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes a No City, County Health Department Q Yes ❑ No SUBDMSION APPR. Other local Agencies Yes El No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes El No State Agencies ❑Yes Q No Federal Agencies ❑Yes [j]No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action Involve a planning or zoning decisbn9 ElYes ❑ No 9 Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑New/revision of master plan Subdivision ❑Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑Other Page 8 of 21 0 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? JAC 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site If developed as permitted by the present zoning? 7 RESIDENTIAL HOME SITES 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ❑Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a Y4 mile radius of proposed action? AC ,R-40 VACANT LAND,AGRICULTUARAL LAND,SINGLE FAMILY HOMES a. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? ❑i Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how marry lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 140.000 SQ.FC. Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes M No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services(recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑� Yes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 0 Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result In the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes IF]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Detais Attach any additional Information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above Is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicantisponsor Name BCB REALTY HOLDING CORP. Date 6/24/2002 X2 12 Signature n tLp, y .+� AfZ-e- Title PA?-Ti-eE If the action Is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 i • PART 2- PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) I In completing the forth the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. 1 The Impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. I The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. I In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions(Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. Q If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact.If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. I. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ❑ YES ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes []No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes [:]No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 &U�r y L **** RECEIPT **** Date: 07/05/2002 Receipt# : <<Number>> Fee Code : Application Fees CM Fee Type: 130—lb P(7R(.-Y tfauJ AIG CO'ZP 8 Amount Paid : Received $ 3,000.00 Permit/Lic# : Name : East, End Drafting P O Box 1675 Southold, NY 11971 Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk JUL U 20OZ ST,thold Town Board • Town Of Southold • P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 07/05/02 Receipt#: 3483 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $3,000.00 Check#: 3483 Total Paid: $3,000.00 Name: East, End Drafting & Design P O Box 1675 Southold, NY 11971 Clerk ID: LINDAC Intemal ID:58970 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSZ.� P.O.Bos 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold,NY 11971 Chair Z OFFICE LOCATION: '1F Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J.CREEMERS 'y4y01 �.a054375 State Route 25 KENNETH L.EDWARDS (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone: 631765-:1938 Fax: 631765-31343 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Supervisor Joshua Y. Horton and the Southold Town Board From: The Southold Town Planning Board Re: The Great Hog Neck Generic Environmental Impact Statement Date: February 15, 2005 The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Mone'ay, February 14, 2005, adopted the follo�ing resolutions: WHEREAS, in the years 2001 and 2002, the Planning Board had received applications for six major subdivisions and one miner subdivision on the Great Hog Neck Peninsula; and . % C WHEREAS, prior to issuing any further approvals for the proposed subdivisions, the Planning Board required that a Generic Environmental Impact Statement be prepared and submitted for the proposed actions; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency had determined that the proposed actions may have a significant impact on the environment and adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed actions; and WHEREAS, four of the subdivision applications were amended to conform to the moratorium application exemption requirements and were approved by the Planning Board; and qlt �r�C C 3, 2!7 7nnn tlha No. 18, 2004 "A Local Law in relation to a new Chapter A106 — Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold"; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that pursuant to Chapter A106, the Planning Board classifies the remaining pending applications, BCB Realty Holding Corp., Tall Pines at Paradise Point and Southview Custom Homes as Standard Subdivisions; therefore, be it further . I Great Hog Neck— Page Two—2/15/05 RESOLVED, that the applications must be revised and re-submitted to conform with "Chapter A106 — Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold" in order for the Planning Board to process the applications; and be it further RESOLVED, that the proposed subdivisions are void as proposed and, therefore, the requirement for a Generic Environmental Impact Statement of the Hog's Neck Peninsula is no longer valid and the Positive Declaration is rendered obsolete and closed. Very truly yours, Yeyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor Southold Town Board Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Southold Town Bo4rd of Trustees Southold Town building Department Southold Town Conservation Advisory Committee Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Environmental Notice Bulletin Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 1 ' • �gUFF014, MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O.Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE C Southold,NY 11971 Chair y OFFICE LOCATION: Town Annex WILLIAM J.CREMERS y� • � 54375 tate Route 25 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �'� �'� (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone:631765-1938 Fax: 631765-31343 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 15, 2005 Ms. Catherine Mesiano 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches, NY 11940 Re: Proposed Subdivision BCB Realty Holding Corp. Located on the north side of Main Bayview Rd., ±300' east of Midland Parkway, in Southold SCTM#1000-88-2-15 Zoning District: A-C Dear Ms. M76iano: The following resolutions were adopted at a(meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 14, 2005: WHEREAS, this subdivision is for 4 lots on 14.174 acres; and WHEREAS, prior to issuing any approvals for any proposed subdivision located on the Great Hog Neck Peninsula, the Planning Board required that a Generic Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for this area; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2002, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency has determined that the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment when cumulatively assessed with all proposed development and adopted a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on August 24, 2004, the Town of Southold Town Board adopted Local Law No. 18, 2004 "A Local Law.in relation to a new Chapter A106 — "Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold"; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that pursuant to Chapter A106, the Planning Board hereby classifies this application as a Standard Subdivision; and be it further BCB Realty Holding Corp. — Page Two — 2/15/05 RESOLVED, that the application must be revised and re-submitted to conform with Chapter A106 — "Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold" in order for the Planning Board to process the application; and be it further RESOLVED, that this Standard Subdivision is no longer valid for the action and the Positive Declaration is rendered obsolete and closed. Upon written request, the Planning Board may credit previously paid application fees towards the new application. The determination will be based upon the amount of work that has been accomplished to date on the application. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, / erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Joshua Y. Horton, Supervisor Southold Town Board Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Conservation Advisory Committee Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Environmental Notice Bulletin Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 14-12-8(3/99)-9c SEQR State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Generic EIS Determination of Significance Project Number Date: 1000-88-2-15 Date: August 12, 2002 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act)of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency,has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant impact on the environment and that a Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: BCB Realty Holding Corp. SEQR Status: Type 1 Unlisted X Scoping: No Yes X If yes, indicate how scoping will be conducted: A public scoping session will be conducted at the Town of Southold Town Hall located at P.O. Box 1179, 53095 State Road 25, Southold,New York Description of Action: The proposed action is to subdivide a 14.15 acre parcel into 4 single family residential lots. The subject parcel is a tree nursery, Location: The site is located on the Great Hog Neck peninsula in Southold. The parcel is located on the north side of Main Bayview Road 300 feet east of Midland Parkway in Southold. SEQR Positive Declaration Page 2 of 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: This proposed action may cause a significant adverse impact on the local environment individually and/or jointly when assessed cumulatively with the five additional,pending subdivisions, as noted below. A comprehensive environmental and infrastructure review must be conducted to determine the cumulative impacts to the parcel, community and the Great Hog Relevant areas of environmental concern include: (1) The impacts to and potential loss of unique,wildlife habitat, species and valuable wildlife corridors. (2) The potential impacts to potential endangered, threatened and special concern wildlife species that may occur on site. (3) The potential impact on open space to the community. (4) The potential impact of sanitary systems on groundwater. (5) The potential impact of increased water demand upon the existing water supply infrastructure. (6) The increase in traffic and trip generations on the peninsula assessed to: local traffic patterns, limited ingress and egress points to the mainland and evacuation routes. (7) The potential impacts to community services. (8) The potential cumulative impacts of the proposed action together with the four pending subdivisions; Forestbrook at Bayview (17 single family residential lots on 37.77 acres), Zoumas at Bayview (22 single family residential lots on 41.10 acres)Bayview Overlook(4-7 single family lots on 16.34 acres) and Dayton Farms(4 lots on 13.45 acres), Southview Custom Homes (4 lots on 13.3 acres) (9) The assessment of a no action alternative. The complete Long Environmental Assessment Form and a Resolution passed by the Southold Planning Board on June 25, 2002 supporting the action is attached for your perusal . For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner Address: P.O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold, New York 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 extension 243 A copy of this notice must be sent to: Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-1750 Chief Executive Officer, Town/CityNillage of Any person requesting a copy All Involved agencies Applicant (If any) Environmental Notice Bulletin, Room 538, 50 Wolf Road, Albany,NY 12233-1750 To: Town Board of the Town of Southold From: The Town of Southold Planning Board Date: June 25, 2002 Re: HOG NECK PENINSULA SEQRA COORDINATION, INTENT TO ASSUME LEAD AGENCY INTENT TO REQUIRE A GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT The following resolutions were passed during the June 24, 2002 Special Meeting. WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board has received a large number of subdivision applications on the Hog Neck Peninsula within recent months, and these applications are simultaneously pending review and decision by the Planning Board, and WHEREAS, these projects are interrelated to the extent that one project on its own may not overtax environmental resources; however, the combined effect of development may result in adverse environmental impacts, thus indicating the potential for cumulative impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board recognizes that while there is zoning as a guiding land use development control, that the combination of subdivisions currently proposed, and the potential for further subdivision pursuant to current zoning, may in fact exceed the resource carrying capacity of the peninsula due to it's unique geographic, environmental and planning considerations, and as a result may result in significant adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the Board's responsibilities as the stewards of land use under the Zoning Code to consider the environmental consequences of land use decision making, and further that SEQRA Part 617.10 indicates that a generic EIS may be used to assess the environmental impacts of: Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution (1) a number of separate actions in a given geographic area which, if considered singly, may have minor impacts, but if considered together may have significant impacts; or (2) a sequence of actions, contemplated by a single agency or individual; or (3) separate actions having generic or common impacts; or (4) an entire program or plan having wide application or restricting the range of future alternative policies or projects, including new or significant changes to existing land use plans, development plans, zoning regulations or agency comprehensive management plans the Planning Board finds that many if not all of these criteria exist with respect to Hog Neck, and WHEREAS, more specifically, the Planning Board finds that, the pending applications represent consideration of a number of separate actions in a limited resource area; that the approval of these actions represents a sequence of actions which may have a significant impact; that these separate actions have generic or common impacts; and that the approval of piecemeal subdivision of land on the Hog Neck peninsula may foreclose the possibility of alternative conservation land use, coordination of resource protection, and may in fact cumulatively overtax the environmental resources associated with Hog Neck, and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold has a Master Plan and a series of studies, planning initiatives and a record of decisions which establish the Comprehensive Plan of the Town; specific studies which establish the planning framework of the Town of Southold are identified below: • Land Use and Groundwater Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton (Cornell, 1983) • Southold Demonstration Project (Cornell, 1983) • Town Master Plan Update (1985) • Long Island Comprehensive Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan (1992) • Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Study (1994) • Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan (1996) • Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program (1999) • Town of Southold Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (1999) • County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study (1999) • Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (1999) • Town Water Supply Management &Watershed Protection Strategy (2000) • Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2001) the Planning Board is aware of these studies, and coupled with the zoning map and Zoning Code of the Town of Southold, seeks to maintain orderly development within the purview of the Board's functions, and 2 Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution WHEREAS, the Planning Board is aware of an overriding set of goals and desires represented by four (4) themes which are embodied in land use documents and regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of the Town, specifically noted as follows: (1) The preservation of farmland and agriculture, (2) The preservation of open and recreational space, (3) The preservation of the rural, cultural, commercial and historical character of the hamlets and surrounding communities, and (4) The preservation of the natural environment. the Planning Board finds that responsible land use decision making must consider these themes, and WHEREAS, the potential for simultaneous development of the current pending applications, and the potential for further development of vacant lands on the Hog Neck peninsula, poses a significant adverse environmental effect upon the resources of Hog Neck, and further may result in a conflict with the four (4) themes that establish the goals and desires of the Town of Southold in terms of the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the Hog Neck Peninsula is a unique land mass comprised of approximately 2 '/2 square miles, that has limited resources, and is independent in many ways from the main body of Southold Town, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck has only two points of access resulting in concern over emergency access as well as the general capacity of the roads to sustain combined development pressure of the pending projects as well as further development of other vacant lands, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is surrounded by water and constrained with respect to access, and as a result, emergency service response, evacuation, flood zone management, and other service and community protection aspects associated with extensive development of Hog Neck warrant consideration, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is adjacent to the Peconic Estuary Reserve, and land use and development must be carefully considered with respect to potential impacts on the Peconic Estuary, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is surrounded by tidal waters and tidal wetlands, and has a number of interior tidal creeks including Goose Creek, Corey Creek and Cedar Beach Creek, comprising vast areas of marine waters and tidal marsh/wetlands, which are productive ecological resources with significant environmental benefit in terms of habitat, food production, stormwater and flood control, with the 3 Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution recognition that these resources and adjacent protective buffers should be protected, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck includes as many as twelve (12) interior State designated freshwater wetland systems (which are grouped and comprised of more than one feature in many cases), and that these systems provide habitat, water resource benefit, and potential inter-linkages in terms of species migration and support, with recognition that stresses to these resources could result in adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is an independent groundwater reservoir, which is subject to salt water intrusion, encroachment of the salt water interface, and depletion for water supply, as well as impact from groundwater discharge, which may result from over-intensified development, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck, due to freshwater and tidal wetlands, as well as open space and upland habitats, is a haven for wildlife resources which depend on the natural environment and expanses of natural resources associated with the peninsula, and that intensified use may result in impacts to these ecological resources, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck includes rural, open space, agricultural and natural resource qualities, as well as cultural resources; these are resources which are embraced by the Town under the Comprehensive Plan and further are resources which may be adversely affected by over-intensification of development, and WHEREAS, as a result of the traffic, water resource, ecological, open space and cultural resources associated with the overall peninsula, and the potential impacts thereto, the Planning Board finds that consideration of individual projects without interrelated review would be contrary to SEQRA, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold in view of the information available with respect to the Hog Neck peninsula, and the pending projects as well as developable land, finds it would be irresponsible to review the current applications in a piecemeal fashion, and that this would essentially result in a segmented review of a series of actions that are expected to result in cumulative and generic impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has conducted a coordinated review with involved agencies of individual actions including both Type I and Unlisted actions, and has assumed lead agency as a result of their role in the review and approval of subdivision applications, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has authority to use planned residential development (cluster) provisions with respect to protection of sensitive environmental resources, and further routinely uses conservation subdivision, purchase of 4 J r Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution development rights, and other land use, environmental and zoning techniques to analyze, mitigate and reduce impacts consistent with the Town Comprehensive Plan and in compliance with SEQRA, and WHEREAS, such techniques are available with respect to Hog Neck; however, piecemeal review of applications does not allow for the effective use of such techniques to adequately protect sensitive environmental resources. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby issues this resolution as a mechanism for coordinated review with involved agencies with respect to the combined actions and resultant development pressure on the Hog Neck peninsula, and that this resolution and the background set forth shall be used in lieu of an Environmental Assessment Form given the detailed account of the environmental sensitivity of Hog Neck identified herein, the geographic area involved and the multitude of pending applications, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Planning Board, after a period of thirty (30) days intends to assume lead agency status with respect to pending subdivision review of applications, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board finds that a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) is appropriate and intends to issue the appropriate determination to require such document for the Hog Neck peninsula, considering the current pending applications which are expected to result in cumulative and generic impacts, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board authorizes the secretary to the Board to file this notice with the following parties: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead Town Board of the Town of Southold Town of Southold Trustees Ms. Betsey Dickerson, Applicant Patricia Moore, Esq., Applicant Agent Abigail Wickham, Esq., Applicant Agent Richard Lark, Esq., Applicant Agent Cathy Mesiano, Expeditor, Applicant Agent 5 • * gueF 60JtHC>4O /i fr 'Rf DIStR SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 908. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (631) 765-4305 August 21, 2002 FAX (631) 765-5076 Mr. Mark Terry ° AUG 2 2 2002 '' Senior Environmental Planner Town of Southold Planning Board South®Id 1bwn PO Box 1179 Planping®®lkrd Southold, NY 11971 Re: SCTM# 1000-88-2-15; BCB Realty Holding Corp. Dear Mr. Terry: The Southold Fire District Board of Commissioners has reviewed the map for the above listed property. It has been determined that there is adequate fire protection for this property. This decision is valid for one year from the date of this letter. Sincerely, N1a*V---- Cynthia Caprise Fire District Secretary PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o�OS�FFO(/rc0 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ti� Gy P.O. Box 1179 Chairman o Town Hall, 63095 State Route 25 y Z Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS • 'F KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 K MARTIN SIDOR,JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE August 20, 2002 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Catherine Mesiano 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches,NY 11940 Re: Town of Southold Moratorium Major and Minor Subdivisions Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Group SCTM# 1000-88-2-15 Minor Subdivision of Baxter at Griffing Street SCTM# 1000-102-5-9.3 Minor Subdivision of Ralph Caselnova SCTM# 1000-18-3-9.8 &9.9 Minor Subdivision of Nickart Realty SCTM# 1000-52-2-13 Minor Subdivision of Peconic Design and Construction SCTM# 1000-63-3-18.1 Major Subdivision Bayview Overlook. SCTM# 1000-79-5-20.6&20.7 Dear Ms. Mesiano: As you are the agent for the above applications please be advised that a Local Law was adopted at the regular meeting of the Southold Town Board on August 13,2002 entitled "Local Law to a Temporary Moratorium on Processing,Review of, and making decisions on applications for Major Subdivisions,Minor Subdivisions and Special Use Permits containing Dwelling Units in the Town of Southold". The Local Law Number 3. 2002 is attached. The Local Law states that the Planning Board Office "shall not accept for review, continue review,hold a hearing or make any decision upon any application for a subdivision, whether that subdivision application was submitted prior to or after the effective date of this law"for a duration of six months beginning August 13, 2002. The above applications are subject to the Local Law. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact my office at 631465- 1938. Sincerely, A Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman Enc. Cc: Joshua Y Horton, Supervisor Town Board Planning Board Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Kathleen Murphy, Assistant Town Attorney PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS gUFFO(,�c BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. h� goy P.O.Box 1179 Chairman C Town Hall,53095 State Route 25 w Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN SIDOR,JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 13, 2002 Ms. Catherine Mesiano 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches, NY 11940 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Holding Corp. Located on the north side of Main Bayview Rd., ±300' east of Midland Parkway in Southold SCTM#1000-88-2-15 Zone A-C Dear Mrs. Mesiano: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 12, 2002: WHEREAS, this subdivision is for 4 lots on 14.174 acres located on the north side of Main Bayview Road, ± 300' east of Midland Parkway in Southold; and WHEREAS, prior to issuing any approvals for any proposed subdivision located on the Great Hog Neck Peninsula, the Planning Board is requiring that a Generic Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for the Great Hog Neck Peninsula; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Generic Environmental Impact Statement; therefore BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 7 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as the lead agency, and as lead agency has determined that the proposed action may have significant impact on the environment when cumulatively assessed with all other proposed development on the Great Hog Neck Peninsula and adopts a Positive Declaration for the action. Enclosed is a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. BCB Realty Holding Corp. — Page Two — 8/13/02 Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, � C� qk Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor Southold Town Board Greg Yakaboski, Esq.,Town Attorney Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Conservation Advisory Committee Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Environmental Notice Bulletin Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o�pS�fFO(,�-co BENNETT ORI,ORBI{1, TR. Z` G P.O.Box 11.79 Chairman p Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J.CREMERS co Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS15 Telephone(631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Section 617.8 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 15th day of August, 2002 on the question of the following: 3:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the Hog Neck Peninsula. The geographic boundaries of the study encompass all waterbodies and lands located to the south and east of Goose Creek and Elizabeth Lane and east of Corey Creek in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. 4:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed minor subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo. The property is located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-53-1-9 Draft Scopes are available on the Town of Southold's Web Site (www.northfork.net/southold) and the Planning Board Office. Dated: 8/5/02 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2002 AND AUGUST 15, 2002 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU CORES SENT TO Suffolk Times FROM : SOUTHILD TOWN PLFA INICI BOARD FAX NO. : 631 765 3136 Rug• 05 2202 10:42M PI P.O. BoX 117 l 53095 Route i Southold.NY ' 1971 Phone: (631) 55-1938 • • Fax: (631)761 3136 E-Mail: plannl 19,t.outhold.org Fax 1b: The Si olk"rimes From Valerie Scopazcera Fait Peace; 2 ------ --- pbo„m new. 8!5102 ne: Legal , :for 8!8/02&6115102 eel Editmr Vrpvnt r Revlew Please Comrnont Please Reply Ax Aegaested Please print tl folb3wing legal ads in the 818102 &8115102 edifaons.Thanks. Scoping Sew , ns- 100 p.m. He s Nock Area 4:00 p.m. Mi Izo Minor Subdivision Kindly ackm rledge receipt by signing below and faxing cover letter back. Received by Date. T9 39Vd M3I.A3IS3HIl LBZCEF�:TF9 69:©T Z;PMI0/90 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS O�SpFFO(,�co BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �Q` Gy P.O. Box 1179 Chairman G Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS O .jc Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGEIE LAT A JR y�O,( �� Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Section 617.8 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 15th day of August, 2002 on the question of the following: 3:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the Hog Neck Peninsula. The geographic boundaries of the study encompass all waterbodies and lands located to the south and east of Goose Creek and Elizabeth Lane and east of Corey Creek in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. 4:00 P.M. Scoping Session for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed minor subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo. The property is located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-53-1-9 Draft Scopes are available on the Town of Southold's Web Site (www.northfork.net/southold) and the Planning Board Office. Dated: 8/5/02 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 6th day of August, 2002 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 8/15/02 Scoping Sessions: 3:00 p.m. Scoping Session for the Hogs Neck Area, Southold 4:00 p.m. Scoping Session for the proposed Minor Subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this day of 60' . 2002. otary Public JOYCE M.WILKINS Notary Public,State of New York No.4952246,Suffolk County Term Expires June 12, ;L0 3 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o�OgaFFOL I-co BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. h� Gym P.O. Box 1179 Chairman C < Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J.CREMERS may, �2 Southold, New York 11971-0969 KENNETH L. EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938 6B(3R6EPBiitEts4fk3of,—JIt y ` Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO MARTIN SIDOR, JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Coordinating Agencies From: The Planning Board Date: August 5, 2002 Re: Hog's Neck Peninsula Generic Environmental Impact Statement Please find the attached passed resolution and draft scope for the above referenced project for your perusal and comment. A scoping session is set for August 15, 2002 at 3:00 pm at the Southold Town Hall Meeting Room, 53095 Main Road, Southold. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call our staff at (631)-765-1938. Enc. Cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor Town of Southold Town Board Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney Town of Southold Board of Trustees Scott Hilary, Southold Conservation Advisory Committee Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Pete Harris,Highway Superintendent Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,Albany Marian Sumner,Applicant Agent Charles Cuddy, Esq., Applicant Agent Patricia Moore,Esq. Applicant Agent Richard Lark, Esq. Applicant Agent Cathy Mesiano, Applicant Agent Betsey Dickerson,Applicant Chic Voorhis,Nelson, Pope&Voorhis, LLC To: Town Board of the Town of Southold From: The Town of Southold Planning Board Date: June 25, 2002 Re: HOG NECK PENINSULA SEQRA COORDINATION, INTENT TO ASSUME LEAD AGENCY INTENT TO REQUIRE A GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT The following resolutions were passed during the June 24, 2002 Special Meeting. WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board has received a large number of subdivision applications on the Hog Neck Peninsula within recent months, and these applications are simultaneously pending review and decision by the Planning Board, and WHEREAS, these projects are interrelated to the extent that one project on its own may not overtax environmental resources; however, the combined effect of development may result in adverse environmental impacts, thus indicating the potential for cumulative impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board recognizes that while there is zoning as a guiding land use development control, that the combination of subdivisions currently proposed, and the potential for further subdivision pursuant to current zoning, may in fact exceed the resource carrying capacity of the peninsula due to it's unique geographic, environmental and planning considerations, and as a result may result in significant adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the Board's responsibilities as the stewards of land use under the Zoning Code to consider the environmental consequences of land use decision making, and further that SEQRA Part 617.10 indicates that a generic EIS may be used to assess the environmental impacts of: Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution (1) a number of separate actions in a given geographic area which, if considered singly, may have minor impacts, but if considered together may have significant impacts; or (2) a sequence of actions, contemplated by a single agency or individual; or (3) separate actions having generic or common impacts; or (4) an entire program or plan having wide application or restricting the range of future alternative policies or projects, including new or significant changes to existing land use plans, development plans, zoning regulations or agency comprehensive management plans the Planning Board finds that many if not all of these criteria exist with respect to Hog Neck, and WHEREAS, more specifically, the Planning Board finds that, the pending applications represent consideration of a number of separate actions in a limited resource area; that the approval of these actions represents a sequence of actions which may have a significant impact; that these separate actions have generic or common impacts; and that the approval of piecemeal subdivision of land on the Hog Neck peninsula may foreclose the possibility of alternative conservation land use, coordination of resource protection, and may in fact cumulatively overtax the environmental resources associated with Hog Neck, and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold has a Master Plan and a series of studies, planning initiatives and a record of decisions which establish the Comprehensive Plan of the Town; specific studies which establish the planning framework of the Town of Southold are identified below: • Land Use and Groundwater Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton (Cornell, 1983) • Southold Demonstration Project (Cornell, 1983) • Town Master Plan Update (1985) • Long Island Comprehensive Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan (1992) • Southold Town Stewardship Task Force Study (1994) • Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan (1996) • Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program (1999) • Town of Southold Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (1999) • County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study (1999) • Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (1999) • Town Water Supply Management &Watershed Protection Strategy (2000) • Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (2001) the Planning Board is aware of these studies, and coupled with the zoning map and Zoning Code of the Town of Southold, seeks to maintain orderly development within the purview of the Board's functions, and 2 Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution WHEREAS, the Planning Board is aware of an overriding set of goals and desires represented by four (4) themes which are embodied in land use documents and regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of the Town, specifically noted as follows: (1) The preservation of farmland and agriculture, (2) The preservation of open and recreational space, (3) The preservation of the rural, cultural, commercial and historical character of the hamlets and surrounding communities, and (4) The preservation of the natural environment. the Planning Board finds that responsible land use decision making must consider these themes, and WHEREAS, the potential for simultaneous development of the current pending applications, and the potential for further development of vacant lands on the Hog Neck peninsula, poses a significant adverse environmental effect upon the resources of Hog Neck, and further may result in a conflict with the four (4) themes that establish the goals and desires of the Town of Southold in terms of the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the Hog Neck Peninsula is a unique land mass comprised of approximately 2 %2 square miles, that has limited resources, and is independent in many ways from the main body of Southold Town, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck has only two points of access resulting in concern over emergency access as well as the general capacity of the roads to sustain combined development pressure of the pending projects as well as further development of other vacant lands, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is surrounded by water and constrained with respect to access, and as a result, emergency service response, evacuation, flood zone management, and other service and community protection aspects associated with extensive development of Hog Neck warrant consideration, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is adjacent to the Peconic Estuary Reserve, and land use and development must be carefully considered with respect to potential impacts on the Peconic Estuary, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is surrounded by tidal waters and tidal wetlands, and has a number of interior tidal creeks including Goose Creek, Corey Creek and Cedar Beach Creek, comprising vast areas of marine waters and tidal marshtwetlands, which are productive ecological resources with significant environmental benefit in terms of habitat, food production, stormwater and flood control, with the 3 Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution recognition that these resources and adjacent protective buffers should be protected, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck includes as many as twelve (12) interior State designated freshwater wetland systems (which are grouped and comprised of more than one feature in many cases), and that these systems provide habitat, water resource benefit, and potential inter-linkages in terms of species migration and support, with recognition that stresses to these resources could result in adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck is an independent groundwater reservoir, which is subject to salt water intrusion, encroachment of the salt water interface, and depletion for water supply, as well as impact from groundwater discharge, which may result from over-intensified development, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck, due to freshwater and tidal wetlands, as well as open space and upland habitats, is a haven for wildlife resources which depend on the natural environment and expanses of natural resources associated with the peninsula, and that intensified use may result in impacts to these ecological resources, and WHEREAS, Hog Neck includes rural, open space, agricultural and natural resource qualities, as well as cultural resources; these are resources which are embraced by the Town under the Comprehensive Plan and further are resources which may be adversely affected by over-intensification of development, and WHEREAS, as a result of the traffic, water resource, ecological, open space and cultural resources associated with the overall peninsula, and the potential impacts thereto, the Planning Board finds that consideration of individual projects without interrelated review would be contrary to SEQRA, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold in view of the information available with respect to the Hog Neck peninsula, and the pending projects as well as developable land, finds it would be irresponsible to review the current applications in a piecemeal fashion, and that this would essentially result in a segmented review of a series of actions that are expected to result in cumulative and generic impacts, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has conducted a coordinated review with involved agencies of individual actions including both Type I and Unlisted actions, and has assumed lead agency as a result of their role in the review and approval of subdivision applications, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has authority to use planned residential development (cluster) provisions with respect to protection of sensitive environmental resources, and further routinely uses conservation subdivision, purchase of 4 Hog Neck Peninsula SEQRA Resolution development rights, and other land use, environmental and zoning techniques to analyze, mitigate and reduce impacts consistent with the Town Comprehensive Plan and in compliance with SEQRA, and WHEREAS, such techniques are available with respect to Hog Neck; however, piecemeal review of applications does not allow for the effective use of such techniques to adequately protect sensitive environmental resources. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby issues this resolution as a mechanism for coordinated review with involved agencies with respect to the combined actions and resultant development pressure on the Hog Neck peninsula, and that this resolution and the background set forth shall be used in lieu of an Environmental Assessment Form given the detailed account of the environmental sensitivity of Hog Neck identified herein, the geographic area involved and the multitude of pending applications, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the Planning Board, after a period of thirty (30) days intends to assume lead agency status with respect to pending subdivision review of applications, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board finds that a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) is appropriate and intends to issue the appropriate determination to require such document for the Hog Neck peninsula, considering the current pending applications which are expected to result in cumulative and generic impacts, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board authorizes the secretary to the Board to file this notice with the following parties: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead Town Board of the Town of Southold Town of Southold Trustees Ms. Betsey Dickerson, Applicant Patricia Moore, Esq., Applicant Agent Abigail Wickham, Esq., Applicant Agent Richard Lark, Esq., Applicant Agent Cathy Mesiano, Expeditor, Applicant Agent 5 Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS Town of Southold DRAFT GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HOGS NECK PENINSULA A) DRAFT GENERIC ENVIRONNIENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (GEIS) This study will be consistent with SEQRA guidance for a GEIS, and will include the entire Hogs Neck Peninsula. The study will utilize GIS wherever possible. Shape files will be obtained from the Town of Southold under a sub-license agreement with the Town and County, for use in evaluating and mapping environmental resources,planning and zoning data, and build-out analysis. An analysis of vacant subdividable lands will be conducted as a basis for impact analysis. The build-out analysis will be used to determine demographic, fiscal, groundwater, trip generation, and other density- derived changes in the current environment which would be anticipated. Assumptions will be made regarding natural areas and open space, fertilized areas, other landscaping,and general site development. A full groundwater impact analysis will be prepared, and the peninsula will be modeled for nitrogen load and water budget. Water quality data will be obtained and discussed with SCDHS, and water availability will be assessed in terms of yield and population. Tidal and freshwater wetlands will be mapped and a full ecological impact analysis will be prepared. Flood prone areas will be mapped and access considered. A traffic impact analysis will be conducted based on the build-out scenario. Ideally, four (4) Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATR) would be installed to monitor trips and key locations before, during and after the Memorial Day Weekend. Four (4) key intersections would also be studied, and access constraints, congestion,level of service and traffic mitigation findings documented. Other environmental resources and potential impacts will be analyzed based on the SEQRA outline included below. Mitigation measures, potential open space acquisitions, linkages, constraints and limitations, development standards, etc. will be documented to assist in ensuring that the carving capacity of the peninsula is not exceeded. The consultant will work closely with the Town to coordinate efforts and will meet with Planning Staff to discuss results and mitigation. The following outline provides a further framework for the DGEIS. 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1.1 Project Purpose,Need and Benefits 1.1.1 Background and History 1.1.2 Public Need and Municipality Objectives 1.1.3 Benefits of the Project 1.2. Location Geographic boundaries Districts or Lands Affected Establish study area and specific parcels for which detailed information is available Page 1 of 5 Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS 1.3 Project Description Describe any site specific conceptual proposals that the Town is aware of, as well as study area land use recommendations as hypothetical land use proposals, to form a basis for impact analysis relating to a proposed project. Describe in detail the current zoning, pending projects, comprehensive plan and management strategies, and determine a build- out density based on current zoning for project evaluation. 1.4 Schedule, Construction, Operation Provide any pertinent insight into the schedule for implementation of the land use initiatives, as well as the schedule for construction and operation of any known land use projects on site specific parcels. 1.5 Approvals Describe any approvals necessary to implement the proposed land use initiatives of the study, as well as subsequent agency decisions which would be needed for any known specific land use projects. 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 Geology - Provide a description of the study area geologic environment. Describe the importance of the resource and the protection of same. Obtain information from the Suffolk County Soil Survey and regional mapping. 2.1.1 Surface Soils- Suffolk County Soil Survey soil associations 2.1.2 Topography—describe based on USGS or regional mapping resources, as well as site specific information as available. Provide slope analysis of study area utilizing digital elevation models. 2.2 Nater Resources-Provide a characterization of the water resource environment in Hogs Neck. Describe the importance of the resource and the protection of same. Obtain information from SCDHS,Town GIS, 208 Study, Comprehensive Plan, etc. 2.2.1 Groundwater— recharge areas, watersheds, general water quality, water supply; depth to groundwater, direction of groundwater flow, etc. 2.2.2 Surface Water and Drainage — significant surface water features and drainage characteristics. 2.3 Ecological Resources - Provide a characterization of the ecological environment of the study area. Describe the importance of the resource and the protection of same. Obtain information from Town GEIS's, Open Space and Natural Resource Inventories as well as site specific field inventories, aerial photography and site habitat mapping. 2.3.1 Vegetation—describe habitats on undeveloped parcels of study area. 2.3.2 Wildlife—describe unique species (threatened, endangered, special concern) and abundance of common species in habitats of affected lands. 2.3.3 Unique Habitats, Species, etc. — consult Town/State wetlands maps to identify wetlands on or in proximity to the site; contact NYS Natural Heritage Program for any unique habitats, floral or fauna species. Evaluate any species' biological needs and suitability of site to accommodate species. 2.4 Transportation—describe major highways, access to lands,local roads and overview of infrastructure. Summarize Traffic Impact Study(see separate scope). 2.5 Land Use and Zoning 2.5.1 Land Use—describe and map existing land use patterns in the study area. Use aerial photographs to document surrounding land use categories as well as surrounding area; establish land use categories and use Town GIS. 2.5.2 Zoning — describe and map existing zoning of lands in study area using Town GIS. Page 2 of 5 • Hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS 2.5.3 Special Districts—describe and map special districts, if any. 2.5.4 Land Use Plans - Review available land use plans including Existing Town Zoning, Special Districts, and relevant regional land use plans and regulations including the 208 Study,and Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. 2.6 Community Services - discuss and map school districts, and discuss other community services and infrastructure within the study area, including police, fire, solid waste, and utilities. 2.7 Cultural Resources 2.7.1 Visual Resources — discuss visual resources of study area, existing site character and open space. 2.7.2 Cultural Resources—Describe Cultural Resources Assessment (CRA) including archival search, historic maps, walkover and documentation of potential historic and archaeological site sensitivity. Summarize Stage IA Cultural Resources Assessment(see separate scope). 2.7.3 Noise Resources — describe noise sources within study area; identify sensitive receptors adjacent the study area. 2.8 Growth-Inducing Aspects 3.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - Impacts of each resource area noted above will be discussed and analyzed in detail; impacts will be discussed as long term/short term, site specific or cumulative where appropriate. 3.1 Geological Resources 3.2 Water Resources 3.3 Ecological Resources 3.4 Transportation 3.5 Land Use, Zoning and Plans 3.6 Community Services 3.7 Cultural Resources 3.8 Growth-Inducing Aspects 3.9 Cumulative Impacts 4.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1 Geology 4.2 Water Resources 4.3 Ecological Resources 4.4 Transportation 4.5 Land Use and Zoning 4.6 Community Services 4.7 Cultural Resources 4.8 Socio-Economic 4.9 Cumulative Impacts 4.10 Growth-Inducing Aspects 5.0 ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED 6.0 ALTERNATIVES 6.1 No Action Alternative 6.2 Full Development under Current Zoning 6.3 Reduced Density Development Page 3 of 5 flogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS EIS EXCLUSIONS I. Fees are for professional services only and do not include direct costs(non-xpected); 2. Engineering,surveying or other services not specified herein; 3. Duplication of document for submission(I client copy included per submission); 4. Direct cost of site soil borings,sampling,water/soil/sediment analysis or other testing,if required(not expected); 5. Public hearings and meetings; public presentation materials (if required); revisions to FIS caused by requests for additional work during comment periods, will be billed based on time rates; all meetings, attendance at hearings and/or work not specifically mentioned herein will be billed at on an hourly rate basis in accordance with the time rates fee schedule. B) TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1. Conduct seven day automatic direction traffic counts at the following locations: a) Bayview Road(main) south of Smith Drive South b) Bayview Road(North Road)North of Goose Creek Lane 2. Calculate the vehicles trip generation rate for the existing residences on Great Hog Neck using the automatic traffic counts and Town data bases to determine the appropriate number of residences. Estimate the number of single family residences, which can be constructed on the undeveloped land on Great Hog Neck. 3. Compare the prevailing trip generation to the Institute of transportation Engineers Data. The higher value the data developed for the prevailing trip generation or the ITE data will be used to project potential traffic increases. 4. Conduct morning (7-9am) evening (4-6pm) and Saturday midday (Ilam-2pm) intersection turning movement counts at the following intersections: a) Route 25 Main Road and Corwin Lane. b) Route 25, Main Road, and Ackerly Pond Road. C) Route 25,Main Road and Oaklawn Avenue d) Route 25,Main Road and Horton Lane. 5. Calculate the growth of the existing traffic using New York State or Suffolk County growth factors. 6. Compare the existing road future traffic capacity and Levels of Service at the intersections listed above. The future conditions to be evaluated are: a) Complete development per existing zoning by 2012 b) Reduced development density as approved by the Town of Southold by 2012 7. Review the emergency service access with the appropriate officials for the existing and full development and reduced density conditions. 8. Inventory the existing Bayview Road intersections to determine sight distance restrictions. 9. Collect existing traffic volume data from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works and the New York State Department of Transportation. 10. Compile and evaluate the data collected into the GEIS for the existing, full development and reduced density conditions. Page 4 of 5 hogs Neck Peninsula Draft Generic EIS C) CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Retain the services of a qualified archaeological services consultant to perform a Stage IA study for the peninsula. The Stage IA (Documentary Search and Sensitivity Assessment Study) report will consist of documentary search and visual inspection study prepared according to NY Archaeological Council guidelines. The report will be accompanied by recommendations regarding the need for further study if applicable. D) DRAFT EIS FOLLOW-UP AND FINAL EIS PREPARATION The DEIS may require finalization, and/or revision subsequent to Planning Board/staff input. The FEIS phase is most difficult to anticipate as the FEIS depends upon the written and oral comments received by Town at hearings and during the comment period. A budget is typically estimated based on experience with prior similar projects; however, depending upon agency/public input, the budget could be more or less. The following services are anticipated: 1. Attend meetings related to Draft and Final EIS. 2. Revise Draft EIS per comments from lead agency(s). 3. Attend Public Hearing on Draft EIS. 4. Prepare Response to Comments on Draft EIS and submit as Final EIS. 5. Revise Final EIS for acceptance by lead agency. Page 5 of 5 Albert J. Krupski,President • • Town Hall James King,Vice-President gUFFO(,�co 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster ,ro rj P.O. Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda C y� Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson H x Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees DATE: August 2, 2002 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Holding Corp. The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the site plan dated June 4, 2002 and determined the proposed minor subdivision to be out of the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code. However, any activity within 100' of a Wetland line would require further review from this office. AUG u � zuul Southold Town Planning Board a eae�ee State of New York Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788-5518 Thomas F. Oelerich, P.E. Joseph H. Boardman Acting Regional Director Commissioner July 30, 2002 Mr. Mark Terry Senior Environmental Planner Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179, Town Hall 53095 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971-0959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Holding Corp.. SCTM #1000-88-2-15 South of Route 25 Great Hog Neck Southold Dear Mr. Terry: We have reviewed the Lead Agency Coordination Request pertaining to the proposed residential subdivision. We agree that the Southold Planning Board should assume lead agency status. Thank you for advising us of this proposal. Very truly - yours, IR %Yl� !I/pi/t J� t !rSd Dl= a 4a ki MICHAEL J. GEIGER, P.E. AUG U 1 2wPlanning Department Southold Town Plannln0-Q�rd • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • �� .�gg �J , � R ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.H. COMMISSIONER July 25, 2002 Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner �e �t Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-1938 RE: Subdivision of BCB Realty Holding Corp AUGU59 002 SCTM# 1000-88-2-15 017.000 Sout,.hfoldsTbm Dear Mr. Terry: PIaM�it�pr� The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS; 'Department")has received your letter concerning the above-referenced project. The Department has no objection to the Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status. Based on a review of the subject coordination, the Department offers the following comments. However, the Department wishes to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. These comments should not be construed as an implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project. All applications are reviewed thoroughly with respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code concerns by appropriate departmental personnel when SCDHS applications are completed. 1. SANITARY CODE A. Article VI Application Status: Our agency has received an application for the above referenced project on July 13, 2001, HD Ref. S10-00-005 as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. The application was deemed complete by the Division of Wastewater. The applicants must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application. ♦DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY•OFFICE OF ECOLOGY♦RIVERHEA13 COUNTY CENTER♦RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397 Phone(631)8522077 In(631)852-2743 B. SCDHS Jurisdiction The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant,therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application. 2. Natural Resources: A. The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources, which may be impacted upon by construction and development activities. It is the position of the department that the SEQRA review process provides the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources,and those all-practicable planning measures should be employed to help ensure their protection. In general, the department encourages the following land use measures be considered (where appropriate)to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA: • Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%. ■ Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes. • Minimal use of fertilizer-dependent turf and landscaping. ■ Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site. Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2741. Sincerely, Kimberly Shaw Principal Environmental Analyst KS/amf PC: Walter Dawydiak, P.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • Y�� �� ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RICHARD J.LAVALLE, P.E. CHARLES J. BARTHA,P.E. LESLIE A. MITCHEL CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER July 23, 2002 Town of Southold Planning Board D P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall 53095 State Route 25 JUL 2 9 � Southold,N. Y. 11971-0959 Attn: Bennett Orlowski,Jr. SoutholdTown Chairman Plannlna BW —�-Z Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Holding Corp.,n/s of Main Bayview Rd. e/o Midland Pkwy in Southold Gentlemen: This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road or a road proposed for improvements by the County, a permit will not be required from this Department. If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at 852-4100. Very truly yours, William S. Shannon,P.E. Chief Engineer By: M.Paul Campagnola Permits Engineer WSS/MPCNKAn SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER (631)852-4010 335 YAPHANK AVENUE 0 YAPHANK,N.Y. 11980 ■ FAX(631)852-4150 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS O�OSUfFo`�C'O • BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS H 2 Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS O yC Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y Q`' Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 12, 2002 Cynthia Caprise, Secretary Southold Fire District P.O. Box 908 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Ms. Caprise: Enclosed please find one (1) survey, dated 6/4/02, for the Minor Subdivision for B.C.B. Realty Holding Corp., north side of Main Bayview Rd., ±600' east of Midland Parkway, Southold. SCTM#1000-88-2-15 O The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. G/ The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please'specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Mark Terry Senior Environmental Planner enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS O�O'SUFfOC�CO BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Gy P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS W Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDSO Telephone (631) 765-1938 JG4Cy�� ! ' ��� Fax (631) 765-3136 CHARDAGGI MARTIN SIDOR, JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 10, 2002 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Proposed Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Holding Corp. Located on the north side of Main Bayview Rd., ±600' east of Midland Parkway in Southold SCTM#1000-88-2-15 Zone A-C Requested Action: This subdivision is for 4 lots on 14.174 acres located on the north side of Main Bayview Road, ± 600' east of Midland Parkway in Southold. The present parcel use is agriculture/tree nursery. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (X) Unlisted Contact Person: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner (631) 765-1938 x 243 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. `` Chairman cc: + Board of Trustees Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services +NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority 'Maps are enclosed for your review 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF Is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF Is Intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet Flexible enough to allow introduction of Information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and Information about a given project and Its site. By identifying basic project data, It assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place In Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible Impacts that may occur from a project or action. R provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it Is a potentially-large impact. The forth also Identifies whether an Impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any Impact in Part 2 Is Identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 Is used to evaluate whether or not the Impact Is actually Important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑Part 1 ©Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the Information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 If appropriate), and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and Importance of each Impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: MA. The project will not result In any large and Important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant Impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described In PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* 0 C. The project may result In one or more large and Important Impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. 'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency S gnature of Preparer(if different from responsible o icer Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Minor Subdivision Application-BCB Realty Holding Corp. Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) 13455 Main Bayview Road,Southold,Suffolk County Name of ApplicantlSponsor BCB Realty Holding Corp. Address 110 Vineyard Place City/PO Port Jefferson State NY Zip Code 11777 Business Telephone 631-765-1862 Name of Owner(if different) Anell Akscin Address 1400 Paradise Point Road City/PO Southold State NY Zip Code 11971 Business Telephone 765.0005 Description of Action: The applicant proposes to create a 4 lot minor subdivision from the 14.174 acre parcel located at N/S Main Bayview Road,+600'e/ Midland Parkway. The proposed lots will be at least 140,000 square(3.22 A)each. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban D Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 14.174 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland(Non-agricultural) 0 acres 3 acres Forested 0 acres 0 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 14 acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0 acres 0 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres Unvegetated(Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres 4 acres Other(Indicate type) n/a acres n/a acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s)on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained 100% of site ❑Moderately well drained 0%of site. ❑Poorly drained 0%of site b. If any agricultural land Is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres(see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes ❑ No a. What Is depth to bedrock N/A (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ❑0-10% 100% ❑10- 15% 0% ❑ 15%or greater 0 % 6. Is project substantial) ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes ❑o No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes EINo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 13' (In feet) g. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 1:1 Yes M No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ❑No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that Is Identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes O No ` According to:F i each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ❑Yes ❑o No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? E]Yes no If es, explain: 14. Does the present site Include scenic views known to be Important to the community? E)Yes ENo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NONE a. Name of Stream and name of River to which It Is tributary N/A 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A b. Size (in acres): N/A Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes ❑ No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? F]Yes ❑No b. If YES, will Improvements be necessary to allow connection? rolYes nNo 18. Is the site located Inan agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? NYes a No 19. Is the site located In or substantial!y contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article B of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes Li]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? riYes ri No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill In dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 14.174 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 14.174 acres Initially; 14.174 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 3 acres. d. Length of project, In miles: <t (if appropriate) e. If the project Is an expansion, Indicate percent of expansion proposed. N/A % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 20 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 4 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 0 0 0 0 Ultimately 4 0 0 0 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 80' width; 120' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 344 ft. 2. How much natural material (I.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes 11No ❑r• N/A a. If yes, for what Intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? N/A b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes 11 No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑E Yes No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? N/A acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old)or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ❑ No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: _months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated S (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2003 year, (Including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 3 month 2005 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No B. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes no No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10; after project Is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?❑Yes no No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal Involved? IF]Yes ❑No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc)and amount ROAD AND ROOF RUN-OFF b. Name of water body Into which effluent will be discharged NONE- ON SITE CONTAINMENT PROPOSED 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? an Yes ❑No Type HOUSEHOLD SANITARY WASTE 14. Will surface area of an existing water body Increase or decrease by proposal❑Yes MEN. If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year Flood plain? ❑Yes no 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Q Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Q Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name TOWN LANDFILUIRANS ST ; location CUTCHOGUE d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or Into a sanitary landfill? [H]Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: RECYCLING OF GLASS,METALS,PAPER MATERIALS,PLASTICS AND YARD WASTE 17, Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ❑� No a. If yes, what Is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what Is the anticipated site life? years. r-WWWrOo �- y"�R-6D>Lt5 P.PPRcYEP �R- 18. WIII project use herbicides or pesticides? FlYes ❑No fZ fg,cam,-r,A, v a6 19. WIII project routinely produce odors(more than one hour per day)? []Yes❑� No 20. WIII project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes ME No 21. WIII project result in an Increase in energy use? ❑� Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate type(s) ELECTRICTTY HOME HEATING FUEL 22, If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity_5 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 1200 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ❑E No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes Ful No SUBDMSION APPR. City, Town, Village Planning Board El Yes 171No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑E No City, County Health Department aYes ❑ No SUBDMSION APPR. Other Local Agencies M Yes El No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑� No State Agencies ❑Yes no No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action Involve a planning or zoning decision? [j]Yes ❑ No If Yes, Indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 • 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? AC 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 7 RESIDENTIAL HOME SITES 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site If developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Q Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a Y4 mile radius of proposed action? AC ,R-40 VACANT LAND,AGRICULTUARAL LAND,SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action Is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 140,000 SQ.FT. Page 9 of 21 • 10. WIII proposed action require anyauthorization(s) for the formation of sewer or waterdistricts? ❑Yes El No ` 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑� Yes ❑ No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? O Yes ❑No 12. WIII the proposed action result In the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes 0 No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse Impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such Impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification 1 certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name BCB REALTY HOLDING CORP. Date 6/24/2002 Signature CR-A47 rwm• A-Aw+ Title pq9--,L« If the action Is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) I In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the Stale and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. I The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. ! The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. I In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions(Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact.If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an Impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large Impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ❑ YES ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes [:]No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or - soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 640 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �pSUFFO(,F c BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. = OGy P.O. Box 1179 Chairman p .� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS W �? Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS G Telephone (631) 765-1938 GE;9RGE-R13'-0iIE-1�6,TRAM,4R. 41 t' Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO SDI 0 MARTIN SIDOR, JR. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 9, 2002 Ms. Catherine Mesiano 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches, NY 11940 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision of BCB Realty Holding Corp. Located on the north side of Main Bayview Rd., ±600' east of Midland Parkway in Southold SCTM#1000-88-2-15 Zone A-C Dear Mrs. Mesiano: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 8, 2002: WHEREAS, this subdivision is for lots on 14.174 acres located on the north side of Main Bayview Road, ± 600' east of Midland Parkway in Southold; and WHEREAS, prior to issuing any approvals for any proposed subdivision located on the Hog Neck Peninsula, the Planning Board is requiring that a SEQR determination be issued; therefore BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiate the SEQR coordination process for this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Submission Without a Cover Letter M t Sender: C PAP M. A-R.r1 Subject: 86,0> SCTDi#: 1000- 88- 02 - S Date: Co - 25 - 02 Comments: -(t�V-ll�t.J(a �+TZ'l�pa+l-kAt/IJC� P��'RTr E"� CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. Licensed Real Estate Broker Real Estate Consultant V June 24, 2002 Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: BCB Realty Holding Corp. — Minor Subdivision Application SCTM #1000-88-2-15 Gentlemen: I am the agent for BCB Realty Holding Corp., contract vendee for the above referenced project. The applicant proposes to create a 4 lot minor subdivision from the 14.174 acre parcel located at N/S Main Bayview Road, +600'e/ Midland Parkway. The property is zoned AC. Although it is customary for lots created in an AC zone to be developed as a cluster, the applicant requests relief from this requirement, as the recently developed adjacent properties have been approved with full-sized lots. Four 3+ acre lots are proposed. A map illustrating same is attached herewith. Enclosed please find the following: • Subdivision application form. • Copy of the property deed • Long EAF • Transactional Disclosure form • Application fee ($3000). • Eight copies of sketch plan Should you require any additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours, atherine Mesiano, Inc. Enclosures 12 Mill Pond Lane • East Moriches, New York 11940 • 631.878.8951 East End Drafting & Design PO Boz 1675 Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1862 May 13`h, 2002 Mr. Mark Terry Town of Southold Planning Department Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Request for Planning Board work session review Proposed Subdivision BCB Realty Holding Corp. SCTM: 1000-88-2-15 13455 Main Bayview Road Southold,NY 11971 To Whom It May Concern: Attached please find 5 copies of a preliminary site plan for the above mentioned project. I would like to submit the plan to you for preliminary review and discussion. Please notify me of the date of your next available work session so that we can discuss the proposed plan. Please contact me at the number&address listed above if you have any questions, or require additional information. Sincerely yours, y�Nems'aL raig 'fad=•. East End Drafting&Design °` " MAY 14 2002 Southold Town Planning Board • LASER FICHE FORM SUBDIVISIONS Project Type: Minor Status: Expired SCTM # : 1000 - 88.-2-15 Project Name: BCB Realty Holding Corp. Location: The project is located on Main Bavview Road + 300 feet e/o Midland Parkway in Southold. Hamlet: Southold Applicant Name: BCB Realty Holding Corp. Owner Name: Anella Akscin Zone 1 : A-C Approval Date: /(v�- PLAT Signed Date: Nof el�ch-, SCCI OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 2: Zone 3: Cand R's : Homeowners Association R and M Agreement: Address: County Filing Date: SCAN Date: NORTH BAYVIEW ROAD NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OVERVIEW FOR B.C.B. REALTY BOLD/NC CORP. • ' AT BAYVIEW TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. I000-as-oz-is of 00 SJ00&30 FSpGPtEs N 4 . AO��.. SJ9 OF 0005 O nN SJ8 pF �� 0 3 w ti 0,01 oN a i SJeppF I - % 1 I I MAINo¢ BAYVIEW ROAD x U W m O W U TTM ► ► I i A 1 -!w r r► , � 11 1 � 'i, •. to i I or i� ' rT -r _ _ T, I T T �. 1 i yJV� � x t, i • � f 3 k f 'lha!l ilk : Ji;f: V"T4v- f'tiip�i7�5{n�^'f°} ylf�f�'v R J4 ^i bSi 11 T', !r tv ��9~Ay•(��r�x k,��'•� T J�fit.` ' . Tr I • � i i 4 4 ♦ I• A, ' 4m 4 L07 SUBD� �yV1E'M ORO SUB MSION IGpNO A t SUsoMs%014 ov KsCM Is J D b LOT FD �5D O LOT 1B VACANT U ,a —83'3'53 Q' E 6(6.42' EEDI 615.42'(AC7�UALLorw mo �, HaA � � � v1p 4 I w `.` I / l ) > w LOT ' �� J 'I 'I w RLIA ° w N w o RdB LOT o p C7 I � 0 l I i �p W t N 69.26.50" w ' - p _ J16 LOT �- _ _ I, L or � ns � 1z� �l J ( W \ w i D N cv I U ED YMIDLAND PKW W - WOODED D =DWELLING P -POOL B = BLDG M' NURSERY SUFFOLK COUNTY SOILS CLASSIFICATIONS HUB HaA, RdB, HaB, RdA - CONI ), 'R NE 4HE TO NGVD w �� �� LOT 1Z5 HdB .. N LOT ('14 ) — 1e1 MAP OF PROPERTY, A T BA YVIEW w HoA. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LOT 13j ° b SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y 1 �� 0 - o 0111 W LOT n.3 � '1000-88-02-15 N a� `� \ SCALE..-1"=100' �( LUL 2 2M5 �� n M JUNE5,2005 Smtho I Town C� L I Plannin P.oar, �E° yp $ 63-1726'_maw - - .- _ 44.21• -- - -- - _WATER MAIN �0 2c�� _ OFEHfGO�'I.ECLtlC _ _ �l 0� T - - - -- AfAIN -- BA YV/EW RD. Y. 9 Ia ECONIC S R 0 eae+ •• !63/i 765 - 5020 F - 797 VACANT P. 0. BOX 909 1230 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 1/97/ 02- 142 NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OVERVIEW At Main Bayview Road SCTM 100-88-02-15 NORTH BAYMEW ROAD oT s„eo A'i'OZ_„�rN1 a W 3 r r r r r'. r , i r rrr i MAINo BAY4IEµ. i W m �i YIELD PLAN MAJOR SUBDIVISION YIELD PLAN \ SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT HEALh sESERVICE'SyO , 2�•ej N/O/F HAVPPAV GE, NEWEW YORH FOR OA q ¢ ep.`f 635 NORTh DATE STERLING HARBOR INC. n"�,� �O;F Bz BAY�IF!✓ kKEYMA AT BAYVIEW o�� q a ��SOCj'9T TOWNOF SOUTHOLD tiO��^y 0~ 8^ �; c 6 eS THIS 15 TO CERTIFY THAT THE PROPOSED REALTY SUBDIVISION OR SUFFOLKCOUNTY, N. Y. „'sfs 92- DEVELOPMENT FOR O JJ• , I r. . qAM' f IN THE WITH A TOTAL DF LETE 1000-88-02-IS `' ? � ; a i '�p' �' r°..,.r u / I 'F 8 T(, WAS APPROVED ON THE ABOVE DATE WATER SUPPLIES AND SEWAGE 100 0 100 200 300 Is `Q- DISPOSAL FACILITES MUST CONFORM TO CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS /� IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION AND ARE SUBJECT TO \ Iu2 5 I 11 l a Scale/ 1' 100' 3�Ob ^ yq \\\ ej0 . i i/ " i O SEPARATE PERMITS PURsuANT rD THGSE STANDARDS Tws nPPRovAI \ ss, SHALL BE VALID ONLY IF THE REALTY SUBDIVISION / DEVELOPMENT \\\ B "va .'� MAP IS DULY FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK WITHIN ONE YEAR OF QQjy�A,_ \\ \ j srI OT.6a, THIS DATE CONSENT IS HEREBY GIVEN FOR THE FILING OF THIS 13455 MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAP ON WHICH THIS ENDORSEMENT APPEARS IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK (�4'y`/ Q p'` p0 / \` \\ �`�,.1 I �`�""M¢ i i �� �b W - y„ COUNTY CLERK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE n q k' D ZONE: AC p IB O j w.oe se rc \\\ y \\ I / / 'W / % P ^' F PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THE SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE. APPLICANT Q\p~ 1 , \ 'e. \\ I LOT L B C B. REALTY HOLDING CORP. m 21 P \ \ ' 1 �, � i •o 1 VITO A. MINE L P E 110 VINEYARD PLACE / `�1 / / — 1 i 8 ' \ A L` / ' I egnuv.c sa,n / O ti — DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PORT JEFFERSON, NEW YORK '1777 h / 6 y / / / (L """ "" •"" DID p / 8 d �� • A \ / / 'No l �^ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY SEPTIC TANK & LEACHING POOL ` NT$ THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION DATED BY DATE: CHAIRMAN, PLANKIPTIRE77I % ' d K 3' / a` 'Y 6'9 I (V~ 1� THE LOT LINES OF THE SUBDIVISION MAPS AS FILED. CANNOT BE S0. 4~ :..r'„,6'"„aT ALTERED WITtlOUi PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD, AND LOTS h 2B m JOT d w I� MUST BE SOLD AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION MAP '"°�e "e pweA. <'8g00- PROPOSED SHALLOW WEL xuL III nne iT NTS,b THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES HER ALL L075 IN THIS C v e�/T DEVELOPMENT COMPLY W1"H THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK _]CIT' DEPAR nENT .F HEALTH. q proposed well /N 16 JAMES J DEERKOSKI, P,E. I/ �d E. NY.S. P.E. LIC NO. D72502 e' Du x 3'-B•' e' DIA. x Y-6" DRYWELL oarWELL ti d v �V = RREES SCENES �. A, / �j e' DIA x B'-6" (�tiv �!1 � -aORrxELL A dd , "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 'Y / 1000 GAL. BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD.' \„w” �P SEPTIC TANK A / 10'� B' DIA x ]'-6" MIN. DRYWELL "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS perll�� P p� COMPLETED MARCH 15, 2002 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS (2) 8 01, x 6' EXPANSION >3 HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL �• ; �Q. LEACHING POOLS POOL ? DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT, AO s a / I JOHN METZGER NYS. L.S. LIG rv0 R X00 t �, PROPOSED ROAD < �LDvo ° re. Is ,1p Oe TYPICAL LAYOUT . ewne R/ ,1 NTS EL. 14 14 Y'°'% a A 14 CJ ry§ DARK BROWN SILTY LOAM OL "�`•.,� r�f 6�, BROWN LOAMY SILT ML 9j l�c�0 +wPo Iz -------- 3.0' 12 !✓ PALE BROWN FINE TO COURSE SAND SW AREA=14,1529 ACRES r h'o 4Rar- 2 s WATER IN PALE BROWN JAMES P J. D EERKOSKI P.E. DR 616,501 S,F, 9d FINE TO COURSE snub sw Ial gmeer 17.0' ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO N.G,V,D, �`�« TEST HOLE 260 Deer Drive ■ =MONUMENTMattituck,New York 11952 • =PIPE NTS odl pw-,4t, TEST HOLE DATA PREPARED 631-298-7116 BY MCDONALD GEOSCIENCE DATE 12-28-99 Dated: 07-20-05 ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY SITE PLAN INFORMATION IS BASED ON LAND SURVEY DATE APRIL 3, 2002, AS PREPARED BY JOHN T. METZGER, PECONIC SURVEYORS, PC LIC. NO. 49618 (N/O/F RAYMOND JAY & STELLA M. AKSCIN) RESTRICTED BUILDING ENVELOPE PLAN MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAN No24 60 40 RESTRICTED BUILDING ENVELOPE I PLAN S FOR a°q 635 • NORry STERLING HARBOR INC. e��� oO"e pp 8gy�fe AT BA YVIE W TOWN OF SO UTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. All 6ISg4� 1000-88-02-15 = RF dF 100 0 100 200 3004 `0 FI r 9 / a // Sca(es 1' = 100' OD ti� '�+ / / lv i O Qrlb' i Lois (V 41FT \�7 14\ 13455 MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Q <y O b , �Q ; b SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK ,� 'y`/ Q\4� :%, i V i i �y b to It �' o 'yZ i i �� PM DO ZONE AC '-07� b [ / /. APPLICANT: E C.B.IOEALTY HO DING CORP �� E4 PORT JEFFERSON, NEW YORK 11777ACE e\I III FQ p q 001^ 24 sy 1 q ry ,� pp , 41 14 4 TOTAL LOT SIZE:616,501 SQ.FF. O / RM 54 1 cy$ \ / umwo.nw z.w,se n. l X00• 60%PRESERVATION:-69,900,6 SQ.FT. ea i (V / l�� ALL LAND THAT ISPRIVATE CONSIDERED ILS.BUFFER AREA IS TO REMAIN BARRIER i FOR ALL UBDIVIEWALKING OTUSE.TRAILS. IB Q4/ FLAND IS TO RDTMININSION LOTCURRENT/NATURAL VEGETATIVE STATE. /� QV LAND SHALL NOT BE CLEARED. TRAILS ARE TO BE MAINTAINED BY SUBDIVISION H.O.A. 40%DEVELOPMENT:246,600.4 SQ.FT, OA 1s P W F r / 2 IO ?O ww fNC g .moi rLja �5V ROAD RI 28,969.5 SQ.FT, 0 1� ' Q 4LOTS AT 54,407.73 SQ.FT.BUILDING AREA 217,630.9 SQ.FT. v u A, / Al �+IN, le Oma' OT I �Ia :o,; ,T / • ��I3'lf�,•, %i al' 15 10�O All 1+ °'„ C GRF i :°.� a rRFF14 AIR Z S� 1p 12 AREA=14,1529 ACRES fF\moo 44�r- OR 616,501 SF, 9d ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO NG.V.D, ■ =MONUMENT • =PIPE \ niznxc nnz x A.�� SITE PLAN INFORMATION IS BASED ON LAND SURVEY DATE APRIL 3, 2002, AS PREPARED BY JOHN T. METZGER, PECONIC SURVEYORS, PC LIC. NO. 49618 CLUSTERED 60 / 40 SUBDIVISION PLAN KEEPING MATURE TREE CLUSTERS MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAN o21 tiro CLUSTERED 60 / 40 SUBDIVISION PLAN KEEPING MATURE TREE CLUSTERS FOR �A, e q J, 6°s - NORTH STERLING HARBOR INC. 22 A T BA YVIE W �� z ~ Fw aSs CryT TOWN OF SO UTHOLD civ Q Bep �S ° FS SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. �� v �� Fxrs 26x6 100 0 1000-88-02-15100 200 300 41Z� 10 �~ ,�J�O T rNC M9T�'�i'F 6rs4a �gCTUd� PC4 ''�, TRE-E.f 9<J Is to kV / ti Sca(e, I' = 100' OO� �gO �I ? O~ b 5 7 v 54'J04i 0~ O}� �. OTR. X00 14\ ti 13455 MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Q 4,� p to J SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 4�P ti� q P 5 bb q (v� 0 b ZONE: AC p b b 19.L9 /.� PD3 D APPLICANT. 3C.3. REALTY HOLDING CORP 24110 VINEYARD Lj Q� ZO PORT JEFFERSON, NEWRLACE YORK 11777 q F }~ Q qy pA ktCTrNC O M 300 4~ v NgTUA, p ggqn T'AE�Fj O a O,Ve b` ti o v h p O ryti Q4i O<p� 24 G OV B 69. �a 26 S v 22 �✓ 14 \ 1t~ TOTAL LOT SIZE:616,501 SQ.FT. 20 X00, 60%PRESERVATION:369,900.6 SQ.FT. 40%DEVELCPMENT::.46,600.4 SQ,FT, 5 " a02 ^ V ROAD R.O,W.:28,969 5 SQ.FT. 4 LOTS AT 54,407.73 SQ.FT.BUILDING AREA 217,630.9 SQ.FT, MINIMUMOF 75'BUFFERS ADJOINING ALL EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOTS l p �P C�tJ T 2Z a `ti? '000 tiZ���b I,yG,HgT�R� ej �P}Z a `ani Al O e All M2 b 14 4 p M AREA=14,1529 ACRES OR 616,501 ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. ■ =MONUMENT • =PIPE amxc uwo x a.l-� SITE PLAN INFORMATION IS BASED ON LAND SURVEY DATE APRIL 3, 2002, AS PREPARED BY JOHN T. METZGER, PECONIC SURVEYORS, PC LIC. NO. 49618 .. . - - e I ._ iy - - I SUFFOLK COUN`fl' DEPARTMENT df f#EALT} � NSERVICES - q( `) S T HAUPPAUGE,'NEW YORK DATE A.�.�'AlT,3r ';�;pY�DVI CORP. . A��'y - ra,�•q�^C�i�i+ _ pr sr ` A��� f - ': .,Tns•Is^i¢ceaneY.TH'- 5. J � V'Vjrl' j 1 {1 M JAlp ' Ai:TlIE'PROPQSEO;REALTY 5u9DM9aN OR ♦ V r/� f�� DEVELOPMENT FOR IN THE VIM A T07AL OF LOTS . /5� , Qs / II s a,r9p�,. Dj I00 0 ._IAO 800 '300 �AV�ANV oYN / / WAS APPROVED ON THE DROVE GATE. WATER SUPPFIFs AND SEWAGE �}1 ; j/ j _ / ^ ^ f' / DISP05AL FACILITIES MUSY CONFORM 70 CONSTRUC110N STANDARDS A to VI/ {\ LpT s I w` �' h IN EFFECT At ME TIME OF CONSTRUCTION AND ARE SUBJECT TO Asj(-^�.Q..'ioi {♦ F �y{/O�fO1 A(�� '' \\ �um.vuacrt � i I / A %^\^ � ' Q I SEPARATE PERMITS PURSUANT TO THOSE STANDAMS. THIS APPROVAL A/ ISIL 4iJU� /.`! /` A 'it"�' 1/p W, 1 ' 1 ;/ /% `� ^ II\` KEY MAP SHALL BE vALlb ONLY IF 11iE REALTY SUBDIVISION / DEVELOPMENT • 5 O � A \\\ % j ``; -- -- —„tl♦"d. -- -- —� MAP IS DULY REED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK WITHIN ONE YEAR OF, - - O,p., �/ ,e.O, .IT THIS PATE CONSENT IS HEREBY GIVEN FOR THE FILING OF THIS .13455 MAIN BAYV14W ROAD �IA�� �Q \ ti _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ` /K/ O b�` / ����`\`� \\ i i R �m / l ' / i q c MAP ON WHICH THIS ENGORGEMENT APPEARS IN THE OFFICE of THE SUFFOLK COUNTY; 'NEW' YORK Ac k'tiV Q Q :O \ I / nm� / / / / 1p .., ...,.., V Nl h, / ^ COUNTY CLERK IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIE PROWSIWS OF THE \ o m. p ^fir. . ZONE. AC b / �-' \ '6 \ / m'/ / /P .,, �T �. Gei?� - 0 xi rt \ 1 PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THe SUFFOLK couNTr SANITARY coDE. APPLICANT: Qv i \ '3 \\ I A I / i /1 07 BC.S. REALTY HOLDING,CORP. W `�� / \\ \� J T / r 110 VINEYARD PLACE 8 i \\ a U ^ / Q •��•�.rt v i — vita A MINEI P.E. _ } —� DIRECTOR, W9 OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PORT JEFFERSON NEW YORK 11777 QA, 1 it 1 ,I `/ ? % \ / - \ / / Aw O qQ1 ✓YtpM1R THIS 1$ TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVED BY HAS BEEN APPROBT rSSS- ' THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTMOID BY RESOLUTION DATED � •, � �I '• p � C 1 j 1e R ti c�/ TANK & LEACHING POOL �,rL11 ��� { pA` f^^ `^ ,6 ^ I ^. % It a DIA, r ]'-G R DIA 3-G'• BY CATS, 42002 DRTWELL IA CHAIPLANNING BOARD- SoutholdTown I. Planning Board k+ �- y 1� I q PROPOSED / fi / 69. 4,/ RELDENCE THE LOT LMES OF THE SUBDIYYSION MAPS AS FILED. CANNOT BE ^^) I -SQA I ti I B' DIA. V 3'-4” - I ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING BOARD. AND LOTS W .- -- ----- / �✓ 14 (L DI LET // MUST BE EMU AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION NAP. AY fAi^ AR y\ Rg ,p�A" '/ / n'X1p""" �' I Sc°°c TANK e' DIA, v DRPMe.L— MIN � FOR ALL LOTS / ME b' EVELOPMENTUCOMPLY VIPH MEPPLY AND E STANDARDSDEPOSAL FAND REQUIREMENTS OF THE W 01A. B' TMEµT THIS JP.\ (2J A E%PA SON �a SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPA OF HEALTH AN I LEACHING POOLS POOL mS T'LG '`' ^� ^•Ly` 2 C2 WARR N A. SAMBACH, SR LOi 4 J �/ �d• Q�- N.YS PE. OC N0. 23])0 qp Z w PROPOSED ROAD - A / / I �v � I ^ / / + ------------------------------- Al TYPICAL LAYOUT. ^Y S� / \ / / 3P ___ _—._._.——_ NTS ___.._- yI 'I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH ME PEOyIREMENTS OF THE yq BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE of THE TOM OF'SOUTHOLD.' MAP WAS ADE BY US ROM ACTUAL SURVE)13 +��, ( ^G`` ^". k ^ ^`^ ^^�/ �QC/N'� HEREONI ACTUALLY MARCH EEBY CERTIFY XIST pQSAN M PO Af,L CONCRETE MONUMENT$ SHOW MUS N$ HEREON ACIUARCH E%IST AND AND THAT C NCRETE MO'$HON/T1 SH ALL W ��© // \, ` ` `O� i DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC OETAfLS ARE CORRECT.- 1 ^^ % I JOHN METZGER -. NYS L5 LIC NO. R f ROADWAY SECTION ( (OWN OF SOUTHOLDI— .-j F�A ,NTS / EL. 13 `;""'\, ���, \m `^f e♦ SGS 1 DARK BROWN SILTY LOAM OL --- 1 0 BROWN LOAMY SILT ML 41 PALE BROWN FINE ARA 14,x' 29 ftGi2ES ��`A� ------ lz.a' To COURSE sanD sw .-�ly.��y;J��1 > , - WATER IN PALE BRCWN - FINE TO COURSE SAND SW i 7.0' e4�v s REF raENCEn m N.GYD - '� T HT SOL }p NTS fH6I8' ' ANY.•R4. '{ OR T `V'D'T Y.{ TIDI! TEST HOLE DATA PREPARED - PECVIVIC SURVEYORS, BY MCDONABD GEOSCIENCE 1 ADA{. - SURVEY 3 .A VILA DATE' 12-28-89 P. a, lux _-SDap FAX Il�� )� 7`6.5-I��7 GF T S * IAF ON[ X9 YUW,=DIV ieIDUFNrIa FRTlr. P. R, SUX 9A9 EXCEPT AS - _ C'r{ply 7EY19-sL♦,B�I,j/1S{QM �. AI,L{,•c�R7 fTCA'TIQNs ON NEIGHBORING 'PROPERTY If.30 TRAVELER. STREET - HER FOO AT�HIS NAP AND COPIES Iugw aN4Y If P2-142 SAIb NAP ¢R COPIES ,IiEAR rHE INRRnSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR (N/O/F RAYMOND JAY & STELLA M. AKSCEN)- SE('J'�'i'IEI.;{J, , 1V,Y. IIA71 WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON, - , w A F. v1v yIt1e v"Nn r ',yr x "1J T / .A A MINOR Vtl INOR a L1�OM91ON PEAN �y Ft , � saFFGLKwNT� �VMT " + sv�tp B.G"" ;E'AL1 tSLbING' G©RPP. 9~ \� s F 44piY SITE DA E TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M f, F +idii. OUi jy N. Y.. Y 'ti iv / k .'INIS IB TO (eRNV THAL T/K PROPA.�s'R{'fLTY SLBBfIf RN 1010 0 y, E ` > E? .f� .. w THE _� x4s�L OF'' :this _ 4� � �"• - / t ` /� /n` k' 'rtC, J'' WAS,ARPROKb UN.PHE 000 R sUVPl1E5 AND sayFyGE; F � Fi 1A "A:.-kdd' �• b t DISPOSAL FAGUTES MUST COMFUNLI't'O C(WSiKUCT10N STNDARDi . Dly KEY MAP - IN EFFECT AT'TRE TIME Of' IL CON9'IN11011SW AND'ARE.sI�BJBGt Tp . �1r41 /A ! i +,Y+ I`J % .a �� J� ,yV SEPARATE PERMITS.PURBUAHT 10 TNOBR STAN6ARb.4 THITS PP(iOVAT, / .%.'aA1q IA1p / + `1� \ iN°'cuw m a.0 - BE ii=- tFdlpl_IIs YL �1M ` 'MI HySHALL BE v.1liD ONLY If THE RE TY S7BWv19aN /4E\5110T 14455 MAIN BAYVIEW ROAD }l1S� "' T I / uo cbMro,gAAVR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -V, A/ W.xr•�'/ I / - - MAP is DULY fl[,PO WITH THE COUNT'(CLERK WITMN ORF YEA BE SUFFOLK, COUNTY, NEW YORK 'fib �j lry �•, 1 /✓ F I.� SN °E THt50ATE CONSENT 1S NEREBr pVEw PDR THE�FIGNI}OF'1 T{IL5 ZONE: AC A \ A, NAP ON WHICH,YHLS ENGORSEMENT APPEARS IN THE'OPREE OF THE k Q O OO • 'C. MA. / , Ix:cT— iuAuaW°°M: - _ _ APPLICANT: y ,� I/ I,�.},, f % /b O .. Tawonrt on °u°� xuxe CWNTY LEAK IN ACCORDANCE WNN THE PRO N Ns QF `D* B.G.B. REALTY HOLDING CORP. - \ j J / ~ 1w RIP '}' `PM TOM,xw°'rTc"a h �.J SMUVALiR1 PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THE SLFFDUt COUNTY•SANITARV COOL I 170 VINEYARD PLACE QA + a / "'/ % /� � ,FIN ux �f0°t "*wm IA• opo �_ ' PORT JEFFERSON• NEW YORK 11777 \H e ` '1 6 J / �r°T se - \ 1 /- sp _ _N .A NINEI P.E \ / �� I % /! l'+, r h' q ti �•.ux s'ux. xApOTL rz. x w., ONiEciOq; MIS157 EN TAC, AU IS `.a I �`.. / u°MNIM sem' �s ' � sem roux _ / Q THIS IS i0 CERTIFY THAT THIS SIIBUMSION,PLAN HAS RE AIPPROVEO BY r�w1 / `� l a /n.u uNs NmNx°RARA `I - +' !„ `N cieAJM- E �'+ / > /I A .� 'Y aFx9W urtRM°us svN wmx GUPRO 14 6Y RESO4ITON DATED ' I� 03c ,y TM Y w.xwswv EH MA ncwv THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF 5 ���� M. An"n¢.0 xAm:nnATRxAL - �/ I.1ll ' .>8pF1F I V snxo i"ia°muNwL JII G BY: DAA: . r 2 24 "'' / ti 1� SEPTIC TANK & LEACHING POOL x° �� �� � - NTS i jaA,.P 19P 111 / Asw N rs, q N6 s nc r'm 11° III MEL, �`IBITi' IF 6.9! 1 THE LOT LINES OF THE BUBOIWBION MAPSAS FILEW, CANNOT 9E ti tWi,M9tni q n.' -� y �6 S0. I .y nmam NMMR � \! -__ --- 1 S M (L ALTERED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PLANNING BD.AIIU,'�AND LOTS /,'_ 2SN.Ax,,R \ ,s w of FAI MUST BE SOO AS SHOWN ON THE SUSONOMON MAP. � i R, a THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSALSTANDARD FANDI➢ES,FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS / ,TT iolIN su(EA�1� SUFFOLK MENT COMPLY WITH THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALINDS AND REQEIIREMEIYTS OF THE j 1 F ``•�� \ / ! `h�4� s iiunansii"`AIIN. sax MNT ILII 3 p'` \`. \\•a••p /Yv\ �. �Pq PROPOSED["SHALLOW WELL ` / \ ARBEN A.SAME G6 SR: NTS N.YB RF UC. NO 2DJ]O ej 46 well ` III /u M-MMMi B' DIA . 7-6" `q 1 %' ' Q DarwELL F.d B CIA. // ro // LOT 1 q �' / J / \�c."',TE.i 's n/ / •\ /PROPOSED I i // \\\ , % \ / QP B' 'DJRYWELL'-6" '1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON iH10 PLAT COMPLY WITH THI! EQU1REMENTS OF THE 1 y fI s , \ I —7 BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD.-1 } ' SEPT C GAL 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROG LCTUAL SURVEYS ? COMPLETED MARCH 15. 2002 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS 10'_ S' D'A . 5'-� HEREON ACTUALLY EAST ANO iHE'a POSITOrvIS C RECTLT HCWN AND ALL ¢ MIN. DRYWELL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORK EA B' DIA . B' p^JbO� __LEACHw -_G POOLS E aDOL___________—/$/ J s E�`L�q •�QfB. Fby*O�� a 9 OL / / PROPOSED ROAD --------�---- a ,:: �, , ti 6 5 y 4ti, 6 YPICA NTS LAYOUT _8� p. •• H EL. 1' DARK BROWN SILTY LOAM OL y�'1Fp�. 1 Hveie — — .4y4 �t.0' CA�ND S� AREA=14:1529 ACRES sP0 moi- BROWN LOAMY SILT ME OR 616,501 SF. ,94 r—_——�4 0' \ PAID BROWN CINE SAND SP WARREN A. SAMBACH SR. *>p�UNENTREFERENCED TO N.G.V.D, `r-' .x n�xro±W 16 6 WO OWN FINE TO COURATER NSE BROWN D FINE BIN SW ConsultingPO 0Engineer7675 &&Manner Cutchogue,New York 11913 13 0' TEST HOLE III NTS 631-734-7492 TEST HOLE DATA -REPAPED Dated: 06-04-02 1 SITE PLAN INFORMATION IS BASED ON LAND SURVEY DATE APRIL 3, 2002, AS PREPARED BY JOHN T. METZGER, PECONIC SURVEYORS, PC LIC. N0. 49618 9Y MCDONALD GEOSCIENCEDATE 06-13-D2