Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-10/11/1973 $outhold Townof Appeals Telephone 765-26,fi0 APPEAL BOARD MEMBER Robert W. Oillispie, Jr., Ch,~kman Robert BerBen Charles grigonis~ ..Ir. Ser~Je Doyen, Jr. Fred Hulse, Jr. MINUTES $0UTHOLD TO$~N BOARD OF APPEALS October ll, 1973 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, October ll, 1973, at the Town 0ffice, Main Road~ Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen; Charles Grigonis, Jr.; Fred Hulse, Jr.; Serge Doyen, Jr. THE CHAIRMAN: On Appeal No. 18!5, Evelyn Swisky, Bayview Road, Southold, New York, the proposal was to divide property with less than required area and frontage. After investigating the property, the Board of Appeals wrote to the Planning Board informing them that the Appeals Board had advised Mrs. Swisky that she would not be permitted to create or sell lots con- sisting of less than 40,000 sq. ft. However~ if the Planning Board is willing to create two lots to the rear of Mrs. Swisky's residence property, the Board of Appeals would grant a variance on the remainder of the property, consisting of approximately 28,000 sq. ft., on which her residence is located, as this lot is larger than the adjoining lot to the east. The Board of Appeals postponed decision on this Appeal until receipt of recommendations of the Planning Board. The Board of Appeals has now received a letter from Mr. John ~Tickham, Chairman of the Southold Town Platting Board advising us that at a meeting on October 4, 1973~ the Board voted to approve the creation of two lots to the rear of Mrs. Swisky's property facing the creek, leaving a balance of approximately 28,000 sq. ft. on which her residence is located. Southold To~n Board of Appeals -2- October 11, 1973 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that Evelyn Swisky, Bayview Road, Southold, New York, requests a variance for permission to divide property with less than required area and frontage, and for approval of access on property located on the north side ef Bayview Road, Southold. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the app!ica~t. After inspection, the Planning Board votedto approve the creation of two 40,000 sq. ft. lets. The Beard finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties er unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Evelyn Swisky, Bayview Road, Southold, New York, be GRANTED pe~missiente divide her property into two lots facing the creek, leaving a balance of approximately 28,000 sq. ft., on which her residence is located. The two lots en the creek shall each consist ef 40,000 sq. ft. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: That applicant fu~ish a 15 foot right of way along the westerly boundary.' That this ~ %s granted subject te the approval of the Building Inspector. Vote of the Board: Grigonis, Doyen. Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, THE CHAIRMAN: Appeal No. 1820, William Grefe, New Suffolk Avenue, New York, because of an improper legal notice, the decision of the Board was postponed. After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to operate a building contractor's yard and to manufacture and store concrete products. The findings of the Board are that applicant is the owner of one acre of property and that according to the Ordinance the proposed use is basically for a contractor's yard with some manufacturing of concrete products, and that the plot size is adeqna~e for a contractor's yard but does no~ meet the 200,000 sq~ ft. Bulk Requirements for "C-l" Industrial use as set forth in Section IX. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the 0rdin~nce will be observed. Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- October 11, 1973 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, William Grefe, New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, New York, be GRANTED permission as applied for to operate a building contractor's yard, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the front yard setback shall be at least 50 feet. 2. That no more than 25% of this parcel shall be used for the storage of manufactured products. 3. That this permission is subject to site plan approval of the Planning Board. 4. That this permission is subject to the applicant obtaining an area variance. Vote of the Board: Grigonis, Doyen. Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, A public hearing was held on August 30, 1973 on Appeal No. 1524, Brian Lynch, Mattituck, New York. The decision of the Board of Appeals is as follows: After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to operate Aireal Spraying service in "A" District. The Board recognizes the need for agricultural spraying and dusting by air, and also recognizes that this is a customary and essential feature of agriculture. However, the findings of the Board are that the Appeals Board would be usurping the legislative functions of the Town by permitting this use. Any change should be made by legislative authority. In reaching this decision, the Board consulted with the Suffolk County Planning Commission, the Southold Town Board, investigations of other Ordinances in Suffolk County, and the decision of Ward v. Gray. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will change the character of the neighborhood, and will not observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, Brian Lynch, Mattituck, New York, be DENIED permission to operate Aireal Spraying Service in "A" District, north side of Oregon Road, Mattituck, as applied for, and Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- October 11, 1973 further RESOLVES that all spraying and dusting activities shall cease by November 15, 1973. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. A public hearing w~s held on August 30, 1973 on Appeal No. 1821, Arthur J. Bujnewski, 6 Surryhill Place, Huntington, New Yerk and Main Read, Pecenic, New York, for permission to operate airfield and airplane storage in "A" Zone District on the south side of Main Read, Peconic, New York. The decision of the Board is as follows: After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant purchased a farm of approximately 32 acres on the south side of Main Road, Route 25, Pecenic, New York, in January of 1972, and requests a variance for permission for storage of twe antique airplanes thereen$ as well as per- mission to operate an airfield for personal use by the applicant in connection with a third plane owned by the applicant, a 1946 Piper Cub of 65 H.P. requiring 200' te 300' to take off with a climb rate of 650 feet a minute, limited to April to September inclusive seasonal use. The applicant's farm is currently leased for use as a sod farm with permissien from the lessee to use part of the approximately 3,000 foot long farm as an airstrip. So far as the Board is able to determine, there are only two other personal airstrips in use in the Town, both ef which predated the original Zoning Ordinance of 1957 and are regarded as a non-conforming use. The original Zoning Ordinance as adopted on April 9, 1957 made no provision for airfields. However, the Ordinance, as amended on November 23, 1971, provided for airports and airfields in the "C-i" General Industrial District, Article IX, A, 47 by Special Exception of the Beard of Appeals; and subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board. The Board notes in Gray v. Ward 343 N.Y.S. 2d 749 that a helipad is not an "accessery use" within a Zoning resolution unless expressly so stated. Ward v. Gray also examines the meaning of "incidental" when used to define an accessory use, stating that "incidental" when used to define an accessory use must also incorporate the concept of reasonable relationship with the primary use - in this case, a sod farm. Nor is it a "customary" use. Private airstrips are prohibited in all districts of the Town of Seuthampten, altheugh limited airfields are permitted in Heavy Industrial Zone. Babylon and Brookhaven permit ai~-perts in General Business Zone and J.2 Business Zenes, respectively, by Special Exception. Islip and Huntington make Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- October 11, 1973 no provision for airfields. Riverhead permits airports in "A" Residential, "A" Light Industrial, and "B" General Industrial by special use permit of the Town Board. The applicant's proposal, in our opinion, constitutes an airport as defined in Section 240 of the General Business Law and, as such, would be governed by Section 249 requirements. Section 240 definition: Airport means any landing area used regularly by aircraft for receiving or discharging passengers or cargo; or for the landing and take-off of aircraft being used for personal or training purposes. In the opinion of this Board, the applicant has an airport as defined above, and we are persuaded that an airport is not a customary and permitted accessory use of "A" Residential and Agriculture Zone property in the Town of Southold; that to permit such a use by means of a variance would usurp the legislative function of the Town Board which can, if it wishes, permit such a use in the "A" Zone by amending the Ordinance. The proposed storage on the premises of several antique airplanes owned by the applicant is a mse of the property which does not affect the public interest and is a use which is accessory and incidental, though perhaps not customary. In reaching these conclusions, the Board consulted w~th Mr. A~thur Bujnowski, the applicant; The Suffolk County Planning Co~-,~ssion; Southold Town Board; Robert Tasker, legal counsel of the Town of $outhold; investigations of other Ordinances in Suffolk County; and the decision of Ward v. Gray. The Board finds that strict application .of the Ordinance would not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not ,~ique and would be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will ch~uge the character of the neighborhood, and will not observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Arthur J. Bujnowski, 6 Surryhill Place, Huntington, New York, be DENIED permission to operate an airfield in "A" Zone ~strict, located on the south side of Main Road, Peconic, New York, as applied for, for the reasons statede The Southold Town Board of Appeals sets November 15, 1973, as the date at which time all flying activities must cease. Vote ef the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse, Doyen. Southold Town Board of Appeals -6- October 11, 1973 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1842 - 8: upon application of Lucile Mosback, Rose? for a variance in accordance with the Zoni Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule divide and set off lots with existing buil than required width and area. Location of side Main Road, East Marion, bounded nort~ Humes & others; east by William Park & otb Gardiners Bay; west by Parker. Fee paid The Chairman opened the hearing by r for a variance, legal notice of hearing, a to its publication in the official newspap O0 P.E. (E.S.T.), Hill, North Carolina, ng Ordinance, for permission to dings with less property: south by Main Road, ers; south by 15.oo. ading the application ffidavits attesting ers, and notice to the applicant. ~ Rudolph Bruer, Esq. presented a sUrVey of the property to the Beard. THE CHAIRMAN: The survey as presented by Mr. Bruer indicates the property runs from Main Road to Pecenic Bay and is approximately 880' t0 900' in depth on the easterly boundary, and somewhat less than that on the westerly boundary. It's an irregular shape. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? RUDOLPH BRUER, ESQ.: The property is approximately 6.3 acres and you will notice that there are three cottages on the smaller part of the property, and a large existing house. There is a right of way going through. Mrs. Mosback would like some value out of it. She has 6.3 acres, and she would like the lower part, known as No. l, probably for one of her children. She would also like to be able te sell as separate lots this piece of property with the three cottages on it. They are 20,000 sq. ft,, 21,000 sq. ft. and 25,000 sq. ft. in size. To enlarge the northerly one so it will be an acre would leave you with two substandard lots. This has been to the Planning Board. What we are proposing as of now is in regard to these three pieces to make one of them an acre piece including the right of way, and also having these three pieces being able to use the beach area. We would withdraw the application and stipulate that this piece ef property would not be further developed. ~at we might ask for in the future would be to take this one house and make it one very large piece so you would have (referring to map) a two acre piece here and a two acre piece here. THE CHAIRMAN: So you would not increase the density. Southold Town B~rd of Appeals -7- C~ober 11, 1973 MR. BRUER: It would increase one house on one whole piece. (Referring to sketch) You would have a cottage here and a cottage here. THE CHAIRMAN: You would have an acre for the house on the road. MR. BRUER: Actually there are five pieces and it would only come out to be one house. You take the three pieces with cottages and increase the upper one so it makes an acre, giving them the right to use the beach. THE CHAIRMAN: This beach is common ground for all of this area? MR. BRUER: It would be common ground (referring to sketch) for this piece and these two pieces. One and Tw~ wouldi~be one lot comprising approximately two acres. There would be no further subdivision. THE CHAIRMAN: We will have to have a survey. This is a miner subdivision which we don't act on. MR. BRUER: (Referring to map) I am asking for these three lots; I am asking for a variance on two lots t~hat are substandard. THE CHAIRMA~N: We would look favorably on this but you would have to have it agreed upon by the Planning Beard. MR. BRUER: I am asking for these two lots here which are substandard. THE CHAIRMAN:, The whole thing has to be tied into one package so there is no way out. You are going to put one building on 80,000 sq. ft. You would have two two acre lots, one one acre lot and two one-half acre lots, and you would have less density. Come back to us after the Planning Board has approved this project. MR. BRUER: I will get Planning Board approval subject to your approval. I wanted to explain it to you, THE CHAIRMAN: I would think that providing it~ all covenanted that they might jump at the o~ee to decrease the density. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone,else who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response.) Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- October 11, 1973 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? MR. GEORGE PARKER: We own property adjacent to this en the west mud (referring to sketch) this cottage on the Bay and this cottage and this cottage for years have been rented by the week and have become aConey Island. This property has had seven or eight automobiles en it and there must have been 20 to 30 people living there through the suMuer. The people change every couple of weeks. This piece of property is right next te us. They have fires right next to our boat house. Mrs. Mosback has tried to keep people away from there. (Referring to sketch) This is ll0 feet of Coney Island property here. Why can't this part be common property for the cottages and as far as this piece is concerned, it could ge right down to the Bay, and this could be for the rest of the community. THE CHAIRMAN: This is not a Zoning matter. MR. PARKER: It's compressing this little beach area rather than this whole beach area here. These are all vacant properties. Mrs. Mosback only proposes.one more house on this side. How about r,m~ing right down to the beach? MR. BRUER: What we are suggesting is rather than having rental people you would have an individual owner and not have a party type situation but an owner who would be there all year round in each one of these places.~, not a person who would leave after a two week vacation. He would be responsible for taxes~ MR. PARKER: These people would have the right to use that beach? MR. BRUER (indicating sketch) 0nly these two. This would be a situation where you b~ve an owner Who is responsible and can be subject to the laws ef the Town. THE CHAIRMAN: De you have a prospective Purchaser? MR. BRUER: No, MR. PARKER: Can this be restricted to one piece of property? THE CHAIR~A~N: (Referring to sketch) This will become a lot, this will beceme a let (you have four houses there now), and this will become a lot~ Southold To~n Board of Appeals October 11, 1973 MR. PA~ER: Does Mrs. Mosback have to verify that? MR. BHUER: We will have to give covenants to the Town in recordable form which I will deliver to the Planning Board and which they will record. THE CHAIHPiAN: We will write a letter to the Chair~ of the Planning Board suggesting that this is a good idea. In the future this could never be sold off. MRS. PA~ERR: Hopefully. I think a~ owner could occupy the premises for vacation time and then rent it to other people. MR. BRUER: All you are doing is adding one other house here. THE CHAIRMAN: This is a far better solution than what could happen. MR. PARE~R: I agree if that is the way it is going to be resolved so it can't be divided into little pieces from now on. THE CHAIRMAN: The Board feels this will be a favorable determination and will write a letter to the Chairman of the Planning Board. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals postpone action on Appeal No. 1842, Lucile Mosback, until approval is received from the Planning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1841 - 8:15 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Eugene Hazzaferro, 215 Oak Street, Greenport, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule for permission to build new one family dwelling~ with insufficient setbacks. Location of property: Lot # 2, Greenport Drivein Park, Brown and Ninth Streets, Greenport, New York. Fee paid $15.00. Southold Tow~Board ef Appeals -lC- 0cteber ll, 1973 The Chairman epened the hearing by reading the application for a variancet legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, a~d notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MR. EUGENE MAZZAFERR0: I am the applicant. The lot is approximately 120 feet on eno side and ll6 feet on Brown Street. On Ninth Street it's 52'6". THE CHAIRMAN: It's been in single and separate ownership for a long time. ¥o~plan to build a 25' x 38' house. Where are you geing to locate the house? Mr. Mazzaferre indicated on the sketch where the house would be located. THE CHAIRMAN: This is a situation that existed prior to the Zoning Ordinance. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes te speak against this application? There was ne response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to build new one family dwelling with insufficient setbacks on Lot #2, Greenport Drivein Park, Greenport. The findings of the Board are that this is a situation that existed prior to the Zoning Ordinance. The Board finds that strict applicatio~ of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessaryhardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use dist~ct; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, Eugene Mazzaferre, 215 Oak Street, Greenport, be GRANTED permission to build new one family dwelling with insufficient setbacks en Lot # 2, Greenport Drivein Park, Greenport, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse, Doyen. Southold Town Board ef Appeals -ll- October 11, 1973 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1840 - 8:25 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Clarice Blackburn, New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue, New¥ork, for a variance in accordance with the Town Law, Section 280 A for approval of access. Location of property: private ~ght of way off south side of New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue, bounded north by New Suffolk Avenues east by Case; south by Peconic Bays west by Lockwood. Fee paid $15.O0. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal'notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? GARY OLSEN, ESQ.: The actual feed to the property is owned by Clifford T. Case, Marion Case, Maureen Case. Maureen Case gave the right of way so I would assume it is coming through the Case family. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation ~d inspection the Board finds that applicant~ requests approval of access (private right of way off somth side of New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue). The findings of the Board are that this is an existing access, 15 feet ~de, that has been in use for many years. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED, Clarice Blackburn, New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue, be GRANTED approval of access, as applied for. Location of property: private right of way off south side of New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Hessrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. Southold Town Board of Appeals -12- October 11, 1973 PUBLI0 HEARING: Appeal No. 1839 - 8:40 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Kenneth Ketcham, Main Road, East Marion, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 3OOC-4A for permission to store and work on private boat over 30' in length in an "A" District. Location of property: north side Main Road, East Marion, bounded north by Schrader & Wallace; east by Preston; south by Main Road; west by S. Boken & right of way. Fee paid $15.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a varisnce, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers~ and notice to the,applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: We have received a letter of complaint, dated October 5, 1973, from Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Boken, as follows: "Due to the fact that I am scheduled to work on October ll, 1973 on the 4 to 12 shift on Plum Island, I am writing to say I am against granting permission to Kenneth Ketcham to store and work on a private boat over 30' in length in "A" District." THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MR. FRED PRESTON: I am a neighbor and I would like to see this work done. It's no problem to me ~nd I live right next to it. (Mrs. Preston was also present). THE CHAIRMAN: In other years before zoning people thought nothing of putting boats up and working on them. MRS. MARY JONES: I am a neighbor and I like to watch Mr. Ketcham working on his boat. MR. KENNETH KETCHAM: I am going to finish the deck and put a cabin on it. It's a brand new hull. MR. MERLON WIGGINS: I would like to speak up for it. I live directly across the street. (Mrs. Wiggins was also present). THE CHAIRMAN: How long will it take you to finish it? MR. KETCHAM: I hope to have it in the water in March. It may not even take that long. It depends en the weather. Southold Town Boar~ of Appeals -13- October 11, 1973 THE CHAIRMAN: Perhaps you had better make it seven months to play safe. We will stipulate that it be off the property by May 1, 1974. MR. KETCHAM: It's on my father-in-law's property. He is Frank Begora, Sr. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to store s~d work on private boat over 30 feet in length in an "A" District, located on the north side of Main Road, East Marion, New York. The findings of the Board are that this is an essential part of some of the needs of a fishing community, which once was a major occupation in East Marion. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or urmecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it w~s RESOLVED, Kern~eth Ketcham, ~in Road, East Marion, New York be GRANTED permission for temporary storage of boat 36' in length on property of Frank Begora, Sr., in rear yard area, until May l, 1974. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. P~BLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1838 - 8:50 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Robert Kolyer, 208 Christian Avenue, Stony Brook, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide property into two lots with less than required width. Location of property: south side Bayview Road, Southold, bounded north by Bayview Road; east by La Rocca, Marini, Blakeman & others; south by Corey Creek, Gozzola; west by Schroeder, Darnell. Fee paid $15.00. Southold Town Board of Appeals -14- October 11, 1973 The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a survey indicating the problem. There are 280 feet on Bayview Road. It is proposed to divide the property longitudinally. One parcel would have 3 acres and one would have 3 1/2 acres. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? RENSSELAER TERRY, JR.~ ESQ.: I appear here in behalf of Mr. Robert Kolyer who is present. We solicit your approval and feel it wo,~ld not be detrimental to the Town. THE CHAIRMAN: The question that comes to mind is that most people are dividing property to obtain maximum density. This is 6 a~d 1/2 acres and you could get five or six houses on it. If you w~nt us to act favorably tonight we would have to restrict any further division, and you would have to agree to covenant this so this would not occur on each of these parcels, lSe will have to do this so we a~e not faced in the future with "Jones" saying he w~uld like to sell off an acre and a half. In the Town of Southold you have to have 40,000 sq. ft. Would that be agreeable to you? MR. ROBERT KOLYER: We are closing on one piece next week and the man is going to build one house. I thought the man who proposes to buy the other piece was going to build one house but he would like to put two houses on that one piece. Would it be conceivable to leave the door open on one piece in case the man wznted to apply in the future? THE CHAIRMAN: We would have to refer this to the Planning Board to subdivide but you should make it clear to your buyers that we limit it to two lots. MR. TERRY: I should tell you that the property act,,~lly extends as marshland, out of this area which is being cut off, and Mr. Kolyer is conveying that to the owner of the adjacent property whose property does not go to Corey Creek. Actually, there will be three separate conveyances. THE CHAIRMAN: A concern might be Environmental Control. At a meeting at Hauppage we returned at least eight or ten referrals as incomplete as they lacked New York State Environ- mental Control recommendations. The State is supposed to take inventory of we.tlands. It's very unclear what is asked for. Southold Town Board of Appeals -15- October 11, 1973 ~. KOLYER: Is that where they are talking about 300 feet back? THE CHAIRMAN: (Referring to map) This property affects this property which is on Corey Creek so that affects the whole thing. However, there is no question but what you would be permitted to do it. MR. TERRY: He would have to get approval before he could get a building permit. THE CHAIRMAN: Planning is considering using this 300 feet from the one fathom mark. ~¢e don't knew yet what they mean. MR. TERRY: We would like to go ahead with this and get approval. THE CHAIRMAN: We will have to specify that this can not be further subdivided. There would not be any revision. It's a beautiful piece of property. MR. KOLYER: If this is split into two pieces, suppose someone buys the other piece, do I understand he can not do anything with it? MR. TERRY: He has to get approval from the State. MR. KOLYER: If "Mr. X" came in and bought it, he is stuck with one residence. I don't have much choice. I have contracted to sell to one man and possibly another. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to divide property into two lots with less than required width on the south side of Bayview Road, Southold, New York. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant subject to restrictions. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or ~uecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- October 11, 1973 0n m~tion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Robert Kolyer, 208 Christian Avenue, Stony Brook, New York, be GRANTED permission to divide property into two lots with less than required width, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to approval of New York State Environmental Control. 2. That there shall be no further division of this property. 3. That the division permitted shall be covenanted. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. MR. TERRY: Does that apply to the meadowland section to the east, which has been separated? THE CHAIRMAN: That is not on the application, or the survey. We are referring to the application. MR. TERRY: I didn't want any misunderstanding because he has already conveyed this. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1843 - 9:00 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Armond Bartos, Jr., Private Road, East Marion, New York for a variance in accordance with the Town Law, Section 280 A for approval of access. Location of property: north side Main Road, East Marion on right of way bounded east by F. Cowan and other, west by R. Long; bounded north by De Nicola; east by right of way; south by I.C. Latham; west by George Cook and others. Fee paid $15o00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the applica- tion for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a survey which indicates that the applicant is the owner of approximately 6.673 acres. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? $outhold Town Board of Appeals -17- October 11, 1973 RUDOLPH BRUER, ESQ.: He bought Parcel Two first, and then Parcel One. MR. ARMAND BARTOS, JR.: I bought the larger parcel in April of 1969. THE CHAIRMAN: You moved the old school house in here and you later purchased the other parcel. MR. BARTOS: I purchased in January or February of the next year, THE CHAIRMAN: The parcel you propose to sell is on the southerly section of Parcel Two. MR. BARTOS: That is all I intend to sell. RUDOLPH BRLrER, ESQ.: The problem is the right of way. You will notice that it's 8'3". THE CHAIRMAN: I am not sure the Building Inspector understood that you had two parcels. MR. BARTOS: Yes, he did. THE CHAIRMAN: Ne went through this before in cor~aection with the little red school house, and that action in 1969 stated that this access has been in existence for many years. However, in order for the applicant to obtain a building permit, he must have approval of access from the Board of AppealS. It is the opimion of the Board of Appeals that to deny this applica- tion would be to deny the applicant the use of his land. It is a condition ofthis approval that the property in question should be used as one single building lot and only one single family dwelling shall be erected on this property. RUDOLPH BRIER, ESQ.: You have an addition of over an acre added to the property since then. THE CHAIR~L~N: Does a~yone else wish to speak for this application? There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) $outheld Town B~ard of Appeals -18- October 11, 1973 THE CHAIRMAN: I think the only reason we can consider it is that the applicant bought a second piece because the stipulation was that there be only one house because of this access. It's 8'3" wide and you have telephone poles along here o MR. BARTOS: I fire truck can get in there. TH~ CHAIRMAft: Has anyone made a~y effort to bring these people together? There is a lot of land back there that you can't get into. MR. BARTOS: I believe there is going to be another right of way made to the north of my property. Russell's property has a right of way~ I am asking for a one family dwelling. R~DOLPH BRUER, ESQ.: Mr. Bartos has no immediate buyer. This is for the future. THE CHAIRMAN: It can't be divided any further. Actually, the density w~uld not be increased. After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to use access on property located on the north side ordain Read, East Marion. The findings of the Beard are that applicant purchased Parcel No. Two in April of 1969. He received approval of the Board of Appeals for access on May 15, 1969. A condition of this approval was that the property in question should be used as one single building lot and only one single family dwelling shall be erected on this property. However, in January or February of 1970 applicant purchased Parcel Ne. I comprising 1.705 acres. The Board finds that the access in question is 8t3". Applicant's total acreage is 6.673 which includes Parcel No. 2 (4.968 acres) and Parcel No. 1 (1.705 acres). The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance ~11 not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED, Armond Bartos, Private Road, East Marion, New York, be C~W~NTED approval of access, as applied for, on property located on the north side of Main Road, East Marion on right of way bounded east by F. Cowan and other; west by R. Long; bo,,nded north by De Nicolas east by right of way; south by I. C. Latham; west by George Cook and others, subject to the following restrictions: Southold Town Board of Appeals -19- October 11, 1973 A condition of this approval is that there sh~ll be no further division of property now or in the future of the diminished lot that will result from selling the property under application, which is irregularly shaped and divided 150' on the right of way and 310' in depth, comprising approximately 1½ acres. The applicant is restricted to selling his property for a single family dwelling, and the property remaining to Mr. Armand Bartos shall continue to be used as a building lot with a single family dwelling unless suitable approved access is obtained. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1844 - 9:10 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Donald A. Stephenson, Main Road, Orient, New York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300 B-1 for permission to alter existing building to a 2 (two) family occupancy. Location of property: off north side Main Road, Orient on right of way bounded east by Scolielo, west by Burnham; bounded north by Long Island Sound; east by Terry and Lomas; south by right of way; west by Stephenson Beach, Inc. and Old Main Road. Fee paid $15.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: At the time we received this ap~l~tion we did not have a survey showing what has been planned. I am a first cousin of the applicant. I have no financial interest whatsoever but aside from guiding the discussion I would prefer not to vote. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MR. DONALD A. STEPBENS0N: In the back of the house where the old cistern used to be, I would like to add a two car ground level garage and a small apartment over the garage. The back of the house is to the northeast. $outheld Town Board of Appeals -20- October 11, 1973 THE CHAIRMAN: The driveway r,mus around the house. MR. STEPHENSON: The only thing it is useful for is to walk down to the beach. THE CHAIRMAN: Does Horace Terry have access to this property? MR. STEP~NSON: Not at that point. He comes up the west drive and cuts across down towards his barn and garage. THE CHAIRMAN: He owns the house on the bluff. MR. STEPHENSON: The building would be 30' or 40' from where he now drives. THE CHAIRMAN: The tennis court doesn't show on the survey but it is southeast of the Rose area. It is my under- standing that driveways and tennis courts and barns finally descended to Beverly Lomas. She is presently the owner of the east driveway, the one that goes around your house. Your property is on both sides of this driveway and also on both sides of the other driveway running around to the west. This property down here (referring to survey) now belongs to Scofield and they have the right to use the driveway. It's common property. It belongs to four properties on the premises. It would not be proper for this Board to grant permission for an addition if it %~uld be an obstruction on a driveway that someone else owns; even if they do not own it but use it. It would be my suggestion that you obtain releases from these people for that portion of the driveway, or maybe they will sign off. MR. STEPHENSON: I need the garage and the new dwelling. The house is six steps up. It's six steps down and six steps up to the new apartment. I don't see any other way to do it. THE CHAIRMAN: The only other way to do it would be to use some porch area. You decide how you want to do it. We would consider it favorably but you would have to set off 80,000 sq. ft. MR. STEPHENS0N: I have five acres. THE CHAIRMAN: I understand that you own this property between the private road on the west and the seawall and r~ing down to the summer house plus the beach. ~hat we can do is to approve it subject to the applicant setting off 80,000 sq. ft. Have you got any way of obtaining this 80,000 sq. ft.? MR. STEPHENSON: Yes. Southold Town Board of Appeals -21- October 11, 1973 THE CHAIRMAN: Permission would be subject to Van Tuyl setting off in the survey 80,000 sq. ft. surrounding the new addition and garage. We may also need sideyard variances. MR. STEPHENSON: The house is about i0 feet from the driveway. (Mr. Stephenson discussed the sketch with the Board) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to alter existing building to a two family occupancy off the north side of Main Road, Orient, New York. The findings of the Board are that applicant hopes to add a small apartment over the garage/ hobby area space consisting of two bedrooms, a bath and living room, all of which will be an integral part of the existing structure and which will use all the facilities of the me_in house. The small apartment will be used by Mrs. Stephenson's mother. The applicant is the owner of five acres of property. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, Donald A. Stephenson, Main Road, Orient, New York, be GRANTED permission to alter existing building to a 2 (two) family occupancy, located off the north side of Main Road, Orient, New York, as applied for, subject to the follow- ing conditions: That applicant obtain a new survey from Van Tuyl which sets off 80,000 sq. ft. using the northerly boundary and extending 80,000 sq. ft. to the west and southwest. This permission is subject to applicant's obtaining clear title to land, free of rights of way, to property to be used for new construction. 3. This permission is subject to site plan approval of the Planning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Bergen, Hulse, Grigenis, Doyen. Not Voting:- Mr. R. W. Gillispie, Jr. Southold To~m Board of Appeals -22- October 11, 1973 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1845 - 9:20 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Freddie Lawson, Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zening Ordinance, Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule for permission to set off lot with less than required area. Location of property: Oak Place and Walnut Avenue, Mattituck, bounded north by Ruthinowski; south by tholing Island Railroad; west by Oak Place. Fee paid $15.00. The Chairman opened the hearing byreading the application for a variance, legal notice ef hearing, affidavits attesting te its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a map which indicates the irregular shape of the property. T~E CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? WIDLIAM ~CKHAM, ESQ.: As mentioned, the plot does not conform to the usual rectangular shape. The applicant wishes to dispose of that section of his property and has a centract for purchase. We would like te be able to split it up in that fasien. The lots are sttitable for homes. The right of way has been there for many years. (Mr. Wiekham discussed the map with the Beard and indicated where it is proposed te divide it). , THE CHAIRMAN: These are private roads and these houses were built a long time ago on small plots. Mr. Lawson wants to make one portion into an 18,000 sq. ft. lot and retain the other for his own use. It would be larger than most of the other plots. After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to set off lot with less t~ requiredarea at 0akPlace and Walnut Avenue, Mattituck. The findings of the Board are that this division ef land will result in two lots; one will be in excess of requirements, a~ud the other will be about 18,000 sq. ft., which will be larger than most surrounding plots in the area. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties cr unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vic~ity of this property ~nd in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. Southold Town Board of Appeals -23- October 11, 1973 On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, Freddie Lawson, Sound Avenue, Mattituck, be GRANTED permission to set off lot with less than required area at Oak Place and Walnut Avenue, Mattituck, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1846 - 9:30 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of William Serrell, Dogwood Lane, Gardiners Bay Estates, East Marion, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule for permission to build an addition with reduced side yard. Location of property: Lots ~ 95 and 96, Gardiners Bay Estates, Dogwood Lane, East Marion, New York. Fee paid $15.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and copy to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MR. JOSEPH ~. 'DIAZ, Builder: I would like to speak for it. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you swear that this is your signature? MR. DIAZ: I do. THE CHAIR~4/~: I believe that the house to the south of this one is about 3 feet off the line. There is another neighbor to the south who is practically on the line. Gardiners Bay is one of the excepted areas in the Zoning Ordinance. Lot sizes can't be changed so you are asking for a reduction to 7 feet, and this is more than 25%. The Building Inspector can grant side yard variances up to 25%. It has to come to this Board if it will be more than 25%. It will be an 8 foot reduction to 7 feet from the line. MR. DIAZ: We are building the addition on the north side of the house. Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- October 11, 1973 THE CHAIRMAN: My understanding is that you are not going to go any closer than 7 feet and you are not going to decrease the front yard. How large is this addition going to be? MR. DIAZ: We want 12 feet on the house for a bedroom, and 12 x 15 feet for a garage. THE CHAIRMAN: Will it be satisfactory to you if we limit the variance to 7 feet? MR. DIAZ: Yes. There will be a bedroom off the house and a garage in back. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone Present who wishes to speak against this application? There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds tb~t applicant requests permission to build an addition with reduced side yard on Lots # 95 and # 96, Gardiners Bay Estates, East Marion. The findings of the Board are that the addition will be added to the north side of William Serrell's house and will be 28 feet in width and 26 feet in depth. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, William Serrell, Dogwood Lane, Gardiners Bay Estates, East Marion, New York, be GRANTED permission to build an addition with reduced side yard, as applied for, subject to the following condition: That the addition shall be no closer than ? feet to the northerly side yard. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. PD~LIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1847 - 9:40 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of John Dinizio, 624 Main Street, Greenport, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning 0rdinanee, Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule for permission to set off lot with less than required area. Location of property: south side of Brown Street, Greenport, bounded north by Brown Street; east by A. Dinizio; south by Tully and Braun; west by Pipes Cove Corporation. Fee paid $15.00. Southold Town Board of Appeals -25- October 11, 1973 The Chairm~n opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MR. JOHN DINIZI0: I am here to speak for the application. (Mr. Dinizio discussed the map with the Board) THE C~&IRMAN: When we went by the property it appeared to us that the center might be low, that the water might run down. It is at least four or five times larger than the other lots. MR. DINIZIO: (Referring to map) The only way to get more than 40,000 sq. ft. is to make this lot longer. (Mr, Dinizio indicated the subject premises on the map). The premises contain 31,336 sq. ft. The w~y it's planned, it makes square lots. THE CHAIRMAN: Is this a subdivision? MR. DINIZIO: No. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to set off lot with less than required area on the south side of Brown Street, Greenport. The findings of the Board are that premises would be larger than the majority of lots in the immediate vicinity. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, John Dinizio, 624 Main Street, Greenport, New York, be GRANTED permission to set off lot with less than required area on the south side of Brown Street, Greenport, Southold Town Beard ef Appeals -26- October 11, 1973 New York, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse, Doyen. Mrs. Lorraine Ter2y attended the meeting and questioned the granting of a~variance for a two family dwelling in an "A" Residential district. The Chairman said that it is permitted by special exception but the applicant must have 80,000 sq. ft. On the application heard tonight, the only way the applicant cs~ do it is to extend to the southwest and west. Mrs. Terry asked if when granting a variance ~(special exception) the Board teek into consideration the feelings of the neighbors. Mr. Bergen said that the neighbors have a right te attend the meeting and be heard. The Chairman said that to some extent we do but the Beard is supposed to act. The reason we have a local Board is that people living here are familiar with local conditions. In this case, I was the expert because I live in that area. I talked to the Lomas's and they don't object and they surround Mr. Stephenson. They own two buildings to the north and own their own residence, and they don't object. Mrs. Terry said that the last time she was here there was an appeal for a place in Mattituck. They probably did not have $0,000 sq. ft. The Chairman said that we had one in Southold. It was a big estate and they wanted to change to two family. They had 50 or 60 acres sc we had to set off that 80,000 sq. ft. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Board of Appeals dated September 20, 1973, be approved as submitted, subject to correction on page 1, 5th paragraph, Planning Board shall be changed to read Appeals Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigenis, Doyen. Southold Town Board of Appeals -27- October 11, 1973 On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was R~SOLVED that the next regular meeting of the $outhold Town Board of Appeals will be held at 7:30 P.M., November l, 1973, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals se~ 7:30 P.M. (E.$.T.), Thursday, November 1, 1973, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Marion McAll, West Cove Road, Cutchogue, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule for permission to divide and set off lot with existing building. Location of property: Lots # 3, 4, 5, Alonzo Jersey, West Cove Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:45 P.M. (E.S.T.), Thursday, November l, 1973, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Samuel Manarel, Harbor Lane, Cutchogue, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 302 for permission to erect accessory building with reduced setbacks. Location of property: Harbor Lane, Cutchogue, bounded north by D. Hommel; east by Harbor Lane; south by J. L. Lyons; west by Dalchet Corp. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set P.M. (E.S.T.), Thursday, November 1, 1973, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing Southoid Town Board of Appeals -28- October 11, 1973 upon application of Pirate's Cove ~rine, Inc., Peninsula Road, Fishers Island, New York, for a variance in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule and Article 1204a for permission to erect a new store building with less than required rear yard. Location of property: west side of Peninsula Read, Fishers Island, bou~uded north by Private Read; east by Pirate's Cove Marine, Inc.; south by West Harbor; west by We Maynard. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse, Doyen. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED that the Seuthold Town Board ef Appeals set 8:15 P.M. (E.S.T.), Thursday, November l, 1973, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application ef William Grefe, New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 900 2,~d Bulk Schedule for permission to use lot of less than required area for industrial purposes (Contractor's yard). Location of property: west side Cox Lane, Cutchogue, bounded north by L. B. Glover, Jr.; east by Cox Lane; south by B. Harris; west by L. Glover, Jr. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Hulse, Doyen. On motion by ¥~. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:30 P.M. (E.S~T.)~ Thursday, November l, 1973, at the Town 0ffice, Main Road~, Southold, New York as the time and place ofhearing upon application of D~vid De Friest, Main Road, Southold, for a variance in accordance ~th the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 301 and Bulk Schedule for permission to set off lot with less than required width withexisting dwelling. Location of property: west side Horton'$ Lane, Southold bounded north by other land of applicant.; east by Horton's Lane; south bY C. W. Booth; west by Jennings and others. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse, Grigonis, Doyen. $outhold Town Board of Appeals -29- October 11, 1973 The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 P.M, ~KUV~D ,, Robert We Gillispie, Jr. Respectfully submitted, Southold Town Board of Appeals Chairman