HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-11/03/1980HENRY E. RAYNOR, Ir.. Chairman
FREDERICK E, GORDON
JAMES WALL
BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr.
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr.
TO D
SLaY
Southold, N.Y. 11971
TELEPHONE
765- 1938
A regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was
held at 7:30 p.m., Monday, November 3, 1980; at the TOwn Hall,
Main Road, Southold, New York.
Present were:
Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr.
Vice-Chairman Frederick E. Gordon
Member James Wall
Member Bennett 0rlowski, Jr.
Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Ruth Oliva, President, North Fork Environmental Council
Paul Demery, L. I. Traveler-Watchman
Mike Stahl, Suffolk Times
On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to approve the amended parking .plan Of Port of Egypt
Enterprises~ Inc. dated December 20, 1979, to include the placement
of a boat storage rack not closer than ten feet from the metal
building on the westerly side of the property.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, Orlowski,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself
lead agency for the subdivision of property of Golden View Estates
located at Laurel. This proOe2t'is unlisted and an initial
determination of non-significance has been made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
Planning Board -2- vember 3, 1980
On motion made by Mr. 0rlowski, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED to approve the sketch map of "Preliminary Subdivision
Map of Golden View Estates" dated September 9, 1980.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. 0rlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to waive the condition that at least two street
connections be provided in subdivisions with twenty or more lots
as contained in A106-32F of the Southold Code Subdivision of Land
regulations because an additional connection will be provided at
the time the property to the west is subdivided°in the subdivision
known as VGolden View Estates".
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
0n motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED to set 8:45 p.m. November 24, 1980 at the Town Hall,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place for a public
hearing on the preliminary map of the subdivision to be known as
"Golden View Estates" located at Laurel.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was
RESOLVED to approve the sketch map of the minor subdivision
Of property of Ernest G. Radford dated October l, 1980 subject
to notation on the map that the easement on the southerly portion
of the property is reserved for possible future dedication to the
Town of Southold.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was
RESOLVED ~o set 8:15 p.m., Monday, November 24, 1980 at the
Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place
for a public hearing on the question of the approval of the map
of the minor subdivision of Ernest G. Radford located at East
Marion.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
Planning Board -3- ~ember 3, 1980
On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to set 7:30 p.m., Monday, November 24, 1980 at the
Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place
for a public hearing on the question of the approval of the minor
subdivision of Katie J. Dexter on the south side of Park Avenue,
Mattituck (#208).
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Wall,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. 0rlowski, it was
RESOLVED to set 7:45 p.m., Monday, November 24, 1980 at the
Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place
for a public hearing on the question of the approval of the minor
subdivision of Katie J. Dexter on the north side of Park Avenue,
Mattituck (#207)~
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Orlowski, Wall,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. 0rlowski, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED to approve the sketch map of the minor subdivision
of the Frank Zanowski Farm dated October 22, 1980 for property
located at East Cutchogue.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Wall,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself
lead agency for the subdivision of property of Frank Zanowski Farm
located at East Cutchogue. This project is uulisted and an initial
determination of non-significance has been made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Wall,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was
RESOLVED to set 8:30 p.m., Monday, November 24, 1980 at the
Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place
for a public hearing on the question of the approval of the minor
subdivision of the Frank Zanowski Farm located at East Cutchogue.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
Planning Board ,~.j -4- vember 3, 1980
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr..Wall, it was
RESOLVED that whereas, a formal application for the approval
cfa subdivision plat entitled Minor Subdivision of Thomas V.
Perillo & Edith M. Perillo was submitted to the Planning Board on
March 31, 1980, and an application fee of $20 was paid on March
31, 1980, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the said subdivision
application aud plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on
September 22, 1980, at 7:30 p.m., and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of
the Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat aud
application,
Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of
Thomas V. Perillo & Edith M. Perillo for approval of said subdivision
plat prepared by Young & Young dated February 15, 1980, be approved
and the chairman of the Planning Board be authorized to endorse
approval on said subdivision plat.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to over-ride the disapproval by the Suffolk County
Planning Commission of the minor subdivision of Thomas V. Perillo
and Edith M. Perillo in regard to reason number one which reads
"The Commission feels that it has no right to approve a
subdivision with substandard lots." With advice from the Town
A~torney, the Planning Board feels i.t does not have the right to
disapprove two legal lots established by the Zoning Board of
Appeals.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Latham
On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to approve preliminary map dated July 15, 1980 of
the subdivision of Clement W. Booth located at Mount Beulah Avenue,
Southold, with the condition that the road be constructed, name
be placed on the road and it be noted for future dedication to the
Town of Southold.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, Orlowski,
Latham
Planning Board ~ -5- ~ember 3, 1980
8:00 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of
the minor subdivision Of Roger & Richard Praetorius at Mattituck.
Roger & Richard Praetorius appeared.
Mr. Raynor read the legal notice of hearing and presented proof of
publication in the L. I. Traveler-Watchman.
Mr. Raynor: There is a letter from the Suffolk County Department
of Health Services.~ "Prior to commenting on individual sewage
systems, we will need clearance from the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation in regards to wetlands. In addition,
we will need t~ know the location of neighboring wells and cess-
pools prior to our comments." There is correspondence from this
Board to the applicant setting this evening for the hearing,
receipt of fee being paid to the Town Clerk, the metes and bounds
description, correspondence from the Board of Appeals on
7th.
Dear Henry:
On September 25, 1980 Mr. Allen Dawe presented the Board of
Appeals with a petition concerning the above variance requesting
a "reversal of decision."
Enclosed is an excerpt from minutes of meeting held September
25, 1980, whereby the Board was not able to get an unanimous
resolution of the members present for a rehearing.
/s/ Linda Kowalski, Secretary
Mr. Raynor: Member Grigonis moved to call for a rehearing and it
was not seconded. Member Douglass moved not to call for a rehearing
and it was not seconded. Therefore, the Board of Appeals will not
rehear this proposed split. There is correspondence to the
applicant from this Board. There is correspondence from the New
York State DePartment of Environmental Conse~ation. "In accordance
with the recommendation of Administrative Law Judge A. Marshall
Irving, following a Decision Conference on the above application,
enclosed is a copy of the Decision, his recommendation, and your
permit. Please review the conditions of the permit and if there
are any questions, please contact Mr. Daniel Larkin, Regional
Permit Administrator at our Stony Brook Regional Office (telephone
nUmber 516-751-7900) before commencing with construction." There
is a photostat of the DEC permit, a notice of complete application
for the DEC and correspondence from this Board. There is
correspondence to the New York State Enviz~anmental Analysis Unit
setting up the State Environmental Guality Review process with
lead agency by this Board and c6rrespondence outlining the criteria
necessary for submission. There is correspondence and the
applicants' application in duplicate, statement of review for
the County Planning Commission as to drainage structures and short
environmental assessment form and decision from the Southold Town
Zoning Board of Appeals. There is a copy of the deed transfer.
That pretty much completes the file on this minor subdivision. As
is our policy, I would like to ask if there is anyone present this
Planning Board ~ -6- ~vember 3, 1980
evening that would like to speak in opposition to this proposed
minor subdivision. Hearing none, is there anyone present that
would like to speak in favor.
Roger Praetorius: There are a number of things and we are not
here to argue the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing. Here are tax
maps and you can see there is a precedent. Well over half the
lots ha~ insufficient areas. This is the DEC approval.
Richard Praetorius: In the total number of lots, there are thirteen
smaller. There are a total of fifteen. Over half that are that
size. The two lots are outlined in red.
Roger Praetorius: Here is a copy of my grandfather's deed. We
have been taxed as two lots. We have done everything asked for.
At this time the Planning Board already solicited any public
opposition to this thing. I don't know why no one showed up. I
am a licensed professional engineer in the State of New York and
if the Board has any questions in regard to the development of
these properties at this time I would like to answer them.
Allen Dawe: I didn't know you were talking about this case when
I walked in.
Mr. Raynor: You will have to wait a minute. Is there anything
else you gentlemen have to say?
Richard Praetorius: We would like to hear the opposition.
Mr. Raynor: Is there anything else you would like to add to what
you have said?
Richard Praetorius: A year ago we got a Board of Appeals decision.
Notices were sent and no one showed up to oppose us. We went to
the DEC and no one opposed us. This s~mmer he wanted to buy our
property and we refused him and his crusade started. This has
nothing to do with public interest in the area. I would just like
to state that.
Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone present this evening that has any
comments abOut this property that should come before this board
at this time?
Allen Dawe: I came up tonight to meet these gentlemen. I am
awfully glad to hear your direct comments. In answering your
question the reason no one came up to object was the fact that I
was out of town and when I got back I had a pile of mail and this
notice was in there somewhere and I discovered it a week or two
later. I was trying to recollect whether anyone had signed. We
picked up our mail in the post office and from then on it is very
vague.
Mr. Raynor: Mr.~Dawe, would you be specific.
Planning Board ~ -7- /~ember 3, 1980
Mr. Dawe: Mr. E~iksen on the other side was advised by his lawyer
that he didn't need to worry about it because the Planning Bogrd
protected him against any cutting down of the property next to
him and that eased him off. He was ready to come and decided not
to come. When I finally got hold of this matter seriously enough
to try to make an issue of it it was last summer and I made a
personal canvas of all property owners that I could contact in
that area, approximately eighteen of them, and made a survey of
all the pieces of property on this map. More than half of the
people that I talked to have quite wide frontages, either 100
feet or not less than the original subdivision. I think he has an
argument when he wants to say pieces of property in that area are
smaller frontage on the street than the minimum for the zoning
but you have to go back to this old map done in 1955.
Mr. Raynor: Mr. Dawe, do you have a copy of the old map?
Mr. Dawe: I do not have a thing with me tonight but my voice and
you go up into Browers Woods. You come down along Westview Drive
where this piece of property is and they are 75 feet bM~ the old
map. The reason this property was made 50 feet on the frontage
was to widen out to get something on the waterfront. While I am
only 50 feet I have almost 7/8 of an acre in the property and it
is beautiful property. We are maintaining in Browers Woods to
cut this beautiful piece of property is going to harm the real
estate values of Browers Woods. You have a copy, do you not?
Where we go from here I do not know. I want to make a statement
that Mr. Eriksen and~I both wrote letters to Roger and offered to
buy a fifteen foot strip on either side, Eriksen fifteen feet and
me fifteen feet. The gentleman never answered my letters. I
don't know why. This is important. If this negotiation goes
ahead and we buy fifteen feet from each one of these lots ........
Roger Praetorius: Forget it. There is not a chance.
Mr. Dawe: I have been before the Zoning Board of Appeals, as you
probably know, and have gotten everyone on the Board of Appeals
to agree with me off the record that this is not a good thing
but what did they do. Grigonis made a motion to open a hearing
and nobody seconded it and I think Douglass made another motion to
not have a new hearing and nobody seconded it. So what's happened,
it's been whitewashed - no action. I think it is poor operation
of public officials. I think we people in Browers Woods .......
Mr. Raynor: Take this up with the Board of Appeals. This is not
the proper forum. If you have some information that is pertinent
to the two proposed lots the Board is here to listen.
Mr. Dawe: My contention is if houses go up in there they will
have to come to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance to get
the proper side and front clearances in order to make a house on
it. It will be a very poor house and I feel sorry for you fellows
if you try to get houses in there and met the rules down here
because you will be much surprised.
Planning Board ~. -8- vember 3, 1980
Roger Praetorius: We are prepared to cope with that.
Mr. Dawe: There is nothing that I can say that will change you
people.
Mr. Raynor: The Board will not make a decision tonight and will
take your comments into consideration.
Mr. Dawe: It said you were having an open hearing.
Mr. Raynor: When we have evaluated the information from the
~minutes the board will meet and make a decision on the matter.
Is there anyone else present this evening that has any information
that should come before the board at this time?
Richard Praetorius: We received a copy of the petition. I am sure
that you have a copy there. I do not know if the rest of the
Plauning Board has reviewed it. For some reason they put on the
petition that ten of the fourteen names have lot sizes smaller
than the lot sizes we are proposing. One of their contentions is
we are lowering the value of their property and I can't see how.
If they could give me a legitimate reason I would say O.K. but
they do not. I am looking at John and Rita Schmidt with 10,125
square feet; Frances and Richard Fogarty with 10,125 square feet;
Bascomb with 13,750 square feet. I do not understand the petition.
I am upset by it. It is something out of the blue that came to
us. I can't see how ten people out of fourteen~hLlots smaller
can sign this thing and say we are hurting the situation here.
Roger Praetorius: There is another situation here. Mr. Eriksen
who is named here has two houses on that lot. He has a detached
garage with bathroom and living space. There are two houses on a
lot smaller than one of ours. He did not sign this petition and
what he has said verbally I do not know. He has also made a road
across our lot.
Mr. Raynor: Do any members of the board have any comments?
Mr. Dawe: May I make some comments. Mr. Eriksen and his wife
went back to New Jersey tonight because they were told by one
member of the Planning Board that it was a losing battle to come
up here tonight.
Mr. Raynor: They spoke to me and I told them if they had some
information that was pertinent to come up.
Mr. Dawe: Eriksen's two houses, this goes back to when Browers
Woods was laid out. It was bought that way.
Roger Praetorius: Have you visited the property?
Mr. Raynor: W±thin the month.
Roger Praetorius: Was Allen Dawe there when you visited?
Planning Board ~yJ -9-
~ember 3, 1980
Mr. Raynor: I wasn'tthere when he was present. Mr. Wall?
Mr..Wall: No questions.
Mr. Raynor: Mr. 0rlowski?
Mr. 0rlowski: No questions.
Mr. Raynor: Mr. Latham?
Mr. Latham: How large is your lot?
Mr. Dawe: Almost 30,000 square feet. My point on the survey was
not square footage but road frontage.
Mr. Raynor: Mr. Gordon?
Mr. Gordon: No questions.
Mr. Raynor: There being no other comments or questions from the
board I would just like to make one comment and that is the fact
that apparently this has initiated with the Board of Appeals and
the action of this board is bound by the Board of Appeals of the
Town of Southold. I put that forward for your consideration
because the Board of Appeals has seen fit to make this two separate
entities although Mr. Praetorius has indicated there was a transfer
of two lots. There being no other comments we will deem this
hearing closed.
8:15 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the
minor subdivision of Joseph Gajeski located at Southold. Richard
Lark, Esq., appeared on behalf of the applicant.
Mr. Raynor read thelegal notice of hearing and presented proof of
publication in the L. I. Traveler-Watchman.
Mr. Raynor: We have in the file comments regarding the State
Environmental Quality Review Act and correspondence from the
applicant's attorney. There is correspondence to the applicant's
attorney on the 22n~ day of September disapprovingthesketchmap.
There is application in duplicate, correspondence from this board
to the Board of AppeaLs and a short environmental assessment form
signed by Joseph Gajeski. That pretty well completes the file.
As is the procedure is there anyone present this evening that
would like to speak in opposition to the subdivision of Joseph
Gajeski. Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening that
would like to speak in favor of this subdivision.
Richard Lark: I amthe attorney representing the application.
This applicationhas apparently caused some confusion and I think
maybe an explanation isin order. Originally when Mr. Gajeski
applied to the Board of Appeals to subdivide it what had happened
is Mr. Ga~eski~ fortunately or unfortunately, is not married nor
Planning Board ~ -10- ~vember 3, 1980
does he have any children and he has lived there in what is referred
to as his house, the Gajeski parcel on this original survey which
is the southerly piece, some 53 years and he purchased the land to
the north from Mr. Stelzer and because he could not put it in
another name, the zoning merged it on him and when he went to do
something he was told by the building inspector that he needed a
variance. Originally he wanted to split it along the lines as he
bought it but the Board of Appeals said no because the lot lines
would be too close to the house. It was the Board of Appeals that
devised the situation where they wanted him, the map you have
before you, to create a lot that would have 150 feet of width on
Maple Avenue and the balance devoted to the other lot called lot
one. It was at their insistence that the lot division was made
in that fashion. Subsequently, a formal application was made and
the board granted it subject to the restriction that he could not
build anything closer than 170 feet on that vacant lot. The theory
was that any house that was ever erected would be put back in this
area there. The land to the north was purchased by C~chanowicz
and will be devoted primarily to nursery stock and the Board of
Appeals felt that is where they wanted any house located and the
barn would be the accessory building for that lot and that is the
history of how that subdivision came about. Curiously enough,
when I applied to the Board of Appeals Maple Avenue had never~been
approved for an access and some of the town officials thought it
was a town road. It came up when Cichanowicz wanted to run
electricity and there is a LILC0 underground gas main that runs
along the side here. There were lighting poles and LILCO found
their equipment and stuff were on private land and they wanted an
easement. That is when it was discovered that Maple Avenue never
received approval of access and that was the Board of Appeals
granted and one condition was no structures closer than 170 feet
on that lot and because of the new change in procedure that the
Planning Board also had to look at it. I questioned~Mr. G~i§enis
at the time because I saw a oonflict and was assured that it had
been discussed and there was no problem and the Planning Board
was in accord because I didn't want to get into the ohicken and
egg situation. Subsequently, I found out that wasn't necessarily
the truth and that was most unfortunate. Probably it should have
come to the Planning Board first but we were told bM the building
inspector that it had to go to the Board of Appeals £irst so that
is the history in a nutshell as to why it was split up in that
particular fashion. They would approve the lot there subject to
their covenant of 17~ feet that would be adopted. He agreed to
it there and he will agree to it here and he is here to answer
any questions. I know you have been to the property. The Board
of Appeals made me compute the area because it is sort of a home
made subdivision and curiously enough the majority of the lots
are smaller than what is proposed here. All are smaller except
the~ larger chunks to the north which have not been subdivided and
are still in farming use.
Mr. Raynor: What was the date of the original hearing with the
Board of Appeals?
-11- November 3, 1980
Planning Board ~
Mr. Lark: It was late June or early July when I spoke to them
about it and they said they wouldn't go for that split.
Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone present this evening that would like
to speak for this proposed minor subdivision? Is there anyone with
any specific information that should come before the Board at
this time? Mr. Gordon? Mr. Latham? Mr. 0rlowski? Mr. Wall?
Mr. Wall:
Mr. Lark:
What is the protuberance by the garage?
It will be eliminated.
Mr. Raynor: The reason I was inquiring as to the date is we~
initiated the procedures in September to have better communication
by the boards.~ Subsequent to that hearing I am sure you are aware
our board suggested it be divided the way you originally proposed
it but the opinion of the Town Attorney says that we are pretty
well bound by the lot lines set by the Board of Appeals which this
board must take first consideration of. If there is nothing else
we will deem this hearing closed and thank you for coming down this
evening.
FIDC0 #184, Fox Avenue business property. The Suffolk County
Planning Commission requires that the whole property be 'shown on
at least a l" to 200' scale. They have made this in an amendment
to Bulletin 8. Mr. Lark appeared on behalf of FIDC0 and he feels
the Board should over-rule the County. The County considers this
an incomplete submission and has not acted on the map. Mr. Raynor
will contact the Town Attorney for his opinion on this matter.
Aldrich Lane Associates. Howard Young appeared. Mr. Raynor
objects to the flaglots. It goes over 1200 feet without an
intersection. There is no park and playground shown. It should
be reconsidered as a cluster. The board will make a field
inspection of the property. Mr. Young felt with the size of the
lots there might be some waivers given. Mr. Raynor asked if the
developers were willing to make a voluntary covenant as to no
further subdivision. Mr. Young said they would be willing. The
maps of the entire area will have to be studied.
Cove Beach Associates. Mr. Howard Young inquired as to who
would tell him what is buildable land on the property as requested
by the Town Board. Mr. Raynor suggested he contact the Town Board.
Guarnaschelli. This is a 27 acre piece which must be divided in
half by a subdivision procedure before the Planning Board. The
Guarnaschellis are to be informed.
-~ No~/-~b
Planning Board ~J -12- er 3, 1980
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED to set 8:00 p.m., November 24, 1980 at the Town Hall,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place for a public
hearing on the question of the approval of the minor subdivision
of Galileo Valentini located at Fishers Island.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Wall,
Latham
Sterling Forest. Ronald and.Edith Reese. The Board reviewed the
comments of the Suffolk County Planning Commission regarding
adhering to the original ~rainage to Be provided. The Board did
not feel this would be necessary for four lots.
Mr. Gordon made a motion, seconded by Mr. Latham and carried
to authorize the chairman to sign the map of Ronald and Edith
Reese.
Motion was made by Mr. 0rlowski, seconded by Mr. Wall and
carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of September
22, 1980.
Motion was made by Mr. 0rlowski, seconded by Mr. Wall and
carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of October
16, 1980.
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED to approve the amended site plau of the Mattituck
Free Library indicating four parking spots in front of the
library, two spots for the handicapped alongside with the
remainder in a 70' by 70' area to the rear and west of the
library. The Planning Board requests that the building inspector
issue a temporary certificate of occupancy for one year for the
work to be completed on the parking area in the rear.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Orlowski, Wall,
Latham
William A. Hatfield. The Board of Appeals has requested information
from this board regarding the setting off of a lot of 5,600 square
feet and insufficient width of 70 feet on the east side of New
Suffolk Road. It was the consensus of the Planning Board that
5,600 square feet was an insufficient area to be set off.
Planning Board ~ -13- No~ er 3, 1980
Jack J'. Stukas. The Board of Appeals has requested information
from this board regarding the insufficient area and width as
originally in 1971 subdivision of JackStukas. The consensus of
the Planning Board is that this is an approved subdivision in the
Estate of George Wells. Mr. Herbert Wells signed a statement
in regard to this subdivision in which he stated "That portion
of the subdivision that is designated as meadow will remain a
scenic easement and will be preserved in its natural state in
perpetuity." It was the consensus of the Planning Board that it
was not its intention to deny the use of the creek over the meadow
land providing proper permits are obtained from the town and any
other agencies involved. This information will be transmitted to
Mr. Burr Lewis and Robert Tasker, Esq.
On motion made by Mr. 0rlowski, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED to set 9:00 p.m., November 24, 1980, at the Town
Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place for a
public hearing on the question of the approval of the final map
of the subdivision to be known as ,,Honeysuckle Hills" owned by
Walter Gatz.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, 0rlowski,
Lath~m
On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to approve the site plan dated September 24, 1979
with attached amendment showing berm and gravel drain trenches
of Knights of Columbus Council Hall Marian Council #3852.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Wall, Orlowski,
Lmtham
James R. Wheeler. The Board of Appeals has requested information
from this board regarding the insufficient area and width of two
parcels at Kenny's Road, Southold. The consensus of the Board is
that this should be processed as a minor subdivision and the
Planning Board has no objection to the proposal.
There being no further business to come before the Board,
Mr. 0rlowski made a motion, seconded by Mr. Wall and carried to
adjourn the meeting. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Henry E~Raynor~//Jr.-, C~3~rman