Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-08/25/1980HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr.. Chairman FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 765- 1988 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was held at 7:30 p.m., Monday, August 25, 1980, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Present were: Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Vice-Chairman Frederick E. Gordon Member Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr. Millicent Gossner, League of Women Voters Henry Lytle, Southold-Peconic Civic Association Mike Stahl, Suffolk Times 7:30 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the minor subdivision of Antone and Eloise Norklun located at Orient. Mr. and Mrs. Antone Norkltm and Mr. and Mrs. Curt Norklun appeared. Mr. Raynor read the legal notice of hearing and presented proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler-Watchman. Mr. Raynor: This is a two-lot minor subdivision sent over to our board by the Board of Appeals. Reviewing the file, sketch approval was granted and a resolution for a public hearing was done at that time. In the file we have correspondence to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation stating the Plarming Board is lead agency. The board is in receipt of the receipt from the Town Clerk in the amount of $50 along with the application and metes and bounds description. I have a letter to the board regarding grading, no new road construction or drainage facilities and under the State Environmental Ouality Review Act we have a short Environmental Assess- ment Form. Along with this we have a resolution from the Southold Board of Appeals. There is no road construction and there is no letter in here from the Superintendent of Highways. As it-is not in the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission we have no correspondence from them. As is the policy with this board, we will ask if there is anyone present this evening that would like to speak in opposition to the minor subdivision of Antone and Eloise Norklun situated at Orient. Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening that would like to speak in favor of this subdivision. Planning Board ~ ~ -2- August _j,, 1980 Hearing none, is there anyone present that has any information that should come before this board at this time concerning this particular proposed subdivision. Hearing none, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Gordon, do you have any questions? (all negative) Hearing none, I will deem this hearing closed. On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant ef£ect on the environmenT. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of Antone and Eloise Norklun is a two-lot residential and business subdivision with a building existing on each lot on 34,113 square feet of property located at Orient in the Town of Southold. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the Suffolk County Department of Health. Services it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. The project will meet all requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Ms. Muriel Tolman, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Orlowski, Latham on motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was RESOLVED that whereas, a formal application for the approval of a subdivision plat, entitled Minor Subdivision of Antone and Eloise Norklun located at Orient was submitted to the Planning Board on June 30, 1980 and $50 application fee was paid on August 6, 1980, and Planning Board ~ -3- August . ~" 1980 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the said subdivision application and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on August 25, 1980 at 7:30 p.m., and WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application, Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of Antone and Eloise Norklun for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Roderick Vau Tuyl, P. C., be approved and the chairman be authorized to endorse his approval on the map. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Latham On motion made by Mr. 0rlowski, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was RESOLVED to set 8:15 p.m., Monday, September 22, 1980, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place for a public hearing on the question of the approval of the preliminary map of the subdivision of Clement W. Booth. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Latham Eccles and Hilary Pridgen minor subdivision. Mr. Orlowski and Mr. Raynor will make an inspection of this property before a decision is made. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency for the subdivision of property of Eccles and Hilary Pridgen located at Laurel. This pro~ect is unlisted and an~in~tial determination of non-significance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Latham On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED to set 8:45 p.m., September 22, 1980, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place for a public hearing on the question of the approval of the minor subdivision of Dawn Estates Shopping Center~ Inc. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Latham Roger H. and Richard J. Praetorius minor subdivision. Mr. Gordon and Mr. Latham will make an inspection of the property. Planning Board ~.~f -4- August , 1980 8:00 p.m. Public Hearing on amendments to the Subdivision of Land Regulations of the Code of the Town of Southold. The first amendment is the definition of "subdivision". The second amendment is the addition of a new section at the end of the present Subdivision Regulations which provides that all the Board of Appeals determinations from January l, 19?l to September 5, 1979 which are included on the "schedule" are deemed to be approved with the same force and effec5 as if the owner had applied to the Planning Board and had obtained approval in accordance with its normal procedures. Mr. Raynor read the legal notice of hearing and presented proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler-Watchman. Mr. Raynor: As is the policy of this board with public hearings, we will ask if anyone present has any specific problems with any of the aforementioned amendment changes. Diana Winecoff, North Sea Drive (Appeal #2566). Two parcels were sold to people called Syragas. These are 100 feet on the Sound between Kenny's Beach and McCabe's Beach. The lot sold next door to mine has a line down the middle dividing it into two 50 foot lots. A gentleman in the office told me that lot is undersized right now so they couldn't appeal for two houses but come to one of the meetings and find what it is about. There is a definite line on the surveyor's map and the only one there and it runs from the water up half way to Sound beach and what I am worrying about is there are a lot of empty lots around there and if we set a precedent then everyone else that sells there lots can do TYne same damn thing and I would like to know what this is down here for. Mr. Raynor: It apparently has been approved by the Board of Appeals in 1979. We intend to talk on the specific notices tonight and go back to the Board of Appeals and request to them at least a reconsideration of their action. You said you spoke to a gentleman. Do you know who you spoke to? Ms. Winecoff: No. Mr. Raynor: It was probably someone from the assessors' office. Ms. Winecoff: It was sold to someone and wife. Wife was on 50% and his name on the other. The same across the street was put down the same way. Someone told me Carol Lounsberry and her brother had it that way. It is too small to build one house and they said get a variance for that and they should be if we are going to get more than one house. Mr. Raynor: Did you-attend any of the hearings the Board of Appeals had? Do you have an adjacent parcel? Ms. Winecoff: Nothing, we never got a thing.~ Other people, the man on the left of me, Dr. Vaccaro, he, missed it, too, and he said we will find out about it because everybody will be upset. Mr. Raynor: If your frontage is 100 feet, what is your depth? Planning Board -5- August .., 1980 Ms. Winecoff: We are the narrowest spot, about 350 to 375 feet deep. A lot of people towards the end have full acres. This person said they have to appeal to build there. Mr. Raynor: Which apparently they have done. I have no knowledge in that area but I will find out. I would suggest for your own self-satisfaction you come to the office to the secretary of the Board of Appeals and review the file. Ms. Winecoff: Who would I speak to? Mr. Raynor: Linda Kowalski. Is there anyone else here this evening that has a question on a specific action? Peter Hanlon (Appeal #2017). My objection was to property belonging to Mr. Stanley Chase. The lot in question is directly in front of my home and has 80 foot frontage and there is no construction within 30 feet and it is in the proximity to Mattituck Airport and I think it constitutes a danger to' my life and property. I have two cesspools which, in my opinion, would be a health hazard if he tried to drill a well. As far as a well is concerned the availability of potable public or private water supply is a necessity for a building permit and I would doubt if he could put any residence on that piece of property. I strongly objected because the board said it would be an economic hardship not to grant this variance and it would not change the character. There are three large residences for a total of 14 acres. Directly across is Homan and next is Mrs. Dexter with four acres and next Sarkesian with eight acres. As far as it being an economic hardship, he bought it for $48,000. He has the building and lot for sale for $225,000 and the lot in question for $75,000 for a total of $300,000. I don't think that margin of profit is a hardship. In my opinion, the Planning Board should not grant a permit. Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has not gotten involved with this. Mr. Hanlon: If he can put that down in writing I would appreciate it no end. I certainly think the other thing in the zoning board that it will change the appearance of the area. They say it won't. This is a three-quarter of an acre on a piece of property with 50 foot front. There are residences of four or five acres. It changes the appearance of the area. Thank you. Mr. Raynor: This came up about three or four months ago regarding the approach strip to the Mattituck Airport. Several years ago we had the property to the north and had discussed a restrictive covenant on the westerly part of that property primarily because of the aviation traffic which is of paramount concern to the board.~ Also, we sent it to the County and they also came back regarding this approach. We will encompass all this in a letter to the Board of Appeals and again ask them if they are in a position to reconsider their action. Mr. Tsounis: What safeguards do you intend to take to not allow this to happen again? Planning Board ~ -6- August _~j, 1980 Mr. Raynor: The problem arose in the fact that it never got here. What we have set up and we set it up about six months ago is a cross-communication between the Board of Appeals and the Planning Board which before this had not been. A perfect example is several of the Board of Appeals referrals where action has ~]ready been taken where we think there is a potential problem. We put them in a holding pattern until we see what is the reasoning for the Board of Appeals to take that action. Prior to the Board of Appeals taking action where it would involve a subdivision they have been requesting of us to send an overview response letter. As soon as they get a submission they say, do you see a problem, and quite honestly we have bounced a few back and said we do see problems here. On ~several occasions they have turned people down which is somethiug different for them. It doesn't make some people happy but overall I think the effect is good. We went from a nothing to a looking stage. What we have before us now is mostly cleanup work and this is the big bulk of the cleanup work which we have paged over. Mr. Tsounis: If you say no, they can go to the Board of Appeals and there is nothing you can do? Mr. Raynor: There is nothing we can do. They have the final say. Ms. Winecoff: If it turns out it is divided into two parcels, what does one do? Mr. Raynor: As far as the jurisdiction of their board, we will request them after reviewing the map and if we find ~he~e is a precedent being set to downgrade the neighborhood, we would ask them to review it. If they tell us they used x, y and z and feel it is legitimate that is all we can do. That leaves yourself open to any type of civil action you would want to pursue. We have a procedure which is known as an Article 78 proceeding which enables anyone who feels they are an aggrieved party to go forward on that basis. Is there anyone else that has anything? Is there anyone that wants to speak in favor of the two proposed amendments. Hearing none, Mr. 0rlowski, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Latham? (all negative) There being no other comments I will declare this hearing closed and thank you for coming down this evening. 0n motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was RESOLVED in the matter of the Minor Subdivision of Whitcom Investment Company to over-ride that part Of Suffolk CountyPlanning Commission condition #5 which reads as follows: "Access structures shall be limited to one for every two lots located on or near the lot line common to two ~lots and shall be shared by the owners of the two lots." The reasons for this over-ride are as follows: 1. The Planning Board does not feel that access structures for each lot would impose any serious problem in the disturbance of the Sound bluff. Planning Board -7- ~ugust t <, 1980 2. A potential of liability also arises with dual possession. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Orlowski, Latham 8:30 p.m. Public Heariug on the question of the approval of the minor subdivision of Ronald & Edith Reese located at Southold. Harold Reese appeared. Mr. Raynor read the legal notice of hearing and presented proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler- Watchman. Mr. Raynor: This is a minor subdivision of four lots on property in excess of eight acres. In going through the file, there is a resolution by the board setting tonight as a hearing, a short Environmental Assessment Form signed by the applicant with regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, computation of drainage and road profiles and going back beyond this there is an old map where the property was a major subdivision and would not have a bearing. This property is cut from a major subdivision down to a minor. The yield on the original was eight lots to four lots. As there is no new highway construction there is no correspondence from the Superintendent of Highways. Under the old map of eight lots in 1978, the proposal was considered to be satisfactory to the Suffolk County Department of Pl&uning. This will have to go out in connection with the State Environmental Quality Review Act. I have a receipt in the amount of $95.00 from the applicant along with au application. That pretty well covers the file on this. Is there anyone present this evening that would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor subdivision. Hearing none, is there anyone that would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor. Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening that has any specific information that should come before this board at this time. Mr. Gordon, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham? (all negative) Ther~ being no further questions, we will declare this hearing closed. Whitehead minor subdivision. Robert Gillispie III appeared. Discuslsion was held~regarding the beach area on the Sound and the appearance that there are two rights-of-way. Mr. Raynor wanted to know the reasoning for dividing the beach out. Mr. Gillispie said if a bridge was built it was felt it would be from lot Iaud they would need a beachhead. They do not intend to build a bridge at the present time. Mr. Gillispie saidMrs. Whitehead owns the right-of- way that is shown on the map. The other right-of-way services the minor subdivision of David Gillispie. The BOard iiid not want to put Campbell in a position to have right-of-ways all around him. Mr. Gillispie said Whiteheads have no rights over that right-of-way of Campbell. Lots 3 and ~ will use the 15 foot right-of-way on the east side of lot 2 to get to Dam Pond. There was discussion regarding the 150 foot being at right angles for lot 2. Mr. Gillispie wanted to provide at least a 20 foot side yard for the large house on lot 1. Planning Board -8- August ~, 1980 On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency for the subdivision of property of Norman and Mary. Ruth Whitehead. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of non-significance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Latham On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. 0rlowski, it was RESOLVED to approve sketch map dated March 5, 1980 of Norman and Mary Ruth Whithead located at East Marion subject to realignment of lot 2 to create right angles at 150 foot frontage. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Latham On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED to approve the request of Susan Hallock to change the position of lot line between two parcels due to the location of the septic wells on lots numbers 2 and 3 in the Minor Subdivision of George H. Wells Estate at Peconic. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, 0rlowski, Latham Ga~eski. This is a referral from the Board of Appeals and will also be a minor subdivision. The Board feels the property is adequately drawn as is and no.variances should be given. This is apparently derived out of a 16 acre piece of property which will se~'a precedent for the remainder of the tract. The original makes more sense than the appeal. Witherspoon cabana property. The board does not feel the property should be divided. The topograph doesn't lend itself to a split. There is a question as to the availability of a fresh water supply. By the elevations the property is obviously in the flood plain. There is no consideration to a 100 foot setback from the sound. Long Pond Estates. The board reviewed the letter of Ernest Wilsberg regarding the bond estimate as prepared by Lawrence M. Tuthill, Town Engineer. A copy of the letter will be sent to Mr. Tuthill with a request for an explanation. On motion made by Mr. Gordon, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was Planning Board .... -9- August ~,~, 1980 RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board release of the bond for the improvements in the subdivision known as "Shorecrest at Southold", pursuant to inspection report #145 of John W. Davis, Planning Board Inspector, indicating all work called for in the bond estimate has be~en completed. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Orlowski, Latham Walter Gatz subdivision. A letter has been received from Young & Young regarding conditions imposed by the Town Engineer on this subdivision. The Planning Board will request that John W. Davis, Planning Board Inspector, and Lawrence M. Tuthill, Town Engineer, review the comments and attend the next regular meeting on September 22, 1980 to review same. The following proposed budget for 1981 will be submitted to Supervisor Pell and the Town Clerk as per law. Office Supplies $ 500.00 Advertising for public hearings 2,000.00 Transportation, lodging for F.I. member 2,300.00 Assn. of Towns & Educational meetings 1,800.00 Office equiDment 500.00 N. Y. Planning Federation dues 55.00 Members' salaries - 4 @ $4,500 i @ $6,500 (chairman) 24,500.00 Secretary's salary increased by $3,000 plus cost of living index 13,600.00 Planning Board inspector 3,500.00 Planning Board engineer 500.00 Professional or legal counsel 3,000.00 plus The Planning Board is in agreement with the proposed change of lot line for George and Barbara Koch which involves the minor subdivision of Clement W. Booth at Mt. Beulah Avenue, Southold. Richmond Creek Farms. The map of this subdivision will be referred to the Soil & Water Conservation District of the Department of Agriculture in Riverhead for its comments on the swale drainage. Louise Ehlers minor subdivision. Mr. Orlowski and Mr. Raynor will make an inspection of this property to determine the buildable land. Planning Board -10- August , 1980 Motion was made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Gordon and carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of July 14, 1980. Motion was made by Mr. 0rlowski, seconded by Mr. Gordon and carried to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of July 28, 1980. A letter will be written to the Zoning Board of Appeals requesting that they review the items that were complained about at the public hearing held previously this evening on the grandfathering of their actions. Nina Stevens. Maps have been received in which this subdivision has been changed to a four-lot minor. Mr. 0rlowski will check out the location of the road in relation to the proposed east-west road. There being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. 0rlowski made a motion, seconded by Mr. Latham and carried to adjourn the meeting. Meeting adjourned at 9:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Muri~Z Tolman, Secretary Henry E. (Raynor, Jr./ Chair~h