Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-09/14/1981P HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr.. Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. ,Ir. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. ,Ir. William F. Mullen, Jr. Southold. N.Y. TELEPHONE 765 - 1938 A regular meeting of the Southold T Planning Board was held at 7:30 p.m., Monday S~ptember 14, 1981, at the Town Hall, Main Road Southold, New York. P~esent were: Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr. Member William F. Mullen, Jr. Member Bennett Orlowski, Jr. (arrived late) 7:30 p.m. Public Hearing on the questio] subdivision of George and Jane Toumanoff Wickham was present to voice his approva2 of the approval of the minor located at Mattituck. John of this subdivision. On?motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED to dispense with the reading of cription on the minor subdivision entitl~ Vote of the board: Ayes: Raynor, Mr. Raynor: Is there any objection from tonight concerning %he deletion of the mJ metes and bounds description? Hearing nc It should be noted that the description Times, commencing on the 3 of September, and noterized by Helen K. Devoe. Going receipt of the Town Clerk of filing fee of the legal notice as it appeared, corre setting this evening as a hearing for thi correspondence from the applicant, corre. ~ounty Department of Planning; The Planning Commission at its regu viewed the proposed subdivision entitled and Jane Toumanoff, referred to it pursua Suffolk County Charter. After due study to approve said map subject to the follow the metes and bounds des- .d George and Jane Toumanoff. atham, Mullen anybody in the audience here nutes . the reading of the ne . motion carried. as in the Suffolk Weekly signed by Troy Gustavson, hrough the file, we have n the amount of $100.O0, copy spondence from this board s proposed subdivision, )ondence f~om the Suffolk ~r meeting on August 5, re- Minor Subdivision, George ~t to Section 1333 of the ~nd deliberation it resolved lng six conditions: 1. Approval of this subdivision shal~ be made subject to the meeting the requirements and standards of the Suffolk County Depart- ment of Health Services. 2. The alignment of the proposed r use of horizontal curves. 3. The map for the subdivision of (labeled Section No. 2 on the present ma subdivision in the office of the County 4. The proposed intersection of Mi street shall be constructed in such a ma~ sight distance for vehicles entering Mil 5. No lot shall be changed in any the Town of S~uthold Planning Board. 6. Conditions three and five shall restrictions in the Suffolk County Clerk signed by Charles G. Lir~_~, duplicate fil~ t~ the Suffolk County Planning Commissio] as this is a minor subdivision, for drai pondence from Department of Health Servi We are in receipt of your letter co~ (2) 9/14 '81 t-~ ~ad shall be improved by the ~he remainder of the property ?) shall be filed as a major ~lerk. [1 Road and the proposed ~ner as to insure adequate Road. ~anner unless authorized by be filed as covenants and s Office. ~s, notice of transmittal ~, waiver of requirements ~age structures, and corres- ~es; ~erning the above. It should be noted that this area has a his~ory of limited groundwater supply d~e to nitrate contamination and ~alt water intrusion. Should you have any further question, plgase feel free to contact me. Royal R. Reynolds, PE, Public Health EngSneer, General Engineering Services, more correspondence and trans~ittals~- Suffolk County Department of Planning, .copy of the shor~ environmental assessment form under the State Environmental Quali~y Review Act, approval by this board of the sketch plan on May 8, n.etes and bound description, applicant's application and a copy again of the surveyors courses and distances. As has been the procedur~ if there is anyone present this evening opposition to this proposed minor subdiv~ Toumanoff? Hearing none, is there anyone would like to speak in favor of this pro John Wickham: My name is John Wickham, a part interest. As I go before the pla speak in favor of it. To the best of my met all the requirements, one we have not lng horizontal curves because, it was the that, the curves are so shallow and that follow the curve in all reasonable sense~ all the requirements of the planning boa~ feels that horizontal curves ~hould be ma are less than 30 curves of 3 angles, A it is somewhat unnecessary. I also want permit granted to George for the subdivis of this board, we will ask who would like to speak in sion of George and Jane present this evening who osed minor subdivision? older of the contract, for ning board, I would like to knowledge and belief, we have had the map changed provid- opinion of our engineer the road would naturally However, we expect to meet If the planning board ~e, it is a note that they s I said, our engineer feels to say, we have a copy of the ion. (3) -- 9/14/81 Mr. Raynor: Thank you John. IF there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor sub- division? Hearing none, is the~e anyone present who has some infor- mation and should come before the board at this time, concerning this subdivision, which may be neither pro nor con, but should become part of this hearing? Hearing none, Mr. Mullen, questions? Mr. Latham? (Negative) There being no further question~ from this board, we will consider this hearing closed. Thank you very much for coming down. On motion made by Mr. Latham, s~ RESOLVED that the request for a Blanchard subdivision from Rich~ Richard A. and Martha Howard to Fishers Island board member was Vote of the board: Ayes: Highland Estates After the comm~ ust 27, and September 2, it was repaired. Six of the thirteen equipment had been on the premi~ ~conded by Mr. Mullen, it was name change on the Smith~ Carter, ~rd A. and Dorthea E. Howard to be tabled until next meeting, as the not present. Raynor, Latham, Mullen .ttee inspected the property on Aug- noted that 18 curb cuts have to be [wellings are occupied. Construction es'during the time of inspection. There is approximately 1500 feet of curbing, leading to the main road, that needs clearing. The commi%be~has given six reports on this property since April 30, 1981.' The board does not find this property suitable for a CO. 7:45 p.m. Public Hearing on thc minor subdivision entitled Robe~ On motion made by Mr. Latham, RESOLVED to dispense with the r cription on the property of the Johnson. Vote of the board: Ayes: Mr. Raynor: It should be noted Weekly Times one week, commenci~ signed by Troy Gustavson, noteri of the file we have transmittals County Planning Commission, tran to the New York State Department question of the approval of the 't Johnson, located in Southold. econded by Mr. Mullen, it was ading of the metes and bounds des- minor subdivision entitled Robert Raynor, Latham, Mullen the legal notice ran in the Suffolk g on the third day of September, 1981, zed by Helen K. Devoe. In review , copies of maps to the Suffolk smittals and copies of correspondence of Ehvironmental Conservation, per- taining to the State Environment 1 Quality Review Act, copy of the legal notice, course and distances from the surveyor and a copy of the determination of this board to declare lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, anLinitial determination~of non- significance , also setting a resolution for Public Hearinq for this piece of property at this time, ~co~respondence back from t~e Department (4) 9/14/81 Mr. Raynor con't. . of Planning stating that this is not within their jusisdiction, signed by Charles Lind, copy of subdivision and road profiles, dated August 4, resolution from this board approving a sketch plan on the minor subdivision of Robert Joknson, on the map dated July 8, a short environmental assessment form-~ copy of the applicant's application along with a receipt from the Town Clerk for the proper filing fee of $75.00. The only thing that is missing from this file, at this time, is a signature on the form for the fact that there be no new drainage structures other than indicated for residential building or grading other than for foundation excava- tion on residential lots. As is the policy of this board, we will ask if there iR anyone present this evening, who would like to speak in opposition to this minor subdivision? Mrs. Wiepzynski: Yes I would. Mr. Raynor: Would you give your name to the secretary please~ Mrs. Wiepzynski: Mr. and Mrs. Wiepzynski. We are the adjoining property owners, of , I thought it was Mr. Haans that owned the property, and I understand now that it is Mr. Johnson. Mr. Raynor: That is correct. Mrs. Wiepzynski: Then the property has been sold? Mr. Raynor: To the best of my knowledge, Yes. Mrs. Wiepzynski: Well that is what I wanted to know. Has it been sold or not? Is it still Mr. Raynor: Yes these people are here representing that they are in fact, owners of Feetoc. Mrs. Wiepzynski: In reading the notice in the newspaper, it was ~ery difficult to follow what's happening to that piece of property. Mr. Raynor: Would you like a copy of one of the maps here, or did ~you have a chance to come into the office and review it? Mrs. Wiepzynski: I reviewed it briefly in the office. Mr. Raynor: O.K. fine. Mrs. Wiepzynski: It seems to me that this is one piece of property and I don't know whether it was sold as one or not, but according to this legal notice, it looks like there are two hearings today. Mr. Raynor: That is correct. Mrs. Wiepzynski: One party and another party. Now, was this property resold again and divided in half? I don't understand it. (5) 9/t~/81 Mr. Raynor: It is my understanding to change a title, from Mr. Haan, half of which went to Mr. Johnson and half of which went to Mr. Penny. Mrs. Wiepznski: So there were two separate sales of property then? Mr. Raynor: That is correct, on which we heard a subdivision approx- imately six months ago. Mrs. W±epznski: My concern is that most of the property in that area are larger parcels and if this type of a subdivision is sold and then split down the middle and then further subdivide, I just don't approve of it. I don't think it is keepin in character with the area. I don't approve of the way the sate was, if it was a sale. I think if it was one piece of property that was six acres, I just don't know. Having a road in there the way it is. I don't know how its water situation would be and sewers on six lots on that size of propersy~, piece of property I border on. I am concerned about it. If you look at all the properties on Sound View Avenue there, it is not in ~eepin with the character. Mr. Raynor: The only thing I can say is Mrs. Wiepznski: I feel that the lots are very very minim, am and I don't approve of that and I would ~ike the board to sort of consider that. Mr. Raynor: O.K. DO you have anything else you would like to add, concerning it? Mrs. Wiepznski: Were both pieces of property sold at one time? Mr. Raynor: I haven't the foggiest idea. Mrs. Wiepznski: Is there any way we could find out? Mr. Raynor: If you wanted to go to the Suffolk County Department, County Clerk's office, you could find out. Mrs. Wiepznski: It seems that if someone had six acres and was will- lng to sell it, that the division would have to be done differently, than it was done right here. Mr. Raynor: O.K. Is there anyone else this evening who would like to speak in opposition to this minor subdivision of'Robert Johnson? Hearing none, Is there anyone present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision of Robert Johnson? Mr. Johnson: I would. Mr. Raynor: Would you give your name to the secretary? Mr. Johnson: Robert Johnson. Ail lots are three acres plus, the lots to the west of us, I think are owned by Edson. They are one acre plus. I don't think it ~hanges the area at all. As far as be- ing small lots, there are a few parcels that are very large lots, be- hind us, or to the east of us, are an acre o~ better. Sewerage (6) 9/14/~ Mr. Johnson: con't. . wouldn't be any problem within the scope of what the Board of Health describes, I think that they are several good looking home sites. Mrs. Wiepznski: Looking at the property that lies to the e~ of yours and I guess, Mr~ Penny's there are lots in there which the water just lays all summer and that's my concern. Can you put a home on a lot like that? Mr. Raynor: The only thing the board can deal with tonight is what's within the metes and bounds description of the area you describe. Mrs. Wiepznski: I really feel that, you know, that the character of the whole area that this is ~ust not condusive in keeping with Southold Town and we are very interested in that. Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else this evening who would like to add to this? Mr. Penny: Yes I would like to add to this. George Penny. If you look at the area, we split a single piece, that was a three acre parcel, right across the street, into three, which meant all of the departments of Southold Town, which went very smoothly, and they wanted the three lots and everything was done accordingly, above board. It is a hillside lot. There are similar hillside lots, they have no low lying areas, as they have in the parcels that you~are concerned with. They meet all the requirements of Southold Town. They are nicely wooded. They are larger than the property to the west of us. If you go past Indian woods, you go into Hickory and into that sub- division, Where' you have half acre lots. So I would say that this is very much in keeping with the entire area. If you could look up and down Soundview Avenue, you would find several strips that are larger but these are eventually all going to be broken down. If you go, if you took that one little section of Soundview Avenue, true the~ are some bigger parcels, but if you go further to the west and further to the east, in any, you know, distance, you're going to find that everything in there is going to acres, and I fee~ this is very con- sistant with keeping with the area growth and a healthy growth for the Town. ~ Mrs. Wiepznski: I disagree .with that. Mr. Raynor: Wait a minute, I've got to give everybody who wants to speak in favor of this an opportunity~to speak. Mrs. Wiepznski: Alright. Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed subdivision? Hearing none, Is there anyone present this evening that may be neither pro nor con~ that has some information that should come before this board? (7) o~. 4/81 Mrs. Wiepznski: Mr. Penny here mentioned the fact that this was with keeping with the character of the area. Westland, when it was developed, for fact many many years, and if you look at t~e Jennings Estate today, that is three acre parcels over there. That is more in keeping with the character of Southold. Mr. Raynor: We have had one subdivision already on the Jennings Estate. Mrs. Wiepznski: Yes, that's right, but the wooded lots are three acre lots. Mr. Raynor: Alright, is there anyone else this evening who would like to have some imput to this public hearing? Hearing none, Mr. Latham, any questions? Mr. Mullen? (Negative) Mr. Raynor: The only comment I would have is number one, before any homes were to be constructed, the Department of Health Services would be called in to check both the cess pools and wells, as far as the fresh water aspect of development of this property would be concerned, ~o that is one of the safe guards that is built in with developments, whether it be here or anywhere else within th~ county. Alright, there being no further question, I will deem this hearing closed, and thank you for coming down. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the request for a property split on the property of RObert J. and Nancy R. Douglass, Willow Terrace II, located in Orient be processed as a set-of, for one lot provision 106-13a. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Multen 8:00 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the minor subdivision of George L. Penny IV, located in Southold, New York. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED to dispense with the reading of the metes and bounds des- cription on the property of George L. Penny IV, located in Southold. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen Mr. Raynor: Publication containing the legal notice which ran for one week in the Suffolk Weekly Times, commencing on the third day of September, 1981 signed by Troy Gustavson, noterized by Helen K. DeVoe. In review of the file, we are in receipt of the filing fee from the Town Clerk's office for the amount of $75.00, for three lots, file from the Suffolk County Department of Planning: Please be advised that pursuant to Section 1333, Article XIII of the Suffolk County Charter that the above captioned plat is not within the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Mr. Raynor con't - correspondence from this board granting sketch plan approval on the ei~h day of July, short environmental assess- ment form, signed by the applicant, application for approval of plot, correspondence from this board, Suffolk County Planning Commission transmittals, correspondence from this board to New York State Depart- ment of Environmental Control, declaring this agency as Lead Agency and making determination of non-significance, legal notice, metes and bounds description, surveyor, copy to the applicant resolving the Planning Board declare itself lead agency under State Environmental Quality Review Act, copies of maps and correspondence. Again, in this file we are missing the drainage structures waiver, along with the statement on no grading other than residential buildings on the lot. As is the policy of this board, I will ask if there is anyone present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor subdivision for George L. Penny IV? Mrs. Wiepznski: Again, as I said, this is not keeping with the character of the area, and being thatait was a large parcel, and it was sold as two parcels, I don't know whether as being an adjoining neighbor, I should have been notified, which I was not. I thought that when there was any kind of a subdivision, that people whose property touched on that, would be notified. I never did, other than the notice. Mr. Raynor: No that is not correct. Only when there's a variance from the zoning or subdivision regulations, is pro6f of publication usually suffices in these areas. Mrs. Wiepznski: But again, i~ is the same feeling that I have, that it's not in keeping with the character of Southold. Mr. Raynor: O.K. Thank you. Is there anyone else present this even- ing who would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor sub- division? Mrs. Wiepznski: Just one other thing.I would like to say, that Mr. Penny brought up before, was that he made an assumption that all the property along Sound View Avenue will be subdivided up into small lots. That, that is going to happen. I don't think that that's an assumption he should make and I don't think that he should, I don't think he,is thinking in the best interest for the Town of Southold. Mr. Raynor: O.K. Thank.you. Is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor? Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision of George L Penny IV? Mr. Penny: Without repeating myself, I would just like to say, that we have done everything properly . the planning regulations established by the various departments in the Town of Southold. We have done everything within the Town Law. I am not going to get into an arguement. Mr. Raynor: Alright, is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor? Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening that has some information that should come before this board at this tim~ which may be neither pro nor con, concerning the property that the board should be aware of before making a determination~ Hearing none, Mr. Mullen questions? Mr. Latham? (Negative) Being no further questions, then we will deem this hearing closed. Thank you all for coming down. On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mutlen, it was RESOLVED that the Suffolk County Planning recommendation ~3 be amended to read: "No residential structure shall be located within 50 feet of the shoreline,"on the minor subdivision entitled G. Richie Latham~ Jr. , located in Orient. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Or~owski Mr. Latham abstained On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the cha±rman be authorized to sign the amended map of the minor subdivision entitled G. Richie Latham~ Jr., located in Orient, with agreement of the Suffolk '..County Planning recommendations and the restrictive covenant. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Orlowski Mr. Latham abstained On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the chairman be authorized to sign the final map~ of the major subdivision entitled Honeysuckle Hills, located at Mattituck. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Rayno~ Mullen, Latham, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the chairman be authorized to sign the final map on the major subdivision entitled Bayview Farm, located in Orient, subject to the receipt of the 4% inpsection fee. ~ote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the site plan and parking of Czartosieski, located in Peconic, be referred to the Building Inspector for certification. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski 8:15 p.m. minor subdivision entitled Hilar On motion made by Mr. Latham, se RESOLVED to dispense with the re cription on the minor subdivisio in Laurel. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the y Pridgen, located in Laurel. conded by Mr. Mullen, it was ading of the metes and bounds des- n entitled Hilary Pridgen, located Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski Mr. Raynor: ran in the Suffolk Weekly Times day of September, signed by Troy Devoe. In review of the file, I County Department of Health Serv We are in receipt of your 1 ment with your designation as le able water supply. Prior to com test well. Should you have any to contact this office. Royal R Correspondence from this board t vironmental Eonservation, declar project is unlisted and initial has been made, copy of the short this applicant, signed by David spector concerning a report as t way, #1. ~2 In review of the file, proof of publication, publication for one week commencing on the third Gustavson, noterized by Helen K. have correspondence from Suffolk ices: ~tter of March 9, and are in agree- ~d agency. The area has a question- nenting, we would normally require a further questions,~.please feel free Reynolds. ~New York State Department of En- ng this board as lead agency; this ~etermination of non-significance environmental assessment form to Horton, correspondence to our in- the improvements on the right of Present access to Lot o.3 consists of a one-way looping road, driveway ten feet in width that meanders through Lots No.1 and No. 2, the new house on Lot No. 3. I assume it was used for entrance and exit. It consists of hard-packed original g~ound. Could see no evidence of other material in this driveway. However, it appears to have handling house building equipment. If it is to be used for any future p~ with the addition of 6 Proposed 25 feet R.O.W. would require tree rem lng stumps throughout. driveway width of say be necessary, the grou Boulevard. After grad bank run containing 20 problem along the east. along westerly propertl ~pose, I would recommend upgrading bankrun with 20% gravel. along easterly line - This R;O.W. ~vat both large and small, includ- Topsoil would be removed for a [5 feet. Also, some grading will id is higher than Peconic Bay Lng, would recommend a 6" course of ~ of gravel. See no drainage ~rly property line. Proposed R.O.W. line. #3 The same exisiting conditions as to trees, topsoil, etc., as B~ted f~r the easterly R.O.Wo are found ~ere. I would not recommend this R.O~W. due to a low area~in- the north- west corner of Lot No.1. Fill would be required to meet Peconic Bay Boulevard and crsate a drainage problem. Mr. Raynor con't, correspondence from the applicant's engineer, correspondence~from this board, the action taken with regard to our inspection report on the 27 of April, correspondence set forward the meeting of tonight, copy of legal notice, copy of correspondence from our board for sketch plan approval, metes and bounds descrip- tion, correspondence concerning ments that have been met. along applicant's application, short ment~ as to grading, and no new Determination from the Board of division. As is the policy of present this evening who would 1 proposed minor subdivision? Hea the Moning Board of Appeals require- with the correspondence and the nv±ronmental assessment form, state- drainage structures and roadways. Appeals concerning this proposed sub- his board, we will ask if anyone is ike to speak in opposition to this ring none, is there anyone present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision? Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening that has some information that should come before this board, at this time, pertinent to this subdivision? Hearing none, Mr. Orlowski? Mr. Latham, Mr. Mullen, any questions? (Negative) It should be noted that two items of deficiencies, one, in the fact to date, we have.no receipt of ~iling fee from the town clerk and this falls within 500 feet of advocable b?dy of water, therefore, whatever the determination this board would make, would have to be subject to the Department Suffol~ County Planning considerations and their recommendations on conditiDns and being no further input, we will deem this hearing closed. Grandview Estates - Mrs. McClane, on behalf of Harold Reese, re- quested a copy of the bond estimate be forwarded to Mr. Reese when it is ready. On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, ~econded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town/ Planning Board submit the certified check in the amount of $2,250.00, for the comple--~lon ~ r---~-~~ struction on the subdivision~entitled Harbor Lights, in lieu of the old bond. Vote of the Board: Ayes: ~aynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski John Simici~h - In reviewing the file of this new proposed minor subdivision, it was noted that this property had been previously subdivided in 1975. It was the ~oncensus of the board that the attorney representing the applicant, make an appointment with the board, as withdrawal of the completed subdivision is necessary. ~te~hen Schilowitz - Mr. James C~on, representing Mr. Schilowitz explained the proposed site plan bordering on both Greenport and Southold boundaries. The plan would consist of nine units, in two clusters of four, and one unit for Mr. Shilowitz, in a town house design. Each unit will have a 45 foot slip for sailboats. Water (12) 9/14j Mr. Stephen Shilowitz con't, and sewerag~ would be supplied by Greenport Village. Mr. Cron was informed that the zoning must be changed from A-Residential to M-Multiple, then go through a site plan procedure with the board. Mr Thomas Samuels spoke in favor of this proposed plan, stating the local people would welcome the idea. John Vescure (Pearson) minor subdivision - the board does not view flag lot favorabl~. Some type of road way needs to be established. John and Ma~y Pearson would be willing to sign whatever need be so that the 20 acre parcel remain in its entirety with no further sub- divisions in the future. The board requested restrictive covenants be sent so that, they may be forwarded to the Town Attroney, and allow the board ample time to study the proposal, and to condider the possibility of dedicating the road to the town. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED to amend the Suffo~k._~ounty Planning recommendation 94 (four) to read: "All residential structures shall be located at least 50 feet back from the edge of Richmond Creek" and to override recommendation ~6 (six), pertaining to the minor subdivision entitled Peconic Bay Gardens~ Inc., located in Peconic. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the chairman be authorized to siqn the amended maps with agreement to the Suffolk County Planning recommendations, on the minor subdivision entitled Peconic Bay Gardens~ Inc., located in Peconic. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Green Briar Acres - has requested a release of bond from this major subdivision. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that a letter calling upon surety, to take care of improve- ments, be directed to the Town Board, including dated correspondence on the major subdivision entitled Green Briar Acres, located in Orient. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead aqenc¥ under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, on the minor subdivision entitled Phebe Bridge Estate, located in Southold. An initial determination of non,significance has been made. (13) 9/~/81 Phebe Bridge Estate conk - applicant must submit new maps with the conditions set by the ZBA, combining lots number two and three as one lot.~% ~ap must show access to lot number one. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the chairman be authorized to sign the final map of the subdivision entitled Nicholas Fontana, located in Mattituck, with complete agreement of the Suffolk County Planning recommendations. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED to send the recommendations and inspection reports on the property of William Tsigakos and Peter Brountzas and Anthony J. and Dorothy A. DeMaula, to the iTown Board for their consideration. Vote of<the-~Board: Ayes~ Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski After completing a field inspection, September 10, 1981 On the property of William Tsigakos and Peter Brountzas, the Southold Town Planning Board recommends denial on the change of zone "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business for the following reasons: The lot is severely under the requi~ed use for the property zoning change. It is less than 20~ of the required area. It would be ha~.ardous for the business operations in regard to traffic flow. The configuration does not comply '~h=good zoning practices because it is too small· This board is very doubtful that the New York State or County would give curb cuts for ingress or egress, as it would cause severe traffic hazards at the intersection. Regarding the same day inspection of the property of Anthony J. and Dorothy A. DeMaula, the~_'Southold Town Planning Board recommends approval on the change of zone "A" Residential and Agricultural Dis- trict to "C" Light for the following reasons: The configuration of the property conforms with the area stipulated under the zoning classifications. Reasonable extension of the existing C-1 use to the North of the property. Consistant with the development plan for the promotion of agricultural and commercial fishing. The residential use of the property is inhibited by the terrain, as Lilco has high tension running through the premises. Edwards-Reiche Bros. - Committee gave a field inspection report. The Board agreed that Mr. Price, Esq. must go to~-~the ZBA for approval. A letter is to be sent to Mr. Price requesting additional maps of the area. On motion made by Mr. Mullen,~seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the planning board approv~ the conditions set forth by the ZBA of Donald C. DeLalla. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Staller site plan - Committee report on the field inspection noted that lots 13 18 are long and deep. It was the board's agreement that covenants be written stipulating no further subdivisions on any of the parcels in the future. A name is to be given to this proposed subdivision. New maps need to be drawn, as the board did not view the sketch map favorably. Being no further business coming before this board, Mr. Orlowski made a motion, seconded by Mr. Latham, and carried, to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Susan E. Long, Secretary Raynor~ Jr.,~Chairman