Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-10/18/1982Southold, N.Y. 11971 HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr., Cha/rrnan JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKt, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. WILLIAM F. MULLEN, Jr. TELEPHONE 765-1938 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was held October 18, 1982 7:30 p.m. at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Present were: Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr. Member William F. Mullen, Jr. Member Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Building Administrator, Victor Lessard 7:30 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the minor subdivision of Edward N. and Marie M. Cartnick, located at Nassau Point. Mr. Raynor presented proof of publication in the Suffolk Times and Long Island Traveler-Watchman. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board dispense with the reading of the metes and bounds description on the subdivision of Edward N. and Marie M. Cartnick. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Mr. Raynor: On review of the file, we have a metes and bounds des- cription from the surveyor, copy of the legal notice, correspondence from the Suffolk County Department of Planning:PursUant to the re- quirements of Section 1333, Article XIII of the Suffolk County Charter, the above captioned proposed final plat which has been referred t~ the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination; however, this shall not be construed that the commission has either approved or disapproved this particular plat. Correspondence from this board to the Suffolk County Depart- ment of Health Services, this is in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act: We are in receipt of your letter dated August 26, 1982.concerning the above mentioned minor subdivision. This Depart- ment is in agreement with your designation of lead agency. The pro- posed subdivision appears to conform with the minimum lot area requirements in the case where an individual water supply and sewage disposal facilities are proposed. It should be noted that this Department is very concerned with the groundwater supply on Nassau pg. (2) ~_~ 10/18/82 Point. The Planning Board may wish to consider routinely requiring test wells for subdivisions of property on Nassau Point in order to assure adequacy of the water supply prior to approval. Signed by. Royal R. Reynolds. Correspondence from this department to the Suffolk County Planning commission, correspondence from this board to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ; all of these pursuant to SEQURA, correspondence to this board from the applicant with regard to the declaration of the Southold Town Planning Board a~l~ad~agency and approval of sketch map on June 25th. Application from the applicant, a short environmental assessment form signed by the applicant, copy of the legal description. That pretty well com- pletes the file. If there is anyone present this evening who would like to speak in opposition ot this proposed minor subdivision of Edward N. and Marie M. Cartnick the floor is now yours. Mr. Wickham: Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a statement. For the record I am William Wickham for the firm of Wickham, Wickham & Bressler of Mattituck. I represent Mr. and Mrs. Huene who own lots 132 through 139 opposite this property. It is my understanding that this application included all of Bayberry Road. We make no objection to the subdivision as far as 222 is concerned, that's your problem we're across the street. But we do object to Bayberry Road being included as part of it and the square footage also being included in it. I have before me a photostat copy of the official map as filed which shows lot number 22 and Bayberry Road. I am not unmindful of the fact that the Cartnick deed includes the description of Bayberry Road which is probably the reason for its inclusion there. I am not unmindful also of the fact that this acquisition of Bayberry Road was from a deed of Nassau Point Properties of Walter JOhnson to Pollack and Garber in 1951, apparently after they bought lot #222. My first point is that this Bayberry Road is an open easement for a right-of-way on a filed map, and as owners of lots 132 through 139 we have an unequivocal easement with the full extent of Bayberry Road. These lots are, I believe, considered as separate lots since Nassau Point is exempted from the merger provisions. So each of these lots would have a right-of-way over the full extent of Bayberry Road. We are particularly concerned about the upper lots, 139, 138 and 137 because on that section which fronts on Nassau Point Road there is a deep depression and we cannot build there. My second point is that I think it is also good law that on a filed map where a con- veyance is made by lot number only that conveyance includes that part of an adjoining road to the center line thereof. We acquired our lots in 1947, sometime before the Walter Johnson deed. The prior owner acquired them in 1926 and so they were conveyed out by Nassau Point properties somewhere between 1922 and 1926. I was not able to get the original deed out of Nassau Point Properties because Mrl Huene just learned about this late Friday afternoon and he called me at the office and the office was closing. However, I do have some deeds in the office, the original deeds of Nassau Point Club Properties which do actually recite that the properties include the fee to the center of any road. We would not like the road included for another reason that if it is said that the property line goes up to the east side of the road it might give owners the thought of putting fences, trees or hedges along and block and block our access and we maintain we have pg. (3) ~l 1~/18/82 full access for those two reasons. We also feel that if there are any vacant lots there and a building permit is given that it ought to take into consideration the westerly line of Bayberry Road and not the easterly. As a matter of fact the Cartnick deed does recite that this is subject to the rights any person may have. Certainly I think we have rights. I don't think that Mr. Johnson should have given this deed. He mastered a good subdivision and violated many instances. You have a lot of lots on Nassau Point with two houses, split lots. This apparently is another example. Mr. JOhnson was very willing to give a deed on something that would dangle in front of him and that happened many times and that's why you've got a violation on Nassau Point. As I said before we have no objection to the subdivision as far as lot number 222 is concerned. We object to having Bayberry Road included in any respect and we object very strenuously. Thank you. Mr. Raynor: Thank you very much Mr. Wickham. Certainly will give us something this office and both the Town Attorney's Office should re- search to come up with a specific . if you have the availability to supply the board with any documentation with regard to your presen- tation tonight we would certainly like it. Mr. Wickham: I will be glad to make copies. Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor subdivision of Edward and Marie Cartnick? (negative) Is there anyone present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision? Dr. Cartnick: I am Dr. Cartnick and I would like to say a word or two about this. I in fact do have a deed for Bayberry Road which I have had for the twelve years that I have owned this property and I was assured . and I have paid taxes on this road. I can see Mr. Wickham's concern about it and in fact I would not wish to intrude on his access to his land if ever that land is sold. The road that is there now, Bayberry Road, is my entrance to my house at present. And that road as far as I am concerned must remain a private road. But there is an entrance on the northerly side of Wunneweta Road which we have kept closed for these meny years at the advise of our attorney's so that it has not been a public road for many years,~but there would be access to this minor subdivision and I should think there would also be an access to those lots that have been mentioned. But the other access road as far as we are concerned could not really be used because this is the main entrance to my home. Mr. Raynor: Dr. Cartnick, would you supply.also the board the deed that you have to your property so that we may also refer this to councel and come up with a determination. Thank you very much. Is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision? (negative) Is there any- one present this evening that has some information that may be neither pro nor con but should come before this board at this time concerning this. proposed subdivision of property? (negative) Hearing none, Mr. Orlowski, do you have any questions? (negative) Mr. Latham? (negative), Mr. Mullen? (negative) There being no further questions of the board or board members, we will declare this hearing closed and thank you very much for coming down this evening. pg. (4) ~ 10/18/82 7:45 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the preliminary map known as Homestead Acres, located near Greenport. Mr. Raynor opened the hearing and at the request of Mr. Rudoiph Bruer, actin~ attorney, in his letter dated October 15, 1982 it was the concensus of the Board to adjourn the hearing not to exceed 45 days. Article 6 Realty Subdivisions and Development.- Mr. Raynor advised those present that the Supervisor and Planning Board have been notified by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services that they are enforcing Article 6 proceedings. Prior to proceeding with subdivision applications all water tests must be done and. a written letter of approval must be submitted to the Planning Board. In the event the water does not meet the standards a municipal system or private community system would have to be established. All board members were in agreement that a blanket statement be sent to all parties involved, inclusive of major and minor subdivision proposals. The following Public Hearing resolutions were withdrawn from the agenda pending approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health approval: Richard J. Cron, Minor Subdivision Golden View Estates, Major Subdivision Emar Farms, Major Subdivision On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the $outhold Town Planning Board refer the map of Golden View Estates to the Town Engineer for the preparation of a bond estimate for improvements within this subdivision. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED to set 7:30 p.m. November 8~ 1982 at the Town Mall, Main Road, Southold, New York as the time and place for the next regular meeting of the Planning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED t~ set 7:30 p.m. November 29~ 1982 at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York as the time and place for a regular meeting of the Planning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski pg. (5) 10/18/82 The following was introduced by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham and carried. Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental ConServation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The mmnor subdivision of Joseph and Edwina Hataier is a four lot subdivision located at Orient. The project has been determined .not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has ~been submitted which indicated that no significant a~verse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. Applicant should be aware that a permit may be required because of the proximity to the wetlands. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated its agreement with thei lead agency designation. Prior to commenting on the water supply or sewage disposal facilities, it is necessary that a test well and test hole be installed. In addition a determination from the Depart- ment of Conservation should be obtained concerning wetlands. The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town.of Southold Subdivis~ion of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained bY contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 pg. (6) i0/18/82 The following was introduced by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski and carried. Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of New York Telephone Company/Kavanaugh' is a two lot subdivision located at Greenport. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significan~ adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated its agreement with the lead a~ency designation. A precursory review of the subdivision indicates that conditions are suitable for individual sewage disposal facilities and that public water supply is available. The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southotd Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold New York 11971 ' Pg- (7) 10/18/82 The following was introduced by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham and carried Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southo!d, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of Annette Zabohonski is a three lot subdivision located at Fishers Island. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be lmplemented as p!anned. ~ The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has stated no objection to the lead agency designation. This subdivision will require permits from this office pursuant to Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations, Part 661. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has stated no objection to the lead agency designation. Prior to commenting on the water supply and sewerage disposal systems it is necessary for test wells and test holes to be installed. In addition it is recommended that clearance be obtained from New York State Department of Environmental Conservation con- cerning wetlands. The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Main Road, Southold New York 11971 ' ' pg. (8) ~_~ 10/18/82 On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of the meeting August 18, 1982~ Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of the meeting August 30, 1982. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski 8:00 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the minor subdivision of Moebius Associates~ Section II, located at Cutchogue. Mr. Raynor read the legal notice and presented proof of publication in the Suffolk Times and Long Island Traveler-Watchman. Mr. Raynor: In review of this file we are in receipt from the Town Clerk's Office the filing fee in the amount of $75. Copy of the notice of public hearing, correspondence from this board to the applicants attorney declaring the Planning Board as lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and approving the sketch map of Moebius Associates, Section II on map amended August 3, 1982. Correspondence from Suffolk County Department of Planning: After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following six conditions deemed necessary to help pre- serve tha natural and aesthetic attributes of the shoreline of Great Peconic Bay: No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Southold Town Planning Board. No residential structure shall be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet of the top edge of the bank along the shoreline of Great Peconic Bay. 3. No sanitary disposal facility shall be installed or con- structed within 100 feet of the top of the bank. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged down the face of the bank in any manner or into Great Peconic Bay. '-J pg.(9) -~ 10/18/82 Access to the beach shall be by means of a suitable structure designed and constructed in a manner that will result in the least disturbance of the stability of the bank. The above conditions shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Town Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearings but their consent to such modification shall not be required. The Commission also offers the following comment on the map for your use and consideration: "It is suggested" that the approval of this subdivision be made subject to the subdivision's meeting the requirements and standards of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, signed by Charles G. Ling, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section. Correspondence from the Department of Health Services to this board stating they have no objection to our designation as lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, correspon- dence from this board to the Suffolk County Planning Commission, correspondence from this board to the New York State DEC declaring the project unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance, application for approval of plot in duplicate, correspondence to this board with regard to construction, a short environmental assessment form signed by Janet Melot representing Moebius Associates, affidavit of ownership that the co-partners in the co-partnership are as follows: Janet M. Melot, John E. Mothersele, Gertrude Mr. Ali, Charlotte A. Lynn. Inside of the remaining lots, that pretty well completes the file. As is the procedure-of this board we will ask if there is any- one present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor subdivision of Moebius Associates, Section II? (negative) Hearing none, is there anyone present who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision? Mr. Lark: Richard Lark, Main Road, Cutchog~e, representing the appli- cant. I personally would like, if I could see the conditions put by the recommended by the County. I want a ruler, because one of the them, as the-board is well aware of having, been to the property, there is an existing large house on proposed lot number three which as pres- ently constructed is within 100 feet of the high water. In addition the surveyor is showing on there there is a beach house which is right on the beach as the board is well aware of this setup here. The property is bulkheaded. The bulkhead is starting to get into disrepair, but it is a bUlkheaded piece of property and the county when they put the spoil from dredging east creek put it along there all the way down past almost to the next creek over there and the house does co~ within pg. (10) ~- 10/18/82 a hundred feet. So I hope this is not another case where the Planning Commission isn't aware of what the property is. Mr. Raynor: No, they stipulate in their provision number two that no residential structure shall be constructed. Mr. Lark: OK, I think Mr. Raynor: I wo~ld presume that's their acceptance Of the house that is on lot two. Mr. Lark: OK, I just wanted to clarify that. I don't think it would be much of a problem on lot number one which would be the effected lot of constructing a residence of 100 feet bsck because it is a practical matter it would put it back approximately 75 feet from the top of the bluff, just scaling it off roughly, you know, from what I know of the property, and the . I don't know what they mean in condition number five, access to the shall be by means of a suitable structure. Mr. Raynor: Prior to the this councel the Planning Commission has asked that one of their conditions be a common use access for each subdivision to the beach. Objection has been raised to this point from the liabilities standpoint and they have reworded their recom- mendation for consideration that access to the beach by. means of a suitable structure design and constructed in a manner that would re- sult in the least disturbance to the stability of the bank. It stipu- lates by each lot facing. Mr. Lark: Well lot number three already has a stair Mr. Raynor: That's correct, that pre-exists. Mr. Lark: That pre-exists. Mr. Raynor: That would not fall under . Mr. Lark: So you are talking about. Mr. Raynor: They are talking about lot number one. Mr. Lark: Property footstairs or something like that? Mr. Raynor: Yes, usually what we required is some type of rendering showing that somebody is not going to go in and strip the bluff. Mr. Lark: Well as I said it is bulkheaded there so it would probably be some type of a step attached to the bulkheading, I would think, you know. Mr. Raynor: I think it's more of a concern from the bulkhead line to the top of the bank as far as the construction and the erosion problems, not from the bulkhead to the beach. Mr. Lark: Right, just leave it alone, it's not that severe there. pg. (tl) ~ - 10/18/82 Mr. Raynor: Well what they're presupposing is that lot number one will want to have direct access to the bay. Mr. Lark: Well it does. Mr. Raynor: OK, but a suitable structure being built on lot one Mr. Lark: The house. Mr. Raynor: No, I'm talking about a stairwell of some description. Mr. Lark: You'd probably just need one right up to the top of the bulkhead. And that would be a footpath going up.because it's not that high there. Mr. Raynor: It dips down, well you may want something above that. That's what they are ~eaving as an option-of doing. Mr. Lark: OK, that's what they're after. Mr. Raynor: In which case they want a rendering showing what type of construction will be done. Mr. Lark: OK. Mr. Mullen: As I recall when we were down there there was fairly good vegetation there and we just want to retain it. Mr. Lark: Yes, so does she. Mr. Raynor: Plenty of poison ivy too. Mr. Lark: Yes. Ok, with those understandings I don't think there is too much of a problem because as you knowwe had proposed a right-of- way there to the beach and the board felt that that wasn't a good idea considering Pequash Avenue has access to the beach and there is a park literally within about four or five hundred feet of the place. So this thing has been around since I guess February when we filed~it and as the board is aware of this was a situation where it came .out of Motherseles Estate which she held the property under a trust and the house's on the lots were preexisting and this is the best situation that we could come up with and I think it conforms with all our zoning and planning regulations as to area and size and everything so unless the board has any questions of me I respectfully move that it be approved as a minor subdivision and I will note for administrative purposes I've also amended it to call it Section II. Mr. Raynor: Yes, that was a request of this board. Mr. Lark: Yes, OK, so there is no problem, Unless there is any questions, I think its been pretty well hashed out. pg. (12) 10/18/82 Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision? (negative) Is there anyone present this evening that has some information per- taining to this minor subdivision of Moebius Associates that should come before this board at this times (negative) Hearing none, Mr. Mullen do you have any questions? (negative) Mr. Latham? (negative) Mr. Orlowski? (negative) Well I guess nobody has any questions for you tonight councel. Mr. Lark: Good. Mr. Raynor: Alright, there being no further comment on the subject, we will declare this hearing closed and thank you for coming down this evening. Sebastians Cove - Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. submitted to the board the Road Profile and Drainage Plan prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl. Mr. Lark advised the board that the utility easement located to the east would be relocated to the west to avoid sewerage problems. Gtover/Southold Town - The Board advised Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. that an on site field inspection would be done on this property prior to the next Planning Board meeting. It was noted that discussion with the Town Attorney and correspondence from Mr. Lark resolved the Board's questions concerning the proposed set off. Andrew & Phyllis Catalano - Mr. John Gillies, Esq. and the applicant met with the Board to discuss this proposed set off. Mr. Raynor ad- vised Mr. Gillies that approval ~n this set off would create a variance type lot on the remaining 24 acres should this be subdivided in the future. Mr. Gillies stated that he is a partner of B & J group which would be purchasing the remaining 24 acres and although he didn't know the future plans for this property, there was a pos- sibility of using it for vineyards or farming. Mr. Raynor asked Mr. Gillies to submit an amendment with possible future development of this property. Mr. Gillies stated he would discuss this proposal with his client, Mr. Catalano. ~i pg.(13) ~ ~ 10/18/82 Lands End at Orient - Mr. John Gillies, Esq. inquired about a re- duction in the amount of the performance bond on this property. Mr. Raynor advised Mr. Gillies to send written request to the Planning Board at which time inspection can be scheduled for remaining work and proceed from there. Mattituck Holdings Co. - It was noted that the attorney for this subdivisiOn will request an extension for the approval of this sub- divison for completion of the file. No action was taken by the board. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that whereas, a formal application for the approval of a subdivision plat entitled "John J. Miesner, Jr." located at Cutchogue, was su'bmitted to the Planning Board on June 16, 1982 and, a filing.fee in the amount of $100 was paid September 1, 1982, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said subdivision application and plat at the Town Hall, Southotd, New York, on September 20, 1982 at 7:30 p.m., and WHEREAS, the 'requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met.by said subdivision plat and application, NOW, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of "John J. Miesner, Jr." for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. dated March 10, 1982 , be approved and the chairman be authorized to endcrse approval on said subdivision plat subject to the following conditions: 1. No lot shall be subdivided or it~' lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Southold Town Planning Board. Each lot shall have a turnaround provision, such as a T-shaped shunt, so that a vehicle leaving a lot will not have to back out into the traffic stream on the road. Ail stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots shall be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow out into the right- of-way of Main State Road. pg. (14) 10/18/82 Since Lots 2-4, inclusive, will eventually be used for business, it is necessary that a plan be developed showing how the parking areas on these lots will be coordinated with the two proposed points of access shown on the ma~. The layout of the parking areas should also insure that a vehicle can move from one lot to another lot without having to reenter the state road. Therefore, a plan showing the arrangement of the pro- posed parking a~eas and curb cuts shall be prepared and easements shall be created to help ~mplement the plan. The above conditions shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an extension of 90 days on the approval of the minor subdivision of Marie Cassid~ for the completion of those conditions set by the Planning Board in resolu- tion of February 8, 1982 ~nd expiration to be 90 days from applicant's written request dated September 14, 1982. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED'that the Southold Town Planning Board approve Inspector John DaVis' report ~247 for the improvements of the right-of-way designated on the map of Dr. J.M. Semer, located at Mattituck. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski pg. (15) ~-- 10/18/82 Bodenstein Site Plan - Mr. Garrett Strang, Architect and the applicants met with the board for a presubmission conference on this proposal. The applicant intends to use the building for clock and watch repair with the sale of some antiques and clocks. The husband and the wife will operate the shop, which 1/2 to 2/3 of the total buildiDg will be sales area. The Board was advised that application had been made to the state for a curb cut. The board requested revised maps showing retail sales area so parking could be determined. Question was raised on stormwater runoff. It was stated the runoff would go north by west on the property. Senior Citizen Community - Prior to this meeting a discussion with Mr. Villa; Department of Health Services and Mr. Wilbur Fried, it was agreed that the site would not contain more than 99 units with a denitrification system used and this site would be strictly for sen~or citizens only. Correspondence from Mr. Fried, applicant notes his request for the amendment of the site by elimination of building 20 and 21 (along the railroad track) and shortening up of ~he proposed road, possibly shortening building 19 by removing the southerly unit. On motion made by Mr. ©rlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plan known as Senior Citizen Community, located at Southold, to the Building Inspector for certification.o~f 99 units with denitrification. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Angel Shore Estates - Mr. Richard Cron, Esq. met with the board to discuss the status of this proposal. The board suggested that the drainage in this area be relocated near lot #9 or creating a pond by piping into a recharge area. Those revised maps reflected the placement of leaching basins by Mr. Roderick Van Tuyl, which the board stated have been discontinued because they were not sufficient. The Board also advised Mr. Cron of Article 6 proceedings with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Mr. Cron was given the option to revise his maps or uerify through the Town Engineer those descrepancies in the drainage calculations submitted hy Mr. Mr. Roderick Van Tuyl and Mr. Lawrence Tuthill. The secretary was instructed to forward Mr. Van Tuyl's computations on drainage to the Town Engineer and request his explanation of the descrepancy in the figures. pg. (16) 10/18/82 Greenbriar Acres - Mr. Richard Cron, Esq. discussed this four lot subdivision with the Board. Mr. Cron stated this subdivision would incorporate a dual right-of-way into one 50 foot right-of-way on the north will be held by lot number four with a right-of-way given to lot three. Fee title will be for lot number two and a right-of- way will be given to lot number one. Fee title would be given to lot four and lot two. Mr. Cron stated they would place covenants and restrictions on the four lots for no further subdivision. A copy would be sent to the Town Attorney for his approval. On motion made by Mr. Orlowfki, seconded bY Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the minor subdivision entitled Greenbriar Acres, lo- cated at Mattituck. An initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Grand View Estates - The Board advised Mr. Harold Reese, Sr. that a meeting will be scheduled with Mr. Raymond C. Dean, Superintendent of Highways and John W. Davis, Inspector for Southold Town to discuss those construction plans for the roads within this subdivision and if they were acceptable he would be advised on proceeding with the improvements. Hill Crest Estates - Because this proposal has been sectionalized, Mr. Harold Reese, Sr was asked to revise the metes and bounds on this proposal for final hearing as it will differ from the metes and bounds of the preliminary hearing. Also requested was the exact square footage of the lots in question. Mr. Raynor fnformed Mr. Reese that the Planning Bsmrd office wasinformed that road construction is in progress on this property. Mr. Reese stated that a section had been bulldozed so that Mr. Roderick Van Tuyl can obtain exact profiles for Mr. Davis in hopes that it would eliminate the problems they ex- perienced with Grand View Estates. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the maps of Hill Crest Estates~ Section I to the Town Engineer for the preparation of a bond estimate for the improvements within this subdivision. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, 0rlowski pg. (17) ~J 10/18/82 Glover/Southold Town - Mr. Stuart Schilke addressed the board regarding his letter of October 14, 1982 stating concerns about the proposed land fill expansion at Cutchogue~ Mr. Raynor advised Mr. Schilke to address his concerns to the Southold Town Board as they are beyond Planning Board jurisdiction. It was also noted that the Planning Board will make a physical field inspection of this area prior to taking any action. Cranberry Acres - The Board reviewed the revised maps which reflect deletion of lots #8 and ~9. Although the maps were erroneously marked preliminary map, the Board amended the file copy to read sketch map of Cranberry Acres and stated the maps should be amended to read Sketch Map. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the major subdivision to be known as Cranberry Acres, located at Bay View, Southold. An initial determination has not been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch map of the major subdivision to be known as Cranberry Acres, located at Bay View, $outhold, dated July 23, 1982 and amended September 24, 1982. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold~Town Planning Baord approve the sketch map of the minor subdivision of Frederick E. Bossert, dated February 18, 1976 and amended August 20, 1982, to be located at Mattituck. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Pg. (18) ~ 18/18/82 On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny, under Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance, the subdivision map of John M. Kerbs, located at Southold, dated August 10, 1982. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve a set-off (106-13) as designated on the map of William and Joan Keinath~ located at Mattituck, dated July 22, 1982 and amended September 21, 1982 in which the 25' strup being set off will be merged with the adjoinmng property to the east. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Marquerite Wasson - It was the concensus of the Board to make an on site field inspection of this property prior to the next meeting of the Planning Board. Doris T. Hoey - It was the concensus of the Board that a field inspection should be made on this property prior to the next meeting of the Planning Board. Mr. Latham will ~nspect the property and give a report at the meeting of November 8, 1982. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the minor subdivision of EdWard Zuhoski Estate, located at Cutchogue. An initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Abstained: Orlowski pg. (19) - -- 10/18/82 On motion made by Mr. Latham,seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Plannzng Board approve the sketch map of Edward Zuhoski Estate, located at Cutchogue, dated August 18, 1982. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen Abstained: Orlowski It was noted this subdivision would require a 280A from the ZBA. On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board withdraw their resolution dated September 20~ 1982 regarding the set-off on the property of Walter and Frank Sawicki, located at Southold. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Multen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve a set-off (106-13) as designated on the map of Walter and Frank Sawicki, dated March 17, 1982, conditional upon the sale of lot number two being made only to Sal Caiola and/or his heirs as stipulated in the August 27, 1982 declaration of Walter and Frank Sawicki and same parcel becoming merged. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Russell Mann - It was the concensus of the Board to make an on site field inspection of this property prior to the next meeting of the Planning Board. Wetlands Mapping - Recognition was given to George Ritchie Latham, Jr., Ruth Oliva and Lorraine Terry for their time and efforts put forth in completing the wetlands mapping fO~ the Town of Southold. It was the concensus of the Board to notify the Town Board that a copy of this map has been forwarded to the firm of Raymond, Pa~ish, Pine & Weiner, Inc. for their study in the Master Plan and Zoning Update for Southold Town. pg'. (20) 10/18/82 Being no further business to come before the board, Mr. Mullen made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, and carried. Meeting adjourned 9:40 p.m. Re. spectfully submitted, Susan E. Long, Secr~35ary Southold Town Planning Boa,rd RECEIVED AND FILED BY T~ SOUT~On~ TOVa~ CLm~ Town of S~thold