HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-05/10/1982HENRY E, RAYNOR, .Ir., Chairman
FREDERICK E. r,~-,,~,,~, ........
lAMES WALL
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, .Ir.
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM..Ir.
William F. Mullen, Jr.
Southold. N.Y. 11971
TELEPHONE
765- 1938
A regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was held at
7:30 p.m., Monday, May 10, 1982 at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold,
New York. Present were:
Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr.
Member William F. Mullen, Jr.
Member George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Member Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Member James Wall
7:30 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of approval of the prelimin-
ary map of the major subdivision known as Hill Crest Estates, located
at Orient. Mr. Raynor read the legal notice and presented proof of
publication in the Suffolk Weekly Times and Mattituck Traveler-Watchman.
Mr. Raynor: In review of the file we have from Suffolk County Depart-
ment of Plann~ing the following correspondence:
In accordance with your request the staff has examined the
proposed subdivision layout for a 66.65 acre tract reputedly
owned by Harold Reese and offer the following comments on
the map for your use.
The staff is of the opinion that while the layout of this
proposed subdivision relative to Main State Road apprears
to be satisfactory the Commission may question other aspects
of the layout.
1. It has been the policy Of the Commission to discourage
the use of cross streets within a subdivision. There are
two such streets within this proposed subdivision.
2. A street should enter another street at or closely to a
right angle. The'angle that Sound View Drive makes with Hill
Crest Road is entirely unsatisfactory as it exceeds the rec-
ommendations of the Institute of Traffic Engineers.
pg. (2) 5/10/82
3. The need for Sound View Drive between Brown's Hill Road
and Hill Crest Drive is questioned.
4. While the map indicates that there will be a 100 foot
setback from the top of the bluff there area areas where this
setback appears to be less than 100 feet.
5. The termination of Hill Crest Drive at Brown's Hill Road
should be reconsidered. Again the road intersects another
road at an unsatisfactory angle. Consideration should be
given to the relationship of this proposed street to the ex-
isting street pattern in the adjoining subdivision. If pos-
sible a cross intersection should not be created. If the
proposed connection is solely for emergency access then the
cross street .intersection is not objectionable provided there
is some kind of control placed on Hill Crest Drive such as a
gate or chain across the road.
6. Aesthetics is an important consideration in subdivision
design. Planners in this office favor the use of curves to
modify the bends in the road alignment. Where possible large
radius curves should be used. Street lengths should be mini-
mized to discourage speeding~ We feel that a large radius
curve at Lots 15-17, inclusive, would be preferable.
The staff suggests that consideration be given to requesting
a revised layout.
They go on to 'say that it does not constitute a review and it is signed
by Charles G. Lind. Correspondence from the Highway Department, Town
of Southold: Gentlemen: The roads in this subdivision are acceptable,
if all the drainage is satisfactory. Very truly yours, Raymond C. Dean.
Location in correspondence, correspondence from this office to the
apPlicant, correspondence from the Town Engineer with regard to design
and this dates back into October which has been accredited into it.
Correspondence from ~he Orient Fire District with regard to design, we
are requesting submersible pumps to be accomodated in the bond for a
hydrant in that particular subdivision. Correspondence from this
board to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Department
of Planning, correspondence from this board to-t~e-~New York State En~iron-
mental Analysis Unit~ New-York State Department of Environmental Conser-
vation with regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act classi-
fying this subdivision, resolution fro sketch approval, short environ-
mental assessment from signed by the applicant, application for approval
of plot in triplicate, other forms from our board to the county. This
correspondence with regard to this subdivision from Dorothy L. Robertson,
President of Brown's Hills Estates: At a meeting of the Board of
DirectOrs of Brown's Hills Estates Inc. on Sunday, October 11, 1981 we
discussed your request for permission for people li~ing in your sub-
division to use our private road in case of emergency and the necessary
hook-up of one of your roads with ours. We appreciate the concern of the
Planning Board for the safety of all of us, but it was the unanimous
decision to reject this offer, or request.
pg. (3) 5/10/82
The Directors also expressed concern that you have chosen to call
your northern east-west road "NOrth View Drive" same as ours, which
has been in for years. We feel that this will lead to endless con-
fusion and since we have to maintain our road ourselves, we do not
wish to have any unnecessary traffic on it. It seems very likely that
people searching for a house on your North View Drive, will end up on
our North View Drive by mistake. Correspondence to this board from
the applicant with regard to our request that the applicant explore
the possibility of tieing in for emergency use to the Brown's Hill
road. Metes and bounds of the property and correspondence back from
both the engineers and the land surveyors. The amount of the filing
fee has been paid to the Town Clerk and correspondence and computation
with regard to the drainage area. That pretty well completes the file
on this proposed major subdivision. As is the policy of this board we
will ask if there is anyone present this evening who would like in
oppisition to the proposed subdivision entitled Hill Crest Estates,
located at Orient? (negative) Hearing none, Is there anyone present
this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed subdiv-
ision? (negative) Hearing none, Is there anyone present this evening
that has some information that may be neither pro nor con with regard
to this subdivision that would be advantageous to this board in trying
to make a decision? (negative) Hearing none, Mr. Latham, do you have
any questions? (negative) Mr. Orlowski? (negative) Mr. Wall?
(negative) Mr. Mullen? (n~gative). Alright there being no further
questions from the board, we will deem this hearing closed and thank
you for coming in.
Mr. Harold Reese asked about creating an access road from route 25A.
Mr. Ray,or stated that such could be done provided that it falls within
the subdivision regulations and jurisdiction; if such a road was placed
in the wrong place, the town would not be liable and it would be up to
Mr. Reese to correct it.
7:45 p.m. Public.Hearing on the question of approval of the preliminary
map of the major subdivision entitled Richmond Creek Farms, located at
Peconic. Mr. Raynor read the legal notice and presented proof of pub-
lication in the Suffolk Weekly Times.
Mr. Raynor: In review of this file we are in receipt of the filing fee
in the Town Clerk's office. We have a short environmental assessment
form that has been filled out but is missing a signature. Correspon-
dence from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services with regard
to the State Environmental Quality Review Act: We are in receipt of
your letter of January 8, 1980. This Department has no objection to
your designation as lead agency. A precursory review of the above
referenced project indicates that cOnditionS are adequate for sewage
disposal facilities; however, problems may be encountered with obtaining
potable water due to high nitrate concentrations in the area. signed by
Royal R. Reynolds, Public Health Engineer. Correspondence from the High-
way Department in the Town of Southold: Gentlemen: I feel that Lot #42
in this subdivision is a terrible~travesty against the property of
Thomas Grattan having their property surrounded by this lot. This is
useless property. The roads in the layout are acceptable. Very truly
yours, Ra~mond Dean.
pg. (4) 5/10/82
Mr. Raynor con't r Correspondence to the applicants surveyor from
the Suffolk Count~ Department of Health Services, cross road profiles,
correspondence fr~m this board to the 'applicant's attorney concerning
correspondenc~ we are missing. Resolution setting Public Hearing date,
copy of the m~tes and bounds description, copy of the deed, correspon-
dence from this beard to the applicants attorney; this was originally
heard, in the preliminary stage and the applicant had let the time
elapse so that th~s was agai~ brought forward at this time. There is
approval and ~orrgspondence in the file dating back well into 71 and
80. This board had requested the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conser-
vation to rewiew ~he drainage and propose this subdivision be considered
as~the applicant ]lad for a swale system and we have correspondence from
their office With regard to this, correspondence from'the New York State
DEC with regard t~ the State Environmental Quality Review Act and a
detailed report f2~om the United States Department of Agriculture with
regard to this. ~?his goes back to the previous submission and we .have
application for a]~provat on this subdivision. Correspondence from the
law office of Wic][ham, Wickham, & Bressler with regard to this applica-
tion and the matc]~ing of cross roads of a client of theirs to the east,
correspondece to ~his board from the office of the Town Clerk, resolu-
tion setting this particular parcel out as a cluster development by a
motion of the T~wn Board, correspondence determining the lot yeild
as proposed. As ~s the procedure of this board we will ask if there is
anyone present.th~.s evening who would like to speak in opposition to the
proposed major s~division entitled Richmond Creek Farms? (negative)
Hearing none, is ~here anyone present this evening who would like to
speak in favor of this proposed subdivision?
Mr. Nesci: Mr. C]
plicants here and
I think initially
almost seven year~
recall we went th~
accession to your
here that the map
is one which has ~
this property, an(
Mr. Raynor: Than]
would like to spe~
Is there anyone pi
may be neither pr~
hearing so that w~
proposed subdivis~
Ruth Olive - Hen]
space down here,
Mr. Raynor: No i
Ruth Olive: It i~
~airman, I am Pat Frank Nesci, attorney for the ap-
this map has been before you for some period of time.
it goes back to a letter that I put before the board
ago with some of the first proposals. As you will
~0ugh many alternative layouts, many of them with
kind suggestions as to,the layout and it is the hope
you see before you now as the final preliminary map
~aken into account years of hard work to developing
that you have before you.
you, is there anyone else present this evening who
k in favor of this proposed subdivision? (negative)
esent this evening that has some information that
nor con but should come before this board at this
may be better able to make a determinatio~ on this
on?
~y, may I ask a couple of questions? Is that open
.s this all marsh?
is not.
not. Did the County Board of Health say anything
about salt water, nothing about chlorides in the water at all?
pg. (5) 5/10/82
Mr. Raynor: Nothing.
Ruth Oliva: Thank you.
Mr. Ra. ynor: I am not sure that they fulfilled as yet the requirements
of the Suffolk County Department of Health standards so I would doubt
very much if this would come up at this point, outside th-~ynoted that
there is high concentration of nitrates in that particUlar area. Is
there anyone else present this evening who has some information or
questions concerning this proposed subdivision? (negative) Mr~ Wall
do you have any questions? (negative) Mr. Mullen ? (negative)
Mr. Orlowski? (negative) Mr. Latham? (negative). I find that there
are several things that are delinquent in this file. There is no
signature on your EAF.
Mr. Nesci: I understand that you mentioned that, may I see that please?
Mr. Raynor: NUmber one, right there, and number two, I find no cross
profiles for swales for development of the roadways.
Mr. Nesci: That should have been submitted to you.
Mr. Raynor: Well if it was it was in hiding somewhere, we've been
through the file several times. As the subdivision .
Mr. Nesci: I can remedy this by s~gning it now. It was made up with the
idea that it would be signed by us representing the owners, so I'll do
that now. (Mr. Nesci signed the short environmental assessment form)
Mr. Raynor: OK, to date we have not received back county recommendations,
and whatever action this board may take, will be in consideration to
those recommendations that may be forthcoming from the Suffolk County
Planning Commission. Any other board member? (negative) Alright, there
being no further input with regard to this proposed subdivision, we will
deem this hearing closed and thank you for coming down.
Southland Corp. 7~Eleven - Mr. Raynor read correspondence from the Town
Attorney, dated April 26, 1982, stating that the Planning Board had
no jurisdiction to determine this proposed site in the B-1 General
Business Zone. It also stated his legal opinion of the rear yard and
front yard setbacks regarding the proposed building. Mr. Multen questioned
whether the planning board had jurisdiction and read from the Town Code
100-112 K (1) stating the Planning Board should approve screening and
hedges along with, 100-112 G which states the Planning Board may reduce
parking spaces within a site. The board also questioned whether the food
prepared on the premises was consumed there. If so, the planning board
would have jurisdiction. The board advised those present to communicate
pg. (6)
5/10/82
with the Town Board their concerns regarding this propo~
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham,
RESOLVED that the site plan (7-Eleven) submitted by Soul
be forwarded to the Building Inspector, along with a coi
Attorney's letter for his determinafion. Th~ board reql
be advised of his decision one week prior to the next P[
meeting.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen
al.
it was
.hland Corp.
,y of the Town
.ests that they
anning Board
Orlowski, Wall
Georgiopoulos - Abigail Wickham, Esq. and the applicants met with the
board to discuss this proposed major subdivision. This proposal consists
of eight lots. Ms. Wickham stated a water test was done on lot ~5 and
was satisfactory. She stated that the DEC had no jurisdiction because
the road separates this property with Great Pond. The ~oard noted this
property to be very low meadow land and requested a copy of the water
report from the attorney. They also asked if the applicants would con-
sider money in lieu of park and playground. Ms. Wi~kha~ stated she would
discuss this matter with them. Ms. Wickham stated there were no soil
borings done on this property. The board will field inspect the property.
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED to refer the proposed 8-lot major subdivision entitled Constantine
p. Georgiopoulos, to the Conservation Advisory Counsi! for any comments
and/or recommendations they might have regarding the very low contours and
its close proximity to Great Pond.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
D.J. Claus Enterprises - Abigail Wickham, Esq. inquired about a subdiv-
ision on this property. The applicant requests to separate five stores.
Mr.'Raynor sta%ed the lots on this area appear to be way to small and
suggested the board to field inspect this property before making a deter-
mination. Mr. Raynor stated that William W±ckham, Esq. objected to the
subdivision on the octogon building that was previously before the board.
The board requested information regarding the parking. Mr. Mullen asked
if the buildings were fire proof. Because the buildings are old and made
of brick and cinderblock it was doubtful.
PG. (7) ~ 5/10'/82
~odor/Staller - Mr. Irving Price, Esq. met with the board to discuss
hhis proposed major development in East Marion. Mr. Price stated that
5e had verbal approval from Raymond Dean and Lawrence TUthill. The
~oard requested that the 17 acres left out on the southern portion be
labeled. Mr. Roderick Van Tyle stated there were two areas, one in the
~outh and one on the north, for conventional drainage system. The board
~ill field inspect this property prior to making a determination.
love Beach Associates - The board reserved making a determination on
this proposal as the attorney did not submit information to the board
in ample time for the board to review it.
~nqel Shore Estates - The board reserved making a determination on
this proposal as the attorney did not submit information to the board
in ample time for the board to review it.
9n motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that ~the Southold Town Planning Board request money in lieu
of the Park and Playground area on the subdivision know as Greenbriar
Acres, located at Mattituck.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board contact the Mattituck
Fire Commissioners for their determination on the necessity of a fire-
well within the subdivision known as Greenbriar Acres., located at
Mattituck.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
pg. (8) 5/10/82
motion made by Mr. Wall, ~conded by Mr. Latham, it was
~SOLVED that the $outhold T~wn Planning Board declare itself lead
in regard to the Stat
~tter of the minor .subdivis
An initial determ
Vote of the Board: Ay
motion made by Mr. Latha
Environmental Quality Review Act in the
ion of Herodotus Damianos, located at
£nation of nonsignificance has been made.
Bs: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
that the Southold
the minor subdivision of
cated at Sou~hold.
Vote of the Board: A
Dn motion made by Mr. Mullen
T wn Planning Board appro, ve the sketch map
Eerodotus .D.amianos~ dated April 20, 1982
~=s: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold
~ater Conservation's recomme
~xisting conditions of lot ~
located at Mattituck, and co:
~lleviate the possibility of
TDwn Planning Board accept the Soil and
ldations, dated May 3, 1982, regarding the
on the minor subdivision Baxter Properties,
npliance of said recommendations so as to
future erosion along the bluff.
Vote of the Board: Ay
)n motion made by Mr. Latham
~ESOLVED that the Southold T
~pection report-~215, dated .
Baxter Propertie.s, located a
this right-of-way are to com
Vote of the Board: Ay.
)n motion made by Mr. Mullen
IESOLVED that the Southold T.
pf the minor subdivision ent
1982, and amended April 27,
Vote of the Board: Ay,
~s: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
~wn Planning Board accept John Davis' in-
lpril 20, 1982, on the minor subdivision of
~ Mattituck, and all improvements made on
ply with said reprot.
~s: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
,wn Planning Board approve the sketch map
Ltted Stanley & Louise Gould, dated APril 22,
[982 located at Nassau Point.
~s: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
Pg. (9) 5/10/82
The following was introduced by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen,
and carried:
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section
617.!0 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is
hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for
the action described below has determined that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of Woodhollow Properties~ Inc. is a four-
lot subdivision, located at Orient.
The project has been determined not to have a slgnificant
effect on the environment for the fol!owin~ reasons:
An environmental assessment has been submitted which
indicated that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project
be implemented as planned.
Because there has been no response in the allotted time
from the New York State Department of EnvirOnmental
Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection
nor comments by that agency.
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has
indicated its agreement with the lead agency designation.
This area has a history of a limited water supply and a test
well is recommended and a test hole should be installed to
insure adequate conditions for sewage disposal.
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold Subdiv±slon of Land Regulations.
Further information can be obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long,
Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road Southold, New York
11971 '
PG. (10) ..... 5/10/82
The following was introduced by Mr. Multen, seconded by Mr. Latham,
and carried:
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section
617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is
hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for
the action described ~elow has determined that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The mlnor subdivision of Reliable Associates is a three-lot
subdivision located at Mattituck.
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons:
An environmental assessment has been submitted which
indicated that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project
be implemented as planned.
Because there has been no response in the allotted time
from the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection
nor comments by that agency.
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has
indicated its agreement with the lead agency designation.
A precursory review indicates conditions are suitable for
individual sewage disposal systems, however, problems may be
encountered with obtaining potable water due to the effects
agriculture on the groundwater supply
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations.
Further information can be obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long,
_Secretary, Southold ToWn Planning Board Main Road, Southold, New York
11971 '
pg. (1t) 5/10/82
The following was introduced by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Mutlen,
and carried:
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section
617.10 and Chapter 4~ of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is
hereby given that Southold Town Ptanning Board as lead agency for
the action described below has determined that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environmenT.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of James W. Dawson is a four-lot subdiv-
ision located at Bayview Southold.
The pro3ect has been determined noc to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons:
An environmental assessment has been submitted which
indicated that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project
be implemented as planned.
Because there has been no response in the allotted time
from the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, it is assumed that there is no objection
nor comments by that agency. Applicant should be aware
that a permit may be required because of the proximity
to the wetlands.
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has
indicated its agreement with the lead agency designation.
Prior to commenting on the sewage disposal and water supply
facilities, it would be necessary to have a test hole and test
well information. Clearance from the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation should be obtained by the applicant.
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southotd Subdivision of Land Regulations.
Further information can be obtained by contacting ~lrs. Susan E. Long,
Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road Southotd, New York
11971 '
pg. (12)
5/10/82
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead
agency in. regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in
the matter of the minor subdivision of Eva & Armand Bartos~ Jr.z
located at East Marion. An initial determination of nonsignificance
has been made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board withdraw their resol-
ution dated April 26, 1982 regarding the minor subdivision of Eva &
Armand Bartos, Jr., located at East Marion.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the $outhold Town Planning Board grant a set-off (106-13)
on the map entitled Eva & Armand Bartos, Jr., dated July 14, 1981,
located at East Marion subject to the following conditions within six
(6) months from date of resolution:
e
The existing road in the 8.25 right-of-way be
upgraded with three inches of bankrun sand and
gravel for a width of 8.25 feet.
Receipt.of a copy of the Covenants and Restrictions
filed with the County Clerk, stating no further sub-
divisions on this property to be held in perpetuity.
Receipt of six (6) final copies of the subdivision
map.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead
agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the
matter of the minor subdivision of Grace Golden located at Nassau Point.
An initial determination of nonsignificance has been made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
pg. (13)
5/10/82
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold To%
agency in regard to the State
matter of the minor subdivisi¢
at Mattituck. An initial dete
made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes
Senior Citizen Community - The
Southold. It was noted that ¢
the site plan. The secretary
refer to Chapter 100-134 A-l,
6, 7, 8, & 9 and to include ir
before the board can make a de
like an emergency access on t~
On motion made by Mr. Mullen,
RESOLVED that the Southold To~
agency in regard to the State
matter of the major subdivisi¢
An initial determination of ne
Vote of the Board: Ayes
On motion made. by Mr% Mullen,
RESOLVED that the Southold To~
entitled East of Eden, locate~
Vote of the Board: Ayes
'n Planning Board declare itself lead
Environmental Quality Review Act in the
,n of Hubert & Catherine Harren located
rmination of nonsignificance has been
: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
board reviewed this site plan located at
ertain information was not included on
was instructed to advise Wilbur Fried to
2, 4, 7, &9; B-l; C-3 & 4; and D-3, 4, 5,
formation stated therein on the site plan
termination. The Board stated they~would
.e western portion of this property.
seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
'n Planning Board declare itself lead
Environmental Quality Review Act in the
n East of Eden~ located at Greenport.
nsignificance has been made.
: Raynor, Lat'ham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
~econded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
Planning Board approve the sketch map
at Greenport.
: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
Kontokosta Change o~ Zone - It was the concensus of the Board that
Prior to preparing an official report stating their recommendations,
a field inspection will be made on this property. The Board will re-
view this proposal at the May 24, 1982 meeting.
pg. (14)
5/10/82
On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch
of the minor subdivision entitled Sal & Benny Caiola, located at
Greenport.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Multen, Orlowski
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Or!owski, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning BOar~ override Suffolk County
Planninq recommendation number two, dated March 4, 1982 regarding the
minor subdivision entitled Charles E. & Beatrice T. Ward~ located at
Southotd.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On Motion made by Mr. Ortowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that whereas, a formal application for %he approval of a
subdivision plat entitled Minor Subdivis!on of Charles E. & Beatrice T.
Ward was submitted to the Planning Board on December 11, 1981 and an
application fee of $50 was paid on April 15, 1982, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the map of said subdivision at
the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, on March 22, 1982 at
7:45 p.m., and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of'the Town
of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application,
NOW, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of Charles E. &
Beatrice T. Ward for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by
Charles E. Ward be approved and the chairman ba authorized to endorse
approval on said subdivision plat subject to meeting the conditions
numbered 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the Suffolk County Planning Depart-
ment dated March 4, 1982, and the construction of a dwetlin~ to be no
closer than 37 feet from the edge of th'e b~nk.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
pg. (15)
5/10/82
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the streets
known as Dolphin Drivez Albacore Drive, and Blue Marlin Drive located
within the filed subdivision Southold Shores.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board instruct John Davis to
inspect the street known as Tarpon Drive, located within the filed
subdivision Southold Shores~ and report his comments and/or recommenda-
tions for improvements, and that no Building Permits are to be issued
untils such time as said road meets the satisfaction of the Planning
Board.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
The Planning Board inspected the above mentioned roads, noting Tarpon
Drive to be in poor condition. The road was describes as rough, narrow,
contained potholes, and vegetation near Pipes Cove.
Bayview Ventures Ltd. David Saland met with the board to discuss this
proposed major subdivision. Mr. Saland stated there would be grass
waterways to channel water down to the drainage area, they propose to
keep the roads private. Mr. Raynor stated the cul-de-sac would ~equire
waivers and the proposal having more than 20 lots would need a waiver
on the ingress and egress. The board questioned the drainage area with
regard to lots 21 , 22, 23, 24, & 25. The board did not favor the flag
lot configuration on lot ~34 and questioned the bubble effect road on
lots 24, 23, & 22. It was stated the proposed rig-ht-of-way is part of
record. The board will field inspect this property prior to making a
determination.
Gertrude Reeves - The board reviewed this subdivision and stated they
had no objections to this proposed set off. After a field inspection
the board noted the area to have 60,000 square feet and the property
was suitable for building. It was the concensus of the board to re-
quest an explanation from the Building Inspector as to why this pro-
posal needs a varlence for insufficient depth as stated in his notice
of disapproval, dated February 10, 1982.
PG. (16) ~ 5/10/82
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead
agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the
matter of the minor subdivision of Raymond & Joan Young, located at
Mattituck. An initial determination of nonsignificance has been made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, 'Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED taht the Southold Town Plannfng Board approve a set off
(106-13) on the property of R.aymond & Joan Young as designated on the
minor subdivision map dated February 19, 1982 subject to receipt of
six (6) copies of the final map and the applicant receiving approval
from the Zoning Board of Appeals within six months from date of resol-
ution.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
Herbert. Mandel - The board field inspected this property which will be
submitted to the board as a major subdivision in two sect.ions. The
board requested an emergency access road to be sketched in near lot %32.
Mr. Mandell stated he would like to give money in lieu of park and play-
ground.
On motion made by Mr~ Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead
agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the
matter of the major subdivision known as Herbert Mandel, located at
East Marion. An initial determination of nonsignificance has been made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southotd Town Planning Board declare itself lead
agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the
matter of the minor subdivision of Jerome E. & M. Dorothy Bloom~ lo-
cated at East Marion. An initial determination of nonsignificance has
been made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
pg.(17) 5/10/82
On motion made by M.r. Latham, seconded by Mr. Wall, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve a set off
(106-13} on the property of Jerome E. & M. Dorothy Bloom, located at
East Marion, as designated on the minor subdivision map dated October
20, 1981 and amended December 7, 1981, subject to the following con-
ditions within six (6) months from date of resolution:
1. Receipt of the filing fee in the amount of $50
2. Receipt of six (6) copies of the final map
3. Applicant receiving approval from the Zoning
Board of Appeals
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham~ it was
RESOLVED that the Southotd Town Planning Board declare itself lead
agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in
the matter of ~the minor subdivision of Robert & Jean Lenzner, lo-
cated at Mattituck. An initial determination of nonsignificance has"
been made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
It was the concensus of the board that the maps be revised to ref!ect
the southerly parcel as lot #3 and to include a provision for the
possible future extension of Sound View Avenue.
On motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the $outhold Town Planning Board declare itself lead
agency in regard to the state Environmental Quality Review Act in
the matter of the minor subdiwision of Winifred R. Caprise,'located
at Orient. An initial determination of nonsignificance has been
made.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
pg. (18) ~ 5/10/82
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board submit their recom-
mendation of ~pproval regarding the amendment of Chapter 100 of
the Code of the Town Of Southold (petroleum storage facilities) to
the Town Clerk as requested in her letter dated March 26, 1982.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, Wall
Being no further business to come before the board, Mr. Orlowski made
a motion, seconded by Mr. Mullen, and carried to adjourn. Meeting
adjourned 9:35 p.m.
u~y submitted,
Susan E. Lo~etary
Southold Town Planning Board
RECEIVED AND ~LED BY
THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK