Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-04/26/1982HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr.. Chairman ,IAMBS WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, ,Ir. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, ,ir. William F. Mullen, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 765 - 1938 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was held at 7:30 p.m., Monday, April 26, 1982 at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Present were: Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Member William F. Mullen, Jr. Member George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Member Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 7:30 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of approval of the minor subdivision of Reliable Associates, located at Mattituck. Mr. Raynor read legal notice and presented proof of publication in the Suffolk Weekly Times. Mr. Raynor: In review of th~s file we are in receipt from the Town Clerk's Office of the filing fee of $75, correspondence from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services: This department has no objection to your designation as lead agency. A precursory review of the above referenced subdivision indicates conditions are suitable for individual sewage disposal systems; however, problems may be en- countered with obtaining potable water due to the effects of agricul- ture on the groundwater supply, signed by Royal R. Reynolds. Corres- pondence from this board to New York State DEC with compliance to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, correspondence from this board to the applicant's attorney designating the Planning Board as lead agency with regard to this subdivision and setting this evening as Public Hearing, correspondence to this board from Jack Driscol, Inc.: Gentlemen: Concerning the property owned by Reliable Associates on Oregon Road and Elijah's Lane to be subdivided: Lot ~2 should be left in one piece with the stipulation that it will not be further subdivided and another house will not be built on it. This is agreed to by Martin Sidor from Oregon Road. Yours truly, Jack Driscoll. Correspondence from the applicant's attorney forwarding copies of the map, correspon- dence to the applicant's attorney with regard to stipulations, metes and bounds description, legal notic of hearing, correspondence from this baord .back and forth to the Zoning Board of Appeals with regard to an action by their board, short environmental assessment form signed by the applicant's attorney and an application for approval of plat. That pretty pg. (2) ~'~ 4/26/82 much completes the file. As is the policy of the board, we will ask if there is anyone present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to Reliable Associates situated in Mattituck? (negative) Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening who would like to speak on behalf of this proPosed subdivision? Mr. Clark: I represent the owners and as you have already approved the sketch of the map qhich we submitted and there being no real op- position to it, I urge that you approve the subdivision and I would certainly appreciated it if you could give us an ~mmed±ate-decision as time is of the essence of disposing of this property. We have been in contract on this for over six months now and certainly would appreciate it and I would personally appreciate it if you would give us an early opinion . ~ . decision. Mr. Raynor: Good, thank you Mr. Clark. Is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision? Mr. Driscoll: Well I Mr. Raynor: Would you give your name to the secretary please? Mr. Driscoll: I am Jack Driscoll. I am the real estate broker that had sold this land. I am sure hou have copies of t~e map. This piece is going to a farmer who wantS to start using it. This piece has already been separated; it does not belong to the subdivision. Mr. Raynor: It isn't included in the metes and bounds description. Mr. Driscoll: No, it's a separate piece of property in itself and it's being sold to a judge and he wants to get in there and he wants to fix the house and I don't blame him, I wouldn't put a new roof on it un- til I got title to it and this is what's holding it up. This is why we are anxious to try and get this thing through as soon as possible. Mr. Raynor: Alright . Mr. Driscoll: They have set up a closing the Reliable Associates, for Friday. There are three of them all at one time. They're all in agree- ment to it and if it's agreeable to the board we will like to do it that way. Mr. Raynor: The board will take it into consideration. Mr. Driscoll: When can I · Can I call you . Mr. Raynor: Call in the morning. Mr. Driscoll: Thank you. Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening Who would like to speak in favor of this proposed subdivision? (negative? Hearing none, pg. (3) 4/26/82 Is there anyone present this evening that may have some information concerning this subdivision that this board should be aware of before making a determination that may be neither for nor against? (negative) Hearing none, Mr. Latham, do you have any questions? (negative) Mr. Orlowski? (negative? Mr. Mullen? (negative? OK there being no fur- ther questions from ~e board we will deem this Public Hearing closed and thank you gentlemen for coming down. Joseph Krupski - Mr. Stanley Corwin, Esq. met with the board to discuss this approved subdivision. Mr. Corwin submitted a boundary agreement to the chairman and asked the board to consider this document with reference to condition number five or to change condition number five altogether. No action was taken by the board Peter Kujawski - Mr. Stanley Corwin, Esq. met with the board to discuss this proposed subdivision. Mr. Raynor informed Mr. Corwin that the board cannot proceed with this proposal until six copies of the map reflecting subdivision regulations were submitted to the board. Mr. Corwin stated that he would forward them to the Planning Board secretary. 5:45 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of approval of the minor subdivision of Woodhollow Properties~ Inc., located at Orient. Mr. Raynor read legal notice and presented proof of publication in the Suffolk Weekly Times. Mr. Raynor: In review of this file recommendations sent forward from the Suffolk County Department of Planning : The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on March 3, 1982, reviewed the pro- posed subdivision plat entitled Minor Subdivision - Woodhollow Prop- erties, Inc., referred to it pursuant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation~it resolved to approve said map subject to the following seven conditions: No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date~unless authorized by the Southold Town Planning Board. A short radius curve, preferably with a radius no greater than 20 feet, shall be provided at each corner of each intersection to facilitate turns. pg. (4) 4/26/82 3. There shall not be any vehicular ingress and egress on Main Road for Lot 1. No driveway or entrance road on Plum Island Lane shall be located within fifty feet of the northerly right-of- way line of Main Road. Consideration shall be given to restricting access to Lot 4 to one of the two existing driveways, preferably the one with the greatest sight distance and least inter- ference with the entrance to the State Park. Ail stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots shall be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow out into Plum Island Lane and Main Road. The above conditions shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. The Commission also offers the following comment on the map for your use and consideration: It is suggested that approval of this subdiv- ision be made subject to the subdivision's meeting the requirements and standards of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. signed by Charles Lind, Chief Planner; Subdivision Review Section. Correspondence from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services: With regard to SEQURA action, this Department zs in agreement with your designation of lead agency. This area has a history of a lim- ited water supply and a test Will is recommended and a test hole should also be installed to insure adequate conditions for sewage disposal. Copy of the applicant's approval of play, copy of legal notice, correspondence from this board to the State Department of Environmental Conservation with regard to our status as Lead Agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, copy of a receipt for the filing fee from the applicant's attorney zn the amount of $100, correspondence to this agency to the Building Inspector:' Dear Mr. Fisher: Our board had field inspected the property on the premises on the proposed minor subdivision entitled Woodhollow Properties, Inc., located at Orient. The existing structure in the rear of lot ~4 (designated in the enclosed map as "barn")has been noted as being in very poor condition. Your attention regarding the Unsafe Building Code on this structure will be greatly appreciated by this board; signed and dated March 10. A response to this came March 22: Gentlemen: A recent inspection of these buildings did not indicate this building as unsafe. The report does state that it does need repair. A pre- existing Certificate of Occupancy,was issued to Woodhollow Properties, Inc., which includes the inspection report; signed by George H. Fisher, Senior Building Inspector. Resolution from this board declaring it- self as lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act and setting this time and place for a public hearing, correspondence from this board to the applicant's attorney and back, short environ- pg. (5) 4/26/82 mental assessment form signed by Walter Uhl, President of Woodhollow Properties Inc. and second copy of application for approval of plot. As this is a cooperation, I do not find a certificate of ownership for the officers, directors, and stockholders of Woodhollow Properties Inco, which this board will have to be in possession of before trying to make a determination. As is the policy of this board, if there is anyone present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to this proposed minor, now is the time. (negative) Hearing none, Is there anyone present this evening who would like to speak . ~ _ for this proposed minor subdivision? Mr. Lark: ~r. Chairman, I am R~chard Lark, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York for the applicant. I have tried to contact the Suffolk County Department of Planning ta find out an~ explanation of their March 4th letter to you, some of the paragraphs therein have not been able to get a self explanatory action or answer in particular I am referring to their letter of Ma~ch 4 to yourselves; I don't know what they mean by item ~2 when the existing~ roads which are Main State Road 25, Plum Island Lane and Park View Lane are either State or al- ready dedicated town highways. I don't think we can . in other words, if the roads weren't existing, I could understand how they might want some short radius curves and stuff, but I don't understand it in relationship to what is there , there is existing roads on the four corners on the property so I am having difficulty that. They were not able to explain it. In fact, I don't even think they saw the property which is not uncommon. Their answer for number one, I mean excuse me. recommended restriction number three, there not be any vehicle access or ingress or egress from the Main Road for lot one, they just , their answer was that they just thought it was a good idea. As you can see the way the lot lays out on the map, that in all probability the driveway Would front on the Main Road and I asked them if there was an inordinately high traffic count and they said not particularly, it's just a policy regardless of where the State Road is, we don't like to any ingress or egress'. Along that the same thing with the tot number five. The board has inspected the premises. The board will note that there is a circular driveway which goes in on the easterly and westerly portions of the property. It is not shown clearly on the map there, and where they swing around and have access to the barn, it goes around to the rear of the house. That's existed for many many years in that location which hasn't caused any problem and I can't see why it can't remain, in fact, if anything it would ease the traffic situation although it is an existing one family house. You would have two methods to get in or get out of the Property. The rest of the requirements they want I feel are in good planning practice, but before any covenants or restrictions are put on the land, I would seriously question those that I have mentioned and . . because I could not find out a reason as to why they recommended them except it seems to be more or less boilerplate and what led me to suspect that they hadn't been to the property was the fact that they weren't even aware that there was an existing house because they were pg. (6) 4/26/82 under the impression like the Department of Health; there might be water tests ~nd yet the Department of He~ you have an existing house and existing ~ will take th~ water sample from that soul standards would have to be met; the 100 z thing, so there is no problem there, but the name of traffic, since that't what ti .... because . don't unaers~an~ ~ we nave existing really can b~ done with that and on the stand that when~ there are two existing d caused any proplem and I think would len~ Llth readily admits where ~ell on the property, they ~ce. And all the other ~oot separations and every- those . especially in ~ey sighted, number two I ~oads and I don't know what lumber five, I don't under- ~iveways which have not to leaving them just where they are at because I would agree, and I did agree with them, that if any driveway is put on Plum Island Lane, it should be located at a distance greater than 50 feet from the i~tersection which would only be good planning. You wouldn't have a d~iveway right on the turn, but I think to limit that lot the way it is layed out in its retangular shape to having the driveway on Plum Island Lane all by itself, I don't think it lends itself to it. So j~st with those comments . and they were not able to give me any satisfactory reasons, other than that I will get you I did note, I thought it had been filed with you, the disclosure statement from the Uhl family. That's no problem to get that forthwith to you, but those ~re my only input at this time to the Public Hearing and I would have l~ked to have gotten something in writing from them back but they did not indicate that they would do so. Mr. Raynor: Usually they only respond tO a government agency. Mr. Lark: Right, so if it has to be held up to get clarification on those and justification because their traffic count certainly doesn't justify it and when I questioned them quite closely on it they became very hazy and vague about the whole thin~ so I think some of those are . . . considering where the property is and its relationship with the fact that it does have an existing house on it, I think they might be unduly burdensome and unfair; those ones that I have talked about. The other ones I think are good planning. Mr. Latham: You have the State Park across the street. Mr. Lark: As you know that is a limited situation there, Mr. Latham: This time of year it is. Mr. Lark: ~o,I know, but with the usage and everything, I thought that they would have state counters there and they sa~d well yeah but ~t s kind of minimal the traffic and I said what are we planning for and then they couldn't really answer me considering where the property was out · n Orient. They took the view whenever the State highways are involved they like to keep the curb cuts with the residence or subdivision down to zilch if they can and probably that makes good sense in the major subdivision type situation, but this particular one I couldn't see the reason for it. pg. (7) ~ 4/26/82 Mr. Raynor: OK, thank you counsel. Mr. Lark: Thank you. Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in behalf of this proposed subdivision of Woodhollow Properties, Inc.? (negative) Hearing none, Is there anyone present this evening that has some information that may be neither pro nor con but should come before this board at this public hearing concerning this proposed subdivision? Mrs. Teidke? Jean Tiedke: Jean Tiedke, yes. Does the Planning Board, are they really aware that there is a ferry out there that brings a lot of traffic and burden? Mr. Raynor: I would hope so. Mrs. Tiedke: I just wondered. It sounded rather odd. Mr. Raynor: Any other comments? (negative) Hearinq none, Mr. Mullen, any questions? (negative) Mr. Orlowski? (negative) Mr. Latham? (negative) Alright there being no further questions we will deem this public hearing closed and thank you for coming down. 8:00 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of approval of the minor subdivision of James W. Dawson, located at Southold. Mr. Raynor read legal notice~and presented proof of publication in the Suffolk Weekly Times. Mr. Raynor: In review of this file, had-junctured earlier, we asked Southold Town Conservation Advisory Counsil to review this subdivision and their findings as follows: Our Council has tentatively approved Mr. Dawson's subdivision with the provision that any future develop- ment of individual lots come before the Council for approval. Yours truly, Frank Cichanowicz III, Chairman; signed by Jane Moffatt, secretary. Copy of the applicant's application, correspondence from Suffolk County Department of Planning: After due study and deliber- ation it resolved to approve said map subject to the following five conditions deemed necessary to help preserve the natural and aesthetic attributes of the shoreline of Corey Creek: No approval shall be given to this subdivision until the question of adequate access for Lot 4 is satisfactorily resolved. A twenty foot wide panhandle could be added to the parcel so that Lot 4 will have frontage on and access to Main Bayview Road. The creation of the pan- handle will resolve the access question. pg. (8) 4 /26/82 No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date~unless authorized by the Southold Town Planning Board. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development of the subdivision or any of the lots shall be discharged directly into any of the adjacent bodies of water. No sanitary disposal facility shall be installed or con- structed within 100 feet of the upland edge of the shore- line of the boat basin or Corey Creek. Conditions 2, 3 and 4 shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the Office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. The Commission also offers the following comment on the map for your use and consideration: It is suggested that approval of this subdiv- ision be made subject to the subdivision's meeting the requirements and standards of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. signed by Ch~arles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section. Correspondence from this board Setting tonight for this time for the hearing, copy of the legal notice, correspondence from this board to counsel ~epresenting the owners, the applicant, please find an application for permit from the New York State Department of Environ- mental Conservation regarding the above captioned subdivision and a copy of that application is attached. Correspondence from this board to New York ~State DEC with regard to State Environmental Quality Re- view Act, correspondence to the County and return, short environ- mental Assessment form s~gned by the applicant James W. Dawson, res- olution approving the sketch plan and Lead Agency status with this board, more correspondence from this board to the Conservation Advisory Council and councel representing the developer. As is the procedure with these public hearings we will ask if there is anyone present this evening who would like to speak in opposition to the proposed minor subdivision of James W. Dawson, located at Bayview in the Town of Southold~ (negative) Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision? Mr. Cron: Yes if it pleases the board, of course this hearing is just merely a culmination of numerous meetings with the board, their rec- omendations and revisions to the map. The only thing that I did not see was the recommendations of the Suffolk County Planning Commission and I was aware of the fact that they would probably want a right-of- way running down inside the property line to lot number four. And we had added that on there as a 15 foot right-of-way, but as I recall hearing you, you said something about a 20 foot right-of-way Mr. Raynor: 25 foot we?~uSUatly require, usually 25 foot is required. pg. (9) 4/26/82 Mr. Cron: Alright, let me. . that's no problem. I assume if we run it in the same location and widen that to 25 feet, we are not going to hav~ any difficulty. Mr. Raynor: I've sketched one of these maps and the right-of-way should be extended into lot four either in this direction or that direction so that the Building Inspector's office can establish a front yard on the lot. Without that we get into a hassle at a later date as to what the front yard is and what the side yard is. Mr. Cron: OK, well let me ask you this question. If we were to widen this to the 25 foot and then extend it down to that point, would that be adequate or Mr. Raynor: As long as you pick up a 150 foot frontage, that's right. Or you can go in the the option is really yours on how you want to establish the yard. Mr. Cron: Alright then subject to those conditions I would respect- fully request that this board approve the minor subdivision. Mr. Raynor: Thank you councel. Mr. Cron: Thank you. Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening who would like to speak in favor of this proposed minor subdivision? (negative) Hearing none, is there anyone present this evening that has some in- formation that may be neither pro nor con but should come before this board at this public hearing so that we may be able to get a better determination on this subdivision? (negative) Hearing none, Mr. Orlowski, do you have any questions? (negative) Mr. Latham? - (negative) Mr. Mullen? (negative) There being no further questions from the board, we will deem this hearing closed and thank you for coming in. Greenport-Southold Condominiums - Stephen Shilowitz met with the board to discuss the certification from the Building Inspector's office on this site. Mr. Raynor read the correspondence from the Building Inspector dated April 12. It was~noted the rear yard was insufficient for set back and would require a variance. The width for parking spaces indicates 9' instead of the required 10. Mr. Shilowitz stated there would be no problem in changing this width. The board stated they would hold this proposal in abeyance until such time as the applicant discussed this with the Building Depart- ment and made the necessary changes. pg. (10) 4/26/82 Gertrude Reeves - Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. met with the board to disCuss this proposed minor, located at Orient. This proposal was disapproved by the Building inspector as the lot has insufficient depth and would require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The board stated they would like to field inspect this property before making a determination. Raymond Young - Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. and Mr. Young met with the board to discuss this proposed minor, located at Mattituck. This two- lot minor requires approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals as the lot area is insufficient. Mr. Lark stated the proposed lots would be larger than those existing in the area and requested the board to approve a set off on this property. The board stated they would make a field inspection on this property prior to making any determination. Aliano/Pharr - Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. reviewed with the board this approved set off of 30,000 square feet in B Zone. Because of the square footage, the Department of Health would not give approval. Mr. Lark informed the board that his client's intention was to obtain additional property in the rear bringing the square footage to 40,000~square feet which would then meet Department of Health approval. It was the con- census of the board that if such a proposal was submitted a covenant stating this rear residential piece is a non buildable use would have to be put on this property and the remaining B property would have to be disposed of so as to avoid possible problems in the future. The following was introduced by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, and carried. Henry Rayor abstained (family member) Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of Paul Kaloski is a two-lot subdivision located at Cutchogue. pg. (ll) 4/26/82 The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the New York State Department of Environ- mental Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated its agreement with 6he lead agency designation. Conditions may be encountered with obtaining potable water due to the effects of agriculture on the groundwater supply. Based upon the contour map submitted, the instalta.~ion of the septic system may be affected by drainage problems. The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southo!d, New York 11971 The following was introducedby Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, and carried: Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Co~ of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Plannmng Board as lead ~gency for the action described'~elow has determined that the project wiI1 not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of Frank Murphy Garden Center ms a four- lot subdivision located at Mattituck. The project has been determined nbt to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: pg. (12) 4/26/82 An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated its agreement with the lead agency designation. Because there are three parcels art tess than 40,00 sq. ft. this proposal would be routinely forwarded to this Depart- ment's Board of Review for a determination. The project wilI?meet all the reqRirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can he obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ' The following was introduced by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, and carried: Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby givqn that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The major' subdivision of Grand View Estates is a 30-1ot subdiv- ision located at Orient. ~ The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An envlronmental assessment has b~en submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. pg. (13) 4/26/82 The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has recognized Southotd Town as lead agency. The study re- quested by the Suffolk County Department Of Health Services should be given careful consideration in arriving at a final determination of significance. The Suffolk County Department of Health ServiQes has indicated its agreement with the lead agency designation. Test wells installed on the property indicated a very lim- ited water supply, in some cases, as little as five feet of fresh water. This Department is awaiting results of a water supply study to determine the adequacy of water supply. The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southo!d Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, $outhold, New York 11971 The following was introduced by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, and carried: Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that So~hotd Town Planning Board as le~d agency for the action described ~elow has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of Marilyn C. Hickev is a two-lot subdiv- ision located at Laurel. ' The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects t~ the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no respons~ in the allotted time from the New York State Department of Environ- mental Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. pg. (14) Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. 4/26/82 The project will meet all the requlremen<s of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 The following was l~kroduced by Mr. Mullen, seconded by,Mr. Latham, and carried: Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of Charles E. & Beatrice T. Ward is a two- lot subdivision located at Southo!d. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted whick indicated that no significant adverse effects tQ the environment were likely to occur sho~uld the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the New York State Department of Environ- mental Conservation it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. The Suffolk County Department of ~ealth Services has indicated its agreement with the lead agency designation. It appears that this area has a limited water supply. Based upon the size and elevations of the proposed parcels, it is expected that an adequate water supply and Sewage disposal system can be designed. pg. (15) 4/26/82 The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southotd Subdivisi6n of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Mrs. Susan E. Long, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 Charles E. & Beatrice T. Ward The board discussed the applicant's request for the board to waive county recommendation ~2 which states any structure should be located 100 feet frOm the edge of the bluff. Correspondence from the applicant explains the existing bluff does not have an erosion problem and the setback of the neighboring houses is approximately 37' to 50'. The board stated they would field in- spect this property prior to the next meeting of May 10 and requested the apptica~nt to submit a letter to the board granting a four day extension on the 45 days allowed to make a determination. The board stated they would take action at this meeting of'the 10th. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a set-off (106-13) on the map entitled Eva & Armand Bartos, Jr., d~ted July' 14, 1981, located at East Marion subject to the following conditions within six (6) months from date of resolution: Compliance with the Town Engineer's recommendation in road report ~206, dated November 27r 1981, "That the existing road in the 8.25 right-of-way be upgraded with 3" of bankrun sand and gravel for a width of 9' 2. Receipt of a copy of the Covenants ~nd Restrictions filed with the County Clerk, stating no further sub- divisions on this property to be held in perpetuity.. 3. Receipt of six (6) final copies of the subdivision map. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latha~'n, ~llen, Orlowski Pg. (16) .... 4/26/82 ~ary Mooney-Getoff - The board reviewed this proposed minor sub- division and noted a portion of the property is owned by the Town of Southotd. It was the concensus of the Board that all actions on the' proposed minor subdivision of Mary Mooney-Getoff be held in abeyance until such time as the Planning Board is in. receipt of a copy of the deed indicating that the applicant has title to the portion of property owned by thC Town of Southold as indicated on the tax map in the Assessors Office. Upon receipt of the above, we will proceed with actions necessary to complete this subdivision. On mo~ion ~ade by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. / Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny without pre~u- dice approval of the sketch map entitled Norman C. BOos, located at East Cutchogue, dated August 19, 1981, as the property is under 40,00Q square feet and dual use of the westerly lot is not permit- ted under Subdivision Regulations for an A-Residential Zone. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Jerome & Dorothy Bloom - The board reviewed this two lot proposed minor subdivision located at East Marion. Mr. Richard Cron, Esq. has requested the board to set off the property (t06-13}. Because of insufficient widtk this proposaI will need Zoning Board of Appeals approval. It was the concensus of the baord to field inspect this property prior to the next meeting of May 10 before making a determin- ation. On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was ! pg. (17) 4/26/82 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a set-off (106-13) as designated on the map entitled Ernest Wi!sberg~ Jr.~ located at Mat%i%uck, dated March 10, 1981 and amended April 2, 1982 subject to the applicant receiving approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals and receiPt of the following within six (6) months from da'te of resolution: i. Six (6) copies of the final map 2. Filing fee in the amount of $50 Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southotd Town Planning Board grant a set-off (106-13) as designated on the map entitled Grace Golden, located at Nassau Point, dated February 12, 1982, subject to the applicant receiving approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals and receipt of six (6) copies of the final map within six (6] months from date of resolution. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a set-off (106-13) as designated on the map entitled Hubert K.~& Catherine P. Harren~ located at Mattituck, dated December 9, 1981 subject to the applicant receiving approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals and receipt of six (6) copies of the final map within six C6) months from date of resolution. Vote .of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, orlowski pg. (18) - 4/26/82 Baxter Properties - Douglas Wendell, on behalf of his father, Bob Wendell and Frank Chic met with the Board to discuss the violation on this property. Mr. Richard Cron, Esq. approached the board to ask the board to waive the county reco~.endations that were discussed at previous meeting. The board stated that they would not take any action concerning this subdivision until they resolved the existing violation. The board informed Mr. Wendell that the Soil and Water Conservation Department met with them earlier in the day and inspected lot ~4. It was noted that no beach grass plantings were planted as recommended by the Department. Mr. Rayhor stated that the board re- quested the Department of Soil and Wate~ Conservation Department to submit drawings and schedules on what should be done to this property. Such recommendation should be forwarded within a week. This matter will be discussed at the meeting of May 10. Greenbriar Acres - Mr. Robert Tasker,~own Attorney met with the board to discuss the abandonment of this subdivision and the existing bond held by the town for improvements on th~s property.. Mr. Tasker stated that the Planning Board cannot enforce ~he~ improvements on the portion of the subdivision that has been abandoned. The board stated their concern for the firewell that was recommended and the park and play- ground area. Mr. Tasker stated that the board could make any such re- quirements on the proposed minor subdiv: sion of this property. Sal & Benny Caiola minor subdivision - The board reviewed this proposed subdivision stating any approval would be subject to receiving covenants stating no further subdivision will be made in the future on the over- sized parcels. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Plannin, agency in regard to the State Environmel the matter of the minor subdivision of at Greenport. An initial determination made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Lath~ Board declare itself lead ltal Qua~ ~vi-~-~ ~t ~ ~al & Benny Caiola, located of nonsignificance has been ~m, Mullen, Orlowski Kontokosta site plan - Mr. David Kapell met with the board to discuss the Building InspectOr's certification on this site. It was noted the 20 units proposed must~be reduced to 19. Mr. Kapell was asked to pg. (19) 4/26/82 submit maps with this revision. The secretary was instructed to send Mr. Kapell a copy of the Building Inspector's certification. Herbert Mandel - Mr. Mandel and David Kapell discussed this major subdivision with the board. The board discussed the shallow drainage area and noted the northwest corner has a section that will be conveyed out. The board also noted the western intersection is in excess of 1200 feet and would require a variance. Mr. Mandel informed the board that this proposal will be done in two sections; the southern portion will be the first. The board informed the applicant that any proposal with 20 lots would require two ingress and egress'. The applicant stated he would change the line thus creating only 19 lots on section I. The board requested information regarding the swale system as soon as possible. Before making a determination on this proposal the board will field inspect it prior to the meeting of May 10. Mr. Young was also present to answer any questions on the layout of this map. Mobeius Associates - Any action on this subdivision was tabled as the board was not in receipt of revised maps. Stanley & Louise Gould - Any action on this subdivision was tabled as the board was not in receipt of revised maps. ~ Pud~e Corp. - The board reviewed this file and noted the applicant had supplied the board with correspondence stating there would be no further subdivision's made on this property in the future and also a disclosure statement listing all involved parties. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act ~in the matter of the minor subdivision of property entitled Pud~e-Corp. located at Southold. An initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski, pg. (20) 4/26/82 On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch map entitled Pud~e-Corp., located at Southold, dated March 8, 1982. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Mattituck Holdings - The board noted the attorney for the applicant had submitted a disclosure statement listing the names of those parties involved. The board has not received covenants and restrictions stating no further subdivision's will be made on the property in the future. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the minor subdivision of property entitled Mattituck Holdinqs Co. located at Laurel. An initial determination of non- significance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Settlers at Oysterponds - Mr. John Raynor met with the board to dis- cuss this proposed cluster development located at Orient. Approximately 50 residents from Orient were present. Mr. Raynor, Chairman, advised the audience that this meeting was not a public hearing and the board would accept comments pertaining to this proposal if such were lim- ited. Any lengthy discussion would be accepted in writing. Mr. Raynor submitted a revised disclosure statement to the board which name of Lawrence S. Ingoglia. The board informed Mr. Raynor of the field inspection made on this property noting a considerable amount of land subject to flooding. The Planning Board calculates approximately 11+ acres that are unbuildable, giving a total of 45 homes to be built. The board presented poloroid pictures to Mr. Raynor showing flooded areas on this property. The board requested that a long environmental assessment form be completed and submitted to the Planning Board. The chairman stated they would require the Soil and Water Conservation, along with the Conservation Advisory Council to do a study on this property prior to making any determination. Mr. Raynor requested a copy of the calculations made by the board regarding the buildable area. Martin Trent, Ruth Oliva, Virginia Moore questioned the water supply on this property. Mr. Robert Burkes stated that when the test wells were done, there had been an excessive amount of rain and snow just prior to the tests. pg. (21) 4/26/82 On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the major subdivision of property of Settlers at Oysterponds~ located at Orient. An initial determination of non- significance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Southold Shores - This property will be field inspected prior to the meeting of May 10 at which time a determination will be made on the conditions of the roads. It was the concensus of the board to field inspect the following subdivisions located at Fishers Island: Allerton Cushman Walter Andrews Annett Zabohonski Robert & Jean Lenzner - It was the concensus of the board to field inspect this subdivision located at Mattituck prior to making a determination. The board reviewed correspondence from the Office of the Town Clerk instructing the Planning Board to prepare an official report on the amendment of Chapter 100 of the Code of the Town of Souhtold ( petrol- eum storage facilities). It was the concensus of the board to re- quest information on how the figures of 20,000 gallons and 1,000 feet were determined~before submitting their recommendations. PG. (22) 4/26/82 On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was RESOLVED that the $outhold Town Planning Board approve Inspector John Davis' report ~121, dated February 8, 1980, on the minor subdiv- ision of George L. Penny, located at Southold. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Mullen, Orlowski Mr. Raynor informed the board that five Planning Consultant firms had been interviewed by the Town Board and himself. It was the concensus of those remaining that Ward Associates be contacted to create a comprehensive plan to the zoning ordinance in this town. A letter was sent to the Town Board requesting funds in the amount of $1,000 to begin Phase I. FIDCO Maps - Discussion on these maps was tabled as Jim Wall was not present. Being no further business to come before the board, Mr. Mullen, made a motion, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, and carried to adjourn. Meeting adjourned 10:15 Respectfully submitted, Susan E. Long, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board PdZCEIVE~ AND FILED TH]g SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK DATE ~-H- ~ HOUR Town Clerk, Town of