HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-11/07/1983HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr.. Chairman
JAMES WALL
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr.
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr.
WILLIAM F. MULLEN, Jr.
Southold, N.Y. 11971
TELEPHONE
765- 1938
A regular meeting of the $outhcld Town Planning Board was held 7:30
p.m., Monday, November 7, 1983 at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold,
New York. Present were:
Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr.
Member George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Member Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Building Administrator Victor Lessard
7:30 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of the approval of the prelim-
inary map of the subdivision to be known as Settler's at Oysterponds,
located at Orient. Mr. Raynor read the legal notice of hearing and
presented proof of publication in the Suffolk Times and Long Island
Traveler-Watchman..
Mr. Raynor: We will review the file. On review of the file. We are
in receipt of the filing fee from the Town Clerk's Office.Copy of the
legal notice, copy of correspondence from this Board to the applicant
setting this time and place for public hearing, preliminary discussion
from the Suffolk County Plannin9 Commission: After examining the pro-
posed subdivision we offer the following comments on the map.
1. This proposed layout will probably be more acceptable
to the Commission because of its lower density. The
Commission, however, may feel that land should be re-
served for agricultural use.
2. Information should be provided with the referral of the
final map indicating what measures will be taken to in-
sure that these lots will not be subdivided in the fut-
ure.
The question of the proposed road should be resolved at
this time. If the subdivider does not build it at this
time who will build it in the future? Consideration
must be given to providing adequate drainage structures
to handle the runoff from the road when built.
(2) .~ 11/7/83
A tangent section of 50 feet is normally provided be-
tween reverse curves. This provides for what is called
"driver recovery" in changing the direction of the
vehicle going from one curve into another.
Short radius curves should be provided at the corners
and a large radius curve at the bend in Narrow River
Road.
Staff comments on a preliminary map do not constitute a review
of the map by the Suffolk County Planning Commission. When the map
has been finalized it should be referred to the Commission for re-
view pursuant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter; and
it's signed by Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner of the Subdivision
Review Section. Correspondence from the Department of Health Services
with regard to our designation as lead agency and initial determina-
tion, correspondence with regard to the State. Environmental Quality
Review Act, correspondence from the applicant's surveyor, Young &
Young, to this Board, correspondence from Martin Trent in objection
to this subdivision. There's correspondence from this Board to Mr.
Dean requesting that this referral receive his consideration and
supply us with an answer concerning roadways, correspondence from
this Board to the applicant, correspondence from this Board to the
Orient Fire Commissioners requesting review of the proposed layout
and designation and location of any firewetls within the subdivision
that they deem as necessary for fire safety. The prior correspondence
in this file refers to the initial subdivisIon which was presented to
this Board and has since been revised to the present number of lots
on the property. As is the procedure, this pretty well completes the
file and we will ask to hear anyone who would like to speak in opposition
to this proposed major subdivision at Orient entitled Settler's at
Oysterponds?
Ruth Oliva: We still do object to this proposed subdivision Settler's
at Oysterponds because we just do not feel we have enough information
first of all to go on. We're still back at the original problem of
water sewerage and stormwater runoff number one. And it says right in
your Code book for the study of a preliminary plat the Planning Board
shall study the preliminary plat taking into consideration requirements
of the community and the best use of the land being subdivided. Par-
ticular attention shall be given to the arrangement, location, streets,
blah, blah, blah, water supplies, sewerage disposal, drainage, lot
size arrangements. We feel that the first priority of a Planning Board
should be to the people that are already living in the community and
the people in the community are most concerned with the water supply
because of incurring salt water intrusion at a later date. They are
very concerned about the sewerage disposal as it is so near to Hallock's
Bay and we feel the shellfish industry there is so very important. We
have all seen in Orient what that whole farm looks like in heavy rains.
It's just under water, most of it. Where would the stormwater run-
off go? There is just no place. Therefore, the people that live sur-
rounding this area are really in jeopardy and it is the Planning Board's
pg. (3) 11/7/83
Ruth Oliva: prerogative or directive really to protect our welfare
and safety of the community. We feel, therefore, we feel your first
priority has to be to the people surrounding it, not to someone
just coming in. It also says in here, the best use of the land.
This piece of land has been farmed continuously for about a hundred
years. Hopefully we will have the farm preservation bond issue
passed tommorrow. We would sincerely hope that perhaps that we
could work out something with the developer that some of it could
be developed and the biggest piece there could be bought for develop-
ment rights for what is the best use of the land. And yet we do not
want to see the developer take a loss either. I have two letters I
would like to read and first of all I have not seen anywhere the
contour map or any proposed drainage on the preliminary maps. Is
there Henry?
Mr. Raynor: The contours exist on several in the file.
Ruth Oliva: I'll read just two letters.
Mr. Raynor: Are these things that we could put in the file so that
other people can read them?
Ruth Oliva: Yes, I will hand in, I had other ones to hand in to you
but I think they rather sum up perhaps even better. They are a lot
better writers. Dear Sirs: This is from Edmond Papantonio who lives
in Orient. Dear Sirs:
A proposal has come before you for the subdivison of farmland.
Although it is less burdensome to examine this proposal by
itself, I urge you to should the more onerous task of evalu-
ating this proposal as a piece of the quilt of the future of
Southold. Sou~hold is at a crossroads; any step taken pushes
the Town in one direction or another. We are in the process
of updating our master plan; tommorrow we vote on whether to
issue Town debt to acquire farmland. Newspapers with a
national circulation write of the North Fork's baymen and
vineyards; ecologists throughout the State (among them, can-
idates for office in Southold) voice concern over the quality
of Long Island's water. All of these issues are involved-
the proposed subdivision called Settler's at Oysterponds;
your dedicion is not limited to this acreage but in a very
real sense directs the future development of Southold.
How can you approve a subdivision that will endanger the
fragile aquifer, dump waste into the shellfish breeding
grounds of Hallock's Bay and risk salt water intrusion, not
to mention suffer itself from inadequate stormwater runoff
(I refer you to the well-publicized pictures of this acreage
after the heavy rains of June, 1982)? How can you intention-
ally dismember farmland tonight when tommorrow your constit-
uents are going to decide whether our Town should go into
debt to acquire farmland? How can you endanger the future of
pg. (4) ~ 11/7/83
Ruth Oliva:
scalloping which provides livelihood and nourishment to
residents? And finally, how can the officials of the
Town of Southold be party to a subdivision where subsequent
purchasers may discover inadequate drinking water?
Ladies and gentlemen of the Town Planning Board, your
obligation is not to outside developers seeking financial
profit at the expense of their transferees and Southold's
future/ your duty is to your constituency and your Town.
I urge you to oppose this subdivision.
Very truly yours,
Edmond . Papantonio
And the second is signed by ten people. Gentlemen:
The new proposal for Settler's at Oysterponds is before you,
and we are aware that many of you, and many others, sighed
with relief at the reduction in the proposed subdivision to
10 lots from the original 50-odd. But it is crucial that
we all be aware uhat what looks like a victory is nothing
of the sort, for two major reasons.
The primary question is not how many houses should be
permitted on this piece of land, but whether it should be
used for residential purposes at all. None of the test wells
have provided potable water; there is every evidence that any
domestic sewage systems would pollute Hallock's Bay, one of
the most important shellfish sources on the North Shore; and
one of our finest parcels of farmland would be destroyed on the
eve of a new farmland preservation proposal. A little
pollution might look better than a lot of pollution, but it
i~ really like being a little bit pregnant. The bay, like
Montauk Lake, would become unavailable to both townspeople
and baymen. There is no good reason to approve this plan,
and every reason to deny it; Mr. Horowitz need not suffer
financial loss, and the Town of Southold need not suffer the
tragic loss of its farmland and its bay.
The second reason we must beware is that we can assume that
Mr. Horowitz' goals have not changed. What assurances are
there, even if this plan passes, that we would not find
ourselves fighting 10 proposed subdivisions instead of one
a year or so down the line? Mr. Horowitz is a sophisticated
developer with sophisticated lawyers; he will certainly have
explored every legal means of circumventing local statutes
and decisions. He comes before you, with this plan, as a
wolf in sheep's clothing. The people of Southold cannot
afford to have their town board plan Little Red Riding Hood.
Sincerely,
signed by 10 people.
pg. (5) 11/7/83
Ruth Oliva: I would just like to add one thing she started to re-
mark about that if this proposal is passed we would certainly ask
that there be covenants and restrictions that it could not be fur-
ther subdivided and nunfoer two, instead of just having the buyer-be-
ware, so many of these lots are under water so much of the year that
they would probably have to be filled and mounded and what have you.
I think that the people should know that there's a chance somewhere
down the line that there is that possibility of salt water intrusion.
Thank you.
Mr. Raynor: Would you provide the Board with those Ruth?
Ruth Oliva: Yes. (Letters were given to the Chairman)
Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening who would like
to speak in opposition to this proposed subdivision? Mrs. Burke?
Is this the same statement that you presented to the Board?
Mrs. Dorothy Burke: Is it within the bounds of this hearing for you
to answer questions.
Mr. Raynor: No. We're here to listen to objections, we're here to
listen to comments, we're here to listen to pros and cons.
Dorothy Burke: Okay. On the limited information that I have the
observation that BY subdividing into five lots, five acres or more,
The developer is now not required to meet with the maps Article 6
requiring potable water and that the burden is now on the future
buyer to provide his own water if he can meet on an individual basis
under the restrictions of Article 6. Instead of asking you, I would
like to say that I hope seriously that you attach enough warnings
starting up front and I don't know if the Town can do this. But it
seems that this is very dishonest thing to sell shoddy merchandise
or inferior merchandise to perspective buyers without proper warning.
The perspective buyer should, in every phase, of the purchase -
be aware that they do not have potable water, that the land will have
trouble every time it rains, any time there's a serious rain, that
eventually his presence on the aquifer may pollute the acquifer with
his own sewerage and sewerage of his neighbors. I think these re-
straints have to be explained right upfront. Mr. Horowitz managed
to get around this by making what seems to be on the surface a very
generous offer in developing five acre lots but really he's throwing
you a hot potato and unless the Planning Board insists that the buyer
knows. And it's basicall, t think a dishonest act. We live as you
all know directly in front of this development. We see it flood.
We see it farmed too. We know what a good piece of farmland it is
and what a poor piece of development land it is. We've looked care-
fully; we don't think that anyone should lose money on an investment
and we've looked very carefully and I think it's rather rash to sug-
gest how he might develop this land to the satisfaction to all of us
but I will anyway. (Mrs. Burke displayed a copy of the map showing
an alternate layout of lots). This tract of land is 16+ acres now
pg. (6) ~ 11/7/83
Dorothy Burkes: divided into three . two five acre lots and
then six plus becaUse of water. Buildable acres are approximately,
would give him approximately six two acre lots that sit on pretty
high ground and the only burden, if there would be a burden, very
likely not be a burden to sewerage because they sit high and be-
cause they sit north, and they are also separated from the body of
land that is farmed. And it seems to me that developing these, this
land, which is developable into two two-acre lots and deeding and
selling transfer of development rights for this would give Mr.
Horowitz a fair return without any threat or minor threat to the com-
munity and I would urge you to consider this and to send it back to
the drawing Board.
Mr. Raynor: Would you define the area of your suggestion?
Dorothy Burkes: Yes, it's the area that begins on Platt Road.
Mr. Raynor: Do you have lot numbers?
Dorothy Burkes: Lot number one, acre five plus - area five plus on
5.0752 acres; lot two, area 5.0947 acres and lot three area 6.7108
acres and that includes the freshwater pond. Just to take it one
step further, the quality of this part of the land, lots four, five
and six, which are 11+ acres, 10.5+ acres and 9+ acres all front on
what's called Orchard Straet, on this map, but we call this Narrow
River Road. The very fact that the middle lot, lot five, needs a
panhandle off Platt Road, off Orchard Street to get to what are
called principle building envelopes which I think is a p~ace where
you can put a house. Here's an indication. This land has 500 feet
on Narrow River Road and yet you need a panhandle to get to it be-
cause otherwise you would have to use a crossway to get through.
That's soggy land. Your car would sink and you'd never be able to
drive in through hare. It seems to me there is a certain amount of
fraud in selling this tpye of land.
~r. Raynor: Do you have some kind of engineering data to back up
what you're saying to the Board?
Dorothy Burkes: Engineering data no, it's by eye. That land, I've
never seen this part of the field dry in 15+ years.
Mr. Raynor: That's nontillable completely? 365 days of the year?
Dorothy Burkes: Not all of it is tilled no. There's a whole section
in there that's not tilled even in drought.
Mr. Raynor: Even in drought it's not dry?
Dorothy Burkes - (didn't hear the Chairman)
Mr. Raynor: It's never dry?
pg. (7) ~ 11/7/83
Dorothy Burkes: It's never farmed because the first rain would
wash it out. That's about it. I would request that you send them
back to the drawing board because there is something workable there
and we'd all be very happy to see assessable and acceptable develop-
ment here. We would be very unhappy with anything less than that.
Thank you.
Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else this evening who would like to
speak in opposition to this proposed subdivision? (Negative)
Hearing none, is there anyone else this evening who would like to
speak in favor of this proposed subdivision?
Mr. Horowitz: Gentlemen of the Board, my name is Charles Horowitz.
I am the developer of this property. I would just like to comment
on what Mrs. Burke had to say regarding the proposal that she made
as far as clustering in this area. I have a topographical map and
I might add that the elevations of this area through here are the
same elevations as are in front of her house so that the benefit up
here seems to me selfish for homes up in this area. The elevations
are exactly the same.
Dorothy Burkes: The houses, at least two of the houses on my side
have serious water propblems every time it rains. (Mrs. Burkes
last statement was inaudiable as she directed her statement to Mr.
Horowitz.)
Mr. Horowitz: That's the only comment that I have. I think the ten
lots that we arrived at, I think are fair and equitable and I recom-
mend that the Board approve it. Thank you.
Mr. Raynor: Is there anyone else present this evening who would like
to speak in favor of this proposed subdivision? (Negative) Is there
anyone present this evening that has some information that should
come before this Board that may be neither pro nor con but would help
the board in making its decision with reference to any particular
characteristics about the property that we should be aware of?
(Negative) Hearing none,. Mr. Latham, do you have any questions?
(Negative) Mr. Orlowski, do you have any questions? (Negative)
I have only one comment and that is I have a map here before me that
I've just received and it is signed by H.W. Davis, the Director of
Environmental Health of the Suffolk County Department of Health Ser-
vices and it's dated the 21st of October and it reads: This is to
certify that the proposed arrangements for water supply and sewage
disposal for Settler's at Oysterponds in the Town of Southold with
a total of 10 lots were approved on the above date. The County has
rendered a decision with regard to this. Alright, there being no
further comments and critisisims and plaudits with regard to this
proposal, we will declare this hearing closed and thank you all for
coming in this evening and participating.
pg. (8) 11/7/83
Ms. Carol Plock met with the Board to discuss her proposal to resep-
arate merged lots, totaling two acres. She expressed that her hus-
band had passed away, her children are grown and left home and she
would like to build a small solar home. Mr. Raynor advised Ms.
Plock that there is no record in our office where this property was
given subdivision approval for the lots in question and the Board
would have to review this as a new application for a two lot minor
subdivision for the approval of said lots. She was advised to con-
tact the Planning Board secretary for necessary application forms
for the subdivision. Also noted was this application would require
an area variance.
Cutchogue Shopping Center - Mr. Burton Seelig, S&~ Realty met with
the Board to discuss the concrete center island north of the central
ingress and egress. Mr. Seelig advised the Board that the New York
State Deaprtment of Transportation favored this island which directs
automobiles. Mr. Seelig proposes to place posts and directional
signs on this island. Mr. Orlowski stated that the island was an in-
convenience because it slows the traffic but the island does protect
parked cars and the safety factor outweighs the inconvenience. Mr.
Seelig was advised to correct the easterly egress by removing the
shrubs because of the poor line of site. The Board reiterated their
disapproval on the undersized dual ingress and egress in the center
and stated any vehiclar problems resulting from this would be the_
total responsibility of the Department of Transportation. Mr. Seelig
stated that his temporary.certificate of occupance expires November
23, 1983 and reqested an extention. The Board advised Mr. Seelig
that the Board meets November 21, 1983 and if there were any problems
in completing the improvements to contact the Planning Board for ap-
proval of an extention.
Mark & Ellie Gordon - Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. met with the Board to
discuss this proposed set off of property. Mr. Lark stated this
proposal would not increase the density and no new building would be
constructed. Mr. Raynor stated this proposal had been before the
Board by Attorney Rudolph Bruer. It was ~oted this application would
have to be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning for
their review. It was the concensus of the Board to make an on s~te
field inspection prior to any action.
pg. (9) <-~ 11/7/83
Mr. George Wetmore met with the Board for a presubmission conference
to discuss the Site Plan Greenport Mall. The density of the coverage
was noted to be 20%-25%. Mr. Wetmore stated the plan proposes city
water and sewage. Mr. Raynor advised Mr. Wetmore, after a meeting
with Greenport Village Planning Board during Master Plan Study, the
Greenport Village Planning Board expressed their reluctance of such
a proposal for this area. The Board questioned the proposed ingress
and egress from Knapp Place, which is a residential road. Mr.
Wetmore said this would be a walk-through and-parking overload. The
plan proposes a through arcade with 25 stores having movable walls.
The Board requested that Mr. Wetmore have the property staked for
the Board to inspect. Mr. Wetmore will notify office when staking has
been done.
Blue Horizons - Ms. Delores Principi and family mnquired about the
status of their proposed sketch plan for this property. Mr. Raynor
advised them that prior to any action, the Board will make an one site
field inspection and contact them when the matter ms placed on an
agenda for discussion. Mr. Raynor stated the property ms presently
considered to fall under the two acre zoning.
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that whereas, a formal application for the approval of a
subdivision plat entitled '!Frank W. Abrams, Jr." located at
Southold was 'submitted to the Planning Board on May 13, 1982
and, a filing fee in the amount of $75 was paid February 16, 1983, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said subdivision application
and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on October 18, 1983 at
7:45 p.m., and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town
of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application,
NOW', therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of "Frank W.
Abrams, Jr." for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by
Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. dated January 3, 1983 , be approved and the
chairman be authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat
subject to receipt and consideration of the Suffolk County Planning
Commission's recommendations.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
pg. (10) 11/7/83
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that whereas, a formal application for the approval of a
subdivision plat entitled .'"James Manos" located at
Mattituck was submitted to the Planning Board on January 14, 1983
and, a filing fee in the amount of $100 was paid May 18, 1983, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said subdivision application
and plat at the Town Hall, Southotd, New York, on October 18, 1983 at
7:30 p.m., and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town
of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application,
NOW, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of "James
Manos" for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by
Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. dated July 11, 1983 , be approved and the
chairman be authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
Mr. Lessard left the meeting 8:30 p.m. to have a meeting with Mr.
Richard Lark, Esq.
Prime Purveyor's Inc. The Board reviewed certification from the
Building Department. The following action was taken.
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that the site plan "Prime Purveyor's be revised to reflect
the loading area, pursuant to the certification of the Building In-
spector's letter, dated October 26, 1983.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
Michael Hall Site Plan - The Board had no objections to the layout
of the proposed rear parking as submitted. The following action
was taken.
pg. (11) ~-~ 11/7/83
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plan
"Michael Hall", proposed law office, to the Building Inspector fox
certification, subject to receipt of three (3) plans drawn by a
licienced architect to reflect rear yard parking.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
North Fork Bank at Cutchogue - The Board reviewed certification from
the Building Inspector's Office and correspondence from Garrett
Strang, architect regarding possible changes with the proposed
curbing. The Board will await correspondence from the Cutchogue Fire
Commissioners regarding their input.
Edward & Ruth Fornuff Minor Subdivision - The Board reviewed corres-
pondence from Mr. Joseph Cusumano, dated October 27, 1983.
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that recommendations number one and two of Inspector John W.
Davis' report ~318, Edward and Ruth Fronuff access road, be complied
with prior to the issuance of a Building Permit and no certificate of
occupancy to be issued until the right-of-way is completed with re-
gard to the remaining recommendations of s~ame report.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
Michael Sitriano - Ms. Sue Hudson, agent, was advised that this applica-
tion had been dissapproved by the Planning Board to reseparate two lots.
She was directed to contact the Town Attorney or the Zoning Board of
Appeals if she wished to pursue this application.
pg. (12) 11/7/83
Jem Realty - Correspondence from Emanuel Kontokosta was received re-
questing the Planning Board to contact the Suffolk County Department
of Planning for reconsideration of his change of zone application to
be a matter of local determination. The Board will forward this cor-
respondence to the Town Clerk as it is the jurisdiction of the Town
Board to make such contacts. Mr. Kapell was present and advised of
this.
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve a set-off
(106-13) as indicated on the minor subdivisiion map of Norman Murray,
dated August 19, 1981, amended September 6, 1983, located at Laurel,
subject to filing covenants and restrictions stating no further sub-
division will be made on any of the lots in the future and approval
from the Zoning Board of Appeals, and Planning Board consideration of
Suffolk County Planning Commission's recommendations.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approva a set-off
(106-13), lot 41 and 42 of Ralph & Mary Merrill, located at Laurel
subject to approval by the zoning Board of Appeals and consideration
of recommendations from the Suffolk County Planning Commission.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Baord recognize "Cedar Beach
Park" as a subdivision regarding configuration of lot lines as in-
dicated on the application of Carl Christianson and will await a
determination form the Zoning Board of Appeals with regard to an
area variance and SEQRA determination prior to further action of the
Board:
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
pg. (13) 11/7/83
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny the application
of Bertha Okula to subdivide property into two lots as indicated on
map dated September 19, 1983 due to insufficient area, 100-31.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
Fred A. Lindner - This five lot subdivision had previously been
approved and endorsed by the Planning Board, January 28, 1964.
These lots are on a filed map contained in the Planning Board office
under the name of "Deep Hole Creek Estates" and therefore does not
require a second approval by the Planning Board. Attorney should
contact the Building Department for information regarding whether
the lots require approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve a set-off (106-13)
as indicated on the map of William P. Riley subject to the filing
and recording of covenants and restrictions stating no further sub-
division will be made on the 5-3/4 acre parcel in the future, approval
by the Zoning Board of Appeals and consideration of recommendations
from the Suffolk County Planning Commission.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
Cranberry Acres - The following action was taken:
On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that Mr. William B. Smith, agent, submit preliminary maps
for necessary referrals to State and County agencies and a public
hearing for the question of the approval of the preliminary maps to
be scheduled when completed.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Latham, Orlowski
pg. (14) 11/7/83
Mr. Raynor advised the Planning Board members to do some. serious
thinking regarding the application of Highpoint at East Marion,
Section II. It was noted that the Town Attorney indicates this
application falls under two acre zoning. The developer, Mr. Herbert
Mandel is awaiting a reply from the Planning Board.
Mr. Lawrence Tuthill met with the Board and submitted correspondence
requesting more information to be included on the maps. of "Homestead
Acres" prior to his preparing a bond estimate for road construction
and improvements within this subdivision. The Planning Board will
forward correspondence and maps to the Greenport Fire Commissioners
requesting whether there is a need for an additional fire hydrant.
Being no further business to come before the Board Mr. Orlowski made
a motion to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Latham, and carried.
Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
f~ 1 ly~ submitted,
Susan E. Long~ e~ec~rcr~ary
Southold Town Plannix~g Board
.~r. E. ~ynor, Jr./Chari~n
RECEIVED AND FILED BY
T~E SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
Hour
To~ ~er~ To~m o~ Sou~old