Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-11/05/1984Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 The 1984 at Town Planning Board held a regular ~eting at November 5, ~outhold Town Hall,Main Road, Southold. Present Chairman tt Orlowski, Jr. Member G hie Latham Member R 'd Ward David Em~lit~, Town Planner James BrFer,I Town Planner Victor Lessa~d, Executive Administrator Frank yakabolski, Special Counsel 7.30 p ~. PUblic hearing onthe question of approval of the minor subdivision/of Sophia and Richard Greenfield to be known as" Cabot's Woods" located at Peconic containing 9.460 acres. On a mo~ion, made by Mr. ?.atham, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVE~th~t~! the Southold Town Planning Board dispense with the reading Iof ~he metes and bounds for the minor subdivision of S'ophia ~na ~ichard Greenfield located at Peconic, containing 9. 460 aQres~ V~te ~f ~he Board: Ayes.' Oriowski, Latham, Ward Or Mr. : We are ~n receipt of the filing ~e. We are in receipt~of ~roof of publicatio~ from the Long Island Traveler Watchma~Isi~'ned by Pat Wood and notorized by Barbara Forbes and also pr(~of ~f publication in the Suffolk Times, signed by Anna Lekkas,/and/n°t°rized by Judith Chien. The file appears to be in orde]~ he~e, we have a map here, since we are all working together, a~d, there has been an amendment to this map, and that only b~ing that Lot 2 was enlarged slightly and lot 3 was cut slightly and it makes the lot larger and makes lot 3 s~ ~.r than 124,610 sq. ft. bu~ I don't see any problem with th~ We have the covenants and restrictions, any approval tonight .d be subject to Covenants and Restrictions being approve~ Mr. Tasker. Everything else appears to be in order. At this ~m~Is will ask if there is any objections to this · minor s~bdi~' ion. Hearing none. Is there anyone here with endorsel~ent~ of this minor subdivision? Yes. Dick Gr~enflield: I .believe you have all the papers necessary Dick Gre approve Mr. but wou 1 the Mr. (none); this was Latham that that Lot No. satisfy also re( had that Lot no in the that could bE stated in adjacen~ did not happy t¢ it with( would b~ their ir subd~i~ the con~ the post or if no 7:45 p. maps of to be k] 20.234 On a mo RESOLVE the John an~ 20.234 V©te : for this Page 2 -- 11/5/84 and I respectfully request that you Okay, is there anyone here neither pro nor con information pertaining to this subdivision that ould know about. Okay. ow-many parcels or lots are made into this subdivision? Four. Okay, any questions from the Board, Mr. Latham (none) .Okay being no further questions,I'll declare closed and thank you all for coming. Janet Geassa, attorney for the applicants for the Board's review of this minor subdivision. Mr. a field inspection of the property. Mr. Latham noted 4 seems to go into the meadow~ Mr. Orlowski stated a of the meadow, 2.8 acres added to the area of acres would be 7.1 acres, therefore, enough to requirements with buildable upland. The Board covenants and restrictions as ~o ne further in perpuity. Ms. Geassa stated that her clients create a minor subdivision only, and it was agreed 4 could contain covenants and restrictions as to ubdivision. Mr. Ltham stated his concern that sometime someone would want to put a dock there, and he noted low creek. Ms. Geassa stated that a restriction in the deed when the lots are sold. Mr. Latham the Nature Conservancy would be interested meadow area since they own considerable land this parcel. Ms. Geassa'stated that her clients a major subdivision, therefore they would be ature Conservancy take the land o~ donate it to be held open space in perpuity if they could do major subdivision. Mr. Orlowski stated that it 'ood idea to contact n~ture conservancy to determine st in this land, however, a covenant~ as to no ~urther or no building past the line of the dike. It was .s of the .BOard to contact Nature conservancy regarding acquisition of the area of meadow shown on the survey, not be done, covenants and restrictions as to .ubdivision and no building. ~lic hearing onthe question of approval of the ~f~na~L~' ..~i~ major subdivision of John and Oliva ~Fellinger-Ihar as "Woodbine Manor" Located at Cutchogue, containing made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward it was ~t the Southold Town Planning Board dispense with of the metes and bound sof the major subdivision of Fellinger-Ihar located at Cutchogue, containing f the Board: K~es: Orlowski, Latham, Ward Mr,¸ signed proof of by Pat around f then a 1 had come in time is a re~ wewitl that tQ ask (hearint subdiVi~ Mr. Fei1 wecompl request Dean, and be done~ with Mr ~ Mr. Mr. rD build~ without Mr. Fell Page 3 ~_~ 11/5/84 We have proof of publication:inthe Suffolk Times Lekkas, notortzed by Judith Chien, we also have lication in the Long Island Traveler Watchman signed notorized by Barbara Forbes. Okay, this has been a while. At'~one time, having approval, but time lapse there and what was needed. We have Und again for another final-hearing. At this point everything we need. What we'don't have yet the TOwn Engineer on the bond estimate, which to have for the road improve~ments. And other than ing is in order. Okay, at this time I would like is anybody out there opposed ;to this subdivision? Is there anyone out there zn favor of this ~-Ihar-I am here with my wife, we are partnens together, ~ith everything, Mr. Chairman, and we respectfully approval. I have a confirmation to ~r. Raymond , we agreed on the roads, how to build the Contract from Mr. Corrizini. Two weeks will have to subbase 6" of concrete and will be topped ~ of blacktop. I think we will have a good road. This will be finished in two weeks? ~-Ihar- In two weeks. We think two weeks. Okay, you know up to then that there can be .~rmit on any of those lots in that subdivision ~d. r-Ihar: Yes, we realize that. Mr. Orl¢ Mr. Fel Mr. Orl~ for the M.r~ Fe'l] but I wj Mr. Or Mr. g~ing any sai~ The fin~ con.but Board st hearing : Okay. r-Ihar: We will send a copy Of this. : That is with Corrizini. You want to hadd that in, r-Ihar: Yes, but I couldn't~make anouther copy of this, tomorrow. : klright, okay, does any body have any questions, Mr. Latham [none). Okay. Well, if the applicant's · e the road finished and approved .before any before building, then that is up to the applicant. Alright. tion will be is there anybody here neither pro nor information pertaining ~to this subdivision that the know about$ Okay, hearing none, I'll declare this :ed and tha~k~you all for coming down. Seacrof~ si~e plans located at Cutchogue-Mr. Richard Cron, esq. ~s pre~entlfor"~n iappoint'meint ~ith the board for consideration of request !or s~ite, plan approval by Seacroft, Inc.. located at Cutchog~e, ~or 160 ~nits on 46.!6 at,res. Page 4 11/5/84 Mr. Or Mr. Mr. On the shows that~ Mr. Crc Mr. Mr. entity Mr. Mr o Mr. it was Mr. Cro ¸Mr. you are that a copy Mr. EAF you there I Board f~ Mr. just hired a to make want us Parts 2 and has I will like On a mot act£on w~ WHE~ Corp°ratl 11935, s~ submisSiOn c · for siteipls Condominium of land ~it~ conjunction Mr. Cron. ntlemen. · Good evening. I will star~ out with one.question. ~ on the tax map, I guess we hame an old tax map, it rcel that the shopping is going to be on and the parcel are going to be on as one parcel~, 52.7 acres. hat is incorrect. Can I just ask when this property was subdivided? was never subdivided. We purchased one parcel inone urchased another parcel in another. Then it is still one parcel. ~. It is owned by two separate entities. : Because looking into Et, it seems that back in 1981 ff in. the tax department but not by this Board. zones. Okay, that was just a question we had. Another on your last letter the Board got the feeling that ioing to provide us With an EAF except the part I with your change of zone, and you gave us Right~ believe in your prior letter you had' asked for an nd I indicated that a new S~Q~A process was something to·, however, in the light of the fact that I submitted in cc~nectio~ with the zone change, ~ou with a certified copy as it appeared in the Town the zone change. Okay, well the Board has reviewed that. I wo~ld say that the Board, in trying to do this proper, has ~elor, Frank Yakaboski, wh~ is sitting with us tonight, that we are doing everything proper. I am sure you o that, and we have reviewed it and also completed 3. Dave Emilit~ our Planner, has been put on this shed it and given us the report and at this time r. Ward read the resolution~that the Board would into the minutes. by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham the following ~ken: on or about April 0f 1984, SEACROFT, LTD., a New York an adress at Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, 2ted a preliminary Sketch plan and attended a pre- Dnference in anticipation of submitting a application approval for the construction of a 160-unit project to be constructed on approximately 46.12 acres ~te off Griffing Street in the Hamlet of Cutchogue in ~ith a shopping pl~aza of approximately 50,000 square Seacroftlcon' feet on ~n a] bounded ~n .ti WHEREAS has subm~tte~ construction site pla~·ap] Code of ~he ~. WHEREAS Sketch,' ~inu- plan subr$itt~ to the e~vir~ NOW,I TH! RESOLVE] application ~ to the p~ovi: Law (SEQRA) , agency wJ The of Envir¢ Health SE agencies to have the revi, agency wJ FUR9 as define and the of new to be cot or publi¢ AltE action which Par~ III its envl~ proposed classifi¢ FURl plan app~ova has been~acc~ with respect FURTHER to prepare a~ a notice of i and any ~pp~ . Vot~ o~ Mr. OrloWski SEQRA. Mr. Cron: Le Page 5 11/5/84 uttinq parcel to the south which said parcel is e. east ~y Griffing Street; and~ as of the 17th day of October, 1984, the applicant to the Board ~a certified se~ of plans for the of a 160 condominium units a~d is now requesting royal therefor, pursuant to Article XIII of the own of Southold; and thi~ Board has reviewed the original preliminary es of the pre-submission conference and ~e certified i and has received a report from its planner relating ~menital impacts of this pro3ect; ~EFO~E, BE IT, th~i~ it is this Board's determination that the ~ SE~CROFT, LTD. for Site plan approval is subject ~ons of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation ~nd ~e it , it is this Board's desire to be the lead to this action. ~encies are the New York State Department , the Suffolk County Department of ~and the Suffolk County P~anning Commission which r i~formal conferences have indicated their willingness Board act as lead agency. In the- interest of expediting oces!s this Board hereby declares itself to be the lead to this action, and it is the proposed action is a Type 1 action ~icle 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (SEQRA) ~tions thereunder, in that it consists of the construction units in excess of 50 units which are not proposed at the commencement of habitation to community utilities. ty, in the event such action were not to be Type 1 action, such action wquld constitute an unlisted ~ili have a significant impa~t on the environment, are 'set forth in the Environmental Assessment Form, lie with this Board. Further, this project and ntal impacts must be viewed in onjunction with the truction of the adjacent shopping plaza and the significant 'impacts likely to result therefrom. Under either ,n, this action is significant, and it is RESOLVED, therefore, that a fuI1 DEIS be prepared it'.is, that SEACROET'S, application for site shall not be deeme8 complete until a draft EIS )ted by this Board as lead agnecy as satisfactory ~o scope, content , and adequacy, and be it, RESOLVED, that ~e Chairman of this Board be directed .d forward to the appropriate agencies and departments ,ositive declaration, pursuant to 6NYCRR part 617, ,priate local law of the Town of Southold. the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Latham, Ward We feel in doing that, Mr. Cron,we have to address me put on the record, first of all, that your resolution Page 6 11/5/84 Mr. Cron items all will fu] Mr. Mr. Cron: to Mr. Mr. Cron Mr. : contains many inaccuracies in terms of facts and ly submitted to this Board. I trust that you me a copy of that resolution. Sure. the earliest possible date. I will then be inclined d respond as I deem necessary. Okay, very good. Okay, good night. Allen Ova gas statJ Harold a field at Ba' before The applicatJ sq. ft. and not This appointment to review the site plan for a ~ed at Peconic had been cancelled. )hine Deneen-The Board reviewed this proposal following ction. The application is for 3 lots on 29,851 located ,ad, Southold. It was noted that this application is ,ard of Appeals for an insufficient area variance. Bacrd recommended to the Board of Appeals that the ,f Harold and Josephine Deneen to subdivide 29,851 three lots be denied since the lots are undersized ~formance with the current two-acre zoning.(100-31) Dominick inspecti( subdivis~ a varian~ the Boar~ until it Lno-Board reviewed this proposal following a field It was noted that one lot in this three-lot underthe current two-acre zoning and will require the Board of Appeals. It was the consensus of inform the applicant of this, and hold the application t6the Board of Appeals, by the applicant. Charles for 4 It .a~ wa exactly versus t as to line. I on this Robert a~d ~ the SuffOlk Dick Ward made a field inspection of this proposal 10.5 acres, located at Southold on Hippodrome C~e~k. ~oted that since the lots bordering on the creek are )0 there may be a question on the amount of wetlands ~ildable area of the lots. There was also a question proposed right-of=way extended tothe other property the consensus of the Board to get a clarification applicant. .dona Norkus- The Board reviewed the decision from ~ounty Planning Commission regarding this subdivision, Page 7 ~ 11/5/84 Norkus as well Board. easement along to insure of the noted th~ and there conservat Board to his requc to build On a motJ RESOLVED a subdivJ was submJ fee of $~ WHEREAS and at 7:45 WHEREAS, Town of applicat NOW, the] and Patr~ of said May 4, October endorse condition e Vot orrespondence from the applicant requesting that 4 of the County's decision be overridden by the t~on No. ~ Stated that "a conservation or scenic ng a minimum width of 50' shall be established and side of the tidal wetlands along Cedar Beach Harbor t no development adverse to the aesthetic quality ine will take place along the shoreline." The Board is'queStion has come before in previous subdivisions, a question as to~the County's definition of a or scenic easement. It was the consensus of the est clarification from the applicant regarding as well as, an indication as to what he proposes he area of the easment. by Mr. Latham, seconded by M'r. Ward it was whereas, a formal application for the approval of plat entitled "Sundown Farms!~ located at Mattituck to the Planning Board on June 12, 1984 and filing paid on October 5, 1984, and lic hearing was held on said subdivision application .he Town Hall, Southold, New York, on October 22, 1984 · and requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Lold have been met by said subdivision plat and e, be it resolved that the application of Joseph Steifer to be known as "Sundown Farms'' for approval plat prepared by Donack Associates dated Lnd amended Sept. 12, 1984, October 2, 1984 and ~84 be approved and the chairman be authorized to on said subdivision plat subject to the followinq .ng of the ~venants and restrictions as prepared~by Town Attorney with the County Clerk .ew by the Suffolk County Planning Commission of the tivision plat. the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Latham, Ward Philip S~ire final hearin as to no fu~ the hearing, the Board t¢ covenants a~ Town Att~rn~ · The Board reviewed this subdivision which had a · . It Was noted that the covenants and restrictions ~her subdivion on Lot 1 in perpui%y, requested at had not been submitted. It was the consensus of hold action on this application until the restrictions were submitted and approve d by the Page 8 ~ 11/5/84 Lynn San done on It was cc review On a moti RESOLVED request Davis, located a Vote ~s-The Board read the road reports from Victor and John W. Davis regarding the work ~cess road within this minor subdivision. ]sensus of Lhe Board to request that prior to any ~de on the road, our inspector be notified to 'ress of the work. ~de by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward it was the SoutholdTown Planning Board accept and with the access road report of John W. for the minor subdivision of Lynn San Andres ~tituck. the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Latham, Ward Andrew Le proposed had been On a mot~ RESOLVED sketch at East M 1984 and Vote Latham made a field inspection of this ~ubdivision. He noted that the amended maps and are according to the Board's request. by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was the Southold Town Planning Board approve the Andrew Lettieri for 2 lots on 12 acres located , lan dated September 1983, and revised August 18, 17, 1984. the Board :Ayes: Orl0wski, Latham, Ward Brewer reviewed Gemma s was pres~ shop. parking other bus Ward job. problems and stated shown on plan to ~he Although on the agenda, this proposal was not plan was not complete. at Cutchogue- Abigail Wickham, attorney at law, o discuss this site plan for a restaurant and gift questioned the Board's request for an asphalt She stated that asphalt was more expensive and ses in the area had blue stone parking lots. Mr. hat the asphalt would be better noting how the id out on the site Plan. He stated that wi th car movement,the bluestones don't do an adequate irman at~o noted that the BOard has encountered applicants'definitions of "dust-free surface", clarify that they prefer asphalt. Ms. Wickham mphaIt would be acceptable and she will have this map, in order that the Board can refer this site uiding Department for certification. Pag? 9 . ~ 11/5/84 Robert to discus reviewed of-way to the to wid~ existing natural on the r~ the to~a] as to Mr. Ms. they woul instead to make trees in a det East this pre and that a also ste buil~inc a foot It was CO that Abigail Wickham, attorney-at-law, was present is minor subdivision with the Board. The Board subdivision map and the sketch indicating the right- n Entenmann and Simmons, the adjacent landowner 3. Wickham stated that Mr. Simmons was agreeable joint right-of-way providing that none of the his property are to be removed as they are There is also a barn that would encroach of-way at the south end. Mrs. Wickham stated that the right-of-way would be 25'. There was discussion the right-of-way should be wider than 25' since as also submitting a subdivision of his property. tared that if a major subdivision was proposed locate the right-of-way to the middle of the farm ere it is now. It was the consensus of the Board ld inspection to locate the Simmons' house and tion to the right-of-way in question', and make on following this. ores- Mr. Joseph Fischetti was present to discuss site plan amendment to construct a swimming pool Mr. Fische~ti stated that the DEC had written was not required for this project. Mr. Fischetti that the plan had received certification f~om the artment. He further noted that the pool will be the 10' contour and have a 15' side yard. onsensus of the Board to request a proper survey 11 the site plan elements. It was also requested ing fee be paid. On a mot RE~ plan fo~ located and as Vo Borman applicat field On a RESOLVED th~ Novembe~ 26 place for ti Vote o~ made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was t the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site tituck Holding Company for a storage buildinq for boats · plans dated as last amended October 15,1984 fied by the Building Department. the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Ward, Latham and Millis- The Board reviewed this new and requested that the property be staked for a tion by the Board. made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. WArd it was t the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, 1984 at the Southold Town Hall as the time and e next regular meeting of the Board. the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Latham, .Ward There wss d~ scussion introdu~ the procedu: 0 for.site plan that the pr~ cedure has been Department ~ fter the Plannin~ referred ti- %o the Building the Boald 'ti at this is an im] process sin~ e certific_ation ~the Board il to a 90 day time plan. qhe ] oard agreed that be addr~sse~ inthe proceu~re an unde~sta~ ding of the Being n( fu 'ther business to made by Mr. Ward, seconded b meeting adj.,urned at 8:57 p.] ~ennett 0~1' ~wsk~, Chairm~ ' mtov 'c Page 10 11/5/84 ~d by Victor Lessard regarding certifications. It was noted for certification by the Buidling Board had reviewed me sit~ plan Department. It was notod by 0ortant step in the site plan by the Buidling Department locks limit for final action on the this is something that should booklet, so the apPlicant has come b~fore the Board, on a motion Mr. Latham and carried.the m. Respectfully submitted, ane M. Schultze, Secret~ry Southold Town Planning Board /