Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-08/20/1984A regula~ mE at 7:30 p.m. Present were: Bennett Or1¢ William Fi G. Ritch~e James Wall, Richard War Victor Lessa Mr. A1 F~ckc The North had schedule for this mec approved pla curbing, thc split rail ocrresponder who own ~he were notLin the truc~s fence. Mr. otherwise, Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 ~ting of the Planning Board was held on August 20, 1984 at the Southold Town Hall. ~ski, Jro, Chairman allen, Jr. Member ~tham, Jr., Member ~ember , Member rd, Executive Administrator rson was present to discuss the amended site plan of rk Bank and Trust Co., at Cutchogue. Mr. Garrett Strang a pre-submissiOn conference but was not present lng. Mr. Fickerson explained that the previously called for curbing, but due to the cost of the were requesting that they be allowed to install a nce around the property. The Chairman presented ~e from the Board of Fire Commissioners of Cutchogue ~djoining property. The Board of Fire Commissioners favor of the fence due to the fact that in emergencies, Dving out of the lot at high speeds may hit the ?ickerson explained that there must be some barrier ~ople will be using the other property, for parking. It was the clonsensus of the Board to request that concrete- mountabl~ t~pe curbing be put in lieu of the fence to' the grass , with the fence continuing to the rear of the property. On ~ m~tion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RES~LVEID that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plaD a~endement for the North Fork Bank and Trust Co., to the BuidllingI Department for certification subject to receipt of six copies ~f t~e site plan indicating concrete, mountable'type cu b, w~th slDllt rail fence beginning at the grass and continuing to the r~ar ~fthe property. Vote the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Academy of the inspecti Ward .in~: .set-off located at Southold. oar~ that prior to any action, the Board will make a field on (f the property. It was the consensus J. Kath~rin a field/ins to any ~cti staked. Mr indicated t for the ins Thomas ~eri Pg. (2) ~ 8/20/84 Tuthill-It was the consensus of the Board to conduct ection onthis property located at New Suffolk prior n. The Board also requested that the property be · Tuthill was present for this discussion, and she a t an application had been made to the Board of Appeals fficient area. lo-Mr. Rudy Bruer,esq. was present for this discussion. It was the ~onsensus of the Board ~that prior to any action a field inspection ~ill be made of this minor subdivision at Matttiuck. T he Board n~ted that this may be handled as a set-off. Mr, Burer noted that ~n application had been made to the Board of Appeals for the insufficient area. Mr. Anthony to discuss filed u~der far the of Heal~h.S~ were on Ithe] Environment~ approval~s w~ extension scheduling for the rec( requeste~d ti that they w~ the lotsI ar~ obtain ~ny map has !bee~ and it was the builldin¢ presented a- and the ~cou] questioned ~ but a stand~ Th Chairman Mr. Gill ex~ made fielld ~onforti, esq. and Mr. Thomas Gill, esq. were present he major subdivision of Harbor View, this was previously BaYView Ventures, Ltd. The Chairman questioned how icants have come with the Suffolk County Department rvices and Article 6. Mr. Gill stated that the approvals e way, as well as, the approval of the Department of 1 Conservation. The Chairman stated that if these re not anticipated prior to September 25, that an uld have to be requested due to the time limit '.for public hearing. Mr. Conforti requested an extension rd to the time does not lapse, however, the Chairman at this be done in writing. Mr. Conforti explained re going to the DEC for the entire property so when sold the individual lot owners will not have to ermits. The Chairman told them that this subdivision reviewed by the~new Town Planner and the Town ~ngineer ound that With the deletion of the wetlands from lots, several of them are undersized. Mr. Conforti memorandum citing court cases where this was challenged ts ruled for the applicant. Mr. Conforti also he Board's action as this ~s not a cluster subdivision rd one, and there is no provision for deleting wetlands. quoted from the Southold'Town Ordinance Section 106-36C. lained the DEC had flagged all the lots and they had nspections of the site. He went to say that all the building en%elopes were set back from the wetlands.The Chairman said thalt t~e memorandUm presented would be sent to the Town Attorney for his I~ev~ew. Mr. Gill said that they would be unhappy to loose any more lo~s due to the fact that tfor the Suffolk County Deparmtnet of Healt~k S~rvices, they had to loose 2 lots for the wate~ treatment plant. ~he/Chairman also presented correspondence from the Mattituck Board of Fi~e.Commissioners indicating the number of fire hydrants and the required gallons per minute. THe attorney's requested a copy of ~thi~ letter and stated that they would be happy to comply to the Fire,Commissioners ~equest. There was a question as to the yard hydrants shown on the plan and the attorney's stated that these are for irrigation purPoses only. Pg. (3) r 8/20/84 On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVE~ th..t the Southold Town Planning Board , follwoing a field inspection ~f the property, refer the site plan of John E. Rempe and Sta¢ia ii. Rempe for a storage building located at Greenport dated July 8, 1984 to the Buidling Department for Certification. Vote o Ernest Curr. the set'off Board of Ap' He expiain~ houses whic that many o smaller tha these home: The Chairm~ for the fi inspection or recommen David Brawn subdivision of Appeals noted in th been made f lot size. On a motion RESOLVED th set-off of Orient, sub and the ind sid App Vot Koke and Be for retail had mad~ so Mr. Koke we them. ~r. the Board: Ayes: OrIowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward n- Mr. Samuel Glickman, esq. was present to discuss located at East Marion, which was also before the .eals for a variance for the insufficient area. that both lots proposed contained pre-existing have been there prior~to_'l~941~ He also stated the lots in the surrounding area are as small or those proposed. The attorney also stated that ~re served with fresh water with there own systems. i reviewed the photographs which were presented 2. It was the consensus of the Board that a field ~ill be made of the property prior to any actions iations. r-Mr. Brawner was present to discuss this minor at Orient whcih received approval from the Board [or the insufficient area of the lots. It wa Board of Appeals approval that a request had )r an additional strip of land to increase the made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was ~t the Southold Town Planning Board approve the David and Jeanne Brawner located at Main Road, ect to the following conditions: Receipt of and filed with the County Clerk covenants restrictions indicating no further subdivision of remaining lot in perpuity. Receipt of six (6) original copies of the survey ~cating the additional strip of land on the southerly ~ of the parcel to be set-off as per the Board of ~als approval. Review of the suffolk County Planning Commission. of the Board: Ayes: ORlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward tani site plan- The Board reviewed this site plan ~stablishments located at Southold. Mr. Ward, boardmenber, ~e suggested changes on the plan. Mr. Bertani and 'e present and the Board reviewed these changes with ~ertanin and Mr. Koke were in agreement to these. On motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen it wa Pg. (4) ~ 8/20/84 RESOLVE] th plan of ~le retail ~ ~ta subject the ind rot ~t the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site [ander Koke and John Bertani located at Southold for )lish~-~nts to ~he Building ~epartment for certiffcation :eciept of six (6) copies of the site plan with ~d changes made. of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward Penelope an~ Pasquale Gemma-The Board reviewed the amended site la maps for th .s proposal for a restaurant and gift shop on the Mai~ n Road atlCut+hogue. The Board had made a field inspection of the property. / · On a mTtion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED th~ site Plan o: gift sh~p 1~ certificati~ of the map Vote 280 North Re North Ro~d e Th~ Boar~ h~ the consens~ meeting to ~ onthe bad fi Mt. Beulah ~ this approve Board gi~e c the spur roe to dedicate cash in ~he the perf9rma that the roa Planning Boa ever came in to request a for this and make a field Mullen, ~oar more thah th Brewer Y~cht ~ Boar~%re' make a field the DEC ~o b. t the Southold Town Planning Board refer the Pasquale and Penelope Gemma for a restaurant and cated at Cutchogue to the Building Department for n subject to receipt of six (6) copies ndicating asphalt paving and drainage. the Board: Ayes: orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall , Ward ~d-This ms a site plan for retail stores located at the Greenport, fommally referred to as the Greenport Mall. ma de a field insptecion of the property and it was that the applicant be brought in at the next availabe iscuss the proposal. Mr. Latham, boardmember, commented boding in this area of the North Road. ~res- Mr. Rudolph Bruer, esq. was present regarding ] major subdivision. Mr. Bruer requested that the )nsideration to the request of his applicant reqarding ~ referred to as "Cosden Court". Mr. Bruer proposed ~o the Town this road without improvements and offer ~mount of $15,000. for the improvements in lieu of ~ce bond presently held by the Town. Mr. Bruer stated ~ was indicated on the plan at the request'of the ~d to provide access to the rear acreage in case that for a subdivision. It was the consensus of the Board ~ opinion from the Town Attorney as to the proceedure whether or not it can be done. The Board will also inspection of the property. It was noted by Mr, [member, that the bond amount is $20,000 which is cash offered. Yard: Proposal to excavate and create new docks- 'iew~ this site plan although they did not get to inspection. It was noted that thetown Board requested lead agency and it was the consensus of the Board to wait unt regard ~o t Reynotd F. read a iett Gentle statem abstai applic Mr. Orlowsk Mullen and Mr. Mullen and himself indicated t to the zone read from t can expand be created. On a m RESOLVED th inspection application Vote o Mr. Orlowsk Hemblowlloc for this pr covenants o which wis a On a motion RESOLVED TH Planning Bo at Southold and restric subdivision COunty plan Vote o Pg. (5) 8/20/84 .1 a negative declaration is issued by the DEC with ~e environment prior to any action by the Board. ~lum: Chan~ of zone- The Chairman, Mr. Orlowski, ~r in to the minutes as follows: ~en: I wish to confirm, in w~iting, my earlier ~nt on the record, to the effect that I will from any involvment in connection with the ~tion of Reynold F. Blum for a change of zone. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., then turned the file over the Board~member, William eft the room to get a drink of water. -eviewed the file and noted that Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, had made a field inspection of the property. They Lat the proposed change of zone would be even .of~Br~w~er~on~he adjacent parcel. Mr. Mullen Le file that the proposal is made so the applicant Lis present business and a s a result two jobs will The total acreage is 2.9. ~tion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was the Southotd Town Planning Board, following a field recommend to the Town Board that the change of zone of Reynold F. Blum located at Cutchogue be approved. the Board: Ayes: Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward Abstained; Orlowski then came back in to the meeting. ~ted at SOuthotd- Mrs. Gail Wickham, esq. was present ~posed set-off, of two acres. The Board.discussed parcel No. 2 for no further subdivision inperpuity, reed to by the attorney. made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall it was ~T following a field inspection, the Southold Town [rd approve the set-off of Ann Hemblo, et.al, located dated last amended June 21, 1984 subject to covenants ~ions filed withthe County Clerk as to no further of Lot No. 2 in perpuity and review of the suffolk ~ing Commission. the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, latham, Wall, Ward pg. (6) 8/20/84 Sundown Far] subdivision Bruer, ~sq. covenants of lots sin~ he would be and any !fur' minor of 4 questioned and lies in said that t part of the problem. Appeals gral right-of-wa] the riq~t-oJ that there lot line~ wh2 eliminate pi attorne5 notthe sure ~h~ The Chairmar in order to lies inside number of L] to comply wJ subdivision Kruse locat~ inspection Board to rec be Widened northerly be Ricketts loc which wa~ in On a motion RESOLVED th~ of the appli Appeals due created. Vote o~ Dr. Mercier: notes ma~e o that thi~ si s located at Mattituck- The Board reviwed this minor the applicants are Mr. and Mrs. Steifer. Mr. Rudolph was present for the discussion. The Board questioned d restrictions as to further subdivision in perpuity e they are all over 2 acres. Mr. Bruer stated that agreeable to covenant and restrict lots 2,3, and 4 only; her subdivision of lot 1 would be restricte~ to a ots~with Planning Board approval. The Board also he right-of-way which follows a traveled dirt road ide and outside the subdivision. The Chairman ePlanning Board only has jurisdiction over the road within the subdivision so this could be a o Bruer presented a decision from the Board of ting conditional approval to a portion of this · He also stated that they wanted to imporve -way as inexpensively as possible. Mr. WArd noted s a right-of-way currently running parallel to the ch is totally oUtside of the subdivision and would oblems with moving the existing LILCO lines, hwoever, expressed his concern with the fact that he is t his client has the legal right over that road. said that we will get in touch with the Town ~ttorney ~et his opinion on the right-of-way sinceait and outside the subdivision and there are~considerable LCO poles which would have to be moved in order th the movement of the right-of-way inside the at Mattituck- The Board had made a second field Df the property and it was the consensus of the ~est that the right-of-way off of Grand AVenue D 50' and extended at a width of 25' along the ~ndary, parallel to the right-of-way of Fox. ted at Mattituck- The Board reviewed this filed ~pected by Mr. Mullen. nade by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was the Southold Town Plannin~ Board recommend denial ~ation of James and Beulah Ricketts to the Board of the considerably undersized lots which would be the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward site plan at Mattituck-The Board reviewed the the Plan by Victor Lessard. Mr. Lessard indicated ~e plan was certified. Pg. (7) ~3/20/84 ON a mo?ion RESOLVE~ th sit~la~ of office as c recelpt~of parking sur line. Vote c On a motion RESOLVED th inspection, made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was bt the Southold Town Planning Board approve the Dr. Mercier located at Mattituck for a professional ~rtifed by the Building Department, subject to ~hree copies of a site plan which indicates ~ace,drainage, and screening along the west property the Board: Ayes:Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was ~t the Southold Town Planning Board, following a field recommend to the Town Board that the change of zone application for Horton Construction Co. be denied since the location isI beyo~' ~ existing zone line and would not be conform~nC~[vo e in with the surrounding area. the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latha, Wall, Ward DouglaslMil er at Laurel- Mr. Guldi, esq. was present for the Board's rewew of this application. Mr. Mark Gross presented a colore~d m p which was drawn by John Raynor of watermill indicating the are~ ar und Laurel Lake Which is where the subdivision is proposed, i r. Gross explained that they (Laurel Lake Associat&on) were co~cerqed with the eco system of the area and the vegatation, as weil~as,/the animals and birds who habitate the~area. ~e requesteld t~at all trees and vegatation within 100'~ of the water be left,and/not removed dus to the environmental impact it would have. '~r. ~ross went on to say that he reqUeste~ t~at any building be done in ~uch a way that the by-products ~o 'not run into the lak~ and he also requested that the Board consider his report and requests. ~ross's con( they would l as possible. The Chadrma~ factors int( accordi]g t( &~eas si b~e~ and not(d t! square feet o~ that is I create wo i said th s w~ a lsp, ~? ted witn tns su] was not eco] that the 1/~ build%ngs o] r. Guldi, attorney for the applicant, answered Mr. erns stating there would be minimum tree removal se buffers, the buildings would be Set back as far and there would be minimal damage to the environment stated that the Board had taken ai~i the environmenta~ consideration, and is aware of the area. However, Section 106-36C, the Chairman explained.that the t t? f~ooding are considered out ~ ..th~ gomp~t~ior~ he building area of the lots are less than two__~c~es .... a~ ~here~S-~1521000 Square f~et of upland an~t62,000 of marshland so of the total acreage better ~an half arshland, and he recommended ~tRat the applicant ots rather than the thr~e as proposed. Mr. M~ten s previously discussed with the attorne~ ~ Mr..Mullen, that he did not feel that the three lots were compatible rounding area. Mr. Guldi stated a two lot subdivision omically feasible to the applicant, and that he felt acre upland would be one of the largest lots with the lake. - ~ ~ ~ ~'~ Pg. (8) .~J 8/20/84 Miller Con -Mr. Guldi disagreed-with the reasoning of the Boar~ ~n theic d ~ial and the Chairman stated ~hat he would contact the Town A zorney for -his opinion regarding this. it was the consensus [ the Board to hold this application until an opini6n is obta~ne from the Town/ 'kttorney regarding the 'deletion of the wet,an, from the buildable base of the lots under Section A106-36C. Stollmeyer located at Southold- The Board made an inspection of ~khis prbperty and noted that the cottage indicated on the survey was that the lc a good prec On a motion RESOLVED th Zoning Boar due to ~he not feel it areas. Vote o On a motion RESOLVED th Town Board located at was gramted days for fi Board feels securing fi Vote o Southold ~[a read corres regardimg ~t Winters! cp site an~ wa also stated plan, howev Mr. Gray an was notlpic Post office Federal Gov h°weverl ha. and Mr. Gra The Board w situation w approval. ~ot actually on the property. Mr. Ward commented 2s are very low and he did not feel that it was ~dent to set-off the low lots. made by Mr.Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was ~t the Southold Town Planning Board~ recommend that t~e t of Appeals deny the application of A.M. Stollmeyer [Ow area of the lot's, since the Planning Board does is a good precedent to set-off the lots in low lying the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was ~t the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the ~hat the relief petition of Richmond Creek Farms, ~econic, be denied since after preliminary approval on Ju~ 15, 1982, the applicant went beyond the 180 ~ing for final approval. Therefore, the Planning it was the applicant who was not diligent in ~al approval. the Board:~Ayes: Orlowski, Latham, Wall, Ward Abstained: Mullen 1 Site plan, Jim Gray principal- The Chairman ~ondence from the Southold Town Chief of Police ~e ingress and egress of the site plan. Chief ~respondence~i~dic~ted that.he had reviewed the ; in favor of the proposed lay-out. The Chairman that the new post office is an o~t parcel on the ~r the land was purchased by the government from [ was never subdivided by the Planning Board. This ~ed up bY the Building Department even though the is under construction due to the fact that the ~rnment is exempt from building permits. They do, ~e to get Planning Board approval for the set-off ~ has flled an application with the Board for this. ~s' in favor of the lay-out and stated that the .th the post office should not h~ld up the site plan Pg. (9) ~ 8/20/84 On a motion ~ade by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED[tha~ the Southold Town Planning Boa~d approve the site plan of "S0uthoidl Mall' Located at Southold, mapped May 3, 1984 and amended June 25,t andl August 1, 1984 for the Construction of seven retail stores, one ~estaurant, and an addition on an existing restaurant as certified 1. A Uote of the On a motion RESOLVED th~ subdivisio] Southold was and filing WHEREAS, a and plat at 7:30 p.m., e WHEREAS, thc of Southbld NOW, the~efc Co., Inc. f¢ with 11.259 Chairman be subject ~o 1. Co statin~ Vote o ON a motion RESOLVED tha subdivision Southold waa and, applica and Whereas~ a ~ and pla~ at 7;45 p.r , WHEREAS ~ a Town of ou~ NOW, th~ 'ef¢ Withers ,on' by the Building Departmett subject to: ~e-year review by the Planning Board Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward nade by Mr. ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was whereas, a formal application for the approval of a olat entitled "Randaz~o Building Co., Inc~" located at submitted to the Planning Board on December 14, 1983 _e was paid February 16, 1984, ablic hearing was held on said subdivision application the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on July: 9, 1984 at ~d ~quirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town 5ave been met by said subdivision plat and application', Ce, be it RESOLVED that the application of Randazzo Building approval of said subdivision plat prepared by R. Van Tuyl ~cres, last dated March 14, 1984, be approved and the ~uthorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat ~e following c6nditions: ~nants and restrictions filed with the County Clerk no further subdivision of Lot No. 4 in perpuity. the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Lathaml, Wall, Ward nade by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mro Latham it was whereas, a formal application for the approval of a lat entitled "Charles S. Witherspoon" located at submitted to the Planning~Board onMarch 20, 1979 tion fee in the amount of $20 was paid on A il 13, 1979 ablic hearing was held on siad subdivision application the Town Hall, Southold New York, on July 9, 1984 at nd 1 the requirements of the Subdivision Regulationsof the hold have ~een met by said subdivision plat and application, re, be it RESOLVED that the application of "Charles S. for approval of said subdivision plat subject to the Pg. (10) 8/20/84 following resolution: 1. Cc statin Lot Nc Vote of the :onditions within 60 days from the date of this Tenants and restrictions 'filed with the County Clerk no further subdivision for the unnumbered lot west of 1 in the subdivision. Board: Ayes: Orlow~ki, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward August ~cre major subdivision at Southold- The Chairman read corresp~ndeI.~e from t~~At~r~rding the approval onthis gubd~vision and the applicant"s request for an extension and a re-apbroval. "Dear Mr. Orlowski: This letter is in response to .yOur letter to me of August 13, 1984 relative to the above mentioned ~bdivision, wherein you have requested by opinion as to the manner ~ich the ~anning Board should proceed with %hi~ matter. in w Gune 27 of the Subd on such fin Section A of land~prc final p~at resolution has been ce ins Section foregoing, subdivision approvi'~g t meet th8 cc that the P1 application and then th hearing and amount of s uncompleted wish me. to detail, ple On a motion RESOLVED t Town At~orn August Acre prior to se Vote DEC Mem~ra recomen~at until the )ear from the information which you sent me that on 75, the Planning Board granted conditional final approval [vision map. It would ~so appear that the c~nditions imposed ~1 approval have not been complied with by the applicant. )6-24 F(2) of the Rules and Regulations for the subdivision Tides, in part, as follows: "Conditional approval of a ~hall expire within 180 days after the date of the ~ran'ting conditional approval unless such requirement ~tified as being completedi" A similar p~ovi~i0n is contained 279 Subdivision 4 of the Town Law. By reason of the it is my opiuion that the final approval of the ~ap expired 180 days after the resolution conditionally ~e same since the applicant did not, within such time, ~ditions imposed. ~t would, therefore, be my opinion ~nning Board must request that the applicant file a new for final approval of the subdivisionmap in question ~ Planning Board can proceed in the normal manner with the consideration of the final approval, including the bond to guarantee the completion of improvements remaining at this time. If you wish any further information or ~ppear before the Board to discuss this matter in further ~se so,vise me. Yours very truly, Robert W. Tasker." made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was ~at the Southold Town Planning Board refer the ~y's correspondence to Mr. James Positlico regarding ~, and the Board will make a field i~Spection of the property 2~ing a public hearing date. the Board: Ayes: orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall,Ward um of' Understanding: It was the consensus that the )n to the Town Board on this matter be held over pard has had a chanoe to review same. Pg. (11)~ ~ 8/20/84 On a m tion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the S0uthold ToWn Pia~ning Board set Monday, August 27, 1984 at 7:39 p.m. at the Southotd Town Hall as the next reqular meetinq for|the Planning Board. Vote o: the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward On ~a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED th ~t the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to grant, appro ral of a building permit within the subdivision of ~D_u_%try Clu Estates, Lot No. 32 subject to a 280-a approval for the acc ~ss road. This is co~3ditional upon no certificate of occupanc ~ being issued until completion of the road as per the require ~ents of John W. Davis' report and a review by the Superin 2endent of Highways and~the Planning Board. Vote c theBoard: Ayes: Orlowsk~, Mutlen, Latham, Wall, Ward There w~s ~ .scussion introduced by Gertrude King Reeves as to the meanin~ of the term "C & R"s" which is used by the Chairman. It was noted that this is a term for covenants and restrictions. There W~as ~iscussion regarding the condition of the road within the sU~divfsion of Seettler's at Oyst-erponds at Orient. Mr. Latham reviewed C( rrespondence from Mrs. Wachsberger regarding the flooding oJ this road. It was the cons~e~s~s of the' Board to send cQrre: ~ondence to Mr. Horowitz regarding this and Mr. Latham stated~tha' he would try to contact Mr. Dean~ Superintendent of Highways. Being ~o f rther business to come before the Board on a motion made b~ Mr Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen and carried the mee%in~ ad ourned at 9:50 p.m. Bennett Or 0wski, Jr. ,~Chairman _~pect~l ly submitted, D l~an~. ~~retary Southold Tow~ .Planning Board