Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-06/04/1984P ~D Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 A regu] was held at Main Road, S Present were Bennett Orto William F. M G. Ritchie L Richard Ward James Wall, Victor Lessa David Emilit James Bryer 7:30 p.m. P~ preliminary On a motion RESOLVED TH~ the reading of Laurel. ~r meeting of the $outhold Town Planning Board 7:30 p.m., Monday, June 4, 1984 at the Town Hall, Duthold. Tski,Jr., Chairman lllen, Jr., Membe~ ~tham~ Jr., Member · Member ~ember rd, Executive Administrator ~ Town Planner Town Planner blic hearing on the question of approval of the maps of Laurel Estates located at Laurel. made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was ~ the Southold Town Planning Board dispense with of the metes and bounds for %he major subdivision Vo~e of the Board: Ayes: Orlows~ MR. Orlowski: In review of the file, we from the Long Island Traveler Watchman sJ notorized by'Clement Thompson., and also in the suffolk Times· Signed ~y SuSan Woe Judith A. C~ein. We have the filing fee from the Department of Health Services, environmental assessment form, we 'have n~ the PlanningBoard under the State Enviro~ Act, we havs i,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward have proof of public~tion gned by Pat Wood and ave proof of publication d and notorized by we have correspondence ~ have the long gative declaration from mental Quality Review in this cor~ Planning Co~ be unsatisfa purpose of ] further, wh~ a proposed space area a cluster s and restric~ correspondence form the Dep~ espondence it is the opinion mission will consider this p~ ctory unless the following i~ ot 16, if this lot is to be has not an over all layout treet tie-in to Aldrich Lane~ nd wh~ is this parcel landlo~ bdivision a yield map must b~ ions that would be palced up( insure that the open space area may.here] rtment of Planning of the Suffolk County 'oposed subdivision to .formation is provided ubdivided further, any ,lan be developed with 2. purpose of open ked. 3. If this is provided and 4. covenants ~n this subdivision to developed and does not Mr. Orlowski of taxes, Ch from the Sup~ Inspection r~ covenants an. no, the Town at the Town We have comm attorney and I'll ask if Hearing none Mr. Bruer: been over'th this was the referred to Mr. Orlowski Mr. Bruer: subdividedir subdivision. the intentic anything els that type.of use. Mr. S'aRand: Mr. Bruer: Mr. Orlowsk: Mr. David Ss retain ownez acres into ~ of grapes.hz irrigation with theminc for the fou~ Mr. Orllwski Mr. Saland: Mr. OrlowskJ open space. Mr. Saland: Mr.. Orlowsk Mr. Saland: be nursery Mr. OrtoWsk going to pla MR. Saland: pg.2 ~ 6/4/84 end up in County ownership, became of nonpayment .rles Lind~ Department of Planning. Correspondence rintendent of Highways, he has no problem withit. ~port from Mr. J. Davis, we have a copy of.~e__ restrictions which have been approved by attorney has not se~t these back yet, they are lttorneys right now,the 'covenants and restrictions. [nications fro~ the applicant'~d?~the applicant's ~hat pretty we,ll completes the -~il~. At this point ~nyone here has,any objectioRs to this major subdivision . Are there any endorsements? ~es, Mr. Bruer, on behalf of the applicant. We hav~ is be6ore, I would like to answer a couple of questi ons Health Department. Lot 16 is a covenant that you ~r. Chairman. Right. t states pretty much that lot 16 will never be furt[~er to anything less, more than excuse me a 4 lot minor With respect to this landlocked piece, it i~ n that the will remainopen space and not used for e other than maybe possibly agriculture, vineyard, thing, there would not be any further residential Perpetual Open Space Perpetual open space. What is ~the access to it. land: The access Wo~ld oome trou~ht lot 16, We will ship of wone of the lots with the well and place 15 rapes on this parcel, we plan to do another 15 acres re. Our well and most of our equ~pement, our drip ill be located up fromt, that would be the access; r subdivision road cutting up here, cul-de-sading lots. : The four lots you are tal.king would be on 16. That is right, which is 24 acres. : Right, but you would always have access to the Now, you are planting on the open sapce land? Perhaps. : Cause that would have to go into a... Would be if we specified that the grapes would tock. : You planted 15 acres of grapes here, and you are nt 15 acres of grapes there. Perhps. We don't-want to lock our selved into it. ~. ~-~ pg 3 ~- 6/4/84 Mr. Orlowski: Will there be an own into the cluster, and they will ret that will be there. M£. Sal'and: Mr. Orlowski Mr. Saland:W mind, with c in a large b who pays the you have wit rye grass, a and t.hey kno the to town the whole ar Mr. Orlowski Mr. Saland: Mr. Orlowski Mr. Bruer: Mr'. Orlowski subdivision? nor con but Taking input Mr. Latham question~? hearing clog Mr. Bruer: Penelope and and Mr. and conference t gift shop in presented to map, as well located in a a pre-existi restaurant w of 70., the access is sh the parking trees which large beech, parking woul out andthere if all the e stated that that the add restrooms., Yes. The vineyard goes wi 11, it p~ys the taxes. luster is tke owners as it, who mows the rye' gr taxes. The larger the h it. We lease it and nd we plant the grapes, ~ they can walk ina~d..h park here . They have ~a, and you know it enh : But you can't pick t irs association hereJ, ~omputed ~in the.grapes and everything :h the lots then? The problem, at least in my :ociation who maintains.this ~ss, who takes careof'liability lcluster, the more problems ce maintain it, we cut the it solved it for the owners ~ve their tra~ils and respect the use of the.., overlooking ~nces the whole area. grapes. No, you can't pick the grapes. Go ahead Mr. Bruer, ~xcuse me. hat is basically it. Okay, anyone else with any endorsements of this (none) Is there anyon ith information perten from the Board, Mr. Mu none); Mr. War~d (none); ~one); al'right, at this ~d and thank you all fo Phank you uery much. Pasquale Gemma Site Pi Mrs. Gemma were presen D. discuss the site pIan an existing building .w the Board '6 copies o.f as, a floor plan Of th. B1 zone, and the build 5g residence. Mrs. Wic puld contain 66 se'ars %wift shop would be 2.00 n with a 20 foot entr ~nd driveway was set ou lre on the property and and one is a very larg be located in the bac ~ hear that is neither pro ~nt to this subdivision ? llen (none); Mr. Wall (none) Mr. Emilita do you have any time I will declare this ~ coming. ~n-Ms. Agibail Wickham,esq. : for this presubmiss~on for a restaurant and [th an addition. Ms. Wickham :he survey including a key ~ building. This site is lng was used previously as ~ham explained that ~e id. 4 at the bar for a total ~quare feet. She stahed the lnce/exit and the design of : in order to Preserve 'the quite old.(on'e is a very poplar) The proposed where it has been cleared are no large trees in the area. The Board questioned ~isting old trees would.remain and the applicant ~e intended to preserve them. Ms. Wickham sta{ed ition would contain the kitchen, and the handicapped ~nd the gift shop. The board questioned the proposed curb cut and theappliCant stated that he had been told by the pg . 4 ~ 6/4/84 Gemma site plan cont.~ tree experts that tO pa~e~the d] Compact the ~oil -and probably k~ 200 year old tree. Mr. Emilita occur with tile poplar and the a has a diffre~lt roOt system and ire under the 'beech tree would' 11 the-tree, which is a questioned the same thing may p. licant stated that that tree he beech tree is older and needs a permit ant DEC had pub forward to concerns. On amotion RESOLVED th~ objections for a tidal 1. No e~ was perfc 2. The 1 that mean made by Mr. Ward, s~eonded by Mr. Mullen it was t the Southold..Town Planning Board state their o the DEc rega~rding the appt£cation of Thomas Samuels wetlands permit whi~ s are as follows: idence was found th~ t a proper topographic survey rmed on the site. ocation of mean higl water-an o~ site inspection reveals high water was fouled to be at elevation five (5) accordin~ to the survey received'by this office. 3. That the existing dike h~s been interrupted (cut through) to drain the property. 4. That the.s'anit~ry table and the low eleVation to the g~ound water run-off 5. Due ~o the approximate ~an high water line, that the lot size~ may be ~eduecd bel)w the zoning.requirements. vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Ward, Wall The Board had also'checked the f~od map and noted that it was e~evat±on A~on~the map.'- Ruth Oiiva~ present c~rresPondence to~ the Plannin~-'Board indicating ~he test hole da~a for applications due to the high ground water the property, may seep due ~ack into the bay. less compact~d soil. Mr. Emili a stated that on his site inspection h~ noted the roots of the poplar were protruding from the s0i . The Board a~l~so- questioned if there were going to be ~ny habitable quarters upstairs, and the applicant stated that the upstairs would,contain an office and storage only, due to the fact that the ~ire code wou~d not permit living space in that 'area. The lapplican~ did not be using the adjacent barn, however, it %'ould be.fixed up to prevent vandalism. It was the consensu~ of theBoard to conduct a field inspection o the property prio~ to any action. Samuels mino~ subdivision locat~d at Orient. Following an ~-site inspection of t~e prope]'ty, the Board reviewed the survey. The Board had noted theft, there appeared to be discrepancie with the survey a~d the n~and . It was also noted t~at the applicant h~d applied to the DEC for the Chairman read ~he legal notice whiah the ished. It was the :onsensus of the Board~to me DEC a letter indiCating the Planning Board's Samuels loca to the Suff© land. ~t wa from-the.app high water, elevations a Mr. William their, object TheY all com Bay polluted Mr. Orville and stated t to be issued Orient. On a motion RESOLVE'D tha of the regul Vote of t~ On a motion-~ RESOLVED t-ha of the regu VOTE of tX On a motion RESOLVED the minutes of Vote of On a motion RESOLVED tbs minutes of Vote of On a motion RESOLVED th~ minutes of vote of tl On a motion RESOLVED th~ ~-~ pg. 5 ~ 6/4/84 ted at Orient co~t. lk~ Collnty Department of Health Services on surrounding ~ th e consensu~ of the Plannlng~ Board to request lican~t, a toPogra~hic survey indicating themean ~tlands area, aetual location of the dike, and 1' intervals. shworth and Mr. Arthur Smith also expressed ions to this proposal, as well a~s, Ruth Oliva. nented that they don't want to see Hallock's as it is a source for the loca'l fisherman. 'erry expressed his objection.with, this proposal lat he strongly disagreed with the ~Nega.tive Declaration to the Cross Sound Ferry proposal located at ~de by Mr. Mulien, seconded'by Mr. Latham it was the Southold Town P~anninglBaord approve. r meeting of March 12, 1984, Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Multen, Latham, Wall, Ward ~ade by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr~ Latham it was t the Southold Town Planning Board app'rove the minutes lar meeting of April 9; 1984. e Board: Ayes': Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward uade by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was t-.the Southold Town Planning Board approve the he special meeting of March 30, 1984. he Board: Ayes: Orlowski, MUllen, Latham, Wall, Ward made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was the Southold T-o~n Planing Board approve the ~e ~p~ciatmeeting of April 2, 1984. he Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was t the SoutholdTown Planning Baord approve the he apecia~ meeting of April 12, 1984 .e Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward made by Mr'. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was .t the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of ~.he spectral meeting of April 23, 1984. Vote of the Board: Ayes~r lowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward - pg.6 ~-'~ 6/4/84 Henry Smith located at Pecon$c. The Board reviewed the new proposal fo.~lowing afield inspection. They noted that Lot No. 1 is undersized since 40~000 square feet is the minimum lot requirement for a lot in the"C" Industrial Zone. This would therefore, require a varianc9 from the Board of Appeals. The Board also questioned the private road to Lot NO. 2. The Board r~ located at C discuss this two plans, a Cutchogue Fi Board favore proposal field inspec Mrs. Judy P~ to discuss t Cutchogue, S of a storage a photograph will be loca two location from the Boa Board questi the consensu to any furth Dr. Joseph L to discuss t amendment to The Board qu storage is s he planned t for a coDpan doors. The on the use e and any chan the Planning On a motion RESOLVED th~ plan amendme Building Dep for Dr. Jose Vote of t Tiewed the clust utchogue. Mr. R withthe Board.. ] nd would also co] re Department. d the open space It was the conse] tion prior to an' scucci was prese he site plans fo~ outhold~ and Gre~ shed for return~ of the storage ted on the side s, Cutchogue and rd of Appeals f~ oned the drainag~ s of the Board t~ ~r action. izewski was pres he proposal for ~ an approved sit~ ~stioned the pro] uch a broad term o use this for ti F, and the build~ Board requested ~ the Building wi ~e of use will h~ Board. made by Mr. Mull~ the Southold T~ nt for the const~ artment for cert ph Lizewski and he Board: Ayes: r proposal for Richard Young, ~chard Young was present to {e stated that he had submitted ~sider donating some land to the ?he Chairman stated that the , however, would review the ~sus of the Board to make a action. ~t for a presubmission conference the 7-11 stores located at ~nport for the construction ~ble bottles. She presented )uildings explaining that these the existing buildings and Southold would require variances )r insufficient setbacks. The from the buildings and it was make a field inspection prior ~nt for a presubmission conference storage building. This is an ~ plan, located at Cutchogue. ~osed use of the building since Dr. Lizewski stated that ~e storage of glass products .ng would have no windows or :ovenants and restrictions ~ich will be for storage only ~ve to have the approval of n, seconded by Mr. Wall it was )wn Planning Board refer the site ~uction of a storage shed to the' _fication. This site plan is .ocated at Cutchogue. )rlowski, Mulle~ Latham, Wall, Ward pg. 7 - 6/4/84 On a motion RESOLVED th~ Lad agency w Services loc. Review Act. been made. Vote of t Abst. had On a motion following ac Pursuan -State Envirc 617~10 and C hereby given the action d have a sign~ DESCRIPTION - The SJ Orient for The pr aade by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was ' - ' ' indicat enviror be imp] the Sou%hold Town Planning Board declare itself [th regard to the~site p]~n nf c~n~_Ho%~q=h~ ~ted at Orient under the State Environmental Quality An initial determination of non-significance has ~e Board;Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall ~ined: Ward due to fact that Mr. Ward's firm )een hired by the Town regarding the use of State Funds. aade by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr.. Wall the 5ion was taken: NEGATIVE DECLARATION t to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law nmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section- hapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for escribed below has determined that the project will not ficant effect on the environment. OF ACTION .te p.~'~f6r'~C~os~'Sound Ferry Services, located at he construction of a ferry terminal. ject has be~n determined not to have a significant e environment for the following reasons: ronmental assessment has been submitted which ed that no significant adverse effects to the ment were likely to occur should the project emented as planned. Becaus~ there has been no correspondence from the Department of HeaJth Services within the alotted time, it has been deemed that t~.ere are no comments or concerns from that agency. Becaus~ '..-'there has been no correspondence from the Department of Environmental Conservation in the alotted'time it has been deemed that there are no comments or concerns from that agency. The pre of the Further infc Secretary, $ 1'1971 Vote of tl.e BOard: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wal~- ~bstained; Ward, due to the fact that Mr. Wa~d's firm had been hi-ad by the Town regarding ~he state funds. ject will meet all the requirements of the Code Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations. rmation can be obtained by contacting D~ne M. Schulkze · outhold Town Planning Board, Main Road, ~outhold, New York pg. 8 ~6/4/84 Charles Simo field iRspec action by the restriction~ which were: 1. No f~ perpuity. 2. Any f a major s Blue Horizon major subdiv and restrict is not to be approved by that the rig the lay-out. On a motion RESOLVED tha sketch map o an---~dated Ma Vote of t Howard Rosen present to d ~ Estate located at Peconic: The Board made a hion of the property, however, prior to any Planning Board , they request covenants and as mentioned at the May 21, 1984 meeting ~ther subdivision of Lots No. 1, 2, and 3 in ~rther subdivision of Lot No. 4 .will constitute ~bdivision. located at Peconiq. The Board reviewed the is~-7 lots and noted that the covenants ions, stating hhat Lqt No. 7 of 48.7 acres further subdivided in perpuity, had been the Town A~torney. The'Board expressed concern bt-of-way be improved, however, they favored made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was the Southotd Town Planning Board approve, the Blue Horizons for seven lots located at Peconic rch 19, 1983 and amended April 10, 1984. ne Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latha. m, Wall, Ward stone located at Cutchogue-Gary Olsen, esq. was iscuss this minor subdivision. The Board noted that a new ~ the lots are restrictions was also not previously a requested, h never finali same and Mr request. On a motion ap containing a ke5 oversized, the as to no further ed that this same st nd ~he same covenan% owever, never complJ zed. The Board sta~ map had been received. Since d requested covenants and bdivision in perpuity. It bdivision was applied for s and restrictions were ed with therefore it was ed that they were requesting Olsen stated that he was in agreement with this made by Mr.Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval to_the ~nor subdivision Of Howard R~sehstone locate~ at Cutchoqu~ dated April 3, 197~ and amended May 30, 1984 subject to ~he...[eq~ipt of qovenants~ and restrictions stating no further ~ubdivisign in perpe~__uit~. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham , Wall, WArd · pg. 9 6/4/84 Wasson located at Mattituck Mr. Gary Olsen, esq. was present to discuss th~ proposal with the Board. He explained that Mrs. Watson' Wanted to transmit 8,575 square feet to the 'adjacgnt landowner E. Borak and requested that this be handle~ a~ a .lot line change. On a motion ~ade by Mt.Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED tha%! the Southold Town Planning BOard approve the lot line change ~f Marguerite R. Wasson located at Mattituck, dated August 24, 1982 and amended February 6, 1984 subject to the recei ~t o'f a declaration and copies of the deed that the area wil. be transmitted to E. Borak as a nonbuildable lot and ther~ will be no further subdivision in perpuity. Vote of t]~e Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall,Ward Ricketts loci[ted at Matt±tuck. Mr. Gary Olsen, esq was present to discuss tibia Set-off as the Board had a question with regard to what was ]~eing set-off. Mr. Olsen stated that he was applying simultaneou~i.y to the Board of Appeals for a variance on the insufficient area. It was the consensus of the Board that prior to making a recommendation to the Board of Appeals regarding th~ application for a set-off of Ricketts located at Mattituck~ t~e B~ard will make a field inspection. On review of the map, ~owever, they. did note that the' surrounding~'lots aresmall, ho~.ever, they will make f~rther ~ecommendation after an on-site visit. Olsen site p~an located at Cutchogue- The Board expressed their satisfaction with ~e construction of the law office. Mr. olsen thanked the Board and requested upgrading the driveway. T~e Board stated that they saw no problem with this, however, suggested that he request an inspection by John W. Davi~ in order tb determine the best way for the improvements~ Davison set-~ ff located at Laurel. Mr. Eugene Davison was present to d~ ~cuss this proposed set-off which had insufficient area. Mr. Da¥ison explained that he has applied to the 'Board of Appeals fgr a variance on ~his insufficient area and for permission tQ construct living quarters above the stabte. ~ The Board requested the countours be put on the map;" ~ and questioned Mr. Davisons future intent withthe property. They statedC~hat knowing this would help to possibly subdivide the property in an advantageous way, rather than simplY setting off one piec~ an indoor ri~ consensus of property and sketch and s' him. ~. Mr. Davison stated that he did wish to construct {lng stable sometime in the future. It was the the Board to conduct a field inspection of the requested that Mr. Davison place any ideas on the ~ake the property so the Board could work with pg. 10 6/4/84 Stegner lcoe subdivision as a set-~f~ is indicatec lot. The Be the applicar for the app] ted at SouthDld.. The Board reviewed this minor which had' be~n approved by the Board of Appeals , The Board questioned the right-of-way which on the sumve¥ as Lot #2 and cannot be a building ard requested some clarification as to what t in ends to do and requested that the attorney icant for lthe applicant, Mr. Rudy Bruer, be scheduled fcr an appointment to 'me~t ~e Board to discuss this propos~l~ It was the consensus of the Board to conduct a ~ield' inSPection prior'to any action. D C. s-elle/ . ~ d * * * aniel · b y ~locate a-t Cutchogue. T~he Board reviewed this proposed'sera,ff'!which was given-280~a approval by the Board of Appeals. On a motion RESOLVED tha set-off of vote of On a motion RE~QLVED tha agency for under the St determinatic Vote of t Following th Appeals did Lot 1. In o the lot line minimum lot this is not to the Board On a motion RESOLVED the ResolutJ vote Grigonis set proposal whi from the Boa On~a motiDn made ~y ~Mr. made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was t the SO~h~td Town Planning Board approve the aniel ~C~i~helley located at Cutchogue. he Bo~rd~ Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall,Ward made by ~r. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was t the S~thold Town Planning Board declare lead he se~-6ffo.of Da~mel C Shelley located at Cutchogue ate E~V%~gnmental Quality Review. An initial n bf n~o~4gignificance has been made. he Boa~r~ ~Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward ese res~t~ti0ns i~ was noted that the Board of not gr~t.l'a variance for the insufficient area of rder top~oceed withthe aPplication, therefore, · 11 h~e to be sh~f~ed in order to obtain the requirement of 80,000~square feet on Lot 1. If ag~ee-ab!~ei the aPPlicant will have to reapply of ApPea~S for an inSufficeint area variance. nade by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward it was that the.'Southold Town Planning Board resCind on of ~pprova~l of the set-off, for Daniel~Shelle~. of the ~oard: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward off located at So~thold. The Board reviewed this ~h receive~ a Varignce on the insufficient area ~d of Appeals. MUl!%ien, seconded by Mr. Ward it was pg. 11 ~ 6/4/84 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant ~pproval of dated Decemb County ~lann Vote of t On a motion RESOLVED tha agency under the set-off of Mary Grigonis, located at Southold, er 27, 1983 subject to the review of the Suffolk ing CQmm~ssion. he Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen,Latham, Wall, Ward made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was t the Southold Town Planning Board declare lead the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the set off of Mary G[igonis loCated at Southold. determinatic Vote of t Plock set-of set-off whic from the Boa On a motion An initail n of non-significance has been made. he Board : Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward f located at Southold. The Board reviewed this h received a variance on the insufficient area rd of Appeals. made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant approval f~ the set-cff of Carol Plock, located at Southold subject to the review of the. Suffolk County Planning Commission. Vote of t On a motion RESOLVED tha lea__d agency under the St determinatic Vote of t Fau lkner lo( which~,receiv of Appeals. had been met appeals, th. he Baord: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward i~w as t the Southold Town Planning. Board declare themselves for the set-off of Carol Plock locateda at Southold ate Environmental Quality Review Act. An initial n of non-significance has been made. he Boardy: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward ~ted at Cutc~ THe Board reviewed this subdivision ed approval on the insufficient area from the Board It was the consensus of the B6ard that since these ged lots and granted a variance from the Board of t this could be handled as a set-off. On a motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED THaT THE Southold Town Planning Board declare lead agency with regard to the State En~menta~li~uality Review Act for the]set-off of Linda M. Faulkner lcoated at Cutchogue. An initial determination on non-significance has been made. Vote of On a motion RESOLVED tha set-off of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, _Wall, Ward made by Mr. Latham , seconded by Mr. Mullen it was t the Southold Town Planning Board approve the inda M. Faulkner Iocatedat Cutchogue dated May 31, 1984 pg. 12 6/4/84 subject to Vote of On a motion RESOLVED tha. a subdivisic was submitte fee was paid WH REA$ a pul and plat at 7:30 p.m., a WHEREAS, the of Southold NOW, theref01 Andres for a] and Young, d~ April .23,. 191 endorse app~ conditions resolution: he review of the Suffolk County Planning Commsission. he Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, WARd made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was whereas, a formal application for the approval' of plat enti'~!ed '.'rLynn San Andres" located at Mattituck' to the Planning Board on December 31, 1982 and filing~ on May '18, 1983 )lic hearing was held on said subdivision application :he' Town Hall, Southold, New York, on May 7, 1984 at requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town ~ave been met by said subdivision plat and application, =., be .it RESOLVED that ~the aPpiication of Lynn San )proval of said subdivision plat prepared by Young ~ted January 5, 1983 and amended March 12, 1984 and 14, be approved and the chairman be authorized to )val on said subdivision plat~.~uhject to the following )e completed within 6 months ~rom the date o~ ~his 1. ~o lot sh~ll'be subdivided or its lot lines changed in aDy manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning'Board. 2. Since this tract has the potential to be further subdivided any subdivision of any part of this tract in the future Shal! have a map of the subdivision filed in the office Of the County Clerk. 3-~: ~Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited ~o ~hat necessary for siting and constructing a house wi~ the intent of preserving as muchof the natural vegetation on the site as possible. Limiting clearing and' 'rading will minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. '4. o residential structure or sanitary .disposal facility shall be installed or constructed within 100 feet of the upland edge of the tidal wetlands along the shoreline of Lone Creek. 5. A conservation or scenic easement having a minimum Width of 50 feet .shall be established along the upland edge of the tidal wetlands along Long Creek in order to insure -that no development adverse to the aesthetic quality of the shore li~e will take place along the shoreline. 6. INo storm~Iater~runoff resulting from the development of the subdi%'ision or any of the lots shall be discharged directly int(, the adjacent body of wateb, Long Creek, or the tidal' wetlands bordering the creek. 7.. Condition,s 1-6 shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the offic( of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval of this subdivision. pg. 13 '~ 6/4/84 Lynn Saq..An~ It was also prior to thc of theTown ires cont. noted that approval of the access road will be needed building permit being issued p~rsuant to Section 280-a Law. Vote of ~he Board: Ayes: Orlowski , Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Wall it was It whereas, a formal application for-the approval of a ~plat entitled "Sebastian's Cove Section II" located at was submitted to the Planning Board on March 26, 1984 fee was paid on March 26, 1984 ~ublic hearing was held on said subdivision application the Town Hall, Southold,..~ew York, on May 7, 1984 at ~nd ~ requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town have been met by said subdivision plat and application, ,re, be it RESOLVED tha~ the application of "Sebastian's ii"for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Rod dated January 24, 1984, be approved and the authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat .he following conditions bein~ completed 6~ont~ .e of this resolution: No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed .ny manner at any future date unless authorized by the hold Town Planning Board. No residential structure or sanitary disposal facility 1 be constructed or otherwise located within 100 feet he edge of ~the shoreline of Mattituck Creek and the 1 w~nds bordering the creek. o stormwater runoff resulting from the development ~e subdivision Or any of the lots shall be discharged tiy into the adjacent body of wa~er or the tidal .nde bordering that body. 4. londitions 1-3 inclusive shall be filed as covenants andI ~estrictions in the office of the County Clerk i c prior to granting of approval to this subdivision. he bond must be posted to the Town Board in the app~ red amount of $125,000. ~ ~. Ii~spection fee must be paid to the Town Clerk in -~he. mount of 4% of the approve d bond amount of 125~000. ' '- ' · / Vote Jf t~e Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion RESOLVEp th subdivision ~attituck and, .fi~ng WHEREASf a and plat at 7:45 p.m., WHEREAS~ th. of Southold NOW, there Cove, Sec. Van Tyle, ~hairman b~ subject to from the d~ Sou' Of ' ire~ e'tl, pg. 14 ~ 6/4/84' On a motion RESOLVED tha Town Board t] for signs be of sign area Vote of ti On a motion RESOLVED tha request comp Inspector Jo] the subdivis~ Vote of ti On a motion RESOLVED tha approval of Fishers Isla resolution f~ Board's appr~ Vote of ti Long Pond Esi submitted to requested net not be chang( On a motion RESOLVED that agency with for the site Community, Sc has been mad~ Vote On a motion RESOLVED tha park and pla] Georgigopoul~ request appr~ the applican' lade by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was ~ the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the ~at' ~e proposed local law in relation to permit fees increased to one dollar ($1) for each square foot with a minimum of twenty-five dollars ($25). ~e Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward lade by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Wall it was ~ the Southold Town Planning Board approve and .iance with the access road report No. 365 of in W. Davis with regard to the acess road within .on of John Simichich located atSouthold. ~e Board: Ayes: Orlowski, MUllen, Latham, Wall, Ward ade by Mr.Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was ~ the Southold Town Planning Board reaffirm the conditional ~he minor subdivision of Allerton Cushman located at ~d and grant a 90-day extension from the date of this ~r completing the conditions as indicated in the ~val resolution of November 8, 1982. ~e Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward ~ates. The Board reviewed the new road sections correct the error in the roadway. THE Board ~ maps or some indication that the lot sizes will ~d by the construction of this road. lade by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was ~ the Southold Town PlanningBoard declare lead ~egard to the State Environmental Quality Reveiw Act ~lan of St. Peter's Luteran Church Retirement ~ction I~ An in itial determination of non-significance of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen,Latham, Wall, Ward %ade by Mr.Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was ~ the Southold Town Planning Board recommend the ,ground fee for the major subdivision of )s located at Southold To be $10,000. and )val of same, as this is the fee agreed upon by and after review by the Planning Board it pg. 15 is felt that this is the acceptable amount. Vote of t Kowalski-Ber consensus of Richard Ward Seacroft si the correspo as follows: Dear Mr. last before by the Zonin of the pre-s which of ~he suant to 1 since that p nothing from for the site In light pursuant to concerned, must elapse we may final You can a exceedingly point where prejudiced b the time tha the delay on product of g In light its individu incur any ir delay, we in due to your I trust t legally pros in particula Yours vet The Chairman reply to thi Dear Mr. are required of the Seacr Site Plan ap paragraph 10 6/4/84 ne Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward ry site plan located at Southold. It was the the Board to hold this over until boardmember could review it. ze plan located at~.~Cutchog~e~. The Chairman read ~dence from the ~a~tor~ey'-'f-or~hhis ~ ~i%ecp~aR, )rlowski, The proposed site plan for Seacroft was [our Board at a pre-submission conference, as required ~ Ordinance, on April 9, 1984. As you know, the purpose ~bmission conference was to enable the Board to indicate development plan elements would be required pur- ~0-134 of the Code. Almost eight weeks have.expired ~e-submission conference and to date we have received the Planning Board as to the matters we should address plan approval. f the fact that there are basically only three areas 100-131, to which the Planning Board should be find it inconceivable that such a period of time ~efore we are furnished with data from you so that ly proceed. ppreciate, I am sure, that any delay in time is ~ostly to this project and is now reaching the hhe individual participants are being~ financially f your Board's unexplained inaction. In the light of t has now elapsed, one must seriously conclude that the part of the Board has been intentional or the ~oss negligence. Df the foregoing, I wish to apprise the Board, and ~1 members, that if Seacroft and its participants ~eparable harm or damages due to this unconscionable- tend to seek legal redress for any damage suffered $oard's conduct. ~at this letter will spur the Board to perform its ~ribed function for the good of all concerned and, , for the Town of Southold. truly , Richard J. Cron then read the correspondence, which was sent zn ~, from the Planni~ Board. 2ron, The following site development plan elements to be indicated on the map for the further review pft project at Cutchgoue as enumerated in Article XIII, ~roval of the Southold Town Doce, as referenced under ~-134 site development plan elements. Legal Dat~ 1. 2. 6. 7. 10. e Proposed 2. 3. Other inJ 1. Jot, block and secti< lame and address of i indicated street widt ?he location and own~ )n the latest tax ma] Indicate emergency e] k complete outline o] .~ovenants applying t~ cis{ing zoning. tevelopment ~how off-street park .how the location, d ~f any proposed outd~ ~ystems. ]ocation of and plan. ~he location and arr. ~ccess and egress, ii Dr other paved areas ~ross sections showi idth of sidewalks a ewe~y'lines. ~ny proposed grading including types and the location of all hydrants and of all ~ater supply and sew ~n outline of any pr ~ovenants. kny contemplated pu property. If the site developm a supplementary plan ormation Draft Environmental of various discrepan with the change of 2. Traffic study to be last study done on N 3. Interior raod inters 4. Architect's solutio~ be followed with co~ 5. Suggest common walk~ space for walking a~ 6. Set back from road ] 7. Provide overall grad with retention on s~ 8. 9. ~g. 16 ~ 6/4/84 numbers ~he owners of record (full disclosure) ~hs. ~rs of all adjoining lands, as shown records. ~trance-exits existing deed restrictions or the property· ~ng for clubhouse and tennis courts Lrection, power, and time of use ,or lighting or public address for any outdoor signs. .ngement of proposed means of lcluding sidewalks, driveways, ; profiles indicating grading and lg width of roadway, location and ~d location and size of water and screening and other landscaping .ocations of proposed street trees. ~roposed waterlines, valves and :ewer lines or alternate means of tge disposal and treatment. Dposed deed restrictions or olic improvements on or adjoining the mnt plan indicates only a first stage, shall indicate ultimate development. Impact Statement is requested because cies found in the initial EIS submitted one. updated to indicate summer peak use, onday, January 24, 1983. ections should be at right angles. of side entrance to garage should mon driveways where applicable. ays along raods and into open d cycling. ooks tight in many cases. ing and drainage systems design te. Suggest underground electrical service. Provide sanitary disposal system design and include location 10. 11. 12. -~ pg.17 ~.~ 6/4/84 Landscaping to develop street tree pattern, screening, and foundation plantings, including type and size. QuestiOn! on maintenance building for equipment and storage for grounds and buildng maintenance. Well sise is indicated, but no support building, storage tank, and access is shown. The Planning upon receipt you for your Very truly y~ The Board re~ a copy of th in order tha~ fire wells. a copy of th~ a copy of thc Board in rep. that the Pla The Board di subdivisions Planning Boa~ Field Inspect updated proc6 permits being has request~ begin work on On a~mot~on b Being no furtl made by Mr. M~ the meeting. Board will continue the preliminary sit ~plan review of the above requested information and plans. Thank attsntion. )urs, Bennett Orlowski~ Jr., Planning Board Chairman tuested the Planning Board secretary to forward .s site plan to the Cutchogue Fire Commissioners they may review for the number and location of I't' ~.s~he~ns~nsus of the Board to forward correspondence to the Board from the attorney,and correspondence sent to the attorney from the to~r~he Town~t~rney to inform the Town Attorney ~ni~BOard has'been put on notice. cussed the condition of the roads within the of Grand View Estates and Highland Estates. The d had met with the Superintendent cf Highways, or and Town Engineer to review the need for dures for road improvements prior to building issued It was noted that the Planning Board d that 3ohn W. Davis and the Town Planner such a document. Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set June 18, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. ~t the Southold Town Hall as the nex~ regular meetinq_of th Planning Board. Vote of t~ Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward ~er business to come before the Board a' motion was ~llen, seconded by Mr. Ward and carried., to adjourn Meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Bennett Or low~ Res, pectfully sub~i~ted, Diane M. Sc · hultze, ~e~a~ Southold Town P~ ~r ~ ~ ~