Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PB-05/07/1984
Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was held at 7:30 p.m., Monday, May 7, 1984, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. Present were: Bennett Orlowski,Jr., Acting-Chairman William F. Mullen, Member G. Ritchie Latham, Member James Wall,Member Richard Ward, Member Victor Lessard, Building Administrator Dave Emilita, Town Planner On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mutlen it was RESOLVED that Bennett Orlowski~ Jr.~.~ct as the Chairman for this Planning Board meetin~ ~-~ ~k~s~ation of ~he previous chairman,~'an~-ince~the To%n~Board has not made a formal'appointment for a new Planning Board Chairman. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall and Ward On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to th~ Town Boar.d that Bennett Orlowski,Jr.,:~e~appointed as the Chairman Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward Bennett Orlowski, Acting Chairman, introduced the newest Board member, Richard Ward, and the new Town Planner~, David Emilita. ~ on the question of approval of the minor subdivision of Lynn San Andres located at Mattituck. On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board dispense with the ~ pg (~) --~ 5/7/84 reading of the metes and bounds for the minor subdivision of Lynn San Andres located at Mattituck. Vote Df the Board: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall,Ward Mr. Orlowski: On review of the file, here, we have yet to have the C & R's on the large lots every else seems to be in order, at this time I am going to ask if anybody has any objections to this minor subdivision. Hearing none, is there anybody in favor that would like to say something. Mr. Rudolph Bruer: Mr. Chairman, I'm Rudolph Bruer on behalf of Mrs. San Andress who is present, I believe everything has been said at all the preliminary meetings, I would just reiterate everything that has been said before and request that the Board grant this minor subdivision. Mr. Orlowski: Okay Mr. Bruer: Do you have any questions, we will be happy to answer them. Mr. Orlowski: Okay, is there, anybody here that has something neither pro nor con but with anything pertaining to this that we would be interested in hearing. Hearing none, I will ask questions of the Board; Mr. Ward (none), Mr. Wall,(none), Mr. Latham (none), Mr. Mullen (none); Mr. Emilita did nyou see anything here that.. Mr. Emilita: Well, only what is on the notes. Only if you want to discuss the issue of the turnaround. Mr. Orlowski: Oh, that would be here Mr. Emilita: Well, actually, it would be here. (inaudible comments) Mr. Orlowski: Okay, that is a turnaround, we could put that in the ... we would be~asking for no further.., you don't plan any further subdivision on these lots. Mr. Bruer : We would be glad to covenant them. Mr. 0rlowski: Okay, I didn't see the covenant in the file. Mr. Bruer: We will supply it, if it is not there. Mr. Orlowski: you will? Mr. Bruer: Yes Mr. Orlowski: Okay, very good; over here, we will put this tin writing, but maybe a large turn-around here for emergency vehicles, for interior lots 3 and 4. Would that be an objection? Mr. Bruer: Only in that the maps are in final form, and we are only talking about servicing two lots on a minor subdivision not a major. Mr. 0rlowski: It may come back as a recommendation ~ this Board. p¢~(3) ~ ~ ~ 5/7/84 Mr. Bruer: I underst~nd what you are saying~Mr. Orlowski, but I think under the circumstances at this point, at the public hearing I think the maps are pretty much in the final form, and we request that it remain the same. I understand we are only talking servicing here and if there was an emergency, I am sure the emergency vehicles are going to disregard anything anyway just to get to... just to do what they are supposed to be doing. And, I could see it if it were to be a~public street, because if the Town was going to come in there to plow and do things like that but it looks like it is going to be a private road. Mr. Orlowski: Okay, any questions. Mr. Emilita: I still think it should have it. Mr. Orlowski: Well, the Board will discuss that and I'll close this hearing now with this recommendation. I just wanted~o inform you that. Mr. Bruer: Okay, thank you very much. Mr. Orlowski: Okay. Public hearin~ on the question of approval of the final maps of ~h~n's cove located at M~ttituc~. On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Plannings]Board dispense with the reading of the metes and bounds for the map of the major subdivision of Sebastian's Cove 1.ocated at Mattituck. Vote of the Board: Orlowski,Mullen~-, Latham, Wall, ward Mr. Orlowski; In review of the file, we have here proof of publication, this is notorized by Clement J. Thompson for the LI Traveler Watchman, in further review of this file, no bond or inspection fee has been paid yet Mr. Lark: Mr. Chairman, that is not quite true, the initial application fee was paid but it was told by the former clerk at the time to wait until the public hearing. Mr. Ortowski: Okay, they returned it because... Mr. Lark: Well, this is the one , if you will recall,that we got fouled up with local law No. 11. Mr. Orlowski: Right. Mr. Lark: THe check was never cashed, it was held in the office, and I thought it was negotiated, because you had it for a long time. And then, when Local Law 11 got passed last summer, there was the confusion, so they said well just wait until...that was the word. Mr. Orlowski: Then it will be forthcoming. Mr. Lark: Oh, yea, there is no problem. In fact on March 26, a check r~ pg (4) ~ 5/7/84 Mr. Lark: was sent ~-05 for the filing fee, you '~ould have that in your file; a new check. Mr. Orlowski: Right. Mr. Lark: Now, a bond, a performance bond has not been set yet, that has to be done, unless you have gotten something back from the Town Board. Mr. Orlowski: Well, we have a bond, right here. Mr. Lark: No, this is the first time I am receiving it. Mr. Orlowski: Just let me see, to make sure this is it. Mr. Lark: Right. Mr. Ortowski: It is, Okay. Mr. Lark: No that we did not recieve. Mr. Orlowski: Well, we will get you a copy just to keep you up to date. Since you are up here, I guess you are pro so we will start with anybody here in favor? Mr. Lark: Well, I represent the applicant, Richard Lark, Main Road, Cutchogue, NY. I believe the file is in conformance with everything you want, I also believe you have in your file the maps that have by the Suffolk County Health Department so, this is a map that did have a hearing on-ce before_~on it bUt~due to the delay and timing involved it was decided best by the former chairman to go ahead and have another public hearing on the final. I think you remember this one, it has been around for some period of time. Mr. Ortowski: Right. Mr. Lark: B ~ , I think you have everything that you wanted, you know all the road profiles and everything were approved' at ta previous meeting, and you have all the final application. You have the, not only the cloth prints, with the health department signature, but you also have the covenants and. restrictions which you said you wanted. You also have a copy of those and ~f you do approve, this, they will be filed simultaneously with the map; you know, in the County Center. I do believe you have the application fee, the bond, no you don't have that. We, has that been set by the Town Board yet? Mr. Orlowski: This has not'been sent over to the town Board, but we will also need the inspection fee. Mr. Lark: Right, that is predicated on the map here. Mr. Orlowski: Right. Would. you like to add anything, you are right this has been around for a long, long time. M~. Lark:-No, I think we stretched this one quite throughly, over the last couple of years, so there is really nothing more that I can add, Except, if any of the board members have any questions. But I think the file is complete. PlanningBoard r~ Pg (~) ~_ 5/7/84 Mr. Orlowski: Well, first I'll ask if there is anybody else here in favor? Is there anybody here that has any objection ~o this subdivision? Hearing none. Is there that has something neither pro nor con but to this subdivision that will give us some ~r. Toumanoff: Mrl Chairman, I am the appli to say that the concept behind this subdivis ~ residential association which will be res road and responsible for the park and play § ~amilies who own the 11 lots involved, if yc Df the 11 original lots were approved as a ~ ~nd will be melted togethor withrthe 7 lots ~ow to form one residential association, whi ~njoy the benefits of the land. ~r. O~lowski: Okay. ~r. Toumanoff: What I did.say, is incorpora~ ~nd restrictions governing both the minor. ~r. Orlowski: Right, we have those. Okay, nember have a question. Mr. Mullen? (none) ~all (none); Mr. Latham. ~r. Latham: We have that l~tter .from the Suf that part of the records? ~r. Orlowski: Yes. It is in the file. Dav~ ~t this time, I will declare the hearing cl( ~or coming. ~r. Wickham: Mr. Chairman, if I may a~k, a~ ~nd part owner, we are under some compulsio~ ~ompleted in a relativil~'hort time, for o~ ~ubdivisiono In view of t~is fact, alit of ~e completed in a ~elatively near future, ~o have the bond reduced at that tim~ ~r. Orlowski: to reduce to the bond because the minor? coming into the... ~r. Wickham: No, because we already have cc if not all of the highway construction. ~r. Mullen: I would like to answer that, I ~r. Orlowski: Bill is our bond expert, Mr. R anybody here omething pertaining nput. a~t. And, I only want ion is to create ponsible~ to the round areas, so the u may remember, 4 ·nor subdivision that under consideration ch will all jointly ~d in the covenants ow would any Board Mr. Ward (none), Mr folk County Planning, is ~none) Okay,Alright sed and thank you all a contractor in this to have the highway ~of lots in the minor the highway work will would it pbe possible you already have it on mpleted the large part hink I can help. ulleno ~r. Mullen: The only way I can forsee ~hat ~s if you have it set up ~nto two distinct sections, therefore, you ~ould have ons bond.for oection I and another bond'for Secti0nlII. Under no circumstances ~hat I foresee, would the bond be reduced u~til everything is ~ompleted. Unless it is sectionalized~ . ~r. Wickham: May we hold this in abeyance a~d discuss it later perhaps it woUld be wise to have it seciontalized. ' Mr. Oriowski: You would have to submit new maps. Planning Board ~ ~ Page 6 Ma~ 7, 1984 Mr. Tou~anoff: I don~'~ thinks?we want to make an fssue of this Mr. Chairman. Mr. ~ark: And besides, that would have to go to the Town Board, anyway because ~they haven't set ~the bond, and any reductions would be an implication to them. Mr. Orlowski: right. Mr. Lark: Ail you'have is recommending.power at this stage. Mr. Orlowski: And the engineer would have to submit another report. Mr. Lark: Right, correct, that is right Mr. Orlowski Mr. Orlowski: And it could get very confusing. Mr. Toumanoff: It is not anissue Mr. Chairman. In fact, it is actually more economical to do the whole road at one time. Mr. Orlowski: I would say so. Okay. Mr. and presented a' letter dated February 1984', which was in file, explaining~ his reasoning for developing this in Sect ~s. The Chairman indicated that this could not be done because when the amended~maps were presented, they must. be considered under the present-zoning. The final hearing will.be on the map which received preliminary approval showing all the lots, not only a portion-of them.. The Chairman also indicated that the roads must be imporved to the satisfaction of.the Planning Board , after approval of the s~bdivision~,prior to any building permits b~ing iss~e~. Mr. Ihar stated that he had spoken'to %he Superintendsnt ~f.Highways and will proceed according to the specifica'tions required. The Planning Board will r~-schedu~e~ a~'.~~rin~g on the question of a~proval of the final map~for this subdivision in October-pursuant to the request of Mr. Ihar that this be scheduled when he returns to Southold~ The Chairman requested that Mr. Ihar request an extension in writing for filing the final ~aps and for holding a public hearing. Mr. Ihar s~ated he would submit this request in writing. Planning Board ~ Page 7 May 7, 1984 Rodrequiz site.plan located at Fishers Island-Mr.Lark, attorney for Mr. Roderquz has cancelled this appointment for a presubmission conference for this site plan to construct a home on business property due to the fact that'he Will need a use varience from the Board of Appeals and will obtain that prior to seeking site plan approval~ Domalski at Mattituck-~The Board will make a field inspection of the proPosed subdivision. Meskousls at Mattituck-The Board will make a field inspection of the proposed set-off. Wasson at Mattituck-The Board requests that the applicant and/or his attorney shhedule an appointment with the Planning Board to discuss this proposal for a lot-line change. Litteiri at East Marion-The Board will make a field inspection of this proposed subdivision. It was noted that this is adjacent to. the subdivision of Cove Beach Associates. Blue Horizons at Peconic-The Board is in receipt of the covenants and restrictions as requested which state that there Will be no further subdivision of lot No. 7 in perpituity. These have not been reviewed by the Town Attorney, however, and prior to any action of the Planning Board this will have to be done. On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accepts Report NO. 355 of JOhn W. Davis regarding the final inspection of. the access road within the subd~.vision of Greenbiar Homes. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Wall On ~ motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accepts Report /~o~of John W~D/a~r~ardin~ the aDDr©va~ ~thela~ess r~ad~h~-~h~-m~nor sub±division of Dr. Meyer Rosenber~.. located at Peconic. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward The Planning Board will get a determination on their jurisdiction for requesting compliance with the recommendation for a stop sign indicated in the report3 from the Town AttOrney. P Board Page 8 lanning ' ~"' ~-~-M~y 7, 1984 On a motion! made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall! it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board dehy the' 'subdivisio~ of John and'Frances Divello located a~ Mattituck due to the insufficient area of the lots. Vote of the Board: Ayes: O:rlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion made Mr. Lat~am, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED tha~ whereas, a formal application for the approval of a subdivision'plat'entitled "Robert and Jean Lenzner" located at Matttituck was submitted to the Planning Board on APril ~9, ~982 and, a filing fee was paid on January 11, 1983. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said subdivision application and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on March 12,'.i984 8:45 p.m.,'~ ~nd WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of-the Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application, NOW, therefore, be it RESOLVED tha~ the application of Robert and Jean Lenzner for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by A.W. Young dated Dec. 1, 1969 and la~'amended~ept.~, 1982, be approved and the chairman be authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat subject to the following .conditions within six months from date of resolution: 1. No ~ot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 2. No grading shall be permit bluff except that that may be or to prevent stormwater from clearing.~and cutting of vegeta limited to that necessary for 3. N0 residential structure be constructed Within 100 feet ted within 50 feet of the top edge ~f t~ necessary to control or remedy erosion flowing over the edge of the bluff. Any tion within this area shall be maintenance. nd sanitary disposal facility shall of the top edge of the bluff. 4. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvemen of the subdivision or any of it's lots Shall be discharged down the fac of the bluff in any manner. ' 5. Access to the beach shall only be by means of a suitable structure designed and constructed in a'manner that will result in the least disturbance of the stability'of the bluff. Access shall-only be a common structure to be shared by both owners. 6. The righ%'of-way shall be constructed and offered for dedication as a towh ~0ad. The angular bend in the alignmen~ shall be replaced with a large radius curve Planning BOard ' Page 9 May 7, 1984 Lenzner subdivision cont. 7. Th~ wa~er quality on the subject premises 'at the time of the la'st s~m~ling exceeded the drinking water'.standards established by the Suffolk County Department of Health~ Services and treatment may be required on individual wells on the subject premises. '8. The]above'conditions '(127 inclusive) shall be filed as covenants and reStricti~ons in the office of the C6unty Clerk on or prior to the gr~nting of approval of this subdivision. vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Ward, Wall Horton chan~e of zone located at Cutcho~ue-The Board will ~ake a fi~l~ inspection prior to making recommendation to the Town Board ~n this proposal. On a motion made by Mr. Mutlen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the final maps of .Constantine Georgiopolous to the necessar~ State and local a~nci~s. The Southold Town Planning Board will 'set Monday,'Ma¥ '~1,1984 ~at 7:'30 p.m. at the $outhold T~wn Hall as ~-~ti~ .andiplace for a public hearing'S'on the question of approval of 'the final maps 'of the majo~ sub~iv'ision of Constantine '~eorgioupoul~s located at' Southo'ld. ' Vote of the Board: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, W rd Mr~_~T_h_om~s_.$~u_~!M_~as present to discuss his proposal for a n~i~s~bdiv~i~ion located m~ Or~. He mad~ his'appointment at the Board s request. Ir'was noted that the Planning Board~ has made several field inspectio~of this propert~.,a~.£hey.~. 5~pog~hY~i~f~:~%~nd~.~ ~The Board also questioned the availability 0f .p0~ahle water On the site. Mr. samuels stated that the water'acceptability Would be determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Servzces. The Planning Board questioned if Mr. Samuels would consider selling one lot to the Town, Mr Samuels stated.he had ino objection to this but wondered if the Town had funds for this purchase, he added that he wouid not donate but would be open to discussing this possibility with the Town. Mr. OrloWski stated that presently the Board does not ~U6k favorably on this subdivision. It was noted that the Board will make another field inspection in order to familirize the new Board member and Town Planner with the subdivision. r-~ pg (10) · 5/7/84 Mr. John Kowalski was present for a p.resubmission conference to discuss ~is site plan for. a proposed fish market' a.nd office buiidin~ located at Southold. He explained that there would be tw6 (2) seperate buildings and the office building would be constructed at a later date, after the fish market. He further ~xplained that the fish market Would be a retail operation, ~nd the occupants ~f th~.office will 'be determined at a later ~ate. The Board stated that they will. make a ~ field inspeetion of this si{e plan prior to taking any action on this proposal. Mr, Qouqlas Castol~i.~as present for a presubmission c0nferDnce to discuss the amended site plan of.'.the. Bea~hwood Cafe .for the construction of an addition on th'is restaurant. The Chairman explained ti.at due to the fact that this application was mislaid during the ransfer of secretaries in the Planning Board office that this h~d been sent to~e Building Department for certification prior to thJ meeting. There was correspondence in the file that this site plan amendment was certified by the Building Department. On a motion made by Mr. L'a'tham, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board ~ amendement''~o the site plan Of Beachwood Caf~ .for the construction of an add:itioD to this resta~ran~ certified b~ the Bui~dinq Department. Vote of the 'Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the SoUthold Town Planning Board. forward thee prel.iminary maps for the major subdivision known as "Laurel Estate~" located at Laurel to the necessary state, county, ~%nd Town a~encies for their revie,w ,prior to the public hearing. Vote .of- the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by' Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town PIanning Board $~t June g. 19B4 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Tow~H~ll; Ma~-~ ~d: .q~h~]d ..as the time and place for a public hearinq on the .question~ o.f appro.val., of t. he pr~e~lminar, y map. for the ma~or subdivision known as Laurel Estates located at LaureD. Vote of %he Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward It was noted that the lot No. 16 within the Laurel Estates subdivision iwould not be subdivided into more than four tots in perpuity with covenants and restrictions, and the open space area would be farmland possibly offered to the Farmland Acquisition Program. ~- pg (11) ~- 5f7f84 On a motion made by Mr. Mul-len, seconded by. Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that t~ SOuthol'd Town Planning Board refer the bond estimate for the Water main extension within the subdivision their approval of the bond amount. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward .Dawson- c'luster located at Southold. Mr. Cron, esq. was present to request sketch approval for this cluster which was approved by the Town Board. for development in the cluster concept. On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED tha~ the Southold TOwn Pl'anning Board approve the ~ f~r the major subdivision of James ~. Dawson, in the cluster ~oncept , located at S0u~hoid~ dated Septeplber 19, 1983 and amended January 26, 1984. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward ~etls-set-off located at Southold~ The Board reveiwed the amended map reflec'ting their recommendation that the road width of the adjacent parcel to the North contain 175' so if it were subdivided in the furture that lot would not need a variance for insufficient width. This required that the set-off piece be moved southerly. On a motion made ~ M~. ~atham,~seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve .the set-off of George Wells located at Southol~ dated January 27, 1984 'and amended April 9, 1984 under Section 106-13 of the South~id Town Code. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward ~** DiMa~io-minpr Mubdivision 'located at Southold. Mrs. DiMaggio was present ~o discus~ this proPosal with the Board, she explained that the property was zoned bu~ness and the existing house is pre-existing, non-conforming. The Board explained that by subdividing this property, it would have to be made conforming, the Board also noted that the area is insufficient for business zoned property. Mrs. DiMaggio stated that she would like. to withdraw this application and the Board requested that this be done in .writing. She stated that it would be done in writing. Simichick-mJnor subdivision loca~ Cuddy, esq Board which minor. The as a minor nofurther to Subdivid that this i at the prev] as present to discus is a subdivision of Board neted nd approved, the app ubdivision, and now ~ lot No. 2 into two tent to. further ous submissionl Thi~ have 'Zoning Board of Appeals a area of the lots; each would hav requirement. The Board will new member and re-schedule th~s (12) 5/7/84 Mr. Charles ~his application with the is in a previously approved ~lication was submitted stated there would be application has been made The Board stated .de should have been indicated ~roposal Will now have to 'al due to the insufficient than the two-acre fie1( insuection with the 21, 1984 meeting. Blower~minor subdivision located III was present to discuss Board noted that they have made · and find the proposed access ro land where the contours are too way. They stated that the better, or ~he .right-of-way coul~ It was suggested that since one as it exists, that this be done be made later, so the rig the house and vacant lot, in the Rosenstone-minor subdivision loc~ stated that they..may request no further subdivision in lots. The Board also noted that in the'area adjacent this since it is possible that a road subdivisions. It was requested include key maps. This will be the submission of a key map. Southold. Mr. Robert Gillispie, ~division with the Board. The field isnpection of the area, .s located in an area of the 'led to accommodate a right-of- ~-way to the east is possibly Llso be constructed to the west. ~se could be buil~ on the land then the subdivision could could be constructed to serve ~st way. at ~ch~ogue~.. The Board and restrictions as to to the large size of the be another subdivision and they will research this, by needed to serve both t new surveys be submitted to .~d on the next agenda following ~On a motion made by Mr. Latham, RESOLVED that the Southold Town aDD~oval of the at SoUth0~d dated·November 1, Board office February 23, 1984. Vote of the Board: Ayes: On a motion made by Mr. Wall, se, RESOLVED that the $outhold Town ~onded by Mr. Ward it was Board ~ra~t sketch and received by the Planning ii, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward by Mr. Ward it was Board declare, themselves lead aqeDc¥ with regard to the S~ate Environmental Quality Review Act for the minor subdivision of A. W. Albertson located at South~ld. An initial determination of non-significance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Multen, Latham, Wall, Ward ~ - pg (13) 5/7/84 On a motion made by~. Ward, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the SouthoId Town Planning Board ~ set-off of Donald P~ Brickley located at Cutchoque due to ~he insufficient' ' ' area of the lots which would be created. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the Southold' Town Planning Board~deny thg set-off of GeorGe R. Tuthiil located at ~4nh~g~i~due ~ the insufficient area of the lots which would be created. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, MUllen, Latham, Wall, Ward Stephenson Beach located at Ea~stMarion-Orient. Mr. Robert Gillispe, III was present tO discuss the minor s.ubdivi~ion. He stated that this subdivision was proposed in.order to donate lot No. 2 to the East Marion-Orient Park District. The Board noted that Suffolk County Department of H~al'th Services approval was needed prior to approval of this subdivision if lot No. 1 and Lot No. 3 were to be building lots. The Board discussed the idea of the Town buying a parcel of this subdivision which abuts the Lond Island Sound. Mr. Robert GilI~spie stated that this would be up to the Stockholders, but, would rather donate it to'the park district. The Board requested a certificate of disclosure listing all the principals of the corporation. Mr. Gillispie stated'that they were anxious for approval of this subdivision and were willing to place covenants of the lots that Nos. 1 and 3 would not be buildable unless Department of Health Services grants approval for the water. The Board will review this proposal again prior to action. On a motion made by Mr. Mr. Mullen, Seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny the subdivis~oD of Jean C. Holland due to the insufficient area of the~ lots which would be created, this subdivision would be non-conforming to the present two-acre zoning. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mull~n, Latham, Wall, Ward Trovano-minor su~divi$ionlocated at Pe~ouic, The Board noted tha~ they attempted aTfield inspection but w~re unable to locate the property due to the ommission of~ a key map on the survey. The Board requested that a new survey be submitted indicating a key map. ~- pg (14) ~ 5/7/84 Christie-set-off of merged lo~s which received approval from the Zoninq Board of Appeals f~r Ithe insu~ticient area of the lots. This subdivi~sion'is loclated at Laurel. On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mrs' Walt~ it was · RESOLVED that the Southold To~n Planning Board approve the ~et-o~if of James and Edna Christie located at Laurel dated February 23, 1984 under section' 106-13 'of the Southold .Town Code. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Latham, Mullen, Wall, Ward~ /(ruse-minor subdivision locate~ at Mattituck. It was the consehsus of t~e'"~oa~d that th~ attorney for the applicant S~ould be called in at the nex~ available meeting of the Planning Board to discuss this proposal. Coster Site Plan located at s6uthoi~'~' Mr. Orlowski read correspondence from the Town ~istorian indicating the historic back~round of the site~ and c~rrespondence from the Southold Town Police Chief and Southold Fire Department indicating the severe traffic congestion in the area. The Board had made a field inspection of the property and were in agreement with the correspondence-received regarding this proposal. The Board also read Correspondence from the Building Department indicating that this site plan could not be certified due to the insufficient parking area. On a motion-~made'by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it wa~. RESOLVE~ that the Southoid Town Planning Board, following a field inspection o~ the property, denvthe "Coster'site plan located at Southold for a proposed fu~era~ parlor in an · ~xisting building with~a proposed~addition due to the historic ~<~background of that building, ~the ~act that the site plan can not be certified as there is insufffcient parking, and the heavy traffic congestion already existing in the area. Vote of the Board: 'Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, .... ..... :. Ward On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch ~ap of the ~ajOr subdivision of Freida Crow]~y R~t~ ]o~] ' ~dated October 1983. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowsk~, Mullen,. Latham, Wall, W~rd It was the consensus of the Board that a park ~e w~]] h~ in lieu of a land reservation for a park and playground. The Board reviewed the minor subdivision of Robert-J. Miller located at Fishers Island; Jim Wall of Fishers Island stated he had made a field inspection of the area and noted there were no problems with the proposal; one parcel is to be donated to the museum on the Island. Christie-se t~he Zoning lots. This On a motion 'RESOLVED th~ set-off of February 23 .Town Code. Vote of ~ruserminor cQnsensus ~J ~ould be ct ~ pg (14) 5/7/84 ~-off of merged lots which received approval from ~oard of Appeals for the insufficient area of the subdivDsion is located a%~ Laurel. made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr.'Wall it was it the Southold Town Planning Board approve the tames and Edna Christie located at Laurel dated 1984 under section'106-13 'of the Southold ' :he Board: Ayes: Orlowski, La'ham, Mu-t~en, Wall, Ward subdivision looated at ~attituck. It was the the Board that the attorney for the applicant ~lled in at the next available meetin~ of the Planning Board to discuss this pro osa~. Cos~ter Site Mr. Orlowski read 3~ nce Town Historian indicating the '~' historic b~ck~round' of the site, and Correspondence from the Sou~ho~d Town Police Chief and Southold Fire Department indicating the severe traffic congestion in the area. The Board had made a field inspection of the property and were in agreement with the cozrespondence-received regarding this proposal.~ The Board also read correspondence from the Building Department indicating that this site plan could n~t be certified due to the insufficient parking area. On a motion-made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVE~ that the Southol~ Town PIanning Board, following a field inspe located at existing bu background can not be the. heavy t ~tion o~ the property,'denythe "Coster' site plan Southold for a proposed fu~r&~parlor in an ilding with a.proposed'addition due to the historic of that building, the fact that the site plan ~ertified as there is insuffi'cient parking, and raffic congestion 'already existing in the area. ~ote of t~e Board: 'Ayes: OrlOWski, MulDen, La,ham, Wall, Ward On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Ptan~inq Board approve the sketch map of the major subdivision.of Freida ~row3ey .~ lo~a~d -~ dated Oetbber 1983. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowsk~, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward It was the consensus of the Board that a park .f~ w~]] h~ in lieu of a land reservation for a park and playground. The Board reviewed the minor subdivision of Robert J. Miller located at Fishers Island; Jim Wall of Fishers Island stated he had made~.a field inspection of the area and noted there were no problems with the proposal; one parcel is to be donated to the museum on the Island. pg (15) 5/7/84 On a m~%ion made b~ Mr. Wal'l, s~e¢on~ed by Mr. Ward it was RE ~old Town Planning Board approve the dat ~a~ch 23, 1984. e Vote of th ~Board: Ayes: Orlowski, ~utlen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motio~ made bY Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. latham it' was RESOLVED tl ~.Southold Town Planning Board declare i~elf lead ac ~rd to ~he State Environmental Quality Review determination of non-s L~ ~ been made. Vote ~of Board: Ayes: 0rLowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward Mrl George O. Gutdi, esq. to discuss th~ h the iBoard. Mr. Guldi . th'at' ~is Proposal iS ~ b~fore the Zonim~'Board of Appeals for approval of the:access road. The 'Board questioned the ~t-back requirement' from LI~CO ~or the hiqh voltage wire running acr,)ss the property. The B~rd also questioned ~he wetlands ar,~a and requested that th~s area be deleted frOm'the buildable b~se of'the subdivision. The Board stated that this wetland are. cannot be included~ in"the computations for determining area. Mr. Guldi presented a letter to the Board stating his opinion as to why the wetlands don't have to be excluded fr.)m the bui'ldabte'area. The Chairman read from the Code of the Town Df Southold, Sectiont06-36C where it states that the laild subject to flooding or land deemd'by the Planning Board to bel uninhabitable shall hot be platted for residential occupancy. The chairman'further~stated that this 'provision in the ordinance means that only the upland can be considered part of the building lot. Mr. Guldi stated that this was Mr. Tasker"~ opinion, but that: it is not clearly, stated in the code un~er subdivisions only in the cluster section and his proposail is not a cluster. The Board will get another opinion from the Town Attorney, Mr. Tasker, regarding this prior to any action. The Board noted that with the deletion of the weti~nds, the subdivision would three .undersized lots; however, if~the proposal contained two lots, there would be enough a~ea. . pg (16) -~ 5/7/84 ManQ'$-miDor The Board re request that writing in will be held to the Plan~ On a m~tion RESOLVED at 7:30.p~m. New York as of the Sout~ vote of On a motion RESOLVED .th~ subdivision access road located at Mattituck. ~eived proposed changes to a resolution and these changes be submitted to the Board in fder that they may h~e them in the .file. THis over until the changes indicated are submitted ~g Board. node by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was the Southold Town Planning Board set .a~ the Southold Town Hal]~ ~.a~n the time and place for ~he n~xt reqular meetinq_ old Tow~ Plann~n~ he Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward made by M~. Mul~len, seconded by Mr. Wall it was the Southold ~own Planning Board refer the ~ finatmaps necessary s~ be referre~ Town En~ine~ Vote of pavison-set The appear befo] to discuss On a motion RESOLVED th~ ~or the major subdivision of Harbor View to the ate and county a~encies, These maps will to the Mattituck Fire commissioners and the r for a bond estimate. he Board': Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham,. Wall, Ward off Iocated at Laurel containing insufficient area. quested that Mr. Eugene Davision be scheduled to 'e the Board at the next available meeting in order .he proposal. made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was ~t the'.Southold T~wn Planning Board ~¢fer the bond ~mou~t to tl~e Southold Town Board for their approval of same f. or the ma.~(~.r subdivision of Sebastaan's Cov_e_~ located at Mattituck. Vote of ~he Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen' , Latha~¥ Wall, Ward * * * Mr. A1 Fezzara and Mr. MariO Fezzara with Rod van Tyle were present to discuss the major subdivision of Blue ~nr~z~-~. It was the consensus o the Board that they will wait for the town Attorney's opinion on the covenants and restrictions as to no furthe'r subdivision on 10t No. 7 in perpuity prior to any action by the Board. (see paqe 7 of these minutes)~ , , , ~ pg ('17) . 5/'7/84 GrandvieW Estates~major subdivision located at Orient. There was discussion ~egard~g' the road.s in ~the a~roved subdi~i~sion~ It was the con~ensus of the Board that Inspector John W. Davis inspec~ the moads~an~submit a report to the Planning Board as to the prog] Being no fu] made a mo~i~ The meeting Bennett Orl RECEIVED THE SOUTHO] 'ess withthe construction. ther business-to come~'-befo~re thee Boar~-Mr. Mullah ,~ ~ ~o ~d'~rn, ~se~nded ~'~ ~'~ ~L~tham'~?an~ car~d. adjourned at 11:00 p.m. w~'~i, Chai/mAn Clerk, ,D TOW-N ~ 'I~wn of Southold ~Respectfully subm~tt~ed, , D-~ane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board