Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-05/06/1985Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 The Sbu' May 6, Southol~ Present Cha~r~ Member Member Member hold Town Planning 'Board had a regular meeting at 985 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, ere: n Bennett Orlowski, Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. S. Ritchie L~tham, Jr. (ichard Ward Member Kenneth Edwards ExecutiVe Administrator Victor Lessa~d Town PiDnner David Emi~ita 7:301'p.m~-- .Public hearing On the question of approval of the major subdivision of Blue Horizon~ located at ~econic, 7 lots on 55.7 ~cres. Mr. Orlo~ski: I wilt dispense with the reading of the metes and boun~s~ if there is any problem with that, with anyone, please let me kno~. I have proof of publication in the Suffoik TImes, signed by Anna Lekkas and-ngt©fiZ~gd by Margaret Young, and proof of publication in the Long Island Tra~ler Watchman signed by Pat WOod and notorized by Barbara Forbes. We have the filin~ fee, correspondence from Health Services,~ correspondence from %he Department of Planning,. Everything else is in order. At this time, I ~ill ask if there are any objections to this subdivision? Hearing none. Are there any endorsements to the subdivision? Hearing none. Anyone out there neither pro>nor con, but with some infprmation pertaining to this subdivision that may be of information to th~s Board?- Hearing none. Any questions from the Board? Mr. M~llen, (none); Mr. Latham, (none); Mr. Ward, (none); Mr. Edwards, (none). Being no further questions, I will declare this hearing closed and thank you for ~coming down. On a motion made by Mr. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 21, 1985. Vote o~ the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Page 2 5/6/85 On a m( RESOLVE of the Vote tion made by Mr. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was D that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes r~gular meeting of February 4, 198.5. of the Board : Ayes: Orlowski, MUllen, Latham, Ward, EDwards On a mc~ion made by Mr, Edwards, seconded by Mr.MUllen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of theregular meeting of March 4, 1985. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, MUtlen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a mo~ion~'made by Mr. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVEp that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, May 20, 198~ at 7:30 p.m. at theSouthold Town Hall,Main Road, Sou~hold as the time and place for the next regBlar meeting of the Planning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen,Latham, Ward, Edwards On a mo~ion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was RESOLVED| that the Southold Town Planning Board set May 20, 1985 at 7:30~p.m. at the Southold Town Hall as the time and place for a public hearing on th e question Of approval of the final maps for the~major subdivision of James W. Dawson Located at Southold. Vote Of the BOard: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a mol RESOLVE! at 7:45 a pub ti~ ion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was that the Southold Town Planning Board set ~ay 20, 1985 p-m.~ at the Southold Town Hall as the time and place for hearing onthe question~ of approval of 'the minor subdivi~ion of Howard Rosenstone located at New Suffolk Road, Cutchogue, containing 4.745 acres. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mutlen, Latham, Ward, Edwards 7:45 p.m. Public hearing onthe question of approval ~ the minor subdivision of Briscoe Smith for 4 lots on 4.1 acres located at Fishers Island. This received relief from the two-acre zoning Page 3 5/6/85 Briscoe from th~ Mr. Orl and bou~ We have Anna Le publica' Wood an in The Beverly We have everyth. Smith cont. Town Board. )wsk±: I will dispense with the reading of the metes ~ds, if there is any objection, please let me know. None. proof of publication in the Suffolk Times, Signed by ~kas and notorized by Margaret Young. We have proof of zion in the Long Island Traveler Watchman sigRed by Pat t notorized by Barbara Forbes. We have proof of publication )ay newspaper signed by LJ Zielenski and notorized by Prescott.. No.correspondence from Suffolk County yet. health services approval. We have the filing fee, and -ng is in order. At this time, ITwill ask if there are any objections to this subdivision.? Mr. Wainwright: Yes, Mr. Chairman, I am objecting, do you want me to come up at this time? Mr. Orlowski: Yes, please. State your name and your objection. Mr. Wail Wainwri~ other s~ and fam~ and Fis! well th~ second ! fully h~ the Soul I repre~ many, y~ ~wright: Thank you. My name it Wainwright, Stuyvesant ~t. I'm a foreigner because I come from ~ainscott, the .de, on the South Fork. But, I am familiar with Southold, .lair with Fishers Island as I represented both Southold ~ers Island in Congress for nine years. And, I remember ~ people on Fishers Island always complain that they are ~and cousins and~second citizens because they are never ~ard and I've found that to be untrue. Am sure that .hold Planning Board will give this very careful consideration. ent a Mrs. Elizabeth Parkinson Cobb, a resident of many, ars Of the Town of Southold on Fishers Island. Mrs. Cobb owns a ~leee of property which is centered on the map. As you yourself can see. I might say that I'm at somewha~ of a disadvantage because your very nice clerk informed me that this hearing was coming ~.p and I asked her if she would send me the papers on Thursda5 and, because I could not come over here. I went to a funerel in WaShington on Thursday night, and got back Wednesday. And, I did not have the file this morening. But, I do have a prelimizary subdivision that was, it is dated'1981. I d~n't the current~ survey, Mr. Chairman. What I would apreciate, seeing hat I am not adequately informed, and not hav~ng the advantaqe of studying this carefully. Whether I would be a!lowed~t0 submit to you and the ~members of the Board a written statement in opposition so I Won't waste your time here. I would. ~nd in that written statement I will ~nclose a copy of the clo~ing letter. A closing letter is a' letter tha~ Mrs. Cobb received from her lawyer at. the<~time she purchased the property, because in the closing letter, which comes from the firm Mi]bank, Hadley and Tweed, the same firm that the gentlemen who is putting the subdivision in here is a partner. It states that Mrs. Parkinson has the option to ~buy certain pieces, and as I just received the copy of this closing letter today, nd would like to submit to the Boar d for thier pursual I'll make sufficient xeroxs for each ~.member of the Board. Being inadequately prepared at this time, I will just ask youm indulgence, obviously you are not going to come to a conclusion because I heard you state that you do not have the County's report at this time. So, I won3~ hold anything up. For example, I don't know if a SEQRA s~atement has been filed, p~art I and whether the Town has complied with Part II. Page 4 5/6/85 Mr. Wai Is one It's PO With yo I'll ha' Mr. Orl Mr. Wail lwright: Because this is all waterfront property. £n the file, because if so, I would like a copy of that. Lnts like that I would bring up to the Board. ~r induldgence, ~ow much time will you give me, because, ze to get ~_hold of a copy of this map?and study it. )wski: We have 90 days'before we make any decision.~ ]wight : Plenty of time, thank you very much. Mr. Orlo% Mr. Wain% Mr. Orlon any obje¢ there ne~ in regard Board, I Edwards. Mr. Edwal the applJ a number the site, of the te site on I that runs and also · ski: 45 days, excuse me. ~right: 45 days? ski: Yes. Okay, is there anyone else out there with tion to this minor subdivision? Is there anyone out ther pro nor con but may have some input for the Board to this subdivision? Hearing none, questions from the 11 start with Mr. Edwards, since this is his area. Mr. ds: Yes, thank you Mr. Chairman. I was hoping that cant would be here or a representative because I have of questions to ask him. I did a field inspection on I'm very concerned about Lot No. 3 and 4, because rrain, I personally don't feel that there is a building ot NO. 3. I have some questions about the right-of-way down betweeen lots 3 t~ Mrs. Parkinson's piece of land, some questions about the right-of-way at the foot, on the water of Lot No. 3, a 20' right'of-way. It doesn't say whose right-of.-way it ms, or who it is for. I really don"t think there is a building site on Lot No.3, and possible a farily good house location on Lot No. 4, I would suggest that he re-design his map and maybe include Lot No. 3 to Lot No.4 and create on~ lot. Mr. OrlowSki: Okay, anything else~ Mr. Edwards: Not at this time. Mr . Orlo Mr.Ward: really is low area Mr. Orlow ~ski: Mr. Mullen, (none); Mr. Latham (None); Mr. Ward? Just in support in what Mr. Edwards said, Lot No. 3 the prime drainage area for the other lots. It is a hhat is collecting drainage. ~ki: Okay, this subdivision was granted relief from the two-acre ~oning by the Town Board. It definetly appears that there is a prob~em with Lot No. 3, as stated on the map, countours are based on mean iow tide, which appears to bearly give Lots 3 and 4 just enough buildable area. So, we have to address this before we come t~ any decision. Being as there are no further questions, I will de~Iare this hearing closed. Page 5 5/6/85 Meadow Farms- The Board reviewed this proposal for a change of zone from A-Residential to M multiple located at Main Road, Southold. Mr. Klatsky was present for this discussion. This proposal is for 72 units, proposed for moderate housing. Mr.Mullen questioned the concentration stating that the 72 units on 18 acres does not take into account the roads and open areas, therefore, a heavier concentration Would exist. Mr. Klatsky stated that generally the density is taken on the gross area, not after deductions for roads, etc. Mr. Klatsky stated that the ~overage is under 15%, and in the hamlet zone that density wDuld be permitted. Mr. Mullen stated that his feeling is that it is that it will be too heavy a concentration, he felt that it was not affordable, moderate housing, and he was opposed to a condominium complex for this type of project. Mr. Mulle also stated that he disagreed with the monthl~ maintenance fees, and he was oposed to the way it was submitted at this t me. Mr. Latham stated that he needed-~ore time to review it Mr. Ward stated that he felt Meadow Farms was a good idea but the condo arrangement could be a problem. Mr. Ward stat d that although it was not "affordable Housing" it was moderate housing and that was n~eded. Mr. Ward stated that the concept of moderat~ housing was not opposed by the Board, however, there was a question on the condominium arrangement. Mr. Ward suggested a joint meeting with the Health Department since it was their requirement that the association be condominium. Mr. Edwards s~ated that he suppported Mr. Ward's comments. Mr. Klatsky stated that the proposal was started in December in 1984, and application was made to theTown Board and the ealth Department. Mr.Klatsky stated thay had tried to answe~ all of the Board's questions. He stated that it was the Healt Department's requirement that a condominimum association be formed it was not the applicant's choice. He said , though, that in a higher density area there are certain advantages in having an association and that is that the maintenance is split amo~ng the homeowners. Mr. Klatsky said that when there is a larg~ development and no association, the maintenance is not kept ~p, therefore, the Town and future buyers become upset. Mr. Klats~y stated that he hoped the Town Planning Board would look into~the condominimium concept. He also stated that there Would not,be any extra amenities such as a pool, the maintanence would be ~imited to grounds and exterior work. Mr. Klatsky stated that he felt a recommendation by the Planning Board at this point would not eliminate them from further recommendations upon site plan approval. Mr. Klatsky said that prior to the Town Boar~ holding a public hearing, the County Planning Commission also needed to respond. Mr.Klatsky also stated his concern that the longer they wait for approval, the more costly it could be for the s~ructures to be built. Mr.Orlowski stated that the affordabl~ housing is a goal of the Board and the density is around the guidelines in the Master Plan which has been presented to the Town Board. Mr. Orlowski stated that there were still a number of questions that needed to be answered, namely Health Department, Highway Superintendent review, Town Board made a determination of significant effect, and requested a DE~S to be done. Mr. Orlowski stated that it might be premature to make a recommendation to theTown Board, since they were not ready to take any action on the zone change. Mr. Orlowski stated that prior to any action by the Planning Board they would Page 6 5/6/85 Meadow F~ like to ] the High~ Health Sc the plan guideline correspo! They had of the d2 stated ti with thi Mr. Mull as the m. for main~ the evir¢ two peop] stated ti employed would no~ .rms Cont. 'eview the condominimum ownership, correspondence from ,ay Superintendent regarding the road widths, County rvices regarding the sewer. Mr. Orlowski stated that has good intentions and is working with the Town's s. Mr. Klatsky stated that although there ~as no ~dence from Mr. Dean, they had two meetings with him. submitted a memo to the Board reflecting the content scussion and tentative conclusions. Mr. Mul!en ~at he felt the Board had moved very dilligently since it was referred by the Town Board in March. n stated that letter of 4/9 $25 a month was mentioned intenance fee for 72 tenants to raise $21,000 a year nance of the exterior. Howe~er, he noted that in ,nment assessment form, page 3, that there will be e who will be employed after construction. Mr. Mullen .at he did not.believe that two people could be at $21,000 per year. Mr. Klatsky said that they be full time workers. Mr. Mullen stated that he did not ~ee how this cost per year could cover all the maintenance including possibly roads and sewage treatment. Mr. Klatsky stated that they had received some bids and prepared a tentative budget which could be made available. Mr. Klatsky mentioned that Mr. Dean had reviewed road width conceptu~ 1 approaches on the roads and possible dedication, however, there was no firm committment from Mr. Dean. However the final road and drainage plans will have to be approved by the Highway Superintendent. Mr.Klatsky expressed his concern with kee~ lng the project moving so that it does not loose momentum Mr. Mullen explained that the Board was proceding with it s review, however, because it is the first project, they must take everything into consideration. Mr. Orlowski questioned the building square footage. Mr. Klatsky stated that until they have deffnite prices from contractors, and on the water treatment, they are using those areas. Mr. Ktatsky stated that they will schedule the meetings and contact the Board as to the time and ~ate. Mr. George L. Penny was present for a pre-submission conference to discus his site plan for Penny Lumber for construction of a 50' X 102' storage building. This is located at Mattituck, on County[Route 48. Mr. Penny stated that the new building would be pack to back with an existing building. The new building will be t~e same size and color. Mr. Lessard pointed out the set-back ~or the new building would have to conform to the set- back for ~he existing building which was about 5'. On a mDtion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latha~ it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer this site plan for Penny Lumber, for the construction of a storage b'~ilding located at Mattituc~ to the building department for certification. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Page 7 5/6/85 Mr. Anth~ off of Lc This pro~ Mr. Tohil separate Mr Tohil] this pro~ as a res~ covenants moving~t~ ny Tohill, attorney, was present to discuss the set- uise O~ Day located at Indian Neck Lane, Pec~nic. osal is for a set-off of 5.8 acres from 13.7 acres. 1 explained the n~%ure of this application was to the existing house from the existing garage apartment. stated that the approval of this set-off would make arty conforming since the apartment has been occupied dence. Mr. Tohill stated that he would be willing to against any further subdivison. Mr. Ward recommended e lot line proposes slightly North to provide more upland for Lot ~oo 2. It was the consensus of the Board to request this. Mr. Tohi~l indicated he would be agreeable to this. It was the cD~s~nsus of the Board to make a field inspection prior to any a~tion. The Board also requested six surveys amended as per tHeirW recommendation. The 8:30 p.m. appointment with Janet Geassa for Joseph Crenshaw had been cancelled by the attorney. The Cove at Southold- This application for 33 condominiums has received Icertification from the Building Department. The Board reviewed/the correspondence from the Suffolk County Planning CommissiOn approving with conditions. It was noted that there were no approvals received from the Health Department. It was the qonsensus of the Board to h~ld anY action on this proposal~until approvals had been obtained from the Health Department for the water and sewer. Peconic omes- The Board reviewed this proposal for 4 lots on 45 ac~es at Sound Avenue, Laure~l. It was noted that some of the l~ts are'very steep, and th~ Board indicated there concern to creat~ buildabla lots. It was the Consensus of the Board to make a f~eld inspection prior to any further action. It was also noted that there was a lettaD of objection from an adjoining lot owne~ who uses the current r~ht-of-way and questions Mr. Horton's authority to change this. (Mr. Horton is the developer) The letter was from Mr. Daniel Jacob~ who was present. He expressed his objections to the Board stating that the new right-of-way proposed goes through a deep ravine making i~ impossible to get to his hcuse from the road, and ~t is 2Q0' from the house. Mr. Jacoby s~ted that he did hot Object to the right-of-way, however, as long ~s the developer providad a way to get to his house. It was the consensus of the Board to request that Mr. Jacoby and Mr. Horton schedule a meeting to resolve the right-of-way question. The Board will conduct a field inspection prior to any action. Page 8 5/6/85 On a motion made by Mr. WarD, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED set-off July 17, Vote It was n and restr parcels ~ frontage. set-off ~ that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the f Agnes McGunnigle, located at Southold, map dated 1984 and amended February 8, 1985 and March 20, 1985. f the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards ted that the applicant was not aggreeable to covenants ictions against further subdivision since one of the ould be proposed as a minor subdivision all having road David Emilita warned the Board about acting on the ithout having seen the minor subdivision plans. Mr. John~ for his affordab expandin~ He statei Mr.Costel they cou] lots so concern access wa road prof that he ~ this proj to the V~ Board, tH the Plan~ anticipat Mutlen re stated tH his hopes people of Mr. Mulle to the Tc possibil~ annexatic a change willing possible. would red in from C approved. along Moc that he ~ the munic to the V~ than crea Costello_.was~.present for:~a pretfminary site plan presentation r0perty a~ Moores Lan~, Greenport and the proposal for e housing. Mr. Costello explained that he had proposed the residential lots to 76 with a cluster design. that the open space included 11 acres with buffering. lo stated that he was keeping the lots small so that d be affordable, and he reduced the area on the ~ommercial here would be 9 building lots. It was noted that another as traffic access onto Middlton Road, and therefore, s provided onto Moores Lane. Mr. Costello submitted ilea for the Board's review. Mr. Costello indicated ould like to use the Planning Board's expertise on ect. He indicated that until the parcel is annexed llage of Greenport, which proposal was before the Town eproject still remained in the Town of Southold and lng Board had jurisdiction over it. Mr. Costello ed that all the lots would be under $20,000. Mr. quested a spread sheet on the project. Mr. Costello at in time he would submit this. Mr. Costello expressed that these lots would provide homes for the working the town with what he referred to as "sweat equity" questioned if Mr. Costello would offer some lots wn. Mr. Costello indicated that he would consider this ty. Mr. Orlowski explained that the proposal for n is pending and questioned if Mr.Costello would make of zone application. Mr. Costello stated that he is to make a change of zone and get as much input as 'Mr. Costello explained that the proposal to annex uce the cost. for water and sewer which must be brought reenport and he hoped that the annexation would be Mr. Ward suggested that the recharge areail~be placed res Lane to go with the buffer. Mr. Costello stated s having tests done on the water and would donate to ipality. Mr. WArd also suggested that they could go llage of Greeport recharge area with piping rather ting a recharge basin and that should be looked into. Mr. Ward also suggested that all access be along 'one line, one right-of-way and put all commercial to one curb cut. Mr. Costello~explained that he was trying to keep the residential away from the commercial and he had increased the residential. He also ~oted that it was buffered50/50. Mr. Costello stated that he ~id not want the commercial area to suffer because there Page 9 5/6/85 Costello cont. were ato~ he would not allow want to Mr. Costc property he had a copies o~ will con~ by Mr. W~ prelimin~ Board's of existing businesses that needed expanding area, and like it kept to one area. He emphasized that he would · any retail businesses at this site since he did no~ ake away from the downtown GreenPort retail businesses. 11o said that he would covenant and restrict the from having any retail shops. Mr. Costello stated that drainage plan and the Board requested that he submit that to them. Mr. Costello also indicated that he ~act the village of Greenport for drainage as mentioned rd. Mr. O~lowski explained that this is only a ry presentation so that Mr. Costello could obtain the dvice. Charles Simmons-Attorney Abigail Wickham was present to discuss this minor subdivision located at Laurel. This application was also bef6re the Board of Appeals for insufficient area variances on Lots ~O. 1 and 2. The Board questioned why the lots could not have the minimum lot Width of 175' since there was enough area to accomodate it. Mrs. Wickham stated that her client intended to sell Lots No. 1 and 2 and build on the remaining acreage un the Sound. Mr. Simmons wanted privacy and felt that if he could build on the remaining area he could position the house far away from the lots. The Board suggested that he place covenants and restrictions on the lots and then make them conforming. Mrs. Wickham indicated that she had mentioned this to her client previously and it was felt that ownership was better tl.an covenants and restrictions since they could be broken. It was nc.ted that Mr. Simmons has an offer pending to sell the development rights to the Farmland Committee on the remainder of the farm Mr. Orlowski requested that if the FarmlandCommittee is not a~le to purchase the development rights, that it contain a covenar as to no further subdivision. Mrs. Wickham stated that she ;ould have to get back to the Board on this matter after she discusses this with her client. Regarding the lot width, the Boar~ stated that they could not make a favorable recommendation to the BOard of Appeals considering that there is enough land area to qomply with the minimum requirements, and it would only mean adding 25' to each lot since they are proposed for 150' width. On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr.Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the following. recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding the application for Charles Simmons at Laurel: The Planning Board recommends that proposed Lots No. 1 and No. 2 have the minimum required lot width of 175' since there is enough area to accomodate this. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Page 10 5/6/85 On a mot RESOLVED request 440 rega of Herod Vot ion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr.Latham, it was that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and ~ompliance with Inspector John W. Davis' report No. ~ding the work within the access road of the subdivision ~tus Damianos at Southold. of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward, the following action was taken: NEGATIVE DECLARATION PurSuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617,.Section- 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for t ' he action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The minor subdivision of John an~ Ca~he~-ine Simicich is four lots on ~1.356 acres located at Mattituck. Tax Map No. 1000-113-7-12. Theproject has been determined not to have a significant effect o~ the environment for the following reasons: An~environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be ~mplemented as planned. '~ Because there has been no comment from the Department. of Environmental Conservation in the alotted time it is ~% assumed that there are no comments or objections fro~ '~hat ' agency. ~ The Suffolk County Health Department has no objection to our lead agency designation. They have received an application and it ~s incomplete. It appears that the project can be served by sewer subsurface disposal system, upon adequate subsoil conditions, and an individual water system upon adequate potable water supply. The Department is requesting a new survey showing.the entire 30.1 acre parcel. The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M-. Schu~tze,~ Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Main Road, Southold New York 11971 ' · Vote o~ the Board: A~es: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, ~a.rd, Edwa~ ~s Page 11 5/6/85 On a mot RESOLVED subdivisi Peconic and, fil WHEREAS, and plat 7:30 p,m, WHEREAS, of Southo NOW, ther prises II and Young chairman Cranberr' the Suff¢ with 7 c¢ had a pu~ reducinc agent, f¢ papers or that his of the pi 5 acres, said that from the for furt On a mot [on made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was that whereas, a formal application for the approval of a ~n plat entitled "Mohring Enterprises II" located at was submitted to the Planning Board on December 13, 1984 ing fee was paid on December 13, 1984, and, public hearing was held on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on April 15, 1985 at and he requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town ld have been met by said subdivision, plat and application, fore, be it RESOLVED that the application of "Mohring Enter-~._ " for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Young , last amendme~ dated October 16, 1984 , be approved and the be authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat. of the Board: Ayes: Orlowsk~ Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Acres at Southold-The Chairman read correspondence from lk County Planning Commission approving this subdivision nditions. This subdivision for 4 lots on 28 has lic hearing, at which time there was discussion of the density to 3 lots due to the wetlands. Mr. Raynor, r the applicant indicated that he was still waiting fPU possible donation of a lot. Mr. Raynor indicated,also client was open to clustering the lots on the west end operty. It was noted that since the lots all exceed the subdivision is exempt from Article 6. Mr. Raynor his client is also open to any comments or recommendations Board. It was the consensus of the Board to hold this er review. on made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr.Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planninq Board approve the sketch map for the minor subdivision of John a~d Frances Divello containi~ 4 lots on 4.38 acres located at Mattituck, map dated March 3, 1980. Vot~ of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Page 12 5/6/85 Henry Ly~ on the ml Peconic. regardinc way to ii to elimi~ of the si The prop~ and wife deed wou2 The Boar¢ would no~ Board re¢ restrictJ to any Be .le- Attorney Abigail Wickham was present for the discussion ~nor subdivision of 2 lots on 9 acres at Soundview Avenue, The Board reviewed the correspondence from Mrs. Wickham the existing lot within the 9 acres and the rignt-~f- . Mrs. Wickhan explained that she had prepared adeed .ate the lot and right-of-way but was requesting approval .bdivision prior to recording it with the County Clerk. rty in question was a lot transferred from Henry Lytle to Henry Lytle along with a right-of-way. The proposed d transfer the property back to Henry Lytle and wift. requested clarification on this so that three lots be created as a result of the subdivision. The uested that the deed be recorded and covenants and ons as to no further subdivision be submitted prior ,ard action. The following new proposals were set for a field inspection: Ernest W~lsberg-lot line change for 2 lots on 1.1 acres at Ole Jule Lan~, Mattituck. Pat LockWood and Pat Lesnikowski-set-off of 52,600 sq. ft. located ~t North Drive, Mattituck. (Subdivision of Shore Acres) It was n~ted that this application is pending with the Board of Appea~s for insufficient area variances. Nick Ipp¢ Road, prJ Long tsl~ On a motJ RESOLVED plan of parking. handicap~ approval Vote lito-set-off of 5,500 sq.ft, from 17,000 sq. ft. at Carole vate, Arshamomaque. nd Shores-4 lots on 5.2 acres at Maddle Road, Greenport. on made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr.Latham, it was that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site ,nn Sciora revised April 9, 1985 subject to asphalt This proposal fs for construction of an addition for ed bathroom facilities, and had received Board of Appeals and certification from the Building Department. of theBoard: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a motion made byMr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board amend their resolution of April t~ 1985 regarding the application of Thomas Perillo and .approve it as a set-off (106-13) for 2 lots on 3.1974 acres subject to: 1. Review of the Suffolk County Planning Commission since this property borders Mattituck Creek. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Page 13 5/6/85 Celic si~e plan- The Board reviewed this site plan for an addition to the e~is%ing office located at Marlene Lane, Mattituck. It was noted that the site plan did not comply with the Board's recommendation that the~e be no cars backing out onto Marlen~ Lane. The plan - still showed 5 spaces on Marlene Lane. On a motJ RESOLVED plan fron regardin¢ Vot Founders W. Davis at Founde that the required noted th, On a mot RESOLVED inspectio of occupa at Southo and a 6-m Vote On a mot RESOLVED inspectio~ on made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was that the Southold Town Planning Board request a site Celic in accordance with the Board's recommendation parking on Marlene Lane. of the Board: Ayes:Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards 'illage- The Board reviewed report No. 442 from John regarding the use of pavement rather than bluestone r Village condominium at Southold. Mr. Davis indicated pavement road was better than what was originally and Mr. Dean concurred with the report. Mr. Ward t there should be more plantings on the site. on made by Mr. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was that the Southold Town Planning Board, following a field n, recommend to the Building Department that a certificate ncy. be issued for the site plan of Founders Village ld subject to the planting of one street tree per unit Dnth review. of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards [~n'~m~d~ by'Mr, ward~ ~econded by Mr.Mullen, it was 2hat the Southold Town PlannLng Board, following a field recommend to the Building Department that a certificate of occupa:~cy be issued for the site plan of Peter Luhrs for anz~ auto repair shop at North Road, County Rte. 48, Southold. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Building Department, following a field inspection, that a certificate of occupancy b~ i~u~d to the ~el~e .'c _ ack Bar at East Marion ~L~D~moval o ~ Qn _of the telephone booths at the ingress. Vote of theBoard: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Page 14 5/6/85 Grand Vi~ No. 1 if the bi they had On a motJ RESOLVED Building for the Grandvie~ Vot~ Being no by Mr. Ms adjourned Bennett w Estates- Mr. Latham made a field inspection of hin this subdivision.at Orient, in order to determine uff plantings requested were there. He reported that been planted and were holding. on-~ade b~'~Mr% Latham; seconded byrMr. Mullen, it was that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Department that a certificate of occupancy be issued ouse located at Lot No. 1 within the subdivision of Estates at Orient. of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards further business to come before the Board, on a motion made llen, seconded by Mr. Latham, and carried, the meeting was at 9:53 p.m. 916wski, Jr. ~airman ID FILED BY TOWN RECEIVED THE SOUTHOLE DATE ~//,~/~5 Respectfully submitted, DJ. ane bi. $chultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board