Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-01/07/1985 P~D T¢ ~LD y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 The southold Town Planning Board held a regular meeting on January 7, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. Present were: Chairman Bennett Orlowski, .Jr. Member William F. Mullen, Jr. Member G. Ritchie Latham,Jr. Member Kenneth Edwards Member Richard G. Ward Town Planners David Emilita and JamesBryer Special Counsel Francis Yakaboski 7:30 p.m. public hearing on the question of approval of the minor subdivision of the John Simon Estate located at Peconic, 4 lots on 81 acres at Middle Road. Mr.Orlowski: We have proof of publication, public hearing in the Long Island Traveler Watchman signed by Pat Wood and notorized by Barbara Forbes, we also ~ave proof of publicationin the Suffolk Times signed by Anna Lekas and notorized by Judith Chien. I will dispense with the reading of the metes and bounds if anybody out there has any objections, please let me know now, if not we will proceed. (none) We have the filing fee, we have a letter from health Services, we also have C and R's as far as the water from the Health Department, handed in by the applicant which we will hand over to Mr. Tasker for his approval. We have nothing from Suffolk County Planning as of yet, any approval would be subject to. And, everything else is in order. At this time, I'll ask if .there anyout there has any objections to this minor subdivision2 Hearing none,'does anyon~e out there have any endorsements of this subdivision? Gail Wickham: I take that to mean comments in favor? Mr. Orlowski: Yes. Gail Wickham: My name is Gail ~ickham, I represent the applicant we~ve spent an awlful long time as the Board knows on this subdivision. We have now complied .witk everything that you require. Just to briefly state for the record, the purpuse of the subdivision is to effect the distribution of the Estate of John and Sara Simon, and we are proposing three lots of about 80,000 square feet each up near the Sound and a fourth lot of a-ppr~i~et~ 47 acres consisting of the remainder of the farm. The lots on the Sound w~ll be serviced by a right-of-way. The Suffolk County Planning Commission did raise Page 2 1/7/85 Gall Wickham: the question of the status of the 1 and 1/3 acre parcel on Middle Road, and if the Board recalls, that was the subject of an earlier set-off that being the homestead in which Mr. Simon and his sisters reside, and that was cut off separately a number of years ago. I don't h~ve any thing else more to add unless the Board has any questions, that haven't been answered already. Mr. O~lowski: Is there anyone else who would like to speak in favor of this subdivision~ Hearing none. Is~ thereanyone out there neither pro nor con but has informatiQn pertai~ing to this subdivision that may be of interest to this Board? Okay, hearing none, questions from the Board, Mr ~ Mullen, (none); Mr. Edwards (none); Mr. Ward? Mr. Ward: Just a question on the lot sizes? I~think counsel had mentioned 80,000 square foot lots? It doesn't show that on the plan. Mr. Orlowski: These lots received a ... Mrs Wikkham: I'm sorry these lots are approximately 55,000 - 60,000 square feet. Mr. Orlowski: They received relief from the Town Board, I believe. They received relief onthe 10th.of May, 1984, Mr. Ward. Okay, anyother questions, Mr. Latham? Mr. Latham: I have one questions, the lot on.Middle Road, that was not part of the relief was it? Mr. Orlowski: No that was set-off before as the counselor just informed us. Mrs. Wickham: The small shown~ is the Charles $~mon Estate and that is s~parated for about 4 years, that now belongs to Elizabeth Simon. The 1.845 acre parcel, that' is the homestead Parcel I referred to earlier and that was set-off a couple of years ago. Mr. Latham: Just one question, Gall. Why would you need to apply for relief to get those lots smaller when you could have another acre a piece and it would not hurt. YOU have 76 acres left. Mrs. Wickham: I think th'e point was to just use the property on the Sound that is not farmabte because the remainder of the farm is farmed and probably will continue~ be so. They also wanted to leave some frontage so that if in the future the farm were ever divided there would be something up there too. Mr. Orlowski: Anyother questions? (none) Okay, the only question I have iS there any correspondence with the Ditler property next door? Combining the right-of~way to the lots? Is that being worked on? Mrs. Wickham: We wrote to Mr. Dille~ in-response to your letter, on September 17 and we never heard from him, I belive we also tried to call him a couple of times, and we did not have any response. So we did not have any communication with him to answer your question. Page 3 1/7/85 Mr. C quest for c rlowski: Okay, it was just a question. If there no further ions, I will declare this hearing closed and thank you all ominq. 7:45 ).m. Public hearing on the question of approval of the major cluster subdivision of Laurel Estates~ Section I located at Aldrich Lane, Laurel. 16 lots on 36 acres. Mr. Orlowski: We have the filing fee, proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler watchman, signed by Pat wood and notorized by Barbara Forbes and we have proof of publication in the SuffoIk times, signed by Anna Lekas and Notorized by Judith Chien. We have C and R's filed by the applicant and approved by our Town Attorney. We have correspondence from Suffolk County Planning which I will refer to later and everything else appears to be in order. Okay, I'll ask now if there is anyout here with any objections to this subdivision~ Hearing none, is there anyone out there in favor of this subdivision? David Saland;. My name is David Salandj~ I am one of the owners. I hope the Board acts in favor as soon as possible, on this subdivision. Is there anything I can comply with, I would be more than happy to. Mr. O~lowski: Any other endorsements of this subdivision? Hearing none, is there anyone out there neither pro nor con but may have some input to this subdivision that would be of interest to theBoard? Hearing no~e, questions from the Board, Mr. Mullen (none); Mr. Edwards (none); Mr. WARd (none) ; Mr. Latham (none). ~Okay, At this point Suffolk County Planning Commission has send back their recommendations after going over withthe applicant and"after ~e study and delibe~atiQn it resolved to diSapprove.said map for the following reasons: 1. Section 1 would 'be paramount to the aproual of Section 2 layout is totally unsatisfactory, approval of Section i would lock in the layout of Section 2. It was Stated in the referral materials that Section 2 would be treated as a minor su'bdivision which usually means that a map of Section 2 will not be filed inthe County Clerk's office. A map or maps for this subdivzsion whether showing the Subdivision of this tractin its entirety or by sections would be filed in the County Clerk's office in keeping withthe intent of Section335 of the REal Property Law. Proposaed subdivision of the tract wilt result in the creation of three landlocked parcels, that is parcels that don't have frontage on existing or proPOSed ~public roads, the creation of such lots is contrary to good subdivision layout principals and creates problems as far as access by emergency and service equipment. This.could result in healt~ safety, and we.lfare problems for the future residents of these lots. Creation of landlocked lots also places the Zoning Board of Appeals in an akw~rd position of having to grant a building permit for each of ~ese lots under section'280-a of the Town Law as the future owners of these lots cannot be held responsible for the landlocked nature of the parcels. 4. .Lots 16 through 19 inclusive have the potential to be subdivided agaLn.therevy placing further dependence on the ~ight-of-way as access. No informatio~ was provided to show how the pond within the tract will be protected Page 4 1/7/85 Mr. Orlowski: against the developmentJ' Well, I don'~ see where the property is going to be landlocked because he does show sufficient width in and out which we asked for and. the County asked for and the applicant has given. We 'have the covenants and restrictions that we asked for on the rest of the parcel and basically what the County is saying here, I think we've answered with the applicant ourselves. They probably have not looked it over as closely, I hope we do get our local member on the Board, so that they will be looked at a lettle bit better. But, I think at this time we could override these restrictions, because the applicant has answered.all our questions that we 'have had, and also the first questions that th e County had. Now the County has come back with something that I don't think is pertaining. On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded byMr. Ward it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board override the Suffolk County Planning Commission's resolution of disapproval regarding ~he major cluster subdivision of'Laurel Estates, SEction I, located at Laurel. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, ~dwards Mr. Orlowski: There are no further questions on this subdivision, I will declare this hea'ring closed and~thank you all for coming. On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning. Board approve the preliminary map for the cluster subdivision of James W. Dawson located at Southold. Plans dated Maly '30, 1984 for 8 lots on 14.4 acres, subject to the red,est of the Suffolk County Planning commission which is that a'dedication for highway purposes be made at the corner of North Bayview Road and Dayton Road. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, War~ Edwards On a motion madeby Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southotd Town Planning Board approve the prelim~Dary map for the major subdivision of Blue Horizons located, a't Peconic, plans dated as ilast amended June 13, 1984 for 7 lots on 55.7 acres. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward , Edwards 8:00Cp~m~cSeacroft-Board to review and/or take action on this site plan for 160 condominium units on 46.16 acres located at School House Lane, and Griffing Street, Cutchogue. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Cron, are you here tonight to represent Seacroft? Page 5 1/7/85 Mr. James Cron: Yes, I am. Mr. Orlowski: I think at this time, the Board would like to ask a question. On our November 5, 1984 meeting a resolution was made asking, requesting a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Does the applicant have any intent in doing this~ Mr. James Cron: The applicant is taking on the November 5 request and that is all I am priviledged to say. Mr. Ortowski: Okay. At this time we would like to let you know that certification has been given and accepted on the 5th of November, the 5th of February is~90 days. And, in 90 days, we have to make a decision one way or another, by then. Do we agree on that? Mr. James Cron: W~. agree on the 90 days, yes. Mr. Orlowski: Are you'planning on having an answer before the 90 days are up? Mr. James Cron: I'll have to consult with my client. Mr. 0rlowski: Okay. Mr. Yakaboski: Mr. Cron, youmean you can't tell us whether the applicant will comply with the directives of this Board to prepare and file a DEIS. Mr. James Cron: I think my answer was quite clear. I said we .are acting on it, and I am not priviledged to go any further. Mr. Orlowski: At this time, the Board, I would like to request ~hat we make a motion for to-recess a~d~go~i~to executive session. On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recess to go into executive session to discuss p~oposed litigation. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards At this time the Board took a five minute recess. Abigail Wickham, esq. reviewed the site plan during this recess. The Board then returned to the Board room for the remainder of the meeting. Mr. ORlowski: ARe there any other comments regarding this site plan approval~ Abigail Wickham: Yes, if I may, my name is Abigail Wickham. I represent Long Island Vineyards who is the owner of the adjoining property to the North. I would like .to make an objection to the site plan based on the existence of a number of buildings in the northerly acre and one-third of property in Violation of an agreement between the devetope~ and the Lonq Island Vineyards as set forth in a letter dated March 9, 1983 and a copy of which is in your file. Specifically the developers agreed that they would not Place any buildings or structures of any kind on the Page 6 1/7/85 Abigail wiCkham: rear acreage to a depth of 150' from~th~northerly boundry line. They've appareantly, according to the site plan have violated this site plan in three respects. They have one set of buildings which appears to be within approximately 100' of the rear line, where it adjoins the Long Island Vineyards Farm. They have also Proposed to place .a building with±n approximately 50' of where it adjoins the Beebe property, and they also have utilities mains running within that 100'. There was also to be an agreement regarding plantings within that buffer zone which does not appear to be addressed in the site plan. I would like to ask the Board in their review of this site plan to please take this agreed upon buffer zone into account and not to approve a site plan which violates it,in the manner I have indicated. Thank you. Mr~ O~lowski: Okay, no further comments, what would the Board like to dO? On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, the following action was taken: WHEREAS, the applicant, Seacroft Ltd., submitted, on the 17th day of Cotober 1984, a certified set of plans for the construction of one hundred sixty (160) condominium units, and requested site plah approval therefor,and WHEREAS, this Board, on the 5th day of NDvember, 19~4, did adopt a resolution determining that Seacroft L{d's application for site plan approval was subject to the provisions of Articet 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and declared itself to be lead agency; directed that a .Draft Environmental Impact Statement be prepared; and determined that the appliCation of Seacroft Ltd. would not be complete until the Draft Environmental Impact Statement had been accepted by this Board as satisfactory with respect to'scope, content and adequacy; and WHEREAS, No Draft Environmental Impact Statement has been filed or accepted by this Board; and WHEREAS, since the meeting of November 5, 1984, this Board has learned that the premises acquired by Seacroft Let. and Seacroft Plaza, Ltd. from Leisure Greens Associates in September of 1983,may have been improperly subdivided; and ~HEREAS, it appears that a portion of land owned by SeacroftLtd. or Seacroft Plaza Ltd., or both, is burdened by a right-of,way in favor of the Roman Catholic Church of the Sacred Heart of Cutchogue, and WHEREAS, an adjoining owner has objected to the site plan contending it ~iolates a w~itten agreement concerniNg~rear yard spacing and plantings, which agreement has not been referred to in the application, and must be considered as part of the Draft E~vironmental Impact Statement, NOW, THEREFORE,-the Board finds as follows: 1. That the application of Seacroft Ltd. having been deemed incomplete hy virtu~ of the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental ConservationLa~, this Board is precluded from taking ?f~rther action on this application until such time as it is completed; and. Page 7 1/7/85 2. That the possible subdivision of the former Leisure Greens premises and th~ existence of the right-of,way may affect the validity of the application of Seacroft Ltd. and, inany event, must further be'considered form an environmental-and planning standpoint; and 3. That, while it is this Board,s position that the time period as provided fo~ in the Town Code for action by this Board has not commended to run, nonetheless,the stated time period for Board action expires on the 5th dayof February 1985; and the applicant not having indicated that it will prepare and file a DEIS, the application of Seacroft Ltd. for site plan approval is denied. Vote of the Board: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Special Counsel Francis Yakaboski left the meeting at this time. On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that whereas, .a formal application for the approval of a subdivision plat entitled .~qhw~iqer and M~rrav Iocated at Southold was submitted to the Pl~anning~Board on April 21, 1983 and, filing fee of $75 was paid on November 7, 1983, WHEREAS, appublic hearing was held on said subdivision application and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on December 17, 1984 at 7:3'0 p.m., and WHEREAS., the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application, NOW~ therefore,-be it RESOLVED that the application of Schwei~er/ Murray for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Rod Van Tuyl dated Apr. 18, 1983, June 29, 1983, Nov. 15, 1983 and la~ amended Mar. 8, 1984, be approved and the Chairman be authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards ON a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham i~ was RESOLVED that th e Southold Town Planning Board ~rant a 90-day extension on the filing of the final maps for the minor subdivision of..Robert J. Miller located at Fishers Island, pursuant to the request of the. applicant. Vote of the Board: Ayes.: 0rlowski, Mullen,Latham, Ward, Edwardx On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the $outhold'Town Planning Board approve the set-off for Peconic Homes Corporation, plans dated December 10, 1984 Page 8 1/7/85 Peconic Homes. cont. located at Mattituck, (106-13) .subject to the review of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr.Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the TownBoard that the change of.Zone petitiionlfrom Herbert Mande] iiocated at Main ~'o~d, East Marion b~ denied since the need is not justified at this point in time,and it is inconsistent with the proposed Master Plan. Vote of the Board: Ayes ~rlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded bx Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board acceDt the access ~oad_report No. 415 from Inspector John W. Davis for the final inspection on the access road within~the mi~.or subdivision of David L . Gillispie located at East Marion. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowsk$ MUllen, Latham,Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr2 Mullen, seConded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accedt the Inspector John W. DAvis' report Ne. 417 r~garding the final inspection of the access road within the minor subdivision f~rme~ly~of Ruth F.prnuff located at Mattituck. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards William T. Emmet and Lily Emmet West- Ken Edwards made a field inspection of the premises and noted that according to FIDCO the split conforms to the designation of the lot line. On a motion made by Mr. EdwardS, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the set-off of Lily Emmet West and William T. EMmet located at Fishers Island plan dated as last revised November 29, 1984 for two lots on 4.50 acres. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham,~ Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr. Lathamf-~seconded by Mr. Edwards it was RESOLVED that the Southold TOwn Planning Board set January 21, 1'985 Page 9 1/7/85 at 7:3'0 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold as the time and place for the next regular meeting of the Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards The Planning Board set the following new proposals for a field inspection: E.dward and Charles Nalbantian- 6 lots on 12 acres west side of Reeve Avenue, Mattituck. Greqory Simonelli-3 lots on 3.8 acres, South s~de of ~and~Avenue, Mattituck. Estate of Thomas Mrowka- 3 lots on 5.8 acres, South side of Mill Road, Peconic. On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold ToWn Planning Board approve %he set- o£f for Long Island Nurseries, plan dated June 10, 1981 and August 24, 1984-subject't~o the review, of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Vote of the Board: Ayss: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that theSouthold Town Planning Board approve the set-off (106-13) of Mark and Ellie Gordon located at Southold, plan dated as last amended November 16, 1984. This set-off of 11,~478 square feet to be merged to property Woned by R~lph Lavina. This approval is subject to 1) Review- by the Suffolk County Planning Commission and 2) Filing of the convenants and restrictions with the County Clerk., stating no futher subdivision of the set-off. Vote of the Board: Ayes: orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr. Latha~, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the set-off for Joseph A. MCKay and Michael S. Greenly located at New Suffolk for two lots on 19,445 square feet subject to the review, of the Suffolk COunty Planning Commission. This received an insufficient area variance from the Board of Appeals Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mutlen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Mary Leonardi and Wilma Meehan-The Board set this proposal for a field inspection prior to any recommendations or action, 2 lots on39,000 square feet. located~ at Reydon Dr~ve,· . Southold. Page 10 1/7/85 Highpoint at East Marion~Section II- The Planning Board was to make recommendation to {~e 'Town Board on the reduction of the letter of credit for road improvements on.this subdivision. The Chairman read report No. 414-from John W.. Davis, Inspector, regarding the improvements to date,and the remaining work to be don~ on the road. It was noted that there was no recommendation from Ray Dean, superintendent of highways regarding this request. On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED th~at the Southold Town Planning Board hold a recommendation to the Town Board regarding the reduction of the letter of credit for Highpoint at East Marion~ Section II until a recommendation from the SUperintendent of Highways is recieved. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Oriowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards ~omestead Acres Iocated at Greenport- The Board reviewed the resolution of disauproval from the Suffolk County Planning Commission regarding this subdivision and the correspondence from the attorney for the applicant requesting that this be overridden. On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board override the Suffolk County Planning Commission's resol~utfon of disapproval for the major subdivision of Homestead ~cres located at Greenport . Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On amotion made byMr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that whereas, a formal application for the approval of a subdivision plat entitled "Homestead Acres" located at Greenport was submitted to the Planning Board on September 30, 1982 and, application fee was paid on October 4, 1982 in amount of $150.00, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on.said subdivision application and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on March 12, 1984 at 7:30 p.m., and WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application, NOW, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of "Homestead Acres" for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl~ PoC. dated Aug. 25, 1983 , be approved and the chairman be authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision plat subject to the following conditions .within 90 days from the date of this resolution: page 1. Performance bond posted in the 2. Inspection fee paid. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlo, 1 1/7/85 approved amount of $250,000. 'ski, Mullen, Latham, Ward~ Edwards On a motionmade by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town P19nning Board refer the cluster subdivision of the sage. P~operty to ~the Town B0a~-~-~r'~-~ r app oval of the cluster conceptr f~r Section I. This proposal is loca{ed at Sage Road, Greenporti Section I will have 19 units on a total overall acreege of 38 acres. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlo~ski,. Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards John and CatherineSimicich- The Bo~ acres located off Bergen Avenue, Ms this parcel to be set-off would me~ Simicich and be entered in the Towr and the balance of the land would Charles Cuddy, esq. and Mr. Simici minor subdivision would be four lot rd reviewed this set-off of 15 ttituck. It was noted that ge with the land of Catharine Farmland Preservation Program, e a minor subdivision. Mr. h were present, they said the s on 11 acres of land and the land offered to the farmland pmeservation program would be a vineyard. On a motion~ made by Mr. Ward, seconded: by Mr.Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the set-off (106-13) for John and Catherine Simici~h located at Mattituck. Subject to the review of the Suffolk County Planning Commission, parcel to be set-off is 15.262 acres, map da%ed December t2, 1984. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards Henr~ DOmalski-minor subdivision tgcated off Oregon Road. This appli~a~io~'received a'variance o~ the.insurricient width and a right-of-way (280-a)approval frqm the Board of Appeals. It was the consensus of the B0ard to request that this appiication be amended to be a set-off. The Boar~ requested that this amendment be put in writing' from the applicant or his a.ttorney. Abigail Wickham, attorney for ~he appli.can~ questioned if the Board coul~ work out' an agreement With the p'ro~erty owners in the' adjacent subdivision to use the road which ~onnects to this property so that the applicant would not have ~o improve the long right-of way. The Board stated that although the road in the subdivision was located so as to allow access to the adjoining land, the road had never been dedicated .to the Town. Therefore, it remained private and Out Of the Board's ju~isdicti°n. Page 12 1/7/85 The Board discussed the pond being constructed in the subdivision of ~e~lers at Oys~erponds located at 'Orient. Mr.Latham said that as far as he could tell, no soil has left the site. The Chairman read Section 106--20 of the Southold Town Code and noted that the Board really had no jurisdication over this since it was an approved and filed map. Even though he is altering the subdivision, the Code was ~ague and there was no provision regarding the building of a pond~ David Emilita quoted Chapter 46 of the Town Code regarding Floodplain. Management'. Mr. Emilita said &n his opinion, according to this chapter the developer should have to file plans indicating how he is altering the flood plan. Mr. Emilita said that the Board may not be able to stop the pond contruction , however, they should have plans. Mr. Latham also said that the.road was never improved as the developer promised, and he should be remineded of this. Mr. Orlowski stated that when a decision had been made regarding this, it would be put in a letter to the applicant. Being no further business to come before the Board~, on a motion made by' Mr. Mullen, .seconded by Mr. Latham and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 9:13 p.m. ~~lrman AND BY T~ $OU~U~D TOWN C~RK HOUR Town Clerk, To~n o~ Sout~ld Respectfully submitted. Diane M. Schuttze, Secretary Southold Town PlanningBoard