HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-08/25/1986 D
T LD
S1 Y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
The Southold Town Planning Board held a regular meeting on
August 25, 1986 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main
Road, Southold.
Present were:
Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Member William F. Mullen, Jr.
Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Member Kenneth Edwards
Planner James Bryer
Planning Intern Melissa Splro
Planning Board Secretary Diane M. Schultze
7:30 p.m. Public hearing on the question of approval of the
minor subdivision for John and Margaret Kerbs located at County
Route 48, Southold. 4 lots on 6 acres which received an area
variance from the Board of Appeals.
Mr. Orlowski: This is a public hearing for the question of
approval of the minor subdivison of John and Margaret Kerbs
located at County Route 48, Southold. This is four lots on
six which received a variance from the Board of Appeals. We
have proof of publication in the Suffolk Times, signed by
Catherine Bonderchuck and notorized by Mary Deegnan and we
have proof of publication in the LI Travler Watchman signed
by Pat Wood and notorized by Barbara Forbes. I will dispense
with the reading of the metes and bounds, if anyone has a
problem with that, please let me know. At this time,everything
in the file is in order, i will aski if there are any objections
to this subdivision? Hearing none. Are there any endorsements
of this minor subdivision? Hearing none. Is there anyone
out there neither pro nor con but may have information pertaining
to this subdivison which would be of interest to the Board?
Hearing none. Any questions from the Board, Mr. Mullen, none;
Mr. Latham, none; Mr. Edwards, none; Mr. Bryer, none. Being
no further quetions, I will declare this hearing closed and
thank you for coming down~
Planning Board Page 2 8/25/86
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, Se_p_t~mber
15, 1986. at the Southold Town Hall as the time and place for th~-
next regular Planning Board Meeting.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, September
15, 1986 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold
as the time and place for a public hearinq on the question of approval
of the minor subdivision for Leander Glover for 3 lots on 15.6 acres
located at Cutchogue.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
Mr. Garrett Strang was present to discuss the site plan for John
Senko at the presubmission conference. This proposal is for construction
of a 2600 square foot, 2-story frame building in addition to the
existing retail building located at Main Road and Ackerty Pond
Lane, Southold. Mr. Strang stated that he would like to have the
Board's input on the conceptual layout of the proposal. The existing
building on the site functions as an ice cream parlor and an antique
store. The intended use of the proposed addition will serve an
addtional retail as well as professional office space. Mr. Strang
explained that the site does have quite a change in topography and
this will have to be worked to the advantage of the proposal.
This means that a two-story building will have the lower level being
at the lower grade which would house the retail use and the upper
level which would be the higher grade and used for the office. Mr.
Strang explained that by doing this they will be able to get double
use out of the building and not having to spread the building out
all over the site, and access can be provided to everyone including
handicapped without the need of an elevator. Mr. Orlowski questioned
if any building elevations were available. Mr. Strang stated that
he had not worked them up yet because the building sits in to an
envelope based on the site as it is proposed and if some changes
were requested it may change the building configuration somewhat.
The Building will be in keeping with the historical nature of Southold
Town. The existing building on the site will be refurbished and
face lifted and looking better aesthtically. The surrounding area
is residential and to the southeast is a service station with business
across the street. Mr. STrang stated that there is no real means
of directing traffic in and out of the site. It was noted that
there is a traffic light on the corner, however, this is a temporary
situation only for the bridge work on Oaklawn Avenue. Mr. Strang
stated that the principal ingress and egress will be off Ackerly
Pond Lane and not off the Main Road. There will be a secondary
egress onto Main Road at about the same location were an entrance
to the site exists now. Mr. Strang stated that he did not see that
Planning Board Page 3 ~/25/86
the building would generate a lot of traffic. Mr.
that 3300 square feet was proposed for the building
the existing and proposed buildings and there are 3
There are two handicapped parking spaces and there
to convert another parking space to handicapped, ho,
all that is required by the State Code. Mr. Strang
the office and retail on the floors would be subjec-
by a tenant of the building, although it was propos.
~trang stated
total including
parking spaces.
is the availability
~ever, two is
stated that
to change
nd that the
second floor would be office. Mr. Lessard stated t]lat a retail
shopping center requires an, acre of land. This prp~sal does not
have an acre, therefore, it will require an area variance by the
Board of Appeals. Mr. Mullen requested that consideration be given
to eliminating the west bound exit onto the Main Ro~d. He stated
that it will be a bad situation if it is proposed that way.
Mr. STrang stated that he felt that this exit would not be-used
by the merchants and probablyvery few of the customers and it would
probably become for emergency only. It was the consensus of the
Board to conduct a field inspection of the premises prior to any
further recommendations. Mr. Mullen stated his concern w~th someone
going out of the egress and turning east. Mr. Strang stated that
the exit would be constructed in such as way that it would be very
difficult to come out and go eastbound.
On a motin made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Edwards, the following
action was taken:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation- Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section
617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Sou%hold, notice
is hereby gmven that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency
for the action described below has determined that the project
Will not have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of John Zuhoski ~s for four lots on
8 acres located off a right-of-way from Oregon Road, Cutchogue.
Tax map No~ 1000-83-2-p/o 13.
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons:
An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated
that no significant adverse effects to the environment were
likely to occur should the project be implemented as
planned.
Planning Board Page 4 8/25/86
There has been no correspondence from the Suffolk County
Department of Health Services in the alotted time, therefore,
it is assumed that there are no objections or comments from
that agency.
There has been no correspondence from the DEC in the alotted
time, therefore, it is assumed that there are no objections.
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of
the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations.
Vote os ~ne Board: Ayes:Mullen, Latham, Edwards
Abstained: Orlowski
On a motion taken by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, the following
actionwas taken: ~ ~ ~
- ~. NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part
617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town
of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning
Board as lead agency for the action described below has determinsd
that the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of Frank Zimmer is for four lots
on17.~4 acres located at Main Road, Orient, tax map no.
1000-13-2-p/o 7.
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons:
An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated
that no significant adverse effects to the environment
were likely to occur should the project be implemented
as planned.
There has not been any correspondence from the Health
Department within the alotted time, therefore, it is
assumed that there are no objections or comments from
that agency.
There has not been any correspondence from the DEC in
the alotted time, therefore, it is assumed that there
are no comments or objections from that department.
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code
o3 the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations.
VOte of th~ Board: Ayes: Ortowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
Planning Board Page 5 8/25/86
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, secoded by Mr. Latham, the following
action was taken:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant 'to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section
617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice
is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency
for the action described below has determined that the project
will not have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of ~Nicholas Aliano is for 8 lots on
16.831 acres located at County Route 48, Peconic, tax map no.
1000-74-4-4.
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons:
An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated
that no significant adverse effects to the environment were
likely to occur should the project be implemented as
planned.
Because there has been no correspondence from the Suffolk
County Department of Health Services in the alotted time,
it is assumed that there are no commen~s or objections from
that agency.
Because there has been no correspondence from the NYS Department
of Environmental Conservation in the alotted time, it is assumed
that there are no objections or comments from that agency.
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of
the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations.
Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M.
Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road,
Southold, New York, 11971.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
Planning Board Page 6 8/25/86
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, the following
action was taken:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Ehvir~nm~l ~nse~vation Law
State Environ~ental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section
617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice
is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency
for the action described below has determined that the project
will not have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of Norman McCullough and another is
for 3 lots ~on 5.9 acres located at the corner of Oregon Road and
Cox's Lane, Cutchogue. Tax map no 1000-83-3-3.
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons:
An environmental assessment has been ~submitted which indicated
that no significant adverse effects to the environment were
likely to occur should the project be implemented as
planned. ~
Because there has been no correspondence from the Suffolk
County Department of Health Services in the alotted time,
-it~ is assumed that there are no objections or comments from
that agency.
Because there has been no correspondence fromthe NYS Department
of Environmental Conservation in the alotted time, it is assummed
that there are no objections or comments from that agency.
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of
the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations.
Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M.
Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road,
$o~hold, New York, 11971.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
John Miska - The Board reviewed this proposal for a set off of
80,000 square feet from 34 acres located at Main Road, Mattituck.
It was the consensus of the Board to set this proposal for a
field inspection.
Planning Board Page 7 8/25/86
Jennie and Stanley Rysko - The Chairman abstained from any discussion
with regard to this proposal since he is related to the applicants.
The propsal for a lot-line change was reviewed by the other Board
members. It was the consensus the conduct a field inspection of
the premises prior to any further recommendations or action.
8:00 p.m. Donald Denis, Architect, was present for the pre-
submission conference for the site plan for the Southold Savings
Bank located at Youngs' Avenue, Southold. This ~proposat was
for construction of an office building. Mr. Bruer, esq. presented
six new site plans to the Board. The site plans had three different
items from the previous plans submitted to the Board, being they
indicated the adjoining lot onwers and structures within 100' of
the lot as well as a correction in the lighting. Mr . Orlowski
stated that ther was a question with regard to the parking. Mr.
Bryer had reviewed the plan and although the parking was shown it
did not come out right. Mr. Bryer explained that the plan calls
for 155 parking spaces and the spaces only total 133. Mr. Denis
stated that as per the Southold Ordinance the parking is based on
the size of the building. The parking requirements are based on
teh area of the parking not the number of spaces. Mr. Denis explained
that he took the area of the parking lot and divided by 350 square
feet which is equal to a parking unit and come up with the nmber
of units and multiply it by 150 and that is how he determined the
size of the building. The Board questioned this and Mr. Denis stated
that it is not the number of parking spaces but the number of parking
units. Mr. Denis then determined the size of the buildinq and
the size of the actual office area by subtracting the othe~ areas.
Mr. Orlowski questioned if there were any elevations of the Buildinqs.
Mr. Denis presented the rendering of the building and the preliminary
floor plans. He noted that there will be no drivein and no tellers,
it will be strictly offices for mortgage department and loans.
Mr. Terry and Mr. Ric~ officers of the Ban~ were also present.
Mr. Mullen questioned why the lights in the parking area were
to remain on from dust until 9:30 p.m. Mr. Terry stated that by
9:30 p.m. all of the employees have left the bank. There isa cleaning
staff who works late and the lights have to be on for their convenience
when leaving, however, other than what is required for security
reasons, the lights will be turned off. Mr. Orlowski questioned
how many people will be employeed and Mr. Terry stated that 50
people~would work there. Mr. Bruer stated that the bank had hoped
to break ground in October and he requested that the Board take
action on the propsoal at this meeting. It was the consensus of
the Board that this could be referred to the Building Department
for certification.
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plan
for the Southold Savings Bank, for constructin of an office building
located at Young's Avenue, Southold to the Building Department for
certification, survey dated August 25, 1986, (new surveys received
amended August 28,1986)
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
Planning Board Page 8 8/25/86
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the following
comments to the Board of Appeals with regard to the application
of Joseph and Catherine Reimer located at Greenport:
1. The Planning Board notes that this property was formerly
three and one-half lots and the proposed division would create
only two.
2. However, the Board cannot endorse lots with less than
80,000 square feet.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullsn, Latham, Edwards
RIAL Realty -
The Board reviewed this proposal for 4 lots on 47 acres- three
of the lots with insufficient width located at Oregon Road,
Mattituck. The Board was familiar with the property and have
made an inspection of it.
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the following
commen~ to the Board of Appeals regarding the application of
RIAL Realty , located at Mattituck:
1. The Planning Board is not in favor of the right-of-way
as proposed due to the severity of the cureve in the vicinity of
Lot no. 2.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
Metro Rentai- Mr. Robert Waddington, applicant, was present.
This site plan proposal was for construction of an addition
on an existing building to be used for storage~located at Main
Road, Mattituck. Mr. Latham questioned if there would be enough
parking on the site since there were large machines and equipment
located in the front off the Main Road. Mr. Waddington explained
that the proposed storage building was to store the equipment
that was in the front and there would be enough parking. Mr.
Orlowski questioned when this proposal woud be heard before
the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Moore, esq, also present, stated
that the hearing was set for September tl, 1986, for a variance
application on the side yard and rear yard setbacks. Mr. Mullen
stated that he would like to have an opportunity to inspect the
premises since he had not done this and he also questioned the
parking.
Planning Board Page 9 8/25/86
Stanley and Helen Simichick Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
abstained from any discussion with regard to this subdivision
proposal since he is related to the applicants. The Board had
inspected the premises. Mr Mullen stated that the Board had
considered clustering the property. Mr. William Moore, esq.
was present. Mr. Moore stated that the applicant had set aside
the lots for family members and a friend and did not wish to
cluster any of the lots propsed.
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch
plan approval to the minor subdivision for Helen and Stanley
Simichick for 4 lots on20.3 acres located at County Route 48,
and Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue, tax map no. 1000-101-1-19.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Mullen, Latham, Edwards
Abstained: Orlowski
Wolf Pit Associates - The Board~reviewed this cluster proposal
located at Mill Road, Mattituck. No one was presen~ representing
the applicant. It was the consensus of the Board to advise the
applicant that the cluster calculations are in correct. The LILCO
easement was not deleted from the total gross acreage of the
proposal pursuant to Section 100-136 A (1).
Joseph and Ann Pacelli- The Board reviewed this subdivision for
2 lots on 39,177 square feet. This proposal had received a
variance on the insufficient lot area from the Board of Appeals.
The original application proposed three lots, however, the Board
of Appeals approval restricted the division to two lots. It was
noted that the applicant has received Article 6 for the division.
It was the consensus of the Board to recommend that this be processed
as a set-off in order to expedite finalizing it. As a set-off it
would not require a public hearing. It was requested that the applicant
amend the surveys to indicate a set-off rather than a minor subdivision
and submit a covering letter stating that this would be a set off.
On a motion made by Mr. Latham , seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the set-off
for Rosalie Gowen located at Zena Road, between Central Drive and
Capt. Kidd Drive~ Mattituck for two lots on 31,740 square feet
(tax map no. 1000-106-2-32 and 43, subject to:
1. Receipt of approval from the Suffolk County Department
of Health Services pursuant to Article 6~
2. Receipt of amended surveys stating set-off rather than
"lot-line" change.
PLANNING Board Page 10 8/25/86
Rosalie Gowen cont.
It was noted that this proposal had received a variance from the
Board of Appeals with regard to the insufficient lot area.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVED that whereas a formal ~application for the approval of a
subdivision plat entitled "Vine View Associates" c/o Breslin Appraisal
Co., located at Southold, tax map no. 1000-69-1 -4 was submitted
to the Planning Board on August 12, 1985 and filing fee of $550
was paid on August 12, 1985, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said subdivision application
and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on August 4, 1986
at 7:~ p.m., and
WHEREAS, the requirement fo the subdivision regulations of the
Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application,
NOW, therefore, be it RESOVLED that the application of "Vine
View Associates" c/o Breslin Appraisal Co. for approval of said
subdivision plat prepared by Rod Van Tuyl dated as last amneded
June 23, 1986 be approved and the Chairman be authorized to endorse
approval on said subdivision plat, subject to the following conditions
to be completed within six months from the date of this resolution:
1. Six surveys bearing a notation that there will be no further
subdivision of any lot in perpetuity.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
A Local Law to Provide for the Regulation of Public Assemblies:
The Board reviewed this proposed Local Law to make recommendations
to the Town Board as per their request. The Chairman read
the comments from the Town Planner, David Emilita as follows:
"Regarding the proopsed Local Law to Provide for the Regulations
of Public Assemblies, it is not clear that the law does not
pertain to private gatherings at residences. We feel these
should be specifically exempted from this Local Law. Also,
the Local Law may not pertain to wineries, depending upon
the type of permit granted to them by the State Liquor Authority
(SLA). This needs to be researched. The Town of Southampton
has found that the SLA pre-exempts certain local controls
depending upon the type of winery permit issued." Mr. Mullen
also commented on page 2, paragraph E 1 that the fee of $10
was too low and he suggested increasing that to $25 or $50,
since this only came into effect if there was a gathering
of more than 50 people. Mr. Mullen also commented on the
same page, paragraph G on the bond to insure cleanup of the
premises, he suggested that rather than securing a surety
bond that a cash deposit be made to the Town A cash
Planning Board Page 11 8/25/86
deposit is more workable than a surety bond. Mr. Mullen stated
that with a surety bond, a claim would have to be filed and
the surety would then contact the individual and by that time
alot of time would have elapsed. However, with a cash situation
you can take the cash and apply it to the cleanup process.
On a motion made by Mr. Multen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it
was:
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the following
comments to the Southold Town Board in regard to the proposed
Local Law to Provide for the Regulation of Public Assemplies:
1. It is not clear that the law does not pertain to
private gatherings at residences. We feel these should
be specifically exempted from this Local Law.
2. The local law may not pertain to wineries, depending
on the type of permit granted to them by the State Liquor
Authority (SLA). This needs to be researched. The Town
of Southampton has found that the SLA pre-exempts certain
local controls depending o nthe type of winery permit
issued.
3. It is recommended that the permit fee by increased
from $10 to perhaps $25 or $50, becuase the permit only
comes into play where there is more than 50 people and
the Board feels that a $10 fee is too low.
4. With regard to Section G, the Board feels that a
cash deposit should be required rather than a surety
bond to ensure the cleanup and restoration of the premises
because that is much more workable than a bond. With
a Surety bond it is a lengthy process to obtain payment,
however, with a cash deposit, the money can be applied
to the clean up process immediately.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
North Road Associates - The Baord reviewed this subdivision
for 4 lots on 16 acres with open space located off a right-of-way
from Main Road, Orient. Mr. Rudy Bruer, esq. was present for
the application. Mr. Bruer stated that the original proposal
was for four lots and the applicant had some resistance to
the cluster concept. The Planning Board had requested that
the application be revised to reflect a cluster concept. The
developer, however, felt that if lot No. 4 were left as a
large lot it would be more workable. The applicant, however,
realized that teh Baord preferred a cluster concept, and therefore
the plan currently pending reflected open space for the common
area which is obtained by clustering. Mr Bruer stated that
if lot No. 4 were allowed to remain large then with only O~e
house and perhaps accessory building on it, there would be
an additional almost 13 acres of open space. Mr. Bruer stated
Planning Board Page 12 8/25/86
that this layout accomplished the cluster concept, and the
feeling of the ordinance. The open space would be put in
to the common homeowners association and it would work effectively.
Mr. Bryer stated that he had reviewed this proposal and it
does satisfy the intent of the code, however, he felt that
the open space could be placed so that it is more beneficial
to the people of the subdivision. Mr. Orlowski questioned
if Lot No. 4 would be 'covenanted against further subdivision
in perpetuity. Mr. Bruer stated that as far as he knew it
would be. Mr. Mullen stated that if the covenants and restricitons
would be in perpetuity then he was agreeable to the plan.
Mr. Bruer stated that the building on LOt No. 4 would most
likely be to the North where the other lots are. Mr. Bryer
staed that there was no problem with it meeting zoning requirements.
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it
was:
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch
plan approval to the minor subdivisin of North Road Associates
for 4 lots on 16.8 acres with 3.377 acres of Open Space, survey
dated as amended July 23, 1986, located off a right-of-way
from Main Road, Orient; subject to:
1. Covenants and restrictions stating that there will
be no further subdivisln of Lot No. 4 in perpetuity.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
Mr~t William Moore, esq. approached the Board and presented
covenants and restrictions with regard to no further subdivision
for the minor subdivision for Leander Glover. Mr. Orlowski
stated that they must read no further subdivision in perpetuity
since this was asked for by the Board.
Tartan Oil - The Board reviewed this proposal for a revised
site plan for a gas station located at County Route 48, Peconic.
The Board members had inspected the property and after the
inspection it was the consensus of the Board to leave two
access roads onto Route 48. The Board questioned, however,
the cooler in the sales kiosk and what items were intended
to be sold. Mr. Tollering and Mr. Leon of Tartan Oil were
present. Mr. Moore stated that the size of the sales area
would not permit a 7-11 type of operation. Mr. Tollering
stated that some of the items they wished to sell woud be
soda.and milk. Mr. Deutzman, the architect, was also present.
Mr. Orlowski read a letter which was received by the Board
outling certain items which would be sold, however, the letter
stated along with the various items, "etc". The Board wanted
this clarified since etc. meant that absolutely anything could
be sold there. Mr. Tollering stated that they would not sell
anything that the Board did not want and he did not what that
was. Mr. Orlowski stated that if a convenience store developed,
Planning Board Page 13 8/25/86
more parking would be required. Mr. Tollering stated that
it would not be a 7-11 or Hess type operation. Only incidentals
would be sold and things related to the gas operation. He
stated they are not in the food business, they are in the
gas business and no prepared food would be sold. Mr. Tollering
stated if the Board wished to restrict them, it would not
be a prob'lem, and they would have no objection. Mr. Mullen
questioned the location of other stores which the principles
owned, in the vicinity of Southold Town. Mr. Mullen asked
that the names be given to the Secretary after the meeting.
Mr. Mullen stated his concern with the term "snack items"
since this covered a broad range of items. Mr. Mullen also
asked that they specifically list those items to be sold.
Mr. ORlowski stated that there would be a problem with policing
this. Mr. Lessard stated that this would not be a problem.
Mr. Latham stated that he would like to see soda and cigarettes
sold only. Mr. Lessard stated that any deviation from what
is approved would require an additonal site plan. Mr. Mullen
questioned the hours of operation. Mr. Tollering stated that
they Wished to run the operation from 5:00 a.m. to ~2:00 a.m.
if there is no objection to it. He stated that if there was
objection, they would not do it. Mr. Tollering stated that
he would do whatever is required, and he would like to know
what the BOard would like. Mr. Latham stated that he not
concerned with the sale of gasoline, however, he did not want
to see the store become a "hang-out". Mr. Orlowski stated
that they board had not objection to the layout, however,
they did have a problem with the store. Mr. Mullen questiDned
Mr. Lessard what would happen if they were in violation of
the approval. Mr. Lessard stated that they :would have to come
before the judge and the operation could be shut down.until
it is resolved. Mr. Orlowski staed that he would not have
any objectin to the list submitted of the items sold if the
word "etc" was eliminated. Mr. Mullen stated that he would
like to have a complete list of all the items intended to
be sold.
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was
RESOLVEED taht the Southold Town Plannig Board aprove the
amended site plan. for Tartan Oil Corporation (formerly Allen
Ovsianik) for construction of a gas station located at County
Route 48, Peconic, survey dated May 31, 1986, tax map no.
1000-74-4-6; subject to :
1. Receipt and approval by the Planning Board of a detailed
list indicating those items intended to be sold in the
sales area of the kiosk.
2. No auto repairs, no self-service, no used car sales
or storage of vehicles on the site.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham~ Edwards
This must be met prior to a certificate of occupancy as per the
Board and Victor Lessard.
Planning Board
Page 14 8/25/86
On a motion amde by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the
set-off of Bertha Kurczewski to set off 22,132 square feet
from 1.508 acres located at Deport Lane, Cutchogue, tax map
no. 1000-1-2-3& 25 , survey dated Augsut 1, 1985, subject
to:
1. Receipt of formal notice that this subdivisin is
exempt from Article 6 under the Suffolk County Department
of Health SErvices.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards
The Board discussed setting up a meeting at Fishers Island
sometime in October. It was felt that October 4, 1986 may
be a possible date for such a meeting. Possibly a pending
subdivision for property at Fishers Island would be ready
for a public hearing which could then be held on the Island.
The Board commended Melissa Spiro for her work in the Planning
Board office this summer. Ms. Spiro had prepared maps and
charts for the Board's information.
Being no further business to come before the Board, on a motion
made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Edward and carried, the
meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~la~ne M. ~'~ar
Schultze, S y
~ ~//pouthold Town Planning Board
~n~tt- O~io~ws~i, Jr. , Ch~rman
AND FILED B!
T~ SOUTHOLD TO\~iN
Town Clerk, Town of Sou~old