HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-12/14/1987Southold, N.Y. ~97!
(516~ 765-1938
PLA/~NING BOARD MINUTES
December 14, 1987
The Southold Town Planning Board held a regular meeting on Monday, December 14,
1987 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold.
PRESENT WERE:
Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Member William F. Mullen, Jr.
Member Richard G. Ward
Member Kenneth Edwards
Executive Administrator Victor Lessard
Town Planner Valerie Scopaz
Administrative Assitant Diane M. Schultze
Town Attorney Francis J. Yakaboski
ABSENT:
Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr.
7:30 p.m. Public hearing on the question of approval of the minor subdivision
of Verveniotis, Plevritis, and Yianourakis located at Horton's Lane, Southold
for 4 lots on 12.3 acres, SCTM # 1000-53-3-21.
Mr. Orlowski: Good evening, I would like to call this meeting to order,
first order of business is a public hearing on the question of approval
of the minor subdivision of Vervenoitis and others located at Horton~s
Lane, Southold. We have proof of publication in the Long Island Travler
Watchman signed by Pat Woods, notorized by Barbara Forbes, we have proof
of publication in the News Review signed by Christina Contento and notorized
by Mary Deegnan, Suffolk Times, sorry. At this time, everything is in
order for a public hearing and I will ask if there are any objections
to this subdivision. Hearing none. Are there any endorsements of this
subddivision.
Mr. Strang: Good evening, Garratt Strang, applicant, acting on behalf
of the applicant for this minor subdivison. As you are well aware the
applicantion has been pending for some time, we have had several extensions.
The Village Board has approved the situation of obtaining water for the
lots.and we are in contract with the Village of Greenport to provide water.
The owners of the parcel are in fact negotiating to start the installation
of the water main, we have Health Department approval based on that, final
approval is basically in the hands of this Board at this time. We respectfully
request approval.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, are there any other endorsements'of this subdivision?
Planning Board Page 2 12/14/87
Mr. Orlwoski: Hearing none, is there any one out there neither pro nor
con but with information pe~tiaining to this subdivision which may be
of interest to>this Board. Hearing-none, questions from the Board~ Mr.
Mullen, none; Mr. Ward, none; Mr. Edwards; none; Ms. Scopaz, none. Okay,
being no further questions, I will declare this hearing closed and thank
you for coming down.
On a motion made by Mr. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday~ January 1!,
1988 at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold as the time and~place
for the next regular Planning Board meeting.
Vote of the Board: Aves: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Edwacds, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of
the regular meeting of November 10, 1986.
Vote of the Board; Ayes:~Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of
the regular meeting of April 13, 1987.
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
ON a motion made by Mr. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Ward, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of
the regular meeting of November 23, 1987.
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Planning Board Page 3 12/14/87
Henry Arbeeny -
SCTM # 1000-59-7-31
Mr. Orlowski: Next, we have Henry Arbeeny, Board to take action on this
preliminary map7ifor this major subdivision tdcated at Kenney's RoJd,and
County Route 48, Southold. This is six lots on 7.5 acres, 3 lots on the
B zone. Approval should be subject to the buffer between the residential
and business zones, put on the map.
Mr. Ward: So moved.
Mr. Orlowski: Valerie, you had some comments on Arbeeny.
Ms. Scopaz: Basically, at the hearing at our last meeting, a suggestion
was made which the Board seemed to be infavor of which was requiring a
buffer between the subdivision co~.~anercial property and residential property.
What I have done is drawn up a condition which if the Board_agrees with,
it can adopt. The finat map'shal!~show a 10' buffer-conservation easement
to run along the rear or northernmost property lines of lots 4,5,6 and
the lot of the business~property. The terms of the easement would be
that the easement shall be planted witha mixture of deciduous and evergreen
trees. The easement shall not be cleared or clear cut, although routine
maintenance of treese in accordance with acceptable horticultural practice
shall be permited. No structures or building of any sort shall be placed
within this easement area. The last condition would be that the terms
of the easement shall be stated on the final subdivision map and with
the deeds'of Lots 3,4,5, and~.6. The reason why it would be in th~ deed
of lot 3, which is a~'residential lot,is that it would give that property
owner notice that he does have the right to that.
Mrs. Moore: Pat Moore, for the applicant. That is a good suggestion to
have a buffer area, but may I suggest that the buffer be on lot 3 rather
than on the commercial properties because on one of the, in particular,
Lot 6, may not be sufficient size to create a 20' buffer. So, maybe create
that buffer so that it is incorporated into the largest of the lots, which
is lot 3.
Mrs. Scopaz: You could consider that option just recognizing that it
will require a residential to provide there own buffer. The other thing
to be considered is that that 20', ordinakly when you are designing a
site plan for commercial property, you try to get a minimum of a certain
number of feet between parking lot and property line. You can incorporate
that 20' easement into_~he overall arrangement for the site plan. It is
up to the Board how it wants do it.
Mr. Orlowski: What is the Board's pleasure.
Mr. Ward: I think it is the responsibility of the commercial developer
to buffer when he builds for the residential. Maybe it could be dome by
a 10' each side or some compromise. I wilt~a~end my resolution to be
that way , 10' on either side of the property.
On~a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following a public hearing,
Planning Board Page 4 12/14/87
approve the preliminary maps for the major subdivision~of Henry Arbeeny
located at Kenney's Road a~d County Route 48, Southold, survey dated as
amended October 7, 1986 subject to the following-conditions:
wi. The final map shall show a~10' buffer- conservation easement
to r~n along the rear or northernmost property lines of lots 4, 5, 6
and a 10' buffer conservation easement to run along the southernmost property
line of Lot No. 3.
2. The terms of the buffer-conservation easement shall be as follows:
a. The buffer- conservation easement shall be planted with a mixture
of deciduous and evergreen trees.
b. The easement area shall not be cleared or clear cut, although
routine maintenance of trees in accordance with acceptable horticultural
practice shall be permitted.
c. No structures or buildings of any sort shall be placed within
this easement area.
3. The terms of the easement shall be stated on the final subdivision
map and with'the~deeds of Lots 3,4,5, and 6.
Vote of the Board; Ayes; Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Golf View Estates -
SCTM # 1000-35-2-16.
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, the~following action
was taken:
WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of a subdivision plat ~ntitl~d
"Golf View Estates" was submitted to the Planning Board on February 19,
1987 and the filing fee was paid, and
HWERHEAS, a final public hearing was held on said subdivision and plat
at the $outhold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, on Monday',
November 23, 1987 at 7:30 p.m., and
WHEREAS, the requirement sof the Subdivision Regulations of the Town
of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and application,
NOW, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the application of Golf View Associates
for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Peconic Surveyors, John
Metzger, and dated as last revised NOvember 5, 1987, be approved and the
Chairman be authorized to endorse approval on~ said subdivision subject
to the following:
1. Receipt and accept'of a bond, passbook, or letter of credit,
for the road improvements, .in the amount of the bond estimate.
2. Receipt of revised surveys indicating a cul-de-sac at the end
of the~right-of-way as well as a 22' improved road with drainage and profiles~
as per the Town of Southold Highway Specifications.
Planning Board Page 5 12/14/87
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman
to endorse the minor subdivision of Stanley and Helen Simchick located
at Cutchogue.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Abstained: Orlowski (related to the applicant)
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman
to endorse the approved lot line change for Walter and Marilyn Gatz.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Or. lowski, Mullen~ Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Multen, it was
RESOLYED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman
to endorse the approved subdivision for Saland / San Andres located at Laurel.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Mr. David Saland approached' the Board at this time andqu~stioned if the Board
would make a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act
for the major subdivisionof Wolf Pit Associates. The Boardnoted this
was omitted from the agenda by an oversite and the Chairman stated that
this would be reviewed at the end ~of the prepared agenda.
On a~ motion'~m~de by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend, following a
field inspection, that the Southold Town Board release the passbook held
for the major subdivision of Paradise-by-the-Bay located at Southold.
The Highway Superintendent and Engineering Consultant have'Also noted
that all improvements as per the bond estimate have been complied with.
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Planning Board Page 6 12/14/87
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was
RESOLVBD that the S~uthold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman
to endorse the approved set off for Peter Blank, l~ated~'at-Orient.
Vote ofthe Board: Ayes: Orlwoski, Mullen, Wards Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the set off
for Richard and William Gillooly to set-off 3.2 acres from 13.4 acres
located~at Tabor Road, Orient, survey dated November 17, 1987, SCTM #
1000-25-2-p/o 4, 15 - 20; subject to :
1. Receipt of endorsement from the Suffolk County Department of
Health Services, pursuant to Acticle 6.
Vote,df th~ Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Southold Villas -
SCTM # 1000-70-1-6
MC. Orlow~ki: Mrs. Patricia Moore and Isaac Sedmer have scheduled a
presentation at the Board's request to discuss the proposed change of
zone pending before the Town Board. Property at Main Road, Southold.
Board is to make recommendation for the change of zone from A-R to M
and A-R to AMD on this property.
Mrs. Moore: Mr. S~dmer asked fo='~me to apologize for him. I was unable
to reahh him until later on this afternoon and it was impossible for
him to be here this e~ening. And he would have been here if possible.
I have with me this evening, Mert~ Wiggon of Peconic Associates and he
is consultant on the water and the planning aspects of this project.
We have submitted to you an affordable housing project which we hope
will be acceptable to the Board and that you will recommend to the Town
Board. Th~s project is what we hope is flexible and accepta~t~. It is
divided into two parts as you can see by the~*plan. One half of which
would be under the~afforda~le l~gislation. Ail of those lots would be
s~ld to individuals qualifing under the affordable housing designation.
The other of the property would be the multiple unit with the two and
four Bedroom of two and tk~ee units per building. The paper work for
the most part speaks for itself. I am here to answer any quetions you
have I don't want to take your valuable time this evening. If you have
any:questions, we will be happy to answer them.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, does the Board have any questions at this point?
Ms. Scopaz.
Ms. Scopaz: I u~derstand that the p~oposed well site has not been determined.
Has the proposed well site been determined?
Planning Board Page 7 12/14/87
Mrs.Moore: We have come up with water quality that is not acceptable
at this site. We h-ave tried closer to the Main Road as well. We are
finding that the water quality is questionable and we may have to seek
other sources of water and negotiate with Greenport. So, it does create
more fliexiblity at this paint, since our site is for~hhe most part been
eliminited.
Ms. Scopaz: Do you have any time frame on this.
Mrs. Moore: No.
Mr. Wiggon: Perhaps, I can answer that, this is the second,~well test
that has been done on the property and the problem has been the nitrates.
And it has been proposed that further pumping migh~ reduce~it~And the
owner is prepared to make a decision~about that with regard to the layout
of the property. We can make that the source of water supply. He will
make that decision as soon as ppssi~le. In fact, he has made that decision,
he doesn't know where yet.
Mrs. Moore: To some extent he has~asked that I relay the message that
if he were to choose another site for the well, he is not about to acquire
another piece of property not knowing whether the Town will approve the
application. It seems a little backward that is why h~ is hoping to get
some kind of response from the Town and that way be assured that he is
at some pointbbeforethe.~goe~and acquires another piece of property.
Mr. Ward: But your final density is based on water and sewer.
Mrs. Moore: Odr final densityiis as has been proposed with water and
swere.
Mr. Ward: So, if you didn't get water, you won't be able to have these
size lots.
Mrs. Moore: Oh, yes, if we don't find water than the whole project may
be scrapped. That is why he is optimistic that he will be able to have
another piece of property. Otherwise we have to stand inline in Greenport
and it may take years.
Mr~.Wiggon: Perhaps, I should qualify one of the comments particularly
the yield, the yi~td is based on 20,000 not 10,000 on the plan there
will,be public water supp%y, but individual sewers.
Mr. Orlwoski: Is ~h~re any reason why you are separating the zones here
and not jsut applying for the AHD.
Mrs. Moore: Well, we were conce=ned with the limitations in AHD because
theemultiples will be privately owned, condominimized and it was ~nclear
if the AHD permitted that is why we separated the property into two. We
also liked the idea of separating it so that it would be, he would not
do one project without the other, in other words, one is very dependent
on th~ other.
Mr. WArd: We were under that the Affordable HOusing Di§triet allowed
for the $0J50 split.
Planning Board Page 8 12/14/87
Mrs. Moore: It does allow the sale?of 50% of the properties but it is
unclemr when it lists the housing~types permitted. It is unclear if
the multiples could be sold as condominiums individually and it is very
clear,~it is charted waters under the multiple whereas the affordable
housing, everyone is learning s~ep by step and we would rather be assurd
that we are going to get what we want before w~'submit an application
that may ultimately give us what we want. We told the Board that we
will~.~ovenant that 100% of the lots will be sold under affordable so
that the question about 50% we W~llnot try to sell 50% of half of the
proeperty, we will'covenant :that the entire property and lots will be
sold under the affordable housing.
Mr. Orlowski: Could you see that Counsellor?
Mr. Yakaboski: There is no indication although there is an indication
that there areattached units~which would limit hhein ~ub B~_of the regulations.
It is understood that if attached units are Allowed, they would have
be condominium or co~op~rativ~ arrangement and could not be sold otherwise.
Mr Orlowski: AHD is meant to accommodateaattached housing and the only
way you are going to sell one is...
Mrs.~Moore: Well, it is unclear whether they wanted rentals or attached
units might be under the rental and saying yes, the multiples could be
rented but not sold. It is very unclear and the clien~ cho~e'~t~ado it
this way. We advised that under multiple it is likely that we could
sell them just as we did under the M.
Mr. Yakaboski: I think that is what the legislation intent it. Under
155.7 E, subdivision lB, I think it is clear enough that the attached
units could be sold and as such would have to be under~-a condominium
or co-operative arrangement.
Mr. Orlwoski: I don't see this Board, and I may be wrong, being in favor
of an M zone. When we went through ~11 this work and agravation to create
and IHD zone, whidh I think will accomodate this in the same way.
Mr. Ward: I think]the other problem?with doing it Mi~ht~now, putting
the cart befdre the ho~se, the site plan elements are going to be locked
in by a zone change line and we would rather ha~e the flexibility. W~
have certain things on the plan.~a~d we would like to decide if it does
go ahead, in terms of buffers and other things and existing housing and
we are not going to have the flexiblity we want.
Mr. Mullen: I would like,to have it go all under AHD.
Mr. Orlowski: And, ¥o0 still hav~!~he problem of water which you are
trying to resolve. I don't think that we will make any recommendation
right now.
Mrs. Moore: Well, I would request that you make some kind of recommendation.
If it means putting the entire piece under AHD, I would rather that.
Rather than having it go back mud forth request that you make some kind
of recommendation. If it means putting the entire piece under AHD, that
is fine, I would recommend to the client that that might be the most
expedient way of handling it. BUtt the TownBoard will want your~recommendation
Planning Board Page 9 12/14/87
Mrs. Moore: A~d, any recommendation that you do have with regard to buffer,
we would happy to do it at this point. We don't want to go back to the
surveyor 300 times we would rather get them allaand save time.
Mr. Orlwoski: What is the Board's pleasure?
On emotion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board r~er the following comments
to the Town Board with regacd to the change of zone request for South~Id
Villas from A-R to M and from A-R to AHD located at Southold:
The Planning Board is not in favor of the change 0f~>zone from
A-R to M and recommend that the entire property be handled under
the change of zone for the AMD Zone. The Board feels that the proposal
could be handled wi~h the provisions of the Affordable Housing District.
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Oclowski, Mullen, Ward~ Edwards.
~polonia Stankewicz
SCTM # 1000-75-6-6
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, secondedby Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board~approve the s~h~Off'~for
~he Estate of Apolonia Stankiwicz located at Southold, SCTM # 1000-75z6-6
to set 6ff 80,000 square feet from 26 acres locatedaat Main Road, Southold
subject to:
1. Obtaining access to the remaining 24 acres from the adjoining
property to the East over the adjoining 50 foot right-of-way. If
this can not be obtained, a 50' access is to be provided along the
easterly property line of the Stankewicz property.
2. Endorsementrof the Suffolk County Department of Health Services
pursuant to Article 6.
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Hillcrest Estates Section I - SCTM # 1000-13-2-8,39; 13-2-1,3,8
Harbor Lights Section 4 SCTM # ~00~ 5 7 ~ '~ ~-
Mr. Orlowski: Next, we have Hillcrest Estates, Section I, Board to make recommendation
to the Town Board with regard to the improvements'and letter of credit.
I don't believe we are finished down there.
Mr. Yakaboski: May we have a report from the Planner.
Ms. Scopaz: I made an ins pection with Mr. Latham~and Mr. Mullen. There
are certain things missing. The fire we!l, street trees and the last
coat, top coat of asphalt have not been completed.
Planning Boacd Page 10 12/14/87
Mr. Mullen: The drainage wasn't done.
Mr. Yakaboski: So what you are saying is that your inspection rea!ly
don't take issue the report of October 20, of Sidney Bowne.
Mr. Mullen: Absolutely.
Mr. Yakaboski: Then I take it it is not finished yet~
Mr. Hall: May I address a couple of things. I won't get into the heavy
things yet. I know on the~meeting a November 9, you issued a letter
regarding an inspection that was done by Mr. Mullen, Mr. Latham, and
Valerie Scopaz. The first two items on,the thing, one the fact that
there is only one leaching pool. Ail four leaching pools are there,
three of them are underground. Next one, catch basins that are above
grade, they are above grade because the top course has not been put down.
They are at the proper grade.
Mr. Orlowski: But the top course of asphalt has not been put down.
Mr. Hall: Acknowledged. We have acknowledged that i~'~is not there.
Mr, Orlowski: Are you going to extend the letter of credit that we now
hold.
MR. Hall: Is there a time frame on it.
Mr. Orlowski: Well, it goes to the21st of January.
Mr. Hall: Yes, Mr. Reese said that it will be extended.
Mr. Orlowski: Well, what it the question, it is not finished, so.
Mr. Hall: Well, we know that and the only reason we are here tonight,
and t think the only reason it is on the calender is Mr. Yakaboski approached
me. Actually, I approached Mr. Yakaboski here in the Town Hall, here
on Friday, four days ago. He then went and had? a m~eting with the Town
supervisor based on my request and came out of that meeting and said
Michael, you-and Mr. Reese better be here Monday night, because we are
putting it on the calender both Hillcrest and Harbor Lights, so that
they can be discussed. The only thing that I can repeat. I have give
a memorandum siting Section 277 of the Town Law, I just don't think it
is clear that the State law says either or. Either completion or bond
before construction can be approved. Specifically, Paradise by the
Bay, there is a house up there, we all know whose house it is and it
is half finished before there was any paving done. I know it is finished
now, but it seems like the Board is being arbitrary. I know they have
problems with Mr. Reese, perhaps on other subdivision.
Mr. Orlowski: That has nothing to do with it.
Mr. Hall: Okay, but it just seems like.
Mr. Orlowski: This Board does not issue building permits, number one,
when this Board is asked to release a bond or to release any building
permits, this Board will not do it unless work is complete 100%.
Planning Board Page 11 12/14/87
Mr. Orlowski: That is the Board's set policy. I believe that counsel
is here to back up us on that.
Mr. Yakaboski: Just a Slight correction for the record. I did not meet
with the Supervisor, I consulted on Friday with Ms. Scopaz regarding
Harbor Lights and Hillcrest and I know your position regarding the bonding
or in this particular case the letter of credit. The Board is very concerned
concerning the issuance of vacant lot certificates of occupanDy and or
building permits on lots in a subdivsion while approved which has not
yet been completed as to curbs, drainage, and in this in particular also
a fire well becasue no certificate of occupancy could issue certainly
until completion and we are put in a situation that is the Planning Board
to some degree but moreover the Building Department in that we grant
a building permit, constructin cormnences and then a personor couple is
not permitted to move into their home because the improvements are not
complete. And, yes, there is a slight history of what might be considered
delay or dilatary progress in some other projects and it is a problem
for us in that we have numerous calls from people who have purchased
lots and who are unRbte to build and we are frustrated. We might as well
hop up the bottom of'~his page to Harbor Lights to this part of the agenda
since we are talking all of them. We reach the question, really, at what
point do we say, enough is enough and call the bond. In Harbor Lights,
we are over four years now, on Hillcrest, I think we,are at least two.
If I am not mistaken. Somebody correct me, if I am wrong. I think I
saw our first letter of credit back in 1985 on this one. What can you
tell us, really what can you tell us . Right now, I am presuming that
the asphalt plants are closed. If I am wrong somebody tell me, I may
be wrong, I don~t know.
Mr. Hall: I think I saw Corrizini's trucks yesterday laying asphalt,
but I don't know.
Mr. Yakaboski: I know they have a fixed dead line when they close and
it an arbitary time. The weather may look great but they know that time
is dcawing to an_~end and theyfix a closing date. Quite candidly, if
the final coat were down tomorrow and the fire w~ll was in and the curbs,
which we by the way have a report of October 20, which our Board report
obviously doesn't agree with. We are at sharp issue with the matter
of the completion of the curbing and the fire well is of major concern
to us. I mean I would be the first to recommend to the Baord that if
it were done that the Board convene a special meeting and not wait and
approve and release the bond and authorize or!at least apprise Mr. Lessard
in the Building Department, everything is done, go ahead at 90 miles
an hour. Because it is no fun for us either. I am called, you and I
fight day after day on the telephone. Mr. Orlowski and I debate back
and forth. You don't like us telling you Mike you go out there and pug
asphalt down, because you don't like to put ashpalt down, but we don't
have, we can't answer anything. We don't want to give approval that
leads to the issuance of a building permit or somekind of a representation
toga banking institution that this vacant lot is now satisfactory for
building purposes. Mr. Hall or Mr. Doe go out and get a mortgage approval
on a vacant lot and then look to do their buiding and then we say, no.
Then everybody is called up short and we only have more problems. Candidly,
again, I am not saying this, you have investments. We would rather ahd
Planning Board Page 12 12/14/87
Mr. Yakaboski: fight and argue with one guy, or one gentlemen, rather
than have a dozen couples in here yelling at the Plannng Board or the
Building Department or the Town Board for approving a subdivision and
permitting them to buy land and not ha~e the ability to go forward and
begin construction.
Mr. Hall: But it still seems as per the Town Code and the Law that constrtUction
can be commenced and the Building Department can issue a building permit.
Granted, I mean, I have an affidavit from Mr. Reese, which I am prepared
to hand out to-the Board. In my affidavit he says it is my intention
not to do final asphalt paving until late Spring, early Summer 1988 in
order to avoid needless wear, tear, and use of the final asphalt coat.
A potential buyer, I know Pat Moore's office represents one of the potential
buyers and Kevin McLaughlin represents another contract vendee and as
soon as we resolve this.
Mr. Yakaboski: Don't worry about the wear a~d tear, get in there and
do the asphalt. Call Corri~ini and get the thing done. Once those roads
are accepted, you know, we do it. If there is wear and tear, we call
up Mr. Jacobs and he goes and fixes the road until that time and until
they are accepted they are inthe hands of the subdivision.
Mr. Reese: As far as the final asphalt coat is concerned, Mr. Corrizini
has recommended that we don't do it now for obvious reasons, we do a
much better job later on. Let the first coat lay there for three oc
four months . Mr. Corrizini, I believe, is a pretty good road layer.
Mr. Yakaboski: This is you underlay, the bottom coat.
Mr. Reese: That is right.
Mr. Yakaboski: Well, that has been in for more than three or four months, hasn't
it?
Mr. Reese: No, he just finished it, well I guess three or four months
ago, yes. But, he would like to let it go until it gets some more wear
and tear. As far as the wells are concerned, fire wells, we are working
on that right now.
Mr. Yakaboski: Hirewells, are contracts let to do the wells?
Mr. Reese: No, there is some discrepancy. I have aletter from the fire
commissioner in Orient telling us what kind of wells to put in. I have
checked this and this letter was written three or four years ago by Mr.
Reeves who was the Fire Commissioner for that area. The new commissioner
happens to be his son. I asked him a month ago and asked if these specifications
were all right~ He read the letter, saw the signature and said yes.
Talking to the well man tonight there is some questions with regard to
the engineerng or capacity which I am going to take up with the Fire
Commissioner tomorrow and perhaps the Superintendent of Highways. So
that we start off on the right foot. If we put in the way the Fire
Commissioners recommended, it might be all right, but according to the
well man, there is some question to be asked. Now, I got in on this
conversation about the bond or th~ completion and all I can say to you
is if you want t ochange it, change the law. I believe we are going
by the law. You have the right to change the law anytime you want and
Planning Board Page 13 12/14/87
Mr. Reese: we have to abide by it, but it seems grossly unfair to have
the law and then change you mind in mid stream. We had a subdivision
over in Hrbor Lights, this might interest you, this may have nothing
to do with it. After the roads have been completed, it took the Town
four years before they would take them over. Four years, every year
they gave me alist of improvements. This went on for four years, until
I finally said, I've had enough of this, I am not fixing them any more
you either take them. Finally they did take them and then it took the
Town seven years to release the bond. They just flately refused to release
the bond. The only way we got the bond released was when Mr. Pell became
Supervisor and I went in ther and asked why they didn't release the
bond, they had it for seven years. And then they released the bond.
Mr. Yakaboski: Well, this isn't section 4 in Harbor Lights?
Mr. Reese: No, this is the first three sections.
Mr. Yakaboski: Well, I must admit, Hillcrest is being tarred slightly
with Harbor Lights.
Mr. Reese: Well, I completed all the requirements of Harbor Lights Section
4, about a week or ten days ago, with one possible exception, the bubble
system into the recharge area. I would like some more definite information
as to what would be required and I will take that up with Mr. Dean tomorrow.
Ail the recommendations taht have been made by Ms~ Scopaz, and they were
only made about two months ago have been completed, with the exception
of the seeding. It doesn't seem much sense to seed the area at this
particlur time.
Mr. Yakaboski: No, that we can certainly understand.
Mr. Reese: The dike and the diversionof the water have all been completed.
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Dean, you will take that up with Mr. Dean? Mr. Dean
works for us~
Mr. Reese: Yes, I will take it up with him, I haven't yet.
Mr. Orlowski: You would address anything to this Board, we will take
it up with Mr. Dean. Okay.
M,r. Reese: No, I will see him tomorrow and ask him to make an inspection.
Mr. Yakaboski: This is on Harbor Lights?
Mr. Reese: Yes, Harbor Lights, Section4 .
Mr. Yakaboski: Well.
Mr. Reese: In light of the fact that that is the last item onthe agenda.
Mr. Yakaboski: Well, I just thought we would move it up and let you
gentlemen enjoy the rest of the eveining rather than go around twice.
Mr. Hall, I appreciate and know you arguments and I know that you and
I inparticular from the legal aspect have been going around and around.
I assure you that we have been researching it. We have been taking a
Planning Board Page 14 12/14/87
Mr. YakaboskI: very hard line. It is very easy for us to sit up
here and take that line but by the same token we are not taking it lightly
and I am_reviewing your memo and we are doing our own work and I assure
you that, I would like to say befcre the holiday, but I have promised
five million things before the hdliday and I don't want to make one more
promise if I can avoid it, but certainly before the end'of the month
or early into January, certainly prior to the January 11 meeting, you
and I will meet either personaly or by phone and discuss this.
Mr. Hall: As to the hard line it just seems that the hard line is just
for Mr~ Reese.
Mr. Yakaboski: No. I know that this may seem like you to be the case.
One of the facts is taht Mr. Reese is an active developer in the Township
and he develops-large parcels as opposed to small parcels, minor subdivisions
and the like where we don't have that kind of a problem, you are dealing
with three or four lots. And, so where you receive the most flack some
time, you do take the closer look. The situation where, Mr. Lessard
and we get put into a bind. We are addressing all of there concerns
and one of the ~hings is we are putting a much more limited time frame
withregard to the completion but you are right, we didn,t do that with
these proposals and I don't want to do that unless we can do it fairly.
Mr. Hall: It seems like there are other major subdivisons with houses
up and granted it might put some people in a bind, but keep the same
bind for everybody.
Mr. Orlowski: Well, this Board is not going to make an recommendations
to the Building Department to issue any building permits in a subdivision
that is not complete. Anybody that gets a building permit, good luck,
you made it, but it is not coming from this board or is this Board going
to approve any Building Permits, we believe we are right and we are going
to stick by it. Becmuse we have to stick to one kind of policy, there
were too many kinds of roads being built. There were too many subdivisions
where I was getting called at t1:00 and 12:00 at night, why they couldn't
get a school bus up their road, why the roa~s aren't finished. Now, it
is simple for us. If the roads are finished and everything is done,
you get all the builidng permits you want and we don't get any more phone
calls it is plain and simple.
Mr. HAll: Thank you.
Mr. Yakaboski: Thank you for coming Mike.
Helen Dris -
SCTM ~ 1000-106-8-20.1
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr.~Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare themselves lead
agency under the State ENvironmental Quality Review Act for the minor
subdivision of ~nthony and Helen Dris located at Mattituck. An initial
determination of non-significance has been made.
Vote of the Board; ~Yes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Planning Boamd
Page 15 12/14/87
On a~-motion ~ade by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch
map for the ~inor subdivision for Anthony and Helen Dris located a
for 3 lots ob 9.6 acres, survey dated as revised August 5, 1987 s~
to:
Filing covenants and restrictions as to no further subdivi~
of a~y lot with the County Clerk.
Vote of the Board: Ayes; Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Orlowski, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chai~
to endorse the minor subdivision of Ana G. Stillo located at Orien~
which had r~ceived Board approval, SCTM # 1000-14-2-26.
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Ortowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Birndorf and Rizzo
SCTM # 1000-97-3-1.
Mr. Kevin McLaughlin was present as attorney for the applicant to
an extension on his final submission.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, next we have Birndorf and Rizzo, Board to gran
extension on filing this final map for this minor subdivision at C~
This is by request of attorney. This is only a sketch plan.
Mr. Edwards: How long an extension is requested?
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. McLaughlin, I have a letter requesting an extem
on the sketch, but I question this because we are going to back to
one any way since it expired. What~is.~ketch needed for.
Mattituck
bject
ion
man
'equest
~ an
~tchogue.
ion
square
Mr. McLaugh%in: The problem we run into is getting Article 6 appr~val
on the property. We have dug a couple of wells and it has come up unacceptable.
The approval was extended once prevously. Then we discovered the ~wo
wells had unacceptable water quality and we went to the mortgagee ~ank
and requested that they sign a consent to covenants and restrictions.
This has no~ been going for approximately five or six months. Abo~t
three month~ of the time was wasted with the original bank until they
informed us that they had sold the mortgage and now a bank known as California
Savings Bani. now holding the mortgage on the property, another couple
of months w~.s spent trying to get them to make a determination whether
they would ign off and what ended up happening is they have now kicked
it back to ~ime Savings bank to make the determination and Dime Savings
has required us to file with them a new FANY MA appraisal form before
they will sign off on that and that is why I am here requesting again
Planning Board Page 16 12/14/87
Mr. McLaughlin: another extension.
Mr~ Orlowski: You need a score card with these banks.
Ms. Scopaz: Would the appraisal be affected by the first layout?
Mr. McLaughlin: I guess that is a matter for the appraiser, but I suspect
so, they are asking for an appraisal on the entire parcel and I am not
sure how that is going to affect the entire appraisal.
Ms. Scopaz: What happens if the Board changes its mind on how to subdivide
the property in light of adjoining properties that have come in to the
South and East of your. property. Would that put your appraisal in jeopardy?
Mr. McLaughlin: By that time we will hve had our covenants and restrictions
filed and we will have gotten Article 6 approval based on the covenants
and restrictions and then we won't need the bank. The only thing we
need the bank to do is sign a consent that they understand that the covenatns
and restricitons may take priorty over the mortgage. And unfortunalty,
it has been~a real circle.
Ms. SCopaz: Could you explain to the Board what the covenants and restricitons
say?
Mr. McLaughlin: Basically, they say that we can't sell any lots until
we put in whatever is necessary in the way of filtration system. To
bring the water quality up to standards for the Health Department.
Those covenants and restrictions have to be consented to by any lein
holder on the property. And, that is where we are.
Mr. Yakaboski: These are the standard Suffolk County Covenants and Restrictions
from the Health Department?
Mr. McLaughlin: Yes, but unfortunately we cant' get anybody at the bank
to sign off on them. I have had Blrindorf and Rizzo's signature for
eight mohths.
Mr. Yakaboski: What you are realy saying is that the sketch plan is
the sketch plan, you are not looking to have that purpoted any more sanctity
than any other normal sketch plan. But at least having a sketch plan
extended you have a leg up to the bank to go and say this is the layout
and this is the C and R's on this proposed layout and will you agree.
Mr. McLaughtin: Yes, and I don't want to go through the filing process
againmnd have to expend~another',x'' amount of dollars of my peoples funds
in order to start another application before the Board. I don~t believe
I have priority in a sketch plan that has been approved by the Board,
certainly it is subject to whatever changes you feel are required and
I don't'have any vested in that.
Mr. Y~kaboski:
degree, as long
not be affected
And, ultimately, should be the layout be altered~to some
as the four lots are yielded, the bank appraisal will
in any way shape or form.
Mr. McLaughlin: Frankly, at that point, I don't care about the banks
appraisal because I will have already gotten the banks approval and
Planning Board Page 2i7 12/14/87
Mr. McLaughlin: have gotten the covenants andrestrictions recorded.
Mr. Yakaboski: Right, and you will have gotten you money.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, as long as you realize that we may be changing this
layout.
Mr. McLaughlin: Understood.
Mr. Orlowski: We even have some drawings here which we will give you
if you like. Does the Board want to grant an. extension on the Sketch.
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was
RESOLVED that the-Southold Town Planning Board grant a 6 month extension
on the filing of the final submission of the subdivisldn of Birndorf
and Rizzo located at Main Road, Cutchogue, for 4 lots on
9.111 acres, SCTM ~ 1000-97-3-1; subject to a revision in the survey that
all lots will have access off the right-of-way proposed.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
First Class Auto Body
SCTM # 1000-75~5-10
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plan
for First Class Auto Body, for construction,~of an addition on an
automotive repair building at Peconic, to the Building Department for
certification. A setback variance was received from the Board~o0f Appeals.
Survey dated as amended November 2, 1987.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward~ Edwards
Mullen Motors
SCTM # 1000-62-3-20
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plan
for Mullen Motors for construction of'an addition on an existing
car sales showroom located at Southold to the Building Department for
certification. A variance and special exception was received from the
Board of Zoning Appeals. Survey revised as per Planning Board review
and dated June 15, 1987, received December 14, 1987.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowksi, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Planning Board Page 18 12/14/87
North Fork Wood Design
SCTM ~ 1000-74-4-5
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan
for North Fork Wood Design located at County Route 48, Peconic for use
of an existing barn for a woodworking shop'subject to a 250' set back
from County Route 48 for storage of products and display of~finished projects.
Vote of the Board: Aye: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
On a motion amde by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman
to endorse the site plan for North Fork Wood Design upon compliance with
the conditions of the conditional approval and revised survey indicating
same.
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Samuels and Steelman
SCTM # 1000-109-1-23
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman
to endorse the approved site plan for Samuels and Steelman for conversion
of an existing barn at Main Road, Cutchogue to an architect's office.
Vote Of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Marina Bay Club
SCTM ~ 1000-117-8-18
Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. was present as agent for the applicant on this
site plan.
Mr. Orlowski: Marina Bay Club, Board to grant an extension on the preparation
and filing for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for this ite
plan located at New Suffolk. The applicant has agreed to this and meet
at the Janaury meeting to discuss the problems. I believe.~
Mr. Raynor: Yes, Mr. Chairman, as agent for the Marina Bay Club, the
extension to finish the Final Environmental Impact Statement, as well
as an opportunity for Mr. Emlita to address same will be fine. I believe
that date runs to the 8th Of February so any meeting subsequent to that.
Mr. Orlowski: Alright, what is the Board's pleasure.
Planning Board Page 19 12/14/87
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Edwards~ it~Was
RESOLVED that ~he Southold Town Planning Board grant a 90-day extension
on the preparation and filing for the Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the site plan for Marina Bay Club located at New Suffolk, SCTM #
1000-117-8-18.
Vote of theBoard: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Mr. Orlowski: How much time do you need?
Mr. Raynor: Really, Mr. ChAirman, we could be ready the end of January
at the present rate which we are compiling the responses to the information.
After speaking with your office and With Mr. Emlita being in China til
the next month, we will leave it up to the Board's discretion.
Mr~ Orlowski: Okay, then 90-days is fine. Mr. Raynor, you will be ready
on the llth of January to address the comments?
Mr. Raynor: Let's separate our SEQRA from our site plan, we will be
fully prepared, we have already addressed the revissions on the site
plan. At that time, we will be prepared as long as we can get our engineering
staff out here.
Ms. Scopaz: The Board has not formally asked the applicant to file a
final environmental impact statement and what the applicant has agreed
to is to extend that filing date 45 days and in January, after David
Emilita is here to be able to give you his comments that you can make
the determination whether you wish the applicant to file a final environmental
impact state ment based on the current site plan or whether you wish
the site plan and request a supplemental impact statememt.
Mr. Orlowski: But on the llth, we will meet to discuss that with the
applicant.
Ms. Scopaz: Right.
Mr. Orlowski: You will be prepared for that.
Mr. Raynor: We are reasonabl-y prepared now. It is basically in deference
to your office that we are extending this.
Mr. Orlowski: Well, we are trying to get all the comments together that
came in and Valerie's and the Board's and get them over to you so on
the llth we can meet here and go over them.
Mr. Raynor: We are already in reciept of all the comments that were
in the permissible limits of SEQRA, some obviously overlap the limits
of the site plan elements. The presubmission honference before the Board
will be to address all the elements under the site plan. With regard
to Ms. ScopazT comments, obviously, until you make a determination as
to what you would want with regard to the SEQRA elements.
Mr. Orlowski: That is why we want to meet, you are talking presubmission
and we are talking SEQRA.
Planning Board Page 20 12/14/87
Mr. Orlowski: We are talking SEQRA, okay.
Mr. Raynor: We can address both at that time, we have no problem with
either of them.
Mr. Orlowski: Well, both overlap so that we will be addressing both.
Mr. Raynor; I am sure out of it, we are addressing one or two elements
that will have to be addressed or modified in some way.
Mr. Orlowski: We~ have to decide and make a determination to go onto
a final or not so that is why we want to meet on the llth.
Mr. Raynor: The engineers, in this case H2M and the traffic people have
already addressed this too.
Mr. Orlowski: Does the Board understand this?
Tide mark Site Plan -
SCTM ~ 1000-45-1-1
Mr. Orlowski: Next, we have Tidemark. Board, as lead agency, to request
an extension on the review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for 30 days. I would like to make this 60 days because David Emilita
will not be back here.
Mr. Raynor: (as agent for the appicant) Mr. Chairman, as extensions
area b~-lateral agreement under SEQRA, the applicant will have to be
addressed. I was more than willing to negotiate the 30 days with.the
Board on the basis of discussions I have had with Szepatowski Associates,
30 days. I willY,be happy to ask for 60 days but I am not sure that the
applicant will agree. The problem is this site plan is being held-for
the addressing of a draft environmental impact statement and as a result
we are hog tied with the Zoning Board of Appeals. They will not allow
us to go forward with the special exception until we have an acceptance
of a draft environmental impact statement.
Mr. Yakaboski: Do you have a hearing scheduled.
Mr. Raynor; We can not get a hearing. It has been the determination
of the ChAirman of that Board that a hearing will not be forthcoming
until the Draft Enviroinmental Impact Statement was accepted. The 30
days was granted because of the workload over at Szepatowski and that
is very understandable. I explained this to the applicant, but to run
it over to February is a financial hard~hip. This is not something that
has not been addressed by Mr. Emlita, I discussed this with him in November.
Mr. Yakaboski: Right now, the only agreement we have is 30 days.
Mr. Orlwoski: We will do it for 30 days and have to keep an eye on it.
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by-~Mr. Edwards, it was
£1anning Board Page 21 12/14/87
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a 30 day extension
on the review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Tide Mark
(Cliffside Associates) in order to determine if same is sufficient for
review.
Vote of the Board: Ayes; Orlowski, Mullen, Ward?, Edwards
Hamilton Federal Savings Bank
SCTM # 1000-140~3~34
Mr. Orlowski: Next, we have HamiltOn Federal Savings Bank. Board to
take action on this site plan for a bank with drive-in window located
at Main Road and Wickham Avenue, Mattituck.
Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, if we allow for the drive-in window and the
elimination of parking area that is presently shown they-are undersized
for parking and I think we should deny the site plan.
Mr. Raynor: (as agent for the applicant) What was submitted was for
review by the Planner. As you can tell it is missing elements such as
a key map, specific elevations and if that is the only comment that the
Board has , we will be happy to address it.
Mr. Ward: It is aprobably an easy comment because it is what we saw,
but what we generally see, we don't like the location or any thing about
it, so there are elements here besides parking that we are concerned
about, traffic.
Mr. Raynor: Fine, what we would like to do is get specifics. I met with the
Town Planner with regard to that with regard to the question of the intersection
and the turning lanes involved. There is a pre-existing curb cut there,
from the DOT with a curb cut existing today. It is filled in by the
prior occupants.
Mr. Orlwoski: Do you have a note from the DOT stating that the curb
cut is still good.
Mr. Raynor: i don't have it'in my position tonight, I didn't know it
was going to be on the agenda tonight. I don't have it here tonight.
Mr. Orlowski: I don't think the Board has any problem with the bank,
but we don't see how you are going to handle the drive-in. I think
you are back to square one.
Mr. Raynor: The comment is that it creates and undersized on parking.
Mr. Orlowski: It is also a traffic hazard, unless you want to go thrOugh
the impact and everything else and prove to us that it doesn't. We don't
see how that would work.
Mr. Raynor: If you address it all in writing.
Ms. Scopaz: If you want to have for the record, my discussions with
Mr. Donald Denis.
Planning Board Page 22 12/14/87
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, we will put it all in writing and send it all to
the applicant.
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, secnoded by Mr. Ward, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny the set off proposal
for Clyde and Joyce Fritz, located at Southold since the property is
undersized and an area variance was not obtained from the Board of Appeals.
SCTM ~ 1000-78-7-44 and 45.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Robert Celic
Site Plan
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Edwards, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Building
Department that a certificate of occupancy be issued for the site plan
of Robert~Celic located at Main Raod, Mattituck, SCTM # 1000-143-3-1,
subject to eliminating the designated parking on Marlene Lane.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwacds
Mullen.Motors site plan
Ms. Scopaz brought up to the Board the request for a sidewalk continuing
along the front of the property where the proposed addition will be built.
Mr. Orlowski stated ~hat he felt the applicant would comply with this
and recommended that it be part of the approval of the site plan.
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen, the following action
was taken:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental C~nservation
Law, State Environmental Qumlity Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section
617¥10 and Chpater 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is
hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead'agency for the
action described below has determined that the project will not have
a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION:
The major subdivision of Wolf Pit Associates is for 13 five-acre
lots located at Mill Lane, Mattituck, SCTM # 1000-107-4-2.1.
Planning Board
Page 23 12/14/87
The project has beendetermined not to have a significant effect on the
environment for the following reasons:
An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated
that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely
tO coccur should the project be implemented as planned.
There have been no comments from the NYS Department of Environmental`
Conservation in the alotted time, therefore, it is assumed that
there are no co~nents or objections from that agency.
There have been no comments from the Suffolk County Department
of Health Services in the alotted time, therefore, it is assumed
that there are not comments or objections from that agency.
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the
Tonw of Southold Subdivision of land Regulations
Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M. Schuttze,
Administrative Assistant, Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main
Raod, Southold, NY 11971~
Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Ward, Edwards
Mr. Richard Mohring was present to discuss with the Board that status
of minor subdivision access road at Peconic. It was noted that this
was not on the agenda, howe~er, an inspection was made and we are awaiting
the '~report.
Mr. Russell Mann questioned the application and procedure for the
change request of Southold Villas located at Southold. The application_
is pending before the Town Board for a change of zone and it was recommended
that Mr. Mann watch for the public hearing notice so that he may be present
to comment at the public hearing.
Being no further business to come before the Board, on a motion~made
by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Edwards, and carried, the meeting was adjonrned
at 9:20 p.m.
Mennett Or{ows{i, Jr., ~rman
Respectfully submStted ~
Southold Town Planning Board