Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-04/27/1987Seuthold, N.Y. 11971 · (516) 765-1988 Planning Board Minutes The Southold Town Planning Board held a regular meeting on Monday, April 27, 1987 at 7:30p.m. at the Southold Town Hail, Main Road, Southold, NY. Present were: Chairman Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Member G. Ritchie Latham, Jr. Member William F. Mullen, Jr. Planner David Emilita Executive Administrator Victor Lessard Secretary Diane M. Schultze Absent: Member Richard G. Ward Member Kenneth Edwards 7:30 p.m. Public hearing on the question of approval of the minor subdivision for Winds Way Building Corp. located at Linden Avenue, Cntchogue for 4 lots on 13.5 acres. Mr. Orlowski: This is apublic hearing on the question of approval of the minr subdivision for Winds Way building Corp. located at Linden AVenue, Cutchogue, this is 4 lots on 13.5 acres. At this time, we have everything in the file in order. We have proof of publication from the Suffolk Times, signed by Richard Williams and notorized by Mary Deegnan a~d proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler Watchman signed by Pat Woods and notorized by Barbara Forbes. As I said, everything is in order for the hearing and I will ask if there area any objections to this minor subdivision? Hearing none. Any endosrements of this minor subdivision. Hearing none. Is there any one out there neither pro nor con but may have information pertaining to this subdivision which may be of interest to this Board? Hearing none, any questions from the Board, Mr. Mullen, (none); Mr. Latham, (none); Mr. Emilita (none). I wil declare this hearing and thank you for coming down. On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, May 11, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall as the time and place for the next regular Board meeting. Planning Board PaGE 2 4/27/'87 Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham On amotion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Twon Planning Board set Monday, May 11, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southotd town Hall, as the ~ime and place for a public hearin gon the question of approval of the preliminary maps for the major subdivision f Long Pond Estates, ~etion II located at Laurel Aenue, Southold. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowok~, Mullen, Latham The Board set the following new pzoposals for a field inspection: Lilian VIshno - 3 lot son 19,298 Greenport. George Kaytis - set off of 40,000 Point, Southold. Pugliese and Calabrese - 18 lots o Main Roa, Cutchogue. The Board wil the change of zone is acted on by On a motion made by Mr. Latham, se RESOLVED that teh Southold Town P1 Mullen Motors located at Cottage P Department for certification. Sit Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski uare feet located at Corwin Street, quare feet from 2.361 acres at Paradise 41 acres in the clster concept at not take action on this propsoal until the Town Board. ~onded by Mr. Mullen~ it was ~nning Board refer the site plan of Lace for employee parking to the Buiding Plan dated as amended April , 1987. Mullen, Latham On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED ~hat the Southold Town Pl~nnig Board accept and refer to the Town Boara, the bond estimate prepared by the Town Engineer, Lawrence Tuthill, for the major subdivision of Daniel Marcucci located at Southold to be known as "Reydon Court" ; bond estimate inthea mount of $65,000. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski. Mullen, Latham On a motion made by Mr. Latham, se. onded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold '~own Pl~nnig Board set Monday, May 11, 1987 at the Southold Town Hall, 7:45 p.n. as the time and place for a public hearing on the questionof approval of the final maps for the major subdivision of Daniel Marcucci to be known as "Reydon Court" located at Southold. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham Planning Board Page 3 4/27/87 7:45 p.m. Public hearing on the question of approva of the minor subdivisio for Winds Way Building Corporation located t New Suffolk Avneue Cutchogue fur 4 lots on 11.88 acres. Mr. Orlowski: Next, we have a public hearing on the question of approval on the minor subdivision of Winds Way building Corp. located at New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue, for 4 lots on 11.88 acres. We have proof of publication in the Long Island Traveler Watchman signed by Pat Woods and notorized by Barbara Forbes, we also have proof of publication inthe Suffolk Times, signed by Richard Williams and notorized by Mary Deegnan. At this time, everything is in order for a hearing. I will ask if there are any objections to this minor subdivision. Hearing none, are they there endorsemetns to this subdivision. Mr. Hobson: Excuse, I represent the County Club Estates, property owners association. We have six acres contiguous with the upper region of Downs Creek and we are very much interested in the environment integrity of the creek, and what impact this building will have on the creek. Is there any assurance we can get, from teh planners or the builders that they will not seek variances or exceptions to any ruling of the State Environmental people. Mr. Orlwoski: If they do, they would have a public hearing on that. Mr. Hobson: We just want to register our concern about that. Mr. Orlowski: Okay, are there any other objections? May I have your name, sir for the record. Mr. Hobson: Richard Hobson. Mr. Orlowski: Hearing no other objections, are ther any endorsements of this minor subdivision. Ms. Pat Moore: Just for the record, I would like to point out that we do have the DEC approval and we do ahve the Health Department approval at this time. Mr. Orlowski: Okay, any other endorsements of this subdivision? Hearing none, are there any one out there neither pko no=~con but may have information pertianing to this subdivision which may by of interest to the Board? Hearing none, any questions from the Board (none). Okay, being no further questions, I will declare this hearing>closed and thank you for coming. M. Paul Friedberg major subdivision at Mattituck. Mr. Daniel Ross, Esq was presnt on behalf of the applicant to discuss this proposal. Planning Board Page 4 4/27/87 Mr. Orlowski:r Next, we have M. Paul Friedberg for 13 lots on26 acres in teh cluster concept at Mill Road, Mattitck. David, I know you made a field inspection and had some comments, would you like to address them. Mr. Emilita: First, I would like to go back to the yield map which as I recall shows the entire tract of land covered with lots. It shows no area for drainage, no ~rea for park and we can't properly review this sketch plan until we get an appropriate yield over the entire site. I would draw the Board's attention to the depression of land which on the yield map encompases tots 8, 9, and t0 and I think that although there may be no drastic drainage problem at present because this area is all meadow, upon development of this site and of the Cooper site to the West the~ will be a significant drainage problem in the area shown as lot 8, 9, and l0 and so I think that the yield map has to be re-drawn to take that into account. We simply have no provision on the yield map for drainage. Mr. Ross: S~, in terms of the yield map, you would like three f the lots eliminated. Mr. Emilita: Well, I am not saying eliminate three of the lots, I am saying that these three lots will be a problem. They will probabtyflood out and I will leave it to your engineer to come up with an appropirate design for drainage. I am not telling you but saying that it will have to be re-designed and probably we candevelop a cluster. MR. Ross: I thought that you did not consider drainage on the yield map ~ut on the final map. Mr. Emitita: If you want to do justice to the site, the site has to be buildable in order to establish your yield interms of number of lots. Mr. Ross: We are hoping to get comments tonigh on the comments I show here, we can work with the number of lots if we know where or have some idea where the lots are going to be. Mr. Emilita: In terms of the cluster, lots 5,6, and 7 should probably not be located whre they are but should be located at the northern end. I think the Board is looking for a continuous track of open space. Mr. Ross: W~ have been over this and what we are trying to do i$ keep that area open for nursery. We are trying to keep all the lots out of the very low are and we were thinking this cluster down in the lower area as being a form of compromise, trying to keep all the lots out of that low area, of th~ 40' line. Mr. Orlowski: Well, we reviewed this and Mr. Ward isn't here but it is much more like what we are looking for. As Dave reviewed it, you density, might loose m lot here and if it going to taking a lot out of the middle, probably lot No. 7 should be the first one to go leaving 5 and 6 you might want to move that to the north and move the rest of that to open space. We are muchcloser now than we were before. Mr. Ross: Can we live with one or two lots there in the middle or are you going to request that that whole area be open. Planning Board Page 5 4/27/87 Mr. Ross: Here you have two open spaces, on e that will be used as nursery which is one of the points of the cluster. To have lots in the middle, you have two large open spaces, one almost 5 and one almost 6. Mr. Orlwoski: Is there any reason for keeping them in the middle, I mean the open space appears, if you did move them to the North, you would still have the open space for the nursery. Or is that marginal land. Mr. Ross: Basically the party that is here and the party that is running the nursery is not the party that is taking the lot and for that reason we would like to keep most of the lots down at this end. The nursery will have the four'lots and~the open space. That is why we are trying to keep this ag shown while trying to do as the Board requested and keeping the lots out of the low area. In terms of the number of lots, we can live with that, but what we are working with is the general concept where you want to the to be. Mr. Latham: How about taking those lots and moving them to lots 8 and 9. Mr. Ross: Well, that will be in the low area again. Mr. Emilita: Lots 5 and 6 in that position will still be receiving drainage from the nursery. Mr. Ross: problem. high. Ther is a slope there, but we don't feel that ther is a drainage There will be drainage. Those lots, 5 and 6 are up there quite Mr. Orlowski: Why don't you re-do your yield map and find out exactly how many lots we'are talking about. I think if you are going to be loosing two, that one lot can go either one way or the other. I don't see a big problem with that, if you are loosing one, let's sit down and see which way we can go. But that one lot will be ahve to be and take into consideration the park and playground -..as per what Mr. Emilita has asked for. Mr. Latham: There is a 50' Town Road on the map which Mr. Ward indicated is that okay. Mr. Orlowski: It would hae to be improved to Town specification and would have to show as 50' Mr. Ross: Would the yield map have to show the park and playground, we intended to put in money in lieu of. Mr. Orlowski: The yield map would still have to show it. George and Irving Newman - subdivisionat Orient Ms. Janet Geasa, attorney for the applicant, was present for the Board's review of this proposal. Mr. Orlowski: Boad to review the final sketch map for the minor subdivision of George and Irving Newman located at Orient for 4 lots on 16 acres. Planning Board page 6 4/27/87 Mr. Latham: The layout was okay, as far as I am concerned. It is just that the right of way that goes down across the middle is my concern. That is all meadow land and it can not be filled on for a road. I am concerned that it is afragile area . Ms. Geasa: I don!t know that that particular area, it is higher area .... I don't know about the question if the meadow can have the right of way down across it. The general meadow area, but I don~t know if that is all meadow area. Mr. latham: The layoutlisokay as far as I am concerned. Ms. Geasa; We would really need that right-of-way to go up the fourth parcel there, so parcel four would have access. Mr. Latham; Well, if the right of way went just down to lot 4, that would be okay. I am concerned with the possiblity of people traveling over it. Ms. Gease: I~see what you are saying, you~reRlly just need the access down to lot 4. Mr. Latham; The DEC is interested in,buying the meadow. Ms. Geasa: Yes, we were contacted. Mr. Latham: Did you get a DEC permit. Ms. Geasa: Yes we did. Mr. Latham: My only question is stopping the right-of-way from going through lot.~4. Mr. Irving Newman: You mentioned George and Irving, it is only Irving, my brother deceased. Mr. Orlowski: Do you have any problem with that recommendation. Ms. Geasa: No. Mr. Emilita: Lot 4, in the meadow area, is there a tie line, and why is that line shown. Ms. Geasa: Initially, what we had anticpated doing is making that five lots and I think that is just a carry over from the last map, when we had it divided. Mr. Emilita: To aviod confusion khis line ought to disappear. Ms. Geasa: We will eliminate that line. Planning Baord Page 7 4/27~87 On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOVLED that the Soutohld Town Planning Boar approve the sketch plan for the minor subdivision oflrving Newman located at Main Road, Orient for 4 lots on 16.4 acres, survey dated as amended February 19, 1987 subject; !. Eliminating the tie line between the wetland area and lot No. 4. This should be included with the parcel. 2. Eliminating the right-of-way from Lot No. 4 to the creek. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer to the Town Board the following comments with regard to the change of zone request for Burt Lewis lcoated at Souhottd for a change of zone from A-R to B zoning: 1. It is noted that this property is proposed for Hamlet Business zoning on the proposed zoning map. 2. This use is also inconformance withthe Master Plan which was adopted by the Board in December 1985. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham Ona motion made by Mr. Mullmn, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the preliminary maps for the major subdivisin of Nicholas Aliano located at County Route 48, Peconic for 8 lots on 16.8 acres, survey dated as amended March 2 1987. ' Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Twon Planning Board accept and requuest complainee with Inspectror John W. Davis' report NO. 582 with regard to the access road improvements within the right-of-way of the minor subdivision of William and Muriel Murray located at Cutchogue. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham Planning Board Page 8 4/27/87 On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconeed by Mr. Mullen, the following action was taken: NEGATIVE DECLARTION Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the enviroment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The major subdivision of "Henry Arbeeny" is located at the corner of Kenney's Road, and County Route 48, Southold it is for 6 lots on 7.5 acres, 3 in the AR zone and 3 in the B zone. TAX MAP NO. 1000-59-7-31. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environmen for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects on the environment were likely to occur should the proejct be implemented as planned. The Department of Environmental Conservation has not responded in the alotted time, therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections by that agency. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has no objection to our designation of lead agency. The Department has received an application which is incomplte. It appears tht the project can be serviced by Subsurface sewage disposal system and a public wter supply. The applicant has proposed public water for lots 4,5, and 6 and well water for lots 1,2, and 3. The department has requested that public water be provided for all six parcels inthe proposed subdivision. If the applicant does not want to provide pubilc water services to lots 1, 2, and 3, then he has to request a Board of Review determination for his proposal. The applicant must also show sewage disposal locations (in front of house) and water main locations on the final map. Approval by the deprtment shall not be granted for this subdivision until these matters are reasolved. The project will meet all the requirements of the code of the town of Southold Subdivisin of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting diane M. Schultze, Secretary, Southold Twon Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham Planing Board Page 9 4/27/87 On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant preliminary approval to the major subdivision for Papadopoulos and Maragos located at Kenney's Road, Southold for 5 lots on 14.375 acres, survey dated as amended December 10, 1986. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham On a motion m~de by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan for John Senko for construction of an office/retail complex located at Ackerly Pond Lane, and Main Road, Southold, site plan dated as amended March 18, 1987 with supplemental landscape plan dated April 21, 1987. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and make the necessary referalls for the major subdvision proposal to be known as "Cedarfields" located at Moores' Lane, and County Route 48, Greenport. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham The Board requested that Mr. Emilita review the Draft environmental Impact Statement for completeness. Upon receipt of that review, the Seqra process will continue. The 8:00 p.m. appointment withMr. Samuel Gtickman, Esq., with regard to overriding the disapproal of the County Planning Board for the subdivision of Helmut Hass at Peconic was cancelled. The appointment will be re-scheduled for~the next regular Planning Board meeting. There were-not enough Board members present to override the County since a majority plus one is needed and there was only a majority present. Mr. David Kapell was present as agent, to discuss withthe Borad the request for a 200' setback for the minor subdivision of Hanoch and Watts located at County Route 48, Cutchogue. Mr. Orlowski: Okay, next we have Mr. David K~apell, as agent, who has requested an appointment to discuss the'request for a 200T setback for the minor subdivision of Ranoch and Watts located at County Route 48, Cutchogue. Mr. Kappell: I would like to explain, two things. One, they felt that the covenants on the oversized lots that they were willing to give were in itself a large con~essio~ on their part. The~tots are going to be very large. They have already begun to plant the two lots n the rear with grapes. They have an eye to doing the same onthe two Planning Board Page 10 4/27/87 lots that front on County Route 48. The idea of setting that far back on the property cramps their plan, and their intentions with regard to the planting because they are not going to plant between the house and the road. So, I would ask for some relief of 100'. I think they would go along with 100'. The other thing is the houses on either side are closer. I understand the Board's reasoning and I think, frankly, most people looking to building on the lots would want to set back a reasonalble distance and even without the requirement, people would build farther back than the other houses in the area. But, if you look at this property, the houses on either side are closer. Mr. Orlowski: It is a good chance to push it back now. Mr. Kappell: Well, they are not unwilling to agree, it is just the extent of the set back. Mr. Orlwoski: Well, if you are talking of planting grapes, are you subdividing the land for houses or are you going to plant, I don't know. Mr. Kapell: Well, it may be a combination of the two, with lots theses size, there is enough room to locate the house toward the road and still leave an area in the back large enough to plant on, in conjunntion with the other planting tht has already been done. Mr. Orlwoski: We asked the applicant to set back 200' since we are looking at 800' deep lots. Mr. Emilia: The covenants and restriction against further subdivision. Mr. Kapell: They have agreed to tthat and they feel that it is a-consession on their part. That is in perpetuity. Mr. Emilita: I think in visw of that, I would be inclined to modify that. Mr. Orlowski: You will go for 100' though. Mr. Kapell: I think so. Mr. Orlowski: With a covenant we will get alot of open space. Mr. Dan Ross, Esq. approached the Board with regard to the site plan for North Fork Early Learning Center. He stated that they are operating out of the Veterans Community Center in Mattituck. He noted that they are going for a special exceptionan~ variances and need site plan approval. We were hoping to avoid the cost of a survey and I donYt anticipate that they will have too' many changes and I was asking for the waiver of a necessity of a survey. Mr. Orlowski stated that the Board has a policy which they will not waivmr which is to ask for a site plan. Mr. Lessard questioned the roads in Hillcrest and what the Board would accept for approval for vacant certificates of occupancy. Mr. Orlowski stated that the roads must be completed and'approved prior to the Planning Board Page 11 4/27/87 issuance of any permits. Being no further business to come before the Board, on a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Mullen, and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 8:22 p.m. REspectfully submitted, /~/~/ // // e M. Schultze, Secretary ~/~/~ ~ ~ Southold Town Planning Board ennett Orl'ow~5, Jr., Cha~an / RECEIVED ~ ~ FILED BY THE SOU~H~ - ~ ~OWN C~ DATE/-/~-~ HOUR/D.'~.~ To~m Clerk, To~,m of So'~old