Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-09/28/1972S th ld To B dof App Is Ogl 0 W/1 00/' SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. T¢lcphon¢SO5-2d6o APPEAL BOARD MEMBERS Robert XY,/. Gi[lispie~ Jr.~ Chairman Robert Ber]en Charles Gregonis, Jr. Serge Doyen~ Jr. Fred Hulse, Jr. MINUT E~ ~OUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEAL~ September 28, 1972 & regular meeting of the ~outhold To~n Board of A~ppeals was held at 7.30 PoM., Thursday, September 28, 1972, at the Tow~ Office, Main Road, ~ou~hol~, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert Wo Gillfspie, Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen; Charles Grigonis, Jr.; Serge Doyen, Jr. Also present: Mr. Howard Terry, Building Inspector. _Absent: M~o Fred Hulse, Jr. PUBLIC H~ARING: Appeal No. 1657 - 7:30 T n application of George and Rose Anderer, 3065 id ; ~2 Mattituck, New York, for a variance in accordance with Article Iii, Section 301 of the Zoning Ordinance for permission to set off a lot with less than required area. Location of property: north side of Middle Road, l~ttituck, New York, bounded north by' G. Bradley; east by J. Haas; south by Middle Road; west by J~ Schlterhols. Fee paid $15.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for $ variance, legal notice of hearing~ affidavit attesting to i~s publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIR24A~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this applicat ion? MR. GEORGE A~NDERER: I am hers to speak for the application. Ne THE CNAIRMA_~ · l.~/aat is the total area of the property? }~{. A. NDERER: It is roughly 38,000 sq. ft. Southold Town Board of Appeals ~eptember 28, 1972 THE CHAIRNAN. What is the dimension of the westerly line? NA~. ANDERER: 121.74 feet. We have a two story house at the present time and would like to have a house on one floor. The present grounds are a little too m~oh to take care of with mowing, etc. i am 67 years old and my wife is 66~ We would like to make things a little easier for ourselves. This is the type of home we would like to have (~. ~nderer showed pictures to the Board). There is a similar type on Little Neck Road in Cutchogue. W~ have been inside and it's a comfortable place and would not injure the surrounding prope~y in any way. ~Mr~ Anderer discussed the map with th~~ Board). The proposed house is 24' x ~0~, about 1,000 sq.ft. over-all. THE CPL~iRi~N: Is there anyone pre~s, ent who wishes to speak against this application'~ MR. GLENN BR~DLEY: I am on the..~D.0~th~erly boundary and I think that you are starting here with less tha~ an acre and t?~t this is a step backboard ..... THE CH~IR~N: It's a step we frequently have to take. Our Ordinance sets 40,000 sq. ft. but, in this case, where surrounding property has lesser lot sizes, it would be unfair to require a person who owns a single, separate lot,which is larger than the previous minimum size required,to conform to the new requirement of 40,000 sq. ft. MR. E. BOI~DEN: Right next to this property there are three small lots and I think that is all the more reason why it should not be subdivided. What about the Health Department? Is there going to be depth en~Ggh.., what about cesspools? How come the Health Department doesn't step into something like this? THE CH&IPG~iA~: They are in the same position that we are in. They did not anticipate the change~ Financial hardship does not enter into our decisions. This appeal would not be granted on that basis. This is an equitable division of property. Our guidance criteria is property in the general area. MRS. GLEt~ BR&DLEY: Our property is 175' x 125'. The North Fork Baptist Church has several ~hundred ~quare feet. The only small one is on the other side. MRS. BOWDEN: Did John Haas apply' ten or twelve years ago? I don~t think he applied because he was led to believe that it would not have been granted. MR~o &~ERER: We bought t~is as an additional lot. THE CH&.IRM&N: Please ask any questions you may have through the Chairman. When did you buy this property? Bouthold Town Bo~d of Appeals September 28, 1972 MR. A!~DERER: In August of 1962. We bought one piece first and then M~. Haas asked if we wanted to buy another piece° ~e said we did and it was combined into one lot. I spoke to Mr. Haas last week and we can get an affidavit from him. It's listed on the Title Search as being sold or bought around 1937 as one piece. THE CH~IR¥~N: Maybe he set this lot off and still owned the rest of it. I believe it was a single piece of property when you came along as the buyer. MR~ ~TD~: He had the part to the ~ast where the house was located that he ~as going to sell to me;;~ and then he asked if we would like to buy the other piece. I~B. BRADLm~: We ~ould not get cl~a~ title to our property. Our lo~was not deep enough so we ended up buying 32 feet. 0~iginally, the only way of access to this property - ~ight of way ~ went out to ~es~phalia Road. THE CH~IRF~N: Bome of these lots were reduced in size. ~. BRADLm-~: That is correct. The County took some of this land. Originally, we were bounded ou~th~.southby Haas. The Title search said he o~ned an acre more or less. After that the County took some of the front. ~R~. BRADL~: The reason w~hy they are so small is because of the wide road. It's not because the lots were sold as tiny lots. The~e are large pieces of property but the road took some of the property. THE CP~IRM~N: ~hat's also a function of this Bo~d of Appeals. These lots would be considerably la~ger if the road had not been built. ~S. BO~_~: By the same token, you say yo~ Judge by the size adjoining lots. These were reduced by the road. THE CPL~IR~N: I would estimate that they were thirty or forty per cent larger. ~Lq~. BOWDEN: T~hey took a tremendous amount ar~ that is not our fault. THE C~l~l~: Does anyone else wish to speak For or against this application? (There was no response.) AFter investigation and inspection the Board Finds that applicant requests permission to set off a lot with less than required area on premises located on the north side of Middle Road, M~ttituck, Southold Town Board of Appe~is -4- September 28, 1972 New York. The Findings of the Board are that applicant owns an irregularly shaped lot in single and separate ownership. Prior to the Zoning Ordinance the lot comprised approximately cue acre which was reduced in size when the County took some of the land to build a road. The total area of the property is now approxi- mately 38,000 sq. ft. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship~ the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike iu the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use districts and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by ~. Bergen, it was RE~0LVED George and Rose ~nderer, 3065 Middle Road (CR27), Mattituck, New York, be GRANTED permission to set off a lot with less than required area on property located on the north side of Middle Road~ Mattituck, New York, as applied For, ~ubject to the following conditions: That the division of property shall increase the northerly line of the westerly lot to 100 feet at the northeast corner of the proposed westerly lot from which point a straight line shall define the easterly boundary of the lot to a point 130' from the southwest corner of the proposed westerly lot along Middle Eoad. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messr$~ Gilllspie, Bergen~ Grigonis~ Doyen, PUBLIC HE~RING: Appeal No. 1659 - 7:45 P.M. (Eo~oT.), upon applicatio~ of Albert Jo Bodenstein, Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York, for a variance in accordance with Article III, Section 302, for permission to erect an accessory building in front yard area. Location of property: north side of Indian Neck Peconic, New York~ bounded north by Richmond Creek~ east by WoloSik; south by Indian Neck Lane (Rd); west by J. Bhipman. Fee paid $15.00o The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavit aSSesSing to its publication in the official newspapers, ~ud notice to the applicant~ THE CH~!RM~N~ Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? $outhold To-~uu Board of Appeals -5- September 28, 1972 l~q. ALBERT J. BODENSTEIN: ~e wish to erect a second hand accessory building 18.3' x 26.3' for small cars. (~. and Mrs. Bodenstein discussed the location of the accessory building with the Chairman_). THE- CH~IHF~N: I don't believe there is a~y question that you have a ~dship. Ys this property in all one ownership? F~. BODEN~TEIN: it had been ~n one ~nership. My father bought the whole thing. ~e have added on to both houses but there is no garage to'this one. Recently we put the property in our as well as EF father:s n~me. THE CitkLq~N: I would like to suggest that you keep this accessory building off the property !~ue by 5 feet. MR. BODENSTE~: I will put the building on a bit of an angle from the property line as t>~ line runs off a little I~RSo BODENSTEIN: We want it as close to the house as possible for bad weather access. The original house was built into a hollow and because o£ water d~ainage we have leveled away from the'house so that there w~ld be enough lc*ground to absorb water. We plan to have it more than 130 feet from the road and it would be behind the garage of the' property next door because they are close to the road. THE CHA~N: is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (~nere was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Boated finds that applicant requests permission to erect an accessory building in the front yard area on premises located on the north side of l'odian Neck Lane, Peconlc, New York. The findings of the Board are that applicant has an unusually long and narrow lot; that the pmoposed garage will be more than 130 feet back of the p~operty line and will be about even with the back wall of the gs~vage on adjacent property. 'l~ne Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessa~y hardship; the hardship created is unique and %,ould not be shared by all properties alike in the i~mediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the v?riance will not change the characte~ of the neighborhood, and wzl_ observe the sp~rmt of the 0rdznance. On motion by M~. Giltispie, seconded by M~. Grigonis, it was ~outhold To~ Board of Appeals -6- September 28, 1972 RESOL~D Albert J. Bodenstein, Indian Neck L~ne, Peconic, New Mork, be GR~I~ED per~isslon to erect an accessory building in front yard area of property loc~ed on the north side of Indian Neck Y~ne~ Peeonic, New Tork, as applied for, subject to the rolls, zing co~itions: That the ~oposed accessory building shall be located no closer than ~ feet to any property line. That the proposed accessory building shall be loce~ed at least l~0 feet back from the southerly property line, Indian Neck Lane. Tha~ the proposed accessory bu~ldzng shall be mocate~ no closer than l0 feet to the existing dwelllng~ Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen: Grigonls, Doyen. pLrBLiC ~.RING: &ppeal No. 1660 - 8:00 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Frederic J. Bruce, ~unneweta Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue~ New York, for a v~iance in acco_wdance with Article iii, Section 302 of the Zoning Ordinance, for permission to e~ect an accessory buildiD~ in the f~ont y~d a~ea. Location of property: west side of %~Iunneweta Road, Lot #227~ ?~p of Nassau Point Properties, Cutchogue~ New Tork. Fee paid -~l~.00. The Chairman opened the hesmir~ by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hea~ing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and. notice to the applicant. TEE CP~M&N: Is there.anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? ~. ~REDERIC J. BRUCE: I am I~. Bruce and I am here to answer ao~ questions you may have, THE Ci~IR~N: The ~ew~rks about aesthetics in your application ~re correct but that is not a legal reason as far as we a~e concerned. However~ the remark you ~made about a slope ihthe terrain is pertinent. The roof of the tool shed is lower t_han the highway. t~. BRUCE: Tes it is. It's not visible from ~unneweta Ro~d~ THE CE~IRM&N: You have erected one building only? i~. BRUCE: Tes sir. ~outhold To~n Bo~d of Appeals -7- September 28, 1972 THE CH~LRM~N: is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) ~ter investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to erect an accessory buildir~ in the front yard area of property located on the west side of Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue, New Tork. The Board finds that applicant is the owner of property that slopes sharply toward the water. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board find~ that strict ~pplication~ of the 0~dinance would oroduce pract~ca! diffmcult~es or ~necessa~y hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the i~m~dlate vicinity of this property and in the same use districts and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by ~. Doyen, it was RESOLVED F~ederic J. Bruce, ~Junneweta Road, Nassau~Point, Cutchogue, New York, be GRANTED permission ~o erect an accessory building in the front yard area of property located on the west side o£ Wunneweta Road, Lot #227, Map of Nassau Point Properties, Cutchogue, New Tork~ as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gil!ispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HE~RING: Appeal No. 1661 - 8:15 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Gerry L. Co~razzini and ~*~celle J. Walsh, Horton's Point, S~thold, New York, for a special exception in accordance with~ticle II!, ~ection 300, subsection B-l~, for permission to hold a yard sale on Eeptember 30, 1972; main date October l, 1972 on premises located east and north side of Private Road (Hyatt Rd.), bounded north by Ro Hyatt~ e~st by R. H - west by R. Hyatt. Fee pa~d ~15.00o yatt~ south by Private Road; The Chairman opened the he~ing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hea~ing, a~fidavlt attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and copy to the applicant. ~ C~iRMAN: Is there ar4vone present ~no wishes to spe~d~ this application? (There was no response.) THE CF~IR~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? Southold T~m Board of Appeals -8- September 28, 1972 (There was no response.) After investigation a~d inspection the Board Finds that applicant requests per~iss~on to hold a yard sale on September 30, 1972~ rain date October l, 1972, on premises located on the east and north side of Private Road (Hyatt Rd), Hortonts Point, ~outhold, New York. The Board finds that t~b~ public convenience and welfare and Justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be obser~ed. 0n motion by Mr, Bergen, seconded by M~. Gil!ispie, it was RESOLVED Gerry Lo Corazzini and C~rcelle J. ~alsh, Horton~s Point, ~outhold, New York, be GRA~P2ED per~isslon to hold a yard sale on Eeptember 30, 1972,~ rain date October l, 1972 on premises located east and north side of Private Road (Hyatt Road), Horton~s Point, ~outhold, New York subject to conditions of Resolution of the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals dated June 15, 1972, as follows: 1. Permission is for a one day yard sale to be held on a specific date, with a specific rain date. Permission is for the sale of household and personal h~s and not property of the owne~ and ~ family may include property of others unless it is for a charitable purpose. 3. Applicant must provide someone to supervise parking at the yard sale to prevent blocking neighbors~ driveways. Vote of the Board: &yes:- Messrs: Giliispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC ~ING: Appeal No. 1658 - ~:30 P.M. (E.~.T.), upon application of Anthony Ciappa a/c Nicholas Sawha, 9 Acorn &venue, ~armingvilie, New York, for a variance in accordance with Article ~ection 301 and 303 of the Zoning Ordinance, for a reduction in established setback. Location of property: east side of Reeve Road and south side of ~ound View Avenue. Mattituck, N. Y., Lot # 6, ~ . Fee paid ~1~.00. Map of Salta_re Estates The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the pplicatzon for a variance, legal notice of hea~ing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, andre to the applicant° Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- September 28, 1972 THE C~IHI~iN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MICHAEL HILL~, ESQ,, Cruser & Hills: I am representing 2z~. ~awha. TX CHAIRMAN: The building permit was issued subject to average setback. The adjacent houses have more than a minimum setback. The 0~dinance always requires that determination is baS, ed on setback of adjacent properti?s. As nearly as we can measure this it appears that the applicant has a 42' to 44' setback and the adjacent properties are 50t or %2t. We also find that the rear of this property slopes somewhat irregularly. ~. MICH~AEL HILL~: There is a difficulty in setting the house back any Further and there is only an 8 foot difference in the average setback next door. I think it would create a tremendous hardsh~p to remove the foundation that has ~.~eady been put in. I would like to point out that when he received a permit there was a survey attached and the space for average setback had a question mark following it. While this is not an excuse, Ciappa~ the contractor, did not know what the average setback was but 35 Feet was set down in the 0rdinznoe. THE CHA~M~N: I believe that 35 feet was stipulated in the p~evious Ordinance° The present Ordinance is 50 feet. The B~ilding Department is not required to ~ke surveys. ~o HILL~: Any error in. the setback was unintentional and was not done to get the advantage of a ~eater rear yard ~rea or to avoid the Zoning Ordinances. He did Feel that the Zoning Ordinance was being complied with. TEE CH~!~N: I suggest you ~ead the section that covers the Building Department because when they issue a permit like this the~ use the phrase ~average setback~. Average setback means ~average~ ~at you really should have done was to get the information as to what the average setback was. It might have been easier for all concerned to find out that this one has a 50~ setback and this one has a 55~ setback. To~ do have a problem back there (there is a gully) which would give you some reasoning, THE CH~M~N: Is there a~vone present who wishes to speak a~ainst'~ . this application? (There was no response°) znv st~ga~zon and inspection the Board finds that applicant ~ ~stab!~shed setback on premises located on the requests a re~ction of ~ east side of Reeve Road and south side of Hound View Avenue~ Matt_~uc~, New Tork. The Board finds that there is a gully on applicant's property which would create a hardship ifapplicant' were forced to move the foundation further back on the property to provide for an average setback. Southold Tc~en Board of Appeals -10- September 28, 1972 The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediat~ vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, amd will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by ~. Bergen, seconded by' Mr. Grigonis, it was RE~OLV~D Anthony Ciappa a/c Nicholas Sawha, 9 Acorn Avenue, Farmlngville, New York, be GRA~ED permission to reduce the established (average) setback on premises located on Lot # 6, Map of Saltaire Estates, Mattituck, New York, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grlgonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: ~ppeal No. 1662 - 8:35 P.M. (E.~.T.), upon application of Tony Scarmato, ll West 46 Street, New York, N. for variance and modification of previous action of Board of Appeals in accordance with Article III, Section 301 of Zoning Ordinance. Location of property: Private Road (Huckleberry Hill Road) off west side of Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York, bounded uorth by Wenk & Baltz~ east by F. Mandaro; south by Gardiners Bay; west by F. LoBar. Fee paid $15.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance and modification of previous action of Board of Appeals, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers~ and notice to the applicant. THE CHA~I~M~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? IRVi~NG L~ PRIC~, JR., E~Q.: I am here to represent the applicant. THE CHA. IR~N: The application states that the reason for the appeal is "amendment of decision of Zoning Board of Appeals dated ~ugust 10,~1972 for the reason that applicant, as contract purchaser, wishes to vary conditions ~nder which original variance to divide property was granted.~ The application is signed by Irving L. Price, Jr. MR~ PRICE: I would like to have the decision of August 10, 1972, change~ to read.~to improve westerly building on premises into an all year s~ngle reszdeuce and to-use thg two smaller buildings on east for accessory use as residences for one week in each of the mont---~ from November 15 to March 15". The previous decision~read ,easterly~ building on premises, etc., and two smaller buildings on ~west~. Southold Town Board of Appeals -Ii- September 28, 1972 THE CH~IRI~N: IS there anything else that you wish to add? Ffiq. PRICE: In our informal discussion .on ~eptember 7th it was i~.d..cated that the present request would be satisfactory. THE CH~IR;~N: This is a confirmation of our informal dis- cussion. ~e were trying to minimize as m~ch as possible any increase in density without depriving a man the use of his property. We understand that he wants to make a year round residenc® of the larger house. I believe that we stressed t~hat there should be no change in the outside dimensions. THE CH~iRF~tN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests modification of the original decision of the Board of Sppeals dated ~ugust 10,~,~o~2 conoernim~ application of Alan Cotgreave, Huckleberry Hill, East Marion, New York, For the reason that applicant~ Tony' Sca~mato~ contract purchaser of Cotgreave~ wishes to vary conditions under which original variance to divide property was granted. ~he original application was granted with the stipulation that the cottages remain strictly ~or seasonal useage during the period from March 15 through November 15, 8 months. Applicant requests permission to use the cottages as an accessory use during the remaining four mouths of the year. The Board finds that strict application of the 0rdiuanoe would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the iw~ediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district$ and the variance will not change the c~mra~ter of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. 0n motion by' Fm. Gil!ispie, seconded by Mm. Grigonis, it was RE~0LVED Tony gcarmato, ll West 46 Street, New York, N. T., be GR~NTED modification of the original decision of the Board o£ Appeals dated August 10, 1972, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: That there be no enlargement of the two small buildings to the east which may be used as accessory uses to the main residence for one week out of each month during the period from November 1% through March 15~ The m~in house when it is ~ ~ remode~eo~ shall meet all requireraents of the Housing Code. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Giilispis, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. Southold To~n Board o£ &ppeals -12- September 28, 1972 PUBLIC HE~-NG: Appeal No. 1663 - 8:50 P.M. (E.~.T.), upon application of L~slie Alger~ 95 Vernon Street, Warren~ R. I., For variance in accordance with &rtlcle III, Section 301 and ~rticle III, Section 1000A of Zoning Ordinance, for permission to set off lot with less t~n ~equired area. Location of property~ P~ivate Road off east side of Main Road, N~ttituck, New Yo~k, bounded on the north by B~cher Estate; east by Private Road~ south by L. Lindsay$ west by ~nder ~nd others. Fee paid $15.00. The ChairmAn opened the ~hea~ing by reading the application For ~ variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CP~IRF~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak For this application? ~ILLIAM J. C~RK, E~Q.: I represent M~. Alger. It would seem From the physical layout of the property that if a variance is not granted the piece would become useless and valueless° it is l~ger than many of the surrounding lotso THE CF~Pd~: There is a house on the north on a 13,%00 sq. Ft. a~ea, and your lot has over 20,000 sq. ft. MR. CI~RK: It was deeded back to M~s. Kander. THE C~m. IRM~N: Is she going ~o sell this lot? ~. CI~RK: Yes, she has a contract to sell this lot. THE C~iR~W~N: Is there a~vone present who wishes to ~peak against this application~ (There was no responseo~ After investigation and inspection the Board Finds that applicant requests permission to set of~ lot with less than required area on premises located on a Private Road on theft side of Main Road, Mattituok, New To~k. The Bo~rd agrees with the reasoning of the applicant that a large majority of the lots iu the surrounding a~ea are smaller than the lot in question. On motion by ~v. Bergen, seconded by M~. Grigonis, it was RE~0LVED Leslie &lger, 95 Vernon Street, Warren, R. I., be GR&N~D permission to set off lot with less than required area on premises located on a Private Road on the east side of Main Road., Mattituck, New Tork, as applied fo~. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. ~outhold Town Board of ApPeals -13- ~eptember 25, 1972 PUBLIC HEA~ING: Appeal No. 1664 - 9:10 P.M. (E.~.T.), upon application of Beach Comber Motel, Box 917, Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York, for special exception to erect and maintain off premises directional sign at corner of Depot Lane (Duck Pond Road) and Vista Place, Cutchogue, New York, on premises of Nicholas Aliano, lot # ll, Map of Vista Bluff. Fee paid $15.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application For a special exception, legal notice .of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CH&L~M&N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? F~. NICH0~ ALL, NO: Without a directional sign m~tel traffic will enter Vista Place which is a dead-end street. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There w~s no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to erect and maintain off premises directional sign at corner of Depot I~ne (Duck Pond Road) and Vista Place, Cutchogue, New York. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant who states that without a directional sign motel traffic will enter Vista Place which is a dead-end street. The Board Finds that the public convenience and welfare and Justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of ueighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the 0rdiuance will be observed. On motion by 2~. Bergen, seconded by ~¢~. Doyen, it was RESOL~D Beach Comber Motels Box 917, Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York, be GRANTED permission to erect and maintain off premises directional sign at corner of Depot Lane (Duck Poud Road) and Vista Place, Cutchogue, New York, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: The sign shall be a directional sign (only)~ for the Beach Comber Motel and shall be no larger than 3' x 4~. The sign shall be subject to all rules and regulations governing signs in the Town of Southold. Vote of the Board: Doyen. ~e *s.- Messrs: Gil!isnie,~ Bergen, Grigonis, ~outhold Town Board of A~ppeals September 28, 1972 PUBLIC ITE~RING: Appeal No. ~1665 - 9:20 P.M. (E.~.T.), upon application of Walter and Pat Courts, Main Road, ~outhold, New York, for a variance in accordance with ~rttcle VII, Sect!on 701 and Article XI, Section ll01, of the Zoning Ordinance for a reduction on parking requirements in existing business building and parking lot. Location of property: Main Street & Toungs Avenue, ~outhold, New Tork, bounded north by Main Road; east by G. Edson~ south by L~tson and others; west by' Youngs Avenue. ~ee paid $15.00o 'The Chairm~n opened the hearing by reading the application For a v~riance, legal notice of hea~ing, affidavit attesting to its publication iu the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. TEE C~LRM~N: ~he application is accompanied by a letter from the attorney For the applicant, George C. Stankevlch, ~ddressed to M~. Howard Terry. (The Chairman read the letter). The appllea~ tion is Further ac0ompanied by a sketch of the store layout indicating that the space to be rented is ~6~ wide by 72~ in length. The part which will be used for restaurant facilities, tables and counter, faces on Main Ro~d, gouthold~ Also in the File is an indication on the part of the Building ~nspector that the required iota2 area is 30,640 sqo ~t. and the parking area is 26,871 sq~ Ft., and that the building area is 11,875 sq. Ft. before storage area. According to the Plot Plan and Parking Layout of Ho C. Bohack ma~ed March 22, 1963, th~ H. C. Bonack building area zs 8,050 sq. ft., the adjoining stores a~we 3,325 sq. ftc, the parking area is 22,12% sq. ft:~ the entire lot.is 33~%00 sq. ft. The parking oapacit~ ~ ccord~ng to this pl=n ~s 5~ cars. Some other f~gures ~d~cate tD~t the parking field was enlarged~ On the Faulkner property to the east the house was torn down and that was added to the parking TH~ C~IRM~N: Is there any'one p~esent who wishes to speak for this application? G~ORG~ C~ ET~EEVICH, ~SQ.: I would like to speak in favor of the application and to say, initially~ that it is a very interesting applic~tion. THE CI-L~ !~2~N: ~ have h~d a lot of experience with these things on the County level. One o£ the unusual things, it seems to me, is that several of these buildings are not occupied. My thinking is that w~tever the total parking area required here is, that we presume ~. Howard Terry' is correct. He worked From a different base, perhaps, than you did iu determing the parking space. lines on the blacktop are not necessarily in accord with present parking laws so you have to go by total square foot~geo Th~ total square footage is 26,871 sq. Ft. 8outhold To~n Board of Appeals -l~- September 28, 1972 MR. HO'~ARD TERRY, Building Inspector: square ffootage you have to take your roadways. space is 350 sq. ft. per car. Out of the total ,~ach parking i~. Stankevich presented a letter to the Bo Flora F. Lesser from the Bohack Corporation, date 1972, re. ~2180 ~ Main Street, Southold, New the Bohack Corporation intends to discontinue it above premises as of Saturday, September 9th, 19' tb~.t t. he foregol.ng should be. of lit. tlc concern.aS The Bohack potato_on will abrade by' all ~ts obligation? as.an t, he ggreement of ~.ease dated ~A~.o~_l 5th, 1963. ~The letter ~s szgn&~-Stephen Chapkl~n, Vice President-Real 2state) o ~rd addressed to ~d September 4, ~, advising her that operations at the '2. &lso stating THE CHAIRN~N: Is Flora Lesser the owner o£ the property? Ffiq. ST~N~VICH: Ye s. TEE C~L&IRI~N: It seems to me that the owue: aware of how many parking spaces are permitted t~ is required from this restaurant would be subtra area for remaining buildings. In the Couuty, app variably denied if they are bel~ what Is permit so I think the same thing should apply here. Th for a building permit. The~e is no building t? ' should be made aware of the parking spaces avail restaurant takes six o~ seven. should be ~ade zere now° ~fhatever ~,ted from the parking ~ications are ih- ed iu the Ordinance is not an application done. This owner ~ble after this M~. HOk[~RD TERRY, Building Inspector! The parking requirements will be based on t~e number to be s~ate~ in the ~estauranto There should be one parking space.for every f~ve seats in the restaurant., FA~.. STANEEVICH: I belzeve the Courts are cOntemplat~n~ a m~xi~m of ~0 seats. ~-~. TERRY: That would require 8 parking spaces. THE Ct~IR2~N: Do you have requirements for truck deliveries? ~. TEREY: 720 sq. ft. for each truck plus reserve space for waiting t~ucks. THE CHAIRMAN: What kind off trucks would these be? ,MR. ~gI~ER ~OUTTS. 2mall trncks. TEE CHA._IRt~N: This is a change of use. Th will ~equire more parking. ¥flq~ T~RRY: The previous occupant was a fur use that is proposed ~iture repair shop. Southold To~n Board of ~ppeals -16- September 28, 1972 i~. SHgN~VICH: It's a specific permitted use in this district. YE. TERRY: The~.Shop required one parking space. Furniture shops measure by floor area; restaurants by the number of seats. ~R. ST&Nt~VICH: We are operating under Section I00i, ~tic!e XI. Other than talking about public buildings there is nothing that covers retail establishments. MR. TEitRT: B-1 is cumulative. Everything that affects one lot affects another. It goes by percentage of lot area. Then you go back to your formulas. THE CH&IRWiN: We have established that this application requires 8 parking spaces, 40 seats. It seems to me that the owner of the premises should be made aware of the parking spaces that would be left. MR~ JOHN De~EBERTI~: i have worked at H~ C. Bohack For a number of years. The parking space at the back was very seldom used~ The ohly ones who would use it were people going over to the hairdresser. It has always been available. About ten-~or twelve spaces have always been empty. THE CHAPMAN: Then, if a parking problem developed,the people who want to use the restaurant can park in the back. ~o DeAlbertis: I have never yet seen that whole parking space Filled. THE CH~IRN~N: How m~ch did they enlarge the parking space when they bought the adjoining space? MR. DeAlbertis: it's about 100~ wide and the same depth, it's incorporated in Bohack~s lease. The lease runs to 1978. THE CH&IRF~I: ~[ill they sublease? MR. DeAlbertls: They will sublease to an independent chain like I.G.A. or Associated but not to a ~egular chain. THE CH~IRN~N: How much was used for storage and how much for selling area? ~q. De&lbertis: I would say about 6,500 sq. ft. For the selling the rest ~or storage and bathrooms. THE CH~IRF~N: ~ere did your tr~cks unload? MR. DeAlbertts: &t the back and side doors. It never affected the area behind the store in questiouo The trucks always pulled sideways to the building. ~outhold Tow~n Board of $~ppeals -17- September 28, 1972 TH~ CPL~IRM~N: As no one is here to represent the owner o£ the building, I believe the owner should be notified of this action. MR. ~T~NEEVICH: I think fairness dictates that. I have the ownerts name: Flora Lesser, c/o Robert &o ~tern, Cradle Rock Road, Pound Ridge, New York. Is it m~ understanding that you would grant 40 seats allocating 8 spaces of the total parking area of the o~erts premises? THE CHArLataN: Yes~ (The Chairm~n and ~WLv. ~tanke~ch ~' discussed Bulk and Parking Regulation Schedule of the Ordinance and noted tb~t in B-1 zoning nothing covers retail establishments except for specifically enumerated e stablishment s). THE CF~L~_~L~: is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? [There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to reduce parking requirements in existing business building and parking lot located at Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Eouthold, New York. The Board finds that the petitioners wish to establish a restaurant and luncheonette on the south side of Main Road, ~outhold, New The proposed restaurant and luncheonette will have 40 seats which will necessitate 8 parking spases%JF0r cars. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all p~opert!es alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and iu the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the 0rdinance. On motion by F~v. Gi!lispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was R~0L~D Walter and Pat Courts, Main Road, aouthold, New Tork, be GR&~I~ED a Certificate of 0ccmpancy upon completion or alteration Of building adjacent to supermarket, formerly H. C. Bohack~ The building under consideration is the second store from the east° & condition of granting the Certificate of Occupancy sh~ll be that the total parking area owned by Flora Fo Lesser shall be reduced by the allocation of 8 parkin8 sp~ces (under the present Zoning Ordinance of December 1971) from the total parkin~ area available on the lesser property. Vote of the Board: ~ves:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen° Southold Town Board of Appeals -18- September 28, 1972 PUBLIC PIE~EI~G: Appeal No. 1666 - 9:40 P.M. (E.S.T.), upon application of Cassie Bouton, 9th Street, Greenport, New York, for a special exception to hold a ys~d sale on premises "Cherry Lane Farm~ on October 7, 1972. Location of property: west side of 9th ~treet~ Greenport, New Tork, bounded north by the Long Island Rail~oad~ east bY 9th Street; south by' Peconic Bay; west by T. Jurzenia. Fee paid $15.00o The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exceptions legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. THE CH~I~I~N: Is there anyone p~esent who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response.) THE CH~IPd~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to hold a yard sale on October 7, 1972 on premises located on the west side of 9th Street ~Cherry Lane Farm~', Greenport, New York. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by ~ Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was R~SOLVED Cassie Bouton, 9th Street~ C~eenport, New York, be GR~N~D permission to hold a yard sale on October 7, 1972 zt "Cherry L~e Par~~, west side of 9th Streets Greenport, New York, subject to conditions of Resclution of June 15, 1972, as follows: !. Permission is granted for a one day yard sale to be held on a specific date, with a specific rain date~ Permission is fo~ the sale of household and personal p~operty of the owner and his family and may not include property of others unless it is for a charitable purpose. ~Appllca~t ~st provide someone to supervise parking at the yard sale to p~event blocking neighbors~ driveways. Vote of the Board: ~yes:- Messrs: Giltispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. $outhold To~ Board of Appeals -19- September 28, 1972 !~BLiC HE~ING: Appeal NCo 67 - 9:50 P.M. (E.~oT.), upon application of Estate .of Ruth Cases Yardley, Pa., for a variance in accordance with &rtzcle III, Section 301 of the Zoning Ordinance to set off lot with less than requ~ frontage and area. Location of property= north side New Surf Avenue, Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by Case Road~ east Meadow Lane~ south by New Suffolk &venue~ west by T. ~halve ~nd others. Fee paid $1~.00. The C.b~ir~an opened t. he heari~ for a varzance, legal not,ce of he~ its publication in the official applicant o THE CH&~M&N: Is there anyon~ for this application? R~NS2EL&~ G. TEI~RY, ~-o, ESQ: g by readlmg the application ring, affidavit attesting to 'spapers, and notice to the present who wishes to speak I appear in behalf of Clifford T. C~se~ Br., Executor° He has a ~oma fids purchaser for the lot but ~s unable to ~ sez_ it without a variance. There will probably be six beneficiaries and they will all have to get together. The ~.olnt is that they can do nothing With the property at the present z~me other.than put a tent on it. I believe that several of the lots in th~s vicinity are small. THE CHAIRM~N~ Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response.) THE C~IR~N. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak · , against this applicatzon, (There was no response. ) &fret iuvestiEattou and ihspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to set off lot with less than required frontage and area on premises located on the north side of New ~ffolk &venue, Cutehog~e, New York. The findings of the Board are that applicant owns a piece of property which is unusual and which is larger in size than any of the lots in the surrounding area. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or ~e~essary hardship; the .hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. 0u motion by M~. Bergen, seconded by M~o Gillispie, it was ~outhold Town Board of Appeals -20- September 28, 1972 RE~OLVED Estate of Ruth Cases Yardley, Pa., Clifford T. Case, ~ro, ~xec~tors be GP~fTE~ permission to set off lot with less than required frontage and area on premises located on the north side of New ~uffolk Avenue, Cutchogue~ New York, as applied for. Vote of the Boa~d~ Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. PUBLIC HEARI~IG: Appeal No. 1668 - 10:00 PoM. (E.S.To), upon application of Adrienne Aurichio and ~ue ~moley for special exception to held a yard sale on ~eptember ~0, 1972; rain date October l, 1972 on premises of Aurichio, north side of North Road {CD2?) Southolds New TOrko Location of p~operty: north side of North Road, bounded north by D. Aurichio$ cast by J. Leviu$ south by North Road (CD2?); west by D. T. Aurlchio. Fee paid ~l~.00. The Chairman opened thc hearing by reading the application For a special exception, legal notice of hearings affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant. TEE. C~¢IRMA~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response°} TBE C H~IRM~N. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this applzcation~ (There was no response.} After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to hold a yard sale on ~eptember ~0, 1972; rain date October l~ 1972 on premises of Aurichio, north side of North Road {C~27)s $outholds New York~ The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by ~ Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RE~LV~D Adrienne Aurichio and Sue ~moley be granted permission to hold m yard sale on September 30, 1972; rain date October l, 1972, on premises located on the north side of North Road (CD2?), ~outhold, New York, subject to conditions of Resolution of thc Southold Town Board of Appeals dated June 15, 1972, as follows: !. Permission is for a one day yard sale to be held on a specific date, with a specific rain date. $outhold Town Board of Appeals -21- September 28, 1972 Permission is for the sale of household and personal property of the owner and his family and may include property of others unless it is for a ch~vit able purpose. &pplicant must provide someone to supervise parking at the yard sale to prevent blocking neighborst driveways° Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. P~L!C Hw_J~R1-NG: Appeal No. 1669 - 10:10 P.M. (~.S.T.), upon application of Beach Comber Motel (Pond Enterprises, Znc.), Box 917, Depot Lane, Cutchogue~ New Tork, For special exception in accordance with Article VI~ Section 600, subsection C-2 _*or second "on premises" ground s~gn. Locate n of property: east side of Depot Lane (Duck Pond Road), Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by Long Island Sound; east by M. McCabe$ south by McCabe; west by Depot Lane (Duck Pond Road). Fee paid ~15o00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application For a special exception~ legal notice of hearing~ affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicant~ (An Informal discussion was held with M~. Nicholas Aliano of Pond ~nterprises, Inc. at 9:00 P.Mo to enable him to leave before the scheduled 10:10 P.M. hearing.) THE CH&IRI,~N: Mr. 4liano explained his reasons for requesting a second ground sign. There is an invasion of out of towners who park on both sides of a dead end road where it meets the beach on Long Island Sound. THE CH~IR2.!~N: ts there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response.) THE CHA. LqMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was uo response.) Southold To~ Board o£ Appeals -22- Beptember 28, 1972 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to erect a second eon premises~ ground sign. Locatior~ of property: east side of Depot Lane (Duck Pond Road), Cutchogue, New York. The Board finds that a second eon premisese ground sign is needed for reasons of privacy as the Motel has had problems with trespassers. The Board Finds that the public convenience and welffare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially inju_wed and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by M~. Gi!lispie, seconded by Fir. Bergen, it was R~SOLVED Beach Comber Motel (Pond Enterprises, Inc.), Box 917, Depot Lane, Cutchogue, New York, be GRA~NT~D permission to erect a second eon premises~ ground sign on the east side of Depot Lane (Duck Pond Road), Cutchogue, New ]fork, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: That the ~No Trespassinge sign shall b~ uo larger than 3' x 4'- That the sign shall be subject to all the rules and regulations governing signs in the To~ of ~outholdo Vote of the Board: ~ves:- Messrs: Gi!lispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. 0n mot!on by 2f~o Gillispie, seconded by ~. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the minutes of the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals dated September 7, 1972, be approved as ~ubmitted, subject to minor correction. Vote of the Board: Doyen. Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by I~. Gi!tispie, it was RESOLVED that the nex~ regular meeting of the ~o~thold Town Board of Appeals will be held at 7:30 PoMo, Thursday, 0ctobe~ 12, 1972, at the Town Office, l~in Road, ~outhold, New TOrko Vote o£ the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gi!!ispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. ~outhold Town Board of Appeals -23- ~eptember 28, 1972 For the Record: Mattituck Shopping Center sent a map for perusal of the Board. (One large ground sign was specified in the original action for the shopping center). Three sign renewals were approved as submitted. Letter received from George C. Stankevich, Esq. dated September l~, 1972~ addressed to the Southold Town Board of Zoning Appeals, re. Application of Jean Ellen Dean, et al: Pursuant to the resolution adopted September ?, 1972 I nnder- stand that the subject application was approved with the following conditions: (a) the tool shed located at the southeast corner of the westerly lot to be created and shown on exhibit ~C~ shall be moved at lease 3 feet from any allot line (b) the applicant will file a copy of the deed, with the Southold Town Board of Zoning Appeals, regarding the westerly lot to be created as shown on exhibit "B~ proving its conveyance from the estate of Elmina Brown to Jean Ellen Dean, who is also a tenant by the entirety with her husband, Raymond C. Dean, of the premises running between the northerly line of the lot to bo created and the southerly line of the Main Road, East Marion, New York. On motion by ~J~. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen~ it was RE--sOLVED that the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals set 7:30 P.M. {E.~.T~), Thursday, October 12, 1972, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place Of hearing upon application of Andrew Dzenkowski, Rocky Point Road~ East Marion, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 301, for permission to divide property with less than 49,000 square feet. Location of property: Lots l, 10, ll, 12, 13,14' and l%, Map of Aqua View Park, East ~riou, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie~ B~rg~n, Grigonis, Doyen. Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- September 28, 1972 motion by Mro Bergen, seconded by IVac GrIgonis, it was RESOLVED that the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals se~ 7:45 P.M. (E.S.To), Thursday, October 12, 1972, at the Tow~n Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Edna Bennett, Rocky Point Road, East Marion, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 301 and Section 280A of the Town Law for permission to divide property with less than 40,000 square feet lots and approval of access. Location of property: Right of way, west side of Rocky Point Road, East Marion, bounded north by Eo Bennett; east by right of way and Raymond; south by 0sgood; and west by F. Rosenberg. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen., Grigonis, Doyen. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED that the Boutho!d Town Board of Appeals set 8:00 P.M. (E.E.T.), Thursday, October 12, 1972, at the Town Office, Main Road, ~outhold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Joseph Quinlan, 109 Stevens Avenue, Hempstead, New York, for a v~iance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article Iii, ~ection 301 for permission to divide property with less than 40,000 square feet lotso Location of property: Lots 76 and 77, Mattituck Park Property', Mattituck, New York. Vote of the Board: ;.yes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. On motion by Fm. Doyen, seconded by Mm. Gillispie, it was R~OLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:15 P.M. (E.~oT.), Thursday, 0ctober'12, 1972, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and piece of hearing ~pon application of Alvin J. Blenk, Reeve &venue, Mattituck, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article Ii~, ~ection 30~, for permission to divide property with less than 40,000 square feet lots. Location of property: Lot ~7, Map of Saltaire ~states, ~ttituck, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonls, Doyen. ~outholdTown Board of Appeals -25- ~eptember 28, 1972 On motion by Nm. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was R~OLVED that the Bouthold Town Board of ~.ppeals set 8:30 P.M. (Eo~.T.), Thnrsday, October 12, 1972, at the Town Office, Main Road, ~outhold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of William Bayha, Founders Path, Southold, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Eection 300 C-3, and Eection 302, for permission to build an accessory building in side yard area. Location of property: Lot ~70, Founders Estates, ~outhold, New York. Vote of the Board: ~yes:- Messrs: Gi!lispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. 0n motion by Mw. Grigonis, seconded by ~h~. Gilllspie, it was RE~0LVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:40 P.Mo (EclaT.), Thursday, October 12~ 1972, at the Town Office, ~ain Road~ ~omthold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Leeward &cres, Inc~, 217 Osborne Avenue, Riverhead, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, ~ection 301 and ~ectiou 280& of the Town Law for permission to divide property with less than 40,000 sq. ft. and approval of access. Location of property~ one-half of lots %0 and 51, Map of Leeward Acres, Southold~ New York. Vote of the Board: Doyen. Ayes:- Messrs: Giliispie, Bergen, Grigonis~ On motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mm. Grigonis, it was R~OLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:50 P~M~ (~.~oT.), Thursday, October 12, 1972, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of he-ring upon application of Otto Macomber, Pine &venue, Southold, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, ~rticle III, ~ectiou 301, for permission to divide property with less than 40,000 square foot lOtSo Location of property: Lots ~16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Map of Goose Bay Estates~ Southold and bounded north by land now or formerly of Davis; east by Private right of way; south by other lands of Macomber; and west by Goose Bay Nstates, Southold, New York. Vote of the Board: Doyen. Wes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, % ~X~ -~ ~outhold Town Bosmd of Appeals -2.6- September 28, 1972 On motion by Mm. Gillispie~ seconded by ~ir. Bergen, it was R~SOLVED that the Eouthold Town Board of Appeals set o ~ -. 9 · O~ P.M. (E.S.T.), ~hursday., October 12~ 1972, at the Town 0£fice, Main Road~ Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Hertha Fraser, Nassau Point Road, C~tchogue, Eew York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article _rI~, Section 300 C-3, and Section 302 for permission to build an accessory building in front yard area. Location of property: Lot #%%, Map of Nassau Point, Cutchogue, New Tork~ Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: ~.ll~spze, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. On motion by F~. Bergen~ seconded by F~. Dpyen, it was RE~0LVED that the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals set 9.~-%~ P.M. (EoS~T.), Thursday, October 12, 1972, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of he~ring upon application of Robert and Annette Rider, c/0 Riverhea~ ~ Apartments, Roanoke Avenue, Riverhead, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning 0~dinance, Article ZzI,~ Sec~on*~ 301, for ~Perm.i.ssion_to divide proper~y, with less than 40,000 square feet~ ~.ocatlon or property: Lot #3h, Map of Eastwood Estates, Cutchogue~ New York. ' Vote of the Board: Doyen. ~es:- Messrs: Gilllspie, Bergen, * * -X.. On motion by Mm. Grigonis, seconded by t~o Bergen, it was t~ESOLI~ED that the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals set - w 9~ 2u PoM. (EoS.T.), Thursday, October 12, 1972, at the Town Office, M~in Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Lyle Meredith, 01d Shipyard Lane and I~.ndon Lane, Southold, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning rczn~nce, 4-t~cle~ ' III, S. ectmon' 300 C-3, and Section 302 for permission to put accessory building in side yard area. Location of property: Lot #89, Map of Founders Estates, Southold, New York. Vote of the Board: SJes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen. ~outhold Town Board of Appeals -27- ~eptember 28, 1972 On motion by ~$o Oillispie~ seconded by Nm. Origonis, it was RESOLVED that the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals set 9:45 P.M. (E.S.T.), Thursday, October 12, 1972, at the Town Office, Main Roads $outhold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of H. Alvin Smith, New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, New Yo~k, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, ~ction 300 C-3~ Section 302, Section 301 and Section 280-A of the To~n Law, for permission to divide p~operty, put two accessory buildings iu front and side yard area, insufficient setback in front yard an~ approval of access. Location of property: Right of Way~ south side of New ~uffolk &venue, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by Paust; east by Hollis Creek; south by other lands of ~pplicant; and west by right of way and T. Witschi. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gz!_~spie, Bergen, Grigonis~ Doyen. The Meeting was adjourned at t0:~0 P.M. APPROVED ,sp otful submitted, Robert W. Gil~f~-, Jr'., Chairman