HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-63.-1-15
.
TO
I'
'J
D
NX725-
so lD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
Southold, N,Y. 11971
(516) 765.i938
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
):1,a.te of APPlication8hZ~8Filing Fee 100.00
~Use Change of~se Re-Use Extension
Revision-Df an Approved SitePlan===-(Date of
Other Specify
OF SITE PLAN
Date Rec'd
of Existing Use
Approval
******************
Name of Business or Site. MliNPIr\..50N oFF/GIF ~L.AZJII/
Location of Site :!!QurH -I!iAST!~ol(~,( e>,c #tJ/t7'bN Awt MIODJ.6" RJ>
Address of Site, if available
Name of Applicant JA""..s V PIi't.vC-c.A
Address of Applicant /% i..,,,,OA L;9HG GAt;r
'RtVGLN6t40 .tV- Y"'//it:>! Telephone. ,7;l 7 -/C,.II
Person to be responsible for Construction Srl9""~EY M.ENt:J6J.$oA/
,4/(cl'hTGG/ oNLy Telephone 2e,.5~8BBt!/
Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Alo
Under contract to purchase~
Owner of Fee Title to Land STAwL.EY /JiVO 8E'rrY ME'NPE4SC-,,/
Address 8""~ J.~,c.~o -rl-Ii:;1!!. ./tIlTScOl'l$Gt Telephone 2~S-f!i1B8e
Site Plans Prepared byJII."",...~ V D'ELuc~icense No. "(ouN(. ~'(eU'U1. 4!>8~3
Address I'Z. 1..'''IpA, l"''''l!!. .."'l.T Telephone (51,(,,) 7"2.71<011
R "'acz.~"'''''c> "" '(. l\~ol******V';~~~*Y?~~~~ 7Z7- z sc,s
'4eo ~$""Cl.....""c~l:t ....v.. / 1<"'.""'''-
Total Land Area of Site J 0 <<:. ~ /5" Sq. Ft. Zone District .
Existing Use of Site N(7""#' Proposed Use of Site <>':F/~ B",I.(7I4/(
Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure (s) N"'NIf! sqft. N~ ""', sqft.
Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure ( s) ~1&O ;rblsqft. 1'1. 9Z0 sqft .-n>7'JII1.
Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) /9 "'~ . %
Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) :31 ~ %
Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) '7 "/0 %
Datum ( Specify)U.S .G. S. /9,170.)( M. S.&>. Other .
Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by
Board of Appeals ~O
Case Number Name of Applicant
Date of Decision Expiration Date
Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County
Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site?
If so, have proper permits been obtained?
Number and Date of permit issued
NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL
OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD.
.
.,
@rnowm
00
APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT
AUG2S_
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
J...._ll."l. V. DE Luc.c.A.
and says that he resides at 12, 1.1~C>'"
in the State of New York, and tha~he is
or that he is the API'J-It:-A~r ffi/llrf.-Te.
(Title)
pAt!>P sIlTY which is hereby
or Corporation)
owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense,
install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII
of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein
and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land
which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel,
including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are
shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly
filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to
roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the
Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with
same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or
changed in any manner without the 'approval of the Planning Board;
and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in
strict accordance with the plans submitted.
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
being duly sworn, deposes
1......a1J! E~"
the owner of the above property,
of the JIlt> /W76R&$7 ,,6-
(Specify whether Partnership
making application; that the
~.o.v.
day of ~
(Notary Public)
~~.. ' y(. IJL t/~
19 tf
(OWner)
HEI.EN It DE VOE
NOrMY PUBLIC, State of New Volt
No. 4707878, Suffolk Counlr./q
Torm Expires March 30, 19-4
')f Signed
(Partner
n
~~~
"==
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENV1RQN,l,.tfNT l C
. DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFA! 5
i U ~~~o@..
... ~.
14-164 (9 8-1)
:.'
..
PART I Project 'In'formnl/on (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor)
. "~pon'o~ vA,.".S pI! L.l.lc.~
-It 37"",1.<< N" 'IV
.3. Project local ton:
Municipality SovTN.e>L.O
Stnte Envlronmentnl Quality R view
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE~ '1 -I'
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
"
2. ProJ(!ct Ndme
. ~e:~t>..I.'<>OIJ O_IG. ~1.A.zA
-4. Is prOPosed actIon:
~ New 0 Ell:;:Ia~Sion
S. DescrIbe prolCct bneilv:
County
S \J I='=O'-\<.
o Modlficalion/.1IIt'rJtion
c:.o"'srI2Vc.Tia~ OF
~F~/~E. 8....i i..C':,;,2 r'
'(Z) 99to
W~TI-I /t!I~
s~ ;r:r
"" ,-9.eK/,J"
S/A1c'..S
b. PreCise locatIon (Toold. mtersectlons, prOMinent landm,uks, (Ie. or provIde molpl
S"vr# -:GAfT C.~~N/!)~.c"r rHIY
o '::H-'>"70N~II'e;8"'C' ""'/&JPq
/ '" 're,f SoS\::77.,w
R.o.
7. Amount oi land ,liiccled:
In"itiariv "';2... 4.3 .,
acr{"~ .
Ultim,lfelv,
z. . ./,3 7
.lcrt's
8. Will proposed .Jctlon compiy wllh elUs.tmg zonmg Of'Olher e"ISlI~ Jolnd use 'eSlflctlonsl
~ Yes -- 0 /';0 If No, descflbe briefly .
--, . . "","--';..- =-00:.. - ~
9. \\h.J.IIS pre~erit,lincr use In vl'riMy oi 'pro'jc~tl - ". ."
o ReSidential 0 Industrial '51- CommercIal
Oesctlbe:
.D..\;ricuJcurc
o r.Hkl.lndlop~'n SP.1CC
o C:ht'r
10. Does aCllon lO...ol...e a permit/approval, or funding. now or ultlmatelv, from any other Go...ernmentol! agency (hode,al, st.:lte or local)l
/,') IZ Ye, 0 No 'If ye,. Ij" .,e~'Yhl 'Ad p"m,e.pp,""I, : oS'lf! "'"t:.IS
{Y$V,cF61.J( Gt>~N""Y. 014;PA4r"".A.1r' e>F ,l:/8;1.t.T
54Vr.#tJL..&> ;t'L"''''~'A(' 8OH~C>
S(1vrHtJ(.D $""..Ou"" a ~A-tA)r
11. DOl'S Any aspeCt 01 the ..ctlon holYe a currently ...alid permit or appro.....U
DYes S No If yes. list agency name and permlVapproval type
12. AS (('suit rJf prOf}flSI.d action WIll e"lsllO~ pcrmlt/Jpprov,l! 'l'qUlfC moiJ,hC.\lIont
o Vrs
:"0
S'i>nJIUre'
I CERTIfY THAT TIlE !NfOR,\lATIO.'1 f'RQVIOlO ,\OOVE IS [IWE TO TIlE B(ST Of MY ~:\O\\'UD(;E
0.".#8
y:
ePI'~[lonso(
1/ tho action is in tho Coastal Area, and you aro a stato agoncy, com pie to tho
Coastal Assossmont Form boloro procooaing \'lith this assossment
"
OVER
c
.
(~,
~IfUWIf~
AUG 2 5 1988 I.!'.JI
.
ALL SITE PLAN ELEMENTS ARE TO BE ON A SURVEY AT A SCAL OF a'~~?iPl8fR~
AND STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCHITECT.
(./)
(..1'
(0
(/)'
(0'
(.1
(0
(,/5
(-1"
( )
( "f
(/
,SITE PLAN ELEMENTS
100-134 Town Code
'Lot, block, and section number, if any, or the property taken
from tax, records 1~~O" C'(,,;$ - t!)/' ~,tp/~ ,
S1"'1HLI Y ANt) 811F17Y HlNb.J.se17v
Name and address 'of the 'owner of record "'I. ,jEI2/e.lltJ T".. , .
, "'I:I.olo/Ur, "by'./17f. 7
Name and address of the person preparing the map J ,,""6$ V Ot: LVGc../Q
" " ' 1,1. LntI"" ,-/f"1l ....,.
" " '"" 'II.lf/I,gD MY .,
Date, North arrow and written and graphic scale ,.. 11/ II 01
Sufficient, description 'or-"information to precisely define the
boundaries of the 'property. All distances shall be in feet and
tenths of 'a foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest ten
seconds :or closer.c The error of closure shall not exceed on in
ten thousan!i.
The locations, nanie', ',and existing width of adjacent streets and
<;urblines
The location and owners' of all adjoining lands, as shmm on the
latest tax records
LocatioQ,;,~td~h'4nd purpOSe of all existing and proposed easements,
'~- s';'-fbiC:k .yei.ervatiims,-- and areas,' dedicated to public use within or
adjoining property.
A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants
applying to the property JJDwE
Existing Zoning
Existing contours at intervals of five or les&, referred to a datum
satisfactory to the Board
Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or
stormwater 'VtJ"'lfi
( ~' Location of existing watercourses, marshes, wooded areas. rock Outcrops
isolated trees with a diameter of eight inches or measured three feet
above the base of the trunk and other significant existing features.
NONS
(v'f Location of uses and outlines of structures, drawn to scale on and
within one hundred (100) feet of the lots.
(~ Paved areas, sidewalks, and vehicular access between the site and
public streets.
( ~ Locations, dimensions, grades ~UP flow direction of existing sewers,
culve and l>aterlines as well as' other underground and above ground
utilities within and adjacent' to the property.
,~,
.
.,
..
Site plan elements cont.
(100-134)
(v)
<--5
(,%
Other existing development, including fences, landscaping and screening
The location of proposed buildings or structural improvement
The'locat'ion 'and design of all uses no't'requiring structures such as
off street, parking, and "loading areas.
( ) The location, direction., power and time of use of any proposed outdoor
lighting or, public address ~ystems.
( )
(;{
The location of, and'plans for, any outdoor signs
The ,location: and arraI)geIIlene of' proposed means of access aI)d egress.
iI)cludiI)g sidewalks, driveways or other paved areas; profiles
iI)dieatiI)g grading .aI)d cross sections showing width of roadway, 'location
and wid,th of sidewalks and .location and size of water and sewer lines.
/
( v)
Any proposed gradiI)g, screening and other landscaping including types
and locationsof.',propbsed street ,trees.
(...-)' , The location of all propOsed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of
all sewer lines'or alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal
and treatment.
(.{'~-An''''''ttt!'~:~f1,.nJ~~o_i:d deed restriction and/or covenants.
( ~ Any contemplated public improvements on or adjoining the property.
' , ' A/(JAJIIL
( ~' If the site development plan indictes only a first stage, a supplementary
plan shall indicate ultimate development.
( /~ny otherinforma,tiori de:emed by the Planning Board necessary to
determine conformity of the site plan with the intent and regulations
of this chapter.
~~,
"_'_1.'.'.'.'.'.'. ,_._t_t_._._,_._~.........,_._._. ..t_ _1.'.'.1_'\_'_'.
TOWN CLERK i
TOWN OF SOUTHOW i
8affolk Counll' New York 516 - 765-1801 ~~ 27679. i
~;"'f"'~Y. U971~.211' ,
~6d ~~'_1d(), OOi
-:Jr -m Q (l(J. /u- /00, 0 ()- ifl,yJLU LM1Lu 4
B" ,1,udith T~~To'1IPerk l-. i
.!;.~. . .,.,. ~!_~~~t-
For.
Ca.h 0
Cheek
it:- 3~lf 8
",
i'I' · \:GIIlpIOlo~ ,..... afar.-.w-
jl . .~....a.."'.It.
j 1_1- ~ PdIII yout... ........ on the ...... of... form 10 ... we cen
. ........... . yw.
i . .. AtIMh thII ... tD ... trona: of 1M ......... or an the blICk if .....
I -....-
I . _ . WIIIt.......... ... -. onthl......... bIIow the.............
I,.. .- .The......... ..... to whom the...... deIIveNd Md_ dMe .
!I,l i;'i:;:~i:~~~~:lke
i Nes nset, NY 11767
400,
.,
i
lr&
...
...
~.\) p ;95 937 400
~ Certified Mail Receipt
~- No Insurance Coverage Provided
-..Iii Do not use for International Mail
~~ (See Reverse)
Sent to
Special Delivery Fee
Stanely Mendelson
Street & No.
892 Jericho Turnpike
p.o., State & ZIP Gode
Nesconset, NY 11767
i I 8, SlgnetunIlAgentl
. PS Form _ _be< 1991
Postage
.'
~
..
Pi
"
!>
i
I
..
'* U.8.G.P.o.: ,.....,....
Certified Fee
I
Restricted Delivery Fee
.
~
...
, ..
, ..
t ;-
" !1-
I .
E a
JI-l~ I
S! ~
: ~ ~
.. ... .
CJ
~ i : t...;...i'3.':!t..:.'":.~--'. "~' .
I.:...':"':-~~. ,_.~JV'....,..'''~...~. of"_~___
'. '. ..-.--liiI......................_"......
~"_ _ -','-.;'l~.._ ---'''.-. .
. " """'". Jli"-__"'-_
ti.o ............-..........----...-
_,I, 3.' 0
.n;:i1~'~~~~~~~ike"
N@sc sett NY 11767
> - j;h::'~,~"
. I ... ... .'
~ -.......
IMI: '
1. 0 Addl . OJ_.'
2. 0 lIMbic....
!
,7.J
\,; ~.
...
<;;
5.
.
..
..
Z
,D
.~
o
Q
;r
...
i
it
"
.
I
..
~
...
..
l!
or
I>
..
II:
~
0"
~
,..ce "
:
~
if
.
..
.~~
-+1
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. 'Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
~F.~~H.O~
,;::f ,/.. , > ~
::::> ,c'.' i-"
Q., .-,
en t':o':\ ~
.,., " ...... tr>
~~#O(!~' ~~~
.~. 'i :'~ "l'
~,..
SCOTI L HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Certified Mail:
July 7, 1992
Mr. Stanley Mendelson
892 Jericho Turnpike
Nesconset, New York 11767
Re: Proposed Site Plan for
Mendelson Medical Plaza
S/E/c CR48 & Horton Avenue
Southold, New York
SCTM * 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Mendelson:
On June 12; 1992, a letter was sent which asked you to
complete the site plan application within ten business days of
receipt if you intended to proceed with the site plan
application for the proposal noted above.
More than fifteen business days have elapsed since your
receipt of that letter on June 15, 1992 and we have not received
a completed application. Accordingly, as of today's date, the
file has been closed.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call
the office.
Sincerely,
~ar~;yY.//s
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
./ .-
.
-(p./LL/..z.~~:;.
,01~ 0:,\1. f. FOLK ~'"
fWIJ' ... (,.?..,~
::t:", , ~-
~"" . ..-~
Q {o.: '., ...
en i,-J':?" ~
-l '"
~,. m. ~
\of"" ~. ~I':i~ ,', ~
'*"" ' '. ,~""
"vi ,;'~_ ...'i:>,
"'- ":'fII ~iJ
'C~~
,
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G, Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L Edwards
SCOTI L HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Rnad
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
Cen:ified Mail:
l't'i/-,
Ju.ne 12, ~
Mr. Stanley Mendelson
892 Jericho Turnpike
Nesconset, New York 11767
Re: Proposed Site Plan for
Mendelson Medical Plaza
S/E/c CR48 & Horton Avenue
Southold, New York
SCTM * 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Mendelson:
On May 15, 1991, we sent a letter which detailed the
information that we needed in order to proceed with your site
plan application. A copy of that letter is enclosed for your
convenience.
Since we did not receive any response from you since that
meeting, we are writing to ask if you intend to proceed with
this application. If you do, please send us six copies of a
revised plan and a revised long environmental assessment form, a
copy of which is enclosed.
If we do not receive a completed application (revised plans
and environmental assessment form) within ten business days of
receipt of this letter, we will assume that you do not wish to
continue with the application at this time and we will close the
file. Our closing the file will not preclude you from making
this application in the future.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call
the office.
Sincerely,
Y>llU# IlL It'fI'il-lL~ i? J/S
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Ene.
.../.. -. ~
.
.
,
,
-'
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennell Orlowski. Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
. Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 15, 1991
Fax (516) 765-1823
Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Mendelson
892 Jericho Turnpike
Nesconset, New York 11767
..
Re: Proposed site Plan for
Mendelson Medical Office
Plaza .
S/E/c County Route 48 and
Horton Avenue, Southold
SCTM ~ 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Mendelson:
After reviewing the site plan and discussing the meeting
that took place on May 13, 1991, the planning Board has decided
to proceed with its review of the site plan that was last
revised in November of 1989 and received by this office in
February of 1990.
First, the plan should be revised to correct certain
mistakes or omissions. The changes are noted below.
,.
1. Provide a key map showing the location and owners of
all adjoining land within five hundred (500) feet, as
shown on the latest tax records, at a scale of one (1)
inch equals one hundred (100) feet,
2. The existing zoning, including zoning lines,. of the LB
and R-80 zoning districts shall be shown.
3. The twenty three (23) spaces along the south property
line shall be removed because Section 100-191 K. (1)
requires twenty feet of landscaped buffer.
4. The landscaping plan shall reflect the requirements
of Section 100-191. K. (2).
5. The drainage plans shall show existing contours for a
distance of two hundred (200) feet beyond the property
line. The drainage must also indicate the watershed
area being drained by each set of leaching pools.
/
~ ~ <" ... ...
.
.
"
6.
The location of the loading area (Section 100-192.),
the dumpster and the electrical transformer must also
be shown.
"
7. A lighting plan must be submitted. The plan shall
indicate the type and location of fixtures. The height
of the fixtures shall not exceed twelve (12) feet. The
light shall be shielded so that no glare is noticeable
off the site.
8. The location and specifications for the outdoor sign
shall be included.
9. The planting islands at the entrance shall be extended
beyond the perking space.
10. Curb ramps shall be provided for all handicapped
spaces.
11. The property survey shall be certified by a
licensed land surveyor.
Upon receipt of the revised plan and a revised Long
Environmental Assessment Form, the Planning Board will commence
the environmental review.
with regard to your offer to covenant that the building may
be used by doctors and dentists only, it will not be necessary
to do so. The use of the building will be set forth in the site
plan approval itself.
After the environmental review is finished, the Board will
need a copy of the water contract with the Village of Greenport
for water supply, and the Health Department's approvals for
water supply and septic disposal.
If you have any questions, please call Valerie Scopaz, Town
Planner.
Very truly yours,
~~'/7?h
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /11..:.
Chairman
cc: James DeLucca, Agent
Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
~
.
,.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 15, 1991
Fax (516) 765-1823
Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Mendelson
892 Jericho Turnpike
Nesconset, New York 11767
Re: Proposed site Plan for
Mendelson Medical Office
Plaza
S/E/c County Route 48 and
Horton Avenue, Southold
SCTM # 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Mendelson:
After reviewing the site plan and discussing the meeting
that took place on May 13, 1991, the planning Board has decided
to proceed with its review of the site plan that was last
revised in November of 1989 and received by this office in
February of 1990.
First, the plan should be revised to correct certain
mistakes or omissions. The changes are noted below.
1. Provide a key map showing the location and owners of
all adjoining land within five hundred (500) feet, as
shown on the latest tax records, at a scale of one (1)
inch equals one hundred (100) feet,
2. The existing zoning, including zoning lines, of the LB
and R-80 zoning districts shall be shown.
3. The twenty three (23) spaces along the south property
line shall be removed because Section 100-191 K. (1)
requires twenty feet of landscaped buffer.
4. The landscaping plan shall reflect the requirements
of Section 100-191. K. (2).
5. The drainage plans shall show existing contours for a
distance of two hundred (200) feet beyond the property
line. The drainage must also indicate the watershed
area being drained by each set of leaching pools.
..
.
6. The location of the loading area (Section 100-192.),
the dumpster and the electrical transformer must also
be shown.
7. A lighting plan must be submitted. The plan shall
indicate the type and location of fixtures. The height
of the fixtures shall not exceed twelve (12) feet. The
light shall be shielded so that no glare is noticeable
off the site.
8. The location and specifications for the outdoor sign
shall be included.
9. The planting islands at the entrance shall be extended
beyc'nd the parking space.
10. Curb ramps shall be provided for all handicapped
spaces.
11. The property survey shall be certified by a
licensed land surveyor.
Upon receipt of the revised plan and a revised Long
Environmental Assessment Form, the Planning Board will commence
the environmental review.
with regard to your offer to covenant that the building may
be used by doctors and dentists only, it will not be necessary
to do so. The use of the building will be set forth in the site
plan approval itself.
After the environmental review is finished, the Board will
need a'copy of the water contract with the Village of Greenport
for water supply, and the Health Department's approvals for
water supply and septic disposal.
If you have any questions, please call Valerie Scopaz, Town
Planner.
Very truly yours,
~ ~'/71.{;s
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /~
Chairman
cc: James DeLucca, Agent
Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
.
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennell Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
May 14, 1991
Mr. Stanley Mendelson
892 Jerich~ Turnpike
Nesconset, New York 11767
Re: Proposed Site Plan for
Mendelson Medical Office
Plaza
S/E/c County Route 48 and
Horton Avenue, Southold
SCTM # 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Mendelson:
At our meeting yesterday, it was agreed that you would
receive a written response from the Planning Board indicating
how it would proceed with your application.
This letter confirms that agreement. Another letter will
follow shortly.
Thank you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
~~~'--fZ/~
. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
cc: Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney
James DeLucca, Agent
t
.
I
,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
scon L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
CERTIFIED MAIL:
Return Receipt Requested.
May 2, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Mendelson
892 Jericho Turnpike
Nesconset, New York 117
Re: Proposed Site Plan for
Mendelson Office Plaza
S/E/c CR 48 and Horton
Avenue, Southold, N.Y.
SCTM * 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Mendelson:
I am writing to you with regard to your proposed site plan
application, which is before my Board. I was informed by the
Town Attorney's office that there exist some disagreements about
the Planning Board's September 1990 request for revised maps.
Evidently there have been some discussions about this matter
between the Town Attorney's office and either you or your agent,
a situation of which I have only recently been made aware.
In the interest of resolving the situation directly and
quickly, I am inviting both you and your agent, Mr. DeLucca, to
the Planning Board office to meet with a member of the Planning
Board, and members of both my staff and the Town Attorney's
office on Monday, May 13, 1991 at 4 p.m. If this date is not
convenient for both you and Mr. DeLucca, please give my
secretary, Holly, alternative dates and the meeting will be
rescheduled.
I am hopeful that we can resolve the outstanding issues at
this meeting.
Very truly yours,
~~ ,tZ.~<- ( ~ I,,?
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /,PJ
Chairman
cc: Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney
Matthew G. Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney
Gerard P. Goehringer, Zoning Board of Appeals
James DeLucca, Agent
~
~
~
~
~
~
.
.
James DeLucca
Architectural Consultant
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, NY 11901
March 25, 1991
Zoning Board OF Appeals
Town OF Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
RE: S.E. corner of Horton
Lane and Middle Road,
Southold, NY
Suffolk County Tax Map
# 1000-063-01-015
Dear Zoning Board OF Appeals members:
Enclosed please find the necessary documents for the above
referenced location.
A.
B.
All required application forms.
Site plan, landscaping plan, floor plan and elevations
for the proposed physician or dental office building.
Site sketch plan 2 and 3.
Copies of correspondence between the town Planning
Board and myself.
C.
D.
I am aSking the Board members for an~terpretation of section
100-112 (Off street parking). In this section of the code,
professional office of physician or dentist requires five
spaces per each physician or dentist office. This is the exact
use which we are proposing for our office building. The
Planning Board will not accept this permitted use, and wants
us to provide one stall per hundred square feet of floor area.
As you will note on our site plan for our proposed eighteen
offices, we are providing one hundred fifteen spaces instead
of the required ninety, which is twenty five more than the
required five spaces per office which we feel is more than
ample parking. If we adhere to the Planning Boards requirement,
we will have to reduce the size of the office building from
eighteen thousand seven hundred square feet with one hundred
fifteen parking stalls, to thirteen thousand four hundred square
feet with one hundred thirty four parking stalls. I have
provided you with sketch # 3 which you will please note the
thirteen thousand four hundred square foot building with one
hundred thirty four.parking stalls. I'm sure you will agree
that the parking area is excessive for that size office
building. Also, the Board requested that I put a twenty foot
planting buffer on the south side of the property. This can
/~
It
'-'
.
,,/'
be noted both on the revised sketch plan # 2 with one hundred
fifteen parking stalls, and sketch plan # 3.
Another demand that the Planning Board has made, is that we~
have a curb cut between our property and the office complex
to the east. You will please note that the existing parking
layout shows only a fourteen foot backup distance, and if
there was to be a twenty four foot isle installed it would
eliminate parking on the other site. Also, if the Board will
please take note that the site next door contains approximately
one half the legal parking stalls that the Planning Board is
requiring us to install. On many occasions that I have checked
this parking area, I never counted more than twenty cars at
anyone time.
Along with the interpretation of the parking ordinance, I am
aSking the Board to grant us a variance from the Planning
Boards demand that the two parking lots be joined.
If the Board needs any additional information,please feel
free to contact me.
Ve y Tr~
James D~
~
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
>~- ':'-:.-:;~~-,~~~
/."'-,~ ~~:'~',',\.r,>:)~":.,",',',"hi\',',
j;~.'i--,\...._ ..?_~
J t~. L'~<' :--'
','1= ' ," -_,1
".:= ", '," ;":::;'1
" :,,1 : ,'-- ,~
;.-\ ~'~ -~~ ,_ .!$r ~ ~ ~.;/'"
-,,1' '~",
""/"'11, ''', ',:""if"
~,,", 'I . . " J
~_' -'-"'. .. ',I f~.. -:.'
"';;; '-, -,. ,y
.....~
~
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P,O, Box 1179
Southold, New York 1197 I
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
September 18, 1990
James DeLucca
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
RE: Proposed Site Plan of
Mendelson Office Plaza
S/E/c County Rd. 48 and
Horton Avenue, Southold
SCTM# 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. DeLucca:
The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of September 5,
1990.
The Planning Board will not accept covenants and
restrictions that the buildings will be used for medical offices
only. The Board refers you to its letter of July 26, 1990, in
which it indicates that a more restrictive parking requirement,
such as for professional and business offices, would be a more
reasonable expectation of future use.
The Board is in favor of a curb cut to Winds Way at the
northwest corner of the property. The parking requirements at
Winds Way have been reviewed. Connecting the two properties is
not thought to present a problem.
I look forward to receiving revised site plans based on
these recommendations.
Very truly yours,
~~/lv/vy
Bennett Orlowski Jr.
Chairman
RGK/hp
cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Zoning Board of Appeals
4\
.
S'48F",L6""
PI!>
James DeLucca ~I:::- WE>
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
September 5, 1990
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Planning Board, Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Proposed Site Plan of
Mendelson Medical Office
Plaza, S/E/C County Rd.
48 andlHorton Avenue,
Southold
SCTM# 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
In answer to your letter of August 24, 1990, before
we take steps to finalize our site plan for your review,
I would like clarification of the following points.
1) Will the Planning Board accept covenance and
restrictions that these buildings will be used
exclusively for medical offices, with the parking
schedule of five parking spaces per office? Of
course we understand that these covenants and
restrictions must be approved by the Town Attorney.
2) As you stated in your letter, the Board recommends
a curb cut to Winds Way at northwest corner of
the property. Is this a recommendation, or a
mandated condition? If this is a mandated condition,
has the Board considered as I pointed out at our
meeting of July 16, 1990, that it would further
reduce the number of undersized parking stalls at
Winds Way?
My client and I would like these questions answered,so
we may either accept your recommendations or requests, or
appeal them to the Zoning Board of Appeals. If you would like
a formal meeting to discuss these matters further, I would
be more than happy to do so.
Thank you very much for your continuing cooperation.
cc: Stanley Mendelson
'"~--:,-'<'
ry ':..' . -', r. ,
,\ "
1..'" . ' .',.,
'"mo~~9IP I .
j:'",
'I'" '~'-"r
t"
t~..,---..
,-
f
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOrf L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
August 24, 1990
James V. DeLucca
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, NY 11901
RE: Proposed Site Plan of
Mendelson Office Plaza
S/E/C County Road 48 and
Horton Avenue, Southold
SCTMi 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. DeLucca:
The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of August 13,
1990, requesting clarification on the maximum building size and
parking requirements for the above referenced site.
The Planning Board cannot design the site, but refers you
to its letter of July 26, 1990 requesting more restrictive
parking requirements, such as that for professional and business
offices.
The more restrictive requirement calls for one parking
space per one hundred (100) square feet of office space. The
maximum lot coverage in this Limited Business zone is 20% and
the landscaped area 35%.
By using these requirements, you will be able to calculate
the maximum building and parking requirements for the site.
In addition, the Board recommends a curb cut to Winds Way
at the northwest corner of the property.
If you have any additional questions or require further
assistance please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
~~f?/~
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
,
.
-ptJ
~K
Is
James De Lucca
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
August 13, 1990
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Planning Board, Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P . 0 . Box 11 7 9
Southold, N.Y. 11971
~ ;J Z.:>hL-
. .
Reference:
Proposed Site Plan of
Mendelson Medical Office
Plaza, S/E/C County Rd.
48 and Horton Avenue,
Southold SCTM# 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Orlowski,
After discussing your letter of July 26, 1990 with Mr.
Mendelson,we would like to receive a clarification on a few
points. We would like to establish the maximum size building
that the Planning Board may have in mind. Also, the maximum
number of parking stalls.
I'm sure you can understand that the size of the proposed
building verses the number of parking stalls,will have to reflect
a financially viable ratio. As I stated to the Board on July
16, 1990, we would like to build a project that the Town of
Southold will be proud to have in their community. I think
you will agree that the amount of parking that I presented to
you in the alternative site plans, reflecting the Town Planners
interpretation of the zoning code, is excessive. We look forward
to your response, so we may move ahead with this project.
Thank you very much for your continuing cooperation.
cc: Stanley Mendelson
T?;);22
James De Lucca
1:
AIJ3 I 4 1990
(
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennell Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
July 26, 1990
James V. DeLucca
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, NY 11901
RE: Proposed Site Plan of
Mendelson Office Plaza
S/E/C County Road 48 and
Horton Avenue, Southold
SCTMt 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. DeLucca:
The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of July 22,
1990, informing the Board of your intent to inform the
Mendelsons that the Board is requiring them to covenant the
office plaza for use as a medical or dental occupancy
exclusively.
,
The Board never intended this interpretation, but rather
meant to imply that a more restrictive parking requirement such
as professional and business offices would be a more reasonable
expectation of future use.
Using the more restrictive requirement, the Board would
consider the possibility of installing the parking in stages as
the occupancy increased. Future parking areas could be
landscaped until ready for parking use.
If you have any questions or require further information
please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
~~.~~
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /'~
Chairman
(
t'
SUfFiLE.
?e. .
R K - -Reid llASf'
James De Lucca
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
July 22, 1990
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Planning Board, Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Reference:
Proposed Site Plan of
Mendelson Medical Office
Plaza S/E/C County Road
48 and Horton Avenue,
Southold SCTM# 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. Orlowski
I would like to thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak
before the planning board on July 16, 1990. I will inform my
client that you are requiring the' proprrty to be COVC'llilllt [or
use as medical or dental occupancy only, so we may limit the
parking schedule to at least five spaces per office.
Thank you very much for your continuing cooperation.
cc: Stanley Mendelson
JUL 2 4 1990
066\ \7 Z
PLANNING BOARD
.10
t
JULY 16,.90
(
Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following
resolution.
RESOLVED THAT THE Southold Town Planning Board authorize
the Chairman to re-endorse the final surveys date July 31, 1989
with the following condition:
1. That no building permits be issued until the fire well
has been installed by the Developer and accepted by the
Cutchogue Fire District.
This subdivision was approved on April 30, 1990 and
endorsed on the same date. However, as the Health Department
approval expired prior to the filing of the maps, it was
necessary that the maps be re-endorsed by the Chairman.
Mr. Edwards: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. (Chairman re-endorsed
maps).
****************************************
c
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. James DeLucca scheduled an appointment
regarding the Mendelson Site Plan. Mr. DeLuca is here and
will answer any questions you may have.
Mr. Delucca - I brought some sketch plans that maybe the board
would like to take a look at while I am talking so that they may
get a better understanding of what I'm talking about.
Mr. Orlowski: Are these new ones?
~
Mr. DeLucca - Basically, it addresses some of the things that
were in the letter and it is just a sketch plan so as I'm
talking to you, I feel that sometimes a picture is worth a
thousand words. I only brought six copies. I have three
sheets. Addressing the code to the letter as (inaudible). Just
a couple of, I tried to do my homework on this over the week-end
and just to bring out a relative matter before we go any further
with this. If one of the requirements that was proposed to me
since this conception of this project was to adjoin the parking
lot to the east, the existing parking lot. Upon examination of
that site next door and- I just want to run some statistics by
you so you can understand where I'm coming from. Basically,
those buildings are all doctors almost 90% are doctors or for
medical use. There is, approximately, next
door 8,700 square feet of office space and approximately 70
parking stalls. Out of that 70 parking stalls, 22 of them do
not meet the code at all. They don't even approach meeting the
PLANNING BOARD
. 10
JULY 16.90
(
Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the fOllowing
resolution.
RESOLVED THAT THE Southold Town Planning Board authorize
the Chairman to re-endorse the final surveys date July 31, 1989
with the following condition:
1. That no building permits be issued until the fire well
has been installed by the Developer and accepted by the
Cutchogue Fire District.
This subdivision was approved on April 30, 1990 and
endorsed on the same date. However, as the Health Department
approval expired prior to the filing of the maps, it was
necessary that the maps be re-endorsed by the Chairman.
Mr. Edwards: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward, Mr. MCDonald, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. (Chairman re-endorsed
maps) .
****************************************
c
Mr. Orlowski: Mr. James DeLucca scheduled an appointment
regarding the Mendelson Site Plan. Mr. DeLuca is here and
will answer any questions you may have.
,
Mr. Delucca - I brought some sketch plans that maybe the board
would like to take a look at while I am talking so that they may
get a better understanding of what I'm talking about.
Mr. Orlowski: Are these new ones?
Mr. DeLucca - Basically, it addresses some of the things that
were in the letter and it is just a sketch plan so as I'm
talking to you, I feel that sometimes a picture is worth a
thousand words. I only brought six copies. I have three
sheets. Addressing the code to the letter as (inaudible). Just
a couple of, I tried to do my homework on this over the week-end
and just to bring out a relative matter before we go any further
with this. If one of the requirements that was proposed to me
since this conception of this project was to adjoin the parking
lot to the east, the existing parking lot. Upon examination of
that site next door and I just want to run some statistics by
you so you can understand where I'm coming from. Basically,
those buildings are all doctors almost 90% are doctors or for .
medical use. There is, approximately, next
door 8,700 square feet of office space and approximately 70
parking stalls. Out of that 70 parking stalls, 22 of them do
not meet the code at all. They don't even approach meeting the
c
c
~
PLANNING BOARD
ell
JULY 16,.90
code. Back up distances are off by 4 to 8 feet, no turning
radius and 7 of them can't even be entered properly. The
interconnecting driveways are twelve feet where they are suppose
to be twenty-four feet so if you start backing down into numbers
which this is the question we are talking about here, numbers as
far as parking stalls relevant to area. If you take the total
number of 70 and divide it out the square footage that they have
next door, you have one stall for every hundred and twenty five
feet of area. If you back out the illegal stalls, which again
do not meet the code at all that was in place when those
buildings were built, you have a parking area of one-hundred and
ninety-three feet of floor area for parking stalls. Now, it is
basically my observation of those buildings, I found that most
I've seen probably twelve cars or maybe fifteen cars in there at
most at one particular time. Now, one of the requirements was
for me to connect my driveway or our parking with that which is
existing. If I were to do that I would wipe out all of these
parking stalls because that is only thirty-eight feet wide. You
have interconnecting driveways, you have to have two way
traffic, you have to have twenty-four feet. I would wipe out
seven legal stalls that he has there plus another nine on the
other side so you are talking about reducing his parking by
about sixteen stalls for me to interconnect which is bringing
down his number significantly and bringing up his ratio probably
close to two-hundred and fifty square feet per parking area so
that is one way and I don't know how we can agree to do that
because I'll have to take the man's parking for a driveway. ' The
second thing is, I was told to push my buildings forward to meet
his building and I agreed with that in principle and if you
look, at all of the sketches one, two and three were basically
very even with his, with the corner of that building, (inaudible)
beyond the required setback. Far beyond what is required by the
code. Then I was told to add a planting buffer on the south
side which you can see on drawing two. Drawing two shows the
existing footprint the same as drawing one with an area of
18,700 feet in building area and basically what I did was I
reduced the front of the planting buff from twenty-five to
twelve feet which is also permitted and is still keeping the
building basically in line with the other one. Thereby, if I
still keep the same ratio, five parking stalls per dental
office, I'm still over the required number of parking stalls at
one-hundred and fifteen. Now, if in fact I go for the true
parking requirements that is suggested in the letter, if you
turn to drawing three, the site the building comes out to 13,400
square feet and I have one-hundred and thirty-four parking
stalls. Two-thirds of the site or better than the three to one
ratio is covered with pavement. Now, if next door has a similar
use and has an area of one stall per 190 feet, you want me to
have a parking area of one stall per hundred square feet and I
don't know where we're going here, something is basically
wrong. As you can see, this
is to the code and you have almost all pavement. For every
hundred square feet of building area you have three-hundred and
fifty feet of asphalt. So as far as my interpretation of the
c
(
c
PLANNING BOARD
JULY 16.990
. 12
ordinance, if you are having seventeen doctor's offices at most
and the ordinance says you are required to have five parking
stalls per physician and we're having seventeen physicians in
that building, to me that adds up below the parking requirement
that we originally put on the first drawing. At that ratio, on
the first drawing we would have ninety stalls and I provided
one-hundred and fifteen. If I dropped down to the assumption
that the plans examiner says that we are going to, then we are
going to have mixed office use. We are going to have doctor's
offices and we'll sign a covenant to that effect but they're
telling me "no we're not going to have doctor's offices there,
we're going to have other people in there" and we're telling
you it is a medical center; but you can see the ratio of parking
here is - - in that other place we're 8700 square feet and if
there are twelve cars in there it's a lot. I made a study, I've
been there about eight times in the last two weeks and the most
I counted were twelve cars in that parking lot.
Mr. Ward: Who is the developer?
Mr. DeLuca: Stanley Mendelson, who owns Steadman Building
Products.
Mr. Ward: Is he going to have a lease with the doctor
conso.rtium?
Mr. DeLuca:
going to do.
Yes, that is what he proposes, that is what he is
I'm making this proposal to you people.
Mr. Ward: What we have done, when we have less parking, you
take your scheme three, which would be as if it didn't go that
way you obviously went one retail, one business or whatever it
was, your scheme three would have the adequate parking for it.
We have taken scheme three and reduced parking to allow for that
but we have not allowed for the additional building.
Mr. DeLuca: We proposed it as physicians and we stand to what
we originally proposed but as you can see in scheme three if you
go to that parking, look at the enormous amount of cars that you
have. You couldn't have all those people in that building if
the cars came in there.
Mr. Ward: Our problem is down the road if the use changes then
the parking could be developed whereas if we go the other way it
can't be.
Mr. DeLuca: I don't disagree with you but if you take a look
at scheme three I think" you will have to agree with me. Look
at the enormous amount of parking that is on this, you couldn't
fit the people in the building.
Mr. Ward: It is more than you would need for a doctors office.
c
(
~
, PLANNING BOARD
.13
JULY 16,.90
Mr. DeLuca: Absolutely. I think if you take a look at the
elevations. They propose a nice looking building, it is all
brick veneer and all colonial style and if we landscaped it
adequately, I mean we have not objected to anything but some of
the things proposed, I mean it is just impossible to do.
Mr. Orlowski: Is this all red brick?
Mr. DeLuca: Yes, the elevations are over there.
along with the proposed building. Again, if you
with the parking lot, we'll wipe out his parking
him.
I gave them
tie that in
if we tie into
Mr. Ward: Just what do you propose to do?
Mr. DeLuca: I would like to do scheme two.
Mr. Ward: You can't do scheme two because we don't have any
covenances or anything.
Mr. DeLuca: I want to develop in that sense. I don't want to
go through all the drainage requirements and the landscaping
plans and everything again.
Mr. Ward: We have to see it upfront in order to deal with
that. We have to see leases etc..
We've discovered that everything is promised and
site plan approval is granted everything else
Mr. McDonald:
as soon as the
happens.
Mr. DeLuca: We'll give you a covenant.
Mr. McDonald: Who is going to enforce the covenant?
Mr. DeLuca: We have to
goes into the building.
everything.
get use permits for every use that
We have to get use permits for
I would rather see you file number three with less
then at least if it does go to retail or some other
always'add a parking lot.
Mr. Ward:
parking and
use you can
Mr. DeLuca:
I don't follow. what you are saying.
Mr. Ward: I'm saying take scheme three which is less building
and if you ever do anything else in the future you can always
add the parking.
Mr. DeLuca: So in other words you are saying eliminate the
parking.
PLANNING BOARD
"14
JULY 16'41'90
c
Mr. Ward: No I'm saying with scheme three with 13,500 foot
square building or whatever it is, it allows for any use to go
in.
Mr. DeLuca: We don't plan to use it for any use, we plan to
go to physicians.
Mr. Ward: Fine, in the meantime we can go according to code and
eliminate some parking and have some more landscaping.
Mr. DeLuca: Fine, that is exactly what we want to do.
Mr. Ward: But we are looking at scheme three and not at two.
Mr. DeLuca: Well the thing is, are you going to require me to
go five parking stalls per physician or are you going to require
one per hundred square feet. That is the question this proposes.
Mr. Ward: I would assume, that if we had a covenant that it was
going to be medical offices, and we went with scheme three, we
could develop less parking and it would also be less building.
If it changes we can add the parking back.
Mr. DeLuca: But, if we are keeping it five stalls per
physician then we are entitled to a larger building.
(
Mr. Ward: Not necessarily.
Mr. DeLuca: Well if we meet all the requirements under our
filed office areas and we file a covenant that we are going to
file that they can't issue building permits over and above what
we are applying for.
Mr. Ward: What do we do, then we get back into the position of
hardship.
Mr. DeLuca: That's the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Mr. Ward: We're not interested in that kind of a situation.
Mr. DeLuca: We're proposing a building. In other words if I
come in and I tell'you I'm going to use a building as a
restaurant you can't say to me, well you might make a movie
theater out of it. We're not proposing that, we are proposing a
physician's office.
Mr. Ward: We would need something in writing from the
developers as to what hls intent is and for our Town Attorney to
start with.
~
Mr. DeLuca: The reason I am presenting this and I don't want
to go through spending this man's money going through all kinds
of calculations and drainage profiles and everything else, I
mean these drawings cost a lot of money to produce and I don't
PLANNING BOARD
. 15
JULY 16.990
c
want to do that unnecessarily if I'm going to work on the
premises.
Mr. Ward: You have got to realize that you are going to be
limited.
Mr. DeLuca: He understands that.
Mr. McDonald: I know that this is in line with the adjacent
building and I appreciate that you have done that but I think
you can do better in terms of parking. Especially since
whatever building is here doesn't have to be visible, it doesn't
have any real high visibility at all since there's proven not to
be any retail in it.
Mr. DeLuca: I don't disagree with that at all. What I am
asking for is input on your part to give me a direction to go to
where we can strike a happy medium, but as you see at the letter
of the law you've got parking allover the place here.
Mr. McDonald: I think what Mr. Ward has said would be the first
step. We need to see something from your applicant that shows
his intentions of the use then we'll go over it and that would
be a good starting point.
(
Mr. Ward: Because otherwise we would be looking at it without
any guarantees.
Mr. DeLuca: We would be willing to covenant the building. If
the owner of the property is going to lock himself into a use,
that's his problem it's not my problem or anyone else's.
Mr. McDonald:
so we can get
have to get a
Do you think
it over with.
little bit of
we could work together
We've got a start now
paper work together.
and submit it
and we just
Mr. Orlowski: Can these parking lots be connected on the
southeast corner of this property?
Mr. DeLuca: That parking area doesn't meet the code either.
It is only thirty-eight feet wide. The driveway doesn't meet
the code either, it is only twelve feet wide and isn't a two way
driveway. I don't know how they could do it but that's history
already.
Mr. Orlowski: Well, we learn a lot from our mistakes.
Mr. DeLuca: What I'm saying is how can you tie into other
areas that do not meet the code.
c
Mr. McDonald: We have to weigh the relative merits of what is
gained and what is lost. That is one of the reasons we here to
see if that connection causes more good or more harm.
PLANNING BOARD
.16
JULY 16.90
, .
c
Mr. DeLuca: I have the measurements just briefly on that back
parking lot. It has got seven stalls and it's four foot short
of backup distance and then it's got a twelve foot driveway
which is only one way and then that leads into a parking area
that is only thirty-six feet wide which is approximately eight
feet short and that only has a twelve foot driveway. So as far
as two way traffic in and out of any of these driveways that is
adjacent to this building is totally impossible because they are
only twelve feet wide.
Mr. McDonald: Why don't you leave that to us.
Mr. DeLuca: I'm talking about two way traffic.
Mr. McDonald: There may be other options as well. We'll review
tha t.
Mr. Orlowski: Ms. Scopaz, do you have a question?
Ms. Scopaz: I would just like to draw out a suggestion.
Perhaps the board would like to schedule a field inspection and
we'll take all of Mr. DeLuca's prints out and then get back to
him as to an answer to his question both on the parking issue as
well as the connecting of the two places.
Mr. DeLuca: Absolutely, and on that field inspection if I
could possibility accompany you on that inspection, I would ,be
( more than happy to take the time to do that.
Mr. Orlowski: I would like to get some internal connections
here somewhere if we can.
Mr. Ward: Well, we'll take a look.
Mr. DeLuca:' My client is more than happy to work with the
board.
Mr. Orlowski: O.K., but we need covenants and restrictions.
Mr. DeLuca: Sure, I'll take care of that. I'll have his
attorney draw it up and it will tell you that basically the
building is going to be used for medical offices.
Ms. Spiro: Do you want these back?
Mr. DeLuca: No, I made plenty of copies. You can have them.
The scale is there but the lines were quickly drawn.
Mr. Orlowski: Alright.
Mr. DeLuca: I want to thank the board.
~
Mr. Orlowski: O.K., I have nothing left on my agenda. Any
questions from the board? Are there any other public comments?
~
.
-,.
HARVEY A. ARNOFF
Town Attorney
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
MATTHEW G. KIERNAN
Assistant Town Attorney
.
July 13, 1990
Mr. James DeLucca
Architectural Consultant
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, New York 11901
Re: Stanley Mendelson property located on
S.E. corner of Horton Lane and Middle Road.
Dear Mr. DeLucca:
..
Reference your undated letter to me in regard to the
above matter, I have spoken to the Planning Board and have been
advised that they have expressly set forth to you the problems
with the application and how it can be solved. It would appear
that either you or your client are unwilling to abide their
recommendations. I now agree with them that a meeting would
serve no useful purpose especially considering the rather long
history and the communication which has predated this letter.
However, if you are still of a mind to proceed with
obtaining an audience with the Planning Board, may I suggest
that you request of their clerk the opportunity to appear before
them at their next regularly scheduled meeting to discuss with
them perhaps on an informal basis (yet still on the record) the
problems which you see in the opposing positions of your client
and the Board.
HAA:cc J
Planning Board
I . n __~._c -
OO(~ ~~I~t'
SOLiTHOIJ) Trr::
PL;,;';i\';i;"'.C .:".:
,
~
-'
,I
.
James DeLucca
Architectural Consultant
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
Harvey Arnoff
16 W. Main Street
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
.
Reference: Stanley Mendelson
property located on S.E.
corner of Horton Lane and
Middle Road. Southold, N.Y.
Dear Mr. Arnoff,
As per our previous discussions, I'm requesting a meeting with you to
discuss the planning boards interpretation of the zoning uses of the
referenced property.
It is of my opinion and Mr. Mendelsons that the planning board is
being arbitrary in its interpretation over office use, set backs,
and parking regulations. This has been an on going problem for
several years,and I would greatly appreciate your input about this
matter before we take further steps to try and resolve this problem
through other means.
~
, Also, I tried to reach you several times last week
f Wabbington's site plan in the town of Riverhead.
"I would greatly appreciate it if I could meet with
as possible.
..
~
concecning 'Obec~
you as quickly
\C{^,\~ '\Z'j WJo ,
\~~ \ :t':' .0'-'-,
\ ","\'" ,c. ','':)\) "
\ 1\ II''. u""
t\ ~" -'
\J I _"..~ ."
k..~ ::";,-:;,1 -, - .'~ ~ .
o..:'0~\\,.\. I'., 0~";)___''''--
(;, '. ~", :-:.---_.-
~---
SENDER:
SUBJECT:
SCTMH:
COMMENTS:
~
~
, ,
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
-,~~
r ~S,^--S".;(L ~
...-
~J-I-'~ .
3 ~ ~C- 31'9')
:~I ~~. r,. ~ @l_f'ifI'i,
,jlH Jll' 7 1990
,
1.-~.._ _'"".._
,'j
ri
'\
\ -
1
.
':5U. bFT c.E
Pf>
HARVEY A. ARNOFF
Town Attorney
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
MATTHEW G. KIERNAN
Assistant Town Attorney
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
.
July 13, 1990
Mr. James DeLucca
Architectural Consultant
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, New York 11901
Re: Stanley Mendelson property located on
S.E. corner of Horton Lane and Middle Road.
Dear Mr. DeLucca:
Reference your undated letter to me in regard to the
above matter, I have spoken to the Planning Board and have been
advised that they have expressly set forth to you the problems
with the application and how it can be solved. It would appear
that either you or your client are unwilling to abide their
recommendations. I now agree with them that a meeting would
serve no useful purpose especially considering the rather long
history and the communication which has predated this letter.
However, if you are still of a mind to proceed with
obtaining an audience with the Planning Board, may I suggest
that you request of their clerk the opportunity to appear before
them at their next regularly scheduled meeting to discuss with
them perhaps on an informal basis (yet still on the record) the
problems which you see in the opposing positions of your client
and the Board.
HAA:cc J
Planning Board
0: Ii!!ji) Ii! ""I) '\if ;~.:
~;') [E; l'? l\ I. \0 !,
J) r'--'--'"
U I Jl , 6 /900
L~~,....,._,...~_..,.
lQ~j~f:,:':;:ii:"\'
, ,..-
)
()
James DeLucca
Architectural Consultant
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
Harvey Arnoff
16 W. Main Street
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
.
Reference: Stanley Mendelson
property located on S.E.
corner of Horton Lane and
Middle Road. Southold, N.Y.
Dear Mr. Arnoff,
As per our previous discussions, I'm requesting a meeting with you to
discuss the planning boards interpretation of the zoning uses of the
referenced property.
It is of my opinion and Mr. Mendelsons that the planning board is
being arbitrary in its interpretation over office use, set backs,
and parking regulations. This has been an on going problem for
several years,and I would greatly appreciate your input about this
matter before we take further steps to try and resolve this problem
through other means.
(Also, I tried to reach you several times last week concerning Robert ,"
Waooington's site plan in the town of Riverhead. ~
I would greatly appreciate it if I could meet with you as quickly
as possible.
r,';;\'" C
,\ It)
\'.1'1'. ,-'
1 t ~~
\ V:\' J\}L \ 6 \C;fJJ
\.\i:\\ ,<
\ <.".",
~,,\:,\,.,,
v~:~~~;~-: - i
",
,
\'~
._~---
.(~
.1
:'. :".-
Town HaIl, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New Yode
11971
SCO'IT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 26, 1990
James V. DeLucca
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, NY 11901
RE: Proposed Site Plan of
Mendelson Office Plaza
S/E/C County Road 48 and
Horton Avenue, Southold
SCTM* 1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. DeLucca:
The Planning Board reviewed your application for the above
mentioned site plan.
Due to the size of the offices and the permitted uses in
this Limited Business zone, more restrictive parking
requirements must be used. The present assumption that the
entire building will be occupied by 18 doctors and dentists
only, must be changed to occupancy of the office space by a mix
of business and professional uses at one parking space per 100
square feet of office floor area. This calculation results in a
requirement for 187 parking spaces.
However, requirement for a 20 foot transition buffer area
on the south side of the site along the boundary of the
residential area will eliminate 23 of the parking spaces shown
on the site plan. Clearly a building requiring 187 parking
spaces cannot be built on a site that can only accommodate 92
parking spaces. Therefore, the building must be reduced in size
to accommodate the required parking.
The following changes must also be made before the Board
can proceed:
1. A separate key map must be provided that shows the
location and owners of all adjoining lands within
five hundred (500) feet, as shown on the latest tax
records, at a scale of one (1) inch equals one hundred
(100) feet.
.
~
.
2. Existing zoning including zone lines must be shown on
the map.
3. A transition buffer area twenty (20) feet in width
shall be shown along the south property line. It
shall be planted with a double row of evergreen trees
six (6) feet in height planted at intervals of ten
(10) feet on center.
4. Two foot contours must be shown on site and two
hundred (200) feet beyond the property line.
5. A curb cut on the east side of the property would
permit traffic to enter and exit on to the adjacent
business property thus facilitating the internal flow
of traffic.
6. Location of loading area, dumpster and transformer
must be shown on the map.
7. A lighting plan must be shown on the map.
8. The location and plans for any outdoor signs must be
in accordance with applicable sign regulations and
shown on the map.
9. The drainage map must indicate the watershed area(s)
being drained by each set of leaching pools or dry
wells.
10. The entrance must be moved further south on Horton
Lane.
11. Planters at both sides of the entrance must extend
beyond the twenty (20) foot parking space(s).
12. Curb ramps must be provided at all handicapped parking
spaces.
13. The map should give reference to a property survey,
that has been certified by a licensed land surveyor.
The Board was extremely pleased with the type and number of
street trees shown on the planting schedule.
If you have any questions or require further information
please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
~~/f4;./
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /"~
Chairman
I
(
~
~eFl LC'
f<,K
SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER
SENDER:
~ /)e ~
~
SUBJECT:
SCTM#:
,...
("PO - ~:3 - (-/J
COMMENTS:
~ 4~'
00-
'-
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765.1938
.
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
March 24, 1989
James V. DeLucca
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, New York 11901
RE: Proposed site 'Plan of
Mendelson Office Plaza
S/E/C County Road 48 &
Horton Avenue, Southold.
SCTM * 1000-63-1-15.
Dear Mr. DeLucca,
All pending site plan applications are being
accordance with the new zoning code. Before the
can proceed with the above-referenced site plan,
brought into compliance with the new code.
The following comments are intended to assist you in
revisions:
reviewed in
Planning Board
it must be
your
1. Show drainage and topography (existing and proposed) on
site plan.
2. Include a lighting plan. Mushroom type fixtures rather
than stanchion pole fixtures are suggested.
3. Landscaping must be revised to conform to code.
4. Parking and off-street loading must be calculated as
per code.
5. Yard setbacks must "be as per code, particularly the
rear yard, which would be the yard parallel to County Road 48.
The existing front yard setback shown on the last set of plans
should be maintained. The shifting of Building A to the north
and the elimination of the "portico" or canopy would enable the
site to meet both yard setbacks. The parking could be placed
within this rear yard, provided adequate screening is used to
buffer view from adjacent residentially zoned land.
.
.
6. Include information on location, type and dimensions of
proposed sign or signs as per code.
7. The new zone of this property is LB, Limited Business.
Upon receipt of eight revised, signed and sealed copies of
the site plan, the Planning Board will proceed with this
application. If any questions should arise, please contact this
office.
K;;~.
Benn~orlOWSkl. Jr. ~
Chairman
~
vs
-r--
.
,
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southo1d, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 76.5-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
September 27, 1988
James V. DeLucca
12 Linda Lane East
Riverhead, New York 11901
RE: Proposed site plan of
Mendelson Office Plaza
S/E/C of County Road 48 and
Horton Avenue, Southold
SCTM #1000-63-1-15
Dear Mr. DeLucca:
The Planning Board reviewed the above-named site plan at a
'work session. The fOllowing revisions to the proposal are
requested: (The number of the item corresponds to that shown on
the plan in red.)
1. The building setback line shall conform to that of the
adjacent commercial buildings that currently face
County Road 48.
An L-shaped building or a different configuration
using several smaller buildings instead of two large
buildings are suggested.
2. There shall be only one curb cut of 30' in width onto
Horton Lane. Curb cut should be located where the
southerly curb cut is shown so as to minimize impacts
on this intersection.
3. Parking lot should be designed so that internal
vehicular circulation is possible without having to
re-enter parking lot from the street.
4. Back-up space behind parking area must be clear for a
distance of a least 20 feet. See marked plan.
5. Curbing is required within the parking lot. Indicate
type. (It is not known at this time if curbing will be
required along Horton Lane.)
6. Drainage calculations and drawings are required for
,..--
,
t
the parking lot and site as a whole. All roof runoff
is to go to drywells. Proposed grades and first floor
elevations shall be shown, in addition to the existing
grades shown.
7. Consider joining parking lots with adjoining project
to east.
8. Indicate type and height of lighting and signage.
Lighting similiar to project to east is strongly
recommended.
9. Indicate where electric meters and transformers will
be placed. Also show location of dumpsters.
The concept Landscaping plan is acceptable, particUlarly the
liberal use of trees and foundation plantings. On revised plans,
include low shrubery to screen view of parking area from _
residentially zoned property as required by the Zoning Code.
If there are any questions, it is recommended that you and
your client set up a meeting with the Town Planner at your
convenience to review the proposed changes.
?L~;;;&%
BENNET]' ORLOWSKI,JR. V
CHAIRMAN
cc: Stanley and Betty Mendelson
· LASER FICHE FORM ·
Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans
SCANNED
SPFile Tvpe:
Proiect Tvpe: Site Plans
Status: Expired
SCTM #: 1000 - 63.-1-15
Proiect Name: Mendelson Medical Plaza
Address: southeast corner of Horton La. & CR 48. South old
Hamlet: Southold
Applicant Name: Stan lev Mendelson
Owner Name: Stan lev Mendelson
Zone 1:
Approval Date:
! P R 1 0 ?~nq
H '."i~nr '
/'101 )-1ffl2CvET)
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A date indicates that we have received the related information
End SP Date:
Zone 2: Zone 3:
Location: southeast corner of Horton La. & CR 48. Southold
SC Filinq Date:
C and R's :
Home Assoc:
Rand M Aqreement:
SCAN Date:
)i
I
I
At, `
n �
#,t DCME IZoA �+
I
000000 kes 14
12161
i
ST
�srN�r
1261
i
lk
i
�7� w
t
c ;
x
.t
I ,
„
ro
• JUS' 17 1990 i
lip
SOUITHPI
0 � I
K `RL 1 .
� p ,. 1141rK rNp► j * 1
S�
Ct
s
it
I d.
i
O
....►.�--� l
....�
-mom �.—•
-moo""
f ..
_ _ _ � w't. � � � j c is Y •�Y up i.`
- - `J*W
SOAP Jill"i46A
I I PSR: �'ts.,rw ,yv,� .
1
zV
4167 - -, *r\tt� ni. E Bono
9Fe,. b 45.6
19, A
4- ,N10. EZ EDGE PPlVS%AiN"Prulkift 44T5
Its
i
ut
LA
A 00
ko
tn
IT
AC
IT
1
tr
a'
i � Y
98 �y \ 1
M .
' .,:`�-�� �• , . ' :�'� '. � ;'�'' .. r� ,;,, . , � �'� � ' F-�+,"?"�a+�'.i�. f�r' PRG,iK�Jt^�S:SiA.�.,i.- . � �� , � r �„ �� ' �' 1.� � / ' ✓ ':`, .. � '- '
ss. x*tC's 6Uii.Wtuc,'- 1ct5*” ,,,,. , '� � '1. "✓. �, r
IT
XN
Ykt'XuP ,. 1r '
' :.l� � , . • �' �' � � .. IT
l - raa4'44. ih�R k � !�iu'r, ' Y ,+�*;��K ,ae o�ssr
i Rte°
/ Pd(7(IwYiMW',4 ir ' ; ' .
.� '��'� � �.��. � k 1: ,i '.�=i-.--.:`mac---=•»r' �F' ".,,5' ry-Nr, �i
I /
`iie,WJ�Te
�„
1i
It
LL
i
J ��1
►r oK
p ^ I i
M
,
r
- ,!y
ry
IT
IT
„
MgplMi I , 'N d _ 1
� 1
l
l h�
.m,ha+.�vrk_.
�.� „' � , s '....:•�_,.�_, v�._,.,..,..- __��....'.', ._ ,,.,za,...b-:_t d.E�..i a,.�x.,�_r ..,a, ' , �.o,_, ra..:.,�......,.... . 4t. ..�� `..,�'. '�. • '' " � _''- _ .._ .. v..
4 A J
1"'GT {7�MIT>•iJ'WQTi,+ 4•V 4'
P+c1E T .lM1i,6tP!)�", �1alp
fh(+k P'L�9YF.11 ,�V cx,
46 . a 45.6 4e.2 �S8 1WAA$j [it'll
44. 4 44.7
1
1 CURWb" ,arc. - ?6.o qs.2 � �1-ll ND. !ri 64Gee P'hN@W1Y.µT �,�
46 .4 -"- " 7` /.-...-- 44.6
- 44
0 �
1 TC.-44.4 j/ 95
DRAINAGE SYSTEM 46,"4 ! /� � r �� 96 ora 95.5 pt.r,wtltNr, aptnr. TYP.
STRUCT. DRAIN. RUNOFF STORAGE STORAGE NUMBER NUMBER ! j j aQ/
NUMBER AREA COEFF. VOLUME VOLUME OF 10' Of 1 / ��L9
(SF) (1) REO'D. PROVED, D6AM. CONES T • 44.6 / Q / N 9S
(2) RINGS (4) i M
DI-1 4140 , 0.95 656 701 2 1PAVIMBbJT AREA .D _ - - 1" "i • i
0I-2,3,4 13210 0.66 1497 1710 5 2 • g^ A^ 95S 3" tT•'A•
DI-5 6030 0.95 955 1009 3 1 �_ pl_5 9� \ �\ \ \ ►.SIeMAt T PAwlMeF4T
DI-6 7730 0.95 1224 1316 4 1
DI-7 12265 0.93 1904 1932 6 1 T�-� (, 96.5 q,•t t+c. \ 0
DI-B 3560 0.75 447 701 2 1 47
DI-9 8000 0.95 1267 1316 4 1 u� 11,*+!a►>t, 1 20 \ Q \ 0
DI-10 13870 0.82 1896 1932 6 i , I �` 97
RD-1 5200 0.95 823 1009 3 45 +W
RO-2 4329 0.95 685 701 2 i hk \ 96.5 ` - 43
NOTES:
T 1. Paved and roof area = 0.95 . \
> lawn area = 0.25 ( ' * Y P. X11 \ \ _ /
2. Based on two (2) Inch rainfall t � *�r�y \ \ "A" \ ��/ / /f 2
3. Inside diameter- 9.33 ft., height = 4.50 ft.
4. Height of cone section - 3,50 ft.
}
1 \
IV
f
49 /
'N.'►i qg ->�' 96.5 ; _ PpRTKA ♦ -- I
Itv
q-'.0 7y 1
t�'I�,IV4+ht Mt: \ FIr.It�H Esti. �=.�.r v
ILITSlhk 1 )" q7 t's , 700 Ywp.fT7 fmcwu�►aFlaO+ LA
l 01F-F-m4E su%l =pt'Nfa vcw.
1
!
PwYslclAwS ^►1C D!&NTtaT•S \ { 1 1 I 1
i
OFESB/py .,.
P ` 8 ice/u 1 ( ( b , Mwgy4t1W4 A41Ri111t' r1t11w41Y
+ 4 -- 1- T- { )nw�m +�1�sawr\")^ Ott r.#1 i _ yo, 4z9 ses f amu`" ��
. 1 V - 1Z_a /"" -- - '- _ i • pVr'r.e�lr�q. ,tcih7„ 47.�� _ .-•-.-;-l.iir 7D'p' te1Ry�"fG' o- �`9
ISM
! ,� i V , li lt' �f :� � 11 I . � �� ��� T►�,{ -,r, -.-=?=--71q,� k1t3St 'IY�� 1�'R:, * i',,, ,� * ,
l 1
I15 it I, 9b 11. a maptc �F MFWwI ►6N1wtl, ctF1( /
N . SPht>►SF' >fF'*F�4 ,1 QrR�lgl+t `„,¢MnryR '..� ryq^y.
W�M1l1'L't 111 ICa \ \ TYF" I' t"tilYTit41Wu�1M .g1rNk 'QIMMt
M . M1 Jt [SPF r � t.Kat '.a N wlaatal+a(r�- gq ' Ca oP TxfsVaIt tllr '
144
1w0%V%MF1JT kVk*k TYt. ---�'-� \ �__\ ) I ---- M --- - � k ` r)-r\ • �_ �
,• } / \\ `\ ..g „ rA„ 19G.5 1 .. .. g „ I . A,. ,. � „ aaR,u.�E ..' , ',�
,1 / \ I ( 16� , �.•• <Zl '10 =0" oro.. X '4 '-�" HhH Cores . IaN6v '' a tj
' T`f'F,
r t7 \ 1 {) ) rg •' fZl Ib: a,. plA x fagAWN
I!-'� '� r'Ii`t-t C.oNc, I?iQr-
,FIAT' GOMC, SLSM TOP. T\'P, �Ar,1J�:AK'b
\ 1
WAWA
/ I f
trM FLIa �c�raNn. St ,pea cpP r
Ilk
4 ,- q.7
wM
. _ DRAIIWA� E
'G11:R4,11£t_ J. C� U'S � ,W-K' M, .1"11K
,
r
r '
.4" - a' �e'=r 3' 1 r{ f k,.
„ J
n'
Y. k
I
- ►d\1 004,8. P1[DhG" � .
96 ^ 1�\ 46 . 4 46•x' ' - 46,2r / �'.rk�j 44• a 44.7
\` � UTI L . �►OL4 \'
Guhlu- rG . 4i.0 95.2• \ �1..1\. NO. bt a0 ta'�a ♦hV ilWllell'
i4 ����- 41.6
4--
P'LAt.,1T11.1C.. r-..c-H EOVLE � i // 1 +••� �` �. '
I TG O
+46.1 � � (O$ /+
'v "' — GOLUhhNAR NORwA�( MAP,-E j �' y\♦� /'r � '
� / , �/// t \ GRPSS AREA GRASS AREA + •-' •"
— cAN Ap1AN 5-F Enn1..,4 cK
VC - 44.6
P`( RAnn1PAl- AR60c-�, i';�F,c � � V `^ „ ` � N � PAVEMENT AREA \1.
GRPSS RQEA ` " �.. \ \ *♦ '
' �� r -�` +,,,, �„ . \ \ 1crbldtihl•T' pn.46twlul'Y
UAL, \ \
HIcKs Vows � .✓♦y — .« "�^`�, � '�, \
VPR\GNT JAPRtiFS'"c `�E.;•NS 1� � '� ``",�._,_ b. t \ .� O
-
'
SPRE AVING , AVAI'I t==`_.E. 13 1N' - . . •SIREWP - i '
iPIN`C G2.BEK N IF'F".
P6GZE A.1•✓t Al,. S"'u .r.'+lar•=Fz.SQ,I , -
PAcHY�,F,rvi-^k"ry CGrto+vu� GVVE.Q �, ly„ � .,,, `N
// /
le
if
f }y
Ni
IN
Ilk
z
r '
i ,
k �
��;';4"r':"�6° � � PAVE MERIT AREA '\. �1o6w A1.•K' .�� �. ' � � �� � Ik �\ _ ,' � .+�.. '„ *�.,
1
r
\ iso`'
C. Y DRi AMtaOPt.#�"M �.
1 IRO
,P' ' ' � \ \ st o�wEw�r� ik r . . I I t * M'K 1�,►�.� iY�6a►,7,�7�i. _
loco ,
/ , _....,_ , +ri blutc.d� K14ii�. t1l4 '+YA+ ,*a--. --*---�-^'-t , 7rti �',*'n � f,�••'^— �r��a�y : ' j
• ;; f' ” �,_ �•; , . ,: " . : , �; i -• ' � rak`�F,4 �' +�rtix�.r�ea��wi e'rx4t , ,r
I,
: t
� � �k � I �' '��' .f i. .l�llbi�'k1e4�tii�k�'K,�t€w,i #.!►l .- +�- �� ',;6f►_ �ttt � �esnaEd!.'
Vis. ase�a,: ` ti I 1 � ► ,�, � '. ',;
i
x'
Y
r
t
k
„
w f
r
Al
;124
41.
rrvy
- ,,�� a ' '-Mi�MbA..C1.;' ',j� ..MJ4.f �► 'G'�t1 `+yrr�,,4' b ,��: r
LIAING
��t'�. 1..M[ CYiA.k+4k�fRt_' J• C�¢€� �tiP'�w� � \MJ'Fi +c - ''`� i ,, .
if
�, M ,.r �7 r.ro � - � t nh rokr`•' '� r• '
F Y R•„
•
a ro ' s
r'
i�" •.A 4- J,
HR f la `Hr+•I4 A ' lr
A ^N
S
i
, , .., - �i .l i n .. •4 .)i. :,l_tr . Ip, .r r,1' r
-, 9, , .e:: , s -�.� , �, ., i :; a i :. r 1'11, J k yb� 'R
nr • r , _ 3 �."'' ' .� - �� 1 " � � r,-, '�, rl
f
, : , . . �. _ ..-� , t � :, l � . . � „ lu.h - r. '. „” 4 . ,,�-3', ' [ i-s . . # . , . , ,� u. ' i' nro
n, '. . . _ r ,N , . i .a✓ � .Xs n .r. r i V .J r' ��. . �. 1 , ('.1 t - '«
. - . : ':°;.
IN
. t.
1 4 ,
... r , .. , ,: -. i .,4a r , ' : , a '.. � � ., rvd iv .,. ,.,v � , , _., ry ,d , vN , k rU,• . � ..� �
nr' " :d}.v. . ,n.
-
._ .,..� -',u...w,,�'....4�.:zs.u�l.✓�«&yl '�u4E-1€�'i"�r4�'$' Y"t" ry.[�rYc3i�,d�'i/"...�',fti/tslf'+Nn'.,s�" 'k'> '�4"�AYi6/t14.krT�tt�.QYCJS:rw:..riWa4w,Hlkrcx/�,.d�.vJ�tllft=SW.F✓�Yrum£.,�'r�,/4. s-„e �.. _ _. .,. ., ,�l..n_.L.e i1r�, rJ:,,.,. ,r. .. _-. . � w
REVISIONS SY
a �
FRONT EL_ F.V r
i
,
. - _--- ..._ —.-tet '__'1^----^— �-:--'~---•�-,�--_,_..._.r.'=-.:.,, •_•__.,. __ __`"_-�---.^Y-^--f-,—,.—^^_-=.- _._+„'_ - _ _r._-.- -„�__,._
QaoeEssioyu
RIGHT S1OE KLEV ■ �`��w��a��C
a
THE 9v
r=1
-- - - —_ C N■CK
-
OATr
ion N
. . -
�,•
_ w:r� - Mhlrrrt�.
. ) � �',6 \ l” ,. aha •- ^ I.f ' a _ � _, ., e_. _ __� _. _ _ �.._ .,. s. L. _ _ a_ _._ _ __ � i ,... � � . � � � _ _ _