Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-56.-6-8.7
�q 9 E N63 3� TEST BORING B-1 hA511AMOMUCK P k A 5 0.0 5 2B ELAS+/- Ar A G, CLAY AND O _ DEBRIS `fes P \�O xqq ZA6�3� \\ \ NF WATER IN ANDDEBRSY M \ LOT ,I'8 \ % \�\ C, O MEQ UTILPOLE tea' // I \\ -a.0' E \Oa SJ O� ep,VE LIL//83B I I G, WATER IN GRAY GONG CLAY CH kqA epG�Oe ° ' ___ r' i ( I S SITE LOCATION /'COT 17 f El95VNG I III WATER IN -8.0' -LEACIR�IN�J7\ I \ 5 BROWN FINE \II, TO COARSE SAND(SW) kq 3 00 ! \ � WATERG I \ \\ \ h UEAnC'I1�HdC-r Y / (\ /1 ry �\ I / i Ali -12.0' EIR�/ 'P o \ METER 5 \ \ �P"" -'j 1 \ \ -/ / I \ WACLAYN GRAY 6j 09 O TEST BORING LOCATION UTIL o i ` 6 ST\ _./ i \-/ \ // / \ IIS ( ) �2 i A 2 °POLE 53 EXISTING N 6 6.5 I / \ I\- EXISTING i/ I\ \ -17.0' �\� SCALE: f. + 6 \\ \\ DISTRIBUTION �� // \ \ GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED 1.1' E \ BELOW SURFACE. SOUTI TOLD BAY -�HAtv)BER i \ TEST HOLE BORING BY McDONALD N� \ _ \ O 500 1000 __,�, _ \ i \ GEOSCIENCE DATED 5/19/09. EXISTING \ \ MON. \ MANHOLE \\ \ SSE•25 FNA. LOT 4 EX IS / W/PUMP KEY MAP t 55fi'CO / Z SI EXISTING N / �. '�, A �\ EXISTING 5' EROI ZION CONTROL NOTES: - GENERAL NOTES \ •6 6' \ SEPTIC \ 1. ALL MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND 1. DURING HE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION,THE USE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,AND NEW YORK STATE DEC AS APPLICABLE. TANK \ WILL BE CESSARY IN ORDER TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM WASHING ONTOADJACENT OFFSRE AREAS,YI� TERWAYS,DRAINAGE INLETS,RECHARGE BASINS,ETC. THE FIELOCONDRWNS ON THE 5RE 2. TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION BASED FROM SURVEY BY PECONIC SURVEYORS EXTEND 1\ ? \ \ _ SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATIONS \ WILL DIC TE WHICH EROSION CONTROL,MEASURE(S)MAY BE NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION. k, DATED SEPTEMBER 20,20D4. LAWN �I _ \ BASED ON AS BUILT SKETCHES THE SPE I )C EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED SHALL CONFORM TO"THENEWYORK yEX STI IS IN6 PROVIDED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS, LOT 19 GUIDELIN FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL,LATEST EDITION". 3. A MINIMUM SEPARATION OFTEN(10)FEET HORIZONTAL AND EIGHTEEN(18)INCHES VERTICALIS \ • I \ k� EPTIC ToDE \ TO BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER LINES, STORM DRAINAGE AND/OR SANITARY LINES OR ENC THE CONT ACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE GENERAL GUIDELINES AS DESCRIBED BELOW OR AS DIRECTED \ PROVIDE CONTINUOUS BY THE LO(�AL MUNICIPALITY: STRUCTURES. A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF TWENTY(20)FEET HORIZONTAL SHALL BE I TANK D EXISYINGI \ FRENCH DRAIN WITH \5' MAINTAINED BETWEEN STORM DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEPTIC SYSTEMS. WATBR G" DIA. PERFORATED /'\\ -SEOIMEt (SHALL BE CONTAINED ON-SITE AND SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ENTER ADJACENT 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS BEFORE \ \ 5ER\NG 6.5 �g1N \ PIPE AT 3'-0" BELOW GRADE / PROPERTII PUB LIC ROADS OR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS.SILT FENCE,HAY BALES,ETC.SHALL BE COMMENCING WORK. BURIED IN GRAVEL. / INSTALL LONG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PRO ORTO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROPOSED FRENCH DRAIN 14,356 \ BE MAIN? �NED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. \ i/ \ 5. ALL DRAINAGE PIPING MATERIAL TO BE 6"OVIMETER ADS N-12 SMOOTH INTERIOR CORRUGATED SFX 12"DEEP AND 6;761 SF X 6" � 1 tl y50 \ / ��/ .. ...•• �•-. -EXISTIN c c \ / / ;.,.:;:....: THE STININSTT �'LA ETA IO CONSTRUCTION FENCE pR OTHER APPROVED MEANS. PROTECTED BY POLYETHYLENE PIPE AS MANUFACTURED BY ADS OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. ROOF DRAIN PIPES DEEP(SEE DETAIL SHEET C-2) _ 6.0 \ �GEON OF TO REMAIN AND SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED AND SHALL BE TO EXTEND A MINIMUM 10'IN TO THE FRENCH DRAIN. 6. ALL ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUTS SHALL BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE PROPOSED ON-SITE . ..-'.."`.. •CLEARII� AND GRADING SHALL BE SCHEDULED SO ASTO MINIMIZE THE EXTEM OF EXPOSED AREAS DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ADDITIONAL ROOF DRAIN LATERAL PIPE AND FIRINGS TO BE PROVIDED AS /`,,, .•,,,,••;":r;'�' ':`:'i;:'i�. ANDTHEL NGTH OF TIME THAT AREAS ARE EXPOSED.GRADED,STRIPPED AND STOC PILE AREAS -EXISTING !!'::--iii;:.?r;}';;':;�;'..: rr: r::r ::;;.:;;.� OF ORARILY SEEDING AS RE UIREDCONSLT THE LOCAL NECESSARY TO CONNECT ALL ROOF DOWNSPOUTS. w SHALL BE ABILIZED WITH THE USE TEMP Q , GREASE :i ' AO::::: i:f:. � CH E MIXTURES FERTILIZER AN MU T TER CON SERVATION DISTRACT FOR SEEDD 7ri•': dF iriip ``1r SOIL AN0, 'A TER CONTROL MF1-SURE AREAS, UTILIZED AS •-• ::�:: ::- CONSTRUCTION,EROSION ANDS '� =': RR RY FR �'� :•:•::r:r :::•:::•::•. 7. DURING CONSTR VIB PERMEABLE PAVING _ EX.RESTAURANT TRAP GRAVELPA tl ,�.�.C. REC M CATIONS.DATIONSCLEARING AND GRADING SHOULD ONLY TAKE PLACE'AFTER IN>H'ALLATION OF 2. ::::[T'- ::;:::: OM E RT OF SEDIMENT TO OFF AREAS PONDS UNITS BY INVISIBLE STRUCTURES,INC. RESnAURANT io '( \ �/ri�ii;a'�; - EROSION ND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES. i NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE TRANSPORT .N / _ :::,• �-;'.': ;:: }' DRAINAGE INLETS,ETC. THE METHODS AND MATERIALS EMPLOYED IN THE INSTALLATION AND ORAN APPROVED OTHE OLD BARGE N HE ) T- R W YORK CONFORM NE Y R -�� B. :: 0 OS CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CON R ••..-�[i�• •�� �-..,R MAINTENANCE FER EROSION ISEDTOTHE t 1' '�� �.:;2rt<,NBJ7.FSR. JJ2H1$UFF,F, �,01J.- MAIN (PARKING AREATO BE RA \ `�'" 6.3 / - gYp{HEq�" RUNOFF �rALL BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM CLEARED SLOPES. GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL'. (BEeN:AN�9f6'PJJ1N• • \ 3, SPECIFIEDTOHAVE AND PAVER UNITS 9g .3". ::;:::: ;:••;j::ir::ri:i +r+: � :::r d - TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 60Ya OPEN i i -DRAINA INLETS INSTALLED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTlDFROM SEDIMENT BY ON AND�OEPT OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO SPACE AS REQUIRED BY NYSDEC) �.. /\ B. THE'CONTRA�TOR SHALLFIELD'VERIFY THE LOCATION H '+-"-'P.':-•.°r' �"'���- I SEDIMENT TRAPS ETC. AS RE6W1nEG; " c THE CATION OF SEDIMENT BARRIERS, „s THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. THE-CONTRACTORISADVISED At 1.SUBSURFACE { ESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL AND MUST BE CONFORMED ..•. - S 1' CONTROL UU37 THROU eHUU'1'L`OMSPRUCTION. INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE 54a�r, .p ( a -"�... '�• THE CO CTOR SHALL AN HE MEAN O C, ACCORDINGLY IN THE FIELD. \ \ N /- ALL DIST�1 BED AREAS SHALL E S TO BE VE E ATED IMMEDIATELY PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BECOMING AIRBORN ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO ME VEGETATED IMMEDIATELY AFTER�MURK IS COMPLETED. 9, ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND DEBRIS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN, �\ I COUNTY,STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS,CODES AND ORDINANCES,CONTRACTOR SHALL BE Q 3 / / / ,�( 05 i -A STAB( ED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANOE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT SOIL AND LOOSE 1y \N". BURIED ON-SITE. DISPOSING OF ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIALS OFFSITE. DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE \ DEBRIS F BEING TRACKED ONTO LOCAL ROADS. THE CONSTRUCTION TRAC NCE SHALL BE BURIED ONSITE. g? � i �" MAINTAI UNTIL THE SITE IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. ANY SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC PROPOSED T WIDE TRENCH\ 6.6 ate° i ��14 250,2'1 ROADS T BE REMOVED OR CLEANED ON A DAILY BASIS. - 10. ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH SUFFICIENT STEEL REINFORCEMENT EXCAVATE THROUGH BOB AND CLAY INTOAVIRGIN Y STRATA OF SAND AND GRAVEL. BACKFILL WITH -EROSIO ONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTpR�PERIODIDALLY AND TO WITHSTAND AASHTO H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING ALONG WITH TEMPERATURE AND SHRINKAGE, - SUITABLE POROUS SAND AND GRAVEL MATERIAL \ _ p1Cr; ri,. - - J N TRANSPORT TO THE SITE AND SITE CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 1 - i IMMEDIA Y AFTER HEAVY OR PROLONIGED RAIN EVENTS. MAINTENANCE M"_ URE.S,TO BE PERFO D AS NECESSARY INCLUDING,BUT ARE NOT LIMITED 70,CLEANINGI)F SEDIMENT BASINS '• '"'`- 5 i �v-51: oJ`Y� ANDT CLEANING OR REPAIR OF SEDIMENT BARRIERS,CLEANING AND REPAIR OF BERMS AND 11. BE DESIGNEDAST, STRUCTURES AN BE MANUFACTURED T UREDWIT AASOPSI CONCRETE LOADING. WP DNERSIQ S,AND CLEANING AND REPAIR OF INLET PROTECTION. rl BE DESIGNED,CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED TO SUPPORT AASHTO H-ZO TRAFFIC LOADING. \ \ .31 III 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FORALL PRECAST STRUCTURES DETAILING THE \ •Z17e: ..... WNL WM QO -EROSIOI, PND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALLBE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY STEEL REINFORCEMENT AND PROVIDE CERTIFICATION BY THE PRECAST MANUFACTURER THAT \ •. •• "''�•'+::i •-•' l MH \ �F- OTHER DDISTURBANCES. STRUCTURES ARE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING. \ • . -"'- "' 1tlEy�� / O� - SEDIMEI BARRIERS AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL 13. MANUFACTURER TO CERTIFY THAT DRAINAGE PRECAST STRUCTURES DELIVERED TO THE SITE _ ' UPLAND I URBED AREAS ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED,AFTER PERMANE,VIT STABILIZATION, " -"� ..-••. -•. P� t44G PAVED EAS SHALL BE CLEANED AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS CLEANED AND FLUSHED AS NECESSARY. MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. \ 4, \ /- ::'-' •.::: •':: :':: ':::: :.:: OO / 14. SITE AREA 1.4219 ACRESvhror-^sIG40LE rp{:GVNrrTOsc>ToN Oki�'It; .. O VV° lea-2iA(IJ ACKNOLEDGES ThIMy TtQi COV?LllT10T190p Ill::S!iflflASl PROPOSED POSTS RAIL FENCE :, .A•;;.:;;,..; �.:: / ov SETP aTn aJ Tt1E RESOLU'rCoOaTIONS OV USSEG OR O APPROVED EQUAL AT O ARE A/CEPTED (SEE pCOHD11I\\TIONS ON ItESOLllT1GM EDGE OF PROVED BUFFER TTHZONE C''f` i Al PLEASE PRINTNAt+� TFTLE 3`•~ `` .' ' :' ;' ::: D (,NAGE CALCULATIONS: C� P�GNATEaE i \u 25 NON-FERTILMED BUFFER ZONE :- .:r i OGS PY (SEE PLANTING PLAN BY DINERS) cFj, �yJj G� G THE PRi (POSED ON-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE STORAGE FOR 4" AT OLD PLAN14 &On!'31 / A�, P.y,\a \�ti RAINFA IN FRENCH DRAINS PROVIDING STORAGE WITHIN THE 35%VOIDS O6;jHE TOWN OF r ,,. PQ \O STON L. 'THE DESIGN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS:,ROOF �-"leo 065 yZO0 Qp-1'�a�\� ct QO�� AND bS0APE 0R0ASPHALT PAVEMENT LO,PERVIOUS GRAVEL DRIVEWAY 6,6 A-�T�HoevyED s1oNATuaE""-T p DRAIN GE AREA"A": NOTE:The approved site devclo meet plan shall be veli a period of three(3)years from the date of approval as pe 0 STO REQUIRED: r. •!'0rrrirn 100.255. ) of3 G� PAVENE , AREA: 3,016 SFX1.00 X4'112=1,005 CF LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED ROOF EA: 3,900 SFX 1.00 X4"112=1,300 CF GRAVE iDRIVEWAY AREA: 23,438 SF X 0.50 X 4"112=3,906 CF \ FRENCH DRAIN - - - - - - - ® LAND APEAREA: 9,778SFX0.10X4"112= 326CF SANITARY SEWER 6,537 CF 2010 nrreovtu t'1-1tlrt'i't' 911109 NYSDEC COMMENTS STORA EPROVIDED: ��"( 20 '',ANDul COT"D E"4E'l oP �.3 REVISIONS GRAVELPAVEMENT FREN DRAIN 14,306 SF X 13"DEEP =14,306 SF X13"112X.35= 5,424 CF - 38.-OIb�5l0 ASPHALT PAVEMENT FRENEK DRAIN 6,354 SFXW DEEP = 6,354SFX8"112X.35 = 1482CF 6,906 CF nn't'P.=l II_5_J.Iv- + ��. NJ•C BULKHEAD N O THE SJ SNE DEPTH VARIES BETWEEN I2"TO1WOVERTHE14,306AREAAND0'TO CONTOUR ----G----- -6 16"0 THE 6,354 SF AREA SPOT GRADE +5.5 99.7 + * . Plons are prepared by Condon Eig,rreedrg,P.C. Il is a doladan atthe New York FLOW ARROW State Education haw,Ande 145,Sedlan 7206,forany pawn unless amng under the dlrecdonolaiwmsed Pmfevtonal EngineerAmMlect,or Land Surveyor,loaller OST912 �1v PROPERTY LINE ------ any Rom in any wall.If an ilem beedlg the seal of an Engineer,AmhlleuL or hand pROFESSl0S4T\'� Suwayorls allerad,the offering Engineer,AmhSed,or land Sumeyorshan affix to the Rem hlNhereeal and the notedon'Alhm l by fallowed by hldherdgnaWm atoll e SILT FENCE - - - - -- S.C.T.M.DIST.1000 SEC.56 BLK.06 LOT 8.7 dale of such elleogona,and a specillcdearelption of(he attention. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OUST CONTROL ® Condon Engineering, P.C. THE OLD DBD MAN RRESTAURANT Scale:l"=20' Drawn by:JJC 1755 Sigsbee Road SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK OF MBII(luck, New York 11952 Date;s1220os (631)298.1986 (631)298-1986faX GRADING AND www.condonangineedng.com --DRAINAGE-PLAN III - - -- --- (III I POSTS-STEEL,T QR U SHAPE TYPE OR 2"HARDWOOD ' FENCE-WOVEN WIRE 14.5 GAUGE 6'MAX.MESH OPEf,ING FILTER CLOTH-MIRPFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUAL 1� III 36'MIN,FENCE POST o p J Z Z HAYBALES • ' OR41N40E7NLET(TW) W 9� ' ! �- ALUMINUM LEADER NOTES: UNDISTURBED GROUND FLOW FLOW 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN.141/2 GAUGE MAX.W '`d' F� LOW 1 'I (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) —� MESH SPACING)WITH FILTER CLOTH OVER FENCE, ce COMPACTED BACKFILL BOUND STRAW BALES 511?MIN. DOWNSPOUT ADAPTER(ADS n 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO 'X6"TRENCH III OR APPROVED EQUAL) o WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" EXISTING 3'-0' EXISTING (SEE CHART FOR PART NUMBER) T 2X2 WOOD ' - ' AT TOP AND MID SECTION. EMBED FILTER z GROUND 6• 'I I� PAVEMENT STAKES(TYP.) CLOTH 6"MIN. ( I I s7 G SEE B :o z ( BEDDING 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN INTO GROUND .- ._, I.(; :.,..i :,;;.,-•.:,r _, ...." ;,.,:..,':'i"',,_ DETAIL) p FLOW w,t, EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY SIX III I-111-II,.Ti- INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER MOUNTABLE BERM STRAW BALE INLET PROTECTION DETAIL 2"STONE OR PROFILE CLOTH (OPTIONAL) TWO REBARS,STEEL PICKETS, RECYCLED CONCRETE 4. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS 7 i NOTES: OR 2"x2"STAKES II ST \\ \ / 4' WOVEN WIRE FENCE(MIN.14112 VERTICAL NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN"BULGES" PROPOSED GRADE 2'N 0 GROUND.F 1.BALES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE OR ON THE CONTOUR FACE DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. I 5U MIN. o AND INA ROW WITH ENDS TIGHTLY ABUTTING THE ADJACENT BALES. STAKE DRIVEN AT ANGLE // SECTION \ \ \ BEDDING DETAIL TOWARDS PREVIOUSLY LAID GAUGE MAX,6"MESH SPACING) 450 BEND(MAX) 2.EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED IN THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF 4INCHES STRAW BALE.DRIVE STAKES AND PLACED SO THE BINDINGS ARE HORIZONTAL. FLUSH WITH TOP OF BALE +,., POSTS(TYP.) 36"MIN.FENCE POSTS. 6"ADS P +. 10 MAX DRIVEN 16'MINANTOTHE = WE(LENGTH VARIES) 3.BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY EITHER TWO STAKES + ,+ '' _ CENTERTOCENTER GROUND !( o OR RE-BARS DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALE. THE FIRST STAKE IN EACH ""•' +µ"'M - - BALE SHALL BEDRIVEN TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE ATANGLE ANGLE FIRST STAKE TOWARD - - w ? m AN w SNAP CONNECTION s c PREVIOUSLY LAID BALE - — EI TO FORCE THE BALES TOGETHER STAKES SHALL BE DRIVE FLUSH X STING 6 a BEND n 450 MAX. GROUND l — 'yam WITH THE BALE. j1OFFILTER + + . . . � 'MPART# PIPE SIZE AFlow + + ILT N 0364AA 3" . . .4.INSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT AND REPAIR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE yMADE PROMPTLY AS NEEDED. + ' 10'MIN.ORMATCH ix 0464AA 4" 2.50" 3,25' 4.75' o '4{ ADJACENT ROAD WI ITH 0465AA 4' 3.25" 4.50" 5.00• 5.BALES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULNESS PLAN 0466AA 4" 2.56" 2.66' 4.63• 6"ROOF DRAIN SO AS NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM FLOW OR DRAINAGE. 0664AA 6" 3.62" 5.63' 6.43" LATERAL(TY IN WITH - Y 0661 066 6"X 6"WYE NETRATION INTO NOTE: •PaN 0664-AC is PVCND WAIRTENANCE TO INCLUDE RIODIC TOP 10 MIN. NOTE: BADS PIPE MAYBE DISTANCE VARIES (SEE SECTION) ELEVATION DRESSING WIT I ADDITIONAI STONE AS USED WHEN A DOWNSPOUT IS (SEE GRADING AND ANCHORING DETAIL REQUIRED, CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO A DRAINAGERAN) DRYWELL, STRAW BALE DIKE DETAIL SILT FENCE DETAIL STABILIZED C011 STRUCTION ENTRANCE ROOF DRAIN ADAPTER DETAIL R ppm OVED By PRECAST STRUCTURE NOTES: NG BOARD 1.ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH Pp A(1p11 SUFFICIENT STEEL REINFORCEMENT TO WITHSTAND PASHTO .(•HQLD H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING ALONG WITH TEMPERATURE AND , ('(• �0 SHRINKAGE,TRANSPORT TO THE SITE AND SITE CONDITIONS AS 00 SHOWN ON THE PLANS. —DATE OCTr'T 2 2 ALL PRECAST STRUCTURES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED WITH ADD PSI CONCRETE AND SHALL BE DESIGNED,CONSTRUCTED NO INSTALLED TO SUPPORT AASHTO H-20 TRAFFIC LOADING. d,13 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL d PRECAST STRUCTURES DETAILING THE STEEL REINFORCEMENT AND PROVIDE CERTIFICATION BY THE PRECAST MANUFACTURER THAT STRUCTURES ARE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT H-20 TRAFFIC WASHED CRUSHED STONE LOADING. PROPOSEDGRADE (SEE PERVIOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL) 4.MANUFACTURER TO CERTIFY THAT DRAINAGE AND SANITARY GRAVELPAVE2 PERMEABLE PAVING UNITS BY pL HP EL.6.5 LP EL.6.0 HP EL.6.5 LP EL 60 PRECAST STRUCTURES DELIVEREOTOTHE SITE MEET ALL EL.5A REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON,SUFFOLK INVISIBLE STRUCTURES,INC. , OR AN APPROVED EQUAL UNITS FILLED WITH FINE GRAVEL-3/16"OR LESS 0% 6.1% 2% IN. 2°k MIN. 2%MIN. COUNTY TUseavlcPsgrlo THE suFFax FILTER FABRIC ATTACHED TO (GRADE .....".".....-."... ............... ... -- ^ - coum DE --- - — T DEPARTMENT OF HEAL OMP D SANDY GRAVEL R A SEED OR SOD ... .. :, _— .4.5E VELPAVE2 EL.�_41W EL 1; /\\\/\\\/ / // \//\/ `�\\��\\//\\//\\/\ C95%MODIFIEDBOTTOM OF PROCTORDENSITY BA 4"MAX SAND'YO 004 °y: -':.: � 5' L 4"OF 314"-1"OPEN GRADED 6' 5 sB'MAx I OCT 2 ZOi� /1109 NYSDEC REVISIONS MENTS STONE,NO FINES(PASHTO#57) POOR DR SUBGETT CLAY SOILS F ` 16"OF 1 %"-2"OPEN EXCAVATE THROLGH BOG D AND AND TOWARD TREK BE SLOPEDALLOW MIN. CLAY INTO AVIRGIN TOWARD TRENCHES TO ALLOW ��O NElyy — EL. BACKFILL WITH STONE AREA ABOVE TO DRAIN) �- 3.O O GRADED STONE,NO �1' ec x s D u c 1 %"-2'OPEN GRADED STONE,NO FINES(AASHTO#1) SUITABLE POR US SAND ANC GRAVEL MATERIAL. PARKING AREA CROSS SECTION rsPT:al ED AS t'eR TERNM y �Q w FINES(AASHTO#1) nr:n CONDITIONS OF rEatu'r xo. I—`I738-b1(d�slv�°� Mos WRAP WITH 6O (MIN.)NONWOVEN // / / / / / / /�/ / / axnz'E_J_ILI.LLKy;S hep `�/`\/`\//`Cl/\//`//`\//`\/�\// NOTE: GEOTEXTILE(FILTER FABRIC)MIRAFI `i/\`%\`i/\ii` `�i`�i`\�i`\�i` `\�i`�i �p9pfESS10hA�'� / / /�/ \ 140N OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. \/\\/\/\/\\/\/\ WRAP WITH60Z.(MIN.)NONWOVEN \ /\\ \\/\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\/\\ \\ GRAVELPAVE2 TO BE INSTALLED IN `/�.Y��/��/�\/�\���/�`/�/�`/�� / til Plsre ere prepared by Condon Englneenng:P.C. It S.C.T.M,DIST.1000 SEC,66 BILK 06 LOT 6.7 GEOTEXTILE(FILTER FABRIC)MIRAFI ACCORDANCE WITH THE Is a violation of he New Yak Slate Education Lew, 140N OR AN APPROVED EQUAL //.//.//.//.//.//.//.//.//.//.//.//.//.// MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS, Article 145,Section 7209,for any person wless PERVIOUS PARKING SECTION FRENCH DRAIN SECTION (LANDSCAPE AREAS) Engneer.A h�`�and's�`ayortoa°`��y� Scale:NTS Condon Engineering, P.C. THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT �-� item In any way.If an hearing the seal of an OLD MAIN ROAD Hem Engineer,Amhiled,or Land Surveyor is shared,the 1755 Sigsbee Road SOUTHOLD, NEWYORK OF sharing Engineer,ArehHecb or Lend Surveyashall Drawn by:JJC Ma6ifUCk, New York 11952 she lothe Item hia'herseal and the noletlon dateof such aftowed by hisand a s ecincre andNe (631)298-1986 (631)298-1986 fax Of dateof lforeallemtions,ands speclactlesalptlon Date:6/2/2009 www.00ndonengineedng.com CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Of the alteretion. lI I 'I ' Ilr �� � I I ti A6, EX. I-STORY FR. I 5� ARAIY 5 RESTAURANT 1 D E S I G N LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE (THE OLD BARGE) I Ff'F[ZF�' - - - - - I Lan Sitep Pl nners L.ONCects �- Development 5trategist5 Agawam Studio - INC PM 1 sa Nugent street PM AG 3-4'I M5 3— SuiteA� (63i)a2a3�n, NY 119688 (63i) 263-66n (fax) / /� S 5 i Info@ararysdesign.com MP �. I - PROPOSED UPPER OBSERVATION e- PROPOSED r f<< 7 F- '011( , UPPER z _I LEVEL AB I N O¢C „ 3 PM PM I IZlt .l _i,` N _ _------ 5 AG (3-4') 5 AG �4-5') 0 w -4 WIDE MULCHED PATH -- 5 3 PM MP o I II 3 I CD 3 AG (3-49 I E PM MP CD t F. wr 1„ I- I 5 3 WOOIi WALK W )Of>> W<\LI WILL . F ',`✓1- AS Jf31. ILWAY E - 11.1. 11 vv p �� 330 Q y1A.)1-".Y�'111 I'' 1 250 . 27 D s' 10' so' 40' z SAB , _ - - o A 4-51 �,,,,n 520 - - - i 1 R VEGETATION PLAN W )_Jc %LE CD SCALE: I"=10'-0" j a U 565052'00' W F w p �.)0 - q a Ii�)�Il�lJ �7��1V�I(J m Revisions - - I1-v No. Dote Description SITE PLANT LIST 3 OTf. SYM. BOTANICAL NAME 'i COMMON NAMESIZE ROOT REMARKS12 SPACING SHRUBS SII 11 AG Amelanohler canadensls DOWNY 5HADBLOW 3-4' 545 MULTI-STEMMED, FULL d AS SHOWN 25 AG Amelanchler canadensls DOWNY SHADBLOW 4-5 13-4 E3 MULTI-STEMMED, FULL A5 SHOWN 56 MP M rlca penqlval NORTHERN BAYBERRY 24-30" 645 FULL AS SHOWN I 13 PM Prunus maritlma BEACH PLUM 3 GAL. CONT. FULL AS SHOWN Seal 12 I GRASSES AS SHOWN 1,150 A8 Ammo hlla brevllleulata i ICAPF AMERICAN BEACH 6RA55 FLU65 CONT FULL12" O.G. V 2" MULCH. DO NOT PLACE -- IF A DISGREPANGY EX STS BI T KEEN THE PLANT LIST AND THE PLAN, THE PLAN QUANTITIES SHALL GOVERN -� MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. MAINTAIN THE MULCH WEED CT 2 0 2010 FREE FOR DURATION OF CONTRACT PERIOD. 4" 5AUGER RIM \ SET TREE AT ORIGINAL GRADE PLANT LEGEND i� --' s, "j tL PLANTING 50 - J IASOTHY A. BUMPH I�� SPACING AS R PLAN MULCH: PINE BARK OR WOODCHIPS '75mm (3") MIN. I i3E3i��� N.Y.S. UC. NO B5252 N07E5: — SOIL SAUCER: USE PREPARED 70P501L 150mm (6') MIN. P I. REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, DECIDUOUS T r.. .{ i,)'f�-j �g NOTES: Job No. _ I ul •- 110499 _ WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM olII a Ir TREES _ T S.C.T.M # 1000-056-06-8.2 ROOT BALL. SCARIFY ROOT III i- C - ISI ��.,�,�'�"hO+�PDI�O �n�_Jr�L HIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FROM Date BALL IF CONTAINER GROWN. l i Wi I ,I TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP. NON-BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL I,I W ITEPLAerRCAREDBYCONDON _ 11/04/09 ROPES AT TOP OF BALL SHALL BE GUT. REMOVE NO — _ _ i,, SHRUBS 1 jp1 _ -�(i/5009NAEVISE ON Scale SHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED '�— ATTITUCK N.Yf 1 ., AS NOTED 2 BACK FILL WITH EXISTING 501E I III ' :I -; III `PREPARED ADMIXTURE BACKFILL Q a _ ---_ //� SEPTEMBER 29 Drn. By a IN SANDY LOAM SOILS: ADD 50% _ III I 1 PREPARED SUBGRADE PEDESTAL p MRM MAX. BY VOLUME COMPOSTED � �-III i � IIIA III - III -�II1 ill' _ III- III - III -III -" 3 rr j THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR d ORGANIC MATERIAL TO THE JI i i___ _ ?X BALL DIA. MIN. SITE PLAN APPROVAL ONLY.THIS PLAN chkd. By -III_= --;' — `COMPACTED 5UB GRADE IS NOT TO BE USED FOR TAR EXI5TIN6SOIL. FIRM MIXTURE AT <,I- �'_I11.- llf_ILI - -fIL-111- BEACH CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. Drawing No. 12 INCH INTERVALS - THOROUGHLY 6RA55 ° ti o AREA= fi1,93B S.F. SETTLE WITH WATER. AP f?OV EU i.`i PLIi TERMS ANI CODR�lt IONS OP 1.4219 ACRES _73 Ol CAROLKIDENSON D..HNJ T 110- I OWNER.(M�� OLD BARGE RESTAURANT n _ 2 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 3 MULTI-STEMMED TREE PLANTING DETAIL r SCALE: NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE o i C " I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 TFEI'?;DEGSIGNED,P1.'Ir,$UANT TO SOUTHOL.DTORII CODE Iwk ISSUES/ REVISIONS Ido-254(1)ACKNOLEDGF;S'nMT rTIECONDLUONS OF THE SI'I 1 11l PROV SET OATH fiJ THE RFdOLU110H OF APPROVALD TFD (/ I ARE ACC EP(ED.IREECONDIYIONSdN RE WTA K�` ' MAP � 30�E SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS rL�?FcralNrrvnpME �� Y \\63\ LC2Laa JQ T Irsl o 'Z� AU(HO¢IZEDSIGNA'N!t'e TITLE .\ES DESIGN FLOWXPERC�VEr• / \ N TOWN OF SOUS'OLD IO ANNBY D G BOAlm �O (,O 3 / 8, \ N CAPACITY SANITARY KITCHEN TOTAL 5OUTHOLD, N.Y. !� PSN r / ZA6N 7 O� RESTAURANT 9SEATS 9x OGPD= 90 9x20 GfD=2380 3570 AU Rzcoslue� rFLe OT 18 E\TS UTIL POLE RETAIL 363 SF x O 03 GPD/5F - I I GPD N/A NOTE:Tile¢ oved site development plaits 111 M M PPr P PIE #838 (DRY STORE 1 O e — — a period of dare(i)years from the date of aper v� r ����� a" 0� EOGB O�� 6 3581 GPddu.seotiGH 100-255. !� O., 5, LOT 17 8' SANITARY. DESIGN CALCULATIONS BASED ON FEB.03'CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) • EAC NG l ffk5TING SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR 6,000 GAL. AS FEF, PLANS BY GREEN MAN-PE ER5EN, INC. i J 5' DATED JUNE 1981 , AND APPROVED BY 5UFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, EXISTING JULY' 01 , 1981 ( H.D REF. NO. 5-47). GROUND WATER (g ±5.G' EL WATER \ EACH O METER Q15� ✓ �� \ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ~ i , AIF UTIL LOT-I S �¢{S. -- POLE T '\ ~ FES. B, zws PECONIC BAY `- T_ � � - � , \) wFST slDe ( eXISTING c6�NDmords J EXISTING LAWN" � \ �' � \ �J -- U15 ING PAFKJNG. 27495 5 F. a' 17 x 6 = 2.804 C.F. i G'�Jo N ( F 2 45 5 Y I _ • IST BUT \ EXISTING HARD SURFA :_ : .. x . 7 x = 501 C.F' FES 17, Zoos �., 7 - (;HA ER1O TOTAL REQUIRED = 3.505 C F. LOT 5 -r� y \c" \ JAIL 28.2005 2/ c - �O \ -- __ _ _ _ - BULKHEAD SUB NOV Iz. 2000 -fX15TING - v -- -SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (EXLSTI PJG) \ LAWN TO BE vZ `� v \ - - 100 L F x I O' W x 4 5D = 4.500 C.F. x .4 = E5T.CAFACITY 1 .500 CF. �"� EXISTING B O�jC 25 p�ON. LOT 14 I � 1 PAVED TO \ qO \� , \MANHOLE BULKHEAD SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD NEW C EXISTIN/ MATCH EXISTING \ \ (NEW) 'E6 5 - g SIGN �' O /PUMP 00 L F. x O' W z 4 5' D = 4,500 C.F. x 4 = EST.CAPACIN .800 Cf. Nov o2, 2000 �, zP00aG - NEW SIGN _ FRENCH DRAIN EXISTING LAWN , 02P I _ A v� A � � r. TL"L � \ -FO.'15TING 5 - 200 L F x 2' W x 3' D = 1 ,200 G.F, x .4 = EST CAPACITY 480 C F 5EP,23, 2004 OI \ � Y � SEPTIC \ TOTAL E5T.CAFACH4 080 Cf SEP la, 3000441 TANK SEPTIC , 1 EXTEND - 43x " ZANK J �" \�� EA5T SIDE ( EXISTING CONDITIONS ) LAWN 42 _ SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATIONS • MAY'27, 2004 \�`\ ` BASED ON A5 BUILT 5KETCHE5 \ PARKING: 191 51 S.F x . 17 x G = 1 .953 C.F. APR 09. 2004 PROVIDED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS. EXISTING HARD SURFACE : 347 5 F x 17 x = 94 C F, 40 ex,r. IW or I9 - �1 ao . na, TOTAL REQUIRED - 2.1407 C,F ^ IES - BULKHEAD SUB-5URfACE DRAINAGE FIELD � FED 27, 2004 PROVIDE CONTINUOUS EYS ING 150 L.F x O' W x 45' D = 6,750 C.F. x A = E5T.CAFACITY 2.700C r. p2i .- - `IV WAT FRENCH DRAIN WITH \5 140V 05, 2003 \\ 37 R CE i �� 6" DIA. PERFORATED \\SE \\\ 3 ��� _ PIPE AT 3'-0" BELOW GRADE c \ \ EXISTING _ 6 5 5� -%� NEW ROOF BURIED IN GRAVEL� PA OR \ GRAVEL yen. A .400 S.F. x 17 x I = 238 C F 02003\ .35 �/ � T p'"� 'V � TOTAL REQUIRED = 238 C.F � ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PARKING 3 uJ 4 NEW FRENCH DRAIN ^y AREA _ r THESE PIAH5 ARE AN IN5TRUMENT OF J I\� / x' 35G LF x 3' D x LS W = .602 C F x .4 = ESLCAPACITti' G40 C.F rlA 33 /.�. ,M� \ 1� SERVICE AND ARE FRI GEMENTSFRO�FRn WILL O PROVIDE CONTINUOUS 32 \ b�`� L \ /L� / • ©e PROSECUTEDTHE ARCHINeCT. IIIFRIIJGEMENTS WILL c FRENCH DRAIN 31 EL .s 2 P \ " U15TING GROSS SQUARE FOOT TOTALS 3o �� \ aR pr _ GREASE SPO � FIRST FLOOR 3923 5.F Z \\ 29 / e PR.RESTAURANT X20 ;� \ TRAP /�Qp160 // �, 5F_COND FLOOR 1 397 5 F. �w 28 \ N i ,NO 3 v TOTAL 53205.E _ ,-O„ I ,-6„ \ SGP ( BARGE) N PNS 01 PARKING: ED GRADE vv 2e �� /� 3 CLEAN GRAVEL ��" ��- RESTAURANT 9 5t_A5T5/ 3 = ao SPACES �I ACCESSORY RETAIL EMPLOYEE. I SPACE 25 Ao \ obPACE O \ 24 10 0 0.9 ADDITIONAL DOR RETAIL 00 TOTAL REQUIRED: 43 5FACE 5 6" PERFORATED TOTAL PROVIDED: as SPACES 23 PIPE WRAPPED WITH FILTER CLOT22 INCL 2ACCESSIBIL ) Ir _ C 20 OR �vv \� • I PER 100 5 F, = 53 5PACE5 \\\\ I8 \ J\ - PROVIDED: 445PACE5 F ISE N C h D �A I N -B NKE - CUEIIT, OWNER �� 17 \ Sw, \ i' BANKED i \\ IS 14 - _ - ��'/ ��� ILAW FOR ANY PERSON, DETAIL \ M UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE THE OLD BARGE / vA.<� DIRECTION OFA LICENSED ~ REFjTAURANT PV .Jlc _ M,H W -------��/ O ARCHITECT,TO ALTER ANY I� D N.T.S. / `uP ITEM ON THIS DRAWING IN RT. 25 \\\ Ox�OO 0 - NtVJS\G fff � " R� ANYWAY..ANY AUTHORIZED ~ 50UTHOLD, N.Y. ALTERATION MUST BE ` '/ 0� NOTED,SEALED,AND A i DESCRIBED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW. R„;p El i„CA i O 0 AR °O PROJEC(TITLE s 61 � �D ADDITION 5Gy°5 COQ �. - 1... DRAWING TITLE ep J05EFH F15CHETTI p PROFE-95IONALENGINEER ! 517E PLAN 1 725 HOBART RD. B 50UTHOLD , N .Y. 1 1971 1 PRINT DATE SALE BASED ON SURVEY FOR G3 20'"0' N THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 63 I -765-2954 I,, p ISSUE III AT AR5HAMOMAQUE .yFED e, zoos MAR 10 T O TOWN of SOUTHOLD h° W - E SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y - 'I `a.( DRAWING NO s se 1000-56-06-8 7 _ AUG.OG. 1995 S AREA = 1 421 9 ACRES LOT COVERAGE 10% �1,�1 I LANDSCAPED G% IINIIII A ZONING DISTRICT MII FIRE DISTRICT 5 5 1 T E P L A N 5G"°QL DISTRICT 28 REF. No 02. 17 SCALE. I"= 20'-0' .. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �QF soar P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR ��� y0/_ Southold,NY 11971 Chair Oy 4 T OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS JAMES H.RICH III �� 54375 State Route 25 DONALD J.WILCENSKI DUNT'1, (cor.M in Rd. . &Youngs Ave.) So Telephone: 631765-1988 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 15, 2011 Mrs. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: Extension of Site Plan Approval: Proposed Amended Site Plan for The Old Barge, Second Floor Located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953'w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zoning District: Marine II Dear Mrs. Denson: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 14, 2011: WHEREAS, the applicant, Carol R. Denson, proposes the amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,397 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the M-ll Zone; and WHEREAS, the C.D. Reiter Partnership is the owner of the property known as SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2003, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Final Approval on the site plan prepared and certified by Robert I. Brown, Licensed Architect, dated November 5, 2003 and last revised February 18, 2005, and authorized the Chairperson to endorse the final site plan subject to a one year review from the date of issuance of the Building Permit; and WHEREAS, the site plan approval expired on March 14, 2008; and The Old Barge Second Floor Page Two February 15, 2011 WHEREAS, on January 15, 2010, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) approved a drainage plan and issued Permit Number#1-4738-01665/00003, effective January 19, 2010; and WHEREAS, the applicant, in a letter dated August 3, 2010, requested for the Planning Board to re-issue an approval that expired on March 14, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board agreed to extend the site plan approval at a Work Session held on September 13, 2010 provided the Town Engineer was satisfied with the revised drainage plan; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2010, the Southold Town Board of Trustees issued Permit#7399 in accordance with the site plans prepared by Condon Engineering, P.C., dated June 2, 2009 and last revised September 29, 2009, and also depicted on the re- vegetation plan last dated November 4, 2009; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2010, the Town Engineer commented that the plan approved by the NYSDEC meets the minimum requirements of Town Code Chapter 236 Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2010, the applicant was informed that all exterior luminaires installed, replaced or repaired shall conform to the new lighting code standards requiring Dark Sky compliant fixtures to be fully shielded; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board granted a 3-year extension of Site Plan Approval retro-active from March 14, 2008 to March 15, 2011 on the site plan prepared and certified by Robert I. Brown, Licensed Architect dated November 5, 2003 and last revised February 18, 2005; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2010, the Southold Town Planning Board granted an approval on the drainage plans stamped by the NYSDEC approved on January 15, 2010, prepared by Condon Engineering, P.C., dated June 2, 2009 and last revised September 29, 2009, and also depicted on the re-vegetation plan last dated November 4, 2009; and WHEREAS, the applicant, in an e-mail dated February 3, 2011, requested for the Planning Board to re-issue an approval that expires on March 15, 2011; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants a 3-year extension of Site Plan Approval from March 15, 2011 to March 15, 2014 on the site plan prepared and certified by Robert I. Brown, Licensed Architect, dated November 5, 2003 and last revised February 18, 2005. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 0 0 The Old Barge Second Floor Page Three February 15, 2011 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very ytruly yours, Martin H. Sidor Chairman cc: Building Department Town Engineer Board of Trustees Winser Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:40 AM To: 'Carol Denson' Subject: RE: Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval Hi Carol I will discuss this with the Planning Board. I will most likely draft a resolution to be read at the February 14, 2011 public hearing for an extension of your site plan approval. This can be done administratively and you will not need to be present unless you wanted to hear it being read? I will keep you posted and let you know by the end of next week that this is how the Board will proceed. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.Winser@town.southold.ny.us -----Original Message----- From: Carol Denson [mailto:crdenson@UDel.Edu] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:54 PM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval Kristy, The extension for our site plan approval for the Old Barge at 750 Old Main Road is due to expire on March 15, 2011. How do we go about requesting another extension? Thank you, Carol R. Denson 1 Winser, Kristy From: Carol Denson [crdenson@UDel.Edu] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:54 PM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval Kristy, The extension for our site plan approval for the Old Barge at 750 Old Main Road is due to expire on March 15, 2011. How do we go about requesting another extension? Thank you, Carol R. Denson l FEB - 7 2011 t MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �QF SO(/TP.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR ��� �� Southold,NY 11971 Char OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS �� 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI lyCOU Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 19, 2010 Mrs. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: Extension of Site Plan Approval: Proposed Amended Site Plan for The Old Barge, Second Floor Located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zoning District: Marine II Dear Mrs. Denson: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 18, 2010: WHEREAS, the applicant, Carol R. Denson, proposes the amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,397 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the M-II Zone; and WHEREAS, the C.D. Reiter Partnership is the owner of the property known as SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2003, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Final Approval on the site plan prepared and certified by Robert I. Brown, Licensed Architect, dated November 5, 2003 and last revised February 18, 2005, and authorized the Chairperson to endorse the final site plan subject to a one year review from the date of issuance of the Building Permit; and WHEREAS, the site plan approval expired on March 14, 2008; and The Old Barge Second Floor Page Two 10/19/10 WHEREAS, on January 15, 2010, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) approved a drainage plan and issued Permit Number#1-4738-01665/00003, effective January 19, 2010; and WHEREAS, the applicant, in a letter dated August 3, 2010, requested for the Planning Board to re-issue an approval that expired on March 14, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board agreed to extend the site plan approval at a Work Session held on September 13, 2010 provided the Town Engineer was satisfied with the revised drainage plan; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2010, the Southold Town Board of Trustees issued Permit#7399 in accordance with the site plans prepared by Condon Engineering, P.C., dated June 2, 2009 and last revised September 29, 2009, and also depicted on the re- vegetation plan last dated November 4, 2009; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2010, the Town Engineer commented that the plan approved by the NYSDEC meets the minimum requirements of Town Code Chapter 236 Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2010, the applicant was informed that all exterior luminers installed, replaced or repaired shall conform to the new lighting code standards requiring Dark Sky compliant fixtures to be fully shielded; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants approval on the drainage plans stamped by the NYSDEC approved on January 15, 2010, prepared by Condon Engineering, P.C., dated June 2, 2009 and last revised September 29, 2009, and also depicted on the re-vegetation plan last dated November 4, 2009; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants a 3-year extension of Site Plan Approval retro-active from March 14, 2008 to March 15, 2011 on the site plan prepared by Young and Young, dated October 12, 2004, and last revised September 6, 2005. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to site plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. i The Old Barge Second Floor Page Three 10/19/10 3. Approved site plans are valid for three years from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 4. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board or its representative must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the approved site plan and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the approved site plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. A copy of the approved site plan is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, �A 44 Martin H. Sidor Chairman cc: Building Department Town Engineer Board of Trustees t. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNINBOARD MWOODHOEMB* hUSEo��OF SOUjyOlo Southold,ox 1 i79 JERIL1971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS CA ZIc Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS ,O 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOROly ��V �1 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D.SOLOMON CDUNV,�4`- Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 15, 2005 Mrs. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for The Old Barge, Second Floor Located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zone: M-ll Marine II District Dear Mrs. Denson: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 14, 2005: The final public hearing was closed. WHEREAS, the applicant, Carol R. Denson, proposes the amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,397 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the M-II Zone; and WHEREAS, The C.D. Reiter Partnership is the owner of the property known as SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2003, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR), Part 617.6, performed a review of this unlisted action, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2004, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services approved the site plan prepared and certified by Robert Brown, dated November 5, 2003 and last revised April 9, 2004, under Reference Number C10-04-001; and The Old Barge Second Floor— Page Two — 03/15/05 WHEREAS, on May 14, 2004, the New York State Department of Transportation reviewed the site plan and assigned the Case Number 04-123PP and indicated no Highway Work Permit is required and the Planning Board has accepted this recommendation; and WHEREAS, on August 3, 2004, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and approved the architectural drawings, associated site plan materials and the Planning Board has accepted this approval and determined it to be satisfactory; and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2005, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals granted Special Exception approval as described under Appeal Number 5626 and the Planning Board has accepted this approval; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2005, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed and certified the site plan for "Restaurant" use by Special Exception; and WHEREAS, on March 7, 2005, the Southold Town Trustees approved an amendment to Permit Number 5964, issued on July 21, 2004, and the Planning Board has accepted this approval; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2005, the Southold Town Engineering Inspector reviewed and approved the proposed drainage with conditions and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 2005, the Southold Fire District recommended that fire protection is adequate and the Planning Board has accepted this recommendation; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, the following two items are incorporated and included in the site plan: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code requirements. 2. All signs shall meet Southold Town Zoning Codes and shall be subject to approval of the Southold Town Building Inspector; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore • • The Old Barge, Second Floor— Page Three - 03/15/05 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared and certified by Robert I. Brown, Licensed Architect, dated November 5, 2003 and last revised February 18, 2005, and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the final site plans subject to a one year review from the date of issuance of the building permit. Enclosed please find one copy of the approved site plan for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Jerily�odhouse Chairperson Enc. cc: Building Department Town Engineer Board of Trustees Zoning Board of Appeals ` MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DF sour P.O.Box 1179 MARTIN H.SIDOR ti� y�� Southold,NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: 41 41 WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS@ 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND � • (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSKI '��(IUNI'1� Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 D C E 0 V MW G BOARD OFFICE WN OF SOUTHOLD NOV � � _ OCtO r 1 LDG.DEPT. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mrs. Carol Denson 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: Extension of Site Plan Approval: Proposed Amended Site Plan for The Old Barge, Second Floor Located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953'w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zoning District: Marine II Dear Mrs. Denson: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 18, 2010: WHEREAS, the applicant, Carol R. Denson, proposes the amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,397 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the M-II Zone; and WHEREAS, the C.D. Reiter Partnership is the owner of the property known as SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 located on the s/s/o Old Main Road,approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2003, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Final Approval on the site plan prepared and certified by Robert I. Brown, Licensed Architect, dated November 5, 2003 and last revised February 18, 2005, and authorized the Chairperson to endorse the final site plan subject to a one year review from the date of issuance of the Building Permit; and WHEREAS, the site plan approval expired on March 14, 2008; and TO: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 FROM: Carol R Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 (302) 239-0979 Email: crdensonka udel.edu DATE: October 16,2010 Your request to John Condon was forwarded to me for copies of the NYSDEC-stamped and signed grading and drainage plans. Three (3)copies of those plans are being sent to you by Federal Express on Monday, October 18. The tracking number is 872884426691. I would like to point out that you currently have in your possession, and on file, the grading and drainage plan designed by Condon Engineering and the revegetation plan designed by Ariaiys Design Landscape Architecture. I would also like to point out that the NYSDEC-stamped plans that we are sending are identical to the Condon Engineering and Ariaiys Design Landscape Architecture plans you have on file. These were sent to you on September 1, 2010. I am also attaching an electronic copy of the NYSDEC permit that was issued on January 19, 2010(which you also have on file), along with the complete permit conditions. I especially call your attention to items# 14 and#15 of the section entitled NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS. C.John Condon OCT 2 0 2010 • Page 1 of 2 Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 2:15 PM To: 'Carol Denson' Subject: RE: Verification of DEC stamped/signed plans Carol, I just received the Fed Ex package you sent. Thank you. I realize the plans in the file prepared by Condon Engineering are the same as I received today( I verged the fact with the Town Trustees)but I needed the actual stamped plans by the DEC for the Planning file. Also, so that the Planning Board could stamp that map approved since that is the one that was being reviewed with respect to revised drainage. In any event, an extension was granted by the Planning Board at last nights public hearing of your site plan approval. A copy is attached for your records. Please note our previous discussion regarding the outdoor lighting in the Resolution for when lighting is installed on site. WHEREAS, on October 5, 2010, the applicant was informed that all exterior luminers installed, replaced or repaired shall conform to the new lighting code standards requiring Dark Sky compliant fixtures to be fully shielded; I hope this information is helpful, should you have questions fell free to contact me anytime. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Kristy.W inseratown.southold.ny.us -----Original Message----- From: Carol Denson [mailto:crdenson@UDel.Edu] Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 12:03 PM To: Winser, Kristy Cc: John Condon Subject: Verification of DEC stamped/signed plans TO: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 FROM: Carol R Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 (302) 239-0979 Email: crdensonCaudel.edu 10/19/2010 • • Page 2 of 2 DATE: October 16, 2010 Your request to John Condon was forwarded to me for copies of the NYSDEC-stamped and signed grading and drainage plans. Three(3) copies of those plans are being sent to you by Federal Express on Monday, October 18. The tracking number is 872884426691. I would like to point out that you currently have in your possession, and on file, the grading and drainage plan designed by Condon Engineering and the revegetation plan designed by Ariaiys Design Landscape Architecture. I would also like to point out that the NYSDEC-stamped plans that we are sending are identical to the Condon Engineering and Ariaiys Design Landscape Architecture plans you have on file. These were sent to you on September 1, 2010. I am also attaching an electronic copy of the NYSDEC permit that was issued on January 19, 2010(which you also have on file), along with the complete permit conditions. I especially call your attention to items# 14 and#15 of the section entitled NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS. C.John Condon 10/19/2010 • • Page 1 of 2 Winser, Kristy From: Carol Denson [crdenson@UDel.Edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:04 PM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Re: Old Barge Kristy, I re-sent the information in the attachments in two separate emails. If you cannot access the information, I will send the cut sheets by fax. The proposed new signs shown on the site plan are to be small directional traffic signs, such as an arrow, that show the direction for drivers to follow when parking. There is no plan to light such signs. Carol On Oct 13, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Winser, Kristy wrote: Carol The attachments seem to be in a MAC Format and cant be opened here at work. Can you put the attachments into a Word document?? I need to review them to make sure the fixtures meet the current code. Also, the Board has requested additional info on the sign proposed. I understand that it will meet Town Code requirements(based on the resolution but,will it be lit and if so type and direction? For ex. Goose neck style on top of sign pointing down. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Kristy.W inser@town.southold.ny_us -----Original Message----- From: Carol Denson [mailto:crdenson@UDel.Edu] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 9:37 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Re: Old Barge Kristy, Thank you for your email of October 5, 2010 containing feedback from the Planning Board's recent Work Session. I especially appreciate that you brought to my 10/14/2010 • • Page 2 of 2 attention that the Town Code now requires a separate lighting plan that incorporates the use of Dark Sky outside lighting fixtures. The Planning Board's resolution, dated March 15, 2005,did address lighting. That resolution states Whereas, the following two items are incorporated and included on the site plan: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting Fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code Requirements. 2. All sign shall meet Southold. . . . As you requested in your email you wanted the details of the proposed lighting for the second floor addition. The details of the outside lighting on the proposed addition are shown on Drawing Number E2, prepared by Fairweather-Brown, September 21, 2005, which you have on file. The outside lighting fixtures that were reviewed and agreed to by the Architectural Review Board are listed below. Attached are the cut sheets. Two (2) outdoor wall lantern fixtures, Sea Gull Lighting#8440-28, to be located on each side of the doorway opening to the observation deck. Seven(7) deck rail fixtures, Kichler Lighting#15066AZT, to be located on the deck posts of the observation deck. One(1) emergency light pack to be located on the east-side emergency exit door on the second level. Carol 10/14/2010 8440-28,Single-Light HSS COO Outdoor Wall Lantern,Aged Brass • Page 1 of 1 Winer, Kristy From: Carol Denson[crdenson@UDel.Eduj Sent: Wednesday,October 13,2010 4:30 PM To: Winser,Kristy Subject:8440-28,Single-Light HSS CO-OP Outdoor Wall Lantern,Aged Brass The specifications for the wall hung unit are shown below. -....��� Sea Gull Lighting Sea Gull lighung wwwSeaGullightim info@SeaGullLightining.c.com m 1 .800.347.5483 l,ij�Tltltrnixatcii I Since 1919 Single-Light HSS CO-OP Outdoor Wall Lantern HSS CO-OP Collection _ Uy Craftsman Style Wall Lantern In Aged Solid Brass and Clear Seeded Glass.Hand-Engraved insignia. I ( Craftsman style wall lantern in aged solid brass andclear seeded glass.Hand-engraved insignia. specificationsDetailed Specs: Product M: 8440-28 HTML Specification Sheet MSRP: $204.27 PDF Specification Sheet Finish: Aged Brass Dimensions: W.8 1/4"H: 13 112" Lamping: 1 Medium A-Line 100w Max. HOW LO Install: �ff. ' Listings: UL Listed for Wet Locations French " cUL Listed for Wet Locations English r wish List r Compare Details HI-RES Downloads • Extends:8 112" Jpg png - Supplied with 6.S"of wire I Catalog View: 2010 Full Line Catalog Canopy:Height.9" Width:4 1/2" Center of outlet box up:4 3/4" - Clear Bulb recomended for this fixture HSS CO-OP - Aged Brass Collection: An ode to our founder,Henry Siegel,and a bygone era expressed in this nostalgic series of aged brass fixtures. Egrave stamp on each piece is a tribute to our founding in 1919,and to our continued attention to details in design. t t I i 8440-28 8441-28 8241-28 6041-28 92041-28 300 10/14/2010 Eliteh tures - HOME ABDO ISUPPORT ADVICE& LIPS CLEARANCE CONTACT US LTlck pglg to register for offers and promotionsl W'+ QC..ML . __ -...... __. ..._. _. _. _.._ _._. _.. By Select Category 5ele�ctt 5ub[ategory Se Ica SelBrai&dmq El Need Help Mei tg apurchaaeT DECK RAIL 1-LT 12V CaRact w at., 1-800-921-4162 KICHLER LIGHTING-1506GAZT Product Camporlu; Recall Mce:$91.00 You Beret$27.00 Bathroom Materials1114Ftttuw Prket$54.00 BaHlroom Lighting Avellablllti:Generally ships in 1-2 Days Ceiling Pana *This Hem Ships for Free on orders over$100 Ceiling Lighting Cl,atWa winalier Commerclal Lightng Door Ha Manufactures:Klehler Llahtino Door Furnishings Home Ppro Indoor Lighting Cl[;k imaes to iaom SKU is 15066AZT Kitchen Lighting Lampe c t nr;an Light Bulbs Detailed Description:Deck Rall 1-1I 12V Lighting Weimer Lighting,trammrmirg light into,beautiful, Accessories functional eorks of aft. Lighting Specials Bulb Nr:Wedge T5 Hirroro Outdoor Lighting Dimensions:W:2.75"x H:5.75"x L:6.5" Pendant Lighting Hnleh:Textured Archltechral Bronze WallSconcesSconceKICHLER Has Wattage:6.5W Water Cankers Tiffany Stained s..xn eau's wa u,...v ,ear - VOItaBe:12V Glass Weight: 1.25 lbs Like Be he Nsl of your friends to gM'Wi? We this. !afro Load Win Provided:]2' like Be he first of your Mends to UL end/or CBA Wiwi use:Suitable for Wet Locations _.__.._. like this. Category: Oumsar Dahum Oummr Uartim-> Ludexaot Writing ® FAr Cram Cad 1144-!1 Prvmeam Customer ReHews and Runless This product is net rated.Click hem to rate this product! IY4J, S.SL CEP74" '001, 201tr flit,r t cur.All P11hts R.served. Become an Affiliate I stop I Links I Site Map I Privacy Statement I Terms a compilers Page 1 of 1 Winser, Kristy From: Carol Denson [crdenson@UDel.Edul Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 9:37 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: Re: Old Barge Kristy, Thank you for your email of October 5, 2010 containing feedback from the Planning Board's recent Work Session. I especially appreciate that you brought to my attention that the Town Code now requires a separate lighting plan that incorporates the use of Dark Sky outside lighting fixtures. The Planning Board's resolution, dated March 15, 2005, did address lighting. That resolution states Whereas, the following two items are incorporated and included on the site plan: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting Fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code Requirements. 2. All sign shall meet Southold. . . . As you requested in your email you wanted the details of the proposed lighting for the second floor addition. The details of the outside lighting on the proposed addition are shown on Drawing Number E2, prepared by Fairweather-Brown, September 21,2005,which you have on file. The outside lighting fixtures that were reviewed and agreed to by the Architectural Review Board are listed below. Attached are the cut sheets. Two (2)outdoor wall lantern fixtures, Sea Gull Lighting 48440-28, to be located on each side of the doorway opening to the observation deck. Seven (7) deck rail fixtures, Kichler Lighting#I5066AZT,to be located on the deck posts of the observation deck. One (1) emergency light pack to be located on the east-side emergency exit door on the second level. Carol 10/12/2010 1 Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:48 PM To: 'Carol Denson' Subject: Old Barge Carol, Your site plan application was discussed at the Planning Board Work Session held last night where a question was raised regarding proposed lighting on site. As you are aware, its been a considerable amount of time since your site plan was approved and since approved in 2005, amendments were made to the lighting code that I wanted you to be aware of. The code now requires a separate lighting plan to be reviewed with Dark Sky compliant lighting fixtures. However, I reviewed the file and noticed that the Architectural Review Committee commented on an outdoor lighting fixture and it also appears lighting was discussed at one time as stated in your resolution: "All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting Fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code Requirements" but,there is no information regarding lighting details/location on the plan for the Planning Board to review. In keeping with the resolution and new code amendment for Dark Sky fixtures, please forward information for the file regarding lighting details proposed for this site that describes type/number and location of existing and proposed lighting on site. For example will there be lighting in the parking area and/on the building? If so, how many,where and what type of lighting fixture is proposed. For your convenience, rather an actual lighting plan, a brief lighting summary along with either photos of existing lighting and or cut sheets of proposed fixtures could be forwarded for review. Contact me anytime with questions. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.W inser(a)town.southold.nv.us 1 • • Page 1 of 5 Winser, Kristy From: Winser,Kristy Sent: Monday,September 20,201010:01 AM To: 'Carol Denson' Cc: Verity, Mike Subject: RE:Old Barge,Southold Carol, She works in the Building Dept,so they must have been delivered there. I will confirm with you later today (I will be meeting with Mike Verity).and advise you of what the next step will be. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O.Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone:(631)765-1938 Fax:(631)765-3136 Kristv.Winsernc town.southold.nv.us ----Original Message----- From:Carol Denson (mailto:crdenson@UDel.Edu7 Sent: Friday, September 17,2010 4:17 PM To:Winser, Kristy Subject: Re:Old Barge,Southold Kristy, The Fed Ex package containing the plans was signed for by C.Bunch on September 3,2010 at 10:19 am. What should be done about this? Carol Delivered initiated Picked up n transit Delivered Delivered Signed for by: C.BUNCH Shipment Dates Destination fl Ship date b..... Sep 1,2010 _. _. ... _ _._ _.. a Deliverydate O Sep 3,2010 10:19 AM at 1W g P M 2 91 p a IV Or i Shipment Facts 11418 9/22/2010 • • Page 2 of 5 Shipment Travel History 1�1R Select time zone:I Local Scan Time - : i All shipment travel activity is displayed in local time for the location Daterrime Activity Locatlon Details ('.Sep 3,201010:19 AM Delivered j Sep 3,2010 8:40 AM On FedEx vehicle for delivery jCALVERTON,NV I;Sep 3,2010 8:14 AM At local FedEx facility iCALVERTON,NY Sep 3,20105:41 AM At dest son facility :JAMAICA,NY I Sep 3,2010 2:39 AM Departed FedEx locationMEMPHIS,TN Sep 2.2010 9:52 AM Arrived at FedEx location MEMPHIS,TN �:.Sep 1,2010 9:34 PM Left FedEx origin facility j NEWCASTLE,DE i -Sep 1,2010 12:57 PM _Picked up 'NEW CASTLE,DE I i i On Sep 17,2010,at 3:37 PM,Winser,Kristy wrote: Hi Carol FYI, I have not received the plans as of yet? Please follow up with FedEx. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold,New York Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Kristv.Winser town.southold.nv.us -----Original Message----- From: Carol Denson [mailto:crdenson@UDel.Edu] Sent: Wednesday,September 01,2010 2:05 PM To: Winser,Kristy Subject: Re:Old Barge, Southold Kristy, The drainage and revegetation plans were sent to you by FedEx today. The tracking number is 872835445666. Thank you, Carol On Aug 31,2010,at 3:29 PM,Winser,Kristy wrote: Hi Carol, I did speak to Mike and thank you for the information you provided. 9/22/2010 • • Page 3 of 5 All I will need from you at this point is an as-built site plan showing the changes made to the original(concerning drainage and revegetation). I will print out this email and use this as your letter to reflect the changes made.As soon as you can submit the as built site plan I will schedule the application for the next Planning Board public hearing to extend your original approval since the approval expired. It is not necessary for you to be at the meeting because it will be an administrative approval(a formality) however,you are welcome to attend if you like. I will inform you of when it will take place. I hope this is helpful. Contact me anytime,at the below number with any questions you may have. Have a good day! Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold,New York Phone: (631)765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.Winser@town.southold.ny.us -----Original Message----- From: Carol Denson [mailto:crdenson@UDel.Edu) Sent:Tuesday,August 31,2010 3:14 PM To: Winer,Kristy Cc: Verity,Mike Subject: Re: Old Barge,Southold Kristy, In accordance with the recommendation in your email of August 19,I did speak with 9/22/2010 • • Page 4 of 5 Michael Verity,Chief Building Inspector,Town of Southold,by telephone on August 30. In that conversation he stated that if the "scope of work"relative to the addition to the building has not changed from that which was originally approved,there should be no problem with having the permit reissued or re-approved. Most assuredly,the scope of the work has not changed from the scope described in the plans that were approved by the Planning Board on 3/14/05 and,subsequently,by the Building Department on 9/21/05. Although the"scope of the work"has not changed,there has been a modification to the original site plan concerning drainage and revegetation. This modification was required by the NYSDEC. The NYSDEC required,and has approved,a site drainage plan for the parking lot;this plan is designed to accommodate a 4"rainfall. The NYSDEC permit also approved a revegetation plan along the landward side of the retaining wall. This plan establishes a 25-foot buffer zone created of native grasses and shrubs. I believe this resolves the issue around the permit from the Building Department. Please advise if you still believe that there are further unresolved issues around the Building Department. In connection with the Board of Trustees and the SCDHS,please be advised that we have applied to these organizations for new permits. Carol R.Denson On Aug 19,2010,at 11:50 AM,Winser,Kristy wrote: Carol, Thank you for your letter dated August 3,2010 regarding your site plan for the Old Barge Restaurant that has since expired. It is recommended that you first meet with Mike Verity in the Building Department @ 765- 1802 and bring a copy of the site plan for his review. He will then determine if additional steps are necessary for you to move forward to obtain your approval. If you have other questions contact,me anytime at the below number. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department 9/22/2010 • • Page 5 of 5 P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold,New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631)765-3136 Kristy.Winser@town.southold.ny.us 9/22/2010 Winser, Kristy From: Winser, Kristy Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:50 AM To: 'crdenson@udel.edu' Cc: Verity, Mike Subject: Old Barge, Southold Carol, Thank you for your letter dated August 3, 2010 regarding your site plan for the Old Barge Restaurant that has since expired. It is recommended that you first meet with Mike Verity in the Building Department @ 765-1802 and bring a copy of the site plan for his review. He will then determine if additional steps are necessary for you to move forward to obtain your approval. If you have other questions contact, me anytime at the below number. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 Kristy.W i nserptown.southold.ny.u s 1 BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 7399 DATE: SEPTEMBER 22.2010 ISSUED TO: CAROL R. DENSON PROPERTY ADDRESS: 750 OLD MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM#56-6-8.7 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on September 22.2010,and inconsideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Carol R.Denson and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to construct an approximate 1,400 square foot second-floor addition to the existing building,install a French drain throughout the parking lot,install a 25'vegetated buffer along the landward side of the retaining wall,and install a post and rail fence or an approved equal at the edge of the buffer zone; with the conditions of the installation of gutters to leaders to drywells to contain roof runoff and in accordance with Chapter 236 of the Town Code-Storm Water Runoff,a line of bay bales with silt fencing is installed prior to construction, that the existing structure is not to be demolished and if there is a reason for the structure to have to be demolished,new permits must be applied for prior to demolition;and as depicted on tlibe Ate`plan prepared by Condon Engineering,P.C.,last dated September 29;2009,and stamped approved on September 22;2010,and also as depicted on the re-vegetation plan last dated November 4,2009 and stamped approved on September 22,2010. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by majority of the said Board as of this date. f AAC �o a���1 # �� L, n2M. e2l a 0- TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee Carol r.Denson, residing at 750 Old Main Road, Southold,New York as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages,of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will,at his or her own expense,defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved,but should circumstances warrant,request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely,or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized,or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Pennittee will be required,upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. The Permittee is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety(90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. 9. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 10. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. NEW YORK STATE DEPARI MENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Facility DEC ID 1-4738-01665 PERMIT Undei the Environmental Conservation Law CL Permittee and Facility Information Permit Issued To: Facility: CAROL R DENSON BARGE RESTAURANT 1184 CORNER KETCH R AD MAIN RD(ST RTE 25) ISCTM# 1000-56-06- 8.2,8.4, 8,9.1 NEWARK, DE 19711 SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 Facility Application Cont ct: COSTELLO MARINE Col rlRAcTING CORP PO BOX 2124 GREENPORT,NY 11944 (631)477-1199 Facility Location: in SOUI HOLD in SUFFOLK COUNTY Village: Southold Facility Principal Referenc Point: NYTM-E: 718.4 NYTM-N: 4550.5 Latitude: 41°04'35.2" Longitude: 72°24'00.9" Project Location: Main Ro (ST RTE 25)-WATERCOURSE-MILL CREEK Authorized Activity: Cons ct upper level addition to existing one story restaurant, construct upper level observation deck,instal french drain around norticast and west sides of restaurant,place fill and regrade parking lot,install fri nch drains and trench for runoff, install permeable pavers,create 25'buffer zone landward of bulkhead aj id install plantings. All work must be in accordance with the attached plans stamped NYSDEC app oved on 1/15/10. (CKW) Permit Authorizations Tidal Wetlands-Under Ar 'cle 25 Permit ID 1-4738-01665/00003 Renewal Effective Date: 9/20/2002 Expiration Date: 9/20/2005 Modification#2 Effective Date: 1/19/2010 Expiration Date: 1/19/2015 Page 1 of 6 r 0 NEW YORK STATE DEPART ENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Facility DEC ID 14738-01665 NYSDEC Approval By acceptance of this peru it,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations,and all conditions included as part of this permit. Permit Administrator:MAR K CARRARA,Deputy Regional Permit Administrator Address: NYS EC REGION I HEADQUARTERS SUNY@ STONY BROOK150 CIRCLE RD STOT,YBROOK,NY 11790-3409 Authorized Signature: Date Distribution List COSTELLO MARINE CO TRACTING CORP Marine Habitat Protection CLAIRE K WERNER Permit Components NATURAL RESOURCE P RMIT CONDITIONS GENERAL CONDITIONS, APPLY TO ALL AUTHORIZED PERMITS NOTIFICATION OF OTHE 1 PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS- Apply to the Following Permits: TIDAL WETLANDS 1. State Not Liable for Dan iage The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or wor herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for th r conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensatio 1 shall accrue from any such damage. 2. Notice of Commencement At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project,the permittee and contractor shall sign and eturn the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and undersi and all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project,the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work. Page 2 of 6 BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 7399 DATE: SEPTEMBER 22,2010 ISSUED TO: CAROL R. DENSON. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 750 OLD MAIN ROAD,SOUTHOLD SCTM#56-6-8.7 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on September 22,2010,and inconsideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Carol R.Denson and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following:' Wetland Permit to construct an approximate 1,400 square foot second-floor addition to the existing building,install a French drain throughout the parking lot,install a 25'vegetated buffer along the landward side of the retaining wall, and install a post and rail fence or an approved equal at the edge of the buffer zone; with the conditions of the installation of gutters to leaders to drywells to contain roof runoff and in accordance with Chapter 236 of the Town Code-Storm Water Runoff,a line of hay bales with silt fencing is installed prior to construction, that At existing structure is not to be demolished and if there is a reason for the structure to have`t b be demolished,new permits must be applied for prlor to demolition;and as depicted on th' a Wplan prepared by Condon Engineering,P.C.,last dated September 29,2009,and stamped approved on September 22;2010;and also as depicted on the re-vegetation:plan last dated November 4,2009 and stamped approved on September 22;2010. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, October 4, 2010 4:00 p.m. Applications: ---------I-------------- Project name: Old Bar �1 Barge Floor SCTM#: 1000-�6-6-8.7 �7- appro.iiiiji. �o i e, Location: to ii. Old h&,ri Road, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold ------ . . ........ ......... ..... -- --------------------- Description: This amended site plan is for a new second floor addition of 1,397 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 parcel in the Mil Zone. acre ----------..........-------------- ----------------------- Status: I Approved Site Plan ----------- ................... ......Approved..........----------- ion: Applicant requests to re-issue Site Plan Approval. This approval expired ...............------------------------ on 3/14/08.s:n 3Memo -------- —-------------- Attachments: I from Town Engineer .................... -...............--------------------- ------------ -------- ------------------T ----------------------------- —------ ---------------------- Project name: Sawicki, Edward - Conservation SCTM#: 1000-125-34.1 ----- I--- / o ---SubdivisinODA . ........--------------------------------- -----------............-.1.....-----------—-------------------------------I------------------------------J-._............-..........--------------........ ................ .. Location: 12700 NYS Route 25, Laurel .................... ------------------------------------------ Description: This is a 3-lot proposed 80/60 conservation subdivision as the first step of an Open Development Area (ODA) on a total of 13.0464 acres in the AC Zoning District. Proposed Lot 1 will total 21,288 sq. ft. (.4887 acres). Proposed Lot 2 will total 62,401 sq. ft. (1.4325 acres) and Proposed Lot 3 will have a reserved area which will total 27,635 sq. ft (.6344 acres) and a preserved area with the Development Rights sold which will total 456,977 ft. (10.4908 acres). -------------------------------- -------------- Status: 0 .................................. --.--P-tll---------------- —----------------.............---------- —----------- Action: Review Sketch Application/accept for formal ------- review. -- . .- - Atachments: -----I-I Staff Report -------------- ....................... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SCTM#: 1 Project name: Winston, Eve 05-1-4 ................................------------ ..........k---------------------------- ----------------------- --- ----- Location: 3450 Private Road #13, Mattituck -------------------- Description. j This proposal is to subdivide a 5.58 acre parcel into two lots, where Lot 1 1 would total 1.836 acres (80,003 sq. ft.) and Lot 2 would total 3.743 acres -80 Zoning District. .................... 163,044 sq. ft.) in the R ----------------—------------ Status: Sketch Review ................................. ------------------------------------- -----_------------------------------ -_----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Action: Review comments from referring_agencies. .. ...... ...................-I--,.--.,--.--- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ........ Staff Report ------------ Attachments: ------- -------------------- ........................................ -------------- --------- ---------------.....................................................-------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ............. Penny, George Prqjectname .......... SCTM#: 1 1000-59-3-17.3 -------------George ------ ----- ------------------------------------------- --------------- - ----- Location: I n/e/s/o Kenny's Road, 705.05' n/w/o CR 48, Southold ---------------------------------------------11------------------------------ ------------------------------- Amend Subdivision Map _RtAios Papadopoulas and George Maragos Status:1 atAmendment Conditional ----------- - ----------------------------—---------------- ................................ —AMOV01------------ ---------- ActioI...n.... Amend previous Amendment of April 12, 2010..... ... --- ---- . ..... Attachments Original and Amended Amendment Resolution ..............................I--.................................... SCOTT A. RUSSELL Q��gtiFPOtx° JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ,,� <iy� SUPERVISOR chi ENGINEER „ TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD go � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Faz. (631)-765-9015 Tel.(631)-765-1560 p��Al �' JAMIE.RICHTER@TOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Martin H. Sidor September 24, 2010 Chairman - Planning Board _ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road — �;� ,� 'V I Southold, New York 11971 Re: "The Old Barge" Site Plan SEP 2 8 2010 SCTM #: 1000-56-06-8.7 Dear Mr. Sidor: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the Grading&Drainage Plans"Cl &C2" dated 6/2/09 prepared by Condon Engineering and the Re-vegetation Plan dated 12/11/09 prepared by Araiys Design for the re-development of "The Old Barge" Site Plan. Please consider the following: 1. In a letter from the applicant,it has been noted that the original drainage design did not meet the minimum requirements necessary for DEC approval. The current drainage design that has been submitted for review has been revised to meet these additional DEC requirements. At this time, I do not have a copy of this DEC permit to review. However,this current plan submitted by the applicant meets the minimum requirements of Town Code Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management. I would recommend that a copy of the DEC Permit be obtained an incorporated into the permanent record and/or Planning Board file. 2. The applicant should be instructed to notify the Town when the proposed regarding, drainage and/or Site Work is under construction. Visual inspections by the Town or a certified Engineering report will be the only verification that the work has been completed satisfactorily. 3. The Applicants letter also referenced Planning Board Approval of the proposed second floor addition to the facility. This approval for the construction of a new second story must come from a Building Department review based on the Building Code of the State of New York. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. Sincerely, James A. Richter, R.A. cc: Southold Town Trustees Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector 0 0 1` Kms' RE: Hard copy of email sent to you on September 20. 2010 8:39 AM Subject: Old Barge Restaurant: Request for Clarification Ms. Lanza, I am perplexed by an email that I received from Christy Winser on September 17, which stated, in part, that she had not received a FedEx package with the plans that I had sent earlier. The log shown below explains why I am perplexed. 7/26 Discussion with Mark Terry concerning steps to follow in requesting that the Planning Board reissue a site plan approval that had expired on March 14, 2008 8/3 Letter sent to the Chair of the Planning Board requesting reissue of site plan approval 8/19 Email received from Christy Winser with direction to discuss my request with Mike Verity 8/30 Spoke to Mike Verity by telephone regarding this request 8/31 Email was sent to Christy Winser confirming content of my conversation with Mike Verity. In her response, Christy Winser stated that 1 would be informed when our request would be put on the PB work session agenda. I was directed to send the drainage and revegetation plans to her attention at the Planning Department. 9/1 Drainage and ReVeg plans were sent to the Planning Department by FedEx. Email to Christy Winser stating that the plans were sent, along with the tracking number 9/3 Fed Ex package was signed for by C. Bunch at 10:19 am 9/13 Work Session Agenda published on the Web states that action was taken on this request and that the status was shown as"Approved Site Plan" 9/17 Email from Christy Winser stating that she had not received the FedEx package with the plans. Would you kindly look into this matter and let me know how this issue will be resolved. Carol R Densor�_ , D n WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, September 13, 2010 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Review Public Meeting Agenda 4:15 p.m. Site Plans & Subdivisions _.. - - ------------------- _ ...- l1000-75-5-14.1- --- -------- Project name: Metro PCS, located at the CTM#: Southold Town Police Station IS Location 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic ------ -- -- - -- --- - _ Description. This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to affix a public utility wireless antenna to an existing lattice tower and install related equipment at the premises located on a 12.27 acre parcel west of Peconic nic Lane in the R-80 Zoning District_ _ _ I Status: Site Plan and Special Exception Consideration Action: Review application and recommend for the Planning Board to accept the application for review and refer the application to involved interested agencies. -- - --------- -_- -- Attachments Staff Report 1 Project name Metro PCS, located at Penny SCTM#: 1000-141-3-38.1 Lumber Location 12585-Sound Ave, Mattituck ........ .....-.......... -_------------------------------------- Description: This application is for site plan and special exception consideration to 1 affix a public utility wireless antenna at a height of 75 feet to the outside of an existing 1 00' flag pole and install related equipment on the ground at the premises located on a 3.8 acre parcel 400 feet east of Lipco Road in the LI Zoning District _.__. . . f -- g------. - - -- - -— -- ----- --- Status: _ Site Plan and Special_Exce tion Consideration Action: Review application and recommend for the Planning Board to accept the application for review and refer the application to involved interested agencies. ----------- Attachments Staff Report Project name j Old Bare Restaurant, 2"d Floor t SCTM#: ' 1000-56-6-8.7 ..... .......... . - - - - - ---- ---..... a Location: 1 the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known ----- - ..-a_as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold- ---------- -- --- ------ - - Description: I This amended site plan is for a new second floor addition of 1,397 sq. ft. 1 and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 ....... ... ..._-. .-.-. -- -..._.._.j.-acre_parcel -- the Mll Zone.. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-..-... ---------------------------------------..---------------- Status: Approved Site Plan -....- - ---- ---------.. oa ---- -- - i Action: Applicant requests Planning Brd to re-issue site plan approval. This approval expired on 3/14/08. - ------------------ Attachments: etter from Applicant TO: Martin H. Sidor—Chairperson Planning Board, Town of Southold 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 _ Southold NY 1197 n FROM: Carol R Denson (1�' ` � - 5 1184 Corner Ketch Road p.LG 2C'' Newark, Delaware 19711 (302) 239-0979 Email: crdenson&a udel.edu DATE: August 3, 2010 RE: Request to reissue Site Plan Approval for Old Barge Restaurant, Second Floor 750 Old Main Road, Southold, SCTM#56-6-8.7 The Planning Board approval for site plans was given on 3/14/05 for three (3)years. This approval expired on 3/14/08. -This letter is requesting that this approval be reissued. -We were unable to obtain the requisite permits from the NYSDEC before the Planning Board approval expired, because of drainage issues with the DEC. DEC required a drainage strategy that was different than the one approved by the Planning Board. -The NYSDEC approved our revised drainage plan and issued a permit on January 19, 2010, (#1-4738-01665/00003). -As a result, the site plan approved by the Planning Board has been modified in two important, environmentally enhanced ways. 1. A French drain system will be installed throughout the existing parking lot. 2. Revegetation plan will be introduced along the upland side of the retaining wall. The Revegetation plan creates a 25 foot buffer zone along the landward side of the retaining wall. This results in the elimination of one(1)parking space, (#14), which means that this space would be permanently eliminated. As an alternative, this space could be incorporated in the area where undesignated space is used as a "bank". -The plans for the second floor addition to the building have not been changed and remain the same as those approved by the Planning Board on 3/14/05. The Board's advice is appreciated on how to proceed with obtaining a reissued approval. TO: Kristy Winser, Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Department b si 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 FROM: Carol R Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 (302) 239-0979 Email: crdensonna udel.edu DATE: September 1, 2010 This letter complements my email to you dated August 31, 2010. It is in consideration of my request to reissue Site Plan Approval for the Old Barge Restaurant, Second Floor, 750 Old Main Road, Southold, (SCTM # 56-6-8.7). Specifically, I have enclosed a set of plans that details the grading and drainage plan designed by Condon Engineering, and the revegetation plan designed by Ariaiys Design Landscape Architecture, both of which have been approved by the NYSDEC. Examination of these plans and a comparison of them with the drainage plan shown on the site plan approved by the Planning Board on 3/14/2005 should provide the information and resources needed. If not, please contact me at any time at 302-239-0979. D SEP 3 2,j10 BLDG.DEPT , SEP 2 2 2010 TOWN OF SOOTHOLD 1 L� � Se;ISo�d Town FL%�Siry 9a2rd •LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPRe Type: Approved Project Type: Amended Site Plans Status: Final - Pending Inspection SUM # : 1000 - 56.-6-8.7 Project Name: Old Barge 2nd floor Address: 750 Old Main Road Hamlet: Southold Applicant Name: Denson, Carol Owner Name: Reiter's CD The Zone 1: MII Approval Date: 3/14/2005 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 3/14/2005 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: on the s/s/o Old Main Road approximately 1953' w/o Dolphin Drive SC Filing Date: Cand R's : Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: TSEDCANN t' 1 _ 111n SCAN Date: -71 wa&M,PLAN STATUS REPO Tr SITE PLAN TYPE: AMEND 'D -'NEW WITHDRAWNINCOM$LETE PROJECT NAME: %- an (S /,AcFYR1) ZONEir�wxE2: ZONB:_ LOCATION:SSG O ly ,c,�4< I ,f c,4,6 HAMLET.: S1— SCTM# 1000 - - OWNER NAME: iso TEL# (� APPLICANT NAME: 2 .o 77-Pj TEL#C__) < s o S o4 s e„+so v /s < 301 139 �J9 )!!* Sus-?3f 16,Yj PROTECT DESS CRIPTION THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR 7-4/ of c J./ c ON / 3B ACRES PARCEL IN THE M ZONE LOCATED AT 3/ w/ / / Qr,u, 6a -� Sa 4 IN T SCTM#1000- - 1 SEE ABOVE). DATE _ =RECEIVED: ON WRITTEN RE VEST: � ION CONFERENCE 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN RE VEST /p!�/02" VEST FOR REVISIONS: -Lo-12-21� SSION: RECEIVED:EIVED: // /a> / AMOUNT RECEIVED-$ 77/, FEE AMOUNT: $300.X _$ g 3 7 . 5X 77 SF=$ 2j _$ 72 /. IA NEW APPLICATION WORKSESSION 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT) [�/ / APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) L!/6 REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED: LEAD AGENCY TOS OTHER CoORDINATED:✓ UNCOO DINATED: SE RA DETERT2INATION: // (TYPE1:_TYPE2: N ISTED- ✓ ) SCP C `c /�<c c RECEIVED/REVIEW: RECEIVED DATE REVIEWED DATE DRAINAGE PLAN: LANDSCAPE PLAN: LIGHTING PLAN: REFERRED FOR APPROVALS: REFERRED DATE APPROVAL DATE NOTES - ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS:APPEAL#: BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: BUILDING TMEN C TOW INEERAP O 4 �/ / /4 / 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COM I�E�: [L/O�/ Q3 p �� / - 3l/�j4 w�/�� DEP.OF TRANSPORTATION SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING: FIRE COMMISSIONERS: -O/ A 8 R' REFE D DATE PROVAL DATE NOTES DRAFT COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS: FILED COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS- PLANNING BOARD APPROVALS PREPARED: CONDITIONAL FINAL'_/ FINAL: / l ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: NOTES FINAL SITE PLAN INSPECTION: DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT TOWN ENG [�/O GENERAL NOTES: � N < � O < a 'FiOV lOV f"Mr f ! S d u aK < /r. r > e We Ye / N � 809 �KtA 11P"'NING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT KI,JR. ���. C� Chairmanairman � P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 RICHARD CAGGIANO Go Southold, New York 11971-0959 WILLIAM J.CREMERB ti ' Telephone (631) 765-1938 KENNETH L. EDWARDS Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN H. SIDOR 'y�J/�! t' - Date Received PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Date Completed TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Filing Fee APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN _New _Change of Use —Re-use _Extension L• /1 �' �N _Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Gi�me" r pp SCTM#: 1000- 5�j E@ U E d 5 4o Location: 7_O OID M D AA Address: - _ — 7 2003 urn Name of uthold Town Applicant: —�df 2 �µ✓0� annin Boats Address of Applicant: ��g C-D � . ro Telephone: M � -___!�' 302 . 2 • ah9 Owner of Land: K• Ph1Lt�lC¢+Stkc v� Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: lL Telephone: 4-7Y•Itl�! . Z Site plans prepared by: --��T'(3R.o�.t /mss�.:� •Bi¢.�.� ObSK.� License No. `T Address: Telephone: Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPLICANTS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 6A I(& L %� W-SO Al being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at Ine State of New Yorkand that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the ,K)'/yQ of the �.� ,ie�{ , ��t?7l�Pesr� (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been dearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. � Q � Signed &,j e/Jlyr� (owner) Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) Swor to me this ,, / G�o day of l vOV, 19 C l i P icl CLAIRE L GLEw p NotarYNo.O1GL4879 Of 5WYork �1 (•/ Qualified in Suffolk County o commission Expires Dec.S, Page 3 Planning Board Site Plan Application M TTotal Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) oning District Sr�a�,, Existing Use of Site :%A# g Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. $ Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) Gross loor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees - Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number _Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk Count; Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACTION(EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION)MAV BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BV PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT 70 PROSECUTION. AUTHORIZATION (where applicant is not the owner) i,�,P�L �• ��S�,J residing at (mailing address) do hereby authorize Amy K. Martin, or other of Fairweather-Brown Design Associates, Inc. to act as my agent to apply for all permits necessary for the proposed work to be performed at ( Owner's signature ) pYCEE A•STEVENS IMM PUBLIC,STATE Of NEW YOi1K N0.4875122 pUALIflED IN SUFFOLK COI1NPf COM4NSSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 9,20 4 �. '+'` � " _.f` irf . /' t /° � . ' mss - C ♦ ' :� r �.. a� ' �, s ,, _ .� F. � t ,��N � A' � , `,;, � y �, �* � �* t * - �� ` ,, /\ s � - �:_- .� ,;, r a�, � t� - 1 a ®� + t .� � � �� - ' �` ♦ ♦ �' •�.. sr.. '�.., � ` i �� ����_ , 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet Flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑✓ Part 1 F Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: R1A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions The Old Barge Restaurant 2nd Floor Name of Action Southold Town Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Bennet Orlowski,Jr. S.T.Planning Board Chairman Print or Tvne Name of Responsible Officer in Lea ncy Title of ponsrble Of r Signature ofesponsible ffrc in Lea Age cy Signa a of par f differe rom re ponsi le officer 01/13/03 website Date Page 1 of 21 61.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: F Part 1 F Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: 17 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. r7B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures descO)ed in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared." C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is�unnaavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. //fes Name of Action '010 ,6 R0i*%Wz �1 Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) A* AW HAIAIROAD. *Wr&40, WY Name of Applicant/Sponsor 4,41Z& R• DEn(Sa Address //87 69gwym'&=a .o' City/PO AWKW, State LW Zip Code 19711 Business Telephone 'OFOQ • $31 • $537 Name of Owner(if different) 1W L. R /e/lAK PAterrlr llP Address /Z. 007J50d (*S A$OVf� City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban ❑Industrial C mmercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: , -LAcres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PPRES�ENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0Moacres e � acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) ,17 fo/acres �L acres Water Surface Area acres #O*L acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces :GG acres .G 4acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑W II drained �1% of site ❑Moderately well drained_% of site. Poorly drained Bd % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes 2 No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) IL[Oo,%1411V 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 1:10-10%/00 % 010- 15%_% ❑ 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes to, 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes allo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 1154 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 11 Yes GZ/No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project areal Yes ®No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes No According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ❑Yes 0110 Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes [;[go If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? �'es ❑No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: /l/D a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Mtl.L GR*EK b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 0 es ❑No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ILYes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ®Yes Mwo 18. Is the site located inan agricultural distric certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 26-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes R 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 0 Yes r;Ko B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: /.* �acres. b. Project acreage to be developed:Acft acres initially; t'.g1�J7 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: I acres. d. Length of project, in miles: I (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing " proposed A_ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? U!(C( AMCAQ h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 'd �T height; &e)r width; Y Q I length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 241,01 j ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? V tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ❑Yes ❑No N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No WA. c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No N1A' 4, How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? O acres. Page 5 of 21 0 0 , 5. Will any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? E] Yes [2 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction:_T_months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? © Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes M<0 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete Ivy Clft O 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 1 1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ✓1No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes Mho a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged ,v 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? les ❑No TypeRlfEWAfi�c- 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? M Yes Eg<o If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? �es 17No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Yes �o a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons ND CO*A(4e ffiVq iX1Q'/A/h b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Cayes M No c. If yes, give name *I)Ma)'rhty tkly r4a location LCT2 4f d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ©Yes No Page 6 of 21 1 • • e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? 17 Yes M<10 a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.,. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes [2No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes ❑No �DOp 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑ Yes [;3 No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity T gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. NO eM&P14# A74PI SVV 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes PNo If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 • 25. Approvals Required: ��// Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board E]YesQNO City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes 12"No � y City, County Health Department 12yes ❑ No must�cs Other Local Agencies ��—�Y/es ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes allo �y NYS'DEG State Agencies uYes ❑ No Federal Agencies ❑Yes r7No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ©Y s ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: E❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision LJQ Site plan ® Special use permit ©Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 0 0 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? M-Z 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 2oY. Lor ewepfte 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? !�D GiEAif�ltfi 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 1414 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? &;Kes �No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a A mile radius of proposed action? IAIIWr MA 446 RL#-. m> ROATIA405 MWMAS Rks�u�a�ts 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a %. mile? yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 62Yes ❑ No W114 515MH W VAS' 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑Yes �lo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes 2No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name � ,'� 5944J4 A.U. Date /t'$'03 Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) I In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific projector site other examples and/or lower thresholds maybe appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. I The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. I In identifying impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO �i YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ❑ E] Yes ❑- No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ❑ ❑ Yes 0 No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more © Yes s©No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ Yes Q No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or © Yes ©' No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ [7 r7 Yes [H]No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) 0N ®YES Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [H]No none apply Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) FmJNO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ©Yes E]No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes E]No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water Yes rEJ No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ©Yes �No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [:1 Yes 0 No none apply 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ®. NO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ © ❑Yes [H]No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ []Yes ❑� No area. • Other impacts: ❑ QYes [ENo none apply Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? HINO AYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. © Yes No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not © Yes No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater © Yes ❑� No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ©Yes No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. © ®Yes No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which © Yes No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons Yes n No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into r ❑Yes FE1 No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ©Yes [H]No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without r7 ® ❑Yes ❑� No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses Yes No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: []Yes No none apply Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [j]No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes EINo • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 No floodway. • Other impacts: ❑� ❑ ❑Yes QNo Action will need to control runoff as proposed under Southold Town Code IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑' No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ❑ © ❑Yes 0 No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5lbs.per hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes liNo or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [j]No none apply IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 6. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑NO r7 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo Federal list,using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ [:]Yes QNo Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes E]No none apply 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [j]No mature forest(aver 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo none apply IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ❑ ❑ ❑Yes M No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields, pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 No acres of agricultural land or,if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of © ❑ ❑Yes ❑o No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No none apply IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary,use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) [H]NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different ❑ ❑ [:]Yes E]No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [FI No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑� No none apply IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ME NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within © ❑ ❑Yes No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ❑ ❑ ®Yes No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑No none apply IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? 0 NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ® ❑ [:]Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑E No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑� No none apply IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? ❑NO DYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. none apply Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ®Yes MNo • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes rNINo resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑' No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo none apply Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ❑NO [D YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or Q ❑ ❑Yes ❑No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. '❑ ❑ []Yes []No • Other impacts: El ❑ []Yes ❑No New curb cut will require approval from jurisdiction. IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [H]NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%increase in the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes '❑No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ❑ ❑ [:]Yes QNo energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes '❑No none apply NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors,noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [j]NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ❑ © ❑Yes ❑' No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑' No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ E3 Yes R No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ El Yes ❑No none apply Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ElNO E-]YES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ❑ ❑ []Yes E]No hazardous substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" ❑ ❑ ❑Yes E]No in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous,highly reactive,radioactive, irritating,infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [H]No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes E]No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENo none apply IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? [ENO [7 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes SNo project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ❑ ❑ ❑Yes QNo services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ❑ [:1 ❑Yes E]No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes EINo • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [ENo structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ❑ © ❑Yes E]No services(e.g.schools,police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future 0 ❑ [:]Yes [j]No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes E]No Other impacts: © ® []Yes SNo none apply 20. Is there,or is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? [E NO ❑YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 0 0 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is Important. To answer the question of importance,consider: I The probability of the impact occurring 1 The duration of the impact 1 Its irreversibility,including permanently lost resources of value 1 Whether the impact can or will be controlled I The regional consequence of the impact 1 Its potential divergence from local needs and goals 1 Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. none known. Page 21 of 21 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 11/07/03 Receipt#: 462 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $721.88 Check#:462 Total Paid: $721.88 D E C E o W E 200 D NOV 0 3 Southold Town Planning Board Name: C, D Reiter C/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Rd Newwark, DE 19711 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID:83302 . .. .ear• i or i rr�i rr�r.�rr�� a in• i COMPLETESENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION •N ON DELIVERY i Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete X 3laoew. Item Orf Restdcted Deliveryis desired. /�.�: loll re m N ■ print your name and address on the reverse _ 0 A"M �° '" ■ ■ ■ that we can return the card toyou. 0 Address. 41 7 Q D K I Attach this card to the back of the mallpieoe, ) C.Date w peliven. br B. Received by{p�IMadNeme W m d 3 on the Lunt K space Permits. 00.�.. n x 8 ZA � ddressed to.. D. B delivery address fq `G w M g YES,enter delivery from Item 1? 0 a �Y+�drass below. ❑No No K Lon go a� ll(1T l�N✓LTL !)G Ul . ZL w O e r— 3. SeI Type far' � MWI 0op.Wel me °Ristartl 04"W Receipt fdrMenohI ❑Irlauretl Melt 0 C.O.D. C3 4. Restrk:ted DelWery'1(Ektna Fee) ❑Yes O 'tORj AOe 7004 1350 0001 7035 8219 ru r .; 3811.February Un 2004 DWWW Return Receipt br P 107.5 -02-IFteM O O� o C3 C3 7PL FTE THIS SECTION+ C3 j, COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY t" karrre 1,2,and 3.Also complete A ❑0° s on the reverse x �d A- /!dent ir 'A that we can return the card to you. '�"'°/wdn... this card to the bads of the mailpiece, B. Raodvgd by(pft#GdftFI p an the Lunt if.space permits. C. Date or DeNwy iC El D. Is delivery ar dell tltlfaddr horn Mem t? 0 Yes ■ � M YES,enter delivery address below ❑No n p l�a)SB/L) 0 3 N 11 g46,e/L)I E ° ARK S {UBI�J , � E l�7/l 3 serice g 42 Rte filled Mail p 6mrees Med 0 Insured Mail m Raosim for mWolOWiae ❑O.o.D; 4. Restricted Delivery?(Exec Fee) 0 Yes 2.Article—�N-- MWarGr ftm 7004 1350 0001 7035 8233 PS Forth 3811,Fef n a y 2004 Domestic Return Receipt taas��-rkfsao L. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as 7�W 64 g42&E 756 d/40W,0 641ilO by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in pla a for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on ^d A&r-H /y, ZaOS" I have sent notices, by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of recor of every pro erty which abuts and every property which is across on 6 /I*I#V M240 pro ,Iv. �1• INrzo L R. -DeNsoti! I YourName .(,print) t Signature IPewA&Y- De-�y7�/ Address a:4 �S Date/ �`W /�(, Notary Publi PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY. noon. Fri., 3/11/05 Re: Proposed Site Plan: The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM#s: 1000-56-6-8.7 iDate of Hearing: Monday, March 14, 2005. 6:05 p.m. Postal DCERTIFIED MAIL,,,110EIPT U ru (Domestic CO Ln 0 y L U r Postage $ '3 0 CertitiedFee $2.30 0707 0 1 C3 (End RedFee $1.75 01 PoHem stmark O ResmMetl Dlivery Fee w Lr) (Entl.="1Requeked) $0.00 M rR Totai Postage a Fees $ $4.42 02/2V2005 S O SOWTO M1 . ---------------------------------____------- -------------- oraoeoxrro. o3S D(,11�22eti7 S� Id ---A ----•---- rl7r ) I (U.S. Postal Servim,., S l � °° A, 13 ° CERTIFIEMAIL. RECEIPT m (Domestic Mail , E d Ln IAI� 100 n ~ Postage $ c-i p cenmedFee $2.30 8747 ar ° A Rattan Red Fee =1 Postmark $ + (ErMorsemsrs M Requiretl) $1.75 Hem � ..- � � 5p� t. VL ResldMed Delivery Fee r a` Lr) (E °❑ '�. Ill d X m o a Total Postage a Fees 1$ $4.42 02/25/20054 C3 C3 Sent To C3 • 0 �J N WPOB XAfo. �U/�ElVtd[J fl�(-�02d/b q arPO Box No. .0 � - S E i T Rv = °$ Qn oU.S. Postal Servim,, CERTIFIED 9i kd" RECEIPT E9 ti � �> 3 LL C3 CIAL. USE �t ���t � � p N �E - Postage $ 40-37 . E e �$ v C; LL '3 certified Fee $2.30 0707 C4 9 8 E —v1 ■ ■ ■ �" C3MRearm Ro*"Fee O1 Pasbnedr 0 (Endmeemem Requketl) $1.75 Restricted DeiWery Fee M (Endorsement RegWrem r=I Total postage&Peee $ $4.42 -"02/25/2005 S C7t o C3 f�� 6E tcf. soak r` am,rd: --------••••-•-•................._lT orPOBox No. oD SoN I ISy f�QN - ........A...... ........ .. qy,5ffite,ZIPt4 W2.K ]�G /�71/ :rr 1 t S0%3TH0<Q 4F oisTa \C' SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT March 11, 2005 P.O. BOX 908. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (631) 765-4305 FAX (631) 765-5076 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SCTM# 1000-56.-6-8.5 & 8.6; Old Barge Restaurant Dear Bruno: Please be advised that the Board of Fire Commissioners has again reviewed the above mentioned map and found that there is adequate fire protection for this site plan. This letter is valid for one year. Sincerely, Miller Fire District Secretary MAR 1 4 2005 j L__- r ;Mgr 07 05 02: 22p _ C D'ENSON (302) 234-2619 p. 1 s COIReiters Cio Carol R.Denson Phone;302-239-0979 Newark,DE 19711 Fax: 302-234-2629 Email:crdensonoudel.edu Fax Cover Sheet i "M to: Mr. Bruno Semon From:Carol N.Danson Senior Site Plan Reviewer ofte beware Tewn of Soutlgld Planning Board Dab:March 7,2005 Fax number: Fax (631) 765-3136 Phonenumber: 302.239.0979 TOTAL PAGES,INCLUDING COVER: 3 Camma�rb: RE: Old Barge Restaurant, Southold Attached is a letter from the Southold Town Trustees that amends our permit, #5964. The amendment addresses all remalning issues that the Planning Board lead with that permit. — — i — U 2005 l t t M4r 07 05 02: 22p C DENSON (302) 234-2619 p. 2 Albert J.Kmpaki, President ilown Hail James Hing,Vice-President, 63095 Route 25 Artie .Foster PA,Box 1179 Ken pohwmda Southold,New York 11971-0469 Peggy A. Dickerson Telephone(631)766.1892 Fax(631)766.1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF Sot THOLD March 7,2005 Ms. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Rd. Newark, Delaware 19711 RE. OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 750 OLD MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM#56.6-6.7 Dear Ms.Denson. The fol'owing action was taker,by !h,- Southol-Toy,,) Board of Trustees on Wednesday February 16, 2005: RESOLVED,that the Southold Town Board of trustees APPROVE the Amendment to Permit a 5984 as follows: The turf area along the Main Road wiP remain; it,,ill be required to be a non-fertilization,non- chetnicat area,within 100'of the watr. No other turf on sae. The French drains around the building will capture ill -unorf and replace the original requtrcment of gutters into drywells. French drains will be installed along tL•c west side of the property to capture runoff from the parking lot,instead of regrading the parking lot. And all else as required on the addcridutn to Permit 1 5944, and as depicted on the site plan approved by the Planning Department as surveyed Fy Joseph Fischetti and last dated February 19,2005. . .Mar 07 OS 02: 22p C DENSON [302] 234-2619 p. 3 9 • 2 This is not a determination from any other age wy If you have any questions, please c.a!! our office at (631) 765-1892 Sincerely, A44-e '9 4 � . Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:hrt gUFFO(�c JOSHUA Y. HORTON ��°� °rry� JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A 0 SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD T TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-9015 Tei.(516)-765-1560 OFFICEOFTHE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse March 8, 2005 Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "The Old Barge" Site Plan SCTM #: 1000-56-06-8.7 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the revised site plan for the above referenced project. This site plan has a revision date of February 18, 2005 and has been prepared by the office of Mr. Robert I. Brown, A.I.A. Some of the items listed in my last report could not be answered or satisfied at this point in time. Once the project moves forward it will be up to the Building department to determine the overall scope of the work and the project's ability to meet FEMA requirements. At this time, this current site plan has been revised to meet the requirements and/or issues that had been detailed in my last report. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact my office. Si erely, ames A. Richter, A. cc: Michael Verity (Chief Building Inspector) SUFF04 � MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �O� �0 P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold,NY 11971 Chair y 10" OFFICE LOCATION: i! ' Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J.CREMERSy�ol ���� 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L.EDWARDS (cor. Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone:631765-1938 Fax:631765-31340 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD VIA FACSIMILE: 302 234-2619 February 16, 2005 Ms. Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Dear Ms. Denson: Re: Site Plan SCTM#56-6-8.7 The Old Barge Restaurant Followin0s a copy of the Planning Board letter adopt at the February 14 Work f Sessiorysetting the Public Hearing date of March 14 2005. / Please call this office at your convenience to arrange an appointment to discuss the required site plan changes. Keep in mind that time is of the essence. Sincerely, B Se on S for Site Plan Reviewer enc. osuFFoc�r , Albert J. Krupski, President 0�. CQG Town Hall , James King,Vice-President h� y� 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster O P.O.Box 1179 M Ken Poliwoda yy, Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson �J Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2005 Ms. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Rd. Newark, Delaware 19711 RE: OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 750 OLD MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 56-6-8.7 Dear Ms.Denson: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Wednesday February 16, 2005: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVE the Amendment to Permit# 5964 as follows: The turf area along the Main Road will remain; it will be required to be a non-fertilization,non- chemical area, within 100' of the water. No other turf on site. The French drains around the building will capture all runoff and replace the original requirement of gutters into drywells. French drains will be installed along the west side of the property to capture runoff from the parking lot, instead of regrading the parking lot. And all else as required on the addendum to Permit# 5964, and as depicted on the site plan approved by the Planning Department as surveyed by Joseph Fischetti and last dated February 18, 2005. } MAR ' 1 2005 1 2 This is not a determination from any other agency. If you have any questions, please call our office at (631) 765-1892. Sincerely, A/� �Z Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:hct Feb 28 05 08: 53e C DENSON (302) 234-2619 p. 1 iSu-6F F A C S I M I L EBS TO: FROM: OUI Name: Name: Fax #: 3 (— 7�%.S� — . 3 (F Fax N: Pages: Q � C(` c/ Date/Time:- MESSAGE: ate/Time:MESSAGE: .I Gi HP FAX FEB 2 8 2005 I I Feb 26 05 06: 53a C DENSON (302) 234-2619 p. 2 C. D. Reiter's Uo Carol R, Denson 1184 Corner Ketcb Road Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239-0979 Fax: (302)234-2619 Email: carolydenson@comcastnet TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chair, Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 FROM: Carol R. Denson DATE: February 28,2005 RE: The Old Barge Restaurant SCTA44 1000-56.6-8.7 On November 26,2004,I sent a letter to the Southold Town Chief Building Inspector addressing the question of the cost of the proposed addition to the Old Barge Restaurant building,and its cost relative to the market value of the existing structure. This ratio is required because the project is located in a FEMA flood zone. A copy of that letter is herewith attached as a matter of information. c.James A.Richter,R.A. Feb 20 05 00: 53a C DENSON (302) 234-2619 p. 3 C.D, Reiter's c/o Carol R.Denton 1184 ComerlCetoh Road Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239.0979 Fax:(302)234-26 19 Email:crdgns mjttdel g& TO. Michael I Verity,Chief Building Inspector Southold Town Building Depertmeat P.O.Bax 1179 Southold,NY 119971 FROM: Carol R. Dermad G " DATE: Novelabet 26,2004 Re: Building Peamit for the Old Barge Restaurant 11"letter&Wmseea the question whether the cost of the proposed addition is leas than 50 percent of the marlret value of the®doting structmv at the time coastrrtcbm is inifiated This determination is Mpured beca m the project is located in a FEMA.. The"arid value oftbe existing shtrclura on October 12,20M was deterntkW to be $620,000.00. This vabro is based on an independent gVaisal conducted by Andrew Stype Reahy,Inc.,Mrdtituck,New York. A latter to that effiect is attached. The cost of the proposed addition,including the substructure and site prepaaban,was oetimated to be$213,300.00. 'Clue mete was recently prepared by our architect;Robert 1.Browa. Fairwathot-Brown Design Associates,Inc.,Greenport,New York,and is based as his etpeimce with constnrcben costs to the area A copy of his letter is also attacbed. The cost of the proposed addition is 34.4 percent of the maid value of the ads*structure. This is subst"atiy lose thea 30 percent,and thus compliance with building codes and FEMA regulations tlaoughout the existing building is not required. Would You pterin confirm this conclusion by sending a later of acl"owledgmeat. Feb 28 05 08: 54a C DENSON (302) 234-2819 p. 4 • • Andrew Stype Realty, Inc. 12985 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 63, MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 (631) 298-8760 FAX (631) 298-5779 www.stype.com olld All' d October 12. 2004 The C.D. Reiter's c/o Ms. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 Re: Watertront Restaurant Known as The Old Barge Located At; 750 Old Main Road Southold,New York SCTMN 1000-56-68.7 Dear Ms. Denson: In accordance with your request 1 am submitting a real estate appraisal regarding market valuation for the above captioned property. ~ Instructions are to indicate market vabte of the subject before improvements so as to conform to the Southold Town Code with regard to substantial improvements to a structure in the FEMA zone, i.e., any reconstruction, rehabilitation,addition or other improtstnsnt of a structure,cannot exceed 50% of the market value of the structure before the start of construction of the improvemem. The appraisal valuation is effective as of date of inspection,October 12.2004. This appraisal is a self-:omained report gad prepared in accords=with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the Appraisal Foundation. Upon oomidertuien of the three approaches to value and current market trends, Ote subject would indicate a market value for the structure of: $618,614. Rounded To: 5620,000. Vc y y urs. Phyllis Atitinson NYS Real Estate Residential Appraiser NYS Real Esu General Appraiser #45000024636 #46000022831 Feb 26 05 06: 55a C DENSON (3021 234-2619 p. 5 _FAIRWEAT FR-BROWN DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC, 205 Bay Avenue Grewport,N.Y. 11944 631-477-9752 (fat)631477-073 November 15,2004 Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark,Delaware 19711 Re: "The Old Barge, SCfM# 1000-5"-8.7 Dear Carol: To follow up on our meeting of October 20,2004 with James Richter,Michael Verity and Bruno Semon,l would like to confum my position that the proposed work involved in the above referenced project does not constitute 50019 or more of the value of the existing structure. As I indicated,the area of the second floor addition is approximately 1,400 sq. ft.,as to the existing structure area of approximately 3,940 sq. ft. The size of the addition compered is therefore 35.5%of the size of the existing structure. This should also be considered in the context of the extent of work involved in the addition with regard to the existing Meeh. bar. The bathrooms andnd Meehan The existing structure contains a full commercial kitchen,and a anical equipment also are pre-existing. The proposed addition will only be built to house dining seats and tables, with a small area for storage. Additionally,I have made some estimates for the addition. In my es imation,based on my recent experience with consmuxion costs,as well as input from John Costello regarding foundation and site work costs,the costs of this project should be in the range of$213,300.00, A breakdown of the costs is attached. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, Robert I. Brown, A.I.A. rY SOFFO(,�c P,6 JOSHUA Y. HORTON ,�� JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR : ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAN ROAD • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-9015 �� � Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse February 28, 2005 Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "The Old Barge" Site Plan SCTM #: 1000-56-06-8.7 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the revised site plan for the above referenced project. This site plan has a revision date of January 28, 2005 and has been prepared by the office of Mr. Robert I. Brown, A.I.A. Please consider the following items for your review: 1. Drainage calculations have been revised to meet the concerns addressed in my previous reports. Please note that a Town Trustees Permit (#5964) has also specified additional Site Drainage Requirements that have not been addressed by this note. 2. As per my last report, a system of Gutters & Leaders should be added to the facility and be connected directly to the site drainage system proposed. This requirement is also noted in the Trustees Permit. 3. My last report indicated that a new French Drain detail has been proposed for the entire perimeter of the restaurant. This French Drain detail has not yet been modified to address those concerns. 4. Existing Finish Floor elevations should be certified to meet all FEMA requirements and the first floor elevation should be noted on the site plan. 5. During previous meetings with the owner and their consultant, it had been noted that this proposed addition and alteration might exceed a 50% Threshold that would trigger a requirement for additional work. The consultant indicated that, in his opinion, it would not exceed this threshold. Both Mr. Verity's office and mine accepted this opinion with the condition that both the Department of State Codes Division and FEMA certify this item. If, when building permits are applied for, this opinion cannot be substantiated, it may be necessary to re-review the entire site plan for additional requirements. Page 1 of 2 1 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson February 28, 2005 Re: "The Old Barge" Site Plan SCTM #: 1000-56-06-8.7 Page 2 of 2 6. The 4' wide buffer area that has been indicated along the westerly property line should be detailed. It is my understanding that some of the original Trustee Permit requirements have been tailored with the provision that the site design be modified to include a French drain and plantings along this property line. Section details and notes should be added to the plan to indicate this change. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact my office. Sin erely, aures A. Richter, R.A. cc: Michael Verity (Chief Building Inspector) 02/23/2005 17:24 6314770973 FAIRWEATHER BROWN PACE 01 s� C. D. REITERS CIO CAROL R. DENSON 1184 CORNER KETCH ROAD NEWARK,DE 19711 VIA FAX (631)7653136 & MAIL February 23, 2005 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse — Chairperaw-Planing Board FEB 2 2005 P. O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re- "The Old Harg e'Site Plan SCTM# 1000.36-6-8.7 Notice of Public Hearing Dear Ms. Woodhouse: The final public hearing regarding the maps for the above-referenced site plan has been scheduled for Monday,March 14,2005, at 6:05 P.M.at the Southold Town H211. In that regard the Notice to Adjacent Property Owners and the sign contain information that is incorrect. Specifically,item#4 slates that the new second floc addition is 1,851.7 square feet. That number is incorrect. The correct number is 1,397 square feet,as documented on the site plan. Sincerely yours, 6" z&"-7� Carol Denson ca Robert I. Brown,ALA. ' • �QH11FF04co • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O.Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold,NY 11971 Chair y OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J.CREMERS y°yol ��Ot' 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L.EDWARDS (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 14th day of March, 2005 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for Greenport Heights Development, LLC, located approximately 775' w/o Moores Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Road 25, in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-45-4-3.1 6:05 p.m. Proposed Site Plar�for The Old Barge, located on the s/s/o/Old Main Road approximately 1953' w/o Dol)hin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road' in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 Dated: 2/22/05 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, MARCH 3, 2005 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The TravelerfWatchman • • Page 1 of 1 Randolph, Linda From: Dina Kontokosta [dkontokosta@travelerwatchman.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 2:23 PM To: Randolph, Linda Sl.i;je�t: Re: legal ad Got it. Thanks. ----- Original Message----- From: RandolphLinda Linda To: editorial@trayelerwatchman,com Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 1:51 PM Subject: legal ad please confirm the following legal ad: 2/22/05 » • �guFFQL1( • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O.Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold,NY 11971 Chair y OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J.CREMERSy�o! ���� 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L.EDWARDS (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone: 681765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 14th day of March, 2005 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for Greenport Heights Development, LLC, located approximately 775' w/o Moores Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Road 25, in Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-45-4-3.1 / 6:05 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for The Old Barge, located on the s/s/o Old Main Road approximately 1953' w/o Dolphin Orive, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 Dated: 2/22/05 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) vu:J York being duly sworn, says that on the 22nd day of February, 2005 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hail, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 3/14/05 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Greenport Heights Development, LLC SCTM#1000-45-4-3.1 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for The Old Barge, Second Floor SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Linba Randolph Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this a-eta s day of It4rU01 , 2005. L Notary P is MELANIE DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York No.01D04634870 Qualified in Suffolk Couny - Commission Expires September 0,_ • $UffO(�C • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �.t.0� �(� P.O.Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold,NY 11971 Chair N G � OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J.OR.EMERSy�p! �.�0`� s 375 State Route 26 KENNETH L.-EDWARDS (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.S1DOR Southold,NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone:631765-:1938 Fax: 631765-31343 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 15, 2005 Ms. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for The Old Barge, Second Floor Located on the s/s/o Old Main Road, approximately 1,953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zoning District: MII Dear Ms. Delison: i The final public hearing regarding the maps for the abo e-referenced site plan has been scheduled for Monday, March 14, 2005, at 6:05 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's.notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex (2nd Floor, North Fork Bank). Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, March 11, 2005. The sign needs to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Encl. Southold Town Planninq Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the M-11 Zoning District; 4. That the application is for a new second floor addition ofz�Cj��-7�sq. ft. and an alteration to 3923 sq. ft. of existing building space on 1.4438 acres parcel in the MII Zone; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. (2"d FI., North Fork Bank). Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, March 14. 2005 at 6:05 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Traveler Watchman, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): The C.D. Reiter Partnership/The Old Barge Restaurant Date: 2/18/05 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) i Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY. noon, Fri., 3/11105 Re: Proposed Site Plan: The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM#s: 1000-56-6-8.7 Date of Hearing: Monday, March 14, 2005, 6:05 p.m. $58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING $58-1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING §58.1. Providing notice of public hearings. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12.27-1995 as L.L. No. 25.1995. Amendments noted where applicable.] §58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon.The,board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for/he giving of notice: A. By causing a notice giving theAfine, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten (10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven (7) days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street 5801 C . D . REITER PARTNERSHIP SITE PLAN FOR THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 1000 =56 =6 -8 . 7 13q '7 Proposal for a new second floor addition of sq . ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on 1 .4438 acres parcel in the M-II Zone. 0 MON . - MARCH 14, 2005 - 6 : 05 P . M . bss Q�QgUfFO(,�co �2 Go = Town Hall,53095 Main Road O Fax(631)765-9502 P.O.Box 1179 y�o! �aQ� Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: February 18, 2005 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: The Old Barge Location: 750 Old Main Road, Southold SCTM# 1000— Section 56- Block 06 —Lot 8.7 Date: November 12, 2004 Revised Date: February 14, 2005 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Restaurant IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN THIS MII DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. * See Special Exception. Appl. No. 5626 Certification based on less than 50% improvement to the structure. Michael J. Verity', Chief Building Inspector • • OgUFFO(,�c Albert J. Krupski, President ��. 0 Town Hall James King,Vice-President = Gy� 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster h P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda 15 Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson 'j'ifro �Qt' Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631)765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Jeri Woodhouse, Chairperson FEB Southold Town Planning Board Date: February 17, 2005 Re: The Old Barge: SCTM#56-6-8.7 Site Plan The Board of Trustees has reviewed the site plan for the Old Barge. They would like to see additional French drains to capture water from the parking lot, running along the west side of the property. The lawn area along the Main Road will be required to be a non-fertilization, non- chemical area, because of the proximity to the creek. The applicant will be required to follow all the conditions of the Trastea permit approved on July 21, 2004. FEB 1 7 1105 FAIRWEATHER-BROWN DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. 205 Bay Avenue Greenport,N.Y. 11944 631-477-9752 (fax)631-477-0973 Email:FBDAInc@optonline.net Transmittal Date: �/ I 14(Os— To: Re: We are are sending, enclosed, the following: [ ] drawings [ ] specifications [ ] samples [ ] for your: [ ] use [ ] approval [ ] information �1iLL- By: Gt � Fig Su-Pd� FAIRWEATHER-BROWN DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. 205 Bay Avenue Greenport,N.Y. 11944 631477-9752 (fax)631-477-0973 Email:FBDAInc@optooline.net Transmittal /9 Date: � QS To: ' FEB 1 0 2005 Re: J We are sending, nclosed, l�wing: - [ ] drawings [ ] specifications [ ] samples [ ] for your: [ ] use [ ] approval [ ] information a Will— By: uBy: \J PEALS BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman �� 53095 Main Road 1� Gerard P. Goehringer G Z P.O. Box 1179 Vincent Orlando �,y • Southold,NY 11971-0959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 James Dinizio,Jr. ��l dap Fax(631) 765-9064 Michael A. Siron --' http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED 'L.4� kt BOARD OF APPEALS FGA A` TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 107, EB ' FINDINGS;-DtLIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION Southold Town Clerk MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2005 Appl. No. 8626 —C.D. REITERS (OLD BARGE RESTAURANT) Property Location: 750 Old Main Road (NYS Route 25), Southold CTM Parcel: 56-6-8.7 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Unlisted Action category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. /. Ila dg 2609 UAW. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The property consists of +1.4219 acres with 252.01 feet along the south side of the Old Main Road in Southold. The property is improved with a single-story restaurant building, as shown on the August 6, 1998 survey, amended September 20, 2004, by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. BASIS OF APPLICATION: The applicant has requested a Special Exception under Zoning Code Section 100-121B(1) pertaining to alterations and new construction relative to the pre-existing restaurant use, and confirmation that the Building Department in its October 2004 determination (Notice of Disapproval) i correctly stated that a rear yard setback variance is not required based on changes in the property's deed and survey, as corrected, and conversations with the Southold Board of Assessors. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 16, 2004 and January 20, 2005, at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the area, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION: The additions, which does not cover the entire existing first story, are measured at 24.8 feet wide by 64.8 feet, plus an upper observation deck 13.2 feet wide by 30.2 feet. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted, and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1) The applicant seeks approval for second-story additions with alterations to the existing building to be used in conjunction with the dining room facilities of the present restaurant. The existing building has been used as a restaurant for many years. It is the determination of this board that the expansion to the upper level in conjunction with the continued operation of the restaurant in this Marine II Zone District will not in any way alter the character of the neighborhood or district. The new construction will not increase the present 120 person seating area of the restaurant. 2). Section 100-121 B(1) authorizes proposed additions and alterations to restaurants. Page 2—February 3, 2005: - Appl. No. 5626—CD Reiter's CTM Parcel 56-6-8.7 (Old Barge Restaurant) 3) In addition, the Board has reviewed the General Standards governing Special Exception uses set forth in Section 100-263 and finds: A. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts. B. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. C. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed fitness facility use and its location. D. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter. E. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. F. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Chairwoman Oliva, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carried to GRANT a Special Exception, as applied for, and to CONFIRM that the Building Department's determination that a rear yard variance is not necessary is correct, based on the survey corrected/amended September 20, 2004 by Peconic Surveyors, P.C., and details on the S-1, A-1, A-2 Diagrams prepared by Fairweather-Brown Design Associations dated September 23, 2004. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, Dinizio and Simon. Absent was Member Goehringer. This Resolution was dul pted (4-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 2/14105 Approved for Filing APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS O�SOFFO(��0 • Southold Town Hall Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman � 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer Z P.O. Box 1179 W Southold,NY 11971-0959 Vincent Orlando ��l ��� Tel. (631) 765-1809 James Dinizio, Jr. 1 41 Fax(631) 765-9064 Michael A. Simon http://southoldtown.northfork.net � 1 BOARD OF APPEALA, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEB FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2005 Appl. No. 5626 — C.D. REITERS (OLD BARGE RESTAURANT) L--- - Property Location: 750 Old Main Road (NYS Route 25), Southold CTM Parcel: 56-6-8.7 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Unlisted Action category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The property consists of 31.4219 acres with 252.01 feet along the south side of the Old Main Road in Southold. The property is improved with a single-story restaurant building, as shown on the August 6, 1998 survey, amended September 20, 2004, by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. BASIS OF APPLICATION: The applicant has requested a Special Exception under Zoning Code Section 100-121 B(1) pertaining to alterations and new construction relative to the pre-existing restaurant use, and confirmation that the Building Department in its October 2004 determination (Notice of Disapproval) correctly stated that a rear yard setback variance is not required based on changes in the property's deed and survey, as corrected, and conversations with the Southold Board of Assessors. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 16, 2004 and January 20, 2005, at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the area, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION: The additions, which does not cover the entire existing first story, are measured at 24.8 feet wide by 64.8 feet, plus an upper observation deck 13.2 feet wide by 30.2 feet. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted, and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1) The applicant seeks approval for second-story additions with alterations to the existing building to be used in conjunction with the dining room facilities of the present restaurant. The existing building has been used as a restaurant for many years. It is the determination of this board that the expansion to the upper level in conjunction with the continued operation of the restaurant in this Marine II Zone District will not in any way alter the character of the neighborhood or district. The new construction will not increase the present 120 person seating area of the restaurant. 2) Section 100-121 B(1)authorizes proposed additions and alterations to restaurants. Page 2—February 3, 2005 . • Appl. No. 5626—CD Reiter's CTM Parcel 56-6-8.7 (Old Barge Restaurant) 3) In addition, the Board has reviewed the General Standards governing Special Exception uses set forth in Section 100-263 and finds: A. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts. B. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. C. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed fitness facility use and its location. D. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter. E. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. F. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Chairwoman Oliva, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carried to GRANT a Special Exception, as applied for, and to CONFIRM that the Building Department's determination that a rear yard variance is not necessary is correct, based on the survey corrected/amended September 20, 2004 by Peconic Surveyors, P.C., and details on the S-1, A-1, A-2 Diagrams prepared by Fairweather-Brown Design Associations dated September 23, 2004. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, Dinizio and Simon. Absent was Member Goehringer. This Resolution was dulypted (4-0 U C� -� Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 2/ /05 Approved for Filing FAIRWEATHER-BROWN `��/r2 DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. 205 Bay Avenue Greenport,N.Y. 11944 � !L 631-477-9752 (fax)631-477-0973 January 28, 2005 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson-Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: "The Old Barge" Site Plan SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: In response to the letter to you from James A. Richter,R.A., Town Engineer, dated January 7, 2005, we are attaching to this letter revised drawings which address items 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8. 1. Adjacent lots numbers12 and 13 have been removed from the site plan. The drainage capacity calculations have been checked for accuracies and revised as follows. On the west side a breakdown of existing drainage and proposed new drainage is shown;the overall capacity is estimated to be 3,600 cubic feet along this side of the building. On the east side the estimated capacity is 2,700 cubic feet. A French Drain has been designed to handle the drainage from the new roof. The dry wells are not required and have been removed from the plan. 4. The two proposed overflow drywells are not needed and have been removed from the plan, along with the cross-section of the dry well detail. 5. Parking spaces# 4 and#5 have been shifted to provide access to the existing Service Road. 6. Parking spaces# 14 through#44 have been revised in accordance with minimum standards of 9 feet by 19 feet each. 8 Previous tie line dimensions noted on the plan have been removed. Item 2, in which Mr. Richter asks for a system of gutters, has not been included because the French Drain, which is proposed to surround the building, serves exactly the purpose that gutters would. That is, runoff'from the roof is caught by the French Drain before it can spread beyond the perimeter of the building. In Item 3, the filter cloth has been added to the detail. A French Drain, if properly prepared will not create any difficulty for a pedestrian or car to traverse. In fact, the entire parking area, except for the handicapped parking spaces is surfaced with gravel. The drain surrounds the handicapped parking spaces so that anyone with mobility issues will not need to cross the drain. As to Item 7, if the Planning Board chooses, we can indicate landscaping along the western property line buffer. At the meeting of November 16, 2004 referenced in Mr. Richter's letter, the issue of 50 percent rule was indeed discussed. Clarification provided by the Chief Building Inspector stated that it is the Chief Building Inspector's responsibility to determine compliance with the 50 percent rule. Further, it is the Chief Building Inspector's decision to seek consultation with either the FEMA representative and/or the Department of State Codes Division about the project. There was no discussion at that meeting about having either of these agencies"certify" any aspect of the project. In the interim since that meeting, a market value appraisal of the existing structure conducted by a licensed appraiser and an estimate of the cost of the proposed addition, including all site development, has been submitted to the Building Department. The cost data indicate that the proposed addition is substantially less than 50 percent. We believe that all concerns raised about the site plan for this project have been addressed; we, therefore,request a meeting at a work session of the Planning Board so that we can move forward to the public hearing. We are available to meet with the Planning Board any time in February except on the 14th. Sincerely yours, ert I. Brown, A.I.A. cc: Carol Denson Page-2 �gUFFO(�- ~ Albert J. Krupski, President �� CQ Town Hall James King, Vice-President .:•r 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda We Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson yif�0 aQ`' Telephone (631) 765-1892 1 l�( Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 21, 2004 John A. Costello Costello Marine Contracting Corp. 423 5" Street Greenport, NY 11944 RE: CAROL R. DENSON: OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 750 OLD MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NY SCTM# 56-06-8.7 The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday July 21, 2004 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, John Costello on behalf of CAROL R. DENSON applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated June 30, 2004 and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on July 21, 2004, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code, 2 • � , ) WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of CAROL R. DENSON to construct an upper level on the existing barge restaurant building with the following conditions: 1. No turf on site 2. Grade the parking lot away from the water 3. Gutters and drywells on the structure; keep all runoff out of the water 4. Cut Phragmites to 1' where it is choking out the Spartina alterniflora along the waters edge, as indicated on the survey 5. Keep the sand area between the parking lot and the bulkhead 6. Remove the 6 x 30 float from the marsh fringe 7. No excavation; second story will be put on pilings, And all as depicted on the survey prepared by Joseph Fischetti last dated April 9, 2004. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, '// Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/hct �.• ��Y� a -1 tt C r �� 7`fl�. � rr�S y1 y.��.r�. 1�i.'� ..., :y>.n..ti .r' �+ r��.:` �t T.�� y ... r �• � !�.?, 1' /'. �..�l :':�i,��._ •moi�l i'\. 1��`"`.+ TERMS and CONDITIONS TSD pamittee Carol Denson teddiag at 1184 Corner. Ketch Rr Npumrk DF 19711N. Y., a$ of the coadderadoo for the Issuance of the permit does understand and prescribe to the fol: �i 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Tows of Southold are released from stay and ail damage; or daiau for damages, of tuts seisingditecdy at lndkvcdy as a twalt of nay open acresperformed .puragof b mit pattai4.19d. t em_me—4 rot 6th or het own she, defend any sad ail such atts`faidated by ddrd patties, and the said pesmittee assam" full llsb q with respect theseto, fP-f¢Dommpkte t3AWoa of the Raard of Ttattet of the Toga of Swdso.ld _ 2. That dih Prank h rand for s pedod of . 24 '. trace. which is ftddea d to be the eaknated time-mpked to oompWe the wodc Involved, but-sbould clow rianm wamn, term for an nmension may be wade to the Board at a lager isle; 3. Tint this Permit should be retained lodefidtely, or as long as the add petmhcee wishes to maintain the structure or ptoject iavolV4 to provide nideaee to anyone concerned dig lade orhation was otiglailly obndoA 4. Thu the work im fvtd wlH be abject to the kgadm acid approval of the Road or Its agents, end wom,00aOiaaae with the provision of the odgldstdog apptiadoe, may be erose fa revocation of this Permit by ns*don of die said Board. 5. Thu chore will be no uaraiwoable interference with oavigadoa as a tesdt of the wodc herein autbotbed. C Ther there shall be no Intederem with the d& of cite pW& to pass and tapas dna¢ the beach between W& and low water!nada. 7. Thu If furore open does of the Town of SonthnU mpice the.nmotd mWor sttadoos In the ballon of•the wale bar I somodaed, or IK in do opiwioa of-the.Smcd of Ttmoeas, flee. work shill cense sammomble obstmmon to free nawkettoo, the aid pmmiwa w111 be nq deed, capon to cemm or alter this wodc or project herds stated wiAtopt tspemes to the Town, & Thu the add Baud will be notified by the Percolate at dee oom#Wm of die voce attdt- orhed 9. That the permlwe wN dais all ocher pwmia and eommrt slut aq be tegnited tale . Pkmea t to ails permit whiff may be subject to revoke anon faifam to obeds nae. -pgUPFO(� Albert J. Krupski, President �w CQ/� Town Hall James King,Vice-President _ �Yj� 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda v. Hf Southold, New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson Gy�o `� Telephone(631) 765.1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ADDENDUM TO PERMIT # 5964 CAROL R. DENSON 750 OLD MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NY SCTM# 56-06-8.7 Wetland permit to Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of CAROL R. DENSON to construct an upper level on the existing barge restaurant building with the following conditions: 1. No turf on site 2. Grade the parking lot away from the water 3. Gutters and drywells on the structure; keep all runoff out of the water 4. Cut Phragmites to 1' where it is choking out the Spartina alterniflora along the waters edge, as indicated on the survey 5. Keep the sand area between the parking lot and the bulkhead 6. Remove the 6 x 30 float from the marsh fringe 7. No excavation; second story will be put on pilings, And all as depicted on the survey prepared by Joseph Fischetti last dated April 9, 2004. �ofF0(,tc !°�J JOSHUA Y. HORTON �� ° JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR G : ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Dy • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fac. (516)-765-9015 41 1 Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse January 7, 2005 Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "The Old Barge"Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-56-06-8.7 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the revised site plan for the above referenced project. This site plan is dated November 16,2004 and has been prepared by the office of Mr. Robert I. Brown,A.I.A. A meeting was held with the Applicant to discuss several issues related to this site plan. Since that time,changes and/or modifications have been made to incorporate some of the items addressed at that meeting. Please consider the following items for your review: 1. Drainage calculations have been added to address the issue of On-Site Runoff. These calculations, however, attempt to utilize the capacity of sub-surface drainage areas located behind the existing bulkheads, including the areas that are adjacent to lots number 12 and 13. It had been the Applicants decision early on in this process to exclude these two single and separate lots from the Site Plan review. Therefore, calculations should be revised to indicate compliance without utilizing these areas. In addition, calculations related to the capacity of this subsurface drainage field should be reviewed and corrected for inaccuracies. 2. A system of Gutters should be added to the facility and leaders from this system should be connected directly to the drainage pools. 3. A new French Drain detail has been proposed for the entire perimeter of the restaurant. This French Drain detail should be modified to include the use of filter cloth to prevent this French drain from the accumulating silt. This French Drain should also be addressed at all points of entry or access to the facility. As proposed,this drain surrounds Handicapped parking areas and pedestrian access walkways that might be difficult or hazardous to traverse over the loose gravel surface of the trench. 4. The Drywell Detail indicates a Finish Floor Elevation of 10.0'. The Parking Lot is shown as Elevation 45. The Finish Floor does not appear to be five and one half feet above the parking area. Finish Floor areas should be certified to meet all FEMA requirements. 5. Parking spaces #4 & 5 should be shifted Westerly to open the Existing Service Road and provide additional access for emergency vehicles. 6. Parking spaces# 14 through 44 appear to be drawn less than eight feet wide. A minimum of 9" wide x 19' long parking space is required. These diagonal parking spaces should be revised accordingly. 7. A 4' wide buffer area has been indicated along the-Westerly property lin . Will the Planning Board require landscaping along this buffer? - Page 1 of 2 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson January 7, 2005 Re: "The Old Barge" Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-56-06-8.7 Page 2 of 2 8. The southerly tie line has been removed and deed descriptions appear to have removed the need for zoning variances. The current site plan indicates two dimensions on the southerly side of the facility adjacent to the wood walk. What do the dimensions of 14'-5" and 20'-9" represent? Please note,the issue of weather or not this proposed renovation constitutes a 50%or greater improvement to the site is still unresolved. Both Mr. Verity and I stated at the above referenced meeting that, in our opinion, this project would exceed the 50% threshold. We then agreed that, if both the FEMA representative and the Dept. of State Codes Division certified this project to be less T than 50%, we would agree with their determination. To my knowledge, this determination has not been certified by either of their departments. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office. jJ in Iy, LuO es A. Richter, .A. CC: Michael Verity (Principal Building Inspector) APPEALS BOARD MARS Annex Location—NFB, First Floor p)S' Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Southold, New York 11971-0959 Gerard P. Goehringer Tel. Intercom Ext. 5011 Lydia A.Tortora Telephone 765-1809 Vincent Orlando Fax 765-9064 James Dinizio http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appea ek, DATE: December 3, 2004 SUBJECT: Coordination for Reply/Comments The following application is under review by the Board of Appeals, with an advertised December 16, 2004 public hearing. Enclosed are the Building Inspector's November 4, 2004 amended Notice of Disapproval, and copies of both applications. The Planning Board may be involved regarding a presubmission or intended filing of a site plan review under the Chapter 100 of Zoning, and your comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience. NAME TAX#/ ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATE DATE STAMPED CD REITERs 56-6-8.7 5626 8/6/04 Special (On File) OLD BARGE Mil Zone and Exception and Amended (Prepared by RESTAURANT 10/2004 Rear yard 9/23/04 Fairweather- setback Site Maps Brown Archs. for Addition Bulk Schedule, 100-244B Lot size less than code for existing house Your comments are appreciated by December 13, 2004. v 1. Thank you. Encls. v% r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ` Oso N g L APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION �. sb 4 Application No. OCT 5 2004 Date Filed: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: I (%*r , Stephen R. Angel Of108 East Main Street P. 0. Box 279 (Residence, House No. and Street Riverhead, NY 11901 - 631 369-1700 (Hamlet, State, Zip Code, Telephone Number) hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE XII , SECTION 100-121 , SUBSECTIONB(1) for the below-described property for the following uses and purposes (and as shown on the attached plan drawn to scale) : Construction of upper level to existing restaurant located in the Marine II (MII) District pursuant to the plans prepared by Robert I. Brown, R.A. and Joseph Fischetti, P.E. OCT A. Statement Of Ownership and Interest; The C.D. Reiter's ts(dre) the owner(x4 of property known and re erred to aS750 Old Main Road; NYS Rt. 25, Southold, NY 11971 (House No. , Street, am et identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, SOction56 Block 6 , Lot(s) 8.7 , which is fetx, d on a subdivision Map (Filed 12 8/30 "Mapc�f' Lewis Holmes Com an Inc. " Filed Map o. 535 , and hSg een approved y t e Southo own P arming Board on as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The above-described property was acquired by the owner on 12/28/02 B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: A restaurant is a permitted use by special exception (see §100-122[B] [1] . The upper level to the existing restaurant will not cause any change in the neighborhood. It will not decrease existing setbacks or change any uses on the property. C. The property which is the subject of this application is zoned Marine II (MII)Distrancdt [x 1 is .can iatant with the use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being tl furnished herewith. L ] is not consistent with the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith for the following reason(s) : [ ] is vacant land. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) ss. : S/Valg t ed Sworn to before me this 5th day of October 20r4. u SxtXphen Angel (Notary u 7c) EIZTeiVCR Notary Public,State of New York ZB2 (rev. 2/(/86) No.01814691045 Quslifled In Suffolk County Commission Expires May 31,20- FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD orT 2004 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. SONO 'ICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 6, 2004 AMENDED: October 2004 TO: The C.D.Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Please take notice that your application dated March 19, 200 For permit for construction of a second story addition to an existing restaurant at Location of property: 750 Old Main Road, Southold,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 56 Block 6 Lot 8.7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction requires site plan approval from the Southold Town Plara in Board. oard This notice of disapproval was amended on October 25,2004, to remove the need for a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. A rear yard setback variance is not required based on changes in the property's deed, conversations with the Southold Board of Assessors and the corrected lot line shown on the most recent survey of the property. --- --- ---/Sip;;a ----------- Authoriz Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA FORM NO. 3 akv` TOWAIOFSOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT GJ �MSOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 6, 2004 TO: The C.D.Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson 2 (OC a� d(` 1184 Comer Ketch Road t\1 7 Newark, DE 19711 �p Please take notice that your application dated March 19, 2004 Q U For permit for construction of a second story addition to an existin rests t Al -� Location of property: 750 Old Main Road Southold NY Southold Town County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 56 Block 6 Lot 8.7 Planning Boa," Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, %6 s non-conforming 61.937 square foot lot in the M-H District is not permitted pursuant to Articie XIL Section 100-122 which states "No buildi4 shall be usedjand no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MII District urless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incororated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule reo::ires a minimum rear vard setback of 25 feet The existing building notes a rear Yard setback of 11 feet The proposed addition notes a rear yard setback of 18 feet. Therefore pursuant to Article= Section 100-242A which states "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling reconstruction or enlargement of a non-conforming building containing a conforming use provided that such action does not create any new non-conformance or increase the degree of non-conformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings." Pursuant to the ZBA's interpretation in Walz 05309) such additions and alterations will thus constitute an increase in the degree of non-conformance In addition the proiect requires site plan approval from the South own Board. - - ------------------ - o afore Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. ORIGINAL APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS For Office Use Only Fee:$ Filed By: Date Assigned/Assignment No. 5U(P. Office Notes: Parcel Location: House No. 750 Street Old Main Road Hamlet Southold NYS Rt. SCTM 1000 Section 56 Block 6 Lot(s)8.7 Lot Size1.4219"i ne District MII I W)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: August 6, 2004 Applicant/Owner(s): Applicant: Stephen R. Angel Owner: The C.D. Reiter's Mailing The C.D. Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson Address: 1184 Corner Ketch Road, Newark De 19711 Telephone: 302 239-0979 NOTE: if applicant is not the owner,state if applicant is owner's attorney,agent,architect,builder,contract vendee,etc. Authorized Representative: Stephen R. Angel Address: 108 East Main Street, POB 279, Riverhead, NY 11901 Telephone: 631 369-1700 Please specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above listed names: ❑Applicant/Owner(s) M Authorized Representative ❑Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED August 6. 2004 FOR: %i Building Permit 0 Certificate of Occupancy 0 Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ❑Change of Use ❑Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Notice of Disapproval requires variance before site plan from Planning Board Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article,Section,Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article XII Section 100-122 SubsectionBulk Schedule Real Yard Setback Article XXIV Section 100-242 Subsection A Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: 3A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ❑A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ❑Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ❑Reversal or Other A prior appeal❑has 1§has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No._Year For Office Use Only: Fee $ Assigned Appl. No. Office Notes: Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, IF granted, because: The character of the neighborhood is commercii Applicant merely seeks to construct a second floor or mezzanine over existing restaurant entirely within the envelope of the existing structure. Impact will be minimal. Also, thi restaurant use isgperY ted pp)ycaspte8ial 6,IyStio ) in his area. 2 The benefit sou ht D the a I If AIV IV T De ac eved �iy some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The existing structure is nonconforming To add a second floor or mezzanine, even though within the envelope of the existing structure, requires a variance under the Board's decision in Walz (115304) . (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The proposed second floor or mezzanine will be within the envelope of the existing structure. The existing setback will not be reduced. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: It will not change the use of the property, hwhich, for manyyears, has been a restaurant. Also, the a encies havin jurisdi tion_Jor ( asat�ie environmentaliacsett-created?th Sy and th Si�ffolk Count De of He �th es, or gx J No. If not, �s th� construction existing, as built? ( ) Yes, or (X) No. The proposed second floor or mezzanine has not been bui (6) Additional Information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirements: (attach extra sheet as needed) see attached sheet This is the MINIMUM that Is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ( ) Check this box and complete PART B, questions on next page to apply_ USE VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Please consult your attorney.) t Xelease roc ed o the sl nature and notary area below. rSig allureant or A ori d Agent Sworn to before me this 5 th (A ent must submit Authorization from Owner) day of .Acto ar;yt 2004. tephen R. Angel (No ryPublic)AKY GARETDeLUCA Notary Public,State of New York No.01B14691045 Qualified in Suffolk County ZBA App 9/30/02 Commission Expires May 31,20 *have approved the project. APPLICATION OF STEPHEN R. ANGEL, AGENT ON BEHALF OF THE C.D. REITER'S Part A (6) Owner seeks to construct either a proposed second story or mezzanine (an "upper level") above an existing restaurant. The restaurant is located close to the shoreline and rear lot line of the property. The location of the restaurant structure is legal and nonconforming. The owner has decided to add to the restaurant by constructing an upper level. The upper level is designed so that it is set back further from the rear lot line than the existing restaurant structure. The only way to add to the restaurant structure without increasing lot coverage or setback nonconformities is to construct an upper level as proposed, i.e., set back further than the existing restaurant structure on which it is located. Owner has received approvals from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("DEC"), the Trustees of the Town of Southold, and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Copies of the DEC's approval and the Trustees' approval are annexed. The Health Department approval is noted on another set of plans which have not been submitted to the Board. The Health Department approval is dated May 12, 2004. Applicant intends to exhibit the plans with such Health Department approval at the hearing in this matter. Owner still needs site plan approval from the Planning Board of the Town of Southold to complete this project. The Planning Board will not entertain the site plan application until a variance has been obtained from the rear yard setback requirement. - A ER / LOT I - P - O 5 _. r-- EXISTING 2 \��p MANHOLE EXISTING LAWN TO BE ��' �� I W/PUMP 51GN I� PAVED TO �\ MATCH U15TING NG \\ IAWN i - n �Q \ � �-�15T W C s, y� 5EPTIC FX15TING \ TANK 44 g SEPTIC TANK 42 4 \39 38 377 . "� 36 NG 5 FY15TING 35 5ERV CE \ \ GRAVEL 34 DRYWELL PARKING 33 �\ AREA 32 3 / \ 30w D p`P P - 29 EL4.5 28 z,o x�° O�G 27 FR RE5TAURANT 2? o 26 A Q�GP BARGE > '\ 25 DRYWELL W/ P� i ' 24 TRAFFIC COVER. 9� j 23 COVER WITH c�%%�� � 22 FILL C. 010 A -DRYV 2 I 0 �\ 20 IN15H 1L tfcn 190 TO MATCH \ 9EXISTING 8 PARKING 2 `O PEA. GANG I 1 IN N O � MON. FND. i 565 QO BG 5T vQ �/ 49 • ��� SITE LAN 5CALE: I"= 20-0" 5 K T FAIRWEATHER-BROWN �s / DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. 205 Bay Avenue Greenport,N.Y. 11944 631-477-9752 (fax)631-477-0973 November 15, 2004 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: "The Old Barge" Site Plan, SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Enclosed please find a revised site plan dated November 12, 2004 for the above referenced project. The revisions to the plan are based on issues raised in Mr. James Richter's letter to the Planning Board dated August 3, 2004, and subsequent meetings between the Planning Board, Carol Denson(the owner)and myself, and between Bruno Semon, James Richter,Michael Verity, Caron Denson and myself. Specifically addressed in these revisions are: 1. Drainage calculations for the gravel parking area have been included on the site plan dated 11/12/04. 2. Drainage and ground water data have been included and detailed. The test hole to be provided is not required as stated in the meeting of October 20, 2004, 3. Unnecessary drywells have been eliminated. 4. Drainage design has been revised to include numbered drainage structures, invert elevations and grading contours. 5. A four(4')foot wide buffer is now provided along the westerly property line. 6. Additional potential parking spaces due now indicated as "land banked"along the easterly property line. 7. The survey, upon which the site plan is based, has been updated and revised to indicate full deeded property. The site plan has been revised accordingly. If you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ly yours, 11 i AOIt. Brown,A.I.A. cc: Carol Denson � -,. Submission Without a Cover Letter `fir L) Sender: CQ Jam( .LL Subject: I r1 (2�) CD SCTM#: 1000 - Date: Comments: IF R D '-J -'J L l II GCT 2 6 Southold Town Plzanl-, ..,�rd ��"- - 7F . 36 Z 7- x'9 7_ -7(p$ - /eoz < t wn _ _ _`�'1?• 9152 , Q �ss. _ � mss d �..• ��� 7q 64. __ _ evss�.►_ s�J`" .v��xr-j7_"�, a' (�///�/_o•.ro /_Cssi,(?//�. 1 ioer��•O �_� a� 4 4 a / „•-:s../_!_l.i__. x.. ,.._ 11 Q11 .? G' VG. 7d.J--_. nj f✓`. ._ _.. t J - ---------- - 1 0�✓.+ / L� aw 0 6uof FORM NO. 3 e6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 6, 2004 AMENDED: October 2004 TO: The C.D.Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Please take notice that your application dated March 19, 200 For permit for construction of a second story addition to an existing restaura r, Location of property: 750 Old Main Road, Southold, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 56 Block 6 Lot 8.7 ;, 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction requires site plan approval from the Southold Town PlanningBoard. oard This notice of disapproval was amended on October 25, 2004, to remove the need for a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. A rear yard setback variance is not required based on changes in the property's deed, conversations with the Southold Board of Assessors and the corrected lot line shown on the most recent survey of the property. i Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA Oct 22 04 03: 27p C DENSON (302) 234-2619 P. 1 F A C S I M I L E TO: FROM: I f4e Name: /3/wovc, jo&le4 Name: Fax#; &51 jU Fax, 3 tib_ Z- Pages: IA,�A -e- Date/Time: soz -.-x3ri - /"/Z 2-1,0 MESSAGE: Alo 7- 141-17WI'e-1) HP FAX r4 Oct 22 04 03: 20p C DENSON (302) 234-2619 p. 3 r F"ROM : COSTELLO M*lN*. oHOhE NO. : 516 477 0005 Ort. 22 2004 08:14NM P1 wfFQ(4' Robert I. Scor Jr, Chairman Seuthuld Town Hd1l,53095 Route 2> .ScOlt A.Russell,Assessor o 1'.0.Dox 1179 Darling J. Duffy,Assessot h Southold,NY 11971-0959 Fax: (631)7riS.1356 41` Telephone:(631)7651937 BOARD OF ASSESSORS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 20,2004 To Whom It May Concern! .t is;he policy of Lhe Southold Town.4saetsocs' Uffice that we accept the filed subdivisionynap lines as tic property lines. Sincere�#y �� Wbert I. Scott,Jr. /l/ / Chairman: F- i rrT Ir 25 Srr„old Town Oct 22 04 03: 27p C DENSON (3021 234-2619 p. 2 C. D. Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239-0979 Fax: (302)234-2619 Email: crdenson'a:udel.edu TO: Michael Venty Southold Town Building Department Fax: 631-1,65-1823 FROM; Carol R. Densod� DATE: October 22, 2004 RE: Old Barge Restaurant This is in response to item k 7 in the Town Engineer's letter of August 3 addressed to Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, chair of the Planning Board, concerning the rear yard property line location of the Old Barge. We discussed this issue at our meeting of October 20, 2004. At that meeting, a copy of the deed was shown to the Town Engineer and it was agreed that the rear yard property line in the deed would be accepted if the Town Assessor concurred. A letter from the Town Assessor to this effect is attached. Also attached is a copy of the deed that shows the property boundaries as defined by the subdivision map conveyed to Lewis Homes Company, Inc., Number 535, and conveyed by a survey recorded in 1926. A survey of the site will be delivered under separate cover. The rear yard issue relates to the Letter of Disapproval from the Building Department of August 6, 2004. Because the proposed addition is greater than 25 feet from the property, line, we are asking that you reconsider the determination in that Letter of Disapproval. c S.Angel J. Costello _-- 1. Richter 11 B.Semonv' l Town Hall,53095 Main Road �O � � Fax(631)765-9502 P.O.Box 1179 y�to� � Telephone(631)765-1802 Southold,New York 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Joshua Y. Horton, Supervisor, Southold Town FROM: Damon Rallis,Permit Examiner,Building Department if DATE: August 16, 2004 REGARDING LETTER FROM CAROL DENSON(August 13, 2004) Project: C_Di Reiter's(The Old Barge) Location: 7z0 Old Main Road, Southold SCTM# 100—Section 56 -Block 6 - Lot 8.7 With regard to the above referenced letter, I have reviewed the file and discussed the letter with Principal Building Inspector Michael Verity and former Principal Building Inspector Edward Forrester. I personally wrote the Notice of Disapproval, issued on August 6, 2004. Regardless of disputes with respect to the timeline included in the above referenced letter, there is one serious inaccuracy that must be addressed. Carol Denson repeatedly refers to a"certification" form the building department for which she paid and was denied.This is incorrect. The building department issues a"certification"of a site plan internally, when it is requested by the Planning Board as per Southold Town Code. Although there seem to be a number of memos from the planning department reflecting a request for certification, it is my understanding that the building department never certified the site plan because it was incomplete. This was not the fault of the applicant. Instead,the planning board was directed to submit a complete site plan to this office,before a certification could be issued. J What Carol Denson refers to in her letter as a"certification"is actually a"notice of disapproval."This is what the applicant paid$35 for and reflects the"certification denial"she received earlier this month. The application for a Notice of Disapproval was submitted to this office at the direction of the planning board. It was not an application for a"certification" as she contends (there is no such thing)but was triggered by the planning board concerns with respect to the newly instituted site plan review process and a number of zoning issues. I received the application on my desk in May,2004. To the best of my knowledge, at the time, it was a brand new application. I personally was not aware that it was already with planning department and had been in the works since 1998. Upon reviewing the application,it was sent to the planning department for comments, as required by Southold Town Code. On May 20,2004,the planning board agreed with my decision to send the applicant for zoning violations and further recommended that the applicant also apply for a use variance(for an accessory retail use) and special exception approval for the restaurant use. Upon final determination from Mike Verity, the building department rejected both of the planning department's recommendations(for a use variance and special exception), as we determined that its pre-existing status made the uses exempt. However, following discussions with both the planning department and zoning board of appeals, it was determined that we could not exempt the applicant from setback requirements. I believe the applicant has been caught in an unfortunate situation with respect to code changes both locally and on the state level, since she first began this process. As you know, in January 22,2002,the Zoning Board issued a town-wide interpretation that requires a variance for any construction outside of an approved building envelope. This was not the case when the process was started in 1998. With respect to the applicant's timeline, it is filled with inaccuracies and false statements. The July 9, 1999 application to the Southold Town Building Department was incomplete and, although the applicant had been advised as to what was necessary to obtain a building permit, it sat dormant until March 14, 2000. At that time, the applicant was contacted and made aware of the situation(see attached letter), she chose, soon after,to withdraw the application. It was not until July 11,2003,that the applicant reached out to the building department to renew the process. Her argument that"personnel changes"and the return of her application caused a delay,resulting in the expiration of her site plan, are unfounded and untrue. Had the applicant's architect followed this department's requirements in a timely fashion, the permit would have been issued in 2000. It should also be noted that this is a vastly different project than the one first submitted in 1999 and does not match the original site plan approval.Therefore,the applicant's timeline should begin on July 11,2003. According to Mr. Verity, he has not met with the applicant in more than a year. In addition,their previous meeting was simply a discussion of state code issues with respect to the construction of the building. The applicant filed for an amended site plan prior to the institution of the building department's participation in the site plan and use determination process. However, as a result of concerns from the planning department,the applicant applied to our office for a Notice of Disapproval, in effect a review of zoning, on March 19, 2004. In short, the applicant's project has changed substantially since first approved by the Southold Town Planning Board in 1998. Because the applicant failed to submit the necessary paperwork in 1999, she was not issued a building permit and her site plan approval ultimately expired. Because her most recent application to this department was submitted on March 19, 2004, it is our contention that she must comply with today's local and state zoning and construction standards. Although the applicant gives the impression that obtaining a site plan approval will automatically result in a building permit,this is impossible. To date, the applicant has n¢t submitted construction drawings to this office that match the most recent site plan. In addition to the changes in the zoning code in the past five years,there have also been changes to the New York State Building Code, for which this project will not be exempt. The project will be required to meet all NYS Codes. In addition,the project has changed in scope since the original permit application in 1999 and is now,by FEMA standards, a substantial improvement. Therefore, the entire building may have to be brought into flood compliance. Please let me know if you have any questions. n 03 70 04: 2, p C MSOM (302] 234-2619 p. l , • FACSIMILE rKvN/ To: Joshua Y.Hotton Supervisor Town of Southold Fax-631-765-1823 — _-From: Carol Reiter Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239-0979 Fax(302)234-2619 Date: August 13,2004 Josh: In one of our earlier conversations you said I should contact you directly, The attached letter is documentation of the difficulties I encountered. I will be attending the work session of the Planning Board on Monday,August 16, and will be in Southold through Tuesday. 1 can be reactped on my cell phone at 302-593-8845. Fax includes cover plus 4 pages. Ike +g it ;U rC= " D Jan 03470 04: 25p C DENSON 1302] 234-2619 p. 2 C.D.Reiter's c/o Carol R.Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239-0979 Fax(302)234-2619 Email:crdenson®ndel.edu To: Joshua Y.Horton Supervisor Town of Southold Fax-631-765-1823 - / From: Carol R.Denson N"a Date: August 13,2004 r RE: Building Permit for the Old Barge Restaurant ISSUE: At issue here,and as shown in the attached documentation„is what I)judge to be arbitrary,discriminatory and unfair treatment of my application by the Southold Town Building Department The decision-making process used by the Building Department brings to mind Yne practice of"bait-and-switch." For example • 114 Chief Building Inspector said if the Planning Board approves the site plan there will be no problem in obtaining a building permit(1998). Clearly this was not true. • Setback of the upper level although discussed with the Building Department was never identified as an issue,now it becomes an issue. • Certification of the amended site plan by the Building Department would be approved once Health Department and other approvals required by the Planning Board are obtained. At the end point of the Planning Board process, the Building Department suddenly changes its decision. These actions by the Building Department have caused the Town Planning Board to be in violation of Town Codes that govern the planning process,as well. An application was made to the Southold Town to obtain a building permit to add an upper level to the existing building known as the Old Barge Restaurant, 750 Old Main Road,Southold. The original planhas been amended and the Planning Board has been ready to place our project back on the agenda, but has been prevented from doing vo because the Building Department has delayed in responding to the request for Certification. Throughout the process,numerous meetings were held with the Building Department where Certification of the site plan was ecificall discrossed,, The Building Department assured us that erewere no set ack or use issues gnd that Certification was not a problem. Over the course of this lengthy application process,whi egan m 1998, no additional information or clarification was requested by the Building Department. Yet�onAu&ust 10, 2004 I received a telephone call from the Building Department sayisapprov e r In a follow-up telephone conversation wr f Buildii p or�that he would certify the original site plan or possibly rescind the letter of August 6,2004 depending on the conversations Jan 03' 70 04: 2!5p CnSOn (30) 234-2619 p. 3 , t With the Planning Board, Town Attorney and myself, and he also said the site plan needs to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The reason given for the disapproval was stated as the ZBA's interpretation in Walz. It is beyond comprehension why the Building Department suddenly changed its decision about setback on the amended site plan. One of the consequences of this action has placed the Town Planning Board in violation of Town codes. Furthermore,bringing in the Walz interpretation at this point in the process is further evidence of bait and switch treatment. The amended site plan process with a local architect began in 2003 while the Walz interpretation was approved January 29,2002. My application has been, and continues to be,vulnerable to double jeopardy situations. Along with each delay or non-response from the Building De aztment new interpretations of the code are interjected into the process. Obtaining a building permit means aiming at a moving target and becomes even more difficult,time consuming and costly. I question if this is typical of the permit process for all applications to the Town of Southold,or if,in fact,I am being treated differently. I request at this time that you pp(1)investigate the situation surrounding mthy application, rocedures necessary building permitthe Process and 2) et blist a mechanism o aassure that move my a d application does not continue o be nahzed the Build' De Y PP Pe by mg Department's arbitrary judgments on its part. To this end, I propose that an independent, objective over-site person or committee be appointed to guarantee fair treatment in the process. I will be amending the Planning Board's work session on Monday,August 16, 2004 to also seek their guidance and assistance with moving the process forward. 2 ,Jan 03' 70 04: 21pp C DENSON (3021 234-2619 p. 4 Shown here is documentation of the major events related to obtaining a building permit. Items related directly to the Building Department are in bold. November 2, 1998 Site Plan submitted to the Planning Department June 4,1999 Site Plan approved by Planning Department July 6,1999 Building Permit Application filed,along with fee payment 1999-2003 Efforts to obtain a building permit from the Building Department were sustained during these years. Ultimately, Personnel changes occurred at the Building Department,and the Chief Building Inspector returned our application without a cover letter or note. In a telephone conversation seeking clarification,I was told to withdraw the application and start the Process over,along with the advice to use a local designer who would be more familiar with the area processes than the architect from Delaware that I had employed,not withstanding the fact that my Delaware architect was licensed in New York State. As a result of these delays, Planning Department Approval % expires Responding in a timely fashion,I contracted with a local architect July 11,2003 Met with the Chief Building Inspector to identify any Building Department issues with submitting an amended site plan August 2003 Submitted a letter requesting extension of Planning Department's approval September 8,2003 Joint meeting with Building Department,Planning Department, local architect and applicant to clarify the requirements to submit an amended site plan. Identification of zoning issues related to setback requirements were specifically addressed.The meeting was attended by representatives from the Planning Department(Burro Semon andValarie Scopaz) Building Department(Michael Verity) Architect,(Robert Brown) Applicant,(Carol and Costel Denson) October 20,2003 Approval received to submit an amended site plan from the Planning Board following a review of the concept site plan with architect November 7,2003 Amended site plan filed with Planning Department November 10,2003 Planning Department sent letter to architect requesting additional site plan information 3 Jan 03' 70 04: 2¢p C CON t f) 234-2619 P. 5 ' November 31,2003 Planning Department requested Certification from Building Department January 13,2004 Negative detemtination received from SEQRA February 2,2004 Revised site plan submitted to Building Department by Planning February 6,2o04 Received comments about site plan received from Town Engineer May 1Z,2004 Received approval of the amended site plan from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services May 14,2004 Highway Work Permit is not required as approved by the Department of Transportation May 17,2004 Fee paid to Building Department to prones eati Cllo4e)r- May 27,2004 Received site plan approval from the Architectural Review Committee,with condition June 17,2004 Revised site plan submitted t Building Department by Planning Board July 20,2004 Received site plan approval frouithe Town Trustees August 3,2004 Received final site plan approval from the Architectural Review Committee August4,2004 Letter sent to Building Department questioning why the Certification process is being delayed and what additional information,if any,is required August 10,2004 Building Department disapproves Certification, refers to ZAB (communication via Telephone call). In a telephone conversation with the Chief Building Inspector seeking clarification of the disapproval,he said that he could certify the original site plan or possibly rescind the letter of disapproval, but also said the site plan needs to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals August 12,2004 Letter from the Building Department dated August 6, 2004 received 4 AUG 1:6 2704 3:46rM SUUIHOLG WU KVIWKk NU. Il F. I • March 14, 2000 Carol Denson The C.D. Reiter Partnership 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 BY FAX Re; The Old Barge Restaurant This letter confirms receipt of your fax dated March 13, 2000. 1 was quite surprised at the tone your letter took particularly the first paragraph. You arrived at my office without an appointment and we met to discuss the status of your application. I did admit that I did not have persrnal knowledge of every permit in the department but I did relate what I knew of your aFpliostions history since its receipt in July 1999, and 1 stated as much to you at that time. I also stated that I would endeavor to get an accurate update and that you should communicate with me in the near future, to which you agreed. In light of that, I am taken aback by your remarks. For the record let me state the fads as they stand as of this date. Your application was received in July 1989, the plans were not certified and stamped plans from your architect were subsequently forwarded for review. Upon review, communications were established with the architect to discuss non-compliant aspects of the projed. The Building Inspectors requirements for amendments were not complied with. Instead your architect chose to defer to the NYS Dept. of State's Regional Architect for a"second opinion".The State's Architect upheld the Building Inspectors determination, recommendations were made on how to achieve compliance. As of this date, this office has not received plans that comply with NYS Fire Prevention and Building Code, thus the application is still pending, we can continue to hold it in its current status or return it to you as Incomplete. Please advise. Should you decide to leave the application open, be advised that we cannot take any further action on it unless a set of compliant plans are submitted for review. Until such time as the plans are received any questions regarding the status of project should be directed to your Architect. Sincerely, Edward Forrester, Director AX 16. 2004 3:4)FM SOUTHOI D SUPERVISORS NU. 161 NF. 2 • FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial D ion D E Date:! �Q / p to Sent: q / M 0X004 Project Name: S S thald Tow Project Address: '4Q Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- 3: Zoning District: Request:_ (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) 1t Initial Determination as to whether use Is permitted: US1z �1W M(J.A�r Q Initial Determination as to whether site plan is re . S nat re o ullditd In e r Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D, Date Received: 4-< /� Date of Comment:2� _ /2 1 a1 Co men +.s e dom, a..,z ruse. f n F / rsns w s re4or usr pf3 St` / d-40 /u �" rrgf° Si na ure of Plarfnln§ Dept. Staff Reviewer Final Determination Date: /� Decisio Signature of Buildi Inspector AUG, 16. 2004 3:4SPy SOUTHOLD SUPERVISORS NO. 161 N 3 • FORM NO.3 • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD. N.Y. NOTICE OF MWPROVAL DATE: August 6,2004 TO: The C.D Reiter's 010 Carol R.Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark,DE 19711 Please take notice that your application dated March 19,2004 For permit for ,.-"� 'on of a second stm addition to an misting restaurant at Location of property: 750 Old Main Road. Southold,NY County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 5¢ Block-k Loth Is returned herewith and disapproved an the following grounds; 11M Woposod tion,on this non eonfonoaing_61 7 square foot lot in the M-II District,isnot parmiiredArticle XIL Section 100-122,which states. 40No buildine shall be used and no buil j or pat t tliw oof shall be erected or altered in the Mn Diolid unless the Bun,Sch 111.e*d Parking and Loading Schedules W&Morated into this chapter hy reference,with the same force and effect if such reaulations were set forth herein in full" Bulk schedule,requires a minimum rear Pard setback of 25 feet. The existing buildingnot 9 a rear Md setback of 11 feet The Proposed addition notes a rear yard setback of 18 feet.Thereforo.F;+ gmA to Article=Section 100-242A which states. "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to grevent the remodcl;n¢ reconstructionenlaror g mal of a non conforming building containing nonfomigg use.W03d that ouch action does not creak any new noo,-MQrmanc4 or increase the degree of non-conformance with regard to the resin tions Rn;nQ toh burldtngs." P to the ZBA's iutretation in Walz(#5309) such additions and Iterations will thus constitute an increase in the degree of non-conformance addition,1p the gmitcl reaRims site Plan v the ou l Bo 412�11�---7 th ' Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application,may require further rMew by the Southold Town Building Department. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans, TEC: (631) 765-.1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey wv�w.northfork.netlSouthold/ PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Examined ,20_ Contact: p Approved ,20 S _ Mail Q Disapproved a/c I/ �- 136- /(77/1 Phone: � a Z' -3?- n97ExPirattoll.20 Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT y 7 - Date lh,411 7 200V INSTRUCTIONS iHQLD L' sa p cation MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale.Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. £Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector ma3authorize,in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described.The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,building code,housing code,and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. k (Signature of applicant or name,if a corporation) ailing s of li t) ,\ p State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general c � elel�j4�K Name of owner of premises (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer V. 11 VLLJ111YJJ, WL11111Y1 YLY1 Vl ay11A Vv VV ur.0 V�, v a.a..uv uaa.. v..uv.au va vu.a va �.. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front R.", . r Depth 10. Date of Purchase ., ame of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES_NO 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES_NOi111<1 ll excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO / !� r 14.Names of Owner of premises Q k2�r T EW 5 Address i I g q do2At—&K/ f�E7'7711 oa No, �0 z 2 3 L 097 Name of Architect a94J Address — Phone No _ Name of Contractor 1.10t rZZ Address es Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wcuand or a freshwater wetland? *YESy neNO * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E-C,. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YESI,--- NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to pioperty lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: C07 OF being duly sworn, deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract)above named, (S)He is the 6 ��7y (Contractor,Agent, Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before this 17-'^^ da f — &'v / r Notary Pubhc Signature of Applicant ROBERT I.SCOTT,JR. otary Public,State of New York Qualified in Suffolk County No.01 SC47250!8 Term Expires May 31, 0. FFOLf PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Q JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Gy P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chair y Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO O Telephone (631) 765-1938 KENNWILLETH L.EDWARDS yJ.CREMERS Wiv, �aQ� Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 17, 2004 Ms Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: Engineers letter and ARC minutes on the site plan for The Old Barge 750 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 Dear Mr. Denson, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated.August 3, 2004 from the Southold Town Engineer. The Planning Board held a work sesr+ion on August 16, 2004 and accepted this report. Please review the enclosed letter and comments. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of the Town Engineer. Submit the revised site plan to the Planning Board for review; we will need the revision to continue the site plan process. The above listed site plan application was reviewed at the Architect Review Committee (ARC)meeting held on August 3,2004.Attached you will find a copy of the minutes from the meeting. Please retain the minutes for your record. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. ZemRec yours, o Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. Semon, Bruno To: Carol Denson Subject: RE: Mondays Work Session 8-16-04 SP Work Sesslon.doc Hi Ms. Denson, The work session is scheduled for August 16, 2004 at 4 :30 pm in the Town Hall Courtroom. It may be over by 6:OOpm. Attached is a word file which is the work Session Agenda Draft. Please call if you have questions. Thank You Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Carol Denson [mailto:crdenson@udel.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:03 AM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: Monday's Work Session Bruno, I will be at the Planning Board's work session on Monday evening at 6:00 pm to discuss my application that is before the Board. I appreciate all of you effort and time to process our application. Carol Denson PS--Please confirm that you have received this message. 1 • i su lz�F FORM NO. 3 • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ✓ 5 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Sl P SOUTHOLD,N.Y. 715i?l°P NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 6, 2004 TO: The C.D.Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Please take notice that your application dated March 19, 2004 For permit for construction of a second story addition to an existin rest a t Location of property: 750 Old Main Road, Southold,NY Seuthald Town County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 56 Block 6 Lot 8.7 Piann .�goa' Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this non-conforming 61,937 square foot lot in the M-II District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XII, Section 100-122,which states. / "No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MII District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule requires a minimum rear yard setback of 25 feet. The existing building notes a rear yard setback of I 1 feet. The proposed addition notes a rear yard setback of 18 feet. Therefore pursuant to Article XXIV Section 100-242A which states, "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a non-conforming building containing a conforming use,provided that such action does not create any new non-conformance or increase the degree of non-conformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings." Pursuant to the ZBA's interpretation in Walz (#5309) such additions and alterations will thus constitute an increase in the degree of non-conformance. In addition the project re uires site plan approval from the South own ng Board. • / ---- -- --- ------------------- o afore Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. * � s (0 FQ SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE August 3, 2004 MLAijrG, The ARC met at the Town Hall Annex at 4:00 p.m. MembersRobert I. Brown, Co-ChairmanDNicholas J. Plananento, Southold 04Ronald McGreevy, MattituckHoward Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Peter Harbes for David Rose Perennials, Henry and Jenny Bremer for North Fork Deli, Pat Moore, Michael and Monica Raynor for Matt-A-Mar Marina and Ronnie Hill for Cutchogue Business Center. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Howard Meinke it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of May 27, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. DAVID ROSE PERENNIALS (5645 Aldrich Avenue - Mattituck) It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Ron McGreevey to APPROVE the APPLICATION as submitted to add offices inside an existing agricultural building with the understanding that further reviews will be required if the plans are revised. /- Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. l NORTH FORK DELI (11155 Main Road - Mattituck) The APPLICATION was TABLED awaiting details including colors, lighting, signage and resolution of the inconsistency in the roof lines between elevations. MATT-A-MAR MARINA (2255 Wickham Avenue - Mattituck) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Howard Meinke to APPROVE the APPLICATION for a 28,000 sq. ft. addition to the boat storage barn and an attached 3300 sq. ft. office building SUBJECT to a review of the siding and roof materials for the office. The Committee favors colors and materials that match the storage barn. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. CUTCHOGUE BUSINESS CENTER (8595A Cox Lane - Cutchogue) After a presentation of the internal changes to this 12,000 sq. ft. storage building, the Committee TABLED the APPLICATION awaiting the signage, the lighting of the sign and the exterior of the building, and the identification of the roof vents. OSPREY DOMINION WINERY (Main Road - Peconic) The Committee continued to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting the exterior color of the drivit, colors and material of the conservatory other than glass and the location of the roof penetrations. BILL FOX GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (2595 Peconic Lane - Peconic) It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Ron McGreevey to APPROVE the APPLICATION . The Committee recommends that the sign be approximately aligned with the top of the first floor windows, Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. NORTH FORK CUSTOM AUDIOlVIDEO (6619 Main Road - Mattituck) It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Nick Planamento to APPROVE the Application as submitted July 28, 2004. The Committee thanks Mr. Salice for his cooperation in amending the earlier application, Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. ELEMENTS OF NATURE (56125 Main Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Robert Brown to ACKNOWLEDGE the FULFILLMENT of the CONDITIONS set forth in its approval of January 29, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. (00. 15 THE OLD BARGE (Main Road - Southold) Robert Brown recused himself. It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Robert Keith to APPROVE the exterior lighting fixture, the CONDITION set forth in the approval of May 27, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. The next meeting was set for Tuesday, August 17, 2004. b(AA FORM NO. 3 R TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �5 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 6, 2004 TO: The C.D.Rciter's c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 r Please take notice that your application dated March 19, 2004 hInn For permit for construction of a second story addition to an existin resta t Location of property: 750 Old Main Road, Southold, NY Southold Town n County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 56 Block 6 Lot 8_7 7 anninq soa Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this non-conforming 61,937 square foot lot in the M-H District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XII Section 100-122,which states, "No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MII District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule requires a minimum rear yard setback of 25 feet. The existing building notes a rear yard setback of 11 feet. The proposed addition notes a rear yard setback of 18 feet Therefore pursuant to Article XXIV Section 100-242A which states, "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling reconstruction or enlargement of a non-conforming building containing a conforming use,provided that such action does not create any new non-conformance or increase the degree of non-conformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings." Pursuant to the ZBA's interpretation in Walz (#5309) such additions and alterations will thus constitute an increase in the degree of non-conformance. In addition the project requires site plan a roval from the South own in Board. E --- ----------------------- o ature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. �s Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: ! �a bar ti,,� Subject: SCTM#: 1000 - Date: $)A1 Comments: FE :AUGd H . S . S . • • • The legend of Henry Siegel is expressed in this series of nostalgic fixtures . i� A tribute to quality is hand- engraved on eac item with the year of our company 's inception . l s, i' 40-28 Outdoor Wall Lantern �I Aged Solid Brass ' Clear Seeded Glass Size: Width:8IN'Height 13'h" Extensio :81h" Height from Center of Outlet Box sib" r� Wattage: One(M) I00 max Clear Bulb Recommended. _I 8441-28 Outdoor Wall Lantern �I Aged Solid Brass Clear Seeded Glass Size. Width: 10"/is'Height 18"Extension: I I ?/d' Height from Center of Outlet Box:6 Wattage: One(M) I00 max. -� Clear Bulb Recommended. 6041-28 Outdoor Pendant Aged Solid Brass uear Seeded Glass Size:. Diameter: 10"As' Height 16 9/4'Overall:54 3?' Wattage: One(M) IpOw max Supplied..with 10 ft of Wire. ^�'+orAddhional Chain Order: j= n 9103-28((Sold$epamtely).See Page 380. �1 ,, Gle?r.Bulb Recommended. ' ,UA.Usted for Damp Location. Isi �i 8241-28 Outdoor Post Lantern —I Aged Solid Brass r Y Clear Seeded Glass M, Sias: Diameter: 10"/is' Height 19 3'i' 74, Wattage: One(M) I00 max J,"{' Fits 3"Post(Sold Separately).See Page 332. ' " a• ` •+ -, Clear Bulb Recommended. t, `i PAGE,192'`' 0 Design Copyright Sea Gulf Lighting Products.Inc. t ! 0 S-#5F gUFFDIt 63 JOSHUA Y. HORTON ��°� c° JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Gy ' TOWN OF SOUI'HOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-1366 411 1 Tel.(51 6)E-7 65�-1560 E pDMC� OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER D TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUG - 3 2004 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse ugustcq� @IBOoWn Chairperson - Planning Board Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "The Old Barge"Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-56-06-8.7 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the revised site plan for the above referenced project. This plan is dated 5/27/04 and has been prepared by Mr. Robert I. Brown,A.LA. This site plan was also briefly reviewed with Mr. Michael Verity from the building department in an effort to determine the extent of the proposed addition, alterations and renovations that may be required based on the conceptual site plan. At that time, it was determined that this project would be considered greater than a 50% renovation and would require compliance with building codes throughout the entire structure. This would also be true for FEMA regulations. I realize that further discussion and details will need to be coordinated between the Owner and the Building Department to make a formal determination of this compliance issue. However, I did not wish to review the site plan based on preexisting nonconforming items that will need to be modified to meet Code. If building systems will need to be renovated to meet code, it is recommended that the entire site be reviewed as a new site wherever possible. I realize that the location and size of the existing building is not a reasonable issue to address, however I do recommend that the parking, drainage and landscaping issues be reviewed. Please consider the following issues for Planning Board review: 1. Based on this preliminary determination (greater than 50% renovation), my last report requested a drainage design for surfaces where development has or will occur. This would include the existing gravel parking area. Gravel surfaces should utilize a runoff coefficient of 0.6 and should be incorporated into the drainage calculations. 2. A test hole should be provided to verify soil conditions and depth to ground water. The proposed 6' Deep drywells, as noted on the plan, will undoubtedly encounter the water table. Section details of the proposed drainage structures should be shown on the plan and should require a minimum separation of two(2)feet between the bottom of the pool and the water table. 3. The proposed drywell on the North Easterly corner of the existing facility is indicated with drainage piping that traverses an existing septic line. This is not recommended and should be changed. 4. The final drainage design should indicate all proposed drainage structures by number and include invert elevations and grading contours to verify containment of all surface water generated at the site. Page 1 of 2 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson August 3, 2004 Re: "The Old Barge" Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-56-06-8.7 Page 2 of 2 5. The revised site plan and documentation from the Architect suggests that the site should be considered separate from Lot # 13 as shown. Section 100-214 of the Town Code requires landscaping that should have a minimum four (4') foot wide buffer along the perimeter of any parking area adjacent to a property line. Does the Planning Board wish to consider realignment of the parking spaces to provide for this requirement? 6. Parking calculations indicate that 43 spaces are required. Section 100-191(A) requires one space for every three seats or one space for each 100 S.F. of building area. (Whichever is Greater). Gross square foot totals indicate 5,320 S.F. of building area. Therefore, a minimum of 53 spaces should be provided to meet this section of code. Does the Planning Board wish to considerthe increase in the numberof parking spaces to provide for this requirement? 7. My last report requested that the Site Plan indicate the actual property lines along the Southerly portion of the site rather than the tie line indicated. The response to my request indicates that the tie line, as shown, is representative of the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. This fact is not in question. However, it is my opinion that the Tie Line misrepresents the true relationship between the southerly property line and the perimeter of the existing structure. The actual property line is much closer to the building footprint that the Tie Line would suggest. Due to the nature of the site and its proximity to the wetland, it is recommended that the actual property lines be shown to give a more accurate depiction of the potential impacts to the site. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office. . i L c�& ames A. Richter, R.A. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) Michael Verity (Principal Building Inspector) Jul 06 04 09: 29a C DENSON (302) 234-2619 p. 1 1t� A5 C.D.Reiter's clo Carol R.Demon 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239-0979 Fax.,(302)134-2619 Email: crde TO: Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Office Town of Southold Fax(631)765-3136 FROM: Carol R. Densor�!; n DATE: July 6,2004 RE: Old Barge Restaurant SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 In response to your letter of June 22, 2004, the proposed lighting fixtures will be studied avid reconunendations resubmitted to the Architectural Review Committee for final approval at their next scheduled meeting. Thank you. If yuu have any questions,please contact me at your earliest convenience. p � C [ o � � JUL - D 6 2004 Southold Town Planning Boar PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o�pg�FFO(,�co p O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE .Z. �/ Chair y� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO �y, • Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMER9 G KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR ��l �aO� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE June 22, 2004 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ms. Carol Denson 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Dear Ms. Denson: Re: The Old Barge—2a"Floor 750 Old Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zone: MII The above site plan application was reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on May 27, 2004. A copy of the meeting minutes is enclosed. Please review the pertinent comments and inform us in writing if you are in agreement with the conditions. In addition, if required, please modify the site/construction plan, and submit the revisions to the Planning Board. If there are any questions,please contact me at(631) 765-1938 ext. 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, A,.,, -�'- D Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer art. cc: file • • Flu s SOUTHOLD TOWN 2 �p ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITT 6 C E U E May 27, 2004 D The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:00 p.m. Members present w JUN - 2 2004 Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman. Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Southold Town Herbert Adler, Jr. Landmarks Preservation Committee Plannin Board Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Ronald McGreevy, Mattituck Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Nicholas Planamento, Gary Salice and James Fitzgerald for North Fork AudioNideo, and James DeLucca for RMB Realty. Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of April 29, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. CVS PHARMACY (Main Road Mattituck) � 3 - 2 The applicant agreed to meet the additional conditions regarding the placement of the dormers and the signage. Also it was learned that the park in front was the property of New York State. It was RESOLVED by-Garrett Stramg and seconded by Robert Brown to APPROVE the APPLICATION. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. RMB REALTY (North Road - Southold) The Committee reviewed catalogue cuts of the building mounted and courtyard lamppost lighting fixtures and learned that bricks will be used for the internal sidewalks and that poles and fixtures would be required for the land banked parking area. It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Robert Brown to APPROVE the APPLICATION with the final CONDITION that the proposed signage be submitted for review. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. WA NORTH FORK CUSTOM AUDIOIVIDEO (6619 Main Road - Mattituck) The applicant described changes to an existing building that do not alter its footprint. These include windows and doors on the east and south elevations , the use of cedar shingles on elevations except the north, and a reverse gable and parapet on the east roof. Colors will be bleaching oil on the shingles and white trim. After an extensive discussion of alternatives, it was RESOLVED by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by Garrett Strang to TABLE the APPLICATION to allow reconsideration of the parapet as it is viewed from the west and submission of the color and design of the signage as well as the exterior lighting fixtures. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. BILL FOX GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (2595 Peconic Lane ¢ Peconic) / Comment was not required on the external design of the structure. It was RESOLVED by Garrett Strang and seconded by Sanford Hanauer to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting signage, colors and exterior lighting fixtures. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. THE OLD BARGE (Main Road - Southold) Robert Brown recused himself. The Committee reviewed the final version of the plans presented earlier on November 6, 2003, It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Howard Meinke to APPROVE the APPLICATION with the CONDITION that catalogue cuts be submitted after a restudy of the wall mounted lighting fixtures. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants re reminded th/t deviations from approved plans without the review// and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. NEW MEMBERS The Committee welcomed Ron McGreevy and Nick Planamento. Robert W. Keith Secretary 40 40 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �0 �(/ P.O.Box 1179 Chair C y� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO y, • Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS G Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L. DS MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: June 17, 2004 To: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Review Re: Proposed amended site plan for The Old Barge Second Floor 750 Old Main Road Southold, N.Y. SCTM#1000-56.-6-8.7, Zone: MII Marine II District Status: SEQR Neg. Declaration was issued 01/13/04, fire district comments are complete, SCDHS released an approval on 05/12/04 and NYS DEC approved the proposed construction. Required Return Date: Please return by June 28, 2004 and it may go on the agenda for the July 12, 2004 Public Meeting. In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. This amended site plan is for a new second floor addition of 1851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3923 sq. ft. of existing building space on 1.4438 acres parcel in the MII Zone located on the s/s/o Old Main Road approximately 1953'w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-56.-6-8.7 This Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns-and approval: Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Robert Brown, dated May 27, 2004 and received by the Planning Board May 28, 2004. 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE .Z� �l/ P.O. Box 1179 Char o y� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD J. CREM R y, � Telephone(631) 765-1938 KENNETH WILLIAM L EDWAR SDS Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR 'yiff� Q`' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: June 17, 2004 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Third notice for certification on the proposed amended site plan for The Old Barge Second Floor 750 Old Main Road Southold, N.Y. SCTM#1000-56.-6-8.7, Zone: MII Marine II District Status: SEQR Neg. Declaration was issued 01/13/04, fire dipr�trict comments are complete, SCDHS released an approval on 05/12/04 and N1'S DEC approved the proposed construction. Required Return Date: Please return by June 28, 2004 and it will go on the agenda for the July 12, 2004 Public Meeting. In reference to the above, the applicant proposes an amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3923 sq. ft. of existing building space on 1.4438 acres parcel in the MII Zone located on the s/s/o Old Main Road approximately 1953' w/o Dolphin Drive, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-56.-6-8.7 This Site Plan reflects the current ild-eut,Gf4hissite, -P-leass-review for certification. Please inform me if you can't make the June 28, 2204 return date. Thank you in advance. Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Robert Brown, dated May 27, 2004 and received by the Planning Board May 28, 2004. Cc: file, pb, vs •6 �� �s SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITT E C U May 27, 2004 D The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:00 p.m. Members present w JUN - 2 2004 Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman. Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Southold Town Herbert Adler, Jr. Landmarks Preservation Committee PlanningBoaro Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Ronald McGreevy, Mattituck Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Nicholas Planamento, Gary Salice and James Fitzgerald for North Fork Audio/Video, and James DeLucca for RMB Realty. Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of April 29, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. CVS PHARMACY (Main Road - Mattituck) The applicant agreed to meet the additional conditions regarding the placement of the dormers and the signage. Also it was learned that the park in front was the property of New York State. It was RESOLVED by Garrett Stramg and seconded by Robert Brown to APPROVE the APPLICATION. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. RMB REALTY (North Road - Southold) The Committee reviewed catalogue cuts of the building mounted and courtyard lamppost lighting fixtures and learned that bricks will be used for the internal sidewalks and that poles and fixtures would be required for the land banked parking area. It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Robert Brown to APPROVE the APPLICATION with the final CONDITION that the proposed signage be submitted for review. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. *s 1• NORTH FORK CUSTOM AUDIO/VIDEO (6619 Main Road - Mattituck) The applicant described changes to an existing building that do not alter its footprint. These include windows and doors on the east and south elevations , the use of cedar shingles on elevations except the north, and a reverse gable and Parapet on the east roof. Colors will be bleaching oil on the shingles and white trim. After an extensive discussion of alternatives, it was RESOLVED by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by Garrett Strang to TABLE the APPLICATION to allow reconsideration of the parapet as it is viewed from the west and submission of the color and design of the signage as well as the exterior lighting fixtures. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. BILL FOX GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (2595 Peconic Lane - Peconic) Comment was not required on the external design of the structure. It was RESOLVED by Garrett Strang and seconded by Sanford Hanauer to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting signage, colors and exterior lighting fixtures. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Main Road - Southold) Robert Brown recused himself. The Committee reviewed the final version of the plans presented earlier on November 6, 2003, It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Howard Meinke to APPROVE the APPLICATION with the CONDITION that catalogue cuts be submitted after a restudy of the wall mounted lighting fixtures. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants re reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. NEW MEMBERS The Committee welcomed Ron McGreevy and Nick Planamento. �v`tit1.GLv Robert W. Keith Secretary • • s��:3 /35 EC [ D �1C DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. D Itil MAY 2 8 20)04 205 Bay Avenue Greenport,N.Y. 11944 Sou'.haltl Town 631-477-9752 (fax)631-477-097 SOLOPI2 ,'io?Bown prl Email:FBDAInc@optonline net Transmittal Date: 6'•2T•pq To: Ptv"' U00', 57r•Stir-TAbUl Fin/tw- `��'E�totaE Toth ?6nrl" turd Re: OW 460h -* 1000- S&-6•Ir,7 We are sending, enclosed, the following: [ ..]'drawings [>j-specifications [wj samples [ ] for your: [ J use [vJ' approval [ ] information i� r v►x 1ev*r. �ri ' 3 Pa 5fiaw ne�f spa S-1 rev S-27-0-4 �,b1�4 se�►s lir 3 alaA,A�E'tluS �-� eX4ivtor lv�kt -�Ste�. tata(r�vt � rho lam(. Lo(h( of SctNts S'rWP C&M Ko Cto oo, By �V�] r FAIRWEATHER-BROWN DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. 205 Bay Avenue Greenport,N.Y. 11944 631477-9752 (fax)631477-097 May 27,2004 r Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer P1,AY 2 2004 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold 100 P. O. Box 1179 wa 0orf Southold,NY 11971 Re: "The Old Barge"Site Plan SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 Dear Bruno: In response to the letter from James A. Richter,R.A., Town Supervisor,to Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson of the Town Planning Board, dated February 6,2004,please be aware of the following revisions to the Site Plan for the above referenced project: 1. The site plan has been revised to eliminate the access to the subject property from the adjacent property to the West. 2. The site plan has been revised to comply with the survey by Peconic Surveyors,P.C. (revised April 7,2004)regarding the tie lines in question. 3. Drainage information is now shown on the revised site plan. Please note that based on FIRM flood insurance rate map, effective May 4, 1998,this project is located in an AE Elev. 8 Zone. The renovations proposed do not affect the first floor of the existing structure,except for the addition of stairs leading to the 1,397 sq. ft. second floor,which is well above the flood plane. Accessibility issues inside the building will be addressed with the Building Department. Also, in furtherance of this application,please be advised that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has approved the application as shown on this site plan. The Health Department Reference number is C10-04-001. Attached you will find the submission to the Architectural Review Committee. If you require any additional information,please let me know. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely yours, Robad I. Brown,A.I.A. 1 r 14 15 16 , 17 155UE5/REVISIONS . ' Ito 5 M • YJTCHEN TOTALdl 119x20 GPD=2380 3570' WA I I Ivy 3581 GPD til ON FEH.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) GAL..A5 PER PLANS DY GREENMAN-PETER5EN, INC. IiUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 5ERVICES, - 0WA LYM " � L � t�FFOI>KCOONIYRIIENTOFl�JILTRti � � ACES B PACE N.B.FIEF.M1) CIO - p `j - 00 / uthold Town PACES Planning 9oaM ?ACF-5 Flwd en thelnlamt M Nb WM,h has been detemdned that •� — PACESpn�doa n�re�tonal eewape dlepowl or cupit .5516L) Y-1 '2 20 OFW W rTIM EMENT • to Nea1J APR. 09, 2008 !3 5.F. Yciro. .')c e*jt ru Mo-%, 111 w0j )7 5.F. PE6.27, 2004 '.0 5.F.. NgV.05, 2003 02003 ALL RIGh TT5S Rt;9ERVED �� TMFSE PLAN5 ARF. AN IN5TRUMENT OF Cast Aluminum '' All have threaded opal glass ' shades that screw onto the fitter, r with vapor-proof gaskets and 'alf r porcelain sockets. w f r; r J � PSSIO.16 Satin Aluminum One-light ceiling 4.3/4"dia.,6-3/4"ht 1 medium base, fixture. 60w max. P55i116 Sahn Aluminum One-light wall fixture. 4-1/2` W.,.6-3/4"ht. 1medium base P5511.31, '.Black Extends 4-3/4". ;.100w max. ' Al H/CTB31/4" .` `• C' y4u r. P5512-16 Satin Aluminum Two-light wall fixture. 4-1/2"W.,13"In. 2 medium base, Mount horizontally Extends 6". each 100w max. r or vertically. H/CTR 6-1/2'. A P5616.16 Satin Aluminum One-light cefimg° ; G dia.,74/2 ht. lmedium base fa . fixture r 60w max. P5617-16 Satin Aluminum One-light wall 6"dia.,7"ht. 1 medium base, iv P5617-31 Black fixture Extends 7". 100w max. H/CTR 3-1/4". + W , P5602-10 Polished Brass One-light wall fixture 4.1/2"W.,7-1/4"ht. I medium base, r, it 35602.11 Weathered Brass with powder coated Extends 5.1/2". 75w max. P5602-30 White finish.Clear marine H/CTR 2-1/4". P5602.31 Black glass. p560310 ,"Polished Brass" One light'cethng 'j4-7/8 dia.;6-1/4"ht. I medium i P560330' White, fixture with powder ;'� -.P5603.31 Black mated$msh.Ckear.', marine'glass. I P5604.10 Polished Brass One-light with 6'dia.,8-1/2"ht. 1 medium base, ! ,' P5604.11 Weathered Brass powder coated finish. Extends 6-1/2". 100w max. P5604-30 White White glass globe. H/CTR 2.1/4". P5604.31 Black u ' e til Medium w Posts and other mounting a S Base o accessories on page 350. Z H/CTR-Height from '+ center of J-box to top of ` future f ' Progress Lighting 337 } � , . . May 25 04 12: 54p C DEN50N (302) 234-2619 p. 1 F A C S I M 1 L E TO: _ FROM: Name: tv, Name: Fax#: (o -7 3f3G Fax #: Pages: I CCN "f' DateiTime: 2 S; ZOOC�/ MESSAGE: q7 roe,, /000�� H P FAX May 25 04 12: 55p C DENSON (3021 234-2619 p. 2 C.D.Reiter's ' E �n Go Carol R Denson V 1184 Corner Ketch Road ), Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239-"" MAY 2 6 2004 Fax:(302)234-2619 Email:crdensonrimadeLedu Southold Town Plannin Board TO: Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Office Town of Southold Fax (631) 765-3136 p , ,rte' FROM: Carol R. Densot&tkO "'" DATE May 25,2004 RE: Old Barge Restaurant SCTM4 1000-56-6-8.7 Attached is a letter from the State of New York Department of Transportation stating that a Highway Work Permit is not required for the subject application. i bank you May 25 04 12: 55p C DENSON (302) 234-2619 p. 3 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 SURIMAL CN.KRABORT1, P.E. JOSEPH H. BOAROMAN REGIONAL CIR[CTOR P-OMMI9910NER May 14, 2004 C.D. Reiter's C/o Ms.Carol R. Denson 1164 Comer Ketch Road Newark,Delaware 1971 i Your Mav 3.2004 Submission Old Barge Restaurant Site Plans Dated 4!9!04 Route 25,Southold SCTM 1000.56-06-8 7 tOmr Case No 04-123P Dear his. Denson: This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island Nerth Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I495,whichever is farther south,north to Long Island Sound. We have completed our review of this submission. As long as all work takes place off the State highway right-of-way and the State right-of-way is not used to perform any work we will not require a Highway Work Permit for this site. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at(631)952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address.Kindly refer to the subject case number and CoLnty tax map number in all correspondence. Very holy yours, s SHAIK A. SAAD,P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr.Peter Harris,Superintendent of Highways,Town of Southold Ms. Valerie Scopaz.Planning Director,Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW V5, X35 • FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 10 SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination D ( 0 �/ Date:/��1 Date Sent: 0 / MAY 2004 Project Name: iTZS �50 I (d S !hold Town Project Address: Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- Zoning District:_ Request: `art "0<!A poldC�E�U � I G.W\'{10nG..Q� S (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: USfz��,rM�� Initial Determination as to whether site plan is ire CJ • S' nat re of ,Auildibd In ect r Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: aS 1,76 /� Date of Comment: o /./ Comment : ev,e.r W oa .P 4 9 of r�t�i ,/oib A,,-77 nlc ga e a o, a..rn v�sc/f/ re4a 115 3 35t; /FJD-/LO /k f,Ct na e o r e +o to Si na ure of Pla ning Dept. Staff Reviewer Final Determination Date: Decision: Signature of Building Inspector Submission Without a Cover Letter alt) �llByL'ort. x 4�l /�� ►i Sender: �o� �� 302 a39'o979 Subject: U �DdTffdLQ o � D SCTM#: 1000 - —0(0 Date: /w 9 a O Plannin Comments: ao 7 �� �C�/ 0{•lp J �� �/�U/'lgq, ,'4t� 6 l 144`" V'-'7- STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGH HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-551F8" SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR May 14, 2004 C.D. Reiter's c/o Ms. Carol R. Denson 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 Your May 3, 2004 Submission Old Barge Restaurant Site Plans Dated 4/9/04 Route 25, Southold SCTM 1000-56-06-8.7 Our Case No. 04-123P Dear Ms. Denson: This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or 1495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. We have completed our review of this submission. As long as all work takes place off the State highway right-of-way and the State right-of-way is not used to perform any work we will not require a Highway Work Permit for this site. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Very truly yours, Original Signed By SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways,Town of Southold Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW May C3 04 08: 23a C DENSON (302) 234-2619 P. 1 C.D.Reiter's c/o Carol R.Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239-0979 Fax.(302)234-2619 Email: erdenaon(a udeLedu TO: Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer KM Planning Board Office Town of SoutholdFax(631) 765-3136FROM1 Carol R. DensoDATE: R1ay 3,2001 RE: Old Barge Restaurant As follow-up to our telephone conversation of April 29, 2004, please list me as the primary contact for the project known as the Old Barge Restaurant. Thank you and i appreciate your guidance in this matter. P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold Town Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Board Fax: (631) 765-3136 To: Ms. Carol Denson From: Bruno Semon Fax 302 234-2619 Pages: 5 including cover Phone: Date: April 29, 2004 Re: Old Barge Restaurant CC: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply As Requested Following are the copies you requested: 1/13/04 Itr to Robert Brown 12/8/03 State Environmental Quality Review PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �O�Q$pFFO(��'0 P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Chair C Town Hall,53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO y, • Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERSKENNETH L. G Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDORDS y�o! T �aO� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 22, 2004 Mr. Robert Brown 205 Bay Avenue Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Town Trustee's memo on the site plan for The Old Barge 750 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 Dear Mr. Brown, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated April 19, 2004 from the Southold Town Trustee's. Please review the enclosed letter and comments. Contact the Town Trustee's after review of the letter to verify the requirements of that agency. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res c lly yo s, zB o emo Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. S�raF' Albert J.Krupski, President • o��gUFFU(,�co0 Town Hall �s James King,Vice-President h'i` y 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster o P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda W Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765.1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer I. API R ( 0 20C -� FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees Southold Town Planning Boar DATE: April 19, 2004 RE: The Old Barge Second Floor SCTM#56-6-8.7 The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the application submitted by The Old Barge and determined the alterations to the existing restaurant to be within the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code, and therefore a permit is required. If you require any further information, please don't hesitate to contact the office. 6 Is PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �OgUFFO(,�co JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE P.O. Box 1179 Chair o y� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Go RICHARD CAGGLANO o Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERSO KENNETH L.EDWARDS 'f' • �� Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR SDI PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 11, 2004 Mr. Robert Brown 205 Bay Avenue Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Engineers letter on the site plan for The Old Barge 750 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.7 Dear Mr. Brown, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated February 6„ 2004 from the Southold Town Engineer. Please review the enclosed letter and comments. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of the Town Engineer. Submit the revised site plan to the Planning Board for review; we will need the revision to continue the site plan process. If there are any questions you,can contact us at(631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. ffRes ct ily s, fB' Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. JOSHUA Y. HORTON *40 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-1366Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse February 6, 2004 Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "The Old Barge"Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-56-06-8.7 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. This site plan was dated 11/06/03 and has been prepared by Mr. Robert I. Brown, R.A.. I have discussed this site plan with the Town Trustees office staff and received a photocopy of a 1986 survey for this property from their files. Please consider the following: 1. I have compared this 1986 survey and an aerial photograph of the site to the proposed Site Plan. There appears to be an encroachment of the existing gravel parking area into the lot located immediately to the West. Property records indicate that there may be common ownership of this parcel but that it is just listed under a different name. If that is true, the Site Plan should be revised to include both parcels. If it is not, the Site Plan should be revised to show only one access point from Old Main Road and discontinue the - encroachment. In this case, parking spaces will also need to be reconfigured. 2. This Site Plan should indicate the actual property lines along the Southerly portion of the site rather than the indicated tie line as shown on the plan. The tie line shown appears to be inconsistent with County Tax Map records that show property lines that swing in close to the actual barge or restaurant building. An example of this can be seen in the aerial photo that I have enclosed for your reference. 3. The amount of renovations proposed for this facility would suggest a major reconstruction of the existing building. These proposed renovations would need, at a minimum; to Provide structural integrity for a second floor, provide for Flood Plane construction requirements and provide for handicap accessibility to the entire building. It is therefore recommended that drainage calculations be provided for the containment of run-off generated over the entire site where development has or will occur. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office. c rely, ElyE D mes A. ichter, R.A. 9c1�4 P er H rrisperi endent of Highways) old Townin BOBO - rt .n � sK• Y \ > .S 1 i • A . 4 t r �! t � t y _f T - - -- MA IN - '^' �'" - z 4.1 S -'4.3 : , f. 4_4 4_ _ 4.9 , . 1 _4�i .• `." / • . Right Of WOy Np 0) • \ ! J a - s 7 g a ., J .. . 1 3.9 , 01 cot^ 6/ 'f �3 ° P P_ ♦ .of LonL. . 4.t • ave nen f• 3.9 ' 205.29 p �rye^'`w! N �'y o u l�Vl y0°,3•P. E. ohLOic% 347.55'0� a u[•e3s N. 63" 13' 00 E. 6 — l-1 rn ` �o Bb"f.' 125.94—NBA, �f oc I o N. 63 qa N / • v 4.4 l LOT25 ; °o OT22 LOT 23 LOT 24 LOTH l _ LOT 12 LOT 3 4OT•14 .-LOT15- L T/ L�7 ��T l LOT 19 L 20 5 _ LOT 26 v" 6C V its.o . - 4 I ,'II gI•y 'moi L o` " Pa.rk!/J y 'Gonc. ( � It - - _ �fG'" - m1p end. ,Mo i f b/ens,* 24s Q e tzhill So de � r \ \ ", .\ S "3 105.5 ��• 1 1 oit i le 24.a �'e�c 5 02.9G - 1Z II (14 le 0 1 C I , \ � proposed •�� P / �Ati � � 30. y / Cd9t• Of �Go• <� /04, ti 04f TG4f p FO 41q�'h. PS. 0 C /1 4i /iy FcF S ti F � Rlei, !� F L T F <" •oF Y flit. O., .4.. Nn_ n PLANNING BOARD MEAS0610040 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE .r 09, P.O. Box 1179 Chair o y� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 W Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO y, • Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS G KENNETH L.EDWARDS Q Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: February 6, 2004 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Review;4) Re: Second Notice for comments, concerns and or certification on the proposed amended site plan for The Old Barge Second Floor 750 Old Main Road Southold, N.Y. SCTM#1000-56.-6-8.7, Zone: MII Marine II District Status: Active $;"e Plan with a negative declaration issued by the Planning Board on January 13 2004. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, the applicant proposes an amended site plan with a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold. The site plan proposes a 119 seat restaurant and approximately 363 sq. ft. of retail store. The existing lot coverage is 10.0% and will be maintained. This Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Please refer to the site plan sent to you on November 10, 2003. As discussed with you today the Planning Board needs to understand the concerns of your Department in reference to this application. Please review the site plan and inform us on any issues of the proposed build out. Thank you in advance. Cc: file, pb, vs • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK S✓er STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RICHARD J. LAVALLE,P.E. CHARLES J.BARTHA, P.E. LESLIE A.MITCHEL CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER February 2,2004 Town of Southold Planning Board Office rm P.O.Box 1179 Southold,N. Y. 11971-0957Attn: Bruno Semon Re: The Old Barge 1,953'w/o Dolphin Drive on Vs of Old Main Rd.in Southold Planning B( SCTM# 1000-5&~6-8.7 Gentlemen: This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road or a road proposed for improvements by the County, a permit will not be required from this Department. If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at 8524100. Very truly yours, William S. Shannon,P.E. Chi En J By: 01 M.Paul Campajilola Director of Highway Planning&Permits WSS/MPC/in SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 4630852-4010 335 YAPHANK AVENUE ■ YAPHANK,N.Y. 1 1980 0 FAX(631)852-4150 • • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �OgOFF014� JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �.j.� l/y P.O. Box 1179 Char p Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 N Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO • Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L. A MARTIN H.SIDORDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 13, 2004 Mr. Robert Brown 205 Bay Avenue Greenport, N.Y. 11944 Re: Proposed amended site plan for The Old Barge, Second Floor Located approximately 1,953'west of Dolphin Drive, on the south sire of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, Southold f SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zone: MII (Marine II District) Dear Mr. Brown: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 12, 2004: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes an amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the Mil Zone, located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive, on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2003, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2003, the Southold Town Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on November 17, 2003, the New York State Department of Transportation responded with no objection to the Planning Board's wishes to assume SEQRA lead agency status; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2003, the New York State Department of D.E.C. responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board Office assuming lead agency status for this action; and r The Old Barge (2nd Floor)— Page Two — 1/13/04 WHEREAS, on November 28, 2003, the Suffolk County Planning Commission responded with no objection to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2003, the Suffolk County Department of Health responded with no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency, the department wishes, however, to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action; therefore, be it RESOLVED that, on January 12, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, / �j �R=ec'C.Ctu�La� Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��gUFFO�,�co JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE P.O.Box 1179 Chair o y� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO �y • Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS O KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant December 8, 2003 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead ,Agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: The Old Barge, Second Floor SCTM#: 1000-56-6-8.7 Location: The site is located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive, on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold. SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: The proposed action involves an amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the MII Zone. The site plan proposes a 119 seat restaurant and approximately 363 sq. ft. of retail store. The existing lot coverage is 10.0% and will be maintained. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. SEQR Negative Declaration - Page Two There has not been any correspondence received from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, Southold Town Building Department, Southold Town Board, Southold Town Board of Trustees, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, or the Suffolk County Department of Public Works in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from these agencies. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Water Authority Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation responded on November 14, 2003 and has no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board Office assuming lead agency status for this action. The New York State Department of Transportation responded on November 17, 2003 and has no objection to the Planning Board's wishes to assume SEQR lead agency status. The Suffolk County Planning Commission responded on November 28, 2003 and has no objectioy to the Town of Southold assuming lead agency. The De"artment of Health Services Office responded on December 9, 2003 and has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. The department wishes, however, to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Address: Southold Town Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 (x 229) cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works FAIRWEATHER-BROWN r7v,2�T DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC. P.O.Box 521 205 Bay Avenue GroenpoM New York 11944 Phone(516) 477-9752 Fax(516) 477-0973 Mr. Bruno Semon Town of Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold,N.Y. 11971 Re: Old Barge Additions and Renovations Old Main Road, Southold,N.Y. Dear Mr. Semon, As per our conversation,this letter is to confirm that we are continuing to revise the drawings for the above referenced project,and will be submitted for final review in the near future. These revisions include finalizing of drawings for Architectural Review, and completion of Department of Health Services application for the septic system. Thank you for your patience. If there is any information you require in the meantime,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ti lobe Brown, p R C E VE DEC 2 4 2003 D Southold Tow$ Plannin Board • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • JVF ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES LINDA MERMELSTEIN,M.D.,M.P.H. ACTING COMMISSIONER December 9, 2003 Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town Hall El P.O. Box 117953095 State Route 25 Southold,New York 11971-0959 RE: The Old Barge Second Floor SCTM#: 1000-56-6-8.7 Dear Mr. Semon: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter dated November 10, 2003, concerning the above- referenced application, and has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. This correspondence is intended primarily to expedite the procedural requirements of SEQRA pertaining to the establishment of lead agency. The comments provided below are,therefore,general nature,representing several of our most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects. The department wishes, however, to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s)established for this action. I. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) I. The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems, pursuant to the authority and requirements of Articles 4, 5, and 6 of the SCSC. Applications must comply with all relevant density and construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Applicants should not undertake the construction of, or connection to, either system without Health Department approval. 2. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has not received an application for the proposed subdivision as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code(SCSC). The project sponsor should submit an application to our agency's Bureau of Water and Wastewater ♦DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY•OFFICE OF ECOLOGY•RIVERHEAD COUNTY CENTER♦RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397 Phom(631)852-2077 Fa (631)852-2743 at the earliest possible date so that a complete technical assessment of this proposal can be undertaken. 3. Design and flow specifications, information regarding subsurface soil conditions,water supply information, and complete design details are essential to the review of this project, and are evaluated fully at the time of application review. Should the town require additional environmental information(such as a DEIS), discussion of the compliance requirements of the SCDHS should be required. In general,the department encourages the following land use measures be considered (where appropriate)to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA. 1. Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%. 2. Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes. 3. Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping. 4. Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site. 5. Clustering of subdivision lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous areas of dedicated open space The department appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal. Additional information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2077. Sincerely, _4 L� tr_ Mara Hogan, Environmental Analyst Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology MH/amf cc: Kimberly Shaw Walter Hilbert, P.E. gv,(3� 90JTH04O ,�/f ✓ G �Rf oisTa` SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 908. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 December 11, 2003 (631) 765-4305 D ((a f� np (� FAX (631) 765-5076 C Ei 19 E D Mr. Bruno Semon DEC 1 1 2003 Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town Planning Board sbouftw Boats PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SCTM# 1000-56.-6-8.5 & 8.6; Old Barge Restaurant Dear Bruno: Please be advised that the Board of Fire Commissioners has reviewed the above mentioned map and found that there is adequate fire protection for this site plan. This letter is valid for one year. Sincerely, An Cynthia Caprise Fire District Secretary • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • 5 r RoBERTJ. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE THOMAS ISLES, AICP DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR OF PLANNING November 28,2003 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Bd. Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: The Old Barge Second Floor S.C.T.M.No.: 1000-56-6-8.7 S.C.P.C.No.: S-LS-G-1868 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Your notification for SEQR Coordination was received by our agency on 11/17/03. Please be advised that our agency,the Suffolk County Planning Commission has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming Lead Agency status for the above referenced. The Suffolk County Planning Commission reserves the right to comment on this proposed subdivision in the future and wants to be kept informed of all actions taken pursuant to SEQRA and to be proved with copies of all EAF's, DEIS's and FEIS's, etc. Please note,that prior to final approval,the site plan should be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for review. Since�� Andrew P. Freleng,, ICP Principal Planner APF:cc G:\CCHORN'ASUBDI V)SEORA0003\SD1868.NOV LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. -4TH FLOOR • P. O. BOX 6100 • (63 11 853-5 190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 1 1 788-0099 TELECOPIER(631) 853-4044 • • a State of New York Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788.5518 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI,P.E. JOSEPH H.BOARDMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER November 17, 2003 Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Re: The Old Barge S/S Old Main Road Southold,NY SCTM #� tJ r<r� Dear Mr. Semon: We reviewed the proposal for an addition to the existing Old Barge Restaurant. We have no objection to the Planning Board's wishes to assume SEQR Lead Agency Status. Thank you for advising us of this proposed addition. Very truly yours, MICHAEL J. GEIGER, P.E. D E C n90 Planning &Program Management NOV Southold Town Plannin Board New York State Department of Environmental Conservation _ Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40-SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 V Phone: (631)444-0403 FAX: (631)444-0360 - LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE November 14, 2003 Bruno Semon Town of Southold Planning Board r� 2 M 2 P.O. Box 1179 D E C E I V s Southold, NY 11971 D Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST NOV T 9 2(103 The Old Barge Second Floor 750 Old Main Road Manning Bo MW Plannin oarA Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Semon: This letter is in response to your Lead Agency Coordination Request of November 10, 2003 regarding lead agency coordination for the above project pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEORA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and it's implementing regulations (6NYCRR Part 617). This Department has no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board Office assuming lead agency status for this action. Please advise the applicant if this project is located within 1 00'of a NYSDEC regulated freshwater wetland,a Freshwater Wetland Permit is required from this Department. If you have any questions, please call me at 631-444-0103. Sincerely, Sherri Aicher Environmental Analyst $oFFo�,� PLANNING BOARD MEMEERB O�Q CC�/i� P.O.Box 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �`Z` -`l� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 ChairmanSouthold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO ,yj, Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS • Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE November 10, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of le41d agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF)to assist you in your response. Project Name: The Old Barge Second Floor 750 Old Main Road Southold, N.Y. SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7, Zone: Mil Marine II District Requested Action: The proposed action involves an amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acres parcel in the MII Zone. The site plan proposes a 119 seat restaurant and approximately 363 sq. ft. of retail store. The existing lot coverage is 10.0% and will be maintained. The site is located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold. SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 SEQRA Classification: ( )Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938, X 229 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( x ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: The site is currently in use as a restaurant. Please feel free t6 contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority *Suffolk County Planning Department *Maps are enclosed for your review ' • pF • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS S FO(q BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� `7G P.O.Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 63095 State Route 25 w Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGL9NO • Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L. DS MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 11, 2003 Mr. Robert Brown 205 Bay Avenue Greenport, N.Y. 11944 Re: Proposed amended site plan for The Old Barge Second Floor Located approximately 1,953'west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zone: MII (Marine II District) Dear Mr. Brown: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 10, 2003: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes an amended site plan for a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acre parcel in the M I I Zone, located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, in Southold; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 61.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions i Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: M Part 1 M Part 2 MPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. 0 B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures des&r ed in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ®C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. 'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not Involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each Instance. Name of Action T& Q o alm4/J Ae_0 av mr Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) Name of Applicant/Sponsor 44[, R& R. DEAIC, / Address //�7 69R,0V /?,&=a 97' City/PO 4K State 11A6 Zip Code Business Telephone jFOZ - sm • 9S3.1 Name of Owner(if different) 7w C p- /ya'm mM5ftarP / Address Gro 4AAQL JZ- nWISOW /AWE&) City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: j�,arl-rrgc, BOOL ADIDITIOAI ro e!/sr1w4 siggavrte' Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:ElUrban F1 Industrial 2160mmercial ®Residential (suburban) ©Rural (non-farm) ElForest ®Agriculture ®Other 2. Total acreage of project area: /IA'38acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) o5�3'0 acres � � acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres ,.� acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) ,I1 acres acres Water Surface Area ,OZ acres #02 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces _,_fesacresev acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: E]W II drained Jt% of site Moderately well drained_% of site. Poorly drained 104F % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes CaNo a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) ��(OfaGf f,(rns 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes:- ®o-10%/Of) % 1:110- 15%_% M 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or ontain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? ®Yes LJNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 1:1Yes ©No B. What is the depth of the water table? 154 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E]Yes 03/No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project areal 12'Yes ®No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes allo According to: t?,OWZN IS VbAVIZIEM I?X Pf UgDAO INILVANA7S Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? QYes Eallo Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? rl Yes Mqo If yes, explain: l 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? LWTVss ONo 1 -7 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Alp a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: "%L G b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ['es ❑No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? L!ryes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ®Yes ❑plo 18. Is the site located inan agricultural distric certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ®Yes R 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes ra<o B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate).. a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: /* r acres. b. Project acreage to be developed:Ifft acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ^ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. % / f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? UI(Ci(AM4M) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: �ZT- height; &G r width; /10length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?�ss'�11 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? V tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ❑Yes ®No N/A a. If yes,for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No t4A. c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑ No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? O acres. Page 5 of 21 . 5. Will any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ®Yes Ea No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: qr months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 1:3 Yes M No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes E;J<o 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 20 ; after project is complete rA 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 1 1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? M Yes 1 &01 No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? 0 Yes Mfio a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? 12Gs E]No Type Krt/1EtrV� 14JAf9A!Af6d3-- 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes 1;1<o If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? les EINo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Utes Qko a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons NO CA*A(4e JifRpy 41WIA191 b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? 12Yes E3No c. If yes, give name '10fJMAO 7giyr AWO'rya ; location Ct/2if d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes CJ/N�o Page 6 of 21 r r e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? MYes E o a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years., 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ©Yes [;3No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? F Ys ONo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes I✓ No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? F Yes [;3 No If yes, indicate type(s) i 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. pip OAU*# AW gjLtsw 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? 11 Yes No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: ��// Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ONO City, Town, Village Planning Board I 04 Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board 17 Yes [O'No � p City, County Health Department V„9✓ Yes ❑ No ry �2.UStELS Other Local Agencies �—�Yes � ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes allo NYS v�� State Agencies Yes ❑ No Federal Agencies ❑Yes 1ZNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? N Y s ® No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision Site plan ❑ Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? M-Z 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 20Y, tat covapfti 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Ko ctfalhYr(s 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 1414 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Ealyes ONo 1 7. 'What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? r t11MW MARcd6 W-M r P.akCYl S MjAWN�s IlKTnvt�r`►l s 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a % mile? 1 (es ®No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N,1K a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Ryes [:] No , wrie sysmm W Aiks, 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ©Yes Mlo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ®Yes ❑ No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ER'No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name �Q .T 4Jw� A.0 . Date f/•$'03 Signature // /�',I Title /Mrl �s'10• M!26 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) 1 In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project,on each site,in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. i The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. 1 In identifying Impacts,consider long term,short term and cumulative effects. Instructions(Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is tower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to I/ Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ❑ YES ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e.,rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes [:]No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) El NO 17 YES Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ Dyes []No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. WIII Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ©NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑No water or more than a 10 acre Increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑No area. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed.Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No per day. •�' Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [--]No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? r7 NO r7 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Proposed Action is Incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1:1 No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No floodway. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ❑NO MYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5lbs.per hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes F-1 No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an Increase in the amount of land ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No committed to Industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? F1 NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Federal list,using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1:3 No g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑ NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields, pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No acres of agricultural land or,if located In an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ®No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines,outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimir ation or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOJRCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? []NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any Impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? ❑ NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Pi;oposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? r7 NO ❑YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there bean effect to existing transportation systems? NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 1 7 IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%increase in the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors,noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [-]NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. Otherimpacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ❑NO ❑YES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No hazardous substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of`hazardous wastes" ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No in any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous,highly reactive,radioactive, irritating,infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No services(e.g. schools,police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact Identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance,consider: 1 The probability of the impact occurring I The duration of the impact I Its irreversibility,including permanently lost resources of value I Whether the impact can or will be controlled I The regional consequence of the impact I Its potential divergence from local needsand goals I Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. - Page 21 of 21 �� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �gUFFO(,�c BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y : Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO /s� Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS G Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.MARTIN H SDS IDOR November 10, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Robert Brown 205 Bay Avenue Greenport,N.Y. 11944 Re: Proposed amended site plan for The Old Barge Second Floor Located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road, Southold SCTM#1000-56-6-8.7 Zone: Mil (Marine H District) Dear Mr. Brown, In reviewing the site plan application materials submitted to the office, the Planning Board(PB)found the following elements to be deficient. The site plan application will need to ir_clude the following to be processed: 1. Add a key map, correct tax map number and refer to site plan checklist for other information required on the site plan. 2. Include a complete breakdown of proposed actual square foot area of each use, existing building and new 2nd floor square foot. 3. Show the dumpster location, outdoor lighting, note how the parking spots will be identified and include one berth per Town code 100-192 (3) as required. 4. We will require drainage calculations for the amended site plan. 5. The site plan will require the following approvals before PB Approval: SCHD, NYS DOT, NYS DEC, Town Trustee's, Fire Department, A.R.C. and Southold Town Building Department. To avoid delays in approval,we recommend that an application for disapproval be submitted to the Building Department. Please revise the site plan and submit copies to the P.B. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfylly yo B emon Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file e4c. w r Site Plan Check List �� [✓j Lot, block, section from tax map — l e ,r r� Name and address of landowner on record (✓)' Names and addresses of adjoining landowners [✓J' Name and address of applicant (if not same as landowner) [ ] Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature [ ] Date of plan [ ] North point [ ] Location of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines [ Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet [ ] Existing zoning, Including zone lines [ ] Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet [ ] Existing contours with Intervals of 2 feet or less [ ] Show wetlands [ ] Trees of 6 inches In diameter at a point 3 feet abovethetrunk base [ ) Location of any cultural and historical features within 500 feet of the property boundaries [ ] Existing building structures and utilities [ ] All uses of the site [ . ] Paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas [✓f Outdoor lighting [ ] Outdoor signs -sketch to scale and colors [ ] Grading,Including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line [✓J Spot'elevations for buildings [ ] Location of landscaping, buffering, street tree plans [+�] Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showingproposed use of floor area [ ] Show location of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants [✓j Show location of dumpster [ ] Percent lot coverage [ J Percent landscaped [ ] Data for architectural review(see attached sheet) [ ] Review required by Suffolk County Department of Health Services [ ] Review by New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit [ ] Review by Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) for curb cut permit [ ] Review by New York Stale Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) [ ] Review by Southold Town Trustees (freshwater wetlands). Flag and show wetlands on plan ( ] Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals ( ] Review required (permit) by Southold Town Board [ ] Other QUA-/( F F6C 4 � STIP PLAN PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE CHECK UST DATE: APPLICATION: You are required to obtain the following approvals: ( ) . Suffolk County Department of Health Services: water supply, waste water disposal permit. (v� . Curb cut for State and County roads. (-T' . Southold Town Trustees: dredging, bulkhead, wetlands, coastal hazard area, Mme. New York State Departmental of Environmental Conservation: bulkhead, dredging, tidal wetlands. (v . Southold Town Board of Appeals: variance, Interpretation, special exception. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: bulkhead, dredging, ( ) . Greenport Village Utility: water If within village franchise area O NYNEX, Long Island Lighting Company: poles moved, other utility considerations. (v-r. Proof of Health Department Review or Exception: Staff will Indicate what type of approval is required. ( ) Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works. curb cut permit The Planning Board will also: t-f . Send a letter to the Fire District for a recommendation on the need for a fire well or hydrant, (--r . Send to Suffolk County Planninb Commisslon for their review, (Condominiums only), M' . Send to the Town Engineering Inspector for / review of drainage and road profiles. Send to the Bullding Department for certification, ( 1 . Send to the Town's Consultant's for price quote to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF). The following information is to be submitted to the Architectural Review Committee after the Planning Board notifies you in writing that the application is acceptable. The Planning Board office will attach a copy of a site plan to the following material: • Notations as to the type of building construction, proposed occupancy or use and the location of fire separation walls (if it projects beyond the building envelope). • Floor plans drawn to scale(1/4" = V preferred) • Elevation drawings to scale of all sides of each building(1/4" = V preferred). The following information shall be shown on the drawings: Type and color of roofing-include sample Type and color of siding-include sample Type of windows and doors to be.used;.material and color of all windows and door frames-include sample Type and color of trim material- include sample • Rendering of buiidiag if possible Notation of the type of heating/cooling equipment to be used. Show or indicate exterior locations of all equipment i.e., heat pumps, air conditioning compressors, etc. on plans and/or elevations. • Type and locations of all roof-mounted mechanical equipment • Type and locations of all mechanical equipment, plumbing and/or attic venting through roof or building sidewall. • Type, color and style of proposed masonry material for chimneys or accent walls- iticlude samples or photos. • Details, color, type and style of any proposed ornamentation, awnings, canopies or tents. • Photos of existing buildings and/or neighboring properties from four directions of project site, if possible. • Type, color and design of all exterior signage, both building-mounted and free standing. Please use this Est as a checklist. Regretfully, we cannot accept incomplete submissions. Place all materials in a large manilla envelope with your application name printed on the outside. Large samples should be labeled. If you want samples returned, please note same on the label. THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WOULD BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH YOU AT A PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE PRIOR TO YOUR ACTUAL SUBMISSION YurtBYAI+b 4TFN11011fineM Retu nuym Iy IuA am.van AyulayOf •1Y ssa omssau '" NaeMnanr# \ MN ho .2 xy�l Y Q. 20.2AIc1 y Ye 1 20;11.1 01 6 14M 1 L1µJ \ d c mx R y • T O 16 sWTNLO \\F d LJAId a 203 r • r I. \ e y�6uo 4.1 V MAIN Du10 MAW \ d �. 1 \ 20 2 y3Y \ 16\ 1 < B\� �•yPe 3.6AId I j r M ddd 1\ I'd 17.2AIc1 • A 50 f sn�ny s ro TOR 6 SaR1g1D 11UAI 12.1 Q MUM ?.I)-/ Y D 43 8 F.D.28 1"• w��' d C S �o� SECTION NO NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K "1 ° SQUIDULO Red Property Tax Service Agency Y �, 1�6 056 Canty Center Rlywhe A ll Y 11901 p5e SlfraA WRITTEN TO YAP 6%IMBUED M 1D nlxart emrol PF9E6pN a TIE Y:Y[IN rffr A osncl BB 1000 PROPERTY MAP BELL PROPFgtt TAX mmDe Aaxr. - p �IYBYox e1TG AN.fl,ux _J r ° wx . .j i 4 4 IT kop ' A i •s �4 V " �sl a� 1311 P WNING BOARD MEMBERS DgOffO�,�c .- BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Q� 0 P.O. Box 1179 Chairman ti� � Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 WILLIAM J. RICHARD J. CREM EDWAR NO SDS W Telephone (631) 765-1938 KENNETH L. DWARFax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR y .#`aQ� Date Received Date Completed PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Filing Fee TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New Change of Use Re-use _Extension rfil' _Revision of Approved Site Plan �r i I 0 Name of Business or Site: jW va> R tN1 SCTM#: 1000- rJ�I a D Location: ( � 1-:71210:103 Address: �i!(i(fl(,p� SLY 1147! Southold Town Name ofPlannin Board Applicant: —._.�n12� R -��ISOI�(, Address of Applicant: (I$� Cp(2 _ � Qoan�AMA"..ry Telephone: Owner of Land: T G .� 2N>•�R PAlttn(CR,(kt p Agent or Person responsible for application: Q*CtT B&L,04 A. �&f- L (� Address: 205 ftq W6—e r � AY•10 Telephone: , 4,71- ,77S?- Site ,71. g7S2Site plans prepared by: i __�( =/qt,,,,_(�, License No. P„ 1G3�11 Address: Telephone: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �DgUFFO(,�c0 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman C Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 CA Southold, New York 11971-0959 WILLIAM J..CREMERS RICHARD Telephone (631) 765-1938 REMO KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 10, 2003 Cynthia Caprise, Secretary Southold Fire District P.O. Box 908 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Ms. Caprise: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan/survey datedNovember 5, 2003 for the Site Plan/Subdivision for the Old Barge Restaurant, Route 25 in Southold. SCTM#1000-56.-6-8.5 & 8.6 O The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fare- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. O The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Ve ruly yours, 6� &— � Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. ot o Bulk Schedule for Business, Office and Industrial Districts Town of Southold Bulk Schedule for Business,Office and Industrial Districts [Added 1-10-1989 by L.L.No. 1-1989; amended 8-22-1995 by L.L.No.18-19951 LID LB HB B Light LI Limited Hamlet General M-1 M-II Industrial Light District Business Business Business Marine I Marine II Park/Planned Industrial Office Park Minimum requirements for business,office,industrial or other nonresidential usel Lot size(square feet) 80,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 80,000 120,000 40,000 Lot width(feet) 175 60 150 150 150 200 100 Lot depth(feet) 250 100 150 150 150 300 150 Front yard(feet) vanable2 15 variable2 35 35 variable2 variable2 Side yard(feet) 20 10 25 20 25 30 20 Both side yards(feet) 45 25 50 45 50 60 40 Rear yard(feet) 75 25 35 25 25 75 70 Landscape area(percent) 35 25 35 25 20 35 25 Maximum permitted dimensions Lot coverage(percent) 20 40 30 30 30 20 30 Building height(feet) 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 Number of stories 2%, 2 2 2 2 2 2 NOTES: I For minimum requirements for residential uses,refer first to Density and Minimum Lot Site Schedule for Nonresidential Districts and then to appropriate indicated column in the Bulk Schedule for Residential Districts.In the Marine I and Marine II Districts,only land above mean high water shall qualify for area calculations. 2 Refer to appropriate zone ordinance. 10-10- 95 0-10- 95 1 0 § 100-121. Use regulations. In the MR District,no building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any uses except the following [one(1)use per eighty thousand(80,000) square feet of land above mean high water, unless otherwise specified]: A. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses permitted under Subsection A(1)hereof, are subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) One (1) one-family detached dwelling per single and separate lot of record in existence as of the date of adoption of this Article. (2) Marinas for the docking, mooring and accommodation of recreational or commercial boats, including the sale of fuel and oil primarily for the use of boats accommodated in such marina. (3) Boat docks, slips,piers or wharves for charter boats carrying passengers on excursions, pleasure or fishing trips or for vessels engaged in fishery or shellfishery. (4) Beach clubs, yacht clubs or boat clubs, including uses accessory to them, such as swimming pools, tennis courts and racquetball facilities. (5) Boatyards for building, storing,repairing, renting, selling or servicing boats, which may include the following as an accessory use: office for the sale of marine equipment or products, dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel and,where pumpout stations are provided,rest room and laundry facilities to serve overnight patrons. (6) Mariculture or aquaculture operations or research and development. (7) Boat and marine engine repair and sales and display, yacht brokers or marine insurance brokers. (8) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, school districts,park districts and fire districts. (9) etail sale or rental of fishing, diving or bathing supplies and equipment if accessory to a marina or boatyard or ship's loft or chandlery. B. Uses permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter provided, subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) estaurants, excluding outdoor counter service, drive-ins or curb-service establishments. 1 0 Such prohibition shall not prevent service at tables on a covered or uncovered terrace or porch incidental to a restaurant. (2) Ferry terminals. (3) Transient hotels or motels, subject to the following conditions: (a) The minimum area for such use shall be not less than three (3) acres. (b) The number of guest rooms permitted in the hotel or motel shall be determined by the proportion of the site utilized for such use and the availability of public water and sewer. The maximum number of guest units shall be one (1)unit per four thousand (4,000) square feet of land with public water and sewer. (4) Fish processing plants. (5) Fish markets, which may include a combination of wholesale and retail sale of finfish and shellfish. (6) Museums with a nautical theme or art galleries. C. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by Article XX, are subject to site plan review: (1) Accessory uses as set forth in and regulated by § 100-31C(1) through(7) of the Agricultural-Conservation District, and subject to the conditions of§ 100-33 thereof.EN(1) § 100-122. Bulk, area and parking regulations. No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the ME District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full EN(2) 2 0 Endnotes 1 (Popup) Editor's Note: Former Subsection C(2), which regulated signs and immediately followed this subsection, was repealed 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 25-1994. For current sign provisions, see Art. XX, Signs. 2 (Popup) Editor's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter, and the Parking and Loading Schedules are in §§ 100-191 and 100-192. 3 (Popup) Editor's Note: This local law also repealed former Art. XIII, Site Plan Approval, as amended. For current provisions, see Art. XXV, Site Plan Approval. 3 k"'9 "'F"t F''' xxoA § 100-239.4. Building setback requirements adjacent to water bodies and wetlands. [Added 3-14-1989 by L.L. No. 3-1989; amended 11-24-1992 by L.L. No. 20-1992; 6-15-1993 by L.L. No. 8-19931 Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, the following setback requirements shall apply to all buildings located on lots adjacent to water bodies and wetlands: A. Lots adjacent to Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound. (1) All buildings or structures located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff or bank. (2) Except as otherwise provided in Subsection A(1) hereof, all buildings or structures located on lots adjacent to sounds shall be set back not less than 100 feet from the ordinary high-water mark of said sound. (3) Buildings or structures which are proposed landward of existing principal dwellings shall be exempt from the requirements set forth in Subsection A(1) and A(2)hereof. B. All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, riprap or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. The following exceptions will apply: (1) Buildings which are proposed landward of existing buildings. (2) Lands which are not bulkheaded and are subject to a determination by the Board of Town Trustees under Chapter 97 of the Code of the Town of Southold. (3) Docks,wharves,pilings, boardwalks, stairs, promenades, walkways and piers,which are accessory and separate from existing buildings or accessory structures. C. All buildings and structures located on lots adjacent to any freshwater body shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the edge of such water body or not less than 75 feet from the landward edge of the freshwater wetland,whichever is greater. The following exception will apply: 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �gUFFO(,�c BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. .r�� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman o Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold,New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO 0-0 rm Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS O KENNETH L.EDWARDS y 0� Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: November 10, 2003 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Proposed amended site plan for The Old Barge Second Floor 750 Old Main Road Southold, N.Y. SCTM#1000-56.-6-8.7, Zone: MII Marine II District Status: Active Site Plan proposed that the Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action at the November 10, 2003 meeting. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The applicant proposes an amended site plan with a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold. The site plan proposes a 119 seat restaurant and approximately 363 sq. ft. of retail store. The existing lot coverage is 10.0% and will be maintained. This Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Please review and inform on whether this needs to be sent over to your department for disapproval. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Robert Brown, dated 11/04/03 and received by the Planning Board 11/07/03. 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman C� � Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGL9N0 T Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS O KENNETH L.EDWARDS Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H.SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: November 10, 2003 To: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer 4�� From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Proposed amended site plan for The Old Barge Second Floor 750 Old Main Road Southold, N.Y. SCTM#1000-56.-6-8.7, Zone: MII Marine II District Status: Active Site Plan proposed that the Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action at the November 10, 2003 meeting. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The applicant proposes an amended site plan with a new second floor addition of 1,851.7 sq. ft. and an alteration to 3,923 sq. ft. of existing building space on a 1.4438 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 1,953' west of Dolphin Drive on the south side of Old Main Road, known as 750 Old Main Road in Southold. The site plan proposes a 119 seat restaurant and approximately 363 sq. ft. of retail store. The existing lot coverage is 10.0% and will be maintained. This Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and approval. It appears the site plan will need to be revised to include drainage calculations, we sent a letter to the applicant. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Robert Brown, dated 11/04/03 and received by the Planning Board 11/07/03. �— ...e.mmr. (zv a,� U comer u. --•— ••�,-^�..^ --- ... soca enn Wenwurx,rmam6vlEw mi rr um ry rux am ym XW x.y t m, D .ewrr�wm _____. uor _ ♦ memms mem'"' g24 m 3a3M0 y / 3 .n A a0 10 v F —N — xa �� a ® ax1.A T.Vi yf' 14M., a 21 QO• \\ F eILL � • '� . O 16 w10Senamio U 202 WA L31Ad 1t1` r '� >5 I 111A1N 4.1 \\ D opq O 9 er I � ^ 7.0A '! B r 2 \ `T2P M+1 d . eJ 17.200 ` r 3 bz 1 `�♦� � F�; \ � d` S LUlcl a \ i\\\\P\\ \\ L�• \. d m. f V MAIM O TpN 6 SOUfM4p r xONcl 1�x 9 �♦ .} © 121 ICJ . D 43 yM16 �"'� / � p BuJd's Parts F.D.28 `' , 'A0 �T o� z 10 � n.DoaE6 taa /—v/ IMA(c) +v \i'•tnT � O s 16 3 cats I A �(C VIC ♦ J� `l y+' Y Y a ♦pAyQ' �qF ea l).1 ` .({•0 caw w M11 O.'a a� �y ♦ e d°`, R F R a O a F u zzuml e M1f�J a \ e a 4 t9 +2 v WA t6 00 FM PCLMa M1D O U . SEE%tw. y+ O O 066-DO-010 usrm dt +5 O WTd _;z __ m In m SEE%C.NaM me�axac +6 At f� 2�E NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © xM6 SOUTHDLD (21) o.ohne u. —_F—_ xunr,r� rw .n E.ria merw --"—_ IAMRed Property Tax Service Agency Y Mr .AIFN n AxWP sPR01lIlE0 Canty CDMx MYeF)IBa4 NT 11901 M poma 23 u r_ 121 um a itu u�^ —___ w.o.wn u. --v—_ em....mer u.—n-- rArx a .AtiFeAlF6 noncar.mrrw Rm69w a u[ s e cuE x sFETy m A mlldr 10 1000 Wn.eu MI A(c) m.u. —___� S�.M D� —_s—_ w4 PMOPFR1t TAx 5F11111:,A(tMy. P w Syrygm:N WR W.A. E " . ,• �! t 4 1 Col 4. t. 3 e s s I AL CURR W/ NXYR �SRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY DATE 11/10/2003 473889 SOUTHOLD SCHOOL SOUTHOLD SCHOOL + ROLL SEC TAXABLE PRCLS 421 RESTAURANT TOTAL RES SITE 56. -6-8 . 7 TOTAL COM SITE 750 OLD MAIN RD ACCT NO 08 OWNER & MAILING INFO === I =MISC 1 ======== ====== ASSESSMENT DATA ====_______ REITER' S C D THE IRS-SS I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT C/O REITER 1 1 ILAND 4,600 **TAXABLE** 2650 WICKHAM AVE I BANK 1TOTAL 10,200 COUNTY 10,200 MATTITUCR NY 11952 **PRIOR** TOWN 10,200 1 ILAND 4,600 SCHOOL 10,200 I ITOTAL 10,200 ==DIMENSIONSSALES INFORMATION __________________________________ ACRES 1 .70 IBOOK 12229 SALE DATE 12/28/02 SALE PRICE 1 1PAGE 606 PR OWNER REITER CARL D JR & ORS =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 =-------===== == TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFDO28 IPK070 IWW020 ISWO11 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75 . 10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=GO TO MENU CURR W/ NXYR SRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY DATE 11/10/2003 473889 SOUTHOLD SCHOOL SOUTHOLD SCHOOL • ROLL SEC TAXABLE PRCLS 311 RES VAC LAND TOTAL RES SITE 56 . -6-8 .2 TOTAL COM SITE 500 OLD MAIN RD ACCT NO 08 OWNER & MAILING INFO === j =MISC 1 ________ ______ ASSESSMENT DATA =__________ THE BARGE & ASSOCIATES IRS-SS I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT C/O CAROL R DENSON 1 1 ( LAND 800 **TAXABLE** 1184 CORNER RETCH RD I BANK ( TOTAL 800 COUNTY 800 NEWARK DE 19711 **PRIOR** TOWN 800 1 ILAND 800 SCHOOL 800 I ITOTAL 800 ==DIMENSIONSSALES INFORMATION =--------------------------------- ACRES . 90 IBOOK 12205 SALE DATE 08/16/02 SALE PRICE 1 PAGE 759 PR OWNER REITER JOAN & ORS ------=TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 _____________ 1 == TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFD028 IPK070 IWW020 ISWO11 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75 . 10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU CURR W/ NXYR SRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY DATE 11/10/2003 473889 SOUTHOLD 0 SCHOOL SOUTHOLD SCHOOL ROLL SEC TAXABLE PRCLS 311 RES VAC LAND TOTAL RES SITE 56.-6-9.2 TOTAL COM SITE 62900 MAIN RD ACCT NO 08 OWNER & MAILING INFO === I =MISC I -------- ---=== ASSESSMENT DATA ========___ REITER CARL D JR & ORS IRS-SS I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT C/O CAROL DENSON 1 1 ILAND 800 **TAXABLE** 1184 CORNER RETCH RD I BANK 1TOTAL 800 COUNTY 800 NEWARK DE 19711 **PRIOR** TOWN 800 1 ILAND 800 SCHOOL 800 1 ITOTAL 800 ==DIMENSIONS === 1 =------ SALES INFORMATION =--------------------------------- ACRES 1. 65 ( BOOK 12189 SALE DATE 05/08/02 SALE PRICE 1 IPAGE 338 PR OWNER REITER HELEN & ORS AS =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 _____________ 1 == TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFDO28 IPK070 IWWO20 ISWO11 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75 . 10- 03-050 F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU MATTITUCK SELF- STORAGE (Wickham Avenue) It was RESOLVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Garret Strang to APPROVE the schedule of colors. The design of the signage remains outstanding. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. (Main Road - Southold) Robert Brown recused himself. In a pre-submission conference, the applicant described the driving of pilings to stabilize the barge and the addition of a second floor to the structure. The Committee agreed in concept with the proposal. R oKeith Secretary �5 SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTE rO E � VNovember 6, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman. 1 2003 Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr.,Landmarks Preservation Committee Southold Town Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Plannin Board Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Merlon E. Wiggin for Brewer Boat Yard, Joseph J. Frohnhoefer ll, Joseph J. Frohnhoefer III, Brett Kehl and Gail Wickham for Seatow Services; and Thomas McCarthy for Mattituck Self Storage. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of September 23, 2003. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. BREWER YACHT YARD (Manhasset Avenue -Greenport) Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the APPLICATION with the CONDITIONS that color samples be submitted, the roof penetrations be located on the southeast corner of the building, the screened air conditioning unit be located on the east side and that the cricket be larger and more visible. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. SEA TOW SERVICES (Boisseau Avenue - Southold) Moved by Howard Meinke and seconded by Herbert Adler, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the APPLICATION with the CONDITIONS that the signage be ground lit and of colonial appearance and that the exterior lighting be recessed soffit lighting. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All, Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. PLANNING BOARD M MJR.BERS o�OgpFFO(BENNE ,�co P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 PC Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD J. CREM RS WILLIAM • Telephone(631) 765-1938 KENNETH at L EDWAR DB O Fax(631) 765-3136 MARTIN H. SIDORy�01 �� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 27, 2003 Ms. Carol Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: Old Barge Restaurant 32945 Main Road Cutchogue,NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-57-6-8.5 & 8.6 Dear Ms. Denson, This letter is in response to the preliminary site plans submitted and to inform you of the next action. The Southold Town Planning Board(P.B.)reviewed the concept site plan at the work session on October 20, 2003 with Mr. Brown present. The concept site plan as proposed looks good and will need to be reviewed for compliance with the Town Code. The P.B. will be waiting for an amended site plan application before this can be processed any further. Please submit the following to the P.B.; application, Long EAF form, all the corresponding documents and fee. Attached you will find an application package. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Resp fa yours, Bruno Serio ite Plan Reviewer CC:file Enc. Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: SC Subject: --� C)L;t� �j4U'j�• SCTM#: 1000- Sb Date: Comments: 1r I p�e - 5zti(�wt� S S t cTv� pECE I V E OCT 17 0 D 2 03 southc Toch %annin BaaM �f► • 0 C. D. Reiter's c/o Carol R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark,Delaware 19711 (302)239-0979 Fax: (302)234-2619 Email: carolydensonna,comcast.com TO: Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Office Town of Southold FROM: Carol R. Denson&,q DATE: September 4, 2003 RE: Old Barge Restaurant In preparation for our meeting at 10am on Monday, September 8, I have enclosed copies of the following items for your review. 1. Letter from Board of Town Trustees, Town of Southold, dated 4/23/98 2. Letter from Department of Army dated 8/20/98 3. DEC permit approval for extending expiration date to 9/20/05 4. DEC permit with expiration date of 12/2/02 5. Letter from Planning Board, Town of Southold, dated 5/25/99 6. Letter from Planning Board, Town of Southold, dated 6/4/99 with copy of site plan, sans endorsements. Thank you for your assistance. I look forward to meeting you on Monday. D SEP _ 5 2n D Souff"Tom flannin Board �gOFFQ(�- Albert J.Krupski,PresidentOff' CO Town Hall James King,Vice-President �� Gy 53095 Main Road Henry Smith y P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster * Southold,New York 11971 Ken Poliwoda G `� Telephone(516) 765-1882 Fax(516)765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 1998 Carol Denson 1184 Corner Kethc Road Newark, DE 19711 RE: Barge Rest. SCTM #56-6-8.5 Dear Mrs. Denson, The following action was taken by the Southold Town Trustees on Wednesday, April 22, 1998, at their Regular Meeting: RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grant a Waiver to add a mezzanine area on top of existing Barge Restaurant, changing roof line, but staying in the same foot print. Runoff will be directed to existing drywells. Plans dated as received April 10, 1998. Located Rt. 25, Southold. However, this approval does not constitute approvals from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, G&&CA-v 9 Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/jmd cc. Bldg. Dept.v D SEP - 5 D 2003 Southold Town Planning Board •WARTMENT OF THE ARMY • . NEW YORK DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS i JACOB K.JAVnS FEDERAL BUILDING NEW YORK,N.Y.10278-0090 'rnr ro �rrexnon oc August 20, 1998 Eastern Permits Section SUBJECT: Joint Application with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Helen D. Reiter c/o Carol Denson 1184 Corner KEtch Road Newark, DE. 19711-2324 Dear Ms. Denson: We have recently received a copy of the Joint Application for permit you filed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) . Please be advised we have reviewed the copy of the Joint Application sent to this office by NYSDEC. Based solely upon the information provided, it appears that a Department of the Army permit is not required for your proposal. The Department of the Army regulates construction activities in navigable waterways and discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including inland and coastal wetlands . If your proposal would involve such work, and has not been portrayed as such in your Joint Application, you should contact this office immediately so that a project-specific determination can be made as to whether a Department of the Army permit will be required. Any inquiries can be directed to this office at (212) 264- 3912, 3913, 6730, or 6731. Sincerely,, / V y' Ja es W. HaggertJkyfC� C ief, Eastern Permits Section p � CEoWE SEP - 5 20 D 03 Southold Town Plannin Board F qz ecu.t\Ied '10-3 New York State Dept of Environmental Co tion Am of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40-SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 v Phone: (631)444-0365 • FAX: (631)444-0360 _ Website:www.dec.state.ny.us Erin M.Crotty CommIulorw PERMIT RENEWAL Helen D. Reiter September 20, 2002 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Permit# 1-4738-01665/00003 Dear Ms. Reiter: Your recent request to extend the above permit has been reviewed pursuant to 6NYCRR Part 621 (Uniform Procedures Regulations) and found to be approvable. Therefore, the permit is hereby extended to September 20, 2005. This letter is an amendment to the original permit and, as such, shall be available at the permitted site whenever authorized work is in progress. All other terms and conditions remain as written in the original permit. Very truly yours, Mark C. Carrara Permit Administrator cc: BMHP Costello Marine Contracting Corp. File rEEPWE5 �- 03thold Townning Board FROM COSTELLO MARINE CONT. PHONE NO. : 516 477 0005 � 07 1998 05:04PM P3 NEWINKINTE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATLOM DEC PERMIT NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE 1.47,56.01665 Decesimr 2 199'8 FACILITT/PRODRAM MMRER(S) PER IT EXPIRATION DATE($) Under the Ervirwees tal Conservation taw Decewber 2, 2002 TYPE OF PERMIT ■ New ❑ Rerwari ❑ Modification ■ Pensit to Comtruct 0 Permit to Operate ❑ Article 15, Title S. Protection ❑ 6MYCM 606: Water 0uality ❑ Article 27, Title 7; ERYCRR of Waters Certification 3602 Solid Waste Marrgwent ❑ Article 15, Title 151 Water O Article 17, Titles 7, B: SPOES ❑ Artiete 27, Title 9; 6MTLRR supply 375: Natardous Waste Nowspoow:t O Article 19: Air Pot lotion O Article 15, Title 1S: Water Control ❑ Article 34: Coastal Erosion Transport Nsnpwaent ❑ Article 23, Title 27: Mined O Article 15, Title 15: Long Land Rtelawtion O Article 36: Floodplain Island Wells MNsgNMnt ❑ Article 24-. Frechwter Wetlands O Article 1S, Title 27: Wild, ❑ Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27. 37; Sodic and Racreatiomt Rivers ■ Article 25: Tidal Wetlands 6MYCRR 3602 Radiation Controt PERMIT ISSUED TO TELEPHONE NUMBER Rolm D. Reiter (516) 765-3920 ADMIN; of PERMITTEE Mein Road Southold NT 11971 CONTACT PERSON FOR PERMITTED WORK TELEPHONE NUMBER Roman Long. Costetlo Marine Contracti CorP., P.O. Box 2126 Greenport, MY 11944-0946 516 477-1199 NAME NRI ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILITY Better pmperty, Old Barge Restaurant, Mein Road LOCATION OF PROJECT/FACILITY Sauthold RT 11971 Caw" TOU1 WATFRCOIRSE MYTH eDwv1MATEs Suffolk Southold Mill Creels DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORISED ACT3YITY: Corstruet 1,300 square foot second story (wwz ine) addition to existing restaurant. BY aeCePtanee of this Panic, the PaMittse agrees that the pereit is contingent upon strict coWiwwe with the ECL, all applicable regulations, the Oenerst Corditione specified (see page 2 S 3) and any SNcial Conditiom included as part of this panit. PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR: ADDRESS Mark C Carrara (CAW) Bids. 440• UNIT, Stmry Brook, NT 11790.2356 AUTHORIZED SIIRATIRE DATE e~ Docenber 2. 1996 Page I of 4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBM SUFFO(,rc BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman P.O.Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS rCDi� Southold,New York 11971 KENNETH L.EDWARDS 'D T Fax(516)765-3136 GEORGE RTTCHIE LATHAM,JR. RICHARD G.WARD 4O`er Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 25, 1999 D E C E 8 U - D The C.D. Reiter Partnership SEP 5 2003 c/o C.R. Denson Southold Town 1184 Corner Ketch Road Planning Board Newark, Delaware 19711 Re: Proposed site plan for The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.5 & 8.6 Dear Ms. Denson: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 24, 1999: The final public hearing, which was held at 7:30 p.m., was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the C.D. Reiter Partnership is the owner of the property known and designated as The Old Barge Restaurant, located at Old Main Rd. in Arshamomaque, SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.5 & 8.6; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on November 2, 1998 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (6NYCRR), Part 617, makes a determination that this project is a Type II action and not subject to the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (SEQRA); and WHEREAS, the final public hearing was closed on May 24, 1999; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore Page 2 May 25, 1999 Proposed site plan for The Old Barge Restaurant RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated August 6, 1998, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution: 1. Certification by the Building Inspector 2. Submission of requested architectural review data for Planning Board review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. r Y Chairman cc: Building Dept. PLANNING BOARD MEMBI " g%jFF9j t BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ,ZO COG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chainnan P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS w Southold,New York 11971 KENNETH L.EDWARDS G Fax(516) 765-3136 GEORGE R CRITCH E LATHAMWARD ,JR y�/ • Telephone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 4, 1999 The C.D. Reiter Partnership Go C.R. Denson 1184 Corner Ketch Road Newark, Delaware 19711 Re: Proposed site plan for The Old Barge Restaurant SCTM# 1000-56-6-8.5 & 8.6 Dear Ms. Denson: Enclosed please find 2 copies of your site plan which were endorsed by the Chairman; one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, l19 Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman D enc. SEP - 5 2003 cc: Building Dept. Southold tows plan, Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �QgUFFO(,� BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �Q" COG P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 p Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGLANO y Z Telephone(631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J.CREMERS O Fax(631) 765-3136 KENNETH L.MARTIN H.SIDORRDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 27, 2003 Ms. Carol Denson 1184 Comer Ketch Road Newark, DE 19711 Re: Old Barge Restaurant 32945 Main Road Cutchogue,NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-57-6-8.5 & 8.6 Dear Ms. Denson, This letter is in response to your letter dated August 13, 2003 for an extension of the approval granted May 25, 1999. The Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the letter at the work session on August 25, 2003. The Planning Board records indicate no final approval was granted and the conditional approval has expired. The Planning Board records show no indication that the two conditions were met as required on the conditional final approval dated May 25, 1999. The site plan is expired at this time and a new application would need to be submitted to the Planning Boards Office. At this time please provide the documents to prove that the conditions were fulfilled as required or submit a new application. If there are any questions you can contact us at(631) 765-1938 x 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res ll ours, B o emo Se ' r Site Plan Reviewer CC:file NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY DATE : 08/20/2003 473889 SOUTHOLD • SCHOOL SOUTHOLD SCH000 ROLL SEC TAXABLE PRCLS 421 RESTAURANT TOTAL RES SITE 56. -6-8 . 7 TOTAL COM SITE 750 OLD MAIN RD ACCT NO 08 4---' OWNER & MAILING INFO === I =MISC I -------- ---=== ASSESSMENT DATA REITER' S C D THE IRS—SS I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT C/O REITER 1 1 ILAND 4,600 **TAXABLE** 2650 WICKHAM AVE I BANK ITOTAL 10,200 COUNTY 10,200 MATTITUCR NY 11952 **PRIOR** TOWN 10,200 1 ILAND 4,600 SCHOOL 10,200 1 ITOTAL 10,200 ==DIMENSIONS === =====_= SALES INFORMATION ---------------------------------- ACRES 1 . 70 IBOOK 12229 SALE DATE 12/28/02 SALE PRICE 1 IPAGE 606 PR OWNER REITER CARL D JR 6 ORS =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 =-------===== == TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFDO28 IPK070 IWWO20 ISWO11 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT{SPEC 75 . 10— 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU /-\i 04-5 8/2a/03 — Z/, /"s 64 // —/7 d,cs 14,1 tl IZA BPX01 -***-BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION *** ----8/20/03--13_38_ 09 ------------ ----------------------- TAXI-D: 473889 56. -6-8 . 5 PERMIT# : 1604 APPLY#: -OWNER: REITER, HELEN & ORS AS TRUSTEE MAP: LOT: ADDR"- MAIN ROAD LOC: 750 OLD MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NY IT971 HAMLET APPLY DATE: PERMIT DATE: DENY DATE: 0/00/00 VERIFIED BY: VERIFY DATE: -T7-9U7-9U EXPIRATION: USE CODE: USE: BUILDING#: ----U—OF: 0 SUBDIVISION RO#: MAX HGT: ZONING DISTRICT: PLOT SIZE: AREA: YARDS SETBACK FRONT: SIDES : REAR: PERMIT OWNER/AGENT: REITER, HELEN & ORS AS TRUSTEE ADDRESS : MAIN ROAD CITY: SO THOLD STATE: NY ZIP: 11971 DESCRIPTION: TRUSTEE PERMIT DOCK + RAMP WETLANDS Y N: _ _COASTAL EROSION Y N: TRUSTEES APPROVAL DATE: 0/00/00 PLANNING BOARD APPROVAL DATE: 0/00/00 DEC APPROVAL DATE: 777UM ZBA APPROVAL DATE: FLOOR AREA: F VALUE OF WORK: . 00 FEE CODE: FEE: . 00 ADD/CHG/DEL: CHANGE F1=Next Permit mammary F3=Exit F7=Reprint F8=C0 F9=Denial F12=Clear 473889 56. -6-8 . 5 OWNER: REITER, HELEN & ORS AS TRUSTEE MU--M—BERT- DATE TYPE CO # USE/DESCRIPTIO 1604 5/10/83 PERMI TRUSTEE PERMIT 1604 DOCK + X1162 1/03/69 PERMIT PERMIT #4162Z 8411 3/05/76 PERMIT PERMIT #8411Z ADDITION + ACC 18105 5/10/89 PERMIT PERMIT #18105 MAKE EMERGENCY 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 0/00/00 F1=More F7=Permit Detail F8=Co Detail F9=Preco F12=New Swis/Parcel F3=Exit X030 - $'b_, �a _ 8` TO N OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET �5VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT FOSTER Ef el, J Tr t 41 J(5 N E ACR. J< / ei (✓ LtdJ 1vu55 S W TYPE OF BUILDING r6' Pri RES. SEAS. VL. FARM OMM. B. MICS. Mkt. Value { ,D� /IMP. TOTAL DATF REMARKS SC� r 1 L- / f/ P E i c /3 C� ZJ �ikr/v �R y C� 4t - U G' OGS GD j '/ r 1 i 1 $Q' 1-P"r S�"'r5''y fz rFr'... p $ 'HP1r� -{ (tea I I •--4 Id rsj Q •Cl9 p pVBE S/.� ✓ x;;,171 /e,Q�r �T�4�c:% ,•'. µ�9dd �o�/ r< /"Cct ;JoRy®ax -�d � � dd 7 00 ! ZcF t i' `��<." �c/1` ✓ '7`.Lr((5-V �$ .�Q-O ZpITION; tt 101pq aP MOS— M4e aw erc heig /� P aj n'L2 Q-Y, n� NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE ' f �+ k+pan I$��oo, �� )/0967 �/3a /e�/ � �. ,. clu>,?d"Ua, s -W/C Drs /oaf FARM Acre Value Per Value ----r �//�� J // Q Acre s � D,2-L �Z(gl JbJ7s—I`Ce!},"r �Qv7O Td Tillable FR NTAGE ON WATERc�I &;2Jd Woodland FRO AD /� P�TPcGE-6t�f-f$Q Meadowland DEPTH House Plot BULKHEAD Total ` DOCK ?_ �■■■■■■■■■s■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■�1■ ■ ■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■MEN■■■■■■■ ■■e ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r�e�i�= e■■■■■ .� . ,Fes-- ��■■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 7 7:17 ■■■■H■■■�■!!!■■■■e■■■■■■e■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■�iiiiil■■■■■■■■H■■■■■ ■I■I■ N■NEI 3■■■1'I.L::■-'■■■■■N■■■ ■■■ ■■■NEI 1■■■Illil3i■11I2No ■■■■■■■■■ ■s■e mmmm ■■■■■■■ Iu■■■■�1■E�■■■■■■■■ ■�■■lip-190-mmm ■■■■■ �■■■ • ■ ■Room ■rcaer�■ MEN■■�it�e ■�i� 0■■■■■■1■i■■■ __ CWRIN Interior Finish ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NOUN■�■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ _■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■N■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■!■■■■■■■ ■r �IN ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■:::,�-arNNli■■ ■■■NNMEN N■N■N■■■■■(i`lNo ME M �i�=m■■■■■■ ME ■ NOON■ NOON■■■N■■�N1�_ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■�iN■e PER ■1■!■■■■■■■�■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■■Ni3■■■1�■!::lam'■■■■nN■■■ ■■■�■■■■!�!1■■■111!!3!■�I�■■■■■■■■N ■■■■MENENE ■!■_■m■ !■■■■■■■■ s■■■■■■■■�iAl�■mom■■■■■ ■■■ ■ • ■MIME Nirr �PlClCNME NOON,■■■■ .. EEMS IF P .. -S Semon, Bruno To: Standish, Lauren;Verity, Mike Cc: Forrester, Ed Subject: The Old Barge 56.-6-8.7 Please read the information below. :t The Planning Board received a letter from Ms.Denson on the above referenced parcel.The request' o extend the expired final approval from May 25, 1999. 1 will present this letter to the Planning Board at Mondays(8/25/03)work session around 4:30pm. The parcel was known as SCTM 1000-56-6-8.5&8.6 when we approved the site plan Hi Lauren, The letter Indicates that the Trustees approval is current. Can you please pull your file and inform me of the status of any permits. Do any violation exist? Please copy the Planning Board with the permit. Hi Mike, Does this site have any open violations? Is a building permit application being reviewed by your department? Are any permits open and expired at this time? Hi Ed, Do you have any open violations on the above? I would appreciate any information on the above to present to the Planning Board on Monday. Thank You Bruno 1 06/24!03 Sn 20:20 M 518 Ids 1960 Southold Town accounting X001 s Albert J.Srupski,Presidento Mvi qjp Town Hall James Sing,Vios-President 53095 Route 96 @aair P:O_Boz 1179 Hearg Artie emit Southold,Naw York 11971.0969. ostu Kan Poliwoda _ Telephone(631)786.1893 Pax(631)7651366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TELEFAXCOVER SHEET To: From: GC Date: -5 10,3 #Pages (Ina cover skeet) ~ p [C FIVE E D AUG 2 5 2003 Southold Town Plannin Board 0819tiO3 SUN 20:21 fAX 310 785 1308 Southoad Topa lceo s w „•.... __�OOY i Board Of Southold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 406 DATE: .July •. _ PERMIT NO. ........._........ :..........._ ISSUED TO Helen_Reiter _._....____........... ..................................... ,...... V. �u#lnritttinn pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1693; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance on- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the r REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;' and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held onApll...24,1987 consideration of the sum of 5....................... paid by ' . .........__...................._.....---...._._._..._._. of ........................_._..._............._......_•---.. ................ N. Y. and subject to, the s Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Inst*n 17 pilings, construct —umber bulkhead, 6' a 10 floyting dock, 1,3 catwalk above MHWM. raise grade by pacement of aprox.4.000 cu.yds. upland fill, on property ; ' located on Main Rqagg, o thotd, N, Y. so in accordance with thea ailed spec�ieations as presented in the originating application. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seat to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the s d Board as of +his data. 41 s x. __ -- ----------------------------- -----r_r-rte -------- Please r Please tear off and re-,uxm to the Trustee Officio- Board _ f Southo ..ld Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK �( Mooring Pexmit No. Date: 06/24/09 5171 20:22 FAX 516 705 1966 Southold Town Accounting 91000 TERMS and CONDITIONS r - - - ... _ _.._......- .� Permit= Helen Reiter swidingac Main Road. South ld. N.Y. ' pate of tin consideration for the issuance of tie permit does undenewd and prescribe to the fol- lowing: 1. That the Southold Trustees Permit must be prominently displayed on the premises effected thereby during the period of •:;r. Thac tie said Board of Truuees and the Town of Southold are released from goy sed %mrk all damages, or claims for damages, of suits wising directly or lodir.my as a remlt of any aper. undo $don performed potsaant to this peoak, gad the said Permittee will, a his of her,own eapenk the " clefead any and all sash suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permicva ass-mw ftdl lJahirby permi wkh respect therm, to the complete ezchrson of the Board of Tmsrea of the Tawe of Southold 3. That this From is valid for a period of tsx 24 moa. which is eonsidend to be dw sufficient dose required to complete the worm involved, but should demmetaops warrant' reTM for an eraeadon may be made to the Board at a hurt riga. i4; That this Permit should be retained imde5oitely, or as long as the sold Perolom wisher to maiacain the savtctwe or project involved, to provide evidence to wyomt concerned that atmtbr odudoo was originally obtained 5: That tie work involved will be subject to the impectiaa and approval of the Soled of i fe agents, and nontompHance with tba provisions of rhe originating appliadon,may be aura fat revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Sward. 6. Thac there wilt be no wmasonable iuterietmce with navigation ore a result of the walk becaia authorized. T. That dttie sbali be no intedcreace with the right of the public to pass and repass along the bad% berween high and low water marks. 8. That if future oper4dom of the Town of Southold require the removal and/at altars in the location of the work berm wthoriecd, or if,in the opidon of the Board of Tower the work shall cause uamsonable obstnrtoon to free navigation, the said Permittee will be ragoimd, upon dun oorce,to remove or alter this work or project berain stand without estpenses to the Town •"='` of Southold. 9. That the said Board will be notified by the Pen:uinee or the completion of the work ■tsh. oarad. (See tear off sheet.) 10. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and contents that may be r Tdnd atp pkmenul m this permit which may be subject to revoke upon [allure to obtala same. „ a I, ce fy that the- work as authorize this permit has been comped and is now ready for your apection. Also, the number quired on this project is clearly visible. I further understand this permit is not• valic until 'this tear off sheet is returned to the Trustee Office. — 0 LASER FICHE FORM • Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SCANNED SPFile Type: Approved APR 1 0 2008 Pro'ect Type: Amended Site Pk nsRecords Management Status: Final - Pending Inspection SUM # : 1000 - 56.-6-8.7 Prosect Name: Old Barge 2nd floor Address: 750 Old Main Road Hamlet: Southold Applicant Name: Denson, Carol Owner Name: Reiter's CD The Zone 1: MII Approval Date: 3/14/2005 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 3/14/2005 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: on the s/s/o Old Main Road approximately 1953' w/o Dolphin Drive SC Filing Date: C and R's : Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCAN Date: 07610/BER BERRIDGE STANDARD COLORS m " ` BuyLine4950 a Berridge Manufacturing Co. .. r. ...F e•,.e a, a BUCKSKIN PARCHMENT ""`��` u 6 AGED BRONZE SHASTA WHITE FOREST GREEN PATINA GREEN SIERRA TAN W = = = M MEDIUM BRONZE HEMLOCK GREEN BRISTOL BLUE TERRA-COTTA DARK BRONZE ZINC HARTFORD GREEN ROYAL BLUE COLONIAL RED COPPER BROWN MATTE BLACK TEAL GREEN BURGUNDY DEEP RED COLORS*METALLIC COPPER-COTE^" CHAMPAGNE LEAD•COTETM PREWEATHERED Berridge Metallic Colors are premium finishes which require a nominal surchage. GALVALUME® NATURAL METAL FINISH `( Berridge Satin Finish Galvalume' is pretreated to remove mill oils,chemicals and residue and coated 5.� on the back side to inhibit corrosion. The top side receives a clear plastic strippable film. f SATIN FINISH GALVALUME® Page 5- (Berridge Standard Colors) .} r s Or a cWool- - , 04 F S ' � j • n✓ N � + 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 ISSUES,REVISIONS KEY MAP OpE SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS ^� a63\3 1A 5?� !� K DESIGN FLOW .r•. Vr _ 6, 1 J � P9 N ! OAQ N CAPACITY SANITARY KITCHEN TOTAL !` \�\ RESTAURANT 119 SEATS 119x10 GPD= 1190 119x20 GPD=2380 3570 �I) 50UTHOLD, M.Y. " Q �� v 'LOT 1"8 p P� �O Pp,NEM�NP LIL#838LE 7 I RETAIL 363 5F.x 0 03 GPD/SF.- I I GPD N/A 1�1 ONG U _ (DRY STORE) l� M lel GE OF CII�6, 3581 GPD tpL O or 5/ LOT 17 1 �, ... - G 8' 1 SANITARY DE51GN CALCULATIONS BASED ON FE8.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) • EAC1 EXISTING SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR 6,000 GAL. AS PER PLANS BY GREENMAN-PETER5EN, INC. \15 DATED JUNE 1981 , AND APPROVED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, J JULY 01 , 1981 H.D. REF. NO. 5-47). GROUND WATER Q ±5.6' EL. off` BARG EXISTING a x WATER 1, \ EACH I a � METER vL k \ uTIL \ \ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 1�1 scAu oFOLE LOT�F6' k �IPT.I 1�1 n PECONIC BAY –� \ = \ \ --\ I '2\ / WEST SIDE ( EXISTING CONDITIONS ) FEB 18, 2005 � L 0 500 1000 uS� \ \ EXISTINGL WN,�' V AA BAB INC �� \ /" PARKING. 27495 S.F. x . 17 x 6 = 2,804 C.F. a� O+E 2 \ _) '` DI5T I5UTION i EX15TING HARD SURFACE : 2945 S.F x 1 7 x 1 = 501 C.F. • _ / FEB.17, 2005 UOT- 15 .L 5— �w\\ n � –� �–rcHA ER r� i \ TOTAL REQUIRED = 3,505 C.F. V — � 70, L --_ A i� JAN28,2005 IEYISTING O –__ G, _ BULKHEAD 5U5-5URFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (EXISTING) \ �ILAWN TO BE V �'y� 7A A �' – � ON. \ `, Z Z Z\ O` EXISTING 00 1.F. z O' W x 4 5' D = 4,500 C.F. x 4 = E5T.CAPACTY 1 ,800 CF. WEI 28 LOT 14 IPAVED TO \ NOV. 12. 2004 H X\ MANHOLE 1 I 555.Vp RAE' Z D. EXCE DRAINAGE FIELD (NEW) GN ING \ 0��� MATCH EXISTING A p�\ \\ 5 O W/FuNI �:� B 0 L F. x I O W x 4.5' D = 4,500 C.f.. 4 -- EST.CAFACITY 1,800 CF, Nov.oz, zooa EXISTING LAWN xPG�� NEW SIGN \\ FRENCH DRAIN \' a peP� 5 200 L.F. x 2' W x 3' D = 1 ,200 C.F x 4 = E5T.CAPACITY 480 C.F. V A EXISTING rI 5EP.23, 2004 \ '� \ SEPTIC r�1 \ V III TOTAL ESL CAPACITI'4,080 CF. 44 '�ISTING vTANK \ SEP, a, 2ooa �y� ♦ � 'V g SFyPTICA ,TANK �\ \ EAST 51DE EXISTING CONDITIONS FXTEND� , \ 42 \ \ SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATIONS ( ) • MAY 27, 2004 LAWNAV ` A� BASED�N AS BUILT SKETCHES PARKING: 191 51 S.F. x . 17 x .6 = 1 ,953 C.F. ` \ — 4 �, \ PROVIDED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS. EXISTING HARD SURFACE . 1 347 S.F. x . 17 x 1 = 94 C.F. APR. 09, 2004 r3TO NG LOT 19 f` \ 4Q De TOTAL REQUIRED = 2,407 C.F. FEN w 1 ° sr FENc \ BULKHEAD 5UB-SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD 39' \ FROVIDE CONTINuous Oft Ee.z7, 2004 \ EX15 INGI 150 L.F. x 10' W x 4.5' D = 6,750 C F. x .4 = EST.CAPACITY 2,700 C.E. r �WAT FRENCH DRAIN WITH A � BE CE \ ��� 6" DIA. PERFORATED / � nloV.os, Zoos E�ISTING 3!7 36 S \� �'�� � FR0`N PIPE AT 3'-O" 5ffLOW GRADE �/ NEW ROOF F `\ BURIED IN GRAVEL. rwi i 1 .400 S.F. x . 1 7 x I = 238 C.F m 6� VEL ` N m2oos '�A 3 JC \, l� O Zy o` .\ TOTAL REQUIRED = 238 C.F. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PARKING 34 v � ° � A W AREA \ ` c NEW FRENCH DRAIN oN THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF J \ 33 �\ GONc \ ° "'h, , 356 L.F. x 3' D x .5' W = ,602 C.F. x .4 = EST.CAPACITY 640 C.F. r SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY of O PROVIDE CONTINUOUS 32 of 1Ly' .N THE ARCHITECT, INFRINGEMENTS WILL \� ER \ • BE PROSECUTED. a FRENCH DRAIN \ 3 / EL \N 2 " 0P ,EXISTING GR055 SQUARE FOOT TOTALS C 0. 3Q �ID p£ n GREASE "D 1 �� O V ` P` `x h�' NK5T FLOOR 3923 S.F. ISI 2,9 ����v/ � � � FR:Xff5TAURAJNT g2�\ cs T'�F T 000Vz"�� ` N SECOND FLOOR 13575.F. 26 \ P+ ¢ BARGE) A N ��� x' TOTAL 5320 S.F. 0 3'_C" I ,_6 N 27 � ��� e � / `� � � � a 3 PARKING: GRADE 2G D RESTAURANT 1 9 5ffASTS/ 3 = 40 SPACES CLEAN GRAVEL \ FFgR 225 `s.2 .a �. \ p ,� / ACCESSORY RETAILL EMPLOYEE SPACE M / ppp/ / �\ ADDITIONAL FOR RETAIL. 2 SPACES �J� TOTAL REQUIRED: 43 SPACES 1� 6" PERFORATED \� \°\\ / / _ 23 A� P G A \ TOTAL PROVIDED: 44 SPACES PIPE WRAPPED WITH FILTER CLOTH \22 8 7, 0 ° \ / w V (INCL.. 2 ACCESSIBLE) \ �\0\ / \ yN ,, OR / 9 / w° \�� \ �� iZgo?�1 PER 100 5.F. = 53 SPACES �� �� V�� /V ---� PROVIDED: 445PACE5 N \\\ N` — 9 LAND IN CLIENT/ FRENCH DI;A ' � '", / '� \ BANKED ~ DETAIL _-,, - / 4 ` \ 32 THE OLD BARGE "\ wOoo wPr` M,HWM._ --1��/ O o RESTAURANT N.T,5. \ y p\PG��O NES S\G ��� I RT. 25 epi r A�' �/ \ SOUTHOLD, N.Y. ROSH RUGOSA o ON yao° // V / PROJECT TITLE ll" / � p0� C?l ✓Pgx�G �ti� ADDITION �v0 .� A 0 DRAWING TITLE ot 49.0 JOSEPH FISCHETTI p \ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER M SITE PLAN v 1725 HCBART RD . SOUTHCJL%J, N .Y. 1 1971 �, PRINT DATE SCALE \ BASED ON SURVEY FOR /� /^ r�CSF \ THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT G3 1 -7G 5-2954 ^ = 20'-0" N aII� AT ARSHAMOMAQUE ISSUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEB. B, 2005 W E SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. DRAWING NO. aw V se 1000-56-06-8,7 AUG.06, 1998 PER` 5 AREA = 1 .42 19 ACRES LOT COVERAGE IO% � LANDSCAPED 6%a si ZONING DISTRICT MII 20FIRE DISTRICT 5 5 1 T E P L AN SCHOOL D15TPJCT 28 G:.i REF. NO, SCALE: I"= 20'-0" - - 0217 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 15SUES/REVI510N5 KEY M A P �E SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS *044 63 \300 1A 5 2� DESIGN PLOW G OPO, N � O _����' ,8'� � 6; CAPACITY SANITARY KITCHEN TOTAL !` SOUTH OLD, N.Y. 1 Zp6�3 / LOT ?8 p RESTAURANT 1 19 SEATS 1 1 9x 10 GPD= 1 190 1 1 9x20 GFD=2380 3570 �) SNS UTILFOLE ��' �7` �� I \, �' RETAIL 3G3 5F.x 0.03 GPD/5F. = I I GPD N/A I p" O\Q ONO P p,�EM LOI L#838 _ iY I\G (DRY STORE) M �OGt O OF O _ __' \ /�� % 3581 GFD w/• \ 5V -LOT 17 \\ G 8' SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS BASED ON 'E15.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) • EA i EXISTING SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR 6,000 GAL AS PER PLANS BY GREENMAN-PETER5EN, INC. DATED JUNE 98H.D NREP. NO. 5-47). GROUND WATER @ APPROVED DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JULY 01 , 1981 Pb a enXG- \ I�EMOTING WATER \\ \\ EACH I .� Q METER UTIL ` v � LOT 16 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS �I 2h PECONIC BAY 0 POLE Q \ I ,' /� 1 WEST SIDE ( EXISTING CONDITIONS ) ISI u+ v EXISTING LAWN G' \ i i moo o sao Iaca � // � \ \ \y � U15 ING� � � '� � PARKING: 27495 S.F. x . 17x.6 = 2.804 C.F. DI5T 15UTION i \ EXISTING HARD SURFACE : 2945 S.F. x . 17 x 1 = 501 C.F. • Nip 3\ LOT 15 \ \ �-'�' '� ��'�, – `–CHA_ ER k� i� \ \ TOTAL REQUIRED = 3,505 C.F. \� \ �O BULKHEAD SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (EXISTING) JAN.28zoos ` ON. \ EXISTING 2 -yn – 1 00 L.F. x I G W x 4.5' D = 4,500 C.F. x .4 = EST.CAFACITY 1 ,800 CF. \ LOT 14 \ v A A \ EXISTING NOV.12. 2004 H EXISTING LAWN TO BE \ \ \ 5' MANHOLE \ I 1 ND. � � BULKHEAD SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (NEW) PAVED TO `I y i SIGN MATCH EXISTING \ \ O W/PUMP 100 L.F. x I O' W x 4.5' D = 4,500 C.F. x .4 = EST CAPACITY 1 ,800 CF. NOV.02, 2004 EXISTING LAWN -- 5- TOTAL EST.CAFACITY 3,600 CF o EXISTING �' \ SEF.23, 2004 o \ I A SEPTIC i9,S� ►�� ' j \ 4 \ EXISTING \ , TANK \ '� '°\y0 ^ SEP.I4, 2ooa 25 \ 4 g v SEPTICA ',� �'�-pA@ EAST SIDE( EXISTING COMDITIONS ) MON. 4 42 \ \ TANK \\ '\ SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATIONS `�' �y� PARKING: 1 91 5 1 S.F. x . 17 x .G = I ,953 C.F. • MAY 27, 2ooa 5 END. LAWN \ \ BASED\QN AS BUILT 5KETCHES'l` ue,O,P EXISTING HARD SURFACE . 1347 S.F. x . 17 x = 94 C.F. 4\�. \ y o PROVIDED BY PECONIC SURVEYC3k5. \\ LOT 19 TOTAL REQUIRED = 2,407 C.F. y APR. os, 2ooa \ 4O 7 °rn �iPV BULKHEAD SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE FlELD a I m PROVIDE CpNTIN0005 1 50 LF. x I O' W x 4.5' D = G,750 C.F. x .4 = E5T.CAPACITY 2,700 C.F. r FE5.29, 2004 yN 39 \ I \ \ S \ 38 GFRENCH DRAIN WITH \5' A Q < ' \ '\\ NOV.OS, 2003 \ \ G� 1� \ _i' 6" DIA. PERFORATED \ \� 0' 37 I5TING 3G WATER a' -�� PRH�N PIPE AT 3'-0" B LOW GRADE 5ERVIC _� BURIED IN GRA EL. \ ✓ \ NEW ROOF r–N 11"ll 02003 LOT 13 GRAVEL 3 \ \ , i' \ \ 'i' I ,400 S.F. x . 1 7 x 1 = 238 C.F. \ S OON 25 D \ \ ' ' \, \ TOTAL REQUIRED = 238 C.F. ALL RIGHHT5 RESERVED PARKING 34 \ _ \ \ �' PA Z AREA A NEW FRENCH DRAIN � p \ \ POND \ \ THESE 7LAN5 ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF J 33 LONG ,\ \ 400 L.F, x 3' D x .5' W = ,800 C F. x .4 = ESLCAPACTY 720 C.F. SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF O \ 32 J �. i'/ \ • THE CU TD ARCHITECT. INFRINGEMENT5 WILL L \ \ EL .5 2 \ GP EXISTING / / GROSS SQUARE FOOT TOTALS 3 \ — 30 RR1Ie /% GREASE �r�P°% FIRST FLOOR 3923 S.F. Z \\ \ 23 \ �/ w FR.]gESTAURANT 220 / TRAP 0JN" SECOND FLOOR 1 397 5.F. 3'-0" I -6" NEAP l BARGE) V I N - 2g \ \ p\, X00° v TOTAL 5320 S.F. m GRADE G \, 27 \ P gg, o PARKING: CLEAN GRAVEL 26 coN° ��3� , / RESTAURANT 1 19 L EASTS/ 3 = 40 SPACES P \ 25 \ 13 e' -o \ A'I \ i ACCESSORY RETAIL EMPLOYEE: SPACE O \24 Q O 70 VA I EP° V ADDITIONAL FOR RETAIL 2 5FACE5 cnUPC,, RFORATED , ` o � / TOTAL REQUIRED: 43 sPAces23 \ �°�u'\G��'\ __ ___ TOTAL PROVIDED: 44 SPACES PE WRAPPED WITH FILTER CLOT 22 v o \a / 1r rn� (INCL.. 2 ACCESSIBLE) 14 2q \ V21 No OR 9 \,\ `OND ,\ 7� 1 PER 100,5.f. = 53 SPACES \ \ ,V e�cR \ PROVIDED: �.� 40LANDSPACES ,CLIENT/OWNER FRENCH D fZA 1 N BANKED ___- D ETAI L / 4_ - \�GOQ �� 0? ^I THE OLD BARGE M N W N _---- 0� \\ ~ RESTAURANT // ��P No RT. 25 D N.T.S. PIPffR STK \ - FIND. A�, r 50UTHOLD, N.Y. (4K, 0 Q° �� PROJECT TITLE NO ON. SIO i 'v I r - FND �' yy d- L� IS'q I �ti� r_ ADDITION 0,44 0 ok e �'• y65a52 Q� 5T 0 DRAWING TITLE �oG JOSEPH FI5CHETTI p \ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 51TEPLAN 1 725 HOBART RD. 5OUTHOLD , N .Y. 1 1971 1^104 PRINT DATE 5CALE BASED ON SURVEY FOR63 1 –765-2954 ^ I" = 20'-d' \ N THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT p 5 ISSUE K AT AK5HAMOMAQUE xw ae TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOV.12, 2004 W E SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. DRAWING NO, sw se 1000-5C-OG-8.7 "- 1 AUG.OG, 1998 T 5 AREA = 1 .42 13 ACRES LOT COVERAGE I O% LAN DECAPED G% ir,a �, (1 %U(':a � G ZONING DISTRICT MII / A <�5 FIRE DISTRICT 5 _ ' _ "� �9a 5 1 T E P L A N SCHOOL DISTRICT 28 ^" REP NO. SCALE I"= 20'-0" 0217 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 ISSUES/ REVISIONS K1 FMAP - EY P� / 55, NNo 5OUTHOLD, N .Y. U LOT 1 e �' -�� MENS TLFOLE �•� \` O�� G C FPNS/ OULaa3a/ \ SANITARY DE51GN CALCULATION.._ M pN w BOGS pp \ �p. c; �,_. LOT 1 7�� NG DE51GN FLOW • / EAG CAPACITY SANITARY -ITCHEN TOTALS IXI5TING \ \ EACH RESTAURANT 119 SEATS I I 9x 10 GPD= 1 190 19x20 GPD=2380 3570 EAxcrs i� (� Oi" WATER �IYl•'. 2 �� f METER � RETAIL 363 SF x O 03 GPD/SF = I I GPD 'I/A I f P" V (DPY5TOKE) — - UTIL I 1 LOT 16 s� �� P" OPOLE y 3681 GPD y /PECONIC BAY � � EXI5TING LAWN PL ,EXIS ING o; IBU TION • � SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS BASED I 1N FEB.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) LOT 1 5 MON. 14/ ^\ \ -EXISTING \ 2, 2 HA \ _ MANTHOLE \SND EXISTING ` \ �� OCA C1EXISTING SYSTEM DE51GNED 6 FOR 000 GAL A5 PER PLANS BY GREENMAN-PCfER5EN, INC W/PUMP \ DATED JUINE 1981 , AND APPROVED BY 51FFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JULY 01 1 981 ( H,D REF. NO 5-471 LAWN TO BE \ PARKING I \r �y / y SIGN 10\ PAVED TE /^ MATCH EXISTING \ \ RESTAURANT 119 SEASTS ! 3 = 40 SPP CES EXISTING LAWN/L - ACCESSORY RETAIL EMPLOYEE: 15f-ACE 19 g?- \ 0 EX15TING ADDITIONAL FOR RETAIL. - 2 51`aCES ►� C 00 �; r �I AGF - \ SEPTIC \,20 L �� EXI5TING TOTAL PROVIDED 43 _S FACE5 x5 \ TANK TOTAL PROVIDED 44 SPACES LAAO" / ,` Z 9 SEPTIC (INCL.. 2 ACCE_-'91BLE) 25 TANK -I SEPTIC 5Y5TEMI LOCATIONS EXTEND - \ BA5ED ON A5 BUILT SKETCHES • MAY 2 J, 2004 <rN LAWN �'1 \ _ — /A� Ao V ¶'�s, APR. 09, 2004 j " PROVIDED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS GROSS SQUARE FOOT TOTALS A \ -7 FIRST FLOOR. 3923 5 F ! _. i V 38 G) ,6 -NEW SECOND FLOOR _ 1 39 ' 5 F Am FEB z'. 2004 6'D x 10' DIA y - \ TOTAL 532 )5,F. N 3"J 6 6 \� A �, � ORYWELL Nov oe, zoo3 v\ \ 3 /� � i- `s" - PROVIDE- CONTINUOUS q7` EXISTING 37 3A EX TERG i- -�/ rR� --�/ FRENCH DP.AIN WITH LOT 19 GRAVEL 3 j SERVICE i"�r PNs . : o \� 6" DIA PERFORATED \ PM ALL RIG©5 RE5ERVED \ LOT 13 \ 3 Z t- PIPE AT 3'-0" BELOW GRADE , PARKING 3 \ BURIED IN GRAVEL n�, ~ TH25F PLAN5 ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF LOT 12 (SEPARATE TITLE) AREA 33 30 " , DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTYOP / \ \ HARD 5L"FACE COVERAGE G776 S.F. THE ARCHITECT. INFRINGEMENTS WILL (SEPARATE TITLE) Ec V=G7.7r. 5F , 0. 17 x = 1 52 c.F. • 6F PROSECUTED 3 2 P \ ttj. -EXISTING 2-b \ Q\�' "h, GREA5E �N p 1 52 \G' -.2 CF/LF = 6.93 L F. r!, EL4 5 _ �� 'f EP PROVIDE 13) 6' D x 10' DIA. 1)RYWIf UL5 Zg 26 \ TRAP FR.RE5TAURANT ,y \ 'dOOO 2� \ \GP (BARGE ) \ New o �+ 2A Pl, G'D x I O' DIA. 5 y9 DRYINELL o ID � tI,9 x 20 163V 1!n v a\ A� Ao \ E \ g \ \ o c� � 0\'7 1-4 PNOS \ w 2 CIIErIT/ OWNER INN THE OLD BARGE � J�w,wP` M _ � RESTAURANT RT. 25 EASED ON sulRVE FOR ~ 50UTHOLD, N.Y, PIPER. STK �' �� p + i�� THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT � FnID. ' �, ��p,0 //�� / AT AK5HAMONOAQUE rw NEW JL(- / �` TOWN OF 50UTIFOLD f 6'D x 10' DIA. SUFFOLK COUNT)', N.Y L \,\ DRYWELL 1000-56-06-0.7 \� �' O / , AUG 06, 1998 , d�PO i' Off, AREA = 1 42119 ACRE DH 3V� ��/ / N 0LOT COVERAGE 10% ILAW FOP ANVIPERSON,e ci�'S�AT LBgox 'w PROJETITLE \ MON ,FI000i� / u ,ue LANDSCAPED I6% UNLESSACTINOUNDERTNN G'P- W ZONING DI5TRwICT VII DIRECTIONOFALICENSED O '_ FIRE DISTRICT 5 ARCHITECT,TO ALTER ANY * J ry� ADDITION ITEM ON THIS DRAWING IN SCHOOL DISTIRICT 28 ANYWAY.ANVAUTHORIiFD �•"�¢�- 1� ALTERATION MUST BE/ °`f t P� m S200� Ex` 5 NOTED,SEALED,ANI NFN�D DESCRIBED IN ACCORDANCE `NITHTHELAW. V <� ST _ - 11� DRAWING TITLE O �\ \ J05EPI1 F15CHETTI �1 SITE PLAN ` PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER � \ \ SI T E P L A N 1 725 H05ART RD. DATE. B 94 PRINT SCALE SCALE "='zp'-O" 50UTHOLD , N .Y. 11971 � MAY27. 2004 I" = 20'-0" 5 K G3 1 -7G5-2354 b 139MA O04 MAY Z 7 ZU04 DKAWIIIG NO MAY 2 8 2004 D s i \\\ SautlloI Town \\ Plennin BonrA REE 110, \ - --- - - - - -- 0217 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 ISSUES/REVISIONS ,A 07 POWM • FREEZER FREEZER OUTSIDE OVERHANG I Gx23 5=47 EX15TIlIG _ E%15TING ~ FY15TING wl 5„ FOOD PREP AREA o _. . _—._ _- . - A EXISTIIJG � ' EXI5TING - HALF HT WALL I I - _ _ EXIT r I MECHANICAL K I T C H E N _ ISI r 1 wl a MAY 27, 2004 23 @7' UP 9� Fj �y RELOCATED COOKING AREA EXISTRV0 " - �:gµ r DOOR - 5 A R 02004 DOOR ALL RIGHTS RE5ERVED _ THESE PLAJ45 ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF I _ - 5 SEATS bl SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF HANDICAP • ©E PROSECUTED, THE ARCHITECT, INFRINGEMENTS WILL - -. _ � _ IC \ G 1 STALL N - �- L �_ . P.AMP � DfNING F L 0 5 5 Y DN I O c --LOW WALL Y -- MEN d-, 7,_3.. I vow --- 8-4 _ HANDICAP HANDICAP STALL TOILET UP , _ - _ • WOMAN -LOW AW (L � - to, EO ,CEO.- - 5 III I� i II I .- - CLIENT/OWNrK - - -- L------ — - -- /� EXISTING i.� E%15TING EXISTING � '� I -A Ml THE OLD BARGE T 6" -, -= s- -- ---,- ~ RESTAURANT RT. 25 D 50UTI10LD. N.Y. MA11N'IIENTRY ACCE55ORY RETAIL GIFT 5t10P 1 EXISTING V; 3G3 5q.Ft. PROJECT TITLE �ww ADDITION EXISTING EXISTING NG ExIs7 I� C DRAWING TITLE M FIRST FLOOR PLAN PRINT DATE SCALE OLD BARGE * PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR 1 � MAY 27, 2004 I/4" = I'-0" 5CALE: 1/4"=1'O" A 'I Issue M MAY 27, 2004 MAY 2 7 2004 IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE O ARC DRAWING NO LAW FOA ANV PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER TH8 - ¢gyp\oe�pT 1.Bq0�r�� DIRECTION OF A LICENSED 0 2 �� ARCHITECT,TO ALTER ANY REM ON THIS ORA IN IN 1 + ANY W AY.ANY AUTHORIZE0 ALTERATION MUST 8E NOTED,SEALED,ANO DE SCRIBEOINACCORDANCE AODM WITHTHE LAVA REF no 0217 ' � � ; f99UK.4y REVIS10N5 "4 ' I 12 13 I I1 If • I 12._7.. _ 5^a 5,0,1 ..... 16'-u^ _ — 7_6 7-6' M1rr MAY 27, 2004 - i STATION 54'-8" ppg . . ALL RIG RE9ERVE0 `1 r '7F ,�/ / T{YE EI�LAN5AN §, OFFICE r % > sER IL�e AND AA"The MoRgKV,& "� „ ,x' TIME AI�Ch1ITE0i. LNPRINMMENT$WILL ^, .r .. I E aKr '1 * aD I—_KI N it G I i i STORAGE* > i J < •, EO. EO. ILL �."... �, 'ter..,,/��✓ a\j �,.%' 'I ip CUENT/OWNER ON THE OLD DAR'Gff RI!BTAU'RANT 25 �C,oeeK a_D^ 7 6 7,G' 7--G- 7 RT. ) SOUTHOLD', N.Y, 655 s4 Ff. =57 5EAT5 . OBSERVATION DECK T�/jII (NO MATING) - ., rROJEcf TITLE - t '. . ADDITION V MR oRAwiNa TrcLe . SECOND FLOOR,PLAN, I ^ PRINT DATE . 9CAU MAY.27. 2W4 1/4 I -01r 011), BARGE P RQ P .d ,rE D 5 . ECOND F L O O R I96UMAY 29:a" MAY 27 2004 %AM 1Ai-=1JV IT 18 A LAW FORT ANY ,�EpED AqO - DRAWING No'' =)�pl r - r 1 UNLESS ACTING UNDER THEED r ARCHITECT.TO ALTER AN D I 1 '.�` * ♦ r, _ r Ir:,u, Yui ! _ _ �'A i ,. � ,i 1 .' 'i _ i . � .. i I i Yif.n•" , I �5 � '• "' � ,_, n' . ', .. - ' .. ',r . ' � . : „ �.� .�� : � - hr"-,.' AUTNORRE . . , ., ,� � ,. �� �� �� ` /� Li NOTED,SEALED d„1 AND. DESCRIBED IN O WPI �,� dM.�: 1 '., ' .. _, � ,.; .. ,.. ,, " , .: . . � - . ^ •� :WITHTHE LANk' 't r R� 1 e n � I A' n� 4 l ij if kc r mi I 3 4 6 7 8 � 1QI 12 13 14 I IGI - � - � I95UE6(REVIBIPNS ' I I I I I:I I I I rLL _ 17 I I I I r� DA II f4R®DINING RM.- MAY 27, 2004 .. .', - ... ALL RIGHTSRESERVED . W N .L T .� L�.. E V �A T ION I � - � �.:._ � THE ARCHITECT, INFRING�RT�SttT LL SERVICE PIANS ARE AN INSTI{U SERVICE AND ARE TME P OP r.. LNTRh 51DE. - .,'_ SCALE: I/4`=1'O` A3 • 13E PROSECUTED. "LL 4 •'xa INE - _ -_., ..,T.,I '� t �'] _ ,,;.Yw+ �1 y 3 I ` • •. _ ' - - CLIENT/OWNER✓ . , y II II j I THE OLD BARGE RE5TAURANT RT. 25 50UTHOLD, N.Y. I I I i I. r, I III i I I FLL--L J � 1 1 - J . PR0.IECT TITLE ADDITION DRAWING TITLE I ELEvAroNs -, El �7 PRINT DATE SCALE MAY 27, ZgC4 I/R u " ISSUE MAY 27, 2004 MAY, 2 7 2004' DRAWING NO. ITISAVIOLAONOFTHE AR u' LAW FOR ANY PERSON, \g'�EPDI oil UNDER Bqp/Ti�`T ' - - � UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT,TO ALTER ANY _ ITEMONTHIS DRAWING IN ANYWAY. O AT VATIWN q " y - NOTED,SEALED,AND 34% DESCRIBED IN ACCORDANCE OF N SCALE: I/4�I'O^ A '2 WITHTHELAW. 0217 „ y i 12 13 14 15 I 17 r e PLOOR _ I I i l� li 11_t LLr FLR@ENTRY!BAR FLR@DINING RM. -. MAY 27, 2004' , i...:._' - „«_. —.-+. ALL RIB &RESERVED S ,O U-.T- H E L E V AT I U N T CSEP, ANBANLAy1N¢f({MpJ9Op DOCK 510 BCALE: 1/4"=10 A menRtnliEc ARE NrrAtrsd lmsva LL BE rRO5ECUT D. a " - - - - CLIENT/OWNER . r THE Ow BARGE ` "BTAURANT RT. 25 ,I 5OUTHOLD, NY. 1 FLOOR ` i PROJECT TITLE . ADVITION r . Ll I i C DRAWING TITLE III FLR@ENTRY!BAR FLR@DINING RM. l I _—_—_�_ ELEVATION5 �. � u � PRINT onrE BCALE n - , MAY 27, 2004 ISSUArz7, zoo4 MAY 17 Z004 DRAWING NO. . NORTH ELEVATI ON ITISAWOLATIONOFTHE EpEDARO LAW FOR ANY PERSON, I.B it 0 n SCALE: /4^=I'O" A Z UNLESS ACTING UN OFA NDER 4,pp0� �yF �� /'1 J ARCHITECT,TO ALTER ANY . - - _ ITEM ONTHIS DRAWING IN D ' i a ANY WAY.ANY AUTHORIZED C ALTERATION MUST BE NOTED,SEALED,AND 16341 DESCRIBED IN ACCORDANCE OF NE`N I REF NO ' - WITHTHELANL I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I I 12 13 14 15 16 17 155UES/REVISION5 OctKEY MAP N63��' I li I N O?� ' Pp N r• LOT IB 5OUTHOLD, N.Y. �' a �P�N / \ ^I t U� \p CONC,PPJ���N 01LI�I#838 \ SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS �cj'� e OG OF �- - O �teLOT 17 DESIGN FLOW EAC CAPACITY SANITARY KITCHEN TOTAL - t" oaReEXISTING kCH WATER RE5TAURANT 1 19 SEATS 1 19N 10 GPD= 1 190 1 1 9x20 GPD=2380 3570' METER - RETAIL 363 SF.x 0.03 GPD/SF. = I I GPD N/A I i �• UTIL � LOT 16 xS � (DRY STORE) � OPOLE •x % -- ., Q'- 3581 GPD PECONIG BAY - —=-- c ti -_I_._-_�_i / � ` i1S� � EXISTING LAWN �� "— EXIS ING ' 50" �` ) Z .p DIST 15UTION �' L/ SANITARY DE51GN CALCULATIONS BASED ON FEB.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) •LOT' 5 �� n� CdA ER EXISTING 5YSTEM DESIGNED FOR 6,000 GAL, A5 PER PLANS BY GREEN MAN-PETERSEN, INC. DATED JUNIE 198 1 , AND APPROVED BY 5UFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 5ERVICE5, MON. LOT 14 EXI5TING Z Y� —EX15TING JULY OI , 1 981 ( H.D. REF. NO, 5-47). ND EXISTING \ . ' LAWNTOBE MANHOLE / SI r PAVED TO " W/PUMP PARKING: y GN \ O N� •� EXISTING LAWN ?' \ MATCH EXISTING � RESTAURANT 119 SEAST5 / 3 = 40 SPACES EUFFbIy(CAIR✓IIT�MMIhEMMOFHEAL7NEEpyICEg A' ACCE55ORY RETAIL EMPLOYEE: I SPACE H.S.REBNO. C I 0 . 0 y - 0 O / Q —EXISTING ADDITIONAL FOR RETAIL: 2 SPACES 3�•20� \ '`\• Nr �� / EXISTING SEPTIC TOTAL REQUIRED: 435PACE5 SUM onttw lMonnetlon submitted,Rhee been determined that cj SEPTIC ' TANK \ TOTAL PROVIDED: 445PACF5 Y1 p�tor4soldconeIfill �t r upplydfeoliflopuN sewage disposal or 5 / (INCL 2 ACCEb518LE) 2 21K _ 2 FUCfENO - \ , TANK h�t-lP � � 555j MON. ATE LAWN O 8 \ OFFIC OFW EW TER EMENT • FND. SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATIONS - + / \ .� PROVIDEON A5 13UILT D BY PECONIC 51RVEYORS.CHE5GK055 5GLJARE FOOT TOTALS J -�V: ('I- Iu Ne.+� resba•�•e-� ('or .;;.,.kl nyB ro�u�, APR. 09, 2004 �v Qj 5 m FIRST FLOIOR 3923 5.F. ;{- e,F,r„-Er Mo-n III 7.001 SECOND (FLOOR 1397 S.F. PE5.29, 2004 l,a� 3 6 A \ TOTAL 5320 5.F. 6 3 a NOV.05, 2003 o EXISTING 3 � 3A EX15 ING em RAVEL LOT ) 9 � { \ LOT G 13 \ 5 5ERv CE cc)co PARK(NG 32 c` \ ALL RIGHHTT5 RESERVED LOT 12 (5EPARATE TITLE) AREA 33 Nc oNc THESE FLAN5 ARE AN IN5TRUTAENT OF \ (SEPARATE TITLE) \ 3o Z” 3 a•i o N, t1E� Of THEARCHITTECND T.. NRE FRwceMENT5MLL 3 q ' • BE PROSECUTED EL45 2 2- q` %-EXISTING 6 ° 22 GREASE \ 1 \ Z FR.�.ESTAURANT - ;� TRAP \ 3 7 23 ZO 1 0 0 Na5 125• .c �S50 ., ri - N CUEgT/OWNER l LAWFOANYP PERSON, THE OLD BARGE W000 UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE RESTAURANT 1 DIRECTION OF A LICENSED . , ARCHITECT,TO ALTER ANY RT. 25 h• / ITM,ONAy:THIS DRAWING IN ► ♦ 5OUTHOLD, N.Y. PIPER 5TK BASED ON SURVEY FOR c� FND. ' Fy.O A' / THE OLD 5AkGf ZED AT AR5HAMOMAQUE�RESTAURANT ALTERATION M ST SEANYAUTHORI , DOTED,SSEALED, NAC AND TOWN OF 501JTHOUD CORDANCE ^\�� SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. WITH THE LAW. \u` 1000-5G-06-8.7 AUG.06, 1998 N AREA = 1 .4219 ACRES r� LOT COVERAGE tl 0°90PROJECT TITLE N� MON. Q00 // �o :+u II'� LANDSCAPED G% " FND. // / Kaa�'ye. 00(- W ' g� E ZONING DISTRICT MII 0\y�¢kEDAp e Cyxr FIRE 1)15TRICT 5 SCHOOL D15TPJCT 20 ¢ �y ADDITION IS Q� 5/ o , 00•N 1 / 5052 22 E 22 pp I�E 1 a' 56 C I] L '1 5T / OF NE`NyOP•E• E . _ _ 3DRAWING TITLE ,• MAY 18 2004, J05EFH FISCHETTi p•M 51TIr P N Southold hahold iM S 1 T E PLAN PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER �Q 1 725 HOBART RD. ' SCALE: I`= 20'-0� IcPRINT DATE 5CALE 50UTHOLD, N .Y. 1 1971 Eno APR. 09, 2004 5 K G3 1 -7G5-2954 ISSUE APR. 09, 2004 O 1 F NE I W DRAWING NO. ' p\SCry rA••9fF r 9 No S I A 2 ' 0217 10, 12 14 - 155UE5/REV151CN5 cp ©� Zp6?3 O� � �o� cpNcl.eP����j oU ve3� 5ANITARYD.ESIGN CALCULATIONS, LOT 17 • . G . . DE51GN FLOW . EAC • RE5TAURANT SANITARY KITCHEN - TOTAL R,Ayl EACH 1 19 515419 I '19x 10= 1 190 1 19x20=2380 3570 0 UTI L OPOLE LOT IGS SANITARY DE51GN CALCULATIONS BASED ON'FEB.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) L py �� ¢�'� EXISTING LAWN �� EX15 INC - p(YSTING5Y5TEM DESIGNED FOR 6,000 GAL. _ r N?�3\2 DI5T BUTION - - /� LOT 15 �\-'j' C'�; CHA ER PARKING: , " EXISTING Z 'EXISTING MON. LOT 14 LAWN TO Be \ �. MANHOLE \ RESTAURANT 1 1 5EF5T5/ 3 = AOSPACE5 ND. ING j' PAVED TO SIGN \ OI ESS W/PUMP ACCCJRY RETAIL EMPLOYEE: $PACE ` MATCH EXI5TING \ r ADDITIONAL FOR RETAIL: 2 SPACE$ IXI511NG LAWN V TOTAL REQUIRED: 43 SPACES yp AA � `� V0 � - '�SEPTICG � TOTAL PROVIDED: 443PACEE5515L • . N ? EXISTING A ` TANK (INCL.. 2 ACGE5518LE) SEPTIC NOV.05, 2003 TANK o p� 3 A r ALL RIAS RRESERVED �• �1 THE5'E PLAN5 ARE,AN IN5TRUMENT OF. \ 3rd 36 6 A \ LOT 19 SERu CE AND ARE THe PROPERTY of TARCHITECT. INPRINGEMENTS WILL PRS BHEE'FR09ECUTED. EX15TING �� 3A GRAVh11, " FARQNG 35 32 Zg.�, \ �Of AREA 33m. Nc. _ SONG r•-q 130 13 cG 1 >' D • ,r q LZe 3\ EL45' 2' P ©rGP �qe P�_�-' .ekc ,—EXOTING rllwl GREASE 6 - o . FR.RESTAURANT;1, � TRAP 00 N� 1.la BARGE r " eq3, \ 3 9g 2 ZZ Goy / o A , . I S 2 �i � �� Q •• -CLIENT/OWNER LOT 13 \ o g` Noy N2�\y , THE OLD BARGE 's2, RESTAURANT RESTAU RANT \ i �Ty RT. 25, pol SOUTHOLD, N.Y. ,11\ 5 , � ewer` `•A`� 'a' � W�a,RnGr` �• „ ��. BA5ED ON SURVEY FOR PROJECT TITLE - Po A• i / THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT AT ARSHAMOMACQUE �©� /$$/,71i + 35,3 e r.a '9UFf ofSburnoLD '��! ADDITION �p00-5G-0G 8.B t 8.G AUG.OG, 1998 /, l 3635E / . / .$ri' AREA = 1.4438 ACRES TO TIE LINE Y+ ��SGG = 1 9S P '�a' '" N LOT COVERAGE 10% 4 /y, 1 / / DRAWING TITLE _ Nye MON. /� r uw xe LANDSCAPED G% +ofc- �FND. fir „� 00'f- pW_� E ZONING D15TRICT Mil S1 A'`oaan qP, 6y FIRE DISTRICT S 5CHO0L 015TRICT 28 G �r!. Ea f �/ � 11 SITE PLAN 1w - 7 m PRINT DATE SCALE NOV'05. 2003 I"= 20'4" NW.05, 2003 NOV 6 -'2003 . SITPLAN DRAWING NO. E ! ITISAVIOLATIONOPIM SPED ARC 1 5CALE: 1x= 20'-0" UNLMA NY OU DN, tLBRD�r UNLESS A'CTIND U CENO IS DINEDl10Yi OP A LICENW • '. - NEM ON iNq UNWIND d "] ; It - �.•� ANTWAXANMU1110111109 I ALTERATDN MIST 00 NAND DESCSINOD•,INA000NDAII6D NE`N� REF. NO WITHTNELA%% 0217 o / C, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 ISSUES/REV151ON5 1A K v !`w !`m N63 \300E �•I 5 ZS M PD N6 N ZA6�3 / 0 W-44v M P� O OT I8 O �I 0\ co pLxas/ \ SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS Of LOT 17 1••I NG \ DESIGN FLOW • FAC / RESTAURANT SANITARY KITCHEN TOTAL • EACH \ 1 19 SEATS I 19x 10= 1190 1 19x20=2380 3570 UTIL \ pPOLE \ LOT 16 ¢� / SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS BASED ON FE5.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) L EXISTING LAWN Zc 1� \ 0t .� FU(IS ING� EXISTING SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR G,000 GAL. PG DI5T IBUTION Oft / \• LOT 15 'Cid,\ CHA ER \ \ P 44 A \ PARKING: FIND. EXISTPQ ING \ �PLAWN TO AIVED OBE \ Q \ MANHOLE \ RESTAURANT I 19 SEASTS/ 3 = 40 SPACES SIGN A \ W/PUMP ACCESSORY RETAIL EMPLOYEE: I SPACE LOT 14 \ 1 MATCH EXISTING \ O &0\ .L \ ADDITIONAL: 2 SPACES � 11114 EXISTING LAW 39 \ EXISTING TOTAL: 43 SPACES L, 2 \ (INCL.. 2 ACCESSIBLE) ! �. SEIPTICG \ �TANKC \ 30 A TANK ow I) y O ►.l 02003 2 \2 6 m Ty ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LOT 9 THESE PLAN5 ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF r� SERVICE AND ATHE PROPERTY OF x,35 A RE\ \ Iy THE ARCHITECT, INFRINGEMENTS WILL ^� 5E PROSECUTED, A EXISTING FRBW \ GRAVEL \ F \ PARKING coN z5 o• \, \ \ \ 1� AREA (0 7 °Nc c°NG r 2 \ c w EXISTING Zm \ o TE FR-RESTAURANT ZRAP � , ( BARGE ) Npo • AmIk \ N Ey g' CL \0 ONS � b� � \ 23 C \ \ �i % CPEO\ 11� N IJV \ a LOT 13 2 \ � � p c � .�, � •• cuENT/°WNER \� \ 0� 1.aN� \3 ?10 \3. Q x A \ 1Z rr WINTHEOLD BARGE � r RESTAURANT RT. 25 D 611111 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. \ r r \ rr r aWP�F M err rI BASED ON SURVEY FOR lel TITLE THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT AT ARSHAMOMAGUE 1y TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Io �"` 5000-5G-OG-8.5G UFFOLK , ADDITION C 8.G AUG.OG, 1998 �000) rrrr N AREA = 1 .4438 ACRES TO TIE LINE LOT COVERAGE 109 N� MON. r/ /e xw xe LAN DSCAPED G% A DRAWING TITLE FIND. Nor rr \a0G'6 W E ZONING DISTRICT MII FIRE 0p'N`aGO SCHOOL DISTRICT T 28 SITE PLAN r 520o e 5 r "ED PRINT DATE SCALE Il OCT IG, 2003 " = 20'-0" go ISSUE OCT. I G, 2003 Tm 51TEPLAN b DRAWING NO. SCALE: I"= 20'-0" � T FOR CONSTRUCTION ol ON REF, NO. 'sw0217 ill 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 IG 17 ISSUES/ REVISIONS +\l 1A K M FREEZER FREEZER OUT5I DE OVERHANG • I Gx23 5=47 J FX15TING EXI5TING • • / EXISTING Off_ • 1 FOOD PREP AREA EXISTING 0 / yG U15TING HALF HT.WALL Q—_-- _- - — F / EXIT � Poo MECHANICAL K I T C I� E N UP I a G COOKING AREA RELOCATED ►.l EXISTING B p, p DOOR A R o ®20 15 SEATS m ALL RIGHTSRE RESERVED HANDICAP 1 THESE PIANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF p STALL N SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE INFRINGEMENTS WILL BEPROSECED ' F o� RAMP DINING LOBBY DNS OW WALL • PON MEN d�, T-e" \QA Ga S?0„ % 1 ;1 O 8_q ro� ft HANDICAP HANDICAP UP STALL u TOILET E WOMAN r L 3eN L EO. Eq. ® B2 C i 11 ® J EXIT O •• CLIENT/OWNER FX15TING 06� EXISTING EXISTING 708 5%Ft. / 15 5F/5T = 47 SEATS THE OLD BARGE r RESTAURANT RT. 25 D MAIN ENTRY ACCESSORY RETAIL GIFT SHOP UISTING 6111111 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 3G3 961.Ft. No r PROJECT TITLE EX15TING EX15TING EXISTING 1 I N ADDITION r i A � DRAWING TITLE FIRST FLOOR PLAN OLD BARGE PROP05ED FIRST FLOOK13 SCALE: 1/4"=1'0" A 9 ^ PRINTDATE SCALE OCT. 1G. 2003 ISSUE t^tet OCT. I G, 2003 p DRAWING NO. " MMIN RY 1� 1 A NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION awo No REF. NO. 0-4 0217 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 1G 17 ISSUES/ REVISION5 1A 4` K M lan POW • J x h A r 1 I N 23'-g" ►.1 STATION DN 10'-6" 54'-3" ►�\ .0'2003 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OFFICE THIE5E FLAN5 ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF ty THE ARCFIITECT. INFRINGEMENT5 WILL BE PROSECUTED. W � DINING ,a F D� 1A r STORAGES ^I N P MECH. EQUIP, 1'r M EQ. EQ. jLLDN �J �\ • CLIENT/OWNER • ► 1 ~ THE OLD BARGE w ► RESTAURANT oecK ALj RT. 25 D �1 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. ass 5Q.FT. = 575EAT5 r OBSERVATION DECK ( NO SEATING) J PROJECT TITLE ADDITION wI f r� Oak DRAWING TITLE �C SECOND FLOOR PLAN vw rI Ao pow 13 PRINT DATE SCALE =Q 16, 2003 OLD BARGE PKOP05ED SECOND FLOOR ISSUE OCT. 16, 2003 PM SCALE: I/4"=1'C" A2 Lp DRAWING NO. A PRELIMINARY- rrQjj CONSTRUCTIONNo REF. NO, 0217 \3�`E N63 52 N� N -O P ZA6 P\ LOT 18 F O�O M pnENj UTIL.POLIF \ SAGE& OONO PPJP IL#83/ \\ LOT 17 \ \ \ EAC G \ EACH '\ UTIL \ \ LOT 16 \ \ OPOLE a \ EXI5 ING\ N Oog\'20� G DI5T IBUTION \ LOT 15 \\ CHA ER AO \ EXISTING \ MON. v MANHOLE FN D. EXISTING 3g �W/PUMP LOT 14 SIGN O\ EX15TI NG 2NA \ 30 \ 3 7 EXISTINSEPTIC SEPTIC\\ \TANK \ LOT 19 O ?0D TANK 39 2 2� 3A \ / weA 3 EXISTING \ \ GRAVEL \ \ coN \ PARKING \ \ AREA \ \ \ONc \ C EL4. N O Z� �t�E EXI57NG EPS 'w GREASE \. rLC� '35Cn Z� L FR.RESTAURANT ".0N TRAP �0006J NN �3 ( BARGE) Q \9g 2 G°No O A 9 2 \32 �EP m �JL LOT 13 \0 \�c v v 20l y� ��V0 '25 '03-/ 20. e �r, PROP. / 5 / / BASED ON SURVEY POR THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT AT AR5HAMOMAQUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. \�� \E 1 000-5G-OG-8.5 4 8.G AUG.OG, 1998 N AREA = 1 .4435 ACRES TO TIE LINE LOT COVERAGE 100% N6, \ MON. /// *. . LANDSCAPED G% L\ �F WE 20NING DISTRICT MII .� END. � // \n 00 FIRE DISTRICT 5 gni/ V co SCHOOL DISTRICT 28 Fo 655200Q�'OS P120 5EAT-9 ROVIDED 4/2I = 405SA2 HANDICAPBY PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C.SOUTHOLD, N.Y. SITE PLAN SCALE: I°= 20-0^ THE OLD BARGE 09/03/03 MRWEATHER-BROWN DE51GN A550CIATE5,INC. 205 BAY AVENUE P.0.50X 521 GREENPORT, N.Y. 1 1944 G3 1 -477-9752 (Fax) 93 1 -477-0973 \ -t LONG ISLAND SOUND .r 4_1 MAIN ROAD ,s byr r/ pevrgM/ "-' 49 A3 N N. 70'31,2O• E. 0 x , U77L. PALE 0 W-fer � --- -- _%_ _246.73= - - - - Al. 63.13'00' E. —a / - _-` 5.28' SOUTHOLD / ` x x — N exls�ling m sign -"i � r i � - 7 - - \ i•• \ � eas° IRR f, r LeosA ^ I j 1 I Wp LOCATION .. SOUTHOLD BAY KEY MAP scale: 1" = 3000' Cho mbar / / AREA TO7ELA1E= 14219AICRE$ AREA TO E0GEOFAEADONC1826= 1.65 ACRES LOT COVERAGE - TO% LOT 19 o LAMSCAPED - 6% J LOT 14 exissi6 a — - m DISTRICT RICT - M/ EX/STING IT 15 MAW I FZ0IRE DISTRICT. - 5 LOT 1s LOT 17 SCHOOL DISTRICT - 28 G R A N E L •Exisf, LOT 1B \� /a LOT 19 PARKING R P A l F oW//� 120 SEATS / 3 - 40 SPACES I K / N G / l I �-.� h- P �\ PROVIDED 42 INCLUDES 2 HANDICAP SPACES , sr � \ $ANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS A R E A A5 I 1981 DESIGN CRITERIA " N Exra>tq9 \ Coft r0.o• c Talk \ GN FLO W, 0S/seal restaurant 4 50 gad / seal = 6,000 gallons ,yy 1 rav ,f 4 ` FI 5 al Kitchen waste - 4500 gad - \ 'cam % bl Sanitary - I500 gad 2. GREASE TRAP / KITCHEN H 600 gad use 8 foot diameter '•" , I d with 5 fool /IgWd depth caw-, .. p,;l N 3. SEPTIC TANK - KITCHEN nQEe I o 12 foot diameter 6 foot liquid depth- 5075 gal/ons rro• ' SEPTIC TANK - SANITARY ,u. _ - - Use exlsllng sepllc lank 5' v l0' • 4' .. U -- - - - - - -�5� - --- _ -!� 4. LEACHING POOLS �wse m �' 6000 gad • s.L wall area - 2000-s.f. wall are required aEs o TA C/R 1 I AN G In -�-g r rs � � 0 9P /eAecE/ ar 1} a e 2000 / 3/.4 s1 / v! _ 63 7 verNcdl Igof regWred " Usq /O fool diameter 5 tool height v /4 pools = 70 vertical fool applied EDGE OPMEADOW, IN 1.926 . ' '. FROM "LEWIS HOME'S COMPANY' ��• FILED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY NCLERK'S65 OFFICE AS MAP -- ' v - AIM �• _ f�blYheaw� k7 ' scow eLWENa SURVEY pP \ - - --- - I wood eu grAo - -- _ SITFR AN n s THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT �" w .e AT ARSHAMOMAOUE _ _ __.__ , _-- _ TQWA OF SOUTHOLD r,. SUFFOW COUNTY IVY D M C ' �No . � f�btllk head• A-7 � '� - � �\ 3 0 - l raoo �� r Dow, \� v '� ' A ;O+ 1889' OCT 26 2004 e ,�- -„ rw. - UN IS549 P prole.,-drr�rranhro,l Southom mwn _ i/e ,line w4 I SEPT. 8 '�+OQS ( ry J Aprb' F, E004 fral QaQ _ Plennm Boan S. 65'52'00' W . *"° =.�- 50.2 V .-.� �' 9pf2Q20dOrevtslonsl . w %M/LL � , " CREEK .',.aePLrcAN r' 7 ,p,�w t„4 ME G. D. PARTNERSHIP CR. .DE, NS ON " INOTE 68NERKETCH ROAD •DESIGN CAL CULA-TIONS W4E1EwAfK, W. ., /97/1 �B-Y� dQ`,-..H1;FJSCHE'TTI, PE. - _ RObAA l.£V l'1 A 1� N,ES ARE ;WFERBNCy O �j ' , .,2 5R 7 C OAT, K ' LTU lY9! r , N 1/s7/ ; r qq�k—7 Fy Y 118;7 " , r N i y y, 'Jill f. t 7 T 11 +r ~ i Y The economical Berridge Tee-Panel. with its Patented Vinyl Weatherseal Snap-On Seam is one of the most popular Berridge Standing Seam Roof Panels When formed on- site with the SS-14 Portable Roll Former, Tee-Panel has no endlaps. - # 1 '1 , m .*1 r ~ V l+ ~ryd l" ~ ~ !I~ 1 h +t 1 S / ^t` n"- ` .~b f r r. . ~W Page 6 - (Tee-Panel) 07610/BER BERRIDGE STANDARD COLORS f 's 6uyLine"50 gs Berridge Manufacturing Co. STANDARD • w BUCKSKIN PARCHMENT'' r I 11 AGED BRONZE SHASTA WHITE FOREST GREEN PATINA GREEN SIERRA TAN MEDIUM BRONZE UAnf% HEMLOCK GREEN BRISTOL BLUE TERRA-COTTA DARK BRONZE ZINC n1mv HARTFORD GREEN ROYAL BLUE COLONIAL RED COPPER BROWN MATTE BLACK TEAL GREEN BURGUNDY DEEP RED ` METALLIC COLORS* e F7 - r COPPER-COTE'rm CHAMPAGNE LEAD-COTE TM PREWEATHERED Berridge Metallic Colors are premium finishes which require a nominal surchage. GALVALUME® ~ Berridge Satin Finish Galvalume° is pretreated to I% ?b race' = `F remove mill oils, chemicals and residue and coated on the back side to inhibit corrosion. The top side receives a clear plastic strippable film. II SATIN FINISH GALVALUME® OAD Page 5 - (Berridge Standard Colors) ��V, � n Z O�rj Jc.... Z—�1 h — N1S —' w., ZS � 6.,)Ir—cam KEY MAP 50UTHOLD, N.Y. 7PECONIC BAY t12,S ✓ 55B SO RT� MON. PND. 3 4 5 SCALE: FT 0� o GRADE - CLEAN GRAVEL G" PERFORATED PIPE WRAPPED WITH FILTER CLOT FIDE N C I-1 DrAI N DETAIL N.T.S. y N� D� o k EXTEND - LAWN 9 P O MP�N �O O FOGS OP GONG PPJ���N'( 8 9 10 II LOT 13 PIPER STK 0 END. C? \k 12 13 14 15 \3GGp`. L.!/yIVIIY11�1 VLJIVIV l�F1Ll..V4YIIVIVJ a6g 25 I ` DESIGN FLOW � � NS I'CAPACITY SANITARY KITCHEN TOTAL vo REST URANT I 1 9 SEATS 9x 0 GPD= 90 19x20 GPD=2380 3570 LOT 18 UTI L,POLE i7r I \ 4 LIL#838 �' / 1 RETAI 3G3 5F.x 0.03 GPD/SF. = I I GPD WA I I O / I\ G, (DRY TORE) 358 1 GPD 'LOT 17 / \ 51// \� G 8' j ANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS BASED ON FEB.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) i' EXISTING SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR 6,000 GAL. AS PER PLANS BY GKEENMAN-FETEK5EN, INC. EA — 5' 'DATED JUNE 1 981 , AND APPROVED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, I II I I i,JULY 01 , 1981 (M.D. REF. NO. 5-47). GROUND WATER @ ±5.G' EL. \I I \ EACH I IXIS ING', \\ DIST IBUTI ON i \ y' EXISTING ` \ MANHOLE \ \ \W/PUMP V 5 \ IXISTING �' \ V \ SEPTIC EXISTING TANK SEPy TICA ' -7,'4'.\3 \ TANK \\� SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATIONS � 42 \ 8 V 13A5EDyJN AS Bu1LT SKETCHES` I,°p 40 y o PROVIDED BY FECONIC 5UKVEY(k5/ iC�., LOT 19 \ 3,9 II PROVIDE C9NTIN0005 \ �\ 3g �� FRENCH DRAIN WITH \\ ` I G G) iG" DIA, PERFO TED rV V 37 3 WATER -v'' P�gIN PIPE AT 3'-O" BLOW GRADE \ ESTING 5ERVIC V �- ,V BURIED IN GRA \ GRAVEL 35 \ �oN -250 PARKING 34 \ ' , L `\\ IN AREA \ 33 32 3 \ \ 3 eL. 3 2 Q`OF G \ v 0 PN �rtle v� GREASE TRAP FR.RE5TAUR / i \� 28 \ a�P (1 BARGE ) LON 25 \24 \ 23 22 \ spa _ 71 %In c 17 l� \ \ \ 9wLK 5 ' �4 OAk�i O N6. M10N; yJol i \ / F�JD 0o 10 Fy0 � R a� \ \ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WEST SIDE ( EXISTING CONDITIONS) PARKING: 27495 S.F. x. 17 x.G = 2,804 C.F. EXISTING HARD SURFACE : 2945 5.F. x . 17 x 1 = 501 C.F. TOTAL REQUIRED = 3,505 C.F. BULKHEAD 5UB-5URFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (EXISTING) 100 L.F. x I0' W x 4.5 D = 4,500 C.F. x.4 = E5T.CAPACITY 1,500 CF. BULKHEAD 5UB-5URFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (NEW) 100 L.F. x I O' W x 4.5D = 4,500 C.F. x.4 = EST.CAPACITY 1,500 CF. TOTAL E5T.CAPACITY 3,600 CF EAST SIDE ( EXISTING CONDITIONS) PARKING: 19 1 51 5.F. x. 17 x .G = I,953 C.F. EXISTING HARD SURFACE : 1 347 S.F. x. 17 x 1 = 94 C.F TOTAL REQUIRED = 2,407 C.F BULKHEAD SUB -SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD 150 L.F. x I GW x 4.5' D = G,750 C.F. x .4 = E5T.CAPACITY 2,700 C.F. NEW ROOF 1 ,400 S.F. x .17 x I = 238 C.F. TOTAL REQUIRED = 238 C.F. NEW FRENCH DRAIN 400 LF x 3' D x 1.51 W = 1,800 C.F. x.4 = E5T.CAFACITY 720 C.F. GROSS SQUARE FOOT TOTALS FIRST FLOOR 3923 S.F. SECOND FLOOR 1 397 5 F \ N 10% tlw NA r TOTAL EXISTING N\OOO to j^ WATER No r METER U L �. A LOT I G OPOLE \- PARKING: pl `�S \ \ H2O EXISTING LAWN r \ \ N1O\20C ^3 � \ LOT 15 PRINT DATE 1 LOT 14 RESTAURANT 119 SEASTS/ EXISTING A Q ND. IXISTING \ LAWN TO BE \ \\ \ SIGN V PAVED TO �\ I SPO MATCH EXISTING \ EXISTING LAWN ADDITIONAL FOR RETAIL: TOTAL REQUIRED: 2 SPACES 43 SPACES MAY 27, 2004 • APR. 09, 2004 idik r FEII 2004 NOV.05, 2003 I 44 \ LOT 13 PIPER STK 0 END. C? \k 12 13 14 15 \3GGp`. L.!/yIVIIY11�1 VLJIVIV l�F1Ll..V4YIIVIVJ a6g 25 I ` DESIGN FLOW � � NS I'CAPACITY SANITARY KITCHEN TOTAL vo REST URANT I 1 9 SEATS 9x 0 GPD= 90 19x20 GPD=2380 3570 LOT 18 UTI L,POLE i7r I \ 4 LIL#838 �' / 1 RETAI 3G3 5F.x 0.03 GPD/SF. = I I GPD WA I I O / I\ G, (DRY TORE) 358 1 GPD 'LOT 17 / \ 51// \� G 8' j ANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS BASED ON FEB.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) i' EXISTING SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR 6,000 GAL. AS PER PLANS BY GKEENMAN-FETEK5EN, INC. EA — 5' 'DATED JUNE 1 981 , AND APPROVED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, I II I I i,JULY 01 , 1981 (M.D. REF. NO. 5-47). GROUND WATER @ ±5.G' EL. \I I \ EACH I IXIS ING', \\ DIST IBUTI ON i \ y' EXISTING ` \ MANHOLE \ \ \W/PUMP V 5 \ IXISTING �' \ V \ SEPTIC EXISTING TANK SEPy TICA ' -7,'4'.\3 \ TANK \\� SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATIONS � 42 \ 8 V 13A5EDyJN AS Bu1LT SKETCHES` I,°p 40 y o PROVIDED BY FECONIC 5UKVEY(k5/ iC�., LOT 19 \ 3,9 II PROVIDE C9NTIN0005 \ �\ 3g �� FRENCH DRAIN WITH \\ ` I G G) iG" DIA, PERFO TED rV V 37 3 WATER -v'' P�gIN PIPE AT 3'-O" BLOW GRADE \ ESTING 5ERVIC V �- ,V BURIED IN GRA \ GRAVEL 35 \ �oN -250 PARKING 34 \ ' , L `\\ IN AREA \ 33 32 3 \ \ 3 eL. 3 2 Q`OF G \ v 0 PN �rtle v� GREASE TRAP FR.RE5TAUR / i \� 28 \ a�P (1 BARGE ) LON 25 \24 \ 23 22 \ spa _ 71 %In c 17 l� \ \ \ 9wLK 5 ' �4 OAk�i O N6. M10N; yJol i \ / F�JD 0o 10 Fy0 � R a� \ \ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WEST SIDE ( EXISTING CONDITIONS) PARKING: 27495 S.F. x. 17 x.G = 2,804 C.F. EXISTING HARD SURFACE : 2945 5.F. x . 17 x 1 = 501 C.F. TOTAL REQUIRED = 3,505 C.F. BULKHEAD 5UB-5URFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (EXISTING) 100 L.F. x I0' W x 4.5 D = 4,500 C.F. x.4 = E5T.CAPACITY 1,500 CF. BULKHEAD 5UB-5URFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (NEW) 100 L.F. x I O' W x 4.5D = 4,500 C.F. x.4 = EST.CAPACITY 1,500 CF. TOTAL E5T.CAPACITY 3,600 CF EAST SIDE ( EXISTING CONDITIONS) PARKING: 19 1 51 5.F. x. 17 x .G = I,953 C.F. EXISTING HARD SURFACE : 1 347 S.F. x. 17 x 1 = 94 C.F TOTAL REQUIRED = 2,407 C.F BULKHEAD SUB -SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD 150 L.F. x I GW x 4.5' D = G,750 C.F. x .4 = E5T.CAPACITY 2,700 C.F. NEW ROOF 1 ,400 S.F. x .17 x I = 238 C.F. TOTAL REQUIRED = 238 C.F. NEW FRENCH DRAIN 400 LF x 3' D x 1.51 W = 1,800 C.F. x.4 = E5T.CAFACITY 720 C.F. GROSS SQUARE FOOT TOTALS FIRST FLOOR 3923 S.F. SECOND FLOOR 1 397 5 F \ N 10% tlw NA r TOTAL 5.F. N\OOO to j^ til No r 5320 \ �I PARKING: pl SITE PLAN r 31 PRINT DATE 1 RESTAURANT 119 SEASTS/ 3 = 40 SPACES I� A� / ISI �' DRAWING NO. ACCESSORY RETAIL EMPLOYEE. I SPACE \ I SPO JAN.28 2005 NOV. 12, 2004 Nov.02,2004 Ir�,qI ADDITIONAL FOR RETAIL: TOTAL REQUIRED: 2 SPACES 43 SPACES MAY 27, 2004 • APR. 09, 2004 idik r FEII 2004 NOV.05, 2003 I \ A ►tel ©20G3 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TOTAL PROVIDED: 445PACE5 • DE PRO5ECUTEo. ::l _,— -- (INCL_2ACCESSIBLE) OQ \ OR I PER IOO.S. F. = 53 SPACES PROVIDED: 44 SPACES \ 7 9 LAND BANKED \ co coDwP�K W M 03� r BASED ON SURVEY FOR \ N THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT AR5d JS K AT SUFFOLK C O COUNTY, N.YW* TOWN of SOUTHOLD W E SUFFOLK COUNTY, N sw y s� 1000 -5G -OG -8.7 AUG.OG, 1998 5 AREA= .42 19 ACRES LOT COVERAGE 10% LANDSCAPED G% ZONING DISTRICT MII FIRE DISTRICT 5 5 1 T E P L A N SCHOOL DISTRICT 28 SCALE I"= 20'-0" v JOSEPH FI5ChETTI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 1 725 HOBART RD. 5OUTHOLD, N.Y. 1 1971 G3 1-7G5-2954 i 16 17 ISSUES / REVI510N5 SCALE 1 " = 20'-0" s i Net REF. NO. 0217 a J i wj E IN N 0 N 10% tlw PROJECT TITLE r TV r to j^ ADDITION r �I DRAWING TITLE pl SITE PLAN r PRINT DATE pISSUE I� NOV.12, 2004 ISI DRAWING NO. • POO �y JAN.28 2005 NOV. 12, 2004 Nov.02,2004 Ir�,qI 5E7.23, 2004 SEP. 14, 2004 MAY 27, 2004 • APR. 09, 2004 idik r FEII 2004 NOV.05, 2003 A ►tel ©20G3 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE5E PLANS ARE AN IN5TRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. INFRINGEMENT5 WILL • DE PRO5ECUTEo. ::l Z r • il CLIENT/OWNER Iv THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT RT, 25 SOUTHOLD, N,Y. SCALE 1 " = 20'-0" s i Net REF. NO. 0217 a J i wj E IN N 0 rM, PROJECT TITLE r r •, j^ ADDITION DRAWING TITLE SITE PLAN PRINT DATE pISSUE NOV.12, 2004 DRAWING NO. SCALE 1 " = 20'-0" s i Net REF. NO. 0217 a J i wj E IN N 0 2 3 4 1'12 13 14 15 16 17 ISSUES / REVISIONS KEY MAP E S NITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS ^� bit N6�°� '? D SIGN FLOW 1 0 x 0 PD C PACIFY SANITARY KITCHEN TOTAL v RESTAU SOUTIIOLD, M.Y. ° �x� Lor re �v 11 NT '9 SEATS 9x O GPD= 190 9x20 GPD=2380 3570 �) � ���� UTIL.POLE /� i7"' I RETAIL 3 3 SF.x O 03 GPD/SF = GPD N/A O\ O LOI L#838 _ I\ G (DRY ST \/ RE) M CONC -' 3581 GFD E06� OP _ _ 1 SLOT 17 8' Sl NITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS BASED ON FE5.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) • EAC \ 5, EX STING SYSTEM DESIGNED FOR G,000 GAL, AS PER PLANS BEE Y GRNMET AN-FEK5EN, INC. D TED JUNE 1 981 , AND APPROVED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JU Y 01, 1981 ( H.D. REF. NO. 5-47). GROUND WATER @ ±5 G' EL. v 5ARG EX15TING U V x qi WATER 1 EACH METER q" �. UTIL DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS I"I soA1.e� OT G'�VA QFOLE C ° i° q PECONIC BAY' EXISTING LAWN��� �'' i i° o Sao laoo / V^, EXIS ING V I� WEST SIDE (EXISTING CONDITIONS) PARKING: 27495 S.F. = PON FEB, 1 B. zoos 0$ °- „ -1ODIST 15UTION x .17x.6 2,804 C.F. 0E �� � is---T--� 3 ER EXISTING HARD SURFACE 2945 S.F. x .17 x 1 = 501 C.F. • FE2005 B.I �, i N� LOT 15 --?.T/ F - -- TOTAL REQUIRED = 3,505 C.F. / -FD(LOTING � y� l PO ---_ _ � _ i \% LAWN TO BE `. rL _ Yom,, - -- BULKHEAD SUB -SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD (EXISTING) W Z�Z\ ON. 1 EXISTING 5 ' 2 LOT 14 PAAVED TO ° �, E '. 5' A HOE R ING � -N, M N L EXISTING ' 100 L.F. x 10' x 4.5'D = 4,500 C.F. x A = EST.CAFACITY 1,800 CF. BULKHEAD � NOV 2, 2004 MATCH _ TO O V W/PUMP FIELD ) IJO' 555 `. Z \ SIGN O ., OPG NEW SIGN m - 4,500 C F. 4 =AGE 00 L F.x W x 4.5' 1)CE E5T CAPACITY .800 CF. NOV.02, 2004 FX157ING LAWN �PG�a � ' �Q2`'"a 6tp, � FRENCH DRAIN 200 L.F. 2'W 3' D= 1,200CF EST.CAPACITY 480 C.F. -� �O EXISTING x x x.4= � 5EP.23, 2004 1STING SEPTIC / `, TANK TOTAL E5T.CAPACITY 4,080 CF. rpm SEP.14, 2004 g � s PT1cv � EXTEND ,-lx \ 4� 42 \ �VK � A \ SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATIONS EAST SIDE (EXISTING CONDITIONS) • MAY 27, 2ooa LAWN /A A EASE D\AS BUILT SKETCHES _ — 41 PARKING: 19151 S.F. x . 17 x .6 = ,953 C.F. EXISTING HARD SURFACE: 1347 S.F. 17 1 = 94 C F \ APR, 09, 2004 ° _ �' \ Ex15 NG PROVIDED BY PECONIC SURVEYO x . x LOT 9 4O 'f , 5TO DE FEND TOTAL REQUIRED = 2.407 C.F. to D ST 1w 39 1 PROVIDE CpNTIN0005 BULKHEAD SUB -SURFACE DRAINAGE FIELD Ak FED 27. 2004 a 3 6 �E(IS INGI ` 8 j WAT FRENCH DRAIN WITH 150 L.F. x I O' W x 4.5' D = 6,750 C,F. x.4 = E5T.CAPACITY2,700 C.F. "w NOV.C5, 2003 ^ SER CE � � 6" DIA. PERFORATED \ 3% 3� S �v'� fv-5" PIPE AT 3'-O" BELOW GRADE EXISTING BURIED IN GRAVEL. NEW ROOF j, 0 N \ PARKING 3S 34 �' ° 25° �\ � 1,400 S.F. x. 17 x 1 = 238 C.F. \ TOTAL REQUIRED = 238 C.F. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NEW FRENCH DRAIN w Z AREA / `•, �,oN° -' 33 356 L.F. x 3'D x 1.5'W = ,G02 C.F x.4 = E5T.CAPACITY 640 C.F. ~ �� THESE PLANS ARE AN w5TRUMENT OF GONC ro `32 3 TY OF THE ARCHITECTSERVICE AND .I FRINGEMENTHE R5 WILL �� 1q' �� O PROVIDE CONTINUOUS • BE PROSECUTED. e�FTER FRENCH DRAIN 31 EL .5 2���GP �EXsrwG / GROSS SQUARE FOOTTOTALS 30 RT�e - ,( GREASE / TRAP p,0; FIRST FLOOR 3923 S.F. FIRST r-1 A z 29 /���FR.'REBTAURANT zoo N '\ \ \ 8 / "N 00 DECOND FLOOR 1307 S.F. / TOTAL 5320 S.F. g -6" \ P 4 BARGE) i \ N E 2% P i a PARKING: ,y5' PO GRADE ,2S / / 3, c " T i CLEAN GRAVEL G°"' �� ��, / ,� RESTAURANT 1 19 9EAST8 / 3 = 40 SPACES ACCESSORY RETAIL EMPLOYEE: SPACE R e aE 2s m�e \2 to O "N � � ��, \'. � ADDITIONAL FOR RETAIL: 2 SPACES F / EP° � 4 �'� °�� I'(�`� �� Q . � TOTAL REQUIRED: 439PACE5 IA m�6" PERFORATED 23 ___- TOTAL PROVIDED: 44 SPACES PIPE WRAPPED WITH FILTER CLOTH 2 2 ��� ����`��� � � � � � ---- (INCL.. 2 ACCESSIBLE) i �� i / • C ��� V��� 2 . �C��S OR \,13.2' ��•. `,���� A i �'OI • G N�i 201 �� s 1 �' i rL5 I PER 1 00 S.F. = 53 SPACES PROVIDED 44 SPACES r CLIENT /OWNER � ewLK DP AINi ���•�� F RENCH i 9 LAND A BANKED � �� �s ____ _ \� ,y . �� l4 THE OLD BARGE � — O�A�� M DETAIL m� MhW_ — 3 a0 RESTAURANT 60�� 5vG , ,.--- N.T.S. �pY ON RT. 25 50UTHOLD, N.Y. oeP��a� A�, ��, °� vw 41' kOSA RUG05A OO O � PRO JECT TITLE QD n ° Q° ,w ��� ��` T✓ 4A�0 DLCO ADDITION .0 O 1►►����y//yyy DRAWING TITLE JOSEPH FISCHETTI Q 490 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER M SITE PLAN 1725 HC ART RD. SOUTHVLW, N.Y. 1 1071 PRINT DATE SCALE � BASED ON SURVEY FOR G3 1-765-2954 ^ I ^ = zo'-o" N THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT „ AT ARSHAMOMAQUE "'" it "` ISSUE FEB, 18, 2005 TOWN OF 50LJTHOLD W E SUFFOL1000-5K- O-83 N.Y. / se 1000-56-06-8.7 r"I DRAWING NO. sw I `:-:•' AUG.06, 1998 5 AREA = 1.42 19 ACRES LOT COVERAGE I O% LANDSCAPED G% ~ ZONING DISTRICT MII5 200J FIRE D15TRICT 5 S 1 T E P L A N SCHOOL DISTRICT 28 REF. NO, 5CALE: I^= 2G -0I 0217 O P MP�N �O OVID �DG�QF GONG PPJ�M�N� 2p6�3 UTIL.FOLE OLIL#83 / LOT 17 UTI L oPOLE \� x LOT 16 NT L LOT I S A0 MON. \ FIND. EXISTING LOT 14 SIGN 39 a \ v 3b N� 30 37 00 \ Zg 36 \ 2� 2� 35 3� 3 EXISTING � GRAVEL \� , � PARKING AREA 6 � EL4. s � 23 L322 LOT 13 \ \0 2\ \6 EXISTING '\ SEPTIC TANK \ rn m 00' i MON. FIND. oom 56e'?' SITE w \FR.RE5TAURANT ( BARGE) pR.eW MANHOLE W/PUMP 5EPTIC TAN K EX15TING \ GREASE TRAP \ ROPOyEO i wP�r. y GCZ PLAN THE OLD BARGE RE5TAUP kNT SCALE: I"= 20'-0" \ LOT 19 O �N0000VV�r� \ I Q N4 BASED ON SURVEY FOR THE OLD BARGE RE5TAUP kNT AT AR5HAMOMAQUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1000 -5G -OG -8.5 G 8.G AUG.OG, 1998 AREA = 1.4435 ACRES T TIE LINE LOT COVERAGE 10% LANDSCAPED G% ZONING DISTRICT MI[ FIRE DISTRICT 5 SCHOOL DISTRICT 28 PARKING: 120 SEATS / 3 -405 ES PROVIDED 42 INCLUDES HANDIC/ BY FECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. 5OUTHOLD, N.Y. THE OLD BARGE OJ� 09/03/03 FAIRWEATHER-BROWN DESIGN A550CIATE5,INC. 205 SAY AVENUE P.O.SOX 521 GIREENPORT, N.Y. 1 1944 G3 1-477-9752 (Fax) 63 1-477-0973 2 12 13 14 15 16 17 ISSUES / REVISIONS AN 1A Vr 1 N63 h Z6 M LS r u 3-44 �O \ N ZA6 / OT 18 M4 n \ '� O PPJEM�Nj D \ uxes/�O SANITARY E51GN C LCULATION5 awk GQNG FOGS OP \ �1 \ LOT 17 \ G DESIGN FLOWry. \ EACH' �+ \ � RESTAURANT SANITA Y KITCHEN TOTAL • '\\ EACH 1 19 SEATS 1 1 9x 1= 1 100 1 19x20=2380 3570 • '\ U OLE LOT 16 SANITARY DESIGN CALCW TION5 BA5ED ON PE5.03 CRITERIA (ADDENDUM) 20 OPOL y\ \ 2 � EXISTING LAWN \ EXIS INC`, R,PG\ EXISTING SYS EM DESIG, ED FOR 6,000 GAL. r �O° 3\ yc DIST IBUTION \ Crn CHA ER A � LOT J5 � \ MON. EXISTING LAWN TO SE A,\ 9, \ �\ EXISTHI NG OL '\ MANHOLE PARKING: RESTAURANT \ 19 SEAS S / 3 = 40 SPACES ;A END. EXISTING PAVED TO AO W/PUMP ACCE550KY RETAIL EMPLOYEE: I SPACE SIGN \ �� \ O \ LOT 14 ' MATCH EXISTING 1\\ ADDITIONAL: 2 SPACES L TOTAL: EXISTING LA ac) EXISTING IC \ \ 43 SPACES (INCL.. 2 ACCESSIBLE) • EXISTING TA K SEPTIC A, 30 TANK \ r-� / / \ ✓� s \\ \ 02003 n 2 g y O l ALL RIGHTS RESERVED �\ let THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF 3 2V \ OT 9 SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITEQ. INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE PROSECUTED \35 i FRgN \ \ �J EXISTING GRAVEL PARKING \ .� AREA �V \ ^ f �� N L F�E2ER � • �GR \ %.� 3A FR. RE�EASESTAURANT ZZO \ g (BARGE) ?,AS o 99 �, O ^ r \ O 23 coN o a CLIENT / OWNER \ \ - O@ �O \ `� �"� �V LOT 3 2 ��'� [, 0 -OHO • s i \ 2 \ ro1 73 220 ~ z THE OLD BARGE \3 \ \ \'\ b' RESTAURANT \ \A \g \ _- z lui Gy RT. 25 50UTHOLD, N.Y. let r .' r BASED ON SURVEY EOR �4 �4 PROJECT TITLE THE OLD BARGE KE5TAURANTI AT AR5HAMOMAQUE ��\� G? A\�� TOWN OF SOUTHO SUFFOLK COUNTY, D N.Y. r ADDITION q\E N\ 1000-5G-06-8.5 8.G N AUG.06, 1998 AREA = 1,4438 A KE5 TO TI LINE lr�; ^� OQ \ MON � � LOT COVERAGE 1 O LANDSCAPED G% a � ^ DRAWING TITLE �p 4 END. i' / \n 0'E W— E QO ZONING DISTRICT W11 FIRE DISTRICT 5 ^ SCHOOL DISTRICT P5 517E PLAN i' 5z004 Fvo 5 Aft pn E C E V T� 1� D ^ PRINT DATE SCALE D 1 OCT. I G, 2003 1 " = 20'-C'- 0'-0"OCT OCT17 2W3 ISSUE r-, OCT. IG, 2003 SCOU•N Tom DRAWING NO. S I T E P L A N SCALE: I "= 20'-0" LIMIARY si :%QT FOR CONSTRUCTIPON IM REF, NO 0217 1 5 G 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 17 ISSUES / REVISIONS 1 C M FREEZER FREEZER OUTSIDE A OVERHANG I Gv23 • 5=47 EXISTING STING I� 1m1 EX15TING • yy O'N'r • FOOD PREP AREA K p r O EXISTING a EXISTING HALF HT. WALL I EXIT r:l ISI MECHANICAL K I T C H E N RELOCATED EXISTING \� COOKING AREA UP a3tS, • DOOR B A R I \ I ti ~ Y �) HANDICAP S SEATS '_ ` ®2003 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Q STALL T N i THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF Iy THE ARCHITECT, INFRINGEMENTS WILL DE PROSECUTED, 00 2� RAMP L O B B Y PN DINING 1!" r r 6 �' `�o LOW WALL • MEN P6, 7'-8" j SB 5'-0 �D HANDICAP HANDICAP UP i 1� WOMAN STALL TOILET EQ. / \ \ L LOW WA t 4 M i r— EXI5TI NG EXIT 1� 0� EXISTING U15TING • • CLIENT OWNER 3 I I 7 1 z 708 5q. Ft./ 15 5F/5T = 47 SEATS THE OLD BARGE f RESTAURANT RT. 25 MAIN ENTRY ACCESSORY RETAIL GIFT SHOP EXISTING SOUTHOLD, N.Y. I 3G3 Scq.Ft. Askr f PROJECT TITLE EXISTING EX15TING EXISTING ^ r ADDITION ISI DRAWING TITLE FIRST FLOOR PLAN OLD BARGE PROP05ED FI RST FLOOR 1 ;� SCALE I/4"= 110" A 'I ^ PRINT DATE SCALE OCT. I G, 2003 /W= 1'-O" ISSUE r ll OGT. I G, 2003 DRAWING NO, p a 1� 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REF, NO. 0217 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II STATION DN OFFICE �o I / STORAGE 6 J 0 MECH, EQUIP. CL DECK OBSERVATION DECK (NO MATING) OLD BARGE * PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR -- 5CALE: 1/4'= IV" DN 12 13 14 15 D I N I N G J � i ) 555 5Q.FT = 57 5EAT5 , R lo, A rso y F()R CONS RUCTV 1(s 17 ISSUES / REV15ION5 N 1A Aw 1` c r PON M • R1 V� �I �I yy 1�+ 0 r r ®2003 ALL RIGHTS RE5ERVED THESE PLANS ARE AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF ly THE ARCHITECT, INFRINGEMENTS WILL BE PROSECUTED. bit 0 ON) 1A .A M • CLIENT/ OWNER ~ THE OLD BARGE w f RESTAURANT j� RT. 25 �I 50UTHOLD, N.Y. MSI r f PROJECT TITLE r ADDITION �I DRAWING TITLE 5ECOND FLOOR PLAN Aft `r im PA pM PRINT DATE SCALE OCT. I G, 2003 I/4" = I'-0" go ISSUE INON OCT. IG, 2003 DRAWING NO. AAw ~ REF. NO. 0217 K I G E I C 19 n .y , .. i , k. P' y. r„ .r. „- u.I-±:�, -,. .r' ,. '411 x l-1 III . - x ?i'': r I: ! . . � r' 1 4Z ,. .. �tl : �y1?� I T'i �. _ ., ].' f y - :4 I F y ^ , k 111 F. ;y,k { ,.� r n _ v -tiY� 1 'Il` lt, . r, r, �,� r �'4 r.' r - f .69r, k4j ''4d. .1 .,fir.. .. - 1 {j I',, .,r. 'µh {1-I R' .l„ - ' •� :_, y '- ,, r r. , x. .. ,,.Ll'11 I rs���ry I Zvi I 1 ,. +, r' I e. - ; .11 is N , 4 ] 'll' 1, ij �. 1 ''.`J.:'� w J p ' �I 1 r ,,ryry ,. ., - 1 r I 5 ', W �qq �, ` x ,l,l r�lr f .., , - - -r4", i w. mp llt. 'at�1r:;Y:I . ITT IT " 0 A { - y .. - . . wr�r, \3 - 1 .,� ] 1. r3 t -, -,T d t [ 'll .., . , '1 a' S 'p'rn yd�n `rlli . 'M F 1" v S i^t9� I� a,' N d . NI• , -3 'FYI Il _ 1 .. V{ J „ r, V.: a : "' .:, ` : ',) - _ P , -11 jt - ('i _ - ©�„#r..'.7 - 11 ial .Y.1K F h 11 i ,f.r _ (}vi "LOT .' _ r. 1 - I - c. I >r: 1. PI l”1111 vi a,..w : u' ; 'GTi4.RG11.fn-": b'o' 'VV' 'n' w, '.'V' i '" :: t : . 6,151 ;" oPI I- IMly' E Y. a Ir �0. ',' 6©T 17 - �,., LqW _ ��.11 ' it lry v r ��'fsgirri ! Y G OM14 4 F � I "�ry�a' „ ] '� :.' ^, r, w - - ]._ '< ...+ "S I i' ,`d. z �T TPtL E?^: ..e '. ''RC5TkL1 T, '5AN _'Ti? �I-� 7 . , /"�� V r ;N rte,'' Ja, r, "v" ..r '' .. 6' I': I ,. - , �:1 x , 11µ.,h} x' ,," ;,.'' :Ill I 'C.H 1 1;6ilx�' 19Ciy `'I, x =�,3 tl 11 fir'. �:J.:-f, ... .L..n. ",.., v..., . , " 1- ,,, . ,� 4,4 AI" § l yL p. }'L . 1 x r. —I,, 1 :,' .l . ',. :, _� . 11, Tt T Fls xY°. i' A - ,LOT .I I, 1p� : _ .. s . Y TI��a FiWiS F'�,OI�' .Q'3,'�R4TERIA (AiJD N©171v13 ' .', , ' , , I ' ' ', � `' .' ' ,. I L :i' . -,.r; Fs 'SF 'r t .-� . - , „I: , pPOLP F y�\ , .8tiU9h,[aAl±, i e ,°,11 . v . G...., „ •d. ,.r .. 1 r: SNS .- '., .: .: -. .: \ h,n;. ,,, -,1 , v �,�y ,. W 2j418TiNG'1J,�WN+\ .ING ,. I' ti DF'l�d'.'6#�GAC^, -� " , ''� ,,, u.,,, 0MI9 I ,1 „Ii .r,:�. , V" .'/� `i'' A r,,... Icy'"r '4:,; 1,y •..{ Y1';. K" r>„ ;x A`fir , .. DIST 6UTION - n% #, �, �; „ r ena r �' t f� N R S A 11 �(�' /� �\yam i LOT (r y ]4 Y �5 - ai ,"wk F I I Y t A.. k s y ,� 3 ` _ - ., .�i .y {,. ] _� I _ , .... 1�' T�" fib' y I 11 I' L rr A - y \ ' 1 _ wby iia 'a . iJ _ i' .n,'. 1 ' STIN I y (S y.,,Jll. 5 n[. :1 -_ I e.,, M"M' ..! IIA', .. � O A V� 4, f t _�' - ,., t. : " iAtMIJ TO BE \^ MMNHQCE .; &fes. ,AU INS, I1 . V ,F}k.I;�PAW' � r pT`-, 7 :�,4,,I ' NR. i� r h a', ,�,r v IX15TIMG 5IGNw. /d P"AVPq TO n W/f'UMP .._, ACC` `� ;,' Sr .: �. 'll,, pACC' . . S.:' ; :n., : 6+dq;,;ti i. ';i a , -i- „ � I' -� MATCM 1571 P16 i .. "' ''b ,;, " ' � „?.' � �,'".'kl �., NA l , ' ': '' ZXStING LAWN �. ... V .r :� _ , 2 9,..,,.- Pr A,_,,,C � - i ' �y,., �{ k: - . 1. A T�'3,T-qG; k'c£�U A3 9RAC'+ . . , S&'rt,a,;;q;i n< nc":, i .':, .is., ., " n�,. ',, . rkI59IN6 :TCa�CXQ',PR{;7� R: 9 PAM+' .. ! ., ',:. 4 { „" •i. e� ' , ..., „ .,., : ..I � \ � � � � : : � ., �4r I IC ., I . 2 � 9 1 4.�`� , , MY' , , 7 a a .. r '' 2 t � K_' „Xt Ci€93t . ,� oS 1#' 1 � - l N ,,.t� G � A -. - N 5 d$ , k:,� vai, �g'4 „• y . 1., r,v,-$ , -r ,' ,..r -', •V ,, �. ., 1',I N /r TANK P" ,.�.,^ ^`;, I'tr,: ",rf +*�tq !�fII,�l 74k1"''"7.Y.<, , r c .,�x ."..: - . ! 1 , 'bC �, J ., .. S 1 i r . , , ,.tl .3�'�p4 �,, a,li _ .� . w ^�!,' -T N .r' ,Y;� 114. K,. at, Tl. N ' � , ,. I ,. nl tl ab, uk �c! 6 , '; I" 't;` -''�'v, TANK'' - - - +: ,K, J :�4i a r ,, V \ 5 a 4S ; ' t ',+' . - - I , - - ?t'i f. JF,: 'd' 'fin• .�r,. .,; fr `� � Ao , 1 N - - - , ' l;, 'a„ 11,' ,',L. ri .. . — Qt - , Lc, I P O wu1 , e ' Y A } ryy� P - . F,,. ,!V "Y �* 5 in . - . I -. - .}I ^i!"'1'ath 'F'f l , ll^..� St i,'}'+r,'' r A 7 '� �. '► ApRE.., iMD,,,L`'�� kdh' w ,,; ry. 4,' ^ rt +'k -frit 1 �, ', "f1S,X AG' I'(It ' . ., -.fit " - Skj{ . g4 t0i'i I,' _L �xr�N��Nh { ti "fi ,` �^ tvlo, ,'I C U15TING , _ k' �I ll '1' .. - t' n z 7 , C : Y ale ' wy. u. �„ 1,. , :I; ',. GW+V,- t" - 'a.'. - r, „xfu . 11 �rfy r"rAlr''. ,Ix , ,s .:�'r'.lt .l .:ii. 't,, ,„ .." PARKING ., - - t - �, - x ��� as1I rra l O' e , J- c 3, , h .J I , .C� . , -I - 1 3p c 1 ]"1 Y 1 .. ! 1 N 'jf,R ., ., 7 k"bF A .'YI 3 \11 q (� r],, i . - ,, ''a 1 ,I x,11:Jul IV kl I A 4 y�� c 'v\• Y �1 Ill'. iL4 W" . �prdlE, fr, IEf(15TING „ - a,Jlx .," `d'. Y , pG� , fi ,il V nZG' .a '/ , FR.RESYAURANT - _ 'T P -.,� �.:_ r - r, y .'.,.- ' e,� V ,n A 9,@',' � _ I a i Pis F Y,,. ��, .5 •..AV' A%� " , - .�i d '1`',� w, c \\\ \'.\ a .4, 1 \ 3 p� ;\\ eu I 2 ,,h - o :O:'I\ k N - A-O1191T1 vAYral9E 'J'y ',' I a t M - LOT 13 4V , ;, '\\C`, -ro " �,, `\ , i A Y ,, 4,i,`,, j TL �Jr{ eq �'' _ - 1I 11 .� �1 `�.;,�A\.'`'� I, .., IL l' , -1. �v - T]H�6J'IM I/V'l I ,P , ?,I', i''; :�' Vt''3 G: A�.11 I. I. ,,. h' I - A „�"'�rk'1 .r' ,r ' , ' ,�;i�tPRANT 1 "` 4 �' " I \� .G 1, v " II' , 1. :,,�}, 'A �' - . r , ^ i11 fi h , v ` I` r' 2. �RT. 2' `, r , , v;' li �, : A +� v v v ;,. `,', C CGU .Y. 1 �, N „t \5 cr` \ v -i .M # F .8� \ \ �' f', w - �\ V� \ L I e - ] \� V 11 " 1 1 - ^ ,'- 'r - ',A '\ - p. R, A / l I ",li J2 A, - lv} V , 1�A , 1, A + .3 J �iI] .d' ,.' ^ ,LLny ly}3 , ,\ mow., - X t` I a,.. , Ix g1. i {��i, , ;fly k PH1� , r v } ,' JI - , ': 9a , I Ill Ill, F Ir adq �1:1' `i '^, - - .- - •.�— ^, - /, �,.��YR QN.5uRi7' _ I ., : ^ tea^ F .Y :' r�FFziecrr ,,, - 'y ,,: r1, i1 , ; i r' r:; - , r^ „ 'n t .. / : ".'' J)'' >', :, i' i'i t *1'. A^ r T M' UWANT } t; 4, �r , /' r�Y' YtA�AAMIAG! �O I� ,� fl TN � ��� 'M - iPvaF /aig ^'docl/siaQ T.il c �'r,, 4, "' }%EL. , „I 393 x. �L y T.�,. ;1] 2 a + 1 :', i I / yl, :'SUFIS IG1: ,v. ii��f El?fSa 1 v'. { vt� �� a. �b ';6;8" X9''6 ?, - ,�7�.f7.1„ `+ ""a ., .. P e' ,I �' , ,r. ,'. .' � 7 ' - , ?�' ?�' .t, - .,I of �. - i" .� it p9 , , �f9 „r- I 1 U; 'h,".,, .'1'.- - r.. .,r/� 6,p' ,fix,✓•, S" a c , �,r Il y 1A ro' IN>a s o ?o` /.9 8' (I 3''S R .. �, - �.,: A p',' * b 6 a l z - i S' �,r. "4©TCQ#< Gr I - EWRwtN2r, 1 ]� 'I 1 I, .,.i . 3 - . ., ..J ! , , y . w( :, 4} i `xq^. ." fA. C96" ,. _ .wll.rr �� a 'i.a L�-,o '�' 'i _ x11, I;T ,, i '�' MON, . / .����% L%S PE✓2 _ li ,, "I j 'ice"-,. W>'' - ]i 11 .'i �y \q. i 1 Ip1 1.Jr ..i.,?': 'h!�. V'� ' l 5,Gh� l7 �'`C F' �r. :,�%/ J C.� "��. "' ,K t ,1 u',w i :U,':I 7 1 - I I r� , CW' ..l I I _ .� , . o r.' u, :. /, 6 '.: .,� �'� t 11]5 " a d' f , 5 ^ - r� 'I ` , A t. •. - a : - .1 - 11 ISI, a ALAI!' ` "y'{' a 1 i' - '.,. ] 6' n I �' '�� �� , '�., oM� 1 �� p I� n� µ l ,'� y yy���� M„n b `� I ia�r h/�"oIa� z N o,v� s I,ioG� , �, �.� LT -ff �P.LA SI a uw MMATIM, (W TM I ��or „� t, ,, scn�: I z o° MOA�GCTIINouNoortNlt �i ' y DIRApCB��1',TI DROPALICOMP ''+� I .S n 1 I T,h - -,1, �l, fi �AlTp1Al1T _ 1r. ^ ANY. AY IS DRAB 1 * * wl a _�.� y ? _ _ - - ,1 _ �1� � nl . f Ill a. Y r T II�T� Ir 6 •, :' 7�gI1 pN -�.tb v t r - _ - NO1 .8=0. AND �y� . I 5 1 ACCOIDUM- Q2t .. �) f1 :. I i. a ,'i ?i y, , �, , ,. - - i ,. : L2 [LONG ISLAND SOU OLD MAIN ROAD edp o/ an 6S ♦3 I 4, N. 70,31,20- E. 0 POLF 0T�� e° ��- *M Cd UTX. POLE LK M � 838 - - - - _ 246.7j' . 63°13'00 E. 9 racer Y ._ if 4 _ - - — - _ _ _ � �' SOUTHOLO mete. �. I // ------- �-_--a ---- -- 5.28'-- ` of sign SOUTHOLD BAY / y KEY MAP scale: 1" = 30001! m \ – Distribufi4 AREA TO 7ELN1E= 1I219 ACRES a � Chamber• � / <n AREA TO E PW OF AE•ADOYY MW = 185 A S — 7I LOT COVERAGE - 10% 6 LAWSCAPED B% J / ZOAAW DISTRICT - M / LOT 19 a 1 m I [OT 14 ENrnN6 --- I FWE DISTRICT. - 5 Lt� r 15 34PT�7wr� EX/ST/NG [Or 15 SCHOOL DISTRICT - 28 j LOT 17 LOT 18 G R A v EI L 'Exis{f PARKING pgV,l LOT 19 120 SEATS / 3 - 40 SPACES P A R I K / N G / I '�- � a " PROVIDED 42 INCLUDES 2 HANDICAP SPAC S SANITARY DESIGN CALCULATIONS A R E A a15 c` 1981 DESIGN CRITERIA co e 240.c Q•�K \ 1. DESIGN FLOW, 120 seal restaurant 050 gad / seal 6,000 gallons 5 0) Kllchen waste - 4500 glad nE h i b1 Sanitary - 1500 gpd ' % I 2. GREASE TRAP / KITCHEN O I 600 gpd use 8 fool diameter with 5 fool liquid dept ti I _ i 1 3. SEPTIC TANK - KITCHEN rout CI o {J t2 fool ddameler 6 foot liquid depth= 5075 gal/ons SEPTIC TANK - SANITARY 1 Via' / Use exts/leg sepflc lank 5'- IO' = 4' I far• __ _______ - / - s- 4, LEACHING POOLS mw N 6000 god , s.f. wall area - 2000 s.f, wall are requir d p Fa,TAUgANT �' �.y+9 N d0 2000 / 31.4 sfsl /�.7 verlkbl /out required (I " 1SARSE / as TFayo c, Use IO tool diameter 5 loot helghl • 14 pools = 70 v hlIccal foot ppl/eof ' a EDGE OF 'MEADOW IN 1926 - f• N FROM 14EWIS HOMES COMPANY' ~ FILED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY W,aa e,,.,arAo SURVEY & \ " �! /Ib�rheaa�l AT' NO. 535 OFFICE AS MAP - ` - - _ - fu• _ .I wooa ,E,o - SITE PLAN - - _ FOR THE OLD BARGE RESTAURANT 4 w .e 4 l �" CL s AT ARSHAMOMAOUE ; — 3 --- — TOWN �OF SOUTHOLD � ead A.7 - "� ---- 1 >u -- SUFFOLK' COUNTY, N.Y. E C fbelRh s beep \� _ �3 1000 '66 0�8 8:7 T SCAL .` !'_ _ 2Or OCT 6 2004 1[G AUG;. 1988 JL ,KIPE'Sllg,'�003 rbe(/�Jo�n an1rM11 Pial ighzr� Apry 7 2004 frevh/d71rfJ, . . Sep 1. 22 200(rav/sYmnrl f� - - —"J 250.27 ` ~� s.FFL 20, tdoa 0 u - / S. 65'52'00' W. p;oM F64 MILL CREEK. APPLICANT, / w `TrOE C. R. PARTNERSHIP NOTE, /caao r, GKJ 6.1T. SON C r R�. Y ? %9;q )18+7 RNER KETCH ROAD SANITARY,DESIGN ALCULATIDMSL _I� .� N� ,.. _ 4' NEWARKti DELAWARE 197p ew �O$W.WRCHETTI,,PE. 000s flT R AD y' " TYJN,G.Y.'TUA1 } fJiSi; 254 Il I� rrs T NES ARE -NP°,E _ AA 0L7fFU r :,. .__, � -.yi' _,. � ......r.-.._ .. �. .. e - ,- 4E1 YVY .�3L�S.iie.. '. '�_ V..A _ L Lam. I— .i:d.. rL.')v= a o. r_ ,�.�... .�,.L... :a' .. -4.- ...• .. f