The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRAYNOR, HENRY AUGUST ACRESFRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 July 17, 1989 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 Re: August Acres Dear Mr. Raynor: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on June 22, 1989 as follows: WHEREAS the Town Trustees have conducted an on site inspection of the subject property, RESOLVED that the Town Trustees approve the request made by Henry Raynor for a waiver on above mentioned property. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for any other permits which may be required for this project. FAK:jas cc: Bldg. Dept. Board of Appeals file Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees Frank Kujawski, President Southold Town Trustees Main Road Southold, NY 11971 P. O. Drawer A F Jamesport, NY 11~4~ ~ June 12, 1989 RE: August Acres, Section major subdivision Dear Mr. Kujawski: In final review of the above captioned subdivision, I would request a waiver from the permit process from your Board. Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, HR:ml cc: Posillico Frank Kujawski, President Southold Town Trustees Main Road Southold, NY 11971 P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY June 9, 1989 Dear Mr. Kujawski: Pursuant to Monday night's meeting with the Southold Town Planning Board, they have requested a~pection by your Board of the subdivision of<Augus~Section I. This subdivision has been in process since 1975 and we are trying to bring same to a final public hearing. Please advise if at this point your board feels the~e is any need for a permit within the metes and bounds of the subject property. I am forwarding under separate cover from Mr. Possilico a check for $35 to cover the inspection fee. As a great deal of time has elapsed processing, I would greatly appreciate a convenience. with Planning Board reply at your earliest Sincerely, HR:ml CC: FQsillico Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 7, 1989 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: August Acres. SCTM ~1000-54-4-44.2 Dear Mr. ~alrno~: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 5, 1989. WHEREAS. a determination of a Positive Declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) was made by the Planning Board on August 15, 1988 for the application of August Acres; and WHEREAS, the application received preliminary approval prior to the time at which SEQRA was in effect; and WHEREAS, the Town Attorney has advised the Planning Board that the final application of August Acres is not subject to the State Environmental Quality Review Act; Be it therefore, RESOLVED~hat the Southold Town Planning Board rescind the Positive Declaration of August 15, 1989. Ver truly yours,__., ..~ BENNI:;'±'T OtLLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN **CONTINUED** CC: jt Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Environmental Conservation,SB Suffolk County Department of Planning Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Trustees Zonning Board of Appeals Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE 1988 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. Raynor: RE: August Acres SCTM #1000_53.74_44.2 The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 15, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board make a determination that the project may have a significant impact on the environment. Enclosed please find the positive declaration If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. enc: jt V~_y Truly yours BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Board FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: August Acres, Section I Date: August 15, 1988 The State Department of Environmental Conservation has requested additional information pertaining to the Soils on-site, which has not been received. That department also agreed with the Board's initial determination of non-significance. The recommendation of David Emilita of Szepatows~ Associates Inc. is that the proposed action will have~mpact on _t_hi_ ~nvir~o~nme~_n~. ~onsequentl~ he recommends ~ssuance of a positive declaration on the grounds that: 1) mitigation of environmental impacts on the pond must be addressed,~ 2) the site is inadequately drained at presentyand 3) the second phase of the project must be discussed at this time in order to avoid segmentation under SEQRA. Further, Mr. Emilita recommends that an archeological survey also be conducted. SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS August 12, 1988 Melissa Spiro Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: August Acres - Section I Dear Melissa: Enclosed is the completed LEAF, Parts II and III for the above mentioned subdivision, as well as the recommended Positive Declaration. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES, INC. David J.S. ~-milita, AICP Principal Planner dms 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 617.21 Appendix E · State En~'ironmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of intent to Prepare a Draft ElS Determination of Significance SEQR Project Number Date This notice ~s issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmentat Conserv'ation Law, The ~n11~-1-1~3 a mr~w~ Pl ann~ nO ~,'~='~_ , as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: August Acres, SEQR Status: Type I ~ Unlisted ~ Description of Action: Section I A major realty subdivision of 36 lots on 43.062 acres. Location; dnclude street address and the name of themunicipatitycoum~ AIocationmapofappropnate scale is also recommended.) Located at Kerwin Blvd. and Bayshore Rd., Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. See attached location map. SCTM #1000-53-4-44.2 Page 2 SEQR Positive Declaration Reasons Supporting This Determination: See attached Part II and Part III. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Address: Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Telephone Number: 516/765-1938 A Copy of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001 Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be princip~,liy located. Applicant (ff any) Other involved agencies (if any) Board of Trustees Conservation Advisory Council Suffolk County Department of Ecology · 1~.16-2 (2;,q7)--7c 617.21 Ap~,endix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer· Frequent- ly. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of--significance ' The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective da~a anddnformation about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id~ntifi-d a~ .ne*.entia~-laq~e. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: :~] Part 1 ~}{ Part 2 ~-Part 3' Upon review of the information recorded on th~s EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that ' ~ A The prolect will not result in any large and important impact, s) and, therefore., is one which will not have a s~gmhcant impact on the enwronment, therefore a negative declaration will be'prepared. B Although the proiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a sigmflcant effect for this Unhsted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been requ,red. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C The prolect may result in one or more large and important impacts that ma; have a significant impact on thy environment, thereJo'u a positive declaration v. ill be prepated · A Conditioned Negat..e Declaration ~s onl', ~ahd ~or L!ni~sted Actions Major subdivision for Auqust Acres Sou~tho~l._d T_o_wn_~_Pla_n_n_ing Board __ _Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ..... · Pa 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AI~D Tt'~.IR MAGNITUDE - Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question:'Have my responses and determinationJ'bee~ reasonablef The reviewer is not expel:ted to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpb asks that it be-looked at further. , · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold o magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State ant for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. '' · The impacts ~ eacE Project, on ~-ach-site, in each Iocality,'will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustrative anc · have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumJative effects, Instructions (Read carefully)' a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size.of the impact, If impactthreshoJdequalsorexceedsanyexampleprov~ded check column 2. If impact wiJl occur but threshoJd is lower than e~,ample, check column d. If reviewer has doubt about s~ze of the impact then conMder the ,mpact as potentiaJb,, large and proceed to PART 3 e If a potentially larqe ~mpact checked in column 2 can be m~t~:ated b\ chanGe[s) in the prolect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box m column 3. A No response md,cares that such a reductmn ~s not possible Th~s must be explained m Part 3 IMPACT ON LAND feet 1 2 3. Small to Potential 'Can Im9act Ee ,.,Odera~e Large Mitigatea By Impact Impact Project Change - IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) DNO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ~ Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland Other impacts: Direct conn~in~ to tid~_! on Pipes Neck Creek not shown on 4 Will proposed action affect any-non-p~rotected existing or new body of water? ~ - DNO '~'-WES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water pr more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: Pond on Lot No_ 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? i-INO ~YES Examples that would apph,' to column 2 · Proposed Actioh will require a discharge permit · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (proiect} acbon · Proposed Action requires water suppl,, from wells v, ith 8rearer than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system · Proposed ~,ction will adverse'~ affect ground~ater · Liquid effluent wdl be conve¥.-d off the site to facihties v, hich presently do not exist or have inadequ[te capacity · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gailons per day. · Proposed Act,on will requ~r,- the storage oi petroleum or them,ca! products greater than 1.100 gallons ~,'a~or runoff; :NO ~'115 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] i--lyes I-]No I-] [] []Yes []No [] [] i'-IYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] :~Yes []No [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes []No [] Et 5~¥es []No ~ [] []Yes []No [~ [] r'-Iyes []No ~_ [] []Yes [DNo m [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No .~, [] []Yes []~o Z ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may'cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action wilt allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: -Impact on Land N/F Pekunka IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? ~NO C]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ~ - · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ' to industrial use · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species; [~)NO DYES E,amples that would apply to column 2 · Reducbon of one or more spec~s listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site. over or near s~te or found on the site · Removz' of any portion of a critical or significant Wildlife habitat. · Apphcation of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for ~griculturat purposes · Other impacts' %%dl Proposed Act,on substant,a]l; affect non-threatened or non-endangered sp~.c~es~ ~F'~ N O =~YES [~amples that ~,,ould appl,, to column 2 P~oposed Action ~ould ~ubstant~aily interfere ~i~h an~ resident or IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES I 2 3 Smart to Pote~ti~l Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [~ i-) DYes ["]No F-) [] DYes r')No [] I-) DYes r-lNg I-~ [] i-]Yes I-)No ["l [] DYes mi-') No [] [] I-lYes l-lNg [] [-'t I-lYes [-1No [] [] DYes ['-lNg [] [] f-~Yes []No [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []~o [] [] DYes •No [] [] DYes •No ~ ?' ~-~e~ []No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located in an Agricultural District. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping), or createa need for such measures(eg causea farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: i, IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? [~NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B ) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or prolect components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed Jand uses. or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will ehminate or significantly reduce their enioyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource, · Proiect components that will result in the elimination or significant screenmg of 5cemc ,,le~,s known to be important to the area · Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Wilt Proposed Action imp~act any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological ~mportance? ~NO iq, YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring ~,,holi,, or partialiv',~ithin or substantially contiguous to an;' facd~b, or s~te hsted on the State or ,~at~ona] Register of h~storic places · Any ~mpact to an archaeological she or iossd bed located within the prolect s~te · Proposed Action ~.11 occur In an area designated as sensitive ior IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION Examples that ~Ou'.d ,~pDl', tc~ ccl[un'~n 2 ~'~ · Othe~ impacts 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Mederate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I--lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No - [] ~- []-. •Ye~..I--I_N.o_ [] ~ []Yes I[-I No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E~¥es []No ~ L ~e~ ~o I IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems~ - R'INO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration ot present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: ................. iMPACT ON ENERGY 15. will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO DYES Examples that would apply to colu~nn 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ~transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or ,vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~NO DY£S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day) · Proposed Action will produce operating no~se exceeding the local ambient noise levels for no,se outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safet'~ ~NO ~YES Examples that ~o~,ld appls to column 2 · Proposed Action ma'~ cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i e od, peshc~des, chemicals, rad,ahon etc ) iff the event o( acodent or upset conditions, or there ma~t be a chronic Jo~ level gas or other flammable hqu,ds v,,th,n 2.000 tee! o~ a she u,,ed tor the dtsposaJ of soi~d or hazardous · Othr. r ~mpacts: 1 Small to Vloderate Impact [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] 0 [] [] 2 3' Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [] Byes nNo 0 OYes Ohio 0 OYes ONo 0 OYes I--iNo 0 OYes ONo [] OYes J'-JNo O OYes []No [] OYes [] ~Yes ~o O OYes r-l~o [] OYes []~o ~ ~¥es [] r%'es IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? · ~NO DYES E,amples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the proiect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a deman_d for ac~ditional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) important precedent for future proiects. · Proposed Action will set an ment!?h8se TT) · P.roposed Action will create or eliminate emp oy · · Other impacts' I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [-] OYes [-INo [] [] I-lYes [--iNo D [-I DYes I-]No [] [-I [-]Yes ' DN0 [] [] I~Yes i--INo [] I-'1 r-~Yes I--INo g3 [] r-lyes r'lNo l--I [] I-lYes I'-INo [] [] ~"]Yes [-INo 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? [~NO DYES as of July 25, 1988 If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude o! Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one'or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions D,scus.~ the follo~,ng for each impact ident,fled in Column 2 of Part 2 Br,efl~ describe th~' ,mpact 2 Descnbe(dapplicable) ho~ the~mpactcou[dbemlh[ated°rreducedt°asma to moderate impactbyproiectchange{s/ 3 Based on the informabon avadable, dec,de ~f ~t is reasonable to conclude that th. is ~mpact is important. To ansv. er the Question of importance, consider · The probabihtv of the impact occurr~n[; · The durahon of the impact 11 Part III August Acres IMPACT ON LAND: Construction is proposed to continue for more than one year. This can be mitigated by adopting a tighter construction schedule and providing certain environmental controls during construction. There is an existing one-acre pond on the site which is proposed to be used as a drainage area. This can also be mitigated by project change. IMPACT ON WATER: The proposed action will likely cause siltation into an existing body of water, the one-acre pond on Lot No. 1. This can be mitigated by providing erosion control measures and placing the pond in a conservation zone of open space. The proposed action will alter surface water runoff and may cause substantial erosion. Again, this can be mitigated by project change. A direct connection to Pipes Neck Creek is not shown on the plans. It runs from the drainage area and must be evaluated. It is possible that a direct connection continues to Lot No. 1 onto the Sage Property. No correspondence from NYSDEC with respect to a connection to tidal wetlands exists. IMPACT ON DRAINAGE: Several low spots pond during periods of rainfall. The drainage system does not function properly and must be redesigned. Some reconstruction of road and drainage may be necessary. The purpose of the 15' wide easement to land N/F Pekunka needs to be explained and its impact assessed. IMPACT ON GRO~H: Phase II needs to be incorporated avoid segmentation under SEQR. into the plans at this time to L; .',L:.j isLAND soUND Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 7, 1989 August Acres. SCTM ~1000-54-4-44.2 Dear Mr. ~ayno~: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 5, 1989. WHEREAS, a determination of a Positive Decl~ation under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) was made by the Planning Board on August 15, 1988 for the application of August Acres; and WHEREAs, the application received preliminary approval prior to the time at which SEQRA was in effect; and WHEREAS, the Town Attorney has advised the Planning Board that the final application of August Acres is not subject to the State Environmental Quality Review Act; Be it therefore, RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board rescind the Positive Declaration of Augus{ 15, 1988 ruly yours CHAIRMAN **CONTINUED** CC: jt Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Environmental Conservation,$B Suffolk County Department of Planning Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Trustees Zonning Board of Appeals Planning Board