Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFraneker Investments, Inc . . James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 11, 2008 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959-0447 RE: FRANEKER INVESTMENTS, INC. PRIVATE RD., FISHERS ISLAND SCTM#3-1-3.3 Dear Mr. Just: The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the site plan prepared by Richard H. Strouse last dated March 4, 2008 and determined the proposed construction of a 15.58' X 16' addition onto an existing garden shed, construction of approx. 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area to be out of the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 275 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 111 of the Town Code. Therefore, in accordance with the current Wetlands Code (Chapter 275) and the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (Chapter 111) no permit is required. Please be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the tidal and/or freshwater wetlands jurisdictional boundary or seaward of the coastal erosion hazard area as indicated above, or within 100' landward from the top of the bluff, without further authorization from the Southold Town Board of Trustees pursuant to Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code. It is your responsibility to ensure that all necessary precautions are taken to prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation within Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction and Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, which may result from your project. Such precautions may include maintaining adequate work area between the tidal wetland jurisdictional boundary and the coastal erosion hazard area and your project or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hay bale berm. This determination is not a determination from any other agency. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. . . 2 Sincere(t ... Jamet~g, ::i:t Board of Trustees JFK:lms TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES MAIN ROAD SOUTHOlD, NY 11971 PAY . 6~~~~OF~Ut u:fv ('<0U!.Rnb ~ ~ f')~d. a rvi.- COjIex)--- ~ NORSTAR BANK 51300 Main Road, Southhold, NY 11971 1387 i 0n.OIlt" h ""> 50-4461214 I 1~ . II I $dCO,oo Ii DOLLARS il I FOR ( ~ II nd II! () q:>- , .. . v 11"00 ~ 38 711"'" 1:0 2 ~ 1,0 I, I, b 51: diUADn "7n. ~ 11"7 ~ ~"'oo 230311" . . ,"" " \. t. Franeker Investments, Inc App Ican . . te road Fishers Island pnva , ~:gJ'..~ i,.. " . '~~~>:.;T-"t? cl' Photographed 29 Jan '08 IJ30Hrs ;' ~ . Warren Van Deventer 37 little Fox Lane Weston, cr 06883 (203) 226-5824 r-" r',,:' j~" \ 1'" " . t.~_J \ I \ \ I ........ ,'I :. it' 1\, \,.-...'" I \ -1 Mr. James King, President Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Ie n \\1) i~i~~1 IE \~ ~ U \i} \ \, L) / r-~" '\Ir'~i\ 'I \ 1.,1 \ L_-._..,c'~;,." Sr'.' , i-:~,cJ .'," L P~:'_'_~~_~'C, --'- o - 0 November 7, 2007 Re: Franeker Investments, Inc.lJudith Corrente Addition to Garden Shed, Fishers Island, NY SCTM# 1000-3-1-3.3 Dear Mr. King and Members of the Board: On November 5th, I received a copy of the attached notice that Franeker Investments, Inc., and Judith Corrente are applying for a permit for a proposed addition to an existing garden shed on their property on Fishers Island. The permit application will be open for public comment on November 14th. The proposed addition includes a 15.58 foot by 16 foot addition to the shed, the construction of approximately 30 feet of retaining wall, a pervious stone parking area, and roof gutters and a drywelL I own the adjacent lot (#25-11) to the west of their property, and I am writing to request that no permit be granted for any addition or expansion to the present structure, since it will allow for more equipment to be brought into this residential area, creating more traffic and noise. Since this property was acquired several years ago, the owners have cut down an area of brush and undergrowth which, for years, had served as a habitat for animals and a buffer zone between our two properties. They then erected the present structure without notifYing me. What is quaintly referred to as a "garden shed" has become, in fact, a maintenance facility for the entire estate, with more than one person working there each day. As you will see from the site plan, the proposed addition will almost double the size of the present structure in close proximity to the property line. This building serves a large estate with a large area oflawn and gardens, which require much maintenance. The constant noise generated by this facility is disturbing. Most weekday mornings at 8 a.m. the noise begins as the workmen start up the lawn maintenance equipment, and neighbors hear noise from a lawn tractor, lawn mowers, weeder/trimmers, leaf blowers, and an occasional chain saw, back hoe and other power equipment. When the machinery is not running, we also can hear noise from truck engines, the conversations of the workmen and, occasionally, a radio. My requests to the ~ . workmen to lessen the noise have been ignored. This has got to stop, and the activities of the present shed should be moved further away from our property line. My family and I come to Fishers to enjoy the peace and quiet it affords. In order to help defray the high costs ofliving there, I have had to rent out the house for a few weeks during the summer, and the tenants have complained to me about all of the noise from this shed. It just seems to get worse each year, and we feel nothing is being done about it. Any further additions will only make matters worse, so I must object to this project for several reasons: It would be another step in changing the peaceful nature of this residential neighborhood. It would become a garage or storage area for all of the maintenance equipment on the property, and would allow for more equipment to be parked in the area. Work starts early in the morning, and neighbors are subjected to the noise. This is especially annoying during the summer months when people have their windows open. The activity disrupts the peace and tranquility of the area. During the last few years, there has been constant construction and traffic from renovations being made to the main house, grounds, and an adjacent residence which once was a windmill used to pump water for the property. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. Obviously, I dislike having to write a letter like this, but feel there is no other recourse. Please do not grant a permit for any further construction on the property, as it will only lead to more noise from all of the equipment. If you have any questions, please call me at the telephone number above, as I'd welcome an opportunity to speak with you directly. Sincerely yours, tf;;{t~ Id~~~ Att. . . . NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Franeker Investments, Inc .c/o Judith Corrente SCTM# 1000-3-1-3.3 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the ~oaf(l. of Trustees w: construct a 15.58'x 16' add1tion onto an eX1st1ng garden shed, construct approx. 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area. A continuous line of staked hay bales with silt fencing shall be installed to establish the limits of grading, clearing and ground disturbance. Roof gutters and dr~ells shall be installed to collect rainwater. 2. -Inat the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: Private road, no #, Fishers Island 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, and/or 97 of the Town Code is open w public comment on: I! I flI-!07. . You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing: The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of South old and docs not referenct: any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME:Franeker Investments Inc. MAlLlNGADDRESS: c/o JMO Environmental Consulting PO Box 44~Ouoque, NY 11959 PHONE #:.~ -653-0607 Enc: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. . . Donald Wilder, Chairman Lauren Standish, Secretary Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., November 7,2007, the following recommendation was made: FRANEKER INVESTMENTS, INC. to construct a 15.58'X 16' addition onto an existing garden shed, to construct approx. 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area. Located: Private Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#3-1-3.3 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. \ . James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. .. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (6:31) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work session Report Date/Time: FRANEKER INVESTMENTS, INC. requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 15.58'X 16' addition onto an existing garden shed, to construct approx. 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area. Private Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#3-1-3.3 II. \ (?O'J ~A\!)<1S" Type of area to be impact~: Y L/ ' /::h s heP f _Saltwater Wetland LFreshwater Wetland _Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of above: Pay! of Town Code proposed work falls under: ~Chapt.275 _Chapt. Ill_other Type of Application: v Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment _Administrative _Emergency _Pre-Submission _Violation _Planning Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: _J.King _J.Doherty _P,Dickerson _D. Bergen_ B. Ghosio, Jr _H. Cusack_D. Dzenkowski _Mark Terry_oilier Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Environmental Review (J., l\G Mlvcl",,, '<. TN [,<tftl"", }) 10\ 1'(\ 'W ~ -I'M ~1/o8 J. )4.rJ?- /'-(/J'~.?~() ~pp C - 7w wP/.4r#l) iJpc. {;;.IIL-'- Pi} ",zt:C;-VI.-o"1-itf. vP~t s/t.{I'ft '- . . Franeker Investments, Inc. Private road, no # Fishers Island tJ .r.-<;. \Ol.t-' ~ ~ "f=\~~.Q~1~~ , ~~l~'- / <l>' ,...<:,~ <;'V 1S\cxk .."I$tawi ~ roue,. 0... 0.4 0.2 - S1reets98 Copyright 0 1988-1997, MIcrosOft Corporalion ardOr its auppIiEn. All ~ RI88tY8d. PIe8se visit our web . at htIp'.IImIIps.expedia.com. 0.8 0.8 -' ---1 -N I ,I SOUND - ISI)JW " .."", rlSHERS dY' . .'/ ""'f'C-_"" ""'-05-00'.10 f- ,- . l ~_,,~~'u E "".,' .... ~ ......_,.-,~ N '~--'-, o ,.,,"~ + 1211 o NOTU (i) COLl'HY OF SUFFOLK CD ~ Red Property 1m $ervice Ager.cy .. CoontjContor RiY"-ho<Jd,NY11lil . . '" ,""'. ~E"', ~ iW" Y ,.,. m '" "' AI"" '"' '" " SOUTHOLD SECTION ~O ".. OH."------'--- ...."..'""."-TER.n::..""'" ~>T'.'U1"" '" >fir 'OIlT<" " T,", "''''-,'''-",T' ",..'0 ,,,(..,",, "MuT.e""".,""""""'''- "... "'0"'''' '" """" .",~. 003 ""u~ ".l ".,"' "." ,-,,. ".1'''' _.n "'TlE'" 1000 PllQPERTY...W ':;""""'''-L_.''.'''' - ~ , !"'.i5iel!j --..... --, . . j.M.O. Environmental Consulting Services March 7, 2008 Mr. James King, President Board of Town Trustees Town Of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971-1179 Re: Application for Franeker Investments, Inc. Private road, no # Road, Fishers Island S.C.T.M.No.1000-003-1-3.3 Dear Mr. King: I am presently writing you as a follow up to the site inspection that you had performed at this site on 1/29/08 as well as the discussion that I had with the Board at the last Trustees meeting. As you may recall when on site with the staff ofthe N. Y.S.D.E.C.'s Freshwater Wetlands Unit it was discussed that the area of vegetation that I had flagged as freshwater wetlands was actually not wetlands. Since that time the Board has also asked how much fill would be needed for the construction of the proposed retaining wall. I have discussed this matter with the project's surveyor and he feels that with the regrading of the area there shall be approximately 26 cy of extra fill that shall be removed from the site. For your and the Board's review I have enclosed 3 copies of the revised plans which have been prepared by CME Associates (last dated 3/04/08) which have been revised to depict that drywells shall be installed to capture roof runoff and that a continuous line of silt fencing and staked hay bales shall be installed and maintained throughout construction. The area of wetlands that were originally depicted on the plans has now been deleted. Should you or members of the Board of Trustees have further comments or questions regarding this project please feel free to contact our office at any time. Phone (631) 653-0607 . Fax (631) 653-3348 121 Jessup Ave. 2nd Floor. P.O. Box 447 Quogue, New York 11959-0447 ... ~ . OFFICE WCATION: Tawn Hall Annex 54375 State Raute 25 (car. Main Rd. & Yaungs Ave.) Sauthald, NY ~~~ @ ~.~:\' + +J cP "c ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~$I MAIliNG ADDRESS: P.O. Bax 1179 Southald, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR TOWN OF SOUTH OLD MEMORANDUM !;.:~'\ I'~ (i'l 1;1 JI S l0 ,)[,),',_. i[.,. ,\1 I.i' I' L.._."... [E JJL!J~\ 1 " 1 : I j I,L! -~_.J s 'J ~ : ' ; ; ,~, : -I T C' ',V i~(,: ':1 [! ~ !JL'~1~(,S -..-....-. ....-------.---- - 9 To: James King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner ~ L WRP Coordinator : .1 Date: November 9, 2007 Re: Request for Wetland Permit for FRANEKER INVESTMENTS, INC. SCTM# 3~1~3.3 FRANEKER INVESTMENTS, INC. requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 15.58'X 16' addition onto an existing garden shed, to construct approx. 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area. Private Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#3-1~3.3 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review ofthe Town of South old Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (L WRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the L WRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the L WRP. Policy 6 Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction . tt . 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The distance from the proposed addition to the freshwater wetland line is 44 feet; the distance from the proposed drivewav to the freshwater wetland is 20 feet; a minimum setback distance of 50 feet from the wetland boundarv is required pursuant to Chapter 275-3.Findinl!s; purpose; iurisdiction; setbacks and 275-5. B (2) e. Please require that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policy to the l!reatest extent practical. If the action is approved and to further Policy 5: Protect and Improve Water quality in the Town of South old: 1. Require a 30 foot nonturf. native vel!etation buffer landward of the freshwater wetland. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. MT/hkc . . Office Use 0IIIy _Coastal Erosion Permit Application /Wetland Permit Application _ Administrative Permit AmendmentffrllDllfer~tension _Received Application: lor (n 0) ....::::Received Fee:$ a ~ .... ~letedApplication~ _Incomplete _SEQRA CIassification: Type I_Type II_Unlisted_ _Coordination:(date __ ~C Referral Sent: I ~Date of Inspection: _Receipt ofCAC Report: _Lead Agency Detennination:_ Technical Review: ..Pnblic HearingHe~ Resolution: - L 1..ul2.-f ..--- ~[E~lE~DU~ o OCT i ' "'J7 I {",. j;':;\ '1 'i , , l,l i~ SOllthold Town Board of Trustees Name of Applicant Franeker Investments. Inc Address r-./n .Tnn; t-h Ann ("nrronf-Q 'D Q J.:lQ'V 2S5 . Fishers Island NY Phone Number:( ) c/0203-966-5552 06390 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 1000-003-1-3.3 Property Location: Private road, no # Fi!=;hPT!=l: Tsl~nn (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Glenn E. Just/JMO Environmental Consulting (If applicable) Address: P.O. Box 447, Quogue, NY 11959-0447 Phone: 653-0607 [I}f'lfr S)P ~\~ IQ~ r - . Board of . Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): 1.97 acres Area Zoning: R-120 Previous use of property: sin\j"le fami 1 y dwp 11 i ng Intended use of property: same Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Dock Agency Date Southold Town Trustees 6/01 6/01 NYSDEC _ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? -----*- No_ Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments ifnecessary): Applicant proposes to ~nn~~rl1~~ ~ 1~ ~R' v 1~' ~~~f~inn nn~o an ~vistin~ garden shed, to construct approx. 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area. A continuous line of staked hay bales with silt fencing shall be installed to A,:;t';=Ihli!=:h t'hp limit-c:: nf qr;::aning. ~lo;::aring ::linn grnnnd disturbance. Roof gutters and drywells shall be installed to collect rainwater. lard of Trustees AppliCatiolt WETLANDffRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Addition to existing garden shed Area ofwetIands on lot: +700 square feet Percent coverage oflot: n/ a % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 55 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetIands: "" feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? o cubic yards How much material will be filled? o cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: o feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: 1 : 1 Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Regrading using bobcat or small pay loader Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetIands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): By in ~ '~orating roof gutters, drywells and erosion control measures, there should be no negative impacts associated with the project. tlrd of Trustees Appl.icatiO. COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: 1lt'lt'li1-in"" 1-n "" ..,vi,,1-i"g 'J<lrt'l..,n shed Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? 0 (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? o (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Regrading with bobcat or small payloader Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments ifnecessary) By incorporating roof gutters, drywells and erosion ,..nnrrnl m~;:ai::llrp~. t-hPTP ~hnnln hp no npg;:at-i"p imp;::III....t-~ n~~n,..i;:at-pn wit-h t-hp prnjp,..t- 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only . . PART I . PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by A ,plicant or Proiect Soonsorl 1. APPliCANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Franeker Investments, Inc. c/o Judith Ann Corrente Proposed shed addition, retaining walls, pervious drive 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Fishers Island County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections. prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) private road, no #, Fishers Island, Town of Southold S.C.T.M.No. 1000-003-1-3.3 Location map and survey enclosed 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: ~New o Expansion o Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFL V: Applicant proposes to construct a 15.58'x 16' addition onto an existing garden shed, to construct approx. 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area. A continuous line of staked hay hales with silt fencing shall be installed to establish the limits of grading, clearing and ground disturbance. Roof gutters and drywells shall be installed to collect rainwater. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: In"ially 0 acres Ultimately 0 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPL V WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 0ves DNa If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~ Residential D Industrial D Commercial D Agriculture o Par1<lFaresUOpen Space o Other Describe: single family dwelling 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING. NOW OR UL TIMATEL V FROM ANV OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCV (FEOERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? o Yes D No If Yes, Itst agency(s} name and permit/approvals: Southald Town Trustees 11. DOES ANV ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTL V VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Dves 0Na If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit/approvals: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? DVes 0Na I CERTIFY THAT THE lNFO~ ATIOJrOVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MV KNOWLEDGE ~ /. _ ApplicanUsponsar name: Glenn E. J~ as /g nt Date: (() CD ) 1- Signature: /V Ifthe action is in ttkCo;urta1 Area, and you are a state aRency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with t is assessment OVER 1 Reset . Board of Trustees . Application AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) I, j...l,.\-\.,.A.", 6<<",,,k.... (print owner of property) residing at 7.0 ],<>~ 25:>- (mailing address) h!" ~~ Ts. \ o--d IV ~i do hereby authorize Glenn E. Just ( Agent) J.M.O. Environmental Cons. toapplyforpermit(s)fromthe Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. ~j~ 'M.uN- ( Owner's signature) -.......... . . CQ'r ..vd-e- .... - - -- U.S Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (DomestIc Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE r-' ~ ~ I. I U S Postal ServIce CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mad Only No Ins urance Coverage ProVided) A :r n.J n.J U1 Postage $ Return Receipt Fee D (Endorsement Required) .-'l D Restricted Delivery Fee o (Endorsement Required) t::J Total Postage & Fees $ n.J n.J rn [J""" [J""" o l'- $ . .-'l Postage $ '. U1 '\ U1 ~, \ , U1 Certified Fee NOv .postmark Return Receipt Fee - ) lfK!o 0 '1><r&"" .-'l (Endorsement Required) 0 Restricted Delivery Fee 11/02/2007 0 (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $5. 11/02/2007 .-'l U1 U1 U1 Certified Fee STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK GI~L~ ,residingat III ~ssYJ2Ave ,2nd F"I. to u.e.. n. . , being duly sworn, deposes Jnd says that on the ~,~ day of l)e"'^~, 200:1', deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of e Town of South old; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at , that said Notices er iled to each f said persons by (certified) (registered) ; / - - . Sworn to befo Day of / '/ y JNlET M. TOOKER _... NolaIyIj~oINew .... o 1905 Qual ~. kCounly 2OJ')a QImmlssian November 13. u.l . . . .. . U.S Postal ServIce CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only No Insurance Coverage Provided) PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE lED MAIL RECEIPTS .-'l m nJ U1 .-'l U1 U1 U1 Address: Postage $ Certified Fee $2.65 $2.15 $0.00 $5.94 o;!-",,," postm~; NO\' - 2 \!MJ : Return Receipt Fee o (Endorsement Required) .-'l D CJ Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ 11/0212007 D nJ nJ m IT" IT" D ['- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK GIe.n()L ,residing at III "iissuoAve ,2nd FJ. u.e.. n. . being duly sworn, deposes-~~ys that on the ~h- day of '2001, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set fortli m the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of e Town of Southold; that said NOtIft' ces . ere mailed at the United States Post Office at that said Notices mailed~ eacD said persons by (certified) (registered) "l. I "-- JANET M. TOOKER NolaIY Public, State of New YorIl No DlT05951905 Qualit,,'d In Suffalk CountY r1X. c:.mIssion b~".s ~ 13. 2O~r '. . . Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except mi1/Or exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministeriol permits 1/Ot located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coasta1 area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determiuation that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the L WRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the L WRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's websi~ (so~ldtown.northfork.net), the Board ofTrusteef~~ ~~ Rj;im!ii~~;lt, all locallibranes and the Town Clerk's office. ! : r . .-- .' '. ,:! B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACfION SCTM# 1000 _ 003 1 3.3 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board G Planning Dept. G Building Dept. G Board ofTrustees [j 1. Category of Town of South old agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) G G (h) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: [j Nature and extent of action: Applicant propos~- ~- ----truct a 15.58'x16' addition onto an existing garden shed, to construct approx. 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area. A continuous line of staked hay bales with silt fencing shall be installed to establish the limit-~ nf qrrlninq, ~lp.;::Irinq ;::Inn Qrnllnn di~""llrhnn~~ Roof autters and drywells shall be installed to collect rainwater. . . Locationofwctmn: private road, no #, Fishers Island Site acreage: 1. 97 Present land use: single family dwelling Present zoning classification: R-120 2. If an application for the proposed action bas been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Nameofapplicant: Franeker Investments, Inc. c/o Judith Ann Corrente (b) Mailing address: P.O. Box 285. Fishers Island. NY 06390 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) c/o JMO Consulting @ 653-0607 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes W"'" No 0 If yes, which state or federal agency? IV~ ~[ \'J) IE r:. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See L WRP Section 111- Policies; Page 2 for evaluation crit?" GJYes 0 No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary PO~iCY 2 Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. L ection III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes G No 0 Not Applicable See . . Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See L WRP )ection III- Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria [J3/ Yes ca No ca Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See L WRP SectiOlyn - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~ .. Yes ca No ca Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water qnality and supply in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Poli7es Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria C2r Yes ca No ca Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 throug~ 32 for evaluation criteria. I [3' Yes ca No ca Not Applicable . . Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for e!=lluation criteria. j G Yes G No UElNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy lJ. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous subs~ces and wastes. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. j}fVes 0 No G Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Jouthold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. /' G yeL] No~'otAPPlicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitafe locatiODS. See LWRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 47 through S6 for evaluation criteria. ~Yes 0 No G Not Applicable .. '. .. . . Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy. 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic EstufY and Town waters. See L WRP Section ill - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. G' Yes D No Cd Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricuIturallands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section 111 - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evalrtion criteria. Cd Yes D No[(i;VNotAPPlicable Attach additional sheets if necessary / Policy 13. Promote ";propriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See L WRP Section 111 - Policies; 1'ages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Cd Yes D No [tJI Not Applicable 'I Created on 5/25105 11:20 AM 'c . . Applicant: Franeker Investments, Inc. c/o Judith Ann Corrente Location: Private road, no #, Fishers Island S.C.T.M.No.1000-0003-1-3.3 Applicant proposes to construct a 15.58' x 16' addition onto an existing garden shed, 44' from the Freshwater Wetlands Line. To construct::t 30' of retaining walls and a stone (pervious) parking area. A continuous line of staked hay bales with silt fencing shall be installed to establish the limits of grading, clearing and ground disturbance. Roof gutters leading to drywells shall be installed to collect rainwater. All work according to plans prepared by CME Associates Engineering, Land Surveying and Architecture, PLLC last dated 8/29/07 . As part of my review of the Town's LWRP Consistency Form Section C, I offer the following comments regarding the Local Waterfront Revitalization Policies and this proposed project: Policy 1. The project activities shall be "concentrated" on a site where similar activities (existing garden shed) currently exist. The project does not involve agricultural land nor will open space be utilized or impacted. I believe that this project is consistent with this policy because the project will not result in a negative impact upon the desired development pattern of the Town of South old nor shall it result in the loss of the community and landscape pattern of the Town of South old. Policy 2. I believe that this project is consistent with this policy because the project shall not have any impacts upon the preservation and retention of historic resources, or any archeological resources nor the Coastal Culture ofthe Peconic Bays. The reason for this is that the project site has previously been "disturbed" and developed. The property itse1fwas previously disturbed when the existing dwelling and garden shed was constructed. . . Policy 3. I believe that this project is consistent with this policy since the project will not have an impact on any scenic resource of the Town of Southold. Policy 4. I feel that the project is consistent with this policy for a number of reasons. The proposed addition to the shed and proposed retaining walls and stone drive has been designed based upon sound engineering practices and designed to the minimum scale necessary. The project shall have no adverse impacts upon adjacent properties or to natural coastal processes or natural resources. The project shall have no impact on any natural protective features nor shall it have any impacts upon public lands or lands in public trust. Lastly, the project does not involve the management of a navigational infrastructure nor are public funds involved with the project. Policy 5. I feel that the proposed project is consistent with this policy for a number of reasons. The project does not involve any direct or indirect discharges that would cause any negative impacts upon water quality standards. There shall be no increase or decrease in the pH, the dissolved oxygen or nutrients in the waterway and there should be no increase in noxious odors at the project site. There shall be no increase in negative health impacts such as pathogens, chemical contaminants or toxicity nor shall there be any negative aesthetic factors involved with the project. The project does not involve watershed development or the quantity or quality of potable water. Policy 6. I feel that the project is consistent with this policy. The project as proposed shall have no impact upon the ecological quality in the Town of Southold. There shall be no negative impacts upon the adjacent area of freshwater wetlands by the destruction of habitat or significant impairment to the tolerance range of any species of fish or wildlife. The project should have no impact upon any vulnerable fish, wildlife, plant species or rare ecological communities. Policy 7. I do not feel that this policy is applicable to this project since the project does not involve any atmospheric deposition of pollutants. Policy 8. I believe that the project is consistent with this policy. The project shall involve the disposal of solid waste or debris which shall be disposed of . . properly. There are no hazardous waste or toxic pollutants involved with the project. Policy 9. I do not feel that this policy is applicable to this project. The proposed project shall have no impact upon adequate physical public access to coastal resources, shall not impact any public visual access to any lands or waters, involve the public interest in and use oflands and waters held in public trust or to public access of such areas. Nor will the project have impacts upon the public's right of access along the shoreline Policy 10. I feel that the project is consistent with this policy. The project shall have no impacts upon any existing water-dependent commercial, industrial or recreational uses of the Peconic Bays. Nor is the project located on Mill Creek or within the Village of Greenport and does not involve water-dependent uses at those sites. Policy 11. I feel that the project is consistent with this policy. The project does not involve aquaculture or the removal of shellfish from uncertified waters of the Town of South old nor shall it have a negative impact upon the long-term maintenance and health ofliving resources. Policy 12. I do not feel that this policy is applicable to the project because no agricultural lands are involved. Policy 13. I do not feel that this policy is applicable to the project since the project does not involve energy or mineral resources.