Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCross Sound Ferry Neville, Elizabeth To: Scopaz, Valerie Subject: RE: Cross Sound Ferry Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Scopaz,Valerie Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:58 PM To: Neville, Elizabeth; Finnegan, Patricia;Corcoran,Kieran; Krauza, Lynne Subject: RE:Cross Sound Ferry Received. Have not had chance to talk with Pat and Kieran about this. Not sure if this creates problem with Iitigation.Valerie -----Original Message----- From: Neville, Elizabeth Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 1:46 PM To: Finnegan, Patricia;Corcoran,Kieran; Krauza, Lynne;Scopaz,Valerie Subject:Cross Sound Ferry I sent down the Change of Zone Petition for Cross Sound Ferry submitted by William Esseks last week. I'm just checking to make sure that it was received by you. Please advise. Thank you. 1 a Neville, Elizabeth To: Krauza, Lynne Subject: RE: Cross Sound Ferry Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Krauza,Lynne Set-t- Monday, February 28,2045 1:59 PM To: Neville, Elizabeth Subject: RE:Cross Sound Ferry Yes, we received it and I put it in Pat's inbox today. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Neville, Elizabeth Seat: Monday, February 28,2005 1:46 PM To: Finnegan,Patricia;Corcoran, Kieran;Krauza, Lynne;Scopaz,Valerie Subject:Cross Sound Ferry I sent down the Change of Zone Petition for Cross Sound Ferry submitted by William Esseks last week. I'm just checking to make sure that it was received by you. Please advise. Thank you. i PATRICIA A. FINNEGANVF f0� JOSHUA Y. HORTON TOWN ATTORNEY NQS �CO Supervisor patricia.finnegan@town.southold.ny.us KIERAN M. CORCORAN p y� Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25 CA P.O. Box 1179 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY W- Southold, New York 11971-0959 kieran.corcoran@town.southold.ny.us Gy • �� LORI HULSE MONTEFUSCO j �a� Telephone (631) 7654939 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY Facsimile (631) 765-6639 lori.montefusco@town.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees From: Patricia A..Finnegan, Esq. Town Attorney Date: August 8, 2005 Subject: Cross Sound Ferry Change of Zone With respect to your Memorandum dated August 5, 2005, in connection with the referenced matter, please be advised that there is no pending application for change of zone. Please see attached letter dated June 24, 2005, addressed to the attorney for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc., which was previously copied to you. PAF/Ik Enclosure cc: Members of the Town Board (w/encl.) Ms. Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk (w/encl.) j Y PATRICIA A. FINNEGAN uFFo JOSHUA Y. NORTON TOWN ATTORNEY NQS `�C Supervisor patricia.finnegan@town.southold.ny.us O ®G h� y KWRAN M. CORCORAN O Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY h 2 P.O. Box 1179 kieran.corcoran@town.southold.ny.us O Southold, New York 11971-0959 LORI HULSE MONTEFUSCO y�� ��0� Telephone (631) 765.1939 .( ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY Facsimile (631) 765-6639 lori.montofusco@town,southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 24, 2005 William W. Esseks, Esq.. Esseks, Hefter &Angel P.O; Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 RE: Cross Sound Ferry Change of Zone Application SCTM No. 1000-15-9-3.5 and 3.6 ,'Dear Mr. Esseks: The Town Board of the Town of Southold has received and reviewed the above- referenced application seeking a change in zoning from R-80 to M-2. The application was discussed at a Work Session of the Town Board on June 21, 2005, and the Board has agreed that they will not take any action on the request. The intensity of uses ` permitted in the M-2 zone is inconsistent with the Town's comprehensive planning efforts in that already overburdened portion of the Town. Accordingly, the Town Board is not interested in considering a zone change on that parcel at this time. You may contact the Town Clerk to request a refund of the application fee submitted with your application. Thank you for your-attention ery truly yo rs, atricia A Fi egan Town Attorney PAF/lk cc: Members of the Town Board Ms. Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Members of the Planning Board Members of the Board of Trustees y Albert J.Krupski,President ��oF S0yo Town Hall James King,Vice-President O l0 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O.Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda Southold,New York 11971-0959 Peggy A. Dickerson • COQ Telephone(631) 765-1892 I�100um Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Supervisor Joshua Horton Town Board , FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees RE: Cross Sound Ferry Change of Zone Application SCTM#15-9-3.50.6 DATE: August 5, 2005 With regard to the above-referenced application currently before your Board, please be advised that the Board of Trustees must address any activity proposed within 100' of tidal wetlands and/or seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Please notify our office prior to any final decisions. cc: Patricia Finnegan, Esq. AUG - 5 2005 'j �pp . 4 3 , y In 1991,the ridership of the Cross Sound Ferry, according to Suffolk County, was 97,000 vehicles. In 1983, ferries left New London daily at 9:00 and 11:00 a.m.;they left Orient at 5:00 and 7:00 p.m. CSF operated three vessels,the New London,which carried 55 vehicles and 295 passengers,the Plum Island,which carried 25 vehicles and 236 passengers, and the Caribbean,which carried 22 vehicles and 310 passengers. The Cape Henlopen, carrying 90 cars and 900 passengers, was added in that year. In 1984 Cross Sound Ferry received a$400,000 grant from from the New York State Department of Transportaton to upgrade their facility. Supervisor Frank Murphy had been quoted in the Suffolk Times(May 24)as stating at a Town Board hearing,"this is an improvement project,not an expansion project", and at a ZBA hearing on April 5 on a petition for a use R E C E 11IE D variance, James McMahon,Director of Community Development for the Town of Southold,had represented on behalf of CSF that the idea was not to expand use or ridership,that the Cape Henlopen would be taken out of service and replaced by one or AU G 16 2005 two small boats the size of the New London,and that the reservation system would be in Orient(we know that none of this ever happened). On this representation,the Southold Town ZBA and the County determined that the Southold Town Clevl action did not warrant a Type I declaration under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as the Orient Association had insisted was necessary in order to determine the impact of the proposed operation on the local environment and quality of life. Joseph T. Sanseverino, Suffolk County Community Development Director, in a letter to the Orient Association,predicted a ridership in 1991 of 166,439 vehicles. It had exceeded that by 1985, and by 1990,the fleet,which still contained the Henlopen,was expanded to include the John H., carrying 120 vehicles and 1000 passengers, and ferries were leaving New London every hour between 7 a.m. and.9 p.m. Today, the fleet includes seven vehicle ferries which leave every hour from both Orient and New London between the hours of 7 a.m. and, in summer,9.45 p.m.; on May 12 Stan Mickus of CSF was quoted in the Suffolk'Times as stating that in 2005 CSF had a ridership of 1.3 million. At no time between 1985 and 1995 was CSF called back for a site-plan and SEQRA review,despite the radical change from the original representation,and despite the Orient Association's notification to the Town in 1991 that the site-plan was being violated. In 1995 CSF applied for a 69-car parking lot west of the terminal;it was approved without environmental review, CSF having stated that it was for employees and overflow. A week or so later,they announced the introduction of the passenger-only high-speed ferry,which they began operating without having filed a site plan to accommodate the parking. Supervisor Tom Wickham sued CSF in the NYS Supreme Court for an injunction against their operations until a new site plan was approved;Judge Patrick Henry denied the injunction but stated that a new integrated site plan was required He said"our denial,of a temporary restraining order and injunctive relief now should not be construed as carte blanee for Defendant's unfettered expansion, if it conflicts with the public good". He also said"that branch of the motion seeking injunctive relief is not denied or dismissed. It is adjourned sine die and the Town can re-calendar it, should it be so advised". He instructed.CSF and the Town to work together to resolve the issue. In 1996 CSF finally submitted a new site plan that included four parcels, one of them residentially-zoned. After,a series of Planning Board and Town Board meetings,the PB declared it a Type I action under SEQRA and listed, on the advice of consultants Charles 4' Voorhis&Associates, 10 strong reasons for reasons for a potential negative impact.(2) After going as far as a scoping session, CSF withdrew the site plan application. Then, in 1997,both the Town Board and the Planning Board abruptly reversed their positions, and when a site plan was subsequently brought back without the residential parcel, the Planning Board agreed with CSF that there was no longer a requirement for a Type I action, although all of the 10 SEQRA requirements were still applicable,as SCSR strongly asserted. The Town's consultants based their advice only on the incremental increase of traffic and parking since 1996, ignoring the fact that the effect of the 'introduction of the passenger ferry and the parking associated with it had never been analyzed., (Please see attached letter from SCSR to Planning Board Chairman Bennett Orlowski, which clearly summarizes the history and issues.) The plan was approved, despite the fact that the parking spaces were not delineated;the first time in Southold Town Planning Board history that this was so.If they were, it would be clear that the SEQRA threshold had been passed. Although SCSR petitioned against the decision,in 2003 the court found in favor of CSF, accepting that the Planning Board had held sufficient meetings and ignoring what SCSR believed to be the unprofessional manner in which the public hearings were conducted. However, Justice Dunn did not formally issue a final judgment in favor of the Planning Board and CSF. Normally the prevailing parties would then normally draft a judgment themselves and present it to the court for entry,but neither the PB nor CSF has done so. Since only a final judgment is appealable, SCSR has been unable to appeal. The result of this sorry history is that an operation carrying well over a million passengers annually and running up to 46 crossings daily has never been submitted to environmental review.. Another result is that the number of vehicular ferry trips has doubled in the interim. (2)Most obviously,the number of parked cars is well over the threshold established by SEQRA for a Type I designation, and the location of the site in a Critical Environmental Area and adjacent to National Natural Area(the State Park)is another threshold. The consultants for the Town listed the 10 following reasons for a type I designation in 1996 (I have abbreviated): 1. The property is adjacent to the Peconic Bay estuary and lies within the Orient Point Critical Environmental Area, and is in proximity to the Orient Beach State Park and 48+acres of County owned-land. 2. significant increase in intensity of land use as function of expanded parking. 3. may change need and use of public and pedestrian services and increase demand for other community services. 4. significant increase in number of vehicle trips 5.may adversely change noise and air quality as function of increased traffic and may substantially increase solid waste generation. ' 1 6. increase use of on-site facilities particularly sanitary flow and water use, and may result in an adverse impact on the environment 7.may inpact visual and aesthetic resources,particularly as regards lighting 8. may cause growth; study of mitigation of potential environmental impacts and alternatives would be facilitated by preparation of draft EIS 9. project ijvolves multiple agency jurisdictions 10. impact of passenger only jet boats on marine environment OV29/00 FRI 20:02 FAX 212 7650924 MILLSON/RAFFERTY/CEESLER 1 002 SOUJTHOLD CITIZENS FOR SAFE ROADS,INC.(SCSR) P.O.BOX 797 GREENPORT, MY 11944 September 19,2tlUt) Re: bead Agency Coordination Request Cross Sound Ferry Dent'Mr.Orlowski: More than six years ago,Cross Sound Ferry Services,Inc,("Cross Sound")abruptly introduced a high-speedpassenger--only ferry service at its terminal in the Town of Southold Once the Town and the Planning Board demanded that Cross Sound comply with applicable local and state law by filing a new site plan covering the entirety of Cross Sound's operation at Orient Point,Crass Sound responded by engaging in a continuous pattern of litigation and delay to avoid such compliance_ Despite its maneuvering,however,Cross Sound has,lost every challenge it made to the Town's authority to require submission of comprehensive revised site plan for the entire ferry terminal operation,and to the Town's obligation to conduct a detailed environmental review of that site pian. In tight of this history,it is therefore impossi It to understand why the Planning Board is now circulating a Lead Agency Coordination Request that,on its face,appears to be incomplete and at odds with both the law and with the positions that have been repeatedly and forcefully taken by the Town and the Planning Board itself A brief review of the procedural history of this matter may be useful.After Cross,Sound introduced its new passenger--only fent'service,the.Planning Board resolved in:July 1995 that operation of the new ferry service and,the result ht use.of the snack liar parcel as a parking lot for customers of the nevi-servvi=required revised site ptati approval_ Cross Sound did not challenge this resolution. Instead,Cross-Sound began to submit piecemeal site plans in an attempt to decouple the passenger-only ferry service from the all of the changes accompanying introduction of that service,among them a manfold increase in the numbers of can driving to and parking around the ferry terminal. The Planning Board,however,stood fvmnt inrequicinp,comprehensive integrated site,planw,tlratwouldaddress both the introductiowo€the nevrferry.service-and its effect on all of Cross Sound's Southold facilities.. Ager r'eprosanting to_thhe state Supreme•Court that it would comply_wi&the Planning,:Board-'s_request„ori 1-u1y.29, 1996, Cross Sound submitted for approval a comprehensive:sk•planfor•the entire ferry terminal area. The submission of Cross Sound's comprehensive site plan for approval automatically triggered the Planning Board's obligation-to apply-the provisions o€the State Environmental,Quality Review Act("SEQRA'j. -hraceordenee with the relevant state regulations,the Board determined on July 30, 1996,that review of Cross Sound's comprehensive site plan was a"Type 1"action,i.e.,one presumptively requiring an I navironmental Impact Statement("EIS"). On September 16,1996,the Plaiinrng Board issued a Positive Declaration,which made an EIS mandatory- tarn December 16, 19%, the Planning Board adopted a Scope Outline for the required EIS. SOUTHOLD TOWN:A OESTINATIOOM NOT A CORRIDOR A GATEWAY,NOT A THRt1WAY SOUTHOLD CITIZENS FOR SAFE ROADS, INC-(SCSR) 2 P.O. BOX 797 GREENPORT, NY 11944 Cross Sound's response was to file a series of lawsuits challenging (1)the Planning Board's Positive Declaration;(2)the Planning Board's adoption of the Scope Outline;and(3)the constitutionality of those provisions of the Town Code of Southold that required Cross Sound to submit a site plan to begin with. Cross Sound's challengeamere rejected by the state Supreme Court in every instance. s a res those court proceedings this Planning Board has the authority(and we believe the obligatiork-to require a comprehensive site plan from Cross Sound and,pursuant to SEQRA,to require an Environmental Impact Statement of the extent set out in the 1996 Scope Outline. One would think that the Board,having won on all counts,would now resume an environmental review of the same scope and character as the one interrupted by Cross-Sound%failed legal actions. Yet,incomprehensibly,despite a successful four-year battle to vindicate the Town's legal authority and obligations,the Planning Board now appears to have reversed course and acceded Cross Sound's defective view of the SEQRA review process: that the only issue involved is parking lot alterations. This is contrary to the taw and to the position the Town has consistently maintained before the courts. The controlling state regulations make it clear in no uncertain terms that: [a]ctlons commonly consist of a set of activities or steps. The entire set of activities or steps must be considered the action,whether the agency decision- making relates to the action as a whole or to only a part of it Considering only a part or segment of any action is contrary to the intent of SBQR. If a lead,agency believes that circumstances warrant a segmented review, it must clearly state in its determination of significance,and any subsequent EIS, the supporting reasons and must demonstrate that such,review is clearly no less protective of the environment. Related actions should be identified and discussed to the fullest extent possible. 6 NYCRR§§617:3(g),617.3(g)(1)(emphasis added). , While the Planning Board properly followed this mandate in its abortive review of Cross Sound's 1996 integrated site plan,its latest action disregards it. Moreover,in improperly disregarding the presumption against segmentation,the Lead Agency Coordination Request provides no hint why the Planning Board now apparently considers a partial and disjointed review"clearly no less protective of the enviromnent",especially given that it reached the opposite conclusion four years ago,and nothing has changed. Nor could such a review be"no less protective",since the substantial increase in the intensity of use of Cross Sound's facilities,along with the new environmental stresses created by this use, stems from a obvious common source--introduction of the passenger-only ferry service and the associated traffic,parking and usage demands it creates. The effects of this new service must be considered in any proper environmental review,a stance the Town has consistently and correctly maintained in its litigation with Cross Sound. As counsel for the Town affirmed to the state Supreme Court while successfully moving to dismiss two of Cross Sound's meritless lawsuits: SOUTHOLD TOWN:A DESTINATION,NOT A CORRIDOR A GATEWAY,NOT A THRUWAY ' 1 SOUTHOLD CITIZENS FOR SAFE ROADS, INC.(SCSR) 3 P.O. BOX 797 • GREENPORT, NY 11944 Cross Sound has apparently adopted the position that the applications pending before the ZBA and the Planning Board only apply for proposed parking on the Trust parcel. That these applications were simply filed as a normal business move and that SEQRA review should focus solely on the parking lot. . . . This defies reason,is contradictory to the record and is contrary to the definition of"action" subject to SEQRA review. Reply Affirmation of Francis J.Yakaboski,11119,20. While the Trust parcel is no longer formally included in Cross Sound's latest submission—although we believe it remains,contrary to its residential zoning status,a repository of dredge spoil for other of Cross Sound's parcels—Mr.Yakaboski's statement is equally true regarding the current site plan,which has been classified on the Lead Agency Coordination Request as"approval of design&layout at three properties zoned Marine i[sic]and used in the ferry terminal operation(staging and parking)."2 In the words of the Town's counsel to the state Supreme Court,lt]he comprehensive site plan, High Speed Ferry and ZBA applications regarding parking are inescapably linked. They are the`activities or set of activities'which comprise the-action' subject to SEQRA review in this case"and"Cross Sound's position would result in a segmented review which is contrary to the purpose and intent of SEQRA." Even the 1996 Preliminary Site Plan Study submitted by Cross Sound confirms that increased parking demands were linked to the introduction of the new ferry service. According to Cross Sound's consultants,"the principal users of the proposed parking facility will be the users of the High.Speed Feiry,when that service is in use." Given these facts,we cannot understand how the Planning Board can now decide to ignore its prior and correct determination of the law,particularly when the alternative being circulated by the Board,in the words of the Town's counsel,"defies reason"and is,"contrary to the purpose and intent of SEQRA". Furthermore,the Narrative submitted by Cross Sound begins with the sentence,"Cross Sound Ferry Services,Inc.requests site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for the existing and on-going operations currently occurring at the project site'. It does so despite providing no details or site plan covering those ' operations--only an incomplete proposal for parking modifications. If Cross Sound is truly requesting appravai for"existing and on-going operations",as it must under the law, it has no justification for shielding such operations from comprehensive SEQRA review. The materials submitted by Cross Sound are plainly insuilicient for such s comprehensive review,however,and the Lead Agency Coordination Request does not characterize the SEQRA action as covering"existing and on-going operations". Nonetheless,given Cross Sound's prior tactics,it is fairly predictable that Cross Sound will later attempt to argue that SEQRA review of its parking plans somehow constituted SEW review of its existing and on-going operations. ' Given Cross Sound's prior shell-game tactics,it would not be surprising if the Trust parcel becomes the subject of a later,piecemeal application by Cross Sound for even more parking. The current application confirms that the Trust parcel is still"controlled" by Cross Sound. Narrative,p. 12. 'Ile properties arc actually zoned"Marine I1". SOUTHOLD TOWN:A DESTINATION,NOT A CORRIDOR A GATEWAY,NOT A THRUWAY 09/'29/00 FRI 20:02 FAX 212 7650924 MILLSON/9AFFERTY/CRESLER 0005 SOMOLD CITIZENS FOR SAFE,ROADS,INC.(SCSR) 9 P.O.BOX 797 GREENPORT, NY 11944 'In addition to improperly segmenting review,Cross Sound's current application is inexplicably classified as an"unlisted"rather than"Type P action. This classification ignores the criteria for a Type I action set out in Section 617.4 ofTitle 6 of the Official Compilation'of Coes,Rules and Regulations ofthe State ofNew York, which,incidentally,provides that"[01 agencies are subject-to this.Type 1 lists" In.19%, the Board con=dy followedthew•entetia and classified€moss•Sound's applicatiotras-a Type I action because it"exceeds 25 peteent of the tlueshold of a.project or action involving the physical alteration'of 10 acres and Occurring-substantih y contigpous-to any publicly,wed,or'operated parklead. 71e propeny stibject=to.alferati is 191 acres and is contiguous to-County owne&parldand." (Southold Town Planning Board Resolution, July 29, 1996:) The project is still contiguous-to County awned d and wNationel Natural Landmark,.andthc-project size ns now 4:06 aches,.,,There ore,'tb ,pr M'0W0f 6 NYCRR§617.4(b)(10)again require that.Cross Sotmd'a ap`hcatr`os bi-a.Typc i faction, Presumptively subject tea Positive Aeclara#ion acid a fidV6;Qioriinental review. Moreover,the materials prepared and submitted by Cross Sound in connection with this review are being circulated even though they are obviously incomplete and/or erroneous. For example,despite the fact that this submission is ostensibly,if improperly,directed towards parking,Question B(lXf)of the Long Enviroawatal Assessment Foam,which asks for the existing and proposed-number of Packing spaces,is answered,"Refer to Narrative." The Narrative contains absolutely nv such information. Furthermore,there is no answer to Question A(7)("Is the-project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of NaOonal Natural Landmarks?')_ In contrast to previous Cross Sound submissions,Question A(6)("Is the project substantially contiguous to,or contain a building,site or district,listed,on,the,State or the National Registers of Historic Places?")is answered"yes.".' Finally,the Narrative parrots. Cross Sound's legally untenable position that parking on the Snack Bat Lot is a"pre- existing,non-conforming use. In connection with this last issue,it is still another matter of concern that the Town is now apparently joining Cross Sound in its unwarranted position concerning the toning status of the Snack Bar Lot. We have only recently seen a copy of a memorandum dated August 14,2000,from Mr.Forrester to you,in which Mt.Forrester , claims to"have received evidence of,and have determined that parking on the parcel known as the`snack bar parcel' is a pre-existing use". We uud6*and dds"evidence" consists of aerial photographs from sometime in the 1950s showing a few,vehicles on the snack bar lot,as well as an affidavit from a single individual stating that during-the 1950s "[4rom time to time,we had occasion to park our vehicles and,the vehicles of our employees east of the north/south extension of the present State Highv�ra�r at the site of the present parking area now employed by patrons of the Cross Sowed fent'°. 'The team"agency"is defined in the regulations as"a state or local agency". 6 NYCRR§617.2(c).. If this answer is correct,-it automatically leads to a Type l elassificatidn,regardless of the acreage involved. 6 NYCRR§617.4(bx9). SOUTHOLD•TOYYN:A DESTINATION NOT A CORRIDOR A GATEWAY,NOT A THRUWAY • '09/29/00 FRt 20:04 FAX 212 7650024 RILLSON/RAFMTY/CHESM rij006 SOUTHOLD CITIZENS FOR SAFE ROADS,INC.(SCSR) S P.O. SOX 107 OREENPORTs NY 11944 It is our understanding that the Courts of this State have held that a non-conforming,use must be substantial,not merely incidental,andtrust be provea as of the.effective-date of the zoning ordinance,not merely,prior-to that,effeetive date. On'both of,these issues the burden of proof jion.the property owner- Furthermore,we iMderstind that the courts have held that"overriding public�policy"favors reasonable.restriction-and eventatal-elimination-of pre-existing,nonconforming uses,and that such uses may be enlarged only in rare circumstances not present in,this case. It is also our understanding that a nonconforming use may not be established tbrough activities begun or continued in violation ofa zoning ordinance. None of the"evidence"submitted,by iCross Sound addresses the actual use of the smack bar parcel on the date-Southold's zoning code went into effect,or proves anything more than that a few ears wem once-occasionally located on the snack bar parcel--hardly the substantial use required to establish'a non- ' conforming use. Given the legal fmrneworl;is it really the Tovwn'sposition that sporadic parking vaguely alleged to have taken place sometime in the 1950s now gives Cross Sound the right regularly to maintain a developed commercW parking lot for hundreds of vehicles in violation of the Town's zoning ordinance? Finally,it is our understanding that the PIanning Board intends to leave the October 2,2000,Public Hearing open so that Cross Sound can fill in the many defects in its current proposal. We believe that the PIanning Board should schedule a further public hearing after Cross Sound has filed a complete and accurate application. The land and waters,surrounding the Cross Sound terminal at Orient Point are among the important natural and recreation resources of Southold,and their protection is for too serious a matter to allow anything less than a full and fair review by the Planning Board and the citizens of this Town. We urge the Planning Board to reject this latest in,a long series of efforts to segment the review of Cross Sound's application for a new sits plan and�ea'toim sitrpOn n=semereview ofall of Cross Soautd's opertionsinluhehighdferrysecenew pa�ekinngg tra€fic and pollution concrated by that ZegBoardv:c . lanshould again require CssSoundtobmitacomplee plan application covering all of the properties it makesuseofatE?ritentPoirufora environmental review as required by law and by the prior determinations of this Planning Board. Very truly yours, 64,1,04, Southold Citizens for Safe Roads,Inc. by Fredrica Wachsberger Bennett Orlowski,Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 BY EXPRESS MAIL, SOUTHOLD TOWN!A DESTINATION,NOT A CORRIDOR A GATEWAY,NOT A THRUWAY I 'SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Significance Lead A,gerccy: Town of Southold Planning Board Town of Southold Address: Town Mall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Date: September 1996 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing remo�,tions pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental"Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the pproposed action described below will have a significant effdct on the environment and that a Drat Environmental Impact Statement must be prepared. Title of Action: Cross Sound Ferry Site Plan Application SCTM No. 1000-15-9-1o.1, 11.1, 15.1 & 3.5 Orient,,New York SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: The subject application involves a request for site plan approval-to provide additional parking to a previously approved ferry.terminal on Rt. 25 in Orient, in order to ac;ommodate increased demand for pparldng that has beengenerated by the inclusion of a high speed passenger only ferry service to the existing vehicular ferryservice. Location: Subject gprope is located at the end of NYS Route 2S, Orient, NY. Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the Criteria for Determination of Significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617,7, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II and the following specific reasons: Page 1 of 2 SEPIII UN l n - i I Cross Sound Ferry,Orient Long EAF Review i Use of the site for passenger ferry parking is known to cause overflow and significant excess demand for parking. In addition, oposed activities on site are expected to increase the intensity of use of land. This Princreased intensity of use will cause potential impact upon the"environment. A list of environmental and planning impact considerations is as follows: L The project is a Type I action,which is more likely to require the preparation of a Draft EIS. In addition,the project is located adjacent to the surface waters of Gardiners Bay,which comprises a portion of the Peconic Bay Estuary,and lies within the Orient Point Critical Environmental Area (CEA). The proposed project may impair the environmental characteristics of this CEA. In addition,the project is in proximity to the Orient Bcach State Park and 48+ acres of County owned land. 2. The proposed action will cause a significant increrse is the intensity of land use on the project site, as a function of the expanded parking,demand for parking in connection with ferry operations and on-site,traffic circulation for parking access. 3. The proposed action may change the need and use of public and pedestrian transportation services (including existing bike trail),and may increase the demand for other community services including fire,police,recreational facilities and utilities. 4. The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the number of vehicle trips which utilize off- site ffsite infrastructure facilities primarily including c:dsting transportation systems. g. The project may adversely change noise and air quality as a function of increased traffic, and/or may substantially increase solid waste generation. Fisting and proposed site drainage must be ' analysed and controlled. gh speed ferry service wi11 increase the use of on-site facilities, 6. Increased intensity of site use for hi particularly sanitary flow and water use,and may result in an adverse impact upon the environment. 7. The project may impact visual and aesthetic resources,particularly as regards lighting,and use during both daytime and nighttime hours. •8. The proposed project may cause growth inducing aspects associated v�ith the proposed project. Im addition, the study of mitigation of potential environmental impacts and alternatives would be facilitated by the preparation of a Draft EIS 9. The project involves multiple agency jurisdictions and permits,and the comprehensive review.of potential impacts would be facilitated through the preparation of a Draft FIS. 10. Impact of passenger only jet boats on marine environment, The proposed project may result in one or more potential impacts upon the environment as noted above. As a result, if the Planning Board is in agreement, it is recommended that a Positive Declaration be issued for this project,based upon the reasons outlined above. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter,please do not hesitate to call. U ar es oor ' , CEP,AICP enc: Long EAF Parts I Draft Positive Declaration CHARLES VQ'QRHi }, &;ASSOCIATES, INC. Pam 2 ENVIRONMENTAL'�AND PNNI9a CONSULTANTS` SE-P -= 9 - 96 MON 1 0 : 25 Cross Sound Ferry Positive Declaration L The project is a Type I action,which is more likely to require the preparation of a Draft M. In addition,the project is located adjacent to.the surface waters of Gardiners Bay,'which comprises a portion of the Peconic Bay Estuary,and lies within the Orient Point Critical EaviironmentalArea (CEA). The proposed project may impair the environmental characteristics of this CFA. In addition, the project is in proximity to the Orient Beach State Park and 48+ aces of County owned land. 2. The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the intensity of land use on the project site,as a function of the expanded parking,demand for parking in connection with ferry operations and on-site traffic circulation for parking access„ 3. The proposed action may change the need and use of public and pedestrian transportation services (including existing bike trail),and may increase the demand for other community services including fire, police,recreational facilities and utilities: 4. The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the number of vehicle trips which utilize off-site infrastructure facilities primarily including existing transportation systems. S. The project may adversely change noise and air quality as a function of increased traffic,and/or may substantially increase solid waste generation:,Existing and proposcd site drainage must be analyzed and controlled. 6. Increased intensity of site use for high speed ferry service will increase the use of on-site facilities particularly sanitary flow and water use,and may result is an adverse impact upon the environment. 7. The project may impact visual and aesthetic resourccs,particularly as regards lighting,and use during both daytime and nighttime hours. 8. The proposed project may cause growth inducing aspects associated with the proposcd project. In addition,the study of mitigation of potential environmental impacts and alternatives would be facilitated by the preparation of a Draft&S ; 9. The project involves multiple agencyjurisdictions and permits,and the comprehensive review of potential impacts would be facilitated through the preparation of a Draft EIS. 10. Impact of passenger only jet boats on marine environment For Further Information: Mr.Robert G. Kassner _Contact Person: Planning Board Town of Southold 53095-Main Road,P.O. Box 1179 Southold•New York 11971 (516)7B-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Southold Town Board Southold Town Buildingg Department Southold Town Zoning board of Trustees Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning i Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County, Department of Parks NYS Dept. of State, Coastal Resources,&Waterfront Revitalization Division NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservatioa,Albany and Stony Brook Offices NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic-Preservation U.S. Dept, of Agriculture U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Federal Emergency Management Agency Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Applicant _ Pager vt2• ' ? Environmental Assessment Form TABLE } Cross Sound Ferry Services,Inc ANALYSIS OF REASONS FOR THE j ORIGINAL POSITIVE DECLARATION IN CONSIDERATION OF CURRENT SITE PL IAN an E x_ s -ffim MAN z 1. The project is a Type 1 action,which is more likely to The 5EQ1tA Type I list has been reviewed With regard to the Tape I action list contained in SEQR 617 7.4,the proposed project does not meet any of the criteria which would result in require the preparation of a Drag EIS. In addition, the classification as a Type I action(See EAF Part 3,Section 52). The current action which involves site plan ap tpprovxi of the existing use within the bounds of the existing Ferry terminal is not a Action not ' project is located adjacent to the surface waters of Type I action. The SEQR regulations effective January 1996,do not designate an action in a CEA as an ai ;automatic Type I action. The site lies adjacent to Gardiners Bay and the Peconic Type I. Gardiners Bay,which comprises a portion the Peconic Bay Estuary;however,no new use areas will be established,and the boundaries of the current use areas will be be 'fetter defined and limited. The project will remain within the MH zoned area,and Estuary, and lies within the Orient Point Critical will not encroach on lands associated with Orient Beach State Park or 48+acres of land owned by Suffolk Cc �rmty. It is also noted that the project has some characteristics of a Type II action, No Impact Environmental Area (CEA). The proposed project may which would not require any review under SEQR. Specifically,a Type II action involves:"replacement,reha Cbilitation or reconstruction of a structure or facility,in kind,on the same site,,.. Expected impair the environmental characteristics of this CEA In unless such action meets or exceeds any of the thresholds in section 617.4 of this Part". The facility will to rehabilitated in-kind and none of the other thresholds will be met or exceeded addition,the project is in proximity to the Orient Beach However,the action is controversial and involves a site plan decision,paddng lot grading and drainage,m lad installation of lighting,landscaping and pedestrian circulation;therefore,this State Park and 48+acres of County Owned landanalysis finds that a conservative classification as an Unlisted action is appropriate. 1�1 2 The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the The proposed action involves improvements to the existing Snack Bar lot portion of the ferry terminal site. T f.1he terms has experienced fluctuations in ridership,as a function of a variety of intensity of land use on the project site,as a function of the factors,one of which includes the popularity of casino gambling facilities in Connecticut In response to these 'die fluctuations,Cross Sound Ferry provided a high speed passenger boat in 1995. It No Impact ILII expanded parking,demand for parking in connection with is noted that the daily passenger carrying capacity of car carrying vessels is 376/0 of that of the passenger on] :ly boat(see Attachment 5). Therefore,the high speed ferry was intended to serve Expected ferry operations and on-site traffic circulation for parking an existing demand in a more convenient fashion. The land use intensity will not-increase as a result of expa Ided parking,since no expanded parking is proposed Cross Sound Ferry reports access. that ridership has stabilized as a function of market factors such as alternative transportation via a high speed passenger ferry to Connecticut from Glen Cove. The Feng terminal comprises a portion of the Orient Point traffic,with sightseers,marina,Plum Island and State Park traffic accounting for ti the balance. On site traffic and parking circulation and needs will be served by the I existingterminal with minor modifications and improvements as reflected on the current site plan. 3. The proposed action may change the need and use of The proposed action does not involve any changes in the operation of the Cross Sound Ferry terminal with the exception of improvements in the pedestrian circulation by installing a cross public and pedestrian transportation services (including walk for patrons and visitors across the State Route(SR)25 right-0f--way in the vicinity of the terminal bui Vding and snack bar. Since no change to the operation or major site changes are No Impact existing bike trail),and may increase the demand for other proposed,no impact is expected on public or pedestrian transportation services. Likewise, the project w 4M not increase the demand for other community services such as fire, police, Expected community services including fire, police, recreational recreational facilities and utilities. As previously noted,the proposed action involves improvements to the exi: Ming Snack Bar lot portion of the ferry terminal site. facilities and utilities. 4. The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the As noted in the discussion under#2 above,the east end traffic volumes are found to be variable as a result of a ;iia variety of factors including growtk and casino gambling in Connecticut Growth number of vehicle trips which utilize off-site infrastructure isnot completely attributable to Cross Sound Ferry.Traffic volumes over the-period since•thehigh-speed ferf y began operation are found to be variable,but do not reflect a significant increase No Impact facilities primarily including existing transportation in the number of vehicle trips. Using conservative peak season traffic counts and a growth factor for capaci, analysis at road segments west of the terminal finds that level-of service is not Expected systems. reduced(with the exception of an insignificant reduction from B to C at CR 25 w/o Tabor Road),and is actu improved at SR 25 elo Narrow River Road Counts conducted by NYSDOT find that Cross Sound Ferry is only a component of traffic volume east of Greenport Cross Sound Ferry repo rts that ridership has stabilized as a result of market factors. As a result,noise,air quality and solid waste factors are not attributable to the proposed project and based on traffic volumes,are no' ed to be significant 5.. The project may adversely change noise and air quality as Although traffic volumes on Rte.25 are variable and influenced bya variety of factors,.the-volumes and,ric attributable to the ferry have not significantly increased as a result of the a function of increased traffic, and/or may substantially proposed project Accordingly,traffic related impacts such as noise and air quality would not increase. I ikewise, solid waste generation as a function of riders would not experience a No Impact increase solid waste generation. Existing and proposed significant increase and would not be significantly impacted Site drainage of the existing Snack Bar parcel pa g area will be improved as a result of the project The parking surface will be Expected site drainage must be analyzed and controlled regraded to eliminate depressions and stonelgravel will be applied to the surface. Drainage rings will be inst metalled in 2 areas at low points on the west side of the parking area to facilitate the f recharge of stormwater. 6. Increased intensity of site use for high speed ferry service As noted previously,traffic is variable as a result of many influences and CSF volume(ridership has not ins ed significantly,therefore,groundwater or surface water impacts would not will increase the use of on-site facilities, particularly increase. Water supply is provided by private wells or alternative portable sources as necessary. Sanitary-efl - uent is handled by 2 on site systems;1 for the terminal and 1 for the Snack Bar. No Impact sanitary flow and water use,and may result in an adverse All indications are that the systems are functioning properly and are capable of handling the volume of wa AM generated with minimal impact on groundwater. Since there are no physical Expected impact on the environment changes proposed for the site(with,the exception of drainage control improvements);no significant impact, fis expected to groundwater or surface water. Drainage control on the Snack Bar ardel would be expected to benefit surface waters. 7. The project may impact visual and aesthetic resources, All use will be confined within the M II zoned area,with no expansion of parking or use areas proposed L w elevation lighting is proposed at the perimeter of the parking lot mounted on particularly as regards lighting, and use during both guard rails and posts. Shields will be provided to screen illumination from adjacent properties to the north an = d east. Site aesthetics will be improved as a result of a landscape restoration plan No Impact daytime and night time homy. to be implemented along the northwest part of the Snack Bar parcel,and east of the Snack Bar parcel off-site) ExDected i 8. The proposed project may cause growth inducing aspects As noted previously,traffic is variable as a result of many influences'and CSF volumehidership has not i ed significantly,therefore, growth inducing aspects of the project are not associated with the proposed project In addition, the expected. The project does not involve expansion of use or parking areas;the existing facility is proposed to r and be improved within the limits of the facility and within the limits of the No Impact ; study of mitigation of potential environmental impacts and Mil zoned area The use has historically operated on the subject site and is an integral part of the character c this parcel,and the transportation connection which it provides to Connecticut, Expected alternatives would be facilitated by the preparation of a therefore,alternatives do not apply. Although the current facility is not proposed to be expanded,mitigation is proposed in the form of drainage improvements,landscape improvements,and Draft EIS. pedestrian circulation improvements. As a result,no significant growth impacts are anticipated,and no additicnah orifi on measures or alternatives I . 9. The project involves multiple agency jurisdictions and The project no longer involves multiple agency jurisdictions or permits,as there is no expansion proposed I e only entity with permit authority is the Planning Board under site plan review permits, and the comprehensive review of potential and approval procedures. The Town Trustees may require'a permit if activity is proposed within 75'of the sb oreline,and NYSDOT will be involved with improvements to the SR 25 right-of- No Impact impacts would be facilitated through the preparation of a way as necessary,however,improvements are designed to increase safety and improve circulation. Expected Draft EIS. 10. Impact of passenger only jet boats on marine environment Tire high-speed passenger carrying ferry has been in operation since 1995. Water quality in Gardiners Bay is subject to tidal cycles and the area is proximate to Block Island Sound and ocean waters providing excellent water quality as reported in various references. Watercraft have been operating a at the terminal since the 1700's,with increasing demand and response to provide No Impact service for this important transportation link. Given that water quality remains excellent,and large vessels ha Fbeen transporting vehicles,passengers and cargo from the ferry site for over 50 Expected ears,it seems reasonable to conclude that the relationshipbetween the current operation and surface water u is co alible,and no si cant im ct on water occurs, r i i VO!141 LUU1 iL .Vl UJl JLJl JJl r r rr..rr� r SOUTH CMZENS FOP.O. FE ROADS, MIC.(SCSR) GREENPORT, NY 11944 August 10,2001 etc Orlo9valci,Chairman Itam of Southold Meaning Board Toon IM,53095 Main Road P.O.coot 1179 934hold,NY 11971 1 Re:Crow Sowed,Ferry Site Plat Application Dear Mr.Orlowski: On behalf of Southold Citizens for Safe Roads, Inc.("SCSR"),I submit this information for the Planting Hoard's consideration in connection with its review of the Site Plan Application of Cross Sound Ferry Services,Inc. ("CSF"),as requested in your kftr of July 17,2001. This letter should be read to incorporate SCSR's previous elements and submissions concerning CSFs most recent Site Plan Application, bwhWing those made at the July 16,2001,hearing. In addition,we believe that much of YAM SCSR has submitted to the Planning Board concerning CSF's previous Site Plan Appliesdon is germane to this application,particularly as it relates to traffic,water quidity ass the oavretmmeatal inspect of CSF's activities and its proposed projects. Because the mvind Site Plan Application does not meaningfully address the environmental and other Means raised by the previous application,SCSR's previous submissions concerning the esvirnnment su rovndmg the site and how it may be affected by CSF's activities and Projects should be considered by the Planning Board at this juncture as well. SCSR strongly believes that CSF's Site Plan Application is clearly a Type I ration under the Stott F.nvirunmentai Quality Review Act(SEQRA),and therefore the Plating Board has no alternative but to nuke a determination that a proper eDvi enmeatal review must be conducted before ftutber consideration of the Site Plan AWkidon. In its application,CSF contends that the 10 Reasons for the Original PWtive Declaration no longer apply. In fact,the contrary is true--all 10 Reasons otnftue to be relevant to the Site Plan,which is why this is a Type I action. Reason#1: "7he project is a Type X action"and it "is located adjacent to the surface waters ofGarifiners Bay, which comprises a portion of the Peconic Bay RttNary, and lies within the Orient Point Critical Environmental Area" "ln addition, the ct is in proximity to the Orient Beach State Park and 48+acres of Cr'ounty,(honed Sirn�ly removing the Trust Property frons the Site Plan Application none of this. Thus,the current proposal,like the previous one,may very well "iufnPati tits environmental characteristics of this CEA". It is also clear that because the site is"substantially contiguous"to"any publicly owned or operated parkland, 'recreation SOUTMOLO TOWN.,A D118TINATION,NOT A CORRIDOR A QATt;M1AY,NOT A THRUWAY ` UO!11/LUUl lU.Ul OJI JL JI JJt 1flUR rmur- UL > SOUTWXID CITIZENS FOR SAFE ROADS, INC. (SCSR) 2 P.O. BOX 787 OREENPORT,MY 11844 am or designated open space",if the project impacts only 25%of any of the SPQRA duabolds,it is a Type I action. Reason#2: "The proposed action will cause a significant increase in the intensity of land use on the project site, as a function of the expanded parking, demand forPWIdng in connection with ferry operations and on-site traJjic circulation,ror parking access." CSF contends,misleadingly,that because the proposed action consists Only of"imprpvemetft"to the site and not"expanded parking",the action should be Approved without my ena►ironmental review. CSF neglects to mention that the West lot lead been approved in 1995 for 69 spaces,and that there has never been my approval for MY puking on the Snack Bar lot. The Site flan Application seeks to legitimize the cMMt levels of parking an both the West lot and Snack Bar lot--which dramatically acted anything that has ever been approved before. If the Site Plan Application were up 6otat about what it was hoping to achieve,it would state that it seeks to expand the approved pazking on those lots from a total of 69 to current levels. Notably,the Site Plan Application deliberately omits any reference to the number of parking spaces involved. Field investigations by Schneider Engineering have shown the fallowing Mobers of parked cars at the respective lots: Smckff West 2 Hour SR 25 7/6/01 235 72 8 36 17/15101 283 80 12 71 7!20101 249 63 9 21 7/2$N I 226 85 21 26 The total number of cars at the Snack Bar and West lots was 307(Friday, July 6,2001),363(Sunday,July 15,2001),312(Friday,July 20,200I)and 311 (sattnday,July 28,2001). In addition,a significant number of cars were parked on SR 25 ad!!!_days,and it would be reasonable to conclude that the overwhelming A �of those cats were associated with CSF's business as well. These numbers tr(t+t�eaent dramatic incream in the amount of parking at the site,and are more than amugb to meet the 25%threshold under SEQRA to be deemed a Type I action. Reason#3: Mw proposed action may change the need and use of public OW ptdostrian transportation services(including existing bike trail). and may increase the demand for other community services including fire,policy, recreational facilities and "kits.of Nothing las changed in the revised site pian with respect to the plan's UnW impact on these items,which is self-evident given the sheer magnitude of the in traffic and parking.as described above. SOUTHOW TOM A DESTINATION,NOT A CORRIDOR A GATEWAY,NOT A THRUWAY 4 SOUTHOLD CITIZENS FOR SAFE ROADS, INC.(SCSR) 3 P.O.BOE 797 GREENPORT,NY 119" Reason #d: 'The proposed action will eause a significant increase in the mattber of vehicle trips which utilize off-site infrastructure facilities primarily including rgcis ft transportation systems". Nothing has changed as a result of the revisions to the site plan;the h=ew in traffic parallels the increase its panting at the site, as described above,and the removal of the Trust Property from the Plan does nothing to address the traffic concerns. Reason#S: "The project may adversely change noise and air quality as a jlmlion of increased traffic, and/or may substantially increase solid waste generation". Again,the revisions to the site plan do nothing to address these issues. Reason#6: "Increased intensity of site use for high speed ferry.service will increase the use of on-site facilities,particularly sanitaryflow and water use. and may result in an adverse impact on the environment." Again,the revisions to the site plan do nothing.to address these'issues. Reason#7. "The project may impact visual and aesthetic resources. particularly as regards lighting, and use during both daytime and night time hours." The Site Plan Application contemplates increasing the amount of lighting at the site. Reason#8: "The proposed project may cause growth inducing aspects associated with the proposed project: In addition, the study of mitigation of potential environmental impacts and alternatives would be facilitated by the preparation of a Draft E.M '�+�� This continues to be true for the current Site Plan Application. A proper emvirontnetrtal review would aid in the study of the impact the projects would have and p mobil alternatives. Reason#9: "The project involves multiple agency jurisdictions and permits, and the comprehensive review of potential impacts would be facilitated through On preparation of a Drafl EIS" CSF concedes that NYSDOT and the Town Trustees may be involved in addition to the Planning Board in this proceeding,and certainly a Draft EIS would pose no impediment to any regulatory process- Reason#10: "Impact of passenger only jet boats on marine environment." Nothing in the revised Site Plan Application addresses this concern. WiMout a Draft EIS,thm will be no way to determine whether the quality of the water.in , this Critical Environmental Area is adversely affected. SOUTHOLD A GATF.WD TIN AEON.NOT Y CORRIDOR It V t&) -XvVF7VUc Dunn Engineering in their 1997 and 1999 studies underestimate the impacts the traffic generated by the ferry has on the local volumes. Dunn claims that, compared to the total background traffic,the ferry traffic is minimal. Dunn Engineering reports uses charts that show that ferry traffic can be as high as 50%of the background and is regularly in excess of 20°x6 of the background volumes. Table 12 of Dunn's 1997 report shows that the fent'component of the background traffic is 30%on weekdays, 20%Saturdays and 18%on Sundays. These percentages are not minimal and in fact are a critical part of the SR 25 volume east of Greenport. As such,attention must be given to any increases to either the background volume or ferry traffic volumes when analyzing level of services impacts. In terms of pure traffic volumes and level of service,the anticipated increase in traffic based on the data reviewed has little negative effect on State Route 25 east of Greenport, as there is excess capacity on the roadway. This does not preclude future reductions in capacity on SR 25. Any significant increase in demand for service will have a negative impact on local traffic. In both the 1999 and 1997 reports, Dunn Engineering analyzed accident data for SR 25 east of Greenport. During 1994 and 1995 the New York State Department of Transportation(NYSDOT)completed a widening and repaving program designed to improve safety along roadways. This program included a shoulder. improvement to allow for bicycle traffic,which has been steadily increasing. In 1996 the rate of accidents fell dramatically, however as shown in Dunn's 1999 report in Table 3 since 1996 the accident rate has increased each year. In 1997 and 1998 SR 25 east of Greenport had accidents rates higher than the State average for two-lane rural highways.. This raise in accident rates coincided with the startup of the high-speed fent' service. As stated previously, any increase in traffic east of Greenport must be analyzed carefully as in this case where the rise in ferry demand following the addition of passenger only fent'service coincided with a rise in accident rates. The final part of our analysis involves the on-site parking. Dunn"s 1997 report does not look at on-site parking, while the 1999 report has a section dedicated to 3Parking Considem ionsz. In addition the Full EAF prepared by Inter-Science Research Associates states that for on-site parking 3see narrative2. After a review of Project Narrative for the Full Environmental Assessment Form(Part 1)as part of the Revised Proposed Site Plan Application for Cross Sound Feny Services Inc.,there is no mention of on-site parking in terms of quantity or location. According to Dunn Engineering, 345 vehicles can be parked on the site. During the course of our research we found a plan prepared by Inter-Science in the Project Narrative for the Full Environmental Assessment Form(Part 1)as part of the Revised Proposed Site Plan Application for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. This plan was titled Maximum Unassisted Parking Plan. On this plan is a parking layout showing 147 parking spaces on the west lot and 235 parking spaces on the snack bar lot for a total of 382 parking spaces. On Friday,July 6,2001 a field investigation was performed at the fent'terminal. It was found that there were 307 vehicles parked on lands owned by Cross Island Ferry Services, Inc. In addition there were thirty-six vehicles parked on-street along SR 25. These vehicles were most likely parked for the ferry, as there was sufficient excess parking in the Plum Island tot, Orient State Park parking area and in the County Park. Both the snack bar lot and west lot were basically filled to capacity. I'd like to submit photos we had taken showing the parking problems as we described them. Another field investigation was performed on Sunday, July 15, 2001. it was found that there were 363 vehicles parked on lands owned by Cross Island Ferry Services, Inc. In addition there were seventy-one vehicles parked on-street along SR 25. These vehicles were,again, most likely parked for the ferry,as t was sufficient excess parking in the Plum Island lot, Orient State Park parking area and in the County P Both the snack bar lot and west lot were filled to capacity. We, again,took photos of the parking on t and would like to submit them for the record. Interesting to note that police officers were actually on tickets to some of the illegal parkers along SR 25. The photos also show the cars being ticketed. 7/16/01 On July 15, 2001 it appears that the Boy Scouts were to be dropped off at the fent'for a weeks vacation to New England. The Boy Scouts had to make arrangements for the use of the adjoining federal parking lot for the parent's cars. I counted 50 cars at 12:30 PM already in the federal parking lot. They were all Boy Scouts related,the federal facility was closed. This is clearly indicating to us that there is insufficient parking on-site for the demand. Our research of the data shows that the West Lot had been approved for sixty-nine(69)parking spaces in 1995, prior to the introduction of the high-speed ferry service. There does not appear to be any approvals for parking on the Snack Bar Lot. It is the position of the applicant that the Snack Bar Lot has been used as parking since the early 1950's. Regardless of whether the Snack Bar Lot pre-dated the zoning,there have been several renovations of the fent'terminal and surrounding area where a site plan should have been submitted and a parking plan approved. This does not appear to be the case. Based on the Town records there is no approved parking on the Snack Bar Lot. In our opinion,there are only sixty-nine(69)approved parking spaces on the Cross Sound Ferry property. According to the Dunn Engineering report of 1999 there is capacity for 345 parking spaces. Based on Dunn's data alone,this is an increase in 276 parking spaces. Inter-Science prepared a plan that shows the site has the capacity to accommodate 382 parking spaces, an increase of 313 spaces from what has been previously approved. According to Chapter 100(Zoning)of the Code of the Town of Southold there are standards for the construction of parking facilities. These standards describe the size of the spaces, aisle widths and number required per use. In addition,the amount and type of landscaping is included. This includes depth and location of buffers and setbacks. Section 100-191(C)describes that 3aisles between rows of parking spaces shall not be less than twenty-two(22)feet2. Also,3fhe minimum parking stall width shall be nine(9)feet, and the minimum length shall be nineteen(19)feet.2 Section 100-212 describes the front yard buffer area along roadways. Section 100-212(B)states that in Ml or MIl zones a landscape buffer fifteen(15)feet in depth is required along all street frontages. The Snack Bar Lot has almost its entire westerly property line adjacent to the SR 25 right-of-way,thus frontage on SR 25. Section 100-213 pertains to transition buffer areas along roadways and adjacent lots of different zoning. Section 100-213(13)(2)states that the required buffer between a lot zoned MI or MI and a butting residential zoned lot,such as the Trost Parcel, requires a twenty(20)foot buffer. Based on these Town Zoning requirements, a plan showing the parking in the Snack Bar Lot was prepared(attached). It shows that only seventy-two(72)spaces can be placed on the snack bar lot to comply with the zoning requirements. This brings the total on the entire site to 141 parking spaces. Dunn's 1999 report uses a quote from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Traffic Engineering Handbook: 3Commercial parking attendants can park cars in stalls less than eight(8)feet wide. With self parking, stall widths that will accommodate most passenger cars and light trucks range between 8.3 and 8.8 feet, depending on anticipated parking activity. Where parking turnover is expected to be low,as for all day parking, narrower stall widths are usually acceptable.2 But,the next paragraph in the Traffic Engineering Handbook states: 3Substandard stall and aisle widths prove to be a false economy. Although this permits the marking of more stalls per given length,vehicles tend to encroach upon adjacent stalls so that one or more spaces are unavailable for use. The end result is no gain in actual space usage, but a parking condition surrounded by confusion.2 7/16/01 Inter-Science research prepared a plan titled Maximum Unassisted Parking Plan. In the potes on the plan they describe the aisle widths used as twelve(12)feet minimum and fifteen(15)feet average. Neither Dunn nor Inter Science explains the relationship between stall width and aisle width. The basic premise is the narrower the stall the wider the aisle. Table 21-2 in ITE's Traffic Engineering Handbook clearly details this relationship for different stall widths, stall angles and aisle widths. In this case, all plans show ninety(90) degree parking. Table 21-2 states that for a stall width of 8.5 feet an aisle twenty-eight feet(28)is recommended(it's the same aisle width for one-way or two-way traffic patterns). The aisle widths described by Inter-Science are for one-way traffic(not mentioned)and angled parking. The use of one-way aisles and angled parking significantly reduce the number of parking spaces that can be placed on the site. It should be noted that the plans do not indicate one-way parking'but they clearly indicate dead-end rows. According to 6 NYCRR Part 617(State Environmental Quality Review(SEQRA)Section 617.4b: 3 The following actions are Type 1 if they are to be directly undertaken,funded or approved by an agency: (10)any Unlisted action,that exceeds 25%of any threshold in this section,occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any publicly owned or operated parkland, recreation area or designated open space, including any site on the Register of National Natural Landmarks pursuant to 36 CFR part 62, 1994$.2 The Type I threshold exceeded in this case is parking since the construction of 1,000 parking spaces is automatically considered Type I. In this case there is a request to increase the approved parking on-site from sixty-nine(69)to either 345(Dunn)or 382(Inter-Science)spaces. In both cases,the increase is more than 25%(250 spaces)of the parking threshold,276(Dunn)and 313(Inter Science). In conclusion,it is clear that this application will have a major traffic safety impact on the area. The requested increase in approved parking spaces in and of itself is a Type I action by definition. The accident rate along SR 25 east of Greenport has increased since the introduction of the high-speed ferry service. The vehicles currently parking along SR 25 are forcing bicyclists to use the main travel ways versus the shoulder lanes creating a potential for more collisions. The fact the current volumes of traffic on SR 25 do not cause any serious degradations of level-of-service,the percentage of traffic created by the fent'has been significantly understated by the applicant. The proposed Snack Bar Lot parking does not meet the standards of the Town or any industry standard publication. �n rea/ity, the traffic safety issues take precedence over all the issues described above. Simply said,from a traffic safety prospective,the cramming of the cars on undersized spaces, undersized aisle widths, no painted parking stall spaces, etc.,create an unsafe condition and many possible legal issues that may develop with respect to accidents. The Town may be held liable for allowing the parking of vehicles in substandard spaces and could very easily be brought in as responsible for the parking approvals. All of these items show an impact on the area that requires a more in depth review and appropriate site plans showing the proposed parking schemes. If you'have any questions please feel free to calf. r 1 �11�0101 ` Neville, Elizabeth From: Finnegan, Patricia Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:39 AM To: Neville, Elizabeth Cc: Scopaz, Valerie Subject: Cross Sound Change of Zone Application Betty- I have reviewed the application and the recent submittal dated May 5, 2005(description of project)and find that the application is complete and should be accepted. The application should be copied and distributed to the Town Board and Planning Board. The Board of Trustees also requested that they receive a copy when it is distributed. Thank you, Pat Patricia A. Finnegan Town Attorney Town of Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 1 t-e- Sf S + �f U peLHz 5 I o—f °'-Cross Sam TLSEc•EivLD Fer�� AUG 2 2OW5 SPAM town Clea Cdr9PIf-ewts ,...._ --------- --- ---------- - -------------- - To: - - To:Chairman Jeri Woodhouse and members of the Southold Town Planning Board Supervisor Josh Horton and members of the Southold Town Board: As resident(s)of Southold Town who are fed up with the traffic generated by the Cross Sound Ferry, I(we)demand that you stop CSF expansion by refusing to grant a zone change from residential to maritime on the property owned by CSF at Orient Point;and that you enforce the site plan and insist that CSF require parking reservations to eliminate overflow.Protect your citizens:JUST SAYNO! Name Jo-&,d A L c Address /d q.r Afe.#4 e w 11,e 4a -? 14 N e - MR«T-M CIC A-0�f Signature o�*oF so�ryol JOSHUA Y.HORTON ~ Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 SUPERVISOR P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ol �� Fax(631) 765-1823 yCow N,�� Telephone(631) 765-1889 OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 28, 2005 VIA FACSIMILE and FIRST CLASS MAIL Mr. Adam Wronowski Cross Sound Ferry Service, Inc. 2 Ferry Street, P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320 William W. Esseks, Esq. Esseks, Hefter&Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Messrs. Wronowski and Esseks: As we have recently discussed, the Town of Southold has been notified by the Governor of the State of New York that effective immediately, in order to meet the recently established "high alert" national security status for transportation, the National Guard has been deployed to join with the Town of Southold Police Department in conducting searches of all commercial vehicles and random passenger vehicles at the Cross Sound Ferry terminal at Orient Point. We are informed that this is a temporary national security measure, but have not been informed as to the duration of this engagement. In order to comply with these heightened security directives in the safest manner possible, and due to the space constraints within the Cross Sound parking area, it is necessary to conduct the searches of the larger commercial vehicles outside of the Cross Sound Ferry parking and loading area, on the shoulder of State Route 25. As a result, the Town of Southold Police Department will cone off the sides of Route 25 for an appropriate distance in order to perform these mandated searches. The Town Board of the Town of Southold has thus asked for the cooperation of Cross Sound Ferry to permit the overflow ferry parking currently utilizing State Route 25 to be directed, on a temporary and emergency basis only, to the vacant field owned by Cross Sound Ferry to the east of the ferry terminal. You and your employees have ensured us that a safe and orderly system for routing such traffic can be achieved immediately. Messrs. Wronowski and Esseks July 28, 2005 Page 2 As we have discussed, the Town's permission to park vehicles on this vacant lot is limited to this temporary emergency activity related to national security directives. This limited permission should not be construed as any grant of zoning, site plan or other regulatory approval of any kind, nor shall it be taken as any waiver of the Town's power to regulate, approve, deny or condition the use of these properties. Any and all required approvals shall continue to be required as provided by law. The Town will notify you immediately once it receives notice either that the heightened security status has been lifted or if it determines for any other reason that parking in the adjacent lot must be discontinued. I wish to thank you for your swift cooperation with these important matters. incerely, , ( Joshua Y. Horton Supervisor JYH/lk cc: Members of the Town Board Members of the Planning Board Zoning Board of Appeals Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq., Town Attorney Mr. Edward Forrester, Code Enforcement Director Building Department RECEIVED From: Lifestoriesl@cs.com Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:09 PM AUG 1 2005 To: Neville, Elizabeth Cc: nfec@optonline.net Subject: CS Ferry Parking Permission Southold Towd Clerk To Southold Town Board: Supervisor Horton's concession to allow parking in the CSF 's east field is effectively an end run that (a) circumvents your ruling not to consider CSR's request for zoning changes and (2) undermines laws the rest of us must abide by. Just how"temporary"will this measure be? Donna Kenny #1A1 Cleaves Point Condominiums Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY Page 1 of 1 Neville, Elizabeth From: Lifestories1 @cs com RECEIVED Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:09 PM To: Neville, Elizabeth AUG » 1 201 Cc: nfec@optonline.net Subject: CS Ferry Parking Permission Southold Town Cled To Southold Town Board: Supervisor Horton's concession to allow parking in the CSF's east field is effectively an end run that (a) circumvents your ruling not to consider CSR's request for zoning changes and (2) undermines laws the rest of us must abide by. Just how"temporary"will this measure be? Donna Kenny #1.Ai Cleaves Point Condominiums Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY 8/1/2005 Neville, Elizabeth From: Finnegan, Patricia KLCEIV` Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:39 AM To: Neville, Elizabeth MAY 1 2 2005 Cc: Scopaz, Valerie Subject: Cross Sound Change of Zone Application Southold Town Clerk Betty- I have reviewed the application and the recent submittal dated May 5, 2005 (description of project) and find that the application is complete and should be accepted. The application should be copied and distributed to the Town Board and Planning Board. The Board of Trustees also requested that they receive a copy when it is distributed. Thank you, Pat Patricia A. Finnegan Town Attorney Town of Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 i MAILING ADDRESS: • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OF soUryoP.O.Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �Q �O Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS cia Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS �Q� 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE E D SOLOMON TIN H.SIDORoly (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) CON% Southold,NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED MAY 10 2005 MEMORANDUM Southold Town Clea To: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk From: Valerie Scopaz, AICP, Town Planning Director 1I Re: Change of Zone Application of Cross Sound Ferry Services Date: May 9, 2005 On review, I find the new project description to more fully explain the proposal. It is suitable for the purpose of accepting the application for filing. VS:ck aft. cc: Patricia Finnegan, Esq. VIL- sol �>S ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE ti Q Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER �� Fax (631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER ��� Telephone (631) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER "Ouf 11�� southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town Attorney Patricia A. Finnegan Principal Planner Valerie Scopaz From: Town Clerk Elizabeth A. Nevill Re: Change of Zone Application ofss Sound Ferry Services Date: May 4, 2005 The enclosed "project description" for change of zone application of Cross Sound Ferry Services was received in this office today from the Office of William Esseks To date, I have not officially accepted this application for filing, in accordance with your response of March 8, 2005. Please review it and send me your recommendation as to whether or not this application now meets the criteria for acceptance for filing by the Town. Thank you. ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W ESSEKS (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER STEPHEN R ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER(631)369-2066 MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. 0 BOX S70 JOHN M.WAGNERNER JANE ANN R. WATER MILL, N.Y 11976 (631) 726-6633 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY CARMELA M. DI TALIA ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK WILLIAM M. DUFFY May 5, 2005 THEODORE D SKLAR RECEIVED OF COUNSEL RECEIVED MAY 4 2005 By Hand Southold Town Clerk Elizabeth A. Neville Town Clerk 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Re: Change of Zone petition of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Dear Ms. Neville: In response to your letter dated March 10, 2005, I am enclosing a new"Project Description" for the proposed Change of Zone by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. We believe that this description is sufficient to commence the change-of-zone process. We are looking forward to working with the Town Board, Town Attorney, and Town Planner on providing any additional information required as part of the ordinary process. Very truly yours, W�-&-- W, William W. Esseks cc: Adam Wronowski Interscience ' f - G PROJECT DESCRIPTION for the proposed Change of Zone by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Dated: May 4, 2005 The petition asks the Town Board to change the zoning district classification of two parcels -- SCTM 100-15-9-3.5 & 3.6 -- from residential R-80 district to marine M-H zoning district. The proposed use of the two parcels is, as shown on the Concept Plan, as a parking lot only. No ferry terminal structures (such as buildings, docks, ramps, etc.) are proposed or planned for the two parcels. No shoreline structures are proposed or planned, an no vessel access of any kind is proposed or planned (in fact, an artificial dune will be created to separate the parking area from the beach). To quiet any speculation that the two properties will be used for some purpose other than the proposed parking lot as shown on the Concept Plan, the Town Board can condition the change-of-zone on there being no ferry terminal structures. As previously explained, the sole purpose of the proposed change-of-zone is to allow the existing property controlled by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. to be used for its most suitable purpose, which is as an extension of the existing parking area on what is called the "Snack Bar" parcel. Under the current zoning classification of R-80, the two parcels are zoned for one single-family residential dwelling per parcel. From a planning perspective, those zoned uses are inappropriate for these parcels, since the uses to the west are zoned marine M-II, and the property to the east is owned by the County. An M-H classification for the parcels is more appropriate from a planning perspective, and will continue the existing character of the community by preserving the general division between the marine uses, which are generally located south of Route 25 along the water, and the existing residential uses north of Route 25. In addition to sound planning reasons, the change-of-zone is further justified because it is the most appropriate and safe means for providing much-need parking for existing vehicles that currently park along the shoulder of the Route 25 terminus. There can be little dispute that the public will be benefited by providing an alternative and safe parking area for those vehicles. Since the two properties at issue are located behind the Snack Bar parcel, the additional parking area would be virtually unnoticeable from Route 25. Thus, instead of a line of vehicles parked along the shoulder of Route 25, those vehicles could be parked in a safe area out of sight of most of the public. . . ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTH OLD To: Supervisor Joshua Y. Horton & Southold Town Board Members Town Attorney Planning Board Trustees Zoning Board of Appeals Town Clerk Elizabeth Neville ~ Transmittal of Cross Sound Ferry Change of Zone Application From: Re: Date: May 12, 2005 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box II 79 Southold, New York II971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net This application has now been deemed complete and ready for filing by receipt of Planning Board letter and e-mail correspondence from the Town Attorney. Copies of same are attached. A complete copy of all documents, maps, and plans comprising this application are attached for your review. . Town Of South old P.OBox1179 Southold, NY 11971 . * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 05/12/05 Receipt#: 35395 Transaction(s): 1 1 Petition Reference 15-9-3.5 Total Paid: Subtotal $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Check#:35395 CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. 35395 , REFERENCE NO. OESCRIPTION INVOICE OA TE INVOICE AMOUNT OISCOUNT TAKEN AMOUNT PAID PERMIT 1.000.00 ] CHECK DATE CHECK NO. PAYEE DISCOUNTS TAKEN CHECK AMOUNT 1110/05 35395 TOWN OF SOUlHHOLD $1,000.00 , Name: Cross, Sound Ferry Service P. O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320 Clerk ID: L1NDAC InternallD: 15-9-3.5 & 3.6 . ~e. ~ r\-\ 8 I5JOS- . MAIUNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED MEMORANDUM MAY 1 0 2005 To: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk From: Jerilynn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson Soufhold Town Clerk Date: May 9, 2005 Re: Planning Board Comments/Recommendations Re: "A Local Law in relation of the Height of Buildings of Residential Structures" " A Local Law in relation to the Size, Height and Setbacks for Accessory Structures" As requested, the Planning Board has reviewed the legislation in reference to the above-captioned Local Law proposals, which are subject to a pubic hearing on May 10, 2005. The Planning Board offers the following comments and recommendations at this time: 1. A height of 22' is excessive for accessory structures and should remain at 18'. 2. It is not clear whether or not the height limitation of 22' for accessory structures is applicable to agricultural structures. 3. The new restrictions for accessory structures are applicable to properties in the R-40 Zoning District as described in the Purpose section of the legislation. However, the text of Section 100-33 fails to include the R-40 Zoning District and should be amended accordingly. 4. The Planning Board supports the concept of preventing excessive massing of residential structures. Therefore, with respect to the height limitations for residential structures, the Planning Board has no objections to the Local Law as proposed. However, additional new legislation is . . Neville, Elizabeth I1FCFIVi=f) From; Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Finnegan, Patricia Thursday, May 12, 2005 11 :39 AM Neville, Elizabeth Scopaz, Valerie Cross Sound Change of Zone Application MAY 1 2 2005 Southol~ Town Cleel Betty- I have reviewed the application and the recent submittal dated May 5, 2005 (description of project) and find that the application is complete and should be accepted. The application should be copied and distributed to the Town Board and Planning Board. The Board of Trustees also requested that they receive a copy when it is distributed. Thank you, Pat Patricia A. Finnegan Town Attorney Town of Southold . Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 1 . . ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town Attorney Patricia A. Finnegan Principal Planner Valerie Scopaz From: Town Clerk Elizabeth A. NeVille@., Re: Change of Zone Application of Cross Sound Ferry Services Date: May 4, 2005 The enclosed" project description" for change of zone application of Cross Sound Ferry Services was received in this office today from the Office of William Esseks To date, I have not officially accepted this application for filing, in accordance with your response of March 8, 2005. Please review it and send me your recommendation as to whether or not this application now meets the criteria for acceptance for filing by the Town. Thank you. . . ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW t08 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 Tij TIT Pf3 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER STEPHEN R. ANGEL. JANE ANN R. KRATZ JOHN M. WAGNER (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 (631) 726-6633 TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY CARMELA M. DI TALIA ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK WILLIAM M. DUFFY May 5, 2005 THEODORE D. SKLAR OF COUNSEL RECEIVED ';;./5 MAY 4 2005 By Hand Southold Town Clerk Elizabeth A. Neville Town Clerk 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Change of Zone petition of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Dear Ms. Neville: In response to your letter dated March 10, 2005, I am enclosing a new "Project Description" for the proposed Change of Zone by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. We believe that this description is sufficient to commence the change-of-zone process. We are looking forward to working with the Town Board, Town Attorney, and Town Planner on providing any additional information required as part of the ordinary process. Very truly yours, )vi....... I;/,~ William W. Esseks cc: Adam Wronowski InterScience . . . PROJECT DESCRIPTION for the proposed Change of Zone by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Dated: May 4, 2005 The petition asks the Town Board to change the zoning district classification of two parcels -- SCTM 100-15-9-3.5 & 3.6 -- from residential R-80 district to marine M-Il zoning district. The proposed use of the two parcels is, as shown on the Concept Plan, as a parking lot only. No ferry terminal structures (such as buildings, docks, ramps, etc.) are proposed or planned for the two parcels. No shoreline structures are proposed or planned, an no vessel access of any kind is proposed or planned (in fact, an artificial dune will be created to separate the parking area from the beach). To quiet any speculation that the two properties will be used for some purpose other than the proposed parking lot as shown on the Concept Plan, the Town Board can condition the change-of-zone on there being no ferry terminal structures. As previously explained, the sole purpose of the proposed change-of-zone is to allow the existing property controlled by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. to be used for its most suitable purpose, which is as an extension of the existing parking area on what is called the "Snack Bar" parcel. Under the current zoning classification ofR-80, the two parcels are zoned for one single-family residential dwelling per parcel. From a planning perspective, those zoned uses are inappropriate for these parcels, since the uses to the west are zoned marine M-Il, and the property to the east is owned by the County. An M-Il classification for the parcels is more appropriate from a planning perspective, and will continue the existing character of the community by preserving the general division between the marine uses, which are generally located south of Route 25 along the water, and the existing residential uses north of Route 25. In addition to sound planning reasons, the change-of-zone is further justified because it is the most appropriate and safe means for providing much-need parking for existing vehicles that currently park along the shoulder of the Route 25 terminus. There can be little dispute that the public will be benefited by providing an alternative and safe parking area for those vehicles. Since the two properties at issue are located behind the Snack Bar parcel, the additional parking area would be virtually mmoticeable from Route 25. Thus, instead of a line of vehicles parked along the shoulder of Route 25, those vehicles could be parked in a safe area out of sight of most of the public. WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 (631) 726~6633 . . ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. 0, Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y, 11901-0279 WILLIAM W, ESSEKS MARCIA Z, HEFTER STEPHEN R. ANGEL JANE ANN R, KRATZ JOHN M. WAGNE:R (63J) 369-1700 TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY CARMELA M, 01 T ALIA ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK WILLIAM M. DUFFY May 4, 2005 THEODORE O. SKLAR OF COUNSEL RECEIVED 0( : (!J- f}/i1 MAY 4 2005 Town Board, Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 $outltold Town Clerk Dear Town Board Members: I have a copy of your April 26, 2005 Resolution concerning Cross Sound Ferry and your Board's request to the New York State Department of Transportation. You adopted that resolution without notice to Cross Sound Ferry ("CSF") or an opportunity to be heard. Your concerns about parking along State Route 25 can be alleviated, immediately, and without interference with interstate commerce by allowing CFS's passengers, many of whom are residents of the Town of South old, and the public, to park their vehicles on CSF's now vacant property. That permission can be granted by the Town Board or the Board of Appeals. CSF has a petition pending before the Town Board for a change of zone to allow property that it owns to be rezoned Marine II. If that application for a change of zone is granted, it can be conditioned upon the rezoned property only being used for vehicle parking purposes. The applicant agrees to that condition. The same parking site is about to be the subject of an application to the Town ZBA for a special permit pursuant to Southold Code Section 100-263, and/or a variance. -rtJ TfI Ph P.b . . ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW May 4, 2005 Page 2 of2 CSF owns or controls approximately 5 acres of property east of its Snack Bar parking lot parcel that, as described above, is available for overflow parking purposes. If in fact there is an emergency condition (as is suggested in the Board's resolution), the Town should allow citizens to park their cars at the Orient site as an incident to traveling to Connecticut upon motor vessels owned and operated by CSF in its providing interstate water carrier service. The vacant property east of the Snack Bar parking lot can be available for vehicular parking on 48 hours notice. CSF has asked me to advise you that it and its consultants will expedite any and all administrative applications that can provide off-street parking on its land. We ask you to rescind your April 26, 2005 resolution and work with CSF to provide additional parking as proposed. Very truly yours, 'N Ui'- W. f.~.1 William W. Esseks Iml cc: Adam Wronowski . . ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 275 OF 2005 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON APRIL 26, 2005: WHEREAS, extensive parking along both sides of State Route 25 in the vicinity of the Cross Sound Ferry terminal in Orient presents an extreme and urgent concern for the safety and welfare of residents and visitors of the Town of South old; and WHEREAS, State Route 25 extends west from the Cross Sound Ferry terminal in Orient past a Suffolk County Park, New York State Park, and the federal Plum Island facility; and WHEREAS, State Route 25 in this area has been designated as a Scenic Byway by the State of New York and serves as a New York State bicycle route; and WHEREAS, the existence ofthese conditions is inconsistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan adopted by the Town Board of the Town of South old; IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of South old requests that the New York State Department of Transportation do the followin!!: a. Immediatelv install No Parkin!! si!!na!!e alon!! both sides of State Route 25 extendin!! west from the Cross Sound Ferry terminal in Orient past the County. State and Federal parks and facilities and past the intersection of Rvder Farm Road in Orient. as needed to rectifv this extreme and ur!!ent safety concern. b. Develop a Park and Ride facilitv alon!! the Lon!! Island Expresswav exit ramp to Exit 71 to provide for parkin!! and shuttle service to and from the Cross Sound Ferry terminal in Orient for walk-on passen!!ers. in accordance with the request made bv the Town of Southold in Julv of 2003. I"ta.,~Q~~~. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk . . ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 10, 2005 William W. Esseks, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel Counselors At Law 108 East Main Street Post Office Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901-0279 Re: Change of Zone petition of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Dear Mr. Esseks, Please be advised that the above referenced application has been deemed incomplete. The following additional information is required as requested by the Town Planner and concurred by the Town Attorney: Detailed description of the proposed use of the land. The project statement prepared by Inter-Science contains the following: "Note: the following text is intended to be used in association with the submitted application forms and drawings. Therefore. this Proiect Statement is not an inclusive description of the proposed action. but is instead a supplementarv overview." (emphasis added) Recommendation is that the application not be deemed complete until a more complete description is received. The description should indicate the parking demand for the present level of ferry service. A justification should be provided for the rezoning to M-I1. Very truly yours, t!'~.t.'t:fO Q~'~"/.&' Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk cc: Town Board Town Attorney Town Planner . . Neville, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Finnegan, Patricia Friday, March 11, 2oo511:45AM Neville, Elizabeth Scopaz, Valerie Cross Sound change of Zone application Betty- I concur with the memo sent over by Valerie on March 8, 2005. The additional information should be requested before the application is considered complete. Pat I will be over in a few minutes if you would like to discuss. 1 . . VALERIE SCOPAZ TOWN PLANNER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 RECEIVED MAR 9 2005 OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~oulhold Town Clerl MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk and Patricia A. Finnegan, Town Attorney /~ From: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planning Director Date: March 8, 2005 Re: Change of Zone Application for Cross Sound Ferry Services SCTM#15-9-3.5 & 3.6 I have reviewed the material attached to your memo of February 22, 2005, and find that there is no detailed description of the proposed use of the land. The project statement prepared by Inter-Science contains the following: "Note: the following text is intended to be used in association with the submitted application forms and drawings. Therefore. this Proiect statement is not an inclusive descnation of the aroaosed action. but is instead a suaalementarv overview." (emphasis added) My recommendation is that the application not be deemed complete until a more complete description is received. The description should indicate the parking demand for the present level of ferry service. A justification should be provided for the rezoning to M-II. . . <-~ ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEF"TER STEPHEN R. ANGEL .JANE ANN R. KRATZ .JOHN M. WAGNER (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 (631) 726-6633 TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY CARMELA M. 01 TALlA ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK WilLIAM M. DUFFY THEODORE D. SKLAR OF COUNSEL February 18, 2005 Via Hand Deliverv Office of the Town Clerk, Elizabeth A. Neville Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Petition of change of zone by Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Dear Mrs. Neville: We are enclosing herewith four sets of the following application materials for consideration by the Southold Town Board for a change of zone for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc.: 1. Application entitled "Request for Amendment and/or Change of Zone" with owner's endorsement and disclosure affidavit attached; 2. Survey map prepared by David H. Fox, Fox Land Surveying, last amended on September 29, 2004; 3. Surveyor's metes and bounds description of the subject property dated April 27, 2004; 4. Copies of deeds described in the application form; . . ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 5. Environmental Assessment Form with Part 1 completed by Interscience Research Associates, Inc.; 6. Project statement for the purposed change of zone dated January 2005; 7. Concept plan dated January 13,2005; 8. Listing of adjacent property owners; and 9. Copies of notices to adjacent property owners with proof of mailing. Weare also enclosing herewith the required application fee in the amount of $1,000 payable to the Town of South old. All communications with regard to this application should be addressed to Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. c/o Esseks, Hefter & Angel, 108 East Main Street, P.O. Box 279, Riverhead, NY 11901. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, J _ i.J. g:...t.k William W. Esseks WWE/jc enc. .' " . . ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMEN1' OFFICEH FREEDOM OF INFORMA'I'ION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 SOll thold town.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERI{ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REOUEST FOR AMENDMENT AND/OR CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NAME: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. (Name under which application shall be known) 1000 - 015.00 09.00 - 003.006 SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP NO.: 1000 - 015.00. - 09.00 - Q03.005 . --- -- --- --- --- District Block Parcel A. SUBMISSION INFORMATION: j" Application is hereby made to the Southold Town Board for amendment to Chapter 100, {Zoning) of the Town Code and/or a change'in the zoning classification of the Zoning ,,' Map in a accordance with the Sectio1l100 - 290 ofthe Zoning Law of the Town of Southold and Section 265, Town Law. Further, the following are submitted herewith (che6k those appropriate, write N/A where not applicable) .X 1. Four (4) sets of the completed application form and petition. Each set shall contain one (1) complete set of cover letter forms, affidavits, project description, surveys, plans, and EAF and any supplemental information as maybe be needed or requested. x . 2. Fee in the amount of$I,OOO.OO ($500.00 for AHD). Applicant is also responsible for any fees incurred in the Environmental Review Process. x 3. Survey map, accurately drawn to appropriate scale, showing the proposed zone district boundary changes, property lines, the calculated areas affected, in acres or square feet, the Suffolk County Tax Map designations, the street rights-of-way in the immediate vicinity and lands, land uses and names of owners immediately adjacent to and extending within two hundred (200) feet of all boundaries of the property to be amcnded. x 4. Metes and bounds description of tile proposed amendment. . . .. x 5. Appropriate Environmental Assessment Fonn (EAF). All Ulilisted and Type I Actions require either a Shorl or Full EAF to be prepared. See Chapter 157 ofToWll Code and I'llrl G 17 NYCRR (SEQR), or check wiUlthe Town Attorney ruul/or the Planning Department. -L G. Other information deemed necessary [or review by the Town Board, Ule Town Planning Board and/or the Suflolk County Planning Commission (i.e. site plans, subdivision maps). Please note items submitted: Project Statement Concept Plan dated January 13, 2005 n. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Nrune Of Applicant(s): Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Address: Hefter & An el 108 E. Main Street Telephone No. 631/369-1700 P.O.Box 279,Riverhead, New York 11901 If ilie applicrult does not own ilie property, is a contract vendee, or if ilie owner is a Corporation or a Partnership, prepare endorsement at the end ofUus fOIDI establislling owner's auiliorization ofllie applicant's request. 2. Ifthe applicant is contract vendee, give name. Iflhe applicant is a cotporation (or partnership), give the nrune llild title of fue responsible officer: Name: . Address:(if different) Title: Telephone No.: 3. Lmdowner(s): A. & J Long Island Realt~~lflne: Address' ap,,r aaaml, (;~r. oni:iwsk~, ind. an as ,gu.ardian l' .r- n RI;H~O_C!,--..H,a.f"""e;: t:.., Augo~ 108 1<' M".2ltl Strsst ~_ Telephone No.: 631/369-1700 4. Nrune ciflicensed architect, landscape architect, civil engineer andlor surveyor who prepared the piau: . Nrune:yo..'\J i d. \-\. t==t'x Title: NYS Licensed .surveyor '/150234 NameofFim1: "FO)( LA...,\:;> ~Ve;y Irvc.., Address: ~'-I SU-NSE'T AVEt.JIJ-E ( we::'TuAMF'TD.u 'Be"'4-\.) t--..I.Y. 1\"\76 Telephone No.: ~~\ - z.~e. -00"2-"'2.. .' 5. Nrune of Allomey, or Agent authorized to represent tile property owner andlor applicant: n 'Rnv ?79. ~:i'n'erhead, New York 11901 Name: William W. Esaeks, Esq. Title: Attorney Nrune of Film: Esseks, Hefter & Angel Address: 108 E. Main Street, P.O. Box 279, Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone No.: 631/369-1700 . . 6. All communications with regard to this application shall be addressed to the following person until further notice: William W. Esseks, Esq. Name: Esseks, Hefter & AnKel Address: 108 E. Main Street, P.O. Box Telephone No.: 631/369-1700 Title: attornev 279, Riverhead. New York 11901 C. SITE/PROJECT DATA: One lot east of Main Road 1. Location of Property terminus (north/south! east/west) side comer of (street) and second lot or road) , 297 feet contiguous on the east (north/south! east/west) >uf as shown on annexed surveys of David H. Fox (nearest intersecting street) Orient (hamlet) 2. Existing zoning district(s) R-80 Special Overlay District(s), if applicable 3. Requested zoning district(s) M-2 2.6158 and 4. Lotarea:2.6291 acres :5l!jXib<Gr acres two continKuous lots 5. a. The latest deed(s) describing this parcel(s) is (are) recorded in the County Clerk's Office as follows: DATE 12/27 /91 10/02/00 LIBER 11396 12079 PAGE 385 151 Record Owner Adam C. Wronowski, indo and as A. & J guardian Long Island Realty, LLC b. A copy ofthe(se) should be attached to the application. 6. There are no encumbrances or liens against this land other thanlllortgagcs'l x YES NO 7. All buildings and structures are shown on the survey? x YES NO (The Town Board reserves the right to request a complete survey showing all existing structures.) 8. Existing: Building Area -0- sq. ft. Lot coverage -0- 9. Please attach a detailed typewritten description ofthe project, the proposed use and operation thereof, including a detailed explanation of the design concept, the reason for the particular design, objective of the developer or project sponsor and how or why the project is (or is not) in compliance with the Town Code and the Master Plan. Explain what benefits will accrue to the community by the proposed rezoning. Document reasons . . why proposeo project cannot be built unoer current zoning reglllaLions ano pursuant to the current zoning map. D. AGENCY COOR()JNATlON AND SIWRA (See Part 617, NYCRR ano Chapter _ of Town Cooe) 1. Does the site Front on a Town, County of State Road~ (circl7 one) Name ano number of the road (i.e. County Road 48@ateRoadn:!> 2. Is the site within any other areas of review of the Suffolk County Plaruling Commission? x YES NO. If yes, the referral requirements of the Suffolk County Planning COlllmission should be examined to assure a complete application. 3. Is the site in a oesignateo critical environmental area as per the New York State Env}{onmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and Chapter -'-- of the Town Cooe? YES NO. If yes, what area? . 4<:!:YP~'ype II or Unlisted Action (circle one) An environmental Assessment form must be completed for Unlisted and Type I actions. 5. Has an Environmental Assessment Form or Draft Enviromuental Impact Statement been prepared? x YES NO. If yes, copies should be submitted with the application. E. I hereby depose and certify that all of the above statements of information, and all statements And information contained in the supporting documents and drawIngs attached hereto are true and correct. - ~ ~ FoR. &',.1-\ looo~ 1'5"-4 -3.00S- ADitf'.\ C. W~ol.)owSKllln<l. o.i'>d a.~ SlUL.-d.i......... ~ FoR. Sc.."'M \000,:",1'5"-4 - '?,.OO<O ADAM C.ItJRo"'l>v..>~K.1 ) Me:M.i!ER A o.r-d. J Leo..) '" ISlA<-Jf.:> Re"AI.:ry t 1..Lc.. Sworn before me this Ib ~ , 20 oS. NOTARY PUBLIC ~...J ~ ~~~~'" ~f"'lk 9 J ~j)<O . . F. OWNER'S ENDORSEMENT (To be signed if applicant is not the owner or if the owner is a corporation or partnership) c.onneC!.--f/ce.-T State of RI.6ae lsl!ll'ld ) ) ss.: County of NeLV ) LJ:,ndcr> ADAM C. WRONOWSKI being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at /0 f?(ljif/ Slr..a~ '-/i;tvn o.,c mY' oS h"c. in the County of-.Mw Lorl<lcn and the State of ~i"1I?tPC.';It": -/- and that he is the owner of one parcel and a member of A & J Long Island Realty, LLC, the owner of the second parcel and in his dual capacity authorizes Esseks, Hefter & Angel and Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc. to make the foregoing application for amendment and/or changes of zone as described herein. Adam C. Wronowski Name Sworn to before me this \It t\.. d~k:' e<r~ Notary Public . 01 ,/ G ~-ic;."','C,,, ~,\14 /lB'fDb . . G. DISCLOSURE AFFlDA VIT State of tJ,~Arzdt4 ) County of AIel<,) ) Lc..d,pn ADAM C. WRONOWSKI being by me duly sworn, deposes and says: I. [am an applicant for a project or an owner of the land which is the subject of a pending application before the Southold Town Board for amendment and/or change of zone. 2. The project name is:_ !"',?ss Sound Ferry Servic~s. Inc. 3. I reside at: / D Pea...;/ St-. " /'v('I.sh~ I t!onne.c.f/~~T v' 4. The Officers ofthe applicant corporation or owner corporation are as follows: NAME TITLE Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc.: John Wronowski Adam C. Wronowski Richard MacMurray John Wronowski Adam C. Wronowski Richard MacMurray President Vice-President Vice-President Treasurer Secretary Assistant Secretary A & J Long Island Realty LLC . -e.A ~ e' rh",_k~ Je>hn '&!. ~;-D'10CA,.J;lok, _ ,,.,. A~t!' . I'fdl4V'n C. IA/rp""o""",,.rA:;~j:___ /7'1~4'T &'.1_ ....I4.s5iC.~ ~r6.n#~~,.c-r_ ~e.-n~r . 5. 1 make ana complete this affidavit under the penalty of perjury and swear to the truth therein. 6. 1 am aware that this affidavit is required by General Municipal Law 809 and that I shall be guilty ofa misdemeanor as provided by General Municipal Law 809 should I knowingly or intentionally fail to make all disclosures herein. 7. During the 12 months before the filing of this application, have any of the following individuals made campaign contribution exceeding $100 in total, in cash or in kind, to members of the Town Board or political committees designated to accept donations behalf: Yes No I) Owner 2) Applicant 3) Agent for owner or applicant 4) Attorney 5) Other ..,/ V- I/' ~ ........... . . Irthe answer to Question 7 is yes, Town Code Chapters _ and _ require lhatthe inronnation be provided below: Numc Tille (OlVllcr. A1!cnl. Attornev. olllcr) Alllollnt ****************************************************************************** For the purpose orthis disclosure, an orJicial or employee or either the Town o I' South old or the County or Su rrolk, shall be deemed to have an interest in the applicant and or owner when that orJicial or employee, their spouse, brothers, sisters, parents, children, grand children or the spouse of any of them: a. Is the applicant or owner b. Is an orJicer, director, partner, or employee or the applicant or owner c. Legally or beneficially owns or c04trols stock or a corporate applicant or owner, or is a member of a partnership or association applicant or owner, or d. Is a party to an agreement with the applicant or owner, express or implied, wherehy said orJicial or employee may receive any payment or other bencfit- whether or not ror services rendered, dependent or contingent upon the favorable approval of such upptication. Ownership of less than five percent oflhe slock of a corporation whose slock is listed on the New York Stock or American Stock Exchanges shall not constitute an interest for the purposes oflhis disclosure ****************************************************************************** YOU MUST ANSWER TilE FOLLOWING QUESTION YES OR NO Do any of the following individuals have an interest in the applicant or owner, as delined above? YES x NO 1. Any orJicial New York State YES NO 2. Any orJicial or employee of Southold Town or Suffolk County'! _YES _NO If the answer above is yes, to any of the questions, General Municipal Law Section 809 requires that you disclose the name and residence and the nature and extent of the Interest of said individual (s) in the applicant or owner. NAME RESIDENCE NATURE OF INTEREST . . Swom before me this \OJ(o... D'YOr:>~.200~ ~. fuc NOT AR PUBLIC ~ ~'M.~~s.~v'" ~i~ '7/ d~OCa ~f) , SIGNATURE Fox Land Surveying P.O. Box 224 Speonk, New York 11972 (631) 325-2902 . . April 27, 2004 Surveyor's Description Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Orient, tlo South old Tax Map # 1000-015.00-09.00-003.005 All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Orient in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, said parcel being particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southeasterly end of Main Road said point being situate North 61 deg. 30 min. 40 sec. East 80.19 feet from the northwesterly corner of land now or formerly Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc. ; Running thence from said point or place of beginning along the easterly side of Main Road North 30 deg. 15 min. 00 sec. West :16.87 feet to the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly L.I.P.A; Running thence along the southerly line of land now or formerly L.I.P.A, land now or formerly William G. Wysocki & Patricia Helinski, and land now or formerly Betsy B. Latham North 63 deg. 46 min. 40 sec. East 297.00 feet to the northwesterly corner of land now or formerly A & J Long Island Realty, LLC.; Running thence along the westerly line of land now or formerly A & J Long Island Realty, LLC. The following two courses and distances; 1. South 27 deg. 45 min. 50 see East 330.00 feet to a point, 2. South 48 deg. 08 min. 10 sec. East 194.98 feet to the approximate high water mark of Gardiners Bay; Running thence along the approximate high water mark of Gardiners Bay South 38 deg. 28 min. 55 sec. West 232.22 feet to the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc.: Running thence along the easterly line of land now or formerly Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc. the following four courses and distances; 1. North 34 deg. 23 min. 40 sec. West .587.84 feet to a point, 2. South 62 deg. 01 min. 40 sec. West 68.00 feet to a point, 3. North 28 deg. 14 min. 10 sec. West 14.00 feet to a point, 3. South 61 deg. 30 min. 40 sec. West 15.50 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing an area of 2.6291 Acres Fox Land Surveying . P.O. Box 224 Speonk, New York 11972 (631) 325-2902 . April 27, 2004 Surveyor's Description Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Orient, tlo Southold Tax Map # 10.0.0.-0.15.0.0.-0.9.0.0.-0.0.3.0.0.6 All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Orient in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, said parcel being particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the' southwesterly corner of land now or formerlyA & J Realty, LLC. Said point being situate 297.00 feet easterly from the point where the southwest corner of land now or formerly L.I.P.A intersects the easterly end of Main Road; Running thence from said point or place of beginning along the southerly line of land now or formerly A & J Long Island Realty, LLC. North 63 deg. 46 min. 40 sec. East 280.74 feet to the westerly line of land now or formerly County Of Suffolk; Running thence along the westerly line of land now or formerly County Of Suffolk the following two courses and distances; 1. South 12 deg. 21 min. 20 sec. East 247.16 feet to a point 2. South 48 deg. 05 min. 00 sec. East 193.28 feet to the approximate high water mark of Gardiners Bay; Running thence along the approximate high water mark of Gardiners Bay South 40 deg. 25 min. 47 sec. West 230.72 feet to the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly Adam C. Wronowski & Jessica Wronowski; Running thence along the easterly line of land now or formerly Adam C. Wronowski & Jessica Wronowski the following two courses and distances; 1. North 48 deg. 08 min. 10 sec. West 194.98 feet to a point; 2. North 27 deg. 45 min. 50 sec. West 330.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing an area of 2.6158 Acres , 1')(1?9'~1 t;"~ _(,I'.... '" 1,.Lv.:l Numhl'rofpngt"'". ~' " TOlu~rN." Serial tr 'Ccnilir;l1rj, PriurC!f.:i__. IkcJI,\ltlM!!,'I!;e IIlSlTIUm'1I1,. ~ I',t~~ ! FiJiIt!!. Fc~' i'~ II;UIlJlillg "" lP..'iH.1 ") ~;Ht:lli\.'n -'-~- I.::A-52 17 (CU1Jl1ly) :5 I:A-52171Sliltel (?~ JU'.T.S..\. Z3GO ---- ;_~j[f:~_1 o I I I ! I I I 11<1,:39 RECEII/E'D :5 '":'):)..(0. Rl=_A:_ ESTATE OCT 1 8 2000 Tri',Ah1Si=Ct:; TAX GUr.::')L:--, COLII-!TY i14,39 L..:,;r"Cd" ""I(lt1!!~I~l':I';\,(~I:lrt1p I'U:~; Sub TU1i!1 -, ~ .:':JC_I :1~~_r.~~!. I.';:~;.,.'~-,:;/~~.. ~<'r ',_ ", ',Ir''''k/,'l&i'', ,':"ij' =-~'. .." 2:-, 'i:~ (;) ~ ') ::... ~~~t'~,::;".,'$ ~~'~,"l/.,'(,ijJl> y'J~:J.:ok,,~.,. Sub Tt't!:tl ~5?) (77.D:.'; ().J, GHANI) TOTAL I{c:lI Property Tax Service Agency VL'I"ificmirm Disl. Sec(jun Block 1000' ~I 015.00 l.UI 09.00 003.004 ..:;j~0Ijf~~:~i~~;~~ti~ , I I I I , , Ii , , i--' I I RECO,~Dt[J S.III',lac!I.llls:/lJlschnrg;es/Hdcasc" Llsl Prnpcrt\' UWIlC!; rVJmllJJg Add r'" nECOlw &: IH::TUHN TO: /'oICNull:y -SpeH1S John R. McNuHy, Esq. I 633 East Main St..," 1'.0. Box 757 Rivarhead, N~rI YorIo: 1190] L.- 0]-5.00 09.00 ,003.006 00 OCT 16 PM ,: 05 EOWt,..'_'~ ;. ;i~}":'::'ii~E" CLEEK a!=" SUFF;lU'; COUrHY P'~'(:(l;di;~:: . ,; '1:' ~ "'.l .!;' 1""...".,,,....1..,. .. "",.'" ... I I H;l~k 1:1'. ~ ,\dd:l,u:t"l-r.l'. SuiJ T o!a~ Sr'<.'(_:'\~'!1 ". Sr.'c,/Add. Tot r,ll(j. '1',\:\ UU:.\ITI1\\'1l_1.lu;:I("'UU1:, Ikld fl)r API't1r1il.llum:ul _,,_,_,. Tramr...rTIl:( .::.~OO' _._ M~n!li(lfl;rn.\; "I"he prupt'l1y cnWTl:lih;~~~;;;:;~-;;;i:;'ur will he illllllUVl'\) hY;1 "nt' III' 1\\'11 Llllli!)' dw~fHtlg 11111.... " 'r'ES t'r N(J lrNO.~t:C;:\flrrorrialt' t:lx c~ pOl!,!C II __orlhisinslnllllCllI. 6 Community Pn....':er.~'..ltitlll ,.'tmu 'Col1~iut.:ratiol1 '?\lIlnulIt _'l-: ~2J{!..Q.Q.9.00_ 'CPF-Tm:.D'Ul. 1'.)7:_';"/ - '~'.1..lt.-....t.~.'L-:..J._ '0 , RECEIVS:> $ "'>:OO(i mplPvcJ ~'X: l,l~c:'~!It t.:UHJ--:/ D /-- / 1'1'0 /(.1 / -"--~ , Ill) --L_ '1'1) ': OCT 1 8 2000 C'~)MM.'JNIT{ Pi=I~~SEHV" Tl0N FUND '::::~~~_._~~LP_ __.__. ______m___ ';'ilk I! ..3d"l-."{) ". / t-'"JS1) Title Compnny illrurfll~l(joll 'lllis p..lJ:!e f'l\nm p~1J1l\rll\C ,Htw:;hcJ Suffolk County ReCUldim! & t:ndorscment PaQ:e OOUGW :HORRIS :and 'MOOJ.OUE ~'f:)P.1US '- :-'":'-<":C ""---,..... -..,--.-.-. tq'!:Cln' iYP1;.i.)[: 1~.Sl[~\"i\n::\"l ,\ "'-". ..---., --." ------"--" It:.II.1-: 1,1 l11c rn:ll1i~s jj.:."t::'j:1 !s:~itw;d ii'l ;';;G1'1{)U~C(Jl_lr:j)'~.\;1:.'.:.' YORK.. TO ?\ [. J' UlNG ISlAND RE!'.LTl' 1.1;: ----- 11\ ,lh'~-1'fl\\To.~h1r (if In lhl' VILl.N.ji:: or 1 IAI_II.1:!, ,'I' 'SO:..""THOLD OHIE;I,r BUXES :., TIIRU l) i\tL!STHL l\'P!:;U UR PR1:'JTU) It,: IiLN:r-~ INt: O;-,J '; PI.~Jt 11) Tn 1-'l:r',- ,~" \1' /""""-,' ~~~~Lr~':1EI~';i~~~~~i&:~~;1W;.,;;.i:'~::;~-'iJ,;i.:Ji;;':,"~.;.:":~.,;,;,:;,,ii. , . . ,.,,:;:-~:~)j jY/:;' :'.:; )i:!:i':]H7i;\:ir-- :.;:''- '~'_"'M"'~"'_':';'~"''''~~I''_____'_'''' . j CO~ISULT YO\..'"?; 1......;.vrEP. 9.EFORC SlnllrlG THIS IflSl R.tI1t.E',,(j" -Tl-lI::. 1"'$1 RUI'{E~r SHC;t:t.,: 810 USEU G':'" :';'..~'N!:.P:S C:Ol', 'l ! I THIS !rIDENTURE. m2:.e In'? . Jay 01 ~.:.-. ";. 'J,_. BETWEEN DOUGLJ\S l.-lor~RIS cl"j 1\,10NIC,lUE MORR!S ,L';' ''':!e. ::Jr;II', r'?$Ia'rng ai "1.;;86 i..aul!:': H~)l:0", r Read, LaurElI HcAlow N,....~ fo...." '17'9, I _:.., _:. .:' ::.l.ir.:: T:::i.,:'!n:: ~{~ctj,t.: ~.~"C I ,'Jany of lhli: ~',r~! pan, an,j 0Am,t:K~t.',..W!;; r~~:G1ng al 4.:.0 O~d Mcn:Du~; Highway. Eastpo~!, New '(or;'; ~ 19~ i I oanv of :111.. 512l;rJna p~n, WITNESSETH, lOa: 'ho pany of Ihe '''51 po" ,n cnnsoderal;on of TEU and nenOOlh, l>iO.OO) oalla" o",a b', /lhE' Pelr!y or ihe- sec'Jnd pan, 11:"~,s riGreb;.' ~nm: and release unto the party of L"~ .~scond par.. H~!? Il(~ir~: or 5uC,:-assors ,.:lnd <'I$slgm; of i~lf3 p;;r:!, C'l toe second oar! foreve,-, I ALL :hal Cl~:i.ail"l plot. piece or parcel of land, '.'JIL'1 lhe build,ops anc ImprCvElmeot!i :tIGrE!On Bfel:tea. Si!:.Ji31o? lYing and billing in the . ~:.')::: SEE "SCHEm!L!: ,1:.." Al>H-!r=X!:D PF:RETO TOGETHER with all righl,'1itle'and interest, if any. of the PSIiY of.the-firgt part.inand to-any streets and roads abutting the above described prlImili9S to the cenler lines lhareof: TOGETHER with the-appurtenancss and aft the estate and rights of the party of the fir::;! part in'and:lo;said premises: -TO' HAVE AND TO HOLD [he premises herein granted unto the oarty of lhe ~econd pan, tho heirs or :;ucoessors and as:;;gns of the part,' of the seconCi part forever. AND ;lhe party oflhe first 'part covenants lha! the party oi the firSl:.part"has not done or suffered anything wheraby the said premises have been encumbered in any 'I,' JY whatever, el(cepl as aforesaid. AND lhopart\' of Ihefirst part, in comoliance wilh SectIon 13 of the Uen Law. -COvenants thaltne party of the first purt "I:~II ~ceive the C()nsideralion for this conveyano:l and wil~ hold U'c right 10 receivC' !Ouch consldcralion as:! trust'und 10 be E1Pp/::'!d first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvemenl and WIll i.ppl~' the same first to tha payment of the Cost of lhe improvement before uSIng any pari of the total 0( the S;;lme lor any o:h~ purpose. The word 'party" sh,'lll be ccnr;lrued as if il-read "partif.ls" y..'henever the sens/? of !his indenture so requIres. ' IN WITNSSS WHEREOF,thepariy of Il1e lirs! parI has:dr.rly.execuled this deed the day and YI3Ar flrsl abo....e written. \. ''..[.In',,"'I''1,r:_..,,. NOTJ..FtY ' , ~. ,~,v~'. . ~~(;. ~';d;.;,.;';I '.",,~( {{Jr~ No.J-I.<I8ll.lli., eul',lffilldb"/"'';;-'Y'D'I''.I' GC:111'J!lI::Iklr"', ~.(m', 1~.111J4I1""--t'T~I;:~,~,.,j. llN PRCSE~IC[ OF: I I I- I . I 1 (:L_, [)CJUG0\S ),( \ ,'.. " -' l\lil-~HRJS ""~ , . , /'1 rn J~(J;,I ) '~ !1,.'yj- r~ rvh1JNIQUE rl0Fn~JS I I ~~.ilimB' 1"~1::W;'~~"~(elW~'~'~"':':'::-J~I'?'!":<'~"*-'''''':''1.'''_! T;1/~m~-'~~~'~~"~"'~r. \~lt. ~~l~iJ~J!{j .~!I'~'~~~~~-~~;~1ih~2j~1i-~~~~,;tJ~~\'e;1:14i0~~t~. ~~:,~~m'~1r12~A1ffj.<~k].~.\$,!:{~~t;;~'~'i;,i.'.;;,:~,;;t.;,'i~!,:;)\~j!:!;:-,;!;~i'f~~:H? \'tWr.i.fn1.~);!. ,'), ('i;!J..'ml:~-d'..~,.:.";..~";.."l."l"~"""""'.~~)~i"'M'",;",,~,,,,~;:,'j.""'~"_" ,'"-,,,U;:l ...,....,.. ~,", ,"~ ~.,.. ...._ . ^F"'" ----.,.--~~.".-".=' "'."",","'~~'"i,,",b,_-,,~,':.cci;~.1!.;';:;;.w,;;.,;;;0!klig;".i11,j;;~,:Jii\~,:21U!L~f'K;,;,L1~\~r;i1i)" I.~~' Eif....l.!_S~D Q'\'L. Y 'NJjfh Ti-l= ,II,C~I':0\"..!...g.0S!".;...';LC":....i:2..E.j'1..QUf'" Ne\' YD~;': nfl..:: . - SI",I... of Now YOfr: C1l!Il:vof f.j''T' On lh~._:i. 0"',1 of ~r..:\ d j;. ../ in Ir.~ "ear ::;::;'; tJe~ore mol!, the Undi!:"5ir~n'~~. p!l!':loMllv ElPP~2rM DOUGLAS !~Oi.'RIE parsona!:.,. ~nowl1 ill m.l or provec Ie: ml: or. !r.~ 021:"15 of s;"lisfac1ory eVldenc-;, tc. be- 111(: jndJlfiduall!;] who5e I\anv:\~) is rar~l subr.crib!!d 10 ll1e .....ith;n illSlrumen: an:! ~c.~nQv,'!t'':!gerj Ie me lhat hllISIll'Jlh~y t!1.eculed ~ttE< :><1:"1"" ,,', hl:~'h"!':','ltlr capacny(ie~). .md :ha~ by hi::;lherlth~lr sIUT',O!!ure(~i en Ire i!ISlrumen lhe indiv"juaH:L. or the purse,'" un~ln cF.ha:; 0~ '.'lIver, tI',€: indi~~I!~I(5j ac~,,_, r7f:CUI~~ Ifle In:;:r(um.~r:: -i~;?r~:=ft~TrL -1 ISI1;1r,~tun) .11'\..1 ~i1lce of iridl'nauai lakw,r,: aCknowl€:IJ,;-:rnton:; i'lOT.'\R't r='UElLIC Bn:VEN O. LEEOs NOTARY PUBLIC. Sllti(1 '.Jrl-1!;f~, Yo:. NO. 31-oIIJB:!774 (;}ualili9</ In I'loJw Yorio: ClJlm~', Carru~,~lSSl(}n ErPlrllS J:inutlry 2r:. 2(\,:," Slate (or Dislncl a/ ':':olu'I'1bia Territory. or Foraigr: C('1..ii'11ri.l of Onll".p. dil,;,of In It'le yenr s,,'~'" 0::': ~;~:... "-::--'. ;:: :'U'1\, ::-' !-'. ':"r, :11<:: 3', ~~,"::~ ~',-;-"- r., "1"0.,. ',-::.'" _'~".,\.! "-2:0r-: mi' !!')~ unt,l~rsl';~~:', re-r~):e:':"ik ;;r'N;;<r~f.' I--..~GN:QU;:' :,'~><'; Rl~; p""rsO/"!;liiy ~_"'C""vn :-:. ,.,.."!" c~ :;!'::"'':l:! 1:- 1111" 0" Ih(' I;"~I~ ("~ .sa!':::!D~S1'.. ';-'JIC~r.U:- lC 1)!:' :,;)'! 'f:':I"I':J'~a"-;:' "'T,'~',.. '--,"''1"'':';'" i~. :<111':) :;w!:.'!:--:;{"bfr:;: W :~~ w'r'll~' 'f:S:"'.'''''''I: ;,I~lC :j:;','i:l'.;-;~,.,~~:: I" :'J1'l 1:-,.2~ ,r~''':5''r.:' :~,~, ...~iO;;'.JI"'~ :,''!:" ~.,,11' '" I"~,:;',,,,,'.':~',,,,~ caDaCJlyr:"~.s,i ,'(It! (r:IJ~ b:- :11:;...tl(,'!~h~lr ],I']naPJ!'\:,,,', u:', 11".- ,n~ln.-,ner:! me ;~!1IIJ!dlJ;k~) o"!r'~ r:--ersn'1 Uf)O~ t'!':'I"\;:!:! ~'i W!lI.:t, ':'~~~l~~~~~~~:;~~f4~:,::,:"::':,"-",,,. ,::";::""':Jr.I:, E"7EYE~ r~ ' ',r H..,.-iI\RY Pl)~i "1_ I-.'~ ,;U.-1.jffl;~''')", Gu.~I,:,~ :-It........',..-IIU.:::O..''l. CC\mr'-milJ':.. ~." _.. _,'......" z". :':1.~j befOre mI!. Ih,:, u"der~'Qr.~d. (lerson...II', Oppeart:G l)~r5r.onalty known It) m~ or P'-';)\/I;.'O (I) rno on Iho;, baStS of sallsiaClOry eVidence tc be Ihe indrvldual's) wh"o::~ ''\eme~'ii IS fate-! ~ubsr..ribed 10 :h~ .....thln inSl(ul1l~nl and aCknr.w;edg~d To me tha: heish<!!/the:' e)'~-'cutlld I",:, ::am.;: in h;:;'~~rf~h~lr ::;:!::;;::Clt\'(J""~l, .'in<j that by hIS/~'!r11h..i~ s;gna~ure(s\ 011 11'\~ In"'trumel'! the Indivl!:luai(s.l. or Ih", person upon ~e:1at~ of whiCll [tie indrJlou,;"...J ;JC!c.c, e.'lCecu:ed l:-le lfIslrurnef11, ~nd Ih,'1 :H/ch individual n."u.:. ~t;ch ar:;p:'!:ill13f1Ce befoie ::11; undf.:r~.Jg!1~d II"; :;"1€: " {ln~t'n Ine City (if 'Jlner pOlll!CSI SUt.-aIVilI0:11 (~r,C1 mr.t'r1I"e GI'lIa or c.ountry {J/ o!r:/;:f PlilCl'I ale "",.,;rIO'l'll!;"J;lr!leni wO!~ t~I'_';':,') . ,,~11~1~~W~\\f~t~ll~~~~t1iy~f[~~iBi~~~~~~~:':s~:::~~i~1i~~~j~ _, BARGAIN ,~ND SAle DeeD W!:H COVENANT AGAIN:1T GRANTOR'S ACTS Title No. DOUGLAS 1\nORRIS and MONIQUE MORRIS 70 ""':"""1'(_ A [. J Long I::iland 'He-31ty LLC :tTANDARO fORIlI C~WYORK BmRDOI' ni~nmTER:l~~ Di!;~iblJl~dby . Commonwealth ..,~'.' ,',I_'-,~: ~,",-"", -', ,'"""", l.'l)!&I!l~""'lA1.nll,,\."'n Trrue l:-,:sl.:R,\lo;t 1: t:, I\IM....;. _. g o ;? ~ o "' " c. o ." 2 ." :1. c, '" . ." ~ .~~ (3!9na!U1e::Jn:::ot!Ic.'?oIlr\:!:vIOUil!11!\'JI1!.lfltlf"lOWI/:dgmelllj SECTIOI-I 015_.00 BLOCK 09.00 LOTS 003.004 &. DCr.HI06 - COUNTY OR TOVi:N :STFl EET'AOORESS Recorded at:ReQueSI or COMMONWEALTH LAND,TITLE lNSUP.A1JC:. COMPMN Rrrll~N av MAIL TO I MCNul-ly-Speiss J'l.ttn.'~John R McNulty, I.:"sq. !633 Ea!>t ~'.~ain St., p.o. Box 757 I Riverhead,- Hew Yorl':"'!1901 I " . , . . . '0' 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner. whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition. many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -. Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 0 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate). and any other supporting information. and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: OA. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. DB. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. . Dc. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible Officer) Date Page 1 of 21 . . . ". PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NonCE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the sAtire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc~ Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipaiity and County) Name of AppiicantlSponsor State Route 25, Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County: SCTM# 1000-15-9-3.5. 3.6 Cross Sound Ferrv Services Tn~ City I PO c/o Esseks, Hefter and Angel, 108 E. Main Street Address PO Box 279, Riverhead State NY Zip Code 11901 Business Telephone 631-369-1700 Name of Owner (if different) Address c/o Esseks. Hefter ann Anq~l. lnR F~cr M~;n ~~raa~ A & J Long Island Realty and Adam C. Wronowski, indo and as Guardian City I PO PO Box 279. Riverhead State NY Zip Code 11901 631-369-1700 Business Telephone Description of Action: Refer to Project Statement Page 2 of 21 . . Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 . Present Land Use: 0 Urban o Forest D Industrial o Agriculture o Commercial 0 Residential (suburban) 0 Rural (non-farm) [ijOther G ra s s:. f 1el d IM"ad ow: Bru sh 1 a nd : Dirt Road/Unvegetated area; Dredge spoil storage; Landscaping; Beach 2. Total acreage of project area: 5,24 acres. (228,470 soL) APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPlETION* Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 30 2lacres (139,953) o acres F mested n acres nacres ^o~-- I...._~I ~f__1 ...lM ~~_l....M""_ - rl--~. pittlHl, Ot8) Beach 10 07acres ( o 46 , 5 1 6 )0 66 o acre~28,8l9: Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24.25 of ECl) acres acres '''S,' L r: r Drege Spoil Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) D i r t r 0 ad, .40 acres (17,695) .42 acre08,S09) .40 acres ( 17,421).03 acre! 1,222) .07 acres (3,021) 3.94 acreOn,Sll .09 acres (3,864) . 19 acref 8,406) unyegatated c egrlng Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) *Based only on conceptual preliminary site plan; Subject to further review. Landscaping 3. Whatis predominant soil type(s) on project site? HaA (Haven Loam 0- 2 % slop es) -U SDA Suf folk. CQ. r1 0 Soil Survey a. Soil drainage: IlUIWell drained ~A, of site Moderately well drained _% of site. o Poorly drained _ % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 0 Yes [])\No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: DO-l0%~% 010-15%-2...--% 015% or greater....5.......-% 6. Is project substantiaJ!Y....!i.~ontigUOUS to, o.r. contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? U Ves @ No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks? D Ves [!JNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 708' (in feet) below surface as per on-site test hole 0 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [!lYes DNa DYes !3No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Page 3 of 21 . . 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes DNO Accordin4 to: MO"'E:. lOE.f,,)''UFHiC) ,0 pIl."Hi." Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc., and Dr. Eric Lamont, Ph.D.- * (L"tDont, 1997, Filed Study for parcel 1000-15-9-3.5) Identify each soecies: , 2, Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (I.e.. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ~Yes DNo Describe: A 100' x 180' pile of dredge spoil is 'located on the sourthern half of the project site. The pil'e reaches a maximum eleva'tion of 16', with the surrounding grade being approximatley ,8'. , 3, Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes ~NO" If~s. explain: MThe beach, fronting and part of the project site, is frequently used by individuals who are waiting for the ferry. , 4, Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes DNO Gardners Bay, Plum Island and Lightouses can be visable from the oro;ect site and ad;acenri beach 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: I Not applicable 8. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Not applicable '6, lakes. ponds. wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Gard1hners Bay. b, Size (in acres): l Page 4 of 21 . . 1 7. Is the site served by existing public utilities? G! Yes DNa [i]Yes Util1ties exist along the DNgroject boundaries. a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? GaYes DNa 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25.AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes []I No 19. Is the site located in or SUbstantial~.__ c.. 1 ontiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the Eel, and 6 NYCRR 6177 D9Yes UNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes IiUi No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). 8. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 11 . 2 *acres. * SCTM# 1000-15-9-10.1, 11.1, 15.1, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.4 b. Project acreage to be developed: 3. 97 acres initially; 3. 97 acres u~imately. * * ** Only SCTM' 1000-15-9-3.5 and 3.6 c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped; 1. 27 acres. d. length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) Not applicable e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. % 451 Add i t ional pa rking ---- spaces represent a 146% f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 309 ; proposed 45 1.* * * ex pan si 0 n . *** With proposed, all parce~s combined - 160 parking spaces. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? Not a p pi i cab 1 e . h. If residential; Number and type of housing units: Initially One Family N/A N/A Two Family N/A N/A Ultimately Multiple Family Condominium N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A width; N/A length. 17' ft. L Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: N / A height: j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will.occupy is? 2. How much natural material (Le. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards. "'To.C O&UL""'~D. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed mYes DNo ON/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? I To be determined. b. Wili topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 0 Yes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 0 Yes DNa DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 3 . 2 1 acres. Page 5 of 21 . . 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes G]NO 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ~ months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: Not Applicable a. Total number of phases anticipated _ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: _ month _ year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: _ month _ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 0 Yes 0 No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? 0 Yes Ii91I No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10-20 ; after project is complete 6 1 O. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 0 Yes o IiW No If yes, explain; I I 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? 0 Yes [iiI No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial. etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? 0 Yes GJ No Typa 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 0 Yes 0 No If yes, explain: No effect on surface area of existing waterbody. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year ftood plain? Iliil Yes 0 No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? 0 Yes I;;J No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? 0 Yes 0 No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes DNo Page 6 of 21 . . e. If yes. explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? D Yes QNO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dves QNO 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? D Yes [Bl No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DvesQNo 21 . Will project result in an increase in energy use? 0 Yes ~ No If yes. indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells. indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. Not Applicable 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. Not Applicable 24. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? 0 Yes 0 No If yes. explain: Page 7 of 21 . 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board GJ Ves City, Town, Village Planning Board /]]ves City, Town Zoning Board Dves City, County Health Department Dves Other local Agencies (Town Trustees) [] Ves Other Regional Agencies Dves State Agencies IiJves Federal Agencies DVes . DNa Type Change of Zone DNa Submission of the Site Plan Application Submjttal Date upon Approval of Zoning change. IKXl No rru No DNa Trustee Permit rn No D.No NYSDEC ~oastal Erosion; NYS Dept. of Transportation :f!.lNo c. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes 0 No lIVes, indicatedecisionrequired:Change of Zoning Boundary D Zoning amendment o Site plan o Zoning variance o Special use permit o New/revision of master plan D Resource management plan Page 8 of 21 o Subdivision o Other . . 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 20% coverage of 5.24 acres is 1.05 acres gf building area.* *Building area excludes at-grad~, surfaced areas.- as per Town Zoning Code. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? l MIl I 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 30% Coverage of 5.24 acres is 1.57.gf building area.* *Building area excludes at-grade, surfaced areas.- as per Town Zoning Code 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [is] Yes DNo The proposed action is consistantwith 1) Local land use and 2) is in response to accornadate the demand for additional 7. What are the predominant land users) and zoning classifications within a Y4 mile radius of proposed action? 1 General Land Use Catagories exist within a 1/2 mile of the project site: 1) Low density residential. 2) Medium density residential. 3) Open space - recreational. 4) Vacant Land 5) Transporation. 6) Commercial. 7~ Utilities. Zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile of the proj-ect site: R-80. R-40, MIl, R~400 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? ~Yes DNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed7 Not applicable. a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 . . 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 0 Yes kil No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education. police, fire protection? Dves lSIJI No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dves DNo Dves o Ves I&t No DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. D. Infonnational Details I Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. VerifICation I cenify that the information provided ab.ove is true to the best of my knowledge. AjlplIIC:lIliIIl!SpQlOlDX Name Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc. Agent for Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. Date -.-January, 2005 Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency. complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 . . PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that It is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large Impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential large impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change Impact on land 1. Will the Proposed Action resuit in a physical change to the project site? NOD YES 0 Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. o 0 DYes ONo 0 0 Yes DNo 0 0 Yes DNo 0 0 Yes DNO 0 0 Yes DNo 0 0 Yes DNo Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. o Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. o Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. o Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. o Excavation far mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tans of natural material (Le., rock or soil) per year. o Page 11 of21 . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. D D DVes DNa Construction in a designated f1oodway. D D DVes DNa Other impacts: D D DVes DNa I 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) DNO DVES Specific land forms: D D DVes DNa I I Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles IS, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) DNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 D 0 Dves DNa Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of 0 0 Dves DNa a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water 0 0 Dves DNa body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. 0 0 Dves DNa Other impacts: 0 0 DVes DNa I I 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 DVes DNo A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface 0 0 DVes DNa area. Other impacts: 0 0 DVes DNa I Page 12 of 21 . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 DVes DNo Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not 0 0 DVes ONo have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater 0 0 OVes DNo than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water 0 0 Dves DNo supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. 0 0 Dves DNo Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which 0 0 OVes DNo presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons 0 0 Dves DNo per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into 0 0 Dves DNo an existing bOdy of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or 0 0 Dves DNo chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without 0 0 Dves DNo water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses 0 0 Dves DNo which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 0 0 Oves DNo Page 13 of21 -----.-.--.- . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? DNO DVES Examples that would apptyto column 2 0 0 Dves DNo Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. 0 0 DVes ONo Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. 0 0 DVes ONo Proposed Action will allow development in a designated 0 0 OVes ONo floodway. Other impacts: 0 0 OVes DNo I IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ONO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 OVes DNo Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton 0 0 Dves ONo of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour 0 0 Dves DNo or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land 0 0 OVes DNo committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of 0 0 DVes DNo industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: 0 0 OVes DNo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO OVES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. o o DVes DNo Page 14 of 21 . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. 0 0 OVes ONo Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, 0 0 OVes ONo other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: 0 0 OVes ONo I 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? DNa OVES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident 0 OVes ONo or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removafof more than 10 acres of 0 0 OVes DNo mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: 0 0 DVes DNo I I IMPACT ON AGRlCULTIJRAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? DNa DVES Examples that would appty to column 2 0 0 OVes ONo The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural tand (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of 0 0 Dves DNo agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 0 0 DVes ONo acres of agricuituralland or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of21 -- ----- . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact impact Project Change The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of 0 0 OVes ONo agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: 0 0 OVes ONo I I IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix 8.) DNa OVES Examples that would appiy to column 2 0 D DVes DNo Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of D D Dves DNo aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or 0 0 DVes DNo significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: 0 D OVes DNo I I IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAl RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ONO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 DVes DNo Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within 0 0 OVes DNo the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive 0 0 OVes DNo for archaeological sites on the NVS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 . . 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Larga Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change o o OVes DNa Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATtON 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. Other impacts: I 0 0 OVes ONO 0 0 OVes DNa 0 0 OVes DNa I A major reduction of an open space important to the community_ IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NVCRR 617.14(g)7 DNa OVES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of theCEA Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA7 0 0 OVes ONO 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONO 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo I Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: Page 17 of 21 . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ONO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 OVes DNa Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. 0 0 OVes DNa Other impacts: 0 0 Dves DNa I IMPACT ON ENERGV 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 Dves DNa Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an 0 0 Dves DNa energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: 0 0 DVes DNa I NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 Dves DNa Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). 0 0 OVes DNa Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the 0 0 OVes DNa local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a 0 0 DVes DNa noise screen. Other impacts: 0 0 Dves DNa I Page 18 of 21 . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBUC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? DNO DVES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of 0 0 Dves DNa hazardous substances (i.e.'oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" 0 0 DVes DNa in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied 0 0 Dves DNa natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other 0 0 OVes DNa disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: 0 0 OVes DNo I I IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 DVes DNa The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating 0 0 DVes DNa services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or 0 0 DVes DNa goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. 0 0 OVes DNa Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, 0 0 DVes DNa structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community 0 0 DVes DNa services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Page 19 of 21 . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: I 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? DNa DYES . 1 Small to Moderate Impact D D o 2 Potential Large Impact o D o 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes DNa DYes DNa DYes DNa I If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 . . Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefiy describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: . The probability of the impact occurring . The duration of the impact . Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value . Whether the impact can or will be controlled . The regional consequence of the impact . Its potential divergence from local needs and goals . Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 - ,~: . .-' Project Statement for the PROPOSED CHANGE OF ZONE for property nnder the control of CROSS ~OUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. Apolication Submitted To: Tlie Southold Town Hoard Date: January, 2005, Note: The following text is intended to be used in association with the submitted application forms and drawings. Therefore, this Project Statement is not an inclusive description of the proposed action, but is instead a supplementary overview. * * * Proiect Site Identification. Data and Historv. " The project site is represented by two vacant adjoining parcels of land located adjacent to the current Cross Sound Ferry Facility in Orient Point, Town of Southold. In specific, the parcels are identified as SCTM 1000 - 15 - 9 - 3,5 & 3.6. The parcels are accessed via State Route 25 and are currently zoned R-80 (Residential Low Density A) by the Town of Southold. The parcels are approximately the same size, have a combined area of 5.24 acres and possess over 450 Lf. of frontage along Gardiners Bay. The project site is the only residentially zoned property, held in private ownership, located on the south side of State Route 25 from the tip of Orient Point for a distance of approximately one mile to the west. The parcels have a history of site disturbance including agriculture and dredge spoil storage. Both sites contain a continuous connecting dirt road which extends from the easternmost property line to the westernmost property line. Both parcels are made up of primarily grassland which is subject to routine mowing, A smaller amount ofbrushland vegetation exists on the periphery of the site, suggestive of a successional field, Prior environmental studies have concluded that the project site does not likely contain rare or unique species of flora and/or fauna. In order to allow safe ingress and egress of the ferry vessels, the applicant must routinely dredge the slips/loading ramp areas. Currently, the dredge spoil from these maintenance events is stored in the southwestern comer of the project site, primarily on SCTM #1000 - 15 - 9 - 3.5. It has been customary for NYS to access this stockpile and use the material for erosion control at Orient Point State Park. The western (SCTM 1000-15-9-3,5) and eastern (SCTM 1000-15-9-3.6) parcels which constitute the project site are owned by (1) Adam C. Wronowski and Jessica Wronowski and (2) A & J Long Island Reality, LLC., respectively. However, each parcel is under the control of Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc, since the referenced owners concurrently own/represent Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. INTER:SCIENCE . . Descriution ofthe Prouosed Action. The proposal involves changing the existing zoning of the project site from R-80 (Residential Low Density A) to Mil (Marine II). By changing the zoning of the site as proposed, the project site would join a large block of land currently zoned Mil (occupied by Orient by the Sea Marina, Plum Island Ferry and Cross Sound Ferry - current block, approximately 21 acres; proposed block, approximately 26.25 acres). Route 25 would continue to serve as the main zoning district boundary between the residentially zoned property to the north and the marine uses to the south. Currently, there is not sufficient area at the Cross Sound Facility to accommodate the current demand for parking. Upon obtaining approval for the change of zone and pursuant to the review of an overall site plan by the Town Planning Board, the proposed zoning change would allow for the creation of additional parking to accommodate ferry passengers who now routinely park along State Route 25. As explained in the previous section of this project statement, the applicant currently conducts routine dredging of the slip/loading ramp area to allow for safe passage of the ferry vessels. The dredge spoil is currently stockpiled on the project site and has been used in the past by NYS for erosion control projects at Orient Point State Park. The applicant is proposing to shape and replace the dredge spoil in a dune like formation along on the upland portion of the beach (no closer than 50' from mean high water), just south of the proposed walkway. The artificial dune will allow for protection of the parking area while also allowing continued unobstructed passage along the beach. Ongoing dredging events will allow for maintenance of the dune, however, if the dune does not require maintenance, the dredge material will be available to NYS for continued erosion control projects at Orient Point State Park. /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /" /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /'/'( /'/' \ /' \ /// ."./'\. /' ~. \ /' / \ \/////// "/,, \ /' ( \ /' /' e{\':I \ \ \ \ /,/,\0{(0) \ Y /' o{ '? I>- \ /' \ {'o'll ~~. \~"oo~ // \ I...sv'tls........ \ /' \ \ / \ e{\':I. ~ \ / \ \o{{0oC'f.\ . \ \ o{ ~':IS. s'f.\ \ {'o'll (',. ~e\\{' \ {0 . r',o ","oq~ // \ ..(~\\o <\V ,.,. j \ ~,\ ,?o'l.\ \,Il j \ \ / \ / e{\':I :v. \ I ,d{0 \\0\ J o{ \ S\) I {'o'll '1.':1 0 00>:1 I \){' "oe I CP \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ SEPT. 29, 2004 AMENDED LABEL JULY 12, 2004 UPDATED SURVEY JUNE 20, 2004 UPDATED SURVEY DATE: MAY 27, 2004 JOB NO: 2004-212combined CERTIFIED TO: CROSS-SOUND FERRY SERViCES, INC. DAViD H. FOX N. Y.S.L.S. #50234 FOX LAND SURVEYING 64 SUNSET AViENUE WESTHAMPTON BEACH, N.Y. 11978 (631) 288-0022 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATlON OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY 15 A VlOLATlON D"SECTlON 7209 OF THE NEW YORK 'STAn: EDUCATION lAW_ COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EM80SSEO SEAL SHALL 1-10T 8E c:ONSIDEREO TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. !,. n.r \':1 \ {0e{ ~'I.':I' \O{ ?-.eO 'll d ~d\O {'O \S >\\oqi {'C!l \,Il'" J ~o I>-~ . >l"<)'! ~o ~\~G 01.0 ,,?~O?oCJ. _----....1\. e{\':I \O{{0 ,<,c{0 o{ ~ov. o'll '0' ,"0<1\ {' 'I.s':I \,Il"'! 'Oe \ ..... o Il1 K' \ ~ ~ "0\ ~ ~\ 0- 0 \ .-<\..... \ '2- (I) ..... '\ \ ~ ~ ~ \\ "',:,..L. ~ \ \ V' (I) \ (I) ':)- \ 'L-..L. \ ....- " \ ~ \ "-:5 \ " \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ '\ ~ '- o ~ \\\""- 0 " \ ~ \ () '\ "'" \ "- ..... "-0 \ '<fl"" \ \ "- \ I.f\ -3'.....\""\ o 0 ""\ 'Q~ ~ \ .. 0- 0 \ \~.......... '\ \ Q--<\~~ \...L. ~ ....I.f\~ \~ .::L ;; ~ ~ ,.,-:' " ~ -:5 " \ \ \ \ \ '\ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ Proposed Change Of Zone Fo~ CROSS-SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. At Orient Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York S.C.T.M.: 1000-015.00-09.00-003.005 clc 003.006 60 60 " \ \ \ /' / cji /' ,~\r:i\\ ~\~~ Ao?' ~~\!I'\ ?lo~~' o'i ?lo , ./ ./ ./ ./ ./' ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ / / / ./ //\ // I / I /// ....~ / ~ - \ / / I ~\~~~~~~~ (//" \, / / e{\'1 '-, \ \ //'\0<0') , y./ o{ ? \l- \ / '00'll ~~. \~"oOl // \ \.s~,os...... \ // \ \ / I e{\'1. ~ , \ ,0{0' Oc,Y-\ . I O{ ~'1S. SY-\ ;;1/ I, 00'll (,. '.(\e\\0 / , '\ ~~\\00'''S\C\C\.I>~e\(,OQl / ,?O / \ ' I ' I e{\'1 \ I ,0<0' "O\Y- I 0< l:, S'0 I 00'll \.'1 a 00" I '00 \.~oo I CP I \ \ \ 0"~~.~ ,Ie:, *\ ~~c,~ eOl. \\ \ ~\\ ...\ \ ~,,\\) \ , I \ SEPT. 29, 2004 AMENDED LABEL JULY 12, 2004 UPDATED SURVEY JUNE 20, 2004 UPDATED SUR,,",y DATE: MAY 27, 2004 JOB NO: 2004-212combined CERTIFIED TO: CROSS-SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. DAVID H. FOX N.Y.S.L.S. #50234 FOX LAND SURVEYING 64 SUNSET A VENUE WESTHAMPTON BEACH, N.Y. 11978 (631) 288-0022 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLA nON OFSEcnON 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT SEARING T1-iE LAND SURVEYOR'S 'NKED SEAL OR EMSOSSEO SEAL SHALL NOT BE: CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID "ffiUE: COPY. CERTIFICATION INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE / / / ./ AleM \.'1' \ ,O{\" ?-.eO\ 'll 0< ~000 00 \S ",oql o Qj \.\l.. J ~O \l-~ !l,.l .,rJ,)~ ~~G li-\l1.0 f?~O~OS""rv eM ,0<0'\.'000' O{ ~O O~ '0. ,"00\ ;~.CSj .. ) ~ ~ ~ l> ~ON< <''''''< ~<I 9) "'<(<I ,0.... 0) o ,"\ \"" ," (I , " " '-0 \ '<SIll\--. ' \ '- I 0' -?" __ \,""i ~ 0 "\ 'Q"~ , \0.- ~ '\\ \ ,\ ~.-k' \ \ o--<\~g." "i..L. ~ , "U>~ , '\ ~ .::L \ ;;,!.. ~-c; ~ \:% ~ () . ~ ., o 0 '? ~ o ~ ~~ 0 ~ r; \J(...,......-- - - ~.. ~......./O .~ q:e ...8-, ~ ..~ \J\V('l '..(\ ~ ~ :/ III :.L. \5).. ..... ("10 Q ~ 0; /1 '? //'" I / ",-'" O~ 1/ />'%. / ./, ..... /,~ )<(.~~ ...~q /.. I , \ .... ..... 10.... "" O"~:<1-IC~ . .,~G \l1C, \ :i," "\~~\~G '" O~r:f'"" "V ~I' ,,~, ...C~'- j~C'O \, ~l"'~ ~" \ ~ I> \ ~.I' " / / / / / / / / / / / / / / C)o'" <P' i, / / / / / / / / / / / ~ /// \1>\ ~ 0'-3' ~ 0\ ., ~\ 0- 0 \ .-(\'"' \ '2. Cil ..... ,. \ ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ "'~..L. ~ \ \ 0' Cil \ i ~'?; \ , ,!..~ \ ..... ("I \ ~ "\ . "\ -:s ("I \ \ \ "\ \ "\ \ "\ "\ \ \ "\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ "\ \ \ \ "\ o <;. 'Ov;. 00 ~"'" ~\ , , ~ , , , \ -:s ("I , I \ ~ , , ~ , , \ I , ~ I , \ Proposed Change Of Zone For: CROSS-SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. At Orient Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York S.C.T.M.: 1000-015.00-09.00-003.005 & 003.006 60 o 60 ~ ~~ % '" '\ '" "'1:, 'b -r.>J- 0- Olll \11\ ~ "0 ~~ 1; 0- 9.. o ..(\ 'f Cil ""0 ~ ~ ~ ,,~ ? .. ." Cil , V~ ~ "~J.. ~ i-. 1:> t'illll -:s ("I ~ di <" .v.\Gy...'\ ~'\~:'S o~' ~\... v~~\\ ~~~, di --- I , / ;' \ \ \ \ /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' /' \ \ \ \-c,. e~\'J \'J. \; ,0((0 ~eO\ ~ o( O{\O {\o \S\ "".;, (\<1 \.~~. J \-0 ~~ \ \ \ \ \ l'~ 0"'~~ ~o ..,,,,0, !i.~ 1.0 ,?~O?OCJ, _"rv / / / "'~~ ~oI <" ' ~,f~y... 'v"~~ --- --- _ ~OO.oo' - -- --- / "'~~ ~oI n':>,c,y... il~ ov.'- ,,\0 ~~~\c"\ \) 'V\s <J?os~""",o, :i.\.. ?~v.\\ 1-0 '?~~~"\ o~ ~~ ~ <1 .?o.v~e-.t ~e-(e-,~ 9J '" !i.CO"\<II-'C~ t. \ ,,\O-e~G'O'\ '" "!i.~ 0;" "- .ocf.'.." l' V'.,~ .' d<-'"' "" \ \700 ? o ~ ? o 0 " ~ o / ~ 0 ~ r. \l\/_....~ -- - ~ y....-.... r' r~ ",,8., ',~ 't""' "on. , IS' ).x U'C/~ 'A\ ~ ~ :/ Il' :);,. ~. ...... 00 . <) ,",,' ~ 0<;~' / , / "../ / / / .$ /.'.~ #' <:i'~./ // ,;' />~. // f4'v /,'1- ;' / /.,. ,~ .&-$ /...,., 1#<) . / o,f ..~if .........y /, -- ./ 7. /' "\'" /~. /0/ /) / 0 / v<Y,," '.. I v~~ /' ~''l'' i~~ 7~ /~. " .rt> r/' '.f:.v../ ..J.. <l;V- ~0 ~<<; 0" t o ~ \ '" "''1:0 'b " .; ~.---'./ .--/~ .. ),> ./.. ~ - ~ o NOTES: 1. AREA = 22B,470 S.F. OR 5.2449 AC. 2. . = MONUMENT FOUND, . = NAIL FOUND. 3. REFERENCE DEED L. 11396 CP. 3B5 & L. 12079 CPo 151 4. lHlS PARCEL IS WITHIN FLOOD ZONES SHOWN HEREON AS DIUNEATED ON FIRM BOUNDARY MAP NO, 36103COOBB G LAST DATED MAY 04, 199B. 5. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V. DATlUM (MSL 1929). 6. CURRENT ZONING USE DISTRICT = R-BO PROPOSED ZONING USE DISTRICT = Mil 7. SOIL TYPES SHOWN HEREON AS DILlNEATED BY SOIL SURVEY OF SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ __................ .....i "Pl'" .I~"......,.. ............,..... "'r"''''.'''_'I"''..IT .. . . Listing of Adjacent Property Owners Concerning the Proposed Zoning Change of Parcels Identified as: SCTM 1000-15-9-3.5 and SCTM 1000-15-9-3.6 Orient, Town of South old Application Name: CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. January, 2005. SCTM 1000-15-9-6.1 Suffolk County Suffolk County Center 330 Center Drive Riverhead, New York 11901-3311 SCTM 1000-15-9-3.4 A & J Long Island Realty LLC. P.O. Box 198 Oakdale, CT 06370 SCTM 1000-15-9-4.2 Betsy Latham 195 Point Road Orient, New York 11957 SCTM 1000-15-9-4.3 William G and Ano Wysocki 145 Point Road Orient, New York 11957 SCTM 1000-15-9-5 Long Island Power Authority c/o Keyspan Corp. Art - Property Tax, 20" Floor One Metro Tech Center Brooklyn, New York 11201-3850 SCTM 1000-15-9-15.1 Cross Sound Ferry Service Inc. Z Ferry Street P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320 . . . SCTM 1000-15-9-9 Address 1: United States Government Washington DC 20000 Address 2: Plum Island Animal Research Facility Main Road / State Ronte 25 Orient, New York 11957 SCTM 1000-15-9-1.13 Daniel F and Ors Nickola P.O. Box 186 Orient, New York 11957 SCTM 1000-15-9-10.1 Cross Sonnd Ferry Services Inc. 2 Ferry Street P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320-0033 SCTM 1000-15-9-11.1 Cross Sonnd Ferry Services Inc. 2 Ferry Street P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320-0033 SCTM 1000-15-9-16 (Underwater Land - Fer", SliDS) Cross Sonnd Ferry Services, Inc. 2 Ferry Street P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320-0033 Underwater Land (Bevond Fer", SliDS) Southold Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 . . TOIVN BOARD TOIVN OF SOUTHOLD in the Matter of the Petition of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. to the Town Boord of rhe Town of Southold. NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Suffolk County Suffolk County Center 330 Center Drive Riverhead, NY 11901-3311 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of South old to .request a change of zone classification. 2. That the property which is the subject of th~ Petition ~ Igcated adiacffit toyouc property and is des- cribed as follows: Two contiguous lots approx~matel.y . acres ac, which are east of the Cross Sound Ferry terminal. ana ~a;~h '~t~ 85e desi5nated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000-015.00-09.00-0.3,006; 10 -015.0 -u~.UU UU5.UU~ 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: R-RO. residential district. 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following ZOne district classification: M_? M~rine di~trict 5. That within five days from the date hereof, . written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the southoldTown Clerk's Office at Main Ro.d, Southold, New York .nd you may then and there examine th~ same during regular office hours. 6. Th.t before the relief sought may be gr.nted, . public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Bo.rd; that. notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the d.te of such he.ring in the Suffolk Times or in the Long Island Tr.veler-Mattituck Watchman, newsp.pers published in the Town of South old and design.ted for the public.tion of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear .nd be heard at such he.ring. Dated: February 17 , 2005 Gross .sound Ferry Services, Inc. Petitioner POSl Office Address: c/o Esseks, Hefter & Angel, 108 East Main St., P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, ~y !l~Ul . . TOWN BOARC' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD in the Matter of the Petition of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. to the Town Boord of the Town of Sourhold. NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO: CERTIFIED, RETUID! RECEIPT REQUESTED A&J Long Island Realty LLC P.O. Box 198 Oakdale, CT 06370 You ARE HEREBY GIVEN '~OT1CE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to .request a change of zone classification. :!. That the property which is the subiect of th~ Petition ~ 'geated ad~ac~t tOYOUr prOpertv and is des- cribed as follows: Two contiguous lots. approxlmately -. acres ac, which are east of the Cross Sound Ferry termlnal ana . : R desinated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000-015.00-09. -003,006; 1 .Uu 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning disrrict: e 'dential district. ". That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following Zone district c1assiftcation: M_? M~r;np. rlistr~ct 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Cleric's Office at Main Road, Southold, New Yorlc and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hou,". G. Thar before the relief soughr may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the marter by the Town Board; that a notioe of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such. hearing in the Suffollc Times or'in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of South old and designated for the publicarion of such. nOlices; thar you or your representative have the rlghr to ap- pear and be heard al such he.ring. Dated: February 17 , 2005 Cross .sound Ferry Services, Inc. Petitioner /.OS[ Office Addre~", c/o Esseks, defter & Angel, 108 East Main St., P.O. Box 279 Rivertlead~ Nt llYUl . . TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD in the Mattor of the Petition of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. TO: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Betsy Latham 195 Point Road Orient, NY 11957 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS to the Town Boord of the Town of Southold. YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN I~OTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to -request 2- change of zone classification. :2. That the propeny which is the subject of th~ Petition ~ Igcated ad~acffit to your prODeny and is des- cribed as .follows: Two contiguous lots approl[l.mately . acres ac, which ar'e east of the Cross Sound Ferry terml.nal and yhirh lors Boe designated on the Suffolk County Tal[ Map nos. 1000-015.00-09,00-003,006; 10 -Ul~.U -U~.uu-UUj.uu~ 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: esidential district. 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone disuier classification: M-? MRrine niRtrict 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Offic" at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine lh~ same durin~ regular office hour::. 6. That before the relief sOllght may be granted, " public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that d lIotice of ~uch hearing must be pubii5hed at le:a.st ten day~; prior to the- date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times 01- in the Long Island TrJveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of SoulhoJd a.nu design;,ned -rOf the publication of such n01}ces; that you or your representative have the right 10 ap- pear and be heard at such hearin!\_ Dated: February 17, 2005 Cross .Sound Ferry Services. Inc. l-'ctitioner r'USt Office Au dres,~~ c/o Esseks, Refter & Angel, 108 East Main St., P.O. Box 279 Riverhead~- Nt J.l~Ul . . TOWN BOA RD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Mattor of the Petition of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. to the Town BOJrd of rhe Town of 50urhold. NOTICE TO ADJACo:NT PROPERTY OWNERS TO: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED William G. and Ana Wysocki 145 Point Road Orient, NY 11957 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to .request a change of zone classification. 2. That the propeny which is the subject of the Petition ~ Igcated adkacffit to your prooenv and is des- cribed as .follows: Two contiguous lots approximately . acres ac, which ar.e east of the Cross Sound Ferry term~nal and i. 1 desi nated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000-015.00-09, 0-003.006; 1 .}. U 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: idential district. 4. Thar by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the fotlowin~ 20ne district classification: M_0 M~r;np digtrict 5. That within five days from the date hereof, , written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town C1~rk's Office at Main Road, Southold, N~w York and you may then and there e:xamine the ~ame during regular office hour::~ 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notir.e of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times or- in the Long Island Traveler;Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the lown of South old and designated for the publicaLion of such nOlices; that you or- your represemallve have the right to ap- pear and be heard al such hearing. Dated: February 17 , 2005 Cross .Sound Ferry Services) Iile. Petitioner l'oST O.ffice ),ddre~s: c/o Esseks, tlefter & Angel, 108 Ea.st Ma:tn St., P ,0. Box 279 RiverheaCL, NY 11~Ul . . TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD in the Maner of the Pelilion of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. to the Town Boord of the Town of Soulhold. NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS ,0: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Long Island Power Authority c/o Keyspan Corp. Att-Property Tax, 20th Floor One Metro Tech Center Brooklyn, NY 11201-3850 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to .request:a. change of zone classification. :2. That the property which is the subject of th~ Petition ~ Igcated adkac~t to Your property and is des- cribed as follows: Two contiguous lots. approxJ.lIlately . acres ac, which are east of the Cross Sound Ferry term~nal and ~nirn lote are desiBnated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000-015.00-09,00-003,006; 1000-01~.U -U~.UU-UU~.UU~ 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition i$ located in the following zoning district: R-RO. residential district. <i. That by such Pelition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following Zone district classification: M_? M~r;ne district 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southord Town Cleric's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you m'l1' then and there examine the 5arne durin:; regular office hour::;. 6. That before the relief ,oughl mal' be granted, " public hearing must be held on the matter by lhe Town Board; that a nOlir:e. of such hearing must be published at. least ten days' prior to. the datt of such hearing in the Suffolk Times 01' in the Long Island Troveler-Mattiwck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designJ.wd far the publication or 5uch notices; that you or your representative have the. right 10 apw pear and be heard at such hearing~ Dated: February 17 , 2005 Cross .sound Ferry Services, Inc. ':'ctllioner '"U,,[ Office Address: c/o Esseks, Hefter & Angel, 108 East Main St. > !'.O. Box 279 Riverhead, N:L 11~Ul . . TOWI\I BOARD TOWN O~ SOUTHOLD in the Maner of the Petition of CROSS. SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. to the Town Boord of the Town of Southold. NOTICE TO ADJACE:NT PROPERTY OWNE:RS TO: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 2 Ferry Street P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to -request 2 change of zone classification. :?. That the property w~ich is the subject of th, Petition ~ Igcated adbac~t to your, property and is des- cribed as.follows: Two contlguous lots approxlmate.Ly . acres ac, which are east of the Cross Sound Ferry termlna.L ana . : 'desi nated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000-015.00-09.0 -003.006; 1 . u-uu~.uu 3. That the property which is the sub jeer of such Petition is located in the following zoning disrrict: idential district. 'i. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the fotlowing Zone district classificatiun: M_? MR,~inp rliRtrict 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written PeritiDn requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the SDuthold Town Cleric's Office at Main Road, Southold, New YDrk and you may then and there examine th, same durin& regular Dffice hour:;. G. That before the relief sough, may be granted, a public hearin& must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a Ilollee Df such hearing must be published at least ten day' prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times or' in the Lon& Island Tr~veler-Manituck Warchman, newsp~per5 published in the Town of SouthDld and design~t"d for the Dublic~lion of such notice:;; that you or YDur representalivt have the right u> ap- pear and be he.ard at such he'aring. Dated: February 17 , 2005 Cross BDund Ferry Services.. Ine. Pelirion~r 1'us1. Office Addre~l;: c/o Esseks. defter & Angel. 108 East Main St., P.O. HO}: 279 Riverhead) NY 11~Ul . . TOWN BOAR.D TOIVN OF SOUTHOL.D in the M~tter of the Pelition of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. to the Town Boord of the Town of South old. NOTICE TO AD.lAC!':NT PROPERTY OWNERS TO: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED United States Government Washington, DC 20000 YOU ARE HER.EBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to .request 2. change of zone classification. :2.. That the property which is the subject of th~ Petition ~ Igcated ad~ac~t to your, property and is des- cribed as .follows: Two contiguous lots approx1IIlately -. acres ac, which are east of the Cross Sound Ferry termlnal and w~irh lot" gre desisnated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000-015.00-09,00-003,006; 10 0-01~.O -OY.uu-uu~.uu~ 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: R-RO. residential district. <I. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the followinr; ZOOt district classification: M_? M~rinp. rliRtrict 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there ex.amine the samt durin~ regular office hour:;;. G. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearin~ must be held on the matter by tilt Town Board; that a fJorir:e of such hearing must be published at least ten day:.- prior to the datt of such hearing in the Suffolk Times Of- in the Long Island T r"veler-Maniruck Watchman, newspapers published in the "own of South old and designated for the publication of such notice::;; that you or your representative havt' the right to ap~ pear and be heard at sue]l hC<lring_ Dated: February 17 , 2005 Cross .Sound Ferry Services, Ihe. Petitiuner I'U51 Office Address, c/o Esseks, Befter & Angel, 108 East Main St., P.O. Box 279 kiverhead" Ni. 11':::lUl . . TOWN BOAR-D. TOIVI'; OF SOUTHOI D in the Maner of the Petition of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. to the Town Boord of the Town of SouthoJd. NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Plum Island Animal Research Facility Main Road, State Route 25 Orient, NY 11957 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of South old to -request a change of zone classification. :?. That the property w~ich is the subject of th~ Petit~on ~ 'ecated adiacffit to your. property and is des- cribed as .follows: Two cont~guous lots approx=ate y . acres ac, which are east of the Cross Sound Ferry term~nal ana . . R r desi nated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000-015.00-09, -003.006; 1 ~. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning districr: r sidential district. '1. Thar by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the '[oHowiog Zont: district classiflcatiun: M_') M.<=I,-;np district 5. That within five dayo from the date hereof, a written Perition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold T own CI~rl('s Office at Main Road, South old, New York and you may then and tbere examiot the same durin~ regular office hour::. G. That before the relief sougbt may be granted, a public bearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notir:e of such hearing must bt published at lc~lSt ten days' prior tn.tht:" date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times 01' in the Long Island Traveler-Maniruck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; rhar you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard ar such he"ring. Dated: February 17 , 2005 Cross .Sound Ferry Services, Ine. Petiti(Jn~r J-USl Office Ad dre;;" c/o Esseks, defter & Angc.l, 108 East Main St., P.O. Box 279 Riverhead~ Nt 11~Ul . . TOWN BOArer, TOW~J OF SOUTHOLD in the Maner of the Petition of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. TO: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Daniel F and Ors Nicko1a P.O. Box 186 Orient, NY 11957 NOTICE TO ADJAC!::NT PROPERTY OWNERS to the Town Boord or the Town of Sou thol d. YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of South old to -request a change of zone classification. :?. That the property which is the subject of th~ Petition ~ 'gcated adiaciillt to YOUr prooeny and is des- cribed asfollow5: Two contiguous lots approx1mately . acres eac , which ar'e east of the Cross Sound Ferry terminal and which lnt, Bre desionated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000-015.00-09.00-003,006; 10 U-u1~.u5-uy.uu-uuJ.uUJ 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: R-RO. residential district. "i, That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone districr classificarion: M_? M~rinp. nistrict 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Soutbold, t~ew York and you may then and there ex.amine tJle samt during regular office hour:. G. That before the relief sought mal' be granted, 0 public hearing must be held on the matte" by the Town Board; thaI a floti..e of such hearing must be published at least ten day' prior to tht date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times 0" in the Long Island Traveler-Mattiruck Watchman, newspapers published in the Towr: of Soulhold and dtsign<lled for the publication of such not.ic~s; that you or your representative have the right tCI ap~ pear and be heard at such hearing:. Dated: February 17 , 2005 CrOSE, .Sound Ferry Services, lue. IJeLitioner I'u", Office Addre", c/o Esseks, Refter & Angel, 108 East Main St., 1'.0. Bolt 279 Riverhead, NY llYUl . . TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTH'.)LD In the Mancr of the Pctition of CROSS SOUND FERRY SERVICES, INC. to the Town Bo,rd of the Town of Southold. NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO: CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Southold Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN I~OTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to .request a change of zone classification. :?. That the property which is the subject of th~ Petit~on ~ Igcated adiacffit to your prooerty and is des- cribed "5.follo\\'5: Two contiguous lots approxllnate y . acres eac , which are east of the Cross Sound Ferry term~nal and nated on the Suffolk County Tax Map nos. 1000 015.00-09. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: sidential district. 4. Th"t by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: M_? M~rinp district 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Cleric's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there e,:amine t.he same during regular office hour::;. G. That before the relief sOllght may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a lJot;oe or such hcaring must be published at least ten days' prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffo/Ie Times 0,- in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southnld and designated Tor the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: February 17 , 2005 Cross .Sound Ferry Services, lnc. Petitioner '.US1 Office Addre~.s: c/o Esseks, !'lefter & Angel., 108 East Main St., P.O. Boy. 279 Riverhead.~ NY llYUl . . AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING STATE OF NEW YORK) )ss COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STEVE GLOSE, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am not a party to the action, am over 18 years of age, and reside in Riverhead, New York. 2. On the 17th day of Febmary, 2005, I served the within Notice To Adjacent Property Owners, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, upon the following property owners at the addresses designated by said property owners for that pmpose, by depositing a true copy of same enclosed in a first class, postpaid, properly-addressed wrapper, in a Post Office within the State of New York. Suffolk County Suffolk County Center 330 Center Drive Riverhead, NY 11901 Receipt No.: 7003 2260000603330443 A&J Long Island Realty LLC P.O. Box 198 Oakdale, CT 06370 Receipt No.: 7003 2260 0006 0333 0450 Betsy Latham 195 Point Road Orient, NY 11957 Receipt No.: 7003226000060333 0467 William G. and Ano Wysocki 145 Point Road Orient, NY 11957 Receipt No.: 7003 2260 0006 0333 0474 . Long Island Power Authority c/o Keyspan Corp. Attn.: Property Tax, 20th Floor One Metro Tech Center Brooklyn, NY 11201-3850 Receipt No.: 7003 2260000603330481 Cross Sound Ferry Service, Inc. 2 Feny Street P.O. Box 33 New London, CT 06320 Receipt No.: 7003 2260 0006 0333 0498 United States Govenunent Washington, DC 20000 Receipt No.: 7003 2260 00060333 0870 Plum Island Animal Research Facility Main Road, State Route 25 Orient, NY 11957 Receipt No.: 7003226000060333 0863 Daniel F and Ors Nickola P.O. Box 186 Orient, NY 11957 Receipt No.: 70023150000421292444 Southold Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Receipt No.: 7003 226000060333 0856 Sworn to before me this 17th day of February, 2005. Not Y P lie JACQUELINE R. CELESTE NOTARY PUBLl9, State 01 New York No. 01 NE6029051 Qualified In Suffolk County Commission expires Aug. 9, 20 ~ . . >1:.. . f!;d ~ G~~sr p<!;~ \ '. , /< // ...\ ",/ ~,'1/'\ //"/,.. ,/.<.--{/\\ \<>\, ~/,/ ,........'''_ \, \ 'iy,.>.:r,/ / .-/\ '\ \ ../ /,//\, '\ \. /.'\ \. . \ /', '\ :, .1 ,,:"'\ '{2'/' ' "i.-..../;!,) \",' \~ , \ \ \ \. \ \. \ \ \. ,.~~ '\ \\\/..(\\ \'.:>"'\\\ \ ,/ \ \ " ... /"\,,\\ , er:b~s\ SC?u qrf' ' \,/ Concept Plan \ '\ ! " i \ I . \. i I , / i I /) ~/.-' ../,e/ , ,/ ,/ ,/ \ '. \ \ , , , \ \ ., \ \, \ \. \\ ,/>< '. ,~' " /\~/ \ \ \ \ \ '\, \ '. " \ \\ ;::>(/ \~,. --\ \\ \, \ \. \, '. '\ \ \\ '\ \~ \; ~ , ~." c -x'" \ \.,/' \ \ '. \ \ " \ \ \ '- \ \ \\ \\,,,,,,>.c;:~ \ \(-// \. \ /.... \ /"'\. \, '\ \. "~/ \ ~"." , / ~/.,... . \ \, \ \ \ .. \ \. \ \, " ". \ \ //'\ \.' \/'\ \ \ . y 1., , \. h \ '\ \ \ 7 \ \ . \ \ x"" \ \ \ \ \ ,.- \ \ ' ~ \. \ " \ \. />.~' \ \. \ \ '. '\ -'\ ))l~i~t\ States of Am\e~ic~ \" \, \ \ \,...,.\ \, \ \ saM# 1000-15-9-9, \ \ \." \ ._ _\ '\ \ ">.--""./\ \ \ \ _\ \. \ '\.- ,,-.J \ \ \..,'\ \ )..-/ \ \ \, \ {'.\ \, .,;:'("\ \ \ "(// >.\ /)<."'__ ~\, "\ \. . \( .' /\ /A--' \ \ \ ., , \//.,'-".. ," \ .. \, '\ i.-'\ \ \ \ .'\. \ \ \/\ \ \:(\ \/\. ' .\ \.;.';', \ '{,'.\ \ ' , 'i,i.:.\" '\/:/..\ ' \. 'v>>\ 'I. \,;;,.... \ \ \ \~:>\ '(;>' , \ \ \ /" 1'\ , \ \ \/"\ \'/\ \ .. ... /. ~..:,', \ '\ 'o. \/ \" x'/j)- , \ \ \ /.\ \ ~ (\ \ \/'''\ '\ \ \' ..... \. \ /\ \ \ 'i':,'" /\ ... \ \/'\ '. \ \ "1'..(/,> \\ \ , . \ '\P \.,.:.',,-V . \ , \, \ , \ \. \ ",'(' " \ ' \ .\" \/,' \ " '. '\, \. \ \ .. \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \\ : .' , /' \., \ / \ \ , \ k .'\ \\ \. '. /^ , \. \ \. , \ '. . , . , , \ " \ \ <.; \ \ \ \. '\ , " \ \, \ \ \ \ \, '\ \\\, \, , \ " .,........'\ ~/, ,.. ,'\ \\. \i /.\ \ , .. , , \, ,". ({'/;?::\ \-,:. "I \ i.,' \ \ ) j I I / ! I i I , I I i ! j , I I i '\ / / ,/ \ . \. \ , \ \ , '\ \ \ \ \, ') '\ \ \ )./i/~ \ \ \. \ /-Y..~"" \'.///: \. \ \....< \. ',-' \\\.J.::"/\\ \. ' " \_~....- 1 \ "- \ \\ \/''\ - \ \ \ ,/-", \ \. \ .:/ \ . ;-(" \ \ \, \ ..\ '\ \ . \ .. \ .,~ ,..... :/;' '/.\ .. \ \,/'-:.f \': 5 ,,':W; v :1 '<i./: (VIces' . Date: January 13, 2005 Si~ 51 I Orient Point Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Site Data: SaM: 1000-015-9-10.1 Area: 1.2 Acres Zone: Mil ( saM: 1000-015-9-11.1 Area: 1.4 Acres Zone: Mil Prepared for: Cross Sound Ferry Services, Inc. 2 Ferry Street P.O. Box 33 New London, CT. 06320 ~ , " \, "-\ ~, ',>- '~ \~,;\, " "".;\ ~ ~" '~~*' , '" \~, '\ ..... ,,'. \~;;\ >> .r ?(',,,- _' \' / / // \,/' S(:TM# 1 000:15~9,,3.5 ",' ,.. \. /" .' ". / . . //~/f: Adam C. Wronmvski & \ /" _../)essica Wronowski -", ,~\ .' --'. , r'\,~\' / ,.cr' \ \ / .,' ~ ,1) ff Zl, ",/;> , ~,_'(""'_v r', ,. ~", ~.< \, / / /; " / / ..""-' / ../' .\ ,"""'. 'v" ,- \/ / ,SCTM# /' \ ,/1000-15-9-10.1: /' ~\ ....../ / '\~\ ,/'/ ~ ,.r' " " /' ',<: /r" Existing " Building ",\//"/ '. ,/ \ \ \ \ <0 ~ % 6<>-Z yo.~ c; Existing Concrete Ramp \ \\ .. \ / " __c-- """,- \ ) E'i;\st\l\'6 \.o3dil''6 R3('f\P SCTM# 1000-15-9-3.5 250 Proposed Spaces SCTM# 1000-15-9-3.6 201 Proposed Spaces T otaJ Spaces: 451 Parking Spaces :\\ VI1 ( , , :/l /1/ <<c:c~, / p <::// /<1 c ~~~ / (1",{I~~ / Jf;(<:'> y ...:'\~:<lo~/> / ~v~ ~ ,,0 '" ~iJ ~"<. ~ / ~.1 ~ ;:y 0 "'" j/ <lo 9~9 t:t;;1 ~ I "~ (9, ~ 10');; / ,," ~~y /1 ~' I /' 'v // ! /// / ;;/ / / /,? ~ ,{/:/ C& II", ~..O' /;; . )7, ///1' /{ .,(t-. //(' / 4 ~ / /1'" 1/' / '1',)/ /\ /1 . ," ~ / \,'---_.,/~ ' <-:> ,~ Acres) iCes / .'\ , ,'\ \ ' '\ '., " \, Q-35 " 7\ 0/,_'- .' \ ,'\ . ~ '\ \, .- \ -',' .'. /" '\ \\ / \ .,,/ \~, \ )\ ./ / / ,../ 'v ./ ~/ \ , '~:'_/"">~~~:-~~::~:) / r,.,:::~::~:~~~:::.>i \_<:::;:;:~o,..,/ // /' / i I I J / 19 rete Gardiners Bay . :/ Inter..Science Research Associates, Inc. 36 Nugent Street, P.O. Box 1201 Southampton, New York 11969-1201 631 283.5958 Fax: 631 283.5974 Note: Site information is based on surveys prepared by David Fox,. April 14, 2004 This is not a survey File: Cross Sound Ferry/02-proposed-parking-B-2-04 @ 2005 Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc. . . SCTM# 1000-15-9-3.4 nil, A&J long Island Realty, llC . -f" /~/ ? .., /\/ .;\ \. . ""\\"'0'/ .\ ./' '(. ~ ~ ~<) /,."1tJ)'. ("<'I f)~~ /. i ,'\. , (J ! yY .\~/. '--.1/" \ ~ "v/ .\ \\ 'f;}]) ~"(I(J1,{ .' .' . . ~-'l' . i -,.' \.", .;.,..' .,/\, " /" ,~\ " ,. )( \.., ./ \ \\ .\ . '>..,- \ . /" ", />\,--.,.".- ,\:,' ,";" . \ , / \.'/\. / .' // \ ./ // //\// , ProP9~d Add!tional parking^y/' /' ()nA.sphiilt,Surface' ,//~\< ./ .\; ",,-" -.' \ /' ," (Curren,t1yV\eclny 2.61 Acres) _\ ,/ 201 Pfop'QSedSpaces /\..... . - \. .\ SCTM#'1000\i?,9:'3.6 ' /'\. . '.;." ./ /' ' nlf: A&J long Isla,nd~..llC / \\ . )'X'.. ..' ../ ..\ / .' / \:' /., ~.- \~.,.' ,/'-\'\ /', ./" /~ \.- ,/ .',\ / \' , , .X "\ ,,/ \, ,. ." " . /" ...":'<.... '\" /./". ."< '\ / ..// )<\/. /\. ~ "'~I) ..-< . ,.--f""'1)'/'./J...t..... "'1""'; , (I;! v '. ./ J,f.J,Y'" ':\ " '\ ..' / \. .~ ." \. .\ ' " .I'~J ./' \, ,,/ _.J \!-~,,- \ / /"'<~:::\ / ,.-/"':-;:~:::~\ ,/ ....,-........--...\ . .//' /:):'~.~:\ ...... '\;,\ \\E3 <f1 ~ t--lo t--l -' ~ q rt" . \\ ".'0 ..-(-(1 J.r' ,'.,V . (I ,Y", ./ -,J....l-. }.; // ..' 'Yo' . r/""'\ ..,J"/ .' )\ .,J' \,. /' . .-:> . \ .- -' '\ ' 0 j?" \ _.:v'.. . \ 0'.- \ ,O~ )<\ ~' -\ . , . x" >< "'~/ ,- \ / . .' ;\/ . /,.,> .,.: " . '\ ~ ~..11J "".1'11/ _ /(i'IX / 'I . v' . '--if"" :x< // - . \,/ /,- "\ //' \\... Existil ~ ~ ,>\ . \. .-\ \ .' /\ Y . \'>\'/ ~ \ -' " --- ,/ ~ \ ../ .- Y .J //. \,/_r _ ./ ~\.'- ~ /. /"\/ o "'\" 'Q /\ /' V, ..'\ /' \. . ,-' \ ./ .).-' ,', / ~\ ..- " '\/ .' \.' '- ",/ '\ . " , . \ /' \. \ \ /' '\,/ ,-,'- \ c '". /, \\ J' ~O'o -SO' .. (:' '\/' , "\. "", \/ , , // >;::' /~5 ''-,f''''- " ,/--.-( ?~,--'-~'-;" ~~1' '.,..'-~" -' ....~"./ ~ v j ~ County of Suffolk SCT M# 1 000-15-9-6.1 SCTM# 1000-15-9-4.2 "''':::"~~ 1~- " , A'l.ilY Q "V\ '"i.Y , Ity of Suffolk 1 000-15-9-6.1 ~ /" ,....".11.'1)./ ./ <1""( j j-<" ,./ ~ .,) \( / .J,.,/..// ,),:/'.~//. ~ ~ ./ ,/ / ~ ~/ /\ ",/ /" \ /~ ,,' /' /< ~/ \~ '. //. ;'x;' // l ~ / \ /' ./ -~/ /~ /" /-/ \(// .../. ,..J" .../"\ ,/ -" V ","" ./\ j // -../ ,..,. ...../"\. / X ./ ..,. \ /' .' , / 1- ,/ / ..;> /" )70 ~, .' ~" ~ ,/ -----.......-...." ,// // ", I / I I I i \ Scale: l' = 40' ~'", " , ,:;a",,' "... . tv \ I } . SCTM# 1000-15-9-1.12 County c SCTM# 10< SCTM# 1000-15-9-1.13 / // J ,/' ,/' / / ~//, '""';"':::" , -, .... ....'. ',. ....-:.' "'"~," . . . ..."" '\ " ~ - ."JIi; ,/' ~",