HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-31.-13-4
r
./
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
GEORGE D. SOLOMON
JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND
MAIUNG ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
SouthoId, NY 11971
I
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE
Chair
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals
/
From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Plauner
L WRP Coordinator
Date: December 20, 2005 (Resubmitted December 28, 2006)
Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 5680 (Bollman)
Amendment to Permit #5901 W. Bruce Bollman
SCTM#1000-31-13-4
W. BRUCE BOLLMAN requests an Amendment to Permit #5901 to move the footprint of the
dwelling 2.6' to the east, abandon the existing septic system and install a new septic system, and
requests a Coastal Erosion Permit to allow for the construction activity in an approx. 108 sq.ft.
section seaward of the CEHA. Located: 1755 Truman's Path, East Marion. SCTM#31-13-4
The structure currently exists and is located in flood zone "X", an area outside of the 500 year
flood zone. The Applicant proposes gutters and leaders into four subsurface drainage systems to
control surface runoff generated by the structure. A pervious driveway is also proposed
The land area seaward of the proposed structure consists of several existing erosion control
structures which include: two wood retaining walls and a wood bulkhead. No other shoreline
hardening structures are proposed The proposed structure will be served by public water.
The applicant proposes to replace the existing septic system with a new septic system. The
expansion pool within the existing septic system is located 74' from the top of bluff line
demarked by the (6.3 wood wall).
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the
Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (L WRP) Policy
Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form
submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation
that the proposed action is generally CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and
therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the applicant demonstrates that
the following policies are applied to the greatest extent possible prior to issuance of any
permit.
Policy Standard
4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards.
r
The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures
from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested:
A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away
from flooding and erosion hazards.
1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard
areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away
from coastal hazard areas as practical.
a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas,
except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6
NYCRR 505.8.
b. Avoid hazards bv sitinl! structures to maximize the distance
from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas.
Policy Standard
5.1 Prohibit direct or indirect discharges that would cause or contribute to
contravention of water quality standards.
B. Prevent point source discharges into Southo/d's coastal waters and manage or
avoid land and water uses that would:
1. exceed applicable effluent limitations, or
2. cause or contribute to contravention of water quality classification and use
standards, or
3. adversely affect receiving water quality, or
4. be contrary to Phase III of the Long Island Sound Study's Nitrogen
Reduction Plan which calls for a 58.5% Sound-wide reduction in nitrogen
levels.
C. Ensure effective treatment of sanitary sewage and industrial discharges by:
8. providing and managing on-site disposal systems:
a. use on-site disposal systems only when impractical to connect with
public sewer systems,
b. protect surface and groundwater against contamination from
pathogens and excessive nutrient loading by keeping septic
effluent separated from groundwater and by providing adequate
treatment of septic effluent,
c. encourage the evaluation and implementation of alternative or
innovative on-site sanitary waste systems to remediate on-site
systems that currently do not adequately treat or separate effluent,
d. encourage the use of alternative or innovative on-site sanitary
waste systems where development or redevelopment of
grandfathered parcels would otherwise increase the level of
negative impacts on ground or surface waters, including wetlands.
To further the intent of Policy 5.1 and 6.3 A which states;
,
A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of
Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their
jurisdiction
1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in
Trustee permit conditions.
It is recommended that the Trustees require that the septic system be relocated to achieve a
100 setback from the top of bluff line pursuant to Chapter ~ 97-12. Findings; purpose;
jurisdiction; setbacks; unless the Trustees at their discretion deem it appropriate to grant a
variance from this requirement, which is wholly within their jurisdiction.
Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above.
MJ
Office Location:
Mailing Address:
Town Annex IFirst Floor, North Fork Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 11971
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
http://southoldtown.northfork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064
Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner
L WRP Coordinator
Planning Board Office
Town of South old
Town Hall Annex
Southold, NY 11971
November 16, 2006
Uc((~v
--- 1 ~ I ;.;:;,:.:,,~~:::~;::....:;~=....:~-=~~~~:.~~~
.i
I. 0 '- ~
mJ' ,,.
L
Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 5680 (Bollman)
Dear Mark:
It. --___._-...
....... ---.:..
-,
The above application has recently been remanded back to the ZBA by the Supreme
Court for a written L WRP determination. The applicant requested and received a
variance for a new foundation centering the footprint as shown on the enclosed copies
and described in the attached Board decision. May we ask for your assistance in an
evaluation and recommendations for this application.
Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
RUTH D. OLlV A
~~
)'
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road. P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
Office Location:
Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 11971
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman
Gerard P. Goehringer
Vincent Orlando
James Dinizio, Jr.
Michael A. Simon
http://southoldtown.northfork.net
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Tel. (631) 765-1809. Fax (631) 765-9064
I" RECEJVED J.- r
q.' .3 d t9-1I<--
C OCT 3 1 2005
~i::~e~
FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION
MEETING OF OCTOBER 27, 2005
ZBA Rehearing File Ref. 5680 - W. BRUCE and MARY ANN BOLLMAN
Property Location: 1755 Trumans Path, East Marion CTM 31-13-4
SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration
in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of
Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned.
PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicants' 9,878.29 sq. ft. parcel has 50 feet along Truman's
Path and 206.07 feet along the south/westerly side property line. The one-story, single-family dwelling
was recently removed, and the accessory garage building remains as shown on the April 3, 2002
survey, last amended March 7, 2005 by Joseph A. Ingegno, L.S.
BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's Notices of Disapproval, issued February 3, 2005 and
amended March 31, 2005, citing Sections 100-239.4B and 100-244 in its denial of an application for a
building permit to substantially remove (or demolish), and construct a new single-family dwelling. The
reasons stated in the Notices of Disapproval are that the new construction: (1) will be less than 10 feet
on a single side, (2) will be less than 25 feet combined side yards, (3) will be less than 75 feet from the
bulkhead, and (4) will have lot coverage exceeding the code limitation of 20 percent.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Zoning Board of Appeals ('ZBA') held a public hearing on the rehearing of this application on
October 20, 2005, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. The entire file and
transcripts of the previous hearings regarding the original application under Appeal No. 5680 held on
March 31, 2005 and May 4, 2005 were also entered into this rehearing record. Based upon all
testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board
finds the following facts to be true and relevant:
I
<6'''1
ZBA DETERMINATION RENDERED MAY 12. 2005 for AREA VARIANCE RELIEF: In a decision rendered
May 12, 2005, the ZBA granted applicant's request to retain the existing nonconforming location of the
foundation, with reconstruction of the dwelling on the first and second floor and enlargement with
small addition, as shown on the March 7, 2005 amended survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno, L.S.
The relief lIranted was related to the location of the new construction areas, as follows: (a) minimum
setback at t~feet for the second-story from the westerly side property line and minimum 5.9 feet from
the existing foundation measurement to the westerly side property line, (b) minimum setback at 12.6
feet from the easterly side property line at its closest point, (c) lot coverage at 21% (exclusive of
waterfront dock, walks, apron, and minor step areas), and (d) setback at 35.2 feet from the bulkhead,
at its closest point.
o
.
Page 2 - October 27. 2005 -I
Z8 Ref. 5680 - W. 8ruce and M. 8"h,.,an
elM ID: 31-13-4
During the first Appeal under File No. 5680, hearings were held on March 31, 2005 and May 4, 2005 and
testimony indicating that the existing block foundation would not be removed or demolished because
It would be too expensive, and that the foundation was stated to be structurally sound and intact, with
very little work done to it and only to have the basement there for the heating system on the north
side.
RESOLUTION SCHEDULING DATE FOR REHEARING: At its September 1, 2005 meeting, a Resolution
was a~opted by unanimous vote of all the members, to reopen Application No. 5680, with a rehearing
date scheduled for September 29, 2005 and October 20, 2005 before the ZBA.
MODIFIED REQUESTS: During the October 20, 2005 hearing, discussions were held regarding
circumstances that resulted after Issuance of the May 12, 2005 ZBA Grant of Alternative Relief relative
to tile applicant's request for variances, and the Building Department's grant of a building permit on
June 28, 2005 (No. 31232-Z) concerning demolition and reconstruction of a new single-family dwelling
per ZBA Decision No. 5680 and Trustees Permit:
1. Testimony was received by the applicant, the applicant's builder, and the town building
Inspector, indicating that a new foundation plan (ref. Page 4 of 10 prepared by Penny Lumber, date
stamped August 9, 2005) was approved by the Building Department as an amendment to Building
Permit No. 312320-z for new construction of the existing foundation in the same place. The Building
Inspector's amendment was issued after reliance on the Information furnished by the builder to the
Building Department in August 2005, and the August 9, 2005 letter from the applicant's engineer as to
why the foundation was unsafe to build upon. The Building Inspector also confirmed that the Building
Department contacted representatives of the Trustees and ZBA Departments regarding the proposed
in-place reconstruction of the unsafe section of the existing foundation that was crumbling.
2. Simultaneously with this Appeal hearing (on October 20, 2005), the ZBA received testimony
under the Appeal of Jennifer Gould (ZBA No. 5681), the adjacent landowner west and closest to the
new construction activities. Testimony was received concerning personal observations, activities
related to the boundaries and adjacent land areas between the Gould and Bollman properties, the
removal of the foundation that existed, the hole recently excavated for the entire new foundation, use
of the existing accessory building over the years, building permits and amendments, as well as other
extensive information.
REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and
personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings:
1. Grant of alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the
neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties.
The ZBA relied upon information offered during the first Appeal in the Spring 2005 indicating that the
applicant's foundation would not be removed. Since that variance determination, circumstances
changed substantially. The foundation is no longer existing, and the area has been cleared and
excavated, planning for construction of an entirely new foundation. Based on these circumstances,
the applicant is able to relocate the dwelling to increase the setback on the westerly side yard, and to
bring the yards into more conformity with the code requirement. Several other houses in the
neighborhood that have similar side lines and yards related to the applicant's long and narrow lot.
2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant
to pursue, other than an area variance. The lot is only 50 feet wide. The total remaining yard area for
both sides, if the dwelling were at a maximum of 29.5 feet in width, would only be 20.5+- feet, instead
of the code-required 25 feet.
3. The variances granted herein is substantial. The foundation has been removed, and a more
conforming side yard setback can be obtained by moving the proposed dwelling location.
(])
Page 3 - October 27, 2005 . J
ZB Ref. 5680 - W. Bruce and M. BOlo" Ian
elM 10: 31-13-4
4. The difficulty has been self-created. The area that contained the foundation has since been
excavated and cleared for an entirely new dwelling.
5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest the relief granted will have an adverse Impact on the
physical or environmental conditions in this residential neighborhood.
6. Grant of alternative relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to
enjoy the benefit of his property and at the same time, preserving and protecting the character of the
neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test
under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Chairwoman
Oliva, and duly carried,
TO VOID and TERMINATE the May 12, 2005 Decision under ZBA Appeal No. 5680, and
TO GRANT variances, setting back the new second floor wall by three feet (for more side yard
conformity), as shown on the hand-drawn elevation diagrams with ZBA date stamped April 11, 2005,
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. a) The 29.5 ft. wide dwelling shall be a minimum of 8.6 feet at its closest point to the westerlv
propertv line. resulting in a 2.7 ft. further setback to the east (instead of the prior ZBA requirement for
a 5.9 ft. minimum setback.)
b) In addition, the 29.5 ft. wide dwelling shall be a minimum of 10 feet from the easterlv side vard
line, resulting in a 2.6 feet reduction In the setback, instead of the requested 12.6 ft. setback approved
by the Board in the May 12, 2005 decision.
2. Both side vards shall remain open and unobstructed for access of emer!lencv and maintenance
vehicles.
3. The basement entrv and wooden steps that are presentlv located on the easterlv side vard must be
moved to another location so that thev do not interfere with or encroach into the setbacks approved bv
this board.
4. The height shall remain limited to a maximum of 27 feet to the highest peak (as proposed and
approved in the May 12, 2005 variance determination).
5. The new second floor wall on the west side shall be a minimum of 11.6 feet from the westerlv
propertv line, resulting in a further setback of 3 feet from the 8.6 ft. side yard setback noted In
Condition 1-a, above.
6. That the area covered with canvas in the front yard (street side) of the house be entirely removed.
7. That the driveway shall consist of pervious or gravel materials for proper drainage.
8. No buildln!l permit shall be issued until a new application for a buildin!l permit is submitted that
meets all of the conditions set forth in this decision and is reviewed (for compliance with the ZBA
conditlonsl bv the ZBA Chairperson or other representative in the Department of the Board of Appeals.
9. That the kitchen area and cookin!l facilities shall be removed from the accessory buildln!l prior to
issuance of a certificate of occupancv for the new dwellin!l.
(j)
Page 4 - October 27.2005 ;
ZB Ref. 5680 - W. Bruce and M. Bo... "an
CTM ID: 31-13-4
10 The setback to the bulkhead shall be a minimum of 35.2 feet and the lot coverage shall not exceed
21 % (exclusive of waterfront dock, walks apron, and minor step areas), as applied for.
11. The owner or his/her authorized aaent shall notify the Zonina Board of Aooeals in writina in the
event of anv orooosed chanae in circumstances. or new develooments. after issuance of this variance.
The Zoning Board of Aooeals reserves the right to regulre a new aoolication with resoect to anv
change in nonconformitv that is restricted bv this variance determination and the orovisions of the
zoning code.
This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the
subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features
as are expressly addressed in' this action.
(Absent
@
c-
!
l
-"
)
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
GEORGE D. SOLOMON
}
MAIUNG ADDRESS:
P.O. Box II 79
Southold, NY II971
,
pLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE
Chair
OFFICE WCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Town of South old Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner
L WRP Coordinator
Ii>
;;1
I'
DEe 2 0 2005
Date: December 20, 2005
';!"'..c,;oc
".-,,',-,.-'
Re:
Amendment to Permit #5901 W. Bruce Bollman
SCTM#1000-31-13-4
""-"'--"-- -'-,"
W. BRUCE BOLLMAN requests an Amendment to Permit #5901 to move the footprint ofthe
dwelling 2.6' to the east, abandon the existing septic system and install a new septic system, and
requests a Coastal Erosion Permit to allow for the construction activity in an approx. 108 sq. ft.
section seaward of the CEHA. Located: 1755 Truman's Path, East Marion. SCTM#31-13-4
The structure currently exists and is located in flood zone "X", an area outside of the 500 year
flood zone. The Applicant proposes gutters and leaders into four subsurface drainage systems to
control surface runoff generated by the structure. A pervious driveway is also proposed,
The land area seaward of the proposed structure consists of several existing erosion control
structures which include: two wood retaining walls and a wood bulkhead. No other shoreline
hardening structures are proposed The proposed structure will be served by public water.
The applicant proposes to replace tlre existing septic system witlr a new septic system. The
expansion pool within the existing septic system is located 74' from the top of bluff line
demarked by the (6.3 wood wall).
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the
Town of South old Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy
Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form
submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation
that the proposed action is generally CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and
therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the applicant demonstrates that
the following policies are applied to the greatest extent possible prior to issuance of any
permit.
Policy Standard
4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards.
"J
The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures
from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested:
A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away
from flooding and erosion hazards.
1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard
areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away
from coastal hazard areas as practical.
a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas,
except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6
NYCRR 505.8.
b. Avoid hazards bv sitinl! structures to maximize the distance
from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas.
Policv Standard
5.1 Prohibit direct or indirect discharges that would cause or contribute to
contravention of water quality standards.
B. Prevent point source discharges into Southo/d's coastal waters and manage or
avoid land and water uses that would:
1. exceed applicable effluent limitations, or
2. cause or contribute to contravention of water quality classification and use
standards, or
3. adversely affect receiving water quality, or
4. be contrary to Phase III of the Long Island Sound Study's Nitrogen
Reduction Plan which calls for a 58.5% Sound-wide reduction in nitrogen
levels.
C. Ensure effective treatment of sanitary sewage and industrial discharges by:
8. providing and managing on-site disposal systems:
a. use on-site disposal systems only when impractical to connect with
public sewer systems,
b. protect surface and groundwater against contamination from
pathogens and excessive nutrient loading by keeping septic
effluent separated from groundwater and by providing adequate
treatment of septic effluent,
c. encourage the evaluation and implementation of alternative or
innovative on-site sanitary waste systems to remediate on-site
systems that currently do not adequately treat or separate effluent,
d. encourage the use of alternative or innovative on-site sanitary
waste systems where development or redevelopment of
grandfathered parcels would otherwise increase the level of
negative impacts on ground or surface waters, including wetlands.
To further the intent of Policy 5.1 and 6.3 A which states;
I
.
A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of
Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their
jurisdiction
1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in
Trustee permit conditions.
It is recommended that the Trustees require that the septic system be relocated to achieve a
100 setback from the top of bluff line pursuant to Chapter ~ 97-12. Findings; purpose;
jurisdiction; setbacks, unless the Trustees at their discretion deem it appropriate to grant a
variance from this requirement, which is wholly within their jurisdiction.
Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing
its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Environmental Permits, Region One
Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356
Phone: (631)444-0365 . FAX: (631) 444-0360
Webslte: www.dec.state.ny.us
"~
.....
~
Erin M. CrolIy
"Commissioner
LEITER OF NO JURISDICTION - TIDAL WETLANDS ACT
W. Bruce Bollman
208 Main Street
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Application #1-4738-03338/00001
Bollman Property, 1755 Truman's Path, East Marion, NY
" SCTM # 1000-31-13-4
April 22, 2004
Dear Mr. Bollman:
Based on the information you have submitted, the Department of Environmental Conservation"
(DEC) has determined that the property landward of the 17' elevation contolJr, as shown on
the survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno dated April 3, 2002, is beyond Article 25 (Tidal
Wetlands Act) jurisdiction. "
.
Therefore, in accordance with the current Tidal Wetlands Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) no
permit is required. "
Be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take
place seaward of the tidal wetlands jurisdictional boundary, as indicated above, without a
permit. It is your responsibility to ensure that all precautions are taken to prevent any
sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation within
Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction which may result from your project. Such precautions may include
maintaining adequate work area between the tidal wetland jurisdictional boundary and your
" project (i.e. a 15' to 20' wide construction area) or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hale"
bay berm.
Please note that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary
permits or approvals from other agencies or local municipalities.
Sincerely,
~~
Deputy Permit Administrator
cc: John Bertani Builder Inc.
" MHP
file (kat)
Board Of Southold'Town Trustees
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
PERMIT NO"... 5.10L" DATE: ._~i!..21d004
ISSUED TO __~..:...!.~UC!, .!3_0LLM~~,_...,_,..__",___,..___
i\ut4nrilutinu
"lII'SUant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Lows of
the State of NewYM, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the
, State of New YorIc 19!i2; and the SoUthoId ToWn Ordinance eft-
filled ,"REGULATING AND THE PlACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS
IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBUC LANDS and the
REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEl,OR OTHt:R MATERIALS FROM
LANDS. UNDER TOWN' W ATERS;t': and in accordance with the
Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on Ap~' 21~
2004 d " "d f f th of $ 250 OO"d b
, _"--0 an In c:~nSl era Ion 0 e sum '._._'_~__.._, u.. pal Y
W. Bruce Bollman
.. -...----------.- -.---..........--.-... .....-...__.~._-....._..__._----_._---
of .._,_..!'-!!.::'_!_,~~io~____._.."_,..._......,..._,..._._,, N. Y. and. subject to the
Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof,
of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the foDoWing:
WeUand Permit to demolish the existing dwelling and construct a new lwo-s\ory dwelling
on the same footprin~ and construct a IIrst floor and second-story addition 10 the new
dwelling, with the comfotion drywalls and gutters are installed to contain the roof 1UIHllf,
and all as depicted on the survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno last daJed May 6,
2004. .. .
all in ac:c:ordance with the detailed spec:ifications as presented in
,the originating applic:ation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board Of Trustees here-
by causes its Corporate. Seal to be affixed, ana these ~ to
...-.d by'_~~~~"'_'_
~
~(:;ir
8
'"""")-..:.,
~o~
.~ ':r.
'l/l';l::.~
."
-0
~-z~
'~~-:.t
~o "
-../~--<.
"""
.;;
'"v
,,'"
U'
'"1.
v
6'.
'"
. o.
,~~ ..
<"
\
~\xJ;ii
->;~~
't.'t
'PA
L./
~9,:
<;,.
"0-"
"2." c."$..-
~ _O-~
\1''l~'?.O
~~ QQ~
~~~~
.p ~(;)%~
~"Y~ 00
<" "'"
"t
S,
<"
~1'+.
'\,
~'~<s
Co
~ ",
~
~ '2,"
~ ~o,
~ ""~.
A.z.. ~I': "-
'p~O i:f,~ '
0_ 'i-Q
-t..,...., "Y""
" ~
'?,c ~
-"
"?"
-"
o
~
""
(> \f'l..111'4
'a::f'oF--(~(T1'f')
4' O\f..- ~'~Of~-
",w<'~",a>S f
,
-.
,"'-'
" 0"
Lll-lt />.5 SHOW
H./t.l"RO p 4'3
SHE[\" 28 Of
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
COUNTY, NEW YO
No. 1000-31 -1 3-(
SCALE 1 "~20'
APRIL 3, 2002
DECEMBER 5, 2003 ADDEO TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY
JANUARY 28, 2004 ADDEO WATER LINE, CESSPOOLS & PRO
MARCH 23. 2004 ADDED COASTAL EROStON HAZARD AREA
MAY 6, 2004 ADDED PROPOSED DRYWELlS
DECEMBER 28, 2004 ADOED PROPOSED SEPTIC SYST[
FEBRUARY 4, 2005 ADDED LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION AND ADDIT
FEBRUARY 14, 2005 ADDED BUILDING AREAS WITH!N SETE
MARCH 7, 2005 ADDED LOT COVERAGE DATA
AUGUST 29, 2005 LOCATED FOUNDATION NAILS
NOVEMBER 9. 2005 REVISED AS PER ZONING BOARD OF AI
SUFFOLK
S.C. TAX
AREA ::: 9,878.29 sq. ft.
(To TIE LINE) 0.228 ac.
CERTIFIED TO.
W. BRUCE BOLLMAN
NOTES
1 ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V_D_ 1929 DA
EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS'
EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS:
fiRST FLOOR
G.o..RACE FLOOR
rap OF BULKHEAD
80TTO~ or BUl.KHEAD
WP Of WALL
2 FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAI<[N FROt.4:
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE t.4AP No 36103C0064 G
.'ONf Af_ 8ASE FLOOD (LEVATlONS OffiRt.lINED
:.O~j; Vf COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOC11Y HAZARD (WI
BAS[ FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINfO
.'(;Nt t.REAS OET[Rt.4INCO TO SE OUTSlor 500-Y[j
3 SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY IS 1,200 GALLONS.
I TANK; e' OIA. BY 5. DEEP
4 LEACHING SYSTEM IS 400 sq fI SIDEWAll AREA.
2 POOLS: S' DIA. X 8' DEEP
PROPOSED EXPANSION POOL
PROPOSED LEACHING POOL
I~~ J PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK
S. THE lOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN ,.
OBSERVATlONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHf
6. THE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEt.l IS TO BE PUMPED CU
7. EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE (INCLUDING GARAGE, .
PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE (INCLUDING EXISTING
TEST HOLE DATA
(JTST HOU.- DUG BY McDONALD GFOSCIENCE ON [