Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-96.-1-1.2PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H~SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To~ Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair Town of Southold Planning Board From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: July 31, 2006 Re~ Proposed Site Plan for Montauk Bus Service Located on the s/e intersection of Commerce Drive and Corporate Drive also known as 350 Commerce Drive in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-1.2 Zone: LI, Light Industrial This site plan proposes construction of a new 3,180 sq. ft bus terminal building with site build out that includes 19 employee parking spaces and 16 bus parking spaces on a vacant 1.083 acre parcel in the LI Zone located approximately 417' s/o Corporate Drive on the w/s/o Commerce Drive known as 115 Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-96.-1-1.2 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfi:ont Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfi'ont Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action is generally CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the following standard best management practices are implemented. To further the intent of Policy 5 and 5.1 "Prohibit direct or indirect discharges that would cause or contribute to contravention of water quality standards". Require thc following clauses in the Covenant and Restrictions: The property is served by public water. The Suffolk County Water Authority has indicated that water supply to the site is limited and that every effort should be made to limit water usage. Waste will be disposed of via an existing, functioning on site sanitary waste system. It is recommended that the Board require the following best management practices. To further protect ground water quality and conserve water supply to the greatest extent possible it is recommended that the Planning Board require the following best management practices to further the conservation of water: 1. Require low flow toilets and fixtures to conserve water usage. 2. Require that surface- water runoff generated from any structures or impervious areas be retained on-site and disposed of via sub-surface leaching pools (dry-wells). 3. Require that native and drought-tolerant plants be used in landscaping. In addition, to further the intent of Policy 8.3 "Protect the environment from degradation due to toxic pollutants and substances hazardous to the environment and public health" specifically Sub-policies "D and E" outlined below; I recommend that the following clauses,(45 also be added to the Covenant and Restrictions. 3 D. Protect public health, public and private property, and fish and wildlife from inappropriate use of pesticides. 1. Limit use of pesticides to effectively target actual pest populations_as indicated through integrated pest management methods. 2. Minimize exposure of people, fish, and wildlife to pesticides. E. Take appropriate action to correct all unregulated releases of substances hazardous to the environment. 3. Prohibit the application and use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers capable of entering the potable water supply. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. Cc: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Date: May 26, 2006 To: From: Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer~__,~ Montauk Bus Service Located at approximately 417' s/o Corporate Drive on the s/w/o Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. SCTM#(s) 1000-96.-1-1.2 Zone: LI (Light Industrial Status: New Application Required Return Date: June This site plan proposes construction of a new 3,180 sq. ft bus terminal building with site build out that includes 19 employee parking spaces and 16 bus parking spaces on 1.083 acres parcel in the LI Zone located approximately 417' s/o Corporate Drive on the s/w/o Commerce Drive known as 115 Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-96.-1-1.2 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan, elevation plan and LWRP form. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for LWRP consistency Thank you in advance. cc: file Eric.: attachments TOW±~ OF SOUTHOLD PLANNI'I~G BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: Site Plan Name: Suffolk County Tax Map gl000- Other SCTM #s: Street Address: Distance to nearest intersection: Hamlet: Type of Site Plan: ~/ New __ Amended If Amended, last approval date: / / Residential SECTrON B: Owners/ARent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address and phone number for the people below.· Property Owner 7-/~_~:' ~--*/-~ 0 ~? Street 275 City /~ 27'/7'-L/aK State A/(.,/ Zip ///q},~2 Applicant's Agent or Representative: · Contact Person(s)* Street .City_ .~//~'~/-/'~'/']Z> State /~. Zip__~tg/ Office Telephone [~;~/) ?Z?-/~/J Other' *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 · SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: ~X~ New Modification of Existing Structure Agricultural Change of use i Property total acreage or square footage: /, O~ ~ ac./r~t. ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ~2~/3~,O ae~q. ft. ( ~/7't~' / ~b'//--O/~C, ) Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ If yes, explain: No/h~ Property Zoning District(s>: ~-- / Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: '~ / ~7~.,/ O ~; Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes u-."" No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes t,.'"" No Ifyes, attach a copy ofthe application packet. '2 B,9 /4p/o~'ov/jl. 19,,~T'~' /2J)J~_.~ Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. If more then one use is · List all existing property uses: List all proposed property uses: Other accessory uses: ~ ~ !'v Existing lot coverage: Gross floor area of existing structure(s): Proposedlotcoverage:__~'..~ % sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: # of proposed spaces: lq ¢,~/~3 Loading Berth: Yes No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: O % Proposedlandscape coverage: ~Z~ % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes __ No )~ If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify ~11 ~p-a~of/e~ formation is tree. Signature of Preparer: _xT"~_~,~.~,,/.~ ~.//f. Date: Pa e 3 of 3 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 end 3. Part 2: Part 3: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guid;,nce as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ Part 1 [] Part 2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead a DA. The project will not result in any large and important im significant impact on the environment, therefore DC. Although the project could have a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitig required, e CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* The project may result in one or more ~arge and important impacts that may have a significant imPaCt~On environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared .... *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Pads A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you be II eve will be needed to complete Pads 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be.dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work Is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Location of Action (Inctude Street Address, Municipality and County) / NameofApplicant/Sponsor ~/~O~T/~,~ ~ BuslnessTelephone (~ ~) 5q9 -- / Name of Owner (if different) TI~ ~ (-.uTc 14-o c, L) I I,,IC, tete N'Y. Z,.Cod. Business Telephone (C~) 5qq -- 3k'~S 0 Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 , 11. Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? r']Yes ~No According to: Identify each species: k 1 2. Are there any unique or unusua~ land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? OYes [~No Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by tqe community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? C'] Yes [~o if yes, explain: Does tho present site [~fiiuda scenic views known to ba important to tha communiW? / 1 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: s. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: r"~Yes []No b. Size {in acres): Page 4 of 21 Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other Iocallydmportant vegetation be removed by this project? [~Yes If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ~:~ months, (including demolition) If multi-phased: a. Tolal number of phases anticipated __ (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month __ year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: --. month year. d. Is phase ! functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [] No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? r~ Yes [] No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction / ~_~ ; after project is complet.e 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project )V'(~) 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes r~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes ~ No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? b'~ Yes If yes, explain: 1 §. Is project or an,/ portion of proiest located in a 100 ,/ear flood plain? DYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? __ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [] Yes ~No Page 6 of 21 ~ 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board [~Yes Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes ~No City, Town Zoning Board [~Yes ~ No City, Count,/ Health Department I~ Yes Other Local Agencies Other Regional Af/encies OYes [] No ~Yes [] No ,~ ~,o/Zo vE~ State Agencies ~Yes ,~ No Federal Agencies L--'~ Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information a planning or zoning decision7 [~Yes ~ No 1. Does proposed action involve If Yes, indicate decision required: [~"1 Zoning amendment I~ Site plan ,: D Zoning variance E] Spe6iat use permit D New/revision of master plan [] Subdivision [] Resource management plan [] Other Page 8 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? []Yes ~..No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes ~"'~o I 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic signif cant y above present levels~ [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes [] No I' I D. Informational Details / Attach as may be/heeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts information associated with your proposal, please discuss 9~ch impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Signature If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Asssssmer~t Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 ~ Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministeria[ permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail~ listing both Snpportine and non ~; If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP poli~ conomons, ~t shall not be undertaken. copy of the L WRP is available in the following places: on~~~ (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the libraxies and the Town Clerk's office, l B. DEscRIpTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION ; The Appheat~on has been submitted to (check appropriate response): ToWnBoard ~ PlanningBoard]~ Building Dept. [] BoardofTrustees [] 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [] (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approvai; license, cortification: Nature and extent of action: T/ ucV moo OF S d? . F T ..c7 Location of action: C'cgP/r4~/C~.~' ~I I,"~ ~ U~,~O~ ~ Site acreage: /, ~ ~ ~ . Present l~d use: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Present zoning classification: Z / ~/~UXr~ ~ If ~ application for the proposed action has been filed with ~e Town of Southold agency, ~e following infomation shall be provided: (a) Nameofapplic~t: ~0~ ~S ~'~/C~/ /~C. (b) Mailingad&ess: ~5~ ~5~C ~~ ~. (c) Telephone nmber: ~ea Code ( ) (~ ~ J) ~ ~ -- ~ ~ (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be ~rectly unde~en, require hnding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ~ No ~ If yes, whch state or federal agency?_ C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No .~. Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes [] No [-] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scemc resources throughout the Town of Southold, See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable' Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable At~ach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes ~l~ No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Soutbold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES pOlicy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~-] No~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets ifnecessmy WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's · ~r-dependent uses and promote sit of new water-dependent uses in ,~suitable locations. See LWRP Section II1 - Policies; Pages 47 through ~6 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [-~ No [] Not ApplicabLe Atlach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes ~ No[~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes ['-] No ~ Not Applicable DATE ~~' ~ FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 26, 2005 TO: James De Lucca A/C Montauk Bus Company 12 Linda Lane, E. Riverhead, NY 11901 Please take notice that your application dated July 15, 2005 For permit to construct a bus terminal at Location of property 115 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 96 Block 1 Lot 1.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction requires special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, as well as site plan approval from the Southold Town Plannin~ Board. Authorized signature ~_.. CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. APPEALS BOARD MEMBER~ Rnth D. O]iva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon http://southoldtown.north fork.net BOARD OF / TOWN OF SOl Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (6311 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETEI MEETING OF DECEMBER 1, Southold Town Hall aC 53095 Main Road · PO. Box 1179t;',d' Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 FEB 2 7 PlanninE B;~ard ZBA Ref. 5778 - MONTAUK BUS SERVICE, INC. Property Location: 115 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Unlisted Action category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. (with correction): The applicant's 47,166.6 square foot parcel is vacant PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION land with 48.56 feet along Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. The property is shown as Lot 2 on the Map of North Fork Industrial Park filed January 27, 2005 with the Suffolk County Clerk. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Zoning Code Section 100-141B(6), and Building Inspector's July 26, 2005 Notice of Disapproval, stating that special exception approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals is required for a proposed bus terminal business use, as well as site plan approval from the Town Planning Board. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on November 17, 2005 at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the area, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted, and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1) The applicant seeks approval for a new school bus terminal facility on Lot 2, Map of North Fork Industrial Park filed January 27, 2005, located in the Light Industrial Zone District. It is the determination of this board that the operations as a bus facility will not in any way alter the character of the neighborhood or industrial use district. The bus terminal in this location will enable the carrier to provide school bus service to the Mattituck-Cutchogue School District without unduly burdening town roads. 2) A school bus terminal use is a permitted use under Zoning Code Section 100-141B(6). 3) School bus transportation is an essential service, and construction of a bus depot in a Light Industrial District will have less impact on surrounding properties than it would at other locations. Pag'b 2 -~December 1, 2005 Appl. No. 5778 - Montauk Bus Service, Inc CTM 96-1-1.2 4) In addition, the Board has reviewed the General Standards governing Special Exception uses set fodh in Section 100-263 and finds: A. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts. B. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. C. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed fitness facility use and its location. D. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter. E. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. F. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection. G. A response was received on November 16, 2005 from the Town Planning Board indicating that reviews are pending and that additional information will be requested from the applicant to be considered complete. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the standards set forth in New York Town Law and the Town Zoning Code, motion was offered by Member Simon, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carried to GRANT a Special Exception, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: 1. That screening shown on the July 13, 2005 revised survey site plan prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno shall be continuously maintained to shield the premises from view from Depot Lane. 2. That the Zoning Board of Appeals reserves the right to inspect the screening. 3. That the site be devoted exclusively to the storage and maintenance of school buses. o,,v Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members _ (Chairw man), Goehringer, Orlando, Dinizio and Simon. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). ~_~~~ Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 2/21/06 TOW ly OF SOUTHOLD PLANNI, IYG BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION ' SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: ~' / } ~ Site Plan Name: ~ O~.lT, a,~ Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- Other SCTM #s: Street Address: ~Ot-n~l~c~ Distance to nearest intersection: Hamlet: Type of Site Plan: >q/ New Amended If Amended, last approval date: / / Residential SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number for the people below: Property Owner 7'-/~_~' ff*/'~Od? City /V/JJ ~7'./7--~d:J~ State /~.~- Zip. Applicant City M~-5 7~/d /r~r~e:~ State Home Telephone ~:~1) ~- ~:~y ~)ther Applicant's Agent or Representative: ContactPersonts)* J~,a4~s V' Dr Z/.,,'cc,,~., City ~//Eff/-/~'/'~g> State /'~)~. Zip /'/q~/ Office Telephone {g~/) 722-/ l/other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person note~d here. Page 2 of 3 SECTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: ~ New ModificationofExisting Structure Agricultural Change of use PropertY total acreage or square footage: /, O& ~ ac./r4. ~.. acreage or square footage: 5~ 36OaerCsq. ft. ( ¢,r'v/vt ~v, rv2,/r. ) Site Plan build-out Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ No ,~ Ifyes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): /-- / (_~]k//~2>~)_5'~,(>/,,g) ~ ) Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: '7 / ~7~,/ O 57 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes ~ No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes ~ No If yes, attach a copy ofthe application packet. ~2 ~,,¢ ~qp,c'~ot/A., /~,~7~- Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: List all proposed property uses: ~/$ 7-~:'.~tt4/,.~]~ If more then one use is Gross floor area of existing structure(s):_ C> .sq. fi. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): :3t Ooo $~. g'f Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: # of proposed spaces: /q ¢,~3 Loading Berth: Yes No ~ Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 0 % Proposed landscape coverage: ~ ~ % Waterfront Data: Isthispropertywithin500"ofawetlandarea? Yes No ~ Ifyesexplain: Signature of Preparer:-r~.~w-~ffd/~.,/_4~ t~.t47. Date: ~ c/ Pa~e 3 of 3 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full FAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR J=E~-_~q_~N._~ USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part1 [] Part2 •part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magn rude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead a DA. The project will not result in any large and important im significant impact on the environment, therefore DB. DC. Although the project could have a significant effect on for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in I~,RT 3 have been required, a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.~ The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact~on environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared 'A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions IxA o T ,ul< Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) webeite Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Pads A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of th e application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you bell eve will be needed to complete Pads 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Name of Appl cant/Sponsor Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO ~-uTc H-O c,u~ State N'Y' zi, oode ilo, s/ ¼~TT ITv c-K Business Telephone (.C~ J ) Bqq- B' S o Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 ~ 1 1. Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to; Identify each species: DYes [~No 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? DYes ~No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by ti~e community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? )f yes, explain: 1 4. Does the present site i~filude scenic views known to be important to the community? L---~Yes 1 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a, Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary l. 1 t5. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: A/O ,'CE b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 5. Will any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [~"'] Yes ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ~ months, (including demolition) 7. if multi phased: Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1; month year, (including demolition) c, Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d, Is phase t functionally dependent on subsequent phases? r~ Yes [] No 8, Will blasting occur during construction? r~ Yes '~ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ,/~_¢ ; after project is complet~ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~fO . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~ Yes [~No If yes, explain: [ 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes ~No e. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~,Yes ~ No 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal7 [] Yes ~ No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in e 100 year flood plain? [] Yes ~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month?__tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [~[No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [] Yes Page 6 of 21 ~ 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, ViJlage Board E~Yes Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes ~ No City, Town Zoning Board [~Yes ~ No City, County Health Department [] Yes [] No Other Locat Agencies E]Yes ~ No Other Regional A~encies [] Yes _~ No State Agencies []Yes ~ No Federal Agencies b----'~Yes .~No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes ~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: r~ Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance ~Site plan ,:: [] SpeCial use permit D New/revision of master plan [] Subdivision [] Resource management plan [] Other EX 6~p T'Io,~I Page 8 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection7 []Yes ~..No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes ~No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes D. Informational Details / Attach any additional information as may be~/~eeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss ~Jch impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification signature Date Jf the action is in the Coastal Area, And you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 , Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfi'ont Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area. (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on tiffs form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the ach/evement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail I/sting both ~npl~orting and non- SUl?.O~'tin~..fa,cts,; If .a~ actio, n c.armot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy st~.da,a ~ · conolnons, it snail not be unOertaken. _..---.----z-_~.~.~ A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places' once ,'own ~ (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, ~~e~.~t 1~.~ [~ libraries and the Town Clerk's office. / ~~~mt local;, The Apphcatlon has been subnutted to (check appropriate response): ._~.~__ T°WnBoard [] PlannhlgBoard]~ Building Dept. ~-~ BoardofTrustees ~-~ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital [] construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: . Nature and extent of action: Location of action: CJD~r-q ~Av6 ~'- Site acreage: /o ~.vg3 :~ .4c~ . Present land use: Present zoning classification: If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Nameofapplicant: /UffO~'~ ~tJ$ ~'~,~'l//d.~/ /~. (b) Mailing address: ~'5~o /~f,,q$7")~. L~",'q~/~/ gS~/~'. td 77c. /V. y. /lq:/ (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) (d, :~/) :?5? -- .~'~ qO (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [--] No [~ If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. []Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold, See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 throUgh 6 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes ~ No ~'] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southolrl, See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes [] bio [~ Not Applicable' Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [~ Yes ~ No J~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evalnati0n criteria Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes [l~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [~ Yes [-~ No ~[ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes No [~ Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES pOlicy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. '~-~ Yes[---] No~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's · Jr-dependent uses and promote sit of new water-dependent uses in ~suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 36 for evaluation criteria. ~'~ Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes ~ No~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable P~PA~DBY-~ Amended on ~/05 DATE · FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 26, 2005 TO: James De Lucca A/C Montauk Bus Company 12 Linda Lane, E. Riverhead, NY 11901 Please take notice that your application dated July 15, 2005 For permit to construct a bus terminal at Location of property 115 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 96 Blockl Lot 1.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction requires special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, as well as site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Authorized Sigh~/iure ~ CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. ~x)',, APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ,~'' Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman ~"~ ~X6~ Gerard P. Goehringer ~)Y\ Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179'~',d' Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ~ x ,, BOARD OF APPEAL~i '~' ~..~ .~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLI~ Tel. (631) 765~1809 · Fax (631) FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETE' MEETING OF DECEMBER 1 ZBA Reft 5778 - MONTAUK BUS SERVICE, INC. Property Location: 115 Commerce Drive, Cutchogue FEB 2 7 20~ . SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Unlisted Action category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. correction): applicant's 47,166.6 square foot parcel is vacant PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION (with The land with 48.56 feet along Commerce Drive in Cutchogue. The property is shown as Lot 2 on the Map of North Fork Industrial Park filed January 27, 2005 with the Suffolk County Clerk. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Zoning Code Section 100-141B(6), and Building Inspector's July 26, 2005 Notice of Disapproval, stating that special exception approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals is required for a proposed bus terminal business use, as well as site plan approval from the Town Planning Board. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on November 17, 2005 at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the area, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted, and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1) The applicant seeks approval for a new school bus terminal facility on Lot 2, Map of North Fork Industrial Park filed January 27, 2005, located in the Light Industrial Zone District. It is the determination of this board that the operations as a bus facility will not in any way alter the character of the neighborhood or industrial use district. The bus terminal in this location will enable the carrier to provide school bus service to the Mattituck-Cutchogue School District without unduly burdening town roads. 2) A school bus terminal use is a permitted use under Zoning Code Section 100-141B(6). 3) School bus transportation is an essential service, and construction of a bus depot in a Light Industrial District will have less impact on surrounding properties than it would at other locations. Pagb 2 --December 1, 2005 Appl. No. 5778 - Montauk Bus Se~ce, inc CTM 96-1-1.2 4) In addition, the Board has reviewed the General Standards governing Special Exception uses set forth in Section 100-263 and finds: A. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts. B. That the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of permitted or legally established uses in the district wherein the requested use is located or of permitted or legally established uses in adjacent use districts. C. That the safety, the health, the welfare, the comfort, the convenience or the order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed fitness facility use and its location. D. That the use will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes and intent of this chapter. E. That the use will be compatible with its surroundings and with the character of the neighborhood and of the community in general, particularly with regard to visibility, scale and overall appearance. F. That all proposed structures, equipment and material shall be readily accessible for fire and police protection. G. A response was received on November 16, 2005 from the Town Planning Board indicating that reviews are pending and that additional information will be requested from the applicant to be considered complete. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the standards set forth in New York Town Law and the Town Zoning Code, motion was offered by Member Simon, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carried to GRANT a Special Exception, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: 1. That screening shown on the July 13, 2005 revised survey site plan prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno shall be continuously maintained to shield the premises from view from Depot Lane. 2. That the Zoning Board of Appeals reserves the right to inspect the screening. 3. That the site be devoted exclusively to the storage and maintenance of school buses. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Orlando, Dinizio and Simon. Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). ~~), ~(~c~ Ruth D. Oliva, Charwoman 2/21/06 This KEY MAP SCALE 1"=600' x I / P I __56 NORTH PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR LOT MAP OF FORK INDUSTRIAL PARK FILE No. 1121B FILED JANUARY 27, 2005 SITUATED AT CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-96-01-1.2 SCALE 1"=20' MARCH 25, 2005 JULY 13, 2005 REVISED SITE PLAN MARCH 7, 2006 REVISED SFFE PLAN AREA 47,166.60 sq. ft. 1.085 ac. OWNER: TIDE CROUP 275 CARDINAL DRIVE MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 APPLICANT: MONTAUK BUS SERVICE, Inc. 556 MASTIC BEACH DRIVE MASTIC BEACH, NEW YORK 11951 NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO AN ASSUMED DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:~ EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: ZONING LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED 30% PROPOSED 7.5% LANDSCAPING COVERAGE REQUIRED 25% PROPOSED 29'~ DRAINAGE SPECIFICATION PAVEMENT ROOF, SIDEWALK AND CURB AREA - 100% RUNOFF GRASS AND LANDSCAPING 10% RUNOFF PROPOSED 100% RUNOFF AREA 5.7:,,560 sq. ff. TOTAL NUMBER OF DRAINAGE ~ 8' DIA,, 4'-6" HIGH FOR 2" RAINFALL = 26,7 RINGS TOTAL NUMBER OF RINGS PROVIDED = 30 RINGS (MIN.) (15 TWO RINGS UNITS) PAVING SPECIFICATIONS 6" STABILIZED BASE (AFTER COMPACTION) $'/2" DENSE BINDER COURSE (AFTER COMPACTION) 1'/2" ASPHALT TOP WEARING COURSE (AFTER COMPACTION) PARKING SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRED PARKING ONE PER EMPLOYEE = 19 PARKING PROVIDED 19 EMPLOYEES = 19 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM CALCULATIONS INV 1,500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL STORMWATER UNIT TOTAL STORAGE PER UNIT = 434 cf (NOT TO SCALE) 12" CORRUG, PE PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL 54 cf SOLID DOME 190 cf 2" CORRUG. PE DRAIN PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL (1) LEACHING POOL OROUND WATER j~ i DRAINAGE SEPTIC DESIGN: & SITE PLAN !James V. De ca P.A. JosePh A. Ingegno Land Surveyor -I~NONE (6~1)727-20g0 ~ 8Q~Q~E AV~UE Fax (65l)~27- 727 lg~JLIN~, ADDI~ES$