The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-81.-1-16.7 , .' I , WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON MAIUNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE WCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY .. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner ~ L WRP Coordinator Date: December 20, 2005 Re: Amendment to Permit #5636 for Mary Zupa SCTM# '1/- / - Ii<,. 1 MARY ZUP A requests an Amendment to Permit #5636 to install 1000-1500 lb. rock armor seaward ofa section of the new bulkhead from the existing jetty easterly for a distance of 112'. Install 332' timber retaining wall 12' landward of the new (replacement) bulkhead. The area between the bulkhead and the proposed retaining wall will be maintained as a non-turf buffer. Located: 580 Basin Rd., Southold. SCTM#81-1-16.7 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (L WRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the L WRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the following Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. The Board should assess any adverse impacts to the Critical Euvironmental Area and adjacent properties and require any necessary amendments to make the action consistent with the L WRP. The following Policy Standards have not been met. Policy Standards 4.1 Minimize losses' of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. D. Use hard structural erosion protection measures for control of erosion only where: 5. The proposed hard structural erosion protection measures are: a. limited to the minimum scale necessary b. based on sound engineering practices 6. Practical vegetative methods have been included in the project design and implementation. 7. Adequate mitigation is provided and maintained to ensure that there is no adverse impact to adjacent property or to natural coastal processes and natural resources and, if undertaken by a private property owner, does not incur significant direct or indirect public costs. 4.2 Protect and restore natural protective features. Natural protective geologic features provide valuable protection and should be protected, restored and enhanced. Destruction or degradation of these features should be discouraged or prohibited. B. Maximize the protective capabilities of natural protective features by: 1. avoiding alteration or interference with shorelines in a natural condition 2. enhancing existing natural protective features 3. restoring the condition of impaired natural protective features wherever practical 4. using practical vegetative approaches to stabilize natural shoreline features 5. managing activities to limit damage to, or reverse damage which has diminished, the protective capacities of the natural shoreline 6. providing relevant signage or other educational or interpretive material to mcrease public awareness of the importance of natural protective features C. Minimize interference with natural coastal processes by: 1. providing for natural supply and movement of unconsolidated materials and for water and wind transport 2. limiting intrusion of structures into coastal waters D. A limited interference with coastal processes may be aI/owed where the principal purpose of the structure is necessary to: 1. simulate natural processes where existing structures have altered the coast 2. provide necessary public benefits for flooding and erosion protection 3. provide for the efficient operation of water-dependent uses Limited interference is to be mitigated to ensure that there is no adverse impact to adjacent property, to natural coastal processes and natural resources, and, if undertaken by a private property owner, does not incur significant direct or indirect public costs. The applicant has not demonstrated snfficient need for the lOOO-1500lb rock armor seaward of the new bulkhead. Further, no eneineerine report or position has been submitted to the file to establish such a need or the potential adverse impacts of the proposed action (if anv). Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. ,. Towl,\ of South old LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for pennits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of South old Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. · Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of South old Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the L WRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listine both supportine and non- supportine facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the L WRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the L WRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold ' s website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office'r;-,..-::;'{'C ' DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED A~1:lhN'- iP \1, 8 2005 SCTM# 10f16~ g~ - I -.J~, 1 \ L\ I' DEe - : I PROJECT NAME.J!1 ()J~ "Lit f'-- \_,L~--, The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Board 0 Building Dept. 0 Board of Trustees ~ ,. _.....~._-" .. ,.,,;., I. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) o o (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: LiJ Nature and extent of action: \ _ -;t:\:- t:: llAY\ '-tl~ IV ~ IA~ ;,)10 3~ IDDO-1500-:P= (Ock. axmo( j Ins-bJR 3.32' ft-hrn:~ wA.il 12 J ~(.lJajfL.o1 flew a( ems',ot' CArrdrof a.d.d ~ "2 I +.mhM. ~....J l17I ~'5ul~ Location of action: 5 &'6 '?,,4-filN' Roy Site acreage:---J. 1 Presentlanduse: V ()...c.wJ (0{> I~ Jot- Present zoning classification: R - 15 0 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name ofapPlicant:~ LV p A-. (b) Mailing address: 4- 51 .5 Pcv~..~ -e ~ RJ. ~, ()W,q 71 (c) Telephone number: Area Code (~~.; 1 b.5'" (g) J ~ (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require nmding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes D No ~ If yes, which state or federal agency? .:. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will requir~ that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of South old that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. No $NO' Appl",bI. DYes D Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria o y~ 0 No ~N" Appllubl, Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria D V.. D N, '" AppU"bl. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No 0 NotA ~ 04- ~ Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria o V.. D N, ~'t Appl",bl. , Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 'hrough 32 for evaluation criteria. p o o Yes -No Not Applicable ~~+ iJj?:': il.~ ~2:::_,,""~',: ~. ':r:.' Ii f~f .';:- Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. DYes D NOP Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wast s. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. '=:J Yes D No Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. o y.D N'f,tAPPti"b" Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See L WRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. LJ Yes D No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. DYes D No ~Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 2 through 65 for evaluation criteria. DYes D No [J?Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. DYes D No ~ Not Applicable "". AREIl BvL2 ~......, TITLE BM CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. i2 MILL POND LANE r: MnRICHFS NY 11940-1222 DATE 10/7/ ().5' CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. 12 MILL POND LANE EAST MORICHES, NEW YORK 11940 516-878-8951 cmesiano@optonline.net November 29, 2005 AI Krupski, President South old Board of Town Trustees Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Mary Zupa Wetlands Permit #5636 580 Basin Road, South old SCTM # 1000-1.81.16.7 Dear Mr. Krupski: I am the agent for the above referenced applicant. At the recommendation of her contractor, Mrs. Zupa is seeking an amendment to the above referenced Wetlands Permit to install 1 000-1500 lb. rock armor seaward of a section of the new bulkhead from the existing jetty easterly for a distance of 112', as illustrated on the attached plan. It was recommended that rock armor be installed at the time the new bulkhead is installed to protect the area from continuing damage as this is the area prone to the greatest impact of wave action and the section of bulkhead that failed during a recent storm. We also request an amendment to include construction of :< 332' tmt2! :""8:,,:;:0 wall 12' landward of the new (replacement) bulkhead, aiso shown on the anacned f~", H,",,~ .-."f ",rr.-<:;"-''''' nr-'....+,........f Thr" ,"",r,"", h,......hHr''''y, H-,,~. h,dt.-h~-.-,,-'; .,...r~ .-. ~,.- ". -':"'-_~~-..._.n' -__-_..,~,'-"', "'~ ,""",::,:;,;, k...'<:::-"~.'~-_" '-,,'-.., ,.-,-,".;'L'_~,--" '-'i,'-,- -" . ". ~. ~- prop-esea reramiflg 'iN.:W '>VBl De ma!nIamea as a f'iGil-IUrr DUTIer. ,!I.1"" :-,-,,~tiF,::-:tL~H-'J -:.~ I', .-!,-,.--,;.,;...,~~~...;.,.-:-. ~,:-., ,;~..__ ~._ y~ __ _~t-,,_., ,~_ ._._,~._.__.--,..,~...--..-! .,,, .---.. -', H'. ".-" ,..,>" wi' ,.. __"'" ,; __~" '" -- ,_,,,, 0' -' ~. _ . ;_. ,. _> '__"".:.. ",~~~!:;.::-=~..,^~~ 7'-.r..W ~C,'_'-' c~m ~:..dkh~nd ::1;18 cc;;:::!:~di~,..., cf :: ~:2:...;~8 3::::: ;J~::;COd3h::d '~".r.r,,~,._...,"'''n .~.- ~ _"~'_'~"_'" "_';r; ,-,..,._....-.._._. "~_._._,... "._.,. ~1~._. .....,.'lr'~.-..~'"' iiiVUHii....(.:H,iVii a.;;.. iii;;;;:i~ i;;:., u ....UiiC:!jiJ YuiiU j iU~i~C..... .Ciii.ii lY! ,-iie: i.,iUif-....;;;.;:u;,.; ~. - ~ '. . 1 nanK YOu 70r your auermon to rnJS mailer. irfJpfDV8rnern.s, ana In6 [ilodhiGarions are assoc~atea ihnth Ihe DUiKheaQ ispiacernerlI. Very trulY yours, Cati"ienne A. MeSiano, ~reSluent r__:__..~__ CIILIU;:-'UIt:::::, f",.... \1;.....+....... fl. 1\."....,...7........... ."->'''- .J h.-",,-.iO '.'" ;-;;n;" .. .'~'L..i:i t=.ric J. BreSSler, t:sq. rlan View Surveyed, 11-1'1-05 SGnt TOOO-81-16./ Southold, New York TIde Range. 2.5'+/- Datum, MSL c.:==-.':;=-=S'l c"'- ---~.~/:::::::::J\ "_~-':::'-:'---'-'l c~'''I-;1 le,.\ ~ '~--.\ ~ \~---2j' u.> ii~\ = ==\ \2 ~< i '\~ ~ '\ ~ 'I. =~;'\ ] ___._-:~~L'~~ L.-....--.----- - 1, ~ ~~------r]', l',--=::::i i -.---'"" . CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. 12 MILL POND LANE E. MORICHES, NY 11940-1222'1 w*e s (5l o ~ ~ Pro pos eJ ~ I 000 - I 500 c.1l Q.t'rv>o( ,-0 '00\0- S 0\'\'(, .' .,' ~~~.." ." ..' (5l ~ IS' .) . ~- -' Proposed Timber R t (1.\) (11) e aJglog Wall (0..' 332 J.f. 12' landward of existing bulkhead -::s Cross SectIon 1" = 10' 411 X 611 ",haler existing grade 12' to bulkhead 6"x6uxlOI ! HfiM e' o.c.. Timber. Bulkhead ~ lll= 50' e @,':1. .' .,' .-- .' .' .."'..... (fl,1-) (\,~.a.} (o"S) O.Ek\.\6.1 sct# \O? of ZUVla \.lat\Co\ i existing grade - TIe Ro 3/4" as 6alv 4" x 6" . ",haler 211xlOllx8' H6 sheathing Proposed Timber Retaining Wall 332 LF. 12' landward of existing bulkhead ..1 __ "':~--- ,.....; --- (1."'; (\;).4) (leA) ~ -B o 8 Proposed. RetainIng ~ Purpose. Erosion COntr'c Applicant. Marti Zup Lat. 41--(:)2-5 Long: /2-~5-2 . (1:2) (ISO) nP) \ %~? '" \ '-\<.'J!5 " (ISO\ ~:<:;~ ~ \ .....0 Dba 7\....c.:J,o ~ ~ :{jIl"-a '-F ~\',l~~ :n0~ "\ \ 'C)...c l' , ~\J:;I :i \ tuJ.~ \ ~~..... \ (\1,\) , ,./" /f / / / f f // /'