Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-31.-13-4 ", / WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON MAIUNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair OFFICE WCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town of South old Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner L WRP Coordinator Date: November 15, 2005 Re: Request for Coastal Zone Permit for Bruce Bollman SCTM#1000-31-13-4 Bruce Bollman requests a Coastal Zone Permit to construct a single-family dwelling, driveway and new sanitary system. Located: Truman's Path, East Marion. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of South old Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. It Is mv determination that the L WRP Consistencv Assessment Form submitted to vour department unshmed and undated. is incomplete (all policv standards are marked not applicable). A recommendation cannot be given to the Board at tbis time. Please have the applicant sign and date the form and assess if the proposed action will or will not support the L WRP policies and resubmit the form to your department. In addition, please have the applicant identify the top of bluff on the survey. The most applicable include but are not limited to the following: Policy Standard 4.1 Minimize losses of hnmau life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. b. Avoid hazards bv sitinl! structures to maximize the distance from Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas. ,- . 5. Manage development in floodplains outside of coastal hazard areas so as to reduce adverse environmental effects, minimize the need for future structural flood protection measures, or expansion of existing protection measures and to meet federal flood insurance program standards. Policv Standard 5.1 Prohibit direct or indirect discharges that would cause or contribute to contravention of water quality standards. B. Prevent point source discharges into Southo/d's coastal waters and manage or avoid land and water uses that would: I. exceed applicable effluent limitations, or 2. cause or contribute to contravention of water quality classification and use standards, or 3. adversely affect receiving water quality, or 4. be contrary to Phase III of the Long Island Sound Study's Nitrogen Reduction Plan which calls for a 58.5% Sound-wide reduction in nitrogen levels.' C. Ensure effective treatment of sanitary sewage and industrial discharges by: 8. providing and managing on-site disposal systems: a. use on-site disposal systems only when impractical to connect with public sewer systems, b. protect surface and groundwater against contamination from pathogens and excessive nutrient loading by keeping septic effluent separated from groundwater and by providing adequate treatment of septic effluent, c. encourage the evaluation and implementation of alternative or innovative on-site sanitary waste systems to remediate on-site systems that currently do not adequately treat or separate effluent, d. encourage the use of alternative or innovative on-site sanitary waste systems where development or redevelopment of grandfathered parcels would otherwise increase the level of negative impacts on ground or surface waters, including wetlands. 5.2 Minimize non-point pollution of coastal waters and manage activities causing non- point pollution. A. Minimize non-point pollution of coastal waters using the following approaches, which are presented in order of priority. I. Avoid non-point pollution by limiting non-point sources. a. Reduce or eliminate introduction of materials which may contribute to non-point pollution. b. Avoid activities which would increase off-site stormwater runoff and transport of pollutants. c. Control and manage stormwater runoff to: . minimize transport of pollutants · restore sites to emulate natural stormwater runoff conditions where degraded stormwater runoff conditions exist . achieve no net increase of runoff where unimpaired stormwater runoff conditions exist 2. Reduce pollutant loads to coastal waters by managing unavoidable non-point sources and by using appropriate best management practices as determined by site characteristics, design standards, operational conditions, and maintenance programs. Policy Standard 5.4 Limit the potential for adverse impacts of watershed development on water quality and quantity. A. Protect water quality by ensuring that proposed expansion or intensification of existing watershed development results in: 1. protection of areas that provide important water quality benefits 2. maintenance of natural characteristics of drainage systems, and 3. protection of areas that are particularly susceptible to erosion and sediment loss B. Limit the individual impacts associated with development to prevent cumulative water quality impacts which would lead to a failure to meet water quality standards. Policy Standard 5.5 Protect and conserve the quality and quantity of potable water. A. Prevent contamination of potable waters by limiting discharges of pollutants to maintain water quality according to water quality classification, and limiting, discouraging or prohibiting land use practices that are likely to contribute to contravention of surface and groundwater quality classifications for potable water supplies. B. Prevent depletion of existing potable water supplies by limiting saltwater intrusion in aquifers and estuaries, through conservation methods or restrictions on water supply use and withdrawals, and by allowing for recharge of potable aquifers. C. Limit cumulative impact of development on groundwater recharge areas to ensure replenishment of potable groundwater supplies. Policy Standard 6.1 Protect and restore ecological quality throughout the Town of Southold. Policy Standard 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Complv with Trustee rel!ulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. B. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the State's wetland laws. 3. Comply with the regulatory requirements of the Tidal Wetlands Act for the protection of mapped tidal wetlands including coastal fresh marsh; intertidal marsh; coastal shoals, bars and flats; high marsh or salt meadow; littoral zones; and formerly connected tidal wetlands. D. Provide adequate buffers between wetlands and adjacent or nearby uses and activities in order to ensure protection of the wetland's character, quality, values, and functions. The adequacy of the buffer depends on the following factors: 1. Potential for adverse effects associated with the use. Uses such as those involving hazardous materials, on-site sewage disposal, or mineral extraction have high potential for adverse effects and may require substantial buffer. 2. The nature and importance of the wetland and its benefits. Substantial buffers may be necessary to avoid adverse effects from adjacent or nearby uses based on the nature of the land use and the characteristics of the affected wetland. 3. Direction and flow of surface water between a use and adjacent or nearby wetland. Buffer widths may be reduced in areas where drainage patterns normally do not lead directly to the wetland and where adverse affects on the wetland, other than those due to runoff, are not likely. 4. Buffer width necessary to achieve a high particulate filtration efficiency of surface runoff as determined by vegetative cover type, soil characteristics, and slope ofland. 5. Other management measures or design alternatives to protect wetlands from adverse effects where site constraints do not allow sufficient buffer width. E. Maintain buffers to ensure that adverse effects of adj acent or nearby development are avoided: I. Maintain buffers to achieve a high filtration efficiency of surface runoff. 2. Avoid permanent or unnecessary disturbance within buffer areas. 3. Maintain existing indigenous vegetation within buffer areas. Policy Standard 9.2. Protect and provide public visual access to coastal lands and waters from public sites and transportation routes where physically practical. A. Avoid loss of existing visual access. 1. Limit physical blockage of existing visual access by development or activities due to the scale, design, location, or type structures. 2. Protect view corridors provided by streets and other public areas leading to the coast. 3. Protect visual access to open space areas associated with natural resources. B. Minimize adverse impact on visual access. 1. Provide for view corridors to the coast in those locations where new structures would block views of the coast from inland public vantage points. 2. Use structural design and building siting techniques to preserve or retain visual access and minimize obstruction of views. 3. Visual access requirements may be reduced where site conditions, including vegetative cover or natural protective features, block potential vIews. 4. Vegetative or structural screening of an industrial or commercial waterfront site is allowed if the resulting overall visual quality outweighs the loss of visual access. E. Protect visual access to the natural shoreline from the water. 1. Prevent loss of natural vegetation due to excessive land clearing and inappropriate non-native landscaping. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. /-,wIf?T,'/e rnJ " Town of Southold !. L I'""",,,r . I Lud) j I .J .\ All applicants for permits' including Town of Southold agen~ieS, ~h~IL20~plet~"this ~CAl'J for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold WaternomCOllsislency"Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. * Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. L WRP CONSISTENCY ASSESS:MENT FORM i'~UV A. INSTRUCTIONS 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the L WRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be celtified as consistent with the L WRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the L WRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold 's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 3 \ \ ~ Lf lIJ, 8 C'LLt.L bo\ ''''''o.J' '\<e.......r i~e(\~ PROJECT NA:ME The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board D Planning Board D Building Dept. D Board of Trustees ~ L Category of Town of South old agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) o o (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: ~ Nature and extent of action: ~r\ \eL'-'~u:""'" for ~X'C\e.-rL u\.c.....-t ('f)()..<)n. I f ro,fw'i"-- , \ \-ur bL J "'\J...u.J'~-' f-e...e T (cypruy) ot- ~i.:), ~ J \ 5-erwJCu-Q... .~~, OfC-(Lj(J,...+,~ O,,--crLLL+ -fur o-\- Y\c:.w -k,,-^d~~~ (.)( rn,'\+- I ,IV \ (\J t l.- \ \a. -\\0\:"- 2"d 916E59l.1E9 s~apl~n8 1ue~~aH dl.E:EO 50 01 ^ON / Location of action: \ "l !;S5T(lA...""-t.L.r\.... Pa--tL Site acreage: Y IXI~.l'i. o)\.-fr Presentland use: Or\e... f.r..L,(T'\, \j cku-e...i \ \~ 2, C 1"\,)[.,0 Present zoning classification: It-i 11'1..(\"" (/C \ t:. u..... t- (Y\ cv \ Vh.- ) cl.e..mo\,.r~ I r1 ') ~~C- d.e..iz.u:...f.Ld-- .J.. c<< () <.J'CL y-- 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: \j.). (.6rw....-- ~ 0 \\ m 0.. rv (b) Mailing address: c!2ok m(J...I" S ke. -\-- G)\.t.e..~ro r:..-.. r-J~ \lC\L-\ '1 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ~9-1l1 - 00;J ~ (d) Application munber, ifany: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes D No~ If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of dcvclopment in the Town of South old that enhances community charactcr, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes advcrsc effects of development, Sec L WRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. lJYes D No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria DYes D No ~ Not Applicable E'''' 91SES9l.1E9 s~aPl~nH ~ue~~a8 "'l.E:EO SO 01 ^O~ Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria o Ves 0 No [2(] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria o Ves 0 No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of South old. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria DYes 0 No cg[Not Applicable Attach additional sbeets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Soutbold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fisb and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 tbrough 32 for evaluation criteria. o o ~ j,.d SJ6E5Sl.JES s~apIJn8 ~ue~~a8 dl.E:EO 50 OJ AO~ Yes No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. DYes D No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. DYes 0 No ~ Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. DYeD No IZI Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary S'd Sl6ESSl.lES s~apI!n8 !u~~~a8 dSE:EO SO Ol ^O~ . ' , . WORKING COAST POLICIES Polley 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See L WRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. DYes D No ISJ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets jf necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. DYes D No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricuIturallands in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. DYes D No~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See L'VRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. DYes D No ~ Not Applicable PREPARED BY TITLE DATE S'd SlSE5S1.1ES s~apI~n8 ~ue~~a8 dSE:EO 50 01 ^O~ . . . . HARVEY A. ARNOFF Attorney At Law 206 Roanoke Avenue, Riverhead, NY 11901-2794 (631) 727-3904 Harvey A. Arnoff Michael P. Sendlenski Paralegal Colleen Grattan-Arnoff, R.N. Fax No,: (631) 727-3940. *Not for service of legal papers Of Counsel George F. Biondo John A. MacLachlan November 21, 2005 Town of Southold, Board of Trustees c/o North Fork Bank Town Hall Annex Building P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 -~.'-'-'~-~-'.' .--, 'r,\ \\ l'i NOV 2 2 LUO:J l..-~-_. i \ I . ".- I -~---'- -...:----.-..--... Ii I' , , .~__.-,.-l Re: W. Bruce Bollman, Applicant LWRP Consistency Assessment Form SCTM #31-13-4 , I l____.___,- ,'- Gentlemen: Enclosed please find LWRP Consistency Assessment Form and rider attached thereto regarding the above-referenced matter. Would you kindly provide us with your evaluation of same. Should you require any further information or documentation, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, MPS/db Enclosure cc: Mr. W. Bruce Bollman John Bertani Builder, 'Inc. if ~ ~~\ MICHAEL P. SENDLENSKI ~ . . . FROM : SOUTHOLD TOWN PLRNNING BORRD FRX NO. : 631 765 3136 Nov. 18 2005 11:50RM Pi ',. Town of South old LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A.. lNSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of South old Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information lIsed by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects UDon the coastal area (which includes all of South old Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the L WRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus. eacb answer lUllSt be explained in detail. listin!! botb sUDDorlin!! nnd non- supportin2 fncts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the L WRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the L WRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtownnorthfork_net), the Board ofTmstees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACfION SCTM# 31 1 3 4 PROJECT NAME W. Bruce Bollman The Application bas been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ca Planning Board ca Building Dept G Board of Trustees ~ I. Category of Town of South old agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e,g. capital construction. planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) G G (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: o Nature and extent of action: Application for a coastal erosion permit to allow for construction activity seaward of the coastal erosion zone for a one family dwelling to be constructed which will be landward of the coastal erosion zone. F,ROM : SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD FAX NO. : 631 765 3136 Nov. 18 2005 11:51AM P2 ~ Locationofactjon:~755 Trumans Path~<Uit... Mrlri nn. 1\10.' YoU-- . Site acreage: 9878.29 sq. ft._. ---' --- one family dwelling (now demolished) and detached Present land use: ---~ two car garage , 1 'fi t'. Residential Present wmng c asSI ca Ion. 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: W. Bruce Bollman 208 Main street (b) Mailing address: Greenport, New York 11944 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) 631-477-0023 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes 0 No[J If yes, which state or federal agency? . C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLlCY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. []Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable See Attached Schedule Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria . G Yes G No [K] Not Applicable SEE Attached Schedule . . . FROM SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD FAX NO. : 631 765 3136 Nov. 18 2005 11:52AM Pi , Atladl additional sheets if n...,"ary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria G Yes G No [!j Not Applicable See Attached Schedule Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria c:a Yes G No 0 Not Applicable See Attached Schedule Anach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in tbe Town of South old. See L WRP Section m _ Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria m Yes G No GNotARplicable See Attacned Schedule Attach addition.l sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of South old ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. o Yes GNu Cd Not Applicable See Attached Schedule . . . ~ROM SOUTHOLD TOWN PLRNNING BORRD FRX NO. : 631 765 3136 Nov. 18 2005 11:53RM P2 r Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for cvaluation criteria. Cd Yes G No ~ Not Applicable See Attached Schedule Attach additional sheets if necessaty Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hllZardous substances and wastes. See L WRP Section llI- Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Gyes 0 No Iia Not Applicable See Attached Schedule PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. G Yes 0 No ~ Not Applicable See Attached Schedule Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES \, "RQM :'SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD FAX NO. : 531 755 3135 Nov. 18 2005 11:53AM P3 " Po\i~v to. Protect Southold's water.dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent IIses in suitable locations. See L WRP Section lll- policies; Pages 47 throngh 56 for evaluation criteria. G Yes 0 No ua Not Applicable See Attached Sch.edu1 e ~ . Attach additional sbeets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See L WRP Section III-Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. [!3 Yes 0 No G Not Applicable See Attached Schedule Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. . 0 Yes 0 NoG Not Applicable See Attached Schedule Attaeh additional sheets ifneees,ary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See Lwru> Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [!3 Yes 0 No ca Not Applicable See Attached Schedule . A~~-r~ PREPARED By)l,- ~I SrJ(~I1~)./ TITU f. 5Q Ut.J 6({.'Cf>5 eP !+frR'/Ey !f12-!rl'F? Amended on 811105 ?t-DC:> ~oo-Nok:...e A-ve. . R~veAe.-;1 Nt//rol DATE~) . . . RIDER TO PART C DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. The submitted plan fosters a pattern of development that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes sufficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of coastal location, and minimizes adverse affects of development in the following manner. The application seeks to rebuild an existing location upon the same dimensional footprint as the previously existing building on the location was constructed. This preserves the community character of the Town of South old and it preserves other open spaces while rehabilitating already developed areas. The instant application makes beneficial use of the coastal locations and minimizes adverse effects or development in that it is rehabilitating and reconstructing already existing development which currently has infrastructure in place. Policy 2. Policy is not applicable to present application as the present structure was not historical and there were no archeological resources involved in the property. Policy 3. The proposed application and building does not impact the visual quality and protects any resources throughout the Town of Southold in that it redevelopment of an already existing business/home. While the applicant believes that it is a major esthetic improvement over the previously existing one family home, this is totally a subjective determination and there is neither a decrease or increase in the visual quality and protection of the scenic resources. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. The instant application applicability to minimizing the loss of life structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion is not applicable to the instant application as the instant application simply seeks to reconstruct a one family dwelling on an already existing footprint. It marginally increases the minimization of lose of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion through better design and the addition of runoff retention devices. . Policy 5. The instant application protects and approves water quality and supply in the Town of Southold by the updating of the septic system and the enhancement of drywells on the property in order to control runoff into the natural resources. Policy 6. The instant application protects the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem in that it provides runoff retention measures which decrease point source pollution and allows natural habitats to better restore themselves without these intrusions. Policy 7. The instant application will not protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold nor will it decrease or impair the air quality in the Town of Southold. The reconstruction of a single family home will have no measurable impacts on air quality. Policy 8. . The instant application will have no effect on the environmental degradation in the Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. The reconstruction of the home has negligible or no effect on solid waste in the Town of Southold and it is a redevelopment of a single one story home. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. The instant application does not provide for public access, to and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold as it is a redevelopment of a single family home. WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. The instant application is not applicable to maintaining or protecting Southold's water dependent uses in promoting or citing of new water dependent uses in suitable locations in that the present location is zoned residential and the application seeks to rebuild a residential home on the location. . Policy 11. The instant project promotes sustainable living marine resources in the Long Island . . . , , Sound, the Peconic Estuary and town waters by providing for improved dry well capturing of gutter leaders, roof runoff which prevents possible point source pollution which could negatively affect ecosystems and habitats. The instant application exceeds the configuration of the previously existing house as it provides better protection for roof runoff recapture. Policy 12. The instant application protects agricultural lands in the Town of South old by redeveloping already developed parcel instead of developing "virgin, natural, undeveloped or agricultural lands". Policy 13. The instant application promotes appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources in that the new construction and redevelop many of this single family house uses significantly better energy efficient design and is compliant with the local building codes which have been strengthened in this regard over the codes in place at the time of the earlier construction.