HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-14.-2-3.14
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
GEORGE D. SOLOMON
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
(cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY
Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
JERIL YN B. WOODHOUSE
Chair
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Town of South old Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner
L WRP Coordinator
Date: August 19,2005
Re: Proposed Permit for David McElroy to Construct a Bluff Stair adjacent to Long
Island Sound
SCTM#1000-14-2-3.14
This proposal is to construct a 4' wide by 68' long fixed stairway with two landings to
access the Long Island Sound beach. Subject stairway will be supported by eighteen
posts.
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of
the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program
(L WRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the L WRP
Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records
available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is generally
CONSISTENT with the following Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT
with the L WRP provided that the Board require any necessary amendments to the
application and implement appropriate best management practices to further the
below listed Policy Standards. Recommended Best Management Practices include:
1. To further the intent ofLWRP Policies 5, 6, aud 8; protect water quality and
the health of the users of the structure; require that no CCA treated wood,
oil based Dreservatives containinl! creosote (CRT) or DentachloroDhenol
(PCP), aDDlied to the surface of wood materials shall be Dermitted in the
construction materials of the structure. The aDDlicant shall use a decay
resistant alternative.
2. Reuuire the submittal of a narrative of proposed construction methods
indicatinl! how the applicant will insure minimal disturbance to the
surroundinl! existinl! vel!etation.
Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in
preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Policy 5
Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of
Southold.
Policy Standards
B.
Prevent point source discharges into Southo/d's coastal waters and
manage or avoid land and water uses that would:
2. cause or contribute to contravention of water quality classification
and use standards, or
3. adversely affect receiving water quality, or
4. be contrary to Phase III of the Long Island Sound Study's Nitrogen
Reduction Plan which calls for a 58.5% Sound-wide reduction in
nitrogen levels.
Policy 6
Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold
ecosystem.
Policy Standards
6.1 Protect and restore ecological quality throughout the Town of South old.
A. Avoid adverse changes to the Long Island Sound and the Peconic Bay
ecosystems that would result from impairment of ecological quality as indicated
by:
1. Physical loss of ecological components
Physical loss is often the most obvious natural resource
impairment to identify. It usually results from discrete actions,
such as filling or excavating a wetland or clearing an upland forest
community prior to development.
2. Degradation of ecological components
Degradation occurs as an adverse change in ecological quality,
either as a direct loss originating within the resource area or as an
indirect loss originating from nearby activities. Degradation
usually occurs over a more extended period of time than physical
loss and may be indicated by increased siltation, changes in
community composition, or evidence of pollution.
3. Functional loss of ecological components
Functional loss can be indicated by a decrease in abundance of fish
or wildlife, often resulting from a behavioral or physiological
avoidance response. Behavioral avoidance can be due to
disruptive uses that do not necessarily result in physical changes,
but may be related to introduction of recreational activities or
predators. Timing of activities can often be critical in determining
whether a functional loss is likely to occur. Functional loss can
also be manifested in physical terms, such as changes in
hydrology.
B. Protect and restore ecological quality by adhering to the following
measures.
1. Maintain values associated with natural ecological communities.
Each natural ecological community has associated values which
contribute to the ecological quality of the Town of South old. These
values should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
2. Retain and add indigenous plants to maintain and restore values of
natural ecological communities.
a. Protect existing indigenous plants from loss or disturbance
to the extent practical.
b. Include use of suitable indigenous plants in the landscaping
plans for new development and in redevelopment projects
where loss or disturbance of existing indigenous plants
could not be prevented during construction.
3. Avoid fragmentation of ecological communities and maintain
corridors to facilitate the free exchange of biological resources
within and among communities.
a. Each individual resource area should be maintained as a
complete contiguous areas to protect the area's natural
resource values. Specifically, actions that would fragment
the ecological community into separate ecological islands
should be avoided.
b. Where fragmentation of ecological communities has
already occurred, the adverse effects of fragmentation can
be mitigated by maintaining or providing connecting
corridors to allow exchange of biological resources.
4. Maintain ecological integrity of particular locales by maintaining
structural and functional attributes, including normal variability, to
provide for self-sustaining systems.
5. Avoid permanent adverse change to ecological processes.
C. Reduce adverse impacts on ecological quality due to development.
2. Mitigate impacts of new development.
Definitions
Habitat destruction is defined as the loss of fish or wildlife use through
direct physical alteration, disturbance, or pollution of a designated area or
through the indirect effects of these actions on a designated area. Habitat
destruction may be indicated by changes in vegetation, substrate, or
hydrology, or by increases in runoff, erosion, sedimentation or pollutants.
Significant impairment is defined as reduction in vital resources (e.g.,
food, shelter, living space) or change in environmental conditions (e.g.,
temperature, substrate, salinity) beyond the tolerance range of important
species of fish or wildlife that rely on the habitat values found within the
designated area. Indicators of a significantly impaired habitat focus on
ecological alterations and may include, but are not limited to, reduced
carrying capacity, changes in community structure (e.g. food chain
relationships, species diversity, etc), reduced productivity and/or increased
incidence of disease and mortality.
The range of parameters that should be considered in applying the habitat
impairment test include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. physical parameters, such as living space, circulation,
flushing rates, tidal amplitude, turbidity, water temperature,
depth (including loss of littoral zone), morphology,
substrate type, vegetation, structure, erosion and
sedimentation rates
2. biological parameters, such as community structure, food
chain relationships, species diversity, predator/prey
relationships, population size, mortality rates, reproductive
rates, meristic features, behavioral patterns and migratory
patterns, and
3. chemical parameters, such as dissolved oxygen, carbon
dioxide, acidity, dissolved solids, nutrients, organics,
salinity, and pollutants (heavy metals, toxics and hazardous
materials)
6,3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands.
A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southo/d Town
Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other
lands under their jurisdiction
1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth
in Trustee permit conditions.
B. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the State's wetland
laws.
I. Comply with regulatory requirements of the Stream Protection Act
for the excavation or placement of fill in all wetlands that are
adjacent to and contiguous at any point to any of the navigable
waters of the state, and that are inundated at mean high water level
or tide.
2. Comply with the regulatory requirements of the Freshwater
Wetlands Act for the protection of mapped freshwater wetlands.
3. Comply with the regulatory requirements of the Tidal Wetlands
Act for the protection of mapped tidal wetlands including coastal
fresh marsh; intertidal marsh; coastal shoals, bars and flats; high
marsh or salt meadow; littoral zones; and formerly connected tidal
wetlands.
C. Prevent the net loss of vegetated wetlands according to the following
measures. Use the measure resulting in the least environmentally
damaging practicable alternative.
1. Avoid placement of fill in or excavation of vegetated wetlands:
a. Choose alternative sites which would not result in adverse
impacts on wetlands.
b. Reduce scale or intensity of development to avoid
excavation or fill.
c. Choose design alternatives which would avoid excavation
or fill.
2.
Minimize adverse impacts resulting from unavoidable fill,
excavation, or other activities by:
a. reducing scale or intensity of use in order to limit incursion
into wetland areas
b. designing projects to result in the least degree of adverse
wetland impacts
Provide compensatory mitigation for adverse impacts which may
result from unavoidable fill, excavation or other activities
remaining after all appropriate and practicable minimization has
been accomplished.
a. Restore former wetlands or create new tidal wetlands
according to the following priorities:
(i) restore former wetlands or create new tidal wetlands
in areas adjacent or contiguous to the site
(ii) where restoration of former wetlands in areas
adjacent or contiguous to the site is not appropriate or
practicable, restore former wetlands in close physical
proximity and in the same watershed, to the extent possible
(iii) where restoration of former tidal wetlands is not
appropriate or practicable, create new tidal wetlands in
suitable locations as determined by sediment, exposure,
shoreline characteristics, and water regime; include
consideration of loss of resource values which may exist at
the mitigation site
3.
b. Creation of new non-tidal freshwater wetlands is generally
not suitable for compensatory mitigation for loss of natural
wetland.
c. Where wetlands are restored or tidal wetlands created:
(i) Provide equivalent or greater area of mitigation
wetland. Base the actual area of wetland provided on the
following factors: characteristics of the mitigation site,
proposed wetland creation or restoration methods and
designs, and quality of the wetland restored or created
relative to the wetland lost.
(ii) Provide equivalent or greater value or benefit to that
of the wetland area lost, as defined by class of freshwater
wetland, as ranked in 6 NYCRR Part 664 or, tidal wetland
zones, as described in 6 NYCRR Part 661.
(iii) A lesser area of mitigation wetland may be allowed
in cases where the mitigation wetland and its benefits
would clearly be a greater value than the wetland lost.
(iv) Guarantee success of the compensatory mitigation.
Wetland mitigation is considered successful if functional
attributes of the wetland have been reached and maintained,
including a plant density which approaches the design
density.
(a) Carry out mitigation in accord with a
compensatory plan which details wetland creation
or restoration measures. Base compensatory plans
on establishment of a natural, self-regulating
wetland.
(b) Monitor and report on progress of the
wetland mitigation according to a prescribed plan.
(c) Provide a suitable performance bond or
other surety instrument guaranteed to an appropriate
agency or organization to assure successful
completion of the mitigation.
d. When a series of small, unavoidable wetland losses
requires mitigation, combine mitigation projects to create
larger contiguous wetland areas whenever the resulting
ecological value would be greater than that achieved
through pursuing discrete, separate efforts.
e. Protect wetland functions and associated benefits regardless
of the availability of compensatory mitigation.
(i) Do not fill, excavate, or dredge vegetated wetland
areas which:
(a) support endangered or threatened species of
plants or animals
(b) have not been subjected to significant
impairment, or
(c) are part of a natural resource management
area, including refuges, sanctuaries, reserves, or
areas designated as Significant Coastal Fish and
Wildlife Habitats, based on wetland values.
(ii) Do not fill, excavate, or dredge vegetated wetland
areas when the wetland loss would result in significant
impairment of the remaining wetland area.
(iii) Retain functions and benefits associated with
vegetated and non-vegetated wetlands.
6.4 Protect vulnerable fish, wildlife, and plant species, and rare ecological
communities.
A. Protect vulnerable fish and wildlife species.
1. Vulnerable fish and wildlife species are those listed in regulation 6
NYCRR Part 182.5 as Endangered Species, Threatened Species,
and Special Concern Species.
2. Review existing species records and field survey proposed
development sites, at the appropriate times, for the presence of
listed species or conditions that meet their habitat requirements.
3. Protect habitat of listed species identified through field surveys or
other methods during all stages of their life cycles.
B. Protect vulnerable plant species.
1. Vulnerable species are those listed in regulation 6 NYCRR Part
193.3 as Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Exploitable
Vulnerable Species, and Rare Species.
2. Review existing species records and field survey proposed
development sites, at the appropriate times, for the presence of
listed species or conditions that meet their habitat requirements.
3. Protect habitat identified by the occurrence of a listed species
during all stages oftheir life cycles.
C. Protect rare ecological communities.
I. Rare ecological communities to be protected include:
a. communities that qualify for a Heritage State Rank of 81 or
82; and
b. communities that qualify for both a Heritage State Rank of
83, 84 or 85; and an Element Occurrence Rank of A. (See
The Natural Coast for an explanation of Heritage State
Ranks).
2. Review existing ecological community records and field survey
sites potentially affected by proposed development for the presence
ofrare ecological communities.
3. Protect rare ecological communities. Use appropriate design and
development of land and water uses that will integrate or be
compatible with the identified ecological community.
4. Use the most up-to-date information available on the structure and
the function of rare ecological communities as a factor in
determining open space requirements of a project.
Polley 8
Minimize environmental degradation in Town of South old from solid
waste and hazardous substances and wastes.
Pollcv Standards
8.3 Protect the environment from degradation dne to toxic pollutants and
substances hazardous to the environment and public health.
A. Prevent release of toxic pollutants or substances hazardous to the
environment that would have a deleterious effect on fish and wildlife
resources.
E. Take appropriate action to correct all unregulated releases of substances
hazardous to the environment.
8.4 Prevent and remediate discharge of petroleum products.
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Polley 9
Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters,
public lands, and public resources of the Town of South old.
Pollcv Standards
9.1 Promote appropriate and adequate physical public access and recreation to
coastal resources.
A. Provide a level of public access and type of recreational use which takes
into account thefollowingfactors:
I. proximity to population centers,
2. public demand for access and recreational use,
3. type and sensitivity of natural resources affected,
4. purpose of public institutions which may exist on the site,
5. accessibility to the public access site or facility,
6. the needs of special groups such as the elderly and persons with
disabilities,
7. the potential for adverse impacts on adjacent land uses,
8. the potential for adverse impacts on the transportation network.
F. Include physical public access to, and/or water-related recreation
facilities on, coastal lands and waters whenever development or activities
are likely to affect the public's use and enjoyment of public coastal lands
and waters. Provide incentives to private development projects which
provide public access and/or water-related recreation facilities.
G. Restrict public access and recreation only where incompatible with public
safety, and the protection of natural resources.
9.2 Protect and provide public visual access to coastal lands and waters from
public sites and transportation routes where physically practical.
A. Avoid loss of existing visual access.
I. Limit physical blockage of existing visual access by development
or activities due to the scale, design, location, or type structures.
2. Protect view corridors provided by streets and other public areas
leading to the coast.
3. Protect visual access to open space areas associated with natural
resources.
B. Minimize adverse impact on visual access.
\. Provide for view corridors to the coast in those locations where
new structures would block views of the coast from inland public
vantage points.
2. Use structural design and building siting techniques to preserve or
retain visual access and minimize obstruction of views .
C. Mitigate for loss of visual access.
1. . Provide public visual access from vantage points on the site where
development of the site blocks visual access from inland public
vantage points.
2. Provide for additional and comparable visual access at nearby
locations if physical access cannot be provided on-site.
9.5 Provide access and recreation that is compatible with natural resource
values.
A. Provide appropriate access and associated recreational activity that will
avoid potential adverse impacts on natural resources. Use the following
factors in determining the potential for adverse environmental effects:
\. intensity of the associated recreational, scientific, or educational
activity,
2. level of likely disturbance associated with the proposed activity.
The following types of access or associated activities are listed in
decreasing order of potential for disturbance:
a. motorized activities,
b. active, non-motorized activities, including water-dependent
and water-related uses,
c. passive activities,
d. avoidance of the area.
3. Sensitivity of the natural resources involved and the extent of the
ecological benefits associated with avoidance of the area.
B. Limit public access and recreational activities where uncontrolled public
use would lead to impairment of natural resources.
I. Establish appropriate seasonal limitations on access and recreation
in order to minimize adverse impacts on fish and wildlife species.
2. Provide stewardship that is capable of controlling anticipated
adverse impacts before providing public access.
3. Physically limit or avoid provision of public access to natural
resource areas whose principal values are based on the lack of
human disturbance.
4. Provide educational, interpretive, research, and passive uses of
natural resources through appropriate design and control of public
access and recreation.
C. Provide public access for fish and wildlife resource related activities,
including fishing and hunting, provided that the level of access would not
result in a loss of resources necessary to continue supporting these uses.
D. Provide access using methods and structures that maintain and protect
open space areas associated with natural resources. Determine the extent
of visual and physical impairment by structures extending through these
open space areas based on:
1. the value of the open space as indicated by un-fragmented size or
mass of the wetland or other natural resources, distance to
navigable water, and wetland value.
2. the size, length, and design of proposed structures.
L WRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM
m.T.
~ [ J~l ~)~ :5lli ~
Town of Southold
A. INSTRUCTIONS
I. All applicants for permits' including Town of Southold agencies, sha co p e
proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This
assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in
making a determination of consistency. · Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits
and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.
Southold Town
Board of Trustees
2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt
minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local
Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant
beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town).
3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the
achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law.
Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a
determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the L WRP policy
standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the L WRP policy
standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken.
A copy ofthe LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of South old's website
(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local
libraries and the Town Clerk's office.
B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION
SCTM#
014
02
003.14
Jill ")
Vi- '-....
~........:,j
I
!
The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response)L_
Town Board 0 Planning Dept. 0 Building Dept. 0 Board of Trustees [gJ
i
--l
1. Category of Town of South old agency action (check appropriate response):
(a)
Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital
construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction)
(b)
Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy)
o
o
[gJ
(c)
Permit, approval, license, certification:
Nature and extent of action:
Aoolicant oroooses to construct a BLUFF STAIRWAY within the northeastern section of
subiect orooertv in order to I!:ain access to the shoreline of Lonl!: Island Sound located
contilZUous to subiect property
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Location of action:
1640 Grandview Drive: Orient: Town of Sonthold. NY
Site acreage:
0.9 acre %
Present land use:
Imoroved w/sin!!le familv dwellin!! and related aoourtenances
Present zoning classification:
2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following
information shall be provided:
(a) Name of applicant: DAVID McELROY
(b) Mailing address: P.O. Box 206: Orient, NY 11957
(c) Telephone number: Area Code ( 631 ) 495 - 2303
(d) Application number, if any: N/A
Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency?
YesD No~
rfyes, which state or federal agency?
DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,
preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use ofa coastal location, and
minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
IZI Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable
Subject proposal is consistent with the policy in that the siting and utilization of the proposed bluff stairway will maintain
the character of the surrounding neighborhood, which currently consists of many similarly-improved residential lots with
similar accessory structures (i.e. access stairs to the contiguous shoreline of Long Island Sound). In addition, subject
proposal will be in harmony with the "...beneficial use of a coastal location..." in that the legally created residential
waterfront (Le. coastal) lot will be enhanced by the inclusion of the proposed bluff stairway in order to access the
shoreline of Long Island Sound. Accordingly, we believe that this project is consistent with this policy.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
DYes 0 No IZI Not Applicable
Policy 2 is not applicable in that subject lot and the surrounding neighborhood cannot be deemed a substantial historic
and/or archaeological resources.
Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See
L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 5 through 7 for evaluation criteria
~ Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable
Subiect proposal will not adversely impact the visual quality of the surrounding area in that the surrounding area is
currently comprised of properties improved with single-family dweliings and related appurtenances, including bluff
stairways of equal, if not greater, size and scope. Scenic resources, assumedly views of Long Island Sound to the north,
are not at risk due to the low-profile nature of the proposed bluff stairway. Accordingly, this proposal will comply with
Policy 3.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See L WRP
Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria
~ Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable
Subject proposal will fully comply with Policy 4 in that the proposed bluff stairway will be situated significantly
landward of the average high water mark (AHW) and at a minimum elevation of 10.0' above sea level. Accordingly,
this proposal will comply with Policy 4.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of South old. See L WRP Section III
- Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria
DYes 0 No ~ Not Applicable
Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that it will have no effect to the water quality/supply within the
surrounding area.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of South old ecosystems including
Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22
through 32 for evaluation criteria
~ Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable
Subject proposal will maintain the quality of the surrounding ecosystem in that the proposal is low-profile in nature and
will protect the vegetation situated along the bluff in that the stairway is to be elevated above said vegetation, and will
offer a more environmentally favorable solution to providing access to the shoreline along the northwestern section of
subiect property, versus continual 'foot traffic" through the vegetation thereon without the use of an elevated stairway.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of South old. See LWRP Section III - Policies
Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria
DYes 0 No [:g] Not Applicable
Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal is simply to improve subject property with a bluff stairway
which will not result in any form of adverse effects to air quality. Accordingly, this proposal is not applicable with this
policy.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous
substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria.
DYes 0 No [:g] Not Applicable
Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve disposal and/or transportation of solid waste,
hazardous waste, toxic pollutants, petroleum products.
Attach additional sheets if necessary
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public
resources of the Town of South old. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation
criteria
DYes 0 No [:g] Not Applicable
Subject proposal is not applicable to this policy in that the proposal is attendant to a private dwelling. Regardless,
this project will not impede any access to the surface waters in and around subject property and/or become
detrimental to the recreational use of the surrounding resources.
Attach additional sheets ifnecessary
WORKING COAST POLICIES
Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependence uses in
suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria
DYes 0 No [:g] Not Applicable
Subiect proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve a water-dependent use (i.e. marina,
aquaculture, etc...).
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic
Estuary and Town Waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria
DYes 0 No [2J Not Applicable
Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve any form of marine resource management
(i.e. commercial fisheries, recreational fisheries, aquaculture, etc...).
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages
62 through 65 for evaluation criteria.
DYes 0 No [2J Not Applicable
Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve agricultural lands (i.e. the conversion of
farmland, the establishment and/or maintenance of new coastal agricultural production, etc,..)
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See L WRP
Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
DYes 0 No [2J Not Applicable
Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve the conservation of energy resources on a
commercial level and/or the promotion of alternative energy sources, proper maintenance of fuel storage facilities
and/or the extraction of mineral extraction
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Created on 5/25/05 11:20 AM
. -/
.
.
.
, : I
,
.
, I
.
87' to the
existing patio
TOP of
BLUFF
I 1 ...
I
I ,
, I
, I
, I .
I I I .
~ I ~ 1 I
16' 48' to
the AHW
UPPER
LANDING
(4'x 8')
SOUTHE.AST
E..LE..Y A TION
BOTTOM
of BLUFF
Scob 1.0" 2 I 0.0' ~
LOWER
LANDING
(4'x 16')
CREST of
BEACH GRAVEl
ELEVATION PLAN (odhe:
McELROYPtopetty
Ptopose4 Bluffst"tw.ly
SlllQtc:. 1640 Gt~rodvk:w DI1""'l Orielll, 1"0...." ufSoulh"I,J, NY
5CTM I: 1000 - 014 - 02 - 003. M
68'
JUN ? 0 2805
P.O.8uor20D3.
Phone: (631)537-11180
Fu: 15311537_5111
-HY-llll:lZ
SOilth')id Town
R~<,;;G d IriJ~tees
-PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to construct a BLUFF STAIRWAY within the
northeastem section of subject property in order to access the shoreline of long Island Sound. The
proposed stairway will measure 68.0' long x 4.0' wide and be include two (2) landings: a 4.0' wide
x 8.0' upper landing and a 4.0' wide x 16.0' long lower landing. Subject stairway will be supported
by eighteen (18) posts (6.0' x 6.0").
--,.__._--~~
Suffolk E;'~-;:onmental Consulting, Inc.
DATh
SCAlE
DItAWN8Y,
COMMENTh
.
llYslnlY'"
"..II
fu't>,....IInr....",l.l""'."l>m...l"',
[2]
01
L:J
LONG ISLAND SOUND
~_51
~ r............
Ir'")
C)
?o c
= LI~ '~:_
~ -:';
g ':=;
--::>
~
~
. ....... .il;P'P.RP~.~_.W;~..~H.'~ P,A!E
EL6__ ................
'(8__
----
El 10_
----
---
--
_ ------CL6
------CL8
---
- - - - -E:L 10
-----
-
-.2: 4.3'07' 1 0"[
GRAVEl ON BEACH
1.30.00'
fL /2
---
PROPOSED
STAiRS
ELID
---
["L10_
BOTTOM OF BLUFF
-----
<o:t ELIO
--
._ELI2
(() ELI8
=- EL 24
__EL2:LJO
---
Fe /2_
E~ !B_ ......
[[24_=(.0
EL 28_
---
----
-----
-=--:::..-=--=--=--=-=--=-
-----
[,- 30 _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _
----
\... - TOP OF BLUFF
9.
~
3
32.2'
~
~
.w
o
.N
to
I,() 25.4'
N
...
z
2-STORY RESIDENCE
or;
""
o
n
~
to
n
<Il
"'~
'9,~
~1'-
,,~
,,"0
~~
os.
,,""
~~
o{,
'1i
"
N 4.3'00 00 W
165.00
GRANDVIEW DRIVE
SURVEY OF
LOT 10
IN
MAP OF GRANDVIEW ESTATES
SITUATE
ORIENT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y.
FM# 7083
DATE FILm JUN 8. 1982
SURVEYED FOR: DAVID J. McELROY
TM# 1000-014-02-003.14
GU4RANTEED TO
DAVID J. McELROY
TITLEWAVES ABSTRACT CO.
2.3 JUN 05
20 APR 05
22 MAR 05
1.3 AUG 05
5 APRil 04
CHANGE MAP SCALE. SHOW STAIRS DETAilS.
SHOW PROPOSED STAIRS LOCATED IN FIELD.
ADD CONTOURS ALONG U SOUND. PROPOSED STAIRS.
CORRECT MEAS. TO SANITARY.
FINAL SURVEY
v.
~ 4,
,..:: :::>
'Of:::-
::g c;
-<;::"-c;
;:; :::C.
if.Jc
CD
~
{,
io
*
'\
"
GUARANTFES INDICA TEO HERE ON SHALL RUN
ONL Y TO THE PERSON FOR lM-/OM THE SURVEY
IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE
nTLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY,
LENDING INSTITUTION, IF LISTED H[R[ON, AND
TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION
GUARANTEES ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO
ADOlnQNAL INSTITUTIONS Of? SUBSEQUENT OWNERS
UNAUmORIZED AL TERA TlON OR ADDITION TO THIS
SURVEY IS A VIOLA nON OF SECTION 7209 OF
mE NEW YORK STATE EDUCAT/ON LAW
COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING
THE LAND SURVEYORS EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL
NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE
COPY.
CREST OF
BEACH GRAVEL
SiTE PLAN
DETAILS
SCALE, 1" = 10.0'+/-
EL 12
4'
----
LOWER LANDING
(4' X 16')
Co
I
U
C5
Q)
------
----- EL 10
o
>-
(/)
Q
w
>-
(/)
0)
(()
I BOTTOM OF BLUFF
------
- - - --EL 10
o
w
(/)
o
Q
o
'"
Q
-----EL 12
-- -___EL 18
- - _ _ _ _ -- EL 24
- - _ _ _ _ _ EL 28
0)
TOP OF BLUFF
_ El 30
STAIR DESIGN PROVIDED 8Y SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC
p,o, BOX 200J, BRIDGEHAMPTON, N,Y, 119J2-200J 6JI-5J7-5150
~ ~J: r~8U W~5 ~ ~
SOL!thflj'd Town
BDJiG of Trustt:es
SURVEYED, 27 DECEMBER 1999
SCALE 1 "= 50'
AREA = 40,65D SF
OR
0.933 ACRES
SURVEYED BY
STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR.
PO BOX 294
NEWSUFFLKNY 11956
63 1 ~ 734 5835