No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-78.-7-10 WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JE!{]LYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair OFFICE WCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTH OLD To: Town of South old Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner L WRP Coordinator Date: July 18, 2005 Re: Proposed Permit to Construct a Dock for 40 C LLC in Goose Creek SCTM# I 000-78-7 -10 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of South old Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. This proposal is to construct a fixed open walkway 4 x 55', a 3' x 14' timber ramp and a 6' x 20' timber float in Goose Creek in Southold. Goose Creek is a listed Critical Environmental Area. The action is located within REACH 8 in the R-40 zoning district. The 89 foot length of the proposed walkway/dock is inconsistent with the size of the surrounding open walkway/dock structures within the area. The dock structure to the north of the property is approximately 35 feet in length (2004 Aerial photograph interpretation). Overall density of dock structures within the immediate vicinity of the parcel is low. The proposed structure is for private use and will not support a pattern of development that enhances community character nor preserves "public" open space. Additionally, the applicant has not proposed sufficient mitigative design and construction best management practices that will minimize the adverse effects of the action on the environment to the greatest extent possible. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of South old. There is no opportunity to meet this policy Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of South old. The Plan View indicates that the structure will be a minimum 3.5' above grade. Policv Standard 3.1 Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southo/d including: A. Minimize the introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character, The action does not meet this policy, conversely, the applicant proposes a structure that will affect the scenic quality of the area. B. Screen components of development which detract from visual quality, C. Using appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. The scale of the structure is large and inconsistent with surrounding dock structures. The length should be evalauted dependent upon the establish need of the applicant. The construction material of the structure has not been identified and should be identified. D. Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality, and The action will result in a loss of high quality low and high salt marsh. The application states that damaged wetland vegetation will be replaced, however, no standard planting plan indicating the timing, species and specifications have been submitted to the Board. The Board should require a simple restoration plan for disturbed areas. E. Protect visual quality associated with agricultural land, open space and natural resources. The visual quality of natural resources (salt marsh) will be impaired as a result of the action. The Board should require a low profile structure to minimize visual impacts. Policy 4. Minimize loss of human life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. No loss of human life is expected as a result of the action. If approved the structure will be designed and constructed to tolerate flooding and minimize erosion. Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of South old. The materials used to construct the dock are unknown and should be identified. In general, the elimination of the use ofCCA-treated materials in marine waters is strongly recommended. Wood pressure-treated with a chromated copper arsenate (CCA) is the most commonly used material for pilings for small docks. There has been extensive study of the toxicity of these compounds in the marine environment that suggests that the degree of toxicity depends on the chemical form as it reaches the target organism. The forms will change over time and in response to sediment types, amounts of organic material present, oxygen levels and water movement (Luoma and Carter, 1991). Laboratory studies bv Weis et al. 0991. 1992) have shown that leachate from CCA -treated wood can be toxic to estuarine species. Leaching decreases by about 50% daily once the wood is immersed in seawater. Approximately 99% of the leaching occurs within the first 90 days (Cooper, 1990, Brooks 1990; in Sanger and Holland, 2002). If CCA is permitted, please implement the following Best Management Practices recommended by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) to minimize leaching into the water: Where CCA-treated materials are to be used, soaking it in saline waters for 90 davs prior to installation will allow leaching to occur in a controlled setting ,or Place a vinyl sleeve over the piling to prevent leaching. The project area demonstrates extremely shallow water depths. The installation of the proposed structures may promote power boat traffic and the possible following negative impacts may occur: Impacts to submerged aquatic vegetation, Contamination from fuel discharges (if power vessels are proposed) Erosion on shorelines, and Re-suspension of bottom sediments and turbidity To further the above policy and to reduce turbidity in the event that the proposed action is approved, the following Best Management Practice is strongly recommended: The encirclement of the entire proj ect area with a floating turbidity screen to remain in place a sufficient number of days to allow the settling of the suspended solids. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of South old ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. The proposed action is located within a DEC Critical Environmental Area. The proposed detailed construction practices of the dock have not been identified. It is recommended that the applicant identifv the proposed construction practices. Activities during dock construction can destroy vegetation either above or below the tide line by pulling them from the substrate or destroying their root system. The peat beds underlying salt marshes can also be compacted through the improper use of heavy equipment. In sea grass beds, the installation of pilings may have immediate impacts as well as cause long- term changes. Installation through "jetting" with high-pressure hoses typically disturbs a surrounding area- depopulating grasses there prior to construction. Once areas are depopulated, the presence of pilings may lessen chances of regrowth. Beal, Schmit, and Williams (1999) suggest that changes in seagrass communities in the vicinity of pilings may be caused by the modification of currents, sediment deposition, attraction ofbioturbators, and leaching from chemicallv treated wood. Both marsh grasses and sea grasses have adapted to living in extended periods of sunlight. Their photosynthetic pathways vary from many terrestrial plants allowing them to be highly productive in their natural settings. Shading can have significant impacts on the health and productivity of these plants. It is recommended that the Board minimize shading from dock structures to the greatest extent possible. Based upon the above the action is inconsistent with the following policy standards. Policv Standards 6.1 Protect and restore ecological quality throughout the Town of South old. The proposed action does not propose a simple restoration plan identifying timing, species and planting specifications of areas that may be impacted (if any) dnring construction. Such a plan shall be required. 6.2 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. The proposed action will result in a net loss of tidal wetlands. 6.3 Protect vulnerable fish, wildlife, and plant species, and rare ecological communities. The proposed action is located within a NYSDEC Critical Environmental Area. The proposed action does not propose a simple restoration plan identifying species and planting specifications of areas that may be impacted (if any) dnring construction. Such a plan should required. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of South old. No significant impact to air quality will occur as a result of the proposed action. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See Policy 5 response above. Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of South old. The proposed action will remain private and will not support a pattern of development that enhances community character nor preserves "public" open space. Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. The proposed action is within a DEC listed Critical Environmental Area. The proposed action will not protect or enhance the physical, cultural and environmental attributes of Goose Greek. Based upon such, the proposed action does not meet the following policy standards to the greatest extent possible. 10.3 Allow for continuation and development of water-dependent uses within the existing concentration of maritime activity in harbors, inlets and creeks. A. Ensure that public actions enable these harbors, inlets and creeks to continue to function as concentrations of water-dependent uses. B. Protect and enhance the economic, physical, cultural, and environmental attributes which make up the character of these harbors, inlets and creeks. 10.4 Minimize adverse impacts of new and expanding water-dependent uses and provide for their safe operation. A. Limit the potential for adverse impacts associated with development of a new water- dependent use by promoting the location of new development at appropriate sites. Appropriate sites include: I. sites which have been previously developed, 2. sites which require minimal physical alteration to accommodate development, 3. sites that already possess public infrastructure or locational characteristics that would support a water-dependent use. B. Avoid development of new water-dependent uses at sites that are located outside of the traditional concentrations of water-dependent uses or at sites that exhibit important natural resource values or where the proposed use will cause sif!Tlificant adverse affects on communitv character. surroundinf! land and water uses. or scenic qualitv. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. The action is proposed within Goose Creek. a listed NYSDEC Critical Environmental Area which entitles the area to a heightened level of protection. The proposed action will not support the following policy standards. A. Ensure that commercial and recreational uses of living marine resources in the Town of Southold are managed in a manner that: C. Foster the occurrence and abundance of the Town's marine resources through: I. protection of spawning grounds, habitats, and water quality, 2. enhancement and restoration of fish and shellfish habitat, 3. the prevention of over-fishing. 11.2 Provide for commercial and recreational nse of the Town of Southold's finfish, shellfish, crustaceans, and marine plants. A. Maximize the benefits of marine resource use so as to provide: I. a valuable recreational resource experience, C. Protect the public health and the marketability of marine and fishery resources by: 1. maintaining and improving water quality of fishery and marketable marine resources to protect public health. Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of South old. This policy does not apply to this action. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. This policy does not apply to this action. Goose Creek is a listed Critical Environmental Area bv The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, which entitles the area to a hei!!htened level of Drotection. It is recommended that the Board of Trustees consider the below information and require the followin!! outstandin!! items to further the Dolicies of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Pro!!ram: 1. The proposed detailed construction Dractices and materials (aDDlication indicates timber?) have not been identified and should be outlined in writin!! to the Board. 2. Althou!!h the aDDlication states that the disturbed areas will be restored, a restoration Dlan outlinin!! sDecies, timin!! and sDecifications has not been submitted to the Board. Such a Dlan must be submitted to the Board. 3. Durin!! construction ofthe structure, require the encirclement ofthe entire Droiect area with a floatin!! turbidity screen to remain in Dlace a sufficient number of davs to allow the settlin!! of the susDended solids. Correspondingly, the potential impact of any Unlisted Action on the environmental characteristics of the Coastal Environmental Area is a relevant area of environmental concern and must be evaluated in the determination of significance prepared pursuant to Section 617.7 of SEQR. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. )!.: ,.. . . 'I. I nl~f-t'~5 m1 . , TOWII of South old LWRP CONSISTENCY ASS.ESSMENT FORM Lf- 0 C L L~ eA. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that aTe subject to thc Town of South old Waterfront Consistency Review taw, This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in . making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt tions including Building Permit~ and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Eros' n Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer tbis fonn should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy ntained in the Town of South,)ld Local Waterfront Revitali:i!:ation Program. A proposed actio win be evaluated as to its significant' beneficial and adverse e.ffects upon thc coastal area (whi includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answere 'yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and con itions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more det' and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the max' \JIll extent practicable with the L WRP policy standards and con~i.tions: If an action cannot e certified as consistent with the L WI<K..policy standards and conditions, It shall not be under! en. . _ - . B. A copy of the LWRP is available in the fo11 (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board 0 libraries and the Town Clerk's office. places~ online at the Town of South old's website rustees Office, the Planning Depa1tmenl,.;;alllocal ,,' f', . '_'J DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOS SCTM#-=i.L--l--~ y IJr The Application bas been submitted to (check propriate response): Town Board o Planning Dept. 0 lliIding Dept. 0 Board of Tr\Jstees .~ 1. action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken direct by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning tivity, agency regulation, land transaction} /' Financial assistance e.g. grant: loan, subsidy) ~ '2-- ~/ Permit. approval, Icense, certification: 'rtC ~ 'i ~ i}\) \\..LJ~' J"'- V u-v... 0-0 w ()U-Z{ ~cl eft -{i;.v ~~~. IAS-t.of- ~C>~. D o (b) (c) 5.<I Nature and extent of action: , ( ~'J\j l~ - Lv ( D,11 LI~ J . . . , , . , , Location of action: en;;5 W~VJ-e,w t>viVe. -Gov~tJ..r..u.kg1. .--- "'\ ~ Site acreage:~.Af)_ / ^t2P 1(0 f.. ?;,:>;. s . j::. o...~ ~a 1) . ...l~,_.J.....-, 0 Present land useq'.e S I ~ liJ I tA..A- PresentzollingclassificationJ(Q~Sh~f) d. . 2. Ifan application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold ageJ1CY, the following information shall be provided.: (a) NllllJeofapplicant:~O C I-L.c. (b) Mailingaddress: BO :f=vt:\Mk.~ ~ . #i? , n.ewVJovk , nV"\ IDO I ~ (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( (l.12i (0 2.-':) - 1.:1.~ (d) Applicati.onnumber, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, orapp1"?val bj; a state or federal agency? Wi 1'7.\1.':) . Yes Lfl No 0 If yes, which state or federal agency? p. E. C . ~~ . op ~tz;Jc. , \J . S . -t\v CNpS of. ~l~ DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes belleficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. DYes 0 No D Not Applicable Attl.ch additional sheets ifnecessary P,olicy 2. Proteet and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. Ste L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluatioD criteria DYes 0 No ~Not Applicable I ,I " . Attach additional sheets if necessary . Polley 3. Enhanee visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section m - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria o Yes ~o 0 Not ApplIcable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POI,JCIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See L WRP Section III ~ Po1icie~ "ages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria D Yes ~o 0 Not Applicable . Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria DYes [3""No DNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if neoessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems illcluding Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section 111 - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. - o yes ~oD Not Applicable e -< . , . . , Attach additional sheelS if necessary . Policy 7. Protect l\Dd improve air quality in tbe Town of Sontbold. See LWRP Section III -- Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. o Yes ~ot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and bazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - policics; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. o Yes ~ot Applicable . PUBUC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. l'rovidc for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources oftbe Town of Soutbold. See LWRP See.tion III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. DYes Er No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets If necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES l'olicy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable JocatlonR. See I"WRP Section 111- Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. DYes 0" No 0 Not Applicable e .. . , . . Attach ~dditional sheets if necessary Poliq 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See L WRP Section III- Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. o Yes ~o 0 Not Applicable Attach odditional shects if neCellsary Polley 12. j>rotect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See L WRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. DYes 0 No r5 Not Applicable . Attach addilion.l sheels ifncocssary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy aud mineral resources. Sell LWRP Section IIl- Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. DYes 0 No ~ot Applicable Created on 5/25105 1 J: 20 AM e . . . '. 1711 Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971.0959 Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Fosbr Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-+il@e'blo'll \ M~\i\rVV \'t C J'< \.J BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTH OLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application -Wetland PerrTIlt ApplicatIOn _ AdnunIstrahve PermIt AmendmenUT rans fer/ Extension _Received Application: Received Fee:S _Completed Application ~_Incomple[e SEQRA Classification Type I~TYl'e II~Unlisted~ CoordmatIOn (date sent) CAC Referral Sent: _Date of Inspection: _Recelpl ofCAC Report: _Lt:ad Agency Determination:~ Technical Review: _Public Hearing Held: Resolution: I fUr"! -~'-~--T.-r~~r !~ I! <1 ._- . 'u,_ ! I! ,ri' , ., , U L I L_ , j -.I :~~ y"s ;'" Name of Applicant 40 C LLC Address 80 f"~Nt:..t..\N sr~1 Nf:W ~O,e..c".1 NY lDOI~ Phone Number:( ) 21Z G25 1114 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - -.J6 - 1- 10 . PropeI1yLocation 62>'5 rlAi~V~€N DI2.i\JE I SOOlliOl..Dj N'ij '500' (j:) ~ r~1Al1.,LJ~~ VI ~w ~D. (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT~f'I. 1\-. ([fapplicable) / Address: tJ. At . Phone: Board of Trustees Application . GENERAL DATA Land Area (in squarefeet) '3 ~ . 02.4 s.t. Area Zoning q2.t. ~ D e.N TI At.-- Previous use of property /2.€ 91 own Ai...- Intended use of property: ~ ~ f) E:Nn At.- Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date . _ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? ~No_ Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): i<<.t. <reoJ€6 CoN5h~S. Of -A tJEw lJ1 Ccrv'sr~TfO 'T1t\113St't ~ 1\1.~ ~ Hl~t... .J1f\V€' 1lf4'l.f'-f:. ~ON).: CD L/;c':J5' . Il"'~ WA'f;~I~ ~.5' 1\1301lE~~A- 31,X14-' lIM~~ ~: AND (D1t 6'X2flllMflsC(l NIt'\> f.:. .:f'wA1. f'16i1T ulett 'Dl1\M. 'PU.s:.5 f,41L.L. ~ Set" 12 fT (;IN a:w;r:.-L. I~E. I)(X:t;... IS To eE \J~ 'Wte- ~n~ Ritfe~ 1.'1 OtJNf:e. . . . Board of Trustees Application WETLANDITRUSTEE LANDS APPLICA nON DATA Purpose ofthe proposed operations: \0 Co!V)leuCl 1l'CE- ~ ~ ~eq+.T1VMW 11~. Area of wetlands on lot:~square feet Percent coverage oflot: 3.33 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge ofwetlands: 6<-OG feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: ~ feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? )( No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? o cubic yards How much material will be filled? o cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 0 feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: er'i S+I~ -to V~ - Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: AATEtt AttS 1-(11..1,.- ~ ~Mov60 gel. Wb81'T8J fN ftA1'JO .1,uEflE. WI ~:liE rvo ~~NG- Qf CoN'~f.<JC..TloN ()f... <irQf2A6-€ Qf' MAfr..flAt-~ ~ '19ot.-3 o,J ~ D. ~lit... VS~ CQW8iMrQI\J MI\1) 10 f.4/MM/2t- ~ ~> . Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters ofthe town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): l1ffl ;l&l..A'N'D V~'i1fflQ1J CPl\1A61U) M Ir (2.€.~u(..T M GF 1HE: fU>")e6 v-HL..t. &b ~ce.o lfl/l k..INO 1\wo IN' ~ PROJECT 10 NUMBER 617.20 APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 2. PROJECT NAME G ~5 WM6t-Ul ~ SEQR . PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION ,. APPLICANT / SPONSOR 40 C U..C G35CT~lld,.j Municipality l)(l.{ Ii E:. Pf.tve. I c:;ouTh9l.D, N'1 County S0FR;>(..;-L 4. PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections, Prominent landmarks ete. or orovide map G;" ~VlE.I.J t>~lve.. I SQLmt10t...-O ,N\{ 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: New 0 Expansion 0 Modification I alteration . 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Pl2OJEC1 (.OtJS/jf5 9'F It- fll'SlNV1 ~ Hll..t,.. <t1A\IE. "l\1tse. ?"G /I It~V6: ~e. I @ ,q. ~ It- G(X2D' 'llM~.At, "FLOAf". rz. fT. f)tJ ~. 1~E:: pOC,J::.... ~az.E+m~ f\.l1tf'b<a€S ~'1 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: N'QItt./G.. Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER '0"Yes D No If no, describe briefly: 1t\E. TltE- 5Er COf\fs~ar:;..O [)oc.(:..,. sa:nPfllS CD 4' X5S/TIM~I,(.. 7 ?>'~ 14' TlM~ ~f M-/O , 8" OtAl'-l. 'PII,ES. wU..1, ~ ~\ IS -'0 I!.e lJ~ ~ OI-iNEL(JN'-''1, RESTRICTIONS? !2HAT [$ PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) ~ Residential 0 Industrial D Commercial DAgricu,ture D Park I Forest I Open Space DOther (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ~NCY (Federal, State or Local) .,D. r..L-lP ~Yes DNa If yes, list agency name and penni! I approvali'M~.D.EC.. I 1'('1$. oept.. ur :,lAl..../ V .S. ~VY\ ~V" S of. f, Irle€N2-- 11. DOES Aff!_J:SPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? DYes ~(fe~;t~ge0 name and penni! I approval 12. AS A ~ULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT / APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? []v es lY.J No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE . Signature N. ~AtAO ~1/S(".l...1 Date: ~ I'll&' Applicant I Sp If the action is a Costal Area. and you are a state agency. complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment . -- ~ .L ~ 4.j 41 :'1 G~<f)~I:rJ/(;;- ,u<',~' :', (j /,;5:Jn,,,,,., '-J 4'1 " " 4, \.J " " 24 jl 44 1'1 34 - 4' ,j<l 4,,\ ,. -4 1\, 'I " ,I " ."l " " " .'4 :21 21;'14 31_ 21 :0':: :' j 24 ,2'1 1r_3 ~I L" .,' .'.' .I - ~ I L J /1 I I) ,..'1 :tl """B 2' '4 .;:,! 11 ..2 )4 "I "I " " ;0 II 'b -1 ,1,0 ug ALH ' Edge of - Ma;-sh ~ ":.. :ross Section "'CALE 1"= 20' _ lmlt of Tidal ~t1ands as >ellneated t:y R Fox on 04-2B-04 " Plan ViI, ~ KEY MAP not to scale .'. SCALE 1"= 50' Applicant, Marlo Rlvelll Propoc,ed, Dock 4 float Purpo~,;', PrIvate Moorlnq l_atltude- N 41-0235 Longltude- H 122532 SCT# IOOO-lB-1-IO Southold, Nee< York Tide Range, 2,3'+/- Dafum, ALH. \ " 1,,/ ~""/I' '- ,/. , .t- ., e" " ~ '" ot.?' ab<,' >:t: C,;b/ l< ::f (J,e, ;'{ s N .,;\L~E w~ 6yty"t/~0,/t ~ ;:::-"1qs OIl'. " 0+ 0'<9/ /q~ o ~ '-II "1':;?~qt 8....05q " ~ Jl ~ J MClin t;'iQ 1! ~~" ~~ J . '",__~_,: ' L _ '.J( l)/'I_ --JII II, I / \ '1(-'1-" ({ ~ /', '11(, [~i "/1,., '/ /, ~,~ 'i (~! " '1,< i 1/ / "~\' ", / 'f _'( I /', '_J, 'J. '/ ,; / "~" 'I /;'1 ~_. /. I,~ -:-t:J , <)., n~ '.r ~~ ,/ ~ 3' X 14' Ramp '/, Proposed Timber Walk 4' x 55' (min. 3.5' abv. gL) 6' x 20' Float ~ '$>C ~. -& ~ <) A, ~ C'l -lL J_.L 1._'_~.J__.L 'i I '/.kll) lc}l 3EA LEVEL \flAPPING , ,'--i'il' I" ',;'H A,eel I Of I HH LH ~/':: ;; '"';',~ ,If ~ ~/--.~... ;-- -~ r',...... r,.- ., ," . ',.' / , f '.. ( . ,~~.. f ''\, I '. ...., ,'." -'!' ''I ',', , ",' ~ \~ /,I /'. , . 1"('. . \ \\1. I' I 1\>':..\ ~t:".l ~~.,~iif . ~ .,"C, "'.J;<P-J g- \" ,<' l' 'I '" % '",- 'l:~",,, D5(J'" .:,,<t- " (")- '--- \<<- "'~.. '- l Af'JO S'-~:;:: -"," THIS PLOT HAS DEVELOPED FROt-! SURVEYS OF 04-22-04 ROBERT H. FOX, N'(S LlGH 5cWn ;, '"'' ,I" (",_,'" ',. ~ (.il . ,,'1'. "J.....I,>'Pn .',III'(}4 f,'" 8" dia, Piles 12' o.c. 10' pen. ex, gr. C'I'/ ,.,.j I'. ", .1./." . . ,.. ~'^" t~1 o~ l'i ~I r----;---- Q) 0 -1' -2' -3' tti Qj; I I .5 rn I I e ~I I I it ~, 4' x 55' Proposed Timber Walk I <( 01 . --_______=L.. (min. 35T abv.gr.)' I ,- ~----. ---- r----------j--------------.-------+-r I AHW+1' ALW 0 " -2 -3' -4' .5' :... --- _Om - -.--- F- r--- - J 12'-0" -- --. .--- ..l-_12~-----J L -.. r- 12'-~:" 1- -12'-0': L-----~~~_~ __" Section Through Dock .# Boat Length Overall 24'-0" rOO> C.,"," '"" I I Timber Walk Elevation of Boat Plan of Dock with Boat Scale: 3/32"= 1 '-0" -4' , I I I I L -- --..~-+_.~ 14'-0" Ramp L 6'-0" J Float . .s' , I 1 J~ I I ~ ~ I I -- f -- _. 1;> b N 22' Boat 40 C LLC 635 WA TERVIEW DRIVE SOUTH OLD, NY 11971 co CJ) ~"oo/;( '* (j () ?~ COCO CJ' ,+e 5 . " " " " .. " .. .. " " .' " " Ad " . ~ " ~'-",,---I~, , sf 3:!.. ''') ,,'-, 9(') 14 -C) C, " '0 " 50 " " " " " 50 .. " " " ",-j " '0 " " " " " .. l' " ]1 (.J<l 21 QB-t- " """ ,i" j. ~ ~ j. ~- . A.~ <, 3t 4IQIJ."?/t . kGS o/' 0+ 0.: iI. afS/~ O'Q/ "'j('.....GQ ~a ""e- '0'" " I ~ 'Q '--', 'io--?'~ 0."'0 /r) t- /c;.; J-y '- C) .S Ib I~ Or 0, 'O! f: /' -, 0/ ~~, _ ,--., <,'3 ')0/1.--,,,,, S,-'/;..,,,. cy -~v 1~'9r,~'/1 Iv> or"~ ,,-, j ') I L,,,,fi / /7;'; " " '0 " " ,. " " " 0' " " " " .. o. /1(, C( <c ) , ^ " .4-1' " ,,-4 " ::11 :.?" :? I 21232,1 ,I " " " " " '. fL;-. , ~, 23 24 " 2.222 ;(1 2] " " " " " 3'-;;.~ " " " " " 2) ,-:; '. :1:1,"'224 .:U ," \q " 1.6 1'1 ~" ~B 010' " " " -""r '- /,-. "-', "';,., " 1<:" /11 --" ' r) So :'>",.",''1 ~ ul'J'--t c, o '''),.., /',..., >,.q I,'." ~'__ '-, '. '~'" 'Cc~ I /"'0~ \,: (). 0~,. _ r ,.:,~;~ PHOTO LOCATOR MAP ,. , , 08 , OB ,/,L 04 " /' ,L , -' " '. " '. " " " O' . ,.. ~ 7.- <;YC ~. /' ~ <:) /', , , " . . . PHOTO # 1 PROPOSED TIMBER WALK 4' x 55' MIN. 3.5" ABV. GR. 40 C LLC 635 WATERVIEW DRIVE SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2004 TIME:11 :30 AM . . . PHOTO # 2 PROPOSED TIMBER WALK .t' x 55' MIN. 3.5" ABV. GR. 40 C LLC 635 WA TERVIEW DRIVE SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 DATE: NOVEMBER 7,2004 TIME:11 :30 AM . . . PHOTO # 3 r PROPOSED TIMBER WALK (4' x 55') MIN. 3.5" ABV. GR. ~" . :..filli t, ":i 40 C LLC 635 WA TERVIEW DRIVE SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2004 TIME:11 :30 AM . . . . PHOTO # 4 ,..",.... - \ " .. ~tt 40 C LLC 635 WA TERVIEW DRIVE SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 DATE: NOVEMBER 7,2004 TIME: 11 :30 AM ., . . PHOTO # 5" 635 WA 40 C LLC SOUT:6~VIEW DRIVE DATE' NOVED, NY 11971 . MBER 7 TIME: 11 :30 AM' 2004