Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-08/11/1997PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairma~ WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATI-IAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Present were: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MINUTES August 11, 1997 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Richard G. Ward O. Ritchie Latham Kenneth Edwards William Cremers Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Melissa Spiro, Planner Robert (3. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Martha Jones, Secretary Mr. Orlowski: Good evening. 'd like to call this meeting to order. The first order of business, Board to set Monday, September 15, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. at Southold Town Hall, Main Rd., Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board meeting. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: Mr, Orlowskh Robert Rowehl - This minor subdivision is for 5 lots on 37.2518 acres located on the north side of Oregon Rd. and the south side of Soundview Ave. in Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-100-2-6 At this time, after our Southold Town Planning Board 2 August 11, 1997 Soundview Ave. in Mattituck. SCTM# I000-I00-2-6. At this time, after our last hearing and some of the commen[s, it would probably be just as easy for me to read this statement. Condition Number I of the Planning Board's August 26, 1996 sketch approval required that "Proposed Lot Number 3 is to be designed as a flag lot with a fifty (50) foot wide access to Soundview Ave. Any future development of Lot 3 shall be from the 50 foot access to Soundview Ave." The Board required that this condition based on an overall concept plan to cluster alt proposed development to the northern half of each parcel within the area from Reeve Ave. east To Duck Pond Rd. and from Long Island Sound south to Oregon Rd. The Board has decided to omit the requirement that any future development of Lot 3 shall be from the 50 foot access to Soundview Ave. This does no~ mean that should future development be proposed for Lot 3 that access would not be from Soundview Ave. However, it allows the Planning Board the option ~o design any future subdivision with access from both Soundview Ave. and Oregon Rd., with access to Soundview Ave. only or with access to Oregon Rd. only. The Board has not revised its requirement that Lot Number 3 be designed as a flag lot with a fifty (50) foot wide access to Soundview ave. or its overall concept plan to cluster all proposed development in the above mentioned area to the northern half of each pa rcel. The above mentioned change will require that Condition Number I of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions be omitted. In addition, the Declaration should include a statement that should access to Lot Number 3 be provided within the 50 foot wide r-o-w, that the common driveway shall be replaced by 8 road to Town Specifications. In addition, the common driveway is to Ioe located on the east side of the right-of-way to allow for a natural buffer area between the proposed common driveway and the existing access to the adjacent parcels on the west. This came from comments from our last public hearing. The hearing is still open. I'1 ask if there are any other comments on this proposed subdivision? Henry Raynor: Good evening Mr. Chairman, members of the Board. My name is Henry Raynor. I'm representing the applicant. In review of your correspondence, your letter of the 6th, we are recommending the Covenants and Restrictions to reflect the Board's recommendation. To our Southold Town Ptanning Board August 11, 1997 way of thinking it's allowed the Planning Board a choice for access on Lot 5, from an either or perspective and it will give the Board - should at sometime this lot ever come in for a subdivision or re-subdivisionS- the ability to do a little innovative design and we couldn't endorse it any more. Mr. Orlowski: Any other comments on this proposed subdivision? Chris Emery: Just so that I'm clear, this will then put it up to a vote for Lot 3 at a future time as developed, is that correct? Mr. Orlowskh It wilt give us the option instead of locking us in to access it from Soundview Ave. Mr. Emery: OK. May I ask, Mr. Raynor, is there any proposed time frame for the development for this third lot? Mr. Raynor: None at all~ We're (inaudible) to agricultural development (inaudible). Mr. Emery: Thank you very much. Mr. Deckinge,~: My name is Deckinger. I live diagonally across from that lot across Soundview Ave. I commented last time that I've been here 18 years and I appreciate the wisdom of Solomon that you exerted in suggesting that there be an option, but I would still like to speak on behalf of the first instruction, no[ being from Soundview, but from Oregon. Because that's a complete road that goes all the way through and that's where most of the traffic is, the natural traffic. The Soundview ends just beyond where this road would come:in .and it seems to me that the first option should be not from Soundview but from Oregon, and far enough so that it can service lots I and 2, if that's the desire [o Keep lots I and 2 first, because the principal argument for even those houses to have a quicker access to Oregon, is that it's quicker to the fire house to get over there, in case of fire. We measured it, it's about a minute faster by going right up to Oregon So, I would enter a suggestion that of course you should have the option to do what you want but I would ask you to consider the greater logic in coming down from Oregon rather than from Soundview. Thank you Mr. Orlowski: Just to let you know that the Board's intention has always been to preserve the prime farmland that runs along Oregon Rd. And seeing as this is only two lots, the Board would rather see these two accessed at this Southold Town Planning Board 4 Augu~ 11,1997 point from Soundview ,Ave. and its keeping the lots up on the north and saving the prime farmland. And Mr. Rowehl has indicated intentions of putting it in the farmland preservation program so at this time I think the Board ~s very much in favor of the way it is laid out. Any other comments? Cindy Suchick: i'm Cindy Suchick and I live across from the first lot and I have the five acres there. The only thing I don't understand, that half of the stuff you read from the first meeting, so I'm just trying to just understand where that strip ts coming down, and I'm assuming that strip is coming down on the private road, right next to the private road like 50 feet away or whatever? Mr. Orlowski: Yes Ms. Suchick: The only thing I would like to just comment on is how come that strip cannot come down on the other side? Is it just because you want to continue it all the way down from Oregon and make it a through street? Is that wha'~ the plan is going to be iP the future? Mr. Orlowski: Well, right now we don't have a plan. But, that's the way it is laid out... Ms, Suchick: Because I wasn't notified of all the proceedings, so I was talking with Melissa to try to understand and I just wanted to voice my opinion that why wouldn't it go down on the east side of the lots I and 2 because that would just be keeping it preserved as far as the farmland is concerned To me, if I'm going to took out my front door, I'm going to look at an airplane strip, is what iUs really going to look like. Mr. Orlowski: Well, I think at this time you're basically going to see a driveway for that second Ms. Suchick: But there would be no way that they could do the other? Or would they consider that? Mr. Orlowski: Not at this point, but the Board will have the option in the future since it is fifty foot, if we wanted to do something. Ms. Suchick: OK. Mr. Orlowski: Any other comments? Are there any questions from the Board? MF. Ward? August 11, 1997 $outhold Town Planning Board 5 Mr, Ward: No Mr, Orlowskh Mr. Latham? Mr. Latham: No Mr. Orlowski: Mr Cremers? Mr. Cremers: No. Mr. Odowski: Mr. Edwards? Mr. Edwards: No. Mr. Or!owski: tf there are no further comments, I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Cremers: So moved Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. What's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to offer the following resolution. WHEREAS, Robert G. Rowehl is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-100-2-6, located on the north side of Oregon Rd. and the south side of Soundview Ave. in Mattituck; and WHEREAS, this proposed m~nor subdivision is for 3 lots on 37.2518 acres; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has required the filing of a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions as part of the subdivision approval; and WHEREAS, the Southoid Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmentai Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on September 30, 1996; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at Southold Town Planning Board 6 Augu~ 11,1997 the Town Hall, Southold, New York on August 11, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Southotd Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Pubtic Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, ali the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold will be met upon fulfillment of the conditions of approval; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated April 27, 1997, subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution: The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be revised as noted in Metissa Spiro's let[er of August 6, 1997. A draft copy of the Declaration must be submitted to the Planning Board for review. Upon approval o-f the draft, the Declaration must be recorded in the County Clerk's office and a copy of the recorded document must be submitted to this office. Final macs (five paper copies and two mylars) must be submitted. All maps must contain the liber and page number of the recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions and a valid stamp of Health Department approval. The park and piaygrounc fee of S2,000.00 per vacant lot must be submit'~ed. Draft deeds for Lots 1, 2 and 3 must be submitted Each deed must provide for access to the applicable lots over the common driveway located on Lot 3. Once the draft deeds are approved, they must be filed when the final subdivision plat is recorded. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Oriowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? Chris Emery: One part I didn't understand. The last paragraph that you were reading in !:erms of lot 3? Mr. Ward: i'll repeat the last paragraplq which is condition 4. Draft deeds for Southold Town P~anning Board 7 Augu~ 11,1997 Lots I, 2 and 3 muse i~e submitted. Each deed muse provide for access to the applicable lots over the common driveway located on Lot 3. Lot 3 is the owner of that fifW foot right-of-way. Mr. Orlowski: Any other questions? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Or!owski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. OrlowskJ: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Orlo¥~sk}: 8roadwaters Cove - This site plan is for the expansion of a concrete block tool shed at an existing marina located on Skunk Lane (Bay Ave.) in Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-104-8-2.5. At this time I'll ask if there are any comments but I'm going to ask for a motion to hold this hearing open also because we have no~ gotten comments back from the ZBA on the opinion of the number of uses permitted and also from the Trustees on the docking and drainage there. So we qaven't got those comments up to this minute so 'm going 'co ask for a motion to hold this hearing open, but the hearing is ope~q if a;qybod'¢ has a comment. William Greene. My name is Wiliiam J. Greene. I'm President of the Broadwaters Cove Association of Homeowners. The Traveler Watchman article as quoted, the marina is currently zoned as an M-1 property, which means that Zito is allowed one use per 4,000 square feet. These figures work out to two permitted uses on the property, a marina and a residence. The Traveler Wat:chman goes on to state that the Planning Board has kept the hearing open, just like you're planning to do now, until it addresses the issue again on A~Jgust 11, which is today. The Board plans to discuss the Town Code in reference to Zito's marina, with the Zoning Board of Appeals as well as 'the Town Attorney, sometime this week. What was the result of that discussion? Mr. Kassner: There was no discussion. The Zoning Board didn't meet. Mr. Greene Well, it's my understanding, and I got this information from somebody that spoke to you, Bob, that the Village Attorney, the Zoning Board and Zito and his attorney met with you? Mr. Kassner: No, we had an internal staff meeting of the Trustees and the Zoning Board and the Planning Board and the Building Department, Southold Town Pfanning Board 8 Augu~ 11,1997 internally. Mr. Greene: OK, and the Zito oroperW was discussed? Ms. Scopaz: it wasn't the whole Board. Mr. Greene: Fine, but could we find out what was the result of that discussion? Mr. ~:assner: Yes. The result of that discussion was that the Zoning Board said that i-f we sent them a memo asking for their opinion as to how many primary uses are on the property, they would respond. Mr. Greene: And how many [orimary uses do you ~hink there are on that property? Mr. Kassner: We wouldn't tell them anything. We simply told them what existed there They make 'chat determination. Also the Trustees said that they would go out and review the docking on the bulkhead and also that drain that we talked about that empties into the wetland, and I have not received responses from either the Trustees or the Zoning Board. Mr. Greene: We collectively are siting seven uses and I'd like: to read them off. He's got rental of seasonal boat slips, that's his primary use. Secondly, he's go~ a residence with a two car garage, and those two are all that Norman Boos did with tha~ marina when he was the owner. The third, since Frank took over, he has added upland boat storage. His house and yard are full of boats and trailers. The fourth, marine motor repairs,:a big part of Frank's source of income. He moved his business from NeW Suffolk, and primarily that's what he did in New Suffolk, was marine motor repairs. A fifth use ~s dost sales. Anybody that drives by on Skunk Lane will see three boats for sale, v¢ith big for sale signs on them. A sixth use is a boat ramp which blocks traffic on Skunk Lane. Now, Norman Boos had a broken down boat ramp ti~ere that was totally inoperable and I never saw him back any boats in or ou: o;'~to Skunk Lane A~d with the storage, something never done by Norma~ Boos !t's my understanding that if you were there for a summer renta, you got your boat out of there when Norman pulled in all of the floating docks. And while you're examining the property, on the east side of the residence there's a !arge wChite shed. i wonder what kind of permit covers that? These are our concerns and ~,¥hat control does the Zoning Board of Appeals have? Southold Town Planning Board 9 Augu~ 11,1997 Is that after you mgke a decision, then we can appeal it to the Zoning Board of Appeals if it's not favorable with our wishes or our concerns? How does that worK? Mr. OrlowsKi The Zoni,qg Board of Appeals will interpret the number of primary uses permitted on this site, and what's primary and what is accessory. The Zoning Board of Appeals will do that. Mr. Greene: You see, we're here to approve or disapprove I0 feet to add to a marine storage motor shed? We're concerned about a lot more things than that And maybe we're bringing our concerns to the wrong body of government as far as Southold Town goes, ts that a possibiliW? We're barking up ~he wrong tree? Mr. Orlowski: Because of the addition to the shed, he has to come in for a site plan. And in doing the site pian process, these questions have come before this Board. This Board cannot answer those questions on the number of pdmary uses. Oniy the Zoning Board can make that interpretation. Mr. Greene: So we should be addressing these complaints to a Zoning Board? Mr. Orlowski: You can go to the Zoning Board and discuss it with them. Find out when it's on their agenda to be discussed, but they haven't done it yet and we haven't got their comments. Mr. Greene. That's what we're afraid of. If he does get 10 feet added to his motor repair shed, then all of these other violations and non-conforming uses, theyjus( sound like they're going to be just swept under the carpe~ somewhere So maybe we're addressing our concern to the wrong people because we're still concerned and we're going to remain concerned until we ge~ some satisfaction and maybe you people aren't the ones that are going to give us our satisfaction Maybe you can help us with that. Mr. Orlowski: Definitely i would approach the Zoning Board of Appeals and see when it's o;~ their agenda to be discussed. That's what we're waiting for ourselves and it hasn't been here and think t pretty much explained it at our I~-st meeting, our last session that that is what we would probably be doing. Ms, Scopaz: think something has been lost here which may not have been explained at the last meeting. The use at Broadwaters Cove predated the 1989 zoning code and it was a use that was permitted under a Zoning Board decision which is why the Board is sending it back to them to clarify what Southold Town Planning Board 10 Augu~ 11,1997 was permitted at that time. Mr. Greene: Well we were very happy with those uses. We had no complaints with those. Ms. Scooaz: How you feel about it is one thing. The Planning Board needs to document -Actually what exactly was ~n existence at the time in 1989, as the Zoning Board saw it before it can make a decision So what we're just tn/lng to do is get the facts We're not discounting how you feel about it. We're just saying we just need to get the facts and we haven't gotten them yet from the Zoning Board. ' Mr. Greene: But everything that I've ever read or everything that I've ever heard is that he's entitled To two uses. And whether it's M-I, whether it's pre-existing, whateYer Norman Boos did, and if that was the case we would probably not be here and we certainly wouldn't be as concerned as we were. But we see it becomlng e full service marina and God knows what's next, maybe fork!if%s bringing boats in 8nd out like down at Strong's, and we can't handle that and neither can the ecology. So that's why we're here and we're very concerned and I would !ike the Zoning Board then, if they're the people that are going to really get involved in this non-usage or over-usage or whatever you want To ceil it, they're the people which we have to talk to and maybe somebody can give me the name, address and phone number and we'll start taking our case somep!ace else and that's all I've got [o say. If anybody else wants to help me, be my guest. Mr. Odowski: The name and number you can get from our office anytime. Dorothy Drugen: Who do we appeal to, or talk to, or get satisfaction from to find ou~ what ~:© do about ail these things that he has just done on his own with no perm:3s[cn, no permits, .qo ;nothing. Where is your enforcement agency? What 8re theV doing? You have people that go out and complain about a dormer or a shed or an accessory. This is a big item. Where is your enforcemen? Mr. Oriowski: The main question is, is it a primary use or is it an accessory use? This Board cannot make that decision The Zoning Board of Appeals will have to m-~',(e thst decision. That is the Board that l suggest you talk to. Because right: now we're waiting 'for them to let us know how many uses are on that prope,%;. Fio;,,~ many are permitted and how many are accessory to it. Any other comments? Nick Bubany: I'm Nick ~ubany, I live across from the marina. What is the Southold Town Planning E~oarc~ 11 August 11, 1997 purpose of the M-I and M-2 zoning that's on record which obviously was passed by the Zoning Board, doesn't that count? Ms. Scopaz: I'm not sure understand your question. Mr. Bubany: The M-1 zoning says he's allowed two uses for that space that he has t,h. ere. Why does the Zoning Board now have to look at it because he decided ne wants to ~ave six on there or five or whatever it is? Ms. Sco:oaz: it we could go back in time, before 1989 the Town had another zoning code in effect and the prior owner of the property under that zoning code went to gne Zoning Board of Appeals and asked for permission basically to put the marina use in. The Zoning Board in its del beration came up with a decision and there were several conditions attached to it. What the ?lan~ing Board ~.s asking is for the Zoning Board [o go through those records and lay out exactly what was before them at that time. Mr. Bubanv: !n !9897 Ms. Scopaz: Back then, whatever year that was. Because when the Town adopted the new code in 1989, the marina property which had prior to this time had been zonea residential was given the marine zoning and this is the problem you're concer,qe~ with. Now under the marine business zone he's allowed cerga!n types of uses But there are other uses that pre-existed and which gte a!iowed to continue as they were. Because this a~,piication wasn't before'them, they don't have the (inaudible) The meeting t?:~:t Bob was taiking about was a staff meeting to' meet with the staff"- peo.c[e from the Zoning Board as well as the Trustees and say, look we have ~ p:ob]em in f:onf: of us, we have an application in front of us and we don't i}ave ali the information vve need to make a dec~sion. And Bob basicaIl~ Yt~en[ throqgh ali ti~e questions that have come up, a lot of the questions were questio;}s tiqat ¥'ou had ~aised at the prior work session and we went througP, every single one of them with them and said, look we don't have the a[~swers to some of these questions, could you please go back to you[' f[ie and do them. As a resui~ of that meeting, a Zoning Board representative asked Bob to do a forr,qa[ !e¥ce[ tc the Zonin~ ~oard saying that we would like the Zoning Board to make this re:v':ew Af!~ ',.:?a~ ',ether has gone out from this Board to that Board. We jus[ ?':aren't he~rd from them yet. You ask, who do you go to. Well we've a!re',~d'¢ made the contact and we're saying we need information. Southold '['own Planning Board t2 Augu~ 11,1997 You can go to those Board's and ask them why they haven't, but we're still waiting on the information Mr. Bubany: Who establishes for example if there was storage there? How do you do that? How do you establish if it's grandfathered in that there was storage? The gentleman said Boos, he had everybody clear everything out. Now if he kept two or three for his close friends, whatever, I never complained for one or two boats. That's not storage. Because he made sure everyone was out of the?e. There was no storage. Somebody said last week, oh, they always F:ao. storage. Three is not three lites, etc. There's a big difference. It used to be 32 boats or 34 boats of a certain length. Now, he's go~ things sifts'p,9 ne>'~ to the bulkhead (inaudible). Now, because he is in violation and no one corrects it, then therefore it becomes grandfa'thered n because it was done? That's ludicrous? Boos uses to have his boat on the bulkhead. And then he put five others. So now, they nut s bi9 boat and five others. So they say, oh they had it that way, I bough~: it with that pre-existing condition. That was a violation that nobody bothe?ed correcting. Now the reason they may not have pushed it, or we did¢¢t push it, is oecause it wasn't very drastic. The man wants To add ~ ',ittle boa': on the side of the bulkhead, that may not be a prob!em, but to sa,/'that now because he was allowed to do that he can do ali of these th!ngs is ludicrous. Does anyone know if he has a permit for that ramp that he out on wetland? Ms. Scopaz: Weit, I think we've asked the Trustees to give us whatever documen'tatio~n... Mr. Buban¥: You don't know Ms. Scopaz: ~ don't know Mr. Kassner He has a permi'k to repair that ramp... Mr. Buba?~¥: No, the one on the wetland, not in the marina, that his wife cut down with a weed whacker ~wo or three weeks ago and they dumped sand on it and now '/ou i:ave ~ wide ramp that can be a beach if you want it to. Is there a permit there? Mr. Kassner: YVeii. we've asked the Trustees to go down and make a complete inspect[on, a second inspection, of the entire property. I understand they were down there, haven't gotten the report backyet. Sour;hold Town Plsnniqg Board 15 Augu~ 11.1997 Mr. Bubany: OK, so if they iook at a ramp then they assume that it was there when in fact it wasn't three weeks ago. This is what he's doing basically. I mean, you ao it and get away with it and then make them chase you later, and nobody chases him. know I can't cut...I can't send my wife out, maybe I wish i could, hacking down grasses so I can build a sandy ramp about that wide in the wet!and and nobody knows if he has a permit and is anybody going to find out? Mr. Ortowski: Well, I'm sure when the Trustees make their inspection they wilt see tt~at Mr. Bubo}ny: What will they see? Mr. Ortowski: Whatever you said has been done over there. Mr. Bubany: A 'amp and a wetland, and they're going to know if that was pre-existing o~ ',f it w~sn't there? Mr. Orlowski: Yes, they will Know that. And the Zoning Board - whatever they were granted from tine Zoning Board pre 1989 is in effect on the property to this day. It stays with the property. We don't know what that was. The Zoning Board wi:! iel us k:sow and we'll have to wait for both these decisions. Mr. 9uban¥: Because at! I see t~appenlng is he basically does it and nobody enforces anythiF~g agalns~ h, hem. The boats are still on the bulkhead... Mr. Oriows:<i: ~ would address [hose wpes of comments to the Trus[ees and the use commen::s to the Zon!ng Board of Appeals They're the two agencies thai; are going ~o give us the information. If you have any other information that 1:hey should know about 1 think that you should give it to either one o'f those Boards. And if you call tomorrow, the office will give you the name and ndm~er of who ~o talk to. Mr. Bubany: Fine, and they decide, Do they also then report - this team that's going dcwn to inspect it .- do they report the violations and make him correct it be-fore ~he¥ eo anythir, g? Or while he's in violation, they may or may not know 3nd then you pass this site plan? Mr. Orlowski: Well, the Trustees wili definitely make an inspection and if he is in viote, tion they wili be written dp, I'm sure. If he's in violation Mr. BubanV: How about ti;e six from last year, or five, or whatever he had that he nevar corrected. He corrected one or two. Augu~ 11,1997 Southold Tcwn Planning Board I4 Mr. Orlowskk Those comments vou'd De better off: addressing to the Trustees instead of iq, ere, Mr, Bubany: i wish you would have l:oid us a month ago. We could have saved a month and discussed this with them and now we're kind of behind the eight baiJ no~ knowing, Mr. Ward: Let me say this, we have passed along your comments and information to botl~ the Zon!ng Board and Trustees, There may have been one or two more tlqings that came out today that you hadn't said in the past and we would osss those comments along aJso, but it doesn't hurt for you ~o do ~t as Mr. Bubapy' Great. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: Any other commen~s? 'm going ~o ente~ain a motion to hold this he~r!ng open. Mr. Latham: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Orlowski; Motion made and seconded. Ail those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski Mr. Ward, Mr. La,ham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremes. Mr. Ofiowski: Opposed? Mo~ion carried It will be re-scheduled again for September 15, a'~ 7:50. gee Kaiter: If we are no~ addressing the fight group wh~ are we scheduled ~r' yet ~n~ne, meeting? Mr. ~ .... ur ow~.~ Beoause this hearing is going to stay open until we get all the answers from the comments ~ha~ we've gotten in this public hearing: ~AJOR AND N:~iNOR SgBDiV!SIONS. LOT LiNE CH~GES ~D SET OFF ~PLICATIONS Final Determ[n~'~ion: Mr. Orlows~[: Waiter Ga[p8 - This lot line change ~e~ween Walter Gaipa and Southold Town Planning Board 15 August11,1997 The Suffolk County Water Authority is to subtract 0.59 acres from a 16.16 acre parcel and to add it To a 0.358 acre parcel, located on Roclo/Point Rd. in East Marion. SCTM# 1000-31-2-22.1 & 32.2. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Ci~airman, I'll offer the following resolution. Be it resolved, that the 8outhold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated March 3, 1997. Conditional final approval was granted on March 31, 1997. The condition of final approval has been fulfilled. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Oriowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Odowski: Opposed? Motion carried. (Chairman endorsed surveys.) Mr. Orlowski: George BambrJck - This proposed tot line change is to subtract 7,096 square feet from a 23,700 square foot parcel and add it to a 7,000 square foot parcel. SCTM# 1000-59-5-7 & 8. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, l'll offer the following resolution. Be it resolved, that the 8outhold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated July 10, 1996. Conditional final approval was granted on October 21, 1996. All conditions have been fulfilled. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? Al those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried, (Chairman endorsed surveys.) Preliminary Extensions: Mr. Orlowski: Summit Estates., Sec. 2 & 5 - This major subdivision is for 25 Southold Town Pianning Board 16 Augu~ 11,1997 lots on 25 acres located on the southwest corner of Main Rd (NYS IRt. 25) and Shipyard Lane ~n East Marion. SCTM# I000-35-8-5.$. Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I move that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of preliminary approval from July 9, 1997 to January 9, 1998. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on July 9, 1996. Mr, Cremers: ~,md the modon. Mr. Orlowski Vlotion made and seconded i,~ Tavor? those ' - ~ Any questions on the motion? All At/es: Mr. Oriowski, ~\~r, Ward, Mr Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski; Opposed? Motion carried. Sketch E~ens~ons: Mr. Oflowski: John ~ Patricia McCarvil[ - This major subdivision is for 3 lots on 118,795 souare feet, in Southold. SCTM# 1000-78-7-32.7. Mr. Cremers: Mr, Chairman, !'Ii offer the following resolution. Be it resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board gran~ a six month extension of sketch approvBI from July 29, 1997 to Janua~ 29, 1998. Conditional sketch approval w~s ~ 'shred on July 29, 1996. W~, Q: Secor';~. Mr. Oriowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the mo~ion? All those ~ Ayes: Mr Orlowski Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Orlowskh 9a~iew/Soyth Harbo~ Pa~neBhip - This clustered major subdivision is for 4 lots on fl2.49 acres located on the east side o~ South Harbor Rcad ~n Sou~l~old ~,,,M~ t000-75-4-8 & 22.1. Augu~ 11,1997 SITE PLANS Extensions; Mr. Or!ov¢~;!: ~ewer Yacht Yard - This approved site plan is for the addition of a maintenaFce and storage building, a pool and a club house with snack bar and res=, room facilities au an existing marina and yacht yard. Clubhouse to be relocated to pool area, located on Manhanset Ave. and Beach Rd. in Oreenport. SCTM# I000-43-3-2 Mr, Cremers: Mr, Chairman, I'll off:er the following resolution. WHEREAS, the 3re~¥er Y~¢ht Yard at Oreenporq nc. is the owner of the proper~:¥ known and designated as Brewer Yacht Yard at the SAN/c of Manhanset Ave. and Beach Rd,; and WHEREAS, ~hi$ site plan was approved b'y the Planning Board on January 11, 1993; and WHEREAS, the property owner is still implementing aspects of the approved plan, in accor'c~3nce with that plain; and WHEREAS, [ne site plan expired on January 11, 1996; and WHEREAS a 6 month extension was granted to expire on July 11, 1996; and WHEREAS, a 12 month extenslon was granted to expire on July 11, 1997; and SouthoId Town Plant;lng Board 17 Mr. Edwards: Mr, Chairman, I move that the Southold Town Planning Board gran*~ a re;to-active six month extension of sketch approval from April 21, 1997 to October 21, 1997. Conditional sketch approval was granted on October 2!, 1996. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those ~n favor? Ayes: Mr. Oriowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers Mr. Orlowskh Opposed? Motion carried. Southold Town Planning Board 18 Augu~ 11,1997 WHEREAS, tne 8oerd finds that this plan is still in compliance with the Zoning Code; be ~ therefore F RESO_V_D, that a 6 mon[n extension be granted to expire on January 11, 1998. Mr. Lal;ham: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion r'nade and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those ~n favorr Ayes: Mr. Odowski. Mr. Ward, Mr Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Rescind Waiver: Mr. Or[owsKi Michael Hu,qhes - This site plan is for a boat sales and accessory repair business ~n two vacan~ buildings located on a 1.375 acre parcet in Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-122-3-6. What's the pleasure of the Boa rd ? Mr. Ward: Mr. (;hairman, i'd like to offer the following resolution. WHEREAS, Harvey Bagshaw is the owner of the property known and ·, ~f5,, 4~o z c, located on Rt. 25 in Mattituck; and desig natec~ as SCTM # ..~ ~-, ~.~-~-~, WHEREAS, Harve~ Bagsh~w has given his approval to Michael Kevin Hughes to lease two buildings of !200 square feet and 1600 square feet apiece on i~is property for boat sales and accessory repair; and WHEREAS, [he ?lanning Board had granted a site plan waiver for this use on March 3, 1997, su~ec.~ to a front yard buffer clear of boats and with planters insta! ed as sho':~'n on tiae site plsn dated February 12, 1997, accompanying the waNer granted on March 31, 1997; and WHE~:E~S, ,,he conditions of the waiver have no~ been met in that the plan~ers have no,c been installed and ~he 20' front yard buffer is not clear of boa~s; and WHEREAS, Mr. Bagshaw has no~ ~uppt[ed the requested documentation August 11, 1997 Southo/d Town P:snni:qg Board 19 showing the areas leased by Mr. Hughes; and WHEP, EAS, the wawer granted on March $I, 1997 contained the statement that any changes in the conditions of this waiver resolution and site plan dated February 12, 1997 may be grounds for rescinding this waiver; be i~ therefore RESOLVED, :r~a~ :he waiver granted on March 51, 1997, be rescinded. Mr. Cremers: Second the mo~Jon. Mr. Orlowski: Mo~ioiq made 8nd seconded. Any questions on ~his motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr, Odowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. OdowsKi: OpOosed? Mo~Jon ca,tied. SITE P~NS - ST~E ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI~ RENEW ACT Mr. Onows~n R~verhesd 8uitdin~ SuDDJ~ - This proposed site plan is for the cons[ruction of a 50,425 square foot building on Rt. 25 in 0reenpo~ SCTM¢ 1000-46-1-2.1 Mr'. Cremer5: ,~r. Cnairmar,, i'll offer- ~he following resolution Be it resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination ¢ non-significance, and gran~s a Negative Decla'3tlon. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Mr. Oriows~i: Morion mace and seconded, Any questions on ~he mo~ion? All those in favor7 Aves: Mr. Ortowski, ~ir. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremem. Mr. Ortowski: Opposed? Mo~ion carried. Southold Tow n planning Board 2O Augu~ 11, '~997 APPROVAL OF pLANNING BOARD MINUTES Mr. 0rlowskh Board to approve the July 14, 1997 minutes. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Orlowskh Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? AVes: Mr. Odowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Odowski: Opposed? Motion carried. At this time I'll ask if there are any comments that anyone would like to put on the recoro, of ~his meeting? Otherwise we're going to adjourn this meeting and go into a work session. At that time, anyone who wants to discuss anything, we can. if there are no comments, I'll enteFcain a motion to adjourn. Mr. Cremers: So moved. · . ~ e and seconded. All those in favor? Mr. Orlowski: Motion mad Ayes: Mr. Odowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Odowski: Opposed? Motion carried· There being no ~uFcher business to come before the Board, the meeting, adjourned a~ 5:4,5 p.m, RespectfulN Mar~ha Bent