The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-103.-1-2 RESIDENTIAL '" 'GENFFRAL / / ...... SITE DATA I ~, ~/~/~ ~Te~ 4v ' ~' ~o,, ~ ,/ ' ~ ~E ~m~ L~ James Homan TOWN OF SOl H D ~ ~ ~ ~ i ,,,4, md~iql. ._ ~, EXISTING: General Business(B) _: , , , , . ~ ~ . License h L8 ~5626 EXISTING ~ R ~ I ' '~/>''' ~J~ETREE~U~,' ~~~}?~'~ ? ~ ~e~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~~' jl~' NOTES: -Elevations shown are based on National shownhereon are from field ob~e~ations ...... L / CUTCHOGUE N.Y. 119~ ~lJ ~~rj [[ '. ~ ~EXISTtNG' hd ~ ~ ~;/J.. ~ TAX MAP~10~103-1 . ~, ,~ , , n ~ ~ ,'~ ~ ~ ' / ~ , AREA ; .... ;. ,~- Existing Office: 1,080 sf ~ 1 per 100 sf = 10.8 spaces Z ~% t / / / / /~ / / / / /7,~ ~t~ Fish Market: 1,410sfe1 per2~sf= 7.05 spaces % ' , I ~,i' ~"~ ~ ;~ ~~' ~-I ~M TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 40 SPACES including 2 handicapped parking spies TRUCK PARKING: 3 Provided / 0 Required ........ ~ '~ I ~ ~i .~ --= %~ ~' ~' ' ' .... .' . ." '' ~ ~ 4 ' 10''0'' X 4''0'' Storm Drain Ring ~ 273.7 cf. = 1094.8 cf. ~,,,,l,,,l~¢¢~f~,'%~;J / / ~ ~-~ ~='~l~E ~ -~--I~j~ /"~&~ FOR PURPOSES OF SIZING SYSTEM, THE DCESIGN FLOW FOR THE FISH M RKET ~?'~¢' ~ ~ ~~ ~ / , ~/ I 1 /¢ ..... I /' TOTAL DES GN FLOW = 73Z 7 GPO DESIGN FLOW: I I ~'~t)'~;]~f ~ ~~C' ~', + ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~, ~~j~/ APPROVED FOR ~NSTRUCIION ONLY (FOR SITE DENSI~ CALCU~TION ONLY) J ~et Title: I ~~~. W ~' ~'- MI~M ~ ~. ~, .............. ~ ~ ~ disposal a0d wate~ supply Jaohtties pu[~uanl to A~cI~ VB and REQUIREMENTS ' 70.5 + 141 = 211.5 GPD "~¢;~E~~¢~p~¢~ ~ / --~I~TI~ ~T=~ ~T~ k %~ SCALE:I =20'-0" ~ppro~ed~naccordan~wlh~rdolRevew j ,00~PDXI'-,00~PD S - pi ~1~1%1~~~ ' ~~~¢~' ae[ermlnauon aaTen~ ,t/ rJ~7 j TOTALSITE DESIGN FLOW' Sql .7GPD CUTCHOGUE. CEMETARY CUTCHOGUE METHODIST CHURCH FIRST LIST OF LAND OWNERS KEY OWNER USE 1, L. HAMID 2. M VERITY 3. CUTCHOGUE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION 4. CUTCHOGUE METHODIST CHURCH 5, J, ScoTr III 6. FRIEDMANN 7. K & K ASSOCIATES 8. M, SCHARADIN 9, W. GILDERSLEEVE 10. C. ORLOWSKI 11. J, BAJEK 12. A. MARVIN 13. S. PLOMtNSKI 14, W. BAXTER JR. 15, J, MAGRINO & J, BARON 16. E, BRADLEY 17. G. BRESLER 18. S. & P. BROWN'INZ 19. E. KISLOW 20. E. KISLOW 21. P. SUJEFKI 22. E. GLOVER 23, E. MACHNOWSKI 24. R. GOODALE 25. H. ZINK 26. G. KELLY 27. D. BLAIKiE 28. METHODIST CHURCH 29. L GREEN II & R. MARTIN 30. R. GIBBS 31. R. BLUM ,32.. H. BLUM 33. J: PHILLIPS & J. HOMAN RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL CEMETERY CHURCH AGRICULTURAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL VACANT RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL VACANT VACANT RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL KEY MAP SCALE: 1" = 100' MAIN ROAD [STATE ROAD 25) [66'] TYPICAL GREASE TRAP CAST IRON FRAME AND COVER TO GRADE- F~NtSHED GRADE All matertsls, tnetmllatlonm end items havtn~ to FROM KITCHEN MIN. 4'Dl~ CLASS 2400 PIPE OR EQUIVLENT 12" CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK -- CAST IRON COVERS FINISHED GRADE FLOW LINE TYPICAL WELL I~F-TAIL Z Project No: Drawn By: ~J'~ Checked By: Date, Scale: t"= I~uo Sheet Title. KEY MAP Sheet No' SP-2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 15, 1994 Thomas Samuels Samuels and Steelman, Architects 252:55 Main Rd. Cutchogue, NY 1'19:~5 Re: Proposed site plan for Braun's Oyster Co. SCTM# 1000-105-1-2 & 5 Dear Mr. Samuels: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 14, 1994: WHEREAS, James Homan is the owner of the property known and designated as Braun~ Oyster Company, located at Main Road, Cutchogue, SCTM#1000-105-1-2 & 5; and WHEREAS, a formal appllcaLlon for the approval of this site plan was submitted on February 18, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 6'17, declared itself lead agency, and issued a Negative Declaration on April '18, '1994; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by Thomas Fisher, Building Inspector, on November '14, '1994; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan RegUlations of the Town of Southold have bccn met; be It therefore Page 2 November 15, 1994 Proposed site plan for Braun's Oyster Co. RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated September 2:5, q994, subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Enclosed please find a copy of the survey which was endorsed by the Chairman. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely/,,' I~icha~d O: Ward Chairman enc. cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Scott I~ussell, Chairman, Board of Assessors SITE PLAN Presub mission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub, conference) Application reviewed at work session (within I0 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions' (within ,30 days of review) Revised submission received Lead Agency Coordination /) SEQRA determination {~d~ REFERRED TO: Zoning Board of Appeals (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees Building Department {certification) Suffolk County Department of Planning Department of Transportation -State Department of Transportation - County Suffolk County Dept. of Health Fire Co m missioners RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan Li_ghting plan V~ Curb Cut approval Health approval ~ Drainage plan t~ Reviewed by Engineer Sent:. Received:_ Approval of site plan -with conditions Endorsement of sire'plan Certificate of Occupancy inspection One year review APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application//~//~ Filing Fee Date Rec'd New Use Change of 'Us~ Re-Use Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval Other .Specify Name of Business or Site ~/~Z/A3~ d~<T~/~ Location of Site ~/~~ ~~ ~ //~ Address of Site, if available ~~ ~/~ N~e of Applicant ~~ ~ ~~~ Address of Applicant ~~ '~/~ ~ ~~ Telephone . ~ Person to be responsible for Construction ~~ Telephone ~ Applicant's interest in site-check one: '~~, Under contract to purchase ~ner of Fee Title to Land ~3 Address ~/~ ~ , ~~~ Telephone~ ~ ~ Site Plans Prepared b~F~ License No.~o Address ~5~ ~/~ ~F~ Telephone $ ~+ Total Land Area of Site 7~, ~.._~2- Existing Use of Site Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s)/Zt~/ Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) .~¢~ sqft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Datum(Specify)U.S.G.S. Ww~/~,/3~~. Other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals Sq. Ft. Zone District ~ Proposed Use of Site;=a~,~/;;~ sqft. .sqft. % % Case Number Name of Applicant 77-'/0~,,~f 0.~~ · Date of Decision ~xpiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? /~D If so, have proper permits been obtained? ~ Number and Date of permit issued n/~ NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~/~/~ ~/~/ being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at /F~&~r~-/f~ ~Z~.. 6~/7tyf~ ~.~'. in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the ~¥6;A4~/~ of the d~/~T~/~ (Title) (Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and ~hat the actual physical improvements will be installed in stri~cordance wit~ the plans submitted. Sign~~_~mOA '~~ (Owner) Sworn to before me this day of ~.,~ -''(Notary Public) 19~9W ~ o r poz-at~e-~)f~rc~and Ti~ ze~ ii'ART 1--PROJECT INFORMAT~I Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona!;~k information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on. information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County), NAME OF APPLiCANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE ,,b ,. Y, NAME OF OWNER (If different) ADDRESS BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. ~'Commercial I-IOther 1. Present land use: mUrban E31ndustrial I~Forest DAgriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: /. ~7"Z--~' acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) d'~ acres Forested C~ acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~:) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) ~ acres Water Surface Area O acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) ~ acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces /~ d.)~ acres IqResidential (suburban) I-]Rural (non-farm) AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres (~ acres C:~ acres 0 acres 0 acres ~ acres /, cP_~ acres Other (Indicate type) /-,,~.~-J~'~'-~:::',~',/~/'~/~ ° (.~' acres 3. What is predominant type(s) on proje~:t site? a. Soil drainage: /~Well drained /o~ % of site E3Moderate]¥ well drained % of site mPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involve~how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYSi.._ Land Classification System? ~ acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on proje~ site? I-lYes )J~]'No . a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 14-1 ~-2 (2/87]-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEpR Purpose: The full EAF is desigi~ed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides obiective data and information about a given proiect and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: if any impact in Part 2 is id(;ntified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date , 5. ,Approximate percentage of project site with slopes: /~-10% 1~10-15% % -' E315% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, sit,e, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? E]Yes ~1o "~7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of Nat onal Natural Landmarks? r-lyes ,,~No 8.What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9.Is site Iocated over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ,j~Yes I-1No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [~Yes ]~o 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? I-lYes ~1o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) E]Yes /~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ~lYes ,~o If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes /~o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, 'ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name ~'(-~/~:~,~..-'1~- b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes I-]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? /~Yes EJNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? E~Yes /~No 18. Is the site located in ap agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25~AA, Section 303 and 304? [~Yes ,~o 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 L-lYes ~o 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? E}Yes /~,1o B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fiji in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor /o 7~ <~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ° ~)~'~ acres initially; ,C)(o acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped ° ~/ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~ ~'~ (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed . ~_,,4~, %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~' ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ,/,--2,~ (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure/~.~-~/* height; ~'"' width; /~)~ length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare proiect will occupy is? /~)z~ ft. 2. How much natural material {i. ~ck, earth, etc.) will be removed from t ~te? O . tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~es f-lNo ON/A a. If yes, for what intend._C purpose is the site being rec'laimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? i-]Yes I-1No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? /~es I-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? O acres. 5. Will any mature forest {over 100 years old) or other Iocally~important vegetation be removed by this project? [~Yes 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: // a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement pha~e 1 c. Approximate completion date of final pha. se months, (including demolition). (number). ,~?~------~'-'~ month ~"~ year, (including demolition). ~ month ~'~- year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [~Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ~lYes ,.~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction .~---.-~ ; after project is complete ~) 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project (~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes /~1o If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~]Yes ~1o a. If- yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial,e~c.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~es r~No Type ~',4t'/'~;~' ,~,~ 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? D-]Yes Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? I~Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes ~l~o a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I-lYes i-INo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain E]Yes E3No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~lYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [~Yes /~_No tons/month. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lyes /~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? I-lYes /~o 21. Will project result in an ncrease in energy use? J~'Yes [-'lNo If yes , indicate type(s) ~./-E'C:T,~/Q_.]I~.. ~'~'"/~T//I/~l' gallons/minute. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~ 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~2~ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I--lYes If Yes, explain 4 25~ Approvals Required: Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board I-'lYes ,/~o City, Town, Village Planning Board ,J~kYes I-INo City, Town Zoning Board f-lYes /~o City, County Health Department ~,Yes E3No Other Local Agencies ,~es ~No Other Regionat Agencies I~Yes ~1~.No State Agencies ~lYes Federal Agencies I~Yes ,~o C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Xes r~No · If Yes, indicate decision required: i-lzoning amendment []zoning variance ~]special use permit r-lsubdivision ,~te plan F-Inew/revision of master plan I-lresource management plan l~other / 2. What is the zoning ciassification(s)of the site? ~ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What' is the maximum potential develo~m,ent of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? C 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Y~es r~No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/, mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? ~kYes I-INo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many Iotsar~e p]oposed? /~/~ / - a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? i~Yes ,~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? E3Yes ,,J~o a. If yes, is existiqg capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I~Yes r~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~lYes ,~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I~Yes ~lNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name 7'~¢~#/';~,~ ~,. ~'~L~ Date ///~//~' Signature ~ ~ Title I[ the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2--~OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR I~GNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information CRead Carefully) , · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, wilt vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact,' also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? [~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 2, feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material {i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t(. _.,,y umque or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)l~NO I~YES · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] C]¥es I--INo [] [] [~Yes []No L-] [] []Yes [~]No [] [] [~]Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~tes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 2.5 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) f~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic ya. rds of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? I~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · ^ 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? I-INO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system· · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveye.l off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions· · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in' areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities· · Other impacts: C 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? I-1NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 Wl 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [-]Yes I--]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-JNo [] [] []Yes r-JNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I--1No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] J~]Yes []No [] [] E3Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] F-lyes r-lNo [] [] []Yes []--] No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] []Yes I-1No [] [] rlYes []No [] [] E-lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] J~]Yes []No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · ~Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? r~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? E]NO ~IyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ~INO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? [:]NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) a~to 2 3. Sm Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated B~ Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lYes E]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I--]No [] [] [-]Yes []No [] [] I--lYes i-"i No [] [] []Yes I--]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-]No [] [] f-lYes i-]No [] [] [~Yes E~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] I'-]Yes []No [] [] []Yes I-]No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes []No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2..5 acres of agricultural land · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land mana§ement systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources;) I~NO F"IYES (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: INIPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? r~No ~IyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 E3NO I-lYES C · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A maior reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I~Yes I-]No [] [] ~-IYes [-']No [] [] I-lyes [] [] I~Yes ~lNo [] [] C1yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ DYes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON TR~SPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? r~NO f~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of an,/form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or suppJy system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - [NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed ^ction affect public health and safety? [NO Z]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 10 ~ 2 ~3 Small to Potential ,Can Impact.Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I~Yes I-'lNo [] [] I~yes I--]No [] [] I~Yes f-]No [] [] ~]Yes I-]No [] [] ~Yes I-1No [] [] I~Yes [-1No [] [] ~]Yes [-iNo [] [] [~]Yes [-INo [] [] ~lYes I~No [] [] I-'lYes I~No [] [] I-lYes E3No [] [] E3¥es I~No [] [] I~Yes [-1No [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] I--lYes []NO [] [] ~lyes []No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? [~NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Th~ permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action wiU conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ' Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to 'I Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~TNO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by proiect change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 t5 ] 7.21 SEQR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-tA V4-Vz V2-3 3-5 5+ · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available [] [] [] [] [] to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State [] [] [] [] [] Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] .[] · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] [] [] scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] [] · State? [] [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes []No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? FIYes []]]No DESCRIPTION OF EXIST~ VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the environment. surrounding Within '1/4 mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V2 mile [-]Yes []No *1 miles I--lYes []No *2 miles [~Yes []No *3 miles []Yes []No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE ' 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. (~ONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other FREQUENCY Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Braun's Oyster Company James Homart 30840 Main Road Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 January 21, 1994 I hereby authorize Tom Samuels of SAMUELS & STEELMAN ARCHITECTS~ ' to act as my agent in obtaining the required permits from the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD, SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT~ OF HEALTH SERVlCES and THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT, · Date: / ,/ ' REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION ~'/ ~ECTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX MAP NUMBERS ~' ~AME & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD ~ NAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREPARING MAP ::~'DATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE. ~DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES ~LOCATIONS, NAMES & EXISTING WIDTHS OF ADJACENT STREETS & CURBS i LOCATION & OWNERS OF ALL ADJOINING LANDS, AS SHOWN ON TAX RECORDS '- LOCATION & PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS .COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING TO PROPERTY ~' i~EXISTING ZONING ---!AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOWS ----' !WATER COURSES, MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" IN DIAMETER OR MORE ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100' OF PROPERTY &W<PAVED AREAS, SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS -~-~! EXISTING SEWERS, CULVERTS, WATERLINES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PROPERTY : ENCING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING /-~PROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVkMENTS' ~OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS ~UTDOOR LIGHTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS OUTDOOR SIGNS' >239K SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTHS'/IZE OF WATER AND SEWER LINES... SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: ~ra~n's Oys~r G. sc~,,~#: 103-'1-1, Z+5 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOI.[D TO: Thomas Fisher, Building Inspector In Charge FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Proposed Site Plan for Braun Oyster Co. Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM# 1OOO-103-1-1, 2 & 3 DATE: November 9, 1994 Please review the attached for certification. The area of the proposed addition is entirely in the General Bus~ness District, and meets the rear yard setback of thirty five feet (35'). The previous site plan of February 13, 1986, and certified by Victor Lessard on August 3, 1987, was approved by the Planning Board but never signed as far as I can determine. I attach this February 13, 1986, plan for your information. You will note at that time the zone line went through the middle of the building. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: CO~ENTS: Io5' 1- 1~2.+5 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNIN(Z BOAR.._~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK~ ROnERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE MARY E. HIBBERD, M.D., M.P.H. April 21, 1994 Robert G. Kassner Town of Southold Town Hall - 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sonthold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Brauns Oyster Co. SCTM #: 1000-103-1-1,2,3 SOUTHOLD TOWN R.ANNING BOARD Dear lvIr. Kasaner: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter dated March 8, 1994, concerning the ahove-ref~renced application, and has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. This correspondence is intended primarily to expedhe the procedural requirements of SEQRA pe/~ainlqg tO file establishment of lead agency. The comments provided below ate, therefore, general in nature, representing several of our most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects. The departmen! wishes, however, to reserve its fight to provide more detailed information within the conmlent period(s) established for this action. I. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) The SCI)lIS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems, pursuant to the authority and requirements of Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the SCSC. Applications must comply with all relevant density and construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Applicants should not undertake the construction of, or connection to, either system without Health Department approval. 2. Where applicable, the depm'anent regulates the storage, handling and discharge of restricted toxic and hazardous materials pursuant to the requirements of Articles 7 & 12 of the SCSC. If an application has not yet been submitted to the SCDHS, one should be filed at the earliest date to allow for the technical review of the proposed action. Project designs submiued to the department should be fully consistent with any action cureently under review through the SEQRA process. Design and flow specifications, information regarding subsurface soil conditions, water supply information, and complete design details are essential to the review of this project, and are evaluated fully at the time of application review. Should the town m:luire additional environmental information (such as a DEIS), discussion of the compliance requirements of the SCDHS should be required. 5. Of particular concern to the department are those areas which because of elevated groundwater conditions, or soils which are not conducive to the proper functioning of conventional subsurface sanitary sewage disposal systems. Your agency should be aware that such conditions li~luenfly requise the use of fill or the excavation of subeurface soils to accommodate subsurface sanitary disposal systems constructed in conformance with the requirements of the SCSC. COUNTY CENTER Letter to Robert Kassne~ April 21, 1994 Page 2 The depar~ent is also siL, nificantly concerned wilh areas where access to potable water may be constrained by unacceptable groundwater quality and the lack of an available public water supply. All private water supply systems must be constructed in conformance with requirements oftbe SCSC. H. NATURAL RESOURCES: The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources which may be impacted upon by construction and development activities. It is the position oftbe depattment that the SEQRA review process provides the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources, and that aH practicable p]nnnin~ measures should be employed to help ensure ~eir protection. Of particular concern to department is the adequate protection of wetlands, surface waters, natural communities, contiguous natural habitats, and rare, threatened and endangered species. In addition, efforts to protect sensitive physical resources such groundwaters, dunes, bluffs, shorelines, natural drainage chnnnels, groundwater recharge areas, and steep slopes are fully supported and encouraged by the SCDHS. In general, the depa~ment encourages the following land use measures be considered (where appropriate) to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA. 1. Maximum practicable setbacks from aH wetlands, surface waters, dunes, a~d bluffs. 2. Non-disturbance buffers between wetland limits and required structural setbacks. 3. Cluste~dng of sebdivislon lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous areas of dedicated open space. 4. Stringent clearing limitations which can reduce potential impacts to wildlife habitats, vegetative con~muultles, and unconsolidated soils. 5. Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less ~han 10%. 6. Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes. 7. Constmodon of recharge areas, so as to minimize the amount of disturbance and structural modification to the site. 8. Maximum use of land-banked parking on commercial sites. 9. Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant tuff and landscaping. 10. Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site. ~ deparanent appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal. Additional information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period. Should you have any questions or requite additional information, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. Kimberly Shaw Sr. Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology KS/amf cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G, Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 19, 1994 Samuels and Steelman 25235 Main Rd. Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed site plan for Brauns Oyster Company SCTM# 1000-1-1, 2 & 3 .Dear Mr. Samuels: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 18, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration records. ~er~/ Chairman for you enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (5t6) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant April 18, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Brauns Oyster Company SCTM#: 1000-103-1-1, 2 & 3 Location: Rt. 25, Cutchogue SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is for a 2,700 square foot addition to an existing storage building at Brauns Oyster Company located on Route 25, in Cutchogue. Page 2 SEQRA Negative Declaration - Brauns Oyster Company April 18, 1994 Reasons Supporting~This Determination: This project involves the construction of a 2,700 square foot addition to an existing storage building on a 75,272 square foot lot. Wholesale/retail sales and food packaging and processing are permitted uses in this General Business (B) District, thus the proposed action is consistent with zoning. An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions, and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Thomas Jorling, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Southold Town Building Dept. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: S'A M U E 'L S & S T E E L M A N ?_AX__C_OV__Erl, S!.LE.~ .r_ COMMENt: DATE DESCRIPTION ,,'~,,,~,~TZ~ ~ ~_, , MAIL FOLLOW UP: __YES .~ NO FRo~: ~ ,' ~~' ~'ol~l ~ of page~.lnclt~dh~g this cover sheel: tf you do not receive all of. the pageg, please e~"~s soot~ a~ po~i~e~ ' PHONE 6t6-734-6406 . EAX 516-134-6407 " 'LAL EXISTING FISH / PACKAGING &PROCESSING : BUILDING :" .°% ~'~ -- O'~ ~~~~/~ ('.~~, ~., ~..=~'~ 425 STILLWATER AVE_ ~ ~ I i--~ ~ ~UTCHO~UE :N.Y. ~ 1935 ~ :/ RESIDENTIAL PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mar~ S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 TeJephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 8, 1994 Thomas Samuels Samuels & Steelman, Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Braun Oyster Company SCTM# 1000-103-1-1, 2 & Dear Mr. Samuels; The following was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 7, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, start the coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS R/chard G, Ward, Chairman George R/tchic Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowskl, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth [.. Edwards Telephone (516} 765-1938 pLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y Town Haft. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southotd, New York 11971 Fax {516) 765 - 1823 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Contact Person: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (~') Uniisted -765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~is agency wishes to' assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments-. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. cc: Sin?}ly, ~ Chairma~ .~ '~_iFc-.h~ardnG. Ward Bo~ cf Trustecs Building'Department Southold Town Board ~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ~YSD~C - SLony ~r~uk NYSDEC - Albany U~--A~orp-of E~ineef~- ~L-Y.S. Dcpt. ef--TT~o~ * Maps are enclosed for your.~eview Coordinating agencies PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 2, 1994 Thomas Samuels Samuels & Steelman, 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Architects RE: Braun Oyster Company Main Road Cutchogue Zoning District: General Business SCTM# 1000-103-1-1, 2 & 3 Dear Mr. Samuels, The Planning Board has received your letter of February 18, 1994, regarding the above proposed project. The following changes must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: Handicapped parking spaces must conform to ADA standards. The space must be 13' wide. Protection must be shown around the fuel tank to protect it from vehicles. Eliminate truck parking at rear of property. Land bank this area. Evergreen screening must be planted in the buffer area to the south and west of the new building addition. · Drainage calculations and drainage pools must be provided for proposed storage building. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer cc: Ural Talgat Thomas Fisher, Building Inspector In Charge PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 1, 1994 Thomas Samuels Samuels & Steelman, 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Architects RE: Peconic Bay Winery SCTM# 1000-103-1-19.2 Braun Oyster Company SCTM# 1000-103-1-1, 2 & Dear Mr. Samuels, This letter will confirm our telephone conversation of February 28, 1994, in reference to the above projects. As discussed, Mr. Frank Cichanowicz the neighbor to the east of the winery has made a preliminary submission to this Boar4 for a brewery. On this plan access is shown to the winery property. No such access is shown on the winery site plan. As discussed, after you have reviewed this matter with Mr. Cichanowicz, and resolved the coordination of plans, I would like to meet with you or a representative of your firm and Mr. Cichanowicz on some of the technical details of the plans. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Site Plan Reviewer cc: Frank Chicanowitz SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Proiect Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM #: 1000 - 103.-1-2 Proiect Name: Braun's Oyster Co. Address: NYS Route 25, Cutcho.que Hamlet: Cutcho.que Applicant Name: James Homan, Braun's Oyster Company Owner Name: James Homan Zone 1: Approval Date: 11/14/1994 SCANNED Records Management OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 11/14/1994 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: SC Filing Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCAN Date: J LAN , . 0# SANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF,SIZiNG SYSTEM, THE DESIGN FLOW FOR THE FISH M,~ cOMPLEX COMBINES THE ADDITION, FISH PROCESSING, MARKET AND OFI THE EXISTING RESIDENCES HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED BECAUSE THEY ARE CoNNE(~TED TO THIER OWN INDEPENDENT SANITARY SYSTEM. DESIGN FLOW AT FISH MARKET COMPLEX: 108 +:~,A + 211.5 + 648 = TOTAL DESIGN FLOW = 73z.7 GPD SEPTIC TANK: 732-.7 X 2 DAY = 1466.4 GPD USE I - 8' DIA X 5' LIQUID DEPTH ~) 1500 GAL GREASE TRAP; USE 1- 8' DIA X 5' LIQUID DEPTH @ 1580 GAL LEACHING POOLS: AREA REQUIRED "' 737-.7 I 1.5 = 488.5 SF NEED 20 VERTICAL FT OF 8' DIA OR ~UFFOI. K COU ~,Y OcP~,,Th,~N, OF HEALTH AP?ROYED FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLY disposal and water supply facilities pursuant to Articles VB and 7 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and is not an expressed nor implied approval to discharge from or occupy the , structure(s) shown. THIS APPROVAL EXPIRES IY~O (2) YEARS ..FROM THE DATE BELOW. DATE ~-/ '- °sIGNATuRE ' ._ Approved in ac¢ordanoe with Board ot R~view RESIDENTIAL EXISTING, GARAGE' N/F R. GIBBS MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE N.Y.11935 B " GENERAL BUSINESS MAIN ROAD ZONE SITE DATA S ~ SCTM # PROPERTY: ADDRESS OWNER: I 1000:10~-1-1,2 & ~ Braun's Oyster Company 30840 Main Road Cutchogue, N.Y, 11935 James Homan 30840 Main Read Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 EXISTING: General Business (B) ZONING SITE: 1.728 acres / 75,272 sq. ft. AREA SURVEYOR: Roderick Van Tuyl Greenport, N Y 11944 , =u, ,'/ . License r~LS 25626 · O ! ,{tii!lill[' '*. .L · ~ . N~ Dated: ~ept. 24, 1985 EXISTING ' "' ' ~" '" - ' "',/ , /~-' NOTES: -ElevatiO~s shown are based on National DECIDUOUS .,[, , ;~ ~ '." ' :, Geodeti~,.Ved:ical Datum of 1929. EXISTING ~r,, / . , , . ,~ , ~ , ..... . ., , .~ .... Public water main not available , ,~ , , ~ ~. , within 500 feet of property. "" -' - ~- ' -The locations of wells and cesspools : I'! ~ I ~ I ! ! :~ ''1=!' 1'; [' ~'' 'IL' ~1 ~'1' ' ~ shownhereon are from field observations , h~,.[~ ,", .~h, ,,,,,, , ' ,~,~ and or from data obtained from others. N/F J. PHILLIPS ~ .,; ,~,,~ I .... :, ~ & J. HOMAN ~:~ LOT AREA: 75,272 sq MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE N.Y. 11935 ~ h! ,, , , .... ,~:EXISTINGHOuSE'~ ~C~C~ 'h't'l AREABUILDING: 15,011 sq. ft.. LANDSCAPPED: 29,268 sq. Illl ~,FT ~' AREA ~' LOT COVERAGE: 19.94 % actual / 30 % max TAX MAP # 1000-103-1-4 · LOT #1 , EXISTING BLUESTONE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPPED: 38 88 % actual / 35 % min AREA EXISTING BLUESTONE PARKING AREA PARKING CALCULATIONS: EXISTING GARAGE Z EXISTING, OFi CES EXISTING ULCO TRANSFORm( N/F D. BLAIKIE 286 STILLWATER AVE CUTCHOGUE N.Y. 11935 EXISTING WELL & LOT #2 EVERGREEN TREES PECONIC VINEYARDS N/F R.BLUM PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS BOX 709 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE N.Y. 11935 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'- 0" / Existing Office: 1,080 s~@ 1 per 100 sf = 10.8 spaces Fish Market: 1,410 sf @ 1 per ~00 sf = 7 05 spaces Fish Packaging: 8,710 sf @ 1 per 500 sf = 17.42 spaces Existing House: 1,111 sf @ 2 per residence - 2.0 spaces Proposed Storage: 2,700 sf @ 1 per 1000 sf = 2.7 spaces TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 39.97 / 40 SPACES TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 40 SPACES including 2 handicapped parking spaces TRUCK PARKING & LOADING: LOADING BERTHS: 3 Provided / 2 Required TRUCK PARKING: 3 Provided / 0 Required R-40 RESIDENTIAL GENE BUSlNI ;S N/F G. KELLY ~ ,~ 425 STIIrLWATER AVE. ¢ r8 CUTCHO~UE N.Y. 11935 4r R-80 RESIDENTIAL ,v SOUTHOLD TOWN Project No' Drawn By: Checked By: Sheet Title SITE PLAN Sheet No SP-1 CEMETARY/ METHOD CHURCH FIRST ~TREET LIST OF LAND OWNERS KEY OWNER USE 1. L, HAMID 2. M, VERITY 3. CUTCHOGUE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION 4. CUTCHOGUE METHODIST CHURCH 5. J. SCOTT III 6. FRIEDMANN 7, K & K ASSOCIATES 8. M SCHARADIN 9. W, GILDERSLEEVE 10. C. ORLOWSKI 11.J. BAJEK 12.A, MARVIN 13.S. PLOMINSKI 14.W. BAXTER JR. 15.J, MAGRINO & J. BARON 16.E. BRADLEY 17.G, BRESLER 18.S. & P. BROWN'INZ 19.E. KISLOW 20,E. KISLOW 21,P. SUJEFKI 22., E, GLOVER 23. E. MACHNOWSKI 24. R, GOODALE 25. H. ZlNK 26. G. KELLY 27. D. BLAIKIE 28 METHODIST CHURCH 29. L GREEN II & R, MARTIN 30. R. GIBBS 31. R. BLUM 32. H. BLUM 33, J, PHILLIPS & J. HOMAN RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL CEMETERY CHURCH AGRICULTURAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL VACANT RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL VACANT VACANT RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL KEY MAP SCALE: 1" = 100' - 0" Z Z Date Sheet Title. KEY MAP Sheet No: SP-2 !! iL >- Z Z Project No: ~,1 Drawn By. LII' Checked By: Date: ~/ Scale ~/~1 (~" = Sheet Title: FLOOR PLAN & BUILDING ELEVATIONS Sheet No' A-1 R-40 RESIDENTIAL B - GENERAL BUSINESS MAIN ROAD ZONE SITE DATA SCTM # ~L, PROPERTY: ADDRESS OWNER: 1000-103-1-1,2 & 3' Braun's Oyster Company 30840 Main Road Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 James H*oman 30840 Main Road Cutchogue, N.Y 11935 = r~,,~ EXISTING: General Business (B) ~"~i~T;~'~~ '~c,, ,~,, ZONING Q~E6~ o , , SITE: 1.728 acres / 75,272 sq. fl. ml~lN~ r~, ~----~~__ AREA ,. ,, ~ , SURVEYOR: Roderick Van Tuyl ~% ' Greenpo~, NY. 119~ O , . ' ~ ,' '~ ' / . License ¢LS 25626 ~ .' · ~) .. ' .' ~, ~, · ~ / ~ Dated: Sept 24, 1985 ' ' , / are ~ ' DECIDUOUS r EXISTING ( ' ' ~L ~"~s~~ '" HOUSE ~t. ~._.._m ~_ .... ~/.~ ,~[ E /~ GeodeticVedicaJDatum of 1929. I ~" / -Public water main not available ~ , ~ - ~: , , within 500 feet of prope~, I~ EXlSTIN - - .... / -The locations of wells and cesspools BLUES' ~ ...... ' I'T. "' LoT; 3' . j~ and or from d~ta obtained from others, N/F J. PHILLIPS ~, ~ '' . / / /. %~/ ' ¢/ ~ r . & J. HOMAN ' ¢; ~ '-" LOT AREA: 75,272 sq,f~ MAIN ROAD ' r ~93~ ~, r EXISTING ~ //' ~ / ~U~LD~NG: 15,0~ sq ~ TAX MAP ¢ 1006.103-1-4 ~ ~ /;, ·, ,, I ," , / / ¢ ~ // ¢ ~NDSCAPPED: 29,268 sq,, EXISTING I ~ BLUE.ONE _ 1. AREA PARKING AREA ~ / ~: ; 'EXISTING ' ' _~:::,~''t, -- ~¢ ~ '// LOT COVERAGE: 19.94 %actual/30%m~ ~L F E, / ~NDSCAPPED: 38.88 % actual / 35 % mtn GARAG~ ~ Existing Office: 1,080 sf ~ 1 per 100 sf = 10.8 spaces , ~: Fish Market' 1,410 sf ~ 1 per ~00 sf = 7,05 spaces ~,%~r~% u '1 ~ARAGI Existing House' 1,111 sf ~ 2 per residence = 2.0 spaces ~[ ~S~J[ Fish Packaging: 8,710 sf ~ 1 per 500 sf = 17.42 spaces N/F R. GIBBS c~~ ~ ~,~¢1- I z-¢~ Proposed Storage. 2,700 sf ~ 1 per 1000 sf = 2.7 spaces MAIN ROAD ~ ~ ~,,=~¢ [ CUTCHOGUE N.Y.11935 i ~a EXI~ TING ,~'"'~'.,~ ~1 LOT ¢1 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 39.97 / 40 SPACES ~ REfAIL ~1 BH TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 40 SPACES ~ M IKET including 2 handicapped parking spaces EXISTINGLiLCO ~pm~.r'p~'*'~P~- ~/L~_ ~ LOADING BERTHS: 3 Provided / 2 Required ~,- . PECONIC VINEYARDS TRUCK PARKING 3 Provided / 0 Required BLUESTONE ~_ ~: N/F R.BLUM ' / PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS ~-*~ PARKING AREA ,-J I BOX 709 MAIN ROAD DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: / .I CUTCHOGUE N.Y. 11935 =~: / New Addition & 1/2 Existing Building ' - EXI--INGST FISH- ['¢// ._ / 5555 sfx 2/12 x f 0 = 9259 cf PACKAGING & PROCESSING ~, 4 - 10'-0" x Storm Drain Ring @ 273.7 cf. 1094.8 cf. BUILDING / ~ EVERGREENEXfSTING TOTAL = 1312 2 cf N/F D. BLAIKIE 285 STILLWATER AVE CUTCHOGUE N.Y, 11935 R-40 RESIDENTIAL N/F G. KELLY 425 STILLWATER AVE. CUTCHO~UE N.Y. 11935 / / R-80 RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' - 0" ~Z Date: ~.- /'7/9~Y' Scale. i"= ~`'l~rl Sheet Title SITE PLAN Sheet No' SP-1 'iI E,A~:~T '1 O 0 , t FROM i~ OAII BELOW. -.. fi&TI accordance with Bea~'d o! Review [ ~-~termirl~li~n dated /'~//,l~,Cj~-! Project No: Drawn By: ~.l"r' Checked By: Date 2../ I"~/~.~ Scale. !~,/11 ~' = Sheet Title: FLOOR PLAN & BUILDING ELEVATIONS Sheet No' A-1