Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-09/14/1998PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENI',~ETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATI'-IAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo]d, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Present were: MINUTES September 14. 1998 Bennett OrlowskJ, Jr., Chairman Richard G. Ward G. Ritchie Latham Kenneth Edwards William Cremers Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Melissa Spiro, Planner Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Martha Jones, Secretary Mr. Orlowski: Good evening'. I'd like to call this meeting to order. The first order of business, Board to set Monday, October 5, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. at Southold Town Hall, Main Rd., Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board meeting. Mr. Cremers: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. OrlowSki: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. PUBLIC HF. ARINGS Mr. Orlowski: 7:30 p.m. - Burt's Reliable, Inc., This proposed site plan is to construct a 900 Sq. ft. addition to an existing office building on Young,s Ave. Southold Town Planning Board 2 September t4, 1998 in Southold. SCTM# 1000-60-I-6. I'll ask if there are any comments on this proposed site plan amendment? Hearing none, any comments from the Board? Mr. Ward? Mr. Ward: No. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Latham? Mr. Latham: No. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Cremers? Mr. Cremers: No. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Edwards? Mr. Edwards: None. Mr. Orlowski: Hearing no comments, I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Ward: So moved. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr, Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. What's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to offer the following resolution. WHEREAS, Burt's Reliable, Inc. is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM# 100060-I-6, located on Young's Ave: in Southold; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on April 24, 1998; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by Building Inspector Gary Fish, on August 27, 1998; and WHEREAS, this approval is for the construction of a 900 square foot addition $outhold Town Planning Board 3 September 14, 1998 to an existing office; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met, be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated August 6, 1998, subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Orlowski: 7:35 p.m. - S&L Irri.qation - This site plan waiver is for a 1,000 sq. ft. office building and a 2,500 sq. ft. storage and warehouse, for an irrigation business, in an existing building. SCTM# 1000-113-10-14.1 & 15. I'll ask if there are any comments on this site plan? Rob Leonard: Good evening. My name is Rob Leonard. I'm here representing S&L Irrigation. I talked to most of my neighbors and some of them had some resistance. Others were more than happy to see the building that we purchased cleaned up and fixed up. I'd like to start out by saying that what we're here for this evening is, as you folks know, is a waiver of site plan review just because the building has been there and we don't want to do anything major to it. We'd asked to put up a fence, and this is how this has all started. As I understand the code, for LB zoning and business properties up there on that corridor, I am entitled to put up a six foot fence, 360 degrees around the building. In question came the buffer, which is again in question As I have been reading through the Town code books which were written well after that building was built, as far as buffers are concerned, and is in my feelings and interpretations is really geared more to the larger parcels of property that are available out there now with the two acre zoning. As I met with your Board last month I agreed to put in the buffer as it stated Southold Town Planning Board September 14, 1998 and we agreed to minimalize it I guess to 10 foot rather than the 20 foot that's written there because of the fact that I only have a half acre of land up there. I don't have five acres or ten acres or even two acres. There was in fact at one time some kind of evergreen hedgerow. There were some black pines that were well dead and removed. Again, to read into the codes any buffer that was there or plant material dies, I'm responsible to replace it, which again I have no problem. As I told the Board, I'm in the yard beautification business and we'd really tike our building to be beautiful. I don't really want to do anything that's unsightly. We don't really have much stuff out there that creates dust or excessive heat, which we don't really produce in my business, beings that we're not even in the office throughout the work day. Glare, the building is a lot brighter than it was before we moved in but I think that just enhances the neighborhood. Accumulation of dust, we don't want to accumulate dust any more than anybody else does. I'm just looking to put up a fence. To provide privacy, again, more the reason to put up the fence because I'd like to have my neighbors have their privacy back. To prevent erosion, I'm pretty flat there I don't think I have a problem there. And I am reading right from the code book. Most of these things that are in the code book and the reason for a buffer zone don't even entail me and what I'm looking to do up there. I guess that's really about all I've got to say. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Leonard, do you have the certified mail receipts and the affidavit of posting? Mr. Leonard: Yes 1 do. ( Mail receipts and affidavit of posting submitted to Board.) Mr. Orlowski: Are there any other comments on this site plan? Tom Hamlin: Good evening. My name ~s Tom Hamlin and I own the property just north of S&L warehouse. My problem is with the buffer zone. S&L removed a large 20 foot section of buffer zone from the end of Kenny's Road all the way backto beyond my house. It's all gone now. Now can see his building and according to this drawing here, he's only going to put trees up until about 10 feet just past my house. And if I look out my door, I'm still going to see his loading dock, I'm going to see his garage, 'm going to see the parking. The whole front of the thing is just going to be nothing but lawn. I just need a buffer zone or something. He said something about privacy. I'm not going to Nave privacy over there with just the lawn. Southold Town Planning Board September '14, '1998 Another thing about the noise, I was cleaning out my garage the other day, the garage door was open, it was about 7:00 at night. I'm cleaning out the garage and I hear a lot of obscenities coming out of that garage door. I don't know who said it...I don't mind them saying it as long as the door is closed. Close the door if you're going to use obscenities. I have three children. That's about it, I just need a buffer zone to the front of the property, which was there when I first moved in two years ago. Thank you. Mr. Ortowski: Any other comments? Ellen Latson: Good evening members of the Planning Board. My name is Ellen Latson and t am an adjacent property owner to the east. I've owned my home there for the past 19 years and the use has remained the same. It was a very Iow key operation with several - one or two employees - you wouldn't even know that they were there. Clearly this new use is a change of use and an intensified use. In researching the recent application that was submitted to the Planning Board by Mr. Leonard I see that he is asking for a 10 foot buffer zone. The code as I understand it clearly asks for a 20 foot buffer zone between a business zone and a residential zone and to my way of thinking, this 20 foot buffer is put there to protect the adjacent residential use of the property. Without the 20 foot buffer it would increase the value of the business property and decrease the value of the residential property. When Mr. Leonard purchased the property he bought it as is, without a waiver. So clearly he cannot come before this Board and justify a hardsh p because he is a new owner of the land. He could have made the buffer a contingent of sale. Mr. Leonard just stated that Larger parcels with two acres, he feels that this 20 foot setback would be more applicable. I beg to differ. In smaller lots such as his and ours, the impact is much greater on a residential lot without the 20 foot buffer. If you have a two acre lot you have a lot more space on your side yards and your back yards between a residential and commercial area Most of the areas where there is going to be a business zone against a residential zone, you're not going to have these size lots, they're all going to be befc re 2 acres I have severa other questions as well. There was always very few employees there, as I stated. And looking at the map, Mr. Leonard says he employees about 12 people seasonally - I believe that's what he told me, it was just a conversation that we had out n our yard. And from the parking, it looks like Southold Town Planning Board 6 September 14, 1998 there's only parking for about 7 or 8 people. So question number one is where are these people going to park when they come to work? And what kind of equipment does he propose for the storage area on the side. Is it going to be equipment that's going to be started at 6:30 in the morning and run at 9:00 at night? And what kind of security will there be in terms of lighting? I want my residential home - our bedrooms just border his property so I don't want any light shining in our bedrooms at night. Is there any other intended occupancy of the building? This is a large warehouse. Does he intend any other use to come out of there? All I'd like to say is that the code was enacted with a lot of forethought on protecting obviously a residential home from a light business use and I'd just like to see that the setback is kept in place and that there's no precedence set, because there's really not a lot of residential homes that border commercial properties except on the North Road and the Main Road, and so if there is going to be an increase in use, and this is obviously an intensified use, I'd just like to see the buffer zone remain intact. That's about it. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: Any other comments or questions? Bernard Heinisch: My name is Bernard Heinisch, I live on 48. My property adjourns Mr. and Mrs. Latson. When this building was originally built about 1957 it was built on a smaller parcel which was subdivided from the Donahue farmland. This was sold as a machine shop and since its sale it really hasn't been kept up to date. I will say that the new owners have improved the outside of the building, that made attempts to make it look worthwhile, which they've done. But this buffer zone is really needed in this area. I would ask that each and every one of you should look at this area because if you stand on 48 and you look at the Latson's monument, where her property starts, her property actually starts inside the overhang of the trees that adjourns her property. Now if you were to grant a 10 foot buffer zone, you would see that that 10 foot is still under the overhanging branches. If you were to plant evergreens along there, I doubt very much they would even grow. Especially on a staggered system, it will take forever to fill out. If you hole the 20 foot, it will give more of an area in between the residential and the business section. When you do put the evergreens, they will get more sun and have more of a chance of living and growing. And would hope rather than a staggered system, they would go in a straight ine. These evergreens will eventually grow high enough to give more shielding than what you have now. There has never been any parking along side of that building since it's been Southold Town Planning Board September I4, 1998 built, adjacent to the Latsons. There's never been any parking to the rear since that building's been built. The parking has always been on Kenny's Road in front of the building. To my recollection, going back to when that building was built there was never any more than four cars there at a time. Occasionally they would have shipments. Shipments coming in and shipments coming out, to the rear of the property. At the present time I understand this is going to be used for all this equipment storage. We can't stop that but we would like to stop this 20 foot buffer. It's not going to do any of us any good. If you look at that property and looking at the map, I see where there is only going to be a hedge line in front of the fence line. That fence is going to be six foot high. If you put evergreens in front, then you won't even be able to see what's parked in the back because he's coming much closer to 48 then anything else that's ever been there. I thought originally he was just going to have parking in the back but now t see it's wrapping around the building. You can still move the vehicles in the back. From what I see, most of the vehicles are half ton pick up trucks. Even if they're pulling a trailer, you can back a trailer into that site. No, you probably won't be able to make a U-turn, but he undoubtedly knew this when he bought the property. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: OK, any other comments? Steve Latson: I'm Ellen's husband and live next door to the east. I really don't have anything to add other than what I think which has already been said. The code is right, it should be 20 feet. We only have a third of an acre, this 20 foot is critical to us. A third of an acre, we Rave a tiny little property and without the 20 feet there's just no way. Bernie's 100% correct a bout the overhanging of trees. The only way you're going to get evergreens to grow in there is if you do go the full 20 feet. Besides that, on the side I wouldn't mind 10 feet of evergreen and then maybe more open area, because if you put the evergreens right up against our property, we have some deciduous trees that wilt suffer from planting, if you plant the full 20 feet in that area. We'd kind of like to work out an arrangement. We haven't really talked to the people at S&L except one day I saw him hanging out in the back yard and I went over and introduced myself, otherwise we haven't communicated whatsoever. They actually came on our property and cut some tree limbs off our trees I understood they were going to cut some of the limbs, but I would like to Southold Town Planning Board September 14; 1998 have been notified that they were going to go 4 feet onto our property instead of on our property line. It just seems normal to me, that's the way I do business. And as far as Tom's buffer, that buffer should extend within 15-20 feet of Kenny's Road, the evergreen buffer. Because as it sits now with the buffer right at the gate area, Tom is still fully exposed. So that buffer has to go down 15-20 feet. All you have to do is go out there with a tape measure, Tom can meet with the people and say, right here, and everybody will all agree, yeah this is it, this is the spot. The only other thing I would say is when we did talk to the people at S&L, this side area that they want to fence in, they kind of indicated would be about 30 feet further to the north than it is now. This is a really deep area. I measured the area. If they have a 20 foot buffer, you know, put a fence up and then a 20 foot buffer area. Like I said, 1 would prefer maybe I0 feet of evergreen and then an open space because in part of that area you're not going to be able to grow your evergreens and if you do grow them further down to the south, you're just going to kill our deciduous bushes. In other words, I'd like to work with these people and do it right, that's all I'm saying. They still have 40 feet to park, to store, to do whatever they want. I just think, they bought and they should be real happy with it. As Ellen said, otherwise they're just expanding their property which would increase their value and it's certainly going to decrease the values of the two residents next door. One last thing, lighting. Ellen mentioned it. We really, really don't want to see security lights on all night long. If they need a light in the yard that they can turn on to go find something, to move things around, or in the fall when it gets dark early, great. But permanent, full time lighting there would really impact our property dramatically, and I'm sure Tom feels the same way. That's it, this is so simple. We'd really like a little more communication. We'd like to get the 20 foot buffer and then even then just discuss the plantings and all that kind of stuff, that's all. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: Any other comments? Donna Dzugas-Smith: I'm the neighbor across the street that,s going to be having a winery across the street so of course people coming and entering are going to see this building, this business. As you know, the North Road is a mixture of everything. The moratorium, I don't totally understand the status of it, whether it's in effect, is it a law, is it not. I unoerstand it's an existing building. I don't know where that plays into this particular site plan I'd like that considered. Southold Town Planning Board September 14, 1998 I find him to try to be a friendly neighbor. He explained to me very well what his plan was. I received in the mail, I walked over there, I spoke with him, we spoke about it. I have a concern about chain link fences. 1 feel that totally detracts from the country look and if that's what we're looking for on the North Road, I have a problem with that. So I appreciate the fact that you're going to try to hide it with trees. I'd like something in, what's it called, Covenants and Restrictions that when businesses are so close to residential...I know when I just put a ot line around my lot, and I have 29 acres, and putting a lot line around an existing house I have a Covenant and Restriction that I cannot have any other access for certain uses off the North Road, and I have 29 acres and I'm right across that. So, here you're talking about a little piece of acreage with an existing business building. I'd like to work with him, I think he's very workable, think his ideas are good. But, I think you have to look at all the residents next door and you have to say, how is this going to be covered? One of the concerns I expressed to him was, OK this is what you want now, but get real successful and two years down the road, three years down the road, he wants to cover it to protect...he says, no 1 won't. I'd like something in there saying that's not going to happen, it's not going to expand. Look at all our communities west of us. How does it start out? It starts out like this, with the spaces that we have now. They slowly become fenced in, residential or business, everyone wants their privacy, their trees, their fences, etc. Then the next thing you know, there's awnings, and then all of a sudden those awnings become enclosed, and the next thing you Know these buildings are bigger and everything is real close together. And this is going to spread out to Southotd. This is why we have our code. This is why we have people like you. This is why we have Boards. And this is why we're having this public hearing, something is planned for. So let's hope that this is not a step to lead into other things. I have a problem with site plan waivers, especially now since t Know what 'm going through. When you buy a place...I Know D&D Cycle building is another problem. It's going to break down the road. I don't want them using this as an example, I don't want them saying, "hey, he got a site plan waiver. He bought that building, it was an existing building." D&D Cycles - an existing building - I don't want a site Plan waiver. That's right in front of my vineyard. I'm thinking ahead, I want you guys to think ahead. You're one of the most dependable departments in the Town Hall. You're very thorough, you're quite professional, and I appreciate that and I'd ike you to look to all this. I think a lot of good points have been brought up Southold Town Planning Board 10 September 14, 1998 tonight. I think this is a very workable neighbor. I ttqink we can definitely come to some compromise here. And I disagree that you can't see...I never knew this neighbor, and I've lived here four years. Now that those trees are down, I met this neighbor, and he's across the road. So yes, that buffer did make a difference. I never saw his house, I never saw him. I see him coming and going now. So these are things that we do need to plan and doesn't need to be spelled out, and this is our chance to bring it all up. The other problem, which you've told us over and over we've got to bring this up to the Town Board, is Light Business zone. When I spoke to Bob, irrigation in a Light Business zone - I have a question about that, but he says irrigation is in Agricultural zone, that this business is irrigation in agricultural land. This is something we need to bring up to the Town Board for a code zone. Because if this is something being brought to you as a light business use that is acceptable, that's something that needs to be better planned for and doesn't always need to fall on your shoulders. Because it's a business, no matter how you look at it, it's a business. So we need to plan welt. Thank you. (Change tape). Rob Leonard: Afew good points came up, some that I think are bad points, From Mr. Latson, we did speak one evening out on the side yard of the building and we did give qim our plans that we wanted to re-plant a hedge before I even knew that it was mandated. It's always been my intentions to re-plant a hedgerow. I've always wanted that. At that time, I did ask if we could trim some limbs off the tree, that he said we came onto his property and cut back four foot into his property. His one comment to me at that time was so long as you don't make it look like a straight wall, we have no problem with that. The man that actually trimmed the tree does actually work for me. He spent about ten years working for Shamrock Tree Service prior to coming to my employment. He's very knowledgeable on trimming trees. Steve's wife actually came out at the time and worked with the man, am mistaken ~n that? As far as lighting is concerned on the site as I discussed with the Planning Board, we have no intentions of putting up any additiona lighting to the building other than what is there right now. As far as how far the buffer is running at this point in time, that was the Board's discretion or recommendation [o me in the letter that you sen~ me it was the length of the proposeO fence. I really don't have a problem with extending that. would like, and I really don't know with the staggered Southold Town Planning Board '1'1 September '14, '1998 spacing and the way it's written and wanted, I think I can give my neighbors more privacy with a solid hedgerow, which is what I would prefer and wanted to do in the first place. I will definitely work with my neighbors on that aspect. I really do believe, although it is a Town ordinance and Town code with these buffers and what not, but t think it's more between Steve and his family and Tom and his family, and us more so than a lot of the other people. Bernie, and I'm sorry, but I don't know your last name, but he was upset with how far forward we were putting the fence. Again, that was the recommendation of your Board since we didn't fence in the back area to move the fence forward. Again, according to Town code, I am entitled to fence in the entire property and I don't have to put any hedge on the south facing fence. However, 1 would like to screen that fence. I don't want the fence to be seen. The whole idea of it is to keep it a secure area, that's why I don't necessarily need the lighting, I have the fence. If I don't have the fence, then I'll have to do the lighting and we'll be back here again to go through it over again. As far as the overhang of the trees are concerned, and that is a concern. And I'm trying to work with the nurseries to find a variety of evergreen that will grow well in the shade. There are some out there. There are some shady spots on the property. Again, I do believe I'm entitled to trim any trees that hang over my property. Not that I want to butcher any trees, that's not my intention. The 20 foot buffer, if I'm mandated to do that, what can I say, what can I do? However, I will guarantee the Board that the fence will not go 10 foot off the property line should I be mandated to make a 20 foot buffer, don't have a problem with changing the chain link to stockade if that would please the Board and the neighbors. I would like to work with everybody. I guess if everybody was at the work session that we sat down at we could have worked this through before this point. Burl also have my concerns with the moratorium. I don't want my permit applications to expire prior to settling this whole matter. I guess that's all I really have to say at this point in time. Thank you. Bernard Heinisch: Again, my name is HeinJsch, I live on 48. In reference to my piece of property, my back yard I can see the entire rear yard of this gentlemen's property. I can see the entire siae yard from this gentlemen's property. I can see the garbage containers. I can see all the vehicles. I Southold Town Planning Board 12 September 14, 1998 don't have to live right next door. I live adjacent to Latsons. Our back yards are open. As far as the lighting is concerned, I believe that the Town code states that no lighting will shine in the evening after a certain time. So lighting is out after a certain time, for security purposes on commercial property, that's to my reCollection. As far as the moratorium goes, isn't the moratorium in effect now for fencing, that no permit will be granted - for 9 months. Is that correct? Mr. Kassner: Who are you addressing your question to? Mr. Heinisch: To the Board. Mr. Orlowski: We'll have to investigate that. Mr. Heinisch: Thank you. Donna Dzugas-Smith: Can t just add something. I don't know if you guys did go past my property and see it staked out. I think one of the problems with the Town, people meed to - as these plans are being made, and maybe it makes your job too involved - you just need to see it. One of the things Bernie pointed out to me, he has that doctors office right next to him, and ten years ago - I didn't know the building was that old, actually it's a very messy building - ten years ago he was asked to put evergreens in order to have that business next to a residence. Do you know those evergreens are this high, and they were built ten years ago, and they're straggly. SO the best laid plans sometimes don't work out. So sometimes if you go and look at the site and say, hey, you know what, on paper it looks like this. Stand on his property and look at my property and see how it's going to look, what I'm doing. Stand on my property and look at this property. I don't know how involved we can get on this but, it's just something for thought. Mr. Orlowski: Some of those are enforcement issues that have to be addressed by the building department. OK does the Board have any comments or questions? Mr. Edwards: The only comment I have is that there have been a lot of good issues presented tonight and I think we need to research it. Mr. Orlowski: Does the rest of the Board feel that way? Mr. Cremers: I think we hold the hearing open. Southold Town Planning Board 13 September 14, 1998 Mr. Orlowski: Hold it open? OK. There were a lot of good comments brought up, one of them being the moratorium, and the 20 foot buffer and I have some notes here. We will take a look at it. The Board at this time will hold the hearing open and I'll entertain that motion. Mr. Latham: So moved. Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded to hold the hearing open. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Latham: One good thing that all the principles are here and I think that's very important. Mr. Latson: Could l ask a question? Could we all just meet, I mean when you're going to come over there? I'm painting our house right now, I'm available any time for the next week and a half, then I start fishing. Mr. Orlowski: Well, I have a small list here so when we get to that point, we'll let you know. Mr. Latson: I'm just saying the communication has been really non-existent. The only time we've talked to the people was late in the evening, they were drinking beers and I just thought I'd go over and introduce myself and we just had a brief discussion, this is what we're going to do, and I said OK, well we'd like to work with you and we'll discuss this and blah, blah, blah, and that was it, we never talked to them since. Mr. Orlowski: Well, maybe you should go over with a cup of coffee and... Mr. Latson: I'm willing to talk to these guys anytime. Mr. Orlowski: I'm going to move on right now. Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: Southold Town Planning Board 14 September 14, 1998 Mr. Orlowski: Jimbo Realty Corp. - This proposed site plan is for a 34,200 square foot self service dry storage building; a 1,750 square foot residence, and a 1,575 square foot office building on a 2.9 acre site on Rt. 48 (a.k.a. North Rd., Middle Rd.) in Southotd. SCTM# 1000-59-4-8 & 9. Again, we've asked the applicant for some information. We have not gotten it yet and i'd like to entertain a motion to hold this hearing open. Mr. Edwards: SO moved. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? Mr. Ward: Yes, Mr. Chairman, at this point I believe these are the comments from the Architectural Review Committee that have requested additional updates on elevations and that, and I think that our resolution should indicate a sixty day period or we'll close the hearing at that point if we don't receive the information. Mr. Latham: t second that motion. Mr. Orlowski: We have an amended motion with Mr. Ward's comments. Motion made and seconded. All those in favOr? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES AND SET OFF APPLICATIONS Final Determinations: Mr. Orlowski: JOhn & PatriCia McCarvill - This major subdivision is for 3 lots on 2.727 acres in SoUthold. SCTM# 1000-78-7-32.7. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated November I, 1997. Conditional final approval was granted on April 6, 1998. All conditions have been SoUthold Town Planning Board 15 fulfilled. Mr. Edwards: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Ortowski: Opposed? Motion carried. September 14, 1998 Any questions on the motion? All Setting of Final Hearings: Mr. Orlowski: Anna T. Droskoski: This lot line change is to subtract 0.4789 of an acre from a 22.1428 acre parcel and add it to a 0.4136 acre parcel; and to subtract 0.4053 of an acre from a 22.1428 acre parcel and add it to a 0.4048 acre parcel. SCTM# 1000-18-4-7. Mr. Latham: I'll offer this. Be it resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, do an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board establishes itself as Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency makes a determination of non- significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Cremers: Second that motion. Mr. Latham: Be it further resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, October 5, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. for a final pUblic hearing on the maps dated December 4, 1996. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Orlowski: Wankel - Moran - This lot line change ~s to subtract 23,600 square feet from a 63,601 square foot parcel, and add it To a 75,165 square Southold Town Planning Board 16 September 14, 1998 foot parcel. SCTM# '1000-'1'15-10-'14.'1 & '15. Mr. Edwards: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to entertain the following motion. BE IT F~ESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality I~eview Act, do an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board establishes itself as Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Edwards: I have a further resolution. Be it resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, October 5, '1998 at 7::~5 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated August '10, 1998. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. SITE PLANS Final Determinations: Mr. Orlowski: P, iverhead Building Supply- This proposed site plan is for a 50,425 square foot building expansion, located on I~t. 25 in Greenport. SCTM# ~000-46-'1-'1 & 2.'1. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I'll offer the following resolution. Southold Town Planning Board 17 September 14, 1998 BE IT RESOLVED, that the $outhold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated October 21, 1997. Conditional final approval was granted on August 10, 1998. All conditions have been fulfilled. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Orlowskh Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. [atham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Mr. Orlowski: Board to approve the July 13, 1998 minutes. Mr. Ward: So moved. Mr. Lal~ham: Second. Mr. Orlowskh Motion made and seconded. Alt those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. The August 10, 4998 minutes? Mr. Ward: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. And the August 31, 1998 minutes? Mr. Cremers: So moved. Southold Town Planning Board 18 Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. OTHER Mr. Orlowski: Harbor Park Homes - Endorsement of Certification of Correction for the approved subdivision of Harbor Park Homes. SCTM#I000- 97-6-17 and 103-I-20.5 & 20.6 (a.k.a 97-3-17.1 and 103-I 20.9, 20.10, 20.11 and 20.12.) Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to offer the following resolution. Be it resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the Certificate of Correction. Conditional approval was granted on June 15, 1998. Six evergreens have been planted in a satisfactory manner fulfilling the Planning Board's condition of approval. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr, Latham Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. have nothing left on the public September 14, 1998 agenda. If anybody would like to make comments on the public record, we can listen to them now, otherwise we'll adjourn and we're going to go into a work session and you can all hang around and say what you feel. I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. Mr. Latham: So moved. Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Southold Town Planning Board 'I 9 September 14, 1998 Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Bennett Ofiov%~_~., Cha~an RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE $OUTHOLD TOWN CLERK OAT~/~/~/¢~ _~ou~.//z~ ~( Town Clezk, Town of Southold Respectfully submitted, Martha A. Jones Secretary